![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 47, 33209-33212, November 19, 1999
-Crystallin
§,
,
From the
Department of Pathology, Case Western
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 and the ¶ Department of
Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was shown that Proteins--
Cloning of human Preparation of the Complexes between 13C-labeled
FTIR Spectroscopy--
Samples of a soluble or aggregated
protein were placed between two calcium fluoride windows separated by a
50-µm thick spacer. Infrared spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a
Bruker IFS 66 instrument. Typically, 500 interferograms were averaged
and Fourier-transformed to give a resolution of 2 cm Infrared spectroscopy is an established method for studying the
secondary structure of proteins (22-24). However, the application of
this technique to determine the backbone conformation of individual components in protein-protein complexes is complicated by the overlapping of the spectroscopic signals from the two macromolecules. To circumvent this fundamental problem and facilitate studies with the
chaperone-bound proteins, we have prepared a uniformly 13C-labeled
-Crystallin, the major lens protein, acts as a
molecular chaperone by preventing the aggregation of proteins damaged
by heat and other stress conditions. To characterize the backbone
conformation of protein folding intermediates that are recognized by
the chaperone, we prepared the uniformly 13C-labeled
A-crystallin. The labeling greatly reduced the overlapping between
the conformation-sensitive amide I bands of
-crystallin and
unlabeled substrate proteins. This procedure has allowed us to gain
insight into the secondary structure of
-crystallin-bound species,
an understanding which has previously been unattainable. Analysis of
the infrared spectra of two substrate proteins (
- and
L-crystallins) indicates that heat-destabilized
conformers captured by
-crystallin are characterized by a high
proportion of native-like secondary structure. In contrast to the
chaperone-bound species, the same proteins subjected to heat treatment
in the absence of
-crystallin preserve very little native secondary structure. These data show that
-crystallin specifically recognizes very early intermediates on the denaturation pathway of proteins. These
aggregation-prone species are characterized by native-like secondary
structure but compromised tertiary interactions. The experimental
approach described in this study can be further applied to probe the
backbone conformation of proteins bound to chaperones other than
-crystallin.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Crystallin, a major lenticular protein, is believed to play a
crucial role in maintaining the transparency of the ocular lens (1-3).
The protein consists of two types of highly homologous 20-kDa chains,
A and
B. These chains self-associate, forming large oligomeric
complexes consisting of 30-40 subunits (1-3). The high resolution
structure of
-crystallin is currently unknown. However, recent
cryo-electron microscopy data for
B-crystallin indicate that the
protein forms spherical particles with a diameter of 8-18 nm and a
large central cavity (4). For many years it was believed that the
expression of
-crystallin was restricted to the ocular lens. More
recently, relatively large quantities of both
B- and
A-crystallin
have been found in various non-lenticular tissues (5-8). Furthermore,
B-crystallin has been associated with neurodegenerative disorders
such Alexander's disease, diffuse Lewy body disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease, and Alzheimer's disease (5, 6, 8). These findings were
accompanied by data showing that
-crystallin belongs to the family
of small heat shock proteins
(sHSPs)1 (2, 8, 9). While
sHSPs are abundant both in eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, no
obvious function has been associated with these proteins. An important
step toward unraveling the functional role of
-crystallin and
related sHSPs was the discovery that these proteins act as molecular
chaperones by preventing the aggregation of other proteins denatured by
heat or other stress conditions (10-14). The chaperone function of
-crystallin is likely to be of considerable importance in
vivo. In particular, the above function was suggested to be
instrumental in the prevention of cataract formation in the ocular lens
(10, 13). In non-lenticular tissues, the role of sHSPs may be to
maintain substrate proteins in a folding-competent state (15, 16).
