JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, K.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, K.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 34765-34772, December 3, 1999


The HIV Nef Protein Alters Ca2+ Signaling in Myelomonocytic Cells through SH3-mediated Protein-Protein Interactions*

Michelangelo FotiDagger , Laetitia Cartier§, Vincent PiguetDagger , Daniel P. Lewparallel , Jean-Louis CarpentierDagger , Didier Trono, and Karl-Heinz Krause§**

From the Departments of Dagger  Morphology,  Genetics and Microbiology, and § Geriatrics and the parallel  Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva Medical School, University of Geneva, CH-1225 Geneva, Switzerland

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human immunodeficiency virus Nef plays an important role in AIDS pathogenesis. In addition to the well known down-regulation of cell surface receptors (CD4, MHCI), Nef is able to alter cellular signaling. Of particular interest for this study is the ability of Nef to bind with a very high affinity to SH3 domains of myelomonocyte-specific protein-tyrosine kinases of the Src family (Src-like PTK). We have therefore investigated Ca2+ signaling in HL60 cells retrovirally transduced with wild type Nef or with a Nef mutant deficient in the SH3-interacting proline-rich motif (Nef(PXXP)4-). In differentiated HL60 cells, Nef markedly altered cellular Ca2+ signaling; the amount of intracellularly stored Ca2+ was increased, and as a consequence, store-operated Ca2+-influx was decreased. This effect was not observed in undifferentiated HL60 cells or in CEM T-lymphocytes and correlated with the differentiation-induced up-regulation of Src-like PTK. The Nef effect on Ca2+ signaling depended entirely on the integrity of its PXXP motif. The Src-like PTK p56/59hck co-immunoprecipitated with both Nef and with the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, providing a possible mechanistic link between the viral protein and intracellular Ca2+ stores of the host cell. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the human immunodeficiency virus 1 Nef protein manipulates intracellular Ca2+ stores through SH3-mediated interactions in myelomonocytic cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Nef is a highly conserved 27-34-kDa myristoylated HIV1 protein that belongs to a set of accessory proteins characteristic of primate lentiviruses. Nef is expressed early in the viral replication cycle (1, 2). Results of studies in rhesus macaques suggest that it is a key factor in the pathogenesis of HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus infection and that it plays a particularly important role for the persistence of infection (3, 4). An important role for Nef in HIV pathogenesis was also suggested by analysis of the HIV genome in long term surviving patients (5, 6).

The down-regulation of immunologically relevant cell surface proteins (CD4 and MHCI) is the best documented biological activity of Nef (7). Several studies indicate that Nef physically connects CD4 with components of the trafficking machinery, leading to the formation of endocytic structures that trigger the accelerated internalization and lysosomal sorting of CD4 (8-13). In addition, Nef exerts genetically and biochemically distinguishable effects on the biology of the cell and on viral growth (14, 15). Nef enhances virus replication by facilitating the early post-entry steps of infection, indirectly promoting the efficiency of reverse transcription (16). Nef also perturbs cellular activation pathways both in lymphoid and nonlymphocytic cells (17-20). The mechanisms and significance of these latter effects are poorly understood. The identification of cellular proteins interacting with Nef both in vitro and in vivo have strengthened the concept that Nef acts as a modulator of intracellular activation pathways. Indeed, tyrosine and serine/threonine protein kinases have been reported to interact with Nef (21). In particular, studies in vitro with recombinant proteins and crystal structure determinations have shown that the core region of Nef, via a proline-rich motif, binds with a high affinity to the SH3 domains of Src-like protein-tyrosine kinases (Src-like PTKs) (14, 22). Four members of the Src kinases family, p56lck, p56/59hck, p59fyn, and p53/56lyn have been shown to be able to interact physically with Nef (14, 22-25). Interestingly, the affinity of Nef-p56/59hck interaction is the highest known for an SH3-mediated protein-protein binding (23).

The Src family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases consists of nine members (Src, Lck, Hck, Fyn, Fgr, Yes, Blk, Lyn, and Yrk) that share common structures and regulation (26). These kinases are widely expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin, with most cells expressing more than one family member (27). Src-family kinases have been implicated in multiple signaling events including cell growth (28), T cell antigen receptor signaling (29), Fc receptor signaling (30, 31), integrin signaling (32), glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored protein signaling (33), phagocytosis (34), apoptosis (35), and tumor necrosis factor release (36). There is also growing evidence that Src-like tyrosine kinases are implicated in the control of cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration (37-42). In these studies, we used HL60 cells as a cellular model to investigate a possible effect of Nef on Ca2+-associated signal transduction pathways in myelomonocytic cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Thapsigargin (Tg), ionomycin, 1,25(OH)2D3, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), and Me2SO were purchased from Sigma, fetal calf serum and geneticin disulfate (G418) were from Life Technologies, Inc., fura-2/AM was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), Complement C tablets (mixture of protease inhibitors) was rom Roche Molecular Biochemicals. All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Calbiochem, Sigma, Merck, and Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). The Ca2+-free medium contained 143 mM NaCl, 6 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM EGTA, 5.6 mM glucose (0.1%), 20 mM Hepes; 0.1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4. The Ca2+ medium had the same ionic composition but was supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2.

