|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 48, 34020-34028, November 26, 1999
Transcriptional Regulation of the Transforming Growth Factor- 2
Promoter by cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein (CREB) and
Activating Transcription Factor-1 (ATF-1) Is Modulated by Protein
Kinases and the Coactivators p300 and CREB-binding Protein*
Michelle L.
Kingsley-Kallesen §¶,
David
Kelly , and
Angie
Rizzino §
From the Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and
Allied Diseases and the § Department of Pathology and
Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6805
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transcription of the transforming growth
factor- 2 (TGF- 2) gene is dependent on a cAMP-response
element/activating transcription factor (CRE/ATF) site that is bound by
CREB and ATF-1 as well as an E-box motif that is bound by upstream
stimulatory factors 1 and 2 (USF1 and USF2). To identify additional
factors involved in the expression of the TGF- 2 gene, we employed F9
embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, which express TGF- 2 only after the
cells differentiate. We show that overexpression of the transcription factors, CREB, ATF-1, USF1, and USF2 dramatically increases TGF- 2 promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells. We further show that the
coactivators p300 and CBP up-regulate the TGF- 2 promoter when CREB
and ATF-1 are expressed in conjunction with protein kinases that
phosphorylate CREB on serine 133 and ATF-1 on serine 63. Importantly,
we identify the presence of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the
nucleus of F9-differentiated cells but not in the nucleus of F9 EC
cells. This phosphorylated form is present in whole cell extracts of
both the parental and differentiated cells, suggesting that nuclear
accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB is regulated during
differentiation of F9 EC cells and is likely to play an important role
in the activation of the TGF- 2 gene.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Transforming growth factor- 2
(TGF- 2)1 is a member of
the TGF- superfamily, which represents a growing number of
structurally related yet functionally distinct polypeptides involved in
the regulation of a broad range of cellular events, including cell growth and differentiation as well as tissue morphogenesis (reviewed in
Refs. 1-3). A subset of this superfamily are the TGF- s, which consists of at least five genes encoding distinct proteins in vertebrates (referred to as TGF- 1-5). TGF- 1-3 are the mammalian homologs and share approximately 70% amino acid sequence homology. Despite this high sequence homology, each isoform has a distinct temporal and spatial pattern of development (4-8). Interestingly, TGF- 1, - 2 and - 3 null mice show distinctive developmental
defects with little to no phenotypic overlap. TGF- 1 knockout mice
die shortly after birth due to multifocal inflammatory disease (9). TGF- 2 null mice exhibit perinatal lethality with a wide range of
developmental defects including cardiac, craniofacial, limb, lung,
spinal column, eye, inner ear, and urogenital defects (10). Mice that
lack the TGF- 3 isoform die within 20 h after birth due to
delayed pulmonary development and defective palatogenesis (11). Thus,
it appears that there are numerous noncompensated functions between
each of the TGF- isoforms. Furthermore, striking differences exist
between the 5'-flanking regions of each gene, suggesting that
differences in isoform expression may be mediated through
tissue-specific gene transcription (12-16). TGF- 2 first appears in
the preimplantation blastocyst (4, 17) and continues into adulthood
(18), where it seems to play important roles in a host of biological
functions including extracellular matrix production, wound healing, and
regulation of the immune system (1-3). The studies presented here
focus on the transcriptional regulation of the TGF- 2 gene in
embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells and EC-differentiated cells, which
represent an in vitro model system of early embryonic
development. In the current study, F9 EC cells were utilized. These
cells resemble biochemically and morphologically the inner cell mass of
the early mouse embryo and under normal culture conditions exhibit very
limited spontaneous differentiation (19). Treatment of F9 EC cells with
retinoic acid (RA) induces differentiation toward an extraembryonic
endoderm-like phenotype (20).
Utilizing the F9 EC model system, previous work by this laboratory and
others have demonstrated that TGF- 2 is activated at both the RNA and
protein levels when F9 cells are induced to differentiate with RA (21,
22). Important for the modulation of the TGF- 2 gene during the
differentiation of F9 EC cells is the presence of a critical positive
regulatory region in the TGF- 2 gene promoter, localized between 77
and +63, where +1 is the transcription start site (23, 24). Within this
positive regulatory region are two cis-regulatory elements: a CRE/ATF
site positioned at 74 to 67 (23, 24) and an E-box motif located
between 50 and 45 (25). The nucleotide sequence of and spacing
between both of these sites are evolutionary conserved in the human,
chicken, and mouse promoters (16,
26).2 Mutation of either site
reduces the expression of TGF- 2 promoter/reporter gene constructs
approximately 60-80% (23-25). Additionally, in electrophoretic gel
mobility shift assays, ATF-1 and cAMP-responsive element binding
protein (CREB) bind to the CRE/ATF motif, and the upstream stimulatory
factors 1 and 2 (USF1 and -2) bind to the E-box element (26-28).
Previous studies have demonstrated that these transcription factors are
present in nuclear extracts prepared from both F9 EC cells and
F9-differentiated cells and can bind to their respective cis-regulatory
elements in vitro (25, 27, 28). Expression of a
dominant-negative USF expression plasmid reduces the expression of a
TGF- 2 promoter/reporter construct by approximately 80% (25). Thus,
it appears that the USF proteins are important for the proper
expression of the TGF- 2 gene, but prior to this study, the exact
function of the E-box and CRE/ATF binding proteins in the case of the
TGF- 2 promoter in F9-differentiated cells had not been elucidated.
USF1 and USF2 are basic/helix loop helix/leucine zipper proteins that
are ubiquitously expressed and bind as dimers to a canonical CACGTG
core DNA sequence (termed an E-box) (29-32). Although the biological
functions of the USF proteins are poorly understood, they are involved
in the regulation of a wide variety of genes including 1(I) collagen
(33), the CYP1A1 gene (34), and the human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 long terminal repeat (35). Recent findings have identified
USF1 as a phosphoprotein (36), which may contribute to its regulation.
Additionally, USF1 proteins do not appear to interact with nucleosomes
that are associated with histone H1 (37), but they preferentially bind
nucleosomal DNA highly acetylated on histone H4 (38).
The CRE/ATF transcription factors, ATF-1 and CREB have been well
characterized, exhibit approximately 70% homology overall, and are
over 90% homologous within their DNA binding, dimerization, and
kinase-inducible domains (39). The kinase-inducible domain contains
multiple phosphorylation sites that are phosphorylated by a number of
different kinases (reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40). Within this domain,
specific phosphorylation at serine 63 of ATF-1 or at serine 133 of CREB
induces a stable interaction with the coactivators p300 and the
CREB-binding protein, CBP (41-44). p300 and CBP are structurally
similar, functionally redundant proteins (45, 46) essential for proper
development (47-49). These proteins function as co-activators by
interacting with a wide range of transcription factors, including MyoD
(50), NF- B (51, 52), signal transducer and activator of
transcription 1 and 2 (53, 54), Smad3 (55), retinoid X
receptor/retinoic acid receptor (56), ER (57), and YY1 (58), which
appear to target p300/CBP to specific promoters and bridge
transcription factors to the basal transcriptional machinery by binding
TFIIB (42), TBP (59, 60), and RNA polymerase II (61, 62). Additionally,
p300/CBP have been shown to acetylate histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4)
intrinsically (63, 64) and through their association with
p300/CBP-associated factor (65, 66). Acetylation of histones is thought
to destabilize nucleosomes and facilitate access of regulatory factors
to DNA (reviewed in Refs. 67 and 68). p300/CBP have also been shown to
acetylate several transcription factors including p53 (69), NF-Y (70),
and GATA-1 (71), which influences their binding to DNA.