-crystallin specifically binds aggregation-prone
structures that occur on the denaturation pathway of proteins (17). A
key to understanding the molecular basis of this apparent "substrate
specificity," is to determine the conformational properties of
non-native proteins recognized by this chaperone. Although recent
fluorescence studies provided some insight into the tertiary structure
of these species (18, 19), important information at the level of
protein secondary structure is still missing. Determination of the
secondary structure of individual components in large protein-protein
complexes presents a difficult experimental problem. To circumvent
these difficulties, herein, we have applied the strategy of
"isotope-edited" infrared spectroscopy. The present data shows that
the aggregation prone folding intermediates captured by
-crystallin
are characterized by a high proportion of native secondary structure.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
A-crystallin has been
previously described (18, 20). The protein was overexpressed in
Escherichia coli strain JM101 essentially as outlined in our
previous study (18). To obtain 13C-labeled
A-crystallin,
cells were cultured in the presence of MOPS-buffered minimum medium
containing a mixture of trace minerals, ammonium chloride, and
uniformly 13C-labeled glucose (2 mg per 400 ml of culture)
as a sole carbon source. The protein was purified by the standard
protocol (18), dialyzed against 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate,
and freeze-dried. The oligomerization state, far/near-UV circular
dichroism spectra, FTIR spectra, as well as the chaperone activity of
A-crystallin were unaffected by the lyophilization/buffer
reconstitution procedure. The low molecular mass
-
(
L) and
-crystallins were isolated from young bovine
lenses and purified as described previously (17).
A-Crystallin and
- or
L-Crystallins--
To
prepare protein-protein complexes for FTIR measurements, lyophilized
13C-labeled
A-crystallin was dissolved in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7, and combined with either
- or
L-crystallin at a 1:0.8 molar ratio of
A monomer to
the substrate protein monomer. The mixtures were then incubated for 30 min at 65 °C. In the absence of the chaperone, the thermally
denaturated
- and
L-crystallins aggregate. However,
-crystallin prevents the aggregation, forming water-soluble
complexes with these proteins (10, 11). After incubation, the samples
were cooled down to room temperature, and the complexes were separated
from the residual free substrate proteins (approximately 18 and 9% for
- and
L-crystallin, respectively) by filtration on a
100-kDa cut-off Microcon filter as described previously (18). The molar
ratio of
-crystallin to the substrate protein in a given complex was
estimated by subtracting the amount of the unbound substrate recovered
in the filtrate (as determined spectrophotometrically) from the initial
amount of this protein in the incubation mixture (18). The absence of
unbound substrates in the final samples was verified by size-exclusion
chromatography on a Superose 6 HR column (data not shown for brevity).
Samples of thermally aggregated
- and
L-crystallins
were obtained by high temperature (65 °C) incubation of these
proteins in the absence of
A-crystallin. The aggregates were
collected by low-speed centrifugation and resuspended in the buffer.
Because water interferes with infrared spectroscopic measurements, the
buffer used in these studies was prepared in
2H2O.
1.
Before further processing, spectra in the 1500-1800 cm
1
region were corrected for the weak absorption of the
2H2O buffer and, if necessary, for the residual
water vapor signal. The technique of Fourier self-deconvolution was
used to resolve the overlapping infrared bands (21, 22). The secondary
structure content was estimated by curve fitting of original
(non-deconvolved) amide I band contours (22).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
A-crystallin. It was verified that the
labeling did not affect the chaperone function of the protein as
indicated by an essentially identical ability of both the labeled and
unlabeled
A-crystallin to suppress the thermal aggregation of
-
and
L-crystallins. Consistent with the previous data
(25, 26), the conformation-sensitive amide I band of unlabeled
A-crystallin has a maximum at 1632 cm
1. Upon labeling,
the maximum of this band shifted to 1591 cm
1 (Fig.
1A, trace 1). The
observed shift of the amide I band by 41 cm
1 toward lower
frequency is consistent with theoretical predictions as well as limited
experimental data available for other proteins (27-29). Importantly,
13C-labeling of
-crystallin greatly reduced the
overlapping of its amide I band with that of the unlabeled substrate
protein. This opened up a possibility of analysis of the amide I bands (and thus the secondary structure) of the chaperone-bound proteins.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Panel A, infrared spectrum of
13C-labeled
A-crystallin alone (trace 1) and
that of an "inert" mixture of 13C-labeled
A-crystallin and unlabeled
-crystallin (trace 2). The
proteins were incubated at room temperature, i.e. under the
conditions that do not lead to the formation of the chaperone-substrate
complex. Panel B, infrared spectrum of the native
-crystallin at room temperature (trace 1) and the
difference spectrum obtained upon subtracting the spectrum of
13C-labeled
A-crystallin from that of an inert mixture
of 13C-
A- and
-crystallins (trace 2). The
concentration of
A- and
-crystallin was 12 and 9.6 mg/ml,
respectively.
To test this approach, we first analyzed the infrared spectrum of an
"inert" mixture of 13C-labeled
A-crystallin with an
unlabeled
-crystallin incubated at room temperature. Under these
conditions, there is no complex formation between these two proteins
(11). As shown in Fig. 1A, the spectrum of the above mixture
shows well separated maxima corresponding to
13C-
A-crystallin (1591 cm
1) and
-crystallin (1637 cm
1). While the high frequency
region above approximately 1650 cm
1 of the amide I band
of
-crystallin contains very little contribution from
-crystallin, a considerable spectral overlapping still exists at
lower wave numbers. However, this residual overlapping can be easily
removed by subtracting the spectrum of 13C-
A-crystallin
alone. The well separated 1591 cm
1 band maximum of the
latter protein serves as an invaluable marker for determining the
subtraction factor (
-crystallin and most other proteins contain no
infrared bands with a maximum at 1591 cm
1). In our
experience, the subtraction factor can be reliably determined using the
original spectra. However, the procedure is especially accurate when
applied to spectra subjected to band-narrowing by Fourier
self-deconvolution. As an illustration, Fig. 1B shows the
infrared spectrum of
-crystallin when measured alone (trace 1) and the one obtained upon applying the subtraction procedure to
the spectrum of an inert mixture of 13C-
A-crystallin and
-crystallin (trace 2). The spectra of
-crystallin represented by traces 1 and 2 are indistinguishable, clearly
demonstrating the validity of the experimental approach used in this study.
The amide I band of the native
-crystallin exhibits a maximum at
1637 cm
1 (Fig. 2,
trace 1). As for other proteins, the observed amide I band
contour is a composite of overlapping components which represent
different elements of protein secondary structure (22-24). These
components can be better resolved by Fourier self-deconvolution (21,
22). The deconvolved spectrum of the native
-crystallin is dominated
by a very strong band at 1636 cm
1 (Fig.
3, trace 1). This band is
highly characteristic of a
-sheet structure (22-24). All other
amide I component bands are much weaker. These bands may be assigned to
-helix (1656 cm
1) and turns (1665 and 1686 cm
1). The band at 1673 cm
1 likely
represents
-sheet structure, although this band may also contain
contributions from turns. The fractional areas of these bands, which
provide an estimate of protein secondary structure (22, 23), are shown
in Table I. Overall, the data indicates that the secondary structure of the protein consists largely of
-strands and little
-helical structure. A very high content of
-sheet structure in
-crystallin is fully consistent with the
crystallographic data (30). Furthermore, the crystal structure of
-II crystallin also indicates the presence of short
-helical regions (30).
|
|
|
The infrared spectrum of
-crystallin bound to
-crystallin was
obtained by subtracting the signal of 13C-labeled
A-crystallin from the spectrum of the thermally prepared protein-protein complex. To ensure reliable subtraction, a control sample of 13C-labeled
A-crystallin alone was pretreated
in the same way as the protein used to prepare the complex. The amide I
band contour of the chaperone-bound
-crystallin (Fig. 2, trace
2) has a maximum at 1637 cm
1, and its overall shape
is remarkably similar to that of the native protein. Upon deconvolution
(Fig. 3, trace 2), the spectrum shows a dominant
-sheet
band at 1634 cm
1. A small shift of this band to lower
frequency as compared with the 1636 cm
1
-sheet band in
the spectrum of the native protein likely reflects a higher degree of
hydrogen-deuterium exchange in the chaperone-bound protein. Consistent
with the visual inspection of the spectra, quantitative analysis
indicates that the secondary structure of the chaperone bound
-crystallin is characterized by only slightly decreased content of
-sheet structure (approximately 61% versus 66% in the
native protein), whereas the content of
-helical structure remains
essentially unchanged. In contrast to the close similarity of the amide
I bands of the native and
-crystallin-bound
-crystallin, a
dramatically different spectrum was observed for
-crystallin thermally denatured in the absence of the chaperone (Figs. 2 and 3,
traces 3). Characteristic features of the latter spectrum
include the strong band at 1618 cm
1 and a band at 1694 cm
1. The 1618 cm
1 band, which accounts for
approximately 22% of the total area of amide I contour, likely
represents intermolecularly hydrogen-bonded
-strands (22, 31),
Importantly, the appearance of this new band was accompanied by a
drastic reduction (to approximately 18%) in the integrated intensity
of the native
-sheet band around 1636 cm
1.
A very similar trend was observed for another lens protein studied,
L-crystallin. This protein is also characterized by a high content of
-structure (25, 32). The deconvolved spectrum of the
native
L-crystallin shows a major
-sheet band at 1631 cm
1 (Fig. 4). This band,
together with a weaker
-structure-characteristic band at 1673 cm
1, account for 40% of the total area of the amide I
contour (Table I). The prominent 1631 cm
1 band is also
seen in the spectrum of the chaperone-bound
L-crystallin, although its integrated intensity is
somewhat decreased. Compared with the native protein, the overall
content of
-sheet structure in the bound
L-crystallin
is reduced from approximately 40 to 36% (Table I). In contrast to this
relatively small change, a much more drastic perturbation of the
secondary structure was observed for
L-crystallin
subjected to heat treatment in the absence of the chaperone. The
spectrum of this protein (Fig. 4, trace 3) shows a dominant
band at 1618 cm
1 (27% of the total area of amide I band
contour) and is very similar to that of the thermally denaturated
-crystallin. The integrated intensity of the native
-sheet band
around 1631 cm
1 is reduced to 3%, indicating that
thermally aggregated
L-crystallin preserves very little
native secondary structure.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The family of molecular chaperones includes a number of
structurally unrelated proteins that share the common property of being
able to recognize and bind non-native conformers of other proteins. By
doing so, they prevent unwanted intermolecular interactions and, in
certain cases, facilitate the correct folding of substrate proteins
(33-36). Some members of the chaperone family (e.g. HSP60) have ATPase activity and are directly involved in protein folding in vivo. Many others, however, lack ATPase activity and play
a less defined auxiliary role in the cell.
-Crystallin and other sHSPs belong to this second group of chaperones. These chaperones appear to act as a passive binder of non-native proteins in response to
cellular stress conditions (34).
There has been great interest in characterizing the specific
conformational states of non-native proteins recognized by molecular chaperones. For example, DnaK binds polypeptide chains in a completely extended conformation. HSP60, on the other hand, associates with relatively compact protein folding intermediates, whereas HSP90 appears
to have dual substrate specificity (33-36). In contrast to these
chaperones, very little specific information is available regarding the
conformation of proteins recognized by sHSPs. The present study
provides, for the first time, a direct insight into the secondary
structure of non-native proteins bound to
-crystallin. To obtain
this information, we have used a strategy of isotope-edited infrared
spectroscopy. Uniform 13C-labeling of the recombinant
A-crystallin protein greatly reduced the overlapping between its
amide I band and the respective bands of substrate proteins. This
allowed infrared spectroscopic analysis of the secondary structure of
-crystallin-bound species. At a qualitative level, the main
conclusions of this study were already evident from a simple visual
comparison of the spectra of free- and chaperone-bound proteins. These
conclusions were further reinforced by a quantitative band-fitting
analysis. Although quantitative determination of protein secondary
structure by band-fitting of infrared spectra is not without pitfalls
and limitations (24), the procedure is of proven value when used to
assess, in relative terms, the extent of conformational changes in
proteins. Overall, the results of this study show that the secondary
structure of non-native proteins bound to
-crystallin is similar to
that of native conformers. Remarkably, for both
- and
L-crystallin, the content of native
-sheet structure
in the chaperone-bound species appears to be reduced by no more than
10%. This contrasts with a greatly diminished native secondary
structure of the same proteins denatured in the absence of the
chaperone. While in this study we have focused on lens proteins
interacting with their physiologically relevant chaperone,
-crystallin, the present data are likely representative of
non-native proteins bound to sHSPs. Furthermore, the experimental
approach described in this work should prove useful for studying
conformational properties of proteins bound to other members of the
chaperone family.
It was previously demonstrated that
-crystallin has an enormous
capacity for binding non-native proteins on the denaturation pathway,
but apparently does not interact with the intermediates that occur on
the refolding pathway (17). Furthermore, it was shown that the
non-native proteins associated with
-crystallin are characterized by
an increased surface hydrophobicity and partially compromised tertiary
interactions (18, 19). The present data extends these observations,
affording a more detailed insight into the substrate specificity of
-crystallin. In particular, the finding that the conformationally
compromised proteins recognized by this chaperone retain a high
proportion of native-like secondary structure provides crucial
experimental support to the earlier hypothesis (18) that
-crystallin
and other sHSPs interact specifically with aggregation-prone folding
intermediates that occur very early on the denaturation pathway. The
complexes of sHSPs with such intermediates may provide a reservoir for
other components of the chaperone machinery to renature the bound
proteins (15, 16). In the context of eye research, recent data indicate
that the aggregation of lens proteins under physiologically relevant stress conditions such as oxidative stress or ultraviolet radiation is
accompanied by only small loss of native secondary
structure.2 Therefore, the
substrate specificity of
-crystallin described above is fully
consistent with the postulated role of this protein as a chaperone that
protects the transparency of the ocular lens.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant EY11694.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Permanent address: Dept. of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Calcutta 700 009, India.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2085 Adelbert Rd.,
Cleveland, OH 44106. Tel.: 216-368-0139; Fax: 216-368-2546; E-mail:
wks3@pop.c wru.edu.
2 W. K. Surewicz, L. P. Choo-Smith, and K. P. Das, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: sHSP, small heat shock protein; FTIR, Fourier-transform infrared; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Horwitz, J.
(1993)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.
34,
10-21 |
| 2. | Groenen, P. J. T. A., Merck, K. B., de Jong, W. W., and Bloemendal, H. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 1-19[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Hoenders, H. J., and Bloemendal, H. (1981) in Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Eye Lens (Bloemendal, H., ed) , pp. 279-326, John Wiley & Sons, New York |
| 4. | Haley, D. A., Horwitz, J., and Stewart, P. L. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 277, 27-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Iwaki, T., Kume-Iwaki, A., Liem, R. K. H., and Goldman, J. E. (1989) Cell 57, 71-78[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Lowe, J., McDermott, H., Pike, I., Spendlove, I., Landon, M., and Mayer, R. J. (1992) J. Pathol. 166, 61-68[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Srinivasan, A. N.,
Nagineni, C. N.,
and Bhat, S. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23337-23341 |
| 8. | Sax, C. M., and Piatigorsky, J. (1994) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 69, 155-201[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Klemenz, R.,
Frohli, E.,
Steiger, R. H.,
Schafer, R.,
and Aoyama, A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3652-3656 |
| 10. |
Horwitz, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10449-10453 |
| 11. |
Wang, K.,
and Spector, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13601-13608 |
| 12. |
Raman, B.,
and Rao, C. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27264-27268 |
| 13. | Rao, P. V., Huang, Q.-L., Horwitz, J., and Zigler, J. S. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1245, 439-447[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Jakob, U.,
Gaestel, M.,
Engel, K.,
and Buchner, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1517-1520 |
| 15. | Lee, G. J., Roseman, A. M., Saibil, H. R., and Vierling, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 659-671[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Ehrnsperger, M., Graber, S., Gaestel, M., and Buchner, J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 221-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Das, K. P., and Surewicz, W. K. (1995) Biochem. J. 311, 367-370 |
| 18. |
Das, K. P.,
Petrash, J. M.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10449-10452 |
| 19. | Lindner, R. A., Kapur, A., Mariani, M., Titmuss, S. J., and Carver, J. A. (1998) Eur. J. Biochem. 258, 170-183[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Andley, U. P.,
Mathur, S.,
Griest, T. A.,
and Petrash, J. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31973-31980 |
| 21. | Kauppinen, J. K., Moffatt, D. J., Mantsch, H. H., and Cameron, D. C. (1981) Appl. Spectrosc. 35, 271-276[CrossRef] |
| 22. | Surewicz, W. K., and Mantsch, H. H. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 952, 115-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Byler, M., and Susi, H. (1986) Biopolymers 26, 469-487 |
| 24. | Surewicz, W. K., Mantsch, H. H., and Chapman, D. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 389-394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Lamba, O. P., Borchman, D., Sinha, S. K., Shah, J., Renugopalakrishnan, V., and Yappert, M. C. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1163, 113-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Surewicz, W. K., and Olesen, P. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9655-9660[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Tadesse, L., Nazarbaghi, R., and Walter, L. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 7036-7037[CrossRef] |
| 28. | Haris, P. I., Robillard, G. T., van Dijk, A. A., and Chapman, D. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 6279-6284[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Zhang, M., Fabian, H., Mantsch, H. H., and Vogel, H. J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 10833-10888 |
| 30. | Wistow, G., Turnell, B., Summers, L., Slingsby, C., Moss, D., Miller, L., Lindley, P., and Blundell, T. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 170, 175-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Fraser, P. E.,
Nguyen, J.,
Surewicz, W. K.,
and Kirschner, D. A.
(1991)
Biophys. J.
60,
1190-1201 |
| 32. | Bax, B., Lapatto, R., Nalini, V., Driessen, H., Lindley, P. F., Mahadevan, D., Blundell, T. L., and Slingsby, C. (1990) Nature 347, 776-780[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Hendrick, J. P., and Hartl, F.-U. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 349-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Jakob, U., and Buchner, J. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 205-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Fink, A. L.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
425-449 |
| 36. | Buchner, J. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 136-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-h. Xi, F. Bai, R. McGaha, and U. P. Andley Alpha-crystallin expression affects microtubule assembly and prevents their aggregation FASEB J, May 1, 2006; 20(7): 846 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Sun, Z Ma, Y Li, B Liu, Z Li, X Ding, Y Gao, W Ma, X Tang, X Li, et al. Gamma-S crystallin gene (CRYGS) mutation causes dominant progressive cortical cataract in humans J. Med. Genet., September 1, 2005; 42(9): 706 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Biswas and K. P. Das Role of ATP on the Interaction of {alpha}-Crystallin with Its Substrates and Its Implications for the Molecular Chaperone Function J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 42648 - 42657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kosinski-Collins, S. L. Flaugh, and J. King Probing folding and fluorescence quenching in human {gamma}D crystallin Greek key domains using triple tryptophan mutant proteins Protein Sci., August 1, 2004; 13(8): 2223 - 2235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Sathish, H. A. Koteiche, and H. S. Mchaourab Binding of Destabilized {beta}B2-Crystallin Mutants to {alpha}-Crystallin: THE ROLE OF A FOLDING INTERMEDIATE J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16425 - 16432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Sathish, R. A. Stein, G. Yang, and H. S. Mchaourab Mechanism of Chaperone Function in Small Heat-shock Proteins: FLUORESCENCE STUDIES OF THE CONFORMATIONS OF T4 LYSOZYME BOUND TO {alpha}B-CRYSTALLIN J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44214 - 44221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Putilina, F. Skouri-Panet, K. Prat, N. H. Lubsen, and A. Tardieu Subunit Exchange Demonstrates a Differential Chaperone Activity of Calf alpha -Crystallin toward beta LOW- and Individual gamma -Crystallins J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 13747 - 13756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. P. Andley, H. C. Patel, and J.-H. Xi The R116C Mutation in alpha A-crystallin Diminishes Its Protective Ability against Stress-induced Lens Epithelial Cell Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2002; 277(12): 10178 - 10186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Narberhaus {alpha}-Crystallin-Type Heat Shock Proteins: Socializing Minichaperones in the Context of a Multichaperone Network Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2002; 66(1): 64 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Purkiss, O. A. Bateman, J. M. Goodfellow, N. H. Lubsen, and C. Slingsby The X-ray Crystal Structure of Human gamma S-crystallin C-terminal Domain J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2002; 277(6): 4199 - 4205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sinha, M. K. Wyatt, R. Sarra, C. Jaworski, C. Slingsby, C. Thaung, L. Pannell, W. G. Robison, J. Favor, M. Lyon, et al. A Temperature-sensitive Mutation of Crygs in the Murine Opj Cataract J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2001; 276(12): 9308 - 9315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |