![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 47, 33334-33340, November 19, 1999
§,
,
,
,
, and
From the
Division of Hematology, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, the ¶ Department of
Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, and the
Drug Discovery Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, the
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612-9497
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion
is modulated by alterations in receptor affinity or by post-receptor
events. Pretreatment of Jurkat T-cells with the
3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, lovastatin,
markedly reduced (IC50 The essential role of leukocyte integrin receptors in cell-cell
and cell-substrate adhesion in the inflammatory and immune systems is
well established. The adhesive capacity of leukocyte integrins is
highly regulated. Integrin receptors in low adhesive state do not
mediate strong adhesion to other cells or ligands. However, when
leukocytes are appropriately activated there is often a detectable
increase in integrin adhesiveness within a few seconds to minutes. Some
activation stimuli induce a measurable change in integrin receptor
affinity, whereas others mediate their effects by post-receptor events
such as cytoskeleton-dependent clustering of receptors that
serve to increase overall avidity (1, 2). For example, the functional
activity of Although a number of cytoplasmic protein regulators of integrin
adhesiveness have been identified and characterized (5), the signal
transduction pathways involved in the regulation of adhesiveness are
still not fully elucidated. Several studies, however, have implicated
the involvement of Ras family proteins. By using Chinese hamster ovary
(CHO) cells transfected with Ras-related small G-proteins, which regulate cell growth,
proliferation, and differentiation, are modified by farnesyl or geranylgeranyl groups. This isoprenylation is required for their translocation to the plasma membrane and function (11, 12). These two
post-translational modifications are catalyzed by the enzymes
farnesyltransferase (FTase) and type I geranylgeranyltransferase (GGTase I) which recognize proteins that end with the motif
CaaX at their carboxyl termini (C is cysteine, a is
aliphatic amino acid, and X is any amino acid). FTase
prefers proteins that end with X as serine or methionine,
whereas GGTase I prefers X as leucine or isoleucine. Ha-Ras,
having the carboxyl-terminal CVLS (the aliphatic amino acids (aa) are
valine and leucine, X is serine), is selectively
farnesylated, whereas Rho and Rac family GTPases have leucine at a
carboxyl-terminal X position and are geranylgeranylated (13,
14). K-Ras in which X is methionine is naturally
farnesylated but becomes geranylgeranylated when FTase is inhibited
(15, 16). The prenylation status of R-Ras is unclear, but its
carboxyl-terminal sequence, CVLL, suggests that it would be
geranylgeranylated. This is also supported by the fact that FTase
inhibitors do not inhibit R-Ras-induced transformation (17).
In the present study we have investigated the role of protein
prenylation in integrin-dependent Jurkat and U937 leukocyte adhesion by utilizing lovastatin and prenyltransferase inhibitors. Lovastatin and related drugs in this class are inhibitors of
3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, an early and
rate-limiting enzyme in the sterol synthesis pathway (18). In
addition to lowering cholesterol, lovastatin reduces the level of
isoprenoids including geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) and farnesyl
pyrophosphate (FPP) by depleting cellular pools of the precursors. FPP
is a substrate for protein farnesyltransferase and GGPP is a substrate
for protein geranylgeranyltransferase.
Notably, recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that a
statin decreased CD11b expression and reduced
CD11b-dependent adhesion of monocytes to endothelium (19),
decreased ICAM-1 and LFA-1 expression in monocytes (20), and reduced
leukocyte-endothelium interactions in vivo (21). We found
that lovastatin inhibited PMA-stimulated adhesion, a post-receptor
event, but not adhesion induced by an activating mAb that directly
modulates Cell Culture--
Jurkat and U937 cells (ATCC, Walkersville, MD)
were maintained in Earle's modified Eagle's medium (EMEM,
BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (HyClone Sterile System, Logan, UT), 5 mM glutamine
(Life Technologies, Inc.), 5 mM sodium pyruvate (Life
Technologies, Inc.), and 5 mM non-essential amino acids
(Life Technologies, Inc.).
Adhesion Assay--
Leukocyte adhesion to FN or LN was performed
as follows. 1.25 µg/ml human FN (Collaborative Research, Inc.,
Bedford, MA) or 100 µg/ml mouse LN (Life Technologies, Inc.) was
coated onto 96-well Pro-BindTM assay plate (Falcon, Becton
Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) by incubating overnight at 4 °C. The
plate was then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in
phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature for 1 h. Immediately
before use, plates were washed three times with phosphate-buffered
saline. Jurkat cells and U937 cells were pretreated with or without
lovastatin for 2.5 days in EMEM. After centrifugation for 7 min at
300 × g, cells were resuspended in 1 ml of phenol red-free medium and then labeled by incubation with 5 µl of the fluorescent dye calcein-AM (1 mg/ml in Me2SO, Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The
cells were then washed twice with phenol red-free medium. After
incubation with PMA (100 ng/ml) or mAb 8A2 (2 µg/ml) for 30 min in
control medium at room temperature, cells (~1 × 105/well) were added to triplicate wells. After incubation
for 30 min at 37 °C, the total population of cells in the well was
analyzed using a fluorescence plate reader (Perspective Biosystems,
Framingham, MA). Unbound cells were removed by washing the plate three
times with phenol red-free medium, and the plate was then reanalyzed to
determine fluorescence of bound cells. After subtraction of background,
the percent adherence was calculated as the emission at 530 nm of bound
cells divided by the absorption of total cells. For the inhibition
experiments, Jurkat cells were preincubated with the MAP kinase/ERK
kinase (MEK-1) inhibitor PD-98059 (23) (Calbiochem) for 30 min in
medium prior to stimulation with PMA. For the rescue experiments,
Jurkat cells were co-incubated with all-trans-GGOH or
trans-FOH together with lovastatin for 2.5 days prior to
assay. The inhibitory effect of GGTI-298 and FTI-277 was assessed in
the same way.
Immunoblotting--
Whole cell lysate was prepared by rapidly
pelleting 1.0 × 106 cells and lysing in 1× SDS
sample buffer. Proteins from whole cell lysate were subjected to
SDS-PAGE and transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose paper
(Intermountain Scientific Corporation, Kayville, UT). After the
transfer, nitrocellulose membranes were blocked overnight at 4 °C in
5% nonfat milk in a Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST)
and then immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. For RhoA blots,
membranes were sequentially incubated with rabbit anti-RhoA antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) in TBST at room
temperature for 3 h, washed with TBST 5 times, incubated with goat
anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase
(Bio-Rad) for 1 h, and then washed with TBST 5 times. RhoA bands
were visualized on x-ray film by incubation of membrane with
chemiluminescence luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.,
Santa Cruz, CA) at room temperature for 1 min. Extracellullar
signal-regulated kinase (ERK1) immunoblots were prepared by sequential
incubation with anti-phosphorylated ERK1 antibody (New England Biolabs,
Inc., Beverly, MA) at room temperature for 3 h and with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody for 1 h. After five washings with TBST, reactive proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence as per the manufacturer's instructions.
For lamin B and Rap1A processing assays, Jurkat and U937 cells were
treated with either vehicle, lovastatin (10 µM), FTI-277 (10 µM), or GGTI-298 (10 µM) for 2.5 days.
The cells were then harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (30 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM NaF, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM
Na3VO4, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor,
25 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 6.4 mg/ml 2-nitrophenyl phosphate). The
lysates were electrophoresed on a 12.5 (Rap1A) and 7% (lamin B)
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted,
respectively, with an anti-Rap1A antibody (Rap1/Krev-1, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or anti-lamin B antibody (lamin B
(Ab-1), Oncogene, Cambridge, MA) as described previously by Lerner
et al. (24).
Chemicals--
Lovastatin was purchased from Calbiochem and was
converted to open acid form before use. Briefly, 25 mg of lovastatin
was suspended in 0.5-1 ml of ethanol, and 3 ml of 0.1 M
NaOH was added. The solution was heated to 50 °C for 2 h. To
this heated solution, 4.5 ml of an aqueous solution containing 81 mM Na2HPO4 and 15 mM
NaH2PO4 was added. The solution was heated to
40 °C for 30 min, and the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with concentrated
HCl. The final concentration was determined by UV spectroscopy
( Lovastatin Inhibits Jurkat Cell Adhesion to Fibronectin--
Both
PMA and the The Inhibitory Effect of Lovastatin on Leukocyte Adhesion Is
Reversed by Co-incubation with GGOH but Not FOH--
Lovastatin is
an inhibitor of 3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase which
catalyzes the production of mevalonic acid. Mevalonic acid can be
converted to both of the two substrates for protein prenylation, GGPP
and FPP. The inhibitory effect of lovastatin on stimulated leukocyte
adhesion could be explained by the lowering of the cellular pool of
either GGPP or FPP. In order to determine which isoprenyl group might
be involved, we depleted the cellular pool of both prenylpyrophosphates
by lovastatin treatment and then determined whether GGPP or FPP rescued
the stimulated adhesion. Since GGOH and FOH can rescue
geranylgeranylation of Rap1A and farnesylation of Ras, respectively
(28), we used GGOH and FOH, which are more cell-permeable. Because the
isoprenyl groups that modify small G-proteins are
all-trans-isomer, all-trans-GGOH and
all-trans-FOH were used. When cells were treated with
lovastatin together with GGOH or FOH, GGOH (Fig.
2, A and B) but not
FOH (Fig. 2C) reversed the inhibitory effect of lovastatin
on leukocyte adhesion. 2.5 µM GGOH was sufficient to
rescue Jurkat cells from the inhibitory effect of 5 µM
lovastatin (Fig. 2B). These results demonstrate that
geranylgeraniol but not farnesol is required for PMA-stimulated
leukocyte adhesion.
Lovastatin Inhibits Protein Prenylation--
Several Ras family
members, Ha-Ras, R-Ras, RhoA, and Rac, have been implicated in cell
adhesion (9, 10, 14, 25-27). RhoA and Rac are geranylgeranylated
proteins (9, 10, 28). Because RhoA (8, 9), but not Rac (10), was
reported to be involved in PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion, we next
examined the effect of lovastatin on RhoA isoprenylation and the
correlation between RhoA isoprenylation and leukocyte adhesion. After
co-incubation for 2.5 days, lovastatin significantly inhibited the
geranylgeranylation of RhoA at concentrations as low as 0.5 µM. The increasing ratio between the intensity of
apparently higher molecular weight RhoA protein and the apparently
lower molecular weight RhoA protein with increasing concentration of
lovastatin reflects decreasing isoprenylation of protein as the
nonprenylated Rho protein migrates more slowly than prenylated Rho
protein (29). Without lovastatin, the majority of RhoA in cells was
isoprenylated. At 14 µM lovastatin, most RhoA was in
non-isoprenylated form (Fig. 3), and at
this concentration stimulated leukocyte adhesion to FN was completely inhibited. Addition of GGOH (5 µM) with lovastatin
resulted in the more rapid migration of Rho as seen in untreated cells
(data not shown). These results suggest that geranylgeranylation of a
protein(s) such as RhoA is required for PMA-stimulated Jurkat cell
adhesion.
