![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 47, 33496-33503, November 19, 1999
-Chemokine, Is Differentially Spliced to
Produce Secretable and Nuclear Targeted Isoforms*
,
, and
From the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Research
Campaign Beatson Laboratories, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road,
Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, United Kingdom, the
Department
of Immunology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 3QU, United Kingdom,
and § Biomed Research Center, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using the murine embryonal stem cell system, we
have identified a novel gene encoding a highly divergent member of the
In depth molecular analyses of hemopoietic stem cells (1) have
been hampered by the numerous technical difficulties associated with
primary adult stem cells such as the near impossibility of homogeneously purifying the stem cell for molecular analysis. To
facilitate such studies, we have attempted to adapt the murine embryonal stem (ES)1 cell
system (2) as an in vitro model of hemopoietic stem cell generation and function. ES cells are derived from the day 3.5 murine
blastocyst and are totipotent, having the full capacity to generate all
tissue of a mature mouse (3, 4). These cells are the basis for all
current transgenic and knockout technologies (5). In addition to
allowing development in utero, ES cells will also
differentiate in vitro and will commit to a range of embryological lineages, notably the hemopoietic and cardiac lineages (6-10). We have now mapped out the time course of generation of hemopoietic stem cells in the differentiating ES cell system and have
reported that while up to 3 days after initiation of differentiation there are no stem cells detected in the developing ES cell population, by 5 days there are a number of primitive and committed stem cells detectable in the in vitro populations (11). This in
vitro system therefore allows a temporal separation of hemopoietic
stem cells from their immediate precursors, and we have now used
techniques of subtractive hybridization (12) to attempt to investigate alterations in gene expression that are concomitant with the onset of
hemopoiesis in this
model.2
During our analysis of the subtracted library, we identified a cDNA
fragment that had homology with members of the chemokine family of
proinflammatory mediators. This is a large family of related proteins
that is defined on the basis of sequence homology and on the presence
of positionally conserved cysteine residues (13, 14). The chemokine
superfamily is subdivided into four smaller subfamilies ( Isolation of the Full-length cDNA for ESkine and
PESKY--
The following oligonucleotides were synthesized from the
EST sequences for the isolation of full-length clones of both ESkine and PESKY: 5' ESkine, 5'-CTCTAGGCTGAGTGAGCATG-3'; 5' PESKY,
5'-GGAAAGACGGTAGAATTTG-3'; 3' ESkine and PESKY,
5'-TTGGAGATTGTCGTCTAATG-3'.
Total RNA for the PCR was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies,
Inc.) according to the supplier's instructions. Day 12.5 murine
placental RNA was used to isolate the ESkine cDNA, whereas murine
testes RNA was used to isolate the PESKY cDNA. The RNA was DNase
I-treated as described previously (16, 17) to remove genomic
contamination, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol
precipitation. 1 µg of RNA was used for each reverse transcriptase-PCR reaction. The reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed
using the RNA PCR core kit (Perkin-Elmer). PCR was carried out using
Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and proceeded for 30 cycles of
94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. The PCR
products were cloned into pCRscript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
sequenced in both directions using the ABI 373A sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Generation of RNA for Expression Analysis--
All RNA samples
were generated using TRIZOL (Life Technologies Inc.). For tissue blots,
tissues were removed from 6-week-old C57/Bl mice and stored in liquid
nitrogen prior to RNA extraction. For embryo and placental RNA
generation, timed matings were initiated, and pregnant mice were
sacrificed at the required time points. Placenta and embryos were
separated, and RNA was generated from both at each time point.
Generation of Radiolabeled Probes--
For Northern blotting,
the cDNA probes were labeled with [ mRNA Expression Analysis--
For Northern blot analysis, 15 µg of total RNA, isolated using Trizol (Life Technologies) was
fractionated on a 1.2% denaturing gel and subsequently blotted by
capillary action onto a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Little Chalfont, UK). Blotted membranes were UV-cross-linked using a
Stratalinker. Prehybridization and hybridization were both carried out
in Express-Hyb (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA), and the
blots were washed, following hybridization, as recommended by the
suppliers. Membranes were exposed to Kodak X-Omat x-ray film and
stripped in 0.1% SDS at 100 °C prior to reprobing.
Genomic Localization--
Genomic localization of the murine
ESkine sequence was carried out using a mouse/hamster somatic cell
hybrid panel supplied by the UK HGMP resource center. This approach
involves attempts to detect the murine gene in a range of
murine/hamster somatic cell hybrids using PCR. For the PCR, the
following primers were used: 5' primer, 5'-CTCTAGGCTGAGTGAGCATG-3'; 3'
primer, 5'-TTGGAGATTGTCGTCTAATG-3'.
PCR was performed using 1.25 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP from the PCR core kit (Perkin-Elmer), and
0.15 µM of the 5' and 3' primers. Reactions were
incubated for 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, and
72 °C for 1 min. Products from the PCRs were visualized on a 1.5%
agarose gel.
Genomic Sequencing--
The genomic fragment encoding ESkine and
PESKY was generated by PCR. This approach assumed the PESKY cDNA
sequence to contain the most 5' sequence stretches within the genomic
locus, and thus the 5' genomic primer was designed using the 5'
noncoding sequences of PESKY. Since both PESKY and ESkine have
identical 3' sequences, a common 3' primer was generated based on the
3' noncoding sequences at this position. These primers were used in a
PCR utilizing Pfu polymerase and genomic DNA from C3H mice.
The generated fragment (approximately 2 kilobase pairs) was sequenced
in both orientations, and a representative genomic map of the
ESkine/PESKY locus was created.
Generation and Analysis of ESkine and PESKY GFP Fusion
Constructs--
For analysis of the subcellular fates of ESkine and
PESKY, the full-length coding sequences were cloned in frame into the pEGFP-N1 expression vector (CLONTECH), which places
the GFP at the carboxyl terminus of the translated proteins. For
transient transfections, HEK 293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum and 5 mM glutamine. 5 × 104 cells were plated
onto single well chambered slides in 3 ml of culture medium and left
overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The cells were transfected
using Fugene 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 6 µl of Fugene was added
dropwise on to 94 µl of serum-free media and left for 5 min at room
temperature. This Fugene mix was then added to 1.5 µg of DNA (for
transfection) and allowed to stand for 15 min. This was then added to
the cells in the chambered slides. Transfection was allowed to proceed
for 24 h.
After 24 h, the cells were washed in PBS twice and then fixed in
3% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. They were washed again in PBS and
treated with 100 µg/ml RNase A for 30 min at 37 °C. They were then
mounted in Vectastain containing propidium iodide (1.5 µg/ml) (Vector
Laboratories). Preparations were examined on a Bio-Rad MRC 600 confocal
attached to a Nikon Diaphot microscope. Images were taken with a × 60 oil immersion lens.
Cell Polarization Assay--
This assay measures the change from
a spherical shape to the shape characterized by head-tail polarity,
typical of locomotive cells (18-20). Heparinized venous blood was
withdrawn gently from the forearm of donors. PBMCs were isolated using
density gradient separation (Lymphoprep, Nycomed, Birmingham, UK) and
washed in RPMI 1640 (ICN, Flow, High Wycombe, UK). Cells were used
either directly or cultured overnight (3-4 × 106
cells/ml in a round bottom polystyrene tube, 17 × 100 mm) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in medium containing staphylococcal
enterotoxin B (SEB, 1 µg/ml; Sigma; Ref. 21). Medium was made up of
RPMI supplemented with bovine serum albumin (10 mg/ml), penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml), and L-glutamine (2 mM) (all from Life Technologies). For the polarization
assay, freshly isolated or overnight cultured PBMCs (2 × 105 cells/0.2 ml) in conical base plastic tubes (110 × 16 mm) were exposed for 30 min at 37 °C to graded concentrations
of ESkine, interleukin 8, or medium alone. The cells were then fixed by
adding an equal volume of 2.5% gluteraldehyde (Sigma), and the
proportions of cells showing the head-tail polarization typical of
locomotive cells were determined. The proportion of cells scored as
either spherical (nonmotile) or polarized (motile) was counted directly using a × 40 phase-contrast objective. 250-300 cells were
counted blind, and polarized cells were expressed as a percentage of
viable cells. For phenotyping, fixed cells were stained with
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD3, -CD4, -CD8, -CD19,
-CD14, or -CD45 (Sigma) and scored under a fluorescent phase contrast microscope (× 40). The percentages of total PMBC expressing each of
the phenotypic stains were analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
Collagen Gel Invasion Assay--
Rat tail collagen (type I) was
prepared in solution from freshly obtained rat tail tendons by
established methods (22, 23). Gels were formed by bringing soluble
collagen (1.5 mg/ml) in dilute acetic acid solution back to physiologic
pH and osmolarity, and ESkine (to 1 ng/ml) or human serum albumin in
culture medium were added prior to gelatinization. PBMCs were prepared
and activated with SEB as described above. They were washed and
overlaid on the gel in 24-well dishes and incubated at 37 °C for
20 h to allow the cells to invade the gel. The proportion of
invading cells was determined by scoring the number of cells remaining
on top of the gel and the number of cells that had penetrated the gel, counting a minimum of 200 cells with an inverted microscope. The proportion of locomotor cells was calculated from the ratio between the
numbers of invasive and noninvasive cells.
Clone JB438 Encodes a Novel
The murine IL11R ESTs AA799176 and AA271042 Encode Variants of ESkine--
Survey
of the ESTs detected by JB438 indicate that EST accession number
AA799176 encodes the complete open reading frame of ESkine, and we have
confirmed this sequence using Pfu PCR (Fig. 2a).
The predicted protein has a 24-amino acid leader sequence with cleavage
being predicted between alanine 24 and leucine 25. The predicted mature
ESkine is 95 amino acids in length, is highly basic with a net charge
of +8, and possesses a putative N-linked glycosylation site
beyond the fourth cysteine residue in the mature protein. The CC motif
confirms ESkine as a
Intriguingly, JB438 also detects other ESTs within the murine data
bases, and one of these (AA271042) encodes the full sequence of a
variant of ESkine (Fig. 2b). This variant encodes the
full-length of the mature protein but has lost the signal peptide,
replacing it with an alternative stretch of 32 amino acids. This novel
amino-terminal stretch has not been seen in any other chemokines, has
no homologies in any data bases, and is not predicted to act as a
signal peptide. Furthermore, no other subcellular targeting signatures
were detected in this alternative amino-terminal sequence. We have
labeled this alternative, presumably nonsecretable (see below), isoform
of ESkine PESKY.
Analysis of nonmurine ESTs reveals the existence of a close rat
homologue (GenBankTM accession number AI058901), which, as
shown, is 87% identical and 88% similar to the mature murine protein
(Fig. 2c). Sequences 5' to the sequences shown in Fig.
2c indicate that this EST encodes the rat homologue of
PESKY, and thus far the direct rat ESkine homologue has not been
reported. Like its murine counterpart, the rat homologue is highly
basic with an overall charge of +11. Additionally, the rat protein has
maintained the two potential CD26 cleavage sites and the putative
N-linked glycosylation site. In addition to this rat
orthologue, conceptual translation of the reverse orientation of the
3'-untranslated region of the human IL11R ESkine and PESKY Are Produced by Alternative Splicing--
The
presence of two alternative isoforms of murine ESkine suggests
differential splicing, and to attempt to understand this process we
have sequenced approximately 2 kilobase pairs of genomic sequence
incorporating the ESkine/PESKY gene. As shown in Fig. 3, the exon-intron structure predicts the
PESKY-specific 5' exon (exon Ia) to be the most 5' within the genomic
locus. This is then followed by the ESkine alternative exon (exon Ib)
and subsequently by the common exons encoding the mature chemokine.
ESkine/PESKY is therefore unprecedented, since this is the first
example of differential splicing of this nature and of the inclusion of
PESKY-like amino-terminal sequences within the chemokine family.
ESkine and PESKY Are Differentially Expressed--
Preliminary
analysis of the expression of ESkine and PESKY using the JB438
sequence, which encodes the third and fourth exons, common to both
ESkine and PESKY, as a probe on murine tissue dot blots, indicated
expression of ESkine/PESKY in murine embryos as early as day 7.5 and
additionally in testes and weakly at other body sites (Fig.
4a). The small number of cells
associated with a day 7.5 murine embryo prompted us to look more
closely at the site of expression here, and we have now demonstrated,
again using the common cDNA portion as a probe, that the expression
is predominantly in the placental tissue and is seen only weakly in the
embryo (data not shown). It is of interest to note that murine IL11R ESkine and PESKY Are Targeted to Discrete Subcellular Loci--
To
attempt to examine the impact of the alternative first exon usage on
ESkine/PESKY subcellular targeting, we have generated fusion cDNAs
in which the coding sequence for the GFP is positioned in frame with
the C terminus of ESkine or PESKY. Transfection of these fusion
constructs into HEK cells revealed discrete subcellular destinations
for the ESkine/GFP and PESKY/GFP protein products. As shown in Fig.
5a, ESkine targets the GFP
protein to a perinuclear location that has been revealed as the Golgi
apparatus by co-staining with the Golgi-specific BODIPY-TR stain (data
not shown). Additionally, weak fluorescence is detected throughout the
cytoplasm concomitant with the processing of this secreted chemokine
through the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, PESKY is seen
to target the fluorescence specifically to the nucleus (Fig.
5b) as shown by both phase contrast microscopy and
co-localization with propidium iodide staining. Little PESKY-directed
fluorescence is detected in other subcellular positions (Fig.
5b). A control GFP-expressing construct failed to target the
GFP to any specific loci, and fluorescence is seen throughout the
control transfected cells (Fig. 5c). Identical results have
been obtained using both COS and CHO cell transfectants, confirming
that these subcellular targeting differences are not exclusive to HEK
cells (data not shown).
Thus, the differential splicing outlined in Fig. 3 yields two variants
of the same chemokine that are differentially expressed and destined
for discrete subcellular fates. The targeting of PESKY to the nucleus
is the first example of nuclear targeting of a member of the chemokine
family, although, as discussed below, such nuclear accumulation has
been reported for a number of other growth factors such as the members
of the fibroblast growth factor family.
Biological Activity of ESkine--
We have encountered significant
technical difficulties in the purification of recombinant ESkine from
mammalian or baculovirus expression sources. For this reason, to
facilitate investigations into the biological properties of ESkine, we
have chemically synthesized the mature protein using previously
described techniques (35). Being a member of the
These polarization results therefore suggest that the effects of ESkine
are detectable on activated but not resting PBMCs and that the majority
of cells involved in this response are CD4+ T cells. The
relatively restricted phenotype of the polarized cells is likely to be
the reason for the limited magnitude of response of the PBMCs to ESkine
in the polarization assay. Additionally, this restricted responsive
population makes a systematic comparison of efficacy between ESkine and
other chemokines, which frequently act on wider, or alternative,
subpopulations of cells, difficult.
Although measurement of polarization is a reliable correlate of
chemoattraction/locomotion, the assay does not directly measure these
properties. To more formally demonstrate the
chemoattractant/locomotion-inducing properties of ESkine, we carried
out the collagen gel invasion assay, in which PBMCs were allowed to
invade collagen gels containing ESkine or control human serum albumin.
Results in Table II show that the
percentage of cells migrating into the gels in response to ESkine was
significantly higher than control, indicating a specific ability of
ESkine to induce locomotor activity in the PBMCs that is higher than
that induced by the nonspecific (human serum albumin) protein controls.
These results are similar to those obtained in the polarization assays
(Fig. 6) and suggest that, in addition to stimulating morphological
polarization, ESkine stimulates locomotion into a connective tissue
matrix. It should be pointed out that the levels of migration seen in
these assays are lower than those seen in similar assays in which
interleukin 8 has been used as the chemoattractant (37), and it is
likely that this, again, is a reflection of the limited phenotype of the ESkine-responsive cells.
During the analysis of a subtracted library prepared from
differentiating ES cells, we identified a novel cDNA that is
identical to a number of ESTs in the murine data bases. The homologous
ESTs are very similar to the extreme 3'-end of the murine interleukin 11 receptor We are currently uncertain whether the novel IL11R Further analysis of ESkine-related ESTs reveals two isoforms of this
chemokine that are generated by alternative 5' exon splicing. One of
these forms encodes a signal peptide-bearing variant (ESkine), while
the other (PESKY) replaces the signal peptide with an alternative stretch of amino-terminal amino acids that is not predicted to function
as a signal peptide. Data base searching has failed to reveal any
subcellular targeting motifs within this alternative amino-terminal
sequence. Results from transfections of HEK and CHO cells with
ESkine/GFP and PESKY/GFP fusion constructs indicate that while, as
expected, ESkine appears to be localized over the endoplasmic reticulum
and Golgi apparatus, PESKY appears to target GFP to the nucleus.
Nuclear translocation of growth factors has been reported previously
(42-44), and in the case of members of the fibroblast growth factor
family, this nuclear translocation appears to be essential for aspects
of function (45, 46). The highly basic nature of PESKY is a likely
contributor to its nuclear localization, and we are currently
attempting to identify the specific nuclear targeting signal within the
complete PESKY sequence. It is not yet clear whether the PESKY-specific
sequences are responsible for the nuclear targeting or whether they
simply act to block signal peptide-directed secretion. In this event, the nuclear localization signal is likely to reside within the mature
chemokine sequence common to both ESkine and PESKY. This may therefore
suggest that upon internalization following receptor binding, ESkine
also will be translocated to the nucleus of its target cells.
Evaluation of this possibility awaits the identification of the ESkine
cellular receptor. This is the first example of nuclear targeting of a
member of the chemokine family, and the elucidation of the role of
nuclear PESKY will be central to our understanding of the role of this
"intrakine" in the cells in which it is expressed.
Expression studies have revealed the two isoforms to be detectable in
discrete tissues. Thus, while ESkine is only detectable, at Northern
blot level, in the placenta, PESKY is detectable in the testes and
brain. PCR analysis suggests low level expression of both isoforms in
other tissues. Hemopoietic tissues such as bone marrow and spleen are
consistently negative for either isoform. However, we have demonstrated
expression of ESkine in FDCPmix cells (data not shown), which are
representative of primitive murine hemopoietic cells (47). This
expression is currently being investigated in more detail.
Initial functional analyses of a novel chemokine is clearly difficult,
and most efforts are primarily aimed at demonstrating activity of
chemokines on proinflammatory or immune effector cells. Our data
suggest that ESkine is active in polarizing, and inducing locomotor
activity in, CD4+ T cells with little activity on other
immune and inflammatory cell types. These observations, while
confirming a potential role for ESkine in T cell chemoattraction or
chemokinesis, are unlikely to represent the full biological profile of
ESkine/PESKY. For example, the detection of ESkine in the placenta as
early as day 7.5 of development (Fig. 4a) precedes the
emergence of the hematolymphoid system in the mouse, and thus it is
unlikely that ESkine is performing an immune or proinflammatory
function at this stage. Detailed examination of the cell types making
and responding to ESkine is therefore essential in helping to suggest
other nonhemopoietic roles for this chemokine. Additionally, our
functional observations shed no light on the possible biological roles
for the nuclear localized PESKY variant of ESkine, and again, further
analysis of the specific cells expressing PESKY is required before any attempts can be made to define biological roles for this intrakine variant.
In summary, therefore, we have identified a novel
-chemokine family of proinflammatory mediators and have called this
protein ESkine. Much of the coding sequence for ESkine overlaps with
the 3'-end of a novel interleukin 11 receptor
-like sequence on
murine chromosome 4. ESkine is produced as two splice variants. One of these variants encodes a classical chemokine with an associated signal
peptide, while the other variant (PESKY) possesses the main body of the
chemokine but has replaced the signal peptide with an alternative
stretch of amino acids that allows for nuclear targeting of this
isoform. This differential splicing arises as a result of alternative
5' exon usage. These differentially spliced forms are expressed at
discrete tissue loci. Thus, while ESkine is highly expressed in the
placenta, PESKY is mainly expressed in the Testes and brain and weakly
in the developing embryo. Studies on the proinflammatory properties of
ESkine reveal it to be active in inducing polarization of
CD4+ T cells but to be inactive on other hemopoietic
cellular populations.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
,
,
), with the
and
families being by far the most populous.
These two subfamilies are defined by the specific cysteine motif that
they bear: the
-chemokine family bears a ...
CXC ... C ... C ... motif, while the
-chemokine family has a ... CC ... C ... C ...
motif. Typically, members of the chemokine family are active as
inflammatory mediators; however, numerous other functions such as
proliferative control and regulation of angiogenesis have been
demonstrated. The chemokines articulate their functions through members
of the seven transmembrane-spanning family of G protein-coupled
receptors. Numerous receptors have been characterized for members of
these families, and most of these receptors display a marked
promiscuity (15). The novel chemokine identified in the ES cell
subtracted library is a member of the
-chemokine family and shows
weak homology to the chemokines LARC and TECK. This novel chemokine,
which we have labeled ESkine, is structurally unique among known
chemokines, has a highly divergent sequence, and overlaps at its 3'-end
with a murine interleukin 11 receptor
(IL11R
) homologue on
murine chromosome 4. ESkine is generated as two alternatively spliced,
differentially expressed variants. One of these variants carries a
classical signal peptide, which presumably allows for release from
mammalian cells and which targets ESkine to the Golgi as determined by
GFP fusion protein analysis. However, the alternative form, which we
refer to as PESKY, lacks the signal peptide, encoding in its place a
charged domain, making it unlikely that this variant is secreted via
classical endocytic pathways from mammalian cells. In fact, studies
using a PESKY/GFP fusion construct indicate that PESKY translocates to
the nucleus, which is maintained as its major domain of expression.
These two alternatively spliced variants are expressed at discrete
tissue loci, with the secretable ESkine being predominantly expressed in the placenta and PESKY being predominantly expressed in the testes
and brain. Bioassays indicate the mature ESkine protein to be active in
inducing polarization and locomotion of activated CD4+ T cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]dCTP
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using the Ready-to-go kit (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech), and unincorporated nucleotides were removed using
NICK columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Probes were denatured at
100 °C for 3 min prior to hybridization. For specific detection of
ESkine or PESKY sequences, the alternative 5' exons were subcloned into
pCRscript and subsequently radiolabeled as cDNA fragments using the
Ready-to-go kit.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Chemokine--
Initial data base
searching with one of the clones (JB438) from the ES cell subtracted
library identified numerous homologous ESTs in the murine data base.
These ESTs have high homology (82%) to the extreme 3'-end of exon 13 in the untranslated region of the murine interleukin 11 receptor
-chain (24-26) and it was initially assumed that JB438 represented
a novel, highly conserved, member of this receptor family.
Surprisingly, closer analysis of JB438 and the related ESTs indicated
that while the homology with the IL11R
gene was identifiable in one
reading orientation, conceptual translation of the cDNAs in the
reverse orientation indicated that JB438 and the homologous ESTs encode
a novel member of the
-chemokine family. We have labeled this
chemokine ESkine.
family are known to reside on chromosome 4 in the
mouse (27), and using mouse/hamster cell hybrids we have demonstrated
specific detection of ESkine on murine chromosome 4. Thus, ESkine and
the IL11R
homologue lie within the same locus in the murine genome
and appear to be transcribed in different directions along chromosome
4, with ESkine overlapping with the extreme 3'-end of the IL11R
homologue (Fig. 1). The overlap with the
homologous regions of the published murine IL11R
gene encompasses 149 bases of the 3'-untranslated region of the receptor gene. The
complementary 149 bases of ESkine include 126 bases of sequence encoding the region of the mature protein from CVH ... to
... QQQN (see Fig. 2a).
Thus, a substantial portion of the 3' ESkine coding sequence overlaps
with the 3'-untranslated region of the putative novel receptor.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Diagrammatic representation of the ESkine
genomic locus. ESkine has been mapped to murine chromosome 4 using
a panel of mouse/hamster somatic cell hybrids. Data base searching
reveals an overlap with a close homologue of the murine IL11R
chain,
suggesting that ESkine and this novel receptor homologue overlap at
their 3'-ends. bp base pair.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sequences of ESkine and PESKY.
a, the full-length cDNA and protein sequence for ESkine.
The signal peptide is underlined, and the putative signal
peptidase cleavage site is marked with an arrow. Conserved
cysteine residues typical of a
-chemokine are in boldface
type and underlined, and the putative
N-linked glycosylation site is highlighted in
boldface italic type. b, the
alternative amino-terminal stretch seen in PESKY. From the alanine
prior to the LPLP motif, PESKY is identical to ESkine. c, a
line up of the murine, rat, and human ESkine sequences. Only the mature
protein sequences are shown here, and only the stretch of the human
homologue inferred from the published human IL11R
sequence is shown.
Identical amino acids are indicated by a vertical
line, and conserved alterations are indicated by
colon.
-chemokine, and data base searching reveals
weak homologies (33-36%) to the
-chemokines LARC (28) and TECK
(29). Additional similarities to TECK include the fact that the
sequence between cysteines 2 and 3 is slightly longer than that seen in
other
-chemokines (27 amino acids compared with 24 or fewer).
Additionally, ESkine shares with TECK an elongated C-terminal tail.
Signal peptidase cleavage at the predicted site reveals two sequential
recognition sites for cleavage by the protease CD26 (LPLP ... ),
which cleaves at the amino terminus of proteins in which the second
amino acid residue is a proline. Chemokines with proline residues at
this position are known substrates for this enzyme and indeed cleavage
by CD26 can markedly alter chemokine function (30-32).
genomic sequence
(accession number HSU32323) reveals the presence of an ESkine homologue
at this position also. The sequence of the presumed protein encoded by
this genomic sequence is shown in Fig. 2c and, as can be
seen, displays 62% identity and 73% similarity with murine ESkine
over the deduced sequence. Intriguingly, the putative glycosylation
site conserved in murine and rat ESkine is altered from NRS to NPS in
the human protein. The presence of a proline residue in this motif
makes it unlikely that it will be used as a glycosylation site in the
human protein (33). Insufficient N-terminal sequence information is
available to confirm the maintenance of the double CD26 cleavage site
in this protein.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Diagrammatic representation of the genomic
locus encoding PESKY and ESkine. Generation of these two variants
appears to arise as a consequence of alternative usage of the two first
exons. The numbering refers to the number of base pairs from
the start methionine codon for PESKY. The position of the putative
N-linked glycosylation site is marked.
is also expressed in the placenta (34); however, we have ensured specific detection of ESkine by using probes capable of discriminating between ESkine and the murine IL11R
homologue on blots. Repeated attempts to RACE the full-length ESkine/PESKY cDNAs from the
placenta and the testes revealed that consistently, ESkine was detected in the placenta but not the testes, while PESKY was detected in the
testes but not the placenta. This suggested differential expression of
these two isoforms and indicates that the expression detected in the
placenta using ESkine/PESKY common sequences is a consequence of ESkine
expression at this site. We have now confirmed this, and analysis of
expression in the embryo and the placenta using probes specific for the
alternative 5' exons of PESKY and ESkine revealed ESkine to be
undetectable in the embryo but to be expressed at high levels in the
placenta (Fig. 4b). Curiously, analysis of PESKY expression
indicates absence in the placenta but its expression, albeit weak, in
the embryo (Fig. 4b). Further tissue analysis using Northern
blotting has failed to detect expression of ESkine-specific sequences
in other tissues (data not shown). However, PESKY-specific sequences
are readily detectable in the brain and testes and are weakly expressed
in kidney and liver (Fig. 4c). It thus appears that ESkine
and PESKY are produced through alternative splicing mechanisms and that
these splice variants are predominantly expressed at distinct tissue
loci. More sensitive techniques of PCR have revealed low level
expression of PESKY in heart and muscle tissue, and, while PCR has not
revealed additional sites for ESkine expression, numerous ESkine like
ESTs have been reported as being derived from epidermal tissues; thus, the skin is a likely source for ESkine expression.

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Results from an analysis of ESkine and PESKY
expression. a, dot blot analysis of tissue expression.
Dot blots were purchased from CLONTECH and probed
with sequences common to both ESkine and PESKY. Blots were hybridized
and washed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
key on the right shows the relative positions of
each of the blotted RNAs. b, demonstration of the
differential expression of ESkine and PESKY in the embryo and placenta.
Total RNAs prepared from timed embryos and associated placenta (days
14.5, 17.5, and 18.5) were blotted onto Hybond N using standard
techniques and probed with radiolabeled sequences specific for either
ESkine or PESKY. Following assessment of ESkine and PESKY expression,
the blots were stripped by boiling in 0.1% SDS and reprobed with
-actin as a control. c, expression of PESKY in a range of
murine tissue. RNA was prepared from each of the represented tissues
and these were blotted onto Hybond N and probed with a PESKY-specific
probe. Following detection of PESKY on the blots, they were stripped
and reprobed with
-actin as a control.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Analysis of the subcellular localization of
ESkine and PESKY/GFP fusion peptides. For each experiment, GFP was
placed in frame with the carboxyl terminus of either ESkine or PESKY
and expressed in HEK cells by transient transfection. Fluorescence was
visualized using confocal microscopy, and nuclei were stained in each
of the photographs by propidium iodide. For each
transfectant, panel 1 is the GFP fluorescence,
panel 2 is the propidium iodide staining, and
panel 3 is the merging of the two.
Co-localization is indicated by yellow staining.
A, ESkine/GFP transfectants; B, PESKY/GFP
transfectants; C, control GFP transfectants.
-chemokine family,
the predicted roles for ESkine lie in the regulation of inflammatory or
immune cell function (however, see below for a discussion of this
point). Such effects on these cell populations typically lead to cell polarization, which can be quantified as outlined under
"Experimental Procedures." We have therefore examined the
biological activity of ESkine in terms of its effects on polarization
of resting and SEB-activated (36) human PBMCs. While ESkine had no
detectable effects on polarization of resting PBMCs, SEB-activated
PBMCs showed a classical "bell-shaped" dose response to activation
by ESkine. Maximal polarization was seen at 1 ng/ml ESkine, at which concentration, following removal of background polarization controls, approximately 20% of PBMCs were polarized (Fig.
6). This polarizing activity is
comparable with (and perhaps even slightly higher in potency than) that
of interleukin 8, another well characterized chemokine (Fig. 6 and Ref.
37) and additionally is very similar in potency to MIP-1
, which we
have previously shown to be maximally active at 1 ng/ml in the
polarization assays (16). To investigate the phenotype of the subset of
PBMCs polarized by ESkine, we have carried out an analysis using a
range of lineage-specific surface markers. As can be seen from Table
I, only CD3+ and
CD4+ cells are polarized by ESkine. No effect on the
polarization of CD8+ cells was observed. Additionally, no
effect of ESkine was seen on the CD19+ B cell population or
on the CD14+ population of monocytes.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Dose response of human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells to ESkine in polarization assays. Cells were
tested directly after separation (open symbols)
or cultured overnight (closed symbols) with SEB
(1 µg/ml). Cells were then washed and exposed for 30 min to ESkine
(squares), recombinant human interleukin 8 (circles), or medium alone. They were then washed, fixed,
and scored under phase contrast microscopy for shape change
(polarization). The percentage of polarized cells exposed to medium
alone (4.3 ± 0.7 for freshly prepared cells, 25.7 ± 2.3%
for cells cultured with SEB) has been subtracted from the
figure. Data are mean of three experiments from three
donors. Cells cultured with SEB and then exposed to ESkine (10 pg/ml to
10 ng/ml) were significantly different (p < 0.05) from
those exposed to medium alone. Freshly isolated cells exposed to ESkine
were not significantly different from those exposed to medium
alone.
Cell type analysis of the polarization response to ESkine
Effect of ESkine on the invasion of collagen gels by SEB-activated
PBMCs
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-chain, suggesting initially that they represented novel
members of this receptor family. Closer inspection of the ESTs revealed
that reverse translation indicates that they encode a novel
-chemokine, which we have called ESkine. Both ESkine and the murine
IL11R
homologue lie on murine chromosome 4 and overlap with each
other at their extreme 3'-ends. This type of genomic organization of
two separate genes with 3' overlaps has been previously reported
(38-41); however, it is currently without precedent in the chemokine family.
like sequences
represent a previously uncharacterized member of this receptor family
or simply a duplicated 3' fragment from the IL11R
genomic locus.
Arguing against this being a novel full-length IL11R
gene are
earlier studies that have indicated the absence of novel IL11R
isoforms in the murine genome (24, 26). We are currently sequencing ESkine genomic clones and hope to be in a position soon to understand the nature of the novel IL11R
-like sequences. Whatever the precise nature of these sequences, it is clear that there is an evolutionarily conserved relationship between ESkine/PESKY and the IL11R
family. Indeed, at the extreme 3'-end of the published murine IL11R
, there
is a partial stretch of ESkine-like sequences; however, this is
interrupted by numerous stop codons. In a similar manner, reverse
translation of the extreme 3'-end of human IL11R
reveals human
ESkine to be encoded at the equivalent locus.
-chemokine that is
a chemoattractant for CD4+ T cells. This protein is unique
within the chemokine family, since it is produced as two splice
variants, one carrying a signal peptide and the other having the signal
peptide replaced by an alternative stretch of amino acids that allows
for nuclear targeting. These splice variants are expressed at discrete
tissue loci. This form of alternative splicing and differential
expression is unprecedented within the chemokine family and represents
an additional level of complexity in the regulation of chemokine
generation and function. In addition, PESKY is the first example of a
nuclear targeted chemokine protein and may suggest intracellular
functions for members of the chemokine family.
| |
Note Added in Proof |
|---|
ESkine has recently been independently characterized by two other groups as ALP (Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (1999) 258, 737-740) and cutaneous T cell attracting chemokine (CTACK) (A. Zlotnik, personal communication). This chemokine will also be known as CCL27 in keeping with the newly introduced chemokine nomenclature system.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a grant from the Leukemia Research Fund. Work in the laboratory of G. J. G. is supported by grants from the Cancer Research Campaign.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-141-330-3982; Fax: 44-141-942-6521; E-mail: g.graham@beatson.gla.ac.uk.
2 J. W. Baird and G. J. Graham, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
ES, embryonic stem;
IL11R
, interleukin 11 receptor
;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear
cell;
SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Graham, G. J., and Wright, E. G. (1997) Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 78, 197-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Robertson, E. J. (1987) in Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach (Robertson, E. J., ed) , IRC Press, Oxford |
| 3. |
Nagy, A.,
Gocza, E.,
Diaz, E. M.,
Prideaux, V. R.,
Ivanya, E.,
and Rossant, J.
(1990)
Development
110,
815-821 |
| 4. |
Nagy, A.,
Rossant, J.,
Nagy, R.,
Abramow-Newerly, W.,
and Roder, J. C.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8424-8428 |
| 5. | Hole, N., and Graham, G. J. (1997) Bailliere's Clin. Haematol. 10, 467-483[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Doetschman, T. C., Eisetter, H., Katz, M., Schmidt, W., and Kemler, R. (1985) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 87, 27-45[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Burkert, U., Von Ruden, T., and Wagner, E. F. (1991) New Biol. 3, 698-708[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Schmidt, R. M.,
Bruyns, E.,
and Snodgrass, H. R.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
728-740 |
| 9. | Wiles, M. V., and Keller, G. (1991) Development 111, 259-267[Abstract] |
| 10. |
Keller, G.,
Kennedy, M.,
Papayannopoulou, T.,
and Wiles, M. V.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
473-486 |
| 11. |
Hole, N.,
Graham, G. J.,
Menzel, U.,
and Ansell, J. D.
(1996)
Blood
88,
1266-1276 |
| 12. |
Wang, Z.,
and Brown, D. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
11505-11511 |
| 13. |
Rollins, B. J.
(1997)
Blood
90,
909-928 |
| 14. | Baggiolini, M. (1998) Nature 392, 565-568[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Murphy, P. M. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7, 47-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Graham, G. J., Wilkinson, P. C., Nibbs, R. J. B., Lowe, S., Kolset, S. O., Parker, A., Freshney, M. G., Tsang, M. L-S., and Pragnell, I. B. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6506-6515[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Nibbs, R. J. B.,
Lowe, S.,
Wylie, S. M.,
Pragnell, I. B.,
and Graham, G. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12495-12504 |
| 18. | Haston, W. S., and Shields, J. M. (1985) J. Immunol. Methods 81, 229-237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Wilkinson, P. C. (1986) Immunology 57, 281-289[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Wilkinson, P. C.,
and Liew, F. Y.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
181,
1255-1259 |
| 21. | Newman, I., and Wilkinson, P. C. (1996) Immunology 87, 428-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Haston, W. S.,
Shields, J. M.,
and Wilkinson, P. C.
(1982)
J. Cell. Biol.
92,
747-755 |
| 23. | Komai-Koma, M., Liew, F. Y., and Wilkinson, P. C. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 1110-1116[Abstract] |
| 24. | Bilinski, P., Hall, M. A., Neuhaus, H., Gissel, C., Heath, J. K., and Ghossler, A. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 359-363 |
| 25. |
Robb, L.,
Hilton, D. J.,
Wilson, T. A.,
and Begley, C. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13754-13761 |
| 26. | Robb, L., Hilton, D. J., Brook-Carter, P. T., and Begley, C. G. (1997) Genomics 40, 387-394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Mock, B. A., and Hirano, M. C. (1998) Mamm. Genome 8 (suppl.), S68-S90 |
| 28. |
Hieshima, K.,
Imai, T.,
Opdenakker, G.,
Van Damme, J.,
Kusuda, J.,
Tei, H.,
Sakai, Y.,
Takasuki, Y. K.,
Miura, R.,
Yoshie, O.,
and Nomiyama, H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5846-5853 |
| 29. | Vicari, A. P., Figueroa, A. P., Hedrick, J. A., Foster, J. S., Singh, K. P., Menon, S., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A., Bacon, K. B., and Zlotnik, A. (1997) Immunity 7, 291-301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Oravecz, T.,
Pall, M.,
Rodriquez, G.,
Gorrell, M. D.,
Ditto, M.,
Nguyen, N. Y.,
Boykins, R.,
Unsworth, E.,
and Norcross, M. A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1865-1872 |
| 31. |
Shioda, T.,
Kato, H.,
Ohnishi, Y.,
Tashiro, K.,
Ikegawa, M.,
Nakayama, E. E.,
Hu, H.,
Kato, A.,
Sakai, Y.,
Liu, H.,
Honjo, T.,
Nomoto, A.,
Iwamoto, A.,
Morimoto, C.,
and Nagai, Y.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6331-6336 |
| 32. |
Proost, P.,
De Meester, I.,
Schols, D.,
Struyf, S.,
Lambeir, A-M.,
Wuyts, A.,
Opdenakker, G.,
De Clercq, E.,
Scharpe, S.,
and Van Damme, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7222-7227 |
| 33. |
Shakin-Eshelman, S. H.,
Spitalnik, S. L.,
and Kasturi, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6363-6368 |
| 34. |
Bilinski, P.,
Roopenian, D.,
and Gossler, A.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2234-2243 |
| 35. | Clark-Lewis, I., Vo, L., Owen, P., and Anderson, J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 287, 233-250[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Marrack, P.,
and Kappler, J.
(1990)
Science
248,
705-711 |
| 37. | Wilkinson, P. C., and Newman, I. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 2689-2694[Abstract] |
| 38. | Williams, T., and Fried, M. (1986) Nature 322, 275-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Adelman, J. P.,
Bond, C. T.,
Douglass, J.,
and Herbert, E.
(1987)
Science
235,
1514-1517 |
| 40. |
Lazar, M. A.,
Hodin, R. A.,
Darling, D. S.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1128-1136 |
| 41. |
Morel, Y.,
Bristow, J.,
Gitelman, S. E.,
and Miller, W. L.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6582-6586 |
| 42. | Acland, P., Dixon, M., Peters, G., and Dickson, C. (1990) Nature 343, 662-664[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Mason, I. J. (1994) Cell 78, 547-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Keifer, P., Acland, P., Pappin, D., Peters, G., and Dickson, C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4126-4136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Imamura, T.,
Engleka, K.,
Zhan, X.,
Tokita, Y.,
Forough, R.,
Roeder, D.,
Jackson, A.,
Maier, J. A. M.,
Hla, T.,
and Maciag, T.
(1990)
Science
249,
1567-1570 |
| 46. | Wiedlocha, A., Falnes, P. O., Madshus, L. H., Sandvig, K., and Olsnes, S. (1994) Cell 76, 1039-1051[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Spooncer, E., Boettiger, D., and Dexter, T. M. (1984) Nature 310, 228-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Huang, A. S. Lonsdorf, L. Fang, T. Kakinuma, V. C. Lee, E. Cha, H. Zhang, K. Nagao, M. Zaleska, W. L. Olszewski, et al. Cutting Edge: Rapid Accumulation of Epidermal CCL27 in Skin-Draining Lymph Nodes following Topical Application of a Contact Sensitizer Recruits CCR10-Expressing T Cells J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6462 - 6466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Chaldee, M.-C. Gaillard, N. Bizat, J.-M. Buhler, O. Manzoni, J. Bockaert, P. Hantraye, E. Brouillet, and J.-M. Elalouf Quantitative Assessment of Transcriptome Differences Between Brain Territories Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1646 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gortz, R. J. B. Nibbs, P. McLean, D. Jarmin, W. Lambie, J. W. Baird, and G. J. Graham The Chemokine ESkine/CCL27 Displays Novel Modes of Intracrine and Paracrine Function J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1387 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Hoover and J. Lubkowski DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2002; 30(10): e43 - e43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Jarmin, M. Rits, D. Bota, N. P. Gerard, G. J. Graham, I. Clark-Lewis, and C. Gerard Cutting Edge: Identification of the Orphan Receptor G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 2 as CCR10, a Specific Receptor for the Chemokine ESkine J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3460 - 3464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||