![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33097-33104, November 12, 1999
From the § Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto
and the Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
Numb is a membrane-associated, phosphotyrosine
binding (PTB) domain-containing protein that functions as an intrinsic
determinant of cell fate during Drosophila development. We
have identified four isoforms of mammalian Numb with predicted
molecular masses of 65, 66, 71, and 72 kDa that are generated by
alternative splicing of the Numb mRNA. The different isoforms
result from the presence of two sequence inserts within the PTB domain
and the central region of the protein. The endogenous expression
pattern of these isoforms, examined using specific antisera, varied in
different tissues and cell lines. In addition, differentiation of P19
cells with retinoic acid leads to the specific loss of expression of the 71- and 72-kDa Numb proteins, suggesting that the expression of
certain forms of Numb protein is regulated in a cell type-specific manner.
Expression of Numb proteins fused to green fluorescent protein revealed
that the form of the PTB domain with the alternatively spliced insert
constitutively associated with the plasma membrane in polarized
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. In contrast, the isoform without the
insert was cytoplasmic, suggesting that different PTB domain isoforms
may regulate the subcellular localization of Numb proteins. The
membrane localization may be due, in part, to differential affinity for
acidic phospholipids. The distinct expression and localization patterns
of the different mammalian Numb isoforms suggest that they have
distinct functional properties.
The numb gene in Drosophila affects binary
cell fate decisions of cells in the peripheral and central nervous
system, as well as muscle cells during development (1-5).
Drosophila Numb is a membrane-associated protein expressed
in progenitor cells of these lineages. During cell division,
Drosophila Numb asymmetrically localizes and subsequently
segregates to one daughter cell, where it functions as an intrinsic
determinant of cell fate (6-9). Evidence suggests that in
Drosophila, Numb proteins influence cell fate by inhibiting
the action of Notch by an unknown mechanism (3, 10, 12).
The mammalian homologue of Numb
(mNumb)1 has been cloned (13,
14), and ectopic expression of mNumb in Drosophila produces a phenotype similar to that produced by ectopic expression of Drosophila Numb (13, 14). In the mouse embryo, Numb is
expressed in all layers of the developing cortical plate, including the progenitor cells of the ventricular and subventricular zones. In these
cells, mNumb is asymmetrically localized during cell division (13),
suggesting that it may have a role in cell fate decisions in the
mammalian nervous system. However, mNumb is also expressed in most
adult tissues, and its expression is widespread in mouse embryos, so it
is likely that Numb function is not limited to neurogenesis (13, 14).
Although the function of mNumb in mammals is still unclear, the
identification of a conserved chicken Numb protein that is
asymmetrically localized in neuroepithelial cells of the chicken
telencephalon and inhibits the repression of neuronal
differentiation by chicken Notch suggests that Numb function in
vertebrates may be similar to its function in Drosophila (15).
Structurally, Numb resembles an adaptor or scaffold protein and is
involved in bringing together multiple proteins into a functional unit
or pathway. It possesses an amino-terminal phosphotyrosine binding
(PTB) domain (16), a proline-rich carboxyl-terminal region (PRR)
containing several putative Src homology 3 domain-binding sites (14),
and an Eps15 homology (EH) domain-binding motif (17). The PTB domain
was first described in the adaptor protein SHC, where it functions to
mediate phosphotyrosine-dependent interactions with growth
factor receptors and downstream effectors (18-22). Based on sequence
similarity, PTB domains have been identified in a diverse group of
proteins of which only a subset are linked to tyrosine kinase-mediated
signaling (16). Functional analysis of the binding specificity of PTB
domains in molecules including Numb, mDab1, X11, and FE65 has shown
that high affinity ligands for these domains are not limited to
phosphorylated tyrosine-containing sequences (23-28). In addition to
the association with specific peptide ligands, some PTB domains, such
as those of SHC and mDab-1, also have the capacity to interact with
phospholipids (28, 29).
Based on recent structure analysis, it has been suggested that the
Drosophila Numb PTB domain can bind multiple,
conformationally distinct peptide ligands (30, 31). Both of the peptide
ligands of the Numb PTB domain that have been identified to date The carboxyl-terminal region of Numb contains an EH domain-binding
motif that interacts with the tyrosine kinase substrate, Eps15 (17, 33,
34). EH-domain containing proteins such as Eps15 and Eps15R are
involved in processes connected with receptor-mediated endocytosis,
organization of the actin cytoskeleton, and possibly other mechanisms
involved in sorting molecules within the cell (35-40). The EH
domain-binding motif, like the PTB domain, is conserved in vertebrate
Numb, the related mammalian protein Numblike (Nbl), and the
Drosophila Numb protein, suggesting that the interaction in
the EH domain-containing proteins is functionally relevant. In
vitro, the Src homology 3 domain of Src binds to Numb, an
interaction that is likely mediated by one of the putative Src homology
3-binding motifs within the central region of the protein
(PXXP (14)). Thus, Numb contains multiple regions that can
mediate its interaction with other proteins.
Previous characterization of mammalian Numb protein expression
suggested that there may be Numb-related gene products or modified forms of Numb, because at least two proteins of different molecular weights are detected by anti-Numb antisera. (13, 14). In addition, two
different sequences of mammalian Numb have been published (13, 14, 17,
41) that differ by the presence or absence of an 11-amino acid insert
within the PTB domain. Here, we describe the cloning and
characterization of four different mouse Numb isoforms. Two of these
represent the already described isoforms that vary in the PTB domain
sequence, and the other two represent novel sequences encoding Numb
proteins with an additional 49-amino acid insert in the central
proline-rich region. Using isoform-specific antisera, we show that the
Numb protein isoforms are differentially expressed in mouse tissues and
cell lines. Furthermore, we show that the insert in the PTB domain may
be an important determinant in the localization of Numb to the plasma membrane.
Antibodies--
Numb- and Nbl-specific antisera were generated
in rabbits immunized with peptides corresponding to different regions
of Numb or Nbl, conjugated to KLH as follows: anti-PRRi,
PVAMPVRETNPWAHAPDC; anti-PRRo, PQSPTFQGTEWGQS; anti-PTBi,
KAERKFFKGFFGKTGKK; anti-PTBo, DAVKRLKATGKKAVKW; anti-Nb-A,
TTHPHQSPSLAKQQTFPQYE; and anti-Nbl-1, CFWNGGPRRPDQHLSPAP. The crude
serum was affinity-purified using GST fusion proteins of the
corresponding regions of Numb: NbPTBi, NbPTBo, NbPRRi, or NbPRRo. The
anti-Numb antibody, anti-Nb-C, recognizing the carboxyl-terminal 15 amino acids of Numb, has been described previously (14). Commercially
available antibodies, anti-E-cadherin (Transduction Laboratories), and
anti-GST (Santa Cruz) were used according to the manufacturers' protocols.
Cloning of Mouse Numb cDNAs--
To obtain mouse Numb
cDNA, a mouse day 11 embryonic cDNA library was amplified by
PCR using the following primers: 5' primer, AAG TTA ACA TGA ACA AAC TAC
GGC; and 3' primer, ACT GCC TAA AGT TCT ATT TCA AAT G. The PCR products
were cloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen) and then subcloned into the
expression plasmid pcDNA3.1/Zeo+ (Invitrogen). The DNA sequence of
the inserts in individual plasmids was determined.
Immunoprecipitations and Western Blotting--
Cell lysates were
prepared from cultured cells (MDCK, A431, P19, NIH 3T3, or N2A) grown
to 75-90% confluence on 10-cm tissue culture dishes. Following two
washes with cold phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were scraped into
1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM NaF, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and protease inhibitors (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals)), and centrifuged at 14,000 × g to
pellet the insoluble matter. For each immunoprecipitation, 0.5-1.0 mg
or the indicated volume was made up to 1 ml with HNTG-ZE lysis buffer
(50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 100 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors) and incubated with
antibody at 4 °C for 2-4 h. The immune complex was bound to protein
A-Sepharose beads, washed three times with cold HNTG-ZE, and eluted by
boiling in SDS sample buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-P), and
immunoblotted with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Bound
antibodies were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
protein A (Bio-Rad) or goat anti-mouse in conjunction with the ECL
system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Transfections--
293T cells were grown to 50-70% confluence
on 10-cm dishes. 1 µg of DNA was added to the cells with 8 µg of
LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) in Opti-MEM (Life Technologies,
Inc). Following incubation at 37 °C for 4 h, the
DNA-LipofectAMINE solution was replaced with Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium containing 10% serum. Cells were lysed 24-36 h
posttransfection. For transfection of MDCK cells with pEGFP, cells were
grown to 70% confluence in six-well plates and incubated with 1 µg
of DNA plus 24 µg of LipofectAMINE in Opti-MEM overnight. Following a
brief wash, cells were gently trypsinized, reseeded onto filters
(Falcon brand Cell Culture Insert, 0.4 µm pore size, polyethylene
terephthalate (P.E.T). track-etched membrane, Becton Dickinson
Labware), and grown for a further 24 h in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium + 10% fetal bovine serum before visualization or
fixation. In some cases, MDCK cells grown on glass coverslips were
similarly transfected without subsequent reseeding onto filters. The
expression of full-length fusion proteins was verified by Western
blotting transfected MDCK cell lysates with anti-GFP.
Lipid Vesicle Precipitation--
GST fusion proteins were
prepared as described above without the use of detergent. The bound
proteins were eluted with 10 mM glutathione in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, immediately diluted into Buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol), and concentrated by nitrogen
pressure through a 30-kDa cutoff amicon filter to 0.1 mg/ml. Lipid
stock solutions were prepared in the commercially recommended solvent
and combined as follows in Pyrex test tubes: 100% dimyristoyl
phosphatidylcholine (PC) (Sigma), 95% PC + 5% dipalmitoyl
phosphatidylserine (PS) (Sigma) (w/w), 90% PC + 5% PS + 5%
L- "Fat Western"--
A modification of the protocol described
in Stevenson et al. (42) was used to examine qualitative
differences in binding of NbPTBi and NbPTBo to phospholipids
immobilized on a membrane support. Phospholipids were prepared in
methanol and/or chloroform, and 0.1-2.5 µg in 5 µl was spotted
onto dry Immobilon-P. The membrane was dried for 30 min, blocked for
1 h at room temperature with TBST+ bovine serum albumin (3% fatty
acid-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 140 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, 1 mM dithiothreitol), and then incubated with GST fusion proteins (3 µg in
5 ml of bovine serum albumin blocking solution) overnight at 4 °C.
Following three 5-min washes with TBST, bound proteins were identified
by Western blotting with anti-GST.
MDCK Subcellular Fractionation--
MDCK cells, grown to 80%
confluence on 10-cm plates, were washed once each with cold
phosphate-buffered saline followed by cold hypo-lysis buffer (10 mM MES, pH 6.5, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
MgCl2, protease inhibitors). Cells from four plates were
scraped into hypo-lysis buffer (0.5 ml per plate), combined, and
homogenized by 25 strokes of a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer. This
resulted in greater than 95% disruption of cell membranes, as
determined by Typan blue uptake. Nuclei and large membrane sheets were
pelleted by centrifuging at 500 × g (P1). This P1
pellet was washed once with hypo-lysis buffer containing 140 mM NaCl and recentrifuged. The supernatants were combined
and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h, resulting
in pellet P2 and a cytosolic fraction. All pellets were solubilized in
HNTG-ZE and cleared by centrifugation. The cytosolic fraction was
supplemented with 10% glycerol and 1% Triton X-100. The equivalent of
one plate was used for each immunoprecipitation.
cDNA Constructs and Mutagenesis--
All wild-type cDNA
constructs were generated by PCR amplification of either rat or mouse
Numb cDNA template and ligated into the indicated expression
vector. Numb PTB mutants were made by PCR-directed mutagenesis. The
following constructs were used in this study: pGEX NbPTBi and pEGFP
NbPTBi, which encode amino acids 13-172 of Numb; pGEX NbPTBo and pEGFP
NbPTBo, which encode amino acids 13-161; pEGFP Numb, which encodes
full-length rat Numb (p67 isoform); and pEGFP Nbl PTB, which encodes
amino acids 54-202 of Nbl. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Imaging of GFP Fusion Proteins in MDCK Cells--
Polarized MDCK
cells transiently transfected with pEGFP constructs were examined using
either a Leica DMR fluorescence microscope or a Leica TCS 4D confocal
microscope. Cells were examined either living or following fixation
with 4% paraformaldehyde, with no observable differences. To examine
actin cytoskeleton, fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton
X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min followed by incubation
with alexa594-phalloidin (25 µl/ml in phosphate-buffered saline
containing 10% normal goat serum and 3% bovine serum albumin;
Molecular Probes) for 1 h.
P19 Cell Differentiation--
Neural differentiation of P19
embryonic carcinoma cells was carried out by treatment of aggregated
cells with retinoic acid essentially as described by McBurney et
al. (11) Briefly, following 2 days treatment of P19 cells with 300 nM retinoic acid, cells were trypsinized and replated onto
bacteriological grade plastic for 3 days with continued retinoic acid
treatment. The resulting cell aggregates were replated onto tissue
culture dishes without retinoic acid and grown for a further 1-4 days
in normal medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium + 10% fetal
bovine serum).
GST Fusion Proteins and in Vitro Binding Experiments--
GST
fusion proteins were produced and purified as described previously
(23). Immobilized purified fusions were incubated with cell lysates
prepared as described above. Protein complexes were washed and resolved
by SDS-PAGE.
Identification of Four Isoforms of Mammalian Numb--
In order to
identify additional Numb mRNA species, PCR was used to amplify Numb
cDNAs from a mouse embryo cDNA library, and the resulting
products were sequenced. Four cDNAs were identified that differ
from each other by the presence or absence of two sequence inserts
encoding an 11-amino acid insert in the PTB region (denoted by PTBi),
identical to that which had been previously reported in rat and human
(14, 17), and a novel 49-amino acid insert within the central region of
the protein adjacent to the proline-rich region (denoted by PRRi) (Fig.
1). These four different cDNA
products encode proteins with predicted molecular masses of 65, 66, 71, and 72 kDa. Analysis of the mouse Numb genomic structure indicates that
the 11- and 49-amino acid insert sequences are encoded by single
exons,2 and therefore, the
different cDNAs likely represent alternatively spliced mRNA
species. In addition, the human Numb gene appears to have a similar
genomic organization to that of the mouse gene, and a sequence encoding
the central 49-amino acid insert can be found within the reported
sequence of the human Numb gene (GenBankTM accession no.
AF109907). This insert was not previously identified as a coding
sequence presumably because the exons were identified based on
comparison with the sequence of the previously published Numb
cDNA.
Antibodies were generated against peptides corresponding to unique
regions within the inserts (PTBi and PRRi) or regions corresponding to
novel epitopes generated by the juxtaposition of amino acids adjacent
to the inserts (PTBo and PRRo) (see Fig. 1). The specificity of the
Numb isoform antibodies was determined by testing their ability to
specifically recognize ectopically expressed Numb proteins. To this
end, the four cDNA isoforms were individually cloned into the
mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1 and transiently expressed in
293T cells. Western blot analysis of total cell lysates demonstrated that anti-Nb-C recognizes all four of the Numb proteins, whereas the
isoform-specific antibodies recognize only the expected protein products (Fig. 2). Antisera against the
PTBi sequence recognized only the p66 and p72 proteins, anti-PTBo
recognizes only the p65 and p71 forms, and anti-PRRi recognizes p71 and
p72, as expected. The anti-PRRo antibody reacted most strongly with p65
and p66; however, weak cross-reactivity with p71 and p72 forms was
detectable.
The panel of Numb antibodies was used to examine the expression of Numb
protein isoforms in mouse tissue lysates (Fig.
3A). Fig. 3A, top
panel, shows the expression of all of the Numb protein isoforms,
as well as the related Nbl gene product, as determined by
immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with anti-Nb-C, which recognizes all of these proteins. Fig. 3A, lower panels,
represent duplicate samples that have been blotted with the
isoform-specific antibodies. This experiment demonstrates that the
variable pattern of Numb-C reactive proteins is related to the
differential expression of the Numb protein isoforms. Proteins lacking
the PTB domain insert, p65 and p71, were expressed in all tissues,
whereas the isoforms with the PTB insert were largely restricted to the
lung, with small amounts expressed in the brain, thymus, and embryo, and none in testis. Conversely, isoforms containing the PRR insert, p71
and p72, were primarily restricted to the testis, with very small
amounts seen in lung, thymus, and embryo. Based on these results, we
can confirm that p65, p66, and p71 are all expressed in
vivo. However, because of the low abundance of the PRRi isoforms, particularly in brain and lung, the unequivocal identification of the
72-kDa (PTBi/PRRi) isoform could not be made.
We also examined the expression of Numb proteins in several mammalian
cell lines (Fig. 3B). In these experiments, anti-Nb-A was
used to examine total Numb expression (Fig. 3B, top panel) because this antibody, unlike anti-Nb-C, has minimal cross-reactivity with Nbl, which is expressed in many tissue culture cell lines (Fig.
3B, bottom panel). A variable expression pattern of all four
Numb proteins was observed, and expression of p72 was confirmed in
several cell lines (Fig. 3B, second panel from top). All
cell lines examined expressed isoforms containing the PTB insert, and all except NIH 3T3 cells expressed isoforms containing the PRR insert.
In contrast, the p65 isoform, which does not contain an insert in
either region, was found predominantly in the neuroblastoma N2A cell line.
Numb Isoforms Are Differentially Expressed during P19 Cell
Differentiation--
Expression of the Numb protein isoforms
containing the PRR insert (p71 and p72) was limited to mouse tissues
containing actively dividing and differentiating cells (testis and
embryo), whereas they are present in the majority of transformed cell
lines, suggesting that expression of these isoforms may be correlated
with cell proliferation or differentiation status. We investigated this further by examining Numb expression during the course of
differentiation of P19 cells to postmitotic neurons (Fig.
4). Exponentially growing P19 cells were
aggregated in the presence of retinoic acid, which results in
differentiation into cells that resemble postmitotic neurons, glia, and
fibroblast-like cells following replating (days 6-9). Fig. 4,
top panel, shows the expression of all Numb isoforms during
the course of differentiation. A marked decline in the p71 and p72
isoforms (PRR insert present), as detected by anti-Nb-C, was observed,
suggesting that the p71 and p72 Nb isoform expression is down-regulated
during differentiation. This was confirmed by immunoprecipitation with
anti-Nb-C followed by Western blotting with anti-PRRi (Fig. 4,
second panel from top). Over the course of differentiation,
increased expression of Nbl was detected at day 5, when the cell
aggregates were replated. This is consistent with previous work
suggesting that Nbl is expressed primarily in postmitotic cells of the
nervous system and our own results showing the Nbl expression is
restricted to the adult brain in the mouse (Ref. 43 and Fig.
3A).
The Numb PTBi Domain Localizes to the Plasma
Membrane--
Structure-function analysis of Drosophila
Numb has indicated that the amino-terminal region, including part of
the PTB domain, is sufficient to direct its membrane localization (12,
44). This amino-terminal region is not conserved in the mammalian Numb proteins. However, it has been reported that mammalian Numb localizes to the plasma membrane (43). Because the PTB domain of the SHC protein
has been shown to direct constitutive membrane localization, we have
tested whether in mammalian Numb the PTB domain also mediates this
function. GFP fusions with the Numb PTBi and PTBo forms of the domain
were expressed in MDCK cells, and their subcellular localization was
examined (Fig. 5). Cells were seeded on
filters 24 h posttransfection, and GFP fluorescence was observed
12-24 h later. GFP alone was distributed diffusely throughout the
cytosol and within the nucleus (Fig. 5D). However, when GFP
was fused to NbPTBi, fluorescence was distinctly localized to the
plasma membrane (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the PTB domain
functioned to relocalize GFP. The GFP-NbPTBo fusion protein
fluorescence appeared similar to GFP alone and was predominantly
localized in the cytosol and nucleus with no obvious recruitment to the plasma membrane (Fig. 5B). The related Nbl PTB domain is
most similar to PTBo, because it does not contain a sequence similar to
the 11-amino acid insert (43). Like the localization of GFP-PTBo, GFP-Nbl PTB was also cytosolic when expressed in MDCK cells (Fig. 5C), suggesting that relocalization of GFP to the plasma
membrane is a specific property of the PTBi form. Confocal microscopy
of polarized MDCK cells confirmed that GFP-PTBi is localized primarily at the plasma membrane, whereas GFP-PTBo was observed throughout the
cytosol and nucleus (Fig. 6). A
full-length Numb protein (p67) with the PTBi domain (GFP-NbFull) also
localized to the plasma membrane, demonstrating that targeting by the
PTBi domain is also functional in the full-length protein (Fig. 6). A
similar distribution of full-length Numb isoforms was observed when
they were transiently overexpressed in MDCK cells and visualized by
immunohistochemistry (data not shown). We also tested whether the
observed localization of the PTBi domain to the plasma membrane could
involve a specific interaction of the PTBi domain with the cortical
actin cytoskeleton. However, treatment of MDCK cells expressing
GFP-NbPTBi with cytochalasin D, which has marked effects on the actin
cytoskeleton, does not affect membrane localization of the PTBi domain,
arguing against the former possibility (data not shown).
To determine whether the two PTB domain isoforms, in the context of the
full-length protein, function to localize the endogenous Numb proteins,
subcellular fractionation of MDCK cells was performed. Crude fractions
of subconfluent (80%) MDCK cells were prepared, providing three
fractions: P1, a low-speed pellet containing the majority of plasma
membrane (as determined by the presence of the integral membrane
proteins E-cadherin and Na+/K+ ATPase); P2, a
high speed pellet that also contained plasma membrane; and S, a
cytosolic fraction. Numb proteins were found both in the cytosol and in
the plasma membrane (Fig. 7, top
panel). Using PTBi- and PTBo-specific antibodies to distinguish
proteins containing the two PTB isoforms, the PTBi forms (p66 and p72)
were found to be more predominant in the P1 plasma membrane containing
fraction, although they were also present to some extent in the
cytosolic fraction (Fig. 7, second panel from top). The
PTBo-containing isoform (Fig. 7, third panel from top),
which is much less abundant, is uniformly distributed. These results
are in keeping with the results obtained with truncated GFP-PTB domain
constructs, suggesting that the PTBi domain directs the constitutive
membrane localization of the p66 and p72 forms of Numb.
Both Numb PTB Domain Isoforms Bind LNX and Acidic
Phospholipids--
It is possible that the 11-amino acid insert
modifies the PTB domain binding specificity such that, unlike PTBo, it
can interact with unique targets localized at the plasma membrane and
thus be retained there. Therefore, we investigated the ability of the PTBi and PTBo domains to interact with the known Numb PTB domain protein target LNX. Previously, we reported that the PTBi domain interacts with an NPXY sequence motif in the PDZ domain-containing protein LNX (23). We examined the ability of LNX to interact with the
PTBo form of the Numb PTB domain (Fig.
8A) and found that both forms
of the PTB domain bind efficiently to LNX in vitro. This
suggests that binding of LNX alone is not sufficient to explain the
differential localization of the Numb proteins.
Another mechanism that might mediate the localization of the Numb PTBi
domain to the plasma membrane, independent of peptide binding, is an
interaction of the PTB domain with membrane phospholipids like that
reported for the PTB domain of SHC (29, 45). Therefore, we tested the
ability of the Numb PTB domains to bind acidic phospholipids. Fig.
8B shows results from experiments in which the indicated acidic phospholipids were incorporated into small, unilamellar vesicles; mixed with purified GST fusions of PTBi, PTBo, and GST alone;
and then pelleted. The amount of fusion protein precipitated with the
vesicles is an indication of the ability of the protein to bind the
phospholipid. Both PTB domains bound to phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate-containing vesicles more efficiently than vesicles containing only the base lipid, 5% phosphatidylserine/95%
phosphatidylcholine. However, PTBi was pelleted more efficiently than
PTBo by phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate-containing vesicles (Fig.
8B). GST alone did not bind significantly to any of the
lipids tested (data not shown). To confirm the association of the Numb
PTB domains with phospholipid, a modified far Western protocol was
employed (fat Western) (42, 46) in which the phospholipids of interest
were spotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and then blotted
with GST-PTBi, GST-PTBo, or GST alone. Bound proteins were then
identified using anti-GST antibodies (Fig. 7B). Both PTBi
and PTBo domains exhibited relatively nonselective binding to a number
of phospholipids in this assay. However, in agreement with the vesicle
pull-down experiments, the Numb PTBi showed greater binding to PI(4)P
than did Numb PTBo. GST alone did not bind detectably to any of the
phospholipids in this assay.
Conserved Numb genes have been identified in many vertebrate
species, including mouse, rat, chicken, and human. Previous reports of
the Numb protein sequence from rat, mouse, and human revealed that
there was an 11-amino acid sequence present in the rat form and one of
the identified human forms that was not present in mouse Numb, even
though these proteins are more than 90% identical overall (13, 14,
17). We have shown that this sequence difference is likely the result
of alternative splicing of the mNumb messenger RNA and that the
corresponding protein products are expressed in all of these species.
Furthermore, we have identified cDNAs encoding two previously
unidentified isoforms of mammalian Numb with a 49-amino acid sequence
inserted in the central region of the protein. The predicted molecular
masses of the four proteins encoded by the cloned cDNAs are 65, 66, 71, and 72 kDa, which likely account for the multiple anti-Numb
reactive bands we and others have previously observed in a number of
cell lines and tissues (13, 14, 23). The cloned cDNAs are expressed
in vivo because we have identified the protein products
directly in mouse tissues and in human, mouse, and rat cell lines using isoform-specific antibodies.
The expression pattern of the Numb proteins varies dramatically between
different tissues and cultured cell lines. The functional relevance of
this is unknown. However, it suggests that the Numb isoforms may have
different functions in different cell types. Not only do the 71- and
72-kDa isoforms containing the insert in the central region of the
protein (PRRi) exhibit relatively restricted expression in primarily
mouse tissues, but we observed that their expression declines following
retinoic acid-induced differentiation of P19 cells. This suggests that
71- and 72-kDa isoforms may have distinct functional properties related
to cellular proliferation or differentiation. Additional studies on the
effects of deregulated expression and investigation of the binding
properties of the inserted 49-amino acid sequence may reveal the
functional properties of these isoforms.
The amino-terminal region of the Numb protein contains an amino acid
sequence with homology to the PTB domains of molecules such as SHC,
FE65, X11, and Disabled (16). The role of these domains in mediating
protein-protein interactions is well established, and therefore, this
region of Numb represents a potential site for the interaction of Numb
with molecules required for its specific localization or its signaling
properties. Indeed structure-function analysis of the
Drosophila Numb protein demonstrated that the PTB domain is
essential for Numb function as a cell fate determinant (12, 25).
Drosophila Numb is constitutively localized to the plasma
membrane, and sequences that mediate this function include amino acids
in the amino terminus, as well as part of the PTB domain (12, 44).
However, this amino-terminal region is not conserved in the mammalian
Numb proteins, although they have been reported to be
membrane-associated (43). We have shown that mammalian Numb proteins
contain either of two forms of the PTB domain, and the presence of the
11-amino acid sequence in the PTBi forms of the PTB domain promotes
localization to the plasma membrane. This suggests that for some forms
of mNumb, membrane association involves the PTB domain and that the
mammalian and Drosophila Numb proteins are localized to the
membrane by different mechanisms.
There is precedent for the role of certain PTB domains in mediating the
constitutive plasma membrane localization of signaling proteins. For
example, the PTB domain of SHC binds both specific phosphopeptide
targets, as well as associating with phospholipids (45). Furthermore,
phospholipid binding correlates with the ability of the domain to
target SHC to the plasma membrane (29). It has been proposed that the
binding of the SHC PTB domain to acidic phospholipids mediates the
constitutive association of SHC with the membrane and facilitates the
recruitment of SHC to an activated receptor, where a high affinity
peptide ligand would displace the bound phospholipid. The PTB domain of
mDab1 also binds phospholipids. However, in contrast to SHC, the mDab1
PTB domain appears to be able to interact simultaneously with both peptides and phospholipids (28).
The region of Numb encompassing the PTB domain insert, and the insert
itself, is rich in basic residues, a property often associated with
proteins that bind membrane lipids. Furthermore, specific arginine and
lysine residues within the PTB domain of SHC are involved in both
binding to acidic phospholipids and membrane localization (29).
Therefore, we tested whether the presence of the four positively
charged residues in the PTB insert could increase the relative affinity
of that PTB domain for membrane lipids, and hence, its association with
membranes compared with that without the insert. We compared the
ability of the Numb PTB domain isoforms to bind acidic phospholipids
and found that both the PTBi and PTBo domains exhibit promiscuous
binding to most of the acidic phospholipids tested. However, in both of
the assays that we used, the Numb PTBi domain appeared to have a
greater affinity for PI(4)P, when compared with PTBo. Given that both PTBi and PTBo bind several abundant membrane phospholipids, it is
unlikely that the small difference in PI(4)P binding is sufficient to
explain the striking difference in the subcellular localization of
these two proteins. Therefore, the localization of the Numb PTBi
isoforms may involve more complicated mechanisms, in which phospholipid
binding could promote targeting of Numb to a membrane region where it
could be retained by a specific protein target.
The insertion of the 11 amino acids within the PTB domain could alter
the folding of the domain and change its binding specificity. The
structures of several PTB domains, including the PTB domain of
Drosophila Numb bound to a high affinity ligand, have been solved (30, 45, 47, 48). Structure-based sequence alignments of the
mammalian Numb PTB domains indicate that the insert region of Numb PTBi
would reside between the We thank Margaret Henry and Martin Bissessar
for technical help, the Amgen Bolder peptide synthesis group and
Marynette Rhynak for help with anti-peptide antiserum, Terry
Kubiseski for advice on the lipid binding assays, and Daniela
Rotin for comments on the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of
Canada, with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society, and by the Medical
Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF169191, AF169192, and AF170709.
¶
Research Scientist of the National Cancer Institute of Canada
supported by the Canadian Cancer Society. To whom correspondence should
be addressed: The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre,
The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto,
Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. Tel.: 416-813-8657; Fax: 416-813-8456;
E-mail: jmcglade@sickkids.on.ca.
2
M. B. French and C. J. McGlade,
unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
mNumb, mammalian
Numb;
Nbl, Numblike;
PTB, phosphotyrosine binding;
EH, Eps15 homology;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
PTBi, PTB domain with the alternatively spliced
insert;
PTBo, PTB domain without the alternatively spliced insert;
PRR, proline-rich carboxyl-terminal region;
PRRi, proline-rich
carboxyl-terminal region with the alternatively spliced insert. PRRo,
proline-rich carboxyl-terminal region without the alternatively spliced
insert;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine
kidney;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PI(4)P, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate;
MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethane-sulfonic acid.
Characterization of Four Mammalian Numb Protein Isoforms
IDENTIFICATION OF CYTOPLASMIC AND MEMBRANE-ASSOCIATED VARIANTS
OF THE PHOSPHOTYROSINE BINDING DOMAIN*
,
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
the
putative serine/threonine kinase NAK and the PDZ domain-containing
protein LNX
interact with Numb in a phosphotyrosine-independent manner (23, 32). In vitro, the vertebrate Numb PTB domain has been reported to mediate the interaction of Numb with the intracellular domain of Notch, presumably in a phosphotyrosine-independent manner, although the specific sequences involved in the interaction have not
been elucidated (13, 15).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate sodium salt from
bovine brain (Sigma), or 5%
L-
-phosphatidyl-D-myo-inositol 4-phosphate
(PI4P) diammonium salt from bovine brain (Calbiochem). These were dried
under argon and resuspended in Buffer B (180 mM sucrose, 20 mM NaCl, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) to a final lipid concentration
of 10 mg/ml. Small unilamellar vesicles were prepared by freeze-thawing
three times followed by extrusion through a 0.1 µm filter 10 times.
The experiment was carried out by combining 50 µl of lipid vesicles,
25 µl of fusion protein, and 75 µl of Buffer A (containing 0.1%
gelatin). After 5 min at room temperature, the lipid-protein mixture
was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min. Proteins
bound to the lipid vesicles were quantified by solubilizing the pellet
in SDS sample buffer and separation by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and visualized by
Western blotting with anti-GST (1:1000 dilution).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The predicted amino acid sequence of the four
mouse Numb isoforms. A, the amino acid sequence of the
largest mouse Numb isoform, which contains both sequence inserts, is
shown. The insert in the PTB domain (boxed region) is
indicated by the white lettering on a black
background. The PRR insert is indicated by the shaded
region. B, schematic representation of the four Numb
isoforms showing the presence or absence of the PTB insert (black
box in the PTB domain) and the PRR insert (speckled
box). Also shown are the regions of Numb to which the anti-Numb
antibodies used in this study are directed (amino acid sequences of the
peptide antigens are detailed under "Experimental Procedures").
Anti-PTBi and anti-PRRi are directed against amino acids within the
respective inserts. Anti-PTBo and anti-PRRo are directed against amino
acids immediately adjacent to the inserts.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Characterization of Numb isoform-specific
antibodies. 293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1
containing cDNAs encoding the 72-, 66-, 71-, or 65-kDa Numb
proteins. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotted
with the indicated anti-Numb antibodies to confirm their specificity.
The top panel shows blotting with anti-Nb-C, demonstrating
that each isoform was expressed. The presence (i) or absence
(o) of the PTB and PRR sequence inserts in each transfected
cDNAs is indicated at the top.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Numb isoforms are differentially expressed in
mouse tissues and cell lines. A, expression of Numb in
adult mouse tissue lysates. Numb was immunoprecipitated (IP)
from equal amounts of mouse tissue lysate (1 mg of protein per 1 ml of
lysis buffer) and Western blotted (Blot) with the indicated
antibodies to determine the presence of Numb isoforms and Nbl in each.
On longer exposure, an immunoreactive band was seen in embryo lysates
in the anti-PTBi IP/anti-Nb-C blot and in the anti-PRRi blot.
B, expression of Numb in cell lines. Experiments were
carried out essentially as described in A, except that for each immunoprecipitation, cell lysate from half
of an 80% confluent plate of cells was used.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Numb isoform expression changes during
retinoic acid-induced P19 cell differentiation. P19 cells were
treated with retinoic acid and aggregated for the days shown, after
which they were replated onto cell culture plastic. Numb isoforms or
Nbl were immunoprecipitated from 0.5 mg/ml lysate and Western blotted
with the indicated antibodies.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Numb PTBi, but not Numb PTBo, localizes to
the plasma membrane of MDCK cells. GFP fusions of Numb and Nbl PTB
domains and GFP alone were transiently expressed in MDCK cells grown on
filters and paraformaldehyde-fixed cells examined using a fluorescence
microscope.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Confocal microscopy of polarized MDCK cells
expressing GFP Numb PTB domains. GFP fusions of the Numb PTBi and
PTBo domains or full-length p67 Numb (Nbfull) were
transiently expressed in MDCK cells grown on filters and
paraformaldehyde-fixed cells examined using a Leica confocal
microscope. Shown are image sections (x-y) through the cell monolayer,
beginning at the basolateral region (panel 1) and continuing
through the apical region (panel 5).

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Identification of endogenous Numb isoforms in
crude MDCK cell fractions. The presence of Numb isoforms in the
membrane (low speed (P1) and high speed (P2)
pellets) and cytosolic fractions (S) of MDCK cells was
determined by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with the
indicated isoform-specific antibodies. Approximately 3% of the lysate
used for each immunoprecipitation was Western blotted with
anti-E-cadherin (bottom panel) to positively identify the
plasma membrane containing fractions.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Both NumbPTBi and NumbPTBo bind LNX and
acidic phospholipids. A, purified immobilized GST
fusion proteins were incubated with cell lysates from 293T cells
transfected with pFLAG-LNX. Protein complexes were washed and separated
by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted with LNX, and developed with the ECL system.
B, GST fusions of NumbPTBi and anti-LNX-N NumbPTBo were
incubated with small unilamellar lipid vesicles composed of PC, PC plus
5% PS (PC/PS), PC/PS plus phosphatidylinositol
4-phosphate (PI(4)P), or
L-
-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate
(PI(4,5)P2). Following centrifugation, the
amount of bound GST-NbPTB was determined by Western blotting with
anti-GST. C, fat Western assay for lipid binding. The
indicated phospholipids were spotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane and incubated with GST fusions of NbPTBi, NbPTBo, or GST.
Bound protein was visualized by incubation with anti-GST followed by
protein A horseradish peroxidase and ECL. The exposure time for each
filter was the same.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 helix and the
2 strand. In the
Drosophila Numb PTB domain structure this region is not directly involved in engaging peptide targets (30). One possibility currently being investigated is whether the insertion of 11 amino acids
in PTBi alters the folding of the domain such that it could mediate
interactions with distinct protein targets by modifying the binding
specificity, or alternatively, whether the insert sequence could
contribute to a second binding surface on the PTBi domain and thereby
promote interaction with unique targets important for membrane localization.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
These authors contributed equally to this work.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Uemura, T.,
Shepherd, S.,
Ackerman, L.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1989)
Cell
58,
349-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Park, M.,
Yaich, L. E.,
and Bodmer, R.
(1998)
Mech. Dev.
75,
117-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Spana, E. P.,
and Doe, C. Q.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
21-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Brewster, R.,
and Bodmer, R.
(1995)
Development
121,
2923-2936[Abstract]
5.
Ruiz, G. M.,
and Bate, M.
(1997)
Development
124,
4857-4866[Abstract]
6.
Rhyu, M. S.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1994)
Cell
76,
477-491[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Knoblich, J. A.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1995)
Nature
377,
624-627[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Spana, E. P.,
Kopczynski, C.,
Goodman, C. S.,
and Doe, C. Q.
(1995)
Development
121,
3489-3494[Abstract]
9.
Vervoort, M.,
Damblychaudiere, C.,
and Ghysen, A.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
7,
21-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Guo, M.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
27-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Jones-Villeneuve, E. M.,
Mc Burney, M. W.,
Rogers, K. A.,
and Kalnin, S. V.
(1982)
J. Cell Biol.
94,
253-262 12.
Frise, E.,
Knoblich, J. A.,
Younger-Shepherd, S.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11925-11932 13.
Zhong, W. M.,
Feder, J. N.,
Jiang, M. M.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
43-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Verdi, J.,
Schmandt, R.,
Bashirullah, A.,
Jacob, S.,
Salvino, R.,
Craig, C. G.,
Lipshitz, H. D.,
and McGlade, C. J.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
1134-1145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Wakamatsu, Y.,
Maynard, T. M.,
Jones, S. U.,
and Weston, J. A.
(1999)
Neuron
23,
71-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Bork, P.,
and Margolis, B.
(1995)
Cell
80,
693-694[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Salcini, A. E.,
Confalonieri, S.,
Doria, M.,
Santolini, E.,
Tassi, E.,
Minenkova, O.,
Cesareni, G.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
and Difiore, P. P.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2239-2249 18.
Blaikie, P.,
Immanuel, D.,
Wu, J.,
Li, N.,
Yajnik, V.,
and Margolis, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32031-32034 19.
van der Geer, P.,
Wiley, S.,
Lai, V. K.,
Olivier, J. P.,
Gish, G. D.,
Stephens, R.,
Kaplan, D.,
Shoelson, S.,
and Pawson, T.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
404-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Vandergeer, P.,
and Pawson, T.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
277-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Lioubin, M. N.,
Algate, P. A.,
Tsai, S.,
Carlberg, K.,
Aebersold, R.,
and Rohrschneider, L. R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1084-1095 22.
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1994)
Science
266,
1862-1865 23.
Dho, S. E.,
Jacob, S.,
Wolting, C. D.,
French, M. B.,
Rohrschneider, L. R.,
and McGlade, C. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9179-9187 24.
Li, S. C.,
Songyang, Z.,
Vincent, S. J.,
Zwahlen, C.,
Wiley, S.,
Cantley, L.,
Kay, L. E.,
Forman-Kay, J.,
and Pawson, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7204-7209 25.
Yaich, L.,
Ooi, J.,
Park, M.,
Borg, J. P.,
Landry, C.,
Bodmer, R.,
and Margolis, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10381-10388 26.
Borg, J. P.,
Ooi, J.,
Levy, E.,
and Margolis, B.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6229-6241[Abstract]
27.
Fiore, F.,
Zambrano, N.,
Minopoli, G.,
Donini, V.,
Duilio, A.,
and Russo, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30853-30856 28.
Howell, B. w.,
lanier, L. M.,
Frank, R.,
Gertler, F. B.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5179-5188 29.
Ravichandran, K. S.,
Zhou, M. M.,
Pratl, J. C.,
Harlan, J. E.,
Walk, S. F.,
Fesik, S. W.,
and Burakoff, S. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5540-5549[Abstract]
30.
Li, S. C.,
Zwahlen, C.,
Vincent, S. J.,
Mc Glade, C. J.,
Kay, L. E.,
Pawson, T.,
and Forman-Kay, J. D.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
1075-1083[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Siegal, G.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
7-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Chien, C. T.,
Wang, S.,
Rothenberg, M.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
598-607 33.
Paoluzi, S.,
Castagnoli, L.,
Lauro, I.,
Salcini, A. E.,
Coda, L.,
Fre, S.,
Confalonieri, S.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
Di Fiore, P. P.,
and Cesareni, G.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6541-6550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Wong, W. T.,
Schumacher, C.,
Salcini, A. E.,
Romano, A.,
Castagnino, P.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
and Di Fiore, P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9530-9534 35.
Mayer, B. J.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R70-R73[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Tang, H. Y.,
and Cai, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4897-4914[Abstract]
37.
Tang, H. Y.,
Munn, A.,
and Cai, M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4294-4304[Abstract]
38.
Sengar, A. S.,
Wang, W.,
Bishay, J.,
Cohen, S.,
and Egan, S. E.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1159-1171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Carbone, R.,
Fre, S.,
Iannolo, G.,
Belleudi, F.,
Mancini, P.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
Torrisi, M. R.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
5498-5504 40.
Chen, H.,
Fre, S.,
Slepnev, V. I.,
Capua, M. R.,
Takei, K.,
Butler, M. H.,
Di Fiore, P. P.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1998)
Nature
394,
793-797[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Juven-Gershon, T.,
Shifman, O.,
Unger, T.,
Elkeles, A.,
Haupt, Y.,
and Oren, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3974-3982 42.
Stevenson, J. M.,
Perera, I. Y.,
and Boss, W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22761-22767 43.
Zhong, W. M.,
Jiang, M. M.,
Weinmaster, G.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1997)
Development
124,
1887-1897[Abstract]
44.
Knoblich, J. A.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13005-13010 45.
Zhou, M. M.,
Ravichandran, K. S.,
Olejniczak, E. T.,
Petros, A. M.,
Meadows, R. P.,
Sattler, M.,
Harlan, J. E.,
Wade, W. S.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
and Fesik, S. W.
(1995)
Nature.
378,
584-592[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Kavran, J. M.,
Klein, D. E.,
Lee, A.,
Falasca, M.,
Isakoff, S. J.,
Skolnick, E. Y.,
and Lemmon, M. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30497-30508 47.
Eck, M. J.,
Dhepaganon, S.,
Trub, T.,
Nolte, R. T.,
and Shoelson, S. E.
(1996)
Cell.
85,
695-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Zhang, Z.,
Lee, C.-H.,
Mandiyan, V.,
Borg, J.-P.,
Margolis, B.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6141-6150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Kyriazis, Z. Wei, M. Vandermey, D.-G. Jo, O. Xin, M. P. Mattson, and S. L. Chan Numb Endocytic Adapter Proteins Regulate the Transport and Processing of the Amyloid Precursor Protein in an Isoform-dependent Manner: IMPLICATIONS FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE PATHOGENESIS J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2008; 283(37): 25492 - 25502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wilson, D.-L. Ardiet, C. Saner, N. Vilain, F. Beermann, M. Aguet, H. R. MacDonald, and O. Zilian Normal Hemopoiesis and Lymphopoiesis in the Combined Absence of Numb and Numblike J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 6746 - 6751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Corallini, S. Fera, L. Grisanti, I. Falciatori, B. Muciaccia, M. Stefanini, and E. Vicini Expression of the adaptor protein m-Numb in mouse male germ cells. Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 887 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||