Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, W.
Right arrow Articles by Alkon, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, W.
Right arrow Articles by Alkon, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 34893-34902, December 3, 1999


Brain Insulin Receptors and Spatial Memory
CORRELATED CHANGES IN GENE EXPRESSION, TYROSINE PHOSPHORYLATION, AND SIGNALING MOLECULES IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS OF WATER MAZE TRAINED RATS*

Weiqin ZhaoDagger §, Hui Chen, Hui XuDagger , Elizabeth MooreDagger , Noam Meiriparallel , Michael J. Quon, and Daniel L. AlkonDagger

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Adaptive Systems, NINDS, and the  Hypertension-Endocrine Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and the parallel  Institute of Animal Science, The Volcani Center, P. O. Box 6 Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Evidence accumulated from clinical and basic research has indirectly implicated the insulin receptor (IR) in brain cognitive functions, including learning and memory (Wickelgren, I. (1998) Science 280, 517-519). The present study investigates correlative changes in IR expression, phosphorylation, and associated signaling molecules in the rat hippocampus following water maze training. Although the distribution of IR protein matched that of IR mRNA in most forebrain regions, a dissociation of the IR mRNA and protein expression patterns was found in the cerebellar cortex. After training, IR mRNA in the CA1 and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus was up-regulated, and there was increased accumulation of IR protein in the hippocampal crude synaptic membrane fraction. In the CA1 pyramidal neurons, changes in the distribution pattern of IR in particular cellular compartments, such as the nucleus and dendritic regions, was observed only in trained animals. Although IR showed a low level of in vivo tyrosine phosphorylation, an insulin-stimulated increase of in vitro Tyr phosphorylation of IR was detected in trained animals, suggesting that learning may induce IR functional changes, such as enhanced receptor sensitivity. Furthermore, a training-induced co-immunoprecipitation of IR with Shc-66 was detected, along with changes in in vivo Tyr phosphorylation of Shc and mitogen-activated protein kinase, as well as accumulation of Shc-66, Shc-52, and Grb-2 in hippocampal synaptic membrane fractions following training. These findings suggest that IR may participate in memory processing through activation of its receptor Tyr kinase activity, and they suggest possible engagement of Shc/Grb-2/Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Because insulin and insulin receptors (IRs)1 were found in the central nervous system, their role(s) in brain function has been a subject attracting many researchers' interest. IR is widely distributed in the brain (1), with particularly high concentrations in neurons and much lower levels in glia (2, 3). Although IR mRNA is largely localized in neuronal somata, abundant IR protein is found in both cell bodies and synapses, including the dendritic field of the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells, the adrenergic terminals in hypothalamus, and membranes of dendrodendritic synaptosomes from the rat olfactory bulb (3, 4). Although the major molecular structure and most of the properties of IR in the central nervous system are indistinguishable from those in peripheral tissues, some differences exist between central nervous system IRs and peripheral IRs. Both the alpha  and beta  subunits, for example, of IR in the central nervous system are slightly lower in molecular weight than those in the periphery (5). Unlike peripheral IR, the brain IR does not undergo down-regulation after exposure to high concentrations of insulin (6, 7). In addition, insulin appears to regulate glucose metabolism only in glia cells but not in neurons (3, 8, 9). These findings have led to speculation that the neuronal IRs mediate functions different from those regulated by their peripheral and glial counterparts.

IR is a glycoprotein with an alpha 2beta 2 tetrameric structure. Binding of insulin to the extracellularly located alpha  subunits results in autophosphorylation of the beta  subunits at tyrosine residues 1158, 1162, and 1163, located in the cell interior (10). Autophosphorylation stimulates the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of IR, which is believed to initiate the biological actions of insulin (10). Like other growth factor receptors, phosphorylated IR triggers subsequent biological responses by activating different cellular signal transduction cascades. These include interaction of the receptor with IR substrate proteins and a variety of Src homology domain 2- and 3-containing proteins (11-13). One of such pathways involves Shc, an adapter protein (14, 15) that mediates association of the receptor with the Grb-2·SOS protein complex (16). This process is known to bring about activation of Ras (16, 17) that in turn triggers the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway leading to regulation of nuclear transcription (18). It is found that the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Shc is responsible for the IR-mediated mitogenic signaling (19).

Evidence from functional studies demonstrates that insulin/IR may play a modulatory role in brain synaptic transmission. Consistent with its enriched distribution in adrenergic terminals, insulin is found to promote central catecholaminergic activities by releasing both epinephrine and norepinephrine (20), inhibiting synaptic reuptake of norepinephrine (21), and altering catecholomine kinetics (22). In the hippocampus, insulin is reported to enhance alpha 1 adrenergic receptor activity, leading to stimulation of membrane phosphoinositol turnover and diacylglycerol production (23), two important second messengers involved in PKC activation.

At the behavioral level, insulin/IR has been implicated in at least two major brain functions: feeding behavior (3, 24) and cognition, including learning and memory (25). A role for insulin/IR in learning and memory is supported by several findings. First, IR is highly concentrated in neurons of specific brain regions, such as hippocampus, amygdala, and some cortical areas (1, 2). Secondly, data from behavioral-pharmacological studies show that injection of streptozotocin, a diabetes-inducing compound, into the brain induces significant memory impairment (26). More importantly, defects in insulin action in both periphery and the brain have been found in Alzheimer's disease (27, 28), and insulin has been shown to reduce phosphorylation of tau protein in human neuronal cultures by inhibiting activity of glycogen synthase kinase-3, hence promoting association of tau to microtubules (29). Finally, impairment of brain cognitive functions in diabetes mellitus, presumably due to disruption of glucose metabolism, is well documented (30-34).

Despite the large body of evidence from clinical and animal studies suggesting involvement of insulin/IR in learning and memory, actual correlated changes of IR during memory processing have never been reported. In this study, we investigate changes in IR expression, Tyr phosphorylation, and certain IR-associated signaling molecules in the rat hippocampal neurons following a water maze training experience.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Water Maze Training-- Male 60-90 day-old Wistar rats (200-250 g) were housed in standardized conditions as described elsewhere (35). To adapt rats to the experimental environment and behavioral activity, all rats were subjected, in the first day of experiments, to 2 min of swimming in a 1.5 m (diameter) × 0.6 m (depth) pool, with water temperature set at 21 ± 1 °C. On the following day, rats were trained in a four-trial water maze task, each trial lasting up to 2 min. During training, rats learned to escape from water by finding an unseen rigid platform submerged about 1 cm below the water surface in a fixed location. The escape latency during each trial was measured as an indicator of learning. In order to assess short-term and long-term biochemical changes, rats were sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after training. For the controls, rats were given four swimming trials, but without the platform present in the pool. The length of each swimming trial for each control rat was yoked to that of each trained rat to equalize nonlearning components, such as locomotor activity and stress. These swimming controls were also sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after the last swimming trial. All rats were sacrificed by decapitation, and their hippocampi were rapidly removed, frozen on dry ice, and stored at -80 °C before use. Hippocampi from a naïve group were also collected and used for basal controls. For in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry studies, the whole brain was rapidly removed following decapitation and frozen on dry ice. In total, 15 rats were used for each group.

The experiments were carried out under the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health regulations for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.

Preparation of the IR Riboprobe for in Situ Hybridization-- A fragment of cDNA corresponding to bases 760-1140 of the rat IR mRNA (GenBankTM accession number M29014) was synthesized by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from the rat hippocampus (see under "RT-PCR" below). This fragment shared no homology with any other proteins in the rat brain and was subcloned into the SrfI cloning site of pPCR-Script Amp SK(+) cloning vector (Stratagene) to produce a template for riboprobe synthesis. The sense and antisense riboprobes were synthesized by in vitro transcription with T7 or T3 RNA polymerase (Ambion) respectively in the presence of 1 µg of IR DNA template, 0.5 mM NTPs and 2 mM [alpha -35S]UTP (>1000 Ci/mmol, NEN Life Science Products). The transcribed product was purified on a Sephadex G-25 spin column (5 Prime right-arrow 3 Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO), and the final labeling to the probe was assessed by scintillation counting.

Preparation of Brain Sections-- Brains from naive, trained, and swimming control rats were sectioned at 12 µm in a cryostat at -20 °C. Sections were collected on silanated glass slides (Digene) and dried at room temperature before being returned to -80 °C for storage.

In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry-- Brain slices were fixed for 5 min in 4% formaldehyde, acetylated, and dehydrated in graded ethanol. The IR riboprobe (1 × 106 cpm in 50 µl) was applied to each slide holding three sections and hybridized at 55 °C for 30 h in a mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1× Denhardt's solution, 4 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 10 µg/ml yeast total RNA, 10 µg/ml yeast tRNA, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% NTS. Slices hybridized with the sense riboprobe or pretreated with RNase before hybridization with the antisense probe were used as negative controls. Following high stringency posthybridization washes and RNase treatment, brain sections were dehydrated in graded ethanol and then subjected to film and liquid emulsion autoradiography.

Immunohistochemistry-- Frozen brain sections from naïve, swimming control, and trained rats were fixed for 5 min in 4% formaldehyde. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and preincubation with 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h, the slices were incubated overnight at room temperature in the same medium containing the primary antibody against rat insulin receptor-beta (Santa Crutz Biotechnology) diluted to 1:400. In control slices, the primary antibody was omitted. Slices were washed with PBS, followed by incubation with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG diluted to1:400 for 1 h at room temperature. Following a wash process, signals were visualized with the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique (Elite kit, Vector Laboratories), in which 3',3'-diaminobenzidine was used as chromogen.

RT-PCR-- Adult rats were killed by decapitation, and their cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellar cortex were rapidly dissected and frozen on dry ice. The total RNA from each above region was extracted using RNA Isolator (Genosys). Following removal of genomic DNA with DNase treatment, the RNA samples were subjected to a reverse transcription reaction to synthesize single strand cDNAs using the first strand cDNA synthesis mix (Novagen). Amplification of a 372-base pair IR cDNA fragment was performed on a DNA thermal cycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer) through a 25-cycle PCR (94 °C 1 min, 50 °C 1 min, and 74 °C 2 s) with primers 5'-CTCTGTCCGCATCGAGAA-3' (forward) and 5'-CCACACACTGACCATCCA-3' (reverse). To control for any variability in sample processing, primers (forward, 5'-AGGTGCTCAACAACATGGAG-3'; reverse, 5'-TACCAGAGGCCACAGTAGCT-3') synthesizing a 183-base pair rat phosphoglycerate kinase 1 cDNA fragment were included in the PCR amplification. The final PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide.

Preparation of Homogenate, S3, and P2M Fractions-- The general cytosolic and crude synaptic membrane fractions were prepared by centrifugation according to the procedure of Rostas et al. (36) with minor modifications. Briefly, the frozen tissues from different brain regions were homogenized respectively in precooled Buffer A (0.32 M sucrose, 2 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, and 1 dose of protease inhibitor mixture purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with a glass-Teflon homogenizer. The homogenate was diluted to 10% (w/v) with Buffer A, and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant (S1) was preserved, whereas the pellet (P1) was washed with Buffer A and centrifuged at 1000 × g again for 5 min. The supernatant was combined with S1 and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatant (S2) was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h to produce a general cytosolic fraction (S3). The pellet (P2) was osmotically lysed (10 ml/g original tissue) on ice for 30 min in Buffer B (2 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 50 µm Ca2+, and 1 dose of protease inhibitor mixture), and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min. The pellet (P2M) from this step was collected as a crude synaptic membrane fraction, redissolved in a small volume of 2 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, containing a dose of protease inhibitor mixture, and stored at -80 °C until use. To investigate training-induced changes, hippocampi from four rats were combined to generate three independent pools from a total of 12 rats in each group.

Protein concentrations were measured using the Bio-Rad Protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad).

Insulin Stimulation of the IR or Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Overexpressed in NIH 3T3 Cells-- The human IR or IGF-1R that was stably transfected into the NIH 3T3 cell (37, 38) was used as positive control for the rat hippocampal IR. Tyrosine phosphorylated IR or IGF-1R was generated by stimulating the transfected cells with insulin (100 nM at 37 °C for 2 min). Cells were washed with ice-cooled PBS and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were then lysed on ice for 30 min in a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 300 mM NaCl, and 1 dose of protease inhibitor mixture) and briefly centrifuged at 8000 rpm (4 °C). The supernatant was collected as cell lysates. Protein concentrations were assessed using the BCA reagent (Pierce).

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation Processes-- Proteins from each subcellular fraction were separated by 4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE. The resolved proteins were transferred to a 0.45 µM nitrocellulose membrane. Blocked with 5% milk powder in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.5, the membrane was incubated with a given primary antibody (such as antibody against IR, Sch, Grb-2, MAPK, or phosphotyrosine) at 4 °C overnight with constant shaking. On the following day, the membrane was washed and incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase at room temperature for 1 h. The immunoreactive signal was then revealed with the enhanced chemiluminescence process. Alternatively, a target protein was immunoprecipitated from subcellular fractions with its specific antibody and then detected with immunoblotting procedures. If the protein of interest was expected to have a molecular mass similar to that of the heavy chain of IgG (around 55 kDa), the primary antibody was covalently cross-linked to agarose beads in a cross-link reaction using the CarboLinkTM kit (Pierce). This process retained IgG molecules on agarose beads during sample denaturing, thereby preventing the target protein signal(s) from being masked by IgG in immunoblotting.

In Vitro Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Hippocampal Proteins-- In vitro phosphorylation of hippocampal S3 and P2M proteins was carried out in a total volume of 50 µl of reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/µl leupeptin, ± 1 mM CaCl2 ± 0.1 µM insulin, and 50 µg of S2 or P2M proteins. Although Mn2+ has been known to be a potent effector for in vitro tyrosine phosphorylation, it was eliminated from the present reactions, as it reacted with sodium vanadate to form yellow precipitates. The phosphorylation reaction was initiated by addition of ATP to a final concentration of 100 µM. After incubating at 37 °C for 3 min, the reaction was terminated by adding 50 µl of SDS reducing sample buffer. The mixture was boiled for 10 min followed by separation by a 4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE. The extent of tyrosine phosphorylation was detected in Immunoblotting using a monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Py20, Upstate).

Data Analysis-- All biochemical experiments were repeated at least three times for each pool of hippocampal tissues. In situ hybridization histochemistry images and signals from immunoblotting were analyzed by measuring the optic mean density using the NIH Image program. Values from the swimming controls and trained animals were normalized against values from naïve animals. Data from three pooled samples were subjected to one- or two-way analysis of variance.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Distribution of IR mRNA and Protein in the Rat Brain-- Consistent with previous findings, our in situ hybridization histochemistry results showed that IR mRNA is widely expressed in the rat brain (Fig. 1A). The highest density of IR mRNA signals was revealed in the cerebellar cortex and choroid plexus of the third and lateral ventricles. Concentrated IR mRNA signals were also detected in forebrain areas, such as anterior olfactory nucleus, pyriform cortex, thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei, hippocampal formation, amygdaloid nucleus, and the cerebral cortex. IR mRNA levels in the hippocampus, cerebral, and cerebellar cortex were also measured using RT-PCR, which again revealed highest levels of IR PCR product in the cerebellum (Fig. 2A), indicating a high concentration of IR mRNA in this area.


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Distribution of IR mRNA revealed by in situ hybridization. Adult rat brain sections were hybridized with an IR riboprobe labeled with 35S as described under "Experimental Procedures." Signals were visualized with film autoradiography. Brain areas were defined according to the Rat Brain Atlas (48). AO, anterior olfactory nucleus; FCtx, frontal cortex; PrL, prelimbic cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; M2, secondary motor cortex; VO, ventral orbital cortex; DTr, dorsal transition zone; Cpu, caudate putamen (striatum); AI, agranular insular cortex; Acb, accumbens nucleus; Tu, olfactory tubercle; Pir, piriform cortex; LV, lateral ventricle; AM, anteromedial thalamic nucleus; VA, ventral anterior thalamic nucleus; Rt, reticular thalamic nucleus; MPO, medial preoptic nucleus; VLH, ventrolateral hypothalamic nucleus; AVDM, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; VM, ventromedial thalamic nucleus; LH, lateral hypothalamic area; VMH, ventrolateral hypothalamic nucleus; CA1, CA1 area of hippocampus; CA3, CA3 area of hippocampus; CA4, CA4 area of hippocampus; DG, dentate gyrus; Chp, choroid plexus; SNR, substantia nigra, reticular part; AmgN, amygdaloid nucleus; CCtx, cerebellar cortex; Bt, brain stem.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Comparison of IR mRNA and protein in different brain regions. A shows the RT-PCR result indicating that the cerebellar cortex (CCtx) possesses the highest IR mRNA level among the three brain regions examined. B shows immunoblotting results for IR protein levels in subcellular fractions from the three above brain regions. The protein concentration in the cerebellar cortex is lower than that in the cerebral cortex (CrCtx) and hippocampus (HP). The right lane is a positive control showing the human IR that is overexpressed in the NIH 3T3 cells. Results from RT-PCR and immunoblotting of brain homogenates were subjected measured by densitometry. The densitometry ratio of IR protein to IR mRNA for different regions is shown in C.

When IR protein levels in the rat brain were measured with immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry, the polyclonal anti-IR-beta antibody detected a 95-kDa protein band from subcellular preparations of the rat brain that migrated slightly faster on SDS gel than the human IR transfected in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 2B). The ratio of IR protein to mRNA was much lower in the cerebellar cortex than in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, (Fig. 2C). In all three areas, IR protein was highly concentrated in the P2M fraction. The disassociation of mRNA and protein expression in distinct brain regions was confirmed by results from immunohistochemistry studies. Fig. 3A shows the liquid emulsion results, which demonstrate cellular distribution of IR mRNA. The dark grains represent the IR mRNA signals, a high concentration of which is present in both Purkinje (indicated by arrows) and granule cells of the cerebellar cortex (bottom panel), whereas the pyramidal cell layer of the hippocampal CA1 area had lower levels of IR mRNA signals (top panel). Fig. 3B shows that immunoreactivity (indicated by darkness of the brown staining) of IR protein in the CA1 pyramidal cells (top panel) was stronger than that in Purkinje and granule cells of the cerebellar cortex (bottom panel). In addition, the cerebral cortical neurons and the choroidal epithelium also showed high IR immunoreactivity (data not shown).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Levels of IR mRNA and protein in the hippocampal CA1cells and the cerebellar cortex: IR mRNA in situ hybridization signals in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells and cerebellar granule and Purkinje cells. IR mRNA in situ hybridization signals in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells and cerebellar granular and Purkinje cells were visualized with liquid emulsion autoradiography (A) as black grains. B shows IR protein immunohistochemical staining in these two areas. The darkness of the brown staining correlates with the concentration of IR protein. PL, pyramidal cell layer; GL, granule cell layer; ML, molecular layer. Arrows indicate the cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Changes in Expression of IR mRNA and Protein following Water Maze Training-- We trained rats in a four-trial water maze task for 1 day in order to distinguish cellular events associated with memory formation with those trigged by other processes such as recall, which usually results from multi-day training tasks. After training, rat maze learning (Fig. 4A) was demonstrated by significantly reduced escape latency (F3,59 = 40.36, p < 0.001). Training induced an up-regulation of IR mRNA in the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus (Fig. 4B). Compared with swimming controls trained animals showed 30% and 22% increases in IR mRNA in the CA1 area at 1 h and 24 h after training. A two-way analysis of variance showed significant training (F1,8 = 14.04, p = 0.006), but not time effects. Similarly, 30-40% increases were found in dentate gyrus after training (F1,8 = 14.51, p = 0.005), whereas no significant changes were found in CA3 region.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Changes in IR mRNA and protein after training. A, escape latency of rats in water maze training (n = 15; p < 0.001). B, rats were sacrificed at 1 and 24 h after training. IR mRNA signals in the hippocampus from trained and control rats were detected with in situ hybridization histochemistry, visualized with film autoradiography, and quantified with an image program. All data was normalized against that from naïve animals and subjected to two-way analysis of variance. The bar graphs show average results (means ± S.E.) in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus areas (n = 3; ** p < 0.01). C, equalized amount of subcellular proteins (homogenate, S3, and P2M) from each group was resolved with SDS-PAGE. IR was detected with a polyclonal anti-IRbeta antibody. The bar graphs summarize results from three independently pooled samples (means ± S.E.; ** p < 0.01). D, immunohistochemical staining of IR protein in CA1 pyramidal cells after training. Left panels are representative samples from swimming controls, whereas the right panels are from trained animals. The darkness of brown staining represents the level of IR protein in the cell. The arrow indicates dendritic area of a neuron. These results demonstrate that IR mRNA is up-regulated, and IR protein undergoes translocation after learning.

Changes in IR protein levels after training were determined with immunoblotting (Fig. 4C). No significant changes in IR protein were found in the total homogenate fraction (Fig. 4C, a). A decrease (19%) in IR immunoreactivity in the S3 fraction was apparent 1 h after training (F1,8 = 18.55, p = 0.0026, Fig. 4C, b). On the other hand, a significant increase in IR protein was detected in the P2M fraction at 1 and 24 h after training (F1,8 =11.36, p < 0.01, Fig. 4C, c). Similar results were also obtained following immunoprecipitation of IR from P2M fractions from each group of animals (data not shown).

Fig. 4D illustrates immunocytochemical changes in IR protein in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells after training. The brown staining indicates immunoreactivity of IR in the CA1 neurons. For swimming controls, the majority of cells (~ 80%) in the CA1 area showed moderate IR immunostaining, with a distribution pattern similar to that of naïve animals (see Fig. 3). A small population of cells (<20%) showed weak staining. After training, however, an increase in IR immunostaining (dark brown) was observed in some of these cells. Table I shows a semiquantitative analysis of training-induced IR immunoreactivity changes. Although the proportion of the cells with weak staining was not changed, 30-38% of the CA1 neurons showed strong immunostaining after training, compared with 3-5% in the swimming controls. In addition, IR immunostaining appeared to be clustered within specific intracellular compartments after training, compared with an even distribution in the cytoplasm of the cell in swimming controls. Increased staining was also seen in dendritic areas.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Immunoreactivity of IR in the hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells from swimming control and trained rats

Changes in Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Hippocampal Proteins-- To investigate a possible involvement of the IR tyrosine protein kinase activity and its downstream signal cascades in learning and memory, we first measured changes in overall tyrosine phosphorylation of the hippocampal proteins. Protein concentrations of the tissue preparations across each group were equalized to 1 mg/ml, of which 15 µl was resolved on SDS-PAGE. Tyr phosphorylation was measured in immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody against phosphotyrosine (Py20). As shown in Fig. 5, more than 10 Tyr-phosphorylated major protein bands were revealed in hippocampal homogenates. One of these bands (P60) showed a decrease in phosphorylation at 1 and 24 h after training, whereas increasing in phosphorylation in the swimming controls. A two-way analysis of variance indicated significant training (F1,8 = 37.57, p < 0.001) effects. In the S3 fraction, dephosphorylation of P60 also occurred at 1 h after training (F1,8 = 34.5 p < 0.001). A significant increase in Tyr phosphorylation was found in a P36 band in trained animals at both 1 and 24 h after training (F1,8 = 28.5, p < 0.001). In the P2M fraction, the most obvious training-specific changes occurred to the P66 and P52 bands, both of which showed significant increases in tyr phosphorylation at 1 and 24 h after training (P66: F1,8 = 10.55, p = 0.01; P52: F1,8 = 16.6, p < 0.01). In addition, several other P2M proteins showed marked increases in Tyr phosphorylation at 24 h after training. These included P120, P95, P75, P 32, P25, and P10. The higher intensity of those protein bands was not due to greater amounts of protein loaded on the gel, as protein staining after electrophoresis showed similar amount of proteins across each lane (data not shown).


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Tyr phosphorylation of hippocampal proteins after training. Equal amounts of total homogenate, S3, and P2M proteins from each group were resolved on SDS-PAGE. Tyr phosphorylation was detected with a monoclonal anti-Tyr(P) antibody. The results show that water maze training induced specific Tyr phosphorylation changes in both cytosolic and synaptic membrane proteins. N, naïve animals; C1 and C24, swimming controls, sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after the last swimming trial; T1 and T24, trained animals sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after training. 3T3, NIH 3T3 cells overexpressed with IR.

In Vitro Phosphorylation of IR and Its Changes after Training-- Because the above immunoblotting results indicated a low basal level of IR Tyr phosphorylation, we then examined in vitro regulation of IR Tyr phosphorylation in hippocampal P2M fractions in the absence and presence of Ca2+. In the presence of ATP, Mg2+, and Na3VO4, a 95-kDa band was heavily phosphorylated (Fig. 6a, 3). This band co-migrated on SDS-PAGE with the human IR (Fig. 6a, lane 5) and IGF-1R (Fig. 6a, 1). The presence of Ca2+ (1 mM) in the reaction markedly reduced its Tyr phosphorylation (Fig. 6a, lane 4). To distinguish IR and IGF-1R, both of which migrated to a similar position on the SDS gel, immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-Tyr(P) antibody following in vitro phosphorylation reactions, and the precipitates were detected by immunoblotting with anti-IR (Fig. 6b) and IGF-1R (Fig. 6c) antibodies. There was little cross-reaction between IR antibody and IGF-1R (Fig. 6b, lane 1), or between IGF-1R antibody and IR (Fig. 6c, lane 5), indicating that these antibodies were target-specific. A major IR-beta protein was detected from the immunoprecitates after phosphorylation (Fig. 6b, lane 3). The amount of precipitated IR-beta was markedly reduced when Ca2+ was added to the phosphorylation reaction (Fig. 6b, lane 3). The phosphorylated 95-kDa band was found to also include IGF-1R (Fig. 6c, lane 3), the phosphorylation of which, however, was not affected by Ca2+ (Fig. 6c, lane 4). Results from lane 2 in all three panels of Fig. 6 indicated that IR and IGF-1R were predominantly in a dephosphorylated state in untreated synaptic membrane fractions.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of Ca2+ on in vitro Tyr phosphorylation of hippocampal IR and IGFR. Hippocampal P2M proteins were phosphorylated in the presence or absence of Ca2+ (see under "Experimental Procedures"). Extent of Tyr phosphorylation was assessed with an anti-Tyr(P) antibody (a). Alternatively, the phosphorylated samples were immunoprecipitated by the anti-Tyr(P) antibody. The precipitates were resolved with SDS-PAGE and blotted by either anti-IRbeta (b) or anti-IGF-1R antibody (c). It was shown that Ca2+ inhibited Tyr phosphorylation of IR but not IGF-1R. Lane 1, positive controls for P-IGF-1R; lane 2, nonphosphorylated P2M samples; lane 3, Tyr phosphorylation in the absence of Ca2+; lane 4, Tyr phosphorylation in the presence of 1 mMCa2+; lane 5, positive controls for P-IR.

