|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 35159-35171, December 3, 1999
Organization and Ligand Binding Properties of the Tail of
Acanthamoeba Myosin-IA
IDENTIFICATION OF AN ACTIN-BINDING SITE IN THE BASIC (TAIL
HOMOLOGY-1) DOMAIN*
Wei-Lih
Lee §,
E. Michael
Ostap¶,
Henry G.
Zot , and
Thomas D.
Pollard§**
From the § Structural Biology Laboratory, The Salk
Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, the Department of Biology, Eastern Michigan University,
Ypsilanti, Michigan 48197, the BCMB Graduate
Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and the ¶ Pennsylvania Muscle
Institute and the Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Acanthamoeba myosin-IA heavy
chain gene encodes a 134-kDa protein with a catalytic domain, three
potential light chain binding sites, and a tail with separately folded
tail homology (TH) -1, -2, and -3 domains. TH-1 is highly resistant to
trypsin digestion despite consisting of 15% lysine and arginine.
TH-2/3 is resistant to -chymotrypsin digestion. The peptide link
between TH-1 and TH-2/3 is cleaved by trypsin, -chymotrypsin, and
endo-AspN but not V8 protease. The CD spectra of TH-2/3 indicate
predominantly random structure, turns, and -strands but no
-helix. The hydrodynamic properties of TH-2/3 (Stokes' radius of
3.0 nm, sedimentation coefficient of 1.8 S, and molecular mass of 21.6 kDa) indicate that these domains are as long as the whole myosin-I tail
in reconstructions of electron micrographs. Furthermore, separately
expressed and purified TH-1 binds with high affinity to TH-2/3. Thus we
propose that TH-1 and TH-2/3 are arranged side by side in the myosin-IA tail. Separate TH-1, TH-2, and TH-2/3 each binds muscle actin filaments
with high affinity. Salt inhibits TH-2/3 binding to muscle actin but
not amoeba actin filaments. TH-1 enhances binding of TH-2/3 to muscle
actin filaments at physiological salt concentration, indicating that
TH-1 and TH-2/3 cooperate in actin binding. An intrinsic fluorescence
assay shows that TH-2/3 also binds with high affinity to the protein
Acan125 similar to the SH3 domain of myosin-IC. Phylogenetic analysis
of SH3 sequences suggests that myosin-I acquired SH3 domain after the
divergence of the genes for myosin-I isoforms.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The myosin superfamily consists of at least 15 classes
distinguished by the sequences of their catalytic domains but also differing in the structure of their tails. Class I unconventional myosins are the best characterized with the exception of myosin-II, the
conventional myosin of muscle and non-muscle cells. Thirty eight
members of the myosin-I family have been identified in 12 organisms at
the protein and DNA levels. Many of these organisms express multiple
myosin-Is with similar catalytic domains but with different tails,
which are presumed to target myosin-I isoforms to various intracellular
locations (1-4) and to adapt them to different functions. Myosin-I
tails differ in sequence and domain organization, but less is known
about their affinity for various ligands. Biochemical and structural
studies on a range of myosin-I molecules are required to understand how
the diverse tails determine function.
Acanthamoeba myosin-Is were the first unconventional myosins
discovered. The three known isoforms (myosin-IA, -IB, and -IC) have
heavy chains of 128-140 kDa and light chains of 17-27 kDa (5-9). The
sequences of myosin-IB and myosin-IC show that they contain a conserved
catalytic domain, a single light chain binding site, a basic region
called TH-11 (for tail
homology-1), a Gly/Pro/Ala-rich (GPA) region called TH-2, and a
55-residue src homology 3 domain called TH-3. Myosin-IA had
not been sequenced. The three tail regions are sequential in myosin-IB,
but the SH3 domain of myosin-IC splits TH-2 into two parts. Transient
kinetic analysis (10) revealed that the catalytic mechanisms of
myosin-IA and myosin-IB are similar to each other and to muscle myosin,
so it is likely that the tails of these myosins account for their
unique functions.
The tail domains of Acanthamoeba myosin-Is bind various
ligands. The basic TH-1 domain binds acidic phospholipids (11). The
C-terminal 25 kDa of Acanthamoeba myosin-IC (consisting of TH-2 and TH-3) (11) and a C-terminal 30-kDa -chymotryptic fragment of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA (12) bind actin filaments in the
presence and absence of ATP. GST fusion proteins with TH-2 from
Dictyostelium long-tail myosin-Is also bind actin filaments
with high affinity (13, 14). The only protein ligand, other than actin,
for Acanthamoeba myosin-I tail is Acan125, identified by its
ability to bind via PXXP motifs to the SH3 domain of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IC in co-immunoprecipitation and
in vitro binding experiments (15, 16). The biological function of Acan125 is unclear, but it consists of leucine-rich repeats
known to mediate protein-protein interactions. The SH3 domain plays an
important role in the functions of long-tail myosin-Is, since
Dictyostelium myoB without TH-3 fails to complement the null
phenotype (17). Interaction with receptor protein via TH-3 may
contribute to localization of myosin-I molecules, as described for
yeast myosin-Is and verprolin Vrp1p (18).
We determined the biochemical and hydrodynamic properties of individual
domains of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA tail, revealing novel
features. The TH-1 domain contributes to actin binding and binds
tightly to the TH-2/3 domains. Hydrodynamic data suggest that TH-2/3
must fold back onto TH-1. This biochemical evidence is consistent with
three-dimensional reconstructions of electron micrographs of myosin-Is
attached to actin filaments (19-21).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning of Acanthamoeba Myosin-IA Gene, cDNA
Tail--
Degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to conserved
myosin ATP-binding site (QCVIISGESGAGKTEASK) and to myosin-IA-specific phosphorylation site (AGTTYALNLNKM) (22) were used to amplify a 1-kb
fragment, SUB01, from an Acanthamoeba genomic library
constructed in the phage vector (a gift from Dr. Eric Bateman,
University of Vermont). SUB01 was used to screen the genomic library
for the myosin-IA gene. From eight positive phage clones, we selected the largest fragment containing SUB01 by restriction mapping and Southern analyses. A 9-kb BamHI fragment was cloned into
pBluescript. This fragment did not span the entire myosin-IA gene. We
used a 250-bp SalI-BamHI fragment from the 3' end
of the 9-kb BamHI fragment as a probe to identify an
overlapping 1.6-kb SalI fragment from the parent phage. Both
9-kb BamHI and 1.6-kb SalI fragments were
subcloned into smaller sizes for sequencing on both strands by primer
walking. We used 10% formamide in our dideoxy sequencing reactions
(U. S. Biochemical Corp.) to eliminate "stalling" of DNA
polymerase at GC-rich sequences (23).
We cloned three cDNA fragments of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA
coding for the IQ, TH-1, -2, and -3 domains by RT-PCR using either poly(A) mRNA (data not shown) or total RNA as template (Fig.
1D). Total RNA was isolated from 6 g of
Acanthamoeba in mid-log phase. Cells were lysed with a
glass-Teflon homogenizer in 80 ml of TRIZOL Reagent (Life Technologies,
Inc.) and processed according to the manufacturer. Poly(A) mRNA was
isolated from total RNA using the Poly(A) Quik mRNA Isolation kit
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Reverse transcription of total or poly(A)
mRNA was performed at 42 °C for 1 h using Superscript II RT
(Life Technologies, Inc.) with primer R (TTAGATGTCCTCGACGTAGTT).
Subsequent PCR reactions were done in 20% glycerol using Elongase
Enzyme Mix (Life Technologies, Inc.) with reverse primer R and
forward primer 1 (ATAACTACATCGGCAACGACC), primer 2 (CTGCGTGAGAACTATTGGC) or primer 3 (GCGAGTTCAAGAACCTCTCGC). RT-PCR
products were cloned into pBluescript for restriction analyses and
sequencing. Northern blotting of Acanthamoeba RNA was
performed as described (24).
Splice Site Determinations--
We used the cDNA sequences
of the RT-PCR products to map intron/exon boundaries in the gene
sequence coding for the IQ, TH-1, -2, and -3 domains. We predicted the
intron/exon boundaries in the gene sequence coding for the catalytic
domain of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA. First, we took advantage
of the fact that myosin-I catalytic domain is highly conserved. We
compared the Acanthamoeba myosin-IA gene sequence with those
in the data base using tBlastx function of BLAST (translated DNA query
versus translated DNA data base) (25) to identify putative
exons coding for the catalytic domain. We then searched for the usually
conserved 5' (GTAC) and 3' (CCAG) splice site sequences flanking the
putative exons. These 5' donor site and 3' acceptor site sequences were
identified in other cloned Acanthamoeba genes: TFIID (26),
myosin-IB (8), myosin-IC (7), actin I (27), HMWMI (28), and myosin-II (29). We predicted the start codon of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA based on alignment with and what is found for Acanthamoeba
myosin-IB and myosin-IC genes, in which the start codon was immediately followed by a 5' donor splice site.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Myosin-IA Tail
Domains--
Constructs of tail domains are shown in Fig.
1C. We chose the N terminus of the A123 construct to be
immediately downstream of the third IQ motif at residue 757 using the
crystal structure of scallop myosin light chain domain as a reference
(30). We chose the N terminus of A23 construct to be residue 985, the
same as the N terminus of the 30-kDa -chymotryptic fragment of
native myosin-IA (12). We used the RT-PCR product and appropriate
primers to amplify the following constructs: A123 (residues 757-1215), A1 (residues 757-984), A2 (residues 985-1161), and A23 (residues 985-1215). Each PCR product was ligated into pMW172 vector (31) at
NdeI and BamHI sites. All final constructs were
verified by DNA sequencing. We expressed all constructs in freshly
transformed Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS strain (Stratagene).
A123 Purification--
Cells were grown overnight at 16 °C in
500 ml of LB/carbenicillin to A600 = 0.2, induced for expression with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 24 h at
16 °C, and harvested. One gram of pelleted cells was resuspended in
25 ml of IPED (IPED, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) buffer with 5 µg/ml aprotinin and 200 µM leupeptin and sonicated 4 times for 30 s with a
sonicator tip of 1.2 cm in diameter (Sonifier 450, Branson Ultrasonics
Corp., Danbury, CT) at level 8 and with 4 min incubation on ice between
each burst. Crude lysate was spun at 105,000 × g for
30 min to obtain soluble A123. When bacteria were grown at 37 °C
rather than 16 °C, >90% of A123 pelleted at 100,000 × g. Soluble A123 was partially purified by gel filtration on
a 2.5 × 99-cm Sephacryl S300 column equilibrated with IPED buffer. Protein was monitored by dye binding (Bio-Rad Protein Assay,
Bio-Rad) and A123 by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie staining. A123
migrated in the void volume together with polynucleotides (DNA/RNA) as
determined by UV absorbance and agarose gel electrophoresis. Fractions
containing A123 were pooled and used for assessment of domain
boundaries (see below). Further purification of A123 from S300 fraction
was difficult due to tightly bound bacterial nucleic acids.
Hydroxylapatite chromatography in 50% formamide removed all detectable
nucleic acids and yielded about 500 µg of pure A123 from 1 g of
bacteria. Upon removal of formamide, purified A123 was only soluble at
pH >9.5.
A23 Purification--
Unlike A123, cells were grown at 37 °C
in 650 ml of LB/carbenicillin for 25 h and harvested. For a
typical preparation, 3-5 g of bacteria were lysed by sonication in 60 ml of IPED buffer with 0.1 M KCl, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and
200 µM leupeptin. After clarification, saturated ammonium
sulfate, pH 7, was added slowly to 20% saturation with gentle stirring
for 15 min at 4 °C. The precipitate was pelleted at 100,000 × g for 15 min and discarded. Similarly the 20-40% fraction
was collected by 100,000 × g, and all of the A23 was
solubilized in 9 ml of lysis buffer. We detected no A23 in ammonium
sulfate precipitates below 20% or above 40% saturation by SDS-PAGE.
After dialysis in IPED buffer and clarification at 3000 × g for 10 min, the 20-40% fraction was passed through a
1 × 9-cm DEAE-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column equilibrated with IPED to remove nucleic acids and other bacterial proteins. 7.5 ml of DEAE flow-through was loaded directly on a 1.5 × 99-cm column of Sephacryl S200 (Sigma) equilibrated with IPED with
0.5 M KCl. Fractions of 2 ml were collected and assayed as
above. Fractions containing A23 were pooled and dialyzed
versus 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 0.5 M KCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and
1 mM DTT. Dialyzed S200 pool was loaded onto a 0.8 × 9-cm column of hydroxylapatite (Bio-Gel HTP Gel, Bio-Rad) equilibrated with the same buffer. Purified A23 flowed through this hydroxylapatite. Hydroxylapatite flow-through was dialyzed into appropriate buffer and
concentrated on a Centricon-3 ultrafilter (Amicon Inc., Beverly, MA).
The identity of A23 was confirmed by N-terminal protein sequencing and
by immunoblotting with M1.7 monoclonal antibody (32). Purified A23 was
free of DNA/RNA contaminants as determined by UV absorbance (280/260
nm 2). We measured the concentration of purified A23 using
extinction coefficients determined from analytical ultracentrifugation experiments: 0.631 A280nm/mg/ml/cm or 0.186 A295nm/mg/ml/cm. A typical preparation yielded
about 3 mg of A23 from 3 to 5 g of bacteria cells, compared with a
yield of less than 3 mg of purified Acanthamoeba myosin-IA
from 1 kg of amoebas (5, 6). Purified A23 was very stable, showing no
degradation over 50 h at 23 °C during sedimentation equilibrium
experiments. Purification of untagged A23 is crucial for obtaining
correct measurement of hydrodynamic properties. A23 with a
(His)6-tag aggregated artificially judging from zero length
chemical cross-linking and Superdex-S200 gel filtration experiments in
0.1 or 0.5 M NaCl and 5 mM imidazole, pH 7. Bacterial expression also yields much larger quantities of pure A23
than digestion of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA with
-chymotrypsin (12).
A2 Purification--
Similar to A23, cells were grown and lysed,
and crude lysate was ammonium sulfate-fractionated and passed through a
column of DEAE-Sepharose in IPED buffer. However, the DEAE flow-through was loaded on a 1 × 9-cm column of CM-Sepharose (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated in IPED buffer. After elution with a
linear gradient of 0-500 mM NaCl in IPED, the fractions
containing pure A2 were pooled and dialyzed versus IPED
buffer before actin co-pelleting assays.
A1 Purification--
Cells were grown at 30 °C overnight in
500 ml of LB/carbenicillin and harvested. Typically, 1-2 g of bacteria
were lysed by sonication in 60 ml of IPED buffer with 0.1 M
KCl, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 200 µM leupeptin. Insoluble
A1 was recovered by pelleting at 105,000 × g for 30 min, extracted with a Dounce homogenizer in 6 M urea/IPED
buffer, and loaded on a 1.5 × 17-cm CM-Sepharose column
equilibrated with the same solvent. The column was eluted with a linear
gradient of 0-500 mM NaCl in IPED buffer. Fractions containing A1 were pooled and passed through a 1.5 × 17-cm column of hydroxylapatite equilibrated with 6 M urea, 0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, and 1 mM DTT to remove nucleic acids and other bacterial
proteins. HA flow-through was loaded on a 1.5 × 75-cm column of
Sephacryl S200 equilibrated with 6 M urea/IPED. Pure A1 was
pooled and refolded by dialysis in five sequential steps of decreasing
urea concentration into a final buffer containing 10 mM
imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT. We
clarified refolded A1 at 105,000 × g for 30 min. The
identity of soluble A1 was confirmed by N-terminal protein sequencing.
A1 was free of DNA and RNA contaminants as determined by UV absorbance.
The yield from 1 g of bacteria was 650 µg of A1 at a
concentration of 1 µM. A1 was soluble at concentrations
1 µM but aggregated at higher concentrations. A1
aggregated during storage at 0 °C, so binding assays described below
were performed within 2 days of urea removal.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Trx-AD3 and
Trx-AD3 -(977-994)--
The expression and purification of TrxAD3
and Trx-AD3 -(977-994) were modified to increase purity. Soluble
bacterial lysate was fractionated with 20-40% saturated ammonium
sulfate, pH 7. The precipitate was solubilized, dialyzed, and
gel-filtered in 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 300 mM
KCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT on a 1.5 × 74-cm column of Sephacryl S300. Fractions containing thioredoxin fusion
proteins were pooled and dialyzed versus 10 mM
imidazole, pH 7.5, and 300 mM KCl. Next, sample was loaded
onto a 1.5 × 9-cm column of hydroxylapatite equilibrated with the
same buffer and eluted with a 0-0.2 M gradient of
potassium phosphate, pH 7.4. Hydroxylapatite fractions containing
thioredoxin fusion proteins were dialyzed versus 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM KCl
and 20 mM imidazole, pH 8, for nickel chromatography as
described by Xu et al. (16).
Controlled Proteolytic Digestion of Recombinant A123--
Pooled
S300 fractions of A123 (0.5 mg/ml) were treated for 10, 20, 30, or 60 min with proteolytic enzymes in 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, and 1 mM DTT (20 ng/µl trypsin (Sigma) at 0 °C, 4 ng/µl endo-AspN (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 0 °C, 10 ng/µl
V8 protease (Sigma) at 23 °C, or 10 ng/µl -chymotrypsin (Sigma) at 23 °C). Reactions were terminated with 10 mM Pefabloc
and 10 mM EDTA and frozen immediately with liquid nitrogen.
Boiling sample buffer was subsequently added, and digestion products
were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie or transferred to
Immobilon-P (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Bands on polyvinylidene
difluoride were visualized by Amido Black staining and excised for
N-terminal sequencing by automated Edman degradation by Dr. W. Fischer
of the Salk Institute.
Stokes' Radius Measurement of Recombinant A23--
Stokes'
radius (RS) was measured by gel filtration in 0.5 M KCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, and 2 mM EDTA on a 1.4 × 96-cm
column of Sephacryl S200 calibrated with blue dextran (void volume),
bovine serum albumin (3.55 nm), ovalbumin (3.05 nm), carbonic anhydrase
(2.36 nm), chymotrypsinogen A (2.09 nm), cytochrome c (1.7 nm), and ATP (salt volume). Stokes' radius of A23 was obtained from
plot of erfc 1 of the partition coefficients
versus Stokes' radius according to Ackers (33).
Actin Filament Co-pelleting Assay--
Acanthamoeba
(34) or rabbit skeletal muscle (35) actin was polymerized for 2 h
at room temperature in 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 0, 20, 40, or
60 mM KCl. Purified A23 at 0.1-0.3 µM was
incubated with various concentrations of polymerized actin in final 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 0, 20, 40, or 60 mM KCl.
The mixtures were centrifuged at 95,000 rpm (rotor TLA 120.2, Beckman
Optima TLX ultracentrifuge, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) for 30 min at 23 °C. The supernatants were transferred to 1.5-ml tubes and
evaporated to dryness in an Eppendorf Concentrator (model 5301, Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY). Each sample was resuspended
in sample buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE with a range of A23
standards and stained with Coomassie. A23 was quantified by
densitometry of wet gels and analyzed with NIH image software. Binding
results were plotted as bound A23 versus total actin
concentration, and fit by Equation 1.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where [A23]bound is the concentration of A23 bound
to actin filaments, [A] is the total actin concentration, [A23] is
the total A23 concentration, and Kd is the
dissociation equilibrium constant.
A1 ± A23 pelleting with muscle actin filaments was done in 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 60 mM KCl. Purified A1 at
about 0.02 µM ± A23 at about 0.02 µM were
incubated with various concentrations of polymerized actin. After
centrifugation, the pellets or air-dried supernatants were analyzed as above.
Circular Dichroism Measurements--
CD spectra were collected
in an Aviv model 62DS spectropolarimeter (Aviv Associates, NJ) using
the manufacturer's 60DS software. Purified A23 samples at 0.263 or
0.132 mg/ml in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, ± 250 mM NaF, ± 50% TFE were placed in a 0.5-mm cell at 22 °C and scanned 4 times between 260 and 185 nm with an integration time of 1 s, a bandwidth of 1.5 nm, a collection frequency of 1 nm/point, and a photomultiplier tube voltage of <390 V at 185 nm. No
post-collection smoothing was applied to the data. Buffer spectra were
subtracted from sample spectra. The raw data were converted to mean
residue ellipticity using the mean residue weight calculated from the
composition and the concentration determined by extinction coefficient
at 295 nm. Spectral deconvolutions by the method of Yang et
al. (36) employed the program PROSEC (DOS version) supplied by
Aviv. Spectral deconvolution by the method of Bohm et al.
(37) employed CDNN (version 2.0c).
Analytical Ultracentrifugation--
Sedimentation velocity and
equilibrium were carried out at 23 °C using An-60 Ti rotor in a
Beckman Optima XLI ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments). For
sedimentation equilibrium, we loaded A23 in IPED or IPED with 0.5 M KCl into six-hole, charcoal-filled Epon centerpieces and
centrifuged them to equilibrium (20 h at each speed). We monitored
absorption at 280 nm, collected data sets every hour, calculated the
root mean square deviation of each data set from the final using the
Matchv7 software (Jeff Lary, National Analytical Ultracentrifuge
Facility, Storrs, CT), and considered equilibrium attained when there
was no change in root mean square deviation in consecutive data sets.
We used the program Reedit9 (Jeff Lary, National Analytical
Ultracentrifuge Facility) to truncate and save the data for individual
samples into separate data sets. Determination of the effective reduced molecular weight of A23 from all data sets by the method of Johnson et al. (38) employed the program Winnonln. We also fit each data set to an exponential function defined by Equation 2.
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where A is 280 nm absorbance, C is a
fitting constant, r is radial position,
rm is the radius of the meniscus, and is the
effective reduced molecular weight. From these fits we calculated the
molecular mass of A23 using a partial specific volume of 0.7164 cm3/g.
For sedimentation velocity, we loaded A23 into two-sector,
charcoal-filled Epon centerpieces and centrifuged at 45,000 rpm for
approximately 4 h. We monitored sedimentation of A23 by fringe displacement and/or absorption at 280 or 295 nm, and collected data
sets every 2 min. Sedimentation velocity of A23 was carried out in
three different conditions as follows: IPED; 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6; or IPED with 0.5 M KCl. Determination of
s* from sedimentation velocity data by the method of Philo
(39) and Stafford (40) employed the programs SVEDBERG and DCDT,
respectively. The partial specific volume of 0.7164 cm3/g
and hydration of 0.4171 g/g were calculated from the amino acid
composition and used in hydrodynamic modeling employing the program
SEDNTERP (41). We calculated the extinction coefficients from data sets
collected near the end of the run using Equation 3.
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where is the extinction coefficient, A and
F are the changes in magnitude of absorbance and fringe
displacement, respectively, from the meniscus to the plateau.
Intrinsic Fluorescence Measurements--
Interactions of
recombinant A23 with recombinant Acan125 C-terminal 39-kDa fragment
(Trx-AD3) were measured by intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence.
Measurements were carried out in KMEM buffer (KMEM, 20 mM
MOPS, pH 7, 0.1 M KCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2) at 23 °C, with excitation at 295 nm and emission at 329 nm in PTI Alphascan spectrofluorimeter (Photon
Technology International Inc., So. Brunswick, NJ). Emission wavelength
scans (295 nm excitation) indicated that A23 is 3× more fluorescent
than equimolar of Trx-AD3 and Trx-AD3 -(977-994). Buffer alone gave
<3% of A23 emission. Trx fusion proteins were titrated either with or
without purified A23 at a fixed level of 0.1 µM. We
converted the raw data to intrinsic fluorescence change by Equation 4.
|
(Eq. 4)
|
where F is the difference in intrinsic
fluorescence between Trx fusion protein alone (FT)
and Trx fusion protein in the presence of A23
(FT+A23). FA23 is
the fluorescence of A23 alone. We assume F is
proportional to the concentration of A23-Trx fusion protein complex. A
plot of F versus Trx fusion protein
concentration is fit by Equation 5.
|
(Eq. 5)
|
where [T] is the total Trx fusion protein
concentration, C is a proportionality constant, [A23] is
the total A23 concentration, and Kd is the
dissociation equilibrium constant.
Glutathione Bead Co-pelleting Assay--
We subcloned A23 DNA
insert into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pGex3x
vector for GST-A23 construct. GST-A23 purified from crude lysate on a
glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column was used
directly in titration. Soluble A1 at 0.3 µM was mixed
with various concentrations of GST-A23 bound to glutathione-Sepharose in 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, and 60 mM NaCl. The mixtures were
centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatants were evaporated to dryness. Each sample was resuspended in
sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie for
quantification of A1.
For A23 binding Acan125 assay, all GST fusion constructs were purified
and eluted from the glutathione-Sepharose column and dialyzed
versus KMEM buffer. Trx-AD3 or Trx-AD3 -(977-994) at 0.5 µM was incubated with 5 µM either GST,
GST-C3, or GST-A23 in KMEM buffer. 200 µl of glutathione beads
equilibrated in KMEM was added and subsequently incubated for 30 min at
4 °C. The mixture was pelleted at 16,000 × g for 10 min. Proteins in the supernatants were precipitated with
methanol/chloroform, separated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie.
Phylogenetic Analyses and SH3 Structure Modeling--
We aligned
the amino acid sequence of the catalytic domain of selected myosin-Is
using the multiple alignment function of ClustalW (42). We chose the
last residue of the catalytic domain as the 15th residue after the
invariant phenylalanine (Phe-672 in Acanthamoeba myosin-IA)
in the usually conserved sequence TKIFIR. The alignment was used to
generate a bootstrapped tree using the neighbor-joining method of
ClustalW. We used NJplot to display the unrooted tree as a dendrogram,
drawn to scale based on sequence divergence.
We aligned the amino acid sequence of the SH3 domain of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA to selected SH3 sequences from
various SH3-containing proteins. We chose the first residue of the SH3
domain to be the 33rd residue N-terminal to the invariant tryptophan
(Trp-1195 in Acanthamoeba myosin-IA), and the last residue
of the SH3 domain to be the 7th residue after the invariant proline
(Pro-1208 in Acanthamoeba myosin-IA). The alignment was used
to generate data for a bootstrapped tree using default parameters of
ClustalW. The unrooted tree was drawn using default parameters of the
PHYLIP program and manipulated in Canvas program.
We used the program MODELLER (43) to generate atomic models of the
myosin-IA and myosin-IC SH3 domains based on the structure of other SH3
domains. Templates with high protein sequence identities to myosin-IA
or myosin-IC SH3 were used individually or in combination for
comparative modeling: Protein Data Base Codes 5hck (44), 1gfc (45),
1hsq (46), and 1neb (47) templates (see Fig. 10 legend) are 41, 44, 44 and 50% identical to myosin-IA SH3, respectively. Template sequences
were aligned with myosin-IA or myosin-IC SH3 by ClustalW before input
for automated comparative modeling by MODELLER. The best myosin-IA or
myosin-IC SH3 model was selected when spatial restraints derived from
the template structures were satisfied as well as possible.
 |
RESULTS |
Primary Structure of Acanthamoeba
Myosin-IA--
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA was the first
unconventional myosin discovered (5) but resisted cloning until now. We
mapped the exon/intron junctions in the myosin-IA gene by three
criteria as follows: comparison with other myosin-Is, a search for
consensus splice donor/acceptor sites, and the sequences of the
available cDNAs. Acanthamoeba myosin-IA gene consists of
22 exons of varying sizes (mean of 166 bp and standard deviation of 87 bp) and 21 introns of approximately uniform sizes (mean of 97 bp and
standard deviation of 21 bp) (Fig.
1A). Northern blot of
Acanthamoeba poly(A) mRNA using myosin-IA-specific DNA
probe detected a single band of 4 kb (Fig. 1E), consistent
with a size predicted from splicing all exons plus ~355 bp of 3'- and
5'-UTR.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA gene
structure. A, genomic DNA sequence is drawn as
predicted exons (box) connected by introns (line)
and with flanking 5'-UTR (line) and 3'-UTR
(line). Two fragments, BamHI and SalI
clones, isolated from phage 17A are shown. Sequences coding for
different regions of the protein are shaded with the same
pattern in C. Genomic sequence of myosin-IA is available in
GenBankTM with accession number AAC35357. B,
deduced protein sequence of myosin-IA. The TEDS rule phosphorylation
site, threonine 330, is boxed. Sequence flanking the
phosphorylation site is bold (22). The three IQ motifs are
highlighted. Residues identical to the N-terminal sequences
of the 30-kDa -chymotryptic fragment of myosin-IA are
bold (12). The C-terminal SH3-domain is
underlined. C, the domain organization of
myosin-IA and expression constructs of myosin-IA tail. T1,
T2, and T3 are tryptic sites determined in Fig.
3D. Asp1 and Asp2 are endo-AspN
proteolytic sites described under "Results." D, three
RT-PCR products of myosin-IA coding for the tail domains. We reverse
transcribed Acanthamoeba total RNA with primer R and
subsequently PCR with three separate pair of primers (primer positions
shown in A): lane 1, primers 1 and R; lane
2, primers 2 and R; lane 3, primers 3 and R. RT-PCR
products are separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose. Marker sizes
are in kb. E, Northern analysis of myosin-IA transcript.
Acanthamoeba poly(A) mRNA was separated by
electrophoresis and blotted with probe N (shown in A)
spanning the IQ motif derived from the genomic BamHI clone.
Marker sizes are in kb.
|
|
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA heavy chain gene encodes a protein of
134 kDa (Fig. 1B) consisting of a catalytic domain (residues 1-687), three IQ motifs (residues 688-756), a basic region (TH-1, residues 757-984), GPA-rich region (TH-2, residues 985-1161), and SH3
domain (TH-3, residues 1162-1215) (Fig. 1C). Our genomic sequence codes for Ala at residue 354 where Brzeska et al.
(22) reported Ser in the peptide phosphorylated by myosin-I heavy chain kinase. The TEDS rule phosphorylation site, Thr-330, is located 16 residues N-terminal to the conserved DALAK sequence. The basic TH-1
domain has a calculated pI of 9.72. TH-2 is rich in Gly (39%), Pro
(28.8%), and Ala (11.9%). TH-3 is a small 55-residue src
homology 3 domain.
The sequence of the catalytic domain of Acanthamoeba
myosin-IA is more similar to Dictyostelium myosin-IC than
any other known myosin, including Acanthamoeba myosin-IB and
myosin-IC (Fig. 2A and Table
I). The sequence following the catalytic
domain of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA, residues 688-756, is
strikingly similar to that of Dictyostelium myosin-IC (Fig.
2B) and includes three potential light chain binding sites.
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA residues Ile-733 to Val-756 are a
recognizable but imperfect IQ motif. The sequences Asn-688 to Cys-711
and Val-712 to Glu-728 are similar to each other and to the first IQ
motif identified in Aspergillus nidulans myoA (residues
730-753) (2), but neither conforms to a classic IQ motif.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic analysis of myosin-IA
sequences. A, the catalytic domain sequence of
myosin-IA is compared with other myosin-Is in a dendrogram drawn by
NJplot using sequences aligned by ClustalW. Numbers at the
nodes represent bootstrapping values (% of 1000 trials). B,
alignment of the IQ motifs of A. nidulans myoA (residues
730-753), Dictyostelium myosin-IC (residues 699-767), and
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA (residues 688-756). Identities are
shaded black, and conserved substitutions are shaded
gray. Black bar denotes the IQ motif. Protein Data Bank
code numbers of proteins used were as follows: Dictyostelium
myosin-IA, gi112999; Dictyostelium myosin-IE, gi462681; rat
myr4, gi628012; Drosophila myosin-IA, gi630866; C. elegans myosin-IA, gi481386; mouse myosin-I , gi1171088; rat
Myr1a, gi423915; mouse MHCI, gi423510; bovine MI heavy chain, gi127757;
Drosophila myosin-IB, gi630867; bullfrog myosin-I ,
gi2134199; rat myr2, gi400429; bovine myosin-I , gi543131;
Dictyostelium myosin-ID, gi462680; Acanthamoeba
myosin-IC, gi127749; rat myr3, gi693995; human myosin-IC, gi557468;
chicken brush border myosin-IB, gi345650; Dictyostelium
myosin-IB, gi462679; Acanthamoeba myosin-IB, gi1171093;
S. cerevisiae MYO5, gi1699241; S. cerevisiae
MYO3, gi914198; A. nidulans MyoA, gi1078633;
Dictyostelium myosin-IC, gi1171094; and
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA, gi3599478.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Pairwise domain comparisons of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA with Acanthamoeba
myosin-IB, myosin-IC, or Dictyostelium myosin-IC
Percent identities shared with Acanthamoeba MIA are
calculated from alignments generated by ClustalW.
|
|
Expression and Purification of Myosin-IA Tail Domains--
We
expressed several constructs of the myosin-IA tail in E. coli and purified them by column chromatography (Fig.
1C and Fig. 3). Of these
constructs, A23 was the best behaved, yielding large amounts of soluble
protein that allowed detailed characterization. A2 was also easy to
work with. A1 was insoluble in bacterial lysates but could be
solubilized and purified by chromatography in 6 M urea.
Purified A1 could be refolded by removing urea but was not soluble at
concentrations above 1 µM, limiting the range of studies. A123 was partially soluble in bacterial lysates, and purification was
challenging due to tightly associated nucleic acids. Hydroxylapatite chromatography in 50% formamide removed all detectable nucleic acid,
but after removal of formamide, the protein was only soluble at high pH
(>9.5).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Bacterial expression and purification of
recombinant A1, A23, A2, and A123. SDS-PAGE of samples stained
with Coomassie. A, A1 total lysate, crude
sonicated lysate in IPED buffer with 0.1 M KCl.
Soluble supernatant and insoluble pellet,
supernatant and pellet of lysate clarified by 105,000 × g for 30 min. Pellet was resuspended in 6 M urea
in IPED buffer for subsequent steps. CM pool, pooled
fractions of A1 after CM-cation exchange chromatography in 6 M urea. HA FT, flow-through of hydroxylapatite
chromatography in 6 M urea. S200 pool, pooled
fractions after Sephacryl S200 gel filtration chromatography in 6 M urea. Soluble A1, supernatant of purified A1
clarified at 105,000 × g for 30 min after removal of
urea by dialysis. B, A23 soluble lysate, soluble
lysate in IPED buffer clarified at 105,000 × g for 30 min. 20-40% AmSO4, resuspended 20-40%
ammonium sulfate precipitate dialyzed in IPED and clarified at
3,000 × g for 15 min. DEAE FT, flow-through
of DEAE-anion exchange chromatography. S200 pool, pooled
fractions of A23 after Sephacryl S200 gel filtration chromatography.
HA FT, flow-through of hydroxylapatite chromatography.
C, purified A2, pooled fraction of A2 after CM
chromatography in IPED buffer. D, A123 soluble
lysate, soluble lysate of bacteria expressing A123 clarified at
105,000 × g for 30 min in IPED buffer. S300
pool, pooled fractions of A123 after Sephacryl S300 gel filtration
chromatography in IPED. 10' and 60', S300 fractions at 0.5 mg/ml digested for 10 and 60 min with 20 ng/µl trypsin at 0 °C.
T1, T2, and T3 indicate bands excised for
N-terminal sequencing. M1.7 indicates the 15-kDa peptide, in
10' and 60' lanes, reacted with monoclonal
antibody M1.7.
|
|
Domain Boundaries in the Myosin-IA Tail--
Trypsin digestion of
partially purified A123 yielded 34- and 29-kDa peptides (T1
and T2, Fig. 3D) that were slowly converted to a
27-kDa peptide (T3, Fig. 3D). By Edman
degradation, all three had the same N terminus as A123. Given the
molecular weights, the C-terminal cleavage sites were most likely at
Arg-1084 (for T1) and Arg-1000 (for T2), followed by further cleavages
at Arg-996, Arg-993, Arg-987, or Arg-985. This behavior indicates that
TH-1 is a stably folded, trypsin-resistant domain despite its
remarkably high content of basic residues. Intact TH-2/3 was not
recovered as a stable tryptic peptide, but a tryptic peptide of 15-kDa
reacted with monoclonal antibody M1.7 (Fig. 3D), which has
an epitope in the C-terminal half of TH-2. -Chymotryptic digestion
rapidly yielded two peptides, one with the same mobility as TH-1 and
the other with the mobility of the A23 construct, as expected from the
cleavage of myosin-IA at Arg-985 (12). The protease endo-AspN, which
cuts the peptide bond on the N-terminal side of aspartic residues,
nicked the link between TH-1 and TH-2, creating a peptide of 30 kDa
with the same N terminus as A123. Given the molecular weight, the
cleavage site was most likely at Asp-1008 (Asp2 site, Fig.
1C). Endo-AspN also cut A123 before Asp-927 in the middle of
TH-1 (Asp1 site, Fig. 1C), creating a C-terminal
peptide of 35 kDa that reacted with monoclonal antibody M1.7. A123 was
resistant to digestion by V8 protease. These experiments established
that recombinant A123 is stably folded and that the link between TH-1 and TH-2 is sensitive to proteolytic digestion. We used this knowledge of the proteolytic sites to design the domain constructs used in the
following experiments.
Physical Properties of A23--
The CD spectrum of A23 in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, ±250 mM NaF shows
no evidence of -helical structure (Fig.
4). The spectra are interpreted as
predominantly , turn, and random structure by both PROSEC (5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6: 4% , 26% , 19% turn,
51% random; 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, with 250 mM NaF: 0% , 45% , 11% turn, 44% random) and CDNN
analyses (data not shown). The lack of helix is consistent with the
high content of glycine and proline in TH-2 and the known structures of
SH3 domains (44-47). Not even 50% TFE promoted significant helical content, so A23 is most likely stably folded.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
CD spectra of purified A23. Conditions
were as follows: thin line, 0.263 mg/ml A23 in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6; thick line, 0.263 mg/ml A23 in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, and 250 mM NaF; thin dashed line, 0.132 mg/ml A23 in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, and 50% TFE; thick
dashed line, 0.132 mg/ml A23 in 5 mM sodium phosphate,
pH 7.6, 250 mM NaF, and 50% TFE.
|
|
The hydrodynamic properties of recombinant A23 show that it is a well
behaved monomer with an asymmetric shape. A23 sediments as a single
homogenous peak at 1.80 ± 0.06 S (n = 5)
independent of concentration between 35 and 234 µM (Fig.
5B). Sedimentation in
imidazole or sodium phosphate buffer with high (0.5 M KCl) or no salt yielded similar results. The molecular mass of A23 was 21.6 kDa by sedimentation equilibrium at three different speeds and at
starting concentrations of 9.6 and 19.2 µM (Fig.
5C). Sedimentation equilibrium at higher concentration (38.4 µM) and in high (0.5 M KCl) or no salt buffer
gave similar results. The molecular mass of A23 calculated from the
amino acid composition is 21,271 Da, but the protein migrates
anomalously on SDS gels at 27-29 kDa. The sedimentation coefficient
and molecular weight yielded a frictional ratio of 1.7 and a Stokes'
radius of 3.04 nm, which is in good agreement with the value of 3.0 nm
obtained by gel filtration on Sephacryl S200 in 0.5 M KCl,
10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Gel filtration chromatography and analytical
ultracentrifugation of purified A23. A, gel filtration
conditions were as follows: 3 ml of 82 µM purified A23
was run on a calibrated 1.4 × 96-cm column of Sephacryl S200
equilibrated in 0.5 M KCl, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA, and 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5. Fractions
of 2 ml were assayed for protein and by SDS-PAGE. A23 migrates as a
single peak with a partition coefficient of 0.2 and a Stokes' radius
of 3.0 nm. B, distribu- tion of sedimentation coefficients in a sedimentation velocity
experiment. Conditions were as follows: 40,000 rpm, IPED buffer,
23 °C, starting concentrations of A23 (bottom to
top) 0.72, 0.98, 2.6, and 4.8 mg/ml. Sedimentation was
monitored by absorption at 280 nm (closed squares) and
fringe displacement (open squares, open circles, and
closed circles). Inset, plot of peak
s* value as a function of protein concentration.
C, sedimentation equilibrium of A23 starting at 9.6 µM (left) and 19.2 µM
(right). Conditions were as follows: IPED buffer, 23 °C,
14,000 (circles), 20,000 (squares), or 28,000 (triangles) rpm. Distributions of A23 at equilibrium were
fitted using the non-linear least square method of Winnonln (38).
Mass = 21.6 kDa. D, residuals from fitting of 20,000 rpm data in C.
|
|
Two models are typically used to approximate nonspherical particles in
hydrodynamic studies, a prolate ellipsoid (cigar-shaped) and an oblate
ellipsoid (disc-shaped). If A23 were a prolate ellipsoid the axial
ratio would be 8.2:1 with length of 17.2 nm and diameter of 2.1 nm, and
if it were an oblate ellipsoid the axial ratio would be 1:10 with
thickness of 0.9 nm and diameter of 9 nm (Table II). The lengths of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IB (20) and myosin-IC (21) tails are
approximately 8.3 and 5.5 nm, respectively. Therefore, the hydrodynamic
data indicate that the size of A23 spans the whole length of the
myosin-I tail (see "Discussion").
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Physical parameters of myosin-IA tail constructs
Molecular masses and sedimentation coefficients (s*) of
myosin-IA tail constructs determined by sedimentation equilibrium and
sedimentation velocity experiments. f/f0,
frictional ratio calculated from mass and s*. Partial
specific volume and hydration used in modeling were calculated from the
amino acid composition. Conditions for A23 are described under
"Results." A2 was in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 2 mM EDTA. A123 was in 20 mM CAPS, pH 10, 1 mM DTT, and 2 mM EDTA.
|
|
A2 and A123 are also asymmetric (Table II). Analysis of A123 was
possible only at high pH, under which condition it is monomeric with
molecular mass of 48.8 kDa (Table II). The oblate ellipsoid model of
A123 approximates the size of myosin-IB tail from reconstructions of
electron micrographs (20), not the prolate ellipsoid model. Taken
together, if A23 extends the length of myosin-I tail, then it should
lie next to A1 domain.
Interaction of A23 with A1--
Consistent with the above results,
purified A1 binds A23 with high affinity in physiological salt
conditions. Soluble A1 bound a fusion protein GST-A23 (GST fused to the
TH-2/3 domain of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA) immobilized on
beads in 60 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM EDTA (Fig.
6A). Neither GST nor control glutathione beads depleted soluble A1 from the supernatant. The dependence of A1 depletion on the concentration of GST-A23 immobilized on beads gave a Kd of 0.25 µM (Fig.
6B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Bead pelleting assay for A1 binding A23.
A, conditions were as follows: 0.3 µM soluble
A1 with 2 µM GST or GST-A23 immobilized on glutathione
beads were mixed at 4 °C in 60 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM EDTA for 2 min. Beads alone of the same amount were
performed as control. Beads were pelleted at 16,000 × g, and supernatant proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
stained with Coomassie. , A1 alone; +, A1 incubated with beads as
indicated. B, conditions were as follows: similar to
A but GST-A23 (filled circles) or GST (open
circles) immobilized on beads was titrated into 0.3 µM soluble A1. Fractions bound determined as total minus
fraction remained in the supernatant. Binding isotherm plotted as
fraction A1 bound against total protein concentration immobilized on
beads.
|
|
Interaction of Myosin-IA Tail Domains with Actin
Filaments--
A23 binds Acanthamoeba actin filaments with
approximately the same affinity at all salt concentrations tested as
follows: Kd = 0.05 µM at no salt; 0.20 µM at 20 mM KCl; and 0.09 µM at
60 mM KCl (Fig.
7A). In contrast, salt
inhibits binding of A23 to rabbit skeletal muscle actin filaments.
Although A23 binds muscle actin filaments with a Kd
of 0.2 µM in no KCl with 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, the affinity of A23 for muscle actin filaments is markedly
lower in higher salt. The Kd is 2.6 µM
in 20 mM KCl and 50 µM in 40 and 60 mM KCl (Fig. 7B). The actin-binding site resides
in TH-2, since A2 without the SH3 domain binds muscle actin filaments
with Kd of 0.2 µM in the no-salt
buffer (Fig. 7C), just like A23. Binding of A2 to muscle
actin filaments was also inhibited by 60 mM KCl.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Pelleting assay for A23 and A2 binding actin
filaments. A, A23 pelleting with
Acanthamoeba actin filaments at three ionic strengths.
Conditions were as follows: 0.2 µM purified A23 was mixed
with various concentrations of actin filaments in 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Tris, pH
7.5, and 0 (closed squares), 20 (open squares),
or 60 (closed circles) mM KCl. After
centrifugation at 200,000 × g for 30 min at 23 °C,
A23 in the supernatant was quantified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie
staining. B, A23 pelleting with rabbit skeletal muscle actin
filaments at various salt concentrations. Conditions were as follows:
similar to A but 0.3 µM purified A23 was used
for assays in 0 (closed squares), 20 (open
squares), 40 (open circles), and 60 (closed
circles) mM KCl. The fits, using Equation 1, for 20 and 60 mM KCl included data points up to 40 µM actin. C, A2 pelleting with skeletal muscle
actin filaments. Conditions were as follows: similar to B
but 0.3 µM purified A2 was used for assay in no KCl.
Fraction bound determined as total minus fraction remained in the supernatant. Binding isotherm
plotted as fraction A2 bound versus total actin
concentration. The fit included data points up to 35 µM
actin. Inset, Coomassie-stained gel of the supernatants
showing A2 depletion. Numbers indicate total actin
concentration in µM.
|
|
Interestingly, purified A1 binds muscle actin filaments with high
affinity in salt, where A23 does not bind. In 60 mM KCl, A1
binds muscle actin filaments with a Kd of ~0.1
µM as assayed by depletion from the supernatants (Fig.
8A) and accumulation in the
pellets (Fig. 8B). When pellets are assayed, A23 does not bind muscle actin filaments in the same 60 mM KCl buffer
(Fig. 8C), just like when supernatants are assayed in Fig.
7B (closed circles). However, A23 binds muscle
actin filaments in 60 mM KCl if A1 is also present at
equimolar concentration (Fig. 8D). Thus, the presence of A1
increases the affinity of A23 for muscle actin filaments in salt by
50-fold, from Kd 50 µM in the
absence of A1 (Fig. 7B, closed circles) to ~1
µM in the presence of A1 (Fig. 8D, open
circles). In the presence of an excess A1 over A23, A23 binds
muscle actin filaments with Kd of 0.3-0.5 µM (other experiments, n = 2). Similar to
A23, A2 does not bind muscle actin filaments under the same conditions
(60 mM salt). The presence of excess A1 over A2 enhances
the binding of A2 to muscle actin filaments. However, at the highest
actin concentration tested (5 µM) only 40% of A2 pellets
(data not shown), indicating that the A1-mediated enhancement of
binding to muscle actin filaments is weaker for A2 than A23.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Pelleting assay for A1 ± A23 binding
muscle actin filaments. A, conditions were as follows:
various concentrations of muscle actin filaments were incubated with
fixed purified A1 in 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 60 mM KCl. After centrifugation at 150,000 × g for 30 min at 23 °C, A1 in the supernatant was
quantified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. The fraction bound was
determined as total minus the fraction in the supernatant. Binding
isotherm is plotted as fraction A1 bound versus total actin
concentration. The fit included data points up to 10 µM
actin. Inset, Coomassie-stained gel of the supernatants
showing A1 depletion. Numbers indicate total actin
concentration in µM. B-D, conditions were as
follows: 0.02 µM A1 alone (B), 0.02 µM A23 alone (C), or both A1 (filled
circles) and A23 (open circles) at 0.02 µM (D). Insets, proteins in the
pellets were quantified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining.
|
|
Interaction of A23 with Acan125--
Two assays established that
Acanthamoeba Acan125 binds the tail of myosin-IA with high
affinity, similar to its known interaction with the SH3 domain of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IC (16). In the first assay, GST-A23
immobilized on beads bound a fusion protein Trx-AD3 containing the
putative SH3-binding sites (PXXP motifs) of Acan125 (Fig.
9A). This assay was originally
used to demonstrate binding of GST-C3 (GST fused to the SH3 domain of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IC) to Trx-AD3. Neither GST nor
glutathione beads alone deplete Trx-AD3 from the supernatant. Neither
GST-A23 nor GST-C3 bound Trx-AD3 -(977-994), an Acan125 construct
lacking the putative SH3-binding sites. A small amount of
"receptor" (GST, GST-C3, or GST-A23, data not shown) was soluble,
which could be due to denatured fusion proteins or contaminating beads
in the supernatant.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Assays for A23 binding Acan125.
A, supernatant depletion assay for A23 binding Acan125.
Conditions were as follows: 0.5 µM Trx-AD3 or
Trx-AD3 -(977-994) with glutathione beads alone or beads plus 5 µM GST, GST-C3, or GST-A23 were mixed at 4 °C in KMEM
buffer for 1 h. Beads were pelleted at 16,000 × g; supernatant proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
stained with Coomassie. B, intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence
assay for A23 binding Acan125. Tryptophan fluorescence emission
measured at 329 nm with excitation at 295 nm. Conditions were as
follows: Trx-AD3 was titrated into either KMEM (open
circles) or 0.1 µM purified A23 in KMEM
(filled circles). C, binding isotherm plotted as
the difference in 329 nm fluorescence against total Trx-AD3
(filled circles) or Trx-AD3 -(977-994) (open
triangles) concentration. Inset, purified Trx-AD3,
Trx-AD3 -(977-994), and A23 used in this assay.
|
|
Intrinsic fluorescence provided a second, more quantitative assay for
the interaction of purified recombinant A23 and Trx-AD3. The tryptophan
fluorescence of A23 is three times higher than equimolar Trx-AD3.
Mixtures of the two proteins are less fluorescent than the sum of the
two components. This quenching measures the extent of interaction
during a titration of A23 with Trx-AD3 (Fig. 9B). The
dependence of quenching ( F) on Trx-AD3 concentration fit
a theoretical curve with a Kd 20 nM
(Fig. 9C). Other experiments yielded Kd
10 nM. Trx-AD3 -(977-994) did not quench the
fluorescence of A23 (Fig. 9C), suggesting that PXXP motifs of Trx-AD3 mediate binding to A23.
To establish the physiological relevance of this affinity, we measured
the concentration of Acan125 protein in amoeba. We solubilized whole
cells in boiling SDS sample buffer, ran these extracts on the same gel
as a range of GST-AD3 standards, and used immunoblotting with a
polyclonal antibody to Acan125 (generated against AD3 fragment) to
compare the unknowns and standards. The concentration of Acan125 is
approximately 2-5 µmol/liter of packed cells (n = 3); this is 2-5 times the total concentration of 1 µM
for all isoforms of myosin-I combined (48).
 |
DISCUSSION |
We studied the tail of Acanthamoeba myosin-IA, because
the tails of the various classes of myosins appear to be major
determinants of their functions, and relatively little is known about
the structures of the tails of myosin-Is or other unconventional
myosins. Previous studies established three regions of sequence
homology among myosin-I tails and provided evidence that TH-1 binds
acidic phospholipids (11, 49), TH-2 binds actin filaments (11, 13, 14)
and TH-3 binds Acan125 (16) (or verprolin Vrp1p in budding yeast (18)).
Our determination of the primary structure of the tail of amoeba
myosin-IA is important because it has been used in many previous
biochemical studies (3, 5, 12, 22, 50-53). The size and shape of the
tails of amoeba myosin-IB (20) and -IC (21) and of brush border
myosin-I (19) were known from reconstructions of electron micrographs
of decorated actin filaments. The tails of amoeba myosin-Is (with TH-1,
-2, and -3) are more massive but not much longer than brush border
myosin-I (with TH-1 alone). However, it was not clear from previous
work how the tail homology regions are arranged in the tail or whether
these domains cooperate in any ligand binding activities. In the
following analysis, we assume that the organization of the tail of
myosin-IB (for which we know the overall size and shape) is the same as
myosin-IA, since the primary structures of the tails are similar in
size (459 residues for myosin-IA and 437 residues for myosin-IB) and the order of their tail homology regions.
Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that the tail of
myosin-IA is composed of three domains, with a TH-1 domain lying side
by side with the elongated TH-2/3 domain. We call the domains A1, A2,
and A3 to distinguish them from the tail homology regions of myosin-IB
and -IC. The tail homology regions are real domains in the sense that
they fold independently and can be separated by proteolysis (Ref. 12
and this paper). Several proteases ( -chymotrypsin, trypsin, and
endo-AspN but not V8 protease) cleave the link between A1 and A2. A3 is
a typical SH3 domain. A1 and A2 can be expressed and purified
separately. Although it consists of 15% lysine and arginine, A1 is
highly resistant to trypsin digestion. A23 is resistant to
-chymotrypsin, and its CD spectrum indicates predominantly turns and
-structure. Our observations are consistent with earlier studies of
proteolytic digestion of native myosin-IA (12, 51, 52).
We were surprised that the hydrodynamic properties of A23 indicate that
this domain alone is as long as the whole myosin-IB tail observed in
reconstructions of electron micrographs. In the reconstructions the
tail of myosin-IB is a flattened structure 8.2 nm long, 4.0 nm thick,
and 4.8 nm wide (20). The hydrodynamic properties of recombinant B23
are the same as A23.2 Neither
oblate ellipsoid nor prolate ellipsoid models are realistic models for
the myosin-I tail, but both ways of modeling the hydrodynamic data
indicate that A23 is highly asymmetric with one dimension between 9.0 and 17.2 nm. If A23 extends the length of the tail, A1 must lie side by
side, rather than the tail domains being arranged in series. Consistent
with this idea, monomeric A123 is asymmetric with maximum length in one
dimension between 11.2 and 20.5 nm (Table II), thus A23 fits within and
spans the size of A123. Additional evidence supports this side-by-side
interaction hypothesis.
First, separately purified A1 and A23 bind each other with
submicromolar affinity under physiological conditions. Given this high
affinity, one might ask how Lynch et al. (12) separated A23
from the rest of myosin-I after -chymotrypsin digestion. In their
work, A23 eluted separately from other digested products of native
myosin-IA in 150 mM KCl on Mono Q anion exchange
chromatography at pH 8.8. Thus this tight interaction may be disrupted
by high salt and high pH.
Second, the EM reconstructions show that the tail of brush border
myosin-I (with only TH-1) is less robust but nearly as long as
myosin-IB (with TH-1, -2, and -3). The tail of brush border myosin-I is
6.1 nm long, 2.0 nm thick, and 4.9 nm wide (19). A plausible
explanation for myosin-IB being twice as thick as brush border myosin-I
is that TH-2/3 folds back onto the TH-1 domain.
Given this side-by-side model for the tail of long-tailed myosin-Is, we
considered the possibility that the C-terminal SH3 might substitute for
the 80 residues missing at the N terminus of the catalytic domain of
myosin-Is. The 80 N-terminal residues of myosin-II are folded similar
to an SH3 domain and are located near the light chain
domain.3 This is close to
where the C terminus of a folded back myosin-I tail might be located.
However, the EM reconstruction of myosin-IB (20) lacks the density
occupied by the N-terminal SH3-like domain of myosin-II. Thus the
C-terminal SH3 domain does not fill the space made available by the
missing N-terminal 80 residues.
Interaction of Myosin-I Tail with Actin Filaments--
The
existence of an ATP-insensitive actin-binding site in the tail of
myosin-IA was first suggested by the ability of the protein to
cross-link actin filaments (observed by electron microscopy) and by the
biphasic activation of the Mg2+-ATPase by actin filaments
(50, 54). Lynch et al. (12) confirmed the existence of this
actin filament binding site and located it near the C terminus of the
tail by cleaving myosin-IA with -chymotrypsin and isolating a
C-terminal actin binding domain of about 30 kDa (shown here to actually
be 21 kDa). We have characterized this A23-binding site in more detail.
First, we showed that A3 is not required for actin binding, since A2
binds actin filaments the same as A23. Recombinant TH-2 from
Dictyostelium myosin-IB (14) and myosin-IC (13) also binds
actin filaments without an SH3.
Second, we found that in physiological salt concentrations A23 binds
Acanthamoeba actin filaments but not muscle actin filaments. Acanthamoeba actophorin (55) and profilin (56) also bind
amoeba actin better than muscle actin. Lynch et al. (12) did
not report on the binding of proteolytic A23 to muscle actin filaments
in physiological salt concentrations, only in low salt. Like amoeba A23, salt also inhibits the binding of TH-2 of Dictyostelium
myosin-IB to muscle actin filaments (14); the
Kd values are 1.3 µM in no
salt, 7.2 µM in 20 mM KCl, and 49 µM in 100 mM KCl. It would be interesting to
know if this myosin also binds better to its own actin independent of
salt concentration.
Third, we found that A1 also binds muscle actin filaments, even in
physiological salt conditions. In a previous study (11), the TH-1
domain of myosin-IC (C1) fused to -galactosidase did not bind actin
filaments, but fusion to the bulky, tetrameric -galactosidase (4 times 90 kDa) may have interfered or myosin-IC may differ in this
regard. The 100-kDa fragment isolated by cleaving myosin-IA with
-chymotrypsin bound actin filaments tightly both in the presence
(Kd = 0.5 µM) and absence
(Kd = 7 nM) of 2 mM ATP
(12). Its affinity in 2 mM ATP was unusually high (75-fold
stronger than rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment-1 to actin filaments
under similar conditions (57)) for an ATP-sensitive actin binding site
in the catalytic domain. Ostap et al. (10) reported that the
ATP-sensitive actin-binding site on native myosin-IA (at 0.5 µM) completely dissociates from actin filaments by low concentration of ATP (at 10 µM). We now know that the
100-kDa fragment contains the catalytic domain, three light chain
binding sites, and A1 domain. The high affinity of the 100-kDa fragment for actin filaments, even in the presence of ATP, is probably explained
by A1 participating in ATP-insensitive actin binding. A1 also enhanced
binding of A23 to muscle actin filaments in physiological salt
concentrations. This suggests that A1 and A23 cooperate in actin
binding and may explain why membrane binding (to B1) competes with
actin filament binding to the tail of myosin-IB (58, 59). Neither the
actin nor membrane binding sites are well localized, but the
orientation of myosin-IB in two-dimensional crystals on lipid bilayers
(20) suggests that the lipid binding site is on the outer surface of
the tail, facing away from actin bound to the catalytic domain.
These experiments establish that the affinity of the tail for amoeba
actin filaments is high enough for the tail of myosin-IA to be largely
associated with filaments in the cell under physiological conditions.
This is also the first evidence that A1 participates in actin binding.
Interaction of Myosin-I Tail with Acan125--
Like the SH3 domain
of myosin-IC, the A23 domain of myosin-IA binds Trx-AD3, a recombinant
C-terminal fragment of Acan125. In both cases, this binding depends on
the PXXP motifs of Acan125. The affinity of these myosin-I
SH3 domains for the ligand is remarkably high. The
Kd of 20 nM is an order of magnitude
stronger than the affinity of the SH3 domains of Hck and Fyn for HIV-1 Nef (60). Contacts outside the core interactions between the SH3 and
PXXP may explain the high affinity of A23 for Trx-AD3. Given
that the concentration of Acan125 exceeds that of all myosin-Is in
amoeba, we expect that most of the myosin-IA is bound to Acan125 in the
cell unless regulated by other cellular factor(s).
Both myosin-IA and myosin-IC bind Acan125. Models of the SH3 domains of
myosin-IA and myosin-IC provide the structural basis for this
interaction (Fig. 10). The SH3 domains
of both myosin-IA and myosin-IC have the hydrophobic residues critical
for binding poly-L-proline ligands as follows: Tyr-1168,
Tyr-1170, Trp-1195, Pro-1208, and Tyr-1211 for myosin-IA and Tyr-985,
Phe-987, Trp-1013, Pro-1026, and Tyr-1029 for myosin-IC. Both myosins
have acidic residues in the variable RT loop, a region believed to
confer ligand specificity in other SH3 domains (60, 61): Glu-1174, Asp-1176, and Glu-1177 for myosin-IA and Glu-990, Asp-993, and Glu-994
for myosin-IC. In the crystal structure of crk-N SH3 complexed with a
polyproline ligand (61), PPPALPPKKR, three acidic residues in the RT loop coordinate a lysine in the +2 position (underlined) relative to the second P of the ligand, just like the PXXPPR
sequence of the two tandem motifs of Acan125. Attempts to model the SH3 domain of Acanthamoeba myosin-IB failed since the sequence
did not satisfy several spatial parameters defined by the SH3 templates used for modeling.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Atomic models of the SH3 domains of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA and myosin-IC. These SH3
models were generated using the program MODELLER and template
structures (Protein Data Base codes 1gfc, human Grb2 C-terminal SH3;
1hsq, human PLC SH3; 1neb, human nebulin SH3; and 5hck, human Hck
SH3) with protein sequences of 40% or higher identity to myosin-IA and
myosin-IC SH3 sequences. Hydrophobic residues critical for the binding
of the ligand and common to all SH3 are gray. Charged
residues located in the RT-loop on myosin-IA and myosin-IC SH3 models
are black.
|
|
The properties of Acan125 suggest that it may organize myosin-I into
higher order structures. This may be essential for function since the
kinetic properties of myosin-Is show that single myosin-I cannot move
along actin filaments alone (10). Acan125 has not only two tandem
PXXP motifs that could bind two myosin-Is but also 16 tandem
leucine-rich repeats in the N-terminal half of the molecule.
Leucine-rich repeats in other proteins contribute to intermolecular
interactions, serving either directly as a ligand-binding site or as a
second site to enhance affinity and/or specificity (62). The
leucine-rich repeats of Acan125 do not bind the SH3 domain of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IC in
vitro4 but may link
myosin-I into a larger complex. SH3 domains assemble protein complexes
in other systems. For instance, SH3 domains of yeast myosin-Is, Myo3p
and Myo5p, bind verprolin Vrp1p, a proline-rich protein localized at
budding sites (18, 63). Similarly, the yeast cytoskeletal protein Abp1p
binds adenylyl cyclase-associated protein Srv2p and actin-associated
protein Rvs167p through SH3-ligand interactions to form a protein
complex required for actin patch formation (64).
Duplication and Evolutionary Divergence of Myosin-I
Genes--
Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences of myosin catalytic
domains established that all classes of myosin had a common origin. Duplication and divergence of myosin genes established several classes
of myosin in primitive eukaryotes before the branching of higher
eukaryotes (65). Some higher eukaryotes including budding yeast have
lost the genes for some myosins. As the various eukaryotes radiated
away from each other over more than a billion years, selective
pressures kept all of the myosins within each class more similar to
each other than the myosins of any other class. The myosin-I family is
no exception to this pattern. The sequences of the catalytic, IQ, and
TH-1 domains of amoeba myosin-IA are more similar to
Dictyostelium myosin-IC than any other myosin, including the
other amoeba myosin-Is (Table I), so they are probably functional
homologs that evolved from the same ancestral gene.
Given the ancient origin and conservation of the myosin-I family, we
were surprised when our sequence analysis indicated that the myosin-I
genes may have acquired their SH3 domains relatively late, after the
separation of contemporary organisms from their common ancestors. Our
phylogenetic analysis of SH3 sequences reveals two distinct patterns
(Fig. 11). For most protein families
the SH3 domains have orthologous relationships. For example, the SH3 domains of Src tyrosine kinases are related most closely to the SH3
domains of other Src tyrosine kinases. The same is true of the SH3
domains of adaptor proteins, PLC s and -spectrins. In contrast,
the SH3 domains of the various myosin-Is (from yeast, amoebas,
Dictyostelium, Caenorhabditis elegans, and mouse)
do not form a closely related cluster. In the case of
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA, the SH3 domain is closer to other
Acanthamoeba myosin-Is than to Dictyostelium
myosin-IC, the closest neighbor phylogenetically of the catalytic
domain. This pattern suggests that myosin-Is acquired their SH3 domains
after the divergence of the genes for myosin-I isoforms. The repertoire
of myosin-I genes in the separate ancestors of Acanthamoeba
and Dictyostelium may have picked up SH3 domains within
these lineages rather than in the common ancestor. Thus the acquisition
of SH3 domains on myosin-I heavy chain genes may be a case of
evolutionary convergence.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Phylogenetic analysis of SH3 domain
sequences. This unrooted tree was generated using the multiple
alignment function and neighbor joining method of ClustalW. Nodes were
classified according to bootstrapping values (% of 1000 trials) as
indicated. Bootstrapping value between 70 and 80% was not observed.
Protein Data Bank codes of proteins used were as follows:
Acan MIA, Acanthamoeba myosin-IA
gi3599478; Acan MIB, Acanthamoeba
myosin-IB gi1171093; Acan MIC, Acanthamoeba
myosin-IC gi127749; Acan HMWMI,
Acanthamoeba HMWMI gi1346638; Bov PLC -1,
bovine PLC -1 gi130224; Chk Src, chicken Src gi125710;
Chk Grb2-N and Chk Grb2-C, N- and C-terminal SH3
of chicken Grb2 gi729629; Chk BBmyosin-IB, chicken brush
border myosin-IB gi345650; Cael Hum-1, C. elegans Hum-1 gi1279775; Cael Sem5-N and
Cael Sem5-C, N- and C-terminal SH3 of C. elegans Sem5 gi134425; Cael spectrin,
C. elegans spectrin gi1206048; Drome
PLC , Drosophila phospholipase C gi1079040;
Drome Dsrc41, Drosophila Dsrc41
gi1536790; Dicty MID, Dictyostelium
myosin-ID gi462680; Drome Drk-N and
Drome Drk-C, N- and C-terminal SH3 of
Drosophila Drk gi729368; Drome spectrin, Drosophila spectrin gi134795;
Dicty MIB, Dictyostelium myosin-IB
gi462679; Dicty MIC, Dictyostelium
myosin-IC gi1171094; Eh MIB, Entamoeba
histolytica myosin-IB gi2114412; Enid MyoA, E. nidulans MyoA gi1078633; Hu c-Crk, human c-Crk
gi1169096; Hu CrkL, human CrkL gi1169094; Hu MIE,
human myosin-IE gi1924940; Hu c-Src, human c-Src gi338460;
Hu spectrin, human spectrin gi2493433; Hu
Cortactin, human Cortactin gi2498954; Hu MIC, human
myosin-IC gi557468; Hu PLC -1, human phospholipase C -1
gi130225; Hu PLC -2, human phospholipase C -2 gi130229;
Hu Grb2, human Grb2 gi121603; Mus
Myo1f, mouse Myo1f gi1679607; Mus Cortactin,
mouse Cortactin gi2498955; Mus Grb2-N, N-terminal
SH3 of mouse Grb2 gi2498425; rsv-Src, Rous sarcoma virus Src
gi400155; Rat Myr3, rat Myr3 gi693995; Sea urchin spectrin, Lytechinus variegatus spectrin gi161334;
Sponge Srk4, Spongilla lacustris Srk4 gi283508;
Xeno spectrin, Xenopus spectrin gi85771; Xeno Src-1, Xenopus Src-1
gi125703; Xeno Crk, Xenopus Crk gi3023561;
Xeno Grb2-N and Xeno
Grb2-C, N- and C-terminal SH3 of Xenopus Grb2
gi1890112; Yeast Rvs167, S. cerevisiae Rvs167
gi927321; Yeast ABP1, S. cerevisiae ABP1
gi113000; Yeast Myo3, S. cerevisiae Myo3 gi914198;
Yeast Myo5, S. cerevisiae Myo5 gi1699241.
|
|
One could argue that phylogenetic analysis of short protein sequences
like SH3 domains may not be significant. However, we observed tight
clustering of protein families (e.g. tyrosine kinases, adaptor proteins, phospholipase C , and -spectrins) based solely on their SH3 sequences. Each cluster is represented by species ranging
from the invertebrates to the vertebrates. The number of sequences from
unicellular organisms is limited, so these orthologous relationships
can be tested more stringently as more data become available.
Distinguishing Features of Amoeba
Myosin-Is--
Acanthamoeba myosin-IA and -IB are similar
in many respects, but the sequence of myosin-IA revealed three putative
IQ motifs. If all are occupied by light chains, amoeba myosin-IA may
have a larger working stroke than amoeba myosin-IB or myosin-IC, which have similar catalytic properties (10) but a single light chain. A
longer working stroke may adapt myosin-IA for activities in the
cytoplasm where it is thought to function in vesicle transport and
phagocytosis (3). However, the number of myosin-IA light chains is
unclear. A light chain of 17 kDa and a variable quantity of a 14-kDa
peptide (always in less than 1 mol/mol of heavy chain of myosin-IA by
Coomassie-stained gels) co-purify with Acanthamoeba myosin-IA (6). The 16.7-kDa light chain of Acanthamoeba
myosin-IC has been isolated and sequenced (9). Given the differences in
the IQ motifs of myosin-IA and myosin-IC, it seems unlikely that they
share this light chain.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
W. L. Lee is very grateful to Richard Cheney
for helpful discussions on phylogenetic analyses, to Laurent Blanchoin
for rabbit muscle actin and help with fluorimetric experiments, to
Steve Koerber for CD spectra, and to Dyche Mullins for
Acanthamoeba actin and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Research Grant GM-26132 (to T. D. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Salk Institute for
Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 619-453-4100 (ext. 1261); Fax: 619-546-0838; E-mail: pollard@ salk.edu.
2
W.-L. Lee and E. M. Ostap, unpublished observations.
3
R. A. Milligan, personal communication.
4
H. G. Zot and W.-L. Lee, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TH, tail homology;
kb, kilobase pairs;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
RT-PCR, reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
UTR, untranslated region;
TFE, trifluoroethanol;
HA, hydroxylapatite;
Trx, thioredoxin;
CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid;
bp, base pair.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Goodson, H. V.,
Anderson, B. L.,
Warrick, H. M.,
Pon, L. A.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
1277-1291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
McGoldrick, C. A.,
Gruver, C.,
and May, G. S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
577-587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Baines, I. C.,
Corigliano-Murphy, A.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
591-603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Doberstein, S. K.,
Baines, I. C.,
Wiegand, G.,
Korn, E. D.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1993)
Nature
365,
841-843[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Pollard, T. D.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
4682-4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Maruta, H.,
Gadasi, H.,
Collins, J. H.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
3624-3630[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Jung, G.,
Korn, E. D.,
and Hammer, J. D.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6720-6724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Jung, G.,
Schmidt, C. J.,
and Hammer, J. D.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
82,
269-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Wang, Z. Y.,
Sakai, J.,
Matsudaira, P. T.,
Baines, I. C.,
Sellers, J. R.,
Hammer, J. R.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1997)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
18,
395-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Ostap, E. M.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
1053-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Doberstein, S. K.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
1241-1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Lynch, T. J.,
Albanesi, J. P.,
Korn, E. D.,
Robinson, E. A.,
Bowers, B.,
and Fujisaki, H.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
17156-17162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Jung, G.,
and Hammer, J. R.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
342,
197-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Rosenfeld, S. S.,
and Rener, B.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
2322-2328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Xu, P.,
Zot, A. S.,
and Zot, H. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25316-25319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Xu, P.,
Mitchelhill, K. I.,
Kobe, B.,
Kemp, B. E.,
and Zot, H. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3685-3690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Novak, K. D.,
and Titus, M. A.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
75-88[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Anderson, B. L.,
Boldogh, I.,
Evangelista, M.,
Boone, C.,
Greene, L. A.,
and Pon, L. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1357-1370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Jontes, J. D.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
683-693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Jontes, J. D.,
Ostap, E. M.,
Pollard, T. D.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
155-162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Carragher, B. O.,
Cheng, N.,
Wang, Z. Y.,
Korn, E. D.,
Reilein, A.,
Belnap, D. M.,
Hammer, J. R.,
and Steven, A. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15206-15211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Brzeska, H.,
Lynch, T. J.,
Martin, B.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19340-19348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Zhang, W.,
Hu, G. Y.,
and Deisseroth, A.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6649[Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 25.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Wong, J. M.,
Liu, F.,
and Bateman, E.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4817-4824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Nellen, W.,
and Gallwitz, D.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
159,
1-18[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Horowitz, J. A.,
and Hammer, J. A., III
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
20646-20652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Hammer, J. D.,
Bowers, B.,
Paterson, B. M.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
913-925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Xie, X.,
Harrison, D. H.,
Schlichting, I.,
Sweet, R. M.,
Kalabokis, V. N.,
Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G.,
and Cohen, C.
(1994)
Nature
368,
306-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Way, M.,
Pope, B.,
Gooch, J.,
Hawkins, M.,
and Weeds, A. G.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
4103-4109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Hagen, S. J.,
Kiehart, D. P.,
Kaiser, D. A.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
2121-2128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ackers, G. K.
(1967)
J. Biol. Chem.
242,
3237-3238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Pollard, T. D.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
769-777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Spudich, J. A.,
and Watt, S.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
4866-4871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Yang, J. T.,
Wu, C. S.,
and Martinez, H. M.
(1986)
Methods Enzymol.
130,
208-269[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Bohm, G.,
Muhr, R.,
and Jaenicke, R.
(1992)
Protein Eng.
5,
191-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Johnson, M. L.,
Correia, J. J.,
Yphantis, D. A.,
and Halvorson, H. R.
(1981)
Biophys. J.
36,
575-588[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Philo, J. S.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
435-444[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Stafford, W. D.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
203,
295-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Laue, T. M.,
Shah, B. D.,
Ridgeway, T. M.,
and Pelletier, S. L.
(1992)
in
Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science
(Harding, S.
, and Rowe, A., eds)
, pp. 90-125, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK
|
| 42.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Sali, A.,
and Blundell, T. L.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
234,
779-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Horita, D. A.,
Baldisseri, D. M.,
Zhang, W.,
Altieri, A. S.,
Smithgall, T. E.,
Gmeiner, W. H.,
and Byrd, R. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
278,
253-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Kohda, D.,
Terasawa, H.,
Ichikawa, S.,
Ogura, K.,
Hatanaka, H.,
Mandiyan, V.,
Ullrich, A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Inagaki, F.
(1994)
Structure
2,
1029-1040[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Kohda, D.,
Hatanaka, H.,
Odaka, M.,
Mandiyan, V.,
Ullrich, A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Inagaki, F.
(1993)
Cell
72,
953-960[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Politou, A. S.,
Millevoi, S.,
Gautel, M.,
Kolmerer, B.,
and Pastore, A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
276,
189-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Baines, I. C.,
Brzeska, H.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1193-1203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Hayden, S. M.,
Wolenski, J. S.,
and Mooseker, M. S.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
443-451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Pollard, T. D.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
4691-4697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Lynch, T. J.,
Brzeska, H.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
13842-13849[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Brzeska, H.,
Lynch, T. J.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10243-10250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Adams, R. J.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1989)
Nature
340,
565-568[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Pantaloni, D.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
11180-11182[Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Blanchoin, L.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25106-25111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Vinson, V. K.,
De La Cruz, E. M.,
Higgs, H. N.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
10871-10880[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Katoh, T.,
and Morita, F.
(1984)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
96,
1223-1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Zot, H. G.,
Doberstein, S. K.,
and Pollard, T. D.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
367-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Miyata, H.,
Bowers, B.,
and Korn, E. D.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1519-1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Lee, C. H.,
Leung, B.,
Lemmon, M. A.,
Zheng, J.,
Cowburn, D.,
Kuriyan, J.,
and Saksela, K.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5006-5015[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Wu, X.,
Knudsen, B.,
Feller, S. M.,
Zheng, J.,
Sali, A.,
Cowburn, D.,
Hanafusa, H.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1995)
Structure
3,
215-226[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Buchanan, S. G.,
and Gay, N. J.
(1996)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
65,
1-44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Vaduva, G.,
Martin, N. C.,
and Hopper, A. K.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1821-1833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Lila, T.,
and Drubin, D. G.
(1997)
Mol. Biol. Cell
8,
367-385[Abstract]
|
| 65.
|
Sellers, J. R.,
Goodson, H. V.,
and Wang, F.
(1996)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
17,
7-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Hofmann, T. A. Richards, and P. de Lanerolle
Ancient animal ancestry for nuclear myosin
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2009;
122(5):
636 - 643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Uruno, K. Remmert, and J. A. Hammer III
CARMIL Is a Potent Capping Protein Antagonist: IDENTIFICATION OF A CONSERVED CARMIL DOMAIN THAT INHIBITS THE ACTIVITY OF CAPPING PROTEIN AND UNCAPS CAPPED ACTIN FILAMENTS
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 14, 2006;
281(15):
10635 - 10650.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Sirotkin, C. C. Beltzner, J.-B. Marchand, and T. D. Pollard
Interactions of WASp, myosin-I, and verprolin with Arp2/3 complex during actin patch assembly in fission yeast
J. Cell Biol.,
August 15, 2005;
170(4):
637 - 648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ishikawa, N. Cheng, X. Liu, E. D. Korn, and A. C. Steven
Subdomain organization of the Acanthamoeba myosin IC tail from cryo-electron microscopy
PNAS,
August 17, 2004;
101(33):
12189 - 12194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Remmert, T. E. Olszewski, M. B. Bowers, M. Dimitrova, A. Ginsburg, and J. A. Hammer III
CARMIL Is a Bona Fide Capping Protein Interactant
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 23, 2004;
279(4):
3068 - 3077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-H. Kong and T. D. Pollard
Intracellular localization and dynamics of myosin-II and myosin-IC in live Acanthamoeba by transient transfection of EGFP fusion proteins
J. Cell Sci.,
March 14, 2003;
115(24):
4993 - 5002.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Tzolovsky, H. Millo, S. Pathirana, T. Wood, and M. Bownes
Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Myosins
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
July 1, 2002;
19(7):
1041 - 1052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-L. Lee, M. Bezanilla, and T. D. Pollard
Fission Yeast Myosin-I, Myo1p, Stimulates Actin Assembly by Arp2/3 Complex and Shares Functions with WASp
J. Cell Biol.,
November 13, 2000;
151(4):
789 - 800.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Liu, H. Brzeska, and E. D. Korn
Functional Analysis of Tail Domains of Acanthamoeba Myosin IC by Characterization of Truncation and Deletion Mutants
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 4, 2000;
275(32):
24886 - 24892.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. R. Gliksman, G. Santoyo, K. D. Novak, and M. A. Titus
Myosin I Phosphorylation Is Increased by Chemotactic Stimulation
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2001;
276(7):
5235 - 5239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|