![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33092-33096, November 12, 1999
From the A-kinase anchoring proteins tether
cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) to specific subcellular
locations. The purpose of this study was to use fluorescence resonance
energy transfer to monitor binding events in living cells between the
type II regulatory subunit of PKA (RII) and the RII-binding domain of
the human thyroid RII anchoring protein (Ht31), a peptide containing
the PKA-binding domain of an A-kinase anchoring protein. RII was linked
to enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP), Ht31 was linked to
enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP), and these constructs were
coexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Upon excitation of the
donor fluorophore, Ht31·ECFP, an increase in emission of the acceptor
fluorophore, RII·EYFP, and a decrease in emission from Ht31·ECFP
were observed. The emission ratio (acceptor/donor) was increased 2-fold
(p < 0.05) in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP and
RII·EYFP compared with cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP, the inactive
form of Ht31, and RII·EYFP. These results provide the first in
vivo demonstration of RII/Ht31 interaction in living cells and
confirm previous in vitro findings of RII/Ht31 binding.
Using surface plasmon resonance, we also showed that the green
fluorescent protein tags did not significantly alter the binding of
Ht31 to RII. Thus, fluorescence resonance energy transfer can be used
to directly monitor protein-protein interactions of the PKA signaling
pathway in living cells.
There is now increasing evidence for clustering and
compartmentalization of signaling enzymes with their activators and
target proteins. This targeting of enzymes with their substrates may promote specificity of signaling events (1-3). To better understand the physiological role of scaffolding proteins, such as A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs),1
which target cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (2, 4), it is essential to monitor in real time the interactions between
the components of this signaling complex in living cells. However, to
date such measurements have not been reported for the PKA pathway.
AKAPs and PKA co-localize in cells. This was first shown by the
redistribution of the type II regulatory (RII) and the catalytic subunits of PKA from the cytosolic to the particulate fraction following overexpression of AKAP75 in HEK293 cells (5). In studies in
HEK293 cells, S-AKAP84 targeted RII to mitochondria (6). In rat cardiac
myocytes, endogenous AKAP100 co-localized with RII in the region of the
junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum/transverse tubule (7). A functional
role of AKAP targeting of PKA is further indicated by studies in which
Ht31 peptide, a competitive inhibitor of AKAP/PKA binding, was
introduced into AKAP-overexpressing cells. For example, transfection of
RINm5F pancreatic beta cells with Ht31 caused redistribution of RII
from a perinuclear to a diffuse cytoplasmic localization and prevented
cAMP-dependent insulin secretion (8). Similarly, in cardiac
myocytes transfected with AKAP79, microinjection of Ht31 impaired the
PKA-dependent increase in L-type Ca2+ current
(9). These studies demonstrate a role for AKAPs in the regulation of
PKA distribution and in the specificity of PKA function.
To date, the binding of RII with full-length AKAPs or with the peptide
Ht31 has been demonstrated in vitro by RII overlay assay
(10-12), by band shift assays on nondenaturing gels (12, 13), by
equilibrium dialysis measurements (12, 13), and recently by solution
NMR measurements of the N-terminal dimerization domain of RII with Ht31
(14). Equilibrium dialysis measurements (12) and surface plasmon
resonance2 showed that Ht31
binds RII with nanomolar affinity. Although these in vitro
approaches provide evidence for high affinity RII/AKAP or RII/Ht31
interactions in vitro, the results presented here extend
these studies by measuring real-time interactions between these
molecules in living cells.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to analyze the
interaction between RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP expressed in CHO cells.
We used enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) and enhanced yellow
fluorescent protein (EYFP) (16) to construct the fusion proteins,
RII·EYFP, Ht31·ECFP, and Ht31P·ECFP (the inactive, prolinated
Ht31 analog). A significant increase in RII·EYFP fluorescence
emission was observed in cells expressing RII·EYFP/Ht31·ECFP compared with control cells expressing RII·EYFP/Ht31P·ECFP thus demonstrating, for the first time, binding of RII to Ht31, the RII-binding domain of an AKAP, in living cells.
Construction of Vectors for the Expression of GFP-tagged
Proteins--
The cDNAs for RII
The cDNAs for RII, Ht31, or Ht31P were amplified by polymerase
chain reaction to remove the stop codon and add restriction enzyme
sites for BglII, XhoI, and BamHI. The
cDNA encoding Ht31 or Ht31P was excised using BglII and
XhoI and ligated into pECFP upstream of ECFP to create
pHt31·ECFP or pHt31P·ECFP, respectively. The cDNA encoding RII
was excised using XhoI and BamHI and ligated into
pEYFP upstream of EYFP to create pRII·EYFP. Thus, ECFP or EYFP was
expressed at the C terminus of each of the proteins of interest.
Constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Transfection and Selection of Positive Cells--
CHO cells were
stably transfected with pECFP, pEYFP, pHt31·ECFP, or pHt31P·ECFP
using Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's protocol. Cells were subcultured 1:5 into selection
media (0.5 mg/ml G418) 48 h posttransfection. Stable transfectants
were amplified and sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorter
analysis using excitation wavelengths of 410 nm for ECFP-expressing
cells and 480 nm for EYFP-expressing cells. For the FRET experiments,
cells stably transfected with Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP were plated
on 30-mm glass-bottom dishes and then transiently transfected with
RII·EYFP using Lipofectin, similar to the methods described by
Miyawaki et al. (16) in their FRET study.
Western Blot Analysis--
Western blot analysis was used to
verify that transfected CHO cells expressed the appropriate fusion
proteins. Adherent cells were released by trypsin-EDTA treatment,
washed with phosphate-buffered saline, pelleted, and resuspended in
ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA,
1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors (30 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 30 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and lysed using a freeze-thaw method.
Proteins from the cell lysate (10 µg/lane) were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a 10% gel, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with an anti-GFP antibody (monoclonal, Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) that recognizes both ECFP or EYFP mutants.
Densitometry was performed using NIH Image Software to determine
differences in expression levels of Ht31 and Ht31P and to determine
whether equal levels of RII·EYFP were transiently expressed in cells
stably expressing Ht31 or Ht31P.
Fluorescence Microscopy--
Cells were plated on glass
coverslips to 95% confluency, washed with phosphate-buffered saline,
and fixed using ice-cold methanol. Cells containing the RII·EYFP
fusion protein were viewed directly using a fluorescein isothiocyanate
filter. Immunofluorescent techniques were used to view cells expressing
ECFP or an ECFP fusion protein. These cells were fixed, blocked with
3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline, and probed with
a primary antibody to GFP and a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Coverslips were then
mounted onto slides, and cells were viewed using a fluorescein
isothiocyanate filter. Although an indirect method was used for viewing
ECFP-expressing cells, both methods can identify the location of
respective fusion proteins.
Preparation of Recombinant RII Surface Plasmon Resonance--
Surface plasmon resonance was
used to investigate the effects of adding a GFP derivative to the C
termini of RII and Ht31. Measurements were taken using the BIAcore 3000 instrument. Streptavidin (SA) sensor chips and HBS buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM
EDTA, 0.005% Surfactant P20) were purchased from Pharmacia Biosensor
AB. The concentration of RII·EYFP in CHO cell lysates was determined
by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using purified RII and anti-RII
antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) as described previously (18). Samples
of RII, RII·EYFP, Ht31·ECFP, or Ht31P·ECFP (analytes) were
diluted in HBS buffer. For determining RII/Ht31 and RII·EYFP/Ht31
interactions, samples of RII or RII·EYFP (0.125-1.0 µg/ml) were
injected at 25 °C at a flow rate of 10 µl/min over the active SA
surface on which Ht31B (ligand) had been immobilized to
~30 response units or over a control surface (control peptide, immobilized Ht31PB).2 For determining
Ht31·ECFP/RII interactions, samples of Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP
were injected over the active RII surface (immobilized RIIB) or control surface (SA surface blocked with free
biotin). In the absence of ECFP, Ht31 or Ht31P peptides are too small
to give a significant increase in response units, so we were unable to
compare binding of the GFP-tagged Ht31 with the native peptide. Therefore, RII/Ht31 interactions were determined by passing RII over
immobilized Ht31B and not vice versa. Flow-rate variation experiments confirmed that both SA surfaces (RIIB and
Ht31B) were not limited by mass transport effects. Kinetic
constants were calculated by global fitting of the data to a 1:1
Langmuir binding model after subtraction of the control surface, using
BIAevaluation software, version 3.0, according to the BIAcore
pseudo-first order rate equation as described by Zakhary et
al.2
FRET Analysis of Cells That Contain Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP
and RII·EYFP--
FRET experiments were performed 48 h after
transient transfection of Ht31- or Ht31P-expressing CHO cells with
RII·EYFP. Each experiment was performed on 15-20 cells at ~80%
confluency. Fluorescence was observed with an Olympus IX-70 inverted
fluorescence microscope and recorded using the Felix software imaging
system (Photon Technology International). Using this system, excitation
was set by a monochromator to the peak excitation wavelength for ECFP,
440 ± 5 nm (using a 455DCLP dichroic mirror). Emitted light was
measured at 480, the peak emission wavelength for ECFP, and at 535 nm
(D480/30 and D535/25 emission filters), the peak emission wavelength
for EYFP. Background fluorescence was determined for each plate of cells by taking readings in a region of the plate that contained no
cells, using the same size field of view. These readings were subtracted from each data point. We did not subtract the
autofluorescence from untransfected cells because cell densities
differed between dishes. Data were expressed as either the raw
fluorescence intensity or as the ratio of fluorescence intensity at 535 nm/480 nm.
Expression of Fluorescent Fusion Proteins in Transfected CHO
Cells--
Western blot analysis was used to verify that transfected
CHO cells contained the appropriate fusion proteins (Fig.
1). The presence of immunoreactive bands
confirmed that cells expressed either the 65-kDa Ht31·ECFP or
Ht31P·ECFP fusion proteins and/or the 80-kDa RII·EYFP fusion
protein. Densitometric scanning of the blots revealed only a 2%
difference in expression levels between Ht31·ECFP and
Ht31P·ECFP in stably transfected cells (n = 4). Lysate was also collected from five plates of cells that were stably
transfected with either Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP and then transiently transfected with RII·EYFP to determine whether cells stably expressing Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP transiently expressed equal levels of RII·EYFP. Proteins from the cell lysate were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and GFP fusion
proteins were identified using an anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 1).
Densitometric analysis of RII·EYFP revealed that cells stably
transfected with Ht31P·ECFP expressed slightly higher levels of
RII·EYFP (an 8% difference) than cells stably expressing
Ht31·ECFP.
In addition to Western blot analysis, fluorescence microscopy was used
to directly visualize the appropriate fusion protein in the transfected
cells. ECFP and EYFP were expressed throughout the cytosol (data not
shown). However, RII·EYFP appeared throughout the cytosol and in the
perinuclear region (Fig. 2A).
Ht31·ECFP-expressing cells showed a similar pattern to those
transfected with RII·EYFP but with more fluorescent signal being
detected in the cytosol (Fig. 2B). The latter results are
similar to the findings of Lester et al. (8), who
demonstrated that Ht31 localized to the cytosol of transfected RINm5F
cells.
Determination of Kinetic Parameters by Surface Plasmon
Resonance--
Equilibrium binding constants (Kd)
were determined for the interaction of RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP with
their respective binding partners. There was no significant difference
in the Kd values for Ht31 and RII (11.0 ± 0.2 × 10 FRET Analysis of Ht31P·ECFP Interactions with
RII·EYFP--
In CHO cells expressing Ht31·ECFP or
Ht31P·ECFP plus RII·EYFP, FRET was observed as a decrease in
emission at 480 nm (the peak emission wavelength for ECFP) and as an
increase in emission at 535 nm (the peak emission wavelength for EYFP).
This indicates that the 480-nm emission from the donor fluorophore
(Ht31·ECFP) excited the acceptor fluorophore (RII·EYFP)
resulting in an increase in emission at 535 nm. There was a dramatic
increase in fluorescence emitted at 535 nm in cells expressing
Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP, because the intensity of the 535-nm
fluorescence from these cells was 5 times greater than native CHO cells
and 2 times greater than control cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP and
RII·EYFP (Fig. 4). Emission at 480 nm
was reduced by 34% in Ht31·ECFP/RII·EYFP expressing cells when
compared with control CHO cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP.
Cells expressing RII·EYFP alone displayed background levels of
fluorescence when excited at 440 nm, because emission at 480 or 535 nm
was reduced by an average of 97 or 84%, respectively, when compared
with cells expressing both Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP (data not shown).
Interestingly, when cells expressing Ht31·ECFP were excited at 440 nm, emission at 535 nm was only 18% lower than emission from cells
expressing Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (data not shown).
To control for different densities of cells on each plate, the ratio of
fluorescence at 535 nm/480 nm was used to compare FRET between cells
expressing RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP or RII·EYFP and Ht31P·ECFP.
The ratio of fluorescence was over 2 times greater in cells expressing
Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP compared with cells transfected with
Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (n = 18) (Fig.
5). These results are consistent with the
findings of Miyawaki et al. (16) who report an ~1.5-fold
ratio increase with the ECFP/EYFP pair when their "yellow cameleon"
(ECFP and EYFP linked together with calmodulin and the
calmodulin-binding peptide M13) binds Ca2+ in response to
addition of ionomycin.
Our FRET measurements in CHO cells co-transfected with Ht31·ECFP
and RII·EYFP demonstrate a significant increase in energy transfer
(i.e. an increase in the 535/480-nm emission ratio) as compared with cells transfected with Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP. The
efficiency (E) of FRET decreases with the sixth power of the distance (R) between donor and acceptor according to the
relationship, E = (1+(R/Ro)6) N-terminal dimerization of RII is required for RII docking to AKAPs
(21, 22) and for RII binding to Ht31 (23). Therefore, our results imply
that RII·EYFP associates to form dimers in the CHO cells. Because
Ht31 can bind to the N termini of dimerized RII in vitro
(23, 24), the ECFP tag at the C terminus of RII should not interfere
with AKAP (or Ht31) binding to RII. We tested this hypothesis using
surface plasmon resonance. We assessed whether significant changes in
Kd occurred as a result of adding a GFP derivative
to the C terminus of these molecules. Our results showed that the
affinity of RII for Ht31 was not significantly altered by fusion of
EYFP to the C terminus of RII. Likewise, taking into consideration that
these experiments were performed using two different SA surfaces, the
Kd for Ht31·ECFP binding to immobilized RII was
similar to that of RII binding to immobilized Ht31. Thus, our results
demonstrate that not only can we successfully use FRET to measure the
interaction between molecules of RII and the RII-binding domain of
AKAPs in intact cells but also that the addition of the 27-kDa ECFP or
EYFP fluorescent tag to the C terminus of the expressed proteins does
not significantly alter this intercellular interaction. Thus, we can
conclude that the C-terminal tag does not affect the interaction
between Ht31 and RII.
In previous FRET studies, two different pairs of GFP derivatives were
used (25-27). We used the ECFP·EYFP pair rather than enhanced blue
fluorescent protein with enhanced GFP. One disadvantage of the
ECFP·EYFP pair is that the amplitude of the change in the emission
ratio is reduced, compared with the enhanced blue fluorescent protein-enhanced green fluorescent protein pair, because the ECFP emission is relatively broad and overlaps the EYFP emission spectrum (27). However, the ECFP·EYFP pair has improved photostability (16,
19). In our study, overlap of ECFP emission into the EYFP channel,
referred to as "cross-talk" by Gordon et al. (28), may
account for elevated FRET measurements in cells expressing the negative
control Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP or in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP
alone. Also, autofluorescence, believed to be primarily from
flavoproteins with peak excitation at 488 nm and peak emission at
~520 nm (15), may have contributed to background fluorescence in both
the RII·EYFP/Ht31·ECFP and the RII·EYFP/Ht31P·ECFP-expressing cells. Thus, there is likely to be a contribution both from FRET and
from autofluorescence to the 535/480-nm emission ratio for both sets of
transfected cells.
In summary, the results of this study provide the first direct
demonstration of binding of RII to the RII-binding domain of an AKAP in
intact cells, thereby demonstrating the physiological relevance of
previous measurements of RII/Ht31 interactions performed in
vitro (12). Our findings indicate the potential of FRET, between
expressed GFP fusion proteins, as a powerful tool for measuring
PKA/AKAP interactions in the intracellular environment.
We acknowledge Dr. Jianjie Ma for helpful
discussions and Russ Desnoyer for help in creating the fluorescent
protein fusion constructs. We would also like to thank Dr. Dianne Perez
for critical review of the manuscript. The Becton-Dickinson FACSVantage
used to perform sorting of EYFP-expressing cells was purchased through a generous gift from the Keck Foundation. ECFP-expressing cells were
sorted using an Elite ESP at the Cancer Research Center at Case Western
Reserve University. Polymerase chain reaction products were sequenced,
and peptides were made by the Molecular Biotechnology Core facility at
the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants RO1 HL56256 (to M. B.), T32 DK07678 and F32 HL10273 (to
M. L. R.), and F32 HL07653 (to D. R. Z.) and by a beginning
grant-in-aid from the Ohio Valley affiliate of the American Heart
Association (to D. S. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
Zakhary, D. R., Moravec, C. S., and Bond, M., in press.
The abbreviations used are:
AKAP, A-kinase
anchoring protein;
PKA, cyclic AMP-dependent protein
kinase;
FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer;
RII, type II
regulatory subunit of PKA;
EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein;
ECFP, enhanced cyan fluorescent protein;
Ht31, the RII-binding domain
of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein;
Ht31P, the inactive
prolinated form of the RII-binding domain of the human thyroid RII
anchoring protein;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
SA, streptavidin;
RIIB, biotinylated RII;
Ht31B, biotinylated
Ht31;
Ht31PB, biotinylated Ht31P;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary.
Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase Binding to
A-kinase Anchoring Proteins in Living Cells by Fluorescence Resonance
Energy Transfer of Green Fluorescent Protein Fusion Proteins*
,
§,
§
Department of Molecular Cardiology,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, Ht31, and Ht31P were gifts
from John Scott (Vollum Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Portland, OR). The construct for Ht31, used in the FRET experiments,
encodes residues 418-718 of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein
(8). The RII-binding domain, residues 493-515 (12), is included in this peptide. The construct for Ht31P contains residues 418-718 from
the same AKAP but with proline substitutions at positions 498 and 507 that prevent Ht31P from binding RII (12). The cDNA encoding ECFP or
EYFP (gifts from Roger Tsien, Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
University of California, San Diego, CA) was ligated into EGFP-N1
(CLONTECH) using AgeI and
BsrGI to form pECFP or pEYFP, respectively.
and Synthetic
Peptides--
Purified recombinant RII
was prepared as described
previously (7). Recombinant RII protein was biotinylated
(RIIB) using a BAC-SulfoNHS reaction (Sigma) according to
manufacturer's instructions. Ht31 and Ht31P (residues 493-515 of the
full-length protein) were biotinylated at the N terminus
(Ht31B, Ht31PB) to allow detection of RII
binding events2 (17). All peptides were synthesized by the
Molecular Biotechnology Core Facility at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Western blot of Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP
fusion proteins expressed in CHO cells. Proteins from the cell
lysate were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with anti-GFP antibody.
Lanes were loaded from left to right
with native CHO cell lysate, CHO cells expressing RII·EYFP, CHO cells
expressing Ht31·ECFP, or CHO cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP. Molecular
mass markers are on the left. The solid arrow
points to RII·EYFP, and the dashed arrow points to
Ht31P·ECFP. Bands below these arrows are
degradation products.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Subcellular distribution of RII·EYFP and
Ht31·ECFP when expressed in CHO cells. Cells expressing
RII·EYFP (A) or Ht31·ECFP (B) were plated,
prepared, and viewed as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
9 M; n = 3) or
Ht31 and RII·EYFP (11.6 ± 0.8 × 10
9
M; n = 3). The Kd for
Ht31·ECFP binding to RII was 4.3 × 10
9
M. The lower Kd for Ht31·ECFP binding
to RII, as compared with the Kd values for
interactions between Ht31 and RII or between Ht31 and RII·EYFP, may
be due to the different experimental conditions, because Ht31·ECFP
binding to RII was measured using an SA surface containing immobilized
RII, whereas RII·EYFP/Ht31 binding was measured on an SA surface
containing immobilized Ht31. A representative sensorgram of
RII·EYFP binding to immobilized Ht31 peptide is shown in Fig.
3. Ht31P·ECFP did not bind RII,
indicating that proline substitution of the amphipathic helix disrupts
RII interaction with this fusion protein as it does for Ht31P without
the ECFP tag (results not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Sensorgram for RII·EYFP binding to
immobilized Ht31 peptide. A sample containing RII·EYFP was
perfused over immobilized Ht31 peptide at 120 s, and dissociation
was achieved by injection of buffer at 300 s. Binding surfaces
were regenerated with 10 mM NaOH. This protocol was
repeated three times for each concentration (in nM) listed
at the right of each curve. Data are expressed in
response units (RU).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A comparison of fluorescent emission at 480 and 535 nm between native CHO cells (A) and cells
expressing Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP (B) or
Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (C). Each graph
depicts raw data obtained from a representative single experiment over
a period of 60 s. The gray line represents emission
measured at 440 nm, and the black line represents emission
measured at 535 nm.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Average results from FRET analysis of
Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP binding to RII·EYFP. Cells
expressing Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP were excited at 440 nm, and
emission was measured at 480 and 535 nm. Results are an average of 18 experiments expressed as the ratio of the relative fluorescence
intensity at 535/480 nm. *, significantly different from Ht31·ECFP + RII·EYFP containing cells; p < 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank
sum test).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
(18). Ro, the critical Forster radius, is the
distance at which FRET is 50% efficient (20). For the ECFP·EYFP
pair, Ro is reported to be 50 Å (19). Thus,
significant energy transfer should only occur between Ht31·ECFP and
RII·EYFP if these two species are ~10-50 Å apart. We observed
energy transfer between Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP; therefore we
can conclude that the Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP expressed in
the CHO cells are sufficiently close for interaction between
these molecules to take place.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Cardiology NB50, Lerner Research Inst., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-444-3734; Fax: 216-444-9263; E-mail: bondm@ccf.org.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Pawson, T.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
Science
278,
2075-2080 2.
Dell'Acqua, M. L.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12881-12884 3.
Tsunoda, S.,
Sierralta, J.,
and Zuker, C. S.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
419-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Rubin, C. S.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1224,
467-479[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ndubuka, C.,
Li, Y.,
and Rubin, C. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7621-7624 6.
Chen, Q.,
Lin, R. Y.,
and Rubin, C. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15247-15257 7.
Yang, J.,
Drazba, J.,
Ferguson, D.,
and Bond, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
511-522 8.
Lester, L. B.,
Langeberg, L. K.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14942-14947 9.
Gao, T.,
Yatani, A.,
Dell'Acqua, M. L.,
Sako, H.,
Green, S. A.,
Dascal, N.,
Scott, J. D.,
and Hosey, M. M.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
185-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Lohmann, S. M.,
DeCamilli, P.,
Einig, I.,
and Walter, U.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
6723-6727 11.
Carr, D. W.,
Stofko-Hahn, R. E.,
Fraser, I. D. C.,
Bishop, S. M.,
Acott, T. S.,
Brennan, R. G.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14188-14192 12.
Carr, D. W.,
Hausken, Z. E.,
Fraser, I. D. C.,
Stofko-Hahn, R. E.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13376-13382 13.
Hauskin, Z. E.,
Coghlan, V. M.,
Hastings, C. A.,
Reimann, E. M.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24245-24251 14.
Newlon, M. G.,
Roy, M.,
Morikis, D.,
Hausken, Z. E.,
Coghlan, V.,
Scott, J. D.,
and Jennings, P. A.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
222-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Benson, R. C.,
Meyer, R. A.,
Zaruba, M. E.,
and McKhann, G. M.
(1979)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
27,
44-48[Abstract]
16.
Miyawaki, A.,
Llopis, J.,
Heim, R.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
Adams, J. A.,
Ikura, M.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1997)
Nature
388,
882-887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Hausken, Z. E.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
986-991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Zakhary, D. R.,
Moravec, C. S.,
Stewart, R. W.,
and Bond, M.
(1999)
Circulation
99,
505-510 19.
Heim, R.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
178-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Wu, P.,
and Brand, L.
(1994)
Anal. Biochem.
218,
1-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Taylor, S. S.,
Buechler, J. A.,
and Yonemoto, W.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59,
971-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Banky, P.,
Huang, L. J. S.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
35048-35055 23.
Newlon, M. G.,
Roy, M.,
Hausken, Z. E.,
Scott, J. D.,
and Jennings, P. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23637-23644 24.
Zhao, J.,
Hoye, E.,
Boylan, S.,
Walsh, D. A.,
and Trewhella, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30448-30459 25.
Romoser, V. A.,
Hinkle, P. M.,
and Persechini, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13270-13274 26.
Mahajan, N. P.,
Linde, K.,
Berry, G.,
Gordon, G. W.,
Heim, R.,
and Herman, B.
(1998)
Nat. Biotechnol.
16,
547-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Pollock, B. A.,
and Heim, R.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
57-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Gordon, G. W.,
Berry, G.,
Liang, X. H.,
Levine, B.,
and Herman, B.
(1998)
Biophys. J.
74,
2702-2713
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Manni, J. H. Mauban, C. W. Ward, and M. Bond Phosphorylation of the cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase (PKA) Regulatory Subunit Modulates PKA-AKAP Interaction, Substrate Phosphorylation, and Calcium Signaling in Cardiac Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 24145 - 24154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Toth, D. Ren, and R. J. Miller Regulation of CXCR4 Receptor Dimerization by the Chemokine SDF-1{alpha} and the HIV-1 Coat Protein gp120: A Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Study J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2004; 310(1): 8 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Luconi, V. Carloni, F. Marra, P. Ferruzzi, G. Forti, and E. Baldi Increased phosphorylation of AKAP by inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase enhances human sperm motility through tail recruitment of protein kinase A J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2004; 117(7): 1235 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Ruehr, M. A. Russell, D. G. Ferguson, M. Bhat, J. Ma, D. S. Damron, J. D. Scott, and M. Bond Targeting of Protein Kinase A by Muscle A Kinase-anchoring Protein (mAKAP) Regulates Phosphorylation and Function of the Skeletal Muscle Ryanodine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24831 - 24836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Oliveria, L. L. Gomez, and M. L. Dell'Acqua Imaging kinase-AKAP79-phosphatase scaffold complexes at the plasma membrane in living cells using FRET microscopy J. Cell Biol., January 2, 2003; 160(1): 101 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Weiss, C. E. Chamberlain, T. Takeda, P. Lin, K. M. Hahn, and M. G. Farquhar Galpha i3 binding to calnuc on Golgi membranes in living cells monitored by fluorescence resonance energy transfer of green fluorescent protein fusion proteins PNAS, December 18, 2001; 98(26): 14961 - 14966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Zakhary, M. A. Fink, M. L. Ruehr, and M. Bond Selectivity and Regulation of A-kinase Anchoring Proteins in the Heart. THE ROLE OF AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION OF THE TYPE II REGULATORY SUBUNIT OF cAMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2000; 275(52): 41389 - 41395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Griesbeck, G. S. Baird, R. E. Campbell, D. A. Zacharias, and R. Y. Tsien Reducing the Environmental Sensitivity of Yellow Fluorescent Protein. MECHANISM AND APPLICATIONS J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2001; 276(31): 29188 - 29194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |