![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35469-35474, December 10, 1999
,
From the Neuroscience Research Institute, Departments of Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada K1H 8M5 and the ¶ Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada H3G 1Y6
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 5-HT1A receptor is implicated in depression
and anxiety. This receptor couples to Gi proteins to
inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity but can stimulate AC in tissues
(e.g. hippocampus) that express ACII. The role of ACII in
receptor-mediated stimulation of cAMP formation was examined in HEK-293
cells transfected with the 5-HT1A receptor, which mediated inhibition
of basal and Gs-induced cAMP formation in the absence of
ACII. In cells cotransfected with 5-HT1A receptor and ACII plasmids,
5-HT1A agonists induced a 1.5-fold increase in cAMP level.
Cotransfection of 5-HT1A receptor, ACII, and G The 5-HT1A receptor functions as an inhibitory somatodendritic
autoreceptor on serotonergic neurons of the raphe nuclei and as a
post-synaptic receptor in a variety of serotonergic targets (1-4). A
number of partial agonists of the 5-HT1A receptor have been shown to
synergize with serotonin reuptake blockers in treatment of depression
(1, 4-7). The antidepressant action of these compounds appears to
involve both agonist-mediated down-regulation of presynaptic 5-HT1A
receptors and activation of the post-synaptic receptors (that are
resistant to desensitization) to result in enhanced serotonergic
neurotransmission. By contrast, the anxiolytic actions of 5-HT1A
partial agonists may involve inhibition of serotonergic activity by
enhancing autoreceptor activation and reducing post-synaptic receptor
action. Homozygous null 5-HT1A receptor mutant mice display enhanced
serotonin release and anxiety-associated behaviors (8-10), consistent
with the idea that hyperactivity of the serotonin system by reduction
in 5-HT1A autoreceptor activity results in anxiety disorders.
The 5-HT1A receptor mediates inhibitory signaling by coupling to
pertussis toxin-sensitive
(PTX-sensitive)1 G proteins
(Gi and Go) to mediate a variety of
intracellular changes including inhibition of cAMP accumulation,
activation of potassium channels, and inactivation of calcium channels
(2, 3). However, in hippocampal membrane preparations, 5-HT1A receptor activation stimulates adenylyl cyclase activity (11-13), an action that can be blocked by the specific antagonist WAY100,135 (11). Activation of the Gi-coupled 5-HT1A or GABA-B receptors
potentiated the electrophysiological actions of the
Gs-coupled Recently, we have shown that modulation of G protein subunits by
expression of antisense G Materials--
All chemicals were reagent grade. PTX was from
Sigma, St. Louis. HEK-293 cells were obtained from Dr. R. Dunn,
Montreal. Rat G Cell Culture and Transfection--
HEK-293 cells were maintained
in DMEM medium (4.5 mg/l d-glucose) + 8% fetal calf serum
at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The 1.9-kilobase BamHI/XbaI fragment of the rat 5-HT1A receptor or
receptor mutants was subcloned into
BamHI/XbaI-cut pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) to
generate p3-DBX or mutants and the rat G cAMP Assay--
24 h after plating cells in 6-well dishes, the
cells were rinsed with DMEM and incubated at 37 °C in 1 ml/well
DMEM, 0.01% bovine serum albumin, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.0),
100 µM isobutylmethylxanthine for 15-20 min.
Experimental compounds were added to triplicate wells as indicated.
Media were recovered and centrifuged at 13,000 × g (30 s) to remove floating cells, and the supernatant was recovered and
stored at X-Galactosidase Staining--
Cells were fixed in 2%
formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 10 min and rinsed 2-3
times with PBS and stained overnight using the X-galactosidase solution
(5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 5 mM potassium
ferrocyanide, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml Xgal in PBS) in a humidified container at 37 °C. The proportion of stained cells
was quantitated from representative photographic frames (2 photos/well). The transfection efficiency attained was 36.5 ± 5.4% (mean ± S.E.), and the variation in transfection efficiency between different transfections was 7.5% by this method.
Western Blot Analysis--
Cells (107/10-cm plate)
were harvested and resuspended in 200 µl of RIPA-L buffer (10 mM Tris (pH 8), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1%
sodium lauryl sulfate, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 5 µg/ml leupeptin)
on ice. The cell lysate was sheared through a 25-gauge needle,
incubated on ice for 30 min, and centrifuged (10,000 × g, 10 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was recovered, stored at Ligand Binding Assay--
Membranes were prepared from
cotransfected HEK-293 cells as described (23) and stored as pellets at
Inhibitory Coupling of the 5-HT1A Receptor--
The 5-HT1A
receptor couples to inhibition of cAMP accumulation in most cell types.
Inhibition of cAMP formation by 5-HT1A receptor activation was examined
in HEK-293 cells transiently cotransfected with the
Gs-coupled dopamine-D1 receptor (20) and the 5-HT1A
receptor (Fig. 1). In three experiments,
dopamine induced a 7.6 ± 0.9-fold increase in cAMP level that was
inhibited by 49 ± 3% upon activation of 5-HT1A receptors with
DPAT. DPAT-mediated inhibition of dopamine-induced cAMP accumulation
was reversed by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist spiperone. Thus, the
5-HT1A receptor is coupled to inhibition of Gs-mediated
cAMP accumulation in HEK-293 cells.
5-HT1A Receptor Coupling to ACII--
We addressed whether the
5-HT1A receptor was coupled to enhancement of cAMP levels upon
cotransfection with an expression plasmid encoding ACII (Fig.
2). In HEK-293 cells transfected
transiently with the rat 5-HT1A receptor cDNA alone (Fig.
2A, first lane), addition of the selective 5-HT1A
agonist DPAT (1 µM) inhibited basal cAMP accumulation by
40%, as observed in other cell lines (24). By contrast, in cells
cotransfected with 5-HT1A receptor and ACII cDNAs, DPAT induced a
1.5-fold increase in cAMP accumulation (Fig. 2A,
second lane; Table I), which
was blocked by pretreatment with 50 ng/ml PTX (data not shown). DPAT
had no effect in non-transfected cells or cells transfected with ACII
alone. Thus, the 5-HT1A receptor couples to endogenous G proteins to
stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity upon cotransfection with ACII, as
observed for other Gi-coupled receptor subtypes (16,
25-27). The 5-HT1A receptor may also weakly activate
G Gi2-dependent Constitutive 5-HT1A Receptor
Activation--
Upon cotransfection of 5-HT1A receptor,
G
The G protein specificity of agonist-independent stimulation of cAMP
levels by the 5-HT1A receptor was examined further by co-transfecting
equal amounts of 5-HT1A receptor, ACII, and either G
Addition of the full agonist DPAT resulted in a small increase in cAMP
level in cells not transfected with exogenous G proteins (Control,
Table I), as observed above. DPAT induced no change or a small decrease
in cAMP levels in cells cotransfected with G Expression of 5-HT1A Receptor, ACII, and G Proteins--
The
relative inactivity of G
Although transfection efficiencies were equivalent for each G protein
tested (35%, see "Experimental Procedures"), it remained possible
that the inactivity of G Concentration-dependence for G Role of the i2 Domain in 5-HT1A Receptor Coupling to ACII--
To
identify the receptor domain implicated in constitutive activation of
ACII by the 5-HT1A receptor, we utilized a point mutant (5-HT1A-i2,
Fig. 5) in the second intracellular loop
(T149A) of the 5-HT1A receptor that couples to
G
Because the 5-HT1B receptor is structurally homologous to the 5-HT1A
receptors, we tested whether this receptor subtype mediated agonist-independent activity (Fig. 5). Upon cotransfection with ACII
and G Inhibition of Constitutive Activity of the 5-HT1A
Receptor--
The activity of a variety of ligands and protein
inhibitors to modulate 5-HT1A receptor coupling to Gi2 and
ACII was examined and compared with the action of PTX, which entirely
uncouples the receptor (Fig. 6). Because
ACII is conditionally activated by G
The activity of 5-HT1A agonists and antagonists was tested in cells
transfected with 5-HT1A receptor, Gi2, and ACII (Fig. 6).
Ligands for the 5-HT1A receptor have been previously characterized as
full or partial agonists or neutral antagonists (40-43). Several partial agonists (e.g. buspirone, BMY-7378) of the 5-HT1A
receptor possess anti-anxiety activity (5, 44-46), and 5-HT1A agonists and antagonists potentiate the anti-depressant response to serotonin reuptake blockers (1, 4, 6, 7). Full agonists (e.g., DPAT,
5-HT) and antagonists (spiperone, (+)WAY100,135, NAN-190, pindolol)
lacked or had minimal inhibitory activity compared with control. Lack
of inhibition by antagonists suggests that
Gi2-dependent constitutive activation of 5-HT1A
receptor is indeed agonist-independent and not mediated by endogenous
5-HT. Spiperone has been characterized as an inverse agonist that
induces a small (30%) decrease in 5-HT1A receptor-induced GTP
The partial agonists buspirone, BMY-7378, and especially flesinoxan,
all demonstrated inhibitory activity, which was maximal at 1 or 10 µM. By comparison, pretreatment with PTX or
cotransfection with
It has been proposed that anxiety results in part from a hyperactivity
of the serotonin system and that anxiolytic 5-HT1A partial agonists
inhibit serotonergic neurotransmission by activating the presynaptic
autoreceptor (51); hence the knockout mice that lack 5-HT1A receptors
display both serotonergic hyperactivity and anxiety-related behavior
(8-10). Our results suggest that in addition to partial activation of
the presynaptic 5-HT1A autoreceptor to inhibit raphe firing,
anti-anxiety agents may also inhibit constitutive, as well as
5-HT-induced activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. It is
tempting to speculate that 5-HT1A receptor ligands that inhibit
constitutive receptor activity may have potentially greater therapeutic
efficacy as anti-anxiety or antidepressant agents than ligands that
lack this activity. The cotransfection paradigm presented here for
detecting inhibitory activity at the 5-HT1A receptor may provide an
effective screening method for identifying anti-anxiety agents.
In summary, we have identified stimulatory coupling of the 5-HT1A
receptor to adenylyl cyclase in the presence of ACII that becomes
agonist-independent upon co-transfection with G
i2, but
not G
i1, G
i3, or G
o,
resulted in an agonist-independent 6-fold increase in the basal cAMP
level, suggesting that Gi2 preferentially coupled the
receptor to ACII. The 5-HT1B receptor also constitutively activated
ACII. Constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor was blocked by
pertussis toxin and the G
antagonist,
CT, suggesting an
important role for G
-mediated activation of ACII. The Thr-149
Ala mutation in the second intracellular domain of the 5-HT1A receptor
disrupted G
-selective activation of ACII. Spontaneous 5-HT1A
receptor activity was partially attenuated by 5-HT1A receptor partial
agonists with anxiolytic activity (e.g. buspirone and flesinoxan) but was not altered by full agonists or antagonists. Thus,
anxiolytic activity may involve inhibition of spontaneous 5-HT1A
receptor activity.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-adrenergic receptor in hippocampal CA1
neurons (14). The ACII protein has been localized to the dendrites and
cell bodies of neurons of the hippocampus (15). This subtype of
adenylyl cyclase is known to be conditionally stimulated by G
subunits derived from activation of Gi/Go
proteins (16, 17). These data suggest that the 5-HT1A receptor may
couple to, or potentiate Gs-mediated actions in the central
nervous system by activation of G
-regulated adenylyl cyclases
like ACII.
i1 subunit cDNA can switch
inhibitory coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to mediate a PTX-sensitive
stimulation of cAMP in GH4 pituitary cells, which express ACII
endogenously (18). We hypothesized that in G
i1-depleted
GH4 cells, the 5-HT1A receptor may activate ACII via release of G
subunits derived from other Gi/Go proteins.
Using a cotransfection approach, we have identified a specific
requirement for ACII in coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to enhance AC
activity. Furthermore, cotransfection of 5-HT1A receptor, ACII, and
G
i2 specifically, resulted in an agonist-independent
increase in cAMP that was not inhibited by receptor antagonists.
Interestingly, 5-HT1A partial agonists but not full agonists or
antagonists inhibited spontaneous coupling of the receptor to stimulate
cAMP accumulation. Thus, part of the anti-anxiety activity of 5-HT1A
ligands may be to silence the spontaneous activity of the 5-HT1A receptor.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
i1, G
i2,
G
i3, G
oA, and ACII cDNAs were
generously provided by Dr. Randall Reed, Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore. Human 5-HT1B receptor cDNA (19) was kindly provided by
Dr. Brian O'Dowd, University of Toronto and the human dopamine-D1
cDNA (20) was from Dr. Qun-Yong Zhou, University of California,
Davis. The pCMV-
GAL plasmid was obtained from ATCC, Bethesda, MD.
[3H]DPAT (228 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. Flesinoxan was a gift of Dr. Pierre Blier, McGill
University, Montreal, Canada; (+)WAY100,135 (the active stereoisomer)
was a generous gift from A. Fletcher, Wyeth-Ayerst; BMY-7378 was from Bristol-Myers Squibb; other 5-HT1A ligands were from Research Biochemicals Inc., Natick, MA. Rabbit anti-rat G
o and
anti-rat G
icommon polyclonal antibodies were purchased
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA);
anti-G
i2 polyclonal antibody was from Upstate Biotechnology.
i1,
G
i2, G
i3, G
oA, and ACII cDNAs were ligated into the EcoRI site of pcDNA3.
The opossum
CT construct was cloned as described previously (21,
22). For transfection, HEK-293 cells were plated at 5 × 106 cells/10-cm dish and incubated overnight. Calcium
phosphate precipitate (2 ml/dish) containing p3-ACII, 12 µg;
p3-DBX, 12 µg; pCMV-
GAL, 6 µg; or
p3-Gi/Go, 15 µg or as indicated, was overlaid
with 8 ml/dish DMEM + 8% fetal calf serum, 20 mM Hepes (pH
7.0), and incubated at 37 °C for 4-6 h in 5% CO2. The
calcium phosphate was aspirated and replaced with 8 ml/dish DMEM + 8%
fetal calf serum, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.0) for incubation
overnight at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The cells were then
plated onto 6-well plates for cAMP and
-galactosidase assays.
20 °C. Attached cells were extracted using reporter lysis buffer (Promega), centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C, and stored at
20 °C. Media were assayed for cAMP by specific RIA, as
described previously. Cell extracts were assayed for
-galactosidase
activity to monitor transfection efficiency. Statistical analyses of
the data were done using the GraphPad Prism software, and groups were compared using unpaired t test with Welsh's correction to
determine significance (p < 0.05).
-Galactosidase Assay--
The transfected cells were rinsed
with PBS, resuspended in 200 µl of reporter lysis buffer, incubated
for 15 min at room temperature, scraped, frozen, and thawed to complete
cell lysis. The lysates were centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 20 s), and
the supernatant was recovered for measurement of
-galactosidase
activity. Equal volumes (30 µl each) of cell extract and 0.3 mM 4-methylumbelliferyl-
-D-galactoside substrate in 15 mM Tris (pH 8.8) were mixed gently,
incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 30 min, and the reaction was
terminated upon addition of 50 µl of Stop solution (300 mM glycine, 15 mM EDTA (pH 11.2)). The sample
was transferred to 2 ml of Z buffer (60 mM
Na2HPO4, 40 mM
NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4), and fluorescence was measured at
EX = 350 nm,
EM = 450 nm on a
Perkin-Elmer LS-50 spectrofluorometer (Buckinghamshire, United
Kingdom). The variation of
-galactosidase activity between wells
observed within a transfection was <6%, and between transfections was
<7%.
80 °C, and assayed for protein content by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce). Lysates (20-50 µg/lane) were electrophoresed on sodium lauryl sulfate-containing polyacrylamide gels
at 100 V, 40 mA for 1 h, blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for 1 h at 250 mA. Blots were incubated overnight in 5%
casein in TBS-T (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl (pH
8.0), 0.1% Tween 20) at 4 °C. The blots were then incubated
overnight with primary antibody, followed by 30-min incubation with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at room
temperature in Tris-buffered saline-Tween, and the peroxidase product
was developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence for Western blot protocol.
80 °C. Membrane pellets were resuspended in TME (75 mM
Tris, pH 7.4, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
EDTA), aliquotted (100 µg in 50 µl) in tubes containing 200 µl of
TME and [3H]DPAT (20 nM) or
[3H]5-HT (50 nM) and incubated at room
temperature for 40 min. The binding reaction was applied to Whatman
GF/C filters under vacuum and rinsed three times with 3 ml of ice-cold
50 mM Tris (pH 7.4). The filters were placed in 3 ml of
scintillation fluid (Ultima-Gold, Packard) and counted for 2 min using
the direct-disintegrations/min program of the Tricarb TR2100 counter
(Packard). 5-HT (10 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of dopamine-stimulated cAMP
formation by 5-HT1A receptor activation in HEK-293 cells. HEK-293
cells were transfected transiently by calcium phosphate coprecipitation
with 12 µg/transfection each of the human dopamine-D1 and rat 5-HT1A
receptor expression plasmids and cAMP production was measured in
triplicate dishes (see "Experimental Procedures"). Data are
presented as mean ± S.E. The dishes were treated with DPAT (2 µM), dopamine (DA, 2 µM) or both
(DA/DPAT) in the absence or presence of the
indicated concentration of spiperone, and similar results were obtained
in three independent experiments. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist
spiperone blocked DPAT-induced inhibition of dopamine-D1 induced cAMP
formation.
s, because activation of ACII requires both G
release from Gi and minimal G
s activity
(17). However in the absence of transfected ACII, DPAT-induced
inhibition of basal cAMP is observed (Table I) indicating that the
5-HT1A receptor couples via G
i to inhibit the activity
of endogenous AC subtypes in HEK-293 cells.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Constitutive 5-HT1A receptor activity in the
presence of Gi2 and ACII. HEK-293 cells were
transfected transiently by calcium phosphate coprecipitation with 12 µg each of the indicated plasmids, and cAMP production was measured.
Transfection efficiency was monitored by cotransfection of
-galactosidase plasmid and quantitated as described (see
"Experimental Procedures"). DPAT (1 µM) was added to
5-HT1A-transfected cells acutely during the assay. Data are presented
as mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples for experiments that were
repeated at least three times (see Table I). A, 5-HT1A
receptor-mediated stimulation of ACII. Cotransfection of plasmids
encoding the 5-HT1A receptor (5-HT1A), G
i2
(
i2), or ACII led to enhancement of cAMP levels.
B, PTX induced uncoupling of the 5-HT1A receptor from
Gi2/ACII. Requirement for 5-HT1A, G
i2, and
ACII. Various plasmids, including G
i2 (
i2)
and G
oA (
o) were transfected in equal
amounts (12 µg each). PTX (50 ng/ml) was present overnight in the
indicated samples.
G protein selectivity for 5-HT1A receptor constitutive activity
-galactosidase, and either no G
protein (Control), or G
o, G
i1, G
i2, or
G
i3 as indicated. The level of basal cAMP (normalized to the
level of cAMP in G
i2-transfected cells) or DPAT (1 µM)-induced change in cAMP (expressed as percent basal)
is presented as the mean ± S.E. of the number of independent
experiments indicated in parentheses. Data were compared by unpaired
t-test with ***p < 0.001 compared to
control for basal cAMP; and *p < 0.05;
**p < 0.01 compared to untreated for DPAT-induced
cAMP.
i2, and ACII cDNAs, a pronounced
agonist-independent increase in cAMP level was observed that was not
altered by addition of the agonist, DPAT (Fig. 2A, Table I).
Although constitutive activity of the 5-HT1A receptor/G protein complex
has been indirectly suggested by the spontaneous binding of GTP
S in
membranes from cells transfected with 5-HT1A receptors (28-30), the
present results provide the first direct evidence of
agonist-independent coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor in the absence of
GTP
S. Constitutive enhancement of basal cAMP levels required
cotransfection of 5-HT1A receptor, G
i2, as well as of
ACII cDNA (Fig. 2) and was blocked by >80% following pretreatment
with 50 ng/ml PTX (Fig. 2B), further indicating the
participation of Gi/Go proteins. By contrast,
little increase in cAMP was observed upon cotransfection with
G
o.
i1,
G
i2, G
i3, or G
o cDNAs
in HEK-293 cells (Table I). Cotransfection of receptor and ACII with
G
i2, but not G
i3, G
i1, or
G
o, resulted in a 6-fold increase in basal cAMP levels
compared with cells transfected with receptor and ACII (16%
versus 100%). In multiple experiments, the rank order of G
protein preference (Gi2 > Gi3, Go,
Gi1) is similar to that identified for G protein
interaction with the bacterially expressed 5-HT1A receptor protein
(31). Thus, the extent of constitutive activation of the 5-HT1A
receptor appears to reflect the extent of coupling between receptor and G protein and is most dependent on the G protein subtype
Gi2.
i1 or
G
i2. In contrast, DPAT inhibited cAMP levels by 30% in cells transfected with G
o (Table I), suggesting that
this G protein mediates inhibitory receptor coupling in cells
transfected with ACII. A slight DPAT-induced increase in cAMP level was
observed with G
i3 but did not achieve significance.
Thus, the spontaneous activity of the 5-HT1A receptor was specific for
the presence of G
i2 and was insensitive to the full
agonist DPAT.
o (or G
i1,
G
i3) to mediate constitutive coupling of the 5-HT1A
receptor could be because of inefficient expression of the receptor,
ACII, or the G protein upon cotransfection in HEK-293 cells. The level
of 5-HT1A receptors expressed in Go- and
Gi2-transfected cells was not significantly different as
detected by specific binding of [3H]DPAT (Table
II). Because the ACII subtype is
regulated by activation of PKC, functional expression of ACII was
detected indirectly by measuring the change in cAMP level induced by
the PKC activator, TPA. In non-transfected HEK-293 cells, no response
to TPA was observed, consistent with a lack of ACII immunoreactivity
observed in these cells (15). In cells cotransfected with plasmids for 5-HT1A receptor, ACII and either G
o or
G
i2, a strong response to TPA (5- to 6-fold) was
detected that did not differ between G
o or
G
i2 (Table II). This result suggests that robust and
equivalent expression of ACII was obtained in both transfections.
Content of 5-HT1A receptor and ACII in cotransfected HEK-293 cells
-galactosidase
and either Go or Gi2 expression plasmids as indicated.
-Galactosidase activity was measured as an index of overall
transfection efficiency and was equivalent between the transfections.
For measurement of 5-HT1A receptor levels, membranes were prepared and
subjected to ligand binding with [3H]DPAT (20 nM), with 10 µM 5-HT added to determine
non-specific binding. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. of three
independent experiments. In separate transfections, the -fold induction
over basal cAMP following addition of TPA (100 nM) was
measured as an index of ACII content. In non-transfected cells, TPA did
not alter significantly the basal cAMP level (0.82 ± 0.20 -fold
basal). Data represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent
experiments.
o to mediate constitutive
activation of the 5-HT1A receptor was because of a lack of expression
of Go protein. The level of G protein expression was
assessed directly by Western blot analysis of membranes from
G
o- or G
i2-transfected cells (Fig.
3). In two independent transfections,
protein extracts from non-transfected HEK-293 cells displayed an
undetectable level of G
o immunostaining, whereas samples
from cells transfected with G
o cDNA expression
plasmid displayed robust expression of G
o that was
proportional to the amount of protein/well (Fig. 3). By contrast,
endogenous G
i proteins were detected in both non-transfected and transfected cells. In cells transfected with p3-G
i2, a 4.8 ± 0.75-fold (n = 4)
increase in Gi2 protein level relative to control was
observed. A smaller 2.0 ± 0.2-fold control increase was detected
in G
i2-transfected cells using the less selective
anti-Gi-common antibody which also detected endogenous Gi proteins in non-transfected cells. In summary, there was
an equivalent induction of G
o and G
i2
proteins upon separate cotransfection with 5-HT1A receptor and ACII
plasmids. Thus, the inactivity of G
o to mediate
constitutive coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to ACII was not because of
inefficient expression of the G
o protein, 5-HT1A
receptor, or ACII.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
G protein expression in
G
o- and
G
i2-transfected HEK-293
cells. Independent transient transfections with G
o
or G
i2 (as indicated above), 5-HT1A receptor, ACII, and
-galactosidase expression plasmids were performed in HEK-293 cells
as in Fig. 2. Controls represent samples from non-transfected cells.
Membranes were prepared and processed for Western blot analysis (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Either 20, 25, or 50 µg of protein
from nontransfected or G
-transfected cells from independent
transfections were examined. The Go blot was probed using
anti-G
o antibody (upper) or stripped and
reprobed with anti-G
i-common antibody
(lower); the Gi2 blot was probed using
anti-G
i2 (upper) or
anti-G
i-common antibody (lower).
i2 Plasmid--
The
concentration dependence of p3-G
i2 cDNA for 5-HT1A
receptor-mediated activation of ACII and inhibition of PGE1-stimulated cAMP levels was examined in parallel (Fig.
4). Upon cotransfection with 5-HT1A
receptor and ACII plasmids, the p3-G
i2 plasmid induced a
concentration-dependent enhancement of cAMP levels, with an EC50 value of 1.7 µg of G
i2 cDNA (Fig.
4A). The response appeared to saturate at a DNA
concentration that was approximately equimolar for 5-HT1A receptor, G
protein, and ACII plasmid (i.e. approximately 15 µg). For
comparison, the concentration dependence of Gi2 cDNA for 5-HT1A receptor-mediated inhibition cAMP levels was examined. PGE1
induced a 3-fold increase in cAMP above the constitutive level of cAMP
in HEK-293 cells transfected with 5-HT1A, ACII, and G
i2
(Fig. 4B). Increasing amounts of G
i2
inhibited PGE1-mediated enhancement of cAMP levels only at the highest
plasmid concentration (50 µg). Thus, the requirement for
G
i2 cDNA was ten-fold greater for
agonist-independent inhibition of PGE1-stimulated cAMP than for
activation of ACII by the 5-HT1A receptor. The concentration dependence
on G
i2 cDNA suggests that the extent of constitutive activation of the 5-HT1A receptor depends on the content of
Gi2 and on the signaling pathway (i.e.,
stimulation versus inhibition of adenylyl cyclase)
examined.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Plasmid concentration-dependence of
G
i2 for 5-HT1A receptor-mediated
stimulatory and inhibitory actions. All transfections were in
HEK-293 cells and contained equal amounts of 5-HT1A receptor and ACII
plasmids and increasing amounts of G
i2 plasmid as
indicated (p3-G
i2). The level of cAMP was assayed in the
absence (A) and presence (B) of PGE1 (1 µM). Results obtained in the presence of PGE1
(B) represent the PGE1-induced increase in cAMP normalized
to the basal cAMP level at each concentration of p3-G
i2,
i.e. -fold basal cAMP. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples.
i-mediated inhibition of cAMP, but not to various
G
-mediated pathways such as activation of PLC
2 or inactivation
of calcium channels (23). The 5-HT1A-i3 is a receptor mutant with three
point mutations that retains coupling to PLC-mediated calcium
mobilization (32). When cotransfected with G
i2 and ACII,
the 5-HT1A-i2 mutant failed to increase cAMP over the level obtained in
the presence of PTX. By contrast, the 5-HT1A-i3 mutant displayed
agonist-independent enhancement of cAMP levels similar to the wild-type
5-HT1A receptor (Fig. 5). The levels of receptor expressed were similar
for each clone although the value for the 5-HT1A-i2 clone was slightly
lower; this may reflect the lower affinity of this mutant for
[3H]DPAT (23). Thus, the second intracellular domain of
the 5-HT1A receptor appears to dictate coupling to G
subunits
resulting in activation of ACII, as well as other G
-regulated
effectors (33).

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Receptor and domain specificity of 5-HT1A
constitutive activity. Equal amounts of the indicated receptor or
5-HT1A receptor mutant were cotransfected with Gi2 and ACII
in HEK-293 cells. The 5-HT1A mutants were in the second intracellular
loop T149A (5-HT1A-i2 (23)) or in three putative PKC phosphorylation
sites in the third intracellular loop (5-HT1A-i3 (32)). In parallel
experiments (n = 3-5), the specific binding for each
receptor was (pmol/transfection): 5-HT1A, 2.07 ± 0.23; 5-HT1A-i2,
1.27 ± 0.06; 5-HT1A-i3, 1.72 ± 0.29; 5-HT1B, 2.2 ± 0.3.
i2, the 5-HT1B receptor mediated a 5-fold increase in cAMP levels that was inhibited by PTX. The smaller effect of the
5-HT1B receptor may reflect a lower constitutive activity compared with
the 5-HT1A receptor because the levels of receptor expressed were
similar. Other receptor subtypes like the dopamine-D1 (Gs
coupled) or the dopamine-D2S (Gi/Go-coupled)
did not increase cAMP in the absence of agonist (data not shown).
Previous studies have indicated that the dopamine-D2S receptor does not
couple to Gs in the presence of ACII (16), suggesting that
the activation of ACII by 5-HT1A receptors does not result from basal
activation of Gs by other receptors endogenous to HEK-293
cells. This supports the hypothesis that the 5-HT1A receptor does
couple to Gs (weakly) in the HEK-293 cells, despite the inability to
detect biochemically an interaction between the receptor and
Gs (28, 31, 34-36). Although 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors
inhibit cAMP synthesis in most tissues and cell lines, these results
indicate that, in cells where ACII is predominant, these receptors
spontaneously couple to stimulate cAMP accumulation.

subunits from
Gi/Go proteins (17), the importance of G
subunits was examined by cotransfection of an equal amount of
expression plasmid containing the carboxyl-terminal domain of GRK2
(
CT), a G
antagonist (37, 38).
CT inhibited spontaneous coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor with maximal inhibition equivalent to
that achieved with PTX. This suggests that the 5-HT1A receptor couples
spontaneously to the Gi2 heterotrimer to release G
subunits, resulting in a
CT-sensitive activation of ACII.
Transfection of G
i2 apparently augments the activity of
endogenous G
subunits to couple to ACII in the presence of the
5-HT1A receptor, presumably by increasing the level of Gi2
heterotrimer. Co-regulation of G
and G
subunit protein levels
has been observed in G
i2 nullizygous mice that are
depleted of G
i2 and specific G
subunits (39).

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of 5-HT1A constitutive activity by
uncoupling agents and partial agonists. All cells were
cotransfected with equal amounts of 5-HT1A receptor,
G
i2, and ACII plasmids and subjected to cAMP assay in
the presence of the indicated compounds except for control (no
additions), +PTX (overnight pretreatment with 50 ng/ml PTX), and
CT
(cotransfected with addition of an equal amount of
CT plasmid (21)).
The following compounds were used: (+)WAY100,135 (WAY);
Flesinoxan (Fles.); BMY-7378 (BMY); buspirone
(Busp.); spiperone (Spip.); NAN-190
(NAN); pindolol, (Pind.). The data are expressed
as percent control, with addition of 0.1% Me2SO as the
vehicle control for spiperone, NAN-190, and pindolol. The data
represent mean ± S.E. of 3-5 independent assays with statistical
significance compared with control as indicated: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
S
binding to Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes (29). The lack of
effect of spiperone or (+)WAY100,135 to inhibit spontaneous coupling of
the 5-HT1A receptor was not due to their inactivity in the HEK cells
because both spiperone (Fig. 1) and (+)WAY100,135 (data not shown)
blocked 5-HT1A-mediated inhibition of cAMP formation. Determination of
inverse agonism in membrane preparations in the presence of the high
affinity G protein ligand GTP
S may not reflect modulation of
receptor-G protein coupling to specific effectors in intact cells which
contain GTP/GDP. The lack of inverse agonist activity of spiperone in
coupling to Gi2/ACII suggests that as observed for
agonists, inverse agonists may show greater efficacy for some effectors
but not others (47-49). Depending on the effector studied, agonists of
the 5-HT1A receptor can have different efficacies of coupling. A
"tight" coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to inhibition of cAMP is
observed, and all agonists mediate some response; however, for calcium
mobilization or pH change, a "loose" coupling is apparent in which
some agonists are ineffective (40, 50). Based on our results, spiperone
induced a conformation of the 5-HT1A receptor that permits coupling to
Gi2/ACII but inhibits G
i-mediated inhibition
of Gs-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity.
CT induced a greater reduction in cAMP levels,
reflecting a more complete uncoupling of the receptor by these agents.
The partial agonism of these ligands to incompletely stimulate the inactive 5-HT1A receptor, and to inhibit partially the constitutively active receptor, suggests that the partial agonists promote an incompletely active conformation of the 5-HT1A receptor upon binding to
the receptor. Furthermore, there appears to be a correlation between
the clinical effectiveness of these compounds as anti-anxiety drugs and
their ability to reduce coupling of the 5-HT1A receptor to ACII.
i2.
Coupling to ACII required mobilization of G
subunits and was
mediated by a putative G
coupling domain in the i2 loop of the
5-HT1A receptor. Partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists that have
anti-anxiety properties inhibited spontaneous receptor coupling to
ACII, whereas full agonists or antagonists lacked this activity; thus,
inhibition of constitutive 5-HT1A receptor activity may contribute to
the therapeutic actions of these compounds.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Christine Forget for excellent technical assistance. We also thank Drs. Randall Reed, Brian K. O'Dowd, and Qun-Yong Zhou for providing plasmid constructs.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council, Canada and the National Cancer Institute, Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Novartis/MRC Michael Smith Chair in Neurosciences. To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Neuroscience Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, Canada K1H 8M5. Tel.: 613-562-5800, ext. 8307; Fax: 613-562-5403; E-mail: palbert@
uottawa.ca.
§ MRC Scholar.
Supported by the Ministry of Iran and a Schizophrenia Society
of Canada scholarship.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
PTX, pertussis
toxin;
AC, adenylyl cyclase;
G
, G protein alpha subunit;
CT, carboxyl-terminal fragment of
-adrenergic receptor kinase;
DPAT, 8-hydroxy-(2-(N,N-di-propylamino)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene;
HEK-293, human embryonic kidney cells;
PGE1, prostaglandin E1;
PKC, protein kinase C;
5-HT, serotonin;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
i2, i3, second
(third) intracellular;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
GTP
S, guanosine
5'-3-O-(thio) triphosphate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Blier, P., and de Montigny, C. (1994) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 15, 220-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Peroutka, S. J. (1993) J. Neurochem. 60, 408-416[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Hoyer, D., Clarke, D. E., Fozard, J. R., Hartig, P. R., Martin, G. R., Mylecharane, E. J., Saxena, P. R., and Humphrey, P. P. (1994) Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 157-203[Abstract] |
| 4. | Mongeau, R., Blier, P., and de Montigny, C. (1997) Brain Res. Rev. 23, 145-195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Charney, D. S., Krystal, J. H., Delgado, P. L., and Heninger, G. R. (1990) Annu. Rev. Med. 41, 437-446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Artigas, F., Romero, L., Demontigny, C., and Blier, P. (1996) Trends Neurosci. 19, 378-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Albert, P. R., Lembo, P., Storring, J. M., Charest, A., and Saucier, C. (1996) Neuropsychopharmacology 14, 19-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Parks, C. L.,
Robinson, P. S.,
Sibille, E.,
Shenk, T.,
and Toth, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10734-10739 |
| 9. |
Ramboz, S.,
Oosting, R.,
Amara, D. A.,
Kung, H. F.,
Blier, P.,
Mendelsohn, M.,
Mann, J. J.,
Brunner, D.,
and Hen, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14476-14481 |
| 10. |
Heisler, L. K.,
Chu, H. M.,
Brennan, T. J.,
Danao, J. A.,
Bajwa, P.,
Parsons, L. H.,
and Tecott, L. H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15049-15054 |
| 11. | Cadogan, A. K., Kendall, D. A., and Marsden, C. A. (1994) J. Neurochem. 62, 1816-1821[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Markstein, R., Hoyer, D., and Engel, G. (1986) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 333, 335-341[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Shenker, A., Maayani, S., Weinstein, H., and Green, J. P. (1987) Mol. Pharmacol. 31, 357-367[Abstract] |
| 14. | Andrade, R. (1993) Neuron 10, 83-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Baker, L. P.,
Nielson, M. D.,
Impey, S.,
Hacker, B. M.,
Poser, S. W.,
Chan, M. Y. M.,
and Storm, D. R.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
180-192 |
| 16. | Federman, A. D., Conklin, B. R., Schrader, K. A., Reed, R. R., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) Nature 356, 159-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Sunahara, R. K., Dessauer, C. W., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 461-480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Liu, Y. F.,
Ghahremani, M. H.,
Rasenick, M. M.,
Jakobs, K. H.,
and Albert, P. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16444-16450 |
| 19. |
Jin, H.,
Oksenberg, D.,
Ashkenazi, A.,
Peroutka, S. J.,
Duncan, A. M.,
Rozmahel, R.,
Yang, Y.,
Mengod, G.,
Palacios, J. M.,
and O'Dowd, B. F.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5735-5738 |
| 20. | Liu, Y. F., Civelli, O., Zhou, Q. Y., and Albert, P. R. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 1815-1824[Abstract] |
| 21. |
Ghahremani, M. H.,
Cheng, P.,
Lembo, P. M. C.,
and Albert, P. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9238-9245 |
| 22. |
Lembo, P. M.,
Ghahremani, M. H.,
and Albert, P. R.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
138-147 |
| 23. |
Lembo, P. M.,
Ghahremani, M. H.,
Morris, S. J.,
and Albert, P. R.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
164-171 |
| 24. |
Albert, P. R.,
Zhou, Q. Y.,
Van Tol, H. H.,
Bunzow, J. R.,
and Civelli, O.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
5825-5832 |
| 25. | Chan, J. S., Chiu, T. T., and Wong, Y. H. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 2682-2689[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Tsu, R. C., Chan, J. S., and Wong, Y. H. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 2700-2707[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Tsu, R. C., Allen, R. A., and Wong, Y. H. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 835-841[Abstract] |
| 28. |
Barr, A. J.,
Brass, L. F.,
and Manning, D. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2223-2229 |
| 29. | Newman-Tancredi, A., Conte, C., Chaput, C., Spedding, M., and Millan, M. J. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol. 120, 737-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Newman-Tancredi, A., Conte, C., Chaput, C., Verriele, L., and Millan, M. J. (1997) Neuropharmacol. 36, 451-459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Bertin, B.,
Freissmuth, M.,
Breyer, R. M.,
Schutz, W.,
Strosberg, A. D.,
and Marullo, S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8200-8206 |
| 32. | Lembo, P. M., and Albert, P. R. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 1024-1029[Abstract] |
| 33. |
Albert, P. R.,
Morris, S. J.,
Ghahremani, M. H.,
Storring, J. M.,
and Lembo, P. M.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
861,
146-161 |
| 34. |
Butkerait, P.,
Zheng, Y.,
Hallak, H.,
Graham, T. E.,
Miller, H. A.,
Burris, K. D.,
Molinoff, P. B.,
and Manning, D. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18691-18699 |
| 35. |
Mulheron, J. G.,
Casanas, S. J.,
Arthur, J. M.,
Garnovskaya, M. N.,
Gettys, T. W.,
and Raymond, J. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12954-12962 |
| 36. | Raymond, J. R., Olsen, C. L., and Gettys, T. W. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 11064-11073[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Koch, W. J.,
Hawes, B. E.,
Inglese, J.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6193-6197 |
| 38. |
Touhara, K.,
Koch, W. J.,
Hawes, B. E.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17000-17005 |
| 39. |
Rudolph, U.,
Spicher, K.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3209-3214 |
| 40. | Schoeffter, P., Bobirnac, I., Boddeke, E., and Hoyer, D. (1997) Neuropharmacol. 36, 429-437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Fletcher, A., Cliffe, I. A., and Dourish, C. T. (1993) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 41-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Hoyer, D., and Boddeke, H. W. (1993) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 270-275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Pauwels, P. J., Van Gompel, P., and Leysen, J. E. (1993) Biochem. Pharmacol. 45, 375-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Stanhope, K. J., and Dourish, C. T. (1996) Psychopharmacology 128, 293-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Taylor, D. P. (1990) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 600, 545-557[Abstract] |
| 46. | Lucki, I. (1996) J. Clin. Psychiat. 57, 5-10 |
| 47. | Leff, P., Scaramellini, C., Law, C., and McKechnie, K. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 355-362[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Kenakin, T. (1995) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 16, 232-238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Kenakin, T. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 416-417[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Dunlop, J., Zhang, Y., Smith, D. L., and Schechter, L. E. (1998) J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 40, 47-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Olivier, B., Soudijn, W., and van Wijngaarden, I. (1999) Prog. Drug Res. 52, 103-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. la Cour, S. El Mestikawy, N. Hanoun, M. Hamon, and L. Lanfumey Regional Differences in the Coupling of 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1A Receptors to G Proteins in the Rat Brain Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kushwaha, S. C. Harwood, A. M. Wilson, M. Berger, L. H. Tecott, B. L. Roth, and P. R. Albert Molecular Determinants in the Second Intracellular Loop of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1A Receptor for G-Protein Coupling Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2006; 69(5): 1518 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Albert and S. Lemonde 5-HT1A Receptors, Gene Repression, and Depression: Guilt by Association Neuroscientist, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 575 - 593. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mao, Q. Zhao, M. Daigle, M. H. Ghahremani, P. Chidiac, and P. R. Albert RGS17/RGSZ2, a Novel Regulator of Gi/o, Gz, and Gq Signaling J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26314 - 26322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Idzko, E. Panther, C. Stratz, T. Muller, H. Bayer, G. Zissel, T. Durk, S. Sorichter, F. Di Virgilio, M. Geissler, et al. The Serotoninergic Receptors of Human Dendritic Cells: Identification and Coupling to Cytokine Release J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6011 - 6019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Buhot, M. Wolff, N. Benhassine, P. Costet, R. Hen, and L. Segu Spatial Learning in the 5-HT1B Receptor Knockout Mouse: Selective Facilitation/Impairment Depending on the Cognitive Demand Learn. Mem., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 466 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |