J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33105-33113, November 12, 1999
Twelve Species of the Nucleoid-associated Protein from
Escherichia coli
SEQUENCE RECOGNITION SPECIFICITY AND DNA BINDING AFFINITY*
Talukder Ali
Azam
§ and
Akira
Ishihama
¶
From the
Department of Molecular Genetics, National
Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan and the
§ Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi,
Saitama 332-0012, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
The genome of Escherichia coli is
composed of a single molecule of circular DNA with the length of about
47,000 kilobase pairs, which is associated with about 10 major
DNA-binding proteins, altogether forming the nucleoid. We expressed and
purified 12 species of the DNA-binding protein, i.e. CbpA
(curved DNA-binding protein A), CbpB or Rob (curved DNA-binding protein
B or right arm of the replication origin binding protein), DnaA
(DNA-binding protein A), Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells),
Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), Hfq (host factor for phage Q
), H-NS (histone-like nucleoid structuring protein), HU (heat-unstable nucleoid protein), IciA (inhibitor of chromosome initiation A), IHF (integration host factor), Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), and StpA (suppressor of
td
phenotype A). The sequence specificity of
DNA binding was determined for all the purified nucleoid proteins using
gel-mobility shift assays. Five proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF, and
Lrp) were found to bind to specific DNA sequences, while the remaining
seven proteins (CbpA, Dps, Hfq, H-NS, HU, IciA, and StpA) showed
apparently sequence-nonspecific DNA binding activities. Four proteins,
CbpA, Hfq, H-NS, and IciA, showed the binding preference for the curved
DNA. From the apparent dissociation constant (Kd)
determined using the sequence-specific or nonspecific DNA probes, the
order of DNA binding affinity were determined to be: HU > IHF > Lrp > CbpB(Rob) > Fis > H-NS > StpA > CbpA > IciA > Hfq/Dps, ranging
from 25 nM (HU binding to the non-curved DNA) to 250 nM (Hfq binding to the non-curved DNA), under the assay
conditions employed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The genome DNA of Escherichia coli is associated with a
core set of 10-20 DNA-binding proteins, altogether forming the
nucleoid (for review, see Ref. 1). These nucleoid-associated proteins, hereafter referred to as the "nucleoid proteins" in this paper, have long been considered to be structural proteins setting the overall
DNA conformation, not only by wrapping or packaging of DNA but also by
introducing bending or coiling (for example, see Ref. 2). The
association of these nucleoid proteins, however, influences not only
the conformation but also the functions of DNA such as replication,
recombination, repair, and transcription. For instance, the template
activity of DNA for transcription is either activated or repressed by
the association of these nucleoid proteins to various extents depending
on the gene (for example, see Ref. 3). The overall activities of the
genome are considered to vary depending on cell growth conditions,
because the composition of nucleoid proteins changes depending on cell
growth conditions or growth phases (4). These observations taken
together suggest the pleiotropic regulatory roles for the nucleoid
proteins in global regulation of gene transcription.
In addition to these nucleoid proteins, a total of about 100 transcription factors interact with specific sequences near gene promoters and act as either activators or repressors of transcription of a gene or a set of genes (5). Recently, the molecular events leading
to transcription regulation by at least some sequence-specific and
mostly gene-specific transcription factors have been characterized in
detail (for instance, see Ref. 5). In contrast, relatively little is
known about transcription regulation by the nucleoid proteins. These
group proteins have been thought to have the activities of
sequence-nonspecific DNA-binding, but no systematic and comparative studies have been performed of the specificity and affinity of DNA
binding for the nucleoid proteins.
In order to understand the overall configuration and physiological
activities of the E. coli genome under various growth
conditions and the role(s) of each nucleoid protein, we performed for
the first time a systematic comparison of the recognition sequence specificity and the DNA-binding affinities among 12 species of the
nucleoid protein from E. coli, including the abundant
nucleoid proteins in growing E. coli cells, i.e.
factor for inversion stimulation (Fis),1 H-NS (histone-like
nucleoid structuring protein), HU (heat-unstable nucleoid protein), IHF
(integration host factor), and Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory
protein), and a set of curved DNA-binding proteins, i.e.
CbpA (curved DNA-binding protein A), CbpB (curved DNA-binding protein
B; or Rob, right origin binding protein), and StpA (suppressor of
Td
phenotype A) (6-15). In addition, we
extended our analysis to include two DNA-associated proteins, DnaA
(DNA-binding protein A) and IciA (inhibitor of chromosome initiation A)
with the regulatory activity of DNA replication (16, 17), a protein,
called Hfq (host factor for phage Q
replication), with
the binding activity to both nucleoid and ribosomes (18), and a novel
DNA-binding protein, Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells),
which is synthesized only in the stationary phase of cell growth and
plays a role in growth-dependent transformation of the
nucleoid configuration (4). Among these 12 proteins, the specificity of
DNA recognition has not been reported for Dps, Hfq, IciA, and StpA.
Here the affinity and sequence specificity of DNA binding were examined
in parallel for all these 12 species of DNA-binding proteins under the
same conditions by gel-mobility shift assays using various DNA probes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Media--
E. coli
strains and plasmids used for expression of the DNA-binding
proteins are shown in Table I. Cells were grown in LB medium.
Reagents and Chemicals--
Restriction endonucleases were
purchased from Takara Shuzo (Japan). P11 phosphocellulose was purchased
from Whatman, while CM-Sepharose, DEAE-Sepharose, heparin-Sepharose
CL-68, Mono-Q, Mono-S, and Sepharose 12 were products of Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech.
Protein Purification--
All 12 DNA-binding proteins were
purified from overexpressed E. coli. The plasmids and the
conditions used for expression of the DNA-binding proteins are
summarized in Table I. The steps of
protein purification and the yield of proteins are summarized in Table
II. The purity of proteins was analyzed
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by staining of gels
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R (Kodak). Protein concentration was
measured by a staining method with Coomassie Blue dye (19) and using
bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Preparation of Synthetic DNA Probes--
Six different kinds of
short DNA duplexes (see Fig. 2 for the sequence) were prepared by
annealing two single-stranded oligonucleotides which were synthesized
with a DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Model 394 DNA/RNA
Synthesizer). For duplex formation, oligonucleotides in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA were heated at 85 °C for 15 min and cooled
slowly to room temperature. DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform
and then precipitated with ethanol. For radiolabeling, the duplex DNAs
were gel-purified and end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP using
T4 polynucleotide kinase (Takara Shuzo, Japan).
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
Gel mobility shift assays was
carried out for the detection of complex formation between DNA-binding
proteins and DNA probes. The procedure was essentially the same for 12 DNA-binding proteins. Mixtures of 32P-labeled (0.5-2.0
nM) or unlabeled probe DNA (5.0 nM) and various amounts of the test protein were incubated in 10 µl of binding buffer
(10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 1 mM
EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) for
25 min at 25 °C. The reaction mixtures were directly subjected to
electrophoresis on 5% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide:bisacrylamide,
38:2) in 0.5% TBE buffer consisting of 89 mM Tris borate
(pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA. The electrophoresis was carried out
at a constant voltage of 60 V at 25 °C (the same temperature as that
used for DNA-protein complex formation). Gels were exposed to x-ray
films or imaging plates. The amounts of unbound free and protein-bound
DNA probes were determined by measuring the exposed films or plates
with a NIH Image Software (version 1.61) or a PhosphorImager (Molecular
Dynamics). The apparent dissociation constant (Kd)
was determined by measuring the protein concentrations which gave 50%
binding of the input probe (27).
Gel shift assays were also carried out using a mixture of
HaeIII-treated pUC19. The reaction products were analyzed by
electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels, and the amounts of unbound free
and protein-bound DNA were determined by staining DNA with ethidium bromide.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of 12 Species of the E. coli DNA-binding
Protein--
As an initial effort for the systematic comparison of DNA
binding properties among the nucleoid proteins in E. coli,
we analyzed in this study 12 species of DNA-binding proteins,
i.e. CbpA, CbpB (or Rob), DnaA, Dps, Fis, Hfq, H-NS, HU,
IciA, IHF, Lrp, and StpA. The molecular properties so far identified
for these proteins are summarized in Table
III. For protein purification, the genes for these nucleoid proteins were transiently expressed at high levels
under control of strong and inducible promoters (Table I). In the case
of HU and IHF, both consisting of two different subunits with similar
sequences, the genes for two subunits are expressed simultaneously in
the same cells, and thus the main components of HU and IHF proteins
used in this study were both heterodimers.
The overexpressed proteins were mostly recovered in soluble fractions
of the respective cell lysates except Dps which was solubilized from
inclusion bodies with a buffer containing 6 M urea and then
renatured. Thus, the native conformation must have been retained for
most of the proteins examined, suggesting that the specificities and
activities herewith described represent those of native proteins. All
the test proteins were purified to apparent homogeneity in two or three
steps of chromatography essentially according to the published
procedures (Table II; for details see "Experimental Procedures"). A
total of 0.5-15 mg of proteins were obtained from 1 liter of the
induced cultures. Fig. 1 shows the
patterns of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for each step of the
purification for all these 12 proteins. The purity at the final step
was more than 95% for all these proteins except for DnaA.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
E. coli DNA-binding Proteins. Twelve species of
the DNA-binding proteins were purified from E. coli as
summarized in Table II. Each step fraction (1 µl aliquot) of the
protein purification was analyzed by SDS-gel electrophoresis on 10 (DnaA), 12.5 (CbpA, CbpB, IciA), or 16.5% (Dps, Fis, Hfq, H-NS, HU,
IHF, Lrp, and StpA) gels. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant
Blue (CBB). The following proteins were used as molecular
mass markers: phosphorylase b, 97.4 kDa; bovine serum
albumin, 66.2 kDa; ovalbumin, 45.0 kDa; carbonic anhydrase, 31.0 kDa;
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 21.5 kDa; and lysozyme, 14.4 kDa.
Sup, supernatant; AS, ammonium sulfate fraction;
Ppt, precipitates; PC, phosphocellulose column
fraction; PCS, phosphocellulose slurry fraction;
G-DEAE, protein pak G-DEAE; and UCE, uninduced
cell extract.
|
|
Construction of DNA Probes for the Gel Shift Assay--
To measure
the DNA binding activities for all 12 DNA-binding proteins by the gel
shift assay, six different types of synthetic oligonucleotide (SO)
probe were synthesized, each carrying a unique sequence as described in
Fig. 2. For simultaneous and quantitative comparison of the DNA binding properties for many proteins under the
same conditions, the size of the DNA probes were adjusted to be within
the range of 40-64 bp. Two types of DNA probe were prepared for the
assay of nonspecific DNA-binding proteins. SOA contains six consecutive
(dA)6 stretches, each being connected by a 4-bp (CGGC)
interval, in a total length of 60 bp. This type DNA is known to form a
curved configuration and has been used for binding assays of the curved
DNA-binding proteins such as CbpA and H-NS (11, 28). SOB of 64 bp in
length, consisting of equal amounts of GC and AT, contains two tandem
repeats of the 26-bp long CbpB-binding site (13) connected by a 6-bp
spacer with CCCGGG sequence (for the sequence see Fig. 2). This set of curved SOA and non-curved SOB was used for the gel mobility shift assay
of the sequence nonspecific DNA-binding proteins (HU, IciA, and StpA)
or those with no known specificity (CbpA, Dps, Hfq, and H-NS).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
DNA probes for gel shift assays. Six
different kinds of duplex DNA probes of 40-64 bp in length were
synthesized for gel mobility shift assays of the DNA-binding proteins.
The complete sequence of each probe is shown. Probe SOA includes six
repetitions of AT clusters, while probes SOB to SOF include the
consensus sequences for the DNA-binding proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF,
and Lrp) as underlined.
|
|
For the DNA binding assays of other proteins with sequence-specific
recognition activities, probes SOC (60 bp), SOD (54 bp), SOE (40 bp),
and SOF (62 bp) were synthesized, which contained three repeats of the
DnaA box on the same DNA surface (29), three repeats of the 15-bp long
Fis-binding site (6), a single 15-bp long IHF-binding site (30), and
three repeats of the 15-bp long Lrp-binding site (31), respectively.
DNA Mobility Shift Assays in Vitro of 12 DNA-binding
Proteins--
Gel mobility shift assays were performed for all 12 nucleoid proteins using both specific and nonspecific DNA probes with the chain length of 40-64 bp (for the probe sequences see Fig. 2).
Mixtures of 0.5-3.0 nM 32P-labeled probe DNA
and various amounts of one of the nucleoid proteins were incubated in
10 µl of the binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH
7.5, containing 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol), and then subjected to electrophoresis
on native polyacrylamide gels. Typical patterns of the gel shift assays
using 2.0 nM 32P-labeled probes are shown in
Fig. 3. The amounts of unbound free and
protein-bound DNA probes were determined by measuring the intensity of
autoradiograms. The apparent dissociation constant (Kd) of each DNA probe for the test proteins was
determined by measuring the protein concentrations which gave 50%
binding of the input probe (27). In most cases, the combinations of bound and unbound probes stayed constant, but in some cases, the protein-bound probes formed diffuse bands. In the latter cases, the
measurement of protein-bound probes was relied only on the amount of
unbound free DNA.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Gel shift assays of the DNA-binding
proteins. The reaction conditions for probe DNA-protein complex
formation and electrophoresis are described under "Experimental
Procedures." The gel patterns are classified into three groups
depending on the nature of DNA recognition: Panels A to
E, sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins; Panels
F to I, curved DNA-binding proteins; and Panels
J to L, sequence nonspecific DNA-binding proteins. For
each assay, the following 32P-labeled DNA probe was used at
2.0 nM. Panel A (CbpB), lanes 1 and
2, control SOE; and lanes 3-12, probe SOB.
Panel B (DnaA), lanes 1 and 2, control
SOB; lanes 3-12, probe SOC. Panel C (Fis),
lanes 1 and 2, control SOB; and lanes
3-12, probe SOD. Panel D (IHF), lanes 1-2,
control SOB; and lanes 3-11, probe SOE. Panel E
(Lrp), lanes 1 and 2, control SOB; and
lanes 3-12, probe SOF. Panel F (CbpA),
lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and lanes 8-14, probe
SOB. Panel G (H-NS), lanes 1-12, probe SOA; and
lanes 13-24, probe SOB. Panel H (Hfq),
lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and lanes 8-14, probe
SOB. Panel I (IciA), lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and
lanes 8-14, probe SOB. Panel J (Dps),
lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and lanes 8-14, probe
SOB. Panel K (HU), lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and
lanes 8-14, probe SOB. Panel L (StpA),
lanes 1-7, probe SOA; and lanes 8-14, probe
SOB.
|
|
The results of gel shift assays using 2 nM radiolabeled
probes are shown in Fig. 4. The
measurements were repeated at least three times for each combination,
and the values shown in Fig. 4 represent the averages, together with
the fluctuation levels of the measurements. The apparent dissociation
constants thus obtained are summarized in Fig.
5. The order of binding affinity among
the sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins was: IHF > Lrp > CbpB > Fis > DnaA, and the dissociation constant ranged
from 37 nM for IHF to 213 nM for DnaA.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Complex formation of various DNA probes with
DNA-binding proteins. Mixtures of 2.0 nM each of the
indicated DNA probes and various amounts of one of the 12 different
DNA-binding proteins were separated by 5% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis as shown in Fig. 3. Gels were dried and exposed to
x-ray films. The intensity of radioactive bands were measured for both
unbound free and protein-bound DNA bands. From the amounts of unbound
probe DNA, the apparent dissociation constants (Kd)
of each probe for the DNA-binding proteins were determined by the
method described by Carey (27).
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The dissociation constants of synthetic DNA
probes for the DNA-binding proteins. The apparent dissociation
constants for each DNA-binding protein were measured according to the
method of Carey (27) as described in the legend to Fig. 4.
A, specific DNA-binding proteins. B, nonspecific
DNA-binding proteins.
|
|
On the other hand, the affinity order among sequence-nonspecific
DNA-binding proteins was: HU > H-NS > StpA > CbpA > IciA > Hfq > Dps using a curved DNA (SOA)
probe, with the dissociation constant ranging from 51 nM
for HU to 172 nM for Dps (Figs. 4 and 5B); and
HU > StpA > H-NS > CbpA > Dps > IciA > Hfq using a non-curved DNA (SOB) probe, with the dissociation
constant ranging from 25 (HU) to 250 (Hfq) nM (Figs. 4 and
5B). The affinity ratio between the curved and non-curved
DNA ranged from 0.49 (HU), 1.03 (Dps), 1.08 (StpA), 1.43 (CbpA), 1.43 (H-NS), 1.43 (IciA) to 1.95 (Hfq). One unexpected finding was that HU
had a higher affinity to the non-curved DNA while Hfq had a higher
affinity to the curved DNA.
We carried out the same type of measurements using both decreasing
concentrations of the labeled probes and increasing concentrations of
unlabeled DNA probes. Essentially the same specificities of DNA binding
were observed for all the proteins examined (data not shown). The order
of DNA binding affinity was also essentially the same when measured
using decreasing or increasing concentrations of both labeled and
unlabeled DNA probes (data not shown).
In order to confirm the binding specificity of the 12 species of
E. coli DNA-binding protein, we also investigated the
complex formation in vitro using a mixture of 11 DNA
fragments generated by HaeIII digestion of pUC19 DNA. When
nonspecific DNA-binding proteins were analyzed using such DNA fragment
mixtures, the longer DNA fragments tend to shift at lower protein
concentrations than the shorter fragments (32). The order of DNA
binding affinity measured in this system was essentially the same at
least among the nonspecific DNA-binding proteins (data not shown).
Sequence-specific DNA-binding Proteins--
Five proteins, CbpB
(Rob), DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp, were confirmed to be the
sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins in the assay system employed. No
significant cooperativity was observed for this group of proteins in
DNA binding, because the test proteins bound to the probe DNAs with
multiple binding sites in a stepwise fashion.
The CbpB bound to the two CbpB-binding sites of SOB in a stepwise
fashion, forming two retardation bands (Fig. 3A, lanes
3-12). The apparent dissociation constant (Kd)
of the first site for CbpB was 67 nM (Figs. 4 and
5A), and approximately 120 nM CbpB was required
for the shift of all input SOB probe (Fig. 3A, lane 10).
Above 140 nM CbpB, all the input SOB were converted to
complexes with two molecules of the CbpB protein (Fig. 3B, lane 11). When SOE without the CbpB site was used as a DNA
probe, no DNA retardation was observed even at the concentration as
high as 80 nM (Fig. 3A, lane 2). The apparent
Kd of 213 nM for DnaA measured using
probe SOC with three tandem DnaA-binding sequences (Fig. 3B,
lanes 3-12) was the highest among the sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins tested (Figs. 4 and 5A), but this was
partly attributed to aggregation of the purified DnaA protein, in
particular at high protein concentrations. DnaA did not form complexes
with a control probe (SOB) without the DnaA-binding sequence (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 2).
Fis also showed the stepwise formation of three types of complexes with
SOD containing three repeats of the Fis-binding core sequence in
protein in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3C,
lanes 3-12). The apparent Kd of SOD for the
Fis dimer was estimated to be about 114 nM (Figs. 4 and
5A). At 240 nM Fis, almost all the input probe
was shifted to the complexes (Fig. 3B, lane 7). No retarded
band was detected when SOB lacking the Fis site was used as probe (Fig.
3C, lanes 1 and 2). IHF showed dose-dependent formation of a single complex with SOE
containing a single IHF-binding sequence (Fig. 3D, lanes
3-11), giving the complete retardation at 80 nM (Fig.
3D, lane 6). The apparent Kd of IHF for
SOE was 37 nM (Figs. 4 and 5A). At high IHF
concentrations, the IHF-SOE complex formed further aggregates, which
migrated to discrete bands with slower migration rates (Fig. 3D,
lanes 7-11), through protein-protein contacts between IHF molecules. IHF did not form complexes with SOB without the IHF site at
least within the protein concentration range examined (Fig. 3D,
lanes 1 and 2). Lrp also formed three discrete bands with SOF containing three repeats of the Lrp-binding site in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3E). At 140 nM Lrp, virtually all the input DNA was converted into Lrp
complexes (Fig. 3E, lane 7). The apparent
Kd of SOF for Lrp was 60 nM (Figs. 4 and
5A). In contrast, the probe SOB without the Lrp-binding
sequence did not form any complexes with Lrp (Fig. 3E, lanes
1 and 2).
Curved DNA-binding Proteins--
The DNA-binding properties of the
sequence nonspecific DNA-binding proteins were examined using a pair of
curved SOA and non-curved SOB probes. Four proteins, CbpA, H-NS, Hfq,
and IciA, were identified as the curved DNA-binding proteins. CbpA and
H-NS has been recognized as the curved DNA-binding proteins, but the
specificity of DNA binding has not yet been analyzed for Hfq and
IciA.
CbpA showed a strong cooperativity in binding to the curved DNA. By
adding small amounts of CbpA, certain fractions of SOA were shifted to
big complexes which were trapped on the gel top even though some DNA
probes remained unbound. All the input SOA probe was shifted to
complexes by adding 280-350 nM CbpA (Fig. 3F, lanes
5 and 6). The apparent Kd for CbpA
was estimated to be 122 nM (Figs. 4 and 5B).
When a non-curved probe (SOB) was used as a control, however, the
affinity was found to be weaker than the curved DNA (Fig. 3F,
lanes 7-14), giving the apparent Kd value of
about 175 nM CbpA (Figs. 4 and 5B). The affinity was 1.43-fold higher for the curved DNA than that for the non-curved DNA. Under the same conditions, we examined the DNA-binding properties for H-NS using the same set of DNA probes, curved SOA (Fig. 3G, lanes 1-12) and non-curved SOB (Fig. 3G, lanes
13-24). The apparent Kd of SOA and SOB for
H-NS was calculated to be 115 and 165 nM, respectively
(Figs. 4 and 5B). The affinity for the curved SOA was
1.43-fold higher than that for the non-curved SOB. Since no
intermediate bands were observed, the binding of H-NS to the probe SOA
was again highly cooperative.
In addition to these two known curved DNA-binding proteins, we newly
identified two DNA-binding proteins with the preference for curved DNA.
Hfq showed dose-dependent complex formation with both SOA
(Fig. 3H, lanes 1-7) and SOB (Fig. 3H, lanes
8-14) probes. The apparent Kd of SOA and SOB
for Hfq was 128 and 250 nM, respectively (Figs. 4 and
5B), indicating that the Hfq protein has a binding
preference (1.95-fold) for curved DNA. The DNA binding activity of Hfq
to the non-curved DNA is the weakest (Kd, 250 nM) among the 12 proteins examined. Complete band shift of the input DNA fragment was observed at the Hfq concentration as high as
350 nM (Fig. 3H, lane 6). Likewise, IciA
preferred the AT-rich curved SOA probe for binding (Fig.
3I). The apparent Kd was 126 and 180 nM for SOA and SOB, respectively (Figs. 4 and 5B). Thus, the affinity to curved DNA was more than
1.43-fold higher than that to non-curved DNA. At high protein
concentrations, complexes migrating slower than the fully saturated
IciA-SOA complex were identified, which may represent aggregates of
DNA-protein complexes.
Sequence-nonspecific DNA-binding Proteins--
HU has long been
recognized as a curved DNA-binding protein with no sequence preference.
HU formed a ladder of complexes with both SOA and SOB probes
concomitantly with the increase in HU concentration (Fig.
3K), each corresponding to the binding of increasing amounts
of the HU 
heterodimer. Since HU forms tetramers or even
oligomers as analyzed by protein-protein cross-linking (33), the
multiple bands observed in the gel shift assay might also be due to the
formation of probe-tetramer or probe-oligomer complexes. One unexpected
result was that the apparent Kd for HU was rather
higher (25 nM) for the non-curved SOB than that (51 nM) for the curved SOA (Figs. 4 and 5B). We
repeated the gel shift assay using 0.5-5.0 nM
concentrations of probes, but always observed the higher affinity to
non-curved DNA than curved DNA (data not shown). Thus, we concluded
that HU was not a curved DNA-binding protein at least under the assay
conditions employed. As in the case of HU, StpA was also found not to
be a curved DNA-binding protein even though it was identified as a
homologue of H-NS because of the sequence similarity (34). Both the
curved SOA and non-curved SOB were retarded on polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis by StpA essentially to the same extent (Fig. 3L,
lanes 1-7 for SOA, and lanes 8-14 for SOB). The
apparent Kd of SOA for StpA was 118 nM
(Figs. 4 and 5B) and approximately 280 nM StpA
was required for the maximum mobility shift (Fig. 3L, lane
6), while the Kd value of SOB was 127 nM (Figs. 4 and 5B). The results suggest no
binding preference of StpA for the curved DNA at least under the
conditions employed.
Dps is one of the stationary-phase proteins in E. coli and
its association with the genome DNA is considered to convert the genome
DNA compact during the growth transition from the exponential to
stationary phase, thereby leading to switch of the transcription pattern (4) and protecting the DNA from oxidative stress-induced damage
(35). However, the DNA binding specificity has not been analyzed for
the Dps protein. Here we carried out the gel shift assay using both the
curved SOA and non-curved SOB probes (Fig. 3J). Both showed
essentially the same levels of DNA binding with the apparent
Kd of 172-178 nM (Figs. 4 and
5B). Thus, we concluded that the Dps protein binds
nonspecifically to both the curved and non-curved DNA probes with
similar affinity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Comparison of the Recognition Specificity of DNA Sequences among 12 DNA-binding Proteins--
Here we examined the sequence recognition
properties for 12 E. coli DNA-binding proteins, including
four proteins, Dps, Hfq, IciA, and StpA, of which the specificity of
DNA binding has not yet been analyzed. Among the eight DNA-binding
proteins, of which the sequence specificity has hitherto been reported,
five, i.e. CbpB (Rob), DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp, are known to
be sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. These five proteins indeed
showed in our assay system the specific recognition of the respective
unique sequence of 26 (13), 9 (29), 15 (6), 15 (30), and 15 bp (31) in
length (see Fig. 2 for the recognition sequence and Fig. 3 for the gel
shift assay). Within the protein concentration ranges examined, these
proteins did not form stable complexes with DNA devoid of the specific
recognition sequences (see Fig. 3, A-E).
CbpB was isolated as a curved DNA-binding protein from E. coli (13), but after cloning and sequencing CbpB was found to be
identical with the Rob (right origin-binding protein) (36). The
CbpB-binding site is often located near promoters as well as at the
right arm of the replication origin, oriC. CbpB and its
homologues, SoxS and MarA, regulate transcription of the genes involved
in oxidative stress response and multiple antibiotic resistance (37,
38). DnaA was originally identified as a regulatory factor of the
replication initiation (reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40). The DnaA protein
binds to the DnaA boxes at the oriC region (16) and
regulates the synthesis of RNA encoded by the oriC region.
As in the case of CbpB, DnaA is known to be involved in transcription
regulation of a set of genes including its own gene (41, 42).
Fis is the most abundant nucleoid-associated protein in growing
E. coli cells (75). Fis plays
a global transcription regulator of the genes highly expressed in
growing E. coli (6, 43). Upon Fis dimer binding, the DNA
helix is bent to various extents depending on the sequence flanking the
15-bp core recognition sequence (20). On the other hand, the IHF level
increases in the stationary phase (75). IHF was originally identified
as a factor for recombination, but is known to constitute one of the
major nucleoid-associated proteins with the regulatory activity of
genome functions (44, 45). IHF has 30% amino acid sequence identity
with HU (2). Upon DNA binding, IHF facilitates DNA bending (30). Like
other sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, IHF regulates
transcription initiation when it binds near the target promoters (7,
46). Lrp also has dual functions, one as a global transcription factor
which regulates, positively or negatively, as many as 75 genes, and the
other as a determinant of the nucleoid structure (for reviews, see
Refs. 9, 47, and 48). The consensus sequence of Lrp recognition is
composed of 15 bp in length, but Lrp protects DNA sequence of 80 to 100 bp against DNAse I digestion (31). Lrp binding to the specific site
induces DNA bending (49). All these five sequence-specific DNA-binding
proteins influence DNA functions such as replication and transcription.
For transcription regulation of specific genes or specific sets of
genes, the direct interaction with the RNA polymerase has been
suggested at least for four proteins, CbpB (Rob) (38), DnaA (50), Fis
(51), and IHF (52). CbpB, Fis, and IHF require the C-terminal domain of
subunit (class I factors) while DnaA interacts with the
subunit
(class III factor).2
The other seven proteins showed apparently sequence nonspecific DNA
binding activities. Five proteins, CbpA, H-NS, HU, IciA, and StpA, have
been proposed to be curved DNA-binding proteins. The binding preference
for curved DNA has been demonstrated for CbpA, H-NS, and HU (11, 12,
23), but no experimental evidence has been published for the
specificity of curved DNA binding for IciA and StpA. The present study
indicates that CbpA, H-NS, and IciA are indeed the curved DNA-binding
proteins. H-NS is one of the major nucleoid-associated proteins with a
sequence nonspecific DNA binding activity (53) with the preference for
curved or bent DNA (11, 28). As in the case of HU and IHF, mutations in
hns result in pleiotropic effects on E. coli cell
growth and stress response (54, 55, 56), suggesting that H-NS is a global regulator of gene functions as well as a structural protein for
compacting the genome DNA. CbpA has been identified as such a
DNA-binding protein as H-NS with the recognition activity of a
synthetic AT-rich curved DNA (11). This was confirmed in our assay. On
the contrary, the same assay did not support the curved DNA binding
nature for HU, which was considered to be a sequence-independent DNA-binding protein with a preference for binding bent or kinked DNA
(57), curved DNA (58), or DNA containing single-strand breaks or gaps
(59). Another unexpected result is no significant binding preference of
StpA for the curved DNA. StpA was identified as a homologue of H-NS in
amino acid sequence, and has been believed to bind to intrinsically
curved DNA (34). The results herein described suggest that StpA has an
as yet unidentified unique role different from that of H-NS.
The IciA protein was discovered as a protein that binds to three
repeats of a 13-bp long AT-rich sequence within the ori
region and inhibits the replication initiation by interfering with the action of DnaA protein (17). In agreement with the predicted function,
the intracellular level of DnaA increases in exponentially growing
E. coli cells but the IciA level increases in the stationary phase (60). The present study provided experimental evidence supporting
the previous prediction of the curved DNA binding nature for IciA.
Likewise, Hfq was identified for the first time as a curved DNA-binding
protein. Hfq was originally identified as a host factor, designated as
HF-I, required for replication of phage Q
RNA (21, 61).
Isolated Hfq has a weak binding activity of both RNA and DNA (18, 32).
Mutant studies indicate that Hfq plays an important physiological role
in uninfected E. coli (62). Among the 12 DNA-binding
proteins examined, two proteins, Hfq and StpA, were originally
identified as the proteins which interact with RNA. Hfq is associated
with both the nucleoid and ribosomes in uninfected E. coli
(18). In good agreement with its association with RNA and ribosomes,
Hfq regulates translation of certain mRNA, including mRNA for
RNA polymerase
38 subunit (63, 64). Here we found that
Hfq is a curved DNA-binding protein with the highest preference for
curved DNA, the Kd value for curved DNA being 50%
the value for non-curved DNA. One attractive hypothesis for the
physiological functions for Hfq and StpA is that these proteins with
binding activities to both DNA and RNA play a role(s) in functional
coordination between DNA and RNA such as transcription-translation coupling.
Dps is the only DNA-binding protein that is produced only in the
stationary phase E. coli (4) and plays a role in the
structural conversion of nucleoid DNA into more compact and
stress-resistant states (35). Dps is also considered to play a role in
switching of the global pattern of gene expression during the growth
transition from growing to stationary phase (65, 66). Overall
repression of the template activity for transcription of the stationary
phase nucleoid may be correlated with the binding of Dps protein. We demonstrated for the first time that the purified Dps indeed shows the
sequence nonspecific DNA binding activity. No unique sequence is
required for Dps binding to the genome DNA (see Fig. 3J).
The results are in good agreement with the finding that Dps becomes the
most abundant structural component of stationary phase nucleoid (75).
Comparison of the DNA Binding Affinity among 12 DNA-binding
Proteins--
In this study, we also compared for the first time the
binding affinity among 12 E. coli DNA-binding proteins under
the same reaction conditions. Among these 12 DNA-binding proteins, the published values of DNA binding affinity are available for six proteins, i.e. CbpB (Rob), DnaA, Fis, HU, IHF, and Lrp, but
no quantitative data have been published for the other six proteins, CbpA, Dps, Hfq, H-NS, IciA, and StpA.
Ariza et al. (37) reported that CbpB binds a DNA fragment
containing the micF promoter with the dissociation constant
of about 1 nM and more weakly to DNA containing the
sodA, nfo, or zwf promoters with the
dissociation constant of 10-100 nM. In our in
vitro binding assay, it was rather difficult to determine the
Kd value for DnaA, because the purified DnaA tended to form aggregates. However, DnaA oligomerization seems to be required
for its regulatory function of transcription (67). Schaper and Messer
(29) reported that the dissociation constant of DnaA for specific
binding to the probe DNA with three repeats of DnaA box was between 1 and 50 nM. Pan et al. (20) measured the
equilibrium dissociation constants of wild-type and mutant Fis proteins
for the hin-D site, located in the distal domain of the
hin recombination enhancer, with the apparent dissociation constants ranging from about 1 nM for specific sites to as
high as 400 nM for nonspecific sites. Martin and Rosner
(68) reported that Fis binds the upstream regulatory region of the
multiple antibiotic resistance marRAB operon, with an
apparent dissociation constant of about 5 nM. Blomfield
et al. (69) measured the affinity of IHF to two IHF sites
upstream of the fimE-fim switch-fimA region for
type 1 fimbriae expression, giving the Kd value for the probe DNA of 10 nM. The Kd value
(1.5 nM) for the specific and cooperative binding of IHF to
the attP site of phage
DNA was observed to be
approximately 1000-fold higher than the value for nonspecific binding
(70). Wiese et al. (71) measured the binding in
vitro of Lrp to DNA upstream of the gltBDF operon, which includes the genes specifying the large (GltB) and small (GltD)
subunits of glutamate synthase, with the apparent Kd of higher than 100 nM, which increases 5-10-fold in the
presence of leucine. On the other hand, Wang and Calvo (72) determined the Kd value of 0.5-2.0 µM for Lrp
binding to the 200-bp region upstream of the ilvIH operon
containing six repeats of the Lrp site.
The values we determined in this study are generally within the range
of published determinations. Among the five sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins (CbpB, DnaA, Fis, IHF, and Lrp), IHF showed the
highest affinity (or the lowest Kd value of 37 nM) to the IHF box and DnaA showed the lowest affinity (or
the highest Kd value of 213 nM) to the
DnaA box. The difference between our estimations and the published
values may be due to the difference in either the DNA probes used or
the reaction conditions employed. Along this line, it should be noted
that: (i) some of the sequence-nonspecific DNA-binding proteins
analyzed may bind with higher affinities to as yet unidentified
specific recognition sequences; (ii) the DNA binding affinity changes
depending on the nature of DNA probes such as the target sequence, the
sequence of flanking regions, the probe length, and the extent of DNA
curvature; (iii) the DNA binding activities of proteins also vary
depending on the reaction conditions such as the overall ionic
strength, pH, and the species and concentrations of salts and metal ions.
In contrast to these sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, the
influence of primary DNA sequence on the DNA binding affinity is less
for the nonspecific DNA-binding proteins. However, the overall
conformation of DNA affects the binding affinity of this group of
proteins. HU dimers bind to linear DNA fragments about every 9 bp
regardless of their sequence or length with the apparent Kd value of 500 nM and the cooperative
constant (
) of 30 corresponding to a weak cooperativity (73). Later
Bonnefoy et al. (74) reported that the HU dimers bind
specifically to the cruciform DNA with an apparent dissociation
constant (Kd) of 5 nM and the
value
of 1 corresponding to a non-cooperative nature. The
Kd value of HU we estimated using the linear probe
with or without DNA curvature was 51 and 25 nM,
respectively (Figs. 4 and 5B). In this study, we used the HU
purified from E. coli co-expressing both
and
subunits. Tanaka et al. (23) found that the equilibrium
dissociation constant (Kd) for various DNA fragments
of the
2 or
2 homodimers (1-2
µM) were not so different from that of the 
heterodimer.
The apparent dissociation constants for DNA binding by the
nucleoid-associated proteins examined in this study ranged from 25 to
250 nM, which are 102-103-fold
higher than those of gene-specific transcription factors with the
binding activities to specific regulatory sites generally arranged near
promoters (5). The molecular basis of the difference in DNA binding
affinity awaits results of the structural analysis of DNA-protein
complexes for both group proteins. Based on the DNA binding affinities
determined in this study, the protein composition of E. coli
nucleoid can be estimated once the intracellular concentrations of
these proteins be measured.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Takeshi Mizuno (CbpA, CbpB, H-NS),
Seiichi Yasuda (DnaA), Reid C. Johnson (Fis), Naoki Goshima (HU), Deog
Sun Hwang (IciA), Amos B. Oppenheim (IHF), David Low (Lrp), and Marlene Belfort (StpA) for gifts of the expression plasmids for DNA-binding proteins and suggestions for the protein purification.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry
of Education, Science and Culture of Japan, and CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) from the Japan Science and
Technology Corporation (JST).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-559-81-6741; Fax: 81-559-6846; E-mail:
aishiham@lab.nig.ac.jp.
2
F. Hansen and A. Ishihama, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Fis, factor for
inversion stimulation;
CbpA, curved DNA-binding protein A;
CbpB, curved
DNA-binding protein B;
DnaA, DNA-binding protein A;
Dps, DNA-binding
protein from starved cells;
Hfq, host factor for phage
Q
;
H-NS, histone-like nucleoid structuring protein;
HU, heat-unstable nucleoid protein;
IciA, inhibitor of chromosome
initiation A;
IHF, integration host factor;
Lrp, leucine-responsive
regulatory protein;
StpA, suppressor of td
phenotype A;
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Pettijohn, D. E.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella
(Neidhardt, F. C., ed)
, pp. 158-166, ASM, Washington, D. C.
|
| 2.
|
Drlica, K.,
and Rouviere-Yaniv, J.
(1987)
Microbiol. Rev.
51,
301-319[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Pruss, G. J.,
and Drlica, K.
(1989)
Cell
56,
521-523[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Almirón, M.,
Link, A. J.,
Furlong, D.,
and Kolter, R.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
2646-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Ishihama, A.
(1997)
in
Nucleic Acids & Molecular Biology: Mechanism of Transcription
(Eckstein, F.
, and Lilley, D. M. G., eds), Vol. 11
, pp. 53-70, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
|
| 6.
|
Finkel, S. E.,
and Johnson, R. C.
(1992)
Mol. Microbiol.
6,
3257-3265[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Nash, H. A.
(1996)
in
Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli
(Lin, E. E. C.
, and Lynch, A. S., eds)
, pp. 149-179, R. G. Landes Co., Austin, TX
|
| 8.
|
Rouviere-Yaniv, J.,
and Yaniv, M.
(1979)
Cell
17,
265-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Newman, E. B.,
and Lin, R. T.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
747-775[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
D'Ari, R.,
Lin, R. T.,
and Newman, E. B.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
260-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Yamada, H.,
Muramatsu, S.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1990)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
108,
420-425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ueguchi, C.,
Kakeda, M.,
Yamada, H.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1054-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kakeda, M.,
Ueguchi, C.,
Yamada, H.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1995)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
248,
629-634[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Wei, T.,
and Bernander, R.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
1865-1872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Cusick, M. E.,
and Belfort, M.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
28,
847-857[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Fuller, R. S.,
Funnell, B. E.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1984)
Cell
38,
889-900[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Hwang, D. S.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1990)
Cell
63,
325-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Kajitani, M.,
Kato, A.,
Wada, A.,
Inokuchi, Y.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
531-534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Sutton, M. D.,
and Kaguni, J. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23017-23024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Pan, C. Q.,
Finkel, S. E.,
Cramton, S. E.,
Feng, J-A.,
Sigman, D. S.,
and Johnson, R. C.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
264,
675-695[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kajitani, M.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
1063-1066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Yamada, H.,
Yoshida, T.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1991)
Agric. Biol. Chem.
55,
3139-3141
|
| 23.
|
Tanaka, H.,
Goshima, N.,
Khono, K.,
Kano, Y.,
and Imamoto, F.
(1993)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
113,
568-572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Nash, H. A.,
Robertson, C. A.,
Flamm, E.,
Weisberg, R. A.,
and Miller, H. I.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
4124-4127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Ernsting, B. R.,
Denninger, J. W.,
Blumenthal, R. M.,
and Matthews, R. G.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
7160-7169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Zhang, A.,
Derbyshire, V.,
Galloway Salvo, J. L.,
and Belfort, M.
(1995)
RNA
1,
783-793[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Carey, J.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
208,
103-117[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Zuber, F.,
Kotlarz, D.,
Rimsky, S.,
and Buc, H.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
12,
231-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Schaper, S.,
and Messer, W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17622-17626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Craig, N. L.,
and Nash, H. A.
(1984)
Cell
39,
707-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Cui, Y.,
Wang, Q.,
Stormo, G. D.,
and Calvo, J. M.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4872-4880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Takada, A.,
Wachi, M.,
Kaidow, A.,
Takamura, M.,
and Nagai, K.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
236,
576-579[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Losso, M. A.,
Pawlik, R. T.,
Canonaco, M. A.,
and Gualerzi, C. O.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
155,
27-32[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Zhang, A.,
Rimsky, S.,
Reaban, M. E.,
Buc, H.,
and Belfort, M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1340-1349[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Martinez, A.,
and Kolter, R.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
5188-5194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Skarstad, K.,
Thony, B.,
Hwang, D. S.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5365-5370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Ariza, R. R.,
Li, Z.,
Ringstad, N.,
and Demple, B.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
1655-1661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Jair, K.-W., Yu, X.,
Skarstad, K.,
Thony, B.,
Fujita, N.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Wolf, R. E., Jr.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
2507-2513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Skarstad, K.,
and Boye, E.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1217,
111-130[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Messer, W.,
and Weigel, C.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
24,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Atlung, T.,
Clausen, E. S.,
and Hansen, F. G.
(1985)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
200,
442-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Braun, R. E.,
O'Day, K.,
and Wright, A.
(1985)
Cell
40,
159-169[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Gourse, R. L.,
Gaal, T.,
Bartlett, M. S.,
Appleman, J. A.,
and Ross, W.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
50,
645-677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Friedman, D. I.
(1988)
Cell
55,
545-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Vargas, L. M.,
Kim, S.,
and Landy, A.
(1989)
Science
244,
1457-1461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Goosen, N.,
and van de Putte, P.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
16,
1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Newman, E. B.,
D'Ari, R.,
and Lin, R. T.
(1992)
Cell
68,
617-619[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Calvo, J. M.,
and Matthews, R. G.
(1994)
Microbiol. Rev.
58,
466-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Wang, Q.,
and Calvo, J. M.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
2495-2501[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Szalewska-Palasz, A.,
Wegrzyn, A.,
Blaszczak, A.,
Taylor, K.,
and Wegrzyn, G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4241-4246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Ross, W.,
Gosink, K. K.,
Salomon, J.,
Igarashi, K.,
Zou, C.,
Ishihama, A.,
Severinov, K.,
and Gourse, R. L.
(1993)
Science
262,
1407-1413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Giladi, H.,
Igarashi, K.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Oppenheim, A. B.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
985-990[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Williams, R. M.,
and Rimsky, S.
(1997)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
156,
175-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Higgins, C. F.,
Hinton, J. C.,
Hulton, C. S. J.,
Owen-Hughes, T.,
Pavitt, G. D.,
and Seirafi, A.
(1990)
Mol. Microbiol.
4,
2007-2012[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Yamada, H.,
Ueguchi, C.,
Yamada, H.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
237,
113-122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Laurent-Winter, C.,
Ngo, S.,
Danchin, A.,
and Berltin, P
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
244,
767-773[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Pontiggia, A.,
Negri, A.,
Beltrame, M.,
and Bianchi, M. E.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
7,
343-350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Shimizu, M.,
Miyake, M.,
Kanke, F.,
Matsumoto, U.,
and Shindo, H.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1264,
330-336[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Castaing, B.,
Zelwer, C.,
Laval, J.,
and Boiteux, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10291-10296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Hwang, D. S.,
Thony, B.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2209-2213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Franze de Fernandez, M. T.,
Hayward, W. S.,
and August, J. T.
(1972)
J. Biol. Chem.
247,
824-831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Tsui, H. C. T.,
Leung, H.-C. E.,
and Winkler, M. E.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
13,
35-49[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Brown, L.,
and Elliott, T.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
3763-3770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Muffler, A.,
Fischer, D.,
and Hengge-Aronis, R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
11 |