![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35483-35491, December 10, 1999
§¶
,

From the
Department of Horticulture, Viticulture, and
Oenology, the University of Adelaide, Waite Campus PMB1,
Glen Osmond SA 5064, South Australia, Australia, the
§ Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant
Biology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, the
¶ Center for Molecular Plant Physiology (Place), The Royal
Veterinary and Agricultural University, 40 Thorvaldensvej,
DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the

Australian Wine Research Institute,
P. O. Box 197, Glen Osmond SA 5064, South Australia, Australia
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The final step in the biosynthesis of the
cyanogenic glucoside dhurrin in Sorghum bicolor is the
transformation of the labile cyanohydrin into a stable storage form by
O-glucosylation of
(S)-p-hydroxymandelonitrile at the cyanohydrin
function. The
UDP-glucose:p-hydroxymandelonitrile-O-glucosyltransferase was isolated from etiolated seedlings of S. bicolor
employing Reactive Yellow 3 chromatography with UDP-glucose elution as
the critical step. Amino acid sequencing allowed the cloning of a full-length cDNA encoding the glucosyltransferase. Among the few characterized glucosyltransferases, the deduced translation product showed highest overall identity to Zea mays
flavonoid-glucosyltransferase (Bz-Mc-2 allele). The
substrate specificity of the enzyme was established using isolated
recombinant protein. Compared with endogenous
p-hydroxymandelonitrile, mandelonitrile, benzyl alcohol, and benzoic acid were utilized at maximum rates of 78, 13, and 4%,
respectively. Surprisingly, the monoterpenoid geraniol was glucosylated at a maximum rate of 11% compared with
p-hydroxymandelonitrile. The picture that is emerging
regarding plant glucosyltransferase substrate specificity is one of
limited but extended plasticity toward metabolites of related
structure. This in turn ensures that a relatively high, but finite,
number of glucosyltransferases can give rise to the large number of
glucosides found in plants.
Cyanogenic glucosides are amino acid-derived secondary plant
metabolites (1). The ability to synthesize these glucosides is common
across many plant genera, including several plant species that are
important food crops (2). The hydrolysis of cyanogenic glucosides,
aided by the presence of The biosynthetic pathway of the cyanogenic glucoside dhurrin has been
established in etiolated seedlings of Sorghum bicolor (Fig.
1) and is catalyzed by two membrane-bound
multi-functional cytochrome P450s and an apparently soluble
glucosyltransferase (reviewed in Ref. 1). The amino acid precursor
L-tyrosine is N-hydroxylated twice by CYP79A1
(P450Tyr) forming
(Z)-p-hydroxyphenylacetaldoxime, which
subsequently is converted to
(S)-p-hydroxymandelonitrile by CYP71E1
(P450ox) (Fig. 1). The S-enantiomer of the
cyanohydrin is converted into a stable storage form, dhurrin, through
conjugation to glucose by
UDP-glucose:p-hydroxymandelonitrile-O-glucosyltransferase (12). The two first enzymes of the pathway have been isolated (13, 14),
their corresponding cDNAs isolated (15, 16), and their function
verified by heterologous expression in Escherichia coli and
isolation of the recombinant enzyme (16, 17).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glucosidases and
-hydroxynitrilases, results in the release of cyanide, which has well known toxicological properties (3). It has therefore been suggested that cyanogenic glucosides and their breakdown products may play a role in plant defense (2, 4-6), although increased levels of cyanogenic glucosides
in barley (7), flax (8), and the rubber tree (9) result in a reduced
resistance to fungal attack. Unfortunately, foods containing cyanogenic
glucosides have reduced nutritional value and may pose a health hazard
if not properly processed (2, 10). It is therefore desirable to
engineer acyanogenic varieties of cyanogenic food crops, for example
cassava (Manihot esculenta), given that traditional
breeding methods so far have not achieved this aim (11).
Conversely, it may be worthwhile to introduce the capability of
cyanogenic glucoside accumulation into particular acyanogenic crop
tissues in order to improve their pest or pathogen resistance.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Biosynthetic pathway for the cyanogenic
glucoside dhurrin in S. bicolor.
To date there are no reports of the isolation of a cyanohydrin glucosyltransferase from a cyanogenic plant (12, 18-20), and attempts to isolate cDNAs that encode for such enzymes have not been completed (21). Given the lability of p-hydroxymandelonitrile, the massive accumulation of dhurrin (22), and the absence of multiple p-hydroxymandelonitrile-O-glucosyltransferase activities in S. bicolor (12), it is most likely that a specific glucosyltransferase is responsible for the synthesis of the cyanogenic glucoside dhurrin, similar to that proposed for anthocyanin accumulation (23, 34). Isolation of the cDNA encoding that specific glucosyltransferase would therefore improve the possibility to introduce the synthesis of cyanogenic glucosides into acyanogenic plants and hence to evaluate the biological role of that metabolic process. The availability of cDNAs and antibodies toward all three enzymes will enable in depth studies of (a) the biology of cyanogenic glucoside metabolism in planta, (b) the ecological role of cyanogenic glucosides, and (c) the possible association between cytochrome P450s and glucosyltransferases involved in secondary plant metabolism (24, 25).
A large number of potential aglycone substrates can be present in any given plant, for example berries of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) contain over 200 different forms of glycosides (26, 27). Novel xenobiotic substances are also glucosylated by many plant species (28). Plants therefore have a large capability to glucosylate a wide range of different chemical structures. However, the number of glucosyltransferases present in plants and the range of substrate specificities exhibited by these are largely unknown. Whereas numerous glucosyltransferases have been partially purified, few have been characterized in an isolated state. Such earlier studies have indicated that both narrow and broad substrate specificities can be found (20, 29-33), although the difficulty associated with the separation of glucosyltransferases with similar chromatographic properties has confused the picture (34). The multiplicity of glucosyltransferases can be assessed from the Arabidopsis thaliana genomic sequencing project. Eighteen putative secondary plant metabolism glucosyltransferase-encoding genes have been identified in the 28% of the genome sequenced to date,1 implicating that around 65 genes may be present in the complete genome assuming an equal distribution. Altogether, over 100 different, putative, secondary plant metabolism glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNAs are available in international data banks. Only in few cases has the protein encoded by these gene sequences been verified (35-39), and only in two instances have authors (34, 40) attempted to investigate the complete specificity of the recombinant protein. In order to gain further insight into the biology of secondary plant metabolism glucosyltransferases, it is therefore necessary to verify functionally the identity of the proteins encoded by these cDNAs by (a) heterologous expression and (b) conducting assays with aglycones of diverse chemical structures.
In the present study we report the isolation, cloning, functional
heterologous expression, and characterization of the substrate specificity of a p-hydroxymandelonitrile-glucosyltransferase
from S. bicolor. The isolation of this protein and the
corresponding cDNA completes the biosynthetic pathway of cyanogenic
glucoside biosynthesis.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biochemicals and Reagents-- All biochemicals were of analytical or higher grade. Substrates and authentic glucosides were obtained from Sigma and Extrasynthèse (Genay, France). Dye reagents were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and Sigma.
Plant Materials-- S. bicolor seeds were obtained from Pacific Seeds, Australia (cultivar MR31).
General Methods-- Protein preparations were concentrated using a Speed Vac Concentrator (Savant) prior to electrophoresis. SDS-PAGE2 was performed using high-Tris linear 8-25% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels (Mini-Protean II, Bio-Rad) (41), and polypeptides were visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (R-250). DNA sequencing reactions were carried out using the Thermo Sequenase fluorescent-labeled primer cycle sequencing kit (7-deaza dGTP) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and analyzed using an ALFexpress DNA Sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Sequence computer analysis was performed using programs in the Genetic Computer Group (Madison, WI) sequence analysis package and NCBI BLAST (42).
Enzyme Assays--
General reaction mixtures (total volume 20 µl) included 100 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.9), 1-5
µM [14C]UDP-glucose (11.0 GBq·mmol
1, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 0-200
µM UDP-glucose, 20 mM aglycone dissolved in
water, 25 mM
-gluconolactone (
-glucosidase
inhibitor), and 0.5-10 µl of protein preparation. At the end of the
incubation period (10 min, 30 °C), 2 µl of 10% acetic acid were
added to terminate the reaction. BSA (1 mg/ml) was included in assays
for the assessment of sbHMNGT yield throughout the purification
procedure. Qualitative analyses of recombinant sbHMNGT were performed
as outlined above except for incubation period (20 min) and
concentrations of reagents as follows: 1.25 mM aglycone
(dissolved in ethanol except for flavonoids that were dissolved in
ethylene glycol monoether), 1.25 µM
[14C]UDP-glucose, 12.5 µM
UDP-glucose, 100 ng of recombinant sbHMNGT, 4 µg of BSA. Quantitative
analyses were performed as outlined for qualitative analysis except for
incubation period (4 min) and concentrations of reagents as follows: 1, 5, or 10 mM aglycone, 5 µM
[14C]UDP-glucose, 0.2 mM UDP-glucose, 200 ng
of recombinant sbHMNGT, 24 µg of BSA. Reaction mixtures for
analysis by NMR spectroscopy (total volume 0.5-1 ml) included 2 mM p-hydroxymandelonitrile or 6.5 mM
geraniol, 3 mM UDP-glucose, 2.5 µg recombinant sbHMNGT, 0.5 mg of BSA. After incubation (2 h), glucosides were extracted with
ethyl acetate and lyophilized in speedy-vac prior to NMR analysis. For
TLC, the reaction mixture was applied to Silica Gel 60 F254 plates
(Merck), dried, and developed in a solvent containing ethyl
acetate:acetone:dichloromethane:methanol:H2O (40:30:12:10:8, v/v) for 1 h. Plates were dried (1 h, room
temperature) and exposed to storage phosphorimaging screens (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) prior to scanning on a Storm 860 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). For LSC, reaction mixtures were
extracted with 400 µl of ethyl acetate to separate glucosides from
unincorporated [14C]UDP-glucose. Two ml of Ecoscint A
(National Diagnostics, NJ) were added to 250 µl of each ethyl acetate
extract and analyzed using a liquid scintillation counter.
Mandelonitrile was used as substrate to assay fractions generated by
liquid chromatography.
Purification--
All procedures were carried out at 4 °C
except where indicated. S. bicolor seeds (1 kg) were imbibed
in water overnight at room temperature and grown at 30 °C in
darkness for 2 days (22). Seedling shoots were harvested and extracted
in 2 volumes of ice-cold extraction buffer (250 mM sucrose;
100 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5); 50 mM NaCl; 2 mM EDTA; 5% (w/v) of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone; 200 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; 6 mM DTT)
using mortar and pestle. The extract was filtered through a nylon mesh
prior to centrifugation (20,000 × g, 20 min). The
supernatant fraction was subjected to differential ammonium sulfate
fractionation (35-70%). The pellet was resuspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5); 5 mM DTT) and desalted
using a Sephadex G-25 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or Bio-Gel P-6
(Bio-Rad) column (2.5 × 20 cm, flow rate: 20 ml/min) equilibrated
in buffer A. The first UV-absorbing peak was collected and applied to a
Q-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column (2.6 × 23 cm,
flow rate: 60-80 ml/h) equilibrated in buffer B (buffer A + 50 mM NaCl). The column was washed with buffer B until the
base line had stabilized, and proteins were eluted with a linear
gradient from 50 to 400 mM NaCl in buffer A (800 ml total). Fractions (10 ml) were collected and 3-5 µl assayed for
mandelonitrile and/or p-hydroxymandelonitrile
glucosyltransferase activity by LSC. To reduce the salt concentration,
combined active fractions (50 mg of protein, 20 ml) were diluted 5-fold
in buffer B and concentrated 20-fold using an Amicon YM30 or YM10
membrane prior to storage at
80 °C.
The remainder of the purification was carried out at room temperature.
One-quarter of the concentrated material from the Q-Sepharose step
(~10-15 mg protein, 5 ml) was applied to a column (1 × 10 cm,
flow rate: 10-15 ml/hr) containing Reactive Yellow 3 cross-linked onto
4% beaded agarose (Lot 63H9502) (Sigma) equilibrated in buffer B. The
column was washed with buffer B until the base line had stabilized.
Proteins were eluted with 10 ml of 2 mM UDP-glucose in
buffer B. Active fractions containing essentially pure sbHMNGT were
combined and stored at
80 °C with or without addition of 1 mg/ml
BSA.
Peptide Generation and Sequencing-- sbHMNGT (~5 µg) was subjected to N-terminal sequencing using an automated protein sequencer. For peptide digestion, sbHMNGT (~100 µg) was precipitated by addition of trichloroacetic acid (10% w/v final concentration), resuspended in 50 µl of 50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM DTT, and 6.4 M urea, incubated (60 °C, 50 min), cooled to room temperature, and diluted with 3 volumes of 30 mM Tris (pH 7.7) and 1.25 mM EDTA. Endoproteinase Lys-C (Promega, Madison, WI) was added (proteinase:substrate ratio 1:25 (w/w)) and the reaction allowed to proceed for 24 h at 37 °C. Peptides were purified with Beckman System Gold high performance liquid chromatography equipment fitted with a Vydac 208TP52 C8 column (2.1 × 250 mm, flow rate: 0.2 ml/min). Peptides were applied in buffer C (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) and eluted with a linear gradient from 0 to 80% acetonitrile in buffer C. Peptides were collected manually and sequenced as described above.
PCR Amplification, Cloning, and Library Screening-- First round PCR amplification reactions (total volume: 40 µl) were carried out using 2 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 4 µl of 10× Taq DNA polymerase buffer, 5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide, 1 µl of dNTPs (10 mM), 80 pmol each of primers C2EF (5'-TTYGTIWSICAYTGYGGITGGAA-3') and T7 (5'-AATACGACTCACTATAG-3'), and ~10 ng of plasmid DNA template. The plasmid DNA template was prepared from a unidirectional pcDNAII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) plasmid library made from 1 to 2 cm high etiolated S. bicolor seedlings (16). Thermal cycling parameters were 95 °C, 5 min, 3 times (95 °C for 5 s, 42 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s), 32 times (95 °C for 5 s, 50 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s), and a final 72 °C for 5 min. Second round PCR amplifications were carried out as above, except using primers C2DF (5'-GARGCIACIGCIGCIGGICARCC-3') and T7, and 1 µl of first round reaction as DNA template. Thermal cycling parameters were 95 °C, 5 min, 32 times (95 °C for 5 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s) and a final 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR reaction mixtures were subjected to gel electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel, and an ~600-bp band was excised and cleaned using a Qiaex II gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The cleaned PCR product was then ligated into the pGEM-T vector and used to transform the E. coli JM109 strain according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). The nucleic acid sequence of PCR clone 1544 encoded peptide sequences obtained in the purified sbHMNGT.
The PCR clone 1544 was employed as template to generate a 306-bp digoxigenin-11-dUTP-labeled probe by PCR using primers 441F (5'-GAGGCGACGGCGGCGGGGCAG-3') and 442R (5'-CATGTCACTGCTTGCCCCCGACCA-3') according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The labeled probe was cleaned using the Qiaex II gel extraction kit after 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and employed to screen approximately 50,000 colonies of the above mentioned plasmid library. Hybridizations were carried out overnight at 65 °C in 5× SSC, 0.1% (w/v) N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.02% (w/v) SDS, and 1% blocking reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Membranes were washed (3 times for 15 min) in 0.5× SSC at 60 °C. Seven hybridizing clones were isolated and one full-length clone, sbHMNGT, was chosen for further characterization.
Heterologous Expression--
Primers EXF1
(5'-AATAAAAGCATATGGGAAGCAACGCGCCGCC TCCG-3') and EXR1
(5'-TTGGATCCTCACTGCTTGCCCCCGACCA-3') were employed to amplify a
1500-bp full-length sbHMNGT insert by PCR, using sbHMNGT
plasmid as template. The primers contained 5' recognition sites for
restriction endonucleases NdeI (EXF1) and BamHI
(EXR1). PCR reaction conditions were essentially as above, except for
thermal cycling parameters: 95 °C, 3 min, 30 times (95 °C for
5 s, 53 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s) and a final
72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was gel-purified, digested with
NdeI and BamHI, gel-purified once again, and
ligated into the plasmid expression vector pSP19 g10L (kindly supplied by Dr. Henry Barnes) (17) which also had been digested with the same
restriction enzymes and gel-purified. The ligation reaction mixture was
then used to transform E. coli JM109 cells according to
manufacturer's instructions (Promega). After selection of successfully cloned cells, expression was initiated as per Ref. 34. Briefly, 600 µl of an overnight 37 °C culture was added to 300 ml of Luria broth (LB) containing ampicillin (100 µg/ml). The culture was allowed
to grow at 28 °C (150 rpm) for 5 h, and
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was then added to
a final concentration of 0.4 mM. After induction, the
culture was allowed to continue growing overnight and harvested by
centrifugation (2500 × g, 10 min). The pellet was
resuspended in 9 ml of 200 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, and 0.1 mg/ml lysozyme. An
equal volume of ice-cold water was added, and the mixture was allowed
to incubate (10 min at room temperature, 20 min on ice). After the
addition of 18 µmol of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 100 units of
DNase I/ml (Sigma), the suspension was subjected to three freeze and
thaw cycles at
20 °C. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was adjusted
to 1.5 mM final concentration, and the preparation was
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min. Negative
controls, containing no insert in the plasmid vector, were prepared as above.
The recombinant protein was isolated as the native protein using two
300-ml cultures lysed as above as starting material. The yield of
recombinant protein varied between 0.1 and 1 mg/100 ml LB culture.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yield and Stability of sbHMNGT--
In preparation for
sbHMNGT purification, sorghum seeds were germinated in
darkness for 1.5-5 days, and extracts made from seedlings were tested
for sbHMNGT activity. Under the conditions of growth, a 2-day
germination period proved optimal with regard to total sbHMNGT
activity, protein concentration, and extract volume (data not shown).
The use of a Waring blender resulted in less than 50% of the activity
as compared with extraction with mortar and pestle. sbHMNGT activity
was largely unaffected by both freezing at
80 °C and the addition
of glycerol. The addition of relatively high concentrations of DTT were
required to retain activity. Thus, lowering the concentration of DTT
from 5 to 2 mM resulted in a 10-fold decrease in activity
after storage at 4 °C for 2 days. This pronounced effect of DTT was
primarily found in crude preparations, whereas partially purified
ion-exchange preparations were less responsive to the concentration of
reducing agents in contrast to previous results (12).
Isolation of sbHMNGT--
Mandelonitrile was employed as a
substrate for the assay of sbHMNGT activity throughout purification,
although the endogenous substrate of sbHMNGT is
p-hydroxymandelonitrile. Previously, mandelonitrile had been
shown to be an equally good substrate (12). Furthermore, the absence of
a hydroxyl group at the para-position of the benzene ring
ruled out the possibility of p-glucosyloxymandelonitrile synthesis, which would be indistinguishable from dhurrin when the
convenient assay based on LSC was employed. Etiolated seedlings of
S. bicolor were extracted with mortar and pestle, and the
protein preparation was subjected to ammonium sulfate fractionation and desalted by gel chromatography. Whereas there was no measurable increase in the specific activity of sbHMNGT, low molecular weight solutes (including cyanide and cyanide precursors) were effectively removed. All sbHMNGT activity bound to Q-Sepharose and was eluted between 150 and 200 mM NaCl with an ~7-fold purification.
Aliquots of combined fractions were stored at
80 °C after
desalting and concentrating.
Several pseudoaffinity reagents were subsequently tried in mini-column
format, including Cibacron Blue 3G, Reactive Green 19, Reactive Yellow
3, and UDP-glucoronic acid cross-linked with 4% beaded agarose. Trials
with elution using NaCl and UDP-glucose at varying salt concentrations
identified Reactive Yellow 3 as the superior column material. sbHMNGT
activity bound to Reactive Yellow 3 at 50 mM NaCl and could
be eluted after washing with a slight increase in NaCl concentration,
without any measurable UV absorbance in the eluate. sbHMNGT activity
correlated with a polypeptide migrating around 50-55 kDa by SDS-PAGE,
but additional polypeptides were also present (data not shown). Elution
with 2 mM UDP-glucose instead of NaCl resulted in the
elution of a similarly migrating polypeptide in apparent homogeneity
(Fig. 2A). Assuming that all
of the polypeptide that was visualized by SDS-PAGE was active (and
therefore that all inactive protein had been lost), sbHMNGT represented
approximately 0.25% of the total protein in the ammonium sulfate
extract and was purified 420-fold with a maximum yield of 22% (Fig.
2A).
|
N-terminal sequencing of approximately 100 pmol of isolated sbHMNGT
yielded phenylthiohydantoin-derivatives at a level 10 times lower than
expected (sequence 1, Fig.
3A). The low response suggested either partial blockage of the N terminus or the presence of
a co-migrating and fully blocked contaminant. The latter possibility was ruled out because protein digestion by endoproteinase Lys C yielded
peptides (sequences 2-5, Fig. 3A) with sequences
all contained in a single cDNA (see below). Only sequence
4 exhibited high similarity to other known and putative
glucosyltransferases (Fig. 3A).
|
Cloning of Full-length sbHMNGT-- Degenerate oligonucleotides derived from peptide sequence 4 and a plasmid T7 primer were employed in nested PCR reactions using a unidirectional S. bicolor seedling plasmid library as template. An ~600-bp PCR fragment representing the C-terminal portion of sbHMNGT was isolated and shown to encode peptide sequences 4 and 5.
The partial PCR fragment was then employed to screen the library. Approximately 50,000 clones were screened, resulting in seven positive isolates, of which 4 were full-length. Preliminary sequencing indicated that they all represented an identical gene. One clone, sbHMNGT, was chosen for further study. The nucleic acid sequence of the sbHMNGT-encoding cDNA has been deposited in GenBankTM with the accession number XYYYYY.
The deduced translation product comprises 492 amino acid residues and has a predicted molecular mass of 52.9 kDa (Fig. 3A) and a theoretical pI of 5.3. Searching the PROSITE sequence motif data base revealed no extended stretches of identical sequence, except for a UDP-glucosyltransferase signature sequence between residues 368 and 411. Known and putative plant secondary metabolism glucosyltransferases in general exhibit a very low degree of overall similarity, with the exception of the C-terminal part which contains a postulated UDP-glucose binding motif (Fig. 3B). Based on this observation the C-terminal region is thought to encode the UDP-glucose binding domain (21, 44, 45, 57), whereas the N-terminal end of the protein may be responsible for binding the divergent and structurally dissimilar substrate aglycones. A comparison between sbHMNGT and a range of known and putative plant glucosyltransferases (listed in Fig. 3B) revealed that sbHMNGT shares highest overall identity (41.6%) and similarity (51.5%) with a partial putative glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNA from Pisum sativum (Table I). Among the few well characterized glucosyltransferases, sbHMNGT shared highest overall identity (36.7%) and similarity (41.5%) with Zea mays flavonoid-glucosyltransferase.
|
Functional Expression in E. coli and Characterization of Substrate Specificity-- Active soluble recombinant sbHMNGT was synthesised in E. coli as described under "Experimental Procedures." The enzyme was isolated using the same procedure for the native protein (Fig. 2B), implicating that the recombinant and native protein shared those physical features that were necessary for this highly selective purification system.
The qualitative substrate specificity of recombinant sbHMNGT was
compared with the complement of glucosyltransferase activities present
in crude desalted extracts of etiolated S. bicolor seedlings (Table II). Fifteen of the 22 substrates
tested were glucosylated by the crude extract, whereas only 6 of these
substrates were accepted by the recombinant enzyme.
Hydroquinone(1,4-benzenediol) and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde were
not glucosylated by sbHMNGT although both compounds reported to serve
as substrates when non-homogenous preparations were used (12). In
addition to mandelonitrile and p-hydroxymandelonitrile,
benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid, and the monoterpenoid geraniol were also
utilized as acceptor substrates by sbHMNGT. NMR spectroscopy
confirmed the sbHMNGT-mediated in vitro synthesis
of geraniol glucoside and dhurrin
(p-hydroxy-(S)-mandelonitrile-
-D-glucopyranoside) (data not shown). The multiple substrate specificity of sbHMNGT prompted analyses of the relative efficiency of utilization between the
differing aglycones. It is not possible to determine accurately the
comparative Km values for the different substrates of sbHMNGT since p-hydroxymandelonitrile rapidly dissociates
in aqueous solutions to p-hydroxybenzaldehyde and cyanide,
forming an equilibrium that is dependent on the initial concentration of the substrate (12). Furthermore, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde
and possibly p-hydroxymandelonitrile, dhurrin,
mandelonitrile, sambunigrin, and benzaldehyde are potent
concentration-dependent inhibitors of isolated sbHMNGT,
although this effect was negated by the inclusion of BSA (1 mg/ml) in
the reaction mixture (data not shown). Accordingly, addition of BSA to
the reaction mixtures rendered it possible to estimate
Vmax values for these different substrates. Such
quantitative measurements demonstrate a greater preference for
p-hydroxymandelonitrile, the endogenous substrate, compared
with mandelonitrile. This is in contrast to previous results obtained
using nonhomogeneous preparations (12) (Table II). The other three
non-cyanogenic substrates were only utilized at less than a fifth of
the maximal rate observed with the cyanohydrins. However, the
acceptance of benzyl alcohol and benzoic acid as substrates indicates
that sbHMNGT is only partially specific for the nitrile group and that
the stereochemistry and/or interactive chemistry of the additional groups present on the hydroxyl-bearing carbon also influence sbHMNGT acceptance. Acetone cyanohydrin, the non-aromatic precursor of the
cyanogenic glucoside linamarin present in cassava (M. esculenta), was not glucosylated by sbHMNGT. This suggested that
sbHMNGT is exclusively specific for the presence of a benzyl group. The
acceptance of geraniol at rates comparable to benzyl alcohol was
therefore surprising (Table II). Control reactions with crude extracts
of E. coli transformed with the expression vector (pSP19
g10L) carrying no insert showed no evidence of geraniol conjugation
(data not shown).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thousands of glycosylated secondary plant metabolites exist and yet only recently have a handful of enzymes responsible for glycosidic transfer been purified and characterized in some detail. Glycosylation is the terminal step in the biosynthesis of cyanogenic glucosides, an important class of metabolites present in several major food crops (2). Significant progress has been made toward understanding the enzymology and molecular biology of the synthesis of dhurrin, the cyanogenic glucoside present in S. bicolor. Although two cytochrome P450 enzymes responsible for the conversion of tyrosine into p-hydroxymandelonitrile have been isolated and their cDNAs cloned, the enzyme crucial to the stable accumulation of dhurrin, namely sbHMNGT, has like many other glucosyltransferases proven very difficult to identify at the molecular level (12, 18-21). The difficulty associated with the isolation of plant secondary metabolite glucosyltransferases in general has been attributed to the apparent lability (46) and low concentration of these proteins (47). S. bicolor was therefore chosen as a model plant since young etiolated seedlings are capable of de novo synthesis of dhurrin up to a level corresponding to 30% of the dry weight matter (22). Furthermore, the two enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway that precede sbHMNGT, CYP79A1 (13) and CYP71E1 (14) (Fig. 1), had earlier been isolated from the same source. The critical step in sbHMNGT isolation was Reactive Yellow 3 dye chromatography in association with UDP-glucose elution, which resulted in more than a 100-fold purification in a single step. Recently, Reactive Yellow 3 with UDP-glucose elution was also employed in the purification of UDP-glucose:betanidin-6-O-glucosyltransferase with similar results as in the present study (48). The use of pseudo-affinity dye chromatography together with substrate-specific elution is now emerging as a highly selective key step in plant glucosyltransferase purification (47-51). This significantly shortens the purification procedure and minimizes the time-dependent loss of activity seen in earlier glucosyltransferase purification protocols (29, 46, 52-56). The importance of optimized buffer conditions was highlighted by the strong effect of DTT concentration on sbHMNGT stability in crude extracts. The differential effect of DTT on the maintenance of a reduced environment at different stages throughout purification may be explained by a higher concentration of low molecular weight radicals and oxidative enzymes in the crude plant extracts. The mechanism by which sbHMNGT activity is affected remains unknown; however, it is interesting to note that the addition of DTT to purified Z. mays indole/acetic acid-glucosyltransferase inhibited the formation of inactive multimers (49). The strong inhibitory effect of p-hydroxybenzaldehyde on sbHMNGT activity was surprising, given that it is a degradation product of the acceptor substrate, p-hydroxymandelonitrile. The addition of BSA to purified sbHMNGT significantly enhanced the apparent activity. Whether this effect is non-selectively chemical or due to allosteric regulation is not known. p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde would only be present in high concentration at the site of synthesis, if p-hydroxymandelonitrile was released into the cytosol prior to conjugation by sbHMNGT. The consequence of such an in vitro effect is further argument for an intimate association between sbHMNGT and CYP71E1 (24), which would minimize any formation of tyrosine-derived p-hydroxybenzaldehyde. However, this effect may not be relevant in vivo since (a) local concentrations of p-hydroxymandelonitrile may be much less than in vitro (1-5 mM), and (b) the presence of other proteins may diminish the inhibition in a similar manner to BSA.
The sequences of glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNAs exhibit only
moderate positional identities, and these are largely confined to
discrete blocks specifying the C-terminal regions of the encoded enzymes. This block of relatively well conserved sequence in
glucosyltransferases most likely represents a common UDP-glucose
binding domain (21, 39, 57). At present it is not possible to predict
glucosyltransferase acceptor substrate specificity from amino acid
sequence, as no determinant residues or regions of residues have been
established. A larger set of functionally verified
glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNAs are required to further our
understanding on this matter, which may not be confirmed until the
three-dimensional structure of a secondary plant metabolism
glucosyltransferase has been presented. sbHMNGT shares highest degree
of overall identity with a putative glucosyltransferase deduced from an
unknown clone from P. sativum, a Z. mays
flavonoid-glucosyltransferase (43), and a Z. mays indole/acetic acid-glucosyltransferase (39) (Table I). This illustrates
that the large number of putative glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNAs tabulated in the nucleic acid data banks, which have been labeled as flavonoid or indole/acetic acid-glucosyltransferase homologues, may be expected to glucosylate a range of other substrates in vivo and thus to be functionally mislabeled at present.
The strong sequence and structural similarity exhibited between the glucosinolate-degrading myrosinases and a cyanogenic
-glucosidase from Trifolium repens (58), and the presence of CYP79
homologues in glucosinolate-producing plants (59), suggest that there
is a strong evolutionary link between cyanogenic glucosides and
glucosinolates. It was therefore surprising to find that the deduced
sequence of a thiohydroximate-glucosyltransferase from Brassica
napus showed only moderate overall identity to sbHMNGT. Similarly,
none of the putative glucosyltransferase-encoding cDNAs isolated
from cassava (M. esculenta) (21) shared any strong identity
with sbHMNGT. However, sbHMNGT exhibited no activity toward acetone cyanohydrin, the main cyanohydrin aglycone present in cassava. Given
that the monocotyledonous maize flavonoid-glucosyltransferase and
sbHMNGT both utilize aglycones with benzyl groups, this may simply
indicate a stronger co-evolution between sbHMNGT and flavonoid glucosyltransferases than between cyanohydrin-glucosyltransferases of
different species. Alternatively, none of the clones isolated by Hughes
et al. (21) encode for an acetone
cyanohydrin:glucosyltransferase.
Investigations into the quantitative and qualitative substrate specificity of recombinant sbHMNGT showed a strong preference for the cyanohydrin present in S. bicolor. Similarly, when recombinant V. vinifera anthocyanidin-glucosyltransferase was assayed against a wide range of different aglycones, it was found to be strictly specific for flavonols and anthocyanidins only, with a strong preference for the latter (34). Both sbHMNGT and V. vinifera anthocyanidin-glucosyltransferase are involved in the final stages of predominant secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. Their presence is necessary for the highly tissue- and development-specific accumulation of their respective glucosides (12, 22-23). A possible scenario then is that the sole in vivo function of these enzymes is related to the glucosylation of unique and single secondary metabolites. It is, nevertheless, likely that enzymes present at the end of biosynthetic pathways have a broader substrate specificity than those preceding upstream, if there is to be any flexibility with respect to the evolution of novel secondary metabolite biosynthesis and xenobiotic catabolism. This is illustrated by the finding that CYP71E1 and sbHMNGT also accept phenylalanine-derived oximes and cyanohydrins (mandelonitrile), respectively, whereas the first enzyme of the pathway, CYP79A1, is exclusive for tyrosine (Fig. 1) (60).
The stereochemistry of the cyanohydrin function is very important for substrate recognition. In sorghum the enzyme is stereospecific for the S-enantiomer of p-hydroxymandelonitrile (12). The wrong stereochemistry at the chiral carbon atom carrying the cyanohydrin function prevents acceptance of the nitrile group in the active site. On the other hand, the presence of a nitrile group is not necessarily required for substrate recognition by sbHMNGT, as demonstrated by the glucosylation of benzyl alcohol and benzoic acid, although at significantly lower rates compared with mandelonitrile. The above results indicate that sbHMNGT has high specificity for substrates that are closely similar to mandelonitrile, given that aglycones with only slight differences in chemical structure, such as hydroquinone, gentisic acid, and acetone cyanohydrin, do not serve as acceptor substrates. It was, therefore, surprising to find that sbHMNGT also conjugated the monoterpenoid geraniol, with equal efficiency compared with benzyl alcohol. To date there are no reports of the isolation of a monoterpenoid glucosyltransferase, despite the obvious importance of this enzyme class in relation to the aroma of processed fruits and vegetables (61). Initial tertiary structural modeling indicates that this unexpected and broadened specificity may be explained by the similarity of geraniol to benzyl alcohol in particular configurations.
The extensive characterization of sbHMNGT, V. vinifera
anthocyanidin-glucosyltransferase (34), and a tobacco
phenylpropanoid-glucosyltransferase (40), now allows us to address the
question of whether glucosylation of the multitude of secondary plant
metabolites results from the action of a relatively small number of
highly promiscuous enzymes with broad substrate specificity or, at the
other extreme, a large number of glucosyltransferases with a tight
substrate specificity. The picture that is emerging, at least in
vitro, is an intermediate situation. The in-depth characterization
of the three glucosyltransferases reveals that a finite number of
glucosyltransferases with some, but not very extended, plasticity
toward structurally similar secondary metabolites exist. The effective
substrate specificity can be further tightened in vivo,
through the generation of only a specific set of aglycones. For
example, if p-hydroxymandelonitrile and not geraniol is
formed in etiolated seedlings of S. bicolor, then sbHMNGT
exhibits tight specificity for the former metabolite. Alternatively, if
a multitude of secondary metabolites, all of which can act as
substrates for a particular glucosyltransferase, are present
simultaneously, then it is possible that glucosyltransferase promiscuity is exhibited in vivo. The consequences of
modulating glucosyltransferase activity, in planta, then
becomes an intriguing one, and it remains to be seen whether the
metabolism of a single class of metabolites can be influenced in
vivo through the modulation of a specific glucosyltransferase
expression. The tools and experimental systems available in the area of
cyanogenic glucoside metabolism now allows us to address this important
question. Hence, the availability of cDNAs encoding for all three
enzymes of the cyanogenic glucoside biosynthetic pathway will now
enable the preparation of transgenic plants, of acyanogenic cultivars,
in which the capability to synthesize dhurrin has been introduced.
This, together with antibodies directed toward these enzymes, will now
permit in-depth studies of the biological role of this important class
of secondary plant metabolites to take place.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank David Tattersall, Dean Naylor, Anna Stines, Chris Ford, John Strickart Nielsen, Mette Dahl Andersen, Ute Wittstock, Rachel Alice Kahn, Barbara Halkier, and Anna Haldrup for invaluable discussions; Neil Shirley and Jelle Lanstein for amino acid sequence analysis; Carl Erik Olsen for mass spectrometric analysis; and Søren Bak for providing plasmid libraries.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF199453.
Recipient of an Australian Postgraduate award.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 45-35283352; Fax: 45-35283333; E-mail: blm@kvl.dk.
1 Annotated sequences deposited in GenBankTM December 15, 1998.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DTT, dithiothreitol; LSC, liquid scintillation counting; sbHMNGT, p-hydroxymandelonitrile-O-glucosyltransferase; sbHMNGT, cDNA encoding sbHMNGT; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Møller, B. L., and Seigler, D. S. (1998) in Plant Amino Acids: Biochemistry and Bio/Technology (Bijay, K. , and Singh, eds) , pp. 563-609, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York |
| 2. | Jones, D. A. (1998) Phytochemistry 47, 155-162[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Solomonson, L. P. (1981) in Cyanide in Biology (Vennesland, B. , Conn, E. E. , Knowles, C. J. , Westley, J. , and Wissing, F., eds) , pp. 11-28, Academic Press, NY |
| 4. | Nahrstedt, A. (1985) Plant Syst. Evol. 150, 35-47[CrossRef] |
| 5. | Hruska, A. J. (1988) J. Chem. Ecol. 14, 2213-2217[CrossRef] |
| 6. |
Patton, C. A.,
Ranney, T. G.,
Burton, J. D.,
and Walgenbach, J. F.
(1997)
J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.
122,
668-672 |
| 7. | Pourmohseni, H., and Ibentahl, W.-D. (1991) Angew Bot. 65, 341-350 |
| 8. | Lüdtke, M., and Hahn, H. (1953) Biochem. Z. 324, 433-442[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Lieberei, R., Biehl, B., Giesemann, A., and Junqueira, N. T. V. (1988) Plant Physiol. (Bethesda) 90, 33-36 |
| 10. | Rosling, H. (1988) Toxicity and Food Security: A Review of Health Effects of Cyanide Exposure from Cassava and of Ways to Prevent These Effects , pp. 1-40, UNICEF, United Nations |
| 11. | Dixon, A. G. O., Asiedu, R., and Bokanga, M. (1994) Acta Hortic. 375, 153-161 |
| 12. |
Reay, P. F.,
and Conn, E. E.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
5826-5830 |
| 13. |
Sibbesen, O.,
Koch, B.,
Halkier, B. A.,
and Møller, B. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9740-9744 |
| 14. | Kahn, R., Bak, S., Svendsen, I., Halkier, B. A., and Møller, B. L. (1997) Plant Physiol. (Bethesda) 115, 1661-1670[Abstract] |
| 15. | Koch, B., Sibbesen, O., Halkier, B. A., Svendsen, I., and Møller, B. L. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 323, 177-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Bak, S., Kahn, R. A., Nielsen, H. L., Møller, B. L., and Halkier, B. A. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 36, 393-405[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Halkier, B. A., Nielsen, H. L., Koch, B., and Møller, B. L. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 322, 369-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Hahlbrock, K.,
and Conn, E. E.
(1970)
J. Biol. Chem.
245,
917-922 |
| 19. | Hösel, W., and Schiel, O. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 229, 177-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Mederacke, H., Selmar, D., and Biehl, B. (1995) Angew. Bot. 69, 119-124 |
| 21. | Hughes, J., and Hughes, M. A. (1994) DNA Sequence 5, 41-49[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Halkier, B. A.,
and Møller, B. L.
(1989)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
90,
1552-1559 |
| 23. | Boss, P. K., Davies, C., and Robinson, S. P. (1996) Plant Physiol. (Bethesda) 111, 1059-1066[Abstract] |
| 24. |
Møller, B. L.,
and Conn, E. E.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
3049-3056 |
| 25. | Hrazdina, G., and Wagner, G. J. (1985) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 237, 88-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Sefton, M. A.,
Francis, I. L.,
and Williams, P. J.
(1993)
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.
44,
359-370 |
| 27. | Sefton, M. A., Francis, I. L., and Williams, P. J. (1994) J. Food Sci. 59, 142-147[CrossRef] |
| 28. | Pflugmacher, S., and Sandermann, H. (1998) Phytochemistry 49, 507-511[CrossRef] |
| 29. | Cheng, G. W., Malencik, D. A., and Brien, P. J. (1994) Phytochemistry 35, 1435-1439[CrossRef] |
| 30. | Ishikura, N., and Yang, Z.-Q. (1994) Phytochemistry 36, 1139-1145[CrossRef] |
| 31. |
Leznicki, A. J.,
and Bandurski, R. S.
(1988)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
88,
1481-1485 |
| 32. |
Yalpani, N.,
Schulz, M.,
Davis, M. P.,
and Balke, N. E.
(1992)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
100,
457-463 |
| 33. | Sandermann, H., Schmidt, R., Eckey, H., and Bauknecht, T. (1991) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 287, 341-350[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Ford, C. M.,
Boss, P. K.,
and Høj, P. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9224-9233 |
| 35. | Markham, K. R. (1996) Phytochemistry 42, 1035-1038[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Moehs, C. P., Allen, P. V., Friedman, M., and Belknap, W. R. (1997) Plant J. 11, 227-236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Warnecke, D. C., Baltrusch, M., Buck, F., Wolter, F. P., and Heinz, E. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35, 597-603[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Tanaka, Y.,
Yonekura, K.,
Fukichi-Mizutani, M.,
Fukui, Y.,
Fujiwara, H.,
Ashikari, T.,
and Kusumi, T.
(1996)
Plant Cell Physiol.
37,
711-716 |
| 39. |
Szerszen, J.,
Szczyglowski, K.,
and Bandurski, R.
(1994)
Science
265,
1699-1701 |
| 40. | Fraissinet-Tachet, L., Baltz, R., Chong, J., Kauffman, S., Fritig, B., and Saindrenan, P. (1998) FEBS Lett. 437, 319-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Fling, S. P., and Gregerson, D. S. (1986) Anal. Biochem. 155, 83-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schäffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402 |
| 43. | Furtek, D., Schielfbein, J. W., Johnston, F., and Nelson, O. E. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 11, 473-481[CrossRef] |
| 44. | Wise, R. P., Rhode, W., and Salamini, F. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14, 277-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Hundle, B. S.,
O'Brien, D. A.,
Alberti, M.,
Beyer, P.,
and Hearst, J. E.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
9321-9325 |
| 46. | Reed, D. W., Davis, L., Jain, J. C., Deluca, V., Nelson, L., and Underhill, E. W. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 305, 526-532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. |
Bar-Peled, M.,
Lewinsohn, E.,
and Gressel, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20953-20959 |
| 48. | Vogt, T., Zimmerman, E., Grimm, R., Meyer, M., and Strack, D. (1997) Planta 203, 349-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Kowalczyk, S., and Bandurski, R. S. (1991) Biochem. J. 279, 509-514 |
| 50. | Li, S. M., Wang, Z. X., and Heide, L. (1997) Phytochemistry 46, 27-32 |
| 51. | Kuai, J.-P., Ghangas, G. S., and Steffens, J. C. (1997) Plant Physiol. 115, 1581-1587[Abstract] |
| 52. |
Sun, Y.,
and Hrazdina, G.
(1991)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
95,
570-576 |
| 53. | Bergenstråhle, A., Tillberg, E., and Jonsson, L. (1992) Plant Sci. (Limerick) 84, 35-44[CrossRef] |
| 54. | Rasmussen, S., and Rudolph, H. (1997) Phytochemistry 46, 449-453[CrossRef] |
| 55. | Guo, L., and Poulton, J. E. (1994) Phytochemistry 36, 1133-1138[CrossRef] |
| 56. | Bao Do, C., Cormier, F., and Nicolas, Y. (1995) Plant Sci. (Limerick) 112, 43-51[CrossRef] |
| 57. |
Ritter, J. K.,
Chen, F.,
Sheen, Y. Y.,
Tran, H. M.,
Kimura, S.,
Yeatman, M. T.,
and Owens, I. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
3257-3261 |
| 58. | Burmeister, W. P., Cottaz, S., Driguez, H., Iori, R., Palmieri, S., and Henrissat, B. (1997) Structure 5, 663-675[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 59. | Bak, S., Nielsen, H. L., and Halkier, B. A. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38, 725-734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 60. | Kahn, R. A., Fahrendorf, T., Halkier, B. A., and Møller, B. L. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 363, 9-18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 61. | Stahl-Biskup, E., Intert, F., Holthuijzen, J., Stengele, M., and Schulz, G. (1993) Flavour Fragrance J. 8, 61-80[CrossRef] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Sanchez-Perez, K. Jorgensen, C. E. Olsen, F. Dicenta, and B. L. Moller Bitterness in Almonds Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 1040 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lunkenbein, M. Bellido, A. Aharoni, E. M.J. Salentijn, R. Kaldenhoff, H. A. Coiner, J. Munoz-Blanco, and W. Schwab Cinnamate Metabolism in Ripening Fruit. Characterization of a UDP-Glucose:Cinnamate Glucosyltransferase from Strawberry Plant Physiology, March 1, 2006; 140(3): 1047 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Thorsoe, S. Bak, C. E. Olsen, A. Imberty, C. Breton, and B. Lindberg Moller Determination of Catalytic Key Amino Acids and UDP Sugar Donor Specificity of the Cyanohydrin Glycosyltransferase UGT85B1 from Sorghum bicolor. Molecular Modeling Substantiated by Site-Specific Mutagenesis and Biochemical Analyses Plant Physiology, October 1, 2005; 139(2): 664 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matros and H.-P. Mock Ectopic Expression of a UDP-Glucose:phenylpropanoid Glucosyltransferase Leads to Increased Resistance of Transgenic Tobacco Plants Against Infection with Potato Virus Y Plant Cell Physiol., September 15, 2004; 45(9): 1185 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|