![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 34924-34931, December 3, 1999
From the A p53-derived C-terminal peptide induced rapid
apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines carrying endogenous p53
mutations or overexpressed wild-type (wt) p53 but was not toxic to
nonmalignant human cell lines containing wt p53. Apoptosis occurred
through a Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway involving increased extracellular levels of Fas/FasL in the absence of protein synthesis, as well as
activation of a Fas/APO-1-specific protease, FLICE. The peptide activity was p53-dependent, and it had no effect in three
tumor cell lines with null p53. Furthermore, the C-terminal peptide bound to p53 protein in cell extracts. Thus, p53-dependent,
Fas/APO-1 mediated apoptosis can be induced in breast cancer cells with mutant p53 similar to the recently described Fas/APO-1 induced apoptosis by wt p53. However, mutant p53 without p53 peptide does not
induce a Fas/APO-1 activation or apoptosis. Docking of the computed low
energy conformations for the C-terminal peptide with those for a
recently defined proline-rich regulatory region from the N-terminal
domain of p53 suggests a unique low energy complex between the two
peptide domains. The selective and rapid induction of apoptosis in
cancer cells carrying p53 abnormalities may lead to a novel therapeutic modality.
More than 50% of human malignancies, including breast cancers,
are associated with missense mutations or deletions of p53, and most of
the missense mutations map to the DNA-binding domain of the protein (1,
2). p53 is a sequence-specific transcriptional factor that
transactivates a number of genes whose products are involved in cell
growth regulation. These include WAF1/p21/Cip1, which arrests the cell
cycle, GADD45 for DNA repair, and Bax and Fas/APO-1 to modulate
apoptosis (3, 4). However, p53 containing mutations in the
transcriptional regulation domain of the protein also induced apoptosis
(5, 6). Apoptosis is a complex process regulated by several pathways,
some of which involve members of the Bcl-2 family (7-9). Fas/APO-1
also induces rapid apoptosis upon binding to Fas ligand
(FasL)1 through the
autocrine/paracrine signaling pathway (10, 11). When activated, the
intracellular death domain in Fas/APO-1 binds to FADD/MORT-1, which
then recruits FLICE (caspase 8/MACH The sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53 appears to be
negatively regulated by its C-terminal 30-amino acid (aa) segment (aa
363-393) (16) and also by N-terminal proline-rich motifs located
between aa 80-93 (17). Synthetic peptides corresponding to the
C-terminal domain of p53 such as residues aa 363-393 bind directly
in vitro to wild-type p53 (17). Binding experiments with p53
proteins that contain selected deletions indicate that binding of the
free aa 363-393 peptide to p53 requires the presence of
both C-terminal aa 363-393 and N-terminal aa 80-93
sequences in the p53 protein (17). This observation suggests either
that the free peptide may interact simultaneously with both regions or
that the absence of either or both of these segments in p53 results in
structural changes in the protein, lowering its affinity for the free peptide.
Deletion of either or both of these regulatory regions, as well as
various C-terminal modifications, stimulate specific DNA binding of p53
in vitro (3, 18, 19). Previous studies demonstrated that the
addition of a chemically modified C-terminal p53 peptide restored
in vitro sequence-specific DNA binding function to mutant p53-273 (Arg to His). Furthermore, intranuclear microinjection of this
peptide into SW480 colon carcinoma cells carrying an endogenous p53-273
His mutation restored transcriptional activation of a p53-responsive
reporter construct (20). Recently, a p53 C-terminal 22-amino acid
peptide (corresponding to residues 361-382), fused to the
Antennapedia (Ant) homeobox domain (17 aa) to facilitate cellular uptake, suppressed growth, and induced apoptosis of SW480 cells (21). However, the mechanism of action of the fusion peptide and
effects on nonmalignant cells are not known. In this study, we report
the peptide mechanisms for inducing apoptosis in breast carcinoma cell
lines carrying endogenous mutant p53 or overexpressed wt p53. Using
conformational energy calculations to compute the low energy
conformations for the N- and C-terminal regulatory domains, we find
that these two domains can form a unique low energy complex, suggesting
that a direct interaction can exist between them.
Tissue Culture--
Cell lines used in this study were purchased
from ATCC and maintained according to ATCC guidelines. The MDA-MB-453
cell line was subcloned, and a line was isolated that did not express
detectable p53.
Peptide Synthesis--
Peptides were synthesized by Research
Genetics (Birmingham, AL). The first two arginines of
Antennapedia were removed when fused to the C-terminal
arginine of p53pep. Peptide stocks (4 mM) were prepared in
water.
Western Blot Analyses--
Western blot analyses were performed
using standard methods and the ECL detection system (Amersham Pharcamia
Biotech) with 1 µg/ml antibodies.
Flow Cytometric Analysis for Apoptosis and Cell Surface Fas and
FasL Analysis--
Propidium iodide-stained cells (1-2 × 106 cells/ml) were analyzed by a fluorescence-activated
cell sorter (FACSCaliber, Becton Dickenson) followed by determination
of the percentage of sub-G1 content cells by the CellQuest
program. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-human
monoclonal Fas/CD95 antibody and biotin-conjugated mouse anti-human
FasL monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, CA) were used to determine cell
surface Fas and FasL by measuring the fluorescent intensity for
104 cells using FACSCaliber according to manufacturer's protocol.
Annexin V-FITC Binding Assay--
Annexin V-FITC binding assay
was performed following the manufacturer's protocol (PharMingen).
CPP32 and ICE Activities/PARP Cleavage--
Experiments were
performed according to Stefanis et al. (22) with 20 µM fluorogenic tetrapeptide substrates. A plasmid
construct encoding the 48-kDa truncated PARP was kindly provided by Dr. L. Greene (Columbia University).
Precipitation of p53 Protein and Biotinylated Ant-p53pep
Complex--
For in vitro binding assay,
[35S]methionine-labeled p53-273 His and the truncated
p53aa360-383 were synthesized using the T7 promoter coupled in
vitro transcription/translation system (Promega Co.).
35S-Labeled p53 proteins were then incubated in the Nonidet
P-40 lysis buffer for 2 h at 4 °C with biotinylated Ant-p53pep
coupled to streptavidin-agarose. Beads were washed three times with
lysis buffer with 0.3 M KCl, and proteins bound to the
biotinylated peptide agarose matrix were separated by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography to
detect p53-273 protein. The interaction between the peptide and p53
protein present in either MDA-MB-468 or nonmalignant MCF10-2A whole
cell extracts was determined by incubation of 500 µg of extracts with
the biotinylated Ant-p53pep-agarose matrix. The complexes were then
analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot
with anti-p53 DO-1 antibody (Santa Cruz).
Conformational Energy Calculations--
It is of interest to
determine whether the N- and C-terminal regulatory domains have well
defined three-dimensional structures and, if so, whether these two
domains can form a low energy complex with one another. Although the
x-ray crystal structure for wild-type p53 has been determined for
residues 94-312, there are no experimentally determined structures for
negative regulatory domains of residues 80-92 and 363-393 in the p53
protein. We therefore computed the possible low energy conformations
for each peptide using the chain build-up method based on the Empirical
Conformational Energy for Peptides Program (23). In this method, all
combinations for the single residue minima for the first two amino
acids in the sequence were generated and subjected to energy
minimization (24). The low energy conformations that occurred within a
cut-off energy (10 kcal/mol) of that for the global minimum were then
combined with the single residue minima (25) for the next amino acid residue in the sequence. These conformations were again subjected to
energy minimization. This process was repeated until the entire sequence was generated. For the two peptides, a number of low energy
minima were found. These were classified into different conformational
groups based on their backbone conformations. The statistical
thermodynamic weights for each conformation and for each conformational
group were determined as described previously (26).
The method was applied to p53 residues 84-89 and 363-382 from the
amino and C-terminal domains, respectively. The 84-89 segment has the
sequence Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro, which is the most conserved among
mammalian p53 sequences in the 80-92 regulatory domain (27) and
contains a regular proline-repeat sequence. The 369-382 peptide, which
has the sequence
Leu-Lys-Ser-Lys-Lys-Gly-Gln-Ser-Thr-Ser-Arg-His-Lys-Lys, was chosen
because it has been found to activate p53 for induction of apoptosis
(21). Both of these peptides were central portions of each peptide.
Docking--
The lowest energy conformation for the 369-382
segment was an A number of peptides from the C-terminal region of p53 were tested
for inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in various
tumor cell lines. These peptides were fused to an
Antennapedia-derived 17-aa domain for efficient
intracellular uptake (29). Similar to the peptide reported by
Selivanova et al. (21), we found peptide p53 aa 361-382 to
be most effective for inducing apoptosis when fused to
Antennapedia. This peptide, referred to as Ant-p53pep hereafter, was chosen for further study. The mean IC50 for
induction of apoptosis by Ant-p53pep in human breast tumor cells was
found to be 30 µM, and this concentration was used
throughout. The Antennapedia peptide alone displayed no
cytotoxic effects when tested up to 500 µM (data not shown).
Induction of Apoptosis by Ant-p53pep--
Effects of Ant-p53pep
were tested using the MDA-MB-468 human breast carcinoma cell line,
which contains an endogenous p53-273His mutant gene (30). This mutation
has been reported as one of the two most prevalent mutated spots in the
p53 gene, accounting for up to 18% of all p53 mutations (3). The
effect of Ant-p53pep on cell viability was initially examined by trypan
blue exclusion. Cell viability counts showed a 10-fold decrease in
viable cells after a 5-h treatment with 30 µM Ant-p53pep
in MDA-MB-468 cells. In contrast, the peptide at 30 µM
for 5 h did not have any effect upon viability in the nonmalignant
wt p53 breast epithelial cell line, MCF10-2A (data not shown).
To investigate the mechanism of peptide-induced cytotoxicity, we
determined whether cell death was due to apoptosis and whether the
effect was specific for the peptide. The DNA content and integrity were
measured by flow cytometry of propidium iodide stained cells (31). A
sub-G1 peak characteristic of apoptotic cells was detected at 5 h in MDA-MB-468 cells treated with 30 µM
Ant-p53pep but not when treated with Antennapedia or p53pep
alone at the same concentration and exposure time (Fig.
1A). The percentage of
sub-G1 content cells was 30-40% in Ant-p53pep-treated
MDA-MD-468 cells. We did not detect any other significant change in the
cell cycle profile. Two other human breast cancer cell lines,
MDA-MB-231 carrying a p53 mutation at aa 280 (32) and MCF7
overexpressing wt p53 were also induced into apoptosis by 30 µM Ant-p53pep (Fig. 1A). To exclude the
possibility of cytotoxic effects on nonmalignant cells, we tested
MCF10-2A and 27sk, a normal skin fibroblast line. Growth and
viability of MCF10-2A and 27sk cells, both expressing low levels of wt
p53, were not affected by 30 µM of Ant-p53pep when
observed over a period of 72 h (Fig. 1A).
Apoptotic cell death was further confirmed by binding of Annexin V to
the externalized phospholipid phosphatidylserine. In many cell types,
phosphatidylserine becomes exposed to the extracellular environment
because of the loss of membrane asymmetry during the early phase of
apoptosis (33). MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with 30 µM
of Ant-p53pep for various time periods and then incubated with Annexin
V-FITC and analyzed by flow cytometry. Fig. 1B shows approximately 35% of cells bound Annexin V following 30 min of exposure to Ant-p53pep (dotted line) compared with the
untreated control (solid line). We have also observed
Annexin V binding in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells but not in 27sk cells
(data not shown). MDA-MB-468 cells showed characteristic morphological
changes associated with apoptosis, including membrane blebbing, cell
shrinkage, and nuclear fragmentation. The morphology of peptide-treated
MCF10-2A cells was similar to control cells (data not shown).
Furthermore, treatment of a p53 null/null breast cancer cell line,
MDA-MB-453, with Ant-p53pep, showed no accumulation of
sub-G1 DNA content or Annexin V binding (Fig.
1C). Two other cell lines with null p53 status, H1299, a
lung adenocarcinoma line, and Saos2, an osteosarcoma line, also were
not induced into apoptosis by Ant-p53pep (data not shown).
Mechanism of Apoptosis Induced by Ant-p53pep--
We investigated
possible mechanisms for peptide-induced apoptosis. The MDA-MB-468 cell
line was selected for further studies because it contains a single copy
of R273H mutation of p53. The R273 mutation is the most prevalent
mutation in p53 that abolishes both DNA binding and transcriptional
ability of p53 (2, 34). The p53-R273H mutant proteins have been shown
to interact with p53-derived peptide in in vitro DNA binding
studies (20). The endogenous levels of p53 were determined by Western
blot analysis in MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells after
Ant-p53pep treatment for 3 h (Fig.
2A). As expected, MDA-MB-468
cells expressed a high level of mutant p53-273H, a very low level of wt
p53 in MCF10-2A, and no expression of p53 in MDA-MB-453 cells. Levels of p53 were not altered after Ant-p53pep treatment. Interestingly, cycloheximide treatment of MDA-MB-468 cells prior to addition of
Ant-p53pep did not block apoptosis (Fig. 2B), suggesting
that Ant-p53pep-induced apoptosis was not dependent on de
novo protein synthesis. Furthermore, there were no significant
changes in expression levels of known apoptotic regulators such as Bax,
Bak, and Bcl-XL in MDA-MB-468 cells following treatment
with Ant-p53pep for up to 3 h as analyzed by Western blot (Fig.
2C). These data indicated that Bax, a direct transcriptional
target of p53, is not induced by Ant-p53pep. There was also no
induction of p21/WAF1 level as evidenced by lack of cell cycle arrest
with Ant-p53pep treatment (Fig. 1A). These data suggest that
transcriptional activation function by p53, or at least induction of
Bax, is not required for apoptosis of Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468
cells.
Because peptide-induced apoptosis occurred very rapidly in the absence
of new protein synthesis, possible changes in cell surface expression
of Fas/APO-1 in MDA-MB-468 cells were examined by flow cytometry. Cells
were incubated with Ant-p53pep and controls for various times and
labeled with FITC-conjugated Fas antibody prior to
fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis. In Fig. 3A, MDA-MB-468 cells showed
~40% higher levels of extracellular Fas/APO-1 protein within 30 min
of Ant-p53pep treatment at 30 µM, as determined by a
shift of peak (black area). Neither p53pep nor
Antennapedia alone affected accumulation of extracellular Fas/APO-1 whose peaks coincided with the untreated control (white area, Fig. 3A). Similarly, extracellular localization
of FasL was also increased by about 30% in MDA-MB-468 cells incubated for 30 min with 30 µM Ant-p53pep (Fig. 3A). In
contrast, nonmalignant MCF10-2A and MDA-MB-453 p53 null cells did not
show any increase in cell surface Fas/APO-1 by Ant-p53pep treatment
(Fig. 3B and data not shown, respectively). Total cellular
level of Fas/APO-1 in Westerns was not altered by Ant-p53pep treatment
in both MDA-MB-468 and MCF10-2A cells (data not shown). MCF10-2A cells,
however, did undergo apoptosis in the presence of agonistic,
apoptosis-inducing Fas IgM antibody at 500 ng/ml within 3 h,
indicating that the Fas/APO-1 signaling death pathway was functional in
these cells (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, treatment of MDA-MB-468
cells with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h generated the
characteristic truncated active form of FLICE (p26) by Western blot
(Fig. 4). These data suggest that the
apoptosis in Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468 cells was mediated through
the Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway and resulted in FLICE activation.
Effects of Ant-p53pep on CPP32 Protease Activity and PARP
Cleavage--
One of the downstream components of apoptosis is
caspase-3/CPP32 cysteine protease, which can be activated by multiple
pathways (35). The processed, active CPP32 cleaves various substrates including PARP. The activity of CPP32 was measured in an in
vitro assay using the fluorogenic tetrapeptide substrate,
Ac-DEVD-AMC. Fluorescence produced from cleaved AMC is directly
proportional to the amount of CPP32 activity present in cell lysates.
Fig. 5A shows measurements of
CPP32 activity in lysates prepared from cells treated either with or
without 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h. CPP32 activity in
MDA-MB-468 cells was increased by ~6-fold above base line when
treated with Ant-p53pep compared with the untreated control (Fig.
5A). In contrast, MCF 10-2A cell lysates showed no
significant increase in CPP32 activity following treatment with the
peptide (Fig. 5A). Studies with control p53pep or
Antennapedia alone showed no effect on CPP32 activity (data
not shown). Ant-p53pep treatment did not alter ICE activity as measured
with an ICE-specific fluorogenic substrate (Fig. 5A).
To further assess the activation of the apoptotic cascade, a truncated
48-kDa form of PARP was translated in vitro and incubated with lysates prepared from either Ant-p53pep-treated or untreated MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells. As shown in Fig.
5B, a proteolytically cleaved [35S]-PARP
fragment was detected only from lysates of MDA-MB-468 cells treated
with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h but not in MCF10-2A or
in a p53 null/null breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-453 (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data suggest that in these lines,
Ant-p53pep activity is p53-dependent.
Interaction of Ant-p53pep and p53 Protein--
To investigate
whether peptide directly interacts with p53 protein and whether this
interaction is important for peptide-induced apoptosis, we measured the
interaction between Ant-p53pep and p53 protein. Mutant p53-273H and a
truncated C terminus p53 fragment (p53-C; deletion in aa 1-359) were
in vitro radiolabeled and incubated with a biotinylated
Ant-p53pep conjugated to a streptavidin-agarose matrix. Fig.
6A shows binding of
35S-labeled p53-273H to Ant-p53pep agarose but not to the
streptavidin-agarose matrix alone. The truncated p53 C terminus
fragment did not bind to Ant-p53pep (Fig. 6A), suggesting
that binding may occur outside the C terminus (aa 360-393) of p53.
Furthermore, mutant p53-273H from extracts prepared directly from
MDA-MB-468 cells also formed complexes with biotinylated Ant-p53pep
(Fig. 6B). Wild-type p53 protein from MCF10-2A also formed a
complex with Ant-p53pep, although the amount was markedly lower than
that in MDA-MB-468 extracts, possibly because of the low expression
levels of p53 in nonmalignant MCF10-2A cells (Fig. 6B),
which did not undergo apoptosis when treated with Ant-p53pep (Fig.
1A).
Interaction of N- and C-terminal Peptides--
Our finding that
Ant-p53pep did not bind to the C terminus of p53, from which it was
derived, suggested another possible interaction site on p53. One
candidate region for the direct interaction of the C-terminal
regulatory peptide is the N-terminal regulatory domain involving
residues 80-93. To explore whether these two regions might interact
with one another, we performed conformational energy calculations to
generate the low energy conformations of each peptide. These low energy
conformations of the central regions of each peptide were "docked"
against one another to explore whether stable complexes could form.
Using the procedure described under "Experimental Procedures," we
found a single lowest energy conformation for the 369-382 C-terminal
sequence, an all This study investigated mechanisms of apoptosis induced by
p53-derived C-terminal peptide. Three human breast cancer cell lines,
carrying either endogenously expressed mutant p53 or overexpressed wt
p53, underwent rapid apoptosis after Ant-p53pep treatment. Peptide
activity to induce apoptosis was not dependent upon de novo
protein synthesis. The transcription/translation-independent induction
of apoptosis has been described in various systems in which a
sequence-specific transactivation-defective p53
(Gln22/Ser23) mutant induced apoptosis in Saos2
osteosarcoma cells (37) and, similarly, in HeLa cells with a
transcription-defective, truncated p53 (38). p53-dependent
apoptosis also occurred in the presence of actinomycin D or
cycloheximide through yet unknown mechanisms (5). Our results indicate
that induction of apoptosis is mediated through Fas/APO-1 pathway in
MDA-MB-468 cells and is p53-dependent because apoptosis was
not observed in p53 null cell lines (MDA-MB-453, H1299, and Saos2).
Moreover, mutant p53 was found to complex with Ant-p53pep. The
mechanisms by which Ant-p53pep and p53 complex initiate the Fas/APO-1
signaling pathway are not clear. Bennett et al. (39)
recently reported that p53-induced apoptosis involved increased surface
expression of Fas/APO-1 in untransformed human vascular smooth muscle
cells carrying wt p53 that occurred within 1 h upon p53
activation. They further showed that increased cell surface Fas/APO-1
was due to redistribution of Fas/APO-1 from the Golgi complex (39). In
agreement with their study, we also found that p53 peptide-induced
apoptosis occurred very rapidly and independent of protein synthesis,
which involved increased cell surface Fas/APO-1. Furthermore, our
preliminary data by confocal microscopy showed a redistribution of Fas
in MDA-MB-468 cells to the plasma membrane when exposed to Ant-p53pep. Control cells, with Antennapedia or p53pep alone, had a
diffuse Fas staining throughout the cells (data not shown). Our data
suggest that the Fas/APO-1 pathway can be activated in cells harboring mutant p53-273H in the presence of the C-terminal peptide, which may be
from its binding to mutant p53 and altering its conformation. How p53
promotes intracellular translocation of Fas/APO-1 and whether mutant
p53/peptide complex involves a similar mechanism are being addressed.
Ant-p53pep selectively induced apoptosis only in tumor cells containing
mutant or overexpressed wt p53. Furthermore, the p53-273H mutant, as
well as wt p53 proteins formed complexes with Ant-p53pep, and yet
apoptosis was not observed in nonmalignant MCF10-2A cells. Lack of
apoptosis in MCF10-2A cells could be due, in part, to instability of wt
p53 under physiological conditions or to a low threshold level of p53
insufficient to initiate apoptosis in nonmalignant cells. Differential
cellular levels of wt p53 were shown to affect whether Saos2 cells
undergo growth arrest or apoptosis. With tetracycline-inducible expression of wt p53, low level wt p53 was shown to arrest or slow cell
growth, whereas high levels of wt p53 induced apoptosis (37). Thus,
apoptosis observed in MCF7 cells (Fig. 1A) may be due to the
high level of wt p53, and the lack of apoptosis in the nonmalignant
lines, MCF10-2A and 27sk, may be due to low expression of wt p53.
Induction of apoptosis in mutant p53 breast cancer cells may be related
to their increased expression/stability of mutant p53, which could
serve as a target for peptide. It is tempting to speculate that
Ant-p53pep binds to mutant p53 and alters mutant conformation, favoring
wild-type conformation. Other post-translational modifications/alterations were shown to modulate p53 activity such as
C-terminal phosphorylation or C-terminal binding with anti-p53 antibody
(40). In this case, new transcription/translation may not be necessary
to induce apoptosis because of a high level of p53 mutant protein
present in many tumor cells. Alternatively, a low cellular level of wt
p53 in nonmalignant cells may not be sufficient to induce apoptosis in
the absence of other additional factors such as DNA damaging agents.
The results of the conformational energy calculations suggest that a
direct interaction of the N-terminal proline-rich segment with a
(Ala-Pro)3 repeat and the C-terminal effector peptide is feasible. Interestingly, the proline-rich region of p53 may be a
binding site for the SH3 domains of proteins (41), further suggesting
that this region of the protein may have a role in signal transduction.
The function of this region is not clear but is implicated in both
p53-mediated tumor cell growth suppression (42) and apoptosis (43). It
cooperates with the C-terminal regulatory region to negatively regulate
p53 activity (17). Our calculated structure also suggested that the
N-terminal p53aa84-89 might fill one of the binding sites along the
helical axis of the C-terminal p53aa369-382. We do not exclude the
possibility of Ant-p53pep from binding to other regions of p53. For
example, there are other potential binding sites along the helical axis of this peptide that could interact with other regions of p53 such as
the N terminus of the DNA-binding core domain from residues aa 97 to aa
117, a region known to undergo considerable conformational change in
mutant p53 (44). Indeed, Selivanova et al. (45) in their
recent studies showed the interaction between the C-terminal peptide
and the core region (aa 99-307) of p53 as well as with the C-terminal
region (aa 320-393). Although the C-terminal domain of p53 (aa
361-393) used in our experiments did not bind to Ant-p53pep (Fig.
6A), this is probably due to a lack of 40 amino acid
residues from aa 320 to 360. They also reported a weak binding for
N-terminal region (aa 1-100). It is further indicated that different
salt concentrations may lead to differential states of bindings as evidenced by lack of binding for the p53 core domain in the study of
Muller-Tiemann et al. (17). It is suggested that, because full-length p53 binds to Ant-p53pep much more effectively, all three
domains may be involved in binding to Ant-p53pep (45). Our
computational binding analysis further indicated that the C-terminal
p53 peptide might also interact with the conserved N terminus
PXXP region of p53. Thus, Ant-p53pep might promote stable
association or prevent association of the N- and C-terminal p53
negative regulatory areas, leading to a favorable conformational alteration which activates p53 function. Thus, restoration of p53
function by exogenous peptide or by a peptide viral carrier construct
provides an attractive therapeutic strategy for tumor cells that
contain either mutant or overexpressed wt p53. It is also possible that
a viral vector carrying p53 peptide sequence may induce apoptosis
similar to the exogenously added Ant-p53pep. If so, it may then have
certain advantages over whole wt p53-based gene therapy approaches.
Whole p53 gene therapy may lead to increased susceptibility to cell
growth arrest or apoptosis in normal cells, whereas selective apoptosis
was demonstrated only in malignant cells by Ant-p53pep. Furthermore,
somatic frameshift mutations in the eight-mononucleotide repeat coding
region of the Bax gene have been found in some cancers, in which case,
whole p53-based gene therapy may not induce Bax-associated apoptosis
because of mutation in Bax (46, 47). However, the p53 peptide-based
approach is most likely not dependent upon Bax as evidenced by this study.
We thank Kelly Wasmund in Research Genetics
for expert peptide synthesis.
*
This work was supported by Columbia University Cancer Center
Core Grant NCI-P30-CA13696-26), American Cancer Society Grant IRG-177,
and Herbert Irving Scholar Award in Medicine and Kevin Cornwell Cancer
Fund (to R. L. F.), Environmental Protection Agency Grant
R-826685 (to P. W. B.-R.), and National Institutes of Health RO1 Grant CA 42500, a Veterans Affairs Merit Award, and a Roche Molecular Biochemicals Award (to M. R. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
Y. Zhang, personal communication.
The abbreviations used are:
FasL, Fas ligand;
wt, wild type;
aa, amino acid(s);
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
PARP, poly(ADP- ribose) polymerase.
Conformational and Molecular Basis for Induction of Apoptosis
by a p53 C-terminal Peptide in Human Cancer Cells*
,
,
,
,

College of Physicians and Surgeons
of Columbia University, Experimental Therapeutics Program, Division
of Medical Oncology, New York, New York 10032, the
§ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, VA
Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11209,
SUNY Health Science
Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203, the ¶ School of Public
Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, and
** Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey 07110-1199
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1). FLICE is a chimeric protein
with an adaptor domain for binding to FADD/MORT-1 in DISC
(death-inducing signaling
complex) and a proteolytic domain similar to ICE (12). The
formation of DISC leads to the activation of FLICE. FLICE is the first
protease activated in the Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway that initiates
downstream activation of caspase-3, -6, and -7 and mitochondrial
damage. This in turn activates ICE family proteases, triggering a
cascade of apoptotic processes (13-15).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix and was at least 10 kcal/mol lower in energy
than for any competing low energy conformation. This conformation was
therefore taken as the reference structure for this sequence. The
lowest energy structure from each class of conformations for the
(Ala-Pro)3 peptide was then subjected to a grid search in
which the rigid body variables but not the dihedral angles were changed
systematically as described previously (28). For each representative
(Ala-Pro)3 conformation, 3024 grid points were generated. A
total of 45 representative low energy conformations for this peptide,
selected as described in the preceding section, were subjected to this
gridding procedure so that a total of over 136,000 conformations were
evaluated. From the grid search, each low energy configuration of the
two peptides was then subjected to energy minimization in which the rigid body variables, and the dihedral angles of the two peptides were
allowed to change.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Measurement of sub-G1 DNA content
in breast cancer cells by Ant-p53pep. A, three breast
cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231, and MCF7, a nonmalignant
mammary cell line, MCF10-2A (wt p53), and a normal skin fibroblast
line, 27sk (wt p53), were treated with 30 µM of either
Ant, p53pep, or Ant-p53pep for 5 h. Cell cycle distribution of
104 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell populations
with sub-G1 DNA content are indicated with
arrows. B, detection of annexin V binding in
Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468 cells. Cells were treated with Ant-p53pep
for 30 min prior to binding with Annexin V. The solid line
represents a background binding of annexin V in the untreated cells,
and the dotted line represents the peptide-treated cells.
C, measurement of sub-G1 DNA content and annexin
V binding in MDA-MB-453 cells (null p53). The experiments were
performed as in A and B.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, p53 expression in MDA-MB-468,
MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells. Cells were treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 3 h. 100 µg of total lysate was
analyzed by Western blot analysis using DO-1 p53 antibody.
B, MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated with cycloheximide at 10 µg/ml for 18 h and then treated with or without 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 3 h and analyzed for
sub-G1 content cells by flow cytometry as described for
Fig. 1A. C, expression of Bax, Bak, and
Bcl-XL. MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated in the presence of
Ant-p53pep for 3 h. 50 µg of total protein prepared from either
untreated or treated cells were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and Western blot analysis with anti-Bax, anti-Bak, or
anti-Bcl-XL antibodies (Santa Cruz, CA). Proteins were
detected using ECL Western blotting detection system.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Increased extracellular localization of
Fas/FasL. MDA-MB-468 (A) or MCF10-2A (B)
were treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep, Ant, p53pep, or no
peptide for 1 h. The white peak represents the
superimposed histograms of untreated, Ant-treated, or p53pep-treated
cells. The black peaks indicate shifts observed in
Ant-p53pep-treated cells. C, agonistic Fas/APO-1
antibody-induced apoptosis in MCF10-2A cells. Cells were treated with
500 ng/ml of apoptosis-inducing Fas/APO-1 IgM antibody (Upstate
Biotechnology Inc.) for 3 h and analyzed by flow cytometry for
sub-G1 DNA content.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Proteolytic activation of FLICE. Total
cell lysate prepared from MDA-MB-468 cells treated with 30 µM of Ant-p53pep was analyzed with anti-FLICE antibody.
Two characteristic truncated forms of FLICE, p43 and p26, are
indicated.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A, Ant-p53pep increased CPP32 protease
activity. CPP32 and ICE protease activities were measured in an
in vitro assay using lysate prepared from cells treated (+)
or untreated (
) with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h. The
background level of fluorescence was subtracted from each measurement.
B, cleavage of PARP. The
[35S]methionine-labeled, truncated 48-kDa PARP was
translated in vitro from reticulocyte lysates and incubated
with 20 µg of lysates prepared from either Ant-p53pep-treated (2 h at
30 µM) or untreated MDA-MB-468, MCF10-2A, and MDA-MB-453
(null p53) cells. Cleaved product of PARP is indicated with
asterisk.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Ant-p53pep binds to both wild-type and mutant
p53 proteins. A, in vitro translated
35S-labeled p53-273H or 35S-labeled truncated
p53-C (
aa1-359) were incubated with biotinylated Ant-p53pep
conjugated to streptavidin-agarose beads (matrix) or matrix alone.
Input represents 5% fraction of the total translated proteins.
B, affinity precipitation of wt p53 and mutant p53-273H
proteins by Ant-p53pep. Biotinylated Ant-p53pep affinity matrix was
directly incubated with whole cell lysates from either MDA-MB-468 or
MCF10-2A cells followed by Western blot as described under
"Results." Cell lysates were precleared with matrix alone prior to
the binding experiments. The left panel indicates p53
proteins detected in 100 µg of total lysates with or without
Ant-p53pep treatment.
-helix consistent with other secondary structure
predictions.2 This structure
was lower by 10 kcal/mol than the energy for the next competing
structure. The lowest energy (global minimum) structure for the
N-terminal (Ala-Pro)3 repeat sequence was, using the single letter conformational state code (36), DADADC. This conformation was
computed to have a probability of occurrence of 25%. The global energy
minimum was found to have a total conformational energy that was over 5 kcal/mol lower than that of the next lowest energy structure. In this
lowest energy structure, the helix axis of the DADADC conformation for
(Ala-Pro)3 was aligned parallel to the helix axis of the
369-382 peptide as shown in stereo view in Fig.
7. The two helices intercalate so that
each of the Pro residues of (Ala-Pro)3 forms favorable
contacts within grooves of the
-helix of the 369-382 sequence. The
two helices are aligned such that most of the side chains of Lys
residues, i.e. Lys370, Lys373,
Lys381, and Lys382, of the 369-382 sequence
point away from the face of this peptide that makes contacts with the
(Ala-Pro)3 peptide. Several of the CH2 groups
of the side chains of Lys372 and Arg379 contact
the Pro residues, and the side chain CH3 group of
Thr377 also contacts the second Pro residue. The complex
therefore has amphipathic properties in which the interface between the
two peptides tends to be nonpolar, whereas the hydrophilic Lys residues point away on the opposite face of the molecule. This unique lowest energy minimum suggests the possibility that p53aa84-89 might form a
binding site within p53 for the Ant-p53pep.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Stereo view of computationally modeled
interaction between the C-terminal p53aa369-382 and N-terminal
p53aa84-89 peptides. The yellow peptide structure is a
minimum energy conformation for p53aa369-382, and the blue
peptide structure is a minimum energy conformation for p53aa84-89. The
peptides are viewed with the N termini at the top and the C
termini at the bottom.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES

To whom correspondence should be addressed: 650 West 168th St.,
New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-1168; Fax: 212-305-7348; E-mail:
fine@cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hollstein, M.,
Rice, K.,
Greenblatt, M. S.,
Soussi, T.,
Fuchs, R.,
Sorlie, T.,
Hovig, E.,
Smith-Sorensen, B.,
Montesano, R.,
and Harris, C. C.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3551-3555
2.
Cho, Y.,
Gorina, S.,
Jeffrey, P. D.,
and Pavetich, N. P.
(1994)
Science
265,
346-355 3.
Ko, L. J.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Gene Dev.
10,
1054-1072 4.
Owen-Schaub, L. B.,
Zhang, W.,
Cusack, J. C.,
Angelo, L. S.,
Santee, S. M.,
Fujiwara, T.,
Roth, J. A.,
Deisseroth, A. B.,
Zhang, W. W.,
Kruzel, E.,
and Radinsky, R.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3032-3040[Abstract]
5.
Caelles, C.,
Heimberg, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1994)
Nature
370,
220-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Wagner, A. J.,
Kokontis, J. M.,
and Hay, N.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2817-2830 7.
Reed, J. C.
(1997)
Nature
387,
773-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Kroemer, G.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
614-620[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Farrow, S. N.,
and Brown, R.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6,
45-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Eischen, C. M.,
and Leibson, P. J.
(1997)
Adv. Phamacol.
41,
107-132
11.
Nagata, S.
(1997)
Cell
88,
355-65[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Kischkel, F. C.,
Hellbardt, S.,
Behrmann, I.,
Germer, M.,
Pawlita, M.,
Krammer, P. H.,
and Peter, M. E.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5579-5588[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Boldin, M. P.,
Goncharov, T. M.,
Goltsev, Y. V.,
and Wallach, D
(1996)
Cell
85,
803-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Cryns, V.,
and Yuan, J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1551-1570 15.
Salvesen, G. S.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1997)
Cell
91,
443-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Hupp, T. R.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
865-875[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Muller-Tiemann, B. F.,
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Elting, J. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6079-6084 18.
Hupp, T. R.,
Meek, D. W.,
Midgley, C. A.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1992)
Cell
71,
875-886[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Kandil, A. N.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5057-5064[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Abarzua, P.,
LoSardo, J. E.,
Gubler, M. L.,
Spathis, R.,
Lu, Y. A.,
Felix, A.,
and Neri, A.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
2477-2482[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Selivanova, G.,
Iotsova, V.,
Okan, I.,
Fritsche, M.,
Strom, M.,
Groner, B.,
Grafstrom, R. C.,
and Wiman, K. G.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
632-638[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Stefanis, L.,
Park, D. S.,
Yan, C. Y.,
Farinelli, S. E.,
Troy, C. M.,
Shelanski, M. L.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30663-30671 23.
Nemethy, G.,
Gibson, K. D.,
Palmer, K. A.,
Yoon, C. N.,
Paterlini, G.,
Zagari, A.,
Rumsey, S.,
and Scheraga, H. A.
(1992)
J. Phys. Chem.
96,
6472-6484[CrossRef]
24.
Pincus, M. R.
(1988)
Int. J. Quant. Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp.
15,
209-220
25.
Vasquez, M.,
Nemethy, G.,
and Scheraga, H. A.
(1983)
Macromolecules
16,
1043-1049[CrossRef]
26.
Shah, D.,
Chen, J. M.,
Carty, R. P.,
Pincus, M. R.,
and Scheraga, H. A.
(1989)
Int. J. Peptide Protein Res.
34,
325-332[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Soussi, T.,
Fromentel, C. C.,
and May, P.
(1990)
Oncogene
5,
945-952[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Pincus, M. R.,
Zimmerman, S. S.,
and Scheraga, H. A.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
4261-4265 29.
Brugidou, J.,
Legrand, C.,
Mery, J.,
and Rabie, A.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
214,
685-693[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Nigro, J. M.,
Baker, S. J.,
Preisinger, A. C.,
Jessup, J. M.,
Hostetter, R.,
Cleary, K.,
Bigner, S. H.,
Davidson, N.,
Baylin, S.,
Devilee, P.,
Glover, T.,
Collins, F. S.,
Weston, A.,
Modali, R.,
Harris, C. C.,
and Jogelstein, B.
(1989)
Nature
342,
705-708[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Gorman, A. M.,
Samali, A.,
McGowan, A. J.,
and Cotter, T. G.
(1997)
Cytometry
29,
97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Thor, A. D,
Moore, D. H. II.,
Edgerton, S. M.,
Kawasaki, E. S.,
Reihsaus, E.,
Lynch, H. T.,
Marcus, J. N.,
Schwartz, L.,
Chen, L. C.,
and Mayall, B. H.
(1992)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
84,
845-55 33.
Vermes, I.,
Haanen, C.,
Steffens-Nakken, H.,
and Reutelingsperger, C.
(1995)
J. Immunol. Methods
184,
39-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Levine, A. J.
(1997)
Cell
88,
323-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Nicholson, D. W.,
and Thornberry, N. A.
(1997)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22,
299-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Zimmerman, S. S.,
Pottle, M. S.,
Nemethy, G.,
and Scheraga, H. A.
(1977)
Macromolecules
10,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Chen, X.,
Ko, L. J.,
Jayaraman, L.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2438-2451 38.
Haupt, Y.,
Rowan, S.,
Shaulian, E.,
Vousden, K.,
and Oren, M.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2170-2183 39.
Bennett, M.,
Macdonald, K.,
Chan, S-W.,
Luzio, P. J.,
Simari, R.,
and Weissberg, P.
(1998)
Science
282,
290-293 40.
Hupp, T. R.,
Meek, D. W.,
Midgley, C. A.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3167-3174 41.
Yu, H.,
Chen, J. K.,
Feng, S.,
Dalgarno, D. C.,
Brauer, A. W.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1994)
Cell
76,
933-945[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Walker, K. K.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15335-15340 43.
Venot, C.,
Maratrat, M.,
Dureuil, C.,
Conseiller, E.,
Bracco, L.,
and Debussche, L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4668-4679[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Adler, V.,
Pincus, M. R.,
Minamoto, T.,
Fuchs, S. Y.,
Bluth, M. J.,
Brandt-Rauf, P. W.,
Friedman, F. K.,
Robinson, R. C.,
Chen, J. M.,
Wang, X. W.,
et al..
(1992)
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1686-1691 45.
Selivanova, G.,
Ryabchenko, L.,
Jansson, E.,
Iotsova, V.,
and Wiman, K. G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3395-3402 46.
Rampino, N.,
Yamamoto, H.,
Ionov, Y.,
Li, Y.,
Sawai, H.,
Reed, J. C.,
and Perucho, M.
(1997)
Science
275,
967-969 47.
Ouyang, H.,
Furukawa, T.,
Abe, T.,
Kato, Y.,
and Horii, A.
(1998)
Clin. Cancer Res.
4,
1071-1074[Abstract]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Guida, A. Bisso, C. Fenollar-Ferrer, M. Napoli, C. Anselmi, J. E. Girardini, P. Carloni, and G. Del Sal Peptide Aptamers Targeting Mutant p53 Induce Apoptosis in Tumor Cells Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6550 - 6558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Dinnen, L. Drew, D. P. Petrylak, Y. Mao, N. Cassai, J. Szmulewicz, P. Brandt-Rauf, and R. L. Fine Activation of Targeted Necrosis by a p53 Peptide: A NOVEL DEATH PATHWAY THAT CIRCUMVENTS APOPTOTIC RESISTANCE J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 26675 - 26686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jalota-Badhwar, R. Kaul-Ghanekar, D. Mogare, R. Boppana, K. M. Paknikar, and S. Chattopadhyay SMAR1-derived P44 Peptide Retains Its Tumor Suppressor Function through Modulation of p53 J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9902 - 9913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wolcke, N. Hunt, J. Jungmann, and D. Ullmann Early Identification of False Positives in High-Throughput Screening for Activators of p53-DNA Interaction J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2006; 11(4): 341 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Senatus, Y. Li, C. Mandigo, G. Nichols, G. Moise, Y. Mao, M. D. Brown, R. C. Anderson, A. T. Parsa, P. W. Brandt-Rauf, et al. Restoration of p53 function for selective Fas-mediated apoptosis in human and rat glioma cells in vitro and in vivo by a p53 COOH-terminal peptide Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2006; 5(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Fischer and K. Schulze-Osthoff New Approaches and Therapeutics Targeting Apoptosis in Disease Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2005; 57(2): 187 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ma, Y. Pan, K. Gunasekaran, R. B. Venkataraghavan, A. J. Levine, and R. Nussinov Comparison of the protein-protein interfaces in the p53-DNA crystal structures: Towards elucidation of the biological interface PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 3988 - 3993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|