JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruehr, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruehr, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33092-33096, November 12, 1999


Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase Binding to A-kinase Anchoring Proteins in Living Cells by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer of Green Fluorescent Protein Fusion Proteins*

Mary Louise RuehrDagger , Daniel R. ZakharyDagger §, Derek S. Damron, and Meredith BondDagger §parallel

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute,  Center for Anesthesiology Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and § Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44195

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A-kinase anchoring proteins tether cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) to specific subcellular locations. The purpose of this study was to use fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor binding events in living cells between the type II regulatory subunit of PKA (RII) and the RII-binding domain of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein (Ht31), a peptide containing the PKA-binding domain of an A-kinase anchoring protein. RII was linked to enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP), Ht31 was linked to enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP), and these constructs were coexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Upon excitation of the donor fluorophore, Ht31·ECFP, an increase in emission of the acceptor fluorophore, RII·EYFP, and a decrease in emission from Ht31·ECFP were observed. The emission ratio (acceptor/donor) was increased 2-fold (p < 0.05) in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP compared with cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP, the inactive form of Ht31, and RII·EYFP. These results provide the first in vivo demonstration of RII/Ht31 interaction in living cells and confirm previous in vitro findings of RII/Ht31 binding. Using surface plasmon resonance, we also showed that the green fluorescent protein tags did not significantly alter the binding of Ht31 to RII. Thus, fluorescence resonance energy transfer can be used to directly monitor protein-protein interactions of the PKA signaling pathway in living cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

There is now increasing evidence for clustering and compartmentalization of signaling enzymes with their activators and target proteins. This targeting of enzymes with their substrates may promote specificity of signaling events (1-3). To better understand the physiological role of scaffolding proteins, such as A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs),1 which target cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (2, 4), it is essential to monitor in real time the interactions between the components of this signaling complex in living cells. However, to date such measurements have not been reported for the PKA pathway.

AKAPs and PKA co-localize in cells. This was first shown by the redistribution of the type II regulatory (RII) and the catalytic subunits of PKA from the cytosolic to the particulate fraction following overexpression of AKAP75 in HEK293 cells (5). In studies in HEK293 cells, S-AKAP84 targeted RII to mitochondria (6). In rat cardiac myocytes, endogenous AKAP100 co-localized with RII in the region of the junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum/transverse tubule (7). A functional role of AKAP targeting of PKA is further indicated by studies in which Ht31 peptide, a competitive inhibitor of AKAP/PKA binding, was introduced into AKAP-overexpressing cells. For example, transfection of RINm5F pancreatic beta cells with Ht31 caused redistribution of RII from a perinuclear to a diffuse cytoplasmic localization and prevented cAMP-dependent insulin secretion (8). Similarly, in cardiac myocytes transfected with AKAP79, microinjection of Ht31 impaired the PKA-dependent increase in L-type Ca2+ current (9). These studies demonstrate a role for AKAPs in the regulation of PKA distribution and in the specificity of PKA function.

To date, the binding of RII with full-length AKAPs or with the peptide Ht31 has been demonstrated in vitro by RII overlay assay (10-12), by band shift assays on nondenaturing gels (12, 13), by equilibrium dialysis measurements (12, 13), and recently by solution NMR measurements of the N-terminal dimerization domain of RII with Ht31 (14). Equilibrium dialysis measurements (12) and surface plasmon resonance2 showed that Ht31 binds RII with nanomolar affinity. Although these in vitro approaches provide evidence for high affinity RII/AKAP or RII/Ht31 interactions in vitro, the results presented here extend these studies by measuring real-time interactions between these molecules in living cells.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to analyze the interaction between RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP expressed in CHO cells. We used enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) and enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) (16) to construct the fusion proteins, RII·EYFP, Ht31·ECFP, and Ht31P·ECFP (the inactive, prolinated Ht31 analog). A significant increase in RII·EYFP fluorescence emission was observed in cells expressing RII·EYFP/Ht31·ECFP compared with control cells expressing RII·EYFP/Ht31P·ECFP thus demonstrating, for the first time, binding of RII to Ht31, the RII-binding domain of an AKAP, in living cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of Vectors for the Expression of GFP-tagged Proteins-- The cDNAs for RIIalpha , Ht31, and Ht31P were gifts from John Scott (Vollum Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Portland, OR). The construct for Ht31, used in the FRET experiments, encodes residues 418-718 of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein (8). The RII-binding domain, residues 493-515 (12), is included in this peptide. The construct for Ht31P contains residues 418-718 from the same AKAP but with proline substitutions at positions 498 and 507 that prevent Ht31P from binding RII (12). The cDNA encoding ECFP or EYFP (gifts from Roger Tsien, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA) was ligated into EGFP-N1 (CLONTECH) using AgeI and BsrGI to form pECFP or pEYFP, respectively.

The cDNAs for RII, Ht31, or Ht31P were amplified by polymerase chain reaction to remove the stop codon and add restriction enzyme sites for BglII, XhoI, and BamHI. The cDNA encoding Ht31 or Ht31P was excised using BglII and XhoI and ligated into pECFP upstream of ECFP to create pHt31·ECFP or pHt31P·ECFP, respectively. The cDNA encoding RII was excised using XhoI and BamHI and ligated into pEYFP upstream of EYFP to create pRII·EYFP. Thus, ECFP or EYFP was expressed at the C terminus of each of the proteins of interest. Constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

Transfection and Selection of Positive Cells-- CHO cells were stably transfected with pECFP, pEYFP, pHt31·ECFP, or pHt31P·ECFP using Lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were subcultured 1:5 into selection media (0.5 mg/ml G418) 48 h posttransfection. Stable transfectants were amplified and sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis using excitation wavelengths of 410 nm for ECFP-expressing cells and 480 nm for EYFP-expressing cells. For the FRET experiments, cells stably transfected with Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP were plated on 30-mm glass-bottom dishes and then transiently transfected with RII·EYFP using Lipofectin, similar to the methods described by Miyawaki et al. (16) in their FRET study.

Western Blot Analysis-- Western blot analysis was used to verify that transfected CHO cells expressed the appropriate fusion proteins. Adherent cells were released by trypsin-EDTA treatment, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, pelleted, and resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors (30 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 30 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and lysed using a freeze-thaw method. Proteins from the cell lysate (10 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a 10% gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with an anti-GFP antibody (monoclonal, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) that recognizes both ECFP or EYFP mutants. Densitometry was performed using NIH Image Software to determine differences in expression levels of Ht31 and Ht31P and to determine whether equal levels of RII·EYFP were transiently expressed in cells stably expressing Ht31 or Ht31P.

Fluorescence Microscopy-- Cells were plated on glass coverslips to 95% confluency, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and fixed using ice-cold methanol. Cells containing the RII·EYFP fusion protein were viewed directly using a fluorescein isothiocyanate filter. Immunofluorescent techniques were used to view cells expressing ECFP or an ECFP fusion protein. These cells were fixed, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline, and probed with a primary antibody to GFP and a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Coverslips were then mounted onto slides, and cells were viewed using a fluorescein isothiocyanate filter. Although an indirect method was used for viewing ECFP-expressing cells, both methods can identify the location of respective fusion proteins.

Preparation of Recombinant RIIalpha and Synthetic Peptides-- Purified recombinant RIIalpha was prepared as described previously (7). Recombinant RII protein was biotinylated (RIIB) using a BAC-SulfoNHS reaction (Sigma) according to manufacturer's instructions. Ht31 and Ht31P (residues 493-515 of the full-length protein) were biotinylated at the N terminus (Ht31B, Ht31PB) to allow detection of RII binding events2 (17). All peptides were synthesized by the Molecular Biotechnology Core Facility at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

Surface Plasmon Resonance-- Surface plasmon resonance was used to investigate the effects of adding a GFP derivative to the C termini of RII and Ht31. Measurements were taken using the BIAcore 3000 instrument. Streptavidin (SA) sensor chips and HBS buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% Surfactant P20) were purchased from Pharmacia Biosensor AB. The concentration of RII·EYFP in CHO cell lysates was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using purified RII and anti-RII antibody (Upstate Biotechnology) as described previously (18). Samples of RII, RII·EYFP, Ht31·ECFP, or Ht31P·ECFP (analytes) were diluted in HBS buffer. For determining RII/Ht31 and RII·EYFP/Ht31 interactions, samples of RII or RII·EYFP (0.125-1.0 µg/ml) were injected at 25 °C at a flow rate of 10 µl/min over the active SA surface on which Ht31B (ligand) had been immobilized to ~30 response units or over a control surface (control peptide, immobilized Ht31PB).2 For determining Ht31·ECFP/RII interactions, samples of Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP were injected over the active RII surface (immobilized RIIB) or control surface (SA surface blocked with free biotin). In the absence of ECFP, Ht31 or Ht31P peptides are too small to give a significant increase in response units, so we were unable to compare binding of the GFP-tagged Ht31 with the native peptide. Therefore, RII/Ht31 interactions were determined by passing RII over immobilized Ht31B and not vice versa. Flow-rate variation experiments confirmed that both SA surfaces (RIIB and Ht31B) were not limited by mass transport effects. Kinetic constants were calculated by global fitting of the data to a 1:1 Langmuir binding model after subtraction of the control surface, using BIAevaluation software, version 3.0, according to the BIAcore pseudo-first order rate equation as described by Zakhary et al.2

FRET Analysis of Cells That Contain Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP-- FRET experiments were performed 48 h after transient transfection of Ht31- or Ht31P-expressing CHO cells with RII·EYFP. Each experiment was performed on 15-20 cells at ~80% confluency. Fluorescence was observed with an Olympus IX-70 inverted fluorescence microscope and recorded using the Felix software imaging system (Photon Technology International). Using this system, excitation was set by a monochromator to the peak excitation wavelength for ECFP, 440 ± 5 nm (using a 455DCLP dichroic mirror). Emitted light was measured at 480, the peak emission wavelength for ECFP, and at 535 nm (D480/30 and D535/25 emission filters), the peak emission wavelength for EYFP. Background fluorescence was determined for each plate of cells by taking readings in a region of the plate that contained no cells, using the same size field of view. These readings were subtracted from each data point. We did not subtract the autofluorescence from untransfected cells because cell densities differed between dishes. Data were expressed as either the raw fluorescence intensity or as the ratio of fluorescence intensity at 535 nm/480 nm.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression of Fluorescent Fusion Proteins in Transfected CHO Cells-- Western blot analysis was used to verify that transfected CHO cells contained the appropriate fusion proteins (Fig. 1). The presence of immunoreactive bands confirmed that cells expressed either the 65-kDa Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP fusion proteins and/or the 80-kDa RII·EYFP fusion protein. Densitometric scanning of the blots revealed only a 2% difference in expression levels between Ht31·ECFP and Ht31P·ECFP in stably transfected cells (n = 4). Lysate was also collected from five plates of cells that were stably transfected with either Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP and then transiently transfected with RII·EYFP to determine whether cells stably expressing Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP transiently expressed equal levels of RII·EYFP. Proteins from the cell lysate were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and GFP fusion proteins were identified using an anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 1). Densitometric analysis of RII·EYFP revealed that cells stably transfected with Ht31P·ECFP expressed slightly higher levels of RII·EYFP (an 8% difference) than cells stably expressing Ht31·ECFP.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Western blot of Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP fusion proteins expressed in CHO cells. Proteins from the cell lysate were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with anti-GFP antibody. Lanes were loaded from left to right with native CHO cell lysate, CHO cells expressing RII·EYFP, CHO cells expressing Ht31·ECFP, or CHO cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP. Molecular mass markers are on the left. The solid arrow points to RII·EYFP, and the dashed arrow points to Ht31P·ECFP. Bands below these arrows are degradation products.

In addition to Western blot analysis, fluorescence microscopy was used to directly visualize the appropriate fusion protein in the transfected cells. ECFP and EYFP were expressed throughout the cytosol (data not shown). However, RII·EYFP appeared throughout the cytosol and in the perinuclear region (Fig. 2A). Ht31·ECFP-expressing cells showed a similar pattern to those transfected with RII·EYFP but with more fluorescent signal being detected in the cytosol (Fig. 2B). The latter results are similar to the findings of Lester et al. (8), who demonstrated that Ht31 localized to the cytosol of transfected RINm5F cells.


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Subcellular distribution of RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP when expressed in CHO cells. Cells expressing RII·EYFP (A) or Ht31·ECFP (B) were plated, prepared, and viewed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Determination of Kinetic Parameters by Surface Plasmon Resonance-- Equilibrium binding constants (Kd) were determined for the interaction of RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP with their respective binding partners. There was no significant difference in the Kd values for Ht31 and RII (11.0 ± 0.2 × 10-9 M; n = 3) or Ht31 and RII·EYFP (11.6 ± 0.8 × 10-9 M; n = 3). The Kd for Ht31·ECFP binding to RII was 4.3 × 10-9 M. The lower Kd for Ht31·ECFP binding to RII, as compared with the Kd values for interactions between Ht31 and RII or between Ht31 and RII·EYFP, may be due to the different experimental conditions, because Ht31·ECFP binding to RII was measured using an SA surface containing immobilized RII, whereas RII·EYFP/Ht31 binding was measured on an SA surface containing immobilized Ht31. A representative sensorgram of RII·EYFP binding to immobilized Ht31 peptide is shown in Fig. 3. Ht31P·ECFP did not bind RII, indicating that proline substitution of the amphipathic helix disrupts RII interaction with this fusion protein as it does for Ht31P without the ECFP tag (results not shown).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Sensorgram for RII·EYFP binding to immobilized Ht31 peptide. A sample containing RII·EYFP was perfused over immobilized Ht31 peptide at 120 s, and dissociation was achieved by injection of buffer at 300 s. Binding surfaces were regenerated with 10 mM NaOH. This protocol was repeated three times for each concentration (in nM) listed at the right of each curve. Data are expressed in response units (RU).

FRET Analysis of Ht31P·ECFP Interactions with RII·EYFP-- In CHO cells expressing Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP plus RII·EYFP, FRET was observed as a decrease in emission at 480 nm (the peak emission wavelength for ECFP) and as an increase in emission at 535 nm (the peak emission wavelength for EYFP). This indicates that the 480-nm emission from the donor fluorophore (Ht31·ECFP) excited the acceptor fluorophore (RII·EYFP) resulting in an increase in emission at 535 nm. There was a dramatic increase in fluorescence emitted at 535 nm in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP, because the intensity of the 535-nm fluorescence from these cells was 5 times greater than native CHO cells and 2 times greater than control cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (Fig. 4). Emission at 480 nm was reduced by 34% in Ht31·ECFP/RII·EYFP expressing cells when compared with control CHO cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP. Cells expressing RII·EYFP alone displayed background levels of fluorescence when excited at 440 nm, because emission at 480 or 535 nm was reduced by an average of 97 or 84%, respectively, when compared with cells expressing both Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP (data not shown). Interestingly, when cells expressing Ht31·ECFP were excited at 440 nm, emission at 535 nm was only 18% lower than emission from cells expressing Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (data not shown).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A comparison of fluorescent emission at 480 and 535 nm between native CHO cells (A) and cells expressing Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP (B) or Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (C). Each graph depicts raw data obtained from a representative single experiment over a period of 60 s. The gray line represents emission measured at 440 nm, and the black line represents emission measured at 535 nm.

To control for different densities of cells on each plate, the ratio of fluorescence at 535 nm/480 nm was used to compare FRET between cells expressing RII·EYFP and Ht31·ECFP or RII·EYFP and Ht31P·ECFP. The ratio of fluorescence was over 2 times greater in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP compared with cells transfected with Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP (n = 18) (Fig. 5). These results are consistent with the findings of Miyawaki et al. (16) who report an ~1.5-fold ratio increase with the ECFP/EYFP pair when their "yellow cameleon" (ECFP and EYFP linked together with calmodulin and the calmodulin-binding peptide M13) binds Ca2+ in response to addition of ionomycin.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Average results from FRET analysis of Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP binding to RII·EYFP. Cells expressing Ht31·ECFP or Ht31P·ECFP were excited at 440 nm, and emission was measured at 480 and 535 nm. Results are an average of 18 experiments expressed as the ratio of the relative fluorescence intensity at 535/480 nm. *, significantly different from Ht31·ECFP + RII·EYFP containing cells; p < 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank sum test).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our FRET measurements in CHO cells co-transfected with Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP demonstrate a significant increase in energy transfer (i.e. an increase in the 535/480-nm emission ratio) as compared with cells transfected with Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP. The efficiency (E) of FRET decreases with the sixth power of the distance (R) between donor and acceptor according to the relationship, E = (1+(R/Ro)6)-1 (18). Ro, the critical Forster radius, is the distance at which FRET is 50% efficient (20). For the ECFP·EYFP pair, Ro is reported to be 50 Å (19). Thus, significant energy transfer should only occur between Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP if these two species are ~10-50 Å apart. We observed energy transfer between Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP; therefore we can conclude that the Ht31·ECFP and RII·EYFP expressed in the CHO cells are sufficiently close for interaction between these molecules to take place.

N-terminal dimerization of RII is required for RII docking to AKAPs (21, 22) and for RII binding to Ht31 (23). Therefore, our results imply that RII·EYFP associates to form dimers in the CHO cells. Because Ht31 can bind to the N termini of dimerized RII in vitro (23, 24), the ECFP tag at the C terminus of RII should not interfere with AKAP (or Ht31) binding to RII. We tested this hypothesis using surface plasmon resonance. We assessed whether significant changes in Kd occurred as a result of adding a GFP derivative to the C terminus of these molecules. Our results showed that the affinity of RII for Ht31 was not significantly altered by fusion of EYFP to the C terminus of RII. Likewise, taking into consideration that these experiments were performed using two different SA surfaces, the Kd for Ht31·ECFP binding to immobilized RII was similar to that of RII binding to immobilized Ht31. Thus, our results demonstrate that not only can we successfully use FRET to measure the interaction between molecules of RII and the RII-binding domain of AKAPs in intact cells but also that the addition of the 27-kDa ECFP or EYFP fluorescent tag to the C terminus of the expressed proteins does not significantly alter this intercellular interaction. Thus, we can conclude that the C-terminal tag does not affect the interaction between Ht31 and RII.

In previous FRET studies, two different pairs of GFP derivatives were used (25-27). We used the ECFP·EYFP pair rather than enhanced blue fluorescent protein with enhanced GFP. One disadvantage of the ECFP·EYFP pair is that the amplitude of the change in the emission ratio is reduced, compared with the enhanced blue fluorescent protein-enhanced green fluorescent protein pair, because the ECFP emission is relatively broad and overlaps the EYFP emission spectrum (27). However, the ECFP·EYFP pair has improved photostability (16, 19). In our study, overlap of ECFP emission into the EYFP channel, referred to as "cross-talk" by Gordon et al. (28), may account for elevated FRET measurements in cells expressing the negative control Ht31P·ECFP and RII·EYFP or in cells expressing Ht31·ECFP alone. Also, autofluorescence, believed to be primarily from flavoproteins with peak excitation at 488 nm and peak emission at ~520 nm (15), may have contributed to background fluorescence in both the RII·EYFP/Ht31·ECFP and the RII·EYFP/Ht31P·ECFP-expressing cells. Thus, there is likely to be a contribution both from FRET and from autofluorescence to the 535/480-nm emission ratio for both sets of transfected cells.

In summary, the results of this study provide the first direct demonstration of binding of RII to the RII-binding domain of an AKAP in intact cells, thereby demonstrating the physiological relevance of previous measurements of RII/Ht31 interactions performed in vitro (12). Our findings indicate the potential of FRET, between expressed GFP fusion proteins, as a powerful tool for measuring PKA/AKAP interactions in the intracellular environment.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge Dr. Jianjie Ma for helpful discussions and Russ Desnoyer for help in creating the fluorescent protein fusion constructs. We would also like to thank Dr. Dianne Perez for critical review of the manuscript. The Becton-Dickinson FACSVantage used to perform sorting of EYFP-expressing cells was purchased through a generous gift from the Keck Foundation. ECFP-expressing cells were sorted using an Elite ESP at the Cancer Research Center at Case Western Reserve University. Polymerase chain reaction products were sequenced, and peptides were made by the Molecular Biotechnology Core facility at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 HL56256 (to M. B.), T32 DK07678 and F32 HL10273 (to M. L. R.), and F32 HL07653 (to D. R. Z.) and by a beginning grant-in-aid from the Ohio Valley affiliate of the American Heart Association (to D. S. D.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Cardiology NB50, Lerner Research Inst., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-444-3734; Fax: 216-444-9263; E-mail: bondm@ccf.org.

2 Zakhary, D. R., Moravec, C. S., and Bond, M., in press.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AKAP, A-kinase anchoring protein; PKA, cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; RII, type II regulatory subunit of PKA; EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein; ECFP, enhanced cyan fluorescent protein; Ht31, the RII-binding domain of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein; Ht31P, the inactive prolinated form of the RII-binding domain of the human thyroid RII anchoring protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; SA, streptavidin; RIIB, biotinylated RII; Ht31B, biotinylated Ht31; Ht31PB, biotinylated Ht31P; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Pawson, T., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Science 278, 2075-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Dell'Acqua, M. L., and Scott, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12881-12884[Free Full Text]
3. Tsunoda, S., Sierralta, J., and Zuker, C. S. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 419-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Rubin, C. S. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1224, 467-479[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ndubuka, C., Li, Y., and Rubin, C. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7621-7624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Chen, Q., Lin, R. Y., and Rubin, C. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15247-15257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Yang, J., Drazba, J., Ferguson, D., and Bond, M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 511-522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Lester, L. B., Langeberg, L. K., and Scott, J. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 14942-14947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Gao, T., Yatani, A., Dell'Acqua, M. L., Sako, H., Green, S. A., Dascal, N., Scott, J. D., and Hosey, M. M. (1997) Neuron 19, 185-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Lohmann, S. M., DeCamilli, P., Einig, I., and Walter, U. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 6723-6727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Carr, D. W., Stofko-Hahn, R. E., Fraser, I. D. C., Bishop, S. M., Acott, T. S., Brennan, R. G., and Scott, J. D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14188-14192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Carr, D. W., Hausken, Z. E., Fraser, I. D. C., Stofko-Hahn, R. E., and Scott, J. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13376-13382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Hauskin, Z. E., Coghlan, V. M., Hastings, C. A., Reimann, E. M., and Scott, J. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24245-24251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Newlon, M. G., Roy, M., Morikis, D., Hausken, Z. E., Coghlan, V., Scott, J. D., and Jennings, P. A. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 222-227[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Benson, R. C., Meyer, R. A., Zaruba, M. E., and McKhann, G. M. (1979) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 27, 44-48[Abstract]
16. Miyawaki, A., Llopis, J., Heim, R., McCaffery, J. M., Adams, J. A., Ikura, M., and Tsien, R. Y. (1997) Nature 388, 882-887[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Hausken, Z. E., and Scott, J. D. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 986-991[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Zakhary, D. R., Moravec, C. S., Stewart, R. W., and Bond, M. (1999) Circulation 99, 505-510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Heim, R., and Tsien, R. Y. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 178-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Wu, P., and Brand, L. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 218, 1-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Taylor, S. S., Buechler, J. A., and Yonemoto, W. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 971-1005[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Banky, P., Huang, L. J. S., and Taylor, S. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 35048-35055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Newlon, M. G., Roy, M., Hausken, Z. E., Scott, J. D., and Jennings, P. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23637-23644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Zhao, J., Hoye, E., Boylan, S., Walsh, D. A., and Trewhella, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30448-30459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Romoser, V. A., Hinkle, P. M., and Persechini, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13270-13274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Mahajan, N. P., Linde, K., Berry, G., Gordon, G. W., Heim, R., and Herman, B. (1998) Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 547-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Pollock, B. A., and Heim, R. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 9, 57-60[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Gordon, G. W., Berry, G., Liang, X. H., Levine, B., and Herman, B. (1998) Biophys. J. 74, 2702-2713[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Manni, J. H. Mauban, C. W. Ward, and M. Bond
Phosphorylation of the cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase (PKA) Regulatory Subunit Modulates PKA-AKAP Interaction, Substrate Phosphorylation, and Calcium Signaling in Cardiac Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 24145 - 24154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. T. Toth, D. Ren, and R. J. Miller
Regulation of CXCR4 Receptor Dimerization by the Chemokine SDF-1{alpha} and the HIV-1 Coat Protein gp120: A Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Study
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2004; 310(1): 8 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Luconi, V. Carloni, F. Marra, P. Ferruzzi, G. Forti, and E. Baldi
Increased phosphorylation of AKAP by inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase enhances human sperm motility through tail recruitment of protein kinase A
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2004; 117(7): 1235 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. L. Ruehr, M. A. Russell, D. G. Ferguson, M. Bhat, J. Ma, D. S. Damron, J. D. Scott, and M. Bond
Targeting of Protein Kinase A by Muscle A Kinase-anchoring Protein (mAKAP) Regulates Phosphorylation and Function of the Skeletal Muscle Ryanodine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24831 - 24836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
S. F. Oliveria, L. L. Gomez, and M. L. Dell'Acqua
Imaging kinase-AKAP79-phosphatase scaffold complexes at the plasma membrane in living cells using FRET microscopy
J. Cell Biol., January 2, 2003; 160(1): 101 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. S. Weiss, C. E. Chamberlain, T. Takeda, P. Lin, K. M. Hahn, and M. G. Farquhar
Galpha i3 binding to calnuc on Golgi membranes in living cells monitored by fluorescence resonance energy transfer of green fluorescent protein fusion proteins
PNAS, December 18, 2001; 98(26): 14961 - 14966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. R. Zakhary, M. A. Fink, M. L. Ruehr, and M. Bond
Selectivity and Regulation of A-kinase Anchoring Proteins in the Heart. THE ROLE OF AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION OF THE TYPE II REGULATORY SUBUNIT OF cAMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE
J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2000; 275(52): 41389 - 41395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Griesbeck, G. S. Baird, R. E. Campbell, D. A. Zacharias, and R. Y. Tsien
Reducing the Environmental Sensitivity of Yellow Fluorescent Protein. MECHANISM AND APPLICATIONS
J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2001; 276(31): 29188 - 29194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruehr, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruehr, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.