![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 48, 34141-34147, November 26, 1999
From the Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Physiology,
University of Connecticut Health Center,
Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3505
The immediate-early gene cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox-2)
is induced in a variety of hyperplastic pathological conditions,
including rheumatoid arthritis and colorectal cancer. Although a causal role for Cox-2 has been proposed, mechanisms by which Cox-2 function contributes to the pathogenesis of hyperplastic disease are not well
defined. We constructed a green fluorescent protein-tagged Cox-2
(Cox-2-GFP) to examine its effects on a variety of cell types upon
overexpression. Subcellular localization and enzymatic and
pharmacological properties of Cox-2-GFP polypeptide were
indistinguishable from those of the wild-type Cox-2 polypeptide.
Overexpression of the Cox-2-GFP or the Cox-2 polypeptide by transient
transfection suppressed the population of cells in the S phase of the
cell cycle, with a concomitant increase in
G0/G1 population. In contrast, transient
overexpression of GFP had no effect on cell cycle distribution, whereas
endoplasmic reticulum-retained GFP (GFP-KDEL) overexpression was
associated with only a minor decrease of cells in S phase. Interestingly, neither NS-398 (a Cox-2-specific inhibitor) nor indomethacin could reverse the effect of Cox-2-GFP overexpression on
cell cycle progression. Furthermore, two mutants of Cox-2, S516Q and
S516M, which lack the cyclooxygenase activity, exhibited the same
effect as Cox-2-GFP. The cell cycle effect of Cox-2-GFP was observed in
ECV-304, NIH 3T3, COS-7, bovine microvascular endothelial cells, and
human embryonic kidney 293 cells. These findings suggest that Cox-2
inhibits cell cycle progression in a variety of cell types by a novel
mechanism that does not require the synthesis of prostaglandins.
Cyclooxygenase is the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of
prostaglandins and thromboxanes, which are involved in numerous physiologic and pathologic processes such as inflammation, pain, angiogenesis, and the regulation of vascular tone. The
Cox1 isoenzymes (the
"constitutive" Cox-1 and the "inducible" Cox-2) have both
overlapping as well as distinct physiologic and pathologic functions
(1, 2). They have similar subcellular localization in the ER and on the
inner and outer membranes of the nuclear envelope (3). The Cox enzymes
catalyze two distinct reactions: 1) the conversion of AA to
PGG2 via the cyclooxygenase activity and 2) the reduction
of PGG2 to PGH2 via the peroxidase activity. PGH2 is converted by distinct isomerases into biologically
active prostaglandins, including PGD2 and PGE2.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin and indomethacin
inhibit the cyclooxygenase activity but not the peroxidase activity (4,
5). Recently developed Cox-2-specific inhibitors such as NS-398,
celecoxib (SC-58635), and rofecoxib likewise inhibit the cyclooxygenase activity of the Cox-2 isoenzyme and thus inhibit prostanoid synthesis (6). Most biologically active prostanoids act on plasma
membrane-localized G-protein-coupled receptors (7). Some prostanoids,
such as 15-deoxy-12,14-PGJ2, act via the nuclear
peroxisomal proliferator activator receptors (8, 9).
Overexpression of Cox-2 is associated with a variety of proliferative
diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, colorectal cancer, and gastric
cancer (1, 2). Cox-2-selective inhibitors may be chemopreventive in
colorectal cancer development (10, 11). Furthermore, gene deletion
studies show that Cox-2 is required for the adenomatosus polyposis coli
model of colorectal cancer development in mice (12). Although these
data strongly suggest a causal role for Cox-2 in proliferative
diseases, relevant molecular mechanisms are not well defined.
Overexpression of Cox-2 in an intestinal epithelial cell line is
associated with inhibition of apoptosis, which may be a potential
mechanism for tumorigenesis (13). Cox-2 overexpression in a colorectal
cancer cell line was also shown to stimulate the production of
angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial cell growth factor
(14). It is generally believed that overexpression of Cox-2 leads to
the secretion of prostanoids and that interaction of these secreted
prostanoids with membrane receptors triggers the proliferative and/or
angiogenic effects (2, 15). However, Cox isoenzymes possess a separate peroxidase activity that can modulate other cellular signaling pathways
such as NF Vascular endothelial cells are critical for the initiation and
maintenance of the angiogenic response, a major process by which new
blood vessels are formed in the adult (19). We originally cloned the
Cox-2 cDNA from human umbilical vein endothelial cells and showed
that Cox-2 expression is induced by various angiogenic factors, such as
fibroblast growth factor-1, the tumor promoter PMA, and the
inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 (2, 20, 21). PMA, which inhibits
growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and promotes
angiogenesis in vitro as well as in vivo, induces an increase in Cox-2 mRNA expression, with minimal change in Cox-1 mRNA levels. Activation of endothelial cell Cox-2 expression
results in the formation of various prostanoids, such as prostacyclin and PGE2, as well as HETEs (22). Thus, Cox-2-derived
prostanoids were thought to mediate endothelial cell functions
including inhibition of thrombosis and regulation of vascular tone and
permeability (23). Indeed, PGE2 induces vascular
endothelial cell growth factor expression and promotes angiogenesis
(24). Overexpression of Cox-2 is associated with chronic inflammatory
diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and solid tumor development (2,
10, 24), both of which are characterized by enhanced angiogenesis.
To study the effects of Cox-2 function, we attempted to derive
endothelial and nonendothelial cells overexpressing Cox-2. Our efforts
were routinely unsuccessful or resulted in clones that transiently
expressed the transgene at low levels (17). Such cells grew at reduced
rates, and loss of transgene expression resulted in growth enhancement.
These anecdotal observations suggested that Cox-2 overexpression may
confer a growth disadvantage. In this report, we studied this
phenomenon in detail using a GFP-tagged Cox-2 chimeric protein.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
ECV-304 cells were obtained
from Dr. Thomas Maciag (Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME). They were
cultured in M199 medium (Cellgro, Mediatech) supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and
antimycotic-antibiotic mixture (Life Technologies, Inc). Bovine
microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Systems) were grown in
fibronectin-coated dishes in M199 supplemented with 20% fetal bovine
serum. NIH 3T3 (ATCC CRL-6361), HEK 293 (ATCC CRL-1573), and COS-7
cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro,
Mediatech) plus 10% fetal bovine serum and antimycotic/antibiotic
mixture. All plasmid-mediated transfections were performed on attached
cells at 30-40% confluence using LipofectAMINE Plus (Life
Technologies, Inc.) or NovaFECTOR (VennNova, Inc.). Indomethacin was
purchased from Sigma, and NS-398 was purchased from Calbiochem.
Cox-2-GFP and Other Constructs--
pcDNA/Neo and
pcDNA/Zeo 3.1 were obtained from Invitrogen. Cox-2, Cox-2-S516Q,
and S516M mutants (25) in pOSML were kind gifts of Drs. David L. DeWitt
and William Smith (Michigan State University). GFP-KDEL cDNA was
generously provided by Dr. Mark Terasaki (UConn Health Center) in pSP64
(26) and subsequently cloned in the pcDNA/Zeo 3.1 expression
vector. 9-N-Desaturase cDNA (27) cloned in pEGFP-N1 was
kindly provided by Dr. Juris Ozols (UConn Health Center). Cox-2-GFP,
S516Q-Cox-2-GFP (S516Q), and S516M-Cox-2-GFP (S516M) constructs were
made by cloning the polymerase chain reaction-amplified GFP open
reading frame (excluding the initiator methionine and the termination
codon) into the BspEI site of the human Cox-2 cDNA
(position 1854 (20)). The insertion did not interrupt the open reading
frame and was in the C-terminal 18-amino acid Cox-2-specific region
(Fig. 1A).
Prostanoid Analysis--
PGE2 release in the culture
medium by cells stimulated for 15 min with 30 µM AA was
used as an indicator of Cox-2 activity. PGE2 was determined
by radioimmunoassay utilizing the method described by Mitchell et
al. (28). Prostaglandin synthesis was also assayed by TLC. Cells
were incubated with 12.5 µM [1-14C]AA
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in serum-free medium. After 15 min at
37 °C, medium was collected and acidified with 1 M HCl, then subjected to lipid extraction with 6 volumes of
chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v) and separation on silica G TLC plates in
the solvent system Iw (ethyl
acetate:isooctane:acetic acid:water, 11:5:2:10) as described (29). TLC
plates were then autoradiographed for 2-4 weeks. All eicosanoid
standards were purchased from Cayman Inc. Radioactive eicosanoid bands
were compared with cold standards visualized by staining with
phosphomolybdic acid.
Protein Extraction and Western Blotting--
Subconfluent cells
were lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM
Na3VO4, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS). Equal amounts of protein (100 µg/lane) were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Protran; Schleicher & Schuell), and immunoblotted with an anti-GFP antibody. ECL detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were used
to visualize immunoblot signals.
Flow Cytometry Cell Cycle Analysis, BrdUrd Incorporation--
48
h after transfection, cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized, fixed
with 70% ethanol, and stored at
Pulse labeling with BrdUrd was conducted in 3-cm glass-bottom dishes
using the Roche Molecular Biochemicals labeling and detection kit, with
the following modifications. BrdUrd concentration was 50 µM, cells were fixed in 70% ethanol in H2O,
the incubation with the primary antibody was increased to 45 min, and
the secondary anti-mouse antibody was conjugated with
tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate. To visualize the nuclei, all
samples were stained for 5 min with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Sigma).
For both green fluorescent and nonfluorescent populations,
BrdUrd-positive cells (red nuclei) were counted and expressed as
percentage of the total corresponding population (blue nuclei).
Cellular and Nuclear Morphology, Immunohistochemistry--
Cells
growing on glass coverslips or in glass-bottom 3-cm dishes were
subjected to transient transfection with different variants of Cox-2
using lipofection reagents. 24-48 h later, cells were washed with PBS
and fixed for 15 min with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS. For
visualization of the nucleus, cells were stained for 5 min with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 in PBS. Immunohistochemistry was carried out as
follows. Cells were permeabilized for 5 min with 0.2% Triton X-100,
washed with PBS, and incubated for 90 min with various primary
antisera. After several washes, the secondary antibody, fluorescein
isothiocyanate- or tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated
antibody was incubated with the sample for 30 min. If necessary,
additional Hoechst 33342 staining was performed. All specimens were
mounted in 80% glycerol and examined/photographed with a
Zeiss-Axiovert 100 fluorescence microscope. All antibodies used for
immunohistochemistry or Western blotting were purchased from Santa Cruz
and Cayman.
Characterization of the Cox-2-GFP Chimeric Polypeptide--
The
Cox-2-GFP chimeric protein was constructed by insertion of the 27-kDa
GFP polypeptide into the C-terminal 18-amino acid insert region of the
Cox-2 polypeptide. This region, known to reside in the lumen of the ER,
is dispensable for Cox-2 enzymatic activity (4, 25). The GFP open
reading frame, excluding the initiator methionine and the termination
codon, was polymerase chain reaction-amplified and cloned into the
BspEI site of the human Cox-2 cDNA (Fig.
1A). We next delineated the
biochemical characteristics and the enzymatic function of the Cox-2-GFP
polypeptide. As shown in Fig. 1B, transfection of Cox-2-GFP
into ECV-304 cells resulted in the production of a band at
approximately 100 kDa, which was detected by the anti-GFP antibody.
COS-7 cells transiently transfected with Cox-2 or Cox-2-GFP yielded
comparable amounts of PGE2; this synthesis was completely
inhibited by NS-398 (Fig. 2A).
These data suggest that the Cox-2-GFP polypeptide is enzymatically active. Incubation of Cox-1, Cox-2, or Cox-2-GFP-transfected ECV-304 cells with [14C]AA led to the release of prostanoids,
which were further analyzed by TLC and autoradiography. As shown in
Fig. 2B, a similar pattern of prostanoids and HETEs was
produced by all three transfections, suggesting that the Cox-2-GFP
polypeptide is capable of coupling to isomerases in a manner similar to
the wild-type protein. As shown previously, the human Cox-2 mRNA is
highly unstable and does not accumulate to high levels in transfected
cells (20). Cox-2-GFP expression level, as determined by enzyme
activity measurements, was slightly higher than the native Cox-2.
Fluorescence microscopic imaging of Cox-2-GFP-transfected cells was
conducted to determine the subcellular localization of the Cox-2-GFP.
As shown in Fig. 2C, the Cox-2-GFP exhibited green fluorescence at the ER and the nuclear membrane, similar to the localization of the wild-type Cox-2 protein. Immunostaining of the Cox-2-GFP-transfected ECV-304 cells with anti-Cox-2 antibody, followed by detection with rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibodies, showed extensive colocalization of the green fluorescence and the Cox-2
epitopes, suggesting that Cox-2 and GFP are stable parts of the same
protein (Fig. 2D). Together, these data establish that the
Cox-2-GFP is functionally indistinguishable from wild-type Cox-2.
Overexpression of Cox-2-GFP Causes G0/G1
Arrest--
Next we determined the effect of Cox-2-GFP overexpression
on cell cycle progression. ECV-304 cells were transiently transfected with the Cox-2-GFP, and cell cycle distribution was analyzed by DNA
staining with PI followed by FACS analysis. We analyzed the cell cycle
characteristics of GFP-positive (Cox-2-GFP expressing; Fig.
3A) as well as GFP-negative
(Cox-2-GFP nonexpressing; Fig. 3B) cells from the same plate
by gating the high and low intensity green fluorescence signal in the
analysis software. Cox-2-GFP expression into ECV-304 cells was
associated with a significant decrease in S phase population (from 50%
to 17%) and a 2-fold increase in G0/G1
population (from 23% to 50%) compared with the nonfluorescent cells
(Fig. 3C). Cell cycle characteristics of GFP-negative cells
are similar to those of untransfected or vector-transfected counterparts.
To assess the specificity of G0/G1 arrest
subsequent to the overexpression of Cox-2-GFP, we conducted several
control experiments. First, we overexpressed the cytosolic GFP and
ER-localized GFP-KDEL proteins in ECV-304 cells (27). As shown in Fig.
3C, GFP expression did not alter cell cycle distribution,
whereas GFP-KDEL caused a minor decrease in S phase, from 55 to 41%.
To determine the fate of cells transfected with Cox-2-GFP, ECV-304
green fluorescent cells were sorted with a FACS StarPlus cell sorter
and maintained in culture for several days. Two distinct phenomena were
observed. Some cells lost their fluorescence (implying a loss of
Cox-2-GFP expression), and many fluorescent cells rounded and died.
After 1 week in culture, less than 1% of the cells maintained their fluorescence. In no case was proliferation of Cox-2-GFP-positive cells
seen, whereas GFP-positive colonies were routinely observed. These data
strongly suggest that Cox-2-GFP overexpression in ECV-304 cells results
in G0/G1 arrest, which leads to cell growth
disadvantage and, ultimately, to cell death.
We also overexpressed Cox-2-GFP in other cell lines such as HEK 293, COS-7, and NIH 3T3 cells. Cox-2-GFP expression caused a variable extent
of growth arrest as indicated by a decrease in the population of cells
in S phase (Fig. 3D). For COS-7 cells, there was a 3-fold
decrease in the percentage of cells in S phase, from 30 to 11%; for
NIH 3T3, from 28 to 16%; and for HEK 293 cells, from 21% to 13%.
Interestingly, HEK 293 and COS-7 cells exhibited a concomitant increase
in the G2/M population. Fluorescence microscopic visualization of Cox-2-GFP-positive cells indicates an increase in
binucleated cells, which appear as a part of the G2/M
population in the FACS analysis. This is further documented in Fig.
4.
To validate the cell cycle data obtained by FACS analysis, we utilized
the BrdUrd incorporation assay to determine the population of cells in
the S phase. Quantitation of BrdUrd incorporation by Cox-2-GFP-positive
and -negative cells is shown in Fig. 3E. Both Cox-2 and
Cox-2-GFP induced a similar degree of S-phase suppression in ECV-304
cells. Bovine microvascular endothelial cells exhibited a similar
behavior with Cox-2-GFP overexpression but not in response to the
overexpression of GFP-tagged 9-N-desaturase (an ER resident enzyme involved in fatty acid metabolism (27)). These data strongly suggest that overexpression of transfected Cox-2 enzyme results in
growth arrest of a variety of cell types.
We also observed that Cox-2-GFP overexpression is associated with
changes in nuclear morphology. Untransfected ECV-304 cells exhibit
primarily round nuclei. Occasionally, mitotic, kidney-shaped, or
apoptotic nuclei are observed. ECV cells transfected with GFP-KDEL have
a similar nuclear morphology (Fig. 4A). In contrast, a large number of Cox-2-GFP positive cells exhibit prominent kidney-shaped, budding, or multilobular nuclei (Table I)
or are binucleated (Fig. 4B). Similar morphological changes
were induced by Cox-2 transfection visualized with anti-Cox-2 antibody
(Fig. 4C). As shown in Table I, 44% of the
Cox-2-GFP-positive cells undergo various degrees and types of nuclear
morphological changes (including specific apoptotic nuclear morphology)
compared with 11% in nonfluorescent cells. Out of the green
fluorescent ECV cells, 12% are binucleated, compared with only 1.5%
in the nonfluorescent cell population. These data suggest that
overexpression of Cox-2-GFP or Cox-2 results in growth arrest as well
as structural changes in the nuclear architecture, most likely due to
defective nuclear envelope breakdown and/or cytokinesis. This may
eventually result in increased cell death, which accompanies Cox-2-GFP
overexpression. Similar to ECV Cox-2-GFP-transfected cells, COS-7 (Fig.
4D) and HEK 293 cells (Fig. 4E) displayed various
changes of nuclear morphology, in particular a very high frequency of
binucleated cells. Such a phenotype is most likely generated by a
defect in cytokinesis. This may explain the increase in
G2/M population (as opposed to G0/G1) for COS-7 and HEK 293 cells transfected
with Cox-2-GFP (Fig. 3D).
A Prostanoid-independent Mechanism Is Involved in
G0-G1 Arrest Caused by Cox-2--
We next
determined whether prostanoid secretion by the Cox-2-GFP-transfected
cells is necessary for the cell cycle arrest caused by Cox-2-GFP. As
shown in Fig. 5A, pretreatment
of Cox-2-GFP-transfected cells with 2 µM indomethacin and
10 µM NS-398 for 48 h did not inhibit cell cycle
arrest. Such treatment resulted in near complete (>95%) inhibition of
prostanoid secretion of the Cox-2-GFP-transfected cells (Fig.
2A and data not shown). To further demonstrate the independence of prostanoid synthesis, we utilized two active-site mutants of Cox-2, initially characterized by Smith and co-workers (4,
25). These mutants, S516Q and S516M, mimic the aspirin-treated Cox-2
and do not produce any PGs (25). However, the S516M mutant possesses a
partial oxidative activity, resulting in the production of
cell-associated 15-(R)-HETE (4, 25). Western blot analysis with anti-GFP antibody on protein extracts from ECV-304 cells transfected with S516Q and S516M yielded an immunoreactive band at the
same molecular weight as Cox-2-GFP (Fig. 5A). TLC analysis of the lipids released into the culture medium confirmed the lack of
cyclooxygenase activity in cells transfected with these two mutants
(Fig. 5B). Since 15-(R)-HETE is poorly secreted,
we could not detect significant increases of the 15-(R)-HETE
band in the medium. However, in some experiments, a radioactive band
consistent with an esterified 15-HETE was observed near the solvent
front (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 5, C and
D, overexpression of S516M and S516Q mutants induced cell
cycle arrest as determined by both FACS analysis and BrdUrd
incorporation. These data unequivocally demonstrate that a
nonprostanoid-dependent function of Cox-2 results in
G0/G1 arrest of transfected cells.
It is well established that the Cox-2 gene is growth factor-,
cytokine-, and tumor promoter-inducible (1, 2). Prostaglandin release
by the Cox isoenzymes is limited by the self-inactivation or suicide
mechanism of irreversible inactivation (1, 2, 4). Therefore, de
novo synthesis of Cox isoenzymes is required to restore the PG
biosynthetic capacity. It is not known whether the sustained presence
of the Cox-2 isoenzyme, which is observed during cytokine stimulation,
is involved in regulation of cell growth. Indeed, treatment of vascular
endothelial cells with the cytokine interleukin-1 or tumor promoter PMA
results in concomitant increase in Cox-2 expression and inhibition of
cell growth (21). Data in this report suggest that sustained
overexpression of Cox-2 induces growth arrest of a variety of
cell types. Interestingly, the ability of Cox-2 to induce growth arrest
is independent of prostanoid secretion. This is consistent with the
fact that interleukin-1 and PMA-induced endothelial cell growth arrest
is not reversed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that block
prostanoid synthesis (Ref. 21, and data not shown). These data
suggest a novel mechanism of Cox-2 function.
It is generally accepted that Cox-2 overexpression and activation of
the relevant phospholipases result in the extracellular secretion of
prostanoids such as PGE2 (1, 2). However, the peroxidase
activity of the Cox-2 isoenzyme may also play a role in signal
transduction; for example, it was shown recently that the
redox-sensitive transcription factor NF We thank Drs. David DeWitt and William Smith
of Michigan State University and Mark Terasaki and Juris Ozols of
University of Connecticut Health Center for their kind gift of
plasmids. We also acknowledge the help of Dr. Juris Ozols for critical
reading of the manuscript and Dr. R. D. Berlin for helpful comments.
*
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health
Grants HL49094 and 54710.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
Cox, cyclooxygenase;
AA, arachidonic acid;
BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
FACS, fluorescent-activated cell sorting;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
HETE, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid;
PG, prostaglandin;
PI, propidium iodide;
PMA phorbol myristic acetate, PBS,
phosphate-buffered saline;
HEK cells, human embryonic kidney
cells.
Overexpression of Cyclooxygenase-2 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest
EVIDENCE FOR A PROSTAGLANDIN-INDEPENDENT MECHANISM*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (16). We recently showed that overexpression of Cox-1
resulted in the tumorigenic transformation of ECV-304 cells, an effect
that was not inhibited by indomethacin (17). Simmons and co-workers
(18) show that the Cox-2 protein binds to an apoptosis- and
autoimmunity-associated protein termed nucleobindin. These results
raise the possibility that the Cox isoenzymes may regulate
intracellular signaling by both PG-dependent and
PG-independent actions.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C. Later cells were stained
for 30 min at room temperature with a 20 µg/ml PI (Sigma) solution in
PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and 0.2 mg/ml DNase-free
RNase A (Sigma). Cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer
(Becton and Dickenson). For each sample, at least 10,000 fluorescent
cells were counted. ECV cells transfected with GFP or GFP-KDEL were
sorted first in a FACS StarPlus cell sorter into green fluorescent and
non-green fluorescent populations. After ethanol fixation, nuclear DNA
was stained with PI, and cells were analyzed by FACS. After gating out
cellular aggregates and debris, cell cycle distribution of fluorescent
or nonfluorescent cells was analyzed using ModFitLT V2.0 software. For
each condition, at least three different experiments were performed.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Cox-2-GFP chimeric protein.
A, Cox-2-GFP was obtained by inserting 720 base pairs
(bp) of the GFP open reading frame (ORF) (from
pEGFP-N1 vector; CLONTECH) into the
BspEI site of Cox-2, near to the 3' end of the open reading
frame. This corresponds to the insertion of 240 amino acids
(aa) from GFP to the C-terminal end of Cox-2 polypeptide
(between amino acids Ser-586 and Gly-587). The salient features of the
Cox-2-GFP polypeptide are indicated (Y = N-linked glycosylation sites). B, ECV-304 cells
were transiently transfected with pOSML vector (Ctrl),
Cox-2-GFP (C2g), and Cox-2 in pOSML expression vector or
pEGFP-N1 plasmid for 14-16 h. 48 h later cell extracts were
prepared and analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-GFP antibody as
described. The predicted molecular mass of the Cox-2-GFP chimeric
protein is 99-101 kDa.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Characterization of Cox-2-GFP.
A, COS-7 cells were transfected with vector
(Ctrl), GFP, Cox-2, or Cox-2-GFP (C2g) for
48 h and incubated for 15 min with 30 µM AA at
37 °C, and PGE2 in the cellular supernatants was
quantified by radioimmunoassay as described. Some cells were pretreated
for 48 h with 25 µM NS-398 before AA administration.
The results represent mean ± S.D. of duplicate determinations
from three independent experiments. B, ECV-304 cells
untransfected or transfected overnight with Cox-1, Cox-2, or Cox-2-GFP
(C2 g) were allowed to express the transgene for 48 h and
incubated for 15 min with 12.5 µM [14C]AA
at 37 °C. Lipids were extracted from cellular supernatants and
further analyzed by TLC and autoradiography. This experiment was
conducted two times with similar results. C, fluorescence
imaging of an ECV-304 cell transfected with Cox-2-GFP. Nuclear DNA was
stained with Hoechst 33342. A composite overlay of green and
blue fluorescence is shown. D, ECV-304 cells were
transfected with Cox-2 cDNA and immunostained with anti-Cox-2
antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary
antibodies, and the pseudocolor image of a fluorescent micrograph is
shown. E, ECV-304 cells transfected with Cox2-GFP were
immunostained with anti-Cox-2 antibody and rhodamine-conjugated
secondary antibodies. The micrograph is an overlay of green
(GFP) and red (rhodamine) fluorescence.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
FACS analysis of the cell cycle.
Transfected cells were fixed with 70% ethanol at
20 °C, stained
for 30 min at room temperature with a PI-Triton-RNase PBS solution, and
analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. A, typical
histogram of PI staining intensity of ECV-304 cells transfected with
Cox-2-GFP after gating only the high intensity green fluorescent cells.
B, the corresponding nonfluorescent population.
C, comparison of cell cycle distribution of
ECV-untransfected (CTRL) and -transfected cells (expressing
(GFP+) or not expressing the transfectant protein
(GFP
)) when transfected with Cox-2-GFP, GFP, and GFP-KDEL.
D, comparison of cell cycle distribution of COS-7, NIH 3T3,
and HEK 293 cells transfected with Cox-2-GFP (C2g).
Statistical significance of the S phase reduction in green florescent
population comparative with nonfluorescent population was calculated
using the paired Student t test. p values are as
follow: COS-7 cells, p < 0.01; NIH 3T3 cells,
p < 0.01; HEK 293 cells, p < 0.05. E, S-phase evaluation by pulse-labeling with BrdUrd. ECV-304
cells were transfected with Cox-2 and Cox-2-GFP (C2g), and
bovine microvascular endothelial cells (BMEC) were
transfected with Cox-2-GFP (C2g) and GFP-tagged
9-N-desaturase. For each experimental condition, transfected
(striped columns) and untransfected cells (solid
columns) were compared for their ability to incorporate BrdUrd as
described. In all experiments except bovine microvascular endothelial
cells transfected with GFP tagged 9-N-desaturase, BrdUrd
incorporation was significantly decreased in green fluorescent
population; p < 0.05. The results are presented as the
mean ± S.D. of 2-6 independent triplicate transfections.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Abnormal nuclear morphology of cells
transiently transfected with Cox-2 or Cox-2-GFP. Cells plated on
glass-bottom 3-cm dishes were 40% confluent when transfected for
14-16 h with GFP, Cox-2, or Cox-2-GFP. After 48 h, cells were
fixed for 20 min with 70% ethanol at
20 °C, then washed with PBS
and stained with Hoechst 33342. A, typical nuclear
morphology of ECV-304 cells transfected with GFP-KDEL. B, a
binucleated cell expressing Cox-2-GFP. C, ECV-304 cells
transfected with Cox-2 after ethanol fixation were permeabilized with
0.2% Triton X-100, stained with anti-Cox-2 monoclonal antibody, and
visualized with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary
antibody. D, multilobular and budding nuclei of COS-7 cells
transfected with Cox-2-GFP. E, binucleated HEK 293 cell
transfected with Cox-2-GFP. For each cell/transfection condition, at
least three independent experiments were performed. Arrows
indicate the Hoechst stained nuclei of Cox-2-GFP-negative or
Cox-2-negative cells.
Nuclear morphology changes induced in ECV-304 cells by transient
transfection
) the green transfectant protein are
shown. Results are presented as mean ± S.D. of three independent
duplicate transfections.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Cell cycle arrest induced by
Cox-2-GFP is PG-independent. A, protein extracts from
ECV-304 cells transfected with GFP, Cox-2, Cox-2-GFP (C2g),
S516Q-Cox-2-GFP (SQ), and S516M-Cox-2-GFP (SM)
were immunoblotted with anti-GFP antibody. The predicted molecular mass
of the Cox-2-GFP chimeric protein is 99-101 kDa. B, after
48 h, ECV-304 cells untransfected or transfected overnight with
Cox-2, Cox-2-GFP (C2g), and S516Q and S516M mutants were
incubated for 15 min with 12.5 µM [14C]AA
at 37 °C. Lipids were then extracted from cellular supernatant
medium and analyzed further by TLC and autoradiography. C,
comparison of cell cycle distribution of ECV cells expressing
(GFP+) or not expressing (GFP
) the transfectant
protein, when transfected with Cox-2-GFP, S516Q, and S516M. In two
experimental groups, cells transfected with Cox-2-GFP were treated for
48 h with 2 µM indomethacin and 10 µM
NS-398 before harvesting for FACS analysis. Statistical significance of
the S-phase reduction and G0-G1 increase in
green florescent population comparative with the nonfluorescent
population was calculated using the paired Student t test.
P values are as follow. In ECV cells transfected with
Cox-2-GFP, for S phase, p < 0.001, and for
G0-G1 phase, p < 0.001. In
indomethacin-treated cells, for S phase, p < 0.01, and
for G0-G1 phase, p < 0.01. In
NS-398-treated cells, for S phase, p < 0.001, and for
G0-G1 increase, p < 0.01. In
S516Q-transfected cells, for S phase p < 0.01, and for
G0-G1 phase, p < 0.001. In
S516M-transfected cells, for S phase, p < 0.001, and
for G0-G1 phase, p < 0.01. D, S-phase evaluation by pulse labeling with BrdUrd. ECV-304
cells were transfected overnight in glass-bottom dishes with Cox-2 and
two Cox-2-GFP mutants, S516Q and S516M. 24 h after transfection,
cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and stained with anti-BrdUrd antibody,
followed by tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary
antibody and Hoechst 33342. For each cellular population
(expressing (striped columns) or not expressing (solid
columns) the green fluorescent transfectant protein), BrdUrd
incorporating red-stained nuclei are expressed as percentage from total
number of nuclei (blue-stained). The reduction in S phase is
statistically significant, with p < 0.05 for all three
experimental condition. All results are presented as mean ± S.D.
of 2-6 independent triplicate transfections.
B is regulated by the
peroxidase activity of the Cox enzyme (16). Thus, such a pathway may be
involved in the growth arrest mechanism. Alternatively, interaction of
Cox-2 polypeptide with cell cycle regulatory proteins in the ER or the
nuclear envelope can result in the modulation of growth arrest. Indeed,
Cox-2 was shown to bind to an apoptosis regulatory protein nucleobindin
(18). Nevertheless, data in this report show unequivocally that Cox-2
overexpression induces G0/G1 growth arrest by
an uncharacterized nonprostanoid-dependent signaling
pathway. Further studies are required to define at a molecular level
this novel mechanism of Cox-2 function and to assess its physiological relevance.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To
whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Vascular Biology,
Dept. of Physiology MC-3505, University of Connecticut Health Center,
263 Farmington Ave., Farmington CT. E-mail: hla@sun.uchc.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dubois, R. N.,
Abramson, S. B.,
Crofford, L.,
Gupta, R. A.,
Simon, L. S.,
Van De Putte, L. B.,
and Lipsky, P. E.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
1063-1073 2.
Hla, T.,
Ristimaki, A.,
Appleby, S.,
and Barriocanal, J. G.
(1993)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
696,
197-204[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Spencer, A. G.,
Woods, J. W.,
Arakawa, T.,
Singer, I. I.,
and Smith, W. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9886-9893 4.
Smith, W. L.,
and DeWitt, D. L.
(1996)
in
Advances in Immunology
(Dixon, F. J., ed), Vol. 62
, pp. 167-215, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
5.
Laneuville, O.,
Breuer, D. K.,
Dewitt, D. L.,
Hla, T.,
Funk, C. D.,
and Smith, W. L.
(1994)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
271,
927-934 6.
Warner, T. D.,
Giuliano, F.,
Vojnovic, I.,
Bukasa, A.,
Mitchell, J. A.,
and Vane, J. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7563-7568 7.
Coleman, R. A.,
Smith, W. L.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1994)
Pharmacol. Rev.
46,
205-229[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Forman, B. M.,
Tontonoz, P.,
Chen, J.,
Brun, R. P.,
Spiegelman, B. M.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
803-812[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Kliewer, S. A.,
Lenhard, J. M.,
Willson, T. M.,
Patel, I.,
Morris, D. C.,
and Lehmann, J. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
813-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Kawamori, T,
Rao, C. V.,
Seibert, K.,
and Reddy, B. S.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
409-412 11.
Sheng, H.,
Shao, J.,
Kirkland, S. C.,
Isakson, P.,
Coffey, R. J.,
Morrow, J.,
Beauchamp, R. D.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
2254-2259[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Oshima, M.,
Dinchuk, J. E.,
Kargman, S. L.,
Oshima, H.,
Hancock, B.,
Kwong, E.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
Evans, J. F.,
and Taketo, M. M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
803-809[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Tsujii, M.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1995)
Cell
83,
493-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Tsujii, M.,
Kawano, S.,
Tsuji, S.,
Sawaoka, H.,
Hori, M.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
705-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Hla, T.,
Bishop-Bailey, D.,
Liu, C. H.,
Schaefer, H.,
and Trifan, O. C.
(1999)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
31,
551-557[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Munroe, D. G.,
Wang, E. Y.,
MacIntyre, J. P.,
Tam, S. S.,
Lee, D. H.,
Taylor, G. R.,
Zhou, L.,
Plante, R. K.,
Kazmi, S. M.,
Bauerle, P. A.,
and Lau, C.
(1995)
J. Inflamm.
45,
260-268[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Narko, K.,
Ristimaki, A.,
MacPhee, M.,
Smith, E.,
Haudenschild, C. C.,
and Hla, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21455-21460 18.
Ballif, B. A.,
Mincek, N. V.,
Barratt, J. T.,
Wilson, M. L.,
and Simmons, D. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5544-5549 19.
Folkman, J.,
and Klagsburn, M.
(1987)
Science
235,
442-447 20.
Hla, T.,
and Neilson, K.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
7384-7388 21.
Ristimaki, A.,
Garfinkel, S.,
Wessendorf, J.,
Maciag, T.,
and Hla, T.
(1994)
J Biol. Chem.
269,
11769-11775 22.
Lopez, S.,
Vila, L.,
Breviario, F.,
and de Castellarnau, C.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1170,
17-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Murohara, T.,
Horowitz, J. R.,
Silver, M.,
Tsurumi, Y.,
Chen, D.,
Sullivan, A.,
and Isner, J. M.
(1998)
Circulation
97,
99-107 24.
Ben-Av, P.,
Crofford, L. J.,
Wilder, R. L.,
and Hla, T.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
372,
83-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Lecomte, M.,
Laneuville, O.,
Ji, C.,
DeWitt, D. L.,
and Smith, W. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13207-13215 26.
Terasaki, M.,
Jaffe, L. A.,
Hunnicutt, G. R.,
and Hammer, J. A., 3rd
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
179,
320-328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Heinemann, F. S.,
and Ozols, J
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3445-3453 28.
Mitchell, J. A.,
Akarasereenont, P.,
Thiemermann, C.,
Flower, R. J.,
and Vane, J. R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11693-11697 29.
Bailey, J. M.,
Muza, B.,
Hla, T.,
and Salata, K.
(1985)
J. Lipid Res.
26,
54-61[Abstract]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Wakimoto, I. Wolf, D. Yin, J. O'Kelly, T. Akagi, L. Abramovitz, K. L. Black, H.-H. Tai, and H. P. Koeffler Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Suppress Glioma via 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 6978 - 6986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Onorato, P. W. Brown, and P. L. Morris Mono-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Increases Spermatocyte Mitochondrial Peroxiredoxin 3 and Cyclooxygenase 2 J Androl, May 1, 2008; 29(3): 293 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boonsoda and P. Wanikiat Possible role of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents Vet Rec., February 2, 2008; 162(5): 159 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ghosh, H. Wang, Y. Ai, E. Romeo, J. P. Luyendyk, J. M. Peters, N. Mackman, S. K. Dey, and T. Hla COX-2 suppresses tissue factor expression via endocannabinoid-directed PPAR{delta} activation J. Exp. Med., September 3, 2007; 204(9): 2053 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xu, S. Choudhary, O. Voznesensky, M. Mehrotra, M. Woodard, M. Hansen, H. Herschman, and C. Pilbeam Overexpression of Cox-2 in Human Osteosarcoma Cells Decreases Proliferation and Increases Apoptosis. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6657 - 6664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. A. Mongini, J. K. Inman, H. Han, R. J. Fattah, S. B. Abramson, and M. Attur APRIL and BAFF Promote Increased Viability of Replicating Human B2 Cells via Mechanism Involving Cyclooxygenase 2. J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6736 - 6751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Wu, J.-Y. Liou, and K. Cieslik Transcriptional Control of COX-2 via C/EBP{beta} Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2005; 25(4): 679 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Gauthier, C. R. Pickering, C. J. Miller, C. A. Fordyce, K. L. Chew, H. K. Berman, and T. D. Tlsty p38 Regulates Cyclooxygenase-2 in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells and Is Activated in Premalignant Tissue Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1792 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Yim, H.-S. Jong, T. Y. Kim, H. H. Choi, S. G. Kim, S. H. Song, J. Kim, S.-G. Ko, J. W. Lee, T.-Y. Kim, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibits Novel Ginseng Metabolite-Mediated Apoptosis Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1952 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Simmons, R. M. Botting, and T. Hla Cyclooxygenase Isozymes: The Biology of Prostaglandin Synthesis and Inhibition Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2004; 56(3): 387 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. McCullough, L. Wu, N. Haughey, X. Liang, T. Hand, Q. Wang, R. M. Breyer, and K. Andreasson Neuroprotective Function of the PGE2 EP2 Receptor in Cerebral Ischemia J. Neurosci., January 7, 2004; 24(1): 257 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Tessner, F. Muhale, S. Schloemann, S. M. Cohn, A. R. Morrison, and W. F. Stenson Ionizing radiation up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 in I407 cells through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Teismann, K. Tieu, D.-K. Choi, D.-C. Wu, A. Naini, S. Hunot, M. Vila, V. Jackson-Lewis, and S. Przedborski Cyclooxygenase-2 is instrumental in Parkinson's disease neurodegeneration PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5473 - 5478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Cesen-Cummings, K. D. Houston, J. A. Copland, V. J. Moorman, C. L. Walker, and B. J. Davis Uterine Leiomyomas Express Myometrial Contractile-Associated Proteins Involved in Pregnancy-Related Hormone Signaling Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2003; 10(1): 11 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chu, F. L. Lloyd, O. C. Trifan, B. Knapp, and M. T. Rizzo Potential Involvement of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Pathway in the Regulation of Tumor-associated Angiogenesis and Growth in Pancreatic Cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2003; 2(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Baek, L. C. Wilson, C.-H. Lee, and T. E. Eling Dual Function of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): Inhibition of Cyclooxygenase and Induction of NSAID-Activated Gene J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 1126 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Bol, R. B. Rowley, C.-P. Ho, B. Pilz, J. Dell, M. Swerdel, K. Kiguchi, S. Muga, R. Klein, and S. M. Fischer Cyclooxygenase-2 Overexpression in the Skin of Transgenic Mice Results in Suppression of Tumor Development Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2516 - 2521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|