JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X.-Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hediger, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, X.-Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hediger, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 35089-35094, December 3, 1999


Yeast SMF1 Mediates H+-coupled Iron Uptake with Concomitant Uncoupled Cation Currents*

Xing-Zhen ChenDagger §, Ji-Bin PengDagger §, Adiel Cohen, Hannah Nelson, Nathan Nelson, and Matthias A. HedigerDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Membrane Biology Program and Renal Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and the  Department of Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast membrane proteins SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3 are homologues of the DCT1 metal ion transporter family. Their functional characteristics and the implications of these characteristics in vivo have not yet been reported. Here we show that SMF1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes mediates H+-dependent Fe2+ transport and uncoupled Na+ flux. SMF1-mediated Fe2+ transport exhibited saturation kinetics (Km = 2.2 µM), whereas the Na+ flux did not, although both processes were electrogenic. SMF1 is also permeable to Li+, Rb+, K+, and Ca2+, which likely share the same uncoupled pathway. SMF2 (but not SMF3) mediated significant increases in both Fe2+ and Na+ transport compared with control oocytes. These data are consistent with the concept that uptake of divalent metal ions by SMF1 and SMF2 is essential to yeast cell growth. Na+ inhibited metal ion uptake mediated by SMF1 and SMF2 expressed in oocytes. Consistent with this, we found that increased sensitivity of yeast to EGTA in the high Na+ medium is due to inhibition of SMF1- and SMF2-mediated metal ion transport by uncoupled Na+ pathway. Interestingly, DCT1 also mediates Fe2+-activated uncoupled currents. We propose that uncoupled ion permeabilities in metal ion transporters protect cells from metal ion overload.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Metal ions are important for all living cells. In man, metal ion deficiency leads to anemia (1), whereas metal ion overload is toxic and leads to hemochromatosis (3), Menkes' disease (2), Wilson's disease (4), and neurodegenerative diseases (5-7). Metal ions such as iron, manganese, zinc, and cobalt are involved in many catalytic reactions, gene regulation, and signal transduction pathways (8-10). An adequate supply of metal ions to cells is important and is provided by specialized transporters.

The recently cloned mammalian metal ion transporter DCT1 (11, 12), originally named Nramp2 (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 2) (13-15), is present in both plasma membranes and endosomal vesicles for translocation, via transferrin-dependent and -independent pathways, of metal ions into the cytoplasm of cells and for maintenance of systemic metal ion homeostasis. It has been found that a mutation in DCT1 at position 185 (G185R) causes microcytic anemia in mk -/- mice and Belgrade rats (12). This mutation was subsequently shown to result in loss of Fe2+ transport ability (16). DCT1-mediated iron absorption in the intestine depends on the body iron status, which is regulated in part by the hemochromatosis gene HFE, a major histocompatibility complex gene (17, 18). A single point mutation in HFE (C282Y) results in iron overload in hemochromatosis patients (3).

SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3 are yeast homologues of the Nramp proteins with 51-54% identity in amino acid sequence to each other and 33-36% identity to DCT1. SMF1 was originally thought to be localized in the yeast mitochondrial membrane (19) and was named SMF, which stands for suppressor of mitochondria import function. However, more recent studies using an antibody demonstrated that SMF1 is located in the yeast plasma membrane, where it is thought to mediate uptake of Mn2+ and Zn2+ into the cytoplasm (20). There was indirect evidence that other divalent metal ions such as Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ are also substrates of SMF1 (21). In analogy to HFE in mammalian cells, the product of the yeast BSD2 (bypass superoxide dismutase deficiency gene 2), localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, regulates metal ion absorption by exerting a negative control on SMF1 activity (21, 22). Despite these findings, a functional characterization of SMF1 has not yet been reported.

In the present study, we expressed SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3 in Xenopus oocytes and used both a radiotracer approach and the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique to investigate the function of these proteins. We show that SMF1 mediates H+-dependent Fe2+ transport and uncoupled Na+ currents. SMF2 also mediates significant H+-coupled Fe2+ transport and uncoupled Na+ currents, which are much smaller than those mediated by SMF1. SMF3 exhibited no detectable activities when expressed in oocytes. Because Na+ inhibited metal ion uptake in oocytes expressing SMF1, we investigated the effect of Na+ on yeast growth.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Oocyte Preparation-- Yeast SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3 cDNAs were subcloned from pTLN2 into pNWP plasmid, and rat DCT1 cDNA was in pSPORT1. Capped SMF and DCT1 cRNAs were synthesized by in vitro transcription from their cDNAs. Oocytes were extracted from stage V-VI Xenopus laevis and were defolliculated using a Ca2+-free solution (90 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) containing 2 mg/ml collagenase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) for ~2 h at 18 °C. Oocytes were injected, on the same day (at least 4 h after defolliculation) or on the following day, with 50 nl of H2O containing 15 ng cRNA of SMF1, SMF2, or SMF3 or 25 ng of cRNA of DCT1. Equal amounts of H2O were injected into control oocytes. Injected oocytes were incubated at 18 °C using antibiotic Barth's solution containing 90 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 0.41 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM Ca(NO3)2 10 mM HEPES, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 10 units/ml penicillin, and 10 µg/ml streptomycin, pH 7.5.

Radiotracer Measurements-- Uptake experiments were performed at 2-4 days following injection. Uptake solutions for radiotracer experiments contained 100 mM NaCl + choline-Cl, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM KCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM L-ascorbic acid (freshly prepared), pH 5.5-7.5 by Tris-Base or HEPES. L-ascorbic acid was added to solutions to maintain iron in the 2+ form. 8-10 oocytes were incubated in 0.5 ml of solutions containing radioactive 55FeCl2. Uptake lasted 30 min and was terminated by washing oocytes through six consecutive ice-cold uptake solution containing 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5.

Electrophysiology-- Experiments utilizing the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique (23) were performed as described (23). Resistance of microelectrodes filled with 3 M KCl was 0.5-2 MOmega . In experiments involving voltage jumping or holding, currents and voltages were digitized at 0.3 or 200 ms/sample, respectively. After ~3 min of membrane potential stabilization following microelectrode impalements, the oocyte was clamped to the holding potential (Vh) of -50 mV. 100-ms voltage pulses between -160 and +60 mV, in increments of +20 mV, were then applied, and steady-state currents were obtained as the average values in the interval from 80 to 95 ms after the initiation of the voltage pulses. Solutions used in electrophysiology were the same as in tracer assay except that they contained no L-ascorbic acid when metal ions other than iron were present. Experimental results were expressed in the form of means ± S.E. (n), where n indicates the number of oocytes used. Data analysis was performed as described (23).

Simultaneous Voltage-clamped Tracer and Current Measurements-- Before starting tracer uptake, oocyte was clamped at -50 mV and perfused with substrate-free solution. Then the membrane potential was held at other test values (+10, -20, -50, -70, or -80 mV). After the perfusion was stopped, the uptake solution (200 µl) was added manually using a pipettor, which washed out the substrate-free solution. The uptake lasted 2-5 min in the chamber whose volume is about 200 µl and was terminated by perfusing (washing) the oocyte with the substrate-free solution. Currents were continuously measured during uptake. Oocyte was then dissolved in 250 µl of 10% SDS and mixed with 2.5 ml of scintillation mixture.

Yeast Strains, Media, and Reagents-- The wild-type strain used in this study is Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303 (MATa/a trp1 ade2 his3 leu2 ura3). The other strains used are Delta SMF1 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 SMF1::URA3), Delta SMF2 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 SMF2::URA3), Delta SMF3 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 SMF3::URA3), and Delta SMF1+2+3 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 SMF1::URA3 SMF2::URA3 SMF3::URA3). During the preparation of the triple disruptant DSMF1+2+3, the URA3 gene was inactivated twice by 5-fluoroorotic acid treatment.

Yeast (S. cerevisiae) cells were grown in a YPD medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% Bactopeptone, and 2% dextrose. The medium was buffered by 50 mM Mes,1 and the pH was adjusted by NaOH (24, 25). Agar plates were prepared by the addition of 2% agar to the YPD buffer medium at the given pH. Yeast transformation was performed as described previously (26), and the transformed cells were grown on minimal plates containing a 0.67% yeast nitrogen base, 2% dextrose, 2% agar, and the appropriate nutritional requirements.

Gene knockout of the new strains was performed as follows. All or part of the target gene was replaced by a selectable marker (URA3, LEU2, or HIS4), leaving flanking DNA sequences of about 0.3 kilobase pairs. When polymerase chain reaction was used for the construct, the DNA fragments were cloned into the TA plasmid of pGEM-T Easy (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). For the disruption we cut the plasmid with the appropriate restriction enzymes and transformed the yeast strains with the plasmid DNA as described previously (26, 27). The yeast strains were grown on minimal medium in the absence of the auxotrophic marker. Colonies that grew on the selective medium were selected, checked by polymerase chain reaction for homologous recombination, and analyzed for their phenotype.

The intact genes containing 0.3 kilobase pair of flanking sequences were cloned by polymerase chain reaction into YPN2 plasmid (25). Yeast transformation was performed either using the method of Ito et al. (26) or using a bench top method according to Elble (27). Sensitivity to low metal ions in the medium was checked by the addition of different EGTA concentration to agar plates buffered by 50 mM Mes, pH 6, containing 0.25% yeast extract, 0.5% Bactopeptone, 0.5% dextrose, and 2% agar (1/4 YPD). The amounts of EGTA required to obtain growth arrest for the disruptant mutants and normal growth for the wild-type strain is dependent on the source and quality of the reagents. Therefore, each experiment was performed with three different EGTA concentrations.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transports of Fe2+ by SMF1-- Xenopus oocytes expressing SMF1 exhibited significant increases in 55Fe uptake compared with H2O-injected control oocytes (Fig. 1a). The increase was higher in the absence of external Na+ (Na+o) than in the presence of 100 mM Na+. At pH 5.5 and in the absence of Na+o, SMF1-mediated iron uptake was 30-40 times higher than control levels.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Uptake of 55Fe in Xenopus oocytes expressing SMF1 and effects of H+ and metal ions. a, SMF1-mediated Fe2+ uptake was measured at 5 µM 55Fe in the presence of 100 mM NaCl (Na) or choline-Cl (Cho) and at pH of 7.5 or 5.5 and was compared with that obtained from H2O-injected control oocytes. The highest uptake was obtained at pH 5.5 and in the absence of external Na+. b-d, all experiments were performed in the absence of extracellular Na+. b, dose response of the SMF1-mediated Fe2+ uptakes as a function of Fe2+ concentration ([Fe2+]) at pH 5.5. The curve represents a Michaelis-Menten fit with Km = 2.2 ± 0.2 µM (means ± S.E.), and Vmax = 15.2 ± 0.4 pmol. c, Fe2+ uptake (5 µM) at various extracellular H+ concentration ([H+]). From left to right, [H+] values correspond to pH of 8.0, 7.5, 7.0, 6.5, 6.0, and 5.5, respectively. The curve represents a Michaelis-Menten fit with Km = 0.62 ± 0.11 µM (or pH 6.2 ± 0.2), and Vmax = 16.1 ± 0.9 pmol. d, Fe2+ (5 µM) transport in the presence of various metal ions at 1 mM was compared with the control level (Fe2+ alone).

Iron transport was saturable and followed the Michaelis-Menten relationship (Fig. 1b). The apparent affinity for Fe2+ was high, with an apparent affinity constant (Km) of 2.2 ± 0.2 µM (n = 10). The H+ dependence of Fe2+ uptake (at 5 µM Fe2+) also followed the Michaelis-Menten relationship with a Km for H+ of 0.62 µM (corresponding to pH 6.2; Fig. 1c). This suggests that one H+ is coupled to the uptake of one Fe2+. Uptake of Fe2+ was completely inhibited by 1 mM Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+, weekly inhibited by 50 µM Al3+, and was not inhibited by 1 mM La3+ or 50 µM Gd3+ (Fig. 1d). In addition, no increase in 55Fe3+ uptake was observed in SMF1-expressing oocytes compared with control oocytes. These results indicate that various divalent but not trivalent metal ions are transported by SMF1. Despite the relatively low transport level of SMF1 in Xenopus oocytes, these characteristics of SMF1 are similar to those of the mammalian homologue DCT1.

Metal ion transport mediated by SMF1 was electrogenic and voltage-dependent (Fig. 2, a and b). Consistent with radiotracer experiments, both Fe2+ and Mn2+ generated currents. Interestingly, although Na+ inhibited iron uptake, Na+ applied in the absence of metal ions induced large SMF1-specific inward currents at -50 mV (Fig. 2c). At pH 5.5 (but not at pH 7.5) and in the presence of 100 mM Na+, addition of Fe2+ apparently evoked a net outward current that is likely composed of Fe2+-inhibited inward Na+ current and Fe2+-stimulated H+-Fe2+ cotransport inward current, with the former being larger than the latter. In the absence of metal ions and in the presence of 100 mM Na+, a reduction in medium pH also apparently stimulated a net outward current, indicating that protons inhibit the Na+ current. Our results show mutual inhibition between the H+-Fe2+ cotransport and Na+ permeation, suggesting that the observed Na+ fluxes are mediated by SMF1 and not by SMF1-stimulated endogenous Na+ pathways.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Metal ion-evoked SMF1-mediated currents and inhibition of Na+ current by low pH with or without Fe2+. a, currents were measured under voltage-clamp conditions. The holding potential (Vh) was -70 mV. At 0 Na+ and pH 5.5, addition of 10 µM Fe2+ or Mn2+ stimulated measurable currents in oocytes expressing SMF1. b, current-voltage curve representing the currents stimulated by Fe2+ (10 µM) at various test potentials, pH 5.5. Data are the averages from four oocytes. c, Fe2+ at 10 µM modestly inhibited Na+ currents at pH 5.5 and 100 mM Na+ but had no effect at pH 7.5 (with or without extracellular Na+). In the absence of Fe2+, low pH (5.5) also slightly inhibited a portion of currents generated by 100 mM Na+.

In the absence of metal ions, a large conductance in oocytes expressing SMF1 was evoked by Na+o (Fig. 3, a-d). The outward currents observed in the presence of external choline-Cl (Fig. 3b) are likely due to effluxes of K+ and Na+, because SMF1 is also permeable to K+ (see below). The Na+ currents were voltage-dependent and exhibited no saturation by hyperpolarization (Fig. 3e). They were not significantly affected by depletion of extracellular Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, or Cl- or by depletion of intracellular Ca2+ (through injection of 25 nl of 50 mM EGTA into the oocyte cytoplasm), indicating that they are uncoupled currents. Na+ currents were Na+- dependent but did not saturate at concentration up to 100 mM Na+o at any Vm tested (-160 to +60 mV) (Fig. 3f).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SMF1-mediated Na+ currents at pH 7.5. a and b, time courses of the total currents in oocytes expressing SMF1 in response to voltage jumps from Vh of -50 mV to various test potentials. For clarity, only currents corresponding to Vm of -160, -120, -80, -20, +20, and +60 mV are shown. c and d, currents obtained from H2O-injected control oocytes. e, I-V curves obtained as in a and b () or c and d (open circle ). f, SMF1-mediated Na+ currents versus Na+ concentration at different Vm. Data are the averages from four oocytes.

We also tested the functions of SMF2 and SMF3 by oocyte expression studies. Compared with SMF1, SMF2 exhibited lower (but significant) Fe2+ uptake and uncoupled Na+ currents (Fig. 4). In contrast, SMF3 exhibited no detectable iron uptake or uncoupled sodium currents in oocytes. It is possible that SMF3 is primarily localized in intracellular membranes, in analogy to Nramp1 (28).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SMF2- and SMF3-mediated 55Fe uptake and Na+ current. a, Fe2+ uptake via SMF2 or SMF3 was measured at 5 µM 55Fe in the presence of 100 mM choline-Cl, pH 5.5, and was compared with that obtained from control oocytes (Ctrl). b, total inward currents were measured at -50 mV in the presence of 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, in oocytes expressing SMF2 (n = 6) or SMF3 (n = 4) or control oocytes (n = 6).

Inhibition by La3+ and Cation Selectivity-- In oocytes expressing SMF1, Na+ currents were partially inhibited by application of 1 mM La3+ (Fig. 5 and Table I). In contrast, Fe2+ uptakes were not inhibited by La3+ (Fig. 2d). La3+ also inhibited an outward current in oocytes expressing SMF1 (Fig. 5b) but not in H2O-injected oocytes (data not shown). In average (n = 5), 47% of the Na+ current in oocytes expressing SMF1 was inhibited by 1 mM La3+ (Fig. 5c). Na+ currents in H2O-injected oocytes were not significantly inhibited by La3+, further supporting the concept that Na+ currents are mediated by SMF1 but not through endogenous Na+ pathways. Taken together, our data indicate the presence of separate modes for La3+-sensitive uncoupled Na+ entry and La3+-insensitive H+-coupled Fe2+ entry by SMF1.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   La3+ inhibition of currents obtained in the presence of alkaline cations, pH 7.5. a, currents were continuously recorded at Vh = -50 mV and in the presence of 100 mM Na+ (Na), 100 mM Na+ + 2.5 mM La3+ (Na+La) or 100 mM choline (Cho). b, voltage dependence of La3+-inhibited currents (La-sensitive, open circle ) and currents stimulated by 100 mM Na+, relative to 100 mM choline (Na-Cho, ). c, average currents obtained from 4 SMF1-expressing and control oocytes, respectively (Vh = -50 mV). Addition of 2.5 mM La3+ reduced the Na+ currents to 53% in SMF1-expressing oocytes. d, comparison of currents stimulated by different alkaline cations (at 100 mM) in the same oocytes (n = 4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Alkaline cation-stimulated currents and inhibition by lanthanum in SMF1-expressing or H2O-injected Xenopus oocytes
Total currents were continuously recorded at Vh of -50 mV in the presence of 2.5 mM La3+ (+La) or in its absence (-La). Currents shown in the table were the difference between total currents obtained in the presence of alkaline ions and in the presence of choline. Data presented are the average values (in nA) from four oocytes.

To test the ion selectivity for the Na+ permeation pathway, Li+, Rb+, or K+ was used to replace Na+. SMF1 was permeable to all of these alkaline cations, which generated similar amplitudes at -50 mV (Fig. 5d), indicating that the cation pathway is nonselective to monovalent cations. La3+ inhibited these currents as well and had lower inhibitory effects on the corresponding currents mediated by H2O-injected oocytes (Table I).

Interestingly, SMF1 and SMF2 are also permeable to Ca2+ (Fig. 6a). The permeation of Ca2+ via SMF1 was partially inhibited by La3+ and Na+ and was not driven by protons (Fig. 6). These data indicate that Ca2+ and monovalent cations share the same nonselective cation pathway.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Uptake of 45Ca in oocytes expressing SMF1, SMF2, or SMF3. a, left panel, SMF-mediated Ca2+ uptake was measured in the absence of Na+ at pH 7.5. Right panel, inhibition of SMF1-mediated 45Ca uptake by La3+ (2.5 mM) in the absence of Na+. b, uptakes were measured at various conditions: [Na+] = 100 or 0 mM, pH 7.5 or 5.5. In all experiments, [Ca2+] = 0.5 mM including the radioactive 45Ca of 36 µM.

DCT1-mediated Uncoupled Currents-- Although yeast SMF1 and its mammalian homologue DCT1 (Nramp2) are functionally similar and both mediate H+-driven Fe2+ uptake, DCT1 did not mediate uncoupled Na+ currents (data not shown). However, DCT1 is not merely a cotransport system. Based on a simultaneous measurements of Fe2+-elicited currents and 55Fe uptake under voltage-clamp conditions (Fig. 7, a and b), the ratio of the Fe2+-evoked current to 55Fe uptake at Vm of +10 mV was close to 3:1, suggesting that the H+:Fe2+ stoichiometry is 1:1 at this membrane potential. However, this ratio increased substantially with hyperpolarization and was unexpectedly high at hyperpolarized potentials (Fig. 7, b and c). This indicates that Fe2+ evokes a stoichiometrically uncoupled and voltage-dependent current. The Fe2+-induced inward currents and the charge:Fe2+ ratios were not significantly affected by removing external cation Na+, Ca2+, or Mg2+, or depleting intracellular Cl- through overnight incubation in Cl--free media (data not shown). Thus, the uncoupled currents of DCT1 are distinct from the SMF1-mediated Na+ currents. The nature of these uncoupled currents is currently under investigation.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Vm dependence of DCT1 charge:Fe2+ uptake ratio. Fe2+-evoked currents and Fe2+ uptake were measured simultaneously under voltage-clamp conditions. a, representative example of currents generated by 10 µM 55Fe at -50 mV and pH 5.7. The charge moved was calculated by integrating the Fe2+-evoked current over the uptake period. b, charge moved at -50 mV was converted to pmol and plotted against Fe2+ uptake. The slope of the linear fit, which is equal to the mean charge:uptake ratio, is 12.5 ± 0.5. c, dependence of charge:Fe2+ uptake ratio on the membrane voltage. Tested potential values were -80 (n = 12), -70 (n = 3), -50 (n = 20), -20 (n = 4), and +10 mV (n = 4).

Effects of Na+ on Yeast Growth-- Uncoupled currents induced by expression of SMF1 in Xenopus oocytes could arise from factors not directly related to the functional properties of SMF1, including up-regulation of an endogenous Xenopus protein and conformational changes of SMF1 induced by abnormal lipid composition in the target membrane. Our electrophysiological data indicate that Na+ permeation is mediated directly by SMF1. To further validate this concept, we examined whether the observed Na+ currents in oocytes expressing SMF1 can be verified in S. cerevisiae in vivo. For this purpose we constructed yeast disruptant mutants with each of SMF1, SMF2, and SMF3 genes individually inactivated and a mutant with all three genes inactivated. EGTA, which chelates vital metal ions such as Mn2+ and Cu2+ is known to inhibit yeast cell growth (29). The yeast disruptant mutants exhibited higher sensitivities to EGTA than the wild-type yeast. The higher sensitivities and associated growth arrest could be suppressed by exposure to low concentrations of manganese or copper in the medium (20, 30). We utilized these mutants to examine whether inhibition of SMF1-mediated Mn2+ or Cu2+ transport by Na+ increases sensitivity to EGTA. Of note, FET3 and FET4 (not SMFs) constitute the main yeast iron transport systems, with high and low affinities, respectively (31), whereas SMF1 and SMF2 mainly mediate uptake of Mn2+ and other metal ions. In the presence of 0.1 mM EGTA and 20 mM Na+, only the triple mutant Delta SMF1+2+3 failed to grow (Fig. 8). Among the individually disruptant mutants, only Delta SMF1 exhibited growth arrest in the presence of 0.5 mM EGTA. At 1 mM EGTA both Delta SMF1 and Delta SMF2 failed to grow. Delta SMF3 can grow at higher EGTA concentrations.2 These results are in agreement with our observation that oocytes expressing SMF2 exhibit lower activities (in both Fe2+ uptake and Na+ currents, Fig. 4) than SMF1-expressing oocytes and that SMF3-expressing oocytes exhibited no significant transport activities in oocytes. For all mutants the growth arrest was suppressed by addition of 5 µM Mn2+ or Cu2+ but not Zn2+.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Na+ affects the growth of yeast mutants in the presence of EGTA. The various yeast strains were grown on agar plates containing 0.25% yeast extract, 0.5% Bactopeptone, 2% dextrose, 2% agar, and 50 mM Mes, pH 6. NaCl and/or EGTA were added where indicated. For the growth assay, the strains were grown in liquid YPD medium to mid-logarithmic phase. The cells were washed and resuspended in water, and 1 µl was seeded on agar plates with the indicated supplements. The concentration of applied MnCl2, CuCl2, or ZnCl2 was 5 µM.

Thus, Delta SMF2 was the appropriate mutant to study the effect of Na+ on SMF1. Indeed, addition of 100 mM NaCl to the plates containing 0.5 mM EGTA caused growth arrest of Delta SMF2, consistent with our finding in Xenopus oocytes that Na+ can effectively compete with other metal ions for their uptake by SMF1.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present studies demonstrate that SMF1, like its mammalian homologue DCT1/Nramp2, mediates proton-coupled metal ion transport when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Transport is saturable with increasing iron concentration and is not inhibited by La3+. SMF1 also exhibits uncoupled cation (Na+, K+, Rb+, Li+, and Ca2+) currents. Uncoupled Na+ currents were not saturable with increasing Na+ concentration and inhibitable by La3+. These results indicate that the cation permeation is a channel-like behavior of SMF1 and that H+-Fe2+ cotransport and Na+ permeation are mediated by SMF1 through distinct mechanisms.

In analogy to DCT1, SMF1 mediates absorption of a variety of divalent metal ions, including Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+. However, although DCT1 is thought to play an essential role in intestinal absorption of both Fe2+ and other divalent metal ions, iron uptake in yeast is probably mediated by the specialized FET3 and FET4 iron uptake systems. Thus, the role of SMF in yeast is most likely to absorb other essential metal ions present in the soil such as Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+.

Our yeast studies show that SMF1 plays a major role in supporting cell growth in the presence of relatively low EGTA concentrations. Oocyte studies suggest that Na+ inhibition of yeast growth at low EGTA concentrations can be attributed to Na+ inhibition of metal ion uptake by SMF1. The physiological significance of this phenomenon can be explained by considering the growth conditions in nature. In the natural environment, yeast can be exposed to drastic changes in the salinity because of water evaporation. Under these conditions the concentration of metal ions in the extracellular environment can reach dangerous levels. Because yeast cells can tolerate NaCl concentrations of up to 0.9 M, competition of Na+ with metal ion uptake may prevent accumulation of metal ions to toxic levels.

Several other transporters also exhibit uncoupled ion currents such as chloride currents in the glutamate transporters (32), Na+ leak currents in the Na+-glucose transporters (33), and alkaline-cation currents in the serotonin transporter (34, 35) and the GABA transporter (36). Uncoupled Na+ and Li+ currents mediated by serotonin transporters were not saturable and exhibited channel-like behaviors (35, 37). The biological and physiological meaning of uncoupled cation-leak pathways in these transporters are still unclear. It was proposed that concomitant Cl- flow with glutamate cotransport through glutamate transporters act as a feedback mechanism to reduce neuronal cell depolarization that would result in toxic vesicular glutamate release (38). The identification of these new components of transporter-associated currents provides new tools to elucidate the interaction between the transporter substrates and ions and will help to elucidate the structure-function relationship of these transporters.

Ca2+ flux via SMF1 was not driven by protons but rather through the uncoupled nonselective pathway. On the other hand, although the mammalian homologue DCT1 was not permeable to Ca2+, its H+-coupled cotransport was inhibited by Ca2+, indicating that Ca2+ can interact with DCT1 as well. Hence, SMF1 and DCT1, when expressed in oocytes, likely possess structural similarity at their Fe2+ and Ca2+ binding sites. Unlike Na+, Ca2+ (up to 70 mM) had no inhibitory effects on yeast growth (30), suggesting that the Ca2+ permeability of SMF transporters in yeast are not significant enough to interfere with cell growth.

What is the physiological significance of the Na+ permeability of SMF1? We have shown that the mammalian homologue DCT1 also mediates uncoupled currents that substantially increase with hyperpolarization. However, in contrast to yeast SMF1, these DCT1-mediated currents are metal ion-gated. Although SMF1 and DCT1 mediate different uncoupled currents, they may utilize these characteristics for similar purposes, that is to prevent from excessive metal ion loading. The Na+ permeation via SMF1 may provide a protection by the preferential uptake of Na+ over the excessive uptake of toxic metal ions. Influx of more than 10 positive charges per Fe2+ entry under physiological (negative) potentials would significantly depolarize the cells, which results in an inhibition of Fe2+ uptake. Further studies are needed to define the physiological significance of the anomalous behaviors of the SMF and DCT metal ion transporters.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank P. Fong for kindly providing the pTLN2 oocyte expression vector and J.-Y. Lapointe and E. M. Wright for valuable discussions and suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by an International Human Frontier Science Program Long-Term Fellowship (to X.-Z. C.), a Dual-Mentored Fellowship of Brigham and Women's Hospital (to J.-B. P), a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (to N. N.), and by National Institutes of Health Grant DK43171 (to M. A. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ These authors made equal contributions to the work

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Renal Div., Rm. 570, Harvard Inst. of Medicine, Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-525-5820; Fax: 617-525-5830; E-mail: mhediger@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.

2 A. Cohen, H. Nelson, and N. Nelson, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviation used is: Mes, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hartman, K. R., and Barker, J. A. (1996) Am. J. Hematol. 51, 269-275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Chelly, J., Tumer, Z., Tonnesen, T., Petterson, A., Ishikawa-Bruch, Y., Tommerup, N., Horn, N., and Monaco, A. P. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 14-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Feder, J. N., Gnirke, A., Thomas, W., Tsuchihashi, Z., Ruddy, D. A., Basava, A., Dormishian, F., Domingo, R., Jr., Ellis, M. C., Fullan, A., Hinton, L. M., Jones, N. L., Kimmel, B. E., Kronmal, G. S., Lauer, P., Lee, V. K., Loeb, D. B., Mapa, F. A., McClelland, E., Meyer, N. C., Mintier, G. A., Moeller, N., Moore, T., Morikang, E., Wolff, R. K., et al.. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 399-408[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Cox, D. W. (1996) Prog. Liver. Dis. 14, 245-264[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Good, P. F., Werner, P., Hsu, A., Olanow, C. W., and Perl, D. P. (1996) Am. J. Pathol. 149, 21-28[Abstract]
6. Hirsch, E. C. (1994) Mol. Neurobiol. 9, 135-142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Babcock, M., de Silva, D., Oaks, R., Davis-Kaplan, S., Jiralerspong, S., Montermini, L., Pandolfo, M., and Kaplan, J. (1997) Science 276, 1709-1712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Orgad, S., Nelson, H., Segal, D., and Nelson, N. (1998) J. Exp. Biol. 201, 115-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Palmiter, R. D., Cole, T. B., Quaife, C. J., and Findley, S. D. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14934-14939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Rodrigues, V., Cheah, P. Y., Ray, K., and Chia, W. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3007-3020[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gunshin, H., Mackenzie, B., Berger, U. V., Gunshin, Y., Nussberger, S., Romero, M., Boron, W. F., Gollan, J. L., and Hediger, M. A. (1997) Nature 338, 482-488
12. Fleming, M. D., Trenor, C. C., III, Su, M. A., Foernzler, D., Beier, D. R., Dietrich, W. F., and Andrew, N. C. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 383-386[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Vidal, S. M., Malo, D., Vogan, K., Skamene, E., and Gros, P. (1993) Cell 73, 469-485[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Vidal, S., Belouchi, A. M., Cellier, M., Beatty, B., and Gros, P. (1995) Mamm. Genome. 6, 224-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Gruenheid, S., Cellier, M., Vidal, S., and Gros, P. (1995) Genomics 25, 514-525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Fleming, M. D., Romano, M. A., Su, M. A., Garrick, L. M., Garrick, M. D., and Andrews, N. C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 1148-1153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Wood, R. J., and Han, O. (1998) J. Nutr. 128, 1841-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Rolfs, A., and Hediger, M. A. (1999) J. Physiol. 518, 1-12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. West, A. H., Clark, D. J., Martin, J., Neupert, W., Hartl, F. U., and Horwich, A. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24625-24633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Supek, F., Supekova, L., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5105-5110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Liu, X. F., Supek, F., Nelson, N., and Culotta, V. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11763-11769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Liu, X. F., and Culotta, V. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4863-4868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Chen, X.-Z., Shayakul, C., Berger, U. V., Tian, W., and Hediger, M. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20972-20981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3503-3507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Noumi, T., Beltran, C., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1938-1942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K., and Kimura, A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 153, 163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Elble, R. (1992) BioTechniques 13, 18-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Searle, S., Bright, N. A., Roach, T. I., Atkinson, P. G., Barton, C. H., Meloen, R. H., and Blackwell, J. M. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2855-2866[Abstract]
29. Pinner, E., Gruenheid, S., Raymond, M., and Gros, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28933-28938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Supek, F., Supekova, L., Nelson, H., and Nelson, N. (1997) J. Exp. Biol. 200, 321-330[Abstract]
31. Dix, D. R., Bridgham, J. T., Broderius, M. A., Byersdorfer, C. A., and Eide, D. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26092-26099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Fairman, W. A., Vandenberg, R. J., Arriza, J. L., Kavanaugh, M. P., and Amara, S. G. (1995) Nature 375, 599-603[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chen, X.-Z., Coady, M. J., Jackson, F., Berteloot, A., and Lapointe, J.-Y. (1995) Biophys. J. 69, 2405-2414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Mager, S., Min, C., Henry, D. J., Chavkin, C., Hoffman, B. J., Davidson, N., and Lester, H. A. (1994) Neuron 12, 845-859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Galli, A., Petersen, C. I., deBlaquiere, M., Blakely, R. D., and DeFelice, L. J. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 3401-3411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Cammack, J. N., and Schwartz, E. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 723-727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Lin, F., Lester, H. A., and Mager, S. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 3126-3135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Picaud, S. A., Larsson, H. P., Grant, G. B., Lecar, H., and Werblin, F. S. (1995) J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1760-1771[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Courville, E. Urbankova, C. Rensing, R. Chaloupka, M. Quick, and M. F. M. Cellier
Solute Carrier 11 Cation Symport Requires Distinct Residues in Transmembrane Helices 1 and 6
J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9651 - 9658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. Martinoia, M. Maeshima, and H. E. Neuhaus
Vacuolar transporters and their essential role in plant metabolism
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(1): 83 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
V. C. Culotta, M. Yang, and M. D. Hall
Manganese Transport and Trafficking: Lessons Learned from Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Eukaryot. Cell, July 1, 2005; 4(7): 1159 - 1165.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Nevo and N. Nelson
The Mutation F227I Increases the Coupling of Metal Ion Transport in DCT1
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53056 - 53061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. L. Hall and L. E. Williams
Transition metal transporters in plants
J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2003; 54(393): 2601 - 2613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Cohen, Y. Nevo, and N. Nelson
The first external loop of the metal ion transporter DCT1 is involved in metal ion binding and specificity
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10694 - 10699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. R. Forbes and P. Gros
Iron, manganese, and cobalt transport by Nramp1 (Slc11a1) and Nramp2 (Slc11a2) expressed at the plasma membrane
Blood, September 1, 2003; 102(5): 1884 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Bereczky, H.-Y. Wang, V. Schubert, M. Ganal, and P. Bauer
Differential Regulation of nramp and irt Metal Transporter Genes in Wild Type and Iron Uptake Mutants of Tomato
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24697 - 24704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. I. Kanner
Transmembrane Domain I of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Transporter GAT-1 Plays a Crucial Role in the Transition between Cation Leak and Transport Modes
J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 3705 - 3712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. E-C. Luk and V. C. Culotta
Manganese Superoxide Dismutase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Acquires Its Metal Co-factor through a Pathway Involving the Nramp Metal Transporter, Smf2p
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2001; 276(50): 47556 - 47562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. Maser, S. Thomine, J. I. Schroeder, J. M. Ward, K. Hirschi, H. Sze, I. N. Talke, A. Amtmann, F. J.M. Maathuis, D. Sanders, et al.
Phylogenetic Relationships within Cation Transporter Families of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2001; 126(4): 1646 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A Sacher, A Cohen, and N Nelson
Properties of the mammalian and yeast metal-ion transporters DCT1 and Smf1p expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2001; 204(6): 1053 - 1061.
[Abstract] [PDF]