Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kostanjevecki, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Beeumen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kostanjevecki, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Beeumen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35614-35620, December 10, 1999


Structure and Characterization of Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata Cytochrome b558, a Prokaryotic Homologue of Cytochrome b5*

Vesna KostanjeveckiDagger , David LeysDagger §, Gonzalez Van DriesscheDagger , Terrance E. Meyer, Michael A. Cusanovich, Ulrich Fischer||, Yves GuisezDagger , and Jozef Van BeeumenDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, Physiology, and Microbiology, Laboratory of Protein Biochemistry and Protein Engineering, University of Gent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, the  Department of Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, and the || Department of Marine Microbiology, University of Bremen, D-28359 Bremen, Germany

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A soluble cytochrome b558 from the purple phototropic bacterium Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata was completely sequenced by a combination of automated Edman degradation and mass spectrometry. The protein, with a measured mass of 10,094.7 Da, contains 90 residues and binds a single protoheme. Unexpectedly, the sequence shows homology to eukaryotic cytochromes b5. As no prokaryotic homologue had been reported so far, we developed a protocol for the expression, purification, and crystallization of recombinant cytochrome b558. The structure was solved by molecular replacement to a resolution of 1.65 Å. It shows that cytochrome b558 is indeed the first bacterial cytochrome b5 to be characterized and differs from its eukaryotic counterparts by the presence of a disulfide bridge and a four-residue insertion in front of the sixth ligand (histidine). Eukaryotes contain a variety of b5 homologues, including soluble and membrane-bound multifunctional proteins as well as multidomain enzymes such as sulfite oxidase, fatty-acid desaturase, nitrate reductase, and lactate dehydrogenase. A search of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome showed that a previously unidentified gene encodes a fatty-acid desaturase with an N-terminal b5 domain. Thus, it may provide another example of a bacterial b5 homologue.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Soluble cytochromes from purple phototropic bacteria are almost invariably found to be of the c-type with covalently bound heme (1, 2). One of the few previously recognized b-type soluble cytochromes in purple bacteria is a minor component and has a large molecular mass (3). It is now known to be a bacterioferritin and to be widespread in bacteria as a whole (4). The best characterized soluble cytochrome b is the b562 from Escherichia coli, with a molecular mass of 12 kDa and a redox potential of +200 mV (5-7). The three-dimensional structure is an antiparallel four-helix bundle, similar to that of cytochrome c' (8).

Kusche and Trüper (9) found a small, soluble cytochrome b558 in Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii, in addition to cytochromes c554 and c'. We found very similar proteins in the related species, Ectothiorhodospira vacuolata. High potential iron protein isozymes were also purified from these two species (10), and the sequences were found to be very similar (11).1 In fact, they are so similar that the two bacteria may be considered to be strains of the same species. The cytochrome b558 from E. shaposhnikovii was reported to have a mass of 15.8 kDa and a redox potential of -210 mV (9). The immediate goal of this study was to identify the cytochrome and to determine its primary and tertiary structures as a contribution to the determination of its functional role.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Isolation and Modification-- Native cytochrome b558 from E. vacuolata was prepared essentially as described by Kusche and Trüper (9). The amino acid sequence was determined with 1.9 mg of protein. Prior to sequencing, the cysteines of the protein were reduced with dithiothreitol and pyridylethylated as described by Friedman et al. (12). Heme and reagents were removed from the denatured protein by gel filtration on a Sephadex G-25F column (22 × 1.5 cm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated in and eluted with 5% formic acid.

Protein Sequence Analysis-- Digestion with Lys-C endoproteinase (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was performed on 18.6 nmol of pyridylethylated apoprotein in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.0, at an enzyme/substrate ratio of 1:30 for 2 h at 37 °C. The same conditions were used for Glu-C endoproteinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) digestion, but the digestion mixture was incubated for 4 h at 37 °C.

Peptides obtained after enzymatic digestions were separated by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography using a Pep-S C2/C18 column (250 × 4 mm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The chromatographic equipment consisted of two Model 6000A chromatographic pumps (Waters, Milford, MA), an injector with a loop of 100-µl volume (Rheodyne, Inc., Cotati, CA), and a UV detector set at 220 nm (Pye Unicam, Cambridge, MA). The solvents used were 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Automated N-terminal sequence and electrospray ionization mass analyses were performed as described (13).

PCR2 Strategy-- The gene for the E. vacuolata cytochrome b558 was obtained via PCR amplification (Vent polymerase, New England Biolabs Inc., Beverly, MA) using degenerate primers based on the amino acid sequence of the protein. The sequence for the amino-terminal primer (based on the first six residues of the protein sequence) was 5'-AAYGARACNGARGCNACN-3', and that of the carboxyl-terminal primer (based on sequence 84-90) was 5'-HTANCARAGRAGITCNCANGG-3'. The PCR fragment was cloned in the vector pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI), and the resulting construct (pGEMT-b558) was verified by sequence analysis.

Construction of the Overexpression Plasmid-- To achieve secretion of cytochrome b558 into the periplasmic space of E. coli, the gene was fused with the nucleotide sequence encoding the signal peptide (sOmpA) of the bacterial outer membrane protein OmpA. Thus, the b558 gene was inserted after the sOmpA leader sequence using the NaeI and HindIII restriction sites of plasmid pT10sOmpArPDI (14-16). As verified by DNA sequence analysis, sOmpA was fused in-frame to the mature b558. The hybrid gene encoding the fusion sOmpA/b558 was transferred from pT10sOmpAb558 to pLPPsOmpArPDI using the restriction sites XbaI and HindIII and also to pQE60 (QIAGEN Inc.) as a NcoI/HindIII fragment. The b558 gene was also cloned without signal sequence in the pQE60 plasmid. The resulting constructs (pLPPsOmpAb558, pQE60sOmpAb558, and pQE60b558) were verified by nucleotide sequencing.

Production of Recombinant Cytochrome b558 in E. coli-- The bacterial strain MC1061 (17) harboring the expression plasmid pLPPsOmpAb558 was grown in LB medium supplemented with carbenicillin (100 µg/ml). After 16 h of incubation, cells were harvested by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 10 min, 4 °C), and the periplasmic fraction was collected after treatment as described by Koshland and Botstein (18). After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotting, the N-terminal amino acid sequence was determined to check for the correct removal of the signal peptide from the secreted protein.

Protein Purification-- Purification of recombinant cytochrome b558 was achieved by a two-step procedure utilizing ion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatographies. The periplasmic protein fraction was first loaded on a Q-Sepharose Fast Flow column (1-ml bed volume; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4. The cytochrome b558 fraction was completely retained on the column and was eluted with 0.35 M NaCl and 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4. The pooled protein was further purified on an HL-Superdex 75 column (1.5 × 60 cm) connected to an Äkta chromatographic system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The cytochrome b558-containing fractions were pooled and concentrated using Vivaspin filters (molecular mass cutoff of 5 kDa). Mass spectroscopy and N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis were used to judge the purity of the preparation.

Characterization of Recombinant Cytochrome b558 from E. coli-- Protein samples were subjected to reducing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (19) and stained with Coomassie Blue or silver (20). Native electrophoresis was used to detect the presence of the heme group by peroxidase reaction (21). Total protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (22) using the Bio-Rad 500-0006 kit with bovine serum albumin as a standard curve.

Crystallization and X-ray Data Collection-- The protein solution was concentrated to 10 mg/ml and dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, to set up crystallization trials using the hanging drop diffusion method. The protein crystallized in 4 M NaCl, pH 5.6, and 0.1 M MES. Crystals grew over a period of several days to a maximum size of 0.2 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm. The crystals belong to space group P3221 with unit cell parameters a and b = 46.406 Å and c = 91.66 Å. Assuming a molecular mass of 10,094.7 Da, as determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and with one molecule in the asymmetric unit, the Vm value is 3.42, corresponding to a solvent content of 63.8%. These values are within the observed range for protein crystals (23). Data collection was performed at the LURE Synchrotron (Orsay, France) on beam-line DW32 (lambda  = 0.97 Å) using a Mar-Research Mar345 imaging plate detector. The x-ray diffraction data were indexed, processed, scaled, and merged using DENZO and SCALEPACK (24). A total of 92,730 measurements from 14,370 unique reflections were recorded, and Rmerge was 5.9% for the data between 15 and 1.65 Å with a completeness of 99.6%.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Sequence Determination-- The complete amino acid sequence of cytochrome b558 (Fig. 1, sequence 1) was obtained by N-terminal sequence analysis of the native protein up to position 16 and of overlapping peptides obtained from Glu-C and Lys-C enzymatic digestions on pyridylethylated apoprotein. Peptides obtained from these two digestions covered the complete sequence. Fragment S12B contained an intramolecular disulfide bridge, which was found to connect Cys24 and Cys53 of the complete protein sequence. Mass data on the different peptides confirming the sequence data are summarized in Table I. The measured mass of native E. vacuolata cytochrome b558 is 10,094.7 Da, which is in agreement with the calculated mass of 10,095.3 Da (Fig. 2).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structure-based alignment of the amino acid sequences of cytochrome b558 with several eukaryotic cytochromes b5. Sequence 1, b558 (complete); sequence 2, bovine microsomal b5 (residues 1-87); sequence 3, Nicotiana tabacum b5 (residues 1-87); sequence 4, S. cerevisiae flavocytochrome-b2:lactate dehydrogenase (residues 1-82); sequence 5, chicken sulfite oxidase (residues 1-85); sequence 6, M. tuberculosis (residues 1-91). Boldface letters indicate conserved residues and those determining the cytochrome b5 fold. It is remarkable that sulfite oxidase has a Gly-Glu-Pro-His tetrapeptide after the sixth ligand, whereas the same tetrapeptide sequence occurs four residues earlier in E. vacuolata b558 and provides the sixth ligand in that protein. The three-dimensional structures clearly show that the tetrapeptides do not align.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Mass analyses of peptides obtained after Lys-C and Glu-C endoproteinase digestions on pyridylethylated apoprotein
Peaks are numbered corresponding to their chromatographic elution.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Electrospray ionization mass spectrum of native cytochrome b558. The number at the top of each peak represents the number of positive charges for the particular m/z peak. The inset is the original spectrum with indication of the m/z values for the series z = 7-10.

A BLAST search of GenBankTM indicated that cytochrome b558 is related to cytochrome b5, yeast flavocytochrome b2, plant nitrate reductases, animal sulfite oxidases, and the fatty-acid desaturases of plants and animals. We developed the strategy to determine the crystal structure of cytochrome b558 to identify it more conclusively. Because we had insufficient native protein for crystallization trials, we prepared recombinant protein for these studies.

Expression of Recombinant Cytochrome b558 in E. coli-- Information obtained from back-translation of the amino acid sequence was used to design degenerate oligonucleotide primers for PCR against the E. vacuolata genomic DNA template. A PCR fragment of the appropriate size and sequence was obtained, showing that it was the correct product derived from the b558 gene. The periplasmic protein fractions from the pQE60sOmpAb558, pT10sOmpAb558, and pLPPsOmpAb558 constructs were prepared from E. coli cells, grown aerobically at 37 °C until saturation (A600 = 2.3). Recombinant cytochrome b558 was expressed from plasmid pLPPsOmpAb558 only when isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside was omitted. When isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside was added, expression was considerably suppressed. The other plasmids did not produce any detectable amounts of cytochrome. Therefore, pLPPsOmpAb558 was used for expression of cytochrome b558. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis (data not shown) showed cytochrome b558 to be the major component in the periplasmic protein fraction. N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis revealed the expected sequence of mature cytochrome b558, confirming the correct processing of the signal peptide by an E. coli signal peptidase.

To ascertain that recombinant cytochrome b558 did incorporate a heme cofactor, the tetramethylbenzidine-hydrogen peroxide test was performed. On native polyacrylamide gels, a unique band was indeed visualized due to the peroxidase activity of the cytochrome. The dithionite-reduced and air-oxidized difference absorption spectra indicated that the oxidized Soret peak maximum was at 414 nm; and upon reduction, the alpha -peak was at 557.5 nm, and the Soret peak was shifted to 424.5 nm and increased in magnitude (Fig. 3), confirming that it had native redox properties.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Dithionite-reduced and air-oxidized difference absorption spectra of recombinant cytochrome b558. The spectra of 4.6 µg of protein were measured in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0.

Purification of Cytochrome b558 from E. coli Periplasm-- Cytochrome b558 was successfully purified from the osmotic shock fluid by ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. Analysis using isoelectric focusing gels showed that cytochrome b558 was retained at a pH of 4.5, which is in accordance with the calculated pI value of 4.75 based upon the sequence (data not shown). On a Q-Sepharose Fast Flow column, cytochrome b558 bound very efficiently at pH 7.4. The eluted protein was judged to be 90% pure. To remove minor contaminating proteins, the cytochrome b558 fraction was loaded on an HL-Superdex 75 column in 100 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, and 100 mM NaCl. Analysis on silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels and mass spectrometry showed the protein to be fully pure.

Three-dimensional Structure Analysis-- The crystal structure of cytochrome b558 was solved by molecular replacement with bovine cytochrome b5 (Protein Data Bank code 1CYO) as the search model. Molecular replacement calculations were performed using AmoRe (25). Refinement was carried out using the maximum likelihood-based program REFMAC (26). Ordered water molecules were included by selecting the peaks based on Fo - Fc difference Fourier maps contoured at 3.0 sigma  and the 2Fo - Fc density contoured at sigma  (Fig. 4). Residues and side chains not visible in the electron density were omitted from the model. For data collection and refinement statistics, see Table II.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Detail of the weighted 2Fo - Fc electron density map surrounding the heme group and both heme ligands with the final model superposed.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Data collection and refinement statistics

The polypeptide chain of cytochrome b558 is folded in five short alpha -helices and five beta -strands involved in a twisted sheet structure (Fig. 5). This is the same overall three-dimensional structure as for eukaryotic cytochrome b5 (31). The first five N-terminal and the last four C-terminal residues are not visible in the electron density. Most alpha -helices are very short, having incomplete alpha -helical geometry (31). In Fig. 1, we show the structure-based alignment of cytochrome b558 with cytochrome b5 sequences for which the three-dimensional structures are already known. All of them are soluble or membrane-bound redox proteins, although in some, the cytochrome b is a domain within a larger enzyme structure (such as, for example, sulfite oxidase and flavocytochrome-b2:lactate dehydrogenase).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Ribbon fold representation of cytochrome b558. alpha -Helices are red, whereas beta -strands are blue. Loops are yellow. This figure was generated using Molscript (29) and Raster3D (30).

Structure of Cytochrome b558 and Comparison with Homologous Proteins-- When comparing cytochrome b558 with the cytochrome b5 domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae flavocytochrome b2 (32) and with bovine microsomal cytochrome b5 (33), it is apparent that cytochrome b558 resembles the latter more closely, having the same orientation for both alpha -helix 5 and the heme group. The C-alpha traces of b558 and bovine microsomal b5 are very similar (Fig. 6A), the only major differences being situated in the loops connecting the alpha -helices involved in heme binding. A close comparison of the two molecules clearly indicates a different orientation of the heme-binding region relative to the twisted sheet structure in b558. This rather small movement is mediated by changes in backbone torsion angles around Gln55, Leu35, and Tyr81.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Stereo representation of the C-alpha trace of E. vacuolata cytochrome b558 (blue), with the heme group and the heme ligand, with bovine microsomal cytochrome b5 (Protein Data Bank code 1CYO) (A), yeast flavocytochrome b2 (Protein Data Bank code 1FCB) (B), and chicken sulfite oxidase (Protein Data Bank code 1SOX) (C) (all in red). Residues involved in reorienting the backbone conformation compared with bovine b5 have been labeled for b558. The disulfide bridge is green.

A structural characteristic novel to the b5 fold in cytochrome b558 is the disulfide bridge between two strands formed by Cys24 and Cys53. Although a single cysteine is observed at position 24 (b558 numbering) in plant cytochromes b5 (34) and yeast flavocytochrome b2, most animal cytochromes b5 lack cysteine altogether. The disulfide bridge appears to span a hydrophobic cleft on the surface of the molecule. This cleft is situated in between two hydrophobic sites of the protein as described by Mathews and co-workers (31). It functions as a sort of a channel making the heme more accessible to the solvent. Recent molecular dynamics simulations (35) as well as NMR and fluorescence studies (36) provide evidence of localized motion at the cleft area. The same authors (36, 37) studied a "de novo" incorporated disulfide bond in the b5 protein, near the same position as in native cytochrome b558. Their result suggests that the engineered disulfide bond inhibits the dynamics of the cleft formation. In the case of cytochrome b558, the influence of the disulfide bridge on the native dynamics remains to be investigated, as does its influence on the interaction with redox partners.

A comparison of the structures of cytochrome b558, bovine cytochrome b5, yeast flavocytochrome b2 (Fig. 6B), and chicken sulfite oxidase (38, 39) (Fig. 6C), a molybdopterin cytochrome b5, clearly shows the locations of insertions and deletions. Cytochrome b558 has a four-residue insertion one position ahead of the sixth heme ligand (His70). This is illustrated in the sequence alignment of Fig. 1. It is curious that several of the insertions and deletions occur at the molecular surface around the heme where electron transfer is thought to take place. They may thus play a role in molecular recognition of reaction partners.

The heme group in cytochrome b558 is buried in a hydrophobic cleft flanked by four short alpha -helices (alpha -helices 2-5) at the sides and by the twisted beta -sheet at the bottom (Fig. 5). In comparison with bovine b5, the heme group is in the so-called B-conformation, rotated 180° around the a,y-meso-carbon atoms relative to the observed A-conformation in bovine b5 (Fig. 6A). In b558, the A-orientation would be less stable due to a close contact with Leu78, a bulky residue that replaces the smaller Ser78 of bovine b5. His42 and His70, extending from the side of the cavity, ligate the iron atom. Whereas in bovine cytochrome b5, one propionic acid group is curved toward the interior of the molecule and the other projects outward in solution, cytochrome b558 has both heme propionates bent back toward the interior of the molecule. Both propionates form salt bridges with Lys64 (Fig. 7), a structural property not normally encountered in cytochromes b5, but frequently observed in cytochromes c. Whereas propionate B is hydrogen-bonded to Tyr66, propionate A is hydrogen-bonded to the hydroxyl group and the peptide nitrogen of Ser71, the latter contact being preserved in bovine b5. Both Lys64 and Tyr66 are close to or part of the four-residue insertion in the b558 sequence when compared with the b5 family.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Stereo representation of the heme pocket. The heme group and selected residues involved in heme binding are represented by atom colored sticks, whereas the backbone is represented by ribbons. Color coding is the same as described in the legend to Fig. 5. This figure was generated using Molscript (29) and Raster3D (30).

The loop connecting alpha -helices 2 and 3 at the other side of the heme plane is formed by the strictly conserved Pro43-Gly44-Gly45 sequence in the cytochrome b5 family. This sequence is positioned at a strategic point where chain reversal occurs, leaving no space to accommodate a side chain at positions 44 and 45. In cytochrome b558, however, the second glycine is replaced by another proline residue, reorienting the local backbone conformation relative to bovine b5. This relocation results in a change in the hydrogen bond partner for the second imidazole nitrogen of His42, which is normally the carbonyl oxygen of Gly45, to a water molecule. The other heme ligand (His70) is hydrogen-bonded to the carbonyl oxygen of Trp61, similar to the interaction with Phe61 in bovine b5. The Phe61 aromatic ring in cytochrome b558 is stacked parallel to the imidazole plane of the second histidine, positioning it firmly in the heme-binding site. This residue is replaced by Trp61 in cytochrome b558, with the indole group having the same structural role.

In addition to the hydrophobic core that constitutes the heme-binding site, a second and smaller hydrophobic core is situated at the other side of the twisted beta -sheet. This core is even more compact in cytochrome b558, where the replacement of the bulky side chains of Ile15 and Ile27 by valine and alanine allows alpha -helix 1 to pack more closely to the beta -sheet. Trp25 is part of a conserved structural motif in the small hydrophobic core: its indole side chain is sandwiched between the imidazole ring of His18 and a methyl group of Ile83. In bovine b5, Ser21 is hydrogen-bonded to Arg50, which is in electrostatic interaction with Glu46. This hydrophilic interaction has a hydrophobic counterpart in b558, where Pro21 is in van der Waals interaction with Leu50, resulting in a reorientation of the local backbone conformation around Pro21. In addition to the Arg50/Glu46 contact, bovine b5 has two more salt bridges between exposed side chains. These contacts do not exist in cytochrome b558, which has no salt bridges except for the interaction of Lys64 with the heme propionates (see above).

Two sets of polar interactions that contribute to anchoring the wall of the heme-binding site to the bottom are conserved in both proteins. On one side of the heme, the hydroxyl group of Thr36 is hydrogen-bonded to both the peptide amide of Cys24 and the carboxylate of Asp34, whereas on the other side, Thr58 interacts with Glu56 and the backbone nitrogen of His29.

Bovine b5 has several negatively charged residues surrounding the exposed heme edge. These residues are implicated in electrostatic interactions with their physiological partners. Redox partners carry a complementary positively charged ring as described in the model of Salemme and co-workers (40) for the cytochrome b5-cytochrome c complex. On the other hand, intramolecular interactions between the cytochrome b2 domain and the FAD domain in flavocytochrome b2 involve but one salt bridge interaction, all others being water-mediated hydrogen bonds or van der Waals interactions. Likewise, cytochrome b558 has no predominant negative charge positioned around the exposed heme edge (Fig. 8). Besides Glu68, only the two propionic acid groups carry a negative charge in this region, and they are partially neutralized by Lys64. The interactions of cytochrome b558 with hypothetical reaction partners could thus be quite different from those of cytochrome b5.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Comparison of the electrostatic molecular surfaces around the heme pockets of cytochromes b558 (A) and b5 (B). The surface is colored according to the electrostatic potential (red, negative; blue, positive) and made transparent; the heme group is blue. This figure was generated by GRASP (41).

Possible Functional Role for Cytochrome b558-- A biological function for E. vacuolata cytochrome b558 is not known so far. However, we do want to propose two possibilities, which we deduced from considering the distribution of cytochrome b5 homologues, including an analysis of the >20 bacterial and two eukaryotic genomes that are presently known.

Cytochrome b5 had not been reported in any bacterial species until now, and b5 genes have not been identified in any of the bacterial genomes. However, a BLAST search of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome (42) revealed the presence of an unidentified gene (Rv1371) with similarity to the fatty-acid desaturases of plants, animals, and fungi. That it is indeed a b5 homologue is shown in the alignment of Fig. 1. It has the two His heme ligands located at the appropriate positions in the sequence, the Pro-Gly-Gly tripeptide after the fifth heme ligand, and Trp22 as well as other conserved residues. It has the flavocytochrome b2 deletion ahead of the sixth heme ligand and a two-residue insertion after helix 5. It also appears to have one of the sulfite oxidase insertions after the sixth heme ligand. The M. tuberculosis cytochrome b5 differs from other cytochromes b5 in having a single-residue deletion three or four residues after Trp22. We think there are two likely functional roles for cytochrome b558 in E. vacuolata. It could be a subunit of a fatty-acid desaturase as found in M. tuberculosis, yeast (43), and animals such as Caenorhabditis elegans (44). An equally likely alternative because of the utilization of reduced sulfur compounds by E. vacuolata is a sulfite oxidase subunit.

Evolutionary Considerations-- The present eukaryotic cytochromes b5 can be assumed to be derived from an ancestral prokaryotic cytochrome b5, for which the E. vacuolata cytochrome b558 could stand as a model. The structure of the prokaryotic cytochrome b558 shows that this protein provides an evolutionarily stable framework that permits a considerable exchange of residues, including the amino acids at the surface as well as amino acids outlining the heme environment, causing no fundamental structural change in the polypeptide backbone. Comparing ~40 deposited b5 sequences, Lederer (6) located eight invariant residues in the b5 fold, of which two now appear not to be conserved in the prokaryotic cytochrome b558. The two residues that are replaced are involved in the interactions with the heme ligands (His42 and His70). The proline that replaces Gly45 in the His-Pro-Gly-Gly loop causes slight changes in the backbone conformation and creates space for an extra water molecule in the His42 environment. The invariant Phe61 is replaced by tryptophan, retaining the same role in the stabilization of His70. Both changes do not seem to be typical of prokaryotic b5, as the M. tuberculosis open reading frame has Gly at position 45 and lacks an aromatic side chain at position 61 altogether.

Although it is surprising how strict the fold is conserved throughout evolution, the function of cytochrome b5 diverged in eukaryotic organisms, and the protein has become a modular domain of several redox systems. Residues conserved throughout the b5 family are therefore to be associated with folding of the protein and binding of a heme group and not with interacting with the redox partners. With the exception of Gly45, replaced by Pro45, all these residues are conserved in cytochrome b558. It is interesting to note that the E. vacuolata protein is not significantly more related to any particular functional class of eukaryotic cytochrome b5, whether the microsomal b5 domain of flavocytochrome b2, sulfite oxidase, or fatty-acid desaturases. It is in fact almost equidistant to these four subclasses of the cytochrome b5 family.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We sincerely thank Drs. K. De Sutter and N. Mertens for providing E. coli expression plasmids.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work was supported in part by Grant GM 21277 from the National Institutes of Health (to M. A. C.) and by Grant Fi 295/1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to U. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF183259.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 1CXY, 009616) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

§ Research Assistant of the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen.

** Supported by Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen Research Projects G.0068.96 and G.0054.97. To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Physiology, and Microbiology, Lab. of Protein Biochemistry and Protein Engineering, University of Gent, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. Tel.: 32-92645109; Fax: 32-92645338; E-mail: jozef.vanbeeumen@rug.ac.be.

1 V. Kostanjevecki, D. Leys, G. Van Driessche, T. E. Meyer, M. A. Cusanovich, U. Fischer, Y. Guisez, and J. Van Beeumen, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bartsch, R. G. (1978) in The Photosynthetic Bacteria (Clayton, R. K. , and Sistrom, W. R., eds) , pp. 249-279, Plenum Press, New York
2. Bartsch, R. G. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1058, 29-30
3. Bartsch, R. G., Kakuno, T., Horio, T., and Kamen, M. D. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 4489-4496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Ringeling, P. L., Davy, S. L., Mondara, F. A., Hunt, C., Dickson, D. P. E., McEwan, A. G., and Moore, G. R. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 847-855[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Itagaki, E., and Hager, L. P. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 3687-3695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Lederer, F. (1994) Biochimie (Paris) 76, 674-692[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Moore, G. R., Williams, R. J. P., Peterson, J., Thomson, A. J., and Mathews, F. S. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 829, 93-96
8. Hamada, K., Bethge, P. H., and Mathews, F. S. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 247, 947-962[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kusche, W. H., and Trüper, H. G. (1984) Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C Biosci. 39, 894-901
10. Kusche, W. H., and Trüper, H. G. (1984) Arch. Microbiol. 137, 266-271[CrossRef]
11. Ambler, R. P., Meyer, T. E., and Kamen, M. D. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 308, 78-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Friedman, M., Zahnley, J. C., and Wagner, J. R. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 106, 27-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Van Driessche, G., Koh, M., Chen, Z. W., Mathews, F. S., Meyer, T. E., Bartsch, R. G., Cusanovich, M. A., and Van Beeumen, J. J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 1753-1764[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. De Sutter, K., Hostens, K., Vandekerckhove, J., and Fiers, W. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 141, 163-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Mertens, N., Remaut, E., and Fiers, W. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 164, 9-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Guisez, Y., Faché, I., Campfield, L. A., Smith, F. J., Farid, A., Plaetinck, G., Van der Heyden, J., Tavernier, J., Fiers, W., Burn, P., and Devos, R. (1998) Protein Expression. Purif. 12, 249-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Casadaban, M., and Cohen, S. N. (1980) J. Mol. Biol. 138, 179-207[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Koshland, D., and Botstein, D. (1980) Cell 20, 749-760[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Blum, H., Beier, H., and Gross, H. J. (1987) Electrophoresis 8, 93-99[CrossRef]
21. Thomas, P. E., Ryan, D., and Ledwin, W. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 75, 168-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Matthews, B. W. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326[CrossRef]
25. Navaza, J. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 50, 157-163[CrossRef]
26. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., and Dodson, E. J. (1997) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 53, 240-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Brunger, A. T. (1997) Nature 355, 472-475
28. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thoronton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-291[CrossRef]
29. Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef]
30. Merrit, E. A., and Murphy, M. E. P. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 50, 869-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Mathews, F. S., Levine, M., and Argos, P. (1972) J. Mol. Biol. 64, 449-464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Xia, Z. X., and Mathews, F. S. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 212, 837-863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Durly, R. C. E., and Mathews, F. S. (1996) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 52, 65-76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Smith, M. A., Stobart, A. K., Shewry, P. R., and Napier, J. A. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 3, 527-537
35. Storch, E. M., Grinstead, J. S., Campbell, A. P., Daggett, V., and Atkins, W. M. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 5065-5075[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Storch, E. M., and Daggett, V. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9682-9693[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Storch, E. M., Daggett, V., and Atkins, W. M. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 5054-5064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Guiard, B., and Lederer, F. (1977) Eur. J. Biochem. 100, 441-453[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Kisker, C., Schindelin, H., Pacheco, A., Wehbi, W. A., Garrett, R. M., Rajagopalan, K. V., Enemark, J. H., and Rees, D. C. (1991) Cell 91, 973-983
40. Wendoloski, J. J., Matthew, J. B., Weber, P. C., and Salemme, F. R. (1987) Science 238, 794-797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Nicholls, A. (1992) GRASP: Graphical Representation and Analysis of Surface Properties , Columbia University, New York
42. Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., III, Tekaia, F., Badcock, K., Basham, D., Brown, D., Chillingworth, T., Connor, R., Davies, R., Devlin, K., Feltwell, T., Gentles, S., Hamlin, N., Holroyd, S., Hornsby, T., Jagels, K., and Barrell, B. G. (1998) Nature 393, 537-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Mewes, H. W., Albermann, K., Bahr, M., Frishman, D., Gleissner, A., Hani, J., Heumann, K., Kleine, K., Maierl, A., Oliver, S. G., Pfeiffer, F., and Zollner, A. (1997) Nature 387, 7-65[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Ainscough, R. (1998) Science 282, 2012-2018[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kostanjevecki, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Beeumen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kostanjevecki, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Beeumen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement