J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 35012-35015, December 3, 1999
Circadian Rhythm of Patched1 Transcription in the Pineal
Regulated by Adrenergic Stimulation and cAMP*
Jimo
Borjigin
§,
Jie
Deng
,
Michael M.
Wang¶,
Xiaodong
Li
,
Seth
Blackshaw
, and
Solomon H.
Snyder
**
§§
From the
Department of Embryology, Carnegie
Institution of Washington, Baltimore, Maryland 21210 and the
Departments of ¶ Neurology,
Neuroscience, ** Pharmacology
and Molecular Science, and 
Psychiatry,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
21205
 |
ABSTRACT |
The tumor suppressor patched1 (PTC1), a product
of the mammalian homologue of the Drosophila segment
polarity gene patched, is a receptor for hedgehog (HH) and
is crucial for embryonic development. Although little is known about
the signal transduction pathways leading to the activation of
ptc1, increased ptc1 transcription has always
been associated with elevated HH activity and decreased activity of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase A. Here, we demonstrate that
in the mammalian pineal gland, ptc1 expression exhibits a dramatic diurnal rhythm with peak expression at midnight. ptc1 mRNA expression in the pineal is regulated by a clock
mechanism mediated by the superior cervical ganglion. Most importantly, ptc1 transcription can be induced by agents activating the
cAMP signal transduction pathway both in vivo and in
vitro and appears to be independent of HH signaling.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Drosophila patched
(ptc)1 is a
segment polarity gene (1) required for the correct patterning of larval
segments during fly early development. It encodes a protein with 12 predicted transmembrane domains (2, 3) and functions to antagonize the
action of HH signaling (4). Ptc is thought to antagonize HH signaling consequent to a physical interaction of Ptc with HH protein (5, 6).
Mutations in human PTC1, the mammalian homologue of
Drosophila Ptc, occur in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma
syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by
predisposition to cancer, and in sporadic basal cell carcinoma, leading
to the proposal that ptc1 is a tumor suppressor
gene (7, 8).
One of the most conserved features of HH signaling is the
transcriptional induction of ptc mRNA in both
Drosophila and higher vertebrates including mammals.
ptc expression is always associated with elevated HH
activity. In the absence of HH, ptc expression is eliminated
in late fly embryos, in fly wing imaginal discs, and in mammalian
chondrocytes (9-11). Ectopic or abnormal expression of HH can induce
ptc expression in adjacent cells in fly imaginal discs, in
the developing neural tube and limb of the chicken, in the developing
brain of the zebrafish, and in developing mouse embryos (12-16). In
addition to HH proteins, cAMP-dependent protein kinase
(PKA) regulates ptc expression. In most cases studied, increased PKA activity down-regulates HH target genes including ptc (17-25), suggesting that PKA is a universal
negative regulator of HH signaling. Recently, however, a constitutively
active form of catalytic subunit of mouse PKA, when introduced into fly
embryos, was shown to elicit an up-regulation of ptc
expression that appears to be independent of HH (26). This experiment,
however, does not necessarily reflect the situation in
vivo, leaving some doubt about whether PKA-mediated,
HH-independent ptc induction exists under normal
physiological conditions.
The pineal gland (epiphysis) is an unpaired midline neuroendocrine
structure originating as an invagination of the diencephalon. The
pineal transduces environmental light and dark information into nightly
formation of the hormone melatonin, which links the body's
physiological processes to the daily cycle of sunlight and darkness.
This circadian production of melatonin is dependent on the
suprachiasmatic nucleus clock, information from which is relayed to the
pineal by the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) in the form of rhythmic
norepinephrine release at night. Light potently inhibits hormone
production at night (27).
Subtractive hybridization cloning, seeking genes that are selectively
up-regulated during the day or night, led to the identification of
serotonin N-acetyltransferase (NAT) (28), the rate-limiting enzyme in melatonin synthesis, and a pineal night-specific ATPase (PINA) (29). Here we report the circadian expression of ptc1 in the pineal and its cAMP-dependent transcriptional
activation that appears to be independent of the hedgehog signaling.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Harlan Sprague Dawley rats were purchased from
Charles River Laboratories and housed in 14:10 light/dark lighting
conditions with "lights off" at 9 p.m. for more than 1 week
before the experiments. Harlan Sprague Dawley rats in which the
superior cervical ganglia were bilaterally removed by surgery (superior
cervical ganglionectomized) were purchased from Zivic-Miller
Laboratories (Allison Park, PA). During dark periods, animals were
sacrificed under safe red lights (cut-off, 600 nm) by decapitation.
Subtractive Hybridization and Northern Blot Analysis of Pineal
RNAs--
The subtractive hybridization used to obtain a partial Ptc1
cDNA (clone NP008) has been previously described (28). The
night-enriched clone NP008 encoding rat ptc1 corresponds to
the 3'-untranslated region (nucleotide 4386-4805,
GenBankTM accession no. U43148) of human ptc1.
NP008 was then used to screen a rat pineal night cDNA library to
obtain a number of overlapping rat ptc1 cDNAs, all of
which show sequence homology of more than 92% with the published mouse
ptc1 sequence. The longest clone (NP008.8), which was
completely sequenced on both strands, was used for Northern blot analysis.
In Situ Hybridization Analysis--
ptc1
(3'-untranslated sequence of the NP008.8) and the full-length rat NAT
cDNA (28) probes were used for in situ hybridization studies. The in situ hybridization technique was performed
as previously described (30).
Pineal Organ Cultures--
Pineal glands were cultured in
vitro according to a modified procedure (31) of Parfitt et
al. (32). Briefly, freshly exercised glands were cleaned of
adhering tissue and cultured in BGJb medium (Fitten-Jackson
Modification, Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 1 mg/ml BSA.
Immediately before use, sodium ascorbate and glutamine were added to
final concentrations of 0.5 and 2 mM, respectively. Cultures were grown in 24-well culture plate containing 0.2 ml of
medium with the medium changed every 24 h. Each well contained two
pineals supported on the middle of a circular nylon mesh.
 |
RESULTS |
Ptc1 Is Diurnally Expressed in the Pineal--
In a second round
of screening the subtracted night-specific pineal cDNA library, we
found that ptc1 expression in the pineal is night-specific
with very little expression of ptc1 during the day (Fig.
1). Peak night-time levels are more than
15-fold greater than daytime troughs. Significant elevation of
ptc1 expression, first evident at 10 p.m. (2200 h),
rises rapidly to peak levels at 12 p.m. (2400 h), which are
maintained until a precipitous decline at 8 a.m. This rhythm differs
from that of NAT and PINA in that ptc1 mRNA reaches its
peak earlier (Fig. 1B and data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Diurnal variations of ptc1
expression in the rat pineals. A, Northern blot
analysis of ptc1 mRNA expression in the adult pineal at
various time points. Animals were housed in a facility with the
lighting cycle consisting of 14 h of light and 10 h of
darkness (lights were turned on at 7 a.m. and turned off at 9 p.m. (2100 h)). During the dark period, animals were sacrificed in the
dark under a dim red light. Each lane contained total pineal
RNA from two glands. The rat ptc1 cDNA (isolated from
the subtraction) corresponding to the C-terminal region of human
ptc1 (7) was used as probe. B, comparison of the
temporal expression profile of ptc1 with that of NAT. The
Northern blot shown in A was hybridized with a NAT probe,
and the blots were quantified using a PhosphorImager analysis program.
Each data point represents the amount of ptc1 (filled
circles) or NAT (open circles) mRNA relative to
that of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase value at the same
time points.
|
|
Ptc1 Expression Is Regulated by a Central Clock via the
SCG--
Temporal expression of ptc1 was examined in rats
maintained in constant darkness. The diurnal rhythm of ptc1
expression is maintained in the absence of light, indicating that it is
under the control of a biological clock (Fig.
2A, left panel). Constant light exposure, which is the most potent rhythm suppressor of clock-regulated pineal genes, abolishes the ptc1 rhythm in
the rat pineal (Fig. 2A, right panel), demonstrating that
typical environmental modulators of the circadian rhythm can disrupt
ptc1 expression. Bilateral ablation of the SCG abolishes
ptc1 transcription (Fig. 2B), consistent with the
notion that ptc1 circadian gene expression
requires neuronal input from the SCG.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Clock regulation of ptc1
transcription via SCG innervation of the pineals.
A, clock regulation of ptc1 expression as
revealed by Northern blot analysis of pineal RNAs taken from rats
housed in either constant dark (DD) or constant light
(LL) for 3 days and sacrificed at the indicated time points.
B, night-specific expression of the ptc1 is
abolished when the SCG is surgically removed from the rats.
D, day; N, night; GAPDH,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The superior cervical
ganglionectomized rats were purchased from Zivic Miller and housed in
light-regulated conditions for more than a week before use in these
experiments.
|
|
Ptc1 Induction in the Pineal Appears To Be Independent of Hedgehog
Signaling--
Hedgehog is the most potent activator of the PTC
transcription. We therefore searched for expression of all known
mammalian hedgehog (hh) genes in the adult pineal
gland. No expression of any of the three mammalian hh
homologues (33) is detected in the rat pineal gland by Northern
blotting and in situ hybridization during the day or night.
Because sympathetic innervation from the SCG is thought to be the sole
innervation of the pineal, we also searched for the hh
messages in the SCG by Northern and in situ analysis but
failed to detect expression of hh transcripts at any time point.
Hedgehog proteins travel considerable distances from their sites.
During eye development in Drosophila, for instance, HH moves alone retinal axons to the brain to induce lamina neurogenesis (34). To
test for the possibility of HH protein expression in the pineal, we
performed Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis using extracts
and sections of day and night pineals utilizing the sonic HH antibody
5E1 (35) and failed to detect any signal. The absence of hh expression
in the pineal gland and in the SCG suggests that it may not be a direct
physiologic regulator of Ptc1 in the pineal.
Activation of cAMP Signaling Is Necessary for Induction of Ptc1
Transcription--
We tested whether norepinephrine, the adrenergic
neurotransmitter of the SCG that activates melatonin synthesis, also
activates ptc1 expression. In vivo, this appears
to be the case, as administration of the
-adrenergic agonist
isoproterenol to intact animals induces expression of ptc1
in the pineal gland (Fig. 3A).
To directly examine the regulation of ptc1 by the
-adrenergic system, we utilized the pineal gland in an organ culture
(Fig. 3B) (29). Norepinephrine strongly stimulates
ptc1 expression in organ culture. The stimulation is
unaffected by
-adrenergic antagonist prazosin but is completely
blocked by the
-adrenergic antagonist propranolol. Furthermore,
isoproterenol stimulates ptc1 expression in pineal organ
culture, as it does in vivo, whereas the
-adrenergic
agonist phenylephrine is ineffective (Fig. 3A). Thus
activation of
-adrenergic receptors is sufficient for
ptc1 induction in the pineal gland. Because stimulation of
-adrenergic receptors leads to the activation of adenylate cyclase
with increases in intracellular cAMP, we examined the effect of direct
cAMP stimulation on the induction of ptc1 mRNA.
Forskolin and a non-hydrolyzable cAMP analogue, dibutyryl cAMP, both
stimulate ptc1 expression (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that activation of the cAMP signal transduction pathway is necessary for the induction of ptc1 transcription
in the pineal.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Stimulation of ptc1 expression by
agents activating the cAMP signal transduction pathway in
vivo and in vitro. A,
Northern blot analysis of pineal RNAs from rats injected with
-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol (+ISO) and
vehicle ( ISO). Rats were given intraperitoneal injection of
isoproterenol (1 ml of 100 µg/ml) at 6 p.m. and sacrificed at
9 p.m. Control rats were injected with the vehicle.
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
B, Northern analysis of RNA isolated from pineals cultured
in vitro in the presence of various drugs. Pineals were
cultured in BGJb medium for 48 h to allow nerve terminal
degeneration prior to drug stimulation. All of the drugs were used at 1 µM concentration, except norepinephrine (NE),
which was used at 0.1 µM. The organ culture experiment
was performed as described (31). PRAZ, prazosin;
PROP, propranolol; PHE, phenylephrine;
ISO, isoproterenol; FSK, forskolin;
DB-cAMP, dibutyryl cAMP.
|
|
Ptc1 Induction Is Regulated Differently from the Pineal-specific
Night Transcripts--
The diurnal pattern of expression of
ptc1 in the pineal led us to postulate that it may
participate in modulation of melatonin production. As an initial study
to determine how ptc1 may participate in this process, we
tested the developmental expression profiles of ptc1
transcript in the pineals and compared it with the pineal-specific and
night-specific transcript, serotonin NAT (Fig.
4; see Refs. 28 and 29). Although the
circadian expression patterns of ptc1 is similar to that of
NAT in adult pineals, ptc1 mRNA is not up-regulated in
night pineals at postnatal day 2 (P2), unlike that of NAT.
These experiments indicate that ptc1 expression during early
pineal development is regulated differently from that of pineal-specific night transcript known to drive melatonin production. Further, it appears that circadian expression of ptc1 is not
required for the rhythmic transcription of NAT.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Midsagittal brain sections of postnatal day 2 (P2) and adult rats during the day (4 p.m.) and night
(4 a.m.) were processed for in situ
hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled ptc1 (NP008.8)
and NAT riboprobes. The daytime expressions of both Patched1
(A) and NAT (C) are clearly visible in sections
from postnatal day 2 rats compared with those of the adult sections
(E and G). Whereas NAT mRNA displayed marked
diurnal in both P2 (C and D) and adult pineals
(G and H), circadian rhythm of ptc1
transcription is not yet seen in P2 (A and
B) animals although it is marked in adult pineals (E
and F). Sense probes revealed no positive signals (not
shown).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Mechanisms of HH/PTC signal transduction have been the subject of
intense investigation. In this study, we demonstrate that the
ptc1 transcript displays a pronounced circadian rhythm in the pineal. In the pineal, cAMP activates ptc1
transcription, contrasting dramatically with ptc1 regulation
in other systems. Hh signaling does not seem to be required in pineal
ptc1 induction, again contrasting with other ptc
systems. These observations point to a novel pathway for
ptc1 signal transduction that is driven by cAMP.
Is cAMP the only signaling system driving pineal ptc1
expression? Our results demonstrate that cAMP is required to induce ptc1 expression. Although it is possible that the HH system
may be involved in pineal regulation, several factors support a
predominant role of cAMP. First, we have repeatedly failed to detect
any mRNA or protein expression for any of the HH family members in
pineal. Second, there is no evidence of HH activity in SCG, the only
known neuronal input to the pineal. Third, because the pineals in
vitro in the organ culture experiments were analyzed more than
48 h after excision, nerve terminals had completely degenerated.
The denervated pineals are able to mount an impressive increase in ptc1 expression by cAMP alone, without other factors (such
as HH) that may be carried by SCG neurons in vivo. Fourth,
in vivo ablation experiments indicate that expression of
ptc1 is dependent on SCG input but can be fully recovered
using agents that specifically stimulate cAMP production.
The cAMP-dependent and HH-independent regulation of
ptc1 in the pineal suggests PTC1 may play a role in the
neuroendocrine and perhaps other systems in an
activity-dependent manner. Unlike the relatively slow time
course of ontogenic and oncogenic processes in which ptc1
has been previously studied, the pineal regulation of ptc
occurs rapidly, with 10-20-fold changes of expression in a few hours.
This swift change suggests a novel type of short term regulatory
function for PTC1 in the pineal and other HH-independent PTC systems.
Our developmental studies indicate that ptc1 cycling is not
necessary for the rhythmic transcription of NAT early in life. Perhaps
PTC1 in the pineal functions in the post-transcriptional regulation of
diurnal processes (i.e. mRNA stability or
post-translational modifications). Besides some diurnally determined
role, PTC1 might play a part in the ontogenesis of pineal systems,
including the development of circadian rhythms and a role in the
oncogenesis of various pineal region tumors, consistent with the known
functions of PTC1 during development and in tumor formation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Jeremy Nathans, Philip Beachy,
Michael Cooper, Masayuki Takahashi, Allan Spradling, Douglas
Koshland, Yixian Zheng, and Chen-Ming Fan for critical reading of
the manuscript and for providing valuable suggestions and Dr. Beachy
for encouragement and providing the mouse sonic hedgehog cDNA probe.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service Grant DA-00266 (to S. H. S.) and National Institute of
Mental Health Grant MH57299 (to J. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
A Merck fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation and a
recipient of the John Merck Scholars Award.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-955-3024; Fax: 410-955-3623; E-mail: ssnyder@jhmi.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ptc1, patched1;
HH, hedgehog;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase;
SCG, superior
cervical ganglion;
NAT, serotonin N-acetyltransferase;
PINA, pineal night-specific ATPase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nusslein-Volhard, C.,
and Wieschaus, E.
(1980)
Nature
287,
795-801[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Nakano, I.,
Hidalgo, A.,
Taylor, A.,
Whittle, J. R.,
and Ingham, P. W.
(1989)
Nature
341,
508-513[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Hooper, J. E.,
and Scott, M. P.
(1989)
Cell
59,
751-765[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Ingham, P. W.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
88-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Stone, D. M.,
Hynes, M.,
Armanini, M.,
Swanson, T. A.,
Gu, Q.,
Johnson, R. L.,
Scott, M. P.,
Pennica, D.,
Goddard, A.,
Phillips, H.,
Noll, M.,
Hooper, J. E.,
de Sauvage, F.,
and Rosenthal, A.
(1996)
Nature
384,
129-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Marigo, V.,
Davey, R. A.,
Zuo, Y.,
Cunningham, J. M.,
and Tabin, C. J.
(1996)
Nature
384,
176-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Hahn, H.,
Wicking, C.,
Zaphiropoulous, P. G.,
Gailani, M. R.,
Shanley, S.,
Chidambaram, A.,
Vorechovsky, I.,
Holmberg, E.,
Unden, A. B.,
Gillies, S.,
Negus, K.,
Smyth, I.,
Pressman, C.,
Leffell, D. J.,
Gerrard, B.,
Goldstein, A. M.,
Dean, M.,
Toftgard, R.,
Chenevix-Trench, G.,
Wainwright, B.,
and Bale, A. E.
(1996)
Cell
85,
841-851[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Johnson, R. L.,
Rothman, A. L.,
Xie, J.,
Goodrich, L. V.,
Bare, J. W.,
Bonifas, J. M.,
Quinn, A. G.,
Myers, R. M.,
Cox, D. R.,
Epstein, E. H., Jr.,
and Scott, M. P.
(1996)
Science
272,
1668-1671[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Hidalgo, A.,
and Ingham, P.
(1990)
Development
110,
291-301[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Capdevila, J.,
and Guerrero, I.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4459-4468[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Vortkamp, A.,
Lee, K.,
Lanske, B.,
Segre, G. V.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
and Tabin, C. J.
(1996)
Science
273,
613-622[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Tabata, T.,
and Kornberg, T. B.
(1994)
Cell
76,
89-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Marigo, V.,
and Tabin, C. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9346-9351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Marigo, V.,
Scott, M. P.,
Johnson, R. L.,
Goodrich, L. V.,
and Tabin, C. J.
(1996)
Development
122,
1225-1233[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Concordet, J. P.,
Lewis, K. E.,
Moore, J. W.,
Goodrich, L. V.,
Johnson, R. L.,
Scott, M. P.,
and Ingham, P. W.
(1996)
Development
122,
2835-2846[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Goodrich, L. V.,
Johnson, R. L.,
Milenkovic, L.,
McMahon, J. A.,
and Scott, M. P.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
301-312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Pan, D.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1995)
Cell
80,
543-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Jiang, J.,
and Struhl, G.
(1995)
Cell
80,
563-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Li, W.,
Ohlmeyer, J. T.,
Lane, M. E.,
and Kalderon, D.
(1995)
Cell
80,
553-562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lepage, T.,
Cohen, S. M.,
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J.,
and Parkhurst, S. M.
(1995)
Nature
373,
711-715[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Strutt, D. I.,
Wiersdorff, V.,
and Mlodzik, M.
(1995)
Nature
373,
705-709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Fan, C. M.,
Porter, J. A.,
Chiang, C.,
Chang, D. T.,
Beachy, P. A.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M
(1995)
Cell
81,
457-465[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Hammerschmidt, M.,
Bitgood, M. J.,
and McMahon, A. P.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
647-658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Epstein, D. J.,
Marti, E.,
Scott, M. P.,
and McMahon, A. P.
(1996)
Development
122,
2885-2894[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Concordet, J. P.,
Lewis, K. E.,
Moore, J. W.,
Goodrich, L. V.,
Johnson, R. L.,
Scott, M. P.,
and Ingham, P. W.
(1996)
Development
122,
2835-2846
|
| 26.
|
Ohlmeyer, J. T.,
and Kalderon, D.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2250-2258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Borjigin, J.,
Li, X.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
39,
53-65[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Borjigin, J.,
Wang, M. M.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1995)
Nature
378,
783-785[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Borjigin, J.,
Payne, A. S.,
Deng, J.,
Li, X.,
Wang, M. M.,
Ovodenko, B.,
Gitlin, J. D.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
1018-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Blackshaw, S.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
8074-8082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Yuwiler, A.
(1983)
J. Neurochem.
41,
146-153[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Parfitt, A. G.,
Weller, J. L.,
and Klein, D. C.
(1976)
Neuropharmacology
15,
353-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Echelard, Y.,
Epstein, D. J.,
St-Jacques, B.,
Shen, L.,
Mohler, J.,
McMahon, J. A.,
and McMahon, A. P.
(1993)
Cell
75,
1417-1430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Huang, Z.,
and Kunes, S.
(1996)
Cell
86,
411-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Ericson, J.,
Morton, S.,
Kawakami, A.,
Roelink, H.,
and Jessell, T. M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
661-673[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.