JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tidball, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavergne, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tidball, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavergne, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 33155-33160, November 12, 1999


Nitric-oxide Synthase Is a Mechanical Signal Transducer That Modulates Talin and Vinculin Expression*

James G. TidballDagger , Melissa J. Spencer, Michelle Wehling, and Eliane Lavergne

From the Department of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1527

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mechanical stimuli can cause changes in muscle mass and structure which indicate that mechanisms exist for transducing mechanical stimuli into signals that influence gene expression. Myotendinous junctions show adaptations to modified muscle loading which suggest that these are transcriptionally distinct domains in muscle fibers that may experience local regulation of expression of structural proteins that are concentrated at these sites. Vinculin and talin are cytoskeletal proteins that are highly enriched at myotendinous junctions that we hypothesize to be subject to local transcriptional regulation. Our findings show that mechanical stimulation of muscle cells in vivo and in vitro causes an increase in the expression of vinculin and talin that is mediated by nitric oxide. Furthermore, nitric oxide-stimulated increases in vinculin and talin expression occur through a protein kinase G-dependent pathway and therefore differ from other mechanisms through which nitric oxide has been shown previously to modulate transcription. Analysis of vinculin mRNA distribution in mechanically stimulated muscle fibers shows that the mRNA is highly concentrated at myotendinous junctions, which supports the hypothesis that myotendinous junctions are distinct domains in which the expression of cytoskeletal proteins is modulated by mechanical stimuli through a nitric oxide and protein kinase G-dependent pathway.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adaptation of organisms to their environment relies largely on modifications in gene expression in response to changes in stimuli applied to constituent cells. The best understood mechanisms through which environmental signals produce changes in gene expression occur in systems in which the stimulus produces a change in the chemical environment surrounding the cell, for example through signaling information mediated by hormones, growth factors, or cytokines (e.g. Refs. 1 and 2). However, cells also respond to changes in their mechanical environment (3), so systems must exist for the transduction of mechanical information to chemical signals in the cell that in turn regulate the expression of specific genes.

Skeletal muscle cells, perhaps more than any other cell type, are profoundly responsive to their mechanical environment. For example, removal of normal mechanical stimuli from muscle cells in vivo can result in rapid changes in gene expression, enzyme activity, and protein synthesis and stability (4-9). Application of mechanical loads to myotubes in vitro yields similar cellular responses (10-13). Although little is known of the mechanisms of mechanical signal transduction in muscle, previous investigations have provided evidence that soluble factors released by muscle cells experiencing loads in vitro may contribute to signaling an increase in protein synthesis (12). In addition, stretch-activated ion channels (14) could provide increases in the concentration of specific cytosolic ions that are capable of activating signaling pathways that can influence gene expression. However, the extent to which these systems of mechanical signal transduction may contribute to modifying the expression of specific proteins in muscle is unknown.

Myotendinous junctions (MTJs),1 which are highly specialized sites of force transmission across the muscle cell membrane (15), are responsive to changes in their mechanical environment (16). Increased mechanical stimulation in vivo or in vitro causes an increased expression of structural proteins that are concentrated at these sites (13). The increased concentration at MTJs of the mRNA encoding proteins whose expression is increased at MTJs suggests that muscle cell nuclei near the MTJ preferentially transcribe those mRNAs.

The local regulation of mRNA and protein synthesis at MTJs that are experiencing modified loading suggests that mechanical signal transduction that regulates the expression of these molecules occurs at MTJs. Recently, neuronal nitric-oxide synthase (nNOS) was shown to be concentrated at MTJs (17), and both its activity and expression are positively regulated by mechanical loading of muscle in vivo and in vitro (18-20). Because nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to modify gene expression in other systems (21-25), it is feasible, but untested, that increased [NO] that is generated during increased muscle loading could affect the expression of structural proteins. Furthermore, nitric oxide that is generated during increased muscle use has a short half-life (26), so its effects in muscle would be local and consistent with the expectation that gene expression in nuclei located near the MTJ would be most affected.

In this investigation, we test the hypothesis that NOS is a mechanical signal transducer in muscle that positively regulates the expression of structural proteins enriched at MTJs. We assay the effects of mechanical stimulation that are mediated by the NOS signaling pathway on the expression of talin and vinculin, which are cytoskeletal proteins that are highly enriched at MTJs and are links in a chain of proteins that couple thin filaments to integrin. Talin was selected for study because its expression is up-regulated by mechanical stimulation of muscle (13). Vinculin was selected because previous investigations have shown that it plays an important role in mechanical coupling in transmembrane assemblies of structural proteins (27).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Vitro Mechanical Loading Protocol-- C2C12 muscle cells were subjected to cyclic strains using a mechanical cell stimulator (Cell Kinetics, Providence, RI), which consists of a stainless steel plate containing wells in which the floor is a silastic membrane. Culture conditions were identical to those used previously (20). Myotubes were cyclically strained using a 6.7% mean deformation of the membrane and adherent cells. Five cycles of strain during a 20-s period followed by 10 s of no strain were applied to the cells, and then the strain cycle was repeated two more times, followed by a 30-min period of no strain. Mean strain rate was 3.4%·s-1. The sequence was repeated 47 times, over the course of 24 h. Cultures were then inspected with an inverted microscope to confirm that the myotubes remained attached to the substratum. Control cultures were grown under identical conditions, but they were not subjected to loading.

Modulation of [NO] and cGMP-dependent Protein Kinase Activity in Vitro-- NO concentration in vitro was modulated by the addition of NO donor or NOS inhibitors to cultures. In addition, potential NO-mediated events in target cells were blocked downstream of NO stimulation by inhibition of cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) with KT5823. Cultures in which NOS activity was inhibited received 100 µM Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) in 10% FBS in DMEM containing no phenol red immediately prior to the beginning of experimental loading protocols. Cultures not subjected to experimental inhibition of NOS activity were subjected to a media exchange at the same time as cultures receiving L-NAME.

Cultures that were stimulated with exogenous NO donor received 100 µM S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) in DMEM containing 10% FBS for 2 h prior to collection for analysis. PKG was inhibited in cultured myotubes by incubation in 2 µM KT5823 for 2 h before analysis. Cells treated with both SNAP and KT5823 were incubated for 30 min with KT5823 only, followed by 2 h in SNAP and KT5823. NO concentration in culture media at the end of the experimental treatments was measured using previously described procedures (20).

In Vivo Mechanical Loading Protocol-- Modified loading of rat hindlimb musculature in vivo was achieved using previously described procedures in which the hindlimb musculature experienced 10 days of unloading followed by 2 days of reloading by normal body weight (13, 28). At the end of the period of unloading or reloading, animals were euthanized, and plantaris muscles were collected for analysis.

Modulation of [NO] in Vivo-- Animals experiencing NOS inhibition during muscle reloading following unloading received water containing the NOS inhibitor L-NAME at 0.5 mg·ml-1 that was provided ad libitum starting 1 day prior to reloading. Control animals received untreated drinking water.

Northern Blots-- RNA was isolated from whole plantaris muscles according to the technique of Chomczynski and Sacchi (29). Electrophoresis and hybridizations were performed as described previously (20). Transfer efficiency and uniformity of loading were checked by staining the membrane with methylene blue. Blots were hybridized with 32P-labeled probes generated by random priming (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Following hybridization at 65 °C, blots were washed with 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.75 M sodium chloride, 5 mM EDTA, and 0.1% SDS for 1 h and exposed to autoradiographic film.

Probes for Northern Hybridization-- The following probes were used to hybridize Northern blots: 1) mouse talin cDNA (generous gift from Dr. D. J. G. Rees; University of Oxford, UK); 2) 28 S ribosomal subunit cDNA (30); 3) rat GAPDH cDNA (31); or 4) rat vinculin cDNA. Rat vinculin cDNA probe was synthesized by PCR of rat cDNA using the following primers: 1) 5' CTG GTG GAC GAG GCT AT 3' (upstream) and 2) 5' ATG TTT CCA GCC ACA GC 3' (downstream) which produce a 290-base pair product. The sequence of the primers was derived from the mouse cDNA sequence.2 Briefly, RNA was isolated (21), and 1 µg was used to make cDNA using random primers (10 ng/µl) and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) in 20 µl at 42 °C for 30 min. Following cDNA synthesis, 2 µl of the reaction was used to perform PCR using TAQ polymerase (Promega), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 4% Me2SO, and 0.2 µM dNTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Cycling conditions were 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 56 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C for 35 cycles. Fifteen microliters of the PCR reaction was run to a 1% agarose gel, and the presence of the 290-base pair product was verified. The remaining 35 µl of the reaction was placed on a G-50 microspin column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to remove nucleotides and primers. The concentration of the purified reaction was determined, and 60 ng was used in a ligation reaction to pCR2.1 (Invitrogen).

In Situ Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction of Single Muscle Fibers-- Plantaris muscles were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for at least 2 days at 6 °C. Muscles were then rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline, and single muscle fibers were dissected from surrounding tissue, while keeping the MTJ region of the fibers intact. Fibers were treated with 2 mg/ml of trypsin at 37 °C for 20 min before washing in sterile water followed by 1 min in 100% ethanol and air drying. Fibers were then incubated with DNase I for 4 h at 37 °C, rinsed in water followed by 1 min in 100% ethanol and air-dried. The RT reaction was performed using SuperScriptTM (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR mixture contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 4.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs, 0.1 unit/ml Taq, 16 µM digoxigenin-11-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-triphosphate, 0.08% bovine serum albumin, and 1.0 µM primers. The same primers were used for vinculin RT-PCR as were used for generating vinculin cDNA for Northern analysis. Primer specificity for rat muscle vinculin was confirmed by RT-PCR of rat muscle RNA using the same RT-PCR conditions as those used for in situ RT-PCR. PCR on isolated fibers was performed for 35 cycles (1 min 94 °C, 1 min at 54 °C, 1.5 min at 72 °C; Ericomp Twinblock thermocycler). After completion of the PCR, the fibers were rinsed in ethanol and then in two changes of TBS (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl) for 10 min and then incubated in TBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature in alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin diluted 1:700 diluted in TBS. After 3 washes in TBS, the sections were immersed in TBS at pH 9.5 and containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium reagents to produce a precipitate at the reaction sites. Positive controls consisted of omitting DNase treatment so that myonuclei containing the targeted sequence would stain after performing a successful PCR reaction. Reverse transcriptase was omitted from negative controls.

Vinculin mRNA distribution was compared with the distribution of beta -actin mRNA by in situ RT-PCR on single rat plantaris fibers using methods similar to those used for vinculin mRNA localization. The primers used to generate a beta -actin 296-base pair product were 5' CGT TGA CAT CCG TAA AGA CCT CTA 3' (upper primer) and 5' TAA AAC GCA GCT CAG TAA CAG TCC G 3' (lower primer) (33). However, PCR on fibers used for beta -actin localization used 30 cycles of PCR (94 °C for 1 min followed by 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min).

mRNA Stability Assay-- The possibility that SNAP treatments may reduce the rate of mRNA degradation rather than increasing transcription was tested by assaying for the rate of decline in concentration of vinculin and talin mRNA in cells treated with an inhibitor of transcription. C2C12 myotube cultures were incubated with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D in 10% FBS in DMEM for 0, 2, 8, or 24 h. The cells were then collected for RNA isolation and Northern analysis for changes in vinculin and talin mRNA concentrations.

Densitometry-- Relative mRNA concentrations were determined by scanning densitometry (Alpha Innotec) and expressed in arbitrary units. Comparisons were made only between those experimental and control samples that were run in the same gel and probed in the same autoradiograph. The significance of differences between the concentration of any given protein or mRNA in loaded and control samples was tested by the Mann-Whitney test, with confidence limit set at p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mechanical Stimulation Increases Talin and Vinculin Expression in Myotubes via an NO-dependent Mechanism-- C2C12 myotubes subjected to mechanical stimulation by periodic cyclic loading in vitro for 24 h showed large increases in the concentration of both talin and vinculin mRNA by approximately 3- and 2.5-fold, respectively, compared with control myotubes not subjected to stimulation (Fig. 1). The presence of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME prevented the increases in talin and vinculin mRNA concentrations caused by mechanical stimulation of myotubes in vitro (Fig. 1). Measurement of NO concentration in the culture media of mechanically stimulated myotubes and unstimulated controls showed that stimulation nearly doubled NO production by myotubes, from 0.5 to 0.9 pmol NO/mg/min (±0.04; n = 4).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Northern analysis of mRNA collected from C2C12 myotubes grown on gelatin-coated, silastic membrane and assayed for vinculin mRNA (upper panel), talin mRNA (middle), or 28 S ribosomal subunit (lower). A, myotubes not subjected to mechanical stimulation; B, myotubes subjected to mechanical stimulation prior to collection for RNA isolation; C, myotubes mechanically stimulated while in culture medium; and D, myotubes mechanically stimulated while in culture medium containing L-NAME.

Exogenous NO Stimulates Vinculin and Talin Expression via PKG-dependent Mechanism-- Addition of 100 µM SNAP produced 30 nM NO/mg/min (± 0.01; n = 3) over the 2-h incubation period. The increased NO concentration was accompanied by an increase in the concentration of vinculin mRNA to 170% of control values and an increase in the concentration of talin mRNA to approximately 260% of control values (Table I). Inhibition of cGMP-dependent protein kinase with KT5823 prevented the increase in vinculin or talin mRNA stimulated by SNAP (Fig. 2). PKG inhibition by KT5823 in the presence of SNAP reduced vinculin mRNA concentration below that of control cultures that were not stimulated by SNAP. Application of KT5823 alone did not significantly decrease vinculin or talin mRNA concentrations (Fig. 2) which indicates that the KT5823 inhibition of the SNAP-stimulated increase of talin and vinculin mRNA does not occur through inhibition of a NO-independent positive regulator of their expression. However, KT5823 application to myotubes in the absence of SNAP resulted in a significant increase in vinculin mRNA concentration, which indicates that there must be other NO-independent, PKG-modulated controls on vinculin expression that remain unidentified.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern analysis of mRNA collected from C2C12 myotubes and assayed for vinculin mRNA (upper panel), talin mRNA (middle), or 28 S ribosomal subunit (lower). A, myotubes in culture medium only; B, myotubes in culture medium containing SNAP for 24 h; C, myotubes in culture medium containing SNAP and KT5823 for 24 h; and D, myotubes in culture medium containing KT5823 for 24 h.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Relative density of signals in Northern analysis of vinculin and talin mRNAs for myotubes treated with NO donor or PKG inhibitor
The Northern blot used for densitometry is shown in Fig. 2, which is representative of the results from three experiments. Mean value obtained by densitometry for untreated cells in 10% FBS in DMEM was set at 100 and used to normalize other samples in each data set.

Talin and Vinculin mRNA Half-life Measurements-- Stability of talin and vinculin mRNAs were measured by assaying for changes in their concentration over time in the presence of actinomycin D, used to inhibit transcription. These assays showed that the half-life for talin mRNA stability in C2C12 myotubes is approximately 12.1 h, and the half-life for vinculin mRNA is approximately 27.3 h (Figs. 3-5).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Northern analysis of mRNA collected from C2C12 myotubes and assayed for vinculin mRNA (upper panel) or talin mRNA (lower). A, myotubes in culture media only; B, myotubes in culture media containing actinomycin D for 2 h; C, myotubes in culture media containing actinomycin D for 8 h; D, myotubes in culture media containing actinomycin D for 24 h.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Linear regression of densitometry of autoradiograph of Northern analysis for vinculin mRNA collected from myotubes cultured in media containing actinomycin D. r = -0.73; p = 0.007.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Linear regression of densitometry of autoradiograph of Northern analysis for talin mRNA collected from myotubes cultured in media containing actinomycin D. r = -0.96; p < 0.0001.

Increased Talin and Vinculin Expression during Muscle Loading Is Inhibited by NOS Inhibition-- Increased loading of plantaris muscles by 2 days of normal weight-bearing following a 10-day period of unloading produced an increase in vinculin mRNA concentration to 2.6 times control and in talin mRNA to 1.8 times control concentrations (Fig. 6; Table II). The increased concentrations of both talin and vinculin mRNA during increased muscle loading was greatly attenuated in animals that received L-NAME in their drinking water during the reloading period (Fig. 6). GAPDH mRNA concentration as a fraction of total mRNA decreased during muscle reloading, but L-NAME had no detectable influence on the effect of reloading on GAPDH mRNA concentration. Thus, NOS inhibition does not affect the changes in concentration of all mRNAs that are caused by muscle reloading.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Northern analysis of mRNA collected from rat plantaris muscles and assayed for vinculin mRNA (upper panel), talin mRNA (second from top), GAPDH mRNA (third from top), or 28 S ribosomal subunit (lower). A, muscles collected from animals after 10 days unloading by hindlimb suspension. B, muscles collected from animals after 10 days unloading by hindlimb suspension, followed by 2 days of reloading by normal weight-bearing while receiving drinking water ad libitum. C, muscles collected from animals after 10 days unloading by hindlimb suspension, followed by 2 days of reloading by normal weight-bearing while receiving drinking water containing L-NAME ad libitum.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Relative density of signals in Northern analysis of select mRNAs in plantaris muscles of animals experiencing modified muscle loading
The Northern blot used for densitometry is shown in Fig. 6 and is representative of the results from three experiments. Mean value obtained by densitometry for unloaded muscle samples was set at 100 and used to normalize other samples in each data set.

Vinculin mRNA was primarily concentrated at MTJs in muscles experiencing increased loading (Fig. 7), as has been shown previously for talin mRNA (13). Negative control fibers showed no labeling at the MTJ following the in situ RT-PCR procedure. Positive control fibers showed strong labeling of nuclei following the in situ RT-PCR procedure (Fig. 7). In situ RT-PCR of beta -actin mRNA showed no detectable differences in the concentration of that mRNA at MTJ and non-MTJ regions of the fibers on reloaded muscles (Fig. 8). Thus, the relatively high concentration of vinculin and talin mRNA at MTJs does not occur for all mRNA. RT-PCR showed that the primers and RT-PCR conditions used for in situ RT-PCR yielded products only of the predicted size for vinculin or beta -actin (Fig. 9), indicating that the reaction products seen by in situ RT-PCR were specific for vinculin or beta -actin mRNA.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Muscle fibers from rat plantaris muscle collected after 10 days of hindlimb unloading and 2 days of reloading and then subjected to in situ RT-PCR for vinculin mRNA. Group of three positive control muscle fibers (A) for which DNase was eliminated from the in situ RT-PCR protocol. The dark structures at the surface of the fibers are nuclei. Other panels show single fibers (B and C) and a bundle of 3 fibers (D) following in situ RT-PCR for vinculin mRNA. The most dense reaction product is at the MTJ. Fiber diameter is approximately 60 µm.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Muscle fibers from rat plantaris muscle collected after 10 days of hindlimb unloading and 2 days of reloading and then subjected to in situ RT-PCR for beta -actin mRNA. A, experimental sample showing beta -actin mRNA found at similarly high concentrations throughout the fibers. B, negative control treated identically as fibers shown in A, except reverse transcriptase was eliminated from the reaction mixture.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   RT-PCR products of rat plantaris muscle mRNA in which an approximately 290-base pair product was amplified using primers specific for either beta -actin (lane B) or vinculin (lane C). DNA ladder is shown in left-hand lane (A).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our findings show that the increases in talin and vinculin mRNAs that result from mechanical stimulation of muscle fibers are mediated by NO. Thus, NOS acts as a mechanical signal transducer in muscle cells and may couple modifications in the mechanical environment to changes in gene expression. Several previous investigations have reported that increased expression of structural proteins in skeletal muscle occurs when muscle is subjected to increased mechanical stimulation (9, 13, 34, 35), but little is known of the mechanisms by which those stimuli from the mechanical environment are transduced into chemical information that can influence gene expression. Although NO synthesis has been shown to be positively regulated by mechanical stimulation of cells in bone (36), endothelial cells (37, 38), and skeletal muscle (18-20), and NO is a famously pleuripotent signaling molecule (26, 39), the present findings are the first to show that it functions in modifying muscle gene expression in response to modified use.

The hypothesis that NOS could function as a mechanical signal transducer in skeletal muscle was supported by several previous investigations. First, nNOS is highly concentrated at MTJs (17), which are specialized for force transduction across the muscle cell membrane (15). This localization would place nNOS at an optimal site for sensing changes in the mechanical environment. Furthermore, increased skeletal muscle loading causes an increase both in nNOS expression (20) and activity (18, 20), and NO has been shown to function as a signaling molecule in several cell types (39). Finally, the short half-life of NO (26) suggests that it would locally regulate changes in transcriptional activity. This local regulatory effect may have particular functional significance in skeletal muscle where the transcriptional activities of individual nuclei located in a single muscle fiber can function independently. This independent regulation of transcriptional activity of individual myonuclei in a single cell has been best demonstrated for myonuclei located near the neuromuscular junction in which the increased expression of acetylcholine receptor subunits can be regulated independently of non-neuromuscular junction nuclei in the same cell (40, 41). The finding reported here that NO transduces mechanical signals to influence the expression of talin and vinculin and that NOS, NO, and the mRNAs of talin and vinculin are most concentrated at MTJs indicates that MTJs may also be a distinct nuclear domain in muscle cells in which NO plays a role in the local modulation of transcription. Other evidence indicating that MTJs may be distinct nuclear domains in muscle includes the findings that the mRNA for myosin heavy chain (34) and talin (13) increase in concentration at the MTJ during modified muscle use.

The observations reported here indicate that NO-mediated modulation of talin and vinculin mRNA concentrations occurs primarily by influencing the rate of transcription, although the possibility that there is some NO-mediated influence on talin and vinculin mRNA stability cannot be excluded entirely. This conclusion is supported by the finding that NO stimulation of myotubes for 24 h caused an approximately 170% increase in vinculin mRNA and 260% increase in talin mRNA, although the half-lives of those mRNAs were approximately 27 and 12 h, respectively. If NO were causing the observed increases in mRNA concentrations reported here solely through RNA stabilization, the maximum increase that would be observed in 24 h stimulation would be approximately 44% for vinculin and 93% for talin, which would be insufficient to explain the majority of the NO-mediated increase in mRNA concentrations.

Although there are several mechanisms through which NO can function as a signaling molecule, to our knowledge the only previously identified mechanism through which it has been shown to influence transcription is through structural modification of transcription factors (23-25). For example, c-Fos, c-Jun, and NF-kappa B binding affinities for target DNA sequences are all influenced by NO (23-25). Current evidence indicates that NO modifies transcription factors by S-nitrosylation of cysteines located in or near DNA binding domains (23-25) and that the NO-mediated effects are independent of guanylate cyclase activation (21). The present findings show that NO modulation of talin and vinculin expression is blocked by inhibition of PKG and therefore NO is not influencing transcription of talin and vinculin through direct interaction with transcription factors but rather through a cGMP- and PKG-dependent pathway. NO modulation of talin and vinculin expression also differs from the mechanisms through which it modulates the expression of genes regulated by AP-1 or NF-kappa B (21-25) in that NO is a positive modulator of talin and vinculin but negatively regulates genes whose expression is influenced by AP-1 or NF-kappa B binding.

Other mechanisms may also exist at MTJs for mechanical signal transduction that may influence the expression of genes for cytoskeletal proteins. The integrin-associated complex of proteins is highly concentrated at MTJs (15) and provides a prominent candidate system for this function because integrins have also been shown to function in signal transduction. Mechanical loads placed on integrins and associated proteins influence the assembly of complexes of structural proteins at the loading site (42-44) and activate kinases concentrated at those sites (42). Although integrin loading per se has not been shown to regulate the expression of genes encoding cytoskeletal proteins, integrin binding of extracellular matrix molecules can dramatically influence gene expression (e.g. Refs. 32, 45, and 46). The co-distribution of nNOS and the integrin complex and the role of both proteins in influencing the response of cells to changes in their mechanical environment support the possibility that future investigations will show synergistic interactions between the two systems when muscle cells respond to changes in their mechanical environment.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant AR40343 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiological Science, 621 Young Dr., University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1527. Tel.: 310-206-3395; Fax: 310-206-9184; E-mail: jtidball@ physci.ucla.edu.

2 J.-L. C. Coll, EMBL accession number L18880.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; NOS, nitric-oxide synthase; nNOS, neuronal nitric-oxide synthase; MTJ, myotendinous junction; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; PKG, cGMP-dependent protein kinase; L-NAME, (Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Herschman, H. R. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 281-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Taga, T., and Kishimoto, T. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 3387-3396[Abstract]
3. Watson, P. A. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 2013-2019[Abstract]
4. Templeton, G. H., Padalino, M., Manton, J., Glasberg, M., Silver, C. J., Lilver, P., DeMartino, G., Leconey, T., Klug, G., Hagler, H., and Sutko, J. L. (1984) J. Appl. Physiol. 56, 278-286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Fitts, R. H., Metzger, J. M., Riley, D. A., and Unsworth, B. R. (1986) J. Appl. Physiol. 60, 1946-1953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Thomason, D. B., Herrick, R. E., Surdyka, D., and Baldwin, K. M. (1987) J. Appl. Physiol. 63, 130-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Thomason, D. B., Biggs, R. B., and Booth, F. W. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 257, R300-R305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. McDonald, K. S., and Fitts, R. H. (1995) J. Appl. Physiol. 79, 1796-1802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Caiozzo, V. J., Haddad, F., Baker, M. J., and Baldwin, K. M. (1996) J. Appl. Physiol. 80, 1503-1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Vandenburgh, H. H., and Kaufman, S. (1979) Science 203, 265-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Vandenburgh, H. H., Hatfaludy, S., Karlisch, P., and Shansky, J. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 256, C674-C682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Vandenburgh, H. H., Shansky, J., Karlisch, P., and Solerssi, R. L. (1993) J. Cell. Physiol. 155, 63-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Frenette, J., and Tidball, J. G. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C818-C825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Sachs, F. (1987) Fed. Proc. 46, 12-16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Tidball, J. G. (1991) J. Biomech. 24 Suppl. 1, 43-52
16. Tidball, J. G., and Quan, D. M. (1992) J. Appl. Physiol. 73, 59-64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Chang, W. J., Iannaccone, S. T., Lau, K. S., Masters, B. S. S., McCabe, T. J., McMillan, K., Padre, R. C., Spencer, M. J., Tidball, J. G., and Stull, J. T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9142-9147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Balon, T. W., and Nadler, J. L. (1994) J. Appl. Physiol. 77, 2519-2521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Reiser, P. J., Kline, W. O., and Vaghy, P. L. (1997) J. Appl. Physiol. 82, 1250-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Tidball, J. G., Lavergne, E., Lau, K. S., Spencer, M. J., Stull, J. T., and Wehling, M. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C260-C266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Peng, H.-B., Rajavashisth, T. B., Libby, P., and Liao, J. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17050-17055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Peng, H.-B., Libby, P., and Liao, J. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14214-14219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Matthews, J. R., Botting, C. H., Panico, M., Morris, H. R., and Hay, R. T. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2236-2242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. DelaTorre, A., Schroeder, R. A., and Kuo, P. C. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 238, 703-706[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Nikitovic, D., Holmgren, A., and Spyrou, G. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 242, 109-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lowenstein, C. J., Dinerman, J. L., and Snyder, S. H. (1994) Ann. Intern. Med. 124, 227-237
27. Ezzell, R. M., Goldmann, W. H., Wang, N., Parasharama, N., and Ingber, D. (1997) Exp. Cell Res. 231, 14-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Morey-Holton, E., and Wronski, J. (1981) Physiologist 24 (suppl.), 45-48
29. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Harrington, C. A., and Chikaraishi, D. M. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 3317-3332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Fort, P., Marty, L., Piechaczyk, M., El Sabrouty, S., Dani, D., Jeanteur, P., and Blanchard, J. M. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 1431-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Pacifici, R., Basilico, C., Roman, J., Zutter, M. M., Santoro, S. A., and McCracken, R. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 89, 61-67
33. Adams, J. W., Migita, D. S., Yu, M. K., Young, R., Hellickson, M. S., Castro-Vargas, F. E., Domingo, J. D., Lee, P. H., Bui, J. S., and Henderson, S. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1179-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Dix, D. J., and Eisenberg, B. R. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 1885-1894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Baldi, J. C., and Reiser, P. J. (1995) J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 16, 587-594[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Pitsillides, A. A., Rawlinson, S. C. F., Suswillo, R. F. L., Rourrin, S., Azman, G., and Lanyon, L. E. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 1614-1622[Abstract]
37. Awolski, M. A., Sessa, W. C., and Sumpio, B. E. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 1449-1454
38. Uematsu, M., Ohara, Y., Navas, J. P., Nishida, K., Murphy, T. J., Alexander, R. W., Nerem, R. M., and Harrison, D. G. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C1371-C1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Hobbs, A. J., and Ignarro, L. J. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 269, 134-148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Simon, M. S., Hoppe, P., and Burden, S. J. (1992) Development 114, 545-553[Abstract]
41. Ahn Jo, S., Zhu, X., Marchionni, M. A., and Burden, S. J. (1995) Nature 373, 158-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M., and Burridge, K. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1403-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Choquet, D., Felsenfeld, D. P., and Sheetz, M. (1997) Cell 88, 39-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Sharp, W. W., Simpson, D. G., Borg, T. K., Samarel, A. M., and Terracio, L. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, H546-H556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Dike, L. E., and Farmer, S. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 6792-6796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Shaw, R. J., Doherty, D. E., Ritter, A. G., Benedict, S. H., and Clark, R. A. F. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 2139-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S. J. Zhang, G. A. Truskey, and W. E. Kraus
Effect of cyclic stretch on beta1D-integrin expression and activation of FAK and RhoA
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): C2057 - C2069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. D. Sidell and K. M. O'Brien
When bad things happen to good fish: the loss of hemoglobin and myoglobin expression in Antarctic icefishes
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2006; 209(10): 1791 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
A. KUMAR, R. MURPHY, P. ROBINSON, L. WEI, and A. M. BORIEK
Cyclic mechanical strain inhibits skeletal myogenesis through activation of focal adhesion kinase, Rac-1 GTPase, and NF-{kappa}B transcription factor
FASEB J, October 1, 2004; 18(13): 1524 - 1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Shiao, A. Fond, B. Deng, M. Wehling-Henricks, M. E. Adams, S. C. Froehner, and J. G. Tidball
Defects in neuromuscular junction structure in dystrophic muscle are corrected by expression of a NOS transgene in dystrophin-deficient muscles, but not in muscles lacking {alpha}- and {beta}1-syntrophins
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1873 - 1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. S. Zhang, W. E. Kraus, and G. A. Truskey
Stretch-induced nitric oxide modulates mechanical properties of skeletal muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): C292 - C299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Fan, E. Roy, L. Zhu, T. C. Murphy, C. Ackert-Bicknell, C. M. Hart, C. Rosen, M. S. Nanes, and J. Rubin
Nitric Oxide Regulates Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand and Osteoprotegerin Expression in Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 751 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. D'Addario, P. D. Arora, R. P. Ellen, and C. A. G. McCulloch
Regulation of Tension-induced Mechanotranscriptional Signals by the Microtubule Network in Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 53090 - 53097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. K. Y. Siu, D. D. Mruk, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Adhering Junction Dynamics in the Testis Are Regulated by an Interplay of {beta}1-Integrin and Focal Adhesion Complex-Associated Proteins
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 2141 - 2163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Ervasti
Costameres: the Achilles' Heel of Herculean Muscle
J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 13591 - 13594.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
Y. Nagasawa, M. Takenaka, J. Kaimori, Y. Matsuoka, Y. Akagi, M. Tsujie, E. Imai, and M. Hori
Rapid and diverse changes of gene expression in the kidneys of protein-overload proteinuria mice detected by microarray analysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 923 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. B. Reid
Plasticity in Skeletal, Cardiac, and Smooth Muscle: Invited Review: Redox modulation of skeletal muscle contraction: what we know and what we don't
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2001; 90(2): 724 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. W. Smith, J. D. Smith, and D. S. Criswell
Involvement of nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscle adaptation to chronic overload
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 2005 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. D'Addario, P. D. Arora, J. Fan, B. Ganss, R. P. Ellen, and C. A. G. McCulloch
Cytoprotection against Mechanical Forces Delivered through beta 1 Integrins Requires Induction of Filamin A
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2001; 276(34): 31969 - 31977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract