JBC Connect with Cosmo for Collagen Detection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 34924-34931, December 3, 1999


Conformational and Molecular Basis for Induction of Apoptosis by a p53 C-terminal Peptide in Human Cancer Cells*

Arianna L. KimDagger , Anthony J. RaffoDagger , Paul W. Brandt-Rauf, Matthew R. Pincus§parallel , Regina Monaco§parallel , Patricio Abarzua**, and Robert L. FineDagger Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, Experimental Therapeutics Program, Division of Medical Oncology, New York, New York 10032, the § Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, VA Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11209, parallel  SUNY Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203, the  School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, and ** Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey 07110-1199

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A p53-derived C-terminal peptide induced rapid apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines carrying endogenous p53 mutations or overexpressed wild-type (wt) p53 but was not toxic to nonmalignant human cell lines containing wt p53. Apoptosis occurred through a Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway involving increased extracellular levels of Fas/FasL in the absence of protein synthesis, as well as activation of a Fas/APO-1-specific protease, FLICE. The peptide activity was p53-dependent, and it had no effect in three tumor cell lines with null p53. Furthermore, the C-terminal peptide bound to p53 protein in cell extracts. Thus, p53-dependent, Fas/APO-1 mediated apoptosis can be induced in breast cancer cells with mutant p53 similar to the recently described Fas/APO-1 induced apoptosis by wt p53. However, mutant p53 without p53 peptide does not induce a Fas/APO-1 activation or apoptosis. Docking of the computed low energy conformations for the C-terminal peptide with those for a recently defined proline-rich regulatory region from the N-terminal domain of p53 suggests a unique low energy complex between the two peptide domains. The selective and rapid induction of apoptosis in cancer cells carrying p53 abnormalities may lead to a novel therapeutic modality.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

More than 50% of human malignancies, including breast cancers, are associated with missense mutations or deletions of p53, and most of the missense mutations map to the DNA-binding domain of the protein (1, 2). p53 is a sequence-specific transcriptional factor that transactivates a number of genes whose products are involved in cell growth regulation. These include WAF1/p21/Cip1, which arrests the cell cycle, GADD45 for DNA repair, and Bax and Fas/APO-1 to modulate apoptosis (3, 4). However, p53 containing mutations in the transcriptional regulation domain of the protein also induced apoptosis (5, 6). Apoptosis is a complex process regulated by several pathways, some of which involve members of the Bcl-2 family (7-9). Fas/APO-1 also induces rapid apoptosis upon binding to Fas ligand (FasL)1 through the autocrine/paracrine signaling pathway (10, 11). When activated, the intracellular death domain in Fas/APO-1 binds to FADD/MORT-1, which then recruits FLICE (caspase 8/MACHalpha 1). FLICE is a chimeric protein with an adaptor domain for binding to FADD/MORT-1 in DISC (death-inducing signaling complex) and a proteolytic domain similar to ICE (12). The formation of DISC leads to the activation of FLICE. FLICE is the first protease activated in the Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway that initiates downstream activation of caspase-3, -6, and -7 and mitochondrial damage. This in turn activates ICE family proteases, triggering a cascade of apoptotic processes (13-15).

The sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53 appears to be negatively regulated by its C-terminal 30-amino acid (aa) segment (aa 363-393) (16) and also by N-terminal proline-rich motifs located between aa 80-93 (17). Synthetic peptides corresponding to the C-terminal domain of p53 such as residues aa 363-393 bind directly in vitro to wild-type p53 (17). Binding experiments with p53 proteins that contain selected deletions indicate that binding of the free aa 363-393 peptide to p53 requires the presence of both C-terminal aa 363-393 and N-terminal aa 80-93 sequences in the p53 protein (17). This observation suggests either that the free peptide may interact simultaneously with both regions or that the absence of either or both of these segments in p53 results in structural changes in the protein, lowering its affinity for the free peptide.

Deletion of either or both of these regulatory regions, as well as various C-terminal modifications, stimulate specific DNA binding of p53 in vitro (3, 18, 19). Previous studies demonstrated that the addition of a chemically modified C-terminal p53 peptide restored in vitro sequence-specific DNA binding function to mutant p53-273 (Arg to His). Furthermore, intranuclear microinjection of this peptide into SW480 colon carcinoma cells carrying an endogenous p53-273 His mutation restored transcriptional activation of a p53-responsive reporter construct (20). Recently, a p53 C-terminal 22-amino acid peptide (corresponding to residues 361-382), fused to the Antennapedia (Ant) homeobox domain (17 aa) to facilitate cellular uptake, suppressed growth, and induced apoptosis of SW480 cells (21). However, the mechanism of action of the fusion peptide and effects on nonmalignant cells are not known. In this study, we report the peptide mechanisms for inducing apoptosis in breast carcinoma cell lines carrying endogenous mutant p53 or overexpressed wt p53. Using conformational energy calculations to compute the low energy conformations for the N- and C-terminal regulatory domains, we find that these two domains can form a unique low energy complex, suggesting that a direct interaction can exist between them.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Tissue Culture-- Cell lines used in this study were purchased from ATCC and maintained according to ATCC guidelines. The MDA-MB-453 cell line was subcloned, and a line was isolated that did not express detectable p53.

Peptide Synthesis-- Peptides were synthesized by Research Genetics (Birmingham, AL). The first two arginines of Antennapedia were removed when fused to the C-terminal arginine of p53pep. Peptide stocks (4 mM) were prepared in water.
<AR><R><C></C><C><UP><B> 361                                                                        382</B></UP></C></R><R><C><UP>p53pep</UP></C><C><UP><B>N-GSRAHSSHLKSKKGQSTSRHKK-C</B></UP></C></R><R><C><UP>Ant</UP></C><C><UP>                                                                           KKWKMRRNQFWVKVQRG</UP></C></R><R><C></C><C><UP><B>361                                                                          382</B></UP></C></R><R><C><UP>Ant-p53pep</UP></C><C><UP> <B>GSRAHSSHLKSKKGQSTSRHKK</B>WKMRRNQFWVKVQRG</UP></C></R></AR>

Western Blot Analyses-- Western blot analyses were performed using standard methods and the ECL detection system (Amersham Pharcamia Biotech) with 1 µg/ml antibodies.

Flow Cytometric Analysis for Apoptosis and Cell Surface Fas and FasL Analysis-- Propidium iodide-stained cells (1-2 × 106 cells/ml) were analyzed by a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACSCaliber, Becton Dickenson) followed by determination of the percentage of sub-G1 content cells by the CellQuest program. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-human monoclonal Fas/CD95 antibody and biotin-conjugated mouse anti-human FasL monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, CA) were used to determine cell surface Fas and FasL by measuring the fluorescent intensity for 104 cells using FACSCaliber according to manufacturer's protocol.

Annexin V-FITC Binding Assay-- Annexin V-FITC binding assay was performed following the manufacturer's protocol (PharMingen).

CPP32 and ICE Activities/PARP Cleavage-- Experiments were performed according to Stefanis et al. (22) with 20 µM fluorogenic tetrapeptide substrates. A plasmid construct encoding the 48-kDa truncated PARP was kindly provided by Dr. L. Greene (Columbia University).

Precipitation of p53 Protein and Biotinylated Ant-p53pep Complex-- For in vitro binding assay, [35S]methionine-labeled p53-273 His and the truncated p53aa360-383 were synthesized using the T7 promoter coupled in vitro transcription/translation system (Promega Co.). 35S-Labeled p53 proteins were then incubated in the Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer for 2 h at 4 °C with biotinylated Ant-p53pep coupled to streptavidin-agarose. Beads were washed three times with lysis buffer with 0.3 M KCl, and proteins bound to the biotinylated peptide agarose matrix were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography to detect p53-273 protein. The interaction between the peptide and p53 protein present in either MDA-MB-468 or nonmalignant MCF10-2A whole cell extracts was determined by incubation of 500 µg of extracts with the biotinylated Ant-p53pep-agarose matrix. The complexes were then analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot with anti-p53 DO-1 antibody (Santa Cruz).

Conformational Energy Calculations-- It is of interest to determine whether the N- and C-terminal regulatory domains have well defined three-dimensional structures and, if so, whether these two domains can form a low energy complex with one another. Although the x-ray crystal structure for wild-type p53 has been determined for residues 94-312, there are no experimentally determined structures for negative regulatory domains of residues 80-92 and 363-393 in the p53 protein. We therefore computed the possible low energy conformations for each peptide using the chain build-up method based on the Empirical Conformational Energy for Peptides Program (23). In this method, all combinations for the single residue minima for the first two amino acids in the sequence were generated and subjected to energy minimization (24). The low energy conformations that occurred within a cut-off energy (10 kcal/mol) of that for the global minimum were then combined with the single residue minima (25) for the next amino acid residue in the sequence. These conformations were again subjected to energy minimization. This process was repeated until the entire sequence was generated. For the two peptides, a number of low energy minima were found. These were classified into different conformational groups based on their backbone conformations. The statistical thermodynamic weights for each conformation and for each conformational group were determined as described previously (26).

The method was applied to p53 residues 84-89 and 363-382 from the amino and C-terminal domains, respectively. The 84-89 segment has the sequence Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro, which is the most conserved among mammalian p53 sequences in the 80-92 regulatory domain (27) and contains a regular proline-repeat sequence. The 369-382 peptide, which has the sequence Leu-Lys-Ser-Lys-Lys-Gly-Gln-Ser-Thr-Ser-Arg-His-Lys-Lys, was chosen because it has been found to activate p53 for induction of apoptosis (21). Both of these peptides were central portions of each peptide.

Docking-- The lowest energy conformation for the 369-382 segment was an alpha -helix and was at least 10 kcal/mol lower in energy than for any competing low energy conformation. This conformation was therefore taken as the reference structure for this sequence. The lowest energy structure from each class of conformations for the (Ala-Pro)3 peptide was then subjected to a grid search in which the rigid body variables but not the dihedral angles were changed systematically as described previously (28). For each representative (Ala-Pro)3 conformation, 3024 grid points were generated. A total of 45 representative low energy conformations for this peptide, selected as described in the preceding section, were subjected to this gridding procedure so that a total of over 136,000 conformations were evaluated. From the grid search, each low energy configuration of the two peptides was then subjected to energy minimization in which the rigid body variables, and the dihedral angles of the two peptides were allowed to change.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A number of peptides from the C-terminal region of p53 were tested for inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis in various tumor cell lines. These peptides were fused to an Antennapedia-derived 17-aa domain for efficient intracellular uptake (29). Similar to the peptide reported by Selivanova et al. (21), we found peptide p53 aa 361-382 to be most effective for inducing apoptosis when fused to Antennapedia. This peptide, referred to as Ant-p53pep hereafter, was chosen for further study. The mean IC50 for induction of apoptosis by Ant-p53pep in human breast tumor cells was found to be 30 µM, and this concentration was used throughout. The Antennapedia peptide alone displayed no cytotoxic effects when tested up to 500 µM (data not shown).

Induction of Apoptosis by Ant-p53pep-- Effects of Ant-p53pep were tested using the MDA-MB-468 human breast carcinoma cell line, which contains an endogenous p53-273His mutant gene (30). This mutation has been reported as one of the two most prevalent mutated spots in the p53 gene, accounting for up to 18% of all p53 mutations (3). The effect of Ant-p53pep on cell viability was initially examined by trypan blue exclusion. Cell viability counts showed a 10-fold decrease in viable cells after a 5-h treatment with 30 µM Ant-p53pep in MDA-MB-468 cells. In contrast, the peptide at 30 µM for 5 h did not have any effect upon viability in the nonmalignant wt p53 breast epithelial cell line, MCF10-2A (data not shown).

To investigate the mechanism of peptide-induced cytotoxicity, we determined whether cell death was due to apoptosis and whether the effect was specific for the peptide. The DNA content and integrity were measured by flow cytometry of propidium iodide stained cells (31). A sub-G1 peak characteristic of apoptotic cells was detected at 5 h in MDA-MB-468 cells treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep but not when treated with Antennapedia or p53pep alone at the same concentration and exposure time (Fig. 1A). The percentage of sub-G1 content cells was 30-40% in Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MD-468 cells. We did not detect any other significant change in the cell cycle profile. Two other human breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 carrying a p53 mutation at aa 280 (32) and MCF7 overexpressing wt p53 were also induced into apoptosis by 30 µM Ant-p53pep (Fig. 1A). To exclude the possibility of cytotoxic effects on nonmalignant cells, we tested MCF10-2A and 27sk, a normal skin fibroblast line. Growth and viability of MCF10-2A and 27sk cells, both expressing low levels of wt p53, were not affected by 30 µM of Ant-p53pep when observed over a period of 72 h (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Measurement of sub-G1 DNA content in breast cancer cells by Ant-p53pep. A, three breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-231, and MCF7, a nonmalignant mammary cell line, MCF10-2A (wt p53), and a normal skin fibroblast line, 27sk (wt p53), were treated with 30 µM of either Ant, p53pep, or Ant-p53pep for 5 h. Cell cycle distribution of 104 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell populations with sub-G1 DNA content are indicated with arrows. B, detection of annexin V binding in Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468 cells. Cells were treated with Ant-p53pep for 30 min prior to binding with Annexin V. The solid line represents a background binding of annexin V in the untreated cells, and the dotted line represents the peptide-treated cells. C, measurement of sub-G1 DNA content and annexin V binding in MDA-MB-453 cells (null p53). The experiments were performed as in A and B.

Apoptotic cell death was further confirmed by binding of Annexin V to the externalized phospholipid phosphatidylserine. In many cell types, phosphatidylserine becomes exposed to the extracellular environment because of the loss of membrane asymmetry during the early phase of apoptosis (33). MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with 30 µM of Ant-p53pep for various time periods and then incubated with Annexin V-FITC and analyzed by flow cytometry. Fig. 1B shows approximately 35% of cells bound Annexin V following 30 min of exposure to Ant-p53pep (dotted line) compared with the untreated control (solid line). We have also observed Annexin V binding in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells but not in 27sk cells (data not shown). MDA-MB-468 cells showed characteristic morphological changes associated with apoptosis, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage, and nuclear fragmentation. The morphology of peptide-treated MCF10-2A cells was similar to control cells (data not shown). Furthermore, treatment of a p53 null/null breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-453, with Ant-p53pep, showed no accumulation of sub-G1 DNA content or Annexin V binding (Fig. 1C). Two other cell lines with null p53 status, H1299, a lung adenocarcinoma line, and Saos2, an osteosarcoma line, also were not induced into apoptosis by Ant-p53pep (data not shown).

Mechanism of Apoptosis Induced by Ant-p53pep-- We investigated possible mechanisms for peptide-induced apoptosis. The MDA-MB-468 cell line was selected for further studies because it contains a single copy of R273H mutation of p53. The R273 mutation is the most prevalent mutation in p53 that abolishes both DNA binding and transcriptional ability of p53 (2, 34). The p53-R273H mutant proteins have been shown to interact with p53-derived peptide in in vitro DNA binding studies (20). The endogenous levels of p53 were determined by Western blot analysis in MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells after Ant-p53pep treatment for 3 h (Fig. 2A). As expected, MDA-MB-468 cells expressed a high level of mutant p53-273H, a very low level of wt p53 in MCF10-2A, and no expression of p53 in MDA-MB-453 cells. Levels of p53 were not altered after Ant-p53pep treatment. Interestingly, cycloheximide treatment of MDA-MB-468 cells prior to addition of Ant-p53pep did not block apoptosis (Fig. 2B), suggesting that Ant-p53pep-induced apoptosis was not dependent on de novo protein synthesis. Furthermore, there were no significant changes in expression levels of known apoptotic regulators such as Bax, Bak, and Bcl-XL in MDA-MB-468 cells following treatment with Ant-p53pep for up to 3 h as analyzed by Western blot (Fig. 2C). These data indicated that Bax, a direct transcriptional target of p53, is not induced by Ant-p53pep. There was also no induction of p21/WAF1 level as evidenced by lack of cell cycle arrest with Ant-p53pep treatment (Fig. 1A). These data suggest that transcriptional activation function by p53, or at least induction of Bax, is not required for apoptosis of Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468 cells.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, p53 expression in MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells. Cells were treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 3 h. 100 µg of total lysate was analyzed by Western blot analysis using DO-1 p53 antibody. B, MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated with cycloheximide at 10 µg/ml for 18 h and then treated with or without 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 3 h and analyzed for sub-G1 content cells by flow cytometry as described for Fig. 1A. C, expression of Bax, Bak, and Bcl-XL. MDA-MB-468 cells were incubated in the presence of Ant-p53pep for 3 h. 50 µg of total protein prepared from either untreated or treated cells were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis with anti-Bax, anti-Bak, or anti-Bcl-XL antibodies (Santa Cruz, CA). Proteins were detected using ECL Western blotting detection system.

Because peptide-induced apoptosis occurred very rapidly in the absence of new protein synthesis, possible changes in cell surface expression of Fas/APO-1 in MDA-MB-468 cells were examined by flow cytometry. Cells were incubated with Ant-p53pep and controls for various times and labeled with FITC-conjugated Fas antibody prior to fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis. In Fig. 3A, MDA-MB-468 cells showed ~40% higher levels of extracellular Fas/APO-1 protein within 30 min of Ant-p53pep treatment at 30 µM, as determined by a shift of peak (black area). Neither p53pep nor Antennapedia alone affected accumulation of extracellular Fas/APO-1 whose peaks coincided with the untreated control (white area, Fig. 3A). Similarly, extracellular localization of FasL was also increased by about 30% in MDA-MB-468 cells incubated for 30 min with 30 µM Ant-p53pep (Fig. 3A). In contrast, nonmalignant MCF10-2A and MDA-MB-453 p53 null cells did not show any increase in cell surface Fas/APO-1 by Ant-p53pep treatment (Fig. 3B and data not shown, respectively). Total cellular level of Fas/APO-1 in Westerns was not altered by Ant-p53pep treatment in both MDA-MB-468 and MCF10-2A cells (data not shown). MCF10-2A cells, however, did undergo apoptosis in the presence of agonistic, apoptosis-inducing Fas IgM antibody at 500 ng/ml within 3 h, indicating that the Fas/APO-1 signaling death pathway was functional in these cells (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, treatment of MDA-MB-468 cells with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h generated the characteristic truncated active form of FLICE (p26) by Western blot (Fig. 4). These data suggest that the apoptosis in Ant-p53pep-treated MDA-MB-468 cells was mediated through the Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway and resulted in FLICE activation.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Increased extracellular localization of Fas/FasL. MDA-MB-468 (A) or MCF10-2A (B) were treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep, Ant, p53pep, or no peptide for 1 h. The white peak represents the superimposed histograms of untreated, Ant-treated, or p53pep-treated cells. The black peaks indicate shifts observed in Ant-p53pep-treated cells. C, agonistic Fas/APO-1 antibody-induced apoptosis in MCF10-2A cells. Cells were treated with 500 ng/ml of apoptosis-inducing Fas/APO-1 IgM antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.) for 3 h and analyzed by flow cytometry for sub-G1 DNA content.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Proteolytic activation of FLICE. Total cell lysate prepared from MDA-MB-468 cells treated with 30 µM of Ant-p53pep was analyzed with anti-FLICE antibody. Two characteristic truncated forms of FLICE, p43 and p26, are indicated.

Effects of Ant-p53pep on CPP32 Protease Activity and PARP Cleavage-- One of the downstream components of apoptosis is caspase-3/CPP32 cysteine protease, which can be activated by multiple pathways (35). The processed, active CPP32 cleaves various substrates including PARP. The activity of CPP32 was measured in an in vitro assay using the fluorogenic tetrapeptide substrate, Ac-DEVD-AMC. Fluorescence produced from cleaved AMC is directly proportional to the amount of CPP32 activity present in cell lysates. Fig. 5A shows measurements of CPP32 activity in lysates prepared from cells treated either with or without 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h. CPP32 activity in MDA-MB-468 cells was increased by ~6-fold above base line when treated with Ant-p53pep compared with the untreated control (Fig. 5A). In contrast, MCF 10-2A cell lysates showed no significant increase in CPP32 activity following treatment with the peptide (Fig. 5A). Studies with control p53pep or Antennapedia alone showed no effect on CPP32 activity (data not shown). Ant-p53pep treatment did not alter ICE activity as measured with an ICE-specific fluorogenic substrate (Fig. 5A).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, Ant-p53pep increased CPP32 protease activity. CPP32 and ICE protease activities were measured in an in vitro assay using lysate prepared from cells treated (+) or untreated (-) with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h. The background level of fluorescence was subtracted from each measurement. B, cleavage of PARP. The [35S]methionine-labeled, truncated 48-kDa PARP was translated in vitro from reticulocyte lysates and incubated with 20 µg of lysates prepared from either Ant-p53pep-treated (2 h at 30 µM) or untreated MDA-MB-468, MCF10-2A, and MDA-MB-453 (null p53) cells. Cleaved product of PARP is indicated with asterisk.

To further assess the activation of the apoptotic cascade, a truncated 48-kDa form of PARP was translated in vitro and incubated with lysates prepared from either Ant-p53pep-treated or untreated MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-453, and MCF10-2A cells. As shown in Fig. 5B, a proteolytically cleaved [35S]-PARP fragment was detected only from lysates of MDA-MB-468 cells treated with 30 µM Ant-p53pep for 2 h but not in MCF10-2A or in a p53 null/null breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-453 (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data suggest that in these lines, Ant-p53pep activity is p53-dependent.

Interaction of Ant-p53pep and p53 Protein-- To investigate whether peptide directly interacts with p53 protein and whether this interaction is important for peptide-induced apoptosis, we measured the interaction between Ant-p53pep and p53 protein. Mutant p53-273H and a truncated C terminus p53 fragment (p53-C; deletion in aa 1-359) were in vitro radiolabeled and incubated with a biotinylated Ant-p53pep conjugated to a streptavidin-agarose matrix. Fig. 6A shows binding of 35S-labeled p53-273H to Ant-p53pep agarose but not to the streptavidin-agarose matrix alone. The truncated p53 C terminus fragment did not bind to Ant-p53pep (Fig. 6A), suggesting that binding may occur outside the C terminus (aa 360-393) of p53. Furthermore, mutant p53-273H from extracts prepared directly from MDA-MB-468 cells also formed complexes with biotinylated Ant-p53pep (Fig. 6B). Wild-type p53 protein from MCF10-2A also formed a complex with Ant-p53pep, although the amount was markedly lower than that in MDA-MB-468 extracts, possibly because of the low expression levels of p53 in nonmalignant MCF10-2A cells (Fig. 6B), which did not undergo apoptosis when treated with Ant-p53pep (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Ant-p53pep binds to both wild-type and mutant p53 proteins. A, in vitro translated 35S-labeled p53-273H or 35S-labeled truncated p53-C (Delta aa1-359) were incubated with biotinylated Ant-p53pep conjugated to streptavidin-agarose beads (matrix) or matrix alone. Input represents 5% fraction of the total translated proteins. B, affinity precipitation of wt p53 and mutant p53-273H proteins by Ant-p53pep. Biotinylated Ant-p53pep affinity matrix was directly incubated with whole cell lysates from either MDA-MB-468 or MCF10-2A cells followed by Western blot as described under "Results." Cell lysates were precleared with matrix alone prior to the binding experiments. The left panel indicates p53 proteins detected in 100 µg of total lysates with or without Ant-p53pep treatment.

Interaction of N- and C-terminal Peptides-- Our finding that Ant-p53pep did not bind to the C terminus of p53, from which it was derived, suggested another possible interaction site on p53. One candidate region for the direct interaction of the C-terminal regulatory peptide is the N-terminal regulatory domain involving residues 80-93. To explore whether these two regions might interact with one another, we performed conformational energy calculations to generate the low energy conformations of each peptide. These low energy conformations of the central regions of each peptide were "docked" against one another to explore whether stable complexes could form. Using the procedure described under "Experimental Procedures," we found a single lowest energy conformation for the 369-382 C-terminal sequence, an all alpha -helix consistent with other secondary structure predictions.2 This structure was lower by 10 kcal/mol than the energy for the next competing structure. The lowest energy (global minimum) structure for the N-terminal (Ala-Pro)3 repeat sequence was, using the single letter conformational state code (36), DADADC. This conformation was computed to have a probability of occurrence of 25%. The global energy minimum was found to have a total conformational energy that was over 5 kcal/mol lower than that of the next lowest energy structure. In this lowest energy structure, the helix axis of the DADADC conformation for (Ala-Pro)3 was aligned parallel to the helix axis of the 369-382 peptide as shown in stereo view in Fig. 7. The two helices intercalate so that each of the Pro residues of (Ala-Pro)3 forms favorable contacts within grooves of the alpha -helix of the 369-382 sequence. The two helices are aligned such that most of the side chains of Lys residues, i.e. Lys370, Lys373, Lys381, and Lys382, of the 369-382 sequence point away from the face of this peptide that makes contacts with the (Ala-Pro)3 peptide. Several of the CH2 groups of the side chains of Lys372 and Arg379 contact the Pro residues, and the side chain CH3 group of Thr377 also contacts the second Pro residue. The complex therefore has amphipathic properties in which the interface between the two peptides tends to be nonpolar, whereas the hydrophilic Lys residues point away on the opposite face of the molecule. This unique lowest energy minimum suggests the possibility that p53aa84-89 might form a binding site within p53 for the Ant-p53pep.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Stereo view of computationally modeled interaction between the C-terminal p53aa369-382 and N-terminal p53aa84-89 peptides. The yellow peptide structure is a minimum energy conformation for p53aa369-382, and the blue peptide structure is a minimum energy conformation for p53aa84-89. The peptides are viewed with the N termini at the top and the C termini at the bottom.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study investigated mechanisms of apoptosis induced by p53-derived C-terminal peptide. Three human breast cancer cell lines, carrying either endogenously expressed mutant p53 or overexpressed wt p53, underwent rapid apoptosis after Ant-p53pep treatment. Peptide activity to induce apoptosis was not dependent upon de novo protein synthesis. The transcription/translation-independent induction of apoptosis has been described in various systems in which a sequence-specific transactivation-defective p53 (Gln22/Ser23) mutant induced apoptosis in Saos2 osteosarcoma cells (37) and, similarly, in HeLa cells with a transcription-defective, truncated p53 (38). p53-dependent apoptosis also occurred in the presence of actinomycin D or cycloheximide through yet unknown mechanisms (5). Our results indicate that induction of apoptosis is mediated through Fas/APO-1 pathway in MDA-MB-468 cells and is p53-dependent because apoptosis was not observed in p53 null cell lines (MDA-MB-453, H1299, and Saos2). Moreover, mutant p53 was found to complex with Ant-p53pep. The mechanisms by which Ant-p53pep and p53 complex initiate the Fas/APO-1 signaling pathway are not clear. Bennett et al. (39) recently reported that p53-induced apoptosis involved increased surface expression of Fas/APO-1 in untransformed human vascular smooth muscle cells carrying wt p53 that occurred within 1 h upon p53 activation. They further showed that increased cell surface Fas/APO-1 was due to redistribution of Fas/APO-1 from the Golgi complex (39). In agreement with their study, we also found that p53 peptide-induced apoptosis occurred very rapidly and independent of protein synthesis, which involved increased cell surface Fas/APO-1. Furthermore, our preliminary data by confocal microscopy showed a redistribution of Fas in MDA-MB-468 cells to the plasma membrane when exposed to Ant-p53pep. Control cells, with Antennapedia or p53pep alone, had a diffuse Fas staining throughout the cells (data not shown). Our data suggest that the Fas/APO-1 pathway can be activated in cells harboring mutant p53-273H in the presence of the C-terminal peptide, which may be from its binding to mutant p53 and altering its conformation. How p53 promotes intracellular translocation of Fas/APO-1 and whether mutant p53/peptide complex involves a similar mechanism are being addressed.

Ant-p53pep selectively induced apoptosis only in tumor cells containing mutant or overexpressed wt p53. Furthermore, the p53-273H mutant, as well as wt p53 proteins formed complexes with Ant-p53pep, and yet apoptosis was not observed in nonmalignant MCF10-2A cells. Lack of apoptosis in MCF10-2A cells could be due, in part, to instability of wt p53 under physiological conditions or to a low threshold level of p53 insufficient to initiate apoptosis in nonmalignant cells. Differential cellular levels of wt p53 were shown to affect whether Saos2 cells undergo growth arrest or apoptosis. With tetracycline-inducible expression of wt p53, low level wt p53 was shown to arrest or slow cell growth, whereas high levels of wt p53 induced apoptosis (37). Thus, apoptosis observed in MCF7 cells (Fig. 1A) may be due to the high level of wt p53, and the lack of apoptosis in the nonmalignant lines, MCF10-2A and 27sk, may be due to low expression of wt p53. Induction of apoptosis in mutant p53 breast cancer cells may be related to their increased expression/stability of mutant p53, which could serve as a target for peptide. It is tempting to speculate that Ant-p53pep binds to mutant p53 and alters mutant conformation, favoring wild-type conformation. Other post-translational modifications/alterations were shown to modulate p53 activity such as C-terminal phosphorylation or C-terminal binding with anti-p53 antibody (40). In this case, new transcription/translation may not be necessary to induce apoptosis because of a high level of p53 mutant protein present in many tumor cells. Alternatively, a low cellular level of wt p53 in nonmalignant cells may not be sufficient to induce apoptosis in the absence of other additional factors such as DNA damaging agents.

The results of the conformational energy calculations suggest that a direct interaction of the N-terminal proline-rich segment with a (Ala-Pro)3 repeat and the C-terminal effector peptide is feasible. Interestingly, the proline-rich region of p53 may be a binding site for the SH3 domains of proteins (41), further suggesting that this region of the protein may have a role in signal transduction. The function of this region is not clear but is implicated in both p53-mediated tumor cell growth suppression (42) and apoptosis (43). It cooperates with the C-terminal regulatory region to negatively regulate p53 activity (17). Our calculated structure also suggested that the N-terminal p53aa84-89 might fill one of the binding sites along the helical axis of the C-terminal p53aa369-382. We do not exclude the possibility of Ant-p53pep from binding to other regions of p53. For example, there are other potential binding sites along the helical axis of this peptide that could interact with other regions of p53 such as the N terminus of the DNA-binding core domain from residues aa 97 to aa 117, a region known to undergo considerable conformational change in mutant p53 (44). Indeed, Selivanova et al. (45) in their recent studies showed the interaction between the C-terminal peptide and the core region (aa 99-307) of p53 as well as with the C-terminal region (aa 320-393). Although the C-terminal domain of p53 (aa 361-393) used in our experiments did not bind to Ant-p53pep (Fig. 6A), this is probably due to a lack of 40 amino acid residues from aa 320 to 360. They also reported a weak binding for N-terminal region (aa 1-100). It is further indicated that different salt concentrations may lead to differential states of bindings as evidenced by lack of binding for the p53 core domain in the study of Muller-Tiemann et al. (17). It is suggested that, because full-length p53 binds to Ant-p53pep much more effectively, all three domains may be involved in binding to Ant-p53pep (45). Our computational binding analysis further indicated that the C-terminal p53 peptide might also interact with the conserved N terminus PXXP region of p53. Thus, Ant-p53pep might promote stable association or prevent association of the N- and C-terminal p53 negative regulatory areas, leading to a favorable conformational alteration which activates p53 function. Thus, restoration of p53 function by exogenous peptide or by a peptide viral carrier construct provides an attractive therapeutic strategy for tumor cells that contain either mutant or overexpressed wt p53. It is also possible that a viral vector carrying p53 peptide sequence may induce apoptosis similar to the exogenously added Ant-p53pep. If so, it may then have certain advantages over whole wt p53-based gene therapy approaches. Whole p53 gene therapy may lead to increased susceptibility to cell growth arrest or apoptosis in normal cells, whereas selective apoptosis was demonstrated only in malignant cells by Ant-p53pep. Furthermore, somatic frameshift mutations in the eight-mononucleotide repeat coding region of the Bax gene have been found in some cancers, in which case, whole p53-based gene therapy may not induce Bax-associated apoptosis because of mutation in Bax (46, 47). However, the p53 peptide-based approach is most likely not dependent upon Bax as evidenced by this study.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Kelly Wasmund in Research Genetics for expert peptide synthesis.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Columbia University Cancer Center Core Grant NCI-P30-CA13696-26), American Cancer Society Grant IRG-177, and Herbert Irving Scholar Award in Medicine and Kevin Cornwell Cancer Fund (to R. L. F.), Environmental Protection Agency Grant R-826685 (to P. W. B.-R.), and National Institutes of Health RO1 Grant CA 42500, a Veterans Affairs Merit Award, and a Roche Molecular Biochemicals Award (to M. R. P.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: 650 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-1168; Fax: 212-305-7348; E-mail: fine@cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu.

2 Y. Zhang, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FasL, Fas ligand; wt, wild type; aa, amino acid(s); FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PARP, poly(ADP- ribose) polymerase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hollstein, M., Rice, K., Greenblatt, M. S., Soussi, T., Fuchs, R., Sorlie, T., Hovig, E., Smith-Sorensen, B., Montesano, R., and Harris, C. C. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3551-3555
2. Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavetich, N. P. (1994) Science 265, 346-355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Ko, L. J., and Prives, C. (1996) Gene Dev. 10, 1054-1072[Free Full Text]
4. Owen-Schaub, L. B., Zhang, W., Cusack, J. C., Angelo, L. S., Santee, S. M., Fujiwara, T., Roth, J. A., Deisseroth, A. B., Zhang, W. W., Kruzel, E., and Radinsky, R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3032-3040[Abstract]
5. Caelles, C., Heimberg, A., and Karin, M. (1994) Nature 370, 220-223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wagner, A. J., Kokontis, J. M., and Hay, N. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2817-2830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Reed, J. C. (1997) Nature 387, 773-776[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kroemer, G. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 614-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Farrow, S. N., and Brown, R. (1996) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 45-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Eischen, C. M., and Leibson, P. J. (1997) Adv. Phamacol. 41, 107-132
11. Nagata, S. (1997) Cell 88, 355-65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Kischkel, F. C., Hellbardt, S., Behrmann, I., Germer, M., Pawlita, M., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5579-5588[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Boldin, M. P., Goncharov, T. M., Goltsev, Y. V., and Wallach, D (1996) Cell 85, 803-815[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Cryns, V., and Yuan, J. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 1551-1570[Free Full Text]
15. Salvesen, G. S., and Dixit, V. M. (1997) Cell 91, 443-446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Hupp, T. R., and Lane, D. P. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 865-875[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Muller-Tiemann, B. F., Halazonetis, T. D., and Elting, J. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6079-6084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Hupp, T. R., Meek, D. W., Midgley, C. A., and Lane, D. P. (1992) Cell 71, 875-886[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Halazonetis, T. D., and Kandil, A. N. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 5057-5064[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Abarzua, P., LoSardo, J. E., Gubler, M. L., Spathis, R., Lu, Y. A., Felix, A., and Neri, A. (1996) Oncogene 13, 2477-2482[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Selivanova, G., Iotsova, V., Okan, I., Fritsche, M., Strom, M., Groner, B., Grafstrom, R. C., and Wiman, K. G. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 632-638[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Stefanis, L., Park, D. S., Yan, C. Y., Farinelli, S. E., Troy, C. M., Shelanski, M. L., and Greene, L. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30663-30671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Nemethy, G., Gibson, K. D., Palmer, K. A., Yoon, C. N., Paterlini, G., Zagari, A., Rumsey, S., and Scheraga, H. A. (1992) J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6472-6484[CrossRef]
24. Pincus, M. R. (1988) Int. J. Quant. Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp. 15, 209-220
25. Vasquez, M., Nemethy, G., and Scheraga, H. A. (1983) Macromolecules 16, 1043-1049[CrossRef]
26. Shah, D., Chen, J. M., Carty, R. P., Pincus, M. R., and Scheraga, H. A. (1989) Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 34, 325-332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Soussi, T., Fromentel, C. C., and May, P. (1990) Oncogene 5, 945-952[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Pincus, M. R., Zimmerman, S. S., and Scheraga, H. A. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 4261-4265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Brugidou, J., Legrand, C., Mery, J., and Rabie, A. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 685-693[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Nigro, J. M., Baker, S. J., Preisinger, A. C., Jessup, J. M., Hostetter, R., Cleary, K., Bigner, S. H., Davidson, N., Baylin, S., Devilee, P., Glover, T., Collins, F. S., Weston, A., Modali, R., Harris, C. C., and Jogelstein, B. (1989) Nature 342, 705-708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Gorman, A. M., Samali, A., McGowan, A. J., and Cotter, T. G. (1997) Cytometry 29, 97-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Thor, A. D, Moore, D. H. II., Edgerton, S. M., Kawasaki, E. S., Reihsaus, E., Lynch, H. T., Marcus, J. N., Schwartz, L., Chen, L. C., and Mayall, B. H. (1992) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 84, 845-55[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens-Nakken, H., and Reutelingsperger, C. (1995) J. Immunol. Methods 184, 39-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Levine, A. J. (1997) Cell 88, 323-331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Nicholson, D. W., and Thornberry, N. A. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 299-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Zimmerman, S. S., Pottle, M. S., Nemethy, G., and Scheraga, H. A. (1977) Macromolecules 10, 1-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Chen, X., Ko, L. J., Jayaraman, L., and Prives, C. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2438-2451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Haupt, Y., Rowan, S., Shaulian, E., Vousden, K., and Oren, M. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2170-2183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Bennett, M., Macdonald, K., Chan, S-W., Luzio, P. J., Simari, R., and Weissberg, P. (1998) Science 282, 290-293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Hupp, T. R., Meek, D. W., Midgley, C. A., and Lane, D. P. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3167-3174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Walker, K. K., and Levine, A. J. (1996) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15335-15340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Venot, C., Maratrat, M., Dureuil, C., Conseiller, E., Bracco, L., and Debussche, L. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4668-4679[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Adler, V., Pincus, M. R., Minamoto, T., Fuchs, S. Y., Bluth, M. J., Brandt-Rauf, P. W., Friedman, F. K., Robinson, R. C., Chen, J. M., Wang, X. W., et al.. (1992) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1686-1691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Selivanova, G., Ryabchenko, L., Jansson, E., Iotsova, V., and Wiman, K. G. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3395-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Rampino, N., Yamamoto, H., Ionov, Y., Li, Y., Sawai, H., Reed, J. C., and Perucho, M. (1997) Science 275, 967-969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Ouyang, H., Furukawa, T., Abe, T., Kato, Y., and Horii, A. (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4, 1071-1074[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Guida, A. Bisso, C. Fenollar-Ferrer, M. Napoli, C. Anselmi, J. E. Girardini, P. Carloni, and G. Del Sal
Peptide Aptamers Targeting Mutant p53 Induce Apoptosis in Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6550 - 6558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. D. Dinnen, L. Drew, D. P. Petrylak, Y. Mao, N. Cassai, J. Szmulewicz, P. Brandt-Rauf, and R. L. Fine
Activation of Targeted Necrosis by a p53 Peptide: A NOVEL DEATH PATHWAY THAT CIRCUMVENTS APOPTOTIC RESISTANCE
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 26675 - 26686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Jalota-Badhwar, R. Kaul-Ghanekar, D. Mogare, R. Boppana, K. M. Paknikar, and S. Chattopadhyay
SMAR1-derived P44 Peptide Retains Its Tumor Suppressor Function through Modulation of p53
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9902 - 9913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
J. Wolcke, N. Hunt, J. Jungmann, and D. Ullmann
Early Identification of False Positives in High-Throughput Screening for Activators of p53-DNA Interaction
J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2006; 11(4): 341 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. B. Senatus, Y. Li, C. Mandigo, G. Nichols, G. Moise, Y. Mao, M. D. Brown, R. C. Anderson, A. T. Parsa, P. W. Brandt-Rauf, et al.
Restoration of p53 function for selective Fas-mediated apoptosis in human and rat glioma cells in vitro and in vivo by a p53 COOH-terminal peptide
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2006; 5(1): 20 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
U. Fischer and K. Schulze-Osthoff
New Approaches and Therapeutics Targeting Apoptosis in Disease
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2005; 57(2): 187 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Ma, Y. Pan, K. Gunasekaran, R. B. Venkataraghavan, A. J. Levine, and R. Nussinov
Comparison of the protein-protein interfaces in the p53-DNA crystal structures: Towards elucidation of the biological interface
PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 3988 - 3993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.