J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 49, 35186-35190, December 3, 1999

The Steroid Hormone Dehydroepiandrosterone Inhibits CYP1A1 Expression in Vitro By a Post-transcriptional Mechanism^*

Henry P. Ciolino and Grace Chao Yeh

From the Cellular Defense and Carcinogenesis Section, Basic Research Laboratory, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The adrenal steroid hormone dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is a potent inhibitor of mammary carcinogenesis induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), though its mechanism is unclear. We examined the effect of DHEA on the expression of the carcinogen-activating enzyme cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) in MCF-7 human breast epithelial carcinoma cells. DHEA inhibited the increase in CYP1A1 enzyme activity that occurs when MCF-7 cells are exposed to the PAH dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). However, DHEA did not directly inhibit enzyme activity as it had no effect when added to the cells after induction by DMBA or TCDD. We observed that the increase of CYP1A1 mRNA in MCF-7 cells caused by DMBA or TCDD was inhibited by DHEA in a concentration-dependent manner. However, DHEA did not inhibit CYP1A1 promoter-driven transcription, indicating that it did not affect the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which regulates transcription of the CYP1A1 gene. Actinomycin D chase experiments showed that DHEA caused a time- and concentration-dependent decrease in CYP1A1 mRNA levels, indicating that DHEA inhibits CYP1A1 expression by decreasing CYP1A1 mRNA stability. These data demonstrate that DHEA inhibits PAH-induced CYP1A1 mRNA expression and enzyme activity in vitro by a post-transcriptional mechanism. This regulation of the expression of carcinogen-activating enzymes may be responsible for the chemopreventive activity of DHEA and may be one of its physiologic functions in vivo.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)¹ and its sulfated form (DHEA-S) are the major secretory products of the adrenal cortex and are the most abundant steroids in humans, with circulating levels in young adults of 5-7 µM (1). Other than their role as precursors of sex steroid hormones (2, 3), their physiologic functions remain unclear. DHEA and/or DHEA-S have been associated with a number of beneficial effects in humans (4) including decreased cardiovascular disease (5), weight loss (6), reduced serum cholesterol (7), and activation of the immune system (8). Thus, the inexorable decline in circulating levels of these hormones that occurs with age, to 5% of peak values by the ninth decade (1, 9), is of substantial concern.

DHEA has also been shown to have considerable chemopreventive activity toward cancer. A significant body of evidence suggests that DHEA may protect against certain cancers (10, 11). In animal models, DHEA has been shown to inhibit both spontaneous (12) and chemically induced (13, 14) carcinogenesis in rodents. Specifically, DHEA inhibits both skin (15, 16) and mammary tumorigenesis (17-19) caused by dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA). DMBA is a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), a class of carcinogen that requires activation to genotoxic metabolites that bind DNA. DHEA has been shown to inhibit DMBA activation in vitro (20) and DMBA-DNA binding in vivo (21). The activation of PAH is catalyzed by the cytochrome P450 1A and 1B families (22, 23), which require NADPH as a cofactor. Because DHEA is a potent uncompetitive inhibitor of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in vitro (24) (the rate-limiting enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway that generates NADPH), the inhibition of DMBA-induced carcinogenesis by DHEA has been ascribed to decreased activation by CYP enzymes because of a lack of NADPH. However, inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and depletion of NADPH pools in vivo have not been demonstrated (12, 25, 26). Indeed, inhibition of cellular glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in vitro occurs only at very high DHEA concentrations (27, 28). Furthermore, other enzymes such as isocitrate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme also produce NADPH (25). Thus, the mechanism of DHEA's chemopreventive activity toward DMBA is unknown.

In the current work we examine an alternative hypothesis to account for the inhibition of DMBA-induced carcinogenesis by DHEA. DMBA, in common with other PAHs, induces the expression of the carcinogen-activating enzyme CYP1A1 (29). We report that DHEA, but not DHEA-S, inhibits the expression of CYP1A1 in vitro by affecting the stability of CYP1A1 mRNA, thereby preventing the induction of CYP1A1 enzyme activity by carcinogens such as DMBA.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Materials-- MCF-7 cells were from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). RPMI 1640, glutamine, fetal bovine serum, trypsin/EDTA, phosphate-buffered saline, and Tris borate buffer were from Biofluids (Rockville, MD). Actinomycin D, -naphthoflavone (-NF), DHEA, DHEA-S, DMBA, EDTA, ethoxyresorufin, resorufin, Tris-HCl, and dimethyl sulfoxide (Me₂SO) were from Sigma. [³²P]dATP was from NEN Life Science Products. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was from the Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, MO). RT-PCR was performed with an Omniscript kit from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). Tris borate gels, Tris borate running buffer, and high density sample buffer were from Novex (San Diego, CA). Primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RT-PCR and the -galactosidase-containing reporter vector were from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). Trizol reagent and LipofectAMINE were from Life Technologies, Inc. The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Stock solutions of all chemicals were dissolved in Me₂SO (except where indicated) and stored at 20 °C. Final Me₂SO concentration in both control and treated cultures was 0.1%.

Cell Culture-- MCF-7 human breast epithelial cancer cells were grown in RPMI 1640 with 2 mM glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum and subcultured weekly using 0.25% trypsin/0.05% EDTA. All experiments were carried out on confluent cultures in growth medium, unless otherwise noted.

Assay of CYP1A1 Activity-- MCF-7 cells were incubated with 1 µM DMBA or 1 nM TCDD in the presence of Me₂SO (vehicle control), DHEA, or DHEA-S for 24 h. Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity, which is a specific assay of the bioactivation capacity of CYP1A, was determined in intact MCF-7 cells grown in 24-well plates as described previously (30).

To determine the direct effect of DHEA/DHEA-S on CYP1A enzyme activity, MCF-7 cells were incubated with 1 µM DMBA or 1 nM TCDD for 24 h to induce enzyme expression. The cells were then washed extensively and incubated with Me₂SO (vehicle control), DHEA, DHEA-S, or 5 µM -NF as a positive control for 3 h, and EROD activity was determined. Also, the effect of DHEA on EROD activity in microsomes isolated from TCDD-treated MCF-7 cells was measured as described (31).

RT-PCR-- Isolation of total RNA, cDNA synthesis, semiquantitative RT-PCR for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA, and analysis of results were performed as described previously (32). cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA using an Omniscript RT-PCR kit as instructed. A cycle number that fell within the exponential range of response for both CYP1A1 (27 cycles for the determination of basal CYP1A1 mRNA and CYP1A1 mRNA stability; 24 cycles otherwise) and GAPDH (17 cycles) was used.

Transient Transfections-- CYP1A1 promoter-controlled CAT transcription was determined as described previously (32).

Statistical Analysis-- Statistical analyses were performed using StatView statistical analysis software (SAS Institute). Differences between group mean values were determined by a one-factor analysis of variance followed by Fisher protected least-significant difference post hoc analysis for pairwise comparison of means.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

DHEA Inhibits Carcinogen-induced CYP1A1 Enzyme Activity-- Incubation of MCF-7 cells with 1 µM DMBA for 24 h caused an increase of CYP1A1 activity from undetectable levels in untreated cells to a specific activity of 1.52 ± 0.16 pmol/min/100,000 cells as measured in intact cells using the EROD assay. In cells co-incubated with DMBA and DHEA there was a concentration-dependent decrease in EROD activity, with a concentration of approximately 100 nM at which 50% inhibition (IC₅₀) occurred (Fig. 1A). The sulfur-conjugated form of DHEA-S had no effect on DMBA-induced EROD activity (Fig. 1A). Treatment of MCF-7 cells with the potent AHR ligand TCDD caused an induction of EROD activity to 15.06 ± 0.89 pmol/min/100,000 cells. This induction was also inhibited by DHEA, but not by DHEA-S, with an IC₅₀ of approximately 1 µM (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Inhibition of CYP1A1 enzyme activity in DMBA- or TCDD-treated MCF-7 cells by DHEA. MCF-7 cells were treated with 1 µM DMBA (A) or 1 nM TCDD (B) for 24 h in the presence of the indicated concentrations of DHEA (filled squares) or DHEA-S (open squares). CYP1A1 activity was measured in intact cells by the EROD method. n = 4 ± S.E. There was a significant difference in enzyme activity in cells treated with all concentrations of DHEA compared with controls (p < 0.05), but there was no difference in cells treated with DHEA-S.

MCF-7 cells were incubated with DMBA or TCDD to induce CYP1A1 enzyme activity and postincubated with DHEA to determine whether the effect of DHEA on CYP1A1 activity results from a direct inhibitory action on the enzyme. As shown in Table I, DHEA had no effect on cellular CYP1A1 activity when added after induction by DMBA or TCDD, whereas the direct, non-competitive CYP1A1 enzyme inhibitor -NF caused a significant inhibition of enzyme activity. DHEA was also unable to inhibit CYP1A1 enzyme activity in the microsomal fraction isolated from TCDD-treated cells, whereas -NF completely abolished CYP1A1 activity (data not shown).

DHEA Inhibits CYP1A1 mRNA Expression-- MCF-7 cells were treated with or without DMBA and DHEA, and the amount of CYP1A1 mRNA was determined by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, exposure of the cells to DMBA for 6 h resulted in a 5-fold increase in CYP1A1 mRNA compared with untreated cells. In the presence of DHEA, this induction was diminished in a concentration-dependent manner to an approximately 2-fold increase in cells co-treated with 1 µM DHEA (Fig. 2). Treatment of MCF-7 cells with TCDD resulted in an 11-fold increase in CYP1A1 mRNA compared with untreated controls (Fig. 3). DHEA inhibited this down to a 4-fold increase in cells co-treated with TCDD and 1 µM DHEA (Fig. 3). DHEA-S did not affect the increase in CYP1A1 mRNA in cells treated with either DMBA or TCDD even at a relatively high concentration of 5 µM (Fig. 4). Treatment of the cells with increasing concentrations of DHEA for 24 h in the absence of other treatments also caused a concentration-dependent decrease in the basal expression of CYP1A1 mRNA (Fig. 5).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Inhibition of DMBA-induced CYP1A1 mRNA expression by DHEA. MCF-7 cells were treated with 1 µM DMBA for 6 h in the presence of the indicated concentrations of DHEA. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. CYP1A1 mRNA was normalized to GAPDH mRNA. n = 3 ± S.E. There was a significant decrease in CYP1A1 mRNA in cells treated with all concentrations of DHEA compared with controls (p < 0.05).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Inhibition of TCDD-induced CYP1A1 mRNA expression by DHEA. MCF-7 cells were treated with 1 nM TCDD in the presence of the indicated concentrations of DHEA for 6 h. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. CYP1A1 mRNA was normalized to GAPDH mRNA. n = 3 ± S.E. There was a significant decrease in CYP1A1 mRNA in cells treated with all concentrations of DHEA compared with controls (p < 0.05).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Lack of effect of DHEA-S on DMBA- or TCDD-induced CYP1A1 mRNA expression. MCF-7 cells were treated with 1 µM DMBA or 1 nM TCDD in the presence of Me2SO (controls) or 5 µM DHEA-S for 6 h. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. There was no significant difference in CYP1A1 mRNA in the presence of DHEA-S.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   Inhibition of basal CYP1A1 mRNA levels by DHEA. MCF-7 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of DHEA for 24 h. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. n = 3 ± S.E. There was a significant decrease in basal CYP1A1 mRNA in cells treated with all concentrations of DHEA compared with controls (p < 0.05).

DHEA Does Not Affect CYP1A1 Promoter-controlled Transcription-- CYP1A1 promoter-driven transcription was examined by transiently transfecting MCF-7 cells with a CAT reporter vector containing the full-length CYP1A1 promoter. Transfected cells were treated with Me₂SO, DMBA, or TCDD for 6 h in the presence of different concentrations of DHEA. As shown in Fig. 6, there was a 4-fold increase in CAT transcription in transfected cells treated with DMBA and a 7-fold increase in cells treated with TCDD compared with Me₂SO-treated controls. Co-incubation with increasing concentrations of DHEA had no affect on transcription. Resveratrol, a dietary polyphenolic compound that is a potent inhibitor of AHR activity and CYP1A1 transcription (32), completely inhibited CAT transcription.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6.   Lack of effect of DHEA on DMBA- or TCDD-induced CAT transcription mediated by the CYP1A1 promoter. MCF-7 cells were transfected with a CAT reporter vector controlled by the full-length CYP1A1 promoter and with a vector containing -galactosidase. Transfected cells were treated with 1 µM DMBA or 1 nM TCDD for 6 h in the presence of the indicated concentrations of DHEA or 5 µM resveratrol. CAT transcription was normalized to -galactosidase transcription. n = 4 ± S.E.

DHEA Decreases the Stability of CYP1A1 mRNA-- The effect of DHEA on the stability of CYP1A1 mRNA was assessed by RT-PCR. Following treatment with DMBA to induce CYP1A1 expression, MCF-7 cells were treated with actinomycin D at 5 µg/ml, a concentration at which CYP1A1 transcription is completely inhibited (32, 33). As shown in Fig. 7, CYP1A1 mRNA levels were reduced in a concentration-dependent manner in DHEA-treated cells compared with controls. The presence of DHEA caused an increase in the rate of degradation of CYP1A1 mRNA compared with controls (Fig. 8). The half-life of CYP1A1 mRNA decreased from approximately 7 h in controls to less than 2 h in DHEA-treated cells.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7.   Effect of DHEA on the stability of CYP1A1 mRNA concentration response. MCF-7 cells were incubated with 1 µM DMBA for 12 h to induce CYP1A1 expression and then washed 3 times in growth medium. The cells were then incubated for 4 h in growth medium without DMBA in the presence of 5 µg/ml actinomycin D and the indicated concentrations of DHEA. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. n = 3 ± S.E.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8.   Effect of DHEA on the stability of the CYP1A1 mRNA time course. MCF-7 cells were incubated for 12 h with 1 µM DMBA. The cells were then washed 3 times with growth medium and incubated in fresh growth medium without DMBA in the presence of 5 µg/ml actinomycin D with Me2SO (Control) or 1 µM DHEA for the indicated times. CYP1A1 and GAPDH (G-3-PDH) mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. n = 3 ± S.E.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Among the best characterized molecular responses to PAHs is the induction of the gene CYP1A1, which encodes the carcinogen-activating enzyme CYP1A1 (34). Inhibition of carcinogen-activating enzymes, either by inhibiting enzyme activity or expression, is an important strategy in cancer chemoprevention (35). In the present study we tested the hypothesis that the established chemopreventive activity of DHEA toward aryl hydrocarbon-induced carcinogenesis may be due, in part, to its effects on the induction of CYP1A1 by PAHs. We used MCF-7 human breast epithelial carcinoma cells as a model system in these experiments because they are derived from the target tissue of DMBA, which is primarily a mammary carcinogen, and because CYP1A1 expression has been extensively characterized in this cell line (36, 37).

DHEA causes a concentration-dependent decrease in DMBA- or TCDD-induced CYP1A1 enzyme activity (Fig. 1, A and B). DHEA was more effective at inhibiting DMBA-induced enzyme activity than TCDD-induced activity, possibly because of the much higher levels of induction caused by TCDD. With either ligand, the IC₅₀ of DHEA was well below its physiologic concentrations (1), suggesting that DHEA could possibly exert a similar inhibitory effect in vivo. Although decreased carcinogen-activating enzyme activity has been previously suggested to explain the chemopreventive activity of DHEA (38), this is the first demonstration of such an effect. On the other hand, sulfated DHEA had no effect on CYP1A1 enzyme activity. DHEA-S is the primary circulating form of the hormone but is inactive with regard to several biologic parameters (39, 40). The inability of DHEA-S to inhibit enzyme activity, even after a 24 h incubation as represented in Fig. 1, suggests that MCF-7 cells do not possess the sulfatases necessary to convert it to active DHEA.

Inhibitors of CYP1A1 enzyme activity may act by directly inhibiting enzyme activity. However, as shown in Table I, DHEA had no direct effect on CYP1A1 enzyme activity. Because CYP1A1 activity was reduced without direct enzyme inhibition, we investigated the effect of DHEA on CYP1A1 expression. DHEA inhibited the increase in CYP1A1 mRNA caused by DMBA (Fig. 2) or TCDD (Fig. 3). Consistent with the EROD data, DHEA was more effective at lower concentrations (<1 µM) in preventing the increase in CYP1A1 mRNA caused by DMBA than the increase caused by TCDD. In agreement with the enzyme data, DHEA-S had no effect on CYP1A1 mRNA induction caused by either ligand (Fig. 4). Thus, the inhibitory effect of DHEA on CYP1A1 enzyme activity is the result of inhibition of CYP1A1 expression.

CYP1A1 expression is known to be regulated at the transcriptional level by the AHR, which, when activated by ligands such as DMBA or TCDD, acts as a transcription factor by binding to the CYP1A1 promoter and up-regulating transcription. As shown in Fig. 6, treatment of transfected cells with DMBA or TCDD caused a 4- or 7-fold increase, respectively, in CYP1A1 promoter-controlled transcription. Unlike the AHR inhibitor resveratrol (31), DHEA did not inhibit DMBA- or TCDD-induced transcription even at high concentrations (Fig. 6). Furthermore, DHEA inhibited even the basal level of CYP1A1 mRNA levels in the absence of treatment with AHR ligands (Fig. 5), suggesting the DHEA operates by a mechanism other than by inhibiting AHR activity. This was confirmed by ligand binding and gel shift assays, which showed that DHEA had no effect on the binding of TCDD to cytosolic AHR and no effect on the DMBA- or TCDD-activated binding of the AHR to the CYP1A1 promoter (data not shown). These data indicate that DHEA does not carry out its inhibitory activity with regard to CYP1A1 expression by affecting the ligand-induced transcription of CYP1A1.

Although there are numerous studies that demonstrate that CYP1A1 expression is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level, one study indicated that post-transcriptional mechanisms, i.e. mRNA stability, may play a role in determining the level of CYP1A1 mRNA (33). Because our data indicate that DHEA decreases CYP1A1 mRNA but does not affect CYP1A1 transcription, we examined the effect of DHEA on CYP1A1 mRNA degradation by carrying out actinomycin D chase experiments. These experiments indicate that DHEA significantly shortens the half-life of CYP1A1 mRNA (Figs. 7 and 8). This increased mRNA degradation seems to be selective because GAPDH mRNA was unaffected by DHEA. The inhibition of CYP1A1 expression by DHEA therefore appears to occur at a post-transcriptional level through modulation of CYP1A1 mRNA stability. Although mRNA stability plays a major role in the determination of gene expression, the regulation of mRNA stability is poorly understood, and the mechanism by which DHEA affects mRNA stability remains to be studied. The modulation of CYP1A1 mRNA stability by a chemopreventive compound is novel and may represent an important mechanism of chemoprevention.

The current data are the first demonstration, to our knowledge, that DHEA inhibits the expression of CYP1A1. This provides a possible explanation for the potent chemopreventive activity of DHEA with regard to the initiation of chemically induced carcinogenesis. In this model system, this inhibition occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations. Thus, DHEA may serve to modulate the response to xenobiotics in vivo. This may be a heretofore unrecognized physiologic function of DHEA.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Susan N. Perkins for careful review of the manuscript.

	FOOTNOTES

^* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Basic Research Lab., Bldg. 560, Rm. 12-05, NCI-FCRDC, P. O. Box B, Frederick, MD, 21702-1201. Tel.: 301-846-5160; Fax: 301-846-6709; E-mail: hciolino@mail.ncifcrf.gov.

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA-S, sulfated dehydroepiandrosterone; AHR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; -NF, -naphthoflavone; CYP1A1, cytochrome P450 1A1; DMBA, dimethylbenzanthracene; Me₂SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EROD, ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES