JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nikaido, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueno, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nikaido, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35809-35815, December 10, 1999


Thioredoxin-dependent Redox Regulation of p53-mediated p21 Activation*

Masaya UenoDagger §, Hiroshi MasutaniDagger , Roberto Jun AraiDagger , Akira Yamauchi§, Kiichi Hirota, Toshiyuki Sakai||, Takashi Inamoto§, Yoshio Yamaoka§, Junji YodoiDagger **, and Toshio NikaidoDagger Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biological Responses, Institute for Virus Research, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, the § Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, and the  Department of Anaesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, the || Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-0841, and the Dagger Dagger  Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thioredoxin (TRX) is a dithiol-reducing enzyme that is induced by various oxidative stresses. TRX regulates the activity of DNA-binding proteins, including Jun/Fos and nuclear factor-kappa B. TRX also interacts with an intranuclear reducing molecule redox factor 1 (Ref-1), which enhances the activity of Jun/Fos. Here, we have investigated the role of TRX in the regulation of p53 activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed that TRX augmented the DNA binding activity of p53 and also further potentiated Ref-1-enhanced p53 activity. Luciferase assay revealed that transfection of TRX enhanced p53-dependent expression of p21 and further intensified Ref-1-mediated p53 activation. Furthermore, Western blot analysis revealed that p53-dependent induction of p21 protein was also facilitated by transfection with TRX. Overexpression of transdominant negative mutant TRX (mTRX) suppressed the effects of TRX or Ref-1, showing a functional interaction between TRX and Ref-1. cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP) induced p53 activation and p21 transactivation. The p53-dependent p21 transactivation induced by CDDP was inhibited by mTRX overexpression, suggesting that TRX-dependent redox regulation is physiologically involved in p53 regulation. CDDP also stimulated translocation of TRX from the cytosol into the nucleus. Hence, TRX-dependent redox regulation of p53 activity indicates coupling of the oxidative stress response and p53-dependent repair mechanism.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thioredoxin (TRX)1 was originally identified in Escherichia coli and has become known as a dithiol hydrogen donor for a variety of target proteins, including ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme essential for DNA synthesis. TRX has a highly conserved amino acid sequence, Trp-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys-Lys, at its active site. The two cysteine residues at the active site, Cys-32 and Cys-35, undergo reversible oxidation-reduction reactions catalyzed by a NADPH-dependent enzyme thioredoxin reductase. TRX and glutathione constitute the major cellular reducing system (1). Human TRX was cloned as an adult T cell leukemia-derived factor, produced by human T cell leukemia virus I-transformed T cells (2). TRX is induced by various kinds of stress, such as viral infection, and secreted from the cells (3, 4). Recently, TRX-dependent peroxidase (peroxiredoxin) families have been cloned (5). TRX is important in cytoprotection against oxidative stresses (6, 7). TRX is induced by various kinds of oxidative stress, including UV, x-ray irradiation, or CDDP treatment. TRX modulates the DNA binding activity of transcription factors, including nuclear factor-kappa B, polyoma virus enhancer-binding protein 2, glucocorticoid and estrogen receptors, and hypoxia-inducing factor 1-alpha (8-12).

The tumor suppresser protein p53 is induced by various kinds of oxidative stress. Its overexpression arrests cell cycle progression in the G1 phase and suppresses cell proliferation through p21 induction (13, 14). p53 exerts its tumor suppressor effect by controlling the expression of cell cycle-related genes after DNA damage (15, 16). p53 is induced by oxidative stresses, such as x-ray or UV irradiation or CDDP treatment. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ataxia-telangiectasia gene product or DNA-dependent protein kinase appears to be an important regulatory mechanism of p53 in response to DNA damage (17-19). Besides the mechanism, involvement of redox regulation in the p53 gene has been reported. The site-specific DNA binding activity of p53 is dependent upon its highly conserved central DNA binding domain that contains a zinc ion (20-22) and cysteine residues (23). Mutation of these cysteine residues in murine p53 markedly decreased sequence-specific DNA binding activity in vitro (24). Agents such as dithiothreitol (DTT) and metal chelators modulate the DNA binding capacity of p53 (25).

Recently, redox factor 1 (Ref-1) was purified as an activator of p53 and was shown to transactivate p53 in vivo (26). Ref-1 was originally identified as a DNA repair enzyme exhibiting apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease activity (27, 28). Ref-1 is a ubiquitous nuclear protein and purified as an activator of activator protein-1 (AP-1) that is a heterodimer of Fos/Jun. Ref-1 activates AP-1 DNA binding activity by reducing cysteine residues in Fos and Jun (29, 30). TRX activates the AP-1 Fos/Jun (heterodimer) through the nuclear redox protein Ref-1 (31). In addition, we previously reported that TRX is able to interact physically with Ref-1 (31). These findings raise the possibility that TRX may, directly or indirectly, regulate p53 activity. Thus, in this study, we tried to elucidate the role of TRX, an endogenous reducing agent, in p53 activity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Lines and Culture-- Human WiDr colon cancer cells were kindly provided by Dr Takahashi and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) under 5% CO2 at 37 °C. MG63 human osteosarcoma cells (obtained from RIKEN cell bank, Tsukuba, Japan) or HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells (obtained from RIKEN cell bank, Tokyo, Japan), MCF-7 cells (obtained from RIKEN cell bank) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS at 5% CO2 in air at 37 °C. p53 was mutated in WiDr cells and deleted in MG63 cells.

Oligonucleotides and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)-- Aliquots of recombinant p53 (p53; residues 1-393) glutathione S-transferase fusion protein purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa-Cruz, CA) were incubated in 10-fold diluted DNA-binding buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 µg of poly(dI-dC), 100 mM KCl, 150 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Samples were incubated with 32P end-labeled double stranded oligonucleotide 5'-TACAGAACATGTCTAAGCATGCTGGGG-3' (wild-type) for 20 min at 25 °C. Reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis at 200 V onto 4% polyacrylamide gels containing 0.25× Tris borate-EDTA buffer at 4 °C for 3.5 h. DNA-protein complexes were identified by autoradiography. The changes in the p53 DNA binding activity were quantitated and analyzed by a densitmeter with the National Institutes of Health Image program (Research Service Branch, National Institutes of Health). The specificity of p53 in the assay was tested by adding 100-fold excess of either wild-type or mutant competitors (5'-TACAGAATCGCTCTAAGCATGCTGGGG-3'), as well as the supershift caused by the addition of 300 ng of the anti-p53 antibody (DO-1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Recombinant TRX was provided by Ajinomoto Co. Ltd (Kawasaki, Japan). Recombinant Ref-1 was prepared as described previously (9).

Transfection and Luciferase Assay-- WiDr cells were seeded at 7 × 105 cells per 60-mm dish prior to transfection. In each transfection, the pcDNA3-wild-type TRX expression plasmid, pcDNA3-mutant type TRX expression plasmid (mTRX; C32S/C35S), which lacks reducing activity, and/or the pRc/CMV-Ref-1 expression vector (Ref-1) (31), pcDNA3/CMV-wild-type p53 expression vector, pcDNA3/CMV-mutant-type p53 (mutation at codon 143) expression vector (32) with -2326/+11PWWP-luciferase or PWP-luciferase, in which the p53 binding site is deleted, were used (33). Cells in the FBS-free medium were transfected with the cationic polymer polyethylenimine, as described by Boussif et al. (34). Briefly, the plasmid DNA and the polymer solution were each diluted into 50 µl of 150 mM NaCl and vortexed. After 10 min, the two solutions were mixed, vortexed vigorously, and added to the cells. After 2 h of incubation, the medium was supplemented with FBS up to 0.5%. Luciferase gene expression was analyzed 24 h later, using an assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI) with luminometer. For controlling the efficiency of the transfection, the Renilla luciferase gene expression was monitored using pCMV-PRL and a dual luciferase system (Promega). Assays were performed in triplicate. The relative fold activation of luciferase was calculated. MCF-7 cells were seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells per 60-mm dish. pcDNA3-TRX C32S/C35S expression plasmid or pcDNA3 was transfected as described above. After 2 h, the medium was supplemented with FBS up to 10% with or without 5 µM CDDP (Sigma). Luciferase gene expression was analyzed 24 h later as shown above. Assays were performed in triplicate. The relative fold activation of luciferase was calculated.

Western Blot Analysis-- WiDr cells were seeded at 7 × 105 cells per 60-mm dish prior to transfection. The transfection was performed by the same method as described above. Cells (7 × 105) were harvested and lysed with SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis buffer (63 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 0.025% bromphenol blue) and then boiled for 5 min. The cell lysate was loaded and separated by 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad). The separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Co., Bedford, MA). The membranes were treated with Tween-PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 for 1 h to inhibit nonspecific binding. Then the membranes were incubated with anti-p21 monoclonal antibodies (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The expression of p21 was detected by the use of ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The same membrane was reblotted with monoclonal anti-beta -actin antibodies (Sigma) to monitor an internal loading control for protein loading.

Immunofluorescence Cell Staining-- HeLa cells were seeded prior to staining at 2.5 × 104 cells/well in culture slides (Falcon). The cells were treated with or without 2 µM CDDP (Sigma). Then, the cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS containing 10% FBS for 20 min at room temperature followed by permeabilization for 10 min using 0.2% (w/v) Triton X-100 in PBS and blocking with PBS containing 5% bovine serum albumin and 10% FBS for 20 min. Slides were incubated with 1 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-TRX mAb (provided by Fujirebio) for 60 min and then washed with PBS. Stained cells were mounted in Crystal Mount (Biomeda Co., Foster City, CA) and were examined using a laser confocal microscope (Bio-Rad).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recombinant TRX and/or Ref-1 Enhance Sequence-specific DNA Binding of p53-- We first tested the influence of DTT (an SH-dependent chemical reducing agent) or diamide (a chemical oxidative agent) on p53-specific DNA binding activity, using an EMSA. Pretreatment of recombinant p53 (rP53) with 50 mM DTT resulted in an increase in DNA binding activity (Fig. 1A, compare lanes 2-4). These bound bands were specific, because they were supershifted upon the addition of the human monoclonal antibody against p53 (DO-1; Fig. 1A, lane 8). In addition, they were competed with an excess of wild-type oligonucleotide encompassing the p53 binding site but not with excess of mutated oligonucleotide (Fig. 1A, lanes 6 and 7). Densitometrical analysis demonstrated that the relative intensities of the specific bands of lanes 2-7 in Fig. 1A are 1, 1.2, 12, 0, 2.5, and 11, respectively. These results show that the binding activity of p53 depends on the redox condition and that a reducing environment is essential for the formation of p53-DNA complexes.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Influence of redox agents and factors on the sequence-specific DNA binding of p53. A, effects of redox modulating agents, such as DTT or diamide, on the DNA binding activity of wild-type p53. 600 ng of recombinant wild-type p53 (rP53) was added to the reaction (except lane 1, control), in the absence (lane 2) or presence of DTT (lane 3, 10 mM; lanes 4 and 6-9, 50 mM) or with diamide (lane 5, 1 mM) for 20 min on ice and then analyzed by the EMSA as described under "Experimental Procedures." A 100-fold excess of wild-type oligonucleotide encompassing the p53-responsive element (wt) (lane 6) or mutated oligonucleotides (m) (lane 7), 300 ng of anti-p53 antibody (DO-1) (lane 8), or 300 ng of MOPC21 used as a control antibody (cont.) (lane 9) were used for monitoring p53 specificity. B, effects of TRX and Ref-1 on the DNA binding activity of wild-type p53. 600 ng of recombinant wild-type p53 (rP53) was incubated with 0.01 µM (lane 3) or 0.1 µM (lane 4) recombinant TRX in the presence of TRX reductase and NADPH for 20 min on ice. Recombinant p53 without treatment (lane 2) or with treatment was subjected to the EMSA. In lanes 5 and 6, 0.01 and 0.1 µM recombinant Ref-1, respectively, was added to the reaction mixture. Anti-p53 antibody (300 ng of DO-1) (lane 7) or MOPC21 (300 ng) (lane 8) used as a control antibody (cont.) (lane 8) were used for monitoring specificity in the presence of 50 mM DTT. C, effects of TRX and Ref-1 on the DNA binding activity of wild-type p53. Recombinant wild-type p53 (rP53) was incubated with 0.1 µM (lane 3) or 1 µM (lane 6) recombinant TRX in the presence of TRX reductase and NADPH for 20 min on ice. rP53 was incubated with 0.1 µM (lane 4) or 1 µM (lane 7) recombinant Ref-1 for 20 min on ice. rP53 was incubated with 0.1 µM (lane 5) or 1 µM (lane 8) both recombinant TRX and recombinant Ref-1 for 20 min on ice. rP53 without treatment (lane 2) and with treatment (lanes 3-10) were subjected to the EMSA. Anti-p53 antibody (300 ng of DO-1) (lane 9) or MOPC21 (300 ng) (lane 10) as a control antibody (cont.) was used for monitoring specificity in the presence of 50 mM DTT.

TRX is an endogenous thiol-reducing molecule that modulates the DNA binding of various transcriptional factors. Therefore, we next examined the effect of recombinant human TRX on the wild-type p53 binding activity using EMSA. We compared the binding activity of p53 in the absence and presence of recombinant human TRX. As seen in Fig. 1B (compare lanes 2-4), recombinant TRX significantly enhanced the sequence-specific DNA binding activity of wild-type p53 in the presence of TRX reductase and NADPH. The effect of TRX was dose-dependent and was visible at a concentration as low as 0.01 µM. The effect of 1 µM recombinant TRX was equivalent to that of 50 mM DTT in enhancing the activity. Ref-1 also significantly enhanced the DNA binding (Fig. 1B, compare lanes 2, 5, and 6), as reported previously (26). Densitometrical analysis showed that the relative intensities of the specific bands of lanes 2-6 in Fig. 1B are 1, 3.4, 5.5, 3.1, and 4.9, respectively. The effect of Ref-1 was seen at a concentration as low as 0.01 µM and reached a plateau level at 0.1 µM (Fig. 1C, lanes 4 and 7). In addition to this result, TRX significantly enhanced Ref-1-mediated p53 binding activity (i.e. Ref-1-mediated p53 binding activity was enhanced by TRX) (Fig. 1C, compare lanes 3-8). TRX (0.1 µM) was capable of enhancing Ref-1-mediated p53 binding activity to a greater extent than that of 0.1 µM Ref-1 alone. Densitometrical analysis showed that the intensities of the specific bands of lanes 2-8 in Fig. 1C are 1, 5.8, 4.9, 11.9, 6.5, 5.2, and 20, respectively. These bound complexes were specific as they were supershifted with a p53-specific antibody (DO-1) (Fig. 1C, lane 9).

Transient Expression of TRX or Ref-1 Activates the Function of Wild-type p53-- We next examined whether TRX and/or Ref-1 could enhance the transcriptional activity of p53 in vivo. The expression vector pcDNA3/CMV-wild-type p53 transactivated the reporter gene that contained the wild-type p53-responsive element of the p21 gene but not the reporter gene that lacked the wild-type p53-responsive element. In contrast, the pcDNA3/CMV-mutant-type p53 was unable to transactivate the wild-type p21 luciferase reporter gene (Fig. 2A). Using this p53-dependent reporter assay for the p21 promoter, we tested the effect of TRX and/or Ref-1 on the transcriptional activity of p53. The reporter gene including the p21 promoter was transfected in colon cancer cells (WiDr cells harboring mutant-type p53) or osteosarcoma cells (MG63 cells lacking wild-type p53). 5.8-fold induction of luciferase activity was observed by overexpression of 1 µg of wild-type TRX (Fig. 2B) compared with the control. 7.6-fold induction was observed by overexpression of 1 µg of Ref-1 (Fig. 2C). In MG63 cells, the same enhancing effect by TRX or Ref-1 was observed (data not shown). Neither TRX nor Ref-1 affected the basal transcriptional activity (data not shown).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   TRX- or Ref-1-mediated stimulation of transactivation by p53. A, p53-dependent transactivation of the p21 promoter in WiDr cells. WiDr cells were transfected with 1.0 µg of wild-type p53 (WT P53) or mutant-type p53 (MUT P53) expression plasmids together with 2.5 µg of either the reporter construct (WT P21 LUC), which contained the p53 binding site of the promoter in p21, or the mutant construct (MUT P21 LUC), which lacked the p53 binding site. The total amount of DNA was normalized to equivalent amounts by control parental plasmids (pcDNA3). Luciferase activities, which were normalized by assaying Renilla luciferase activity, were determined at 20 h. Fold activation represents the mean of triplicate samples. The results are means ± S.D. of triplicate wells. B, effects of transient overexpression of wild-type TRX on p53-dependent transactivation of wild-type p21 promoter in WiDr cells. pcDNA3-wild-type TRX (TRX) (2.0 µg) was co-transfected with wild-type p53 (WT P53) and wild-type p21 luciferase construct (WT P21 LUC). These results are representative of three independent experiments. C, effects of transient overexpression of Ref-1 on the p53-dependent transactivation of the p21 promoter. Different amounts (0, 1.0, or 2.0 µg) of the pRc/CMV-Ref-1 expression vector (Ref-1) were transfected with wild-type p53 (WT P53) and wild-type p21 luciferase (WT P21 LUC) in WiDr cells. The luciferase values for each of the plasmids were normalized by the corresponding Renilla luciferase activity.

Effect of TRX on the Expression of p21 Induced by p53-- We then performed Western blot analysis to test whether TRX or Ref-1 overexpression can modulate the expression level of p21. Transfection of either wild-type TRX (Fig. 3, lane 5) or Ref-1 (Fig. 3, lane 6) with wild-type p53 increased the p21 expression more than that of the control vector (Fig. 3, lane 4). TRX alone or Ref-1 alone did not significantly change p21 expression level (compare lanes 1-3). The amount of beta -actin in each lysate was almost equivalent. These results suggest that either TRX or Ref-1 augments p53-dependent p21 expression in vivo.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of TRX on the expression of p21 induced by p53. Up-regulation of p21 induction by the TRX or the pRc/CMV-Ref-1 expression vector (Ref-1). WiDr cells were transiently transfected by TRX or Ref-1 expression vector with the wild-type p53 expression vector (WT P53). The total amount of DNA was normalized to equivalent amounts by control parental plasmids (pcDNA3). p21 expression (top panel) was then determined by Western blot analysis. The bottom panel shows beta -actin expression analyzed by reprobing the same membrane with anti-beta -actin monoclonal antibody.

Transient Co-expression of TRX and Ref-1 Activates the Function of Wild-type p53-- We then tested the enhancing effect when TRX and Ref-1 were co-transfected. When suboptimal doses of wild-type TRX and Ref-1 expression vectors were co-transfected simultaneously, p53 activity was further enhanced in WiDr cells, compared with that when TRX or Ref-1 were transfected alone (Fig. 4). The extent of the induction was 2.8-fold. In MG63 cells, the same enhancing effect by TRX and Ref-1 was observed. TRX enhanced the effect of Ref-1 almost 3-fold in MG63 cells (data not shown).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   TRX- and Ref-1-mediated stimulation of transactivation by p53. Potentiation of p53 transactivation by both Ref-1 and TRX. In addition to the pRc/CMV-Ref-1 expression vector (Ref-1), the wild-type TRX expression plasmid was transfected with wild-type p53 (WT P53) and wild-type p21 luciferase (WT P21 LUC) in WiDr cells. The luciferase activities were normalized by Renilla luciferase activity. The results are means ± S.D. of triplicate wells. This experiment was reproduced three times.

Mutant TRX Suppresses the Up-regulated Function of Wild-type p53 by TRX or Ref-1-- Because TRX and Ref-1 are reported to interact functionally and physically in the AP-1 system (29, 31), we further analyzed the interaction of TRX and Ref-1 in p53 activation. As mutant TRX in which active site cysteines are replaced by serine residues (TRX (Cys-32/Cys-35)) competitively inhibits thioredoxin reductase activity (35), we examined the effect of TRX (C32S/C35S) overexpression on the p53 activation. Transfection of a mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) expression vector repressed the effect of TRX in p53 activation (Fig. 5). Upon co-transfection of this expression vector, the p53 activation by Ref-1 was significantly suppressed, whereas basal transcriptional activity was unchanged by the transfection of mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) (Fig. 5B). These data suggest that at least part of the Ref-1 mediation of p53 activation is modulated by the redox activity of TRX.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of mutant TRX on TRX-/Ref-1-mediated stimulation of the transactivation by p53. A, activation of p53 by wild-type TRX was abolished by the addition of mutant-type TRX (C32S/C35S). In addition to the reporter construct (WT P21 LUC), wild-type p53 (WT P53), TRX, or mTRX expression plasmids were transfected in WiDr cells. The luciferase activities determined are shown as means ± S.D. of triplicate wells. All samples included a Renilla luciferase expression vector as a transfection efficiency control. B, activation of p53 by Ref-1 was partially antagonized by mTRX. In addition to the Ref-1 or TRX expression vector with WT P53 and WT P21, mTRX expression plasmids were transfected in WiDr. Luciferase activities normalized by Renilla luciferase activity are expressed as means ± S.D. of triplicate wells. The result is a representative of three independent experiments.

We next examined whether the redox regulation by TRX is involved in physiological p53 function. p53 transactivates p21 promoter upon oxidative stress, such as treatment with CDDP. We tested the effect of mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) overexpression in the transactivation of the p21 promoter by CDDP treatment in MCF-7 cells harboring wild-type p53. The p21 promoter activity in transfectants with a mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) expression vector was suppressed to 50%, compared with that in transfectants with control vector (Fig. 6). The result indicates a role of TRX-dependent redox regulation in p53 activity.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Suppression of CDDP-induced p21 transactivation by mutant TRX (C32S/C35S). p21 promoter activity induced by CDDP was suppressed by overexpression of mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) in MCF-7 cells. The total amount of DNA was normalized to equivalent amounts by control parental plasmids (pcDNA3). The luciferase activities determined are shown as means ± S.D. of triplicate wells. All samples included a Renilla luciferase expression vector as a transfection efficiency control. This result is a representative of three independent experiments.

Nuclear Translocation of TRX by CDDP-- TRX is known to exist in cytoplasm without oxidative stress. On the other hand, p53 translocates from cytoplasm to nucleus upon oxidative stress for example treatment with UV or CDDP. We studied subcellular localization of TRX on CDDP treatment. In the absence of CDDP, TRX mainly remained in cytoplasm. In contrast, after 60 min of incubation with 2 µM CDDP, cells with nuclear staining were seen (Fig. 7). These data suggest that TRX translocates from cytosol to nucleus upon oxidative stress.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Nuclear translocation of TRX by CDDP CDDP treatment induced translocation of TRX from cytosol to nucleus in HeLa cells. A, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-TRX mAb staining of cells treated with CDDP. B, control antibody staining of cells treated with CDDP. C, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-TRX mAb staining of cells without CDDP treatment.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have demonstrated here that TRX enhances the sequence-specific DNA binding activity of p53 both directly (when applied alone) or indirectly (by enhancing Ref-1 mediation), and we have provided clear evidence that TRX is an important factor in the regulation of p53 DNA binding activity.

In the EMSA, recombinant TRX or Ref-1 augmented the sequence-specific DNA binding of p53. The effect of TRX and Ref-1 was seen at almost the same concentration. The enhancing effect of TRX on Ref-1-dependent p53 activation was marked in the EMSA. The effect of Ref-1 was reached to a plateau level at a concentration of 0.1 µM. However, the effect was further augmented by the addition of TRX.

In the luciferase assay, our results showed that either TRX or Ref-1 augments p53-dependent p21 expression in vivo. As seen in the EMSA, TRX enhanced Ref-1-mediated p53 activation in WiDr cells harboring mutant p53 or MG63 cells lacking p53. These results further indicate a functional coupling between TRX and Ref-1 in the p53 activation system. The interaction between TRX and Ref-1 has also been observed in other systems. TRX can activate AP-1 DNA binding activity (29), acting as a factor in a redox cascade involving Ref-1. We have previously demonstrated that TRX and Ref-1 enhanced PMA-induced activation of AP-1 (31). The DNA binding activity of transcriptional factor polyoma virus enhancer-binding protein 2 is regulated by the redox mechanism with TRX and Ref-1 (9). The interaction of co-activators with hypoxia-inducing factor 1-alpha or hypoxia-inducing factor 1-alpha -like factor has been regulated by TRX/Ref-1 system (12). The overexpression of the mTRX C32S/C35S, which lacks reducing activity, decreased the effect of the transfected Ref-1, as well as TRX, indicating that at least part of the Ref-1 mediation of p53 activation is modulated by the redox activity of TRX. In the presence of a reducing agent, Ref-1 was reported to be a potent stimulator of wild-type p53 (26). Our previous report also showed the direct interaction of Ref-1 and TRX through the cysteine residues of TRX (31). Therefore, besides its direct action on p53, TRX seems to be able to act indirectly on p53 via the redox regulation of Ref-1. Mutant TRX (C32S/C35S) overexpression suppressed the transactivation of the p21 promoter by CDDP treatment in MCF-7 cells, indicating that the redox regulation of TRX plays a role in physiological p53 activity. In a yeast system, the importance of the TRX system in p53 activity has also been reported, in studies in which deletion of the thioredoxin reductase gene inhibited p53-dependent reporter gene expression (36). In addition, we have shown here that TRX translocates from cytosol to nucleus upon treatment with CDDP. The translocation was also induced by oxidative stresses, including UV irradiation (37), or hydrogen peroxide (10). Therefore, it is presumed that TRX translocates to the nuclear compartment upon oxidative stress to interact with Ref-1. It might be possible that TRX is involved in the mechanism of translocation of p53 upon oxidative stress. Both the direct interaction between p53 and TRX and the mechanism of the dynamic regulation of Ref-1 by TRX in the nuclear compartment require further analysis.

Higher levels of TRX are detected in cancerous tissues, such as adult T cell leukemia, hepatocellular carcinomas, and cervical neoplastic squamous epithelial cells of the uterus (38-40). Several groups analyzed p53 status in adult T cell leukemia patients and human T cell leukemia virus I-infected cells. Inhibition of p53 transactivation function by the human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax protein was reported (41). On the other hand, the mutations of p53 are frequent in cancer tissues. Therefore, this abnormal expression of TRX might be explained as a compensation mechanism for p53 dysfunction. Mutation of the cysteine residues in p53 could function as an escape mechanism from redox regulation. This possibility should be further investigated in the cancerous predisposition or cancerous tissues.

In this study, p53-dependent p21 expression was up-regulated by the TRX-Ref-1 cascade. p53 is thought to be a gatekeeper against DNA damage, and it induces G1 arrest to afford cells time to repair damaged DNA (15, 16). TRX is induced and translocated into cell upon oxidative stress. Thus, our results suggest that TRX interacts with p53 in response to oxidative stress and plays a role in stimulating p53 function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. S. Xanthoudakis and P. Hinds for providing plasmid vectors and Dr R. Takahashi for providing WiDr cells. We also thank the members of the laboratory, including Drs. H. Nakamura and T. Ohno for excellent support; Dr. K. Nakayama of Shinshu University for instructive advice; Y. Yamaguchi for technical help; and Y. Kanekiyo for secretarial help.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan and by a grant-in-aid for research for the future from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-75-751-4024; Fax: 81-75-761-5766; E-mail: yodoi@virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TRX, thioredoxin; mTRX, mutant TRX; Ref-1, redox factor 1; CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II); AP-1, activator protein-1; DTT, dithiothreitol; FBS, fetal bovine serum; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Holmgren, A. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 237-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Tagaya, Y., Maeda, Y., Mitsui, A., Kondo, N., Matsui, H., Hamuro, J., Brown, N., Arai, K., Yokota, T., Wakasugi, H., and Yodoi, J. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 757-764[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Yodoi, J., and Tursz, T. (1991) Adv. Cancer Res. 57, 381-411[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Nakamura, H., Nakamura, K., and Yodoi, J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 351-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Chae, H. Z., Robinson, K., Poole, L. B., Church, G., Storz, G., and Rhee, S. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7017-7021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Ohira, A., Honda, O., Gauntt, C. D., Yamamoto, M., Hori, K., Masutani, H., Yodoi, J., and Honda, Y. (1994) Lab. Invest. 70, 279-285[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Nakamura, H., Matsuda, M., Furuke, K., Kitaoka, Y., Iwata, S., Toda, K., Inamoto, T., Yamaoka, Y., Ozawa, K., and Yodoi, J. (1994) Immunol. Lett. 42, 75-80[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Matthews, J. R., Wakasugi, N., Vireliezier, J. L., Yodoi, J., and Hay, R. T. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3821-3830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Akamatsu, Y., Ohno, T., Hirota, K., Kagoshima, H., Yodoi, J., and Shigesada, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14497-14500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Makino, Y., Okamoto, K., Yoshikawa, N., Aoshima, M., Hirota, K., Yodoi, J., Umesono, K., Makino, I., and Tanaka, H. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 2469-2477[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Hayashi, S., Hajiro-Nakanishi, K., Makino, Y., Eguchi, H., Yodoi, J., and Tanaka, H. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4035-4040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ema, M., Hirota, K., Mimura, J., Abe, H., Yodoi, J., Sogawa, K., Poellinger, L., and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1999) EMBO J. 7, 1905-1914[CrossRef]
13. Macleod, K. F., Sherry, N., Hannon, G., Beach, D., Tokino, T., Kinzler, K., Vogelstein, B., and Jacks, T. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 935-944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Takahashi, R. (1997) Leukemia 3, 331-333
15. Levine, A. J. (1997) Cell 88, 323-331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lotem, J., Peled-Kamar, M., Groner, Y., and Sachs, L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9166-9171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Banin, S., Moyal, L., Shieh, S., Taya, Y., Anderson, C. W., Chessa, L., Smorodinsky, N. I., Prives, C., Reiss, Y., Shiloh, Y., and Ziv, Y. (1998) Science 281, 1674-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Canman, C. E., Lim, D. S., Cimprich, K. A., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., Kastan, M. B., and Siliciano, J. D. (1998) Science 281, 1677-1679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Woo, R. A., McLure, K. G., Lees-Miller, S. P., Rancourt, D. E., and Lee, P. W. K. (1998) Nature 394, 700-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Bargonetti, J., Manfredi, J. J., Chen, X., Marshak, D. R., and Prives, C. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2565-2574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Pavletich, N. P., Chambers, K. A., and Pabo, C. O. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2556-2564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wang, Y., Reed, M., Wang, P., Stenger, J. E., Mayr, G., Anderson, M. E., Schwedes, J. F., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2575-2586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (1994) Science 265, 346-355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Rainwater, R., Parks, D., Anderson, M. E., Tegtmeyer, P., and Mann, K. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3892-3903[Abstract]
25. Hainaut, P., and Milner, J. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4469-4473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Jayaraman, L., Murthy, K. G., Zhu, C., Curran, T., Xanthoudakis, S., and Prives, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 558-570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Seki, S., Akiyama, K., Watanabe, S., Hatsushika, M., Ikeda, S., and Tsutsui, K. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20797-20802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Demple, B., Herman, T., and Chen, D. S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 11450-11454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Xanthoudakis, S., Miao, G., Wang, F., Pan, Y. C., and Curran, T. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3323-3335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Xanthoudakis, S., and Curran, T. (1992) EMBO J 11, 653-665[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Hirota, K., Matsui, M., Iwata, S., Nishiyama, A., Mori, K., and Yodoi, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3633-3638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Yamamoto, M., Yoshida, M., Ono, K., Fujita, T., Ohtani-Fujita, N., Sakai, T., and Nikaido, T. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 210, 94-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Sowa, Y., Orita, T., Minamikawa, S., Nakano, K., Mizuno, T., Nomura, H., and Sakai, T. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 241, 142-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Boussif, O., Lezoualc'h, F., Zanta, M. A., Mergny, M. D., Scherman, D., Demeneix, B., and Behr, J. P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7297-7301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Oblong, J. E., Berggren, M., Gasdaska, P. Y., and Powis, G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11714-11720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pearson, G. D., and Merrill, G. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5431-5434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Masutani, H., Hirota, K., Sasada, T., Ueda, T. Y., Taniguchi, Y., Sono, H., and Yodoi, J. (1996) Immunol. Lett. 54, 67-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Makino, S., Masutani, H., Maekawa, N., Konishi, I., Fujii, S., Yamamoto, R., and Yodoi, J. (1992) Immunology 76, 578-583[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Fujii, S., Nanbu, Y., Nonogaki, H., Konishi, I., Mori, T., Masutani, H., and Yodoi, J. (1991) Cancer 68, 1583-1591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Nakamura, H., Masutani, H., Tagaya, Y., Yamauchi, A., Inamoto, T., Nanbu, Y., Fujii, S., Ozawa, K., and Yodoi, J. (1992) Cancer 69, 2091-2097[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Pise-Masison, C. A., Choi, K. S., Radonovich, M., Dittmer, J., Kim, S. J., and Brady, J. N. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 1165-1170[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Umekawa, T. Sugiyama, T. Kihira, N. Murabayashi, L. Zhang, K. Nagao, Y. Kamimoto, N. Ma, J. Yodoi, and N. Sagawa
Overexpression of Thioredoxin-1 Reduces Oxidative Stress in the Placenta of Transgenic Mice and Promotes Fetal Growth via Glucose Metabolism
Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 3980 - 3988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. J. Nadeau, S. J. Charette, M. B. Toledano, and J. Landry
Disulfide Bond-mediated Multimerization of Ask1 and Its Reduction by Thioredoxin-1 Regulate H2O2-induced c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Activation and Apoptosis
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2007; 18(10): 3903 - 3913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Aichler, H. Algul, D. Behne, G. Holzlwimmer, B. Michalke, L. Quintanilla-Martinez, J. Schmidt, R. M. Schmid, and M. Brielmeier
Selenium status alters tumour differentiation but not incidence or latency of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in Ela-TGF-{alpha} p53+/ mice
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 2002 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Kobayashi-Miura, K. Shioji, Y. Hoshino, H. Masutani, H. Nakamura, and J. Yodoi
Oxygen sensing and redox signaling: the role of thioredoxin in embryonic development and cardiac diseases
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2040 - H2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Zhou, A. E. Damdimopoulos, G. Spyrou, and B. Brune
Thioredoxin 1 and Thioredoxin 2 Have Opposed Regulatory Functions on Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1{alpha}
J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7482 - 7490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Berndt, C. H. Lillig, and A. Holmgren
Thiol-based mechanisms of the thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems: implications for diseases in the cardiovascular system
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1227 - H1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. K.C. Ng, J. Wu, E. Chang, B.-y. Wang, R. Katzenberg-Clark, A. Ishii-Watabe, and J. P. Cooke
A Central Role for Nicotinic Cholinergic Regulation of Growth Factor-Induced Endothelial Cell Migration
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 106 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. C. Schulze, H. Liu, E. Choe, J. Yoshioka, A. Shalev, K. D. Bloch, and R. T. Lee
Nitric Oxide-Dependent Suppression of Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein Expression Enhances Thioredoxin Activity
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2666 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. T. Jones, C. W. Pugh, S. Wigfield, M. F.G. Stevens, and A. L. Harris
Novel Thioredoxin Inhibitors Paradoxically Increase Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-{alpha} Expression but Decrease Functional Transcriptional Activity, DNA Binding, and Degradation.
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5384 - 5394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. T. Jones and A. L. Harris
Identification of novel small-molecule inhibitors of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 transactivation and DNA binding.
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2006; 5(9): 2193 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
L. S. Terada
Specificity in reactive oxidant signaling: think globally, act locally
J. Cell Biol., August 28, 2006; 174(5): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
N. FEDOROFF
Redox Regulatory Mechanisms in Cellular Stress Responses
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2006; 98(2): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Ravi, H. Muniyappa, and K. C. Das
Endogenous Thioredoxin Is Required for Redox Cycling of Anthracyclines and p53-dependent Apoptosis in Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 40084 - 40096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
T. YOSHIDA, H. NAKAMURA, H. MASUTANI, and J. YODOI
The Involvement of Thioredoxin and Thioredoxin Binding Protein-2 on Cellular Proliferation and Aging Process
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2005; 1055(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page