GGTI-298, but Not FTI-277, Inhibits Leukocyte Adhesion in a Dose-
and Time-dependent Manner--
Since the inhibitory effect
of lovastatin was reversed by co-incubation with GGOH and since
lovastatin inhibited protein geranylgeranylation, we next tested the
effect of inhibitors that directly block protein prenylation. We first
evaluated the ability of FTI-277 and GGTI-298 to inhibit protein
farnesylation and geranylgeranylation, respectively, in Jurkat and U937
cells. To this end, we treated these cells with either vehicle,
lovastatin, FTI-277, or GGTI-298 and processed the samples for
immunoblotting with antibodies against lamin B and Rap1A as described
under "Materials and Methods." Fig. 4
shows that treatment with FTI-277 resulted in inhibition of lamin B processing as indicated by the band shift. GGTI-298, on the other hand,
had no effect on lamin B processing. Fig. 4 also shows that GGTI-298
inhibited the processing of the geranylgeranylated small G-protein
Rap1A. In contrast, FTI-277 had no effect on Rap1A processing. Thus, in
both Jurkat and U937 cells GGTI-298 inhibited the processing of Rap1A
but not lamin B. Similarly, FTI-277 inhibits lamin B but not Rap1A
processing. The results of Fig. 4 clearly demonstrate that GGTI-298 and
FTI-277 were selective for their intended targets, GGTase I and FTase,
respectively. As expected, lovastatin inhibited the processing of both
lamin B and Rap1A but was much more potent at inhibiting Rap1A than
lamin B (Fig. 4).
We next examined the effects of FTI-277 and GGTI-298 on leukocyte
adhesion. Fig. 5, A and
B, shows that GGTI-298 inhibited PMA-induced U937 cell
adhesion to LN in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The
IC50 was ~2-3 µM which is in agreement
with the effect of this inhibitor on protein geranylgeranylation
in vivo (22). At this concentration protein farnesylation is
not inhibited by GGTI-298. One day pretreatment with 10 µM GGTI-298 produced ~50% inhibition of cell adhesion,
consistent with the half-life of RhoA (28). FTI-277 did not inhibit
PMA-induced adhesion of either U937 or Jurkat cells (Fig. 5,
C and D). Fig. 4 shows that FTI-277 does not
inhibit protein geranylgeranylation, but GGTI-298 does at the condition
we are using. These indicate that protein farnesylation is not required
for stimulated leukocyte adhesion. Together with the rescue
experiments, these results demonstrate that a geranylgeranylated protein(s) is involved in the signaling pathway, which regulates integrin adhesiveness.
Lovastatin Does Not Inhibit PMA-stimulated MAPK
Phosphorylation--
To establish that lovastatin did not inhibit a
proximal component of PMA-stimulated activation, i.e. its
effect on PMA-induced adhesion was not due to blockade of all
PKC-mediated signaling, we determined its effect on PMA-stimulated
MAPKK activation. ERK1 and ERK2 activation is required for many signal
transduction events (30). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate activates
PKC, and, ultimately, results in threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation
of ERK1 and ERK2. Phosphorylation of ERK1 in control and
lovastatin-treated cells was monitored by immunoblot analysis with an
anti-phosphorylated ERK1 antibody that recognizes only the
phosphorylated form of ERK1. The immunoblot analysis in Fig.
6 shows that PMA still activated this
MAPK cascade even at lovastatin concentrations up to 40 µM. This result suggests that treatment with lovastatin
did not disable all components of PMA-stimulated signaling but
specifically blocked one or more elements in the pathway leading to
increased The MAPK Cascade and PI-3 Kinase Pathway Are Not Involved in
PMA-stimulated Cell Adherence to Fibronectin--
To confirm further
that the MAPK cascade does not play a role in PMA-stimulated cell
adhesion, we pretreated cells with PD-98059, a specific inhibitor of
MEK-1, for 30 min at room temperature prior to the adhesion assay.
Treatment with PD-98059 (10 µM) did not inhibit
PMA-stimulated Jurkat cell adhesion (Fig.
7A), although immunoblot
analysis demonstrated that ERK1 phosphorylation was completely blocked
(Fig. 7B). Pretreatment with the PI-3 kinase inhibitor LY
294002 at 14 µM also did not inhibit PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion (data not shown).
Integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion is modulated by
alterations in receptor affinity or by post-receptor events (1-4). Pretreatment of Jurkat T-cells with lovastatin markedly reduced Recently, several proteins involved in signal transduction have been
shown to be lipid-modified by covalent attachment of farnesyl or
geranylgeranyl groups, which are derived from mevalonic acid (31).
Lovastatin inhibits the biosynthesis of both of these isoprenoids.
Thus, one possible mechanism by which lovastatin inhibits leukocyte
adhesion is interference with a signaling pathway(s) that requires an
isoprenylated protein(s). The fact that all-trans-GGOH, but
not FOH, prevented lovastatin-induced inhibition of leukocyte adhesion
suggested that a protein(s) modified by a geranylgeranyl-group, not a
farnesyl-group, was required for PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion.
However, since lovastatin targets an early step in the sterol synthesis
pathway, lovastatin might also inhibit the biosynthesis of other lipid
moieties, which are required for leukocyte adhesion (Fig.
8). Although the rescue by GGOH and the
inhibition of RhoA geranylgeranylation strongly suggested that a
geranylgeranylated protein(s) regulated leukocyte adhesion, it remained
possible that GGOH itself or a derivative lipid, like vitamin Q (also
called ubiquinone) which can be converted from geranylgeranyl
pyrophosphate, regulates cell adhesion (Fig. 8). Also,
integrin-modulating factor-1, possibly an isoprenyl lipid, has been
reported to regulate integrin function (32). GGTI-298 inhibits protein
geranylgeranylation without changing cellular lipid content by
targeting protein geranylgeranyltransferase-I. Thus, the inhibitory
effect of GGTI-298 demonstrated a geranylgeranylated protein(s) indeed
regulates post-receptor events in PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion
(Fig. 8). Whether this geranylgeranylated protein(s) regulates kinases
(e.g. RhoA kinase), the synthesis of integrin-modulating lipids, or other signaling pathways remains to be determined. The fact
that the specific FTase inhibitor, FTI-277, did not inhibit leukocyte
adhesion confirmed the rescue experiments showing that farnesylated
proteins are not involved (Fig. 8).
1-2 µM)
4
1-dependent adhesion to
fibronectin (FN) stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)
which modulates post-receptor events. In contrast, lovastatin did not
inhibit Jurkat cell adhesion to FN induced by the
1
integrin-activating monoclonal antibody (mAb) 8A2, which directly
modulates
1 integrin affinity. Similarly, pretreatment
of U937 cells with lovastatin inhibited PMA-stimulated, but not mAb
8A2-stimulated,
6
1-dependent
leukocyte adhesion to laminin. The inhibition of lovastatin on
PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion was not mediated by mitogen-activated
protein kinase or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. The inhibitory
effect of lovastatin on PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion was reversed by co-incubation with geranylgeraniol, but not with farnesol, with
concurrent reversal of the inhibition of protein prenylation as shown
by protein RhoA geranylgeranylation. The selective inhibition of
protein geranylgeranylation by the specific protein
geranylgeranyltransferase-I inhibitor, GGTI-298, blocked PMA-stimulated
leukocyte adhesion but not mAb 8A2-induced leukocyte adhesion. The
protein farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FTI-277, had no effect on
leukocyte adhesion induced by either stimulus. These results
demonstrate that protein geranylgeranylation, but not farnesylation, is
required for integrin-dependent post-receptor events in
leukocyte adhesion.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 integrins on human T-cells can be
regulated by treatment with certain divalent cations or activating
monoclonal antibody (mAbs)1
that directly increase the affinity of
1 integrins for
their ligands, presumably by altering receptor conformation (3, 4). In
contrast, the protein kinase C activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), generally promotes adhesion by targeting events that
occur following receptor occupancy without significantly affecting the
affinity of the receptor for the ligand (3, 4). For a given leukocyte
cell type, different activation stimuli may modulate integrin
adhesivity by one or the other mechanism.
1 integrins, Hughes
et al. (6) reported that overexpression of Ha-Ras suppressed
increases in integrin affinity and that suppression by Ha-Ras
correlated with activation of the MAP kinase pathway. These results
suggested that the Ha-Ras-linked MAP kinase pathway mediated a negative
feedback loop for integrin affinity modulation. Zhang et al.
(7) showed that R-Ras promoted the ligand-binding activity of
1 integrins in CHO cells. The small GTP-binding protein RhoA has also been shown to be required for stimulated integrin adhesiveness in some leukocytes (8, 9). More recently, D'Souza-Schorey et al. (10) reported that the Rho subfamily protein, Rac,
regulated integrin-mediated spreading and increased adhesion of
T-lymphocytes.
1 integrin affinity. Inhibition of
PMA-stimulated cell adhesion by lovastatin was reversed by
co-incubation with geranylgeraniol but not farnesol and correlated with
inhibition of geranylgeranylation of proteins, such as RhoA. Moreover,
the protein geranylgeranyltransferase-I inhibitor, GGTI-298 (22), but
not farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FTI-277 (22), also inhibited
PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion. These results demonstrate that a
geranylgeranylated protein(s) is required for PMA-stimulated,
integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion and suggest potential
new targets for small molecule inhibitors of leukocyte adhesion.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
231 = 21, 490 M
1
cm
1). The stock solution was frozen in small aliquots.
Phorbol myristate acetate (Sigma) was used at 100 ng/ml. All
trans-GGOH was obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals
(St. Louis, MO). All trans-FOH was purchased from Sigma.
Monoclonal antibody P4C10 (anti-
1) and P1D6
(anti-
5) were used at 1:400 dilution (Life Technologies, Inc.). Monoclonal antibody HP1/2 (anti-
4) was a gift
from Dr. Roy Lobb (Biogen, Cambridge, MA). Monoclonal antibody GoH3
(anti-
6) was obtained from Kamiya Biomedical Co.
(Seattle, WA). Monoclonal antibody 5D1 (anti-
1) was a
gift of B. Schwartz (University of Washington, Seattle, WA).
GGTI-298 and FTI-277 were prepared as described previously (22).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 integrin-activating mAb 8A2 markedly
stimulated Jurkat cell adherence to FN (Fig.
1A), and this stimulated adhesion was blocked by mAb to the
4 or
1
but not the
5, subunit (data not shown). PMA and 8A2
also stimulated U937 cell adherence to LN (Fig. 1B), and
this stimulated adherence was blocked by mAb to the
6
subunit (data not shown). To determine the effect of lovastatin on
leukocyte adhesion, we exposed the cells to varying concentrations of
lovastatin for 2.5 days prior to the adherence assay. As shown in Fig.
1A, lovastatin at concentrations greater than 5 µM nearly completely inhibited PMA-stimulated Jurkat cell adherence to FN with an IC50 of 1-2 µM.
Addition of lovastatin at the time of the adhesion assay without
pretreatment had no inhibitory effect (data not shown). Importantly,
lovastatin had no significant effect on mAb 8A2-stimulated Jurkat cell
adhesion to FN. Lovastatin also inhibited PMA-, but not mAb 8A2-,
stimulated adherence of U937 cells to LN (Fig. 1B). These
results suggested that PMA-induced leukocyte adhesion is regulated by
one or more products in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Lovastatin inhibits PMA- but not mAb
8A2-stimulated leukocyte adhesion. A, Jurkat cells were
treated with varying concentrations of lovastatin for 2.5 days in EMEM.
The cells were then labeled with calcein-AM for 30 min at room
temperature. Leukocyte adhesion was induced by either PMA (100 ng/ml)
or the
1 integrin-activating mAb 8A2 (2 µg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature. Percent adherence was determined after a
30-min incubation on FN-coated plates (1.25 µg/ml) at 37 °C. The
figure shows the dose dependence of lovastatin for inhibition of
PMA-stimulated Jurkat cell adhesion to FN with a calculated
IC50 of 1 µM. Values represent the means ± S.E. of triplicate wells. Similar results were obtained in three
independent experiments. B, U937 cells were treated in the
same manner as Jurkat cells. The assay was performed as above except
that the plate was coated with LN (100 µg/ml).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The inhibitory effect of lovastatin on
PMA-induced adhesion is prevented by co-incubation with geranylgeraniol
but not farnesol. A, Jurkat cells were co-incubated
with 5 µM GGOH and various concentrations of lovastatin
for 2.5 days in EMEM, and the adhesion assay was performed as above.
B, Jurkat cells were treated with 5 µM
lovastatin and various concentrations of GGOH (0-10 µM)
as in A. C, Jurkat cells were co-incubated with 5 µM FOH and various concentrations of lovastatin for 2.5 days.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Lovastatin inhibits the isoprenylation of
RhoA. Jurkat cells were pretreated with lovastatin for 2.5 days
and then treated with or without PMA (100 ng/ml) for 30 min. Cell
lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis to assess relative
amounts of prenylated and unprenylated RhoA which differ in
electrophoretic mobility.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
GGTI-298 and FTI-277 selectively inhibit
protein prenylation in Jurkat and U937 cells. FTI-277 and GGTI-298
inhibit selectively lamin B and Rap1A processing in Jurkat and U937
cells, respectively. Cells were treated with vehicle (lane
1), lovastatin (lane 2), FTI-277 (lane 3),
or GGTI-298 (lane 4). Cell lysates were prepared, and
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with a lamin B
antibody or a Rap1A antibody as described under "Materials and
Methods."

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
GGTI-298, but not FTI-277, inhibits
PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion in a dose- and
time-dependent manner. The assays in A-C
were performed with LN-coated plates. A, U937 cells were
treated with various concentrations of GGTI-298 for 2.5 days.
B, U937 cells were treated with 10 µM GGTI-298
for various amounts of time. C, U937 cells were treated with
10 µM FTT-277 for 2.5 days. D, Jurkat cells
were treated with 1 µM FTT-277 for 2.5 days and then
assessed for adhesion to FN-coated plates.
1 integrin adhesiveness. These results also
suggest that the MAPK cascade does not play a role in PMA-induced
leukocyte adhesion.
![]()
View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Lovastatin does not inhibit PMA-stimulated
ERK1 phosphorylation. Jurkat cells were pretreated with lovastatin
for 2.5 days in EMEM and then treated with or without PMA (100 ng/ml)
for 30 min. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis for
phosphorylated ERK1.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The MEK-1-specific inhibitor, PD-98059, does
not inhibit PMA-stimulated Jurkat cell adhesion to fibronectin.
A, Jurkat cells were incubated with PD-98059 (0-10
µM) for 30 min at room temperature, and the adhesion
assay was then performed as above. B, Jurkat cells were
pretreated with PD-98059 for 30 min and then treated with or without
PMA (100 ng/ml) for an additional 30 min. Cell lysates were subjected
to immunoblot analysis for phosphorylated ERK1 (
0.3 × 10 6 cells per lane).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
4
1-dependent adhesion to FN
stimulated by PMA, which modulates post-receptor events. In contrast,
lovastatin did not inhibit Jurkat cell adhesion to FN induced by the
1 integrin-activating mAb 8A2, which directly modulates
1 integrin affinity. Similarly, pretreatment of U937
cells with lovastatin inhibited PMA-, but not mAb 8A2-, stimulated
6
1-dependent leukocyte
adhesion to LN. Flow cytometry analysis showed that treatment with
lovastatin did not alter the integrin expression on U937 or Jurkat cell
surface (not shown), indicating that the inhibitory effect of
lovastatin on cell adhesion was not due to a reduction of receptor
number. Thus, lovastatin inhibited PMA-stimulated adhesion of two
different
1 integrin receptors, in two different
leukocyte cell lines, by targeting signaling pathways regulating
post-receptor events, but not by inhibiting the integrin expression on
the cell surface.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The involvement of the cholesterol
biosynthetic pathway in PMA-stimulated leckocyte adherence. The
enzymatic steps (italic) inhibited by various compounds
(underlined) used in this study are shown. The abbreviations
used in this figure are: GPP, geranyl pyrophosphate;
PGGT, protein geranylgeranyltransferase; PFT,
protein farnesyltransferase.
Ras family proteins require prenylation for function, and several have been implicated in the regulation of integrin function. Ha-Ras was shown to suppress integrin affinity in CHO cells through activation of the MAPK pathway (6). Our studies demonstrate that lovastatin and GGTI-298 inhibit PMA-stimulated adhesion, which involves post-receptor events rather than affinity modulation (1-4). Moreover, Ha-Ras requires farnesylation for function (33), whereas PMA-stimulated adhesion requires a geranylgeranylated protein(s). Furthermore, inhibition of the MAPK pathway did not affect PMA-stimulated adhesion. Ha-Ras is therefore not involved in our model system.
In contrast to Ha-Ras, R-Ras, was shown to promote integrin-dependent adhesion in CHO cells (7). However, the effect of R-Ras again involved increases in receptor affinity rather than post-receptor events. Also, R-Ras may signal through PI-3 kinase (34), but the PI-3 kinase inhibitor LY 294002 had no effect on PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion. Thus, although it is probably geranylgeranylated, R-Ras is not likely involved in PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion.
Rho subfamily proteins are geranylgeranylated, and two members, Rac and
RhoA, have been reported to be involved in
1
integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion (8-10). An activated
mutant of Rac triggered adhesion and spreading of a T-lymphocyte line
to FN, but, importantly, a dominant-negative Rac did not block
PMA-stimulated spreading on FN (10). Inhibition of RhoA by C3
transferase exoenzyme inhibited PMA-stimulated
2
integrin-dependent human neutrophil adhesion to fibrinogen
and
4
1-dependent murine
lymphocyte cell line adhesion to VCAM-1 (8). However, C3 transferase
exoenzyme did not inhibit PMA-stimulated
2
integrin-dependent lymphocyte adhesion to ICAM-1 (35).
Moreover, C3 transferase exoenzyme treatment increased PMA-stimulated
1 integrin-dependent monocyte and U937 cell
spreading on FN (36). Thus, the role of RhoA in PMA-stimulated
leukocyte adherence is uncertain. Although our studies show that
reduced isoprenylation of RhoA correlated with the inhibition of
PMA-stimulated adhesion by lovastatin, we cannot conclude that RhoA is
the critical geranylgeranylated protein regulating post-receptor events.
It is interesting that lovastatin inhibited PMA-induced adhesion
without blocking the MAPK cascade signaling pathway. PMA activates PKC
which is generally considered to lie upstream of Ras (33, 37, 38), and
a previous report showed that expression of a dominant-negative Ras
mutant in Jurkat T-cells was able to prevent PMA-stimulated
up-regulation of CD69 (33). Since Ras lies upstream of the MAPK cascade
(34, 39, 40), activation of Ras will stimulate and blockade of Ras will
inhibit the MAPK cascade. Ras has to be isoprenylated in order to
function (28). Our study shows that at concentrations of lovastatin at
which protein isoprenylation and cell adhesion were inhibited,
activation of the MAPK cascade was not inhibited. A likely explanation
is that PKC in fact functions downstream of Ras by activating Raf-1 kinase as previously reported (23, 41, 42). Thus, although Ras function
was likely blocked by lovastatin, PKC still activated the MAPK cascade
via Raf-1. Since lovastatin inhibited PMA-stimulated cell adhesion, but
not MAPKK activation, we surmise that in Jurkat cells the
PMA-stimulated signaling pathway regulating
1
integrin-dependent adhesion does not involve the MAPK
cascade. This conclusion is supported by studies showing that the MEK-1
inhibitor PD-98059 (10 µM) potently inhibited
PMA-stimulated MAPKK activity but did not inhibit PMA-stimulated
leukocyte adhesion.
In conclusion, lovastatin blocked PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion,
and GGOH but not FOH reversed this inhibitory effect. The
GGTase-specific inhibitor, GGTI-298, but not FTase-specific inhibitor,
FTI-277, also blocked PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion. Together,
these results demonstrate that a geranylgeranylated protein(s)
regulates post-receptor events in integrin-dependent PMA-stimulated leukocyte adhesion as shown in Fig. 8.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grants HL18645 (to J. M. H.), HL07321 (to L. L.), and CA67771 (to S. M. S. and A. D. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Hematology, Box 357710, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7710. Tel.: 206-616-4573; Fax: 206-685-3062; E-mail: liliu@u.washington.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; EMEM, Earle's modified Eagle's medium; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FN, fibronectin; FOH, trans-farnesol; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; FTI, farnesyltransferase inhibitor; GGOH, geranylgeraniol; GGPP, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate; GGTI, geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor; LN, laminin; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MAPK, MAP kinase; MAPKK, MAP kinase kinase; MEK-1, MAP kinase/ERK kinase; PI-3 kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; GGTase I, type I geranylgeranyltransferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; FTase, farnesyltransferase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Stewart, M., and And Hogg, N. (1996) J. Cell. Biochem. 61, 554-561[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Bazzoni, G., and Hemler, M. E. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 30-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Faull, R. J.,
Kovach, N. J.,
Harlan, J. M.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
155-162 |
| 4. |
Faull, R. J.,
Kovach, N. L.,
Harlan, J. M.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
1307-1316 |
| 5. | Shattil, S. J., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 1-5 |
| 6. | Hughes, P. E., Renshaw, M. W., Pfaff, M., Forsyth, J., Keivens, V. M., Schwartz, M. A., and Kinsberg, M. H. (1977) Cell 88, 521-530 |
| 7. | Zhang, Z., Vuori, K., Wang, H., Reed, J. C., and Ruoslahti, E. (1996) Cell 85, 61-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Laudanna, C., Campbell, J. J., and Butcher, E. C. (1996) Science 271, 981-983[Abstract] |
| 9. |
Tominaga, T.,
Sugie, K.,
Hirata, M.,
Morii, N.,
Fukata, J.,
Uchida, A.,
Imura, H.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1529-1537 |
| 10. | D'Souza-Schorey, C., Boettner, B., and Van Aelst, L. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3936-3946 |
| 11. | Lowy, D. R., and Willumsen, B. M. (1989) Nature 341, 384-385[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Khosravi-Far, R.,
Clark, G. J.,
Abe, K.,
Cox, A. D.,
McLain, T.,
Lutz, R. J.,
Sinensky, M.,
and Der, C. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24363-24368 |
| 13. | Didsbury, J. R., Uhing, R. J., and Snyderman, R. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 171, 804-812[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Hori, Y., Kikuchi, A., Isomura, M., Katayama, M., Miura, Y., Fujioka, H., Kaibuchi, K., and Takai, Y. (1991) Oncogene 6, 515-522[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Lerner, E. C., Zhang, T. T., Knowles, D. B., Qian, Y., Hamilton, A. D., and Sebti, S. M. (1997) Oncogene 15, 1283-1288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Whyte, D. B.,
Kirschmeier, P.,
Hockenberry, T. N.,
Nunez-Oliva, I.,
James, L.,
Catino, J. J.,
Bishop, W. R.,
and Pai, J. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14459-14464 |
| 17. | Carboni, J. M., Yan, N., Cox, A. D., Bustelo, X., Graham, S. M., Lynch, M. J., Weinmann, R., Seizinger, B. R., Der, C. J., Barbacid, M., and Manne, V. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1905-1913[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Alberts, A. W.,
Chen, J.,
Kuron, G.,
Hunt, V.,
Huff, J.,
Hoffman, C.,
Rothrock, J.,
Lopez, M.,
Joshua, H.,
Harris, E.,
Patchett, A.,
Monaghan, R.,
Currie, S.,
Stapley, E.,
Albert-Schonberg, S. G.,
Hensens, O.,
Hirshfield, J.,
Hoogsteen, K.,
Liesch, J.,
and Springer, J.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
3957-3961 |
| 19. | Weber, C., Erl, W., Weber, K. S., and Weber, P. C. (1997) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 30, 1212-1217[Abstract] |
| 20. | Niwa, S., Totsuka, T., and Hayashi, S. (1996) Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 18, 669-675[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Kimura, M.,
Kurose, I.,
Russell, J.,
and Granger, D. N.
(1996)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
17,
1521-1526 |
| 22. | Vogt, A., Qian, Y., McGuire, T. F., Hamilton, A. D., and Sebti, S. M. (1996) Oncogene 13, 1991-1999[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Cai, H., Smola, U., Wixler, V., Eisenmann-Tapper, T. I., Diaz-Meco, M. T., Moscat, J., Rapp, U., and Cooper, G. M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 732-741[Abstract] |
| 24. |
Lerner, E. C.,
Qian, Y.,
Blaskovich, M. A.,
Fossum, R. D.,
Vogt, A.,
Sun, J.,
Cox, A. D.,
Der, C. J.,
Hamilton, A. D.,
and Sebti, S. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26802-26806 |
| 25. |
Yamane, H. K.,
Farnsworth, C. C.,
Xie, H. Y.,
Evans, T.,
Howald, W, N.,
Gelb, M. H.,
Glomset, J. A.,
Clarke, S.,
and Fung, B. K.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
286-290 |
| 26. | Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, J. C., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Jak'obisiak, M.,
Bruno, S.,
Skierski, J. S.,
and Darzynkiewicz, Z.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3628-3632 |
| 28. | McGuire, T. F., and Sebti, S. M. (1997) Oncogene 14, 305-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Sebti, S. M., Tkalcevic, G. T., and Jani, J. P. (1991) Cancer Commun. 3, 141-147[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Detmers, P. A.,
Zhou, D.,
Polli, E.,
Thieringer, R.,
Hanlon, W. A.,
Vaidia, S.,
and Bansal, V.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
1921-1929 |
| 31. | Glomset, J. A., and Farnsworth, C. C. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 181-205[CrossRef] |
| 32. | Hermanowski-Vosatka, A., Van-Strijp, J. A., Swiggard, W. J., and Wright, S. D. (1992) Cell 68, 341-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | D'Ambrosio, D., Cantrell, D. A., Frati, L., Santoni, A., and Testi, R. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 616-620[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Kinoshita, T., Shirouzu, M., Kamiya, A., Hashimoto, K., Yokoyama, S., and Miyajima, A. (1997) Oncogene 15, 619-627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Petruzzelli, L.,
Maduzia, L.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
4208-4216 |
| 36. | Aepfelbacher, M., Essler, M., Huber, E., Czech, A., and Weber, P. C. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 5070-5075[Abstract] |
| 37. | Downward, J., Graves, J. D., Warne, P. H., Rayter, S., and Cantrell, D. A. (1990) Nature 346, 719-723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Franklin, R. A., Tordai, A., Patel, H., Gardner, A. M., Johnson, G. L., and Gelfand, E. W. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 2134-2140 |
| 39. | Font-de, M. J., Porras, A., Ahn, N., and Santos, E. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6068-6075[Abstract] |
| 40. |
Salojin, K.,
Zhang, J.,
Cameron, M.,
Gill, B.,
Arreaza, G.,
Ochi, A.,
and Delovitch, T. L.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
887-897 |
| 41. |
Zou, Y.,
Komuro, I.,
Yamazaki, T.,
Aikawa, R.,
Kudoh, S.,
Shiojima, I.,
Hiroi, Y.,
Mizuno, T.,
and Yazaki, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33592-33597 |
| 42. |
Liao, D. F.,
Monia, B.,
Dean, N.,
and Berk, B. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6146-6150 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Rydgren, O. Vaarala, and S. Sandler Simvastatin Protects against Multiple Low-Dose Streptozotocin-Induced Type 1 Diabetes in CD-1 Mice and Recurrence of Disease in Nonobese Diabetic Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 180 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-H. Lee, Y. S. Cho, and Y.-M. Han Simvastatin Suppresses Self-Renewal of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells by Inhibiting RhoA Geranylgeranylation Stem Cells, July 1, 2007; 25(7): 1654 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ferri, G. Colombo, C. Ferrandi, E. W. Raines, B. Levkau, and A. Corsini Simvastatin Reduces MMP1 Expression in Human Smooth Muscle Cells Cultured on Polymerized Collagen by Inhibiting Rac1 Activation Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 27(5): 1043 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pirat, P. Zeyneloglu, D. Aldemir, M. Yucel, O. Ozen, S. Candan, and G. Arslan Pretreatment with Simvastatin Reduces Lung Injury Related to Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 225 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ohkawara, T. Ishibashi, T. Sakamoto, K. Sugimoto, K. Nagata, K. Yokoyama, N. Sakamoto, M. Kamioka, I. Matsuoka, S. Fukuhara, et al. Thrombin-induced Rapid Geranylgeranylation of RhoA as an Essential Process for RhoA Activation in Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10182 - 10188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yonekawa and J. M. Harlan Targeting leukocyte integrins in human diseases J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 77(2): 129 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hiraga, P. J. Williams, A. Ueda, D. Tamura, and T. Yoneda Zoledronic Acid Inhibits Visceral Metastases in the 4T1/luc Mouse Breast Cancer Model Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 10(13): 4559 - 4567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsumoto, D. Einhaus, E. S. Gold, and A. Aderem Simvastatin Augments Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Proinflammatory Responses in Macrophages by Differential Regulation of the c-Fos and c-Jun Transcription Factors J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7377 - 7384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schonbeck and P. Libby Inflammation, Immunity, and HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors: Statins as Antiinflammatory Agents? Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21_suppl_1): II-18 - II-26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Katano, L. Pesnicak, and J. I. Cohen Simvastatin induces apoptosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and delays development of EBV lymphomas PNAS, April 6, 2004; 101(14): 4960 - 4965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yu, I. Morita, K. Shimokado, T. Iwai, and M. Yoshida Amlodipine Modulates THP-1 Cell Adhesion to Vascular Endothelium via Inhibition of Protein Kinase C Signal Transduction Hypertension, September 1, 2003; 42(3): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Palinski and C. Napoli Unraveling Pleiotropic Effects of Statins on Plaque Rupture Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2002; 22(11): 1745 - 1750. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, B. R. Schwartz, J. Tupper, N. Lin, R. K. Winn, and J. M. Harlan The GTPase Rap1 Regulates Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate-stimulated but Not Ligand-induced beta 1 Integrin-dependent Leukocyte Adhesion J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40893 - 40900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kawakami, A. Tanaka, K. Nakajima, K. Shimokado, and M. Yoshida Atorvastatin Attenuates Remnant Lipoprotein-Induced Monocyte Adhesion to Vascular Endothelium Under Flow Conditions Circ. Res., August 9, 2002; 91(3): 263 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |