JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pradhan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pradhan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33002-33010, November 12, 1999


Recombinant Human DNA (Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase
I. EXPRESSION, PURIFICATION, AND COMPARISON OF DE NOVO AND MAINTENANCE METHYLATION*

Sriharsa Pradhan, Albino BacollaDagger , Robert D. WellsDagger , and Richard J. Roberts§

From New England Biolabs, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915 and the Dagger  Center for Genome Research, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A & M University, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030-3303

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A method is described to express and purify human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase (human DNMT1) using a protein splicing (intein) fusion partner in a baculovirus expression vector. The system produces ~1 mg of intact recombinant enzyme >95% pure per 1.5 × 109 insect cells. The protein lacks any affinity tag and is identical to the native enzyme except for the two C-terminal amino acids, proline and glycine, that were substituted for lysine and aspartic acid for optimal cleavage from the intein affinity tag. Human DNMT1 was used for steady-state kinetic analysis with poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) and unmethylated and hemimethylated 36- and 75-mer oligonucleotides. The turnover number (kcat) was 131-237 h-1 on poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), 1.2-2.3 h-1 on unmethylated DNA, and 8.3-49 h-1 on hemimethylated DNA. The Michaelis constants for DNA (KmCG) and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) (KmAdoMet) ranged from 0.33-1.32 and 2.6-7.2 µM, respectively, whereas the ratio of kcat/KmCG ranged from 3.9 to 44 (237-336 for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC)) × 106 M-1 h-1. The preference of the enzyme for hemimethylated, over unmethylated, DNA was 7-21-fold. The values of kcat on hemimethylated DNAs showed a 2-3-fold difference, depending upon which strand was pre-methylated. Furthermore, human DNMT1 formed covalent complexes with substrates containing 5-fluoro-CNG, indicating that substrate specificity extended beyond the canonical CG dinucleotide. These results show that, in addition to maintenance methylation, human DNMT1 may also carry out de novo and non-CG methyltransferase activities in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Methylated cytosine is found in the genome of organisms ranging from prokaryotes to mammals (1). Methylation of DNA in eukaryotes is implicated in various biological and developmental processes, such as gene regulation (2), DNA replication (3), genomic imprinting (4), embryonic development (5), carcinogenesis (6), and genetic diseases (7). The bulk of the methylation takes place during DNA replication in the S-phase of the cell cycle (8). The maintenance methylation ensures the propagation of tissue-specific methylation patterns established during mammalian development. The methyl transfer reaction proceeds via nonspecific binding of the enzyme to DNA, recognition of the specific DNA target site, and recruitment of the methyl group donor S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet)1 to the active site of the enzyme. DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases (m5C MTase) introduce a methyl group onto carbon 5 of the target cytosine through a covalent intermediate between the protein and the target cytosine (9). During this process, the cytosine is flipped 180° out of the DNA backbone into an active site pocket of the enzyme (10). After completion of the methyl transfer reaction, the products, methylated DNA and S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (AdoHcy), are released. Previous studies on the mechanism of methylation were mainly limited to prokaryotic m5C MTases although some limited kinetic studies have also been reported with mouse and human DNMT1 (11, 12).

Eukaryotic m5C MTases have been cloned from various organisms such as mouse (13), human (14), Xenopus (15), sea urchin (16), chicken (17), Arabidopsis (18), and pea (19). The human DNMT1 has been localized to the chromosomal site 19 p13.2-p13.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (14). The enzyme consists of a large N-terminal region and a smaller C-terminal region linked by a run of Gly-Lys dipeptide repeats (14). The large N-terminal domain is unique to the eukaryotic m5C MTases. The smaller C-terminal domain has strong homology with prokaryotic m5C MTases and contains the elements necessary for catalysis (20). The function of the N terminus is poorly understood, and there is little sequence homology between plant and animal enzymes. Sequences within this domain have been implicated in Zn2 binding (21), interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (22), and targeting to replication foci (8). The full-length mouse m5C MTase is about 1700 amino acids in length and has a molecular mass of 183.5 kDa (23).

Prokaryotic m5C MTases are usually part of restriction-modification systems and rarely discriminate between unmethylated or hemimethylated DNA substrates. In contrast, mammalian m5C MTases show a much higher reaction velocity on a hemimethylated DNA substrate (maintenance methylation), the product of semiconservative DNA replication, than on an unmethylated DNA substrate (de novo methylation). Methylation of single-stranded DNA by the mammalian m5C MTase is strongly stimulated by the presence of nearby 5-methylcytosines (24). This rate of methylation was comparable with that of hemimethylated DNA (24). It has been demonstrated that the human enzyme can also methylate non-B-DNA structures such as hairpins and mismatches (12). Recently, a family of mammalian m5C MTases has been identified and hypothesized to serve as de novo methyltransferases (25).

The diverse role played by DNA methylation in mammals has motivated several groups to express mammalian m5C MTases in Escherichia coli (26), baculovirus (23, 27), and mammalian (COS) cells (28). In the E. coli and COS cell expression systems, the amount of protein produced was low, whereas protein expression was high using the baculovirus system. Insect cells are rich in proteases, and long purification protocols often result in partial proteolytic degradation of proteins. To overcome the problem of degradation, we have constructed and expressed the human DNMT1 as a fusion protein with a Saccharomyces cerevisiae VMA1 intein gene (29). The C terminus of the human DNMT1 was fused to the N terminus of the intein. A small chitin-binding domain from Bacillus circulans has been added to the C terminus of the intein for affinity purification. Thus, the three-part fused human DNMT1 protein can be immobilized using chitin beads as an affinity matrix.2 Addition of dithiothreitol (DTT) at low temperature initiates cleavage on the column between the intein and the recombinant human DNMT1.2 Whereas the intein and chitin-binding domain remain attached to the column, the purified recombinant enzyme is eluted. This purified recombinant human DNMT1 is identical with the native enzyme except for the two C-terminal amino acids. In this report, we have studied its steady-state kinetic parameters on double-stranded, unmethylated, and hemimethylated DNA substrates, which are representative of human genes. We also assayed methylation of non-CG sequences by human DNMT1.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human DNA(Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase Transfer Vector-- Human DNMT1 expression constructs were derived from pBKSHMT5.0 (b) (gift of Prof. S. Baylin, The Johns Hopkins University). This plasmid had the full-length human DNMT1 cDNA based on the previously published sequence (14). A polymerase chain reaction of the 3' end of the cDNA was used to incorporate an SmaI restriction endonuclease site in place of the stop codon of the cDNA and to provide the optimal amino acids for protein cleavage (sense primer, 5'-GGAATTCCATATGCATGACAGGAAGAACGGCCGCAGC-3' and antisense primer, 5'-TGACCCGGGAGCAGCTTCCTCCTCCTTTATTTTAGC-3'). The restriction sites are underlined. This change causes the C-terminal amino acids lysine and aspartic acid to become proline and glycine. Substitution of these two amino acids at the C terminus of the mammalian DNMT1 had no effect on the methyl transfer reaction as compared with the native sequence enzyme as judged by methylase assay (data not shown). This polymerase chain reaction product of about 500 bp was digested with NdeI and SmaI and ligated to a baculovirus vector pVIC12 to give pDelta VICHMT-4. This construct contains the 3' end of the human DNMT1 cDNA in frame with the intein chitin-binding domain of the transfer vector pVIC1.2 pDelta VICHMT-4 was digested with NruI and EagI and a 4.1-kbp EcoRV-EagI fragment from pBKSHMT5.0(b) was ligated to give the functional human DNMT1 transfer vector pVICHMT (Fig. 1). The ligated junctions in the final pVICHMT construct were verified by DNA sequencing.

Insect Cell Culture, Viral Transfection, and Recombinant Protein Expression-- A pupal ovarian cell line (SF9) from the worm Spodoptera frugiperda was used for co-transfection and expression of the human DNMT1 as described previously (23) with the following modifications. SF9 cells were maintained as a suspension culture in TNM-FH media (JRH Biosciences) supplemented with fetal calf serum 10% (v/v) and an antibiotic/antimycotic solution at a final concentration of 5 units of penicillin, 50 µg of streptomycin, and 0.125 µg of amphotericin B ml-1 at 27 °C on a Bellco steering platform at 70 rpm. Co-transfection of a monolayer of SF9 insect cells was carried out using BaculoGold DNA, a modified, linearized Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV) DNA (PharMingen) and the transfer vector pVICHMT. Four days after transfection, the supernatant was screened for recombinant baculovirus using the agarose overlay technique (31). Individual plaques were purified and amplified 2 to 3 times in order to reach a viral titer above 2 × 108 ml-1. Recombinant clones from individual plaque isolates were used for test expression by infecting 1.5 × 106 SF9 cells in a 60-mm Petri dish. Forty-eight hours post-infection the cell extracts were checked for methyltransferase activity and fusion protein expression by Western blot analysis using anti-intein antibody (New England Biolabs). For routine protein expression, SF9 cells were grown in spinner culture flasks. SF9 cells at a density of 1.4 × 106 ml-1 were infected at a multiplicity of infection between 5 and 7. The cells were kept at 27 °C at 60 rpm and harvested 48 h post-infection after a final wash with phosphate-buffered saline.

Recombinant DNA(Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase Purification-- For protein purification, infected cells (5.6 × 108) were resuspended in 15 ml of buffer M (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM Na2EDTA, protease inhibitor mixture containing 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin A, E64, bestatin, leupeptin and aprotinin (Sigma), 0.2% (v/v) per ml of cell extract, 7 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 500 mM NaCl). The cell suspension was sonicated on ice for 30 s using a model W-225R (Heatsystem-Ultrasonics) sonicator in pulsed mode at 50% duty cycle. The extract was incubated on ice for 30 min with occasional shaking and was centrifuged at 11,000 × g for 30 min. If the supernatant remained cloudy, then one more centrifugation step was included. Purification from larger numbers (>1 × 109) of cells required an initial 40-70% ammonium sulfate fractionation. This supernatant was loaded on a chitin bead column (New England Biolabs) equilibrated with buffer M at 0.4 ml/min. The nonspecifically bound proteins were removed by washing with 30-column volumes of buffer M. On-column cleavage of the target protein was initiated by passing 2-column volumes of buffer M supplemented with 50 mM DTT. The column was closed, and the target protein was cleaved from the intein chitin binding domain by overnight incubation at 4 °C. Human DNMT1 was eluted with buffer M and dialyzed against buffer M supplemented with 0.2% (v/v) protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma), 7 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 100 mM NaCl, 50% glycerol (v/v), and 1 mM DTT. The purified protein was stored at -20 °C. The purity of the protein was checked by SDS-PAGE (4-20% Tris/glycine/SDS gradient gel). Purified protein was quantitated using the Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin as standard.

DNA (Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase Assay and Data Analysis-- m5C MTase assays were carried out at 37 °C, for 30 min in duplicate with a total volume of 25 µl of reaction mix. A typical reaction contained S-adenosyl-L- [methyl-3H]methionine (AdoMet) (specific activity 15 Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), substrate DNA, and enzyme in assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1 mM Na2EDTA, pH 8.0, 1 mM DTT, 7 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5% glycerol, and 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin). For kinetic analysis, the CG or CI concentrations were calculated from either substrate oligonucleotides or poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC). One nM double-stranded oligonucleotide with 1 CG site is 2 nM CG. For poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), an average length of 7000 bp was used to determine the concentration of CI. For double-reciprocal plots, the concentrations of CG or CI and AdoMet were varied. The MTase reactions were stopped by transferring the reaction tubes to an ethanol/dry ice bath and were processed by spotting the reaction mix on DE81 paper circles (Whatman). These circles were washed sequentially with 4 × 1 ml of cold 0.2 M ammonium bicarbonate, 4 × 1 ml of Milli Q water, and 4 × 1 ml of ethanol using a manifold (Millipore) connected to a vacuum pump. The filters were dried; 3 ml of Opti-fluor (Packard) was added to each, and tritium incorporation was measured. To calculate counting efficiency, tritiated plasmid DNA (pUC DNA methylated with tritiated AdoMet using M.SssI) was either spotted on DE81 paper, processed, and counted or directly counted with Opti-fluor. The efficiency of [3H]DNA measurement was ~55%, and all calculations were corrected accordingly. Data obtained were plotted by regression analysis using the GraphPad PRISM program (GraphPad Software Inc.) or SigmaPlot (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The equations used for fitting the data points and to obtain the kinetic constants, Vmax, KmCG, KmAdoMet, are reported elsewhere (32). These figures represent estimated values.

Southern Blot Analysis-- Genomic DNA was isolated from SF9 cells 48 h post-infection with recombinant virus using the Easy DNA Kit (Invitrogen). The purified DNA was digested either by AatII, BsiEI, or SwaI, and the digested DNA fragments were separated on a 1% agarose gel in TBE buffer gel. The DNA in the gel was blotted on to Hybond-N+ and probed with a random-primed human DNMT1 clone. The blot was washed as described (33) and autoradiographed.

Western Blot Analysis-- Cell extracts were mixed with SDS loading dye with 2 µM Tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine in place of DTT, boiled at 95 °C for 5 min, and loaded on a 4-20% Tris/glycine/SDS gradient gel. Tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine is a strong reducing agent and does not take part in the cleavage process (34). The proteins were blotted on an Immobilin-P membrane and probed with an anti-intein antibody (New England Biolabs) followed by chemiluminescent detection of the human DNMT1.

5-Fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine Assay-- Duplex oligonucleotides containing 5-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (FdC) were 32P-end-labeled using polynucleotide kinase and [gamma -32P]ATP. Human DNMT1 (10 nM) was used with 5 nM fluorocytosine-containing oligonucleotide duplex in the presence of 50 µM cold AdoMet in 1× buffer M at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding SDS gel loading dye (one-third of the reaction volume) and boiling the sample at 100 °C for 5 min. The boiled protein/DNA mixtures were loaded and resolved on a 4-20% Tris/glycine/SDS gradient gel. The gel was dried and autoradiographed.

Oligonucleotides-- Poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), average length 7000 bp, was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The following oligonucleotides were synthesized at New England Biolabs. For the SNRPN exon-1: UMUS, d(CAGAGTGGAGCGGCCGCCGGAGATGCCTGACGCATCTGTCTGAGGAGCGGTCAGTGACGCGATGGAGCGGGCAAG); MUS, d(CAGAGTGGAGMGGCMGCMGGAGATGCCTGAMGCATCTGTCTGAGGAGMGGTCAGTGAMGMGATGGAGMGGGCAAG); UMLS, d(CTTGCCCGCTCCATCGCGTCACTGACCGCTCCTCAGACAGATGCGTCAGGCATCTCCGGCGGCCGCTCCACTCTG); MLS, d(CTTGCCMGCTCCATMGMGTCACTGACMGCTCCTCAGACAGATGMGTCAGGCATCTCMGGMGGCMGCTCCACTCTG). For the FMR-1 locus: UMUS, d(CGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGGCGG); MUS, d(MGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGGMGG); UMLS, d(CCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCGCCG); MLS, d(CMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMGCMG). For the FC oligo duplexes: FS (FG), d(GGAGATGTCFGCAACFGGATACFGAAGGAACCTGC); MLS, d(GCAGGTTCCTTMGGTATCMGGTTGMGGACATCTCC); FS (FCG), d(GGAGATGTFCGCAAFCGGATAFCGAAGGAACCTGC); FS (FWG), d(AGATGTGCFTGCFAGFTGAGFAGGATC); MLS (MWG), d(GATCMTGCTMAGMTGGMAGGCACATCT). The following abbreviations were used for oligonucleotide duplexes: UMUS, unmethylated upper strand; MUS, methylated upper strand; UMLS, unmethylated lower strand; MLS, methylated lower strand; FS, fluorocytosine strand; W is either A or T; M is 5-methylcytosine; and F is 5-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine. Duplexes were prepared by annealing equimolar amounts of appropriate single strands. Complementary oligonucleotides were incubated in annealing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM Na2EDTA, and 100 mM NaCl) at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 65 °C for 15 min and 37 °C for 15 min. For the oligonucleotides corresponding to the CGG·CCG repeat of the FMR-1 locus, the annealing step was followed by cleavage with S1 nuclease. This additional step was included to eliminate any single-stranded nucleotide that resulted from imperfect annealing between the two complementary 36-mers. PAGE analyses of the annealed duplexes showed that ~90% of the products had the expected length of 36 bp, whereas ~10% were one repeat shorter (11 repeats, 33 bp in length). The full-length duplexes were purified on a 15% polyacrylamide gel, dissolved in TE, and stored at -20 °C.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Purification of the Biologically Active Human DNA (Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase-- Co-transfection of the human DNMT1 transfer vector, pVICHMT, with linear AcNPV DNA (BaculoGold DNA, PharMingen) resulted in homologous recombination of the polyhedrin promoter and the DNMT1 cDNA carried by the construct (Fig. 1, A and B). Only the recombinant viruses are viable. The transfection supernatant was harvested and used for purification of several single plaques. Recombinant viral DNA from each of the plaques was isolated and checked for correct recombination of the human DNMT1-intein-chitin binding domain construct using restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blotting. The probe used was the full-length human DNMT1 cDNA. As expected, an SwaI digest gave an ~10-kbp band, whereas AatII and BsiEI gave two bands each (Fig. 1C). Several clones had double homologous integration with the human DNMT1 coding sequence lying downstream of the polyhedrin promoter, and one, VICHMT8, was used for all further expression and purification studies. Two different insect cell lines, SF9 and High Five (Trichoplusia ni), were used for the evaluation of protein levels. Different multiplicities of infection were used, and the extracts were evaluated at 48 h post-infection for DNMT1 expression using poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) as substrate. High Five cells have been reported to express between 5- and 10-fold higher protein levels than SF9 cells (35), but for human DNMT1 the protein expression did not improve (data not shown). All further experiments used the SF9 cell line for expression. To follow expression and find optimal conditions for production, extracts of the human DNMT1 clones were assayed by Western blots using anti-intein antibody. The optimal expression of the enzyme was 48 h post-infection (Fig. 1D), and the human DNMT1-specific band starts decreasing after 54 h post-infection infection (data not shown).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Expression of recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. A, diagram representing the human DNMT1 expression construct pVICHMT and its method of integration into the AcNPV genome. pVICHMT is shown schematically. A 4.85-kbp cDNA containing human DNMT1, indicated by the gray shading, was fused to the N-terminal of the VMA1 intein-chitin binding domain, as shown by the hatched line. Two flanking black arrows corresponding to AcNPV open reading frame (ORF) 603 and 1629 are also indicated. The Amp and ori loci are indicated with black shading. The recipient AcNPV genome has deletions of the following sequences, C-terminal ORF1629, polyhedrin promoter (pPH), and the polyhedrin open reading frame. The N-terminal intein cleavage site APG/C, is also shown. The regions available for homologous recombination are indicated. B, a schematic of VICHMT8, a recombinant virus following homologous recombination. The polyhedrin promoter lies upstream of the DNMT1-intein-CBD fusion genes. The full-length cDNA was used as a probe to identify the correct homologous recombination. The restriction sites are indicated as A (AatII), S (SwaI), and B (BsiEI). C, Southern blot analysis of the DNA from the recombinant clone VICHMT8. The DNA band released by SwaI contains the whole cDNA plus the intein-CBD, which is about 10 kbp. The other two enzymes release the expected fragments of 3.5 and 8.0 kbp for AatII and 2.5 and 6.5 kbp for BstEI. Minor bands represent defective viral DNAs resulting from illegitimate recombination (30). D, time course of human DNMT1 expression using VICHMT8. Infected cell extracts were analyzed on an SDS gel, blotted, and probed with anti-intein antibody. A 235-kDa band appears in all lanes. The day of cell harvest is indicated at the top of each lane. Control lanes with uninfected SF9 cell extract are labeled C. M indicates the biotinylated protein molecular weight markers. BSA, bovine serum albumin.

Mouse DNMT1 is highly unstable and susceptible to proteolysis (13). The protease-susceptible domains in mouse and human DNMT1 are similar (14). To minimize degradation, all steps of the purification were carried out at 4 °C using buffers containing a mixture of protease inhibitors supplemented with additional E64, a strong inhibitor of the cysteine protease, which is abundant in insect cells. During sonication, the presence of 500 mM NaCl ensures that most of the enzyme, which is normally tightly bound to DNA, remains soluble (36). Most of the enzyme was bound to the chitin-bead affinity matrix. Overnight incubation at 4 °C with 50 mM DTT induced cleavage on the column and released most (>90%) of the full-length recombinant human DNMT1 (Fig. 2). This method yielded protein that was at least 95% pure as determined by SDS-PAGE on a 4-20% Tris/glycine gradient gel and Coomassie staining (Fig. 2). The dialyzed protein was stored at -20 °C for 4 weeks with little loss of activity. However, significant loss of activity appeared upon prolonged storage (>6 weeks) at either -20 or -80 °C.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Single step purification of recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. Protein samples were resolved on a 4-20% Tris/glycine gel and visualized by Coomassie staining. M in kDa (molecular mass markers), E (cell extract), A (ammonium sulfate fraction), F (flow-through), and W (wash) are as indicated on the top of the gel. Column fractions are numbered. Arrows indicate the approximate location of the purified human DNMT1 and chitinase, respectively.

Steady-state Kinetic Properties of Recombinant Human DNA(Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase on Poly(dI-dC)·Poly(dI-dC) Substrate-- Historically, poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) has been used to define the biochemical properties of mammalian m5C MTases (36, 37). Each molecule of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) provides a large number of potential (CI) dinucleotide sites for methylation. It has also been claimed that this polymer can undergo methylation at rates comparable to a hemimethylated DNA substrate (38). Thus, we used this substrate to define the biochemical properties of the recombinant human DNMT1. The time course of methylation for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) was examined at constant DNA and enzyme concentrations. The reaction was found to be linear for the first 30 min (Fig. 3A), during which time each enzyme molecule undergoes several rounds of catalysis. This is evident from the fact that 1 nmol of human DNMT1 incorporated several nanomoles of methyl groups onto the substrate DNA (Fig. 3, A and B). Similar reactions were carried out with fixed concentrations of DNA and AdoMet but variable amounts of enzyme. The rate of methylation was linear at enzyme concentrations between 1 and 4 nM (Fig. 3B). The resulting curves (Fig. 3, A and B) were used to determine the optimal enzyme and substrate concentrations under which linear methylation reaction was obtained. Based on the above observations, a series of double-reciprocal plots was made at six different AdoMet concentrations or six different CI (DNA) concentrations, with poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) having an average length of 7000 bp. With this procedure the reciprocal of the amount of [3H]CH3 transferred to the DNA in 1 min by 1 nM DNMT1 (1/v) is plotted as a function of 1/substrate concentration (either 1/CI or 1/AdoMet) in the presence of fixed concentrations of the co-substrate. For bireactant enzymes, which use two substrates and give two products such as DNMT1, these double-reciprocal plots usually yield linear regressions, and their slopes and intercepts are then replotted to derive all the kinetic constants. However, for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), both double-reciprocal plots, i.e. those with 1/CI as the variable substrate (Fig. 4A) as well as those with 1/AdoMet as the variable substrate (Fig. 4B), were not linear. In particular, the increases in 1/v at low 1/CI (i.e. at high DNA concentration) indicated that the DNA substrate inhibited the reaction, especially in the presence of low amounts of AdoMet (Fig. 4A). We conclude that poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) acts both as a substrate and as an inhibitor of the methyl transfer reaction with human DNMT1. The regressions from the plots of 1/v versus 1/AdoMet (Fig. 4B) were concave, suggesting some positive cooperativity due to enzyme activation at high AdoMet concentrations. Overall, these data indicate that the methyl transfer reaction with poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) by human DNMT1 does not follow simple kinetics.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Linearity of the methyl transfer reaction as a function of time and enzyme concentration. A, time course of methylation catalyzed by recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. Reactions (500 µl) containing 1 nM human DNMT1, poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), and AdoMet were incubated at 37 °C. 20 µl of reaction mix in duplicate were spotted onto DE81 at fixed time intervals and processed as described under "Experimental Procedures." 3H incorporation in the DNA was measured. The mean values of two measurements are plotted. Filled circles, 100 nM CI and 1 µM AdoMet; open circles, 1 µM CI and 10 µM AdoMet B, linearity of the methyl transfer reaction as a function of enzyme concentration. Duplicate reactions (25 µl) contained poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) (1 µM CI), 10 µM AdoMet, and various human DNMT1 concentrations (0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 nM). The filled circles depict the mean values of [3H]methyl group incorporation.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Double-reciprocal plots for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC). A, the AdoMet concentration was fixed at 1.0 µM (filled diamonds), 1.7 µM (filled squares), 2.6 µM (filled triangles), 5.0 µM (filled circles), 10 µM (open circles), and 20 µM (open squares). 1/v is plotted against 1/CI. Linear regression used 4 sets of data points (0.1, 0.12, 0.17, and 0.25 µM CI) because substrate inhibition was observed at higher CI concentrations (0.5 and 1 µM). The values of the slope and intercept were used to replot the data and obtain the kinetic constants. B, the DNA (CI) concentration was fixed at 0.1 µM (open diamonds), 0.12 µM (filled diamonds), 0.17 µM (open squares), 0.25 µM (filled squares), 0.5 µM (open circles), and 1.0. µM (filled circles). 1/v is plotted against 1/AdoMet using a non-linear regression. The intersects on the y axis and the slopes were replotted to obtain the second set of kinetic constants. The average values of the kinetic constants are shown in Table I.

Since the derivation of the Michaelis constants and Vmax requires an estimate of the slopes and intercepts from the lines in Fig. 4, the two data points at low 1/CI that deviated from linearity at the four lowest AdoMet concentrations (Fig. 4A) were excluded from the regressions (32, 39). Fig. 5, A and B, shows that, with the exception of 1 µM AdoMet, such slopes and intercepts varied linearly with respect to 1/AdoMet concentration, which enabled all the kinetic constants to be evaluated (32). The intercept values from Fig. 4B were also replotted (Fig. 5C) and indicated that Vmax(app) varied linearly with the DNA at infinite AdoMet concentrations. Furthermore, the 1/Vmax obtained from these data (y axis intercept of Fig. 5C) agreed closely with that estimated from Fig. 5B (y axis intercept), giving confidence in the method used. Due to their curvature, the slopes of Fig. 4B were not used to verify the kinetic constants obtained from Fig. 4A. However, a preliminary estimate of their values (Slope 1/AdoMet) was used to generate a broad range interval for the value of the inhibition constant for the DNA, by setting Slope 1/AdoMet = AX/VK + BC/VX A/V(1 + BC/AK), where A indicates KmAdoMet; X indicates [CI]; V indicates Vmax; K indicates KiCI; B indicates KAdoMet; and C indicates KmCI (40). The equation is based on the assumption that the reaction is ordered, with AdoMet binding before the DNA to the catalytic center of DNMT1. However, this assumption needs to be verified. The KAdoMet is the dissociation constant for AdoMet, for which the equation gives a value of ~1.0 µM. KmAdoMet, KmCG, kcat, and KiCI are listed in Table I. The value for kcat for the recombinant human enzyme is 184 (131-237) h-1, at least 30-fold higher than the values found from the MEL cells or recombinant mouse enzymes (11, 23). The Km value of CI was 0.5 (0.3-0.7) µM, whereas that for the AdoMet was 7.2 (5.3-9.1) µM. The Ki for DNA is estimated between 0.2 and 1.2 µM CI. These constants can be used as the basis for a comparison of different enzyme preparations.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Intercept and slope replots of the methylation rate in poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC). Replots of the slopes and y axis intercepts are from Fig. 4. A and B represent the slopes versus 1/AdoMet and 1/Vmax(app) versus 1/AdoMet from the fixed AdoMet data in Fig. 4A. C represents 1/Vmax(app) versus 1/CI from the data in Fig. 4B. Error bars are indicated. The kinetic constants Vmax, KmAdoMet, and KmCI were calculated from these plots.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Comparison of steady-state kinetic parameters of human and murine DNMT1 using poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC) as substrate

De Novo and Maintenance Methylation Catalyzed by the Recombinant Human DNA (Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase-- Finding a 30-fold difference in the kcat value of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) by the recombinant human and mouse DNMT1 prompted us to address the question of the de novo and maintenance methylation properties of the enzyme. Two sets of oligonucleotides were evaluated kinetically. One set of oligonucleotides corresponds to the imprinted locus SNRPN (small nuclear riboprotein-associated peptide N) exon-1, and the other set was from a short stretch of the FMR-1 locus (fragile X mental retardation syndrome). Both DNA sequences mimic human genes and are methylated during development or disease progression. Three sets of duplex DNAs were made with either both strands unmethylated or one strand methylated (hemimethylated). Two hemimethylated duplexes contained either the coding (upper) or the complementary strand (lower) in methylated form. The FMR-1 locus contained either 24 (unmethylated duplex) or 12 (hemimethylated duplex) cytosine residues available for methylation. Similarly, the SNRPN exon-1 locus contained either 16 or 8 target cytosines (assuming that the CG dinucleotide is the only target site for methylation).

A series of double-reciprocal plots were made with six different AdoMet or six different DNA concentrations following the same principles described for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC). For the unmethylated duplex, the CG concentration ranged between 0.5 and 5.0 µM, and for the hemimethylated substrate it was between 0.1 and 1.0 µM. The AdoMet concentration was varied from 4.0 to 15.1 µM for unmethylated DNA and 2.0 to 12.1 µM for hemimethylated DNA. At each given DNA and AdoMet concentration, less than 5% of the cytosines were converted to 5 methylcytosine, and the AdoMet concentration was in vast excess over that of the end product, AdoHcy. Double-reciprocal plots were obtained using the SNRPN exon-1 locus either as an unmethylated or hemimethylated substrate. With increasing concentrations of the co-substrate, the slope of the plots decreased, as expected. Representative double-reciprocal plots of SNRPN exon-1 at fixed AdoMet and at fixed DNA are shown in Fig. 6, A and B. Replots of 1/Vmax(app) versus 1/AdoMet (from Fig. 6B), slopes of 1/v versus 1/AdoMet (from Fig. 6B), 1/Vmax(app) versus 1/CG (from Fig. 6A), and slopes of 1/v versus 1/CG (from Fig. 6A) were all linear (data not shown). kcat for the unmethylated imprinted SNRPN exon-1 locus was about 2.3 h-1. However, the kcat value for hemimethylated SNRPN exon-1 was 23 and 49 h-1 for the lower and upper methylated strand duplexes, respectively (Table II). The values obtained for KmCG were similar for both hemimethylated duplexes.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Double-reciprocal plots for the human SNRPN exon-1. A, fixed AdoMet plot. The AdoMet concentration was 2.0 µM (filled diamonds), 4.0 µM (open squares), 8.0 µM (filled squares), 9.8 µM (open circles), and 12.0 µM (filled circles). B, fixed DNA plot. The CG concentration was 0.15 µM (open diamonds), 0.18 µM (filled diamonds), 0.25 µM (open squares), 0.37 µM (filled squares), 0.75 µM (open circles), and 1.50 µM (filled circles). The fitting of the data was performed as described (32).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Steady-state kinetic parameters of recombinant human DNMT1 using SNRPN exon-1 as substrate

Similar experiments were carried out with the FMR-1 locus substrate. In this case, the double-reciprocal plots and replots were linear for (CGG·CCG)12 and (m5CGG·CCG)12 but were curved for (CGG·Cm5CG)12. Together with the data from poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), these curved velocity patterns reveal that the sequence composition and methylation status of the DNA template may dramatically alter the kinetics of the reaction. The kinetic constants measured for the FMR-1 locus are shown in Table III. Unmethylated trinucleotide repeats had a very low kcat (1.2 h-1). The kcat of hemimethylated triplet repeat DNA increased about 10-20-fold, depending on the methylated strand (Table IV), as observed for the SNRPN exon-1 locus. Furthermore, since kcat measures the rate of dissociation of the products (methylated DNA and AdoHcy) from the enzyme, the increases in kcat for the hemimethylated DNA substrates are consistent with human DNMT1 having a greater affinity for hemimethylated DNA (41) than for fully methylated DNA. Finally, the finding that the kcat values varied 2-3-fold between the upper and the lower hemimethylated strands suggests that DNA product release is additionally influenced by the sequence composition flanking the CG substrate site.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Steady-state kinetic parameters of recombinant human DNMT1 using FMR-1 locus as substrate

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Preference for hemimethylated DNA by human DNMT1

Some of the hemimethylated templates, such as SNRPN exon-1 and FMR-1 substrates (methylated lower strand, Tables II and III), showed a lower KmAdoMet than their unmethylated counterpart. According to the reaction scheme used to derive the velocity equations for the methyl transfer reaction by DNMT1 (32), KmAdoMet is defined as the ratio between kcat and the forward rate constant for the binding of AdoMet to the catalytic center. For all the DNA templates tested, kcat was greater for the hemimethylated substrates than for the unmethylated ones, which increases KmAdoMet in the former molecules. However, since KmAdoMet values were lower for hemimethylated duplexes, we believe that such low KmAdoMet values are due to substantially higher rates of AdoMet binding. In the accompanying paper (32), we provide evidence that hemimethylated DNA activates the reaction rates by binding to an allosteric site in DNMT1. We propose that the consequence of such allosteric binding is to increase the accessibility of AdoMet to the catalytic center.

The second-order rate constant defined by the ratio of kcat/KmCG is also a good measure of the catalytic efficiency of an enzyme. For human DNMT1 the catalytic efficiency for hemimethylated DNA was 3-10-fold higher than the corresponding unmethylated DNA (Table IV). Thus we conclude that human DNMT1 is catalytically more efficient on hemimethylated than on unmethylated DNA.

Non-CG Methylation in Vitro by the Recombinant Human DNA(Cytosine-5) Methyltransferase-- The above data clearly demonstrate that the full-length human DNMT1 prefers hemimethylated DNA as a substrate. However, there is methylation in mammals at non-CG sequences (42, 43). To test whether human DNMT1 can methylate non-CG sequences, a series of FdC-containing oligonucleotide duplexes were made with non-CG sites such as FXG, where X was either C, A, or T and F was 5-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine. The complementary strand of the FdC strand was methylated to create a hemimethylated duplex (see "Experimental Procedures"). A stable complex is formed between FdC-containing oligonucleotide and DNMT1 only after transfer of the methyl group from AdoMet to the target cytosine. The complex results from the inability of the fluorine atom on C-5 of cytosine to serve as a leaving group and permit release of the enzyme (9). Following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the reaction mixture, the complex can be visualized by autoradiography. This technique has been used successfully to cross-link Dcm DNA m5C MTase from E. coli (44). From the autoradiography it is clear that human DNMT1 forms a complex with non-CG sites (Fig. 7). The efficiency of complex formation was in the order FG > FCG > FWG, where the 5' F is the methyl acceptor in each case. Hence we conclude from these results that human DNMT1 also methylates non-CG sequences.


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Asymmetric methylations by human DNMT1. Radioactive duplex oligonucleotides were covalently cross-linked with human DNMT1. The presence or absence of DNMT1 and/or AdoMet in the reaction is indicated with either a + or - sign above each lane. The target sites are indicated on the top as FG, FCG, or FWG. F represents 5-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine, and W is either A or T. DNA-protein cross-linked bands are above 175 kDa and are indicated by an arrow. Pre-stained protein molecular mass markers are indicated on the right.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previously, several purification attempts were described for mammalian m5C MTases using human placental tissue (37), murine erythroleukemia cells (13), and murine ascites cells (45). However, because of the small amount of the protein and the many purification steps required to approach homogeneity, it has been difficult to purify these proteins. The problem is compounded by the presence of a protease-susceptible domain in the first 300 amino acids of the N-terminal domain and the large molecular mass of the m5C MTases, about 183.5 kDa (13, 23). This gene is selectively expressed in a few tissue types such as placenta, lung, brain, and heart (14). Recently, recombinant expression systems using COS cells (28) and baculovirus (23) have been reported for the murine DNMT1. In COS cells the expression was very low, but the baculovirus system led to a much higher level of protein expression. However, even in the baculovirus system, purification involved several chromatographic steps leading to a reduced yield of full-length protein. The addition of a hexa-histidine tag to the N terminus of the DNMT1 and nickel column affinity purification was attempted (23). However, in this purification method several other proteins were present after the affinity elution, and further chromatographic purification was required. Thus we switched to an intein-based purification system (29).2

The full-length DNMT1 gene was placed in a vector such that it was fused in frame to an intein and a chitin-binding domain. The fusion precursor is immobilized on a chitin matrix where the intein can be activated to catalyze its own cleavage and release the full-length human DNMT1 protein. Although the intein-chitin domain remains bound to the affinity beads, the target protein is eluted. We have been successful in obtaining 1 mg of protein/1.5 × 109 cells (a liter of infected SF9 cells). This purification protocol yields intact protein at over 95% purity. Often a secondary band close to 55 kDa was observed which was later established to be the viral (AcNPV)-encoded chitinase (data not shown). To facilitate cleavage from the purification tag, the two C-terminal amino acids were changed from lysine and aspartic acid to proline and glycine. This had no detectable effect on activity.

Poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) as a substrate has been shown to have either comparable or greater methyl group acceptance ability than other DNAs (38). In this work, we demonstrate a complex behavior of the human DNMT1 with the poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) substrate. At higher concentrations of CI, substrate inactivation was apparent. It was suggested that mouse DNMT1 can form reversible, multimeric complexes at a higher protein concentration (46), and this may be the cause of the inactivation. Kinetic observations by Hitt et al. (47) suggest an irreversible binding of murine DNMT1 to DNA and aggregation at high molar excess of the enzyme. However, our kinetic measurements were carried out at 2 nM human DNMT1. In this concentration range, protein aggregation was not detected in a gel shift assay (data not shown). Thus aggregation seems unlikely. Several other DNA substrates that we tested using the above conditions also do not support the aggregation hypothesis. However, an alternative explanation of enzyme inactivation at high poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) concentrations via the formation of a ternary complex consisting of DNA-enzyme-DNA may explain our observations. This hypothesis is supported by the presence of a DNA-binding peptide motif, B1, at the N terminus of the human DNMT1 protein (48). Motif B1, as well as a deleted portion of it -DB1, interacts and binds strongly to DNA. DB1 can bind oligonucleotide duplexes as small as 30 bp through the lysine residues (48). Thus, it is possible that poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) may have formed catalytically inactive complexes with human DNMT1 at high CI concentrations. It should be noted that proteolysis of the N terminus of murine DNMT1 leads to its catalytic activation (21), suggesting that this domain may be involved in repression of methyl transfer.

One potentially significant observation with recombinant human DNMT1 is the high turnover number compared with previous reports for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) (Table I). This difference could be due to the inherent nature of the human DNMT1 or could reflect a greater percentage of active protein because of our purification protocol. This could also be caused by the substrate, which has a limited search space for methylation. Our results are consistent with the kcat values of other AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases such as the bacterial m5C MTases M.HhaI, 78 h-1 on poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) (9), and tRNA (m5U54) methyltransferase, 108 h-1 (49).

The mammalian enzymes have been classified as maintenance m5C MTases. The mouse enzyme is found to be associated with replication foci where it likely methylates the newly synthesized DNA during the S-phase of the cell cycle (8). We analyzed two synthetic DNAs representing the whole exon-1 sequence of SNRPN and 12 CGG trinucleotide repeats from the FMR-1 gene. These are representative of human DNA sequences that undergo methylation during development (imprinting) or are implicated in disease (fragile X syndrome). Both sequences have multiple CGs, thus enabling the study of both de novo and maintenance methylation processes in well defined, biologically relevant sequences.

The kcat values for normal DNA substrates shown in Tables II and III are smaller than the turnover number for poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) shown in Table I but are comparable to other m5C MTases (11, 49). However, the strand bias for methylation is evident for human DNMT1, once the kcat values for complementary hemimethylated duplexes are compared (Table IV). This could be the result of an unusual topological structure of the DNA, or the sequence context of 5mC may act as a signal for enhanced methylation in adjacent DNA regions as observed previously (24). Kinetic studies with more substrates will be necessary to assess whether this is due to a specific sequence effect. The human enzyme has a typical turnover number between 7 and 49 h-1 for hemimethylated DNA as compared with 1.2-2.3 h-1 for unmethylated DNA. Our data show that the turnover number for human m5C MTase and unmethylated DNA is at least 110-fold greater than previously reported (12). The preference for methylation between hemimethylated and unmethylated DNA is about 15-fold, as measured under optimal kinetic conditions (Table IV), whereas a 134-fold difference was observed by Kho et al. (12) for the human enzyme using oligonucleotide duplexes. A major reason for this discrepancy may be the quality of the enzyme since a much smaller human m5C MTase was used for kinetic analysis by Kho et al. (12) based on the FdC data presented. Our data show clearly (Table IV) that the enzyme prefers hemimethylated DNA as a substrate and is capable of both de novo and maintenance methylation. However, within the nucleus, DNMT1 binds to the replication fork (8) along with many other factors, such as p21 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (22). Thus, the enzyme is in a very different environment during DNA replication, and the rate of methylation in vivo may differ from that observed in vitro.

Apart from methylating the canonical CGs, the human DNMT1 can also methylate unusual structures such as slipped duplexes, snapbacks, and cruciforms (50). Clark et al. (42) have shown that mammalian cells were capable of maintaining methylation of cytosine at CNG sites within the transfected plasmids. There are also reports of non-CG methylation in the hypermethylated CG promoter region of the human L1 retrotransposon (43). Methylation at such sites and its maintenance were postulated to be mediated by a different enzyme(s) (25). We tested the ability of the recombinant human DNMT1 to carry out non-CG methylation by substituting the target cytosine with a fluorocytosine and allowing the reaction to proceed in the presence of AdoMet (44). Oligonucleotide duplexes containing FCG or FWG sequences formed covalent complexes with the human enzyme, indicative of a successful methyl transfer event. Thus, human DNMT1 can carry out de novo and maintenance methylation at the CG sites and can also maintain methylation of some non-CG sites.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. S. Baylin, The Johns Hopkins University, for the gift of the cDNA clones for human DNMT1 (pBKSHMT5.0-b). We thank Drs. Ming Xu and Sanjay Kumar for suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM46127 (to R. J. R.), NS37554, and GM52982 (to R. D. W.) and by the Robert A. Welch Foundation (to R. D. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: New England Biolabs, 32 Tozer Rd., Beverly, MA 01915. Tel.: 978-927-3382; Fax: 978-921-527; E-mail: roberts@neb.com.

2 M. E. Scott, S. Pradhan, and M. Q. Xu, submitted for publication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AdoMet, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; AdoHcy, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine; m5C MTase, DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases; kbp, kilobase pair; AcNPV, Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus; DTT, dithiothreitol; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; bp, base pair(s); FdC, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine; SNRPN, small nuclear riboprotein-associated peptide N; FMR, fragile X mental retardation.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Shapiro, H. S. (1970) in CRC Handbook of Biochemistry Selected Data for Molecular Biology (Sober, H. S., ed) , pp. 80-103, The Chemical Rubber Co., Ohio
2. Graessmann, M., and Graessmann, A. (1993) in DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance (Jost, J. P. , and Saluz, H. P., eds) , pp. 404-424, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel
3. Rein, T., Zorbas, H., and DePamphilis, M. L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 416-426[Abstract]
4. Barlow, D. P. (1995) Science 270, 1610-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Li, E., Bestor, T. H., and Jaenisch, R. (1992) Cell 69, 915-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Schmutte, C., and Jones, P. A. (1998) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 379, 377-388
7. Imbert, G., Feng, Y., Nelson, D. L., Warren, S. T., and Mandel, J. L. (1998) in Genetic Instability and Hereditary Neurological Diseases (Wells, R. D. , and Warren, S. T., eds) , pp. 27-46, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
8. Leonhardt, H., Page, A. W., Weier, H. U., and Bestor, T. H. (1992) Cell 71, 865-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Wu, J. C., and Santi, D. V. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4778-4786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Klimasauskas, S., Kumar, S., Roberts, R. J., and Cheng, X. (1994) Cell 76, 357-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Flynn, J., Glickman, J. F., and Reich, N. O. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7308-7315[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kho, M. R., Baker, D. J., Laayoun, A., and Smith, S. S. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275, 67-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Bestor, T., Laudano, A., Mattaliano, R., and Ingram, V. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 203, 971-983[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yen, R. W., Vertino, P. M., Nelkin, B. D., Yu, J. J., El-Deiry, W., Cumaraswamy, A., Lennon, G. G., Trask, B. J., Celano, P., and Baylin, S. B. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 2287-2291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kimura, H., Ishihara, G., and Tajima, S. (1996) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 120, 1182-1189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Aniello, F., Locascio, A., Fucci, L., Geraci, G., and Branno, M. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 178, 57-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tajima, S., Tsuda, H., Wakabayashi, N., Asano, A., Mizuno, S., and Nishimori, K. (1995) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 117, 1050-1057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Finnegan, E. J., and Dennis, E. S. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2383-2388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Pradhan, S., Cummings, M., Roberts, R. J., and Adams, R. L. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1214-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kumar, S., Cheng, X. D., Klimasauskas, S., Sha, M., Posfai, J., Roberts, R. J., and Wilson, G. G. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1-10[Free Full Text]
21. Bestor, T. H. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2611-2617[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Chuang, L. S., Ian, H. I., Koh, T. W., Ng, H. H., Xu, G., and Li, B. F. (1997) Science 277, 1996-2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Pradhan, S., Talbot, D., Sha, M., Benner, J., Hornstra, L., Li, E., Jaenisch, R., and Roberts, R. J. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4666-4673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Christman, J. K., Sheikhnejad, G., Marasco, C. J., and Sufrin, J. R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7347-7351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Okano, M., Xie, S., and Li, E. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 219-220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Tollefsbol, T. O., and Hutchison, C. A., III (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18543-18550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Glickman, J. F., and Reich, N. O. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 204, 1003-1008[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Czank, A., Hauselmann, R., Page, A. W., Leonhardt, H., Bestor, T. H., Schaffner, W., and Hergersberg, M. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 30, 259-263
29. Chong, S., Shao, Y., Paulus, H., Benner, J., Perler, F. B., and Xu, M.-Q. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22159-22168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Wickham, T. J., Davis, T., Granados, R. R., Hammer, D. A., Shuler, M. L., and Wood, H. A. (1991) Biotechnol Lett. 13, 483-488[CrossRef]
31. O'Reilly, D. R., Miller, L. K., and Luckow, V. A. (1992) Baculovirus Expression Vectors: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 124-127, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York
32. Bacolla, A., Pradhan, S., Roberts, R. J., and Wells, R. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33011-33019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 9.52-9.55, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
34. Burns, J. A., Butler, J. C., Morgan, J., and Whitesides, G. M. (1991) J. Org. Chem. 56, 2648-2650[CrossRef]
35. Davis, T. R., Trotter, K. M., Granados, R. R., and Wood, H. A. (1992) Bio/Technology 10, 1148-1150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Turnbull, J. F., and Adams, R. L. P. (1976) Nucleic Acids Res. 3, 677-695
37. Carotti, D., Palitti, F., Mastrantonio, S., Rispoli, M., Strom, R., Amato, A., Campagnari, F., and Whitehead, E. P. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 866, 135-143[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Xu, G., Flynn, J., Glickman, J. F., and Reich, N. O. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 207, 544-551[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Copeland, R. A. (1996) Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis , pp. 93-120, Wiley-VCH, New York
40. Segel, I. H. (1975) Enzyme Kinetics: Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-state Enzyme Systems , pp. 813-826, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
41. Flynn, J., Azzam, R., and Reich, N. O. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 279, 101-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Clark, S. J., Harrison, J., and Frommer, M. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 20-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Woodcock, D. M., Lawler, C. B., Linsenmeyer, M. E., Doherty, J. P., and Warren, W. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7810-7816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Hanck, T., Schmidt, S., and Fritz, H.-J. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21,