The primary purpose of this study was to understand how the TGF- 2
gene is regulated in F9-differentiated cells. First, we demonstrate
that ATF-1, CREB, USF1, and USF2 function in vivo to
up-regulate TGF- 2 promoter activity. We also demonstrate that the
activity of CREB and ATF-1 is enhanced by the catalytic subunit of
protein kinase A (PKA) and calmodulin kinase IV (CaMKIV). Additionally, since phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 by
these kinases has been shown previously to recruit p300 and CBP
(41-44), we examined the ability of p300 and CBP to modulate TGF- 2
promoter activity. We determined that p300 and CBP augment TGF- 2
promoter activity when expressed in conjunction with CREB or ATF-1 and
the catalytic subunit of PKA or constitutively active CaMKIV. This
activation is dependent on an intact CRE/ATF site but not an intact
E-box. We also show that the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB is
present in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells but not in the
nucleus of F9 EC cells. Importantly, this phosphorylated form is
present in whole cell extracts of both the parental and differentiated
cells, suggesting that nuclear accumulation of serine
133-phosphorylated CREB is regulated during differentiation of F9 EC
cells. In view of the findings presented here, we propose that
accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of
F9-differentiated cells allows for recruitment of p300/CBP to the
TGF- 2 promoter, and this is likely to play an important role in the
activation of the TGF- 2 gene when EC cells differentiate.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium HG-21 and
Ham's F-12 were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal bovine
serum was obtained from HyClone (Logan, UT). All-trans-RA
was purchased from Acros Organics, a division of Fisher. All other
chemicals, including protease and phosphatase inhibitors, gelatin, and
dibutyryl cAMP were purchased from Sigma, unless otherwise indicated.
Cell Culture and Differentiation of EC Cells--
F9 EC cells
were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum and grown on tissue culture dishes coated
with 0.1% gelatin. When cellular extracts were prepared,
differentiation of F9 EC cells was induced by a 4-day treatment with 5 µM RA. When differentiated cells were used in
transfection studies, they were treated for 3 days with 5 µM RA before transfection. Stock cultures and all
experimental cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Transient Transfection Assay--
F9-differentiated cells were
transfected in monolayer by the calcium phosphate precipitation method
as modified by our laboratory (23). The plasmids utilized in each study
are described in the figure legends. In each experiment, 2 µg of
either pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or pCH111 (obtained from Dr.
Ron Hines, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) was
co-transfected to normalize for transfection efficiency. pCH110
contains the -galactosidase reporter gene under the control of the
SV40 promoter and enhancer. The pCH111 plasmid contains the
-galactosidase reporter under the control of the RSV long terminal
repeat. After an overnight incubation with the DNA-calcium phosphate
precipitate, the cells were washed twice with Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/F-12 medium (1:1) and refed with Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (and 5 µM RA for F9-differentiated cells). Chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) activities were determined 48 h after
transfection by the method of Seed and Sheen (72) and normalized to
-galactosidase activity by the method of Rosenthal (73) to adjust
for differences in transfection efficiency (74). TGF- 2 promoter/CAT
chimeric gene constructs and their mutants (see Fig. 1) were described
previously (16, 23-25). Unless otherwise noted, the null vector,
pUC-19 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to keep the total DNA
concentration the same in each experiment. The eukaryotic expression
plasmids psvUSF1-pN3, containing the full-length cDNA encoding
human USF1, and psvUSF2-pN4, containing the full-length cDNA
encoding murine USF2, were obtained from Dr. Michèle Sawadogo
(75). pECEATF-1 and pECEATF-2 expression plasmids were obtained from
Dr. Michael O'Reilly and contain the human cDNAs for ATF-1 and
ATF-2 under the control of the SV40 promoter and enhancer (76). The
expression plasmid, pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK contains the full-length mouse
CBP cDNA with a hemagglutinin (HA) tag (42), and the expression
plasmid, pRc/RSV-CREB 341, contains the cDNA for CREB 341 (77). CBP
and CREB expression plasmids were provided by Dr. Richard Goodman. The
expression plasmid for p300, pCMV p300-CHA, was obtained from Dr.
David Livingston and contains a p300 cDNA insert from nucleotides
1134-8329 with a C-terminal HA tag cloned into the pCI vector (78).
The pSKG4 plasmid was provided by Dr. Steven K. Hanks and contains the
cDNA for the human PKA type catalytic subunit driven by the CMV
promoter in the pcD vector (79). pRSV-CaMKII-(1-290) contains a
cDNA insert that contains residues 1-290 of CaMKII and codes for a constitutively active form of the kinase (80). pRSV-Mouse
CaMKIV-(1-313) contains residues 1-313 of the mouse cDNA of
CaMKIV and produces a constitutively active form of the kinase (80).
The CaM kinase expression plasmids were provided by Dr. Richard Maurer.
All plasmids were purified by Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA) tip-500 columns.
Preparation of Nuclear and Whole Cell Extracts--
Nuclear
extracts of F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells (4-day treatment
with RA) were prepared as described previously (25) with minor
modifications described here. All buffers were supplemented with the
following protease and phosphatase inhibitors: 2.5 kallikrein-inactivating units/ml aprotinin, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor,
2.5 mM benzamidine, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml
antipain, 1 µg/ml chymostatin, 2 µM pepstatin A, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 2 mM sodium vanadate, and 5 mM sodium fluoride. Nuclear extracts were not subjected
to dialysis, but following nuclei extraction, they were stored at
80 °C. Whole cell lysates from F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells
(4-day treatment with RA) were prepared in the following manner. Cells
were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and scraped into lysis buffer
containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl and
1% Triton X-100 supplemented with the following protease and
phosphatase inhibitors: 2.5 kallikrein-inactivating units/ml aprotinin,
0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml soybean
trypsin inhibitor, 2.5 mM benzamidine, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml antipain, 1 µg/ml chymostatin, 2 µM pepstatin
A, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 2 mM sodium vanadate,
and 5 mM sodium fluoride. Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 6000 × g in a
refrigerated microcentrifuge for 2 min. Supernatants were stored at
80 °C.
Western Blot Analysis--
For Western blot analysis, the
PhosphoPlus CREB (Ser133) antibody kit from New England
Biolabs (Beverly, MA) was used. Briefly, 20 µg of nuclear or whole
cell extracts were fractionated by 14% SDS-polyacrylamide
electrophoresis and transferred to an Immobilon-P (polyvinylidene
difluoride) membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Following
transfer, membranes were washed briefly in 1× Tris-buffered saline
(TBS), pH 7.6, and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature in
blocking buffer (1× TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk).
The membranes were washed three times for 5 min each in TBS/T (1× TBS,
0.1% Tween 20) and then incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of either
CREB antibody or P-CREB antibody in primary antibody dilution buffer
(1× TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 5% bovine serum albumin) overnight at
4 °C. Membranes were again washed three times with TBS/T and then
incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of the horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Following three washes with TBS/T, the
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was detected using
LumiGLO (New England Biolabs) as specified by the manufacturer and
exposed to x-ray film. Protein expression was quantitated using a densitometer.
 |
RESULTS |
The Transcription Factors ATF-1, CREB, USF1, and USF2 Stimulate the
TGF- 2 Promoter in F9-differentiated Cells--
As previously
reported, transcription of the TGF- 2 gene is dependent on a CRE/ATF
element located from 74 to 67 and an E-box motif between 50 and
45 relative to the transcription start site (Fig.
1) (23-25). Electrophoretic gel mobility
shift assay analysis determined that CREB and ATF-1 bind to the CRE/ATF site in the TGF- 2 promoter (Ref. 27 and data not shown) and USF1 and
USF2 bind to the E-box motif (25). We have also shown that transient
transfection of a dominant negative USF plasmid decreases (by
approximately 80%) the activity of the TGF- 2 promoter/reporter gene
construct, p 2-77 (25). The p 2-77 construct contains the TGF- 2 promoter region located between 77 and +63 in relationship to the transcription start site and drives the expression of the CAT
reporter gene (Fig. 1). Prior to the current study, the function of the
E-box-binding proteins and the CRE/ATF transcription factors at the
TGF- 2 promoter had not been elucidated. Therefore, we initially
transiently transfected expression plasmids for USF1, USF2, ATF-1, and
CREB with p 2-77 into F9-differentiated cells. When expression
plasmids for either USF1 or USF2 were co-transfected with p 2-77
into F9-differentiated cells, we observed a 60-80-fold activation of
p 2-77 with USF1 and a 20-fold stimulation with USF2 (Fig.
2A). When both USF1 and USF2
were transfected in equal amounts, the USF2 expression plasmid appeared
dominant. From these studies, it appears that USF1 homodimers activate
the TGF- 2 promoter more strongly than USF2 homodimers and that
USF1/USF2 heterodimers have a transactivation potential that
corresponds to USF2. As expected, when USF1 and USF2 were expressed
with the p 2-40 construct, which contains only the TATA box of the
TGF- 2 promoter, no stimulation was observed (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Structure of the
TGF- 2 promoter/reporter constructs. The
TGF- 2 promoter/reporter gene constructs were named
p 2-n, where n represents the number of
nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site. p 2-77
contains the 77/+63 fragment of the human TGF- 2 promoter. The
mutant construct p 2-77C harbors a two-base pair mutation (shown in
lowercase type) in the CRE/ATF site. The mutant construct
p 2-77E contains a two-base pair mutation (shown in lowercase
type) in the E-box motif.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Overexpression of transcription factors with
p 2-77 in F9-differentiated cells.
F9-differentiated cells were transfected in monolayer with 10 µg of
the p 2-77 TGF- 2 promoter/CAT plasmid together with 2 µg of the
pCH110 normalizing plasmid. A, increasing amounts (shown in
µg) of either psvUSF1-pN3 or psvUSF2-pN4 were cotransfected with
p 2-77 where indicated (USF1 or USF2). The amount of DNA
transfected was kept at 22 µg for all samples by the addition of null
plasmid, pSG5 (Invitrogen). B, increasing amounts (shown in
µg) of pECEATF-1, pRSV-CREB, or pECEATF-2 were cotransfected with
p 2-77 where indicated (ATF-1, CREB, or
ATF-2). The amount of DNA transfected was kept at 22 µg
for all samples by the addition of null plasmid, pECE for ATF-1 or
pRc/RSV for CREB. The normalized CAT activities were determined by
dividing the CAT activity of each lysate by the -galactosidase
activity in the same lysate, and the bars represent the
normalized CAT activities of the plasmids relative to the activity of
p 2-77. The CAT activity of p 2-77 alone was 1010 cpm for
A and 1001 cpm for B. The experiment was
performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times with similar
results. S.D. values are shown.
|
|
When expression plasmids for ATF-1 and CREB were co-transfected with
p 2-77 into F9-differentiated cells, p 2-77 activity was
increased approximately 50-fold at the highest concentrations tested.
When equal amounts of ATF-1 and CREB were co-transfected, we found that
their effects were additive. This observation suggests that ATF-1 and
CREB possess analogous transactivation potentials for the TGF- 2
promoter. In fact, in each of the studies described in the remainder of
this report, ATF-1 and CREB where found to be interchangeable.
Therefore, in most cases, only the findings observed with CREB are
described. We also observed that overexpression of ATF-2, which does
not bind in electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay analysis using
F9-differentiated nuclear extract (27), resulted in a smaller (10-fold)
activation of the TGF- 2 promoter. In other studies, bacterially
expressed ATF-2 has been shown to bind to the TGF- 2 CRE/ATF site
(81). However, our studies suggest that, in comparison with ATF-1 and
CREB, ATF-2 has a lower transactivation potential for the CRE/ATF site
in the TGF- 2 promoter. Nevertheless, CREB, ATF-1, and ATF-2
activation of the TGF- 2 promoter appears to be specific for the
CRE/ATF site, since transactivation was not observed when CREB, ATF-1,
or ATF-2 was expressed with either the p 2-40 construct, which
contains only the TATA box of the TGF- 2 promoter, or with a
p 2-77 construct that contains a two-base pair mutation in the
CRE/ATF site (see Fig. 1), designated p 2-77C (data not shown).
Co-transfection of the Catalytic Subunit of PKA Enhances the
Induction of the TGF- 2 Promoter by CREB--
Several studies have
indicated that the phosphorylation of CREB and ATF-1 regulates their
ability to transactivate multiple genes (reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40).
In particular, phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at
serine 63 increases their transactivation potential (80, 82-84).
Multiple kinases such as Ca2+/calmodulin kinases II and IV
(CaMKII or CaMKIV) (44, 80, 82), protein kinase C (83), and PKA (84)
are able to phosphorylate CREB and ATF-1 at these specific serine
residues. Since PKA activity increases with F9 differentiation (85, 86)
and because we have observed that the addition of cAMP to
F9-differentiated cells induces at least a 3-fold increase in the
expression of the p 2-77 construct,3 it is possible
that PKA plays a role in the regulation of the TGF- 2 promoter. To
test this possibility more directly, we examined the ability of PKA to
modulate the activity of CREB at the TGF- 2 promoter in
F9-differentiated cells. In these experiments, suboptimal concentrations of the expression plasmid for CREB were used. When the
catalytic subunit of PKA (cPKA) was co-transfected with CREB into
F9-differentiated cells, a dose-dependent increase (up to 5-fold) in the expression of p 2-77 was observed (Fig.
3). The cPKA expression plasmid on its
own did not alter the expression of p 2-77, which argues that the
transcriptional activation observed was not due to general effects on
transcription but was specific to CREB. Additionally, expression of
cPKA in the presence of a serine 133 to alanine 133 mutant of CREB
(CREBM1) had little to no effect on the expression of p 2-77 (data
not shown).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression of the catalytic subunit of PKA in
conjunction with CREB increases the activity of
p 2-77. F9-differentiated cells were
transfected in monolayer with 10 µg of p 2-77 together with 2 µg
of the pCH110 normalization plasmid. One µg of pRc/RSV-CREB was
co-transfected with increasing amounts (shown in µg) of the catalytic
subunit of PKA (pSKG4) as indicated (CREB or
cPKA). The amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using
the null plasmid, pUC-19. The bars represent the CAT
activities relative to the activity of p 2-77 alone (1423 cpm). This
experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times
with similar results. S.D. values are shown.
|
|
Expression of the Catalytic Subunit of PKA in Conjunction with CREB
Targets p300 and CBP to the CRE/ATF Site within the TGF- 2
Promoter--
It is well documented that phosphorylation of CREB at
serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 allows for recruitment of the
coactivators p300 and CBP (41-43). Therefore, since PKA increased CREB
activation of the TGF- 2 promoter, we examined the ability of p300
and CBP to modulate the expression of the p 2-77 construct.
Utilizing transient transfection assays, expression plasmids for p300
or CBP were co-transfected with expression plasmids for CREB and cPKA.
We observed that transfection of p300 or CBP in the presence of cPKA
and CREB increased p 2-77 expression (3-4-fold) over the expression
observed with CREB transfected with cPKA alone (Fig. 4). In the presence of CREB, cPKA, and
p300 or CBP, we observed an overall 40-fold increase in the expression
of p 2-77. When cPKA was not included or when a serine 133 to
alanine 133 mutant of CREB (CREBM1) was used, p300 and CBP did not
affect the expression of the TGF- 2 promoter/reporter construct (data
not shown). The induction that we observed in TGF- 2 promoter
activity by p300 and cPKA is specific to CREB (and ATF-1). Although
ATF-2 has been shown to interact with p300 at other promoters (87),
p300 did not modulate the activity of p 2-77 when transfected with
ATF-2 in the presence or absence of cPKA (Fig.
5 and data not shown). Similarly, p300
did not increase the response of p 2-77 to USF1 in the presence or
absence of cPKA (Fig. 5 and data not shown).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
CBP and p300 enhance the expression of
p 2-77. F9-differentiated cells were
transfected with 10 µg of p 2-77 and 2 µg of the pCH110
normalizing plasmid. 0.5 µg of pRSV-CREB (CREB) and 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA) were co-transfected as indicated.
Increasing amounts (shown in µg) of either pCMV p300-CHA
(p300) or pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK (CBP) were added as
shown. The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the
null plasmid, pUC-19. The bars represent the CAT activities
relative to the activity of p 2-77. The CAT activity of the
p 2-77 construct was 1435 cpm for this experiment, which was
performed in duplicate at least five times with similar results. S.D.
values are shown.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of p300 and CBP are unable to
modulate ATF-2 and USF1 activity at the TGF- 2
promoter. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of
p 2-77, 1 µg of pECEATF-2 (ATF-2) or psvUSF1-pN3
(USF1), 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA), 10 µg of
pCMV p300-CHA (p300), and 2 µg of the pCH110 normalizing
plasmid. The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23.5 µg using
the pUC-19 plasmid. The bars represent CAT activities
relative to the activity of p 2-77 alone (5760 cpm). The experiment
was performed in duplicate at least three times with similar results.
S.D. values are shown.
|
|
We also did not observe transactivation when CREB, cPKA, and CBP were
expressed with either p 2-40 (data not shown) or p 2-77C (Fig.
6). Mutation of the CRE/ATF site
typically reduces the expression of the TGF- 2 promoter/reporter
construct by 60-80% (23, 24). A similar reduction in expression of
the p 2-77C construct was observed in this experiment. However, for
more direct comparison, expression of both p 2-77 and p 2-77C
were set to 1.0 (Fig. 6). Overall, we observed a 17-fold increase in
the level of expression of p 2-77 and only a 1.8-fold increase in
the level of expression of p 2-77C (Fig. 6). These results argue
that activation by CREB; CREB and cPKA; and CREB, cPKA, and CBP is
dependent on an intact CRE/ATF site.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
CBP stimulation of the
TGF- 2 promoter is dependent on an intact
CRE/ATF site. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of either p 2-77 or p 2-77C and 2 µg of the pCH110
normalizing plasmid. The p 2-77C construct contains a two-base pair
mutation in the CRE/ATF site that dramatically reduces CREB and ATF-1
interaction (see Fig. 1). 0.5 µg of pRSV-CREB was utilized where
indicated (CREB), 0.5 µg of pSKG4 was transfected where
indicated (cPKA), and 10 µg of pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK was
added as shown (CBP). The total amount of DNA was kept
constant at 23 µg using the pUC-19 null plasmid. The solid
bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of
p 2-77, and the crisscrossed bars represent CAT
activities relative to the activity of p 2-77C. The CAT activity of
p 2-77 alone was 4188 cpm, and the CAT activity of p 2-77C alone
was 2133 cpm. The experiment was performed in duplicate at least two
times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.
|
|
Although the E-box is essential for optimal expression of the TGF- 2
gene, we observed that modulation of the TGF- 2 promoter by p300/CBP
was not dependent on an intact E-box motif. As shown previously, when
the E-box is mutated at two critical base pairs (see Fig. 1),
expression of the mutant construct, p 2-77E, is reduced
approximately 80% (see Fig. 1) (25). We observed a similar reduction
(approximately 80%) in expression of p 2-77E for this study. Again,
for a more direct comparison, the expression of p 2-77 and
p 2-77E was set to 1.0 (Fig. 7).
Regardless of whether we utilized p 2-77 or p 2-77E, titration of
p300 with ATF-1 and cPKA increased expression 4-fold above the
expression of ATF-1 and cPKA, and increased expression of the TGF- 2
promoter/reporter constructs approximately 25-fold overall (Fig. 7). We
observed similar results with CBP and with the substitution of CREB for ATF-1 (data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
p300 stimulation of the
TGF- 2 promoter occurs independently of an
intact E-box motif. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with
10 µg of either p 2-77 or p 2-77E and 2 µg of the normalizing
plasmid pCH110. The p 2-77E construct contains a two-base pair
mutation in the E-box motif that disrupts USF1 and USF2 interaction
(see Fig. 1). Increasing amounts (shown in µg) of pCMV p300-CHA
(p300) were titrated with 0.5 µg of pECEATF-1
(ATF-1) and 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA). The total
amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the pUC-19 null
plasmid. The solid bars represent CAT activities relative to
the activity of p 2-77, and the hatched bars represent
CAT activities relative to the activity of p 2-77E. In this study,
the CAT activity of p 2-77 alone was 1726 cpm, and the CAT activity
of p 2-77E alone was 530 cpm. The experiment was performed in
duplicate at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are
shown.
|
|
p300 Stimulates TGF- 2 Promoter Activity in the Presence of
Constitutively Active CaMKIV but Not CaMKII--
Similar to PKA,
CaMKIV can phosphorylate CREB on serine 133 and ATF-1 on serine 63. Also like PKA, the activity of Ca2+/CaM kinases increases
with differentiation of F9 EC cells (88), and this increase in activity
may play a role in the activation of the TGF- 2 promoter. Therefore,
we repeated the previous studies using an expression plasmid for
constitutively active CaMKIV in place of the catalytic subunit of PKA.
We observed that transfection of CaMKIV with CREB and p300 stimulated
p 2-77 activity (Fig. 8). Hence, both
PKA and CaMKIV can regulate TGF- 2 promoter activity. On the other
hand, expression of constitutively active CaMKII had little or no
affect on the ability of CREB to activate p 2-77 expression (Fig.
8). This is in agreement with previous observations made for other
promoters (80, 82). CaMKII has been shown to phosphorylate CREB on
serine 133 and serine 142 and phosphorylate ATF-1 on serine 63 and
serine 72. It has been proposed that this dual phosphorylation of CREB
and ATF-1 blocks their activation (82) and interferes with their
ability to interact with p300 or CBP (80, 82).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
p300 stimulates
TGF- 2 promoter activity in the presence of
constitutively active CaMKIV, but not CaMKII. F9-differentiated
cells were cells were transfected with 10 µg of p 2-77, 1 µg of
pRSV-CREB (CREB), 0.5 µg of RSV-CaMKII
(CaMKII) or pRSV-CaMKIV(CaMKIV), 2 µg of
the pRSV- -gal normalizing plasmid, and increasing amounts (shown in
µg) of pCMV p300-CHA (p300). The total amount of DNA was
kept constant at 23.5 µg using the pUC-19 null plasmid. The CAT
activity of p 2-77 was 1023 cpm. The experiment was performed in
duplicate at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are
shown.
|
|
CREB Is Phosphorylated at Serine 133 in the Nucleus of
F9-differentiated Cells but Not in the Nucleus of F9 EC Cells--
As
we have shown, the addition of cPKA or CAMKIV with CREB and p300 or CBP
increases the expression of the TGF- 2 promoter in F9-differentiated
cells where the gene is normally expressed. Since phosphorylation of
CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 is important for recruitment
of p300 and CBP (42-44), it is possible that these phosphorylated
forms are not present in the parental cells where TGF- 2 is not
expressed. To test this possibility, we examined the phosphorylation
status of CREB and ATF-1 in F9 EC cells and in F9-differentiated cells
utilizing Western blot analysis, employing antibodies that specifically
recognize CREB and ATF-1 phosphorylated at serine 133 and serine 63, respectively. We analyzed both whole cell and nuclear extracts for the
presence of the phosphorylated forms of CREB or ATF-1 (Fig.
9). In whole cell extracts prepared from
both F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells, CREB was phosphorylated
at serine 133 (Fig. 9A). Densitometry analysis comparing
phospho-CREB to the total level of CREB showed no significant
difference in the level of phosphorylation between the whole cell
extracts of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells. However, when the same
experiment was performed using nuclear extracts from F9 EC and
F9-differentiated cells, phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 was
detected only in nuclear extracts prepared from F9-differentiated
cells. There was no apparent change in the total amount of CREB between
nuclear extract preparations of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells.
Thus, it appears that the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB
accumulates in the nucleus only upon differentiation of F9 EC cells.
Although we have shown previously that ATF-1 is present in F9 EC cells
and in F9-differentiated cells and can bind in vitro to the
TGF- 2 CRE/ATF site, we did not detect serine 63-phosphorylated ATF-1
in either F9 EC or F9-differentiated extracts. It does not appear that
our assay or nuclear extract preparation excluded serine
63-phosphorylated ATF-1, since we detected a significant amount of
serine 63-phosphorylated ATF-1 in U87MG nuclear extracts where the
TGF- 2 promoter is highly expressed (data not shown).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Western blot analysis of whole cell and
nuclear extracts of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells. 20 µg of
whole cell extract (A) or nuclear extract (B)
from F9 EC or F9-differentiated (4-day RA treatment) cells were
fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and
immunoblotted with either a CREB-specific antibody or an antibody that
recognizes the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB. This experiment
was repeated at least four times with two different extract
preparations, and similar results were observed.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we sought to identify factors involved in the
transcriptional regulation of the TGF- 2 gene. Previous studies utilizing the somatostatin and vasoactive intestinal peptide promoters in F9-differentiated cells showed that expression of CREB or ATF-1 on
their own was unable to activate these promoters (77, 84, 89). Only in
the presence of cAMP or the catalytic subunit of PKA were ATF-1 and
CREB able to activate the SS and VIP promoters. Unlike these previous
reports, our studies show that overexpression of CREB and ATF-1
significantly induces TGF- 2 promoter activity in F9-differentiated
cells. We demonstrate that USF1 and USF2 are also able to stimulate
TGF- 2 promoter activity in the differentiated cells. Although
relatively little is known about the regulation of USF proteins, the
functions of ATF-1 and CREB are tightly regulated by phosphorylation.
Transcriptional activation of multiple promoters is enhanced by
phosphorylation of ATF-1 at serine 63 and CREB at serine 133, as is
their affinity for co-activators p300 and CBP (41, 42, 44, 82, 90).
Consistent with these studies, we demonstrate that expression of the
catalytic subunit of PKA with CREB or ATF-1 stimulates TGF- 2
promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells. We also observed that
expression of cPKA or CaMKIV in conjunction with ATF-1 or CREB is
required for the further stimulation of TGF- 2 promoter activity by
the coactivators p300 and CBP. The action of these factors requires the
TGF- 2 CRE/ATF site, since we do not observe activation of the
TGF- 2 promoter with CREB, cPKA, or CBP when the CRE/ATF site is
mutated (Fig. 6). Additionally, p300/CBP appear to function
specifically through ATF-1 and CREB, since p300 was unable to modulate
promoter activity through ATF-2. This was somewhat surprising, since
ATF-2 has been shown to interact with p300, and this interaction
potentiates transactivation of the c-jun promoter (87). We
also demonstrate that unlike another E-box binding protein, MyoD, which
has been shown to interact with p300 and modulate several
muscle-specific genes (50), USF1 does not invoke a p300 response at the
TGF- 2 promoter.
It is interesting that ATF-1 and CREB appear to promote activation of
the TGF- 2 promoter equally. Since ATF-1 and CREB are ubiquitous
proteins, it is possible that depending on tissue type and cellular
environment, either CREB or ATF-1 may regulate the TGF- 2 promoter.
In some cases, it is possible that they function coordinately, since
CREB and ATF-1 can form heterodimers. Although they are highly
homologous, distinct differences are found in their N-terminal and
kinase-inducible domains. ATF-1 and CREB are extremely divergent in
their N-terminal regions, which may play a role in their regulation or
subcellular localization (39, 91). In addition, ATF-1 lacks a GSK-3
kinase phosphorylation site in its kinase-inducible domain, whereas
this site is present in CREB and appears to promote phosphorylation of
CREB at serine 133 (92). Whether these differences play a role in the
in vivo interaction with p300/CBP at specific promoters has
yet to be determined.
We also examined various protein kinases that have been shown to
phosphorylate CREB and ATF-1 at serine 133 and serine 63, respectively,
and whose activities are increased upon differentiation of F9 EC cells
(85, 86, 88). The protein kinase that we examined initially was PKA.
Although PKA is expressed at the protein level by both F9 EC and
F9-differentiated cells, PKA is not activated by cAMP in F9 EC cells
(89). Upon differentiation, PKA is activated and becomes responsive to
cAMP (85, 86, 89). As in the case of the transcription factors CREB and
ATF-1 and the coactivators p300 and CBP, PKA and CaMKIV appear to be
functionally redundant in their ability to activate the TGF- 2
promoter. Similar to PKA (Fig. 4), only when we express constitutively
active CaMKIV with CREB, p300 (Fig. 8), and CBP (data not shown) are we
able to activate the TGF- 2 promoter. However, as in the case of
previous reports for other promoters (80, 82), CaMKII had little or no
affect on the ability of CREB and p300 to modulate TGF- 2 promoter activity.
One of the most intriguing findings reported in this study is that the
serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB is present in the nucleus of
F9-differentiated cells but is not detected in the nucleus of F9 EC
cells. Therefore, as summarized in Fig.
10, our data suggest that localization
of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB to the nucleus upon differentiation
may be an important control pathway for the activation of the TGF- 2
gene through recruitment of p300/CBP. Multiple mechanisms may account
for the presence of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of
F9-differentiated cells, but not in the nucleus of F9 EC cells.
Although serine 133-phosphorylated CREB is present in the whole cell
extracts of both F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells, it was not
determined whether CREB is differentially phosphorylated on other
residues in F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells. Phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 is important for transactivation, but it is possible, if not likely, that phosphorylation of CREB on additional sites regulates its location within the cell. Thus, it is possible that
phosphorylation or dephosphorylation at a particular residue(s) allows
for nuclear import or nuclear export of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB
as occurs with the transcription factor NF-AT4 (93). Nuclear import of
NF-AT4 is stimulated by the activation of the intracellular calcium
phosphatase, calcineurin, which dephosphorylates masking residues
around the nuclear localization signal of NF-AT4. In turn,
rephosphorylation of NF-ATF4 at these sites stimulates its export from
the nucleus.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Model of phosphorylation and nuclear
localization of CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells allows
for p300/CBP recruitment to the TGF- 2
promoter. It is our hypothesis that proper phosphorylation of CREB
and its proper cellular localization are both necessary for p300/CBP
recruitment and activation of the TGF- 2 promoter when EC cells
undergo differentiation. Proper phosphorylation of CREB serine 133 allows for interaction with specific coactivators, p300, and CBP.
Recruitment of p300 and/or CBP to the TGF- 2 promoter allows for
bridging of CREB to the TATA box-binding proteins (TBP) as
well as interaction with RNA polymerase II and components of the basal
machinery involved in transcription of the TGF- 2 gene.
|
|
It is also possible that (de)phosphorylation of CREB at particular
residues may allow for interaction with cytoplasmic anchoring proteins
that retain serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the cytoplasm of F9 EC
cells. Such a mechanism exists for the transcription factors, NF- B
and Dorsal, which are retained in the cytoplasm as inactive complexes
by their anchoring proteins I B (94, 95) and Cactus (96),
respectively. Specific phosphorylation of NF- B and Dorsal plays a
critical role in their release from their cytoplasmic anchoring
proteins as well as their translocation to the nucleus and subsequent
activation of NF- B- and Dorsal-responsive genes. A similar mechanism
may exist for CREB. Another possibility is that the protein kinase
responsible for accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the
nucleus may not be active in F9 EC cells. Multiple kinase activities
are up-regulated during F9 differentiation, including PKA, protein
kinase C, and CaM kinases (85, 86, 88, 97-99). Some of these kinases
phosphorylate CREB not only on serine 133 but also on other residues
(100-102), which again may play important roles in the proper cellular
localization of CREB. It is possible that one or more of these
mechanisms may be responsible for the presence of serine
133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells, and
an in depth analysis will be needed to distinguish between them.
Finally, it is noteworthy that genes such as c-jun (87),
FGF-3 (103), tissue plasminogen activator (104), and the
TGF- type II receptor (105) also contain CRE sites and turn on with RA-induced differentiation of EC cells. Like TGF- 2, their promoters contain additional cis-regulatory elements that provide specificity and
ensure that the correct gene is activated at the precise time. The
nuclear localization of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB may be one step
in the coordinate regulation of multiple genes during differentiation.
Hence, understanding how the TGF- 2 gene is activated at the level of
transcription will not only further our knowledge of this gene but may
also provide important clues into the expression of many genes
regulated by differentiation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank the following investigators for
generous gifts: Dr. Michael O'Reilly for the TGF- 2 promoter/CAT
chimeric gene constructs and pECEATF-1 and pECEATF-2 plasmids; Dr. Ron
Hines for the pCH111 plasmid; Dr. Michèle Sawadogo for
psvUSF1-pN3 and psvUSF2-pN4; Dr. Richard Goodman for the expression
plasmids pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK and pRc/RSV-CREB 341; Dr. Richard Eckner
and Dr. David Livingston for the p300 expression plasmid,
pCMV p300-CHA; Dr. Steven K. Hanks for the pSKG4 plasmid; Dr. Richard
Maurer for pRSV-CaMKII-(1-290) and pRSV-Mouse CaMKIV-(1-313); and Dr.
Marc Montminy (Harvard Medical School) for the pRSV-CREBM1 plasmid.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NCI, National Institutes of
Health, Grants CA 74771 and CA 79491. Core Facilities in the Eppley Institute were supported in part by American Cancer Society Grant SIG
and National Cancer Research Center Support Grant CA 36727.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported in part by a biotechnology fellowship from the
Nebraska Research Initiative and by a University of Nebraska
Presidential Graduate Fellowship from the Emley Fellowship Fund.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Eppley Inst.
for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986805 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6805. Tel.: 402-559-6338; Fax: 402-559-4651; E-mail:
arizzino@unmc.edu.
2
P. Wilder and A. Rizzino, unpublished observations.
3
D. Kelly and A. Rizzino, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TGF- 2, transforming growth factor- 2;
EC, embryonal carcinoma;
RA, retinoic
acid;
CRE, cAMP-response element;
ATF, activating transcription factor;
CREB, CRE-binding protein;
USF, upstream stimulatory factor;
CBP, CREB
binding protein;
CaMKII and CaMKIV, calmodulin kinase II and IV,
respectively;
PKA, protein kinase A;
RSV, Rous sarcoma virus;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
cPKA, catalytic subunit of PKA;
CREBM1, serine
133 to alanine 133 mutant of CREB.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1990)
in
Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
(Sporn, M. B.
, and Roberts, A. B., eds), Vol. 95
, pp. 419-472, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
|
| 2.
|
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1993)
Growth Factors
8,
1-9[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kingsley, D. M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
133-146[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Pelton, R. W.,
Nomura, S.,
Moses, H. L.,
and Hogan, B. L. M.
(1989)
Development
106,
759-767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Gatherer, D.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Baird, D. T.,
and Akhurst, R. J.
(1990)
Development
110,
445-460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Flanders, K. C.,
Ludecke, G.,
Engels, S.,
Cissel, D. S.,
Roberts, A. B.,
Kondaiah, P.,
Lafyatis, R.,
Sporn, M. B.,
and Unsicker, K.
(1991)
Development
113,
183-191[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Millan, F. A.,
Denhez, F.,
Kondaiah, P.,
and Akhurst, R. J.
(1991)
Development
111,
131-144[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Schmid, P.,
Cox, D.,
Bilbe, G.,
Maier, R.,
and McMaster, G. K.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
84-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Shull, M. M.,
Ormsby, I.,
Keir, A. B.,
Pawlowski, S.,
Deibold, R. J.,
Yin, M.,
Allen, R.,
Sidman, C.,
Proetzel, G.,
Calvin, D.,
Annunziata, N.,
and Doetschman, T.
(1992)
Nature
359,
693-699[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Sanford, L. P.,
Ormsby, I.,
Gittenberger-de Groot, A. C.,
Sariola, H.,
Friedman, R.,
Boivin, G. P.,
Cardell, E. L.,
and Doetschman, T.
(1997)
Development
124,
2659-2670[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Kaarinen, V.,
Voncken, J. W.,
Shuler, C.,
Warburton, D.,
Bu, D.,
Heisterkamp, N.,
and Groffen, J.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
11,
415-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Kim, S. J.,
Glick, A.,
Sporn, M. B.,
and Roberts, A. B.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
402-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Lafyatis, R.,
Lechleider, R.,
Kim, S. J.,
Jakowlew, S.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19128-19136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Malipiero, U.,
Holler, M.,
Werner, U.,
and Fontana, A.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
171,
1145-1151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Geiser, A. G.,
Kim, S. J.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
84-92
|
| 16.
|
Noma, T.,
Glick, A. B.,
Geiser, A. G.,
O'Reilly, M. A.,
Miller, J.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1991)
Growth Factors
4,
247-255[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Slager, H. G.,
Lawson, K. A.,
van den Eijnden-vanRaaij, A. J. M.,
DeLaat, S. W.,
and Mummery, C. L.
(1991)
Dev. Biol.
145,
205-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Miller, D. A.,
Lee, A.,
Pelton, R. W.,
Chen, E. Y.,
Moses, H. L.,
and Derynck, R.
(1989)
Mol. Endocrinol.
3,
1108-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Bernstine, E. G.,
Hooper, M. L.,
Grandchamp, S.,
and Ephrussi, B.
(1973)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
70,
3899-3903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Strickland, S.,
and Mahdavi, B.
(1978)
Cell
15,
393-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kelly, D.,
Campbell, J.,
Tiesman, J.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1990)
Cytotechnology
4,
227-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Mummery, C. L.,
Slager, H.,
Kruijer, W.,
Feijen, A.,
Freund, E.,
Koornneef, I.,
and van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J.
(1990)
Dev. Biol.
137,
161-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Kelly, D.,
O'Reilly, M.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1992)
Dev. Biol.
153,
172-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve],
|
| 24.
|
O'Reilly, M. A.,
Geiser, A. G.,
Kim, S-J.,
Bruggeman, L. A.,
Luu, A. X.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19938-19943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Scholtz, B.,
Kingsley-Kallesen, M.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32375-32380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Burt, D. W.,
and Patton, I. R.
(1991)
DNA Cell Biol.
10,
723-734[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kelly, D.,
Scholtz, B.,
Orten, D. J.,
Hinrichs, S. H.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1995)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
40,
135-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Scholtz, B.,
Kelly, D.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1995)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
41,
140-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Gregor, P. D.,
Sawadogo, M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1730-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Sirito, M.,
Walker, S.,
Lin, Q.,
Kozlowski, M. T.,
Klein, W. H.,
and Sawadogo, M.
(1992)
Gene Expr.
2,
231-240[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Bendall, A. J.,
and Molloy, P. L.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2801-2810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Sirito, M.,
Lin, Q.,
Maity, T.,
and Sawadogo, M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
427-433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Rippe, R. A.,
Umezawa, A.,
Kimball, J. P,
Breindl, M.,
and Brenner, D. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1753-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Takahashi, Y.,
Nakayama, K.,
Itoh, S.,
Fugii-Kuriyama, Y.,
and Kamataki, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30025-30031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
D'Adda di Fagagna, F.,
Marzio, G.,
Gutierrez, M. I.,
Kang, L. Y.,
Falaschi, A.,
and Giacca, M..
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
2765-2775[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Galibert, M. D.,
Boucontet, L.,
Goding, C. R.,
and Meo, T.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
6176-6183[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Juan, L. J.,
Utley, R. T.,
Adams, C. C.,
Vettese-Dadey, M.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
6031-6040[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Vettese-Dadey, M.,
Grant, P. A.,
Hebbes, T. R.,
Crane-Robinson, C.,
Allis, C. D.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2508-2518[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Lee, K. A. W.,
and Masson, N.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1174,
221-233[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Montminy, M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
807-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Chrivia, J. C.,
Kwok, R. P. S.,
Lamb, N.,
Hagiwara, M.,
Montminy, M.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1993)
Nature
365,
855-859[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Kwok, R. P. S.,
Lundblad, J. R.,
Chrivia, J. C.,
Richards, J. P.,
Bächinger, H. P.,
Brennan, R. G.,
Roberts, S. G. E.,
Green, M. R.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1994)
Nature
370,
223-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Lee, J. S.,
Zhang, X.,
and Shi, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17666-17674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Shimomura, A.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Kitani, T.,
Fujisawa, H.,
and Hagiwara, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17957-17960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Arany, Z.,
Sellers, W. R.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Eckner, R.
(1994)
Cell
77,
799-800[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Lundblad, J. R.,
Kwok, R. P. S.,
Laurance, M. E.,
Harter, M.. L.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1995)
Nature
374,
85-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Tanaka, Y.,
Naruse, I.,
Maekawa, T.,
Masuya, H.,
Shiroishi, T.,
and Ishii, S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10215-10220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Yao, T. P.,
Oh, S. P.,
Fuchs, M.,
Zhou, N. D.,
Ch'ng, L. F.,
Newsome, D.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Li, E.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Eckner, R.
(1998)
Cell
93,
361-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Oike, Y.,
Takakura, N.,
Hata, A.,
Kaname, T.,
Akizuki, M.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Yasue, H.,
Araki, K.,
Yamamura, K.,
and Suda, T.
(1999)
Blood
93,
2771-2779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Puri, P. L.,
Avantaggiata, M. L.,
Balsano, C.,
Sang, N.,
Graessmann, A.,
Giordano, A.,
and Levrero, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
369-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Gerritsen, M. E.,
Williams, A. J.,
Neish, A. S.,
Moore, S.,
Shi, Y.,
and Collins, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2927-2932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Felzien, L. K.,
Betts, J. C.,
Leung, K.,
Beach, D. H.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1997)
Science
275,
523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Bhattacharya, S.,
Eckner, R.,
Grossman, S.,
Oldread, E.,
Arany, Z.,
D'Andrea, A.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1996)
Nature
383,
344-347[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Zhang, J. J.,
Vinkemeier, U.,
Gu, W.,
Chakravarti, D.,
Horvath, C. M.,
and Darnell, J. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15092-15096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Shen, X.,
Hu, P. P.,
Liberati, N. T.,
Datto, M. B.,
Frederick, J. P.,
and Wang, X. F.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell.
9,
3309-3319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Chakravarti, D.,
LaMorte, V. J.,
Nelson, M. C.,
Nakajima, T.,
Schulman, I. G.,
Juguilon, H.,
Montminy, M.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1996)
Nature
383,
99-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Hanstein, B.,
Eckner, R.,
DiRenzo, J.,
Halachmi, S.,
Liu, H.,
Sercy, B.,
Kurokawa, R.,
and Brown, M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11540-11545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Galvin, K. M.,
and Shi, Y.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3723-3732[Abstract]
|
| 59.
|
Abraham, S. E.,
Lobo, S.,
Yaciuk, P.,
Wang, H. G. H.,
and Moran, E.
(1993)
Oncogene
8,
1639-1647[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Dallas, P. B.,
Yaciuk, P.,
and Moran, E.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
1726-1731[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Kee, B.,
Arias, J.,
and Montminy, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2373-2375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Cho, H.,
Orphanides, G.,
Sun, X.,
Yang, X. J.,
Ogryzko, V.,
Lees, E.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Reinberg, D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5355-5363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Bannister, A. J.,
and Kouzarides, T.
(1996)
Nature
384,
641-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Schiltz, R. L.,
Russanova, V.,
Howard, B. H.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1996)
Cell
87,
953-959[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Kuo, M. H.,
Brownell, J. E.,
Sobel, R. E.,
Ranalli, T. A.,
Cook, R. G.,
Edmonson, D. G.,
Roth, S. Y.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1996)
Nature
383,
269-272[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Yang, X. J.,
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Nishikawa, J.,
Howard, B.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1996)
Nature
382,
319-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 67.
|
Wolffe, A. P.,
and Pruss, D.
(1996)
Cell
84,
817-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Struhl, K.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
599-606[Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Liu, L.,
Scolnick, D. M.,
Trievel, R. C.,
Zhang, H. B.,
Marmorstein, R.,
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1202-1209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Jin, S.,
and Scotto, K. W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4377-4384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Boyes, J.,
Byfield, P.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Ogryzko, V.
(1998)
Nature
396,
594-598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
Seed, B.,
and Sheen, J. Y.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
271-277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 73.
|
Rosenthal, N.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
152,
704-720[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 74.
|
Hall, C. V.,
Jacobs, P. E.,
Ringold, G. M.,
and Lee, F.
(1983)
J. Mol. Appl. Genet.
2,
101-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 75.
|
Meier, J. L.,
Luo, X.,
Sawadogo, M.,
and Straus, S. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6896-6907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 76.
|
Ellis, L.,
Clauser, E.,
Morgan, D. O.,
Edery, M.,
Roth, R.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1986)
Cell
45,
721-732[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 77.
|
Walton, K. M.,
Rehfuss, R. P.,
Chrivia, J. C.,
Lockner, J. E.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 78.
|
Eckner, R.,
Ewen, M. E.,
Newsome, D.,
Gerdes, M.,
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Lawrence, J. B.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
869-884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 79.
|
Maldonado, F.,
and Hanks, S. K.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
8189-8190[Free Full Text]
|
| 80.
|
Sun, P.,
Enselen, H.,
Myung, P. S.,
and Maurer, R. A.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2527-2539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 81.
|
Kim, S. J.,
Wagner, S.,
Liu, F.,
O'Reilly, M. A.,
Robbins, P. D.,
and Green, M. R.
(1992)
Nature
358,
331-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 82.
|
Sun, P.,
Lou, L.,
and Maurer, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3066-3073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 83.
|
Yamamoto, K. K.,
Gonzalez, G. A.,
Biggs, W. H., III,
and Montminy, M.
(1988)
Nature
334,
494-498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 84.
|
Gonzalez, G. A.,
and Montminy, M. R.
(1989)
Cell
59,
675-680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 85.
|
Plet, A.,
Evian, D.,
and Anderson, W. B.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
889-893[Free Full Text]
|
| 86.
|
Plet, A.,
Gerbaud, P.,
Anderson, W. B.,
and Brion, D. E.
(1985)
Differentiation
30,
159-64[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 87.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Song, J.,
Eckner, R.,
Ugai, H.,
Chiu, R.,
Taira, K.,
Shi, Y.,
Jones, N.,
and Yokoyama, K. K.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
233-245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 88.
|
Gao, P.,
and Malbon, C. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9002-9008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 89.
|
Masson, N.,
Ellis, M.,
Goodbourn, S.,
and Lee, K. A. W.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1096-1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 90.
|
Schwartz, R.,
Helmich, B.,
and Spector, D. H.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
6955-6966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 91.
|
Guo, B.,
Stein, J. L.,
van Wijnen, A.,
and Stein, G. S.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
14447-14455[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 92.
|
Fiol, C. J.,
Williams, J. S.,
Chou, C. H.,
Wang, Q. M.,
Roach, P. J.,
and Andrisani, O. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32187-32193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 93.
|
Hogan, P. G.,
and Rao, A.
(1999)
Nature
398,
200-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 94.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1988)
Cell
53,
211-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 95.
|
Ghosh, S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1990)
Nature
344,
678-682[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 96.
|
Norris, J. L.,
and Manley, J. L.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1654-1667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 97.
|
Kraft, A. S.,
and Anderson, W. B.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
9178-9183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 98.
|
Galvin-Parton, P. A.,
Watkins, D. C.,
and Malbon, C. C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17771-17779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 99.
|
Khuri, F. R.,
Cho, Y.,
and Talmage, D. A.
(1996)
Cell. Growth Differ.
7,
595-602[Abstract]
|
| 100.
|
Buchner, K.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
228,
211-221[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 101.
|
Jans, D. A.,
and Heubner, S.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
651-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 102.
|
Jans, D. A.,
and Hassan, G.
(1998)
BioEssays
20,
400-411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 103.
|
Murakami, A.,
Grinberg, D.,
Thurlow, J.,
and Dickson, C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5351-5359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 104.
|
Rickles, R. J.,
Darrow, A. L.,
and Strickland, S.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1691-1704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 105.
|
Kelly, D.,
Kim, S. J.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21115-21124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Corre, A. Primot, Y. Baron, J. Le Seyec, C. Goding, and M.-D. Galibert
Target Gene Specificity of USF-1 Is Directed via p38-mediated Phosphorylation-dependent Acetylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 10, 2009;
284(28):
18851 - 18862.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. P. Gaide Chevronnay, P. B. Cornet, D. Delvaux, P. Lemoine, P. J. Courtoy, P. Henriet, and E. Marbaix
Opposite Regulation of Transforming Growth Factors-{beta}2 and -{beta}3 Expression in the Human Endometrium
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2008;
149(3):
1015 - 1025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Iwasaki, K. Hailemariam, and Y. Tsuji
PIAS3 Interacts with ATF1 and Regulates the Human Ferritin H Gene through an Antioxidant-responsive Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 3, 2007;
282(31):
22335 - 22343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Fraser, M. Arora, S. S. Bohlson, E. Lozano, and A. J. Tenner
Generation of Inhibitory NF{kappa}B Complexes and Phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-binding Protein Correlates with the Anti-inflammatory Activity of Complement Protein C1q in Human Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2007;
282(10):
7360 - 7367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhu, M. Casado, S. Vaulont, and K. Sharma
Role of Upstream Stimulatory Factors in Regulation of Renal Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1
Diabetes,
July 1, 2005;
54(7):
1976 - 1984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Steiger, S. Bandyopadhyay, D. H. Farb, and S. J. Russek
cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Activating Transcription Factor-4, and Upstream Stimulatory Factor Differentially Control Hippocampal GABABR1a and GABABR1b Subunit Gene Expression through Alternative Promoters
J. Neurosci.,
July 7, 2004;
24(27):
6115 - 6126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Gueripel, M. Benahmed, and A. Gougeon
Sequential Gonadotropin Treatment of Immature Mice Leads to Amplification of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Action, Via Upregulation of Receptor-Type 1, Smad 2 and 4, and Downregulation of Smad 6
Biol Reprod,
March 1, 2004;
70(3):
640 - 648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sayasith, N. Bouchard, M. Sawadogo, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization and Role of Bovine Upstream Stimulatory Factor 1 and 2 in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2004;
279(8):
6327 - 6336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Chen, A. E. West, X. Tao, G. Corfas, M. N. Szentirmay, M. Sawadogo, C. Vinson, and M. E. Greenberg
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Are Mediators of Ca2+-Responsive Transcription in Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 1, 2003;
23(7):
2572 - 2581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Pastier, J.-M. Lacorte, J. Chambaz, P. Cardot, and A. Ribeiro
Two Initiator-like Elements Are Required for the Combined Activation of the Human Apolipoprotein C-III Promoter by Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor-4
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 19, 2002;
277(17):
15199 - 15206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Calomme, T. L.-A. Nguyen, Y. de Launoit, V. Kiermer, L. Droogmans, A. Burny, and C. Van Lint
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Binding to an E Box Motif in the R Region of the Bovine Leukemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat Stimulates Viral Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 8, 2002;
277(11):
8775 - 8789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pan, T. A. Black, Q. Shi, C. A. Jones, N. Petrovic, J. Loudon, C. Kane, C. D. Sigmund, and K. W. Gross
Critical Roles of a Cyclic AMP Responsive Element and an E-box in Regulation of Mouse Renin Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 30, 2001;
276(49):
45530 - 45538.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Shenkar, H.-K. Yum, J. Arcaroli, J. Kupfner, and E. Abraham
Interactions between CBP, NF-{kappa}B, and CREB in the lungs after hemorrhage and endotoxemia
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
August 1, 2001;
281(2):
L418 - L426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Li, J. A. Harton, X. Zhu, and J. P.-Y. Ting
Downregulation of CIITA Function by Protein Kinase A (PKA)-Mediated Phosphorylation: Mechanism of Prostaglandin E, Cyclic AMP, and PKA Inhibition of Class II Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in Monocytic Lines
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2001;
21(14):
4626 - 4635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Fajas, C. Paul, A. Vié, S. Estrach, R. Medema, J. M. Blanchard, C. Sardet, and M.-L. Vignais
Cyclin A Is a Mediator of p120E4F-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest in G1
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2001;
21(8):
2956 - 2966.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|