|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35686-35692, December 10, 1999
The Microtubule Binding of Tau and High Molecular Weight Tau
in Apoptotic PC12 Cells Is Impaired because of Altered
Phosphorylation*
Penny K.
Davis and
Gail V. W.
Johnson
From the Departments of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0017
 |
ABSTRACT |
Although the importance of the microtubule
network throughout cell life is well established, the dynamics of
microtubules during apoptosis, a regulated cell death process, is
unclear. In a previous study (Davis, P. K., and Johnson, G. V. (1999) Biochem. J. 340, 51-58) we demonstrated that the
phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau was increased
during neuronal PC12 cell apoptosis. The purpose of this study was to
determine whether the increased tau phosphorylation that occurred
during apoptosis impaired the microtubule binding capacity of tau. This study is the first demonstration that microtubule-binding by tau and
high molecular weight tau is significantly impaired as a result of
altered phosphorylation during a naturally occurring process, apoptosis. Furthermore, co-immunofluorescence studies reveal for the
first time that tau populations within an apoptotic neuronal PC12 cell
exhibit differential phosphorylation. In control PC12 cells, Tau-1
staining (Tau-1 recognizes an unphosphorylated epitope) is
evident throughout the entire cell body. In contrast, Tau-1 immunoreactivity in apoptotic PC12 cells is retained in the
nuclear/perinuclear region but is significantly decreased in the
cytoplasm up to the plasma membrane. The selective distribution of
phosphorylated tau in apoptotic PC12 cells indicates that tau likely
plays a significant role in the cytoskeletal changes that occur during apoptosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The cytoskeleton and its associated proteins provide the framework
of the cell and are important for the facilitation of many critical
events such as mitosis, migration, and differentiation. As a major
component of the cytoskeleton, microtubules are dynamic structures,
essential for many cellular processes, such as process outgrowth, cell
polarity, and intracellular trafficking (1-3). Microtubule-associated
proteins are critically important modulators of microtubule dynamics.
The microtubule-associated protein tau is a family of differentially
spliced isoforms (4) that are primarily but not exclusively expressed
in neurons (4-8). Tau was first identified by its ability to stabilize
microtubules and to promote microtubule assembly in vitro
(9-11). Introduction of tau into non-neuronal cell systems increased
tubulin polymerization, stabilized microtubules (12), and stimulated
the formation of cellular processes (13). The importance of tau in
neurite outgrowth is supported by the concomitant increases in tau
expression and neurite formation during differentiation of PC12 cells
(14), and by the suppression of neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells treated with tau antisense oligonucleotides (15). In addition to functioning as
a microtubule-stabilizing protein, tau may modulate neurite outgrowth
by regulating microtubule-plasma membrane interactions (16).
Furthermore, recent reports have described new functions of tau beyond
its classical role as a modulator of microtubule dynamics. For example,
tau was found to activate phospholipase C- in conjunction with
arachidonic acid (17, 18), and to interact with the SH3 domain of the
Fyn protein kinase (19), indicating that tau contributes to the
regulation of signaling systems.
Tau is regulated by differential phosphorylation of specific Ser and
Thr residues. In general, increases in tau phosphorylation have been
found to correlate inversely with its ability to bind and stabilize
microtubules (20, 21). In vitro, tau is a substrate of
numerous protein kinases, and phosphorylation by any of these kinases
usually but not always decreases the ability of tau to bind
microtubules and promote microtubule assembly (for reviews see Refs. 22
and 23). However, the extent to which the microtubule binding capacity
of tau is reduced by phosphorylation is highly dependent on which sites
are phosphorylated. For example, phosphorylation of tau at just a few
sites within the microtubule-binding region virtually abolishes the
association of tau with microtubules, whereas phosphorylation of
numerous sites outside this region reduces but does not eliminate tau
binding to microtubules (24-26). Although it is likely that
site-specific phosphorylation also modulates the non-microtubule
functions of tau, these putative effects have not yet been examined.
Thus far, 25 Ser and Thr residues throughout tau have been identified
as phosphorylation sites (27, 28). However, the regulatory implications
of phosphorylation at the majority of these residues are unknown.
High molecular weight (HMW)1
tau is produced from an 8-kilobase mRNA generated by alternative
splicing from the same gene that encodes for tau (6, 7). HMW tau
contains one or two additional inserts compared with tau and migrates
on SDS-polyacrylamide gels with an apparent molecular mass of
approximately 110 kDa (6, 7). HMW tau is primarily expressed in the
peripheral nervous system and in cell lines derived from the neural
crest such as PC12 cells (29, 30). Very little is known about the
function and regulation of HMW tau. Fractionation of peripheral nerve
tissue demonstrated that HMW tau was in the tubulin fraction, clearly indicating that it associated with microtubules (31). Given this
finding, it is likely that the general functional properties of HMW tau
may be similar to those of tau. However, the microtubule binding
characteristics of HMW tau have not yet been measured. The regulation
of HMW tau by phosphorylation remains mostly unclear, as is the
specific intracellular localization of HMW tau compared with tau.
Tau and other cytoskeletal regulatory proteins may play an important
role in facilitating the cytoskeletal reorganization that occurs during
apoptotic cell death (32-35). In a previous study, our laboratory
demonstrated that during apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells induced by
trophic factor withdrawal, tau and HMW tau were hyperphosphorylated at
residues within the Tau-1 antibody epitope and potentially at other Ser
and/or Thr residues (35). The present study focused on the functional
and localization alterations associated with tau and HMW tau
hyperphosphorylation during apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells.
Intriguingly, the microtubule binding capacity of both tau and HMW tau
from apoptotic neuronal PC12 cells was significantly less than that of
tau and HMW tau isolated from control cells. Furthermore, the
microtubule binding function of tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells
was restored to almost control levels following dephosphorylation.
Examination of Tau-1 immunoreactivity in apoptotic cells indicated that
tau hyperphosphorylated at the Tau-1 epitope was limited to specific
subcellular locations. These novel findings demonstrate functional and
localization consequences of tau and HMW tau phosphorylation during a
physiological process, apoptosis, and suggest that the phosphorylation
of tau may play an important role in microtubule reorganization during
the apoptotic process of neuronal cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
PC12 cells were grown on rat tail
collagen-coated dishes in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% horse serum,
5% Fetal Clone II (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 20 mM glutamine,
100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin as described
previously (36). To induce differentiation to a neuronal phenotype,
PC12 cells were maintained in medium containing 5% serum and 100 ng/ml
nerve growth factor (NGF) for 9-10 days (36). Serum and NGF were
removed by replating the differentiated PC12 cells onto new
collagen-coated dishes as described previously (37), and cells were
maintained in serum-free medium with or without 100 ng/ml NGF for the
times indicated (38). For co-immunofluorescence studies, cells were reseeded onto glass coverslips in 24-well plates coated with 12 µg/ml
laminin (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 100 µg/ml poly
D-lysine (Sigma).
Immunoblot Analysis--
Cell homogenates were prepared, and
immunoblot analysis was carried out as described previously (38).
Briefly, proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 7.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
either Tau-1 or Tau-5. After incubation with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, immunoblots were developed
using Enhanced Chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunoblots were quantified using a Bio-Rad GS-670 imaging densitometer.
Preparation of Taxol-stabilized Microtubules--
Rat brain
tubulin was purified from once-cycled microtubules by phosphocellulose
chromatography as described previously (9). Tubulin containing
fractions were pooled, and taxol was added to a final concentration of
20 µM. Following incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the
assembled microtubules were pelleted by centrifugation at 130,000 × g. Microtubules were resuspended in stabilization buffer
(50 mM PIPES/KOH, pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 20 µM taxol, and 0.1 mM GTP), aliquoted, and frozen at 80 °C until use.
Purification of Tau and HMW Tau--
Because tau and HMW tau are
heat-stable proteins (9, 39), enrichment of tau and HMW tau from
control and apoptotic PC12 cells was carried out by preparing a
heat-stable fraction as described previously (40). For each
purification, 7-9 100-mm dishes of control or apoptotic PC12 cells
were used. Tau and HMW tau were separated using size exclusion
chromatography on a column (20 × 1 cm) containing Toyopearl
HW-55S chromatographic medium with a globular protein size exclusion
limit of 10,000-700,000 kDa (TosoHaas, Montgomeryville, PA). Proteins
were eluted with column buffer (20 mM Mes, pH 7.2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 750 mM NaCl, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml
aprotinin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor,
and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at a flow rate of
0.1 ml/min. Fractions containing Tau and HMW tau were identified by
immunoblot analyses using the phosphate-independent antibody Tau-5
(41). To ensure that microtubule-associated protein 2 was not present
in HMW tau fractions, the immunoblots were also probed with AP14
antibody (42). Fractions containing tau or HMW tau were combined and
dialyzed against buffer containing 50 mM PIPES/KOH, pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.5 mM MgSO4 using
Slide-A-Lyzers (Pierce). Proteins were concentrated using Centicon-10
concentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA), and the concentration was
determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce).
Microtubule Binding Assay--
The microtubule binding assay was
carried out as described previously with modifications (24). To remove
unpolymerized tubulin, taxol-stabilized microtubules were incubated for
5 min at 37 °C, centrifuged at 110,000 × g for 10 min, and resuspended in reaction buffer containing 50 mM
PIPES, pH 6.9, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM
MgSO4, 20 µM taxol, and 0.1 mM
GTP at 37 °C. Microtubules (30 µM) were preincubated
for 10 min at 37 °C. Tau at 4.5 µM or HMW tau at 2 µM was then added, and incubation continued for 10 min at
37 °C. After underlying each sample with a 10% sucrose (prepared in
reaction buffer) cushion, the samples were centrifuged at 110,000 × g for 10 min in a Beckman Airfuge. Microtubule-bound tau
or HMW tau present in the pellets was determined by quantitative immunoblot analysis using the Tau-5 antibody, and statistical analysis
was carried out using Student's t test. To dephosphorylate tau or HMW tau prior to use in the microtubule binding assay, the
proteins were incubated in the absence or presence of lambda protein
phosphatase (New England Biolabs Inc., Beverly, MA) in reaction buffer
for 4 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, microtubules were
added, and the assay was carried out as described above.
Co-immunofluorescence--
For fixation, cells were rinsed once
with PEM (80 mM PIPES/KOH, pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 µM taxol, and 0.1 mM GTP) and incubated with 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in
PEM for 30 min at 37 °C. After rinsing with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS; pH 7.4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4,
8.0 mM NaHPO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl), cells were incubated with 0.1 M
glycine for 20 min and permeabilized for 90 s in 0.5% (v/v)
Triton X-100 in PBS (16).
Staining was carried out essentially as described by Brandt et
al. (16). Before staining, cells were blocked for 1 h with PBS containing 0.3% bovine serum albumin. All antibodies were diluted
in blocking solution before use. The primary antibodies used were: a
tau polyclonal antibody (Dako Corp.), the Tau-1 monoclonal tau antibody
(8) (a gift from Dr. L. Binder), and an active c-jun N-terminal kinase
polyclonal antibody (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Tau-1 antibody
recognizes tau or HMW tau only when Ser195,
Ser198, Ser199, Ser202, and
Thr205 (numbered according to the longest human brain tau
isoform (43)), are not phosphorylated (8, 44). To increase
sensitivity, Tau-1 was biotinylated with sulfo-NHS-biotin according to
the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce) and was visualized using Texas Red-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson Immunoresearch Labs, West
Grove, PA). Secondary antibodies were fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit, fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse, or Texas Red-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch Labs). Cells were incubated
for 1 h at room temperature with the primary antibodies, followed
by a 30-min incubation at room temperature with the appropriate
secondary antibodies. Coverslips were then incubated with 10 µg/ml
Hoechst in PBS for 1 min at room temperature. After extensive washing
with PBS, coverslips were mounted using Immuno-Mount (Shandon,
Pittsburgh, PA) and stored at 20 °C. Cells were photographed using
the SPOT cooled color digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc.,
Sterling Heights, MI) on a Nikon Diaphot 200 microscope with a 100×
CF/CF N plan apochromat objective. The images of the Hoechst stained
nuclei were pseudocolored for increased clarity with the SPOT camera software.
 |
RESULTS |
Tau and HMW Tau from Apoptotic Cells Have Reduced Microtubule
Binding Capacity--
As demonstrated previously by our laboratory
(38) and others (45, 46), neuronal PC12 cells become apoptotic
following removal of serum and NGF. Depriving neuronal PC12 cells of
serum and NGF for 48 h resulted in a significant decrease in cell
viability and an increase in the presence of condensed chromatin (38). Additionally, based on quantitative immunoblot analysis, significant increases in the phosphorylation of tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells within the Tau-1 epitope occurred at this time point (35). Therefore, all subsequent studies were carried out on PC12 cells 48 h after removal of serum and NGF or of serum alone (as a
control). Chromatin morphology determined by Hoechst staining
demonstrated that after 48 h of serum and NGF deprivation ~25%
of the cells exhibited condensed chromatin (38). However, the majority
of the cells exhibited activated N-terminal c-Jun kinase (JNK) staining in the nucleus (data not shown, but see Fig. 4, D and
F), an event in the apoptotic process that precedes
condensation of the chromatin (47-49).
The function of tau and HMW tau isolated from apoptotic and control
PC12 cells was assessed using an in vitro microtubule binding assay. Equivalent amounts of tau or HMW tau purified from control and apoptotic cells were incubated with taxol-stabilized microtubules. The amount of tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells that
bound to the microtubules was significantly less (37 and 27% of
control, respectively) than that of tau and HMW tau isolated from
control cells (Fig. 1). These findings
demonstrate that the microtubule binding capacity of tau and HMW tau
from apoptotic neuronal PC12 cells is significantly impaired.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The microtubule binding capacity of tau and
HMW tau from apoptotic cells is impaired. Equivalent amounts of
tau and HMW tau purified from control (+) and apoptotic ( ) neuronal
PC12 cells were incubated with taxol-stabilized microtubules.
Microtubule containing fractions were analyzed for levels of bound tau
or HMW tau by immunoblotting with the Tau-5 phosphate-independent
antibody (A). Immunoblots are representative of at least
three independent experiments. Molecular masses (kDa) are indicated at
the left. The two bands present in the tau immunoblots
(right panel) are likely two different isoforms, because
PC12 cells express several different splice variants of tau (78). The
quantitative analysis of tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells present
in the microtubule fraction is expressed as a percentage of control
values (B). The quantified data represent the means ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments. *, p 0.05 when compared with control values.
|
|
Restoration of the Microtubule Binding Capacity of Tau and HMW Tau
from Apoptotic Cells by Dephosphorylation--
Tau and HMW tau from
apoptotic and control cells were dephosphorylated with lambda protein
phosphatase prior to assessing their function using the microtubule
binding assay. To determine whether incubation with lambda protein
phosphatase resulted in tau dephosphorylation, equivalent amounts of
tau incubated in the presence or absence of lambda protein phosphatase
were immunoblotted with Tau-1 (Fig.
2A). When tau isolated from
control and apoptotic cells was incubated in the absence of lambda
protein phosphatase, the Tau-1 immunoreactivity of tau from apoptotic
cells was significantly less than that of tau from control cells (Fig.
2A, two right-hand lanes). After lambda protein
phosphatase treatment, the Tau-1 immunoreactivity was approximately the
same for both control and apoptotic tau (Fig. 2A, two
left-hand lanes), which verified that tau was dephosphorylated.
Additionally, treatment with lambda protein phosphatase resulted in an
increased electrophoretic mobility of tau and HMW tau, further
indicating dephosphorylation of the proteins (Fig. 2).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Restoration of apoptotic tau and HMW tau
microtubule-binding after dephosphorylation. As a measure of
dephosphorylation, equivalent amounts of tau from control (+ NGF) and
apoptotic ( NGF) cells deprived of serum for 48 h were incubated
in the presence (+) or absence ( ) of lambda phosphatase and
phosphorylation within the Tau-1 epitope was analyzed by immunoblotting
(A). Following incubation in the presence (+) or absence
( ) of lambda phosphatase, tau or HMW tau from control (+ NGF) and
apoptotic ( NGF) neuronal PC12 cells deprived of serum and NGF for
48 h were incubated with taxol-stabilized microtubules.
Microtubule bound tau or HMW tau was determined by immunoblot analysis
using the phosphate-independent antibody, Tau-5 (B).
Immunoblots are representative of at least three independent
experiments. Molecular masses (kDa) are indicated at the
left.
|
|
Treatment of tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells with lambda protein
phosphatase almost fully restored their microtubule binding capacity
(Fig. 2B). Dephosphorylation of tau and HMW tau from
apoptotic cells resulted in a 61.3 ± 7.3% (n = 3) and 62.2 ± 7.7% (n = 4) increase,
respectively, in the amount bound to microtubules when compared with
the microtubule-binding of untreated tau and HMW tau from apoptotic
cells. These results indicate that dephosphorylation of tau and HMW tau
from apoptotic cells restored microtubule binding capacity to 98.3 and
89.2% of control, respectively.
Loss of Tau-1 Immunoreactivity in Apoptotic PC12 Cells--
To
examine the localization of tau associated with changes in Tau-1
phosphorylation (35) within apoptotic cells, co-immunofluorescence studies were carried out using Tau-1 and polyclonal tau antibodies. Total tau in control cells was distributed throughout the neurites and
cell body (Fig. 3A). In
control cells Tau-1 reactivity, which recognizes only an
unphosphorylated epitope of tau and HMW tau (8), was present
throughout the cell body, including the nuclear and perinuclear regions
as evidenced by colocalization with the Hoescht stain. In contrast,
Tau-1 staining was almost undetectable in the neurites (Fig.
3B). Although total tau staining of apoptotic cells was
still present throughout the cell body including the perinuclear and
nuclear regions (Fig. 3D), a dramatic loss of Tau-1
immunoreactivity was observed in the cell body and at the plasma
membrane indicating increased phosphorylation within the Tau-1 epitope
(Fig. 3E). Indeed, Tau-1 staining in apoptotic cells appeared to be maintained only in the perinuclear and nuclear regions
(Fig. 3, E and F). Interestingly, there was an
absence of Tau-1 staining within the nucleolus of both control and
apoptotic cells. This is evidenced by the presence of dark
"spots" in the nucleus that occur with the Tau-1 staining and the
absence of Hoescht stain at the same location in the nucleus (Hoescht
does not stain nucleoli) (see solid arrowheads in Fig. 3,
E and F). These findings are in agreement with a
previous study demonstrating that in neurons, tau was present in the
nucleus but absent from the nucleolus (50). It should be noted that
apoptotic cells maintaining tau staining exhibited normal chromatin
morphology (Fig. 3, D-F, open arrowheads).
Staining of tau in those apoptotic cells possessing condensed chromatin
was dramatically lower, and thus, characterization of staining patterns
in these cells was not possible. This lack of staining in apoptotic
cells was also apparent for tubulin and actin (data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Loss of Tau-1 immunoreactivity within the
cell body of apoptotic neuronal PC12 cells. Control (+ NGF,
A-C) and apoptotic ( NGF, D-F) neuronal PC12
cells following 48 h of serum deprivation were stained with a tau
polyclonal antibody (A and D), which recognizes
both tau and HMW tau (together referred to as total tau), and the Tau-1
antibody (B and E), which recognizes only an
unphosphorylated epitope of total tau. Chromatin morphology was
examined using the Hoechst stain (C and F). In
control cells Tau-1 staining was almost exclusively in the cell body
with minimal staining within neurites (B). During apoptosis,
total tau staining was maintained in the cell body (D), In
contrast, Tau-1 staining was virtually absent throughout most of the
cytoplasm of the apoptotic cells, indicating hyperphosphorylation
within the epitope, and was present only within the nucleus and/or
perinuclear region (E). Open arrowheads point to
specific cells (D-F) and are used for orientation purposes
between panels. In E and F the solid
arrowheads indicate a nucleolus and emphasize the lack of Tau-1
staining in this area. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
To clearly demonstrate that cells possessing noncondensed chromatin and
decreased Tau-1 immunoreactivity in the cultures deprived of serum and
NGF were undergoing apoptosis, cells were co-stained with Tau-1 and an
antibody to activated JNK. Several studies have demonstrated previously
that JNK activity increases during apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells
(48, 49) and localizes to the nucleus (47). JNK is activated by
phosphorylation of Thr183 and Tyr185 (51), and
a JNK antibody recognizing an epitope containing these phosphorylated
residues was used. In control cells, a diffuse, light staining pattern
of active JNK was observed throughout the cytoplasm but was virtually
absent in the nucleus as indicated by the lack of colocalization with
the Hoechst staining (Fig. 4,
A and C). Tau-1 staining in control cells was, as
before, primarily in the cell body (Fig. 4B). In cells
deprived of NGF and serum, staining of active JNK was intensely bright
and localized to the nucleus in cells exhibiting normal chromatin
morphology, indicating that these cells are apoptotic (Fig. 4,
D and F). Cells possessing nuclear active JNK
also exhibited the alterations in the Tau-1 staining, which was
localized to the nucleus and perinuclear regions (Fig.
4E).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Tau-1 staining patterns are altered in
apoptotic cells possessing active JNK in the nucleus. Control (+ NGF, A-C) and apoptotic ( NGF, D-F) neuronal
PC12 cells deprived of serum for 48 h were stained with an
antibody to active JNK (A and D), which was used
as a marker of apoptosis, and the Tau-1 antibody (B and
E), which recognizes only an unphosphorylated epitope.
Chromatin morphology was assessed using the Hoechst stain (C
and F). Bright nuclear staining of active JNK in cells
deprived of serum and NGF indicated apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells
that did not exhibit condensed chromatin (D and
F) and that changes in Tau-1 staining patterns were being
observed in apoptotic cells (E). Arrowheads point
to specific cells (D-F) and are used for orientation
purposes between panels. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Microtubule dynamics are essential for numerous processes during
cell life, and they most likely play an integral role during apoptotic
cell death. This is implied by several studies demonstrating alterations of cytoskeletal components during apoptosis (33, 52, 53).
Tau acts as a regulator of microtubule dynamics through its ability to
stabilize microtubules and promote microtubule assembly (9-11), a
function that is modified by its phosphorylation state (20, 21, 54).
However, abnormal alterations in the phosphorylation state of tau may
lead to impaired function and thus negatively affect microtubule
stability and cytoskeletal dynamics (21, 55, 56).
During apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells tau and HMW tau are
hyperphosphorylated at Ser and/or Thr residue(s) within the Tau-1 antibody epitope and potentially at other Ser/Thr residues (35). The
purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of altered phosphorylation of tau and HMW tau during neuronal PC12 cell apoptosis in terms of function and localization. In this study, two novel findings are presented. First, alterations in the phosphorylation state
of tau and HMW tau during neuronal apoptosis significantly reduced the
microtubule binding capacity of tau and HMW tau. Second, in
apoptotic cells Tau-1 staining was significantly reduced throughout the cell body with the exception of the nucleus and perinuclear region,
indicating hyperphosphorylation of tau and HMW tau at this epitope in
the cell body but not in the nucleus and perinuclear region. Thus the
intracellular localization of tau is an important determinant of
whether or not it is hyperphosphorylated during apoptosis.
In apoptotic PC12 cells, total tau staining appeared similar to control
cells. In contrast, the pattern of Tau-1 immunoreactivity in apoptotic
cells differed significantly from that of control PC12 cells,
indicating subcellular changes in the phosphorylation of tau within
this epitope. Tau-1 staining in control cells was observed mostly
throughout the cell body and to a much lesser extent in the neurites.
Similar observations have been reported previously in immature,
cultured hippocampal neurons where Tau-1 staining was predominantly in
the cell body and only to a minor extent in the developing processes
(57). Tau-1 staining was also present in the nucleus and perinuclear
region of the control and apoptotic PC12 cells. Tau has previously been
identified within the nucleus using the Tau-1 antibody (58-60). In
dividing cultured cells tau localizes to the nucleoli during interphase
and to the nucleolar organizing regions during mitosis (59). Given
these findings it has been hypothesized that tau may be involved in nucleolar reformation and/or rRNA synthesis during cell division (50,
59, 60). In contrast to these observations in dividing cultured cells,
tau is present in the nucleus but not in the nucleoli in
differentiated, nondividing cells (50). In the present study Tau-1
immunoreactivity was present in nuclei but not in nucleoli of
differentiated, neuronal PC12 cells, and thus is in agreement with the
previous findings. Because tau in differentiated cells does not
localize to the nucleolus, it is likely that the functions tau mediates
in the nucleus of these cells differs from those it regulates in
dividing cells. In differentiated cells tau may be involved in
signaling or regulation of nuclear proteins. However, the functional
roles of nuclear tau in both dividing and differentiated cells remain
to be elucidated.
During apoptosis, Tau-1 staining throughout the cell body is
significantly diminished, although total tau staining is maintained, indicating an increase in tau phosphorylation within this epitope (35).
In agreement with these findings, increased tau phosphorylation was
indicated in a previous report that showed increased immunoreactivity of apoptotic PC12 cells with AT8, an antibody that recognizes a
phosphoepitope within the Tau-1 epitope (61). Furthermore, it is
interesting that Tau-1 immunoreactivity (which recognizes only the
unphosphorylated epitope) is maintained in the perinuclear region of apoptotic cells. This finding is most likely due to differential alterations in the activity of protein kinases and/or protein phosphatases in specific subcellular compartments during apoptosis. The selective increase in tau phosphorylation in the vicinity of the plasma membrane during apoptosis is indicative of a
specific role for tau in this area of the cell. Given that tau likely
mediates microtubule-plasma membrane interactions through specific
actin-binding proteins (16), it is tempting to speculate that the
increase in tau phosphorylation during apoptosis may result in a
disruption of these interactions and hence facilitate the membrane
blebbing that occurs (38, 62). Microtubule destabilization contributes
to apoptotic blebbing (63, 64), and therefore the decrease in the
microtubule-binding of tau in apoptotic cells may also play a role in
this process. The selective maintenance of Tau-1 immunoreactivity in
the perinuclear region of apoptotic neuronal PC12 cells indicates that
tau in a "normal" phosphorylation state in this subcellular
compartment may be required for appropriate progression of the
apoptotic process. For example, tau may mediate interactions between
the cytoskeleton and the nuclear envelope.
In contrast to the findings presented here and in our previous study
(35) that demonstrated increased tau phosphorylation during PC12 cell
apoptosis, an earlier report presented data suggesting that there was a
general dephosphorylation of tau during apoptosis based on
immunocytochemical findings (65). However the study of Mills et
al. (65) differed in several aspects from the present one. First,
a subclone of the PC12 cell line called PC6-3 (46) was used that
displays significant differences from the parental PC12 cell line with
respect to sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli and the timing of apoptotic
events. Second, the protocol used by Mills et al. (65) to
induce apoptosis differed significantly from the procedure used in this
study (37, 38). Lastly, it should be noted that unlike the present
study, Mills et al. (65) did not examine
co-immunofluorescence for total tau and Tau-1 staining, and it was
difficult to assess the increases in Tau-1 immunoreactivity relative to
the total tau levels in individual cells because the levels of tau in
the apoptotic cultures showed significant cell-to-cell variability. In
support of the findings presented here, Nuydens et al. (61)
reported an increase in tau phosphorylation in apoptotic PC12 cells.
Furthermore, during apoptosis there is a decrease in the activity of
specific protein phosphatases that are known to dephosphorylate tau
(38). Finally, the fact that the microtubule binding capacity of tau
and HMW tau from apoptotic cells was restored by dephosphorylation (see below) clearly indicates that tau phosphorylation is increased in the
apoptotic paradigm used in the current study.
Because the phosphorylation state of tau and HMW tau was increased
during apoptosis, the functions of tau and HMW tau purified from
apoptotic and control neuronal PC12 cells were examined in vitro by assessing their ability to bind taxol-stabilized
microtubules. The ability of both tau and HMW tau from apoptotic cells
to bind to microtubules was impaired significantly compared with tau
and HMW tau from nonapoptotic cells. However, after dephosphorylation the microtubule binding capacity of both tau and HMW tau from apoptotic
cells was almost fully restored. These findings clearly demonstrate
that the phosphorylation state of tau and HMW tau is increased during
apoptosis resulting in functional impairment. Further, to our
knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that phosphorylation
of HMW tau diminishes its binding to microtubules. At the present time,
little is known about the effects of phosphorylation of specific
residues, alone or combination, on tau function. However, it is
unlikely that hyperphosphorylation of the Tau-1 epitope is solely
responsible for the impairment of tau and HMW tau microtubule-binding during apoptosis. The mechanisms leading to alterations in the phosphorylation of tau and HMW tau during apoptosis may involve increased protein kinase activity, decreased protein phosphatase activity, aberrant expression of a protein kinase, or any combination of these events. For example, increases in Cdc2 protein kinase activity
(38, 66, 67) and decreases in protein phosphatase 2B activity (38)
occur during apoptosis of neuronal PC12 cells and may potentially
contribute to altered tau and HMW tau phosphorylation.
Nuclear changes, including DNA fragmentation and chromatin
condensation, have been shown to occur in the late stages of the apoptotic process (68, 69). Therefore, the extremely low levels of
total tau, as well as tubulin and actin (data not shown), in apoptotic
cells containing condensed chromatin are likely due to late proteolytic
events that occur immediately prior to the demise of the cell. In
contrast, the alterations in the Tau-1 staining pattern occurred in
apoptotic cells prior to nuclear condensation, suggesting that these
changes are coincident with earlier phases of the apoptotic process. We
hypothesize that hyperphosphorylation within the Tau-1 epitope and
coincident impairment of the microtubule binding capacity of tau and
HMW tau occurs prior to the late stages of apoptosis and probably
during early stages apoptosis when the cell is preparing to
irreversibly enter the cell death process (70). This implies that
increased phosphorylation of tau and HMW tau at the Tau-1 epitope and
at other putative sites resulting in impaired microtubule binding
function may contribute to the cytoskeletal alterations and membrane
blebbing that occur during apoptotic cell death. Although it cannot be
ruled out that changes in tau phosphorylation are nonspecific
downstream events that occur as a result of the apoptotic process, the
early and selective changes in tau phosphorylation (35) and impairment
of microtubule-binding strongly suggest that the increase in tau
phosphorylation may facilitate the cytoskeletal rearrangements that
occur during apoptosis.
The microtubule binding capacity of tau isolated from Alzheimer's
disease brain is significantly decreased as a result of abnormal
phosphorylation (55, 71). Numerous hyperphosphorylated Ser and Thr
residues throughout tau from Alzheimer's disease brain have been
identified including the those within the Tau-1 epitope (27, 28), and
alterations of phosphorylation within the Tau-1 epitope of tau
represent an early neuropathological event of Alzheimer's disease
(72). Although the study of tau hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer's
disease has been extensive, the mechanisms contributing to the
hyperphosphorylated state of Alzheimer's disease tau are unknown.
Interestingly, several studies have presented evidence that neuronal
apoptosis may contribute to the neurodegeneration that occurs in
Alzheimer's disease (73-77). Thus, further study of the mechanisms
involved in tau hyperphosphorylation at the Tau-1 site and in the
incompetence of tau microtubule binding function during neuronal PC12
cell apoptosis may contribute to our understanding of events
responsible for the hyperphosphorylation and dysfunction of tau during
Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the findings of this study have provided
important and novel information regarding the function and regulation
of HMW tau and the regulation and function of the cytoskeletal proteins
tau and HMW tau during neuronal apoptotic cell death.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. R. S. Jope for critically
reading and editing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant NS35060.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Psychiatry,
SC1061, 1720 7th Ave., South, University of Alabama,
Birmingham, AL 35294-0017. Tel.: 205-934-2465; Fax: 205-934-3709;
E-mail: gvwj@uab.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HMW, high molecular
weight;
NGF, nerve growth factor;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic
acid;
Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
JNK, N-terminal c-Jun kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baas, P. W.,
Deitch, J. S.,
Black, M. M.,
and Banker, G. A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8335-8339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Joshi, H. C.
(1998)
Cur. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
35-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Sinclair, G. I.,
Baas, P. W.,
and Heidemann, S. R.
(1988)
Brain Res.
450,
60-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lee, G.,
Cowan, N.,
and Kirschner, M.
(1988)
Science
239,
285-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Gu, Y.,
Oyama, F.,
and Ihara, Y.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
1235-1244[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Goedert, M.,
Spillantini, M. G.,
and Crowther, R. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1983-1987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Couchie, D.,
Mavilia, C.,
Georgieff, I. S.,
Liem, R. K.,
Shelanski, M. L.,
and Nunez, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4378-4381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Binder, L. I.,
Frankfurter, A.,
and Rebhun, L. I.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1371-1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Weingarten, M. D.,
Lockwood, A. H.,
Hwo, S. Y.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
1858-1862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Cleveland, D. W.,
Hwo, S. Y.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1977)
J. Mol. Biol.
116,
227-247[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Cleveland, D. W.,
Hwo, S. Y.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1977)
J. Mol. Biol.
116,
207-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Drubin, D. G.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
2739-2746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Knops, J.,
Kosik, K. S.,
Lee, G.,
Pardee, J. D.,
Cohen-Gould, L.,
and McConlogue, L.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
725-733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Drubin, D. G.,
Feinstein, S. C.,
Shooter, E. M.,
and Kirschner, M. W.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1799-1807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Esmaeli-Azad, B.,
McCarty, J. H.,
and Feinstein, S. C.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
869-879[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Brandt, R.,
Leger, J.,
and Lee, G.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1327-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Jenkins, S. M.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1998)
Neuroreport
9 (1),
67-71[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hwang, S. C.,
Jhon, D. Y.,
Bae, Y. S.,
Kim, J. H.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem
271,
18342-18349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Lee, G.,
Newman, S. T.,
Gard, D. L.,
Band, H.,
and Panchamoorthy, G.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
3167-3177[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Jameson, L.,
Frey, T.,
Zeeberg, B.,
Dalldorf, F.,
and Caplow, M.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
2472-2479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Lindwall, G.,
and Cole, R. D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
5301-6305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Johnson, G. V. W.,
and Jenkins, S. M.
(1996)
Alzheimer's Dis. Rev.
1,
38-54
|
| 23.
|
Johnson, G. V. W.,
and Hartigan, J. A.
(1998)
Alzheimer's Dis. Rev.
3,
125-141
|
| 24.
|
Gustke, N.,
Steiner, B.,
Mandelkow, E. M.,
Biernat, J.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Goedert, M.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
307,
199-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Drewes, G.,
Trinczek, B.,
Illenberger, S.,
Biernat, J.,
Schmitt-Ulms, G.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Mandelkow, E. M.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7679-7688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Trinczek, B.,
Biernat, J.,
Baumann, K.,
Mandelkow, E. M.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
1887-1902[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Morishima-Kawashima, M.,
Hasegawa, M.,
Takio, K.,
Suzuki, M.,
Yoshida, H.,
Titani, K.,
and Ihara, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
823-829[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Hanger, D. P.,
Betts, J. C.,
Loviny, T. L.,
Blackstock, W. P.,
and Anderton, B. H.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
2465-2476[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Drubin, D.,
Kobayashi, S.,
Kellogg, D.,
and Kirschner, M.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
106,
1583-1591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Oblinger, M. M.,
Argasinski, A.,
Wong, J.,
and Kosik, K. S.
(1991)
J. Neurosci.
11,
2453-2459[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Taleghany, N.,
and Oblinger, M. M.
(1992)
J. Neurosci. Res.
33,
257-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Levee, M. G.,
Dabrowska, M. I.,
Lelli, J. L., Jr.,
and Hinshaw, D. B.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1981-C1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
van Engeland, M.,
Kuijpers, H. J.,
Ramaekers, F. C.,
Reutelingsperger, C. P.,
and Schutte, B.
(1997)
Exp. Cell Res.
235,
421-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Rao, L.,
Perez, D.,
and White, E.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
1441-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Davis, P. K.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
340,
51-58
|
| 36.
|
Greene, L. A.,
and Tischler, A. S.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
2424-2428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Batistatou, A.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
461-471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Davis, P. K.,
Dudek, S. M.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
2338-2347[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Lindwall, G.,
and Cole, R. D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
12241-12245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Fleming, L. M.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
309,
41-47
|
| 41.
|
Carmel, G.,
Mager, E. M.,
Binder, L. I.,
and Kuret, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32789-32795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Riederer, B. M.,
Draberova, E.,
Viklicky, V.,
and Draber, P.
(1995)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
43,
1269-1284[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Goedert, M.,
Spillantini, M. G.,
Potier, M. C.,
Ulrich, J.,
and Crowther, R. A.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
393-399[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Szendrei, G. I.,
Lee, V. M.,
and Otvos, L., Jr.
(1993)
J. Neurosci. Res.
34,
243-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Greene, L. A.
(1978)
J. Cell Biol.
78,
747-755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Pittman, R. N.,
Wang, S.,
DiBenedetto, A. J.,
and Mills, J. C.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
3669-3680[Abstract]
|
| 47.
|
Cavigelli, M.,
Dolfi, F.,
Claret, F. X.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5957-5964[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Park, D. S.,
Stefanis, L.,
Yan, C. Y. I.,
Farinelli, S. E.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21898-21905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Brady, R. M.,
Zinkowski, R. P.,
and Binder, L. I.
(1995)
Neurobiol. Aging
16,
479-486[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Karin, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16483-16486[Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Mashima, T.,
Naito, M.,
Noguchi, K.,
Miller, D. K.,
Nicholson, D. W.,
and Tsuruo, T.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
1007-1012[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Guenal, I.,
Risler, Y.,
and Mignotte, B.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
489-495[Abstract]
|
| 54.
|
Johnson, G. V.
(1992)
J. Neurochem.
59,
2056-2062[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Bramblett, G. T.,
Goedert, M.,
Jakes, R.,
Merrick, S. E.,
Trojanowski, J. Q.,
and Lee, V. M.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
1089-1099[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Lu, Q.,
and Wood, J. G.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
508-515[Abstract]
|
| 57.
|
Mandell, J. W.,
and Banker, G. A.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
5727-5740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Greenwood, J. A.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1995)
Exp. Cell Res.
220,
332-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Loomis, P. A.,
Howard, T. H.,
Castleberry, R. P.,
and Binder, L. I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8422-8426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Thurston, V. C.,
Pena, P.,
Pestell, R.,
and Binder, L. I.
(1997)
Cell Motil. Cytoskelet.
38,
100-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Nuydens, R.,
Dispersyn, G.,
de Jong, M.,
van den Kieboom, G.,
Borgers, M.,
and Geerts, H.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
240,
687-691[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Kroemer, G.,
Petit, P.,
Zamzami, N.,
Vayssiere, J. L.,
and Mignotte, B.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
1277-1287[Abstract]
|
| 63.
|
Bonfoco, E.,
Leist, M.,
Zhivotovsky, B.,
Orrenius, S.,
Lipton, S. A.,
and Nicotera, P.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
2484-2493[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Kolodney, M. S.,
and Elson, E. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10252-10256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Mills, J. C.,
Lee, V. M.,
and Pittman, R. N.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
625-636[Abstract]
|
| 66.
|
Scott, C. W.,
Vulliet, P. R.,
and Caputo, C. B.
(1993)
Brain Res.
611,
237-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 67.
|
Gao, C. Y.,
and Zelenka, P. S.
(1995)
Exp. Cell Res.
219,
612-618[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Deckwerth, T. L.,
and Johnson, E. M., Jr.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1207-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Farschon, D. M.,
Couture, C.,
Mustelin, T.,
and Newmeyer, D. D.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
1117-1125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Deshmukh, M.,
Vasilakos, J.,
Deckwerth, T. L.,
Lampe, P. A.,
Shivers, B. D.,
and Johnson, E. M., Jr.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
1341-1354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Yoshida, H.,
and Ihara, Y.
(1993)
J. Neurochem.
61,
1183-1186[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
Su, J. H.,
Cummings, B. J.,
and Cotman, C. W.
(1994)
Neuroreport
5,
2358-2362[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 73.
|
Guo, Q.,
Fu, W.,
Xie, J.,
Luo, H.,
Sells, S. F.,
Geddes, J. W.,
Bondada, V.,
Rangnekar, V. M.,
and Mattson, M. P.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
957-962[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 74.
|
Loo, D. T.,
Copani, A.,
Pike, C. J.,
Whittemore, E. R.,
Walencewicz, A. J.,
and Cotman, C. W.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7951-7955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 75.
|
Smale, G.,
Nichols, N. R.,
Brady, D. R.,
Finch, C. E.,
and Horton, W. E., Jr.
(1995)
Exp. Neurol.
133,
225-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 76.
|
Wolozin, B.,
Iwasaki, K.,
Vito, P.,
Ganjei, J. K.,
Lacana, E.,
Sunderland, T.,
Zhao, B.,
Kusiak, J. W.,
Wasco, W.,
and D'Adamio, L.
(1996)
Science
274,
1710-1713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 77.
|
Gervais, F. G.,
Xu, D.,
Robertson, G. S.,
Vaillancourt, J. P.,
Zhu, Y.,
Huang, J.,
LeBlanc, A.,
Smith, D.,
Rigby, M.,
Shearman, M. S.,
Clarke, E. E.,
Zheng, H.,
Van Der Ploeg, L. H.,
Ruffolo, S. C.,
Thornberry, N. A.,
Xanthoudakis, S.,
Zamboni, R. J.,
Roy, S.,
and Nicholson, D. W.
(1999)
Cell
97,
395-406[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 78.
|
Smith, C. J.,
Anderton, B. H.,
Davis, D. R.,
and Gallo, J. M.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
375,
243-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rametti, F. Esclaire, C. Yardin, and F. Terro
Linking Alterations in Tau Phosphorylation and Cleavage during Neuronal Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 24, 2004;
279(52):
54518 - 54528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Cho and G. V. W. Johnson
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3{beta} Induces Caspase-cleaved Tau Aggregation in Situ
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 24, 2004;
279(52):
54716 - 54723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Cho and G. V. W. Johnson
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3beta Phosphorylates Tau at Both Primed and Unprimed Sites. DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON MICROTUBULE BINDING
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
187 - 193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|