Cell Culture and HL60 Cell Differentiation-- The promyelocytic HL60 cell line stably expressing either Nef, Nef(PXXP)4-, or the empty vector was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and selected in the presence of 1 mg/ml G418. The CEM cell line expressing Nef was described elsewhere (9). CRE and CRIP cells (43) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum. HL60 differentiation to the granulocyte phenotype was triggered by adding Me2SO (final concentration 1.3% v/v for 3 days and then 0.65% for 2 days) to the culture medium. Differentiation toward the monocyte and macrophage phenotype was obtained by adding, respectively, 100 nM of 1,25(OH)2D3 for 5 days and 20 nM of PMA for 2 days to the culture medium (44-49). Nef expression did not affect the general morphology of differentiated cells, and cytofluorimetry analysis of specific cell surface markers such as CD14, CD11b, CD11c, CD18, HLA DR, HLA ABC, the fMet-Leu-Phe (fMLP) receptor, and CD71 confirmed that differentiation to each phenotype was efficient under these conditions (data not shown).

DNA Constructions-- The plasmid pLXSN (CLONTECH, Hampshire, UK) as well as pLNefSN were described elsewhere (9). The construct LNef(PXXP)4-SN was created by ligation of a XhoI-DraIII fragment from pCMX Nef(PXXP)4) (50) into the XhoI-DraIII-cleaved LNefSN plasmid.

HL60 Retroviral Transduction-- HL60 cell lines stably producing the various murine leukemia virus-based retroviral vectors were generated by infecting CRIP cells with the supernatant of transfected CRE cells in the presence of 8 µg/ml polybrene (43). Transduced CRIP clones were selected in the presence of 0.4 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies Inc.). HL60 promyelocytes were infected with the various retroviral expression vectors by cocultivation with CRIP producer cell lines and selected in the presence of 1 mg/ml G418 (9).

Antibodies Used in This Study-- R-phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD4, CD11b, CD11c, and fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD18 were purchased from DAKO (Copenhagen), R-phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against HLA DR and HLA (A, B, and C) were from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA), monoclonal antibodies to CD71 were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, monoclonal antibodies to p56lck and p59fyn were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), monoclonal antibodies to p53/56lyn were from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY), and monoclonal antibodies to CD14 were kindly provided by Dr. J. Pugin (Hópital Cantonal, Geneva). Polyclonal antibodies against p56/59hck were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Polyclonal antibodies against the Ins(1,4,5)P3-receptor type I Rbt04 were kindly provided by Dr. J. Parys (Leuven, Belgium). Polyclonal antibodies against the HIV-1 Nef were as described previously (50). Anti-mouse/rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and anti-mouse/rabbit fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate-conjugated IgG was from DAKO (Copenhagen).

Flow Cytometry Analysis-- Flow cytometry was performed on a Becton Dickinson FACScalibur. Labeling was performed by incubating cells with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 2 h in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5% bovine serum albumin at 4 °C. Next cells were washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline and immediately analyzed on the flow cytometer. For fluorochrome-unconjugated antibodies, a second incubation with fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies was performed 1 h at 4 °C in phosphate-buffered saline, bovine serum albumin 0.5%. Time course of antibody binding showed that equilibrium was reached for all antibodies after 90 min at 4 °C, and binding was saturating at the concentration used (data not shown). Specificity of the binding was assessed by incubating the cells with a 10-fold excess of nonspecific immunoglobulins before the specific antibody (data not shown).

Measurements of Intracellular Free Ca2+ Concentrations-- [Ca2+]c was measured with the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator fura-2. Cells (2 × 107/ml) suspended in Ca2+ medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin were loaded for 45 min at 37 °C with 2 µM fura-2/AM, then diluted to 107/ml and kept on ice. Just before use, a sample of loaded cells (5×106/ml) was centrifuged and resuspended in the desired medium at 37 °C. Fluorescence measurements were performed on a Perkin-Elmer fluorometer (LS3, Perkin-Elmer) thermostated at 37 °C. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 340 and 505 nm, respectively. Calibration was performed for each cuvette by the sequential addition of 4-5 mM Ca2+ (to reach a 5 mM final Ca2+ concentration), 2 µM ionomycin to measure Ca2+-saturated fura-2 (Fmax), followed by 24 mM EGTA, 60 mM Tris, pH 9.3, and 0.1% Triton X-100 (TX-100) to measure Ca2+-free fura-2 (Fmin). Results are expressed as concentration (nm) of intracellular free Ca2+.

Protein Analysis-- For quantitative protein detection, cells were lysed in TX-100 1% buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% sucrose, 1% TX-100 and a mixture of protease inhibitors) or alternatively in radioimmune precipitation buffer (9.1 mM dibasic sodium phosphate, 1.7 mM monobasic sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and a mixture of protease inhibitors) for 20 min on ice. Cell lysates were next centrifuged 20 min at 4 °C 1200 × g to discard aggregates, and protein concentrations were determined using the BCA assay from Pierce. The proteins were then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred on nitrocellulose membranes. Western blot analysis was performed using the ECL kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

For immunoprecipitations, cells were solubilized 20 min on ice with either solubilization buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4, 1% TX-100, 10 mM orthovanadate, and a mixture of protease inhibitors) or alternatively with radioimmune precipitation buffer (9.1 mM dibasic sodium phosphate, 1.7 mM monobasic sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM orthovanadate and a mixture of protease inhibitors). After a brief sonication, 400-500 µg of protein were adjusted to the same volume (800 µl) and precleared for 1 h with 3 mg/ml protein A-Sepharose. The beads were discarded by centrifugation, and 1.5 µg of anti-p56/59hck antibodies were added to each sample overnight at 4 °C with gentle mixing. The immune complexes were then precipitated by adding 3 mg/ml protein A-Sepharose. The beads were washed three times with the corresponding solubilization buffer and boiled 5 min. The immunoprecipitates were finally separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred on nitrocellulose membranes. Western blot analysis was performed using the ECL kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Myelomonocytic cells (especially macrophages) are important targets of HIV. It therefore seems very relevant that the HIV Nef protein interacts with a high affinity with Src-like PTKs of myelomonocytic cells. However, the effects of Nef in these cells have so far not been examined. We therefore decided to use HL60 cells as a myelomonocytic cell model to investigate this question. Indeed, HL60 cells cannot only be used in their undifferentiated form as promyelocytes but can also be induced to differentiate major subtypes of myelomonocytic cells (44, 45). Differentiation with Me2SO, 1,25(OH)2D3, and PMA will lead to a granulocyte (46), monocyte (47, 48), and macrophage phenotype (49), respectively. Retroviral transduction was used to generate HL60 cell lines stably expressing the wild type form of HIV1 Nef (Nef) or a mutated Nef protein (Nef(PXXP)4-), where prolines 69, 72, 75, and 78 were replaced by alanines. Previous in vitro studies have shown that, although Nef interacts with high affinity with four members of the Src-like PTK family (Lck, Fyn, Hck, and Lyn), no such interactions are observed for the Nef(PXXP)4-) mutant (14, 22-25).

Nef Expression in HL60 Cell Lines-- As assessed by Western blot analysis, Nef and (Nef(PXXP)4-) were expressed to significant levels both in undifferentiated promyelocytes and differentiated cells (Fig. 1A). To verify whether the expressed Nef wild type and PXXP mutant were functional, we investigated the down-regulation of CD4 cell surface expression by cytofluorimetry. Indeed, it has been shown previously that the PXXP motif of Nef is not crucial for CD4 down-regulation (14, 15). As shown in Fig. 1B, CD4 surface expression was efficiently down-regulated by Nef in undifferentiated and differentiated HL60 cells showing that Nef was functional in this cellular background. The Nef(PXXP)4-) mutant was also able to down-regulate CD4, but, as described previously in other cells (14, 50), somewhat less efficiently than the wild type form. Thus, the expressed Nef and Nef(PXXP)4) are functional with respect to CD4 down-regulation.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Nef expression and Nef-induced CD4 down-regulation in HL60 cells. HL60 promyelocytes stably transfected with Nef (LNefSN), the Nef(PXXP)4- mutant (LNef(PXXP)4-SN), or an empty vector as control (LXSN) were induced to differentiate toward various phenotypes by the addition of the appropriate inducer to the culture medium. A, Western blot analysis showing either the wild type form of Nef or the Nef(PXXP)4 mutant expression in HL60 cells. B, cytofluorimetric analysis showing down-regulation of CD4 cell surface expression in nef-expressing HL60 cells. DMSO, Me2SO.

Nef Decreases Agonist-induced Ca2+ Influx through an Increase in Stored Ca2+-- The cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration, [Ca2+]c, is a crucial intracellular signaling mediator in myelomonocytic cells (51, 52). In response to specific agonists, [Ca2+]c elevations occur in two different steps. First, Ca2+ is released from intracellular stores in response to the generation of inositol phosphate (=Ca2+ release). Second, the emptying of intracellular stores activates, by a yet unknown mechanism, Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane (=Ca2+ influx). To investigate a potential effect of Nef on agonist-induced [Ca2+]c elevations, fura-2-loaded HL60 cells were stimulated with the bacterial peptide fMLP. To separate the initial Ca2+ release phase from the subsequent Ca2+ influx phase, the following protocol was used. Cells were kept in a Ca2+-free medium. Under these conditions, the [Ca2+]c increase in response to fMLP stimulation was used as a measure for Ca2+ release. Subsequently, Ca2+ was added to the extracellular medium, and the resultant [Ca2+]c elevation was used as a measure of Ca2+ influx (Fig. 2). In control cells, basal [Ca2+]c was around 70-80 nM. Ca2+ elevations due to Ca2+ release in response to 100 nM fMLP were 250-350 nM. Ca2+ influx, induced by Ca2+ readdition, raised [Ca2+]c to 300-400 nM (Fig. 2B). Wild type Nef expression affected neither basal [Ca2+]c nor Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. By contrast, Ca2+ influx was decreased by approximately 50% in the presence of the viral protein (Fig. 2B). The Nef inhibition of Ca2+ influx was also present when the lag time between fMLP addition and Ca2+ readdition was reduced to 1 min, suggesting that activation of Ca2+ channels is decreased by Nef already in the early phase of fMLP stimulation (not shown).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Nef inhibits the agonist-induced store-operated Ca2+ influx and increases Ca2+ store content. Control and nef-expressing cells were differentiated by Me2SO. [Ca2+]c was monitored in fura-2-loaded cells. A, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after stimulation in Ca2+-free medium by 100 nM fMLP followed by the readdition of 1 mM extracellular Ca2+after 5 min. B, [Ca2+]c values immediately before (Basal), 30 s after fMLP addition (fMLP-induced release), and 30 s after Ca2+ readdition (Ca2+ influx). C, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after stimulation in Ca2+-free medium by 100 nM fMLP followed by 1 µM ionomycin after 5 min. D, [Ca2+]c values immediately before (Basal), 30 s after fMLP addition (fMLP-induced release), and 30 s after ionomycin addition (ionomycin-induced Ca2+ release). Data are means ± S.E. of 3-11 independent experiments.

Since in myelomonocytic cells agonist-induced Ca2+ influx is regulated by the filling state of intracellular Ca2+ stores (53, 54), the decrease in agonist-induced Ca2+ influx in Nef-transfected cells might be due to an increase in residual Ca2+ store content after stimulation. To test this hypothesis, we performed experiments essentially similar to the Ca2+ influx protocol described above. However, instead of adding back Ca2+ in the medium to measure Ca2+ influx, the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin was added to assess the amount of residual Ca2+ store content. Ionomycin-releasable Ca2+ from internal stores was approximately double in wild type nef-expressing cells as compared with control cells (Fig. 2, C and D). This would be compatible with the concept that an increased Ca2+ store content accounts for the decreased Ca2+ influx in Nef-transfected cells.

Thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the Ca2+ pumps of agonist-sensitive Ca2+ stores, is able to induce a depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores and a subsequent store-operated Ca2+ influx independently from receptor activation and Ins(1,4,5)P3 production. We therefore studied thapsigargin-induced [Ca2+]c changes using protocols similar to those described above for fMLP. In contrast to fMLP, thapsigargin induced an equivalent Ca2+ influx in nef-expressing and in control cells (Fig. 3, A and B). The absence of inhibition of thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ influx by Nef might have two possible explanations. (i) Either the presence of a receptor agonist (i.e. fMLP) is necessary to unravel the inhibitory effect of Nef on Ca2+ influx, or (ii) after efficient depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores by thapsigargin, a normal activation of store-operated Ca2+ influx occurs. When fMLP was coapplied with thapsigargin, no inhibition was observed (Fig. 3, C and D), excluding the former possibility. Instead, thapsigargin efficiently depleted intracellular Ca2+ stores both in nef-expressing and in control cells (Fig. 3, E and F), demonstrating that after efficient inhibition of the Ca2+-ATPase, (i) the Ca2+ store contents are down to similarly low levels in both nef-expressing and control cells, and (ii) normal size Ca2+ influx occurs.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   After efficient depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores by thapsigargin, normal Ca2+ influx occurs in Nef-transfected cells. Control and nef-expressing cells were differentiated by Me2SO, and [Ca2+]c was monitored in fura-2-loaded cells. A, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after the addition of 50 nM Tg in Ca2+-free medium followed by the readdition of 1 mM extracellular Ca2+after 5 min. B, [Ca2+]c values immediately before (Basal), 30 s after Tg addition (Tg-induced release), and 30 s after Ca2+ readdition (Ca2+ influx). C, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after the concomitant addition of 50 nM Tg and 100 nM fMLP in Ca2+-free medium followed by the readdition of 1 mM extracellular Ca2+after 5 min. D, [Ca2+]c values immediately before (Basal), 30 s after Tg plus fMLP addition (fMLP+Tg-induced release), and 30 s after Ca2+ readdition (Ca2+ influx). E, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after the addition of 50 nM Tg in Ca2+ free medium followed by 1 µM ionomycin after 5 min. F, [Ca2+]c values immediately before (Basal), 5 min after Tg addition (Tg-induced release), and 30 s after ionomycin addition (ionomycin-induced release). Data are means ± S.E. of 3-7 independent experiments.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that, after agonist stimulation, an abnormally high residual Ca2+ store content prevents the normal activation of store-operated Ca2+ influx in nef-expressing cells. The normal activation of Ca2+ influx by thapsigargin excludes the possibility that Nef directly blocks store-operated Ca2+ channels. The residual Ca2+ after agonist stimulation is unlikely to be due to an inhibition of agonist-induced signaling to Ca2+ stores, as the amplitude of fMLP-induced Ca2+ release was identical in nef-expressing and in control cells. Thus, we considered the possibility that the Ca2+ content of intracellular stores is constitutively increased in nef-expressing cells. To test this hypothesis, we directly added the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin to cells kept in a Ca2+-free medium without any prestimulation. As shown in Fig. 4A, nef-expressing cells had indeed a markedly increased ionomycin-releasable Ca2+ pool. Thus, we conclude that Nef is able to constitutively increase cellular Ca2+ store content in differentiated HL60 cells.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Nef-increased Ca2+ store content is a requirement for HL60 cell differentiation. Ionomycin-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores was measured in various fura-2-loaded cells stably transfected either with nef or control vector (undifferentiated HL60 cells, differentiated HL60 cells, and in the CEM T cells). A, typical traces showing [Ca2+]c elevations after the addition of 1 µM ionomycin in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ in both control and nef-expressing HL60 cells differentiated by Me2SO. B, effect of Nef on [Ca2+]c release 30 s after ionomycin addition in undifferentiated HL60, Me2SO/1,25(OH)2D3/PMA-differentiated HL60, and CEM T lymphocytes. Experiments were performed in the absence of extracellular Ca2+. Ionomycin-released [Ca2+]c value for cells expressing an empty vector (control) were 316 ± 65, 520 ± 19, 255 ± 33, 131 ± 13, and 272 ± 36 nM for undifferentiated HL60, Me2SO-differentiated HL60, 1,25(OH)2D3 -differentiated HL60, PMA-differentiated HL60, and CEM T cells, respectively. Data are means ± S.E. of 3-10 independent experiments.

The Nef-induced Increase in Cellular Ca2+ Store Content Requires Factors Expressed upon Differentiation of Myelomonocytic Cells-- To investigate the mechanisms underlying the Nef-induced increase in cellular Ca2+ content, we analyzed the Nef effect in undifferentiated HL60 cells, in three different types of differentiated HL60 cells, and in CEM T-lymphocytes. As shown in Fig. 4B, an increase of Ca2+ content ranging from 30 to 60% was observed in all types of differentiated HL60 cells, i.e. HL60 granulocytes (Me2SO), HL60 monocytes (1,25(OH)2D3), and HL60 macrophages (PMA). In contrast, in undifferentiated HL60 promyelocytes and in CEM lymphocytes, no increase in Ca2+ store content was observed.

Thus Nef appears to require the presence of differentiation-induced cofactors not present in T-lymphocytes to exert its action on intracellular Ca2+ stores. Importantly, the two myelomonocytic cell types, which are thought to be relevant for HIV infection, namely monocytes and macrophages, clearly are sensitive to the Nef effect on Ca2+ store content.

SH3-mediated Protein-Protein Interactions via the PXXP Motif in the Nef Core Is Required for the Nef Effect on Ca2+ Stores-- Myelomonocyte-specific Src-like PTKs would be good candidates as differentiation-induced cofactors that mediate the Nef effect on Ca2+ signaling. Nef binds to four members of this PTK family (p56lck, p56/59hck, p59fyn, and p53/56lyn (14, 22-25) with a high affinity via interactions between a proline-rich motif in the Nef core and SH3 domains of Src-like PTKs. The mutation of the Nef proline motifs prevents the binding of Nef to Src-like PTKs and their subsequent activation but does not abolish other Nef effects such as cell surface CD4 down-regulation (Fig. 1B). We therefore studied Ca2+ signaling in HL60 cells expressing a proline mutant of Nef (Nef(PXXP)4). As shown above, this mutant was well expressed and functional with respect to CD4 down-regulation (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 5, cells expressing the Nef(PXXP)4 mutant behaved like control cells. (i) fMLP-induced Ca2+ influx was not diminished (Fig. 5A), and ii) the amount of ionomycin-releasable Ca2+ was not increased either in unstimulated cells or after fMLP stimulation (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutation of a proline motif in the Nef core abolished the Nef-mediated increase of intracellular Ca2+ store content and the subsequent inhibition of agonist-induced store-operated Ca2+ influx. [Ca2+]c elevations after various stimulation protocols were measured in Me2SO-differentiated HL60 cells expressing either the wild type form of Nef or the Nef(PXXP)4- mutant. A, effect of Nef and Nef(PXXP)4 expression on the agonist-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores and the subsequent store-operated Ca2+ influx. In control cells, 277 ± 43 nM of Ca2+ were released by 100 nM fMLP from internal stores, and the [Ca2+]c elevation subsequent to Ca2+ influx was of 333 ± 62 nM. Data are mean ± S.E. of 3-5 independent experiments. B, effect of Nef or Nef(PXXP)4- expression on the ionomycin-releasable intracellular Ca2+ with or without a prior stimulation by 100 nM fMLP. In control cells, 520 ± 19 nM of Ca2+ were released by ionomycin in unstimulated cells; 5 min after fMLP addition, 157 ± 27 nM of Ca2+ were released by ionomycin. Data are means ± S.E. of 5-10 independent experiments.

Up-regulation of Src-like PTKs during of Myelomonocytic Differentiation-- Among the four Src-like PTKs able to interact with Nef, p56/59hck, p53/56lyn, and p56lck are restricted in their expression to cells of the hematopoietic lineage; p56/59hck expression is restricted to myelomonocytic cells (55), whereas p53/56lyn is found either in myelomonocytic or in B-lymphocytic cells (56), and p56lck is specifically expressed in lymphocyte. By contrast p59fyn is more ubiquitously expressed. We thus investigated the expression of these four Src-like PTKs under our conditions of HL60 cell differentiation by Western blots analysis of total cell extracts. We did not detect p56lck and p59fyn in undifferentiated or differentiated HL60 cells (data not shown). By contrast p56/59hck and p53/56lyn were detected to varying amounts in HL60 cells depending upon the differentiation type (Fig. 6). p56/59hck and p53/56lyn were not expressed to detectable levels in CEM T cells (data not shown). The p56/59hck- and p53/56lyn-associated signals were further quantitated by densitometry in wild type and nef- or nef(PXXP)4- -expressing HL60 cells (Fig. 6, B and C). In undifferentiated HL60 cells, only a very weak p56/59hck-associated signal was detected. However, upon differentiation, the p56/59hck signal strongly increased, reaching the highest level in Me2SO-differentiated cells. By contrast, the p53/56lyn-associated signal was already relatively high in undifferentiated cells and showed only relatively small increases with differentiation as previously reported by others (57).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   p56/59hck and p53/56lyn expression in HL60 cells. Expression of p56/59hck and p53/56lyn tyrosine kinases was investigated by quantitative Western blot analysis of lysates from HL60 cells differentiated toward each phenotype. A, typical Western blot revealing the expression of p56/59hck and p53/56lyn in undifferentiated and Me2SO (DMSO)-differentiated HL60 cells expressing either an empty vector (control), the wild type form of Nef, or the Nef(PXXP)4 mutant. B, relative increase of p56/59hck expression with cell differentiation as compared with undifferentiated HL60 cells. Data are means ± S.E. of 4-7 independent experiments. C, relative increase of p53/56lyn expression with cell differentiation as compared with undifferentiated HL60 cells. Data are means ± S.E. of 3-6 independent experiments.

Note that, although the expression of Src-like PTKs was clearly differentiation-dependent, it was not influenced by the expression of Nef or the Nef mutant. Thus, although Nef might possibly modulate activity or cellular localization of Src-like PTKs, it does not influence protein levels of these kinases.

P56/59hck Interacts in Vivo with Nef and the Ins(1,4,5) Receptor-- Interactions of HIV1 Nef and Src-like PTKs have been clearly demonstrated in vitro (14). In vivo Nef-p56/59hck interaction has been observed only in reconstituted cell systems overexpressing both Nef and p56/59hck (58). The results presented so far would be compatible with a mediation of the Nef effect on Ca2+ signaling by p56/59hck and p53/56lyn. To study whether Nef is indeed able to interact with these Src-like PTKs in myelomonocytic cells, we immunoprecipitated p56/59hck and p53/56lyn and then examined the immunocomplexes by blotting with Nef-specific antibodies. We first performed immunoprecipitations with lysates from differentiated HL60 cells using anti p56/59hck antibodies. Coimmunoprecipitation of Nef was observed with cells expressing wild type Nef but not the Nef(PXXP)4 mutant (Fig. 7). Using anti-p53/56lyn antibodies, we were unable to detect any Nef-associated signal in the immunoprecipitates (data not shown). Thus, Nef clearly interacts with p56/59hck through its proline-rich motifs. The negative results concerning p53/56lyn should be taken with caution. They might suggest that Nef does not interact in vivo with p53/56lyn. Alternatively however, the interaction between Nef and p53/56lyn might be of too low affinity to be detected by immunoprecipitation, or the antibody used could have disrupted the interaction.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Src-like PTK p56/59hck interacts in vivo with Nef and the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. p56/59hck was immunoprecipitated from Me2SO (DMSO)-differentiated HL60 cells, and Western blot analysis of the immune complexes were performed. Upper lane, Western blot analysis with antibodies specific for the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor. Middle lane, Western blot analysis with antibodies specific for p56/59hck. Lower lane, Western blot analysis with antibodies specific for Nef. The result is representative of three independent experiments.

Previous studies in lymphocytes have implicated nonreceptor tyrosine kinases in the control of Ca2+ store regulation. More specifically, the Src-like PTK p59fyn regulates the activity of the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor in lymphocytes through direct interaction with this Ca2+ release channel (42). We could not detect p59fyn in HL60 cells (not shown). It is, however, conceivable that myelomonocyte-specific Src-like PTKs play a role in the regulation of Ca2+ store function. We therefore examined whether p56/59hck is able to interact with the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor in HL60 cells. As shown in Fig. 7, the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor coimmunoprecipitated with p56/59hck. This observation provides a possible link between the known regulation of Src-like PTKs activity by Nef and the SH3-dependent regulation of myeloid cell Ca2+ signaling demonstrated in our study. Note, however, that the amounts of Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor, which coimmunoprecipitated with p56/59hck, were comparable in control and nef-transfected cells. This would be compatible with a concept where Nef regulates in a qualitative, rather than a quantitative manner, the association between p56/59hck and the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study we show a novel mechanism whereby the HIV Nef protein manipulates cellular signaling; Nef expression in myelomonocytic cells leads to an increased Ca2+ content of intracellular stores. The Nef PXXP motif was crucial for the observed effect. This suggests that proteins bearing SH3 domains are able to interact with Nef, such as Src-like PTKs, might act downstream to Nef to alter the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ signaling pathways.

What Are the Downstream Mediators of the Nef Effect on Ca2+ Signaling in Myelomonocytic Cells?-- Our results allowed assembly of the following information concerning elements downstream of Nef involved in the increase in Ca2+ store content.

The absence of the Nef effect in lymphocytes and undifferentiated HL60 cells suggests that factors induced by myelomonocytic differentiation are involved in the mediation of this effect.

The absolute requirement for the proline-rich regions of Nef suggests the involvement of SH3 domain-containing proteins, in particular Src-like PTKs.

The coimmunoprecipitation of Nef and the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor with p56/59hck makes the latter Src-like PTK a particularly attractive candidate.

Thus, our results are compatible with the following scheme. Nef interacts with Src-like PTKs (in particular p56/59hck), which in turn interact with elements of intracellular Ca2+ stores (in particular the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor). Further experiments will however be necessary to definitively prove this hypothesis.

Possible Molecular Mechanisms of the Nef-induced Increase in Ca2+ Storage-- The amount of Ca2+ stored within intracellular Ca2+ stores is essentially a function of two parameters, the activity of Ca2+ uptake and the permeability of the Ca2+ store membrane. Thus, either an increased Ca2+-ATPase activity or a decreased Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor activity are the most likely mechanisms accounting for the increase Ca2+ storage observed in nef-expressing cells. The observation that p56/59hck is not only coimmunoprecipitating with Nef but also with the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor together with the known regulation of the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor by Src-like PTKs in lymphocytes suggest the latter possibility. However, a modulation of the Ca2+-ATPase activity and thereby of the Ca2+ uptake mechanisms of intracellular stores is an attractive alternative or additional hypothesis to explain the Nef effect. Note that Nef has also been shown to interact with a cellular H+-ATPase (59).

Potential Physiological Role of Increased Ca2+ Storage-- What could be the potential physiological role of the observed increase in intracellular Ca2+ storage? A most obvious explanation might be to allow cells to release increased amounts of Ca2+ during stimulation, although we could not observe such an effect in nef-expressing cells. Indeed, after fMLP stimulation, an increased residual Ca2+ store content rather than an increased Ca2+ release, was observed. Thus, the relevant effect of the Nef-induced Ca2+ increase should reside within other cellular events, which are controlled by the content of Ca2+ stores. Indeed, there is a decrease in store-operated Ca2+ influx in response to receptor activation in nef-expressing cells. As Ca2+ influx is involved in a variety of crucial cellular functions, a decreased Ca2+ influx might be a pathophysiologically relevant Nef effect. In addition, Nef could alter other cellular functions independent of an extracellular Ca2+ influx but which may be regulated by the Ca2+ content of the endoplasmic reticulum. Indeed, the Ca2+ content of the endoplasmic reticulum plays an important role in protein synthesis (60, 61), regulation of apoptosis (62, 63), gene expression (64), and regulation of the nuclear pore activity (65). Future studies will have to address the question of how the Nef-induced increase in intracellular Ca2+ storage and the subsequent potential effects relate to the specific properties of HIV infection in myelomonocytic cells.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank A. Monod for her helpful and excellent technical support and Dr. W. Kelley for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (FNRS) Grants 3139 055226.98 (to D. P. L.) and 31.50560.37 (to D. T.), by National Institutes of Health Grant R37 AI34306 (to D. T.), and by a professorship from the Giorgi-Cavalieri Foundation (to D. T.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biology of Aging Laboratory, Dept. of Geriatrics, 2, Chemin Petit Bel-Air, CH-1225 Chêne-Bourg/Genève, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-22-3055451 or 41-22-3056521; Fax: 41-22-3055455 or 41-22-3056611; E-mail: kkrause@cmu.unige.ch.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HLA, human major histocompatibility; Src-like PTK, Src family protein-tyrosine kinase; TG, thapsigargin; 1, 25(OH)2D, 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; fMLP, fMet-Leu-Phe.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kim, S. Y., Byrn, R., Groopman, J., and Baltimore, D. (1989) J. Virol. 63, 3708-3713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Klotman, M. E., Kim, S. Y., Buchbinder, A., DeRossi, A., Baltimore, D., and Wong Staal, F. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 5011-5015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kestler, H. W., Ringler, D. J., Mori, K., Panicali, D. L., Sehgal, P. K., Daniel, M. D., and Desrosiers, R. C. (1991) Cell 65, 651-662[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Harris, M. (1996) J. Gen. Virol. 77, 2379-2392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Salvi, R., Garbuglia, A. R., Di Caro, A., Pulciani, S., Montella, F., and Benedetto, A. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 3646-3657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Mariani, R., Kirchhoff, F., Greenough, T. C., Sullivan, J. L., Desrosiers, R. C., and Skowronski, J. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 7752-7764[Abstract]
7. Oldridge, J., and Marsh, M. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 302-305[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Rhee, S. S., and Marsh, J. W. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 5156-5163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Aiken, C., Konner, J., Landau, N. R., Lenburg, M. E., and Trono, D. (1994) Cell 76, 853-864[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Mangasarian, A., Foti, M., Aiken, C., Chin, D., Carpentier, J.-L., and Trono, D. (1997) Immunity 6, 67-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Foti, M., Mangasarian, A., Piguet, V., Lew, D. P., Krause, K. H., Trono, D., and Carpentier, J. L. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 37-47[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Piguet, V., Chen, Y. L., Mangasarian, A., Foti, M., Carpentier, J. L., and Trono, D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2472-2481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Piguet, V., Gu, F., Foti, M., Demaurex, N., Gruenberg, J., Carpentier, J. L., and Trono, D. (1999) Cell 97, 63-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Saksela, K., Cheng, G., and Baltimore, D. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 484-491[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Iafrate, A. J., Bronson, S., and Skowronski, J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 673-684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Aiken, C., and Trono, D. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 5048-5056[Abstract]
17. De, S. K., and Marsh, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6656-6660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Greenway, A., Azad, A., and McPhee, D. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 1842-1850[Abstract]
19. Alexander, L., Du, Z., Rosenzweig, M., Jung, J. U., and Desrosiers, R. C. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 6094-6099[Abstract]
20. Hanna, Z., Kay, D. G., Rebai, N., Guimond, A., Jothy, S., and Jolicoeur, P. (1998) Cell 95, 163-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Saksela, K. (1997) Front. Biosci. 2, 606-618
22. Lee, C. H., Saksela, K., Mirza, U. A., Chait, B. T., and Kuriyan, J. (1996) Cell 85, 931-942[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Lee, C. H., Leung, B., Lemmon, M. A., Zheng, J., Cowburn, D., Kuriyan, J., and Saksela, K. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5006-5015[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Collette, Y., Dutartre, H., Benziane, A., Ramos-Morales, F., Benarous, R., Harris, M., and Olive, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6333-6341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Baur, A. S., Sass, G., Laffert, B., Willbold, D., Cheng-Mayer, C., and Peterlin, B. M. (1997) Immunity 6, 283-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Sicheri, F., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 777-785[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Tsygankov, A., and Bolen, J. (1993) Stem Cells (Dayton) 11, 371-380[Abstract]
28. Willman, C. L., Stewart, C. C., Longacre, T. L., Head, D. R., Habbersett, R., Ziegler, S. F., and Perlmutter, R. M. (1991) Blood 77, 726-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Mustelin, T. (1994) Immunity 1, 351-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Durden, D. L., Kim, H. M., Calore, B., and Liu, Y. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 4039-4047[Abstract]
31. Wang, A. V., Scholl, P. R., and Geha, R. S. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 180, 1165-1170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Lowell, C. A., Fumagalli, L., and Berton, G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 895-910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Stefanova, I., Corcoran, M. L., Horak, E. M., Wahl, L. M., Bolen, J. B., and Horak, I. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20725-20728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Welch, H., and Maridonneau-Parini, I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 102-109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Di Somma, M. M., Nuti, S., Telford, J. L., and Baldari, C. T. (1995) FEBS Lett. 363, 101-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. English, B. K., Ihle, J. N., Myracle, A., and Yi, T. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 1017-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Vostal, J. G., Jackson, W. L., and Shulman, N. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 16911-16916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Sargeant, P., Farndale, R. W., and Sage, S. O. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18151-18156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Lee, K. M., Toscas, K., and Villereal, M. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9945-9948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Yule, D. I., Kim, E. T., and Williams, J. A. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 202, 1697-1704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Jenner, S., Farndale, R. W., and Sage, S. O. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 337-339
42. Jayaraman, T., Ondrias, K., Ondriasova, E., and Marks, A. R. (1996) Science 272, 1492-1494[Abstract]
43. Danos, O., and Mulligan, R. C. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 6460-6464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Harris, P., and Ralph, P. (1985) J. Leukocyte Biol. 37, 407-422[Abstract]
45. Collins, S. J. (1987) Blood 70, 1233-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Collins, S. J., Ruscetti, F. W., Gallagher, R. E., and Gallo, R. C. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 2458-2462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Miyaura, C., Abe, E., Kuribayashi, T., Tanaka, H., Konno, K., Nishii, Y., and Suda, T. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 102, 937-943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Brown, G., Bunce, C. M., Rowlands, D. C., and Williams, G. R. (1994) Leukemia 8, 806-815[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Rovera, G., Santoli, D., and Damsky, C. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 2779-2783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Aiken, C., Krause, L., Chen, Y. L., and Trono, D. (1996) Virology 217, 293-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Mandeville, J. T., and Maxfield, F. R. (1996) Curr. Opin. Hematol. 3, 63-70[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Krause, K. H., Campbell, K. P., Welsh, M. J., and Lew, D. P. (1990) Clin. Biochem. 23, 159-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Parekh, A. B., and Penner, R. (1997) Physiol. Rev. 77, 901-930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Favre, C. J., Nusse, O., Lew, D. P., and Krause, K. H. (1996) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 128, 19-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Ziegler, S. F., Marth, J. D., Lewis, D. B., and Perlmutter, R. M. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2276-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Yamamoto, T., Yamanashi, Y., and Toyoshima, K. (1993) Immunol. Rev. 132, 187-206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Meier, R. W., Bielke, W., Chen, T., Niklaus, G., Friis, R. R., and Tobler, A. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 185, 91-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Briggs, S. D., Sharkey, M., Stevenson, M., and Smithgall, T. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17899-17902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Lu, X., Yu, H., Liu, S. H., Brodsky, F. M., and Peterlin, B. M. (1998) Immunity 8, 647-656[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Bergeron, J. J., Brenner, M. B., Thomas, D. Y., and Williams, D. B. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci 19, 124-128[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Krause, K. H., and Michalak, M. (1997) Cell 88, 439-443[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Bian, X., Hughes, F. M., Jr., Huang, Y., Cidlowski, J. A., and Putney, J. W., Jr. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, C1241- C1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Zhou, Y. P., Teng, D., Dralyuk, F., Ostrega, D., Roe, M. W., Philipson, L., and Polonsky, K. S. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1623-1632[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Pahl, H. L., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci 22, 63-67[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Perez-Terzic, C., Jaconi, M., and Clapham, D. E. (1997) Bioessays 19, 787-792[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Li, K. Malathi, O. Krizanova, K. Ondrias, K. Sperber, V. Ablamunits, and T. Jayaraman
Cdc2/Cyclin B1 Interacts with and Modulates Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor (Type 1) Functions
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 6205 - 6210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Milicic, D. A. Price, P. Zimbwa, B. L. Booth, H. L. Brown, P. J. Easterbrook, K. Olsen, N. Robinson, U. Gileadi, A. K. Sewell,