Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley-Kallesen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley-Kallesen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzino, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 48, 34020-34028, November 26, 1999


Transcriptional Regulation of the Transforming Growth Factor-beta 2 Promoter by cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein (CREB) and Activating Transcription Factor-1 (ATF-1) Is Modulated by Protein Kinases and the Coactivators p300 and CREB-binding Protein*

Michelle L. Kingsley-KallesenDagger §, David KellyDagger , and Angie RizzinoDagger §parallel

From the Dagger  Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases and the § Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6805

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transcription of the transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) gene is dependent on a cAMP-response element/activating transcription factor (CRE/ATF) site that is bound by CREB and ATF-1 as well as an E-box motif that is bound by upstream stimulatory factors 1 and 2 (USF1 and USF2). To identify additional factors involved in the expression of the TGF-beta 2 gene, we employed F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, which express TGF-beta 2 only after the cells differentiate. We show that overexpression of the transcription factors, CREB, ATF-1, USF1, and USF2 dramatically increases TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells. We further show that the coactivators p300 and CBP up-regulate the TGF-beta 2 promoter when CREB and ATF-1 are expressed in conjunction with protein kinases that phosphorylate CREB on serine 133 and ATF-1 on serine 63. Importantly, we identify the presence of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells but not in the nucleus of F9 EC cells. This phosphorylated form is present in whole cell extracts of both the parental and differentiated cells, suggesting that nuclear accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB is regulated during differentiation of F9 EC cells and is likely to play an important role in the activation of the TGF-beta 2 gene.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-beta 2)1 is a member of the TGF-beta superfamily, which represents a growing number of structurally related yet functionally distinct polypeptides involved in the regulation of a broad range of cellular events, including cell growth and differentiation as well as tissue morphogenesis (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). A subset of this superfamily are the TGF-beta s, which consists of at least five genes encoding distinct proteins in vertebrates (referred to as TGF-beta 1-5). TGF-beta 1-3 are the mammalian homologs and share approximately 70% amino acid sequence homology. Despite this high sequence homology, each isoform has a distinct temporal and spatial pattern of development (4-8). Interestingly, TGF-beta 1, -beta 2 and -beta 3 null mice show distinctive developmental defects with little to no phenotypic overlap. TGF-beta 1 knockout mice die shortly after birth due to multifocal inflammatory disease (9). TGF-beta 2 null mice exhibit perinatal lethality with a wide range of developmental defects including cardiac, craniofacial, limb, lung, spinal column, eye, inner ear, and urogenital defects (10). Mice that lack the TGF-beta 3 isoform die within 20 h after birth due to delayed pulmonary development and defective palatogenesis (11). Thus, it appears that there are numerous noncompensated functions between each of the TGF-beta isoforms. Furthermore, striking differences exist between the 5'-flanking regions of each gene, suggesting that differences in isoform expression may be mediated through tissue-specific gene transcription (12-16). TGF-beta 2 first appears in the preimplantation blastocyst (4, 17) and continues into adulthood (18), where it seems to play important roles in a host of biological functions including extracellular matrix production, wound healing, and regulation of the immune system (1-3). The studies presented here focus on the transcriptional regulation of the TGF-beta 2 gene in embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells and EC-differentiated cells, which represent an in vitro model system of early embryonic development. In the current study, F9 EC cells were utilized. These cells resemble biochemically and morphologically the inner cell mass of the early mouse embryo and under normal culture conditions exhibit very limited spontaneous differentiation (19). Treatment of F9 EC cells with retinoic acid (RA) induces differentiation toward an extraembryonic endoderm-like phenotype (20).

Utilizing the F9 EC model system, previous work by this laboratory and others have demonstrated that TGF-beta 2 is activated at both the RNA and protein levels when F9 cells are induced to differentiate with RA (21, 22). Important for the modulation of the TGF-beta 2 gene during the differentiation of F9 EC cells is the presence of a critical positive regulatory region in the TGF-beta 2 gene promoter, localized between -77 and +63, where +1 is the transcription start site (23, 24). Within this positive regulatory region are two cis-regulatory elements: a CRE/ATF site positioned at -74 to -67 (23, 24) and an E-box motif located between -50 and -45 (25). The nucleotide sequence of and spacing between both of these sites are evolutionary conserved in the human, chicken, and mouse promoters (16, 26).2 Mutation of either site reduces the expression of TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter gene constructs approximately 60-80% (23-25). Additionally, in electrophoretic gel mobility shift assays, ATF-1 and cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) bind to the CRE/ATF motif, and the upstream stimulatory factors 1 and 2 (USF1 and -2) bind to the E-box element (26-28). Previous studies have demonstrated that these transcription factors are present in nuclear extracts prepared from both F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells and can bind to their respective cis-regulatory elements in vitro (25, 27, 28). Expression of a dominant-negative USF expression plasmid reduces the expression of a TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter construct by approximately 80% (25). Thus, it appears that the USF proteins are important for the proper expression of the TGF-beta 2 gene, but prior to this study, the exact function of the E-box and CRE/ATF binding proteins in the case of the TGF-beta 2 promoter in F9-differentiated cells had not been elucidated.

USF1 and USF2 are basic/helix loop helix/leucine zipper proteins that are ubiquitously expressed and bind as dimers to a canonical CACGTG core DNA sequence (termed an E-box) (29-32). Although the biological functions of the USF proteins are poorly understood, they are involved in the regulation of a wide variety of genes including alpha 1(I) collagen (33), the CYP1A1 gene (34), and the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat (35). Recent findings have identified USF1 as a phosphoprotein (36), which may contribute to its regulation. Additionally, USF1 proteins do not appear to interact with nucleosomes that are associated with histone H1 (37), but they preferentially bind nucleosomal DNA highly acetylated on histone H4 (38).

The CRE/ATF transcription factors, ATF-1 and CREB have been well characterized, exhibit approximately 70% homology overall, and are over 90% homologous within their DNA binding, dimerization, and kinase-inducible domains (39). The kinase-inducible domain contains multiple phosphorylation sites that are phosphorylated by a number of different kinases (reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40). Within this domain, specific phosphorylation at serine 63 of ATF-1 or at serine 133 of CREB induces a stable interaction with the coactivators p300 and the CREB-binding protein, CBP (41-44). p300 and CBP are structurally similar, functionally redundant proteins (45, 46) essential for proper development (47-49). These proteins function as co-activators by interacting with a wide range of transcription factors, including MyoD (50), NF-kappa B (51, 52), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and 2 (53, 54), Smad3 (55), retinoid X receptor/retinoic acid receptor (56), ER (57), and YY1 (58), which appear to target p300/CBP to specific promoters and bridge transcription factors to the basal transcriptional machinery by binding TFIIB (42), TBP (59, 60), and RNA polymerase II (61, 62). Additionally, p300/CBP have been shown to acetylate histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) intrinsically (63, 64) and through their association with p300/CBP-associated factor (65, 66). Acetylation of histones is thought to destabilize nucleosomes and facilitate access of regulatory factors to DNA (reviewed in Refs. 67 and 68). p300/CBP have also been shown to acetylate several transcription factors including p53 (69), NF-Y (70), and GATA-1 (71), which influences their binding to DNA.

The primary purpose of this study was to understand how the TGF-beta 2 gene is regulated in F9-differentiated cells. First, we demonstrate that ATF-1, CREB, USF1, and USF2 function in vivo to up-regulate TGF-beta 2 promoter activity. We also demonstrate that the activity of CREB and ATF-1 is enhanced by the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) and calmodulin kinase IV (CaMKIV). Additionally, since phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 by these kinases has been shown previously to recruit p300 and CBP (41-44), we examined the ability of p300 and CBP to modulate TGF-beta 2 promoter activity. We determined that p300 and CBP augment TGF-beta 2 promoter activity when expressed in conjunction with CREB or ATF-1 and the catalytic subunit of PKA or constitutively active CaMKIV. This activation is dependent on an intact CRE/ATF site but not an intact E-box. We also show that the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB is present in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells but not in the nucleus of F9 EC cells. Importantly, this phosphorylated form is present in whole cell extracts of both the parental and differentiated cells, suggesting that nuclear accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB is regulated during differentiation of F9 EC cells. In view of the findings presented here, we propose that accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells allows for recruitment of p300/CBP to the TGF-beta 2 promoter, and this is likely to play an important role in the activation of the TGF-beta 2 gene when EC cells differentiate.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium HG-21 and Ham's F-12 were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal bovine serum was obtained from HyClone (Logan, UT). All-trans-RA was purchased from Acros Organics, a division of Fisher. All other chemicals, including protease and phosphatase inhibitors, gelatin, and dibutyryl cAMP were purchased from Sigma, unless otherwise indicated.

Cell Culture and Differentiation of EC Cells-- F9 EC cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and grown on tissue culture dishes coated with 0.1% gelatin. When cellular extracts were prepared, differentiation of F9 EC cells was induced by a 4-day treatment with 5 µM RA. When differentiated cells were used in transfection studies, they were treated for 3 days with 5 µM RA before transfection. Stock cultures and all experimental cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Transient Transfection Assay-- F9-differentiated cells were transfected in monolayer by the calcium phosphate precipitation method as modified by our laboratory (23). The plasmids utilized in each study are described in the figure legends. In each experiment, 2 µg of either pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or pCH111 (obtained from Dr. Ron Hines, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) was co-transfected to normalize for transfection efficiency. pCH110 contains the beta -galactosidase reporter gene under the control of the SV40 promoter and enhancer. The pCH111 plasmid contains the beta -galactosidase reporter under the control of the RSV long terminal repeat. After an overnight incubation with the DNA-calcium phosphate precipitate, the cells were washed twice with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 medium (1:1) and refed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (and 5 µM RA for F9-differentiated cells). Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activities were determined 48 h after transfection by the method of Seed and Sheen (72) and normalized to beta -galactosidase activity by the method of Rosenthal (73) to adjust for differences in transfection efficiency (74). TGF-beta 2 promoter/CAT chimeric gene constructs and their mutants (see Fig. 1) were described previously (16, 23-25). Unless otherwise noted, the null vector, pUC-19 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to keep the total DNA concentration the same in each experiment. The eukaryotic expression plasmids psvUSF1-pN3, containing the full-length cDNA encoding human USF1, and psvUSF2-pN4, containing the full-length cDNA encoding murine USF2, were obtained from Dr. Michèle Sawadogo (75). pECEATF-1 and pECEATF-2 expression plasmids were obtained from Dr. Michael O'Reilly and contain the human cDNAs for ATF-1 and ATF-2 under the control of the SV40 promoter and enhancer (76). The expression plasmid, pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK contains the full-length mouse CBP cDNA with a hemagglutinin (HA) tag (42), and the expression plasmid, pRc/RSV-CREB 341, contains the cDNA for CREB 341 (77). CBP and CREB expression plasmids were provided by Dr. Richard Goodman. The expression plasmid for p300, pCMVbeta p300-CHA, was obtained from Dr. David Livingston and contains a p300 cDNA insert from nucleotides 1134-8329 with a C-terminal HA tag cloned into the pCI vector (78). The pSKG4 plasmid was provided by Dr. Steven K. Hanks and contains the cDNA for the human PKA type alpha  catalytic subunit driven by the CMV promoter in the pcD vector (79). pRSV-CaMKII-(1-290) contains a cDNA insert that contains residues 1-290 of CaMKII and codes for a constitutively active form of the kinase (80). pRSV-Mouse CaMKIV-(1-313) contains residues 1-313 of the mouse cDNA of CaMKIV and produces a constitutively active form of the kinase (80). The CaM kinase expression plasmids were provided by Dr. Richard Maurer. All plasmids were purified by Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA) tip-500 columns.

Preparation of Nuclear and Whole Cell Extracts-- Nuclear extracts of F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells (4-day treatment with RA) were prepared as described previously (25) with minor modifications described here. All buffers were supplemented with the following protease and phosphatase inhibitors: 2.5 kallikrein-inactivating units/ml aprotinin, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 2.5 mM benzamidine, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml antipain, 1 µg/ml chymostatin, 2 µM pepstatin A, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 2 mM sodium vanadate, and 5 mM sodium fluoride. Nuclear extracts were not subjected to dialysis, but following nuclei extraction, they were stored at -80 °C. Whole cell lysates from F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells (4-day treatment with RA) were prepared in the following manner. Cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and scraped into lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl and 1% Triton X-100 supplemented with the following protease and phosphatase inhibitors: 2.5 kallikrein-inactivating units/ml aprotinin, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 2.5 mM benzamidine, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml antipain, 1 µg/ml chymostatin, 2 µM pepstatin A, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 2 mM sodium vanadate, and 5 mM sodium fluoride. Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 6000 × g in a refrigerated microcentrifuge for 2 min. Supernatants were stored at -80 °C.

Western Blot Analysis-- For Western blot analysis, the PhosphoPlus CREB (Ser133) antibody kit from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA) was used. Briefly, 20 µg of nuclear or whole cell extracts were fractionated by 14% SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis and transferred to an Immobilon-P (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Following transfer, membranes were washed briefly in 1× Tris-buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.6, and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (1× TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk). The membranes were washed three times for 5 min each in TBS/T (1× TBS, 0.1% Tween 20) and then incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of either CREB antibody or P-CREB antibody in primary antibody dilution buffer (1× TBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 5% bovine serum albumin) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were again washed three times with TBS/T and then incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Following three washes with TBS/T, the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was detected using LumiGLO (New England Biolabs) as specified by the manufacturer and exposed to x-ray film. Protein expression was quantitated using a densitometer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Transcription Factors ATF-1, CREB, USF1, and USF2 Stimulate the TGF-beta 2 Promoter in F9-differentiated Cells-- As previously reported, transcription of the TGF-beta 2 gene is dependent on a CRE/ATF element located from -74 to -67 and an E-box motif between -50 and -45 relative to the transcription start site (Fig. 1) (23-25). Electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay analysis determined that CREB and ATF-1 bind to the CRE/ATF site in the TGF-beta 2 promoter (Ref. 27 and data not shown) and USF1 and USF2 bind to the E-box motif (25). We have also shown that transient transfection of a dominant negative USF plasmid decreases (by approximately 80%) the activity of the TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter gene construct, pbeta 2-77 (25). The pbeta 2-77 construct contains the TGF-beta 2 promoter region located between -77 and +63 in relationship to the transcription start site and drives the expression of the CAT reporter gene (Fig. 1). Prior to the current study, the function of the E-box-binding proteins and the CRE/ATF transcription factors at the TGF-beta 2 promoter had not been elucidated. Therefore, we initially transiently transfected expression plasmids for USF1, USF2, ATF-1, and CREB with pbeta 2-77 into F9-differentiated cells. When expression plasmids for either USF1 or USF2 were co-transfected with pbeta 2-77 into F9-differentiated cells, we observed a 60-80-fold activation of pbeta 2-77 with USF1 and a 20-fold stimulation with USF2 (Fig. 2A). When both USF1 and USF2 were transfected in equal amounts, the USF2 expression plasmid appeared dominant. From these studies, it appears that USF1 homodimers activate the TGF-beta 2 promoter more strongly than USF2 homodimers and that USF1/USF2 heterodimers have a transactivation potential that corresponds to USF2. As expected, when USF1 and USF2 were expressed with the pbeta 2-40 construct, which contains only the TATA box of the TGF-beta 2 promoter, no stimulation was observed (data not shown).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structure of the TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter constructs. The TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter gene constructs were named pbeta 2-n, where n represents the number of nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site. pbeta 2-77 contains the -77/+63 fragment of the human TGF-beta 2 promoter. The mutant construct pbeta 2-77C harbors a two-base pair mutation (shown in lowercase type) in the CRE/ATF site. The mutant construct pbeta 2-77E contains a two-base pair mutation (shown in lowercase type) in the E-box motif.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Overexpression of transcription factors with pbeta 2-77 in F9-differentiated cells. F9-differentiated cells were transfected in monolayer with 10 µg of the pbeta 2-77 TGF-beta 2 promoter/CAT plasmid together with 2 µg of the pCH110 normalizing plasmid. A, increasing amounts (shown in µg) of either psvUSF1-pN3 or psvUSF2-pN4 were cotransfected with pbeta 2-77 where indicated (USF1 or USF2). The amount of DNA transfected was kept at 22 µg for all samples by the addition of null plasmid, pSG5 (Invitrogen). B, increasing amounts (shown in µg) of pECEATF-1, pRSV-CREB, or pECEATF-2 were cotransfected with pbeta 2-77 where indicated (ATF-1, CREB, or ATF-2). The amount of DNA transfected was kept at 22 µg for all samples by the addition of null plasmid, pECE for ATF-1 or pRc/RSV for CREB. The normalized CAT activities were determined by dividing the CAT activity of each lysate by the beta -galactosidase activity in the same lysate, and the bars represent the normalized CAT activities of the plasmids relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77. The CAT activity of pbeta 2-77 alone was 1010 cpm for A and 1001 cpm for B. The experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

When expression plasmids for ATF-1 and CREB were co-transfected with pbeta 2-77 into F9-differentiated cells, pbeta 2-77 activity was increased approximately 50-fold at the highest concentrations tested. When equal amounts of ATF-1 and CREB were co-transfected, we found that their effects were additive. This observation suggests that ATF-1 and CREB possess analogous transactivation potentials for the TGF-beta 2 promoter. In fact, in each of the studies described in the remainder of this report, ATF-1 and CREB where found to be interchangeable. Therefore, in most cases, only the findings observed with CREB are described. We also observed that overexpression of ATF-2, which does not bind in electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay analysis using F9-differentiated nuclear extract (27), resulted in a smaller (10-fold) activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter. In other studies, bacterially expressed ATF-2 has been shown to bind to the TGF-beta 2 CRE/ATF site (81). However, our studies suggest that, in comparison with ATF-1 and CREB, ATF-2 has a lower transactivation potential for the CRE/ATF site in the TGF-beta 2 promoter. Nevertheless, CREB, ATF-1, and ATF-2 activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter appears to be specific for the CRE/ATF site, since transactivation was not observed when CREB, ATF-1, or ATF-2 was expressed with either the pbeta 2-40 construct, which contains only the TATA box of the TGF-beta 2 promoter, or with a pbeta 2-77 construct that contains a two-base pair mutation in the CRE/ATF site (see Fig. 1), designated pbeta 2-77C (data not shown).

Co-transfection of the Catalytic Subunit of PKA Enhances the Induction of the TGF-beta 2 Promoter by CREB-- Several studies have indicated that the phosphorylation of CREB and ATF-1 regulates their ability to transactivate multiple genes (reviewed in Refs. 39 and 40). In particular, phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 increases their transactivation potential (80, 82-84). Multiple kinases such as Ca2+/calmodulin kinases II and IV (CaMKII or CaMKIV) (44, 80, 82), protein kinase C (83), and PKA (84) are able to phosphorylate CREB and ATF-1 at these specific serine residues. Since PKA activity increases with F9 differentiation (85, 86) and because we have observed that the addition of cAMP to F9-differentiated cells induces at least a 3-fold increase in the expression of the pbeta 2-77 construct,3 it is possible that PKA plays a role in the regulation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter. To test this possibility more directly, we examined the ability of PKA to modulate the activity of CREB at the TGF-beta 2 promoter in F9-differentiated cells. In these experiments, suboptimal concentrations of the expression plasmid for CREB were used. When the catalytic subunit of PKA (cPKA) was co-transfected with CREB into F9-differentiated cells, a dose-dependent increase (up to 5-fold) in the expression of pbeta 2-77 was observed (Fig. 3). The cPKA expression plasmid on its own did not alter the expression of pbeta 2-77, which argues that the transcriptional activation observed was not due to general effects on transcription but was specific to CREB. Additionally, expression of cPKA in the presence of a serine 133 to alanine 133 mutant of CREB (CREBM1) had little to no effect on the expression of pbeta 2-77 (data not shown).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of the catalytic subunit of PKA in conjunction with CREB increases the activity of pbeta 2-77. F9-differentiated cells were transfected in monolayer with 10 µg of pbeta 2-77 together with 2 µg of the pCH110 normalization plasmid. One µg of pRc/RSV-CREB was co-transfected with increasing amounts (shown in µg) of the catalytic subunit of PKA (pSKG4) as indicated (CREB or cPKA). The amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the null plasmid, pUC-19. The bars represent the CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77 alone (1423 cpm). This experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

Expression of the Catalytic Subunit of PKA in Conjunction with CREB Targets p300 and CBP to the CRE/ATF Site within the TGF-beta 2 Promoter-- It is well documented that phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 allows for recruitment of the coactivators p300 and CBP (41-43). Therefore, since PKA increased CREB activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter, we examined the ability of p300 and CBP to modulate the expression of the pbeta 2-77 construct. Utilizing transient transfection assays, expression plasmids for p300 or CBP were co-transfected with expression plasmids for CREB and cPKA. We observed that transfection of p300 or CBP in the presence of cPKA and CREB increased pbeta 2-77 expression (3-4-fold) over the expression observed with CREB transfected with cPKA alone (Fig. 4). In the presence of CREB, cPKA, and p300 or CBP, we observed an overall 40-fold increase in the expression of pbeta 2-77. When cPKA was not included or when a serine 133 to alanine 133 mutant of CREB (CREBM1) was used, p300 and CBP did not affect the expression of the TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter construct (data not shown). The induction that we observed in TGF-beta 2 promoter activity by p300 and cPKA is specific to CREB (and ATF-1). Although ATF-2 has been shown to interact with p300 at other promoters (87), p300 did not modulate the activity of pbeta 2-77 when transfected with ATF-2 in the presence or absence of cPKA (Fig. 5 and data not shown). Similarly, p300 did not increase the response of pbeta 2-77 to USF1 in the presence or absence of cPKA (Fig. 5 and data not shown).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   CBP and p300 enhance the expression of pbeta 2-77. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of pbeta 2-77 and 2 µg of the pCH110 normalizing plasmid. 0.5 µg of pRSV-CREB (CREB) and 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA) were co-transfected as indicated. Increasing amounts (shown in µg) of either pCMVbeta p300-CHA (p300) or pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK (CBP) were added as shown. The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the null plasmid, pUC-19. The bars represent the CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77. The CAT activity of the pbeta 2-77 construct was 1435 cpm for this experiment, which was performed in duplicate at least five times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Expression of p300 and CBP are unable to modulate ATF-2 and USF1 activity at the TGF-beta 2 promoter. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of pbeta 2-77, 1 µg of pECEATF-2 (ATF-2) or psvUSF1-pN3 (USF1), 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA), 10 µg of pCMVbeta p300-CHA (p300), and 2 µg of the pCH110 normalizing plasmid. The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23.5 µg using the pUC-19 plasmid. The bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77 alone (5760 cpm). The experiment was performed in duplicate at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

We also did not observe transactivation when CREB, cPKA, and CBP were expressed with either pbeta 2-40 (data not shown) or pbeta 2-77C (Fig. 6). Mutation of the CRE/ATF site typically reduces the expression of the TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter construct by 60-80% (23, 24). A similar reduction in expression of the pbeta 2-77C construct was observed in this experiment. However, for more direct comparison, expression of both pbeta 2-77 and pbeta 2-77C were set to 1.0 (Fig. 6). Overall, we observed a 17-fold increase in the level of expression of pbeta 2-77 and only a 1.8-fold increase in the level of expression of pbeta 2-77C (Fig. 6). These results argue that activation by CREB; CREB and cPKA; and CREB, cPKA, and CBP is dependent on an intact CRE/ATF site.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   CBP stimulation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter is dependent on an intact CRE/ATF site. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of either pbeta 2-77 or pbeta 2-77C and 2 µg of the pCH110 normalizing plasmid. The pbeta 2-77C construct contains a two-base pair mutation in the CRE/ATF site that dramatically reduces CREB and ATF-1 interaction (see Fig. 1). 0.5 µg of pRSV-CREB was utilized where indicated (CREB), 0.5 µg of pSKG4 was transfected where indicated (cPKA), and 10 µg of pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK was added as shown (CBP). The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the pUC-19 null plasmid. The solid bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77, and the crisscrossed bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77C. The CAT activity of pbeta 2-77 alone was 4188 cpm, and the CAT activity of pbeta 2-77C alone was 2133 cpm. The experiment was performed in duplicate at least two times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

Although the E-box is essential for optimal expression of the TGF-beta 2 gene, we observed that modulation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter by p300/CBP was not dependent on an intact E-box motif. As shown previously, when the E-box is mutated at two critical base pairs (see Fig. 1), expression of the mutant construct, pbeta 2-77E, is reduced approximately 80% (see Fig. 1) (25). We observed a similar reduction (approximately 80%) in expression of pbeta 2-77E for this study. Again, for a more direct comparison, the expression of pbeta 2-77 and pbeta 2-77E was set to 1.0 (Fig. 7). Regardless of whether we utilized pbeta 2-77 or pbeta 2-77E, titration of p300 with ATF-1 and cPKA increased expression 4-fold above the expression of ATF-1 and cPKA, and increased expression of the TGF-beta 2 promoter/reporter constructs approximately 25-fold overall (Fig. 7). We observed similar results with CBP and with the substitution of CREB for ATF-1 (data not shown).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   p300 stimulation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter occurs independently of an intact E-box motif. F9-differentiated cells were transfected with 10 µg of either pbeta 2-77 or pbeta 2-77E and 2 µg of the normalizing plasmid pCH110. The pbeta 2-77E construct contains a two-base pair mutation in the E-box motif that disrupts USF1 and USF2 interaction (see Fig. 1). Increasing amounts (shown in µg) of pCMVbeta p300-CHA (p300) were titrated with 0.5 µg of pECEATF-1 (ATF-1) and 0.5 µg of pSKG4 (cPKA). The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23 µg using the pUC-19 null plasmid. The solid bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77, and the hatched bars represent CAT activities relative to the activity of pbeta 2-77E. In this study, the CAT activity of pbeta 2-77 alone was 1726 cpm, and the CAT activity of pbeta 2-77E alone was 530 cpm. The experiment was performed in duplicate at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

p300 Stimulates TGF-beta 2 Promoter Activity in the Presence of Constitutively Active CaMKIV but Not CaMKII-- Similar to PKA, CaMKIV can phosphorylate CREB on serine 133 and ATF-1 on serine 63. Also like PKA, the activity of Ca2+/CaM kinases increases with differentiation of F9 EC cells (88), and this increase in activity may play a role in the activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter. Therefore, we repeated the previous studies using an expression plasmid for constitutively active CaMKIV in place of the catalytic subunit of PKA. We observed that transfection of CaMKIV with CREB and p300 stimulated pbeta 2-77 activity (Fig. 8). Hence, both PKA and CaMKIV can regulate TGF-beta 2 promoter activity. On the other hand, expression of constitutively active CaMKII had little or no affect on the ability of CREB to activate pbeta 2-77 expression (Fig. 8). This is in agreement with previous observations made for other promoters (80, 82). CaMKII has been shown to phosphorylate CREB on serine 133 and serine 142 and phosphorylate ATF-1 on serine 63 and serine 72. It has been proposed that this dual phosphorylation of CREB and ATF-1 blocks their activation (82) and interferes with their ability to interact with p300 or CBP (80, 82).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   p300 stimulates TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in the presence of constitutively active CaMKIV, but not CaMKII. F9-differentiated cells were cells were transfected with 10 µg of pbeta 2-77, 1 µg of pRSV-CREB (CREB), 0.5 µg of RSV-CaMKII (CaMKII) or pRSV-CaMKIV(CaMKIV), 2 µg of the pRSV-beta -gal normalizing plasmid, and increasing amounts (shown in µg) of pCMVbeta p300-CHA (p300). The total amount of DNA was kept constant at 23.5 µg using the pUC-19 null plasmid. The CAT activity of pbeta 2-77 was 1023 cpm. The experiment was performed in duplicate at least three times with similar results. S.D. values are shown.

CREB Is Phosphorylated at Serine 133 in the Nucleus of F9-differentiated Cells but Not in the Nucleus of F9 EC Cells-- As we have shown, the addition of cPKA or CAMKIV with CREB and p300 or CBP increases the expression of the TGF-beta 2 promoter in F9-differentiated cells where the gene is normally expressed. Since phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 and ATF-1 at serine 63 is important for recruitment of p300 and CBP (42-44), it is possible that these phosphorylated forms are not present in the parental cells where TGF-beta 2 is not expressed. To test this possibility, we examined the phosphorylation status of CREB and ATF-1 in F9 EC cells and in F9-differentiated cells utilizing Western blot analysis, employing antibodies that specifically recognize CREB and ATF-1 phosphorylated at serine 133 and serine 63, respectively. We analyzed both whole cell and nuclear extracts for the presence of the phosphorylated forms of CREB or ATF-1 (Fig. 9). In whole cell extracts prepared from both F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells, CREB was phosphorylated at serine 133 (Fig. 9A). Densitometry analysis comparing phospho-CREB to the total level of CREB showed no significant difference in the level of phosphorylation between the whole cell extracts of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells. However, when the same experiment was performed using nuclear extracts from F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells, phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 was detected only in nuclear extracts prepared from F9-differentiated cells. There was no apparent change in the total amount of CREB between nuclear extract preparations of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells. Thus, it appears that the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB accumulates in the nucleus only upon differentiation of F9 EC cells. Although we have shown previously that ATF-1 is present in F9 EC cells and in F9-differentiated cells and can bind in vitro to the TGF-beta 2 CRE/ATF site, we did not detect serine 63-phosphorylated ATF-1 in either F9 EC or F9-differentiated extracts. It does not appear that our assay or nuclear extract preparation excluded serine 63-phosphorylated ATF-1, since we detected a significant amount of serine 63-phosphorylated ATF-1 in U87MG nuclear extracts where the TGF-beta 2 promoter is highly expressed (data not shown).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Western blot analysis of whole cell and nuclear extracts of F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells. 20 µg of whole cell extract (A) or nuclear extract (B) from F9 EC or F9-differentiated (4-day RA treatment) cells were fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunoblotted with either a CREB-specific antibody or an antibody that recognizes the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB. This experiment was repeated at least four times with two different extract preparations, and similar results were observed.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we sought to identify factors involved in the transcriptional regulation of the TGF-beta 2 gene. Previous studies utilizing the somatostatin and vasoactive intestinal peptide promoters in F9-differentiated cells showed that expression of CREB or ATF-1 on their own was unable to activate these promoters (77, 84, 89). Only in the presence of cAMP or the catalytic subunit of PKA were ATF-1 and CREB able to activate the SS and VIP promoters. Unlike these previous reports, our studies show that overexpression of CREB and ATF-1 significantly induces TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells. We demonstrate that USF1 and USF2 are also able to stimulate TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in the differentiated cells. Although relatively little is known about the regulation of USF proteins, the functions of ATF-1 and CREB are tightly regulated by phosphorylation. Transcriptional activation of multiple promoters is enhanced by phosphorylation of ATF-1 at serine 63 and CREB at serine 133, as is their affinity for co-activators p300 and CBP (41, 42, 44, 82, 90). Consistent with these studies, we demonstrate that expression of the catalytic subunit of PKA with CREB or ATF-1 stimulates TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in F9-differentiated cells. We also observed that expression of cPKA or CaMKIV in conjunction with ATF-1 or CREB is required for the further stimulation of TGF-beta 2 promoter activity by the coactivators p300 and CBP. The action of these factors requires the TGF-beta 2 CRE/ATF site, since we do not observe activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter with CREB, cPKA, or CBP when the CRE/ATF site is mutated (Fig. 6). Additionally, p300/CBP appear to function specifically through ATF-1 and CREB, since p300 was unable to modulate promoter activity through ATF-2. This was somewhat surprising, since ATF-2 has been shown to interact with p300, and this interaction potentiates transactivation of the c-jun promoter (87). We also demonstrate that unlike another E-box binding protein, MyoD, which has been shown to interact with p300 and modulate several muscle-specific genes (50), USF1 does not invoke a p300 response at the TGF-beta 2 promoter.

It is interesting that ATF-1 and CREB appear to promote activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter equally. Since ATF-1 and CREB are ubiquitous proteins, it is possible that depending on tissue type and cellular environment, either CREB or ATF-1 may regulate the TGF-beta 2 promoter. In some cases, it is possible that they function coordinately, since CREB and ATF-1 can form heterodimers. Although they are highly homologous, distinct differences are found in their N-terminal and kinase-inducible domains. ATF-1 and CREB are extremely divergent in their N-terminal regions, which may play a role in their regulation or subcellular localization (39, 91). In addition, ATF-1 lacks a GSK-3 kinase phosphorylation site in its kinase-inducible domain, whereas this site is present in CREB and appears to promote phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 (92). Whether these differences play a role in the in vivo interaction with p300/CBP at specific promoters has yet to be determined.

We also examined various protein kinases that have been shown to phosphorylate CREB and ATF-1 at serine 133 and serine 63, respectively, and whose activities are increased upon differentiation of F9 EC cells (85, 86, 88). The protein kinase that we examined initially was PKA. Although PKA is expressed at the protein level by both F9 EC and F9-differentiated cells, PKA is not activated by cAMP in F9 EC cells (89). Upon differentiation, PKA is activated and becomes responsive to cAMP (85, 86, 89). As in the case of the transcription factors CREB and ATF-1 and the coactivators p300 and CBP, PKA and CaMKIV appear to be functionally redundant in their ability to activate the TGF-beta 2 promoter. Similar to PKA (Fig. 4), only when we express constitutively active CaMKIV with CREB, p300 (Fig. 8), and CBP (data not shown) are we able to activate the TGF-beta 2 promoter. However, as in the case of previous reports for other promoters (80, 82), CaMKII had little or no affect on the ability of CREB and p300 to modulate TGF-beta 2 promoter activity.

One of the most intriguing findings reported in this study is that the serine 133-phosphorylated form of CREB is present in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells but is not detected in the nucleus of F9 EC cells. Therefore, as summarized in Fig. 10, our data suggest that localization of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB to the nucleus upon differentiation may be an important control pathway for the activation of the TGF-beta 2 gene through recruitment of p300/CBP. Multiple mechanisms may account for the presence of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells, but not in the nucleus of F9 EC cells. Although serine 133-phosphorylated CREB is present in the whole cell extracts of both F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells, it was not determined whether CREB is differentially phosphorylated on other residues in F9 EC cells and F9-differentiated cells. Phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 is important for transactivation, but it is possible, if not likely, that phosphorylation of CREB on additional sites regulates its location within the cell. Thus, it is possible that phosphorylation or dephosphorylation at a particular residue(s) allows for nuclear import or nuclear export of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB as occurs with the transcription factor NF-AT4 (93). Nuclear import of NF-AT4 is stimulated by the activation of the intracellular calcium phosphatase, calcineurin, which dephosphorylates masking residues around the nuclear localization signal of NF-AT4. In turn, rephosphorylation of NF-ATF4 at these sites stimulates its export from the nucleus.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Model of phosphorylation and nuclear localization of CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells allows for p300/CBP recruitment to the TGF-beta 2 promoter. It is our hypothesis that proper phosphorylation of CREB and its proper cellular localization are both necessary for p300/CBP recruitment and activation of the TGF-beta 2 promoter when EC cells undergo differentiation. Proper phosphorylation of CREB serine 133 allows for interaction with specific coactivators, p300, and CBP. Recruitment of p300 and/or CBP to the TGF-beta 2 promoter allows for bridging of CREB to the TATA box-binding proteins (TBP) as well as interaction with RNA polymerase II and components of the basal machinery involved in transcription of the TGF-beta 2 gene.

It is also possible that (de)phosphorylation of CREB at particular residues may allow for interaction with cytoplasmic anchoring proteins that retain serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the cytoplasm of F9 EC cells. Such a mechanism exists for the transcription factors, NF-kappa B and Dorsal, which are retained in the cytoplasm as inactive complexes by their anchoring proteins Ikappa B (94, 95) and Cactus (96), respectively. Specific phosphorylation of NF-kappa B and Dorsal plays a critical role in their release from their cytoplasmic anchoring proteins as well as their translocation to the nucleus and subsequent activation of NF-kappa B- and Dorsal-responsive genes. A similar mechanism may exist for CREB. Another possibility is that the protein kinase responsible for accumulation of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus may not be active in F9 EC cells. Multiple kinase activities are up-regulated during F9 differentiation, including PKA, protein kinase C, and CaM kinases (85, 86, 88, 97-99). Some of these kinases phosphorylate CREB not only on serine 133 but also on other residues (100-102), which again may play important roles in the proper cellular localization of CREB. It is possible that one or more of these mechanisms may be responsible for the presence of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB in the nucleus of F9-differentiated cells, and an in depth analysis will be needed to distinguish between them.

Finally, it is noteworthy that genes such as c-jun (87), FGF-3 (103), tissue plasminogen activator (104), and the TGF-beta type II receptor (105) also contain CRE sites and turn on with RA-induced differentiation of EC cells. Like TGF-beta 2, their promoters contain additional cis-regulatory elements that provide specificity and ensure that the correct gene is activated at the precise time. The nuclear localization of serine 133-phosphorylated CREB may be one step in the coordinate regulation of multiple genes during differentiation. Hence, understanding how the TGF-beta 2 gene is activated at the level of transcription will not only further our knowledge of this gene but may also provide important clues into the expression of many genes regulated by differentiation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the following investigators for generous gifts: Dr. Michael O'Reilly for the TGF-beta 2 promoter/CAT chimeric gene constructs and pECEATF-1 and pECEATF-2 plasmids; Dr. Ron Hines for the pCH111 plasmid; Dr. Michèle Sawadogo for psvUSF1-pN3 and psvUSF2-pN4; Dr. Richard Goodman for the expression plasmids pRc/RSV-mCBP.HA.RK and pRc/RSV-CREB 341; Dr. Richard Eckner and Dr. David Livingston for the p300 expression plasmid, pCMVbeta p300-CHA; Dr. Steven K. Hanks for the pSKG4 plasmid; Dr. Richard Maurer for pRSV-CaMKII-(1-290) and pRSV-Mouse CaMKIV-(1-313); and Dr. Marc Montminy (Harvard Medical School) for the pRSV-CREBM1 plasmid.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by NCI, National Institutes of Health, Grants CA 74771 and CA 79491. Core Facilities in the Eppley Institute were supported in part by American Cancer Society Grant SIG and National Cancer Research Center Support Grant CA 36727.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Supported in part by a biotechnology fellowship from the Nebraska Research Initiative and by a University of Nebraska Presidential Graduate Fellowship from the Emley Fellowship Fund.

parallel To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Eppley Inst. for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986805 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6805. Tel.: 402-559-6338; Fax: 402-559-4651; E-mail: arizzino@unmc.edu.

2 P. Wilder and A. Rizzino, unpublished observations.

3 D. Kelly and A. Rizzino, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TGF-beta 2, transforming growth factor-beta 2; EC, embryonal carcinoma; RA, retinoic acid; CRE, cAMP-response element; ATF, activating transcription factor; CREB, CRE-binding protein; USF, upstream stimulatory factor; CBP, CREB binding protein; CaMKII and CaMKIV, calmodulin kinase II and IV, respectively; PKA, protein kinase A; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; HA, hemagglutinin; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; cPKA, catalytic subunit of PKA; CREBM1, serine 133 to alanine 133 mutant of CREB.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1990) in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Sporn, M. B. , and Roberts, A. B., eds), Vol. 95 , pp. 419-472, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
2. Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1993) Growth Factors 8, 1-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kingsley, D. M. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 133-146[Free Full Text]
4. Pelton, R. W., Nomura, S., Moses, H. L., and Hogan, B. L. M. (1989) Development 106, 759-767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gatherer, D., ten Dijke, P., Baird, D. T., and Akhurst, R. J. (1990) Development 110, 445-460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Flanders, K. C., Ludecke, G., Engels, S., Cissel, D. S., Roberts, A. B., Kondaiah, P., Lafyatis, R., Sporn, M. B., and Unsicker, K. (1991) Development 113, 183-191[Abstract]
7. Millan, F. A., Denhez, F., Kondaiah, P., and Akhurst, R. J. (1991) Development 111, 131-144[Abstract]
8. Schmid, P., Cox, D., Bilbe, G., Maier, R., and McMaster, G. K. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 84-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Shull, M. M., Ormsby, I., Keir, A. B., Pawlowski, S., Deibold, R. J., Yin, M., Allen, R., Sidman, C., Proetzel, G., Calvin, D., Annunziata, N., and Doetschman, T. (1992) Nature 359, 693-699[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sanford, L. P., Ormsby, I., Gittenberger-de Groot, A. C., Sariola, H., Friedman, R., Boivin, G. P., Cardell, E. L., and Doetschman, T. (1997) Development 124, 2659-2670[Abstract]
11. Kaarinen, V., Voncken, J. W., Shuler, C., Warburton, D., Bu, D., Heisterkamp, N., and Groffen, J. (1995) Nat. Genet. 11, 415-421[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kim, S. J., Glick, A., Sporn, M. B., and Roberts, A. B. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 402-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Lafyatis, R., Lechleider, R., Kim, S. J., Jakowlew, S., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19128-19136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Malipiero, U., Holler, M., Werner, U., and Fontana, A. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 171, 1145-1151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Geiser, A. G., Kim, S. J., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 84-92
16. Noma, T., Glick, A. B., Geiser, A. G., O'Reilly, M. A., Miller, J., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1991) Growth Factors 4, 247-255[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Slager, H. G., Lawson, K. A., van den Eijnden-vanRaaij, A. J. M., DeLaat, S. W., and Mummery, C. L. (1991) Dev. Biol. 145, 205-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Miller, D. A., Lee, A., Pelton, R. W., Chen, E. Y., Moses, H. L., and Derynck, R. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1108-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Bernstine, E. G., Hooper, M. L., Grandchamp, S., and Ephrussi, B. (1973) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70, 3899-3903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Strickland, S., and Mahdavi, B. (1978) Cell 15, 393-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Kelly, D., Campbell, J., Tiesman, J., and Rizzino, A. (1990) Cytotechnology 4, 227-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Mummery, C. L., Slager, H., Kruijer, W., Feijen, A., Freund, E., Koornneef, I., and van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J. (1990) Dev. Biol. 137, 161-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kelly, D., O'Reilly, M., and Rizzino, A. (1992) Dev. Biol. 153, 172-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve],
24. O'Reilly, M. A., Geiser, A. G., Kim, S-J., Bruggeman, L. A., Luu, A. X., Roberts, A. B., and Sporn, M. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19938-19943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Scholtz, B., Kingsley-Kallesen, M., and Rizzino, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32375-32380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Burt, D. W., and Patton, I. R. (1991) DNA Cell Biol. 10, 723-734[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Kelly, D., Scholtz, B., Orten, D. J., Hinrichs, S. H., and Rizzino, A. (1995) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 40, 135-45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Scholtz, B., Kelly, D., and Rizzino, A. (1995) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41, 140-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Gregor, P. D., Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1730-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Sirito, M., Walker, S., Lin, Q., Kozlowski, M. T., Klein, W. H., and Sawadogo, M. (1992) Gene Expr. 2, 231-240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Bendall, A. J., and Molloy, P. L. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2801-2810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Sirito, M., Lin, Q., Maity, T., and Sawadogo, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 427-433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Rippe, R. A., Umezawa, A., Kimball, J. P, Breindl, M., and Brenner, D. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1753-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Takahashi, Y., Nakayama, K., Itoh, S., Fugii-Kuriyama, Y., and Kamataki, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30025-30031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. D'Adda di Fagagna, F., Marzio, G., Gutierrez, M. I., Kang, L. Y., Falaschi, A., and Giacca, M.. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 2765-2775[Abstract]
36. Galibert, M. D., Boucontet, L., Goding, C. R., and Meo, T. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 6176-6183[Abstract]
37. Juan, L. J., Utley, R. T., Adams, C. C., Vettese-Dadey, M., and Workman, J. L. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 6031-6040[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Vettese-Dadey, M., Grant, P. A., Hebbes, T. R., Crane-Robinson, C., Allis, C. D., and Workman, J. L. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2508-2518[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lee, K. A. W., and Masson, N. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1174, 221-233[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Montminy, M. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 807-822[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Chrivia, J. C., Kwok, R. P. S., Lamb, N., Hagiwara, M., Montminy, M., and Goodman, R. H. (1993) Nature 365, 855-859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Kwok, R. P. S., Lundblad, J. R., Chrivia, J. C., Richards, J. P., Bächinger, H. P., Brennan, R. G., Roberts, S. G. E., Green, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1994) Nature 370, 223-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Lee, J. S., Zhang, X., and Shi, Y. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17666-17674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Shimomura, A., Ogawa, Y., Kitani, T., Fujisawa, H., and Hagiwara, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17957-17960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Arany, Z., Sellers, W. R., Livingston, D. M., and Eckner, R. (1994) Cell 77, 799-800[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Lundblad, J. R., Kwok, R. P. S., Laurance, M. E., Harter, M.. L., and Goodman, R. H. (1995) Nature 374, 85-87[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Tanaka, Y., Naruse, I., Maekawa, T., Masuya, H., Shiroishi, T., and Ishii, S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10215-10220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Yao, T. P., Oh, S. P., Fuchs, M., Zhou, N. D., Ch'ng, L. F., Newsome, D., Bronson, R. T., Li, E., Livingston, D. M., and Eckner, R. (1998) Cell 93, 361-372[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Oike, Y., Takakura, N., Hata, A., Kaname, T., Akizuki, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Yasue, H., Araki, K., Yamamura, K., and Suda, T. (1999) Blood 93, 2771-2779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Puri, P. L., Avantaggiata, M. L., Balsano, C., Sang, N., Graessmann, A., Giordano, A., and Levrero, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 369-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Gerritsen, M. E., Williams, A. J., Neish, A. S., Moore, S., Shi, Y., and Collins, T. (1997) Proc. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2927-2932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Perkins, N. D., Felzien, L. K., Betts, J. C., Leung, K., Beach, D. H., and Nabel, G. J. (1997) Science 275, 523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Bhattacharya, S., Eckner, R., Grossman, S., Oldread, E., Arany, Z., D'Andrea, A., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Nature 383, 344-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Zhang, J. J., Vinkemeier, U., Gu, W., Chakravarti, D., Horvath, C. M., and Darnell, J. E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15092-15096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Shen, X., Hu, P. P., Liberati, N. T., Datto, M. B., Frederick, J. P., and Wang, X. F. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell. 9, 3309-3319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Chakravarti, D., LaMorte, V. J., Nelson, M. C., Nakajima, T., Schulman, I. G., Juguilon, H., Montminy, M., and Evans, R. M. (1996) Nature 383, 99-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Hanstein, B., Eckner, R., DiRenzo, J., Halachmi, S., Liu, H., Sercy, B., Kurokawa, R., and Brown, M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 11540-11545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Galvin, K. M., and Shi, Y. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3723-3732[Abstract]
59. Abraham, S. E., Lobo, S., Yaciuk, P., Wang, H. G. H., and Moran, E. (1993) Oncogene 8, 1639-1647[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Dallas, P. B., Yaciuk, P., and Moran, E. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 1726-1731[Abstract]
61. Kee, B., Arias, J., and Montminy, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2373-2375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Cho, H., Orphanides, G., Sun, X., Yang, X. J., Ogryzko, V., Lees, E., Nakatani, Y., and Reinberg, D. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5355-5363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1996) Nature 384, 641-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Ogryzko, V. V., Schiltz, R. L., Russanova, V., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Cell 87, 953-959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Kuo, M. H., Brownell, J. E., Sobel, R. E., Ranalli, T. A., Cook, R. G., Edmonson, D. G., Roth, S. Y., and Allis, C. D. (1996) Nature 383, 269-272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. Yang, X. J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nishikawa, J., Howard, B., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Nature 382, 319-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Wolffe, A. P., and Pruss, D. (1996) Cell 84, 817-819[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Struhl, K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 599-606[Free Full Text]
69. Liu, L., Scolnick, D. M., Trievel, R. C., Zhang, H. B., Marmorstein, R., Halazonetis, T. D., and Berger, S. L. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1202-1209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. Jin, S., and Scotto, K. W. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4377-4384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Boyes, J., Byfield, P., Nakatani, Y., and Ogryzko, V. (1998) Nature 396, 594-598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Seed, B., and Sheen, J. Y. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 271-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Rosenthal, N. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152, 704-720[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Hall, C. V., Jacobs, P. E., Ringold, G. M., and Lee, F. (1983) J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2, 101-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Meier, J. L., Luo, X., Sawadogo, M., and Straus, S. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6896-6907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
76. Ellis, L., Clauser, E., Morgan, D. O., Edery, M., Roth, R., and Rutter, W. J. (1986) Cell 45, 721-732[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
77. Walton, K. M., Rehfuss, R. P., Chrivia, J. C., Lockner, J. E., and Goodman, R. H. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78. Eckner, R., Ewen, M. E., Newsome, D., Gerdes, M., DeCaprio, J. A., Lawrence, J. B., and Livingston, D. M. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 869-884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Maldonado, F., and Hanks, S. K. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 8189-8190[Free Full Text]
80. Sun, P., Enselen, H., Myung, P. S., and Maurer, R. A. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2527-2539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
81. Kim, S. J., Wagner, S., Liu, F., O'Reilly, M. A., Robbins, P. D., and Green, M. R. (1992) Nature 358, 331-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
82. Sun, P., Lou, L., and Maurer, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3066-3073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Yamamoto, K. K., Gonzalez, G. A., Biggs, W. H., III, and Montminy, M. (1988) Nature 334, 494-498[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Gonzalez, G. A., and Montminy, M. R. (1989) Cell 59, 675-680[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
85. Plet, A., Evian, D., and Anderson, W. B. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 889-893[Free Full Text]
86. Plet, A., Gerbaud, P., Anderson, W. B., and Brion, D. E. (1985) Differentiation 30, 159-64[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
87. Kawasaki, H., Song, J., Eckner, R., Ugai, H., Chiu, R., Taira, K., Shi, Y., Jones, N., and Yokoyama, K. K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 233-245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
88. Gao, P., and Malbon, C. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9002-9008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
89. Masson, N., Ellis, M., Goodbourn, S., and Lee, K. A. W. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1096-1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Schwartz, R., Helmich, B., and Spector, D. H. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 6955-6966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
91. Guo, B., Stein, J. L., van Wijnen, A., and Stein, G. S. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 14447-14455[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Fiol, C. J., Williams, J. S., Chou, C. H., Wang, Q. M., Roach, P. J., and Andrisani, O. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32187-32193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
93. Hogan, P. G., and Rao, A. (1999) Nature 398, 200-201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Baeuerle, P. A., and Baltimore, D. (1988) Cell 53, 211-217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Ghosh, S., and Baltimore, D. (1990) Nature 344, 678-682[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
96. Norris, J. L., and Manley, J. L. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 1654-1667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
97. Kraft, A. S., and Anderson, W. B. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 9178-9183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
98. Galvin-Parton, P. A., Watkins, D. C., and Malbon, C. C. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17771-17779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
99. Khuri, F. R., Cho, Y., and Talmage, D. A. (1996) Cell. Growth Differ. 7, 595-602[Abstract]
100. Buchner, K. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 211-221[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
101. Jans, D. A., and Heubner, S. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 651-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
102. Jans, D. A., and Hassan, G. (1998) BioEssays 20, 400-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
103. Murakami, A., Grinberg, D., Thurlow, J., and Dickson, C. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5351-5359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
104. Rickles, R. J., Darrow, A. L., and Strickland, S. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1691-1704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
105. Kelly, D., Kim, S. J., and Rizzino, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21115-21124[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Corre, A. Primot, Y. Baron, J. Le Seyec, C. Goding, and M.-D. Galibert
Target Gene Specificity of USF-1 Is Directed via p38-mediated Phosphorylation-dependent Acetylation
J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 2009; 284(28): 18851 - 18862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. P. Gaide Chevronnay, P. B. Cornet, D. Delvaux, P. Lemoine, P. J. Courtoy, P. Henriet, and E. Marbaix
Opposite Regulation of Transforming Growth Factors-{beta}2 and -{beta}3 Expression in the Human Endometrium
Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1015 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Iwasaki, K. Hailemariam, and Y. Tsuji
PIAS3 Interacts with ATF1 and Regulates the Human Ferritin H Gene through an Antioxidant-responsive Element
J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22335 - 22343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. A. Fraser, M. Arora, S. S. Bohlson, E. Lozano, and A. J. Tenner
Generation of Inhibitory NF{kappa}B Complexes and Phosphorylated cAMP Response Element-binding Protein Correlates with the Anti-inflammatory Activity of Complement Protein C1q in Human Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7360 - 7367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
Y. Zhu, M. Casado, S. Vaulont, and K. Sharma
Role of Upstream Stimulatory Factors in Regulation of Renal Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1
Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 54(7): 1976 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. L. Steiger, S. Bandyopadhyay, D. H. Farb, and S. J. Russek
cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Activating Transcription Factor-4, and Upstream Stimulatory Factor Differentially Control Hippocampal GABABR1a and GABABR1b Subunit Gene Expression through Alternative Promoters
J. Neurosci., July 7, 2004; 24(27): 6115 - 6126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
X. Gueripel, M. Benahmed, and A. Gougeon
Sequential Gonadotropin Treatment of Immature Mice Leads to Amplification of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Action, Via Upregulation of Receptor-Type 1, Smad 2 and 4, and Downregulation of Smad 6
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 640 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sayasith, N. Bouchard, M. Sawadogo, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization and Role of Bovine Upstream Stimulatory Factor 1 and 2 in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6327 - 6336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. G. Chen, A. E. West, X. Tao, G. Corfas, M. N. Szentirmay, M. Sawadogo, C. Vinson, and M. E. Greenberg
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Are Mediators of Ca2+-Responsive Transcription in Neurons
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2572 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Pastier, J.-M. Lacorte, J. Chambaz, P. Cardot, and A. Ribeiro
Two Initiator-like Elements Are Required for the Combined Activation of the Human Apolipoprotein C-III Promoter by Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor-4
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 15199 - 15206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Calomme, T. L.-A. Nguyen, Y. de Launoit, V. Kiermer, L. Droogmans, A. Burny, and C. Van Lint
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Binding to an E Box Motif in the R Region of the Bovine Leukemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat Stimulates Viral Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 8775 - 8789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Pan, T. A. Black, Q. Shi, C. A. Jones, N. Petrovic, J. Loudon, C. Kane, C. D. Sigmund, and K. W. Gross
Critical Roles of a Cyclic AMP Responsive Element and an E-box in Regulation of Mouse Renin Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 45530 - 45538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. Shenkar, H.-K. Yum, J. Arcaroli, J. Kupfner, and E. Abraham
Interactions between CBP, NF-{kappa}B, and CREB in the lungs after hemorrhage and endotoxemia
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): L418 - L426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
G. Li, J. A. Harton, X. Zhu, and J. P.-Y. Ting
Downregulation of CIITA Function by Protein Kinase A (PKA)-Mediated Phosphorylation: Mechanism of Prostaglandin E, Cyclic AMP, and PKA Inhibition of Class II Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in Monocytic Lines
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 4626 - 4635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Fajas, C. Paul, A. Vié, S. Estrach, R. Medema, J. M. Blanchard, C. Sardet, and M.-L. Vignais
Cyclin A Is a Mediator of p120E4F-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest in G1
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2956 - 2966.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley-Kallesen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingsley-Kallesen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzino, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement