|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 48, 33966-33972, November 26, 1999
Erythropoietin Induces Glycosylphosphatidylinositol
Hydrolysis
POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF PHOSPHOLIPASE C- 2*
Cédric
Boudot ,
Emmanuelle
Petitfrère ,
Zahra
Kadri ,
Stany
Chretien§,
Patrick
Mayeux¶,
Bernard
Haye , and
Claudine
Billat
From the Laboratoire de Biochimie, CNRS UPRES-A 6021,
IFR 53 Biomolécules, UFR Sciences Exactes et Naturelles,
BP 1039, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne,
F 51687 Reims Cedex 2, the § Institut National de la
Transfusion Sanguine (INTS), 6 Rue Alexandre Cabanel, F 75014 Paris,
and ¶ Institut Cochin de Génétique Moléculaire,
INSERM U363, Hôpital Cochin, Université René
Descartes, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques,
F 75014 Paris, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
We showed that erythropoietin induced rapid
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) hydrolysis and tyrosine
phosphorylation of phospholipase C (PLC)- 2 in
FDC-P1 cells transfected with the wild-type erythropoietin-receptor.
Erythropoietin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC- 2
was time- and dose-dependent. By using FDC-P1 cells
transfected with an erythropoietin receptor devoid of tyrosine
residues, we showed that both effects required the tyrosine residues of
intracellular domain on the erythropoietin receptor.
Erythropoietin-activated PLC- 2 hydrolyzed purified [3H]GPI indicating that GPI hydrolysis and
PLC- 2 activation under erythropoietin stimulation were
correlated. Results obtained on FDC-P1 cells transfected with
erythropoietin receptor mutated on tyrosine residues suggest that
tyrosines 343, 401, 464, and/or 479 are involved in
erythropoietin-induced GPI hydrolysis and tyrosine phosphorylation of
PLC- 2, whereas tyrosines 429 and/or 431 seem to be
involved in an inhibition of both effects. Thus, our results suggest
that erythropoietin regulates GPI hydrolysis via tyrosine
phosphorylation of its receptor and PLC- 2 activation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Erythropoietin is essential for the survival, proliferation,
and differentiation of the late erythroid progenitor cells (for review
see Ref. 1). Erythropoietin exerts its action on its target cells by
binding to specific cell-surface receptors (for review see Ref. 2). The
erythropoietin receptor
(Epo-R)1 belongs to the
cytokine receptor superfamily, and its cytosolic domain lacks intrinsic
kinase activity. Nevertheless, ligand binding leads to a rapid but
transient tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins, including the
receptor itself (3-5). This phosphorylation is carried out via the
activation of an associated tyrosine kinase, JAK2 (6, 7). Epo-R
tyrosine phosphorylation creates binding sites for Src homology domain
2 (SH2) containing proteins such as Grb2, Shc,
Stat5, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, SHP1, and SHP2 that
relay and amplify the signals (for review see Ref. 8).
The glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) molecules with the general
structure lipid-phosphate-inositol glycan have been isolated from
plants, bacteria, yeast, parasitic protozoa, and mammalian cells
(9-11). In eukaryotic cells, GPI molecules may be attached to protein
moieties thereby providing a membrane anchor. Free GPIs also exist
under an uncomplexed form. Both forms of GPI have been shown to
participate in signal transduction events (for review see Ref. 12). In
different cellular systems GPI turnover is modulated by a variety of
hormones, cytokines, and growth factors such as insulin (13, 14),
insulin growth factor-I (15, 16), nerve growth factor (17, 18),
interleukin-2 (19), thyroid-stimulating hormone (20), or erythropoietin
in rat erythroid progenitor cells (21). Then the hydrolysis of
glycosylphosphatidylinositol could be another pathway in signal
transduction. GPI hydrolysis generates diacylglycerol and the polar
group of the lipid, an inositol phosphoglycan (IPG) which can act as a
second messenger (for review see Ref. 22).
The dependence on increased receptor phosphorylation and GPI hydrolysis
after growth factor stimulation remains to be conclusively defined.
However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors were shown to be able to partially
block epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated GPI hydrolysis (23), and
hydrolysis of GPI in response to insulin is reduced in cells bearing
kinase-deficient insulin receptors (24, 25).
The nature of the phospholipase C (PLC) responsible for hormone-induced
GPI hydrolysis is still unknown. Mammalian GPI-PLC was partially
purified from rat liver membranes (26) but has not yet been cloned.
PI-PLC from Bacillus cereus was shown to facilitate the
release of some PI-glycan-ethanolamine-anchored proteins as PI-PLC
isolated from trypanosomes (27) and rat liver membranes (26, 28). Among
eukaryote PI-PLC isoforms, only the 1 and
2 types contain SH2 and SH3 domains and become potential candidates for binding to phosphotyrosine residues during Epo receptor
activation (29-31). Epo activation of a PLC was suggested in erythroid
progenitor cells (32), and PLC- 1 activation was evidenced in UT7 cells (33), but Epo activation of PLC- 2
has never been described, whereas PLC- 2 activation by
macrophage-colony-stimulating factor has been described in FDC-P1 cells
(34).
In this report, we show that erythropoietin induces a rapid and
transient hydrolysis of GPI and tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC- 2. Both effects require the presence of the same
tyrosine residues on the intracellular domain of Epo receptor. We show that Epo-activated PLC- 2 is able to hydrolyze purified
[3H]GPI. Our results suggest that tyrosine Y1
(Tyr343), Y2 (Tyr401),
Y7, and/or Y8
(Tyr464 and/or Tyr479) are implicated in
Epo-induced GPI hydrolysis and tyrosine phosphorylation of
PLC- 2, whereas tyrosines Y3 and/or
Y4 (Tyr429 and/or Tyr431) seem to
be involved in Epo-induced inhibition of GPI hydrolysis. Thus, our
results strongly suggest that Epo regulates GPI hydrolysis via tyrosine
phosphorylation of its receptor and PLC- 2 activation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Purified recombinant human erythropoietin
(specific activity of 120,000 units/mg) was from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. [1-3H]Ethan-1-ol-2-amine hydrochloride (26 Ci/mmol) and D-[6-3H]glucosamine
hydrochloride (33 Ci/mmol) were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Anti-PLC- 2 antibodies (catalog number (Q-20) sc-407) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (4G10) (catalog number 17-123) and anti-JAK2 antibodies (catalog number 06-255) were from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. ECL
substrate solution was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. -MEM, Iscove
Dulbecco's medium, and fetal calf serum were from Life Technologies,
Inc. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma.
Epo-R Mutants--
The intracellular domain of the murine Epo
receptor contains 8 tyrosines as follows: Tyr343
(Y1), Tyr401 (Y2),
Tyr429 (Y3), Tyr431
(Y4), Tyr443 (Y5),
Tyr460 (Y6), Tyr464
(Y7), and Tyr479 (Y8) of the mature
protein. Epo-R mutants were constructed as described previously (35). A
schematic representation of Epo-R wild type (WT) and mutants is done in
Fig. 1. The
Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 Epo-R mutant was
kindly provided by Dr. U. Klingmüller (Zentrum fur Molekulare
Biologie, Universitat Heidelberg, Germany).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of wild-type and
mutated Epo receptors. The intracellular part of the WT Epo-R
contains 8 tyrosine residues as follows: Y1
(Tyr343), Y2 (Tyr401),
Y3 (Tyr429), Y4
(Tyr431), Y5 (Tyr443),
Y6 (Tyr460), Y7
(Tyr464), and Y8 (Tyr479).
F corresponds to a phenylalanine substitution;
EC, extracellular.
|
|
Cell Cultures--
FDC-P1 cells were maintained in -minimum
essential medium ( -MEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum and 3%
WEHI conditioned media as a source of interleukin-3. Stable
transfections of murine Epo-R cDNA into FDC-P1 cells were done as
described previously (35). After transfection, Epo-sensitive cells were
maintained in -MEM containing 10% fetal calf serum and 2 units/ml Epo.
Cell Labeling and Stimulation--
Cells were grown with 3%
WEHI as source of growth factor and metabolically labeled with
[3H]ethanolamine (1.5 µCi/ml) or
[3H]glucosamine (5 µCi/ml) for 20 h prior to
assay. Four hours before the end of this period, cells were starved of
growth factor in -MEM containing 1% (v/v) of fetal calf serum.
Cells were then washed twice with medium, 25 mM HEPES,
and aliquots of 10-20 × 106 cells were preincubated
at 37 °C for 15 min before stimulation with 5 units/ml Epo for 0-30
min. Incubations were stopped with HClO4 (5% v/v). After
centrifugation at 1200 × g, pellets and supernatants
were stored at 20 °C before GPI and IPG quantitations.
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) and Inositol Phosphate Glycan
(IPG) Assays--
Lipids were extracted from the resultant pellets and
analyzed by sequential acid/base silica gel thin layer chromatography (TLC, Silica Gel 60, Merck) as described previously (14) or by HPTLC
(Silica Gel 60 aluminum-backed HPTLC plates, Merck) developed in
chloroform/methanol/NH4OH/water (45:45:3.5:10, v/v). HPTLC plates were sprayed with EN3HANCE (NEN Life Science
Products) and fluorographed on Kodak XAR-5 film. To quantitate
incorporation of radiolabel into GPI, HPTLC plates were either scanned
before fluorography on a Berthold LB 2821 automatic TLC linear
analyzer, or 1-cm bands of TLC were scraped and their radioactivity
content estimated by scintillation counting. IPG levels from
perchlorate supernatants or from the aqueous phase obtained after GPI
hydrolysis were determined by chromatography on a Dowex AG 1-X8
(200-400 mesh) column as described previously (13, 21).
Sensitivity of [3H]GPI to Nitrous Acid, PI-PLC, and
PLC- 2--
A sample of [3H]GPI from WT
Epo-R FDC-P1 cells recovered after the basic thin layer chromatography
was incubated in 25 mM sodium acetate, 0.16 M
sodium nitrite, pH 3.5, for 5 h at 37 °C (9) or with 1 unit/ml
PI-PLC from B. cereus in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, for 2 h at 37 °C (36). Controls were done by incubating
[3H]GPI with buffer alone. Reaction was terminated by the
addition of chloroform/methanol (1:2), and the amount of radioactivity released in the aqueous phase after lipid extraction was determined. Results were expressed as the percentage of recovered radioactivity. Hydrolysis of purified [3H]GPI from WT FDC-P1 cells by
mammalian PLC- 2 was determined by incubation of
Epo-activated PLC- 2 from WT FDC-P1 cells bound on 2.5 mg
of protein G beads or with PLC- 2 from FDC-P1 ZERO
obtained from a PLC- 2 immunoprecipitation with 15 × 106 cells, in 250 µl of HEPES 25 mM, pH
7.4, for 2 h at 37 °C. Control was done by incubation of
[3H]GPI with 2.5 mg of protein G beads in 250 µl of
HEPES 25 mM, pH 7.4, for 2 h at 37 °C. Lipids were
extracted with the same protocol as above. Then, [3H]GPI
contained in the organic phase was reanalyzed by HPTLC and quantitated
on Berthold analyzer before fluorography. IPG contained in the aqueous
phase was quantitated as described previously (13, 21).
Determination of 2,5-Anhydromannitol--
A sample of presumed
GPI labeled with [3H]glucosamine from WT Epo-R FDC-P1
cells recovered after the basic thin layer chromatography was
hydrolyzed with nitrous acid. Then the deaminated glycan was reduced
with sodium borotritide and subjected to solvolysis in 0.5 M methanolic HCl for 12 h at 80 °C as described
previously (37). Samples were analyzed on Silica Gel 60 HPTLC plates
developed for 10 cm in 1-propanol/acetone/water (9:6:5, v/v) (38) and were scanned on a Berthold analyzer.
2,5-[3H]Anhydromannitol control was prepared by treating
[3H]glucosamine as above.
Immunoprecipitations and Immunoblottings--
Starved FDC-P1
cells expressing the WT and mutant Epo-R were incubated with or without
Epo (5 units/ml) for 1-10 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed once with
phosphate-buffered saline and solubilized at 2 × 107
cells/ml with 1% Brij 98 in solubilized buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM
Na2VO4, pH 7.4). Immunoprecipitations were done
as described previously (5) with either anti-PLC- 2 or
anti-JAK2 antibodies. Following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
using 7.5% polyacrylamide gels, proteins were electrophoretically
transferred to protean nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were blocked,
incubated with anti-PY antibodies and then with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated second antibody before adding ECL substrate
solution and exposing to Kodak X-Omat film. When necessary, blots were
stripped by incubating the membrane for 30 min at 55 °C in 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS. Then the blot was washed twice with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween
20 and reprobed as described previously.
 |
RESULTS |
Evidence for Glycosylphosphatidylinositol in Epo-R-transfected
FDC-P1 Cells--
GPI identification was done with cells metabolically
labeled for 20 h with [3H]ethanolamine, a
radiolabeled precursor of GPI. Polar lipids were then extracted and
resolved by sequential acid/base thin layer chromatography (TLC) or by
HPTLC. During the first acid TLC, GPI did not migrate and was clearly
separated from phosphatidylethanolamine which migrated at 9 cm (not
shown). The material around the origin (2 cm) was recovered and
analyzed on a second TLC or on HPTLC which was run in an alkaline
solvant system. As shown in Fig. 2,
A-C, a single peak of [3H]glycolipidic
fraction was recovered between phosphatidylcholine (PC) and
phosphatidylinositol monophosphate (PIP). The same fraction was also
labeled in extracts from WT Epo-R FDC-P1 cells incubated with
[3H]inositol or [3H]glucosamine instead of
[3H]ethanolamine (not shown).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of GPI from FDC-P1 cells
transfected with the wild-type Epo-R, chromatographic isolation of
GPI. After cell labeling for 20 h with
[3H]ethanolamine (1.5 µCi/ml), total cellular lipids
were extracted, and GPI was purified by sequential TLC on Silica Gel 60 (A) or on HPTLC (B and C) as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Radioactivity was detected by
counting 1-cm bands of TLC by scintillation (A), Berthold
analysis (B), or fluorographic analysis (C).
O, origin; F, solvent front. The migration
patterns of known phospholipids are indicated: PIP,
phosphatidylinositol monophosphate; PC, phosphatidylcholine.
Presented data correspond to one experiment out of six others.
|
|
Characterization of GPI was confirmed by testing the sensitivity of the
radiolabeled product to several GPI-hydrolyzing conditions. The
recovered [3H]ethanolamine glycolipid fraction was first
treated with nitrous acid that hydrolyzes the glycosidic bond between
inositol and glucosamine. After deamination by nitrous acid, about 65%
of the labeled material was recovered in the aqueous phase, and 10.5% of the radioactivity was recovered in the aqueous phase in control incubations. Moreover, we have shown
2,5-[3H]anhydromannitol production after having
deaminated/reduced and methanolyzed the recovered
[3H]glucosamine glycolipid fraction (Fig.
3, A-C). We further
investigated the cleavage of the purified recovered
3H-labeled lipidic peak from WT Epo receptor-transfected
FDC-P1 cells by PI-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) from B. cereus. After treatment, about 21% of the labeled material was
recovered in the aqueous phase versus control 5%. These
values are in good agreement with previously published results showing
the sensitivity of GPI from various tissues to B. cereus
PI-PLC (24, 39). Altogether, our results show that the lipidic products
extracted from FDC-P1 WT Epo receptor-transfected cells and migrating
between PIP and PC corresponded to GPI.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Determination of 2,5-anhydromannitol
(AHM). A sample of recovered glycolipidic
fraction (10,000 cpm) labeled with [3H]glucosamine was
hydrolyzed with nitrous acid and reduced with sodium borotritide and
subjected to 0.5 M methanolic HCl solvolysis. Control was
prepared by treating a [3H]glucosamine (G)
sample as above. Samples were analyzed on HPTLC plates developed for 10 cm as described under "Experimental Procedures" and scanned on
Berthold analyzer: A, control with
2,5-[3H]AHM; B, [3H]AHM
recovered after treatment of the glycolipidic fraction. C,
fluorographic analysis: lane 1, control with
2,5-[3H]AHM; lane 2, [3H]AHM
recovered after treatment of the glycolipidic fraction.
|
|
Epo-induced GPI Hydrolysis in Epo-R-transfected FDC-P1
Cells--
GPI hydrolysis was assessed by measuring both GPI or
inositol phosphate glycan (IPG) levels (its hydrolysis product) from cells metabolically labeled with [3H]ethanolamine. Epo (5 units/ml) induced a rapid and transient GPI hydrolysis with a parallel
IPG release within 1 min in FDC-P1 cells transfected with WT Epo-R.
Then the IPG level rapidly decreased and returned to control values
after 30 min of Epo exposure. No GPI hydrolysis was detected after Epo
stimulation of non-transfected FDC-P1 cells (Fig.
4).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Time course of Epo-induced GPI hydrolysis and
IPG. Wild-type (WT) or non-transfected (NT)
FDC-P1 cells (20 × 106) labeled with
[3H]ethanolamine (1.5 µCi/ml) for 20 h were
deprived of growth factor and stimulated with Epo (5 units/ml). GPI
( ) and IPG ( ) levels from WT-FDC-P1 cells, GPI ( ), and IPG
( ) levels from NT-FDC-P1 cells were measured at different times as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as
percent of the zero time value and are the mean of three separate
experiments. 100% represents 2200 ± 410 dpm for IPG and
14,600 ± 660 dpm for GPI from WT-FDC-P1 cells and 2880 ± 230 dpm for IPG and 13,820 ± 420 dpm for GPI from NT-FDC-P1
cells.
|
|
Epo Induced the Tyrosine Phosphorylation of PLC- 2 in
Epo-R-transfected FDC-P1 Cells--
To assay the possible involvement
of PLC- 2 in Epo-induced GPI hydrolysis, we first
investigated its tyrosine phosphorylation in WT Epo-R FDC-P1 cells upon
Epo stimulation. As shown in Fig. 5A, Epo induced the tyrosine
phosphorylation of a 142-kDa protein immunoprecipitated with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies. This effect was maximal after
1-2 min of Epo stimulation and then decreased after 5 min of
stimulation. Reprobing the blot with anti-PLC- 2
antibodies confirmed that the 142-kDa protein was indeed
PLC- 2. Epo-induced PLC- 2 tyrosine
phosphorylation was dose-dependent as shown in Fig.
5B and the Epo effect was maximal at 0.1 units/ml.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time and dose dependence of
PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation induced by Epo.
Growth factor-deprived WT FDC-P1 cells were stimulated either with Epo
(5 units/ml) for 0-10 min (A) as indicated or for 1 min
(B) with different Epo concentrations as indicated. Cells
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies, and immunoprecipitated proteins
were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies
(PY). The blot was then stripped and reprobed with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies.
|
|
Tyrosine Residues of the Epo-R Are Required for Epo-induced
PLC- 2 Tyrosine Phosphorylation--
In order to know
whether tyrosine residues of the Epo-R play a significant role in
Epo-induced PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation, we used
interleukin-3-dependent FDC-P1 cells transfected with the
wild-type (WT) Epo-R and with Epo-R devoid of tyrosine residue (ZERO)
(Fig. 1). Then, cells were stimulated for 1 min with Epo 5 units/ml. Cellular extracts were immunoprecipitated with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies and analyzed by Western blotting.
As shown in Fig. 6, in contrast to FDC-P1
cells expressing WT Epo-R, Epo did not induce the tyrosine
phosphorylation of PLC- 2 in FDC-P1 cells ZERO,
suggesting that the tyrosine residues of the intracellular domain of
the Epo-R were required for Epo-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
PLC- 2. Reprobing the blot with anti-PLC- 2
antibodies showed that the same amounts of PLC- 2 had
been immunoprecipitated from each sample. Moreover, JAK2
immunoprecipitations carried on the same cellular extracts followed by
an anti-phosphotyrosine blot showed that these cells were stimulated by
Epo.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Tyrosine residues of the intracellular domain
of the Epo receptor are required for Epo-induced PLC- 2
tyrosine phosphorylation. FDC-P1 cells expressing either the
wild-type Epo receptor (WT) or the mutant receptor
(ZERO) devoid of tyrosine residues in its intracellular
domain were deprived of growth factor for 4 h and then stimulated
for 1 min with 5 units/ml of Epo (+) or with vehicle alone ( ); cells
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies, and immunoprecipitated proteins
were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies
(PY). The blot was stripped and reprobed with
anti-PLC- 2 antibodies. A control of Epo stimulation was
done on the same cellular extracts using JAK2 immunoprecipitation
followed by an anti-phosphotyrosine blot.
|
|
PLC- 2 immunoprecipitations from FDC-P1 cells expressing
various Epo-R mutants were achieved after Epo stimulation. As shown in
Fig. 7, PLC- 2 tyrosine
phosphorylation was found to occur in mutants Y1,
F1Y2, F1Y5-8, and in
Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 upon Epo
stimulation. It was more important in
Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 FDC-P1 cells than
in WT FDC-P1 cells. In F1Y3-4 and
Y1-6 FDC-P1 cells, an inhibition of PLC- 2
tyrosine phosphorylation was seen after Epo stimulation. It was
probably due to the presence of Tyr428-431 which inhibited
PLC- 2 phosphorylation. This hypothesis was confirmed by
the enhanced PLC- 2 activation observed in Epo-stimulated
Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 FDC-P1 cells.
Altogether, our results suggest that Tyr343,
Tyr401, and Tyr464 and/or Tyr479
are involved in PLC- 2 activation, whereas
Tyr429 and/or Tyr431 reduced this
PLC- 2 activation.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Epo-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
PLC- 2 in FDC-P1 cells transfected with various Epo-R
mutants. FDC-P1 cells expressing either the wild-type Epo receptor
(WT) or mutants Epo-R were deprived of growth factor for
4 h and then stimulated for 1 min with 5 units/ml of Epo (+) or
with vehicle alone ( ). Cells lysates were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with anti-PLC- 2 antibodies, and
immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) antibodies. The blot was then
stripped and reprobed with anti-PLC- 2
antibodies.
|
|
Correlation between Epo-induced GPI Hydrolysis and
PLC- 2 Tyrosine Phosphorylation--
Treatment of
recovered [3H]GPI with Epo-activated PLC- 2
bound on protein G beads from immunoprecipitates of WT or ZERO-FDC-P1 cells resulted in an hydrolysis of about 50.2 and 9.8%, respectively (Fig. 8A). Analysis of the
resultant products showed a greater IPG content released in the aqueous
phase in samples treated with Epo-activated PLC- 2 from
WT FDC-P1 cells than from ZERO FDC-P1 cells (Fig. 8A). To
the contrary, analysis of [3H]GPI remaining in the
organic phase is greater in sample hydrolyzed with Epo-activated
PLC- 2 from ZERO FDC-P1 than from WT FDC-P1 cells (Fig.
8, B and C). This demonstrated that
PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation is required for GPI
hydrolysis. Moreover, as described previously, Epo induced a rapid IPG
release within 1 min in FDC-P1 cells transfected with WT Epo-R, and no
change of IPG levels was observed in FDC-P1 cells ZERO after Epo
stimulation (Fig. 9). IPG levels were
also determined upon Epo stimulation (5 units/ml, 1 min) in
metabolically labeled FDC-P1 cells expressing various Epo-R mutants.
These experiments show an excellent correlation between Epo-induced
PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation and Epo-induced GPI
hydrolysis. Indeed, after Epo stimulation, IPG levels were increased in
Y1 and in F1Y2 mutants which only
retains a single tyrosine at positions 343 and 401, respectively. These
cells differ from FDC-P1 ZERO by only one tyrosine. Nevertheless, IPG
level in Y1 or Y2 mutants was about half the
level obtained in WT-Epo-R FDC-P1 transfected cells. IPG level was
greatly increased after Epo stimulation in
F1Y5-8 mutant, but IPG increase was also lower
than in WT-Epo-R FDC-P1 transfected cells. In
Y1-2F3-4Y5-8, IPG level obtained
after Epo stimulation was greater than in WT-Epo-R FDC-P1-transfected
cells. In F1Y3-4 and Y1-6
mutants, Epo induced an inhibition of IPG basal level (Fig. 9).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Correlation between Epo-induced GPI
hydrolysis and PLC- 2 activation. A,
[3H]GPI from WT FDC-P1 cells recovered after TLC was
incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with Epo-activated
PLC- 2 from WT FDC-P1 cells or PLC- 2 from
Epo-R mutant ZERO as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Control reaction was obtained with protein G beads in buffer alone.
Values were corrected by subtraction of values obtained from control
incubations in the absence of PLC- 2 (14%). Results are
presented as the means of triplicate experiments and are expressed as
the percentage of the initial label recovered in the aqueous phase
after treatment and extraction. Analysis of hydrolysis products was
done on one representative experiment; IPG was measured in the aqueous
phase (inset), and [3H]GPI remaining in the
organic phase was quantitated by Berthold analysis (B) or by
fluorographic analysis (C). O, origin;
F, solvent front; PIP, phosphatidylinositol
monophosphate; PC, phosphatidylcholine.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Epo-induced GPI hydrolysis in FDC-P1 cells
transfected with various Epo-R mutants. FDC-P1 cells expressing
either the wild-type Epo receptor or Epo-R mutants were labeled with
[3H]ethanolamine (1.5 µCi/ml) for 20 h, deprived
of growth factor for 4 h, and then stimulated for 1 min with 5 units/ml Epo (+) or with vehicle alone ( ). IPG release was determined
as described under "Experimental Procedures" in WT cells and Epo-R
mutants. Data are the means of three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results show that FDC-P1 cells contain GPI molecules that are
hydrolyzed to produce IPG after Epo stimulation. After TLC or HPTLC
analysis, GPI migrated as a single peak between PC and PIP as described
previously in Epo-sensitive cells (21) and in other cells (14, 37, 36).
The material of this peak exhibited all the characteristics of GPI.
Indeed, it could be labeled with [3H]inositol and
[3H]glucosamine in addition to
[3H]ethanolamine. Moreover, the GPI structure of this
lipid was confirmed by its partial sensitivity to PI-PLC from B. cereus and nitrous deamination of the free amino group on
glucosamine. Presence of glucosamine in 3H-recovered
glycolipidic fraction was also confirmed by 2,5-anhydromannitol obtained after deamination/reduction and methanolysis of this molecule.
Altogether these results indicate that the labeled glycolipid fraction
corresponds to GPI. It has been previously shown that GPI displays
various degrees of sensitivity to bacterial PI-PLCs cleavage (14, 19,
23, 24, 36, 39). Epo stimulation of Epo receptor-transfected FDC-P1
cells metabolically labeled with [3H]glucosamine induced
the same level of GPI hydrolysis with release of water-soluble IPG
forms. In contrast to GPI molecules involved in insulin signal
transduction in H35 hepatoma cells which does not contain ethanolamine
(14, 40), our results show that GPI molecules containing ethanolamine
are involved in Epo signal transduction.
Bacterial PI-PLCs can partially mimic the effects of the extracellular
ligand on GPI through the generation of diacylglycerol and IPG
(13, 41, 42), suggesting that the formation of IPG from GPI is due to
the activation of a phospholipase C. A GPI-specific PLC has been
purified and cloned from T. brucei (43) and peanuts (44). It
is able to hydrolyze GPI-anchored proteins and phosphatidylinositol. However, this enzyme is not active on free GPI phospholipids (45). A
mammalian GPI-PLC has been partially purified from rat liver membranes
(26) but has not been cloned. The presence of two different GPI-PLC
activities has also been reported in brain membranes (46). Our results
strongly suggest that Epo induced the hydrolysis of GPI through the
activation of PLC- 2. Indeed, PLC- 2
immunoprecipitated from Epo-stimulated FDC-P1 cells was able to
hydrolyze GPI molecules purified from these cells. The time course of
Epo-induced PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation displays a
good parallelism with the kinetics of Epo-induced GPI hydrolysis.
Moreover, we observed a full correlation between the ability for
mutated Epo receptors to activate PLC- 2 and to induce
IPG release. PLC- 2 is expressed mainly in hematopoietic
cells (47). In FDC-P1 cells, macrophage-colony-stimulating factor
induces activation of PLC- 2 and its tyrosine
phosphorylation (34). Here, we observed that Epo stimulation of WT
FDC-P1 cells induced a rapid tyrosine phosphorylation and
dephosphorylation of PLC- 2 since maximal tyrosine
phosphorylation was detected between 1 and 2 min and decreased after
this time. Although Epo-induced PLC- 2 has not been
previously reported, it has been shown that Epo activates
PLC- 1 in the UT-7 human cell line (33). The mechanism of
PLC- 1 activation by Epo was not reported. Our results
indicate that the tyrosine residues of the Epo receptor are involved in the activation of PLC- 2. Indeed, Epo receptors devoid of
tyrosine residue on their intracellular domain did not activate
PLC- 2. In contrast, Epo induced the activation of
PLC- 2 in FDC-P1 cells expressing Epo receptors with
either the first (Tyr343) or second tyrosine
(Tyr401) residue albeit to a reduced level compared with
cells expressing normal Epo receptors. Nevertheless, our results
indicate that the main activation site for PLC- 2 is
located in the C-terminal part of the receptor, suggesting that the
seventh or eighth tyrosine residue could be involved in this
activation. Yet, we could not show that PLC- 2 is
associated with the activated Epo-R and coimmunoprecipitate with it as
for PLC- 1 in UT7/Epo cells (33). This was probably due
to the rapid dissociation of the SH2 domains of PLC- 2
from the phosphorylated tyrosine residues of the Epo receptor (48). Previous results have indicated that an intact tyrosine kinase activity
is required for GPI hydrolysis in response to growth factors in Chinese
hamster ovary cells carrying normal human insulin receptors. These
cells hydrolyze up to 70% of their GPI within 2 min after the addition
of 0.1 nM insulin, whereas cells expressing a mutant
cDNA (Lys-1018 to Ala) that encodes a receptor lacking kinase
activity (49) hydrolyzes only 20-30% in response to insulin (24).
More recently, Clemente et al. (23) had indicated that tyrosine kinase inhibitors partially block GPI hydrolysis in parallel to the inhibition of both EGF receptor autophosphorylation and EGF-induced cell proliferation.
Our results also indicate that the tyrosine residues Tyr429
and/or Tyr431 are involved in deactivation of
PLC- 2 phosphorylation and in GPI hydrolysis inhibition.
Indeed, Epo-induced PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation and
GPI hydrolysis in mutants F1Y3-4 are lower
than in controls without Epo but are greater in mutants Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 (deprived of
Tyr429 and Tyr431) than in WT FDC-P1 cells.
Then tyrosines Tyr429 and/or Tyr431 appear to
be negative regulators of GPI hydrolysis. The Tyr429 was
identified as the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP1 in the cytoplasmic
domain of the Epo-R (50). Thus, our results suggest that
PLC- 2 could be a substrate for Epo-activated SHP1.
The levels of cell surface expression of Epo-R have been already
published for the cell lines used in this study (35) except for the
mutant Y1-2F3-4Y5-8 which
expressed 880 ± 50 Epo receptors. Most Epo-R mutants used in our
experiments have been previously shown to be able to mediate
Epo-induced Stat5 activation (35). Moreover, the ZERO Epo-R mutant
which did not activate Stat5 (35) mediates Epo-induced JAK2 activation
(Fig. 6). These results show that all Epo-R mutants used in our
experiments were activated by Epo. Although the levels of the cell
surface expression are not identical, it should be noted that in WT
FDC-P1 cells which expressed about 2100 Epo receptors or in
Y1-2F3-4 Y5-8, we could detect a
good level of phosphorylation of PLC- 2 and GPI
hydrolysis, whereas in mutant ZERO (without tyrosine residue) or in
F1Y3-4 which expressed about 5700 and 7700 Epo
receptors, respectively, we could not observe any PLC- 2
activation nor any GPI hydrolysis. From our results, we conclude that
the levels of both Epo receptors are not correlated to GPI hydrolysis.
A low level of PLC- 2 tyrosine phosphorylation in
immunoprecipitates of control cells was often observed. Nevertheless,
no tyrosine phosphorylation of the Epo receptor was observed in these cells (not shown). This low level of PLC- 2 could be
attributed to unidentified molecules present in the fetal calf serum
required to maintain cell survival during Epo starvation.
The GPI/IPG pathway in Epo signal transduction has already been
described in rat erythroid progenitor cells. Erythropoietin-stimulation of these cells increases GPI hydrolysis with a parallel increase in IPG
levels, and purified erythroid rat IPG partially mimicked Epo-proliferative effects on erythroid colonies (21). We have also
shown that IPG induced Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase (p44
form) activation, and we also suggested that protein kinase C could be
involved in this activation (51). Data presented here suggest a direct
link between Epo receptor tyrosine phosphorylation leading to
activation of PLC- 2 and GPI hydrolysis and provide complementary information on the GPI/IPG pathway in Epo-proliferative effects.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thanks Marie-Line Sowa for excellent
technical work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Ligue Nationale
Contre le Cancer, Comité de la Marne, and Comité de
l'Aube.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Fax:
33-03.26.91.32.79.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Epo-R, erythropoietin receptor;
-MEM, -minimum essential medium;
GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol;
SH2, Src homology domain 2;
IPG, inositol phosphoglycan;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PLC, phospholipase C;
PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C;
WT, wild
type;
HPTLC, high performance thin layer chromatography;
AHM, 2,5-anhydromannitol;
PIP, phosphatidylinositol monophosphate;
PC, phosphatidylcholine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Krantz, S. B.
(1991)
Blood
77,
419-434[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Koury, M. J.,
and Bondurant, M. C.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
210,
649-663[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Miura, O.,
D'Andrea, A.,
Kabat, D.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
4895-4902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Quelle, F. W.,
and Wojchowski, D. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
609-614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Dusanter-Fourt, I.,
Casadevall, N.,
Lacombe, C.,
Muller, O.,
Billat, C.,
Fischer, S.,
and Mayeux, P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10670-10675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Yi, T.,
Tang, B.,
Miura, O.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1993)
Cell
74,
227-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Miura, O.,
Nakamura, N.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Aoki, N.
(1994)
Blood
84,
1501-1507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Damen, J. E.,
and Krystal, G.
(1996)
Exp. Hematol.
24,
1455-1459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Ferguson, M. A.,
and Williams, A. F.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
285-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Gaulton, G. N.,
and Pratt, J. C.
(1994)
Semin. Immunol.
6,
97-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Thomas, J. R.,
Dwek, R. A.,
and Rademacher, T. W.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
5413-5422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Jones, D. R.,
and Varela-Nieto, I.
(1998)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
30,
313-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Saltiel, A. R.,
and Cuatrecasas, P.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5793-5797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Mato, J. M.,
Kelly, K. L.,
Abler, A.,
and Jarett, L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
2131-2137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Farese, R. V.,
Nair, G. P.,
Standaert, M. L.,
and Cooper, D. R.
(1988)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
156,
1346-1352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kojima, I.,
Kitaoka, M.,
and Ogata, E.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16846-16850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Chan, B. L.,
Chao, M. V.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1756-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Represa, J.,
Avila, M. A.,
Miner, C.,
Giraldez, F.,
Romero, G.,
Clemente, R.,
Mato, J. M.,
and Varela-Nieto, I.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8016-8019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Merida, I.,
Pratt, J. C.,
and Gaulton, G. N.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9421-9425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Martiny, L.,
Antonicelli, F.,
Thuilliez, B.,
Lambert, B.,
Jacquemin, C.,
and Haye, B.
(1990)
Cell. Signal.
2,
21-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Devemy, E.,
Billat, C.,
Sartelet, H.,
Martiny, L.,
and Haye, B.
(1994)
Cell. Signal.
6,
523-529[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Varela-Nieto, I.,
Leon, Y.,
and Caro, H. N.
(1996)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
115,
223-241[CrossRef]
|
| 23.
|
Clemente, R.,
Jones, D. R.,
Ochoa, P.,
Romero, G.,
Mato, J. M.,
and Varela-Nieto, I.
(1995)
Cell. Signal.
7,
411-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Villalba, M.,
Alvarez, J. F.,
Russell, D. S.,
Mato, J. M.,
and Rosen, O. M.
(1990)
Growth Factors
2,
91-97[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Suzuki, S.,
Taneda, Y.,
Hirai, S.,
Yamamoto-Honda, R.,
and Toyota, T.
(1992)
Diabetes
41,
1373-1379[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Fox, J. A.,
Soliz, N. M.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
2663-2667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Hereld, D.,
Krakow, J. L.,
Bangs, J. D.,
Hart, G. W.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
13813-13819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Kuppe, A.,
Evans, L. M.,
McMillen, D. A.,
and Griffith, O. H.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
6077-6083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Cantley, L. C.,
Auger, K. R.,
Carpenter, C.,
Duckworth, B.,
Graziani, A.,
Kapeller, R.,
and Soltoff, S.
(1991)
Cell
64,
281-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Pawson, T.,
and Gish, G. D.
(1992)
Cell
71,
359-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Schlessinger, J.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Genet. & Dev.
4,
25-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Mason-Garcia, M.,
Clejan, S.,
Tou, J.-S.,
and Beckman, B. S.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
262,
C1197-C1203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ren, H.-Y.,
Komatsu, N.,
Shimizu, R.,
Okada, K.,
and Miura, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19633-19638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Bourette, R. P.,
Myles, G. M.,
Choi, J.-L.,
and Rohrschneider, L. R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5880-5893[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Gobert, S.,
Chretien, S.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Muller, O.,
Pallard, C.,
Dusanter-Fourt, I.,
Groner, B.,
Lacombe, C.,
Gisselbrecht, S.,
and Mayeux, P.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2434-2441[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Gaulton, G. N.,
Kelly, K. L.,
Pawlowski, J.,
Mato, J. M.,
and Jarett, L.
(1988)
Cell
53,
963-970[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Ralton, J. E.,
and McConville, M. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4245-4257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Schneider, P.,
Ralton, J. E.,
McConville, M. J.,
and Fergusson, M. A. J.
(1993)
Anal. Biochem.
210,
106-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Eardley, D. D.,
and Koshland, M. E.
(1991)
Science
251,
78-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Mato, J. M.,
Kelly, K. L.,
Abler, A.,
Jarett, L.,
Corkey, B. E.,
Cashel, J. A.,
and Zopf, D.
(1987)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
146,
764-770[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Macaulay, S. L.,
and Larkins, R. G.
(1990)
Cell. Signal.
2,
9-19[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Vila, M. C.,
Milligan, G.,
Standaert, M. L.,
and Farese, R. V.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8735-8740[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Bulow, R.,
and Overath, P.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
11918-11923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Bütikofer, P.,
and Brodbeck, U.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17794-17802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Jones, D. R.,
Avila, M. A.,
Sanz, C.,
and Varela-Nieto, I.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
233,
432-437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Fouchier, F.,
Baltz, T.,
and Rougon, G.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
269,
321-327[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Noh, D.-Y.,
Shin, S. H.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1242,
99-114[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Rhee, S. G.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
297-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Chou, C. K.,
Dull, T. J.,
Russell, D. S.,
Gherzi, R.,
Lebwohl, D.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Rosen, O. M.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1842-1847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Klingmüller, U.,
Lorenz, U.,
Cantley, L. C.,
Neel, B. G.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1995)
Cell
80,
729-738[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Devemy, E.,
Billat, C.,
and Haye, B.
(1997)
Cell. Signal.
9,
41-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Tong, I. Hirschler-Laszkiewicz, W. Zhang, K. Conrad, D. W. Neagley, D. L. Barber, J. Y. Cheung, and B. A. Miller
TRPC3 Is the Erythropoietin-regulated Calcium Channel in Human Erythroid Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 2008;
283(16):
10385 - 10395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Um and H. F. Lodish
Antiapoptotic Effects of Erythropoietin in Differentiated Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells Require Activation of Both the STAT5 and AKT Signaling Pathways
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 3, 2006;
281(9):
5648 - 5656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Montoye, I. Lemmens, D. Catteeuw, S. Eyckerman, and J. Tavernier
A systematic scan of interactions with tyrosine motifs in the erythropoietin receptor using a mammalian 2-hybrid approach
Blood,
June 1, 2005;
105(11):
4264 - 4271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Tong, X. Chu, J. Y. Cheung, K. Conrad, R. Stahl, D. L. Barber, G. Mignery, and B. A. Miller
Erythropoietin-modulated calcium influx through TRPC2 is mediated by phospholipase C{gamma} and IP3R
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2004;
287(6):
C1667 - C1678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Haq, A. Halupa, B. K. Beattie, J. M. Mason, B. W. Zanke, and D. L. Barber
Regulation of Erythropoietin-induced STAT Serine Phosphorylation by Distinct Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 3, 2002;
277(19):
17359 - 17366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shirane, H. Sawa, Y. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Kitajima, Y. Shinkai, K. Nagashima, and I. Negishi
Deficiency of phospholipase C-{gamma}1 impairs renal development and hematopoiesis
Development,
December 15, 2001;
128(24):
5173 - 5180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Muller, C. Jung, S. Wied, S. Welte, H. Jordan, and W. Frick
Redistribution of Glycolipid Raft Domain Components Induces Insulin-Mimetic Signaling in Rat Adipocytes
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2001;
21(14):
4553 - 4567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|