We next measured whether in vitro phosphorylation of IR was changed as a function of training, because it may reflect alterations of the properties and sensitivity of the receptor to its ligand during memory processing. A significant increase of in vitro Tyr phosphorylation was found in P180 (F1,8 = 12.04, p < 0.01) but not P95 after training (Fig. 7a1). The presence of insulin in the reaction stimulated the overall phosphorylation of P180, with significantly stronger signals (F1,8 =29.12, p < 0.001) detected in the trained animals (Fig. 7a2). Insulin treatment did not change Tyr phosphorylation of P95 from naïve and swimming control rats, but it significantly enhanced that from trained animals (F1,8 = 17.48, p < 0.001). In the presence of Ca2+, the overall phosphorylation of P180 was markedly increased (Fig. 7b1), but no significant differences were detected among the trained and control rats. The overall Tyr phosphorylation of P95, on the other hand, was markedly reduced in the presence of Ca2+. Samples from the swimming controls showed particularly weaker phosphorylation signals (Fig. 7b1) compared with that from other groups (F1,8 = 5.3, p = 0.05). When Ca2+ and insulin were both present in the reaction (Fig. 7b2), increases in phosphorylation of P180 (F1,8 = 20.11 p = 0.002) and P95 (F1,8 = 18.37, p = 0.003) were shown only in trained animals. In addition, phosphorylation of P66 was also increased after training (Fig. 7, b1 and b2). These results suggest that sensitivities of P180 and P95 to insulin were increased after water maze training.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Changes in in vitro Tyr phosphorylation of P95 and P180 after training. Equal amounts of P2M proteins were phosphorylated in the absence or presence of Ca2+ and insulin, followed by measurement of phosphorylation with an anti-Tyr(P) antibody in Western blots. a1, Tyr phosphorylation in the absence of Ca2+ and insulin; a2, Tyr phosphorylation in the presence of insulin but the absence of Ca2+; b1, Tyr phosphorylation in the presence of Ca2+ but absence of insulin; b2, Tyr phosphorylation in the presence of both Ca2+ and insulin. N, naïve animals; C1 and C24, swimming controls sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after swimming trials; T1 and T24, trained animals sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after training (n = 3; ** p < 0.01). The increases in in vitro phosphorylation of IR suggest that training may induce changes in molecular properties of IR.

Changes in Shc Protein and Its Interaction with IR-- To identify the 66- and 52-kDa proteins in P2M fractions that showed increased Tyr phosphorylation after training (Fig. 5, P2M). Freshly prepared S3 and P2M samples from trained and control rats were separated on SDS gels and immunoblotted with anti-Shc antibody. This antibody detected Shc-66 and -52, localized mainly in the cytosolic fractions of the hippocampus. Although no apparent change was seen in the S3 fraction, significant increases in amounts of Shc-66 (F1,8 = 31.8, p < 0.001) and Shc-52 (F1,8 = 14.42, p = 0.005) were found in the P2M fractions from trained animals (Fig. 8A).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Changes in Shc and Grb-2 proteins after training. A, equal amounts of S3 and P2M proteins from each group resolved with SDS-PAGE were detected with anti-Shc antibody; B, P2M proteins from each group were immunoprecipitated (ip) with anti-IRbeta antibody followed by immunoblotting (ib) with anti-Shc antibody (left), or samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-Shc antibody and then immunoblotted with anti-IRbeta antibody (right). These results indicate that Shc was increased in the P2M, and it appeared to interact with IR during learning. C, equal amounts of S3 and P2M proteins resolved with SDS-PAGE were blotted with anti-Grb-2 antibody. An increased accumulation of Grb-2 was shown after training. N, naïve animals; C1 and C24, swimming controls sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after swimming trials; T1 and T24, trained animals sacrificed at 1 and 24 h, respectively, after training; 3T3, positive controls for Shc proteins (n = 3; ** p < 0.01).

A immunoprecipitation experiment was performed to determine possible in vivo interactions between IR and Shc. Equal amounts of P2M proteins from each group were subjected to immunoprecipitation with a goat anti-IR-beta antibody cross-linked to agarose beads. The immunoprecipitate was then blotted with anti-Shc antibody following SDS-PAGE and transfer processes. Shc-66 was co-precipitated with IR by the IR-beta antibody from trained animals (Fig. 8B). Similarly, P2M proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-Shc antibody followed by immunoblotting with anti-IR-beta antibody. A strong immunoreactive band was only detected by IR-beta antibody in samples from trained animals (Fig. 8B). The co-immunoprecipitation of Shc with IR suggests that these two proteins may be associated in vivo after training.

Changes in Grb-2 Protein after Training-- Because Grb-2 protein is known to be involved in IR-Shc signaling, its change in learning was assessed in the S3 and P2M fractions with immunoblotting. Like the Shc proteins, Grb-2 is largely a cytosolic localized protein (Fig. 8C). Although no changes were seen in S3 fraction, a significant training-induced increase in Grb-2 immunoreactivity was shown in the P2M fraction (Fig. 8C).

Changes in MAPK after Training-- Finally, we measured the training-induced changes in MAPK, a protein known to be a downstream molecule to the IR/Shc/Grab-2/SOS cascade (16-19). No apparent changes in the total amount of MAPK were detected in the S3 and P2M fractions by the Regular-MAPK antibody (Fig. 9A). A significant increase, however, in the active form of MAPK (P-MAPK) was observed in the S3 fraction at 1 h after training (F1,8 = 15.32, p < 0.01) and in the P2M at both 1 and 24 h after training (F1,8 = 42.25, p < 0.001), whereas the P2M from swimming controls showed a decreased MAPK phosphorylation (Fig. 9B). When in vitro phosphorylation was performed, the overall P-MAPK signal in the S3 was elevated (Fig. 9C, left panel) and further enhanced by addition of insulin to the reaction (Fig. 9D, left panel). In the P2M, insulin treatment during in vitro phosphorylation only increased the P-MAPK signal in the samples from trained animals (Fig. 9D, right panel).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Activation of MAPK after training. Equal amounts of S3 and P2M proteins resolved by SDS-PAGE were blotted with anti-regular (Reg.) MAPK (A) and active (P) MAPK (B) antibodies. C, P-MAPK after an in vitro phosphorylation reaction; D, P-MAPK after in vitro phosphorylation in the presence of insulin. These results demonstrate that MAPK was activated in the hippocampus after training (n = 3; ** p < 0.01).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present findings from in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and immunoblotting experiments confirm that IR is abundantly distributed in the brain. Specific regional concentrations of IR may reflect different IR functions associated with particular brain regions. An abundance of IR, for example, in areas such as olfactory bulb and thalamic nuclei is consistent with its involvement in regulation of food intake. High concentrations of IR in the hypothalamus and limbic system including the hippocampus, pyriform cortex and amygdala areas that reciprocally connect and communicate among each other, suggests its role in emotion and higher cognitive functions, particularly learning and memory. The very high density of IR in the choroid plexus suggests that it may be required for transport of glucose and peripheral insulin across the blood-brain barrier.

Although levels of IR protein match that of its mRNA in the forebrain areas, a striking disassociation between IR mRNA and protein levels was revealed in the cerebellar cortex. These results suggest differences in IR mRNA translational efficiency and/or IR protein stability in different brain regions. For example, IR in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus may possess a high efficiency of translation, or enhanced stability, whereas in the cerebellar cortex very high levels of IR mRNA may be required to supply a rapid turnover of the receptor. We believe that the distribution patterns of IR mRNA and protein reflect the significance of IR functions in different brain regions.

The hippocampus, which contains high levels of IR, is critically involved in spatial memory processing. IR mRNA was clearly up-regulated in the hippocampal CA1 and dentate gyrus areas shortly following water maze training, suggesting that synthesis of IR may be increased in these areas as a result of learning. An increased IR in the P2M was accompanied by a reduction of IR in the S3, suggesting a possible translocation of IR to the synaptic membrane after training. Changes in the distribution pattern of IR were also observed in the immunohistochemical studies, in which IR became more concentrated in certain cellular compartments such as the nucleus and dendrites of the CA1 neurons after training. It is of interest that this change is only seen in a subpopulation of the pyramidal cells in the CA1 area, suggesting that only in specific neurons was IR activated by training. This subpopulation specificity of learning-induced changes of IR are consistent with numerous previously published biophysical and biochemical studies. Voltage-dependent K+ currents, for example, were found in single identified neurons of the mollusk Hermissenda after Pavlovian conditioning (39). Related changes of K+ currents were found in a subpopulation of CA1 pyramidal cells (40), and a subpopulation of H6 cerebellar cortical Purkinje neurons (41) after Pavlovian conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response. Translocation of PKC was demonstrated in a subpopulation of cells with these same paradigms within these same regions, as well as with rat spatial learning (42, 43). Finally, in a very recent study, a subset of CA1 pyramidal cells was found to have reduced inhibitory postsynaptic potentials only after spatial maze learning (44). These findings, together with those of other reports that changes in expression of neural cell adhesion molecule (45) are found in a subset of hippocampal neurons after learning, support the interpretation that learning of a particular task involves only a subpopulation of neurons within a relevant region such as the hippocampus.

Given that IR is a receptor tyrosine kinase, autophosphorylation of which is essential for its activation, changes in autophosphorylation of IR after learning would be expected if the receptor is actively involved in memory formation. Although there was a low level of in vivo phosphorylation of IR, an insulin-stimulated in vitro phosphorylation of IR was detected in the synaptic membrane fraction only from trained animals. Although these results did not necessarily reflect the in vivo phosphorylation status of IR under trained or swimming control conditions, they provide evidence that the molecular properties of some component of the IR signaling pathway may be altered by training. Interestingly, the in vitro phosphorylation of IR but not IGF-1R was markedly inhibited by presence of 1 mM Ca2+ in the reaction. It is unclear how changes in intracellular Ca2+ due to increased synaptic activity during learning might influence the IR phosphorylation. The complexity of both the relevant pre- and postsynaptic biochemical cascades, however, precludes a straightforward interpretation at this time, but it will certainly motivate intensive follow-up studies.

The activated IR signaling cascade after training appeared to involve Shc protein. Levels of shc-66 and -52 were increased, and both proteins were significantly phosphorylated in vivo in the P2M only in trained animals. Co-immunoprecipitation of Shc with IR from trained animals suggests that activation of Shc during learning may be associated with IR PTK activity. Because Tyr phosphorylation of Shc leads to its specific association with the Grb-2·SOS complex, our detection of a training-induced accumulation of Grb-2 in the P2M fraction suggests that such an event may occur in water maze training. Finally, a training-specific activation of MAPK was also detected. Activation of MAPK was also previously reported following increases in intracellular Ca2+ (46) and retrieval of spatial memory (47). Although no evidence, either from previous work or the present study, directly identifies the upstream events associated with activation of MAPK, our results showed that the training-induced MAPK phosphorylation was further enhanced by in vitro insulin treatment of the P2M fraction, suggesting an increased sensitivity of this signaling pathway to insulin. Although it is tempting to speculate that during learning IR may have triggered a Ras/MAPK cascade mediated by Shc and Grb-2, further studies are needed to identify the precise links among changes in IR, Shc/Grb-2, and MAPK during spatial memory formation.

Apart from Shc, a 180-kDa P2M protein, which co-migrated with the insulin receptor substrate-1 (data not shown), also showed an increased insulin-sensitive in vitro Tyr phosphorylation after training. More detailed studies of this protein following training are under investigation.

Taken together, our results reveal, for the first time, that spatial training induces a series of changes in IR of the hippocampus, including IR gene expression, protein translocation, and Tyr phosphorylation. Because most of these changes were detected in synaptic membrane fractions, IR may play a role in regulation of synaptic activities (such as neurotransmission and/or synaptic plasticity) during memory formation.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) M29014.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Adaptive Systems, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Tel.: 301-402-0514; Fax: 301-402-2281; E-mail: wqzhao@ helix.nih.gov.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IR, insulin receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; RT, reverse transcription; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; IGF-1R, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor; IGFR, insulin-like growth factor receptor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Werther, G. A., Hogg, A., Oldfield, B. J., Mckinley, M. J., Figdor, R., Allen, A. M., and Mendelsohn, F. A. O. (1987) Endocrinology 121, 1562-1570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Marks, J. L., King, M. G., and Baskin, D. G. (1991) Molecular Biology and Physiology of Insulin and Insulin-like Growth Factors , pp. 459-470, Plenum Press, New York
3. Schwartz, M. W., Figlewicz, D. P., Baskin, D. G., Woods, S. C., and Porte, D., Jr. (1992) Endocr. Rev. 13, 387-414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Marks, J. L., Maddison, J., and Eastman, C. J. (1998) J. Neurochem. 50, 774-781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Heidenreich, K. A., Zahniser, N. R., Berhanu, P., Brandenburg, D., and Olefsky, J. M. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8527-8530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Zahniser, N. R., Goens, M. B., Hanaway, P. J., and Vinych, J. V. (1984) J. Neurochem. 42, 1354-1362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Boyd, F. T., Jr., and Raizada, M. K. (1983) Am. J. Physiol. 245, C283-C287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Heidenreich, K. A., and Brandenburg, D. (1986) Endocrinology 118, 1835-1842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Clarke, D. W., Boyd, F. T., Kappy, M. S., and Raizada, M. K. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 11672-11675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kahn, C. R., White, M. F., Shoelson, S. E., Backer, J. M., Araki, E., Cheatham, B., Csermely, P., Folli, F., Goldstein, B. J., Huertas, P., Rothenberg, P. L., Saad, M. J. A., Siddle, K., Sun, X. J., Wilden, P. A., Yamada, K., and Kahn, S. A. (1993) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 48, 291-339
11. Roth, R. A., Zhang, B., Chin, J. E., and Kavocina, K. (1992) J. Cell. Biochem. 48, 2-18
12. Quon, M. J., Butte, A. J., and Taylor, S. I. (1994) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 5, 369-376[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Cheatham, B., and Kahn, C. R. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 117-142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., Grignani, F., McGlade, J., Cavallo, F., Forni, G., Nicoletti, I., Grignani, F., Pawson, T., and Pelicci, G. (1992) Cell 70, 93-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bonfini, L., Migliaccio, E., Pelicci, G., Lanfrancone, L., and Pelicci, P. G. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 257-261
16. Rozakis-Adcock, M., McGlade, J., Mbamalu, G., Pelicci, G., Daly, R., Li, W., Ratzer, A., Thomas, S., Brugge, J., Pelicci, P. G., Schlessinger, J., and Pawson, T. (1992) Nature 360, 689-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Sasaoka, T., Ishiki, M., Sawa, T., Ishihara, H., Takata, Y., Imamura, T., Usui, I., Olefsky, J. M., and Kobayashi, M. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 4427-4434[Abstract]
18. Orban, P. C., Chapman, P. F., and Brambilla, R. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 38-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ricketts, W. A., Rose, D. W., Shoelson, S., and Olefsky, J. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26165-26169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Sauter, A., Goldstein, M., Engel, J., and Ueta, K. (1983) Brain Res. 260, 330-333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Raizada, M. K., Shemer, J., Judkins, J. H., Clarke, D. W., Masters, B. A., and LeRoith, D. (1988) Neurochem. Res. 13, 297-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Masters, B. A., Shemer, J., Judkins, J. H., Clarke, D. W., LeRoith, D., and Raizada, M. K. (1987) Brain Res. 417, 247-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Figlewicz, D. P., and Szot, P. (1991) Brain Res. 550, 101-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Woods, S. c., Chavez, M., Park, C. R., Riedy, C., Kaiyala, K., Richardson, R. D., Figlewicz, D. P., Schwartz, M. W., Porte, D., Jr., and Seeley, R. (1996) Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 20, 139-144[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Wickelgren, I. (1998) Science 280, 517-519[Free Full Text]
26. Lannert, H., and Hoyer, S. (1998) Behav. Neurosci. 112, 1199-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Craft, S., Peskind, E., Schwartz, M. W., Schellenberg, G. D., Raskind, M., and Porte, D., Jr. (1998) Neurology 50, 164-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Craft, S., Neocomer, J., Kanne, S., Dagogo-Jack, S., Cryer, P., Sheline, Y., Luby, J., Dagogo-Jack, A., and Alderson, A. (1996) Neurobiol. Aging 17, 123-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hong, M., and Lee, V. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19547-19553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Matthaei, S., Horuk, R., and Olefsky, J. M. (1986) Diabetes 35, 1181-1184[Abstract]
31. Stolk, R. p., Breteler, M. M. B., Ott, A., et al.. (1997) Diabetes Care 20, 792-795[Abstract]
32. Ott, A., Stolk, R. P., Hofman, A., Van Harskamp, F., Grobbee, D. E., and Breteler, M. M. B. (1996) Diabetologia 39, 1392-1397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Leibson, C. L., Rocca, W. A., Hanson, V. A., Cha, R., Kokmen, E., O'Brien, P. C., and Palumbo, P. J. (1997) Am. J. Epedemiol. 145, 301-308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Biessels, G. J. (1999) J. Med. 54, 35-45
35. Cavallaro, S., Meiri, N., Yi, C. L., Musco, S., Ma, W., Goldberg, J., and Alkon, D. L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9669-9673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Rostas, J. A., Brent, V. A., Heath, J. W., Neame, R. L., Powis, D. A., Weinberger, R. P., and Dunkley, P. R. (1986) Neurochem. Res. 11, 253-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kadowaki, T., Bevins, C. L., Cama, A., Ojamaa, K., Marcus-Saumuels, B., Kadowaki, H., Beitz, L., Mckeon, C., and Taylor, S. I. (1988) Science 240, 787-790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Kato, H., Faria, T. N., Stannard, B., Roberts, C. T., Jr., and LeRoith, D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2655-2661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Alkon, D. L., Lederhendler, I., and Shoukinmas, J. J. (1982) Science 215, 693-695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Coulter, D. A., Lo Turco, J. J., Kubota, M., Disterhoft, J. F., Moore, J. W., and Alkon, D. L. (1989) J. Neurophysiol. 61, 971-981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Schreurs, B. G., Gusev, P. A., Tomsic, D., Alkon, D. L., and Shi, T. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 5498-5507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Olds, J. L., Anderson, M. L., McPhie, D. L., Staten, L. D., and Alkon, D. L. (1989) Science 245, 866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Olds, J. L., Golski, S., McPhie, D. L., Olton, D., Mishkin, M., and Alkon, D. (1990) J. Neurosci. 10, 3707-3713[Abstract]
44. Gusev, P. A., and Alkon, D. L. (1999) Abstr. Soc. Neurosci. 25, 1623
45. Fox, G. B., O'Connell, A. W., Murphy, K. J., and Regan, C. M. (1995) J Neurochem. 65, 2796-2799[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Rosen, L. B., Ginty, D. D., Weber, M. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1994) Neuron 12, 1207-1221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Blum, S., Moors, A. N., Adams, F., and Dash, P. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 3535-3544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Paxinos and Watson, Rat Brain Atlas (Paxinos, G., and Watson, C., eds) Academic Press, San Diego, CA


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W.-Q. Zhao, P. N. Lacor, H. Chen, M. P. Lambert, M. J. Quon, G. A. Krafft, and W. L. Klein
Insulin Receptor Dysfunction Impairs Cellular Clearance of Neurotoxic Oligomeric A{beta}
J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 2009; 284(28): 18742 - 18753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. G. De Felice, M. N. N. Vieira, T. R. Bomfim, H. Decker, P. T. Velasco, M. P. Lambert, K. L. Viola, W.-Q. Zhao, S. T. Ferreira, and W. L. Klein
From the Cover: Protection of synapses against Alzheimer's-linked toxins: Insulin signaling prevents the pathogenic binding of A{beta} oligomers
PNAS, February 10, 2009; 106(6): 1971 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
E Guillod-Maximin, A F Roy, C M Vacher, A Aubourg, V Bailleux, A Lorsignol, L Penicaud, M Parquet, and M Taouis
Adiponectin receptors are expressed in hypothalamus and colocalized with proopiomelanocortin and neuropeptide Y in rodent arcuate neurons
J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 200(1): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. J. Francis, J. A. Martinez, W. Q. Liu, K. Xu, A. Ayer, J. Fine, U. I. Tuor, G. Glazner, L. R. Hanson, W. H. Frey II, et al.
Intranasal insulin prevents cognitive decline, cerebral atrophy and white matter changes in murine type I diabetic encephalopathy
Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3311 - 3334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
W.-Q. Zhao, F. G. De Felice, S. Fernandez, H. Chen, M. P. Lambert, M. J. Quon, G. A. Krafft, and W. L. Klein
Amyloid beta oligomers induce impairment of neuronal insulin receptors
FASEB J, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 246 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. C. Woods, S. C. Benoit, and D. J. Clegg
The Brain-Gut-Islet Connection
Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(Supplement_2): S114 - S121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Martin-Pena, A. Acebes, J.-R. Rodriguez, A. Sorribes, G. G. de Polavieja, P. Fernandez-Funez, and A. Ferrus
Age-Independent Synaptogenesis by Phosphoinositide 3 Kinase
J. Neurosci., October 4, 2006; 26(40): 10199 - 10208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Vellai, D. McCulloch, D. Gems, and A. L. Kovacs
Effects of Sex and Insulin/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Signaling on Performance in an Associative Learning Paradigm in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. M. Ryan, M. I. Freed, J. A. Rood, A. R. Cobitz, B. R. Waterhouse, and M. W.J. Strachan
Improving Metabolic Control Leads to Better Working Memory in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2006; 29(2): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. L. Alkon, H. Epstein, A. Kuzirian, M. C. Bennett, and T. J. Nelson
Protein synthesis required for long-term memory is induced by PKC activation on days before associative learning
PNAS, November 8, 2005; 102(45): 16432 - 16437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J.-T. Dou, M. Chen, F. Dufour, D. L. Alkon, and W.-Q. Zhao
Insulin receptor signaling in long-term memory consolidation following spatial learning
Learn. Mem., November 1, 2005; 12(6): 646 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. I. Duarte, M. S. Santos, R. Seica, and C. R. Oliveira
Oxidative Stress Affects Synaptosomal {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid and Glutamate Transport in Diabetic Rats: The Role of Insulin
Diabetes, August 1, 2004; 53(8): 2110 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. Peila, B. L. Rodriguez, L. R. White, and L. J. Launer
Fasting insulin and incident dementia in an elderly population of Japanese-American men
Neurology, July 27, 2004; 63(2): 228 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. O'Malley and J. Harvey
Insulin Activates Native and Recombinant Large Conductance Ca2+-Activated Potassium Channels via a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Dependent Process
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2004; 65(6): 1352 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Schubert, D. Gautam, D. Surjo, K. Ueki, S. Baudler, D. Schubert, T. Kondo, J. Alber, N. Galldiks, E. Kustermann, et al.
Role for neuronal insulin resistance in neurodegenerative diseases
PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3100 - 3105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Pascale, P. A. Gusev, M. Amadio, T. Dottorini, S. Govoni, D. L. Alkon, and A. Quattrone
Increase of the RNA-binding protein HuD and posttranscriptional up-regulation of the GAP-43 gene during spatial memory
PNAS, February 3, 2004; 101(5): 1217 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Song, L. Wu, Z. Chen, R. A. Kohanski, and L. Pick
Axons Guided by Insulin Receptor in Drosophila Visual System
Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 502 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Yokoo, T. Saitoh, S. Shiraishi, T. Yanagita, T. Sugano, S.-I. Minami, H. Kobayashi, and A. Wada
Distinct Effects of Ketone Bodies on Down-Regulation of Cell Surface Insulin Receptor and Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Phosphorylation in Adrenal Chromaffin Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2003; 304(3): 994 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Quattrone, A. Pascale, X. Nogues, W. Zhao, P. Gusev, A. Pacini, and D. L. Alkon
Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in learning by the neuronal ELAV-like mRNA-stabilizing proteins
PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11668 - 11673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
U. N Das
Cognitive performance and glucose
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2001; 74(3): 409 - 409.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Gasparini, G. K. Gouras, R. Wang, R. S. Gross, M. F. Beal, P. Greengard, and H. Xu
Stimulation of {beta}-Amyloid Precursor Protein Trafficking by Insulin Reduces Intraneuronal {beta}-Amyloid and Requires Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2561 - 2570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shi, R. J. Boado, and W. M. Pardridge
Antisense imaging of gene expression in the brain in vivo
PNAS, November 29, 2000; (2000) 250332397.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Zhao, S. Cavallaro, P. Gusev, and D. L. Alkon
Nonreceptor tyrosine protein kinase pp60c-src in spatial learning: Synapse-specific changes in its gene expression, tyrosine phosphorylation, and protein-protein interactions
PNAS, July 5, 2000; 97(14): 8098 - 8103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shi and W. M. Pardridge
Noninvasive gene targeting to the brain
PNAS, June 6, 2000; (2000) 130187497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
W. ZHAO, N. MEIRI, H. XU, S. CAVALLARO, A. QUATTRONE, L. ZHANG, and D. L. ALKON
Spatial learning induced changes in expression of the ryanodine type II receptor in the rat hippocampus
FASEB J, February 1, 2000; 14(2): 290 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shi and W. M. Pardridge
Noninvasive gene targeting to the brain
PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7567 - 7572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shi, R. J. Boado, and W. M. Pardridge
Antisense imaging of gene expression in the brain in vivo
PNAS, December 19, 2000; 97(26): 14709 - 14714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, W.
Right arrow Articles by Alkon, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, W.
Right arrow Articles by Alkon, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement