![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35309-35312, December 10, 1999
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (M/C 536), University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The damaged DNA-binding protein (DDB) is believed
to be involved in DNA repair, and it has been linked to the repair
deficiency disease xeroderma pigmentosum. DDB also exhibits
transcriptional activities. DDB binds to the activation domain of E2F1
and stimulates E2F1-activated transcription. Here we provide evidence
that DDB or DDB-associated proteins are targets of cullin 4A (CUL-4A). CUL-4A is a member of the cullin family of proteins, which are believed
to be ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligases (type E3). The CUL-4A gene
has been shown to be amplified and up-regulated in breast carcinomas.
In this study, we identify CUL-4A as one of the DDB-associated
proteins. CUL-4A co-immunoprecipitates with DDB, but not with a
naturally occurring mutant of DDB. Moreover, CUL-4A in HeLa nuclear
extracts co-purifies with DDB, suggesting they are parts of the same
complex. The observation provides insights how CUL-4A, through an
interaction with DDB, might be playing a role in the development of
breast carcinomas.
DDB1 binds to UV-damaged
DNA and cisplatin modified DNA with high affinities (1-3). The damaged
DNA binding function of DDB requires both DDB1 (p125, 127 kDa) and DDB2
(p48, 48 kDa) gene products, which are believed to be subunits of DDB
(2, 4). About 30% of XP-E (xeroderma pigmentosum group E) patients
lack the damaged DNA binding activity of DDB (5, 6). DDB exhibits very
little repair activity in nucleotide excision repair assays, in
vitro (7). However, microinjection of purified DDB complements the
repair deficiencies in XP-E cells lacking the damaged-DNA binding
activity of DDB (8). It has been postulated that DDB functions as a
repair protein in the context of chromatin structure and that it alters
chromatin conformation to enhance repair at the damaged sites (4, 6).
Recent results also suggest that damaged DNA recognition function of
DDB is downstream of p53. Induced expression of p53 causes an increase
in the expression of p48 mRNA (9). Moreover, p48 mRNA
expression is increased upon DNA damage in p53 +/+ cells, but not in
p53 Two mutants, 2RO and 82TO, have been characterized from XP-E patients.
These mutants harbor single amino acid substitutions, R273H (2RO) and
K244E (82TO), in the WD motif of p48 (DDB2 gene product) (10). These
mutant p48 proteins are impaired in their ability to cooperate with the
p125 subunit in damaged DNA binding assays (4, 10). The mutant 2RO is
also incapable of forming a stable complex with the p125 subunit (11).
p48 plays an important role in the nuclear localization of p125 (11).
These two XP-E mutants of p48 are deficient in their ability to enhance
nuclear localization of p125 (11).
DDB also possesses a transcriptional function (11-13). It can function
as a transcriptional partner of E2F1. DDB associates with the
C-terminal activation domain of E2F1 and cooperates with E2F1 to
stimulate transcription from an E2F1-regulated promoter (13). Moreover,
expression of DDB can overcome retinoblastoma inhibition of the
E2F1-activated transcription (13). The transcriptional function depends
upon both p48 and p125 subunits. The mutants 2RO and 82TO exhibit a
deficiency in their transcriptional function (11). The p125 subunit of
DDB has been shown to associate with several viral and cellular
proteins. For example, p125 has been shown to bind the hepatitis B
virus X protein, which is a potent activator of transcription (14).
p125 also interacts with the V proteins encoded by paramyxovirus SV5,
mumps virus, human parainfluenza virus, and measles virus (15). A
recent study indicated an interaction between p125 and the C-terminal
cytosolic region of the Alzheimer's precursor protein (16). While the
significance of many of these interactions is yet to be determined, the
functional interaction between DDB and E2F1 suggests a role for DDB in
the cell cycle.
CUL-4A is a member of the cullin family of proteins that are believed
to be regulators of the cell cycle (17, 18). The members of the cullin
family possess extensive sequence homology among each other and,
therefore, are believed to have similar biochemical function (17, 18).
CUL-1, the most well characterized cullin, was shown to be involved in
cell cycle exit in Caenorhabditis elegans (17).
The yeast homologue of CUL-1, cdc53, has been shown to be involved in
proteolysis of the cell cycle inhibitor Sic1p and the G1 cyclins
through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (19, 20). It has been proposed
that CUL-1 and the other members of the cullin family function as E3
ligases, which are involved in selecting specific targets for
ubiquitination (21). This notion is consistent with the observation
that the cullins associate with other proteins involved in the
ubiquitination of target proteins (21). Targets for the human cullins
are not known. It has been shown that CUL-1 associates with the cell
cycle regulatory protein cyclin A through an interaction with SKP1
(22). Here, we show that CUL-4A remains endogenously associated with
DDB, suggesting the possibility that CUL-4A targets DDB or a
DDB-associated protein involved in cell cycle regulation or DNA repair.
Cell Culture, Plasmids, and DNA Transfection--
Human
osteosarcoma U2OS cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% CO2. Spinner cultures of HeLa cells were grown in minimum essential medium
containing 5% calf serum. Plasmids used in this study have been
described previously (11). DNA transfection was performed by the
calcium-phosphate precipitation procedure as described previously
(13).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blots--
The
immunoprecipitation and Western blot experiments were carried out
following previously described procedures (11, 13). For large scale
immunopurification of DDB-binding proteins, 5-30 plates (10 cm) of
U2OS cells were transfected with plasmids expressing T7 epitope-tagged
p48 proteins. Cells were harvested after 36 h of removal of the
DNA precipitates. The harvested cells were lysed by suspending and
incubating in buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5% Nonidet
P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The lysate was
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant
was further cleared by filtration through 0.22 µ low protein binding
filters. Agarose-linked T7 antibody, which was further cross-linked as
described in Hayes et al. (13), was used to immunopurify the
DDB-binding proteins.
Trypsin Digestion and Sequence Analysis of DDB-binding
Proteins--
Trypsin digestion of gel bands containing DDB-binding
proteins were performed in Harvard Microchemistry Facility (Cambridge, MA). The sequence analyses of the tryptic peptides were carried out in
the same facility by microcapillary reverse-phase HPLC tandem mass spectrometry.
Peptide Antiserum--
A chemically synthesized peptide, with
the sequence ERDKDNPNQYHYVA, corresponding to human CUL-4A was
conjugated to maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce).
The conjugate was used for rabbit immunization and antiserum production.
HeLa Nuclear Extracts and Heparin-Agarose
Fractionation--
HeLa nuclear extracts were prepared following the
procedure of Dignam et al. (23). The heparin-agarose
fractionation was carried out essentially following a previously
described procedure (13).
DNA Affinity Chromatography--
One milligram of sonicated
salmon sperm DNA or sonicated salmon sperm DNA that was irradiated with
2 J/cm square of UV light in a Stratalinker (Stratagene) was linked to
4 ml of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B following the procedure of Kadonaga
et al. (24). Columns containing 0.8 ml of the affinity beads
were used for chromatography of the heparin-agarose-purified DDB. The
columns were equilibrated in buffer A (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing 0.1 M KCl. The heparin-agarose fraction was dialyzed against an
excess of buffer A containing 0.1 M KCl for 4 h. The dialyzed material was incubated with 5 µg/ml of sonicated salmon sperm DNA and then applied three times onto the affinity columns. After
loading, the columns were washed with 4 ml of buffer A containing 0.1 M KCl followed by elution with buffer A containing 0.3 M KCl (3.2 ml) and 0.7 M KCl (3.2 ml).
In an attempt to understand the function of DDB, we looked for
cellular proteins that interact with the p48 subunit of DDB. Plasmids
expressing T7 epitope-tagged p48 or the naturally occurring mutants of
p48 (82TO and 2RO) were transfected into U2OS cells. The extracts of
the transfected or mock-transfected cells were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody against T7 that is
covalently linked to Sepharose beads. The immunoprecipitates were
subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by silver
staining. We detected several polypeptides co-immunoprecipitating with
the T7 antibody from the extracts of cells expressing the T7-p48
proteins, but not from the mock-transfected cells (Fig. 1). The bands migrating just below the
55-kDa marker corresponded to the wild-type or the mutant p48 proteins,
as they were the only bands recognized by the T7 antibody in Western
blots (not shown). The band migrating slightly above the 116-kDa marker
corresponded to p125, as that was the only band detected by the p125
antibody in Western blot (not shown). As expected, the p48 transgene
product co-immunoprecipitated p125, and the pattern of p125
co-precipitation with the wild-type and the mutant p48 was consistent
with our previous observation in showing that the mutant 2RO failed to bind p125 (11).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
cells.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of DDB-binding proteins.
U2OS cells were transfected with plasmids expressing T7 epitope-tagged
p48 or mutants 2RO and 82TO (5 µg of plasmid/10-cm plate, five plates
for each transfection). Cells were harvested 36 h after
transfection. Cell extracts were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The extracts were filtered through a low
protein binding 0.22-µm filter and subjected to immunoprecipitation
with T7 antibody that was covalently linked to beads. The
immunoprecipitates were eluted with gel loading buffer at room
temperature for 15 min. The eluted materials were boiled and subjected
to 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The bands were
visualized with silver staining. A relatively shorter stain is shown.
The band patterns in lanes T7-p48 (82TO) and
T7-p48 looked very similar in a longer stain of the same
gel.
There were several polypeptides of molecular mass ranging between 55 and 70 kDa specifically co-immunoprecipitated with DDB from transfected
cells (Fig. 1). These polypeptides were co-immunoprecipitated from
cells transfected with both wild-type and mutant p48. Interestingly, a
polypeptide of about 80-85 kDa was co-immunoprecipitated specifically with the wild-type p48 and 82TO, but not with 2RO (marked with an
arrow, Fig. 1). The overall band intensity in the lane for 82TO was low, but a darker stain did detect the 80-85-kDa polypeptide in that lane (not shown). To identify the polypeptides, the gel bands
from a Coomassie Blue-stained gel were excised and were subjected to
tryptic digestion and sequence analyses. We focused on the 80-85-kDa
polypeptide because of its specificity. The sequence analysis was
performed at the Harvard Microchemistry Facility (Cambridge, MA) by
microcapillary reverse-phase HPLC tandem mass spectrometry on a Finigan
LCQ quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Four of the tryptic peptides
obtained from the 80-85-kDa polypeptide corresponded to CUL-4A,
whereas three others corresponded to both CUL-4A and CUL-4B (Fig.
2). CUL-4A and CUL-4B are extremely
homologous (about 88% identical) (21); therefore, it is very likely
that the 80-85-kDa polypeptide co-immunoprecipitating with DDB is
CUL-4A. However, the possibility that both CUL-4A and CUL-4B
co-immunoprecipitated with DDB cannot be ruled out.
|
The interaction between DDB and CUL-4A is interesting because of the
following reasons. First, a naturally occurring mutant of DDB, 2RO,
failed to associate with CUL-4A. The patient harboring the 2RO mutation
developed skin cancer at an early age of 14 (25). Moreover, CUL-4A was
shown to be amplified and up-regulated in breast cancers (26). We
sought to confirm the interaction by biochemical and immunochemical
methods. A peptide antiserum specific for CUL-4A was generated as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The antiserum
specifically recognized an 80-85-kDa polypeptide in Western blots of
crude extracts (data not shown). This CUL-4A-specific antiserum was
employed to detect co-immunoprecipitation of CUL-4A with DDB. U2OS
cells were transfected with plasmids expressing the T7 epitope-tagged
p48 proteins. The transfected cell extracts were subjected to
immunoprecipitation by using an agarose-linked monoclonal antibody
against the T7 epitope. The immunoprecipitates were then subjected to
Western blot analysis. The blot was cut into two pieces across the
molecular mass region of 68 kDa. (CUL-4A is about 80-85 kDa and p48
migrates as a 42-kDa band.) The upper part of the blot was probed with
the CUL-4A antibody and the lower part with T7 antibody. The T7
antibody detected the expression of the p48 transgene products. The
wild-type and the two mutants, 82TO and 2RO, were expressed at
approximately similar levels (Fig. 3).
Consistent with the experiment in Fig. 1, both wild-type and 82TO
co-immunoprecipitated CUL-4A, whereas 2RO failed to
co-immunoprecipitate CUL-4A (Fig. 3, upper panel). This
result also confirmed the observation that DDB associates with
CUL-4A.
|
The interaction with CUL-4A could be an artifact of overexpression of
the DDB proteins. For example, CUL-4A might target only misfolded DDB
for proteolysis. Therefore, we investigated to ascertain an interaction
between the endogenous gene products. HeLa cell nuclear extracts were
fractionated to see whether CUL-4A co-purifies with DDB. HeLa nuclear
extracts were first fractionated by heparin-agarose as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Briefly, extracts were applied onto the
column at 0.1 M KCl. After loading, the column was
successively washed with 3 bed volumes of buffer containing 0.1 M KCl and 0.25 M KCl. The column was finally
eluted with a linear gradient (10 bed volumes) of KCl from 0.25 to 0.75 M. The column fractions were analyzed for the DDB proteins
and CUL-4A by Western blot assays. The blots were cut across the
molecular mass regions of 98 and 68 kDa to obtain three pieces, which
were separately probed with antibodies for p125, p48, and CUL-4A. We made two significant observations in this experiment. First, CUL-4A co-purified with p48 as well as p125, the subunits of DDB (Fig. 4A). Second, p125 appears to
be much more abundant than p48 in HeLa nuclear extracts (Fig.
4A). It is possible that p125 has a longer half-life. On the
other hand, it might be indicative of additional functions of p125 that
do not involve p48. In any event, a clear peak of p125 co-migrated with
p48 and CUL-4A in the gradient fractions (Fig. 4A), which is
congruent with the notion that the endogenous CUL-4A and DDB remain
associated.
|
To further investigate the co-purification of CUL-4A with DDB, we
employed an affinity column specific for UV-damaged DNA-binding proteins. DDB was shown to possess high affinity for UV-damaged DNA,
and it was purified using UV-damaged DNA affinity column (1). The
heparin-agarose fractions containing the two DDB polypeptides and
CUL-4A were pooled and dialyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The dialyzed material (1 mg/ml) was incubated with 5 µg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA. The material was then divided in
two parts, and approximately equal amounts of the material were loaded
onto affinity columns containing either double-stranded DNA-Sepharose
or UV-damaged DNA-Sepharose. The material containing the salmon sperm
DNA was loaded by gravity flow. The flow-through materials were
collected as 0.1 M KCl eluate. After an extensive wash with
buffer containing 0.1 M KCl, the columns were successively eluted with 4 bed volumes of buffers containing 0.3 M KCl
and 0.7 M KCl. Aliquots of each of the three fractions (0.1 M KCl, 0.3 M KCl, and 0.7 M KCl)
were analyzed by Western blot, as in the previous experiment. The three
pieces of the blot were probed with three different antibodies specific
for p125, p48, and CUL-4A. Clearly, a significant part of CUL-4A
co-purified with DDB and eluted by high salt from the UV-damaged DNA
column (Fig. 4B). This result is consistent with the notion
that in HeLa cell nuclear extract CUL-4A remains tightly bound to DDB
and that CUL-4A binds to functionally active molecules of DDB. During
this analysis, we consistently observed a 170-kDa band, marked by an
asterisk, recognized by the p125 antibody co-purifying with
p125. It is possible that this polypeptide corresponds to a
p125-related protein that binds to UV-damaged DNA. This 170-kDa band
might also represent a modified form of p125.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results presented here suggest that CUL-4A has a high affinity for DDB in mammalian cells, and a significant part of CUL-4A remains associated with DDB in HeLa nuclear extracts. CUL-4A is mainly a nuclear protein, as only a small part (about 20%) is detected in the cytosolic extracts (data not shown). As can be seen in Fig. 4, greater than 50% of CUL-4A co-purified with DDB through a damaged DNA affinity column, suggesting that DDB is one of the primary targets of CUL-4A. CUL-4A has been shown to be amplified and up-regulated in breast cancers (26), and therefore, it is interesting that it targets DDB that has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. For example, a mutation in the p48 gene that leads to an inactivation of DDB function correlates with the development of skin cancer (25). Based on its homology with other cullins, CUL-4A is believed to be an E3 ligase involved in the ubiquitination of target proteins (21). (However, a direct evidence that CUL-4A possesses ubiquitin-ligase activity is yet to be seen.) It is possible that a key function of CUL-4A is to target DDB for proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In this scenario, a high level of CUL-4A expression (as in many breast cancers) would efficiently reduce the cellular levels of the DDB, accomplishing a result similar to that observed in DDB mutation.
DDB may not be the ubiquitination target of CUL-4A. For example, CUL-1, which is believed to be involved in ubiquitination and degradation of cyclin A, interacts with cyclin A indirectly through SKP1 (22). Therefore, it is also possible that CUL-4A targets a DDB-associated protein such as E2F1. It has been shown that E2F1 is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (27). Similarly, proteins that associate with DDB in its DNA repair pathway may also be targets of CUL-4A. We speculate that loss of DDB or loss of other components in the pathway of DDB function would have similar effect.
Surprisingly, we observed that a complex of CUL-4A and DDB could bind
UV-damaged DNA. DDB has a high affinity for UV-damaged DNA and is
believed to be involved in DNA damage recognition (5). Microinjection
of DDB in repair-deficient XP-E cells can complement the deficiency,
implying a role of DDB in DNA repair (9). The fact that CUL-4A remains
associated with DDB and is able to interact with DDB bound to damaged
DNA suggests a possible role for CUL-4A in DNA damage recognition.
Mdm2, which is an E3 ligase involved in the ubiquitination of p53, also
possesses a transcriptional activity (28, 29). Mdm2 was shown to have a
transcriptional repression domain, which when tethered to a promoter
can inhibit transcription (30). Thus an E3 ligase can have dual
function. In this regard, it will be interesting to determine whether
CUL-4A also possesses a role in damaged DNA recognition and repair.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by NCI Grant CA 76276 (to P. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 312-413-0255;
Fax: 312-413-0364; E-mail: pradip@uic.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: DDB, damaged DNA-binding protein; XP-E, xeroderma pigmentosum group E; E3, ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hwang, B. J., and Chu, G. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 1657-1666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Dualan, R., Brody, T., Keeney, S., Nichols, A. F., Admon, A., and Linn, S. (1995) Genomics 29, 62-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
van Assendelft, G. B.,
Rigney, E. M.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3399-3404 |
| 4. |
Hwang, B. J.,
Toering, S.,
Francke, U.,
and Chu, G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4391-4399 |
| 5. |
Chu, G.,
and Chang, E.
(1988)
Science
242,
564-567 |
| 6. |
Otrin, V. R.,
Kuraoka, I.,
Nardo, T.,
McLenigan, M.,
Eker, A. P. M.,
Stefanini, M.,
Levine, A. S.,
and Wood, R. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3182-3190 |
| 7. |
Kazantsev, A.,
Mu, D.,
Nichols, A. F,
Zhao, X.,
Linn, S.,
and Sancar, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5014-5018 |
| 8. |
Keeney, S.,
Eker, A. P.,
Brody, T.,
Vermeulen, W.,
Bootsma, D.,
Hoeijmakers, J. H.,
and Linn, S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4053-4056 |
| 9. |
Hwang, B. J.,
Ford, J. M.,
Hanawalt, P. C.,
and Chu, G.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
424-428 |
| 10. |
Nichols, A. F.,
Ong, P.,
and Linn, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24317-24320 |
| 11. |
Shiyanov, P.,
Hayes, S. A.,
Donepudi, M.,
Nichols, A. F.,
Linn, S.,
Slagle, B. L.,
and Raychaudhuri, P.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4935-4943 |
| 12. | Krishnamoorthy, R. R., Lee, T.-H., Butel, J. S., and Das, H. K. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 960-969[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Hayes, S.,
Shiyanov, P.,
Chen, X.,
and Raychaudhuri, P.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
240-249 |
| 14. | Lee, T. H., Elledge, S. J., and Butel, J. S. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 1107-1114[Abstract] |
| 15. | Lin, G. Y., Paterson, R. G., Richardson, C. D., and Lamb, R. A. (1998) Virology 249, 189-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Watanabe, T., Sukegawa, J., Sukegawa, I., Tomita, S., Iijima, K., Oguchi, S., Suzuki, T., Nairn, A. C., and Greengard, P. (1999) J. Neurochem. 72, 549-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Kipreos, E. T., Lander, L. E., Wing, J. P., He, W.-W., and Hedgecock, E. M. (1996) Cell 85, 829-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Mathias, N., Johnson, S. J., Winey, M., Adams, A. E. M., Goetsch, L., Pringle, J. R., Byers, B., and Goebl, M. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6634-6643[Abstract] |
| 19. | Feldman, R. M. R., Correll, C. C., Kaplan, K. B., and Deshaies, R. J. (1997) Cell 91, 221-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Willems, A. R., Lanker, S., Patton, E. E., Craig, K. L., Nason, T. F., Mathias, N., Kobayashi, R., Wittenberg, C., and Tyers, M. (1996) Cell 86, 453-463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Ohta, T., Michel, J. J., Schottelius, A. J., and Xiong, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. 3, 535-541[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Michel, J., and Xiong, Y. (1998) Cell Growth Differ. 9, 439-445 |
| 23. |
Dignam, J. D.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489 |
| 24. |
Kadonaga, J. T.,
and Tjian, R.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5889-5893 |
| 25. | de Weerd-Kastelein, E. A., Keijzer, W., and Bootsma, D. (1974) Mutat. Res. 22, 87-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Chen, L.-C.,
Manjeshwar, S.,
Lu, Y.,
Moore, D.,
Ljung, B.-M.,
Kuo, W.-L,
Dairkee, S. H.,
Wernick, M.,
Colins, C.,
and Smith, H. S.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
3677-3683 |
| 27. |
Martelli, F.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2858-2863 |
| 28. | Honda, R., Tanaka, H., and Yasuda, H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 25-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Ko, L. J.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1054-1072 |
| 30. |
Thut, C. J.,
Goodrich, J. A.,
and Tjian, R.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1974-1986 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Stoyanova, T. Yoon, D. Kopanja, M. B. Mokyr, and P. Raychaudhuri The Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group E Gene Product DDB2 Activates Nucleotide Excision Repair by Regulating the Level of p21Waf1/Cip1 Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Lee, W. Terzaghi, G. Gusmaroli, J.-B. F. Charron, H.-J. Yoon, H. Chen, Y. J. He, Y. Xiong, and X. W. Deng Characterization of Arabidopsis and Rice DWD Proteins and Their Roles as Substrate Receptors for CUL4-RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligases PLANT CELL, January 1, 2008; 20(1): 152 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Tan, E. Ehrlich, and X.-F. Yu DDB1 and Cul4A Are Required for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpr-Induced G2 Arrest J. Virol., October 1, 2007; 81(19): 10822 - 10830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wen, K. M. Duus, T. D. Friedrich, and C. M. C. de Noronha The HIV1 Protein Vpr Acts to Promote G2 Cell Cycle Arrest by Engaging a DDB1 and Cullin4A-containing Ubiquitin Ligase Complex Using VprBP/DCAF1 as an Adaptor J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27046 - 27057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Luijsterburg, J. Goedhart, J. Moser, H. Kool, B. Geverts, A. B. Houtsmuller, L. H. F. Mullenders, W. Vermeulen, and R. van Driel Dynamic in vivo interaction of DDB2 E3 ubiquitin ligase with UV-damaged DNA is independent of damage-recognition protein XPC J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2007; 120(15): 2706 - 2716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Skaar, L. Florens, T. Tsutsumi, T. Arai, A. Tron, S. K. Swanson, M. P. Washburn, and J. A. DeCaprio PARC and CUL7 Form Atypical Cullin RING Ligase Complexes Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2006 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Lovejoy, K. Lock, A. Yenamandra, and D. Cortez DDB1 Maintains Genome Integrity through Regulation of Cdt1 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2006; 26(21): 7977 - 7990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, Q.-E. Wang, Q. Zhu, M. A. El-Mahdy, G. Wani, M. Praetorius-Ibba, and A. A. Wani DNA Damage Binding Protein Component DDB1 Participates in Nucleotide Excision Repair through DDB2 DNA-binding and Cullin 4A Ubiquitin Ligase Activity. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8590 - 8597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. El-Mahdy, Q. Zhu, Q.-e. Wang, G. Wani, M. Praetorius-Ibba, and A. A. Wani Cullin 4A-mediated Proteolysis of DDB2 Protein at DNA Damage Sites Regulates in Vivo Lesion Recognition by XPC J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13404 - 13411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bondar, A. Kalinina, L. Khair, D. Kopanja, A. Nag, S. Bagchi, and P. Raychaudhuri Cul4A and DDB1 Associate with Skp2 To Target p27Kip1 for Proteolysis Involving the COP9 Signalosome. Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(7): 2531 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Thon, K. R. Hansen, S. P. Altes, D. Sidhu, G. Singh, J. Verhein-Hansen, M. J. Bonaduce, and A. J. S. Klar The Clr7 and Clr8 Directionality Factors and the Pcu4 Cullin Mediate Heterochromatin Formation in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1583 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kulaksiz, J. T. Reardon, and A. Sancar Xeroderma Pigmentosum Complementation Group E Protein (XPE/DDB2): Purification of Various Complexes of XPE and Analyses of Their Damaged DNA Binding and Putative DNA Repair Properties Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 9784 - 9792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Precious, K. Childs, V. Fitzpatrick-Swallow, S. Goodbourn, and R. E. Randall Simian Virus 5 V Protein Acts as an Adaptor, Linking DDB1 to STAT2, To Facilitate the Ubiquitination of STAT1 J. Virol., November 1, 2005; 79(21): 13434 - 13441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Ulane, A. Kentsis, C. D. Cruz, J.-P. Parisien, K. L. Schneider, and C. M. Horvath Composition and Assembly of STAT-Targeting Ubiquitin Ligase Complexes: Paramyxovirus V Protein Carboxyl Terminus Is an Oligomerization Domain J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10180 - 10189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Skaar, T. Arai, and J. A. DeCaprio Dimerization of CUL7 and PARC Is Not Required for All CUL7 Functions and Mouse Development Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2005; 25(13): 5579 - 5589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Precious, D. F. Young, L. Andrejeva, S. Goodbourn, and R. E. Randall In vitro and in vivo specificity of ubiquitination and degradation of STAT1 and STAT2 by the V proteins of the paramyxoviruses simian virus 5 and human parainfluenza virus type 2 J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2005; 86(1): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Takata, H. Yoshida, M. Yamaguchi, and K. Sakaguchi Drosophila Damaged DNA-Binding Protein 1 Is an Essential Factor for Development Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 855 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bondar, A. Ponomarev, and P. Raychaudhuri Ddb1 Is Required for the Proteolysis of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Replication Inhibitor Spd1 during S Phase and after DNA Damage J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 9937 - 9943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Reardon and A. Sancar Recognition and repair of the cyclobutane thymine dimer, a major cause of skin cancers, by the human excision nuclease Genes & Dev., October 15, 2003; 17(20): 2539 - 2551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Leupin, S. Bontron, and M. Strubin Hepatitis B Virus X Protein and Simian Virus 5 V Protein Exhibit Similar UV-DDB1 Binding Properties To Mediate Distinct Activities J. Virol., June 1, 2003; 77(11): 6274 - 6283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, K. A. Powell, K. Mundt, L. Wu, A. M. Carr, and T. Caspari Cop9/signalosome subunits and Pcu4 regulate ribonucleotide reductase by both checkpoint-dependent and -independent mechanisms Genes & Dev., May 1, 2003; 17(9): 1130 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, F.-C. Yang, D. W. Clapp, and K. T. Chun Enforced expression of CUL-4A interferes with granulocytic differentiation and exit from the cell cycle Blood, March 1, 2003; 101(5): 1769 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Nichols, T. Itoh, F. Zolezzi, S. Hutsell, and S. Linn Basal transcriptional regulation of human damage-specific DNA-binding protein genes DDB1 and DDB2 by Sp1, E2F, N-myc and NF1 elements Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2003; 31(2): 562 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zolezzi, J. Fuss, S. Uzawa, and S. Linn Characterization of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe Strain Deleted for a Sequence Homologue of the Human Damaged DNA Binding 1 (DDB1) Gene J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 41183 - 41191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Andrejeva, E. Poole, D. F. Young, S. Goodbourn, and R. E. Randall The p127 Subunit (DDB1) of the UV-DNA Damage Repair Binding Protein Is Essential for the Targeted Degradation of STAT1 by the V Protein of the Paramyxovirus Simian Virus 5 J. Virol., October 11, 2002; 76(22): 11379 - 11386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bontron, N. Lin-Marq, and M. Strubin Hepatitis B Virus X Protein Associated with UV-DDB1 Induces Cell Death in the Nucleus and Is Functionally Antagonized by UV-DDB2 J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 2002; 277(41): 38847 - 38854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, J. C. Ruiz, and K. T. Chun CUL-4A Is Critical for Early Embryonic Development Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 4997 - 5005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bergametti, D. Sitterlin, and C. Transy Turnover of Hepatitis B Virus X Protein Is Regulated by Damaged DNA-Binding Complex J. Virol., June 5, 2002; 76(13): 6495 - 6501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rapic-Otrin, M. P. McLenigan, D. C. Bisi, M. Gonzalez, and A. S. Levine Sequential binding of UV DNA damage binding factor and degradation of the p48 subunit as early events after UV irradiation Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2002; 30(11): 2588 - 2598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Parisien, J. F. Lau, J. J. Rodriguez, C. M. Ulane, and C. M. Horvath Selective STAT Protein Degradation Induced by Paramyxoviruses Requires both STAT1 and STAT2 but Is Independent of Alpha/Beta Interferon Signal Transduction J. Virol., March 27, 2002; 76(9): 4190 - 4198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||