|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 50, 35955-35962, December 10, 1999
Target and Specificity of a Nuclear Gene Product That
Participates in mRNA 3'-End Formation in Chlamydomonas
Chloroplasts*
Haim
Levy §,
Karen L.
Kindle¶ , and
David B.
Stern **
From the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research
and the ¶ Plant Science Center, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York 14853-1801
 |
ABSTRACT |
Chloroplast mRNA maturation is catalyzed by
nucleus-encoded processing enzymes. We previously described a recessive
nuclear mutation (crp3) that affects 3'-end formation of
several chloroplast mRNAs in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
(Levy, H., Kindle, K. L., and Stern, D. B. (1997) Plant
Cell 9, 825-836). In the crp3 background, atpB mRNA lacking a 3'-inverted repeat normally
required for stability accumulates as a discrete transcript. The
mutation also affects the atpA gene cluster; polycistronic
mRNAs with psbI or cemA 3'-ends accumulate
to a lower level in the crp3 background. Here, we
demonstrate that the crp3 mutation also alters 3'-end
formation of psbI mRNA and cemA-containing
mRNAs. A novel 3'-end is formed in monocistronic psbI
transcripts, and this is the only terminus observed when the
psbI 3'-untranslated region is fused to an aadA
reporter gene. Accumulation of mRNAs with 3'-ends between
cemA and atpH, which is immediately downstream,
was reduced. However, this sequence was not recognized as a 3'-end
formation element in chimeric genes. The crp3 mutation was
able to confer stability to three different atpB
3'-stem-loop-disrupting mutations that lack sequence similarity, but
are located at a similar distance from the translation termination codon. We propose that the wild-type CRP3 gene product is
part of the general 3' 5' processing machinery.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Gene expression in chloroplasts depends on nuclear gene products,
which mediate transcription and post-transcriptional processes (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2), including mRNA processing, splicing,
RNA stabilization, and translation initiation. Many nuclear factors
have been identified by genetic screens, e.g. in maize and
Arabidopsis by high chlorophyll fluorescence or leaf pigmentation patterns (3-7) and in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by high chlorophyll fluorescence
or a failure to grow photoautotrophically (reviewed in Ref. 1). These
mutations are recessive and can affect one or several chloroplast transcripts.
Progress in defining the precise targets of these nuclear factors has
been limited to Chlamydomonas, where chloroplast
transformation and the use of chimeric reporter genes are routine.
Nuclear factors required for psbD and petD
mRNA stability, for example, have been shown to interact with the
5'-untranslated region
(UTR),1 protecting the
mRNA from 5' 3' exonucleolytic degradation (8-10). In
addition, point and deletion mutagenesis has been used to define potential sites of interaction between nuclear translation factors and
the 5'-UTRs of petD (11), psbD (10), and
psbA (12). These studies suggest a complex interplay between
nuclear proteins and multiple cis-elements in chloroplast mRNAs.
In contrast to the 5'-UTR, whose functions in mRNA stability and
translation are relatively well described, the role of the 3'-UTR in
chloroplast gene expression is enigmatic. Although stem-loop-forming inverted repeat structures are commonly found in the 3'-UTR and stabilize RNAs in vitro and in vivo (13-15), the
inverted repeats can be replaced in vivo by a polyguanosine
sequence, which also forms a strong secondary structure (16). This
suggests that at least for atpB mRNA, specific sequences
are not required for formation of a stable 3'-end. Furthermore, the
3'-UTRs of various chloroplast genes are interchangeable both in
tobacco (17) and in Chlamydomonas (18, 19), suggesting that
gene-specific regulation is not accomplished through elements in this
region. Nonetheless, the stabilizing functions of 3'-UTRs are often
orientation-dependent (18, 19), and recent data from
Chlamydomonas suggest that 3'-end formation may stimulate
translation initiation in vivo (20).
To address the function of the 3'-UTR in more depth, we have taken a
molecular genetic approach. Previously, a series of 3'-deletions were
engineered downstream of the atpB gene.
Chlamydomonas strains with UTRs that lacked the potential to
form a stable 3'-stem-loop structure grew slowly under photoautotrophic
conditions, were sensitive to high intensity light, accumulated a
reduced amount of atpB mRNA that was heterogeneous in
size, and accumulated a similarly reduced level of the ATPase
-subunit, the product of the atpB gene (15). Two types of
phenotypic revertants were isolated from a prototypical strain of this
series, atpB 26, by virtue of their ability to grow rapidly on
minimal medium and their tolerance of high light. One class resulted
from a dramatic amplification of the mutant atpB gene in the
chloroplast, so that heterogeneous and unstable RNA accumulated to a
high level and thus increased ATPase accumulation (21). A second type
resulted from a mutation in a nuclear gene, which we have termed
CRP3 (chloroplast RNA
processing). This recessive mutation allows a discrete
transcript to accumulate from the 3'-deleted copy of atpB,
which results in increased accumulation of the ATPase -subunit due
to enhanced transcript stability and more efficient translation (20,
22). Interestingly, the crp3 mutation also caused changes in
other chloroplast transcripts, including accumulation of putative
processing intermediates and altered stability of transcripts from the
atpA gene cluster (22). Thus, CRP3 appears to
encode a factor involved in the maturation of several chloroplast
transcripts. In this report, we examine the specificity of suppression
of RNA instability by crp3 and show that it has a target in
the 3'-UTR. A possible role for CRP3 in wild-type cells is discussed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains, Culture Conditions, and Genetic Analysis--
The
strains used in this study are shown in Table
I. Cells were grown in TAP medium (23)
under constant fluorescent lighting. Genetic crosses were performed
using standard techniques (23).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Chlamydomonas strains used in this study
Some strains shown in the figures are combinations of one of the
nuclear mutants and one of the chloroplast genotypes, e.g.
atpA 3-crp3 contains the crp3 mutation
in the nucleus and the 3 deletion in the atpA gene
cluster.
|
|
Plasmids and Probes--
We have previously described the
structure and expression of the atpA gene cluster, which
contains the atpA, psbI, cemA, and atpH genes (24). Plasmid pCEMA, which contains most of the
cemA (ycf10) coding region, was generated by
inserting a 1-kilobase EcoRI-HindIII fragment of
the chloroplast EcoRI fragment 22 into pBluescript
SK+ (Stratagene). This plasmid served as a template for
amplifying the entire insert by PCR using T7 and T3 primers, and the
PCR fragment was used as a probe in RNA filter hybridizations. The psbI coding region probe was inserted into pBluescript
SK+ as a 296-base pair PCR-amplified fragment using primers
psbI1 and psbI3, covering from 35 relative to the translation
initiation codon to + 93 relative to the termination codon. The
psbI-cemA intergenic region was amplified with
primers psbI2 and psbI4, covering from 31 to +405 relative to the
psbI termination codon. The cemA-atpH
intergenic region was amplified with primers cemA1 and cemA2, covering
from 44 to +207 relative to the cemA termination codon.
Primers psbI2 and cemA1 had added SphI sites, and primers psbI4 and cemA2 had added XbaI sites. The psbI2-psbI4 and
cemA1-cemA2 PCR products were inserted into pBluescript
SK+, and the orientation of the inserts was determined by
XbaI digestion. Since pBluescript has one XbaI
site in its polylinker, in one of the orientations, the PCR fragment
could be excised as an XbaI fragment. This fragment was
cloned into XbaI-digested pDAAD, which contains the
aadA selectable marker downstream of the atpB
gene (25). The orientation of the insertions was determined by
digesting with SphI, as one site was present in the insert,
and a second site was present in pDAAD between the aadA
coding region and the rbcL 3'-UTR. For 3'-end mapping of
atpB 24 and atpB 27 RNAs, the atpB 3'-regions from each
strain were PCR-amplified using primers 9001 and 8901 (15) and inserted
into the EcoRV site of T-tailed pBluescript SK (26).
Chloroplast Transformation--
Chlamydomonas
chloroplast transformation was carried out as described previously
(15). Transformants were selected by their ability to grow on TAP
plates containing 100 µg/ml spectinomycin. Transformants were
colony-purified, and the expected insertions were confirmed by DNA
filter hybridizations and appropriate PCR amplifications (data not shown).
Isolation of Nucleic Acids, Filter Hybridizations, and
Ribonuclease Protection--
For whole-cell nucleic acid preparations,
cells were grown in TAP medium, and RNA was isolated as described
previously (22). RNA was size-fractionated on 6% formaldehyde and
1.1% agarose gels, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized with
32P-labeled probes as described previously (22). The
3'-ends of atpB, psbI, and cemA
transcripts were mapped using the plasmids described above and RNase
protection as described previously (27). Gel imaging and quantification
were performed using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Aberrant Processing of the psbI 3'-UTR in the crp3
Background--
The Chlamydomonas atpA gene cluster
contains four genes, which are transcribed into eight known mono- and
polycistronic mRNAs, as shown in Fig.
1 (diagram) and described
previously (24, 28, 29). The crp3 mutation was previously
shown to affect the accumulation of mRNAs that terminate downstream
of the psbI and cemA (ycf10) coding
regions; the amount of psbI-terminated RNAs was moderately reduced, whereas the amount of cemA-terminated RNAs was
strongly reduced (22). To examine the effect of the crp3
mutation on these RNAs in detail, we performed filter hybridizations
using total RNA extracted from wild-type, crp3, or atpA 3
cells (24); in atpA 3, the psbI promoter has been
deleted.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Analysis of psbI 3'-end
formation. A, total RNA from the indicated strains was
subjected to gel electrophoresis and filter hybridization as described
under "Experimental Procedures," using as probes psbI
and psbA coding regions, the latter as a loading control.
RNA species are identified by numbers as indicated in the
diagram. RNAs denoted by asterisks (3*, 6*, and
7*) are unique to the crp3 background and are discussed
under "Results." The diagram is adapted from Drapier
et al. (24), and indicates the extent of the psbI
promoter deletion in strain atpA 3. Bent arrows represent
promoters, and RNA sizes are given in kilobases. B, RNase
protection was performed on the psbI-cemA
intergenic region using the uniformly labeled antisense RNA probe
marked by a heavy line in the diagram and total
RNA from the strains indicated at the top of the gel. Lane
probe is probe alone; lane tRNA is a reaction
containing 10 µg of yeast tRNA instead of Chlamydomonas
RNA. The protected bands marked readthrough,
novel, and wt are discussed under "Results."
They result from protection of the RNAs listed in
parentheses. The sizes of the protected bands are 424 nucleotides (readthrough), ~180 nucleotides
(novel); and ~80 nucleotides (wt). The mapped
wild-type (wt) and novel 3' termini are indicated by
vertical arrows between psbI and cemA.
bp, base pairs.
|
|
Fig. 1A shows the results of probing with the
psbI coding region. In wild-type cells, six RNAs were
detected of which the most abundant was the monocistronic
psbI message, transcript 7. In crp3 cells, it was
expected that RNAs 2, 3, 6, and 7 might be affected since their 3'-ends
are downstream of psbI or cemA. Indeed, RNA 2 was
virtually undetectable; however, only a small change, if any, was seen
in the accumulation of the bands corresponding to RNAs 3 and 6, which
are similar in size. Most remarkably, a new species was observed that
migrated slightly slower than RNA 7; this is marked as RNA 7* in Fig.
1A. This suggested that monocistronic psbI
mRNA might be aberrantly processed in crp3 cells. This
is supported by results from atpA 3, in which the
psbI-proximal promoter has been deleted: neither RNA 7 nor
the new transcript was observed. However, RNA 3 accumulated to a high
level (it is shorter due to the atp 3 deletion). This suggests that
crp3 selectively affects transcripts terminating downstream
of psbI.
The difference in size between the wild-type and novel monocistronic
psbI mRNAs could result from differences at the 5'-
and/or 3'-end(s). The 5'-end of psbI mRNA was mapped by
primer extension, using total RNA from wild-type and crp3
cells, as described previously (24), and no differences were observed
between wild-type and crp3 cells (data not shown). The
3'-end of psbI mRNA was mapped by RNase protection,
using a uniformly labeled antisense RNA spanning the intergenic region
between psbI and cemA. As shown in Fig. 1B, two major protected bands were obtained using wild-type
RNA. The longer fragment (readthrough) represents protection
by RNAs 1, 2, 5, and 6, whereas the shorter fragment (wt)
represents protection by RNAs 3 and 7. By comparison with a DNA
sequencing ladder, the psbI 3'-end was mapped to 83 ± 3 nucleotides downstream of the psbI termination codon (data
not shown). In crp3, an ~50% reduction in the level of
transcripts with the wild-type psbI 3'-end was observed
(wt- crp3). In addition, a longer protected product that represents a novel psbI 3'-end accumulated. This product is
~100 nucleotides longer than the wild-type product, represents
~50% of the psbI 3'-ends, and corresponds to RNA 7* in
Fig. 1A and possibly to a slightly longer RNA 3.
In an attempt to distinguish between the 3'-ends of RNAs 3* and 7*, we
took advantage of the fact that in strain atpA 3, RNA 3 accumulates,
but RNA 7 does not (Fig. 1A). The 3'-ends of
psbI-containing transcripts were again mapped by RNase
protection, using total RNA from atpA 3 and atpA 3-crp3;
the latter strain was constructed by crossing atpA 3-mt+
to crp3-mt . As shown in the last two
lanes of Fig. 1B, the wild-type 3'-ends downstream of
psbI were also present in the atpA 3 strains, although at
a lower level in the crp3 background. The novel
psbI 3'-end, on the other hand, accumulated to a low, but
detectable level in atpA 3-crp3 and must represent a
modified version of transcript 3. The observation of a novel 3'-end
partially explains the reduction in the atpA-psbI
(RNA 3) level reported previously for crp3 and atpA 3-crp3 (atpA 3 was referred to as 12 in this
earlier paper (22)). However, the level of RNA 3* in the
crp3 background appears to be less than expected from the
amount of RNA 7*, suggesting an unexpected contribution of the 5'-end
to the process of 3'-formation and/or RNA stability.
Modified Processing or Stability of the cemA 3'-End--
The
cemA transcript does not accumulate in a monocistronic form,
but only in polycistronic mRNAs transcribed from the
atpA and psbI promoters (Fig. 1). Fig.
2 (diagram and A)
highlights the four cemA-containing transcripts, which in
wild-type cells are
atpA-psbI-cemA-atpH (RNA
1), atpA-psbI-cemA (RNA 2),
psbI-cemA-atpH (RNA 5), and
psbI-cemA (RNA 6). In the crp3
background, a substantial decrease in the levels of RNAs 2 and 6 was
observed; these are the two transcripts that terminate between
cemA and atpH. When gels were run longer to
increase resolution (see Fig. 4A), it was clear that the
reduction in RNA 6 abundance was accompanied by an accumulation of a
slightly larger species (RNA 6*) that, based on its estimated size, had
its 3'-end within the atpH coding region. Furthermore, the
reduction in RNA 6 was accompanied by an increase in RNA 5, consistent
with a precursor-product relationship.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of cemA 3'-end
formation. A, total RNA from the indicated strains was
subjected to gel electrophoresis and filter hybridization as described
under "Experimental Procedures," using a cemA coding
region probe or atpH as a loading control; atpH
is unaffected by the crp3 mutation (24). RNA species are
indicated by numbers and refer to the diagram
(see legend to Fig. 1). B, RNase protection was performed on
the cemA-atpH intergenic region using the
uniformly labeled antisense RNA probe marked by a heavy line
in the diagram. See the legend to Fig. 1 for additional
details. The sizes of protected bands are 262 nucleotides
(readthrough) and ~235 nucleotides (cemA
3'). wt, wild-type.
|
|
To discern whether 3'-end maturation downstream of cemA is
modified in crp3 and to detect any residual RNA 2, RNase
protection was performed using the uniformly labeled antisense RNA
probe corresponding to the cemA-atpH intergenic
region, as shown in Fig. 2 (diagram). Fig. 2B
shows the results of this experiment. Two major species were protected
by RNA from wild-type cells, the shorter one representing the 3'-ends
of RNAs 2 and 6 and the longer one representing RNAs 1 and 5, which
contain atpH (readthrough). In the mutant
background (crp3), the cemA 3'-end accumulated to a lower level, which was expected since RNA 6 was clearly reduced in
abundance. To examine RNA 2, 3'-ends between cemA and
atpH were mapped in strain atpA 3-crp3, which
fails to accumulate RNAs 5 and 6 due to a deletion of the
psbI promoter. In atpA 3 cells, the amount of probe
protected by cemA 3'-ends was reduced relative to wild-type
cells. This is consistent with our previous observation that whereas
RNA 2 increases in abundance in atpA 3 cells relative to wild-type
cells (Fig. 1A), this increase is not in proportion to the
decline in RNA 6 (see Fig. 6 in Ref. 24). In atpA 3-crp3 cells, a further reduction in probe protected by cemA
3'-ends compared with the wild-type sibling (atpA 3) was observed
however, the protected product was clearly present. This suggests that although not readily detectable on RNA filter blots, RNA 2 does accumulate to some extent in the crp3 background. However,
unlike psbI, no heterogeneity in the size of the protected
band was seen, suggesting that any processing that takes place between
cemA and psbI occurs at the same site as in
wild-type cells.
It should be noted that the size of the probe protected by RNA 8 would
be only 31 nucleotides and therefore not visible in this experiment.
Furthermore, the novel RNA 6*, which apparently has a 3'-end within the
atpH coding region, would fully protect the probe and
contribute slightly to the band labeled readthrough.
The psbI-cemA intergenic region confers correct
or modified 3'-end processing to a chimeric mRNA, but the
cemA-atpH region does not. To test whether the
psbI-cemA and cemA-atpH
intergenic regions contain information sufficient for the recognition
of mRNA processing or stability functions altered in
crp3, we tested the ability of these regions to serve as
RNA-processing sites in the context of a bacterial aadA
reporter gene engineered to be expressed in Chlamydomonas
chloroplasts (30). Fig. 3
(diagram) shows the configuration of these four constructs,
in which the intergenic regions were inserted in the two possible
orientations between the aadA coding region and the
Chlamydomonas chloroplast rbcL 3'-UTR. The
promoter and 5'-UTR were from the Chlamydomonas chloroplast
petD gene. The original petD-aadA-rbcL
cassette produces translationally competent mRNAs, which confer
spectinomycin and streptomycin resistance to transformed cells (25). We
rationalized that if the inserted intergenic sequences were sufficient
to promote 3'-end formation, a shorter mRNA ending at the
processing site would accumulate. Otherwise, a longer mRNA that
represents processing at the rbcL 3'-end would accumulate.
In either case, the mRNA was expected to be stable and to confer
antibiotic resistance. Indeed, spectinomycin-resistant transformants
were recovered when this construct was introduced into both the
wild-type (CRP3) and crp3 mutant strains, and
these transformants contained the desired DNA configurations.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of the crp3 mutation
on RNA accumulation from chimeric genes containing the psbI
or cemA 3'-UTRs. The structure of plasmids
used for chloroplast transformation of atpB 26 or
atpB 26-crp3 is shown in the diagram. The
bacterial aadA coding region is fused downstream of
transcription and translation signals of the petD gene.
Downstream of aadA, the psbI or cemA
3'-UTRs described under "Experimental Procedures" were inserted in
the two possible orientations. Sequences from the rbcL
3'-region were used as a second 3'-end maturation site downstream of
the test sequence. This chimeric gene is transcribed convergently with
a wild-type copy of the atpB gene. The panels
shows a representative RNA filter hybridization using total RNAs from
the transformation recipients (first two lanes) and single
examples of each transformant. The crp3 genotype is
indicated as w (wild-type, no suppression) or m
(mutant, suppresses atpB 26). In the upper panel, the
aadA coding region was used as a probe. Additional probes
were atpB (middle panel) and cemA
(lower panel). For cemA, RNAs are indicated by
numbers as defined in the legend to Fig. 1. For the
aadA panel, the identities of each major
hybridizing species are indicated schematically. Transcripts that
contain the rbcL 3'-UTR are indicated schematically by two
stem-loops. In the case where the first stem-loop is inverted, the
psbI or cemA 3'-UTR was inserted in the
( )-orientation. Note that some readthrough transcripts are seen in
the psbI+ strains. The identities of the lower
molecular weight and more weakly aadA-hybridizing species
have not been determined.
|
|
Typical RNA accumulation patterns from the transformants and control
strains are shown in Fig. 3. The middle panel shows results with an atpB probe. As expected, no discrete transcript
accumulated in atpB 26, the wild-type recipient strain for the
transformation (see "Experimental Procedures"), whereas a low
amount of a discrete transcript was detected in the other recipient,
atpB 26-crp3 (the crp3 mutation stabilizes the
normally unstable atpB transcript). In all the
transformants, atpB mRNA accumulation was wild-type since the atpB 26 deletion had been replaced with wild-type sequences during transformation (see diagram in Fig. 3).
Fig. 3 (lower panel) shows results with a cemA
probe. This probe provided verification of the nuclear background;
lanes with a low level of RNA 2 and a high level of RNA 5 carry the
crp3 mutation. Probing with aadA, as shown in the
upper panel, revealed the transcripts produced from the
chimeric genes. For psbI insertions downstream of the
aadA coding region, different results were obtained depending on the orientation of the insertion. In the (+)-orientation and in the wild-type background, a mRNA that corresponds to
processing in the psbI 3'-UTR accumulated, indicating that
the psbI-cemA intergenic region carries
sufficient information to direct maturation of the psbI
3'-end. In the crp3 background, a slightly larger transcript
accumulated. Based on its size, this transcript most likely terminates
at the novel psbI 3'-end as in RNA 7* (Fig. 1A).
However, there was little evidence for accumulation of
aadA-psbI transcripts with the wild-type 3'-end.
These results indicate that for the psbI 3'-end, the
psbI-cemA intergenic region included in these
constructs includes sequences sufficient for processing and stability
in the crp3 background.
In transformants containing the psbI 3'-UTR in the
( )-orientation, little or no RNA processed at the psbI
3'-end could be detected. Mainly the longer mRNA processed at the
rbcL 3'-end accumulated, and the crp3 mutation
had no effect. This indicates that the psbI 3'-UTR functions
in an orientation-dependent manner, as has been reported
previously for other 3'-UTRs in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts
(18, 19). The longer transcripts were also seen when the
psbI 3'-UTR was in the (+)-orientation, although in a reduced amount. This is consistent with inefficient transcription termination and incomplete processing. Transcription termination at
Chlamydomonas chloroplast 3'-inverted repeats has previously been reported to be inefficient (25). However, previous examples of
chimeric constructs with two adjacent inverted repeats resulted in
accumulation of only the shorter transcript, suggesting that the
3'-psbI processing site may be less efficient than those
downstream of atpB (27).
For strains containing the chimeric constructs with the
cemA-atpH intergenic region downstream of
aadA, results were identical regardless of the orientation
or nuclear background. In each case, only the longer mRNA,
processed at the rbcL 3'-end, could be detected. Therefore,
the cemA-atpH intergenic region is not sufficient
for correct 3'-end maturation in this context. Possibly, additional sequences within the atpH coding region are required to
confer processing activity. Indirect evidence for this is that the new RNA 6*, unique to crp3 and discussed above, may terminate
within the atpH coding region, suggesting that a determinant
recognized by crp3 resides in this region.
The crp3 Mutation Can Suppress Other 3'-UTR Deletions in the atpB
Gene--
Various deletions in the atpB 3'-UTR that
eliminate part or all of the potential stem-loop structure cause
mRNA heterogeneity and instability (15, 21). The crp3
mutation was isolated as a suppressor of one of these deletions,
atpB 26. To address the question of whether crp3
specifically suppresses the atpB 26 deletion, e.g. by a
sequence-specific mechanism, we crossed
atpB 26-crp3-mt to two mt+
strains (atpB 24 and atpB 27) that have different deletion end points in the atpB 3'-UTR. Like atpB 26, these deletions
remove part of the stem-loop structure; however, the sequence context surrounding the deletion is different. The 5'-deletion end points are
shown schematically in Fig. 4
(diagram). Because the chloroplast genome is inherited from
the mt+ parent, all four tetrad progeny would inherit the
atpB 24 or atpB 27 deletion, whereas the mutant and wild-type
alleles of CRP3 would segregate 2:2. PCR was used to verify
that chloroplast DNA was indeed inherited from the mt+
strain, and at least six complete tetrads were obtained from each
cross.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Suppression of RNA instability in other
atpB 3'-UTR deletions by crp3.
To analyze suppression of the atpB 24 (A)
and atpB 27 (B) deletions, total RNA from
the indicated strains (a-d are tetrad products from the
cross shown above them) was subjected to gel electrophoresis and filter
hybridization as described under "Experimental Procedures," using
an atpB coding region probe, psbA as a loading
control, or cemA to determine crp3 genotype. The
crp3 genotype is indicated as w (wild-type, no
suppression) or m (mutant, suppresses atpB 26). RNA
species in the cemA panel are indicated by
numbers and refer to the diagram. The approximate
locations of the 5' termini of the atpB 3'-deletions in each
strain are indicated at the bottom center. wt,
wild-type.
|
|
Fig. 4A shows results from a representative tetrad of the
cross atpB 27 × atpB 26-crp3. A psbA
probe (middle panel) served as a loading control, and a
cemA probe (lower panel) identified the progeny
carrying the crp3 mutation (a and b in
this tetrad). An atpB probe (upper panel) showed
a clear 2:2 segregation for the accumulation of a discrete
atpB transcript, which was present only in the
crp3 mutant progeny. Therefore, crp3 suppresses
the partial absence of a 3'-stem-loop in the atpB 27 deletion. The intensity of the atpB transcript in
atpB 27-crp3 suggests that suppression is even more
effective than with atpB 26, perhaps because atpB 27 retains part
of the stabilizing secondary structure.
Fig. 4B shows results obtained in a parallel experiment with
atpB 24. It is clear from the parental strain that atpB 24
accumulates a low amount of a wild-type sized atpB
transcript (see also Ref. 21; Fig. 4B), although the
deletion into the 3'-stem-loop is larger than the one in atpB 27.
Because these strains were generated by bi-directional Bal31
deletion, we explain this difference by a fortuitous combination
of flanking sequences. Accumulating atpB transcripts of
representative tetrad progeny from the cross atpB 24 × atpB 26-crp3 show a 2:2 segregation for an abundant,
discrete transcript. As in the case of atpB 27, this phenotype is
linked to crp3 as shown by the pattern of cemA
hybridization (multiple complete tetrads were analyzed for each cross).
These results clearly show that in the case of the atpB
3'-UTR, crp3 can suppress different deletion mutations and
thus does not recognize a sequence specific to atpB 26.
The atpB mRNAs Have Different 3' Termini in the atpB 24,
atpB 26, and atpB 27 Strains--
The atpB transcripts
in atpB 24-crp3, atpB 26-crp3, and
atpB 27-crp3 all had similar mobilities on RNA gel blots.
Since each had a different deletion in the atpB 3'-UTR, this
suggested that 3'-end formation was occurring at different sequences,
rather than at a common cryptic 3'-end maturation site downstream of all the 3'-deletion end points. To investigate this, the 3'-ends of
atpB mRNAs in each of these strains were mapped by RNase
protection. The sizes of protected fragments were determined using a
DNA sequencing ladder, allowing us to estimate 3'-end locations with an
error of approximately ±5 nucleotides.
The results in Figs. 5 (A and
B) show that two and one major atpB 3' termini
were found in atpB 24-crp3 and atpB 27-crp3, respectively. These ends were also detected in the wild-type
(CRP3) background, although at a much lower level; we
previously reported similar results for atpB 26 (22). Thus, the
recessive crp3 mutation appears to selectively stabilize
minor RNA species also present in the unsuppressed (CRP3)
siblings. In addition to the major protected species, numerous minor
bands including the fully protected probe (minus vector sequences) were
detected. These bands presumably correspond to species that are longer
or shorter than the major discrete transcripts and can be seen in the
filter hybridizations shown in Fig. 4. The existence of two major
protected species for atpB 24-crp3 (Fig. 5B)
suggests that two discrete transcripts should be seen on filter blots
such as the one in Fig. 4B. However, the size difference
between the two is only ~85 nucleotides, and they were not resolved
on that gel.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
3' termini of atpB mRNAs
in atpB 3'-UTR deletion strains carrying the
crp3 suppressor mutation. RNase protection assays
were performed with uniformly labeled antisense RNAs corresponding to
the atpB 24 and atpB 27 3'-UTRs in A and B,
respectively. The major protected products are marked by
arrows with the approximate distance between the 3'-end and
termination codon indicated in nucleotides (nt). Lanes
probe and tRNA are controls as described in the legend
to Fig. 2B. The sizes of protected products were estimated
using a DNA sequencing ladder. The band representing complete
protection of the non-vector part of the probe is indicated as
readthrough. The locations of atpB 3' termini in
the different strains are indicated in C. Numbering is
relative to the atpB translation termination codon, with the
first base downstream of the codon being +1. For the deletion mutants,
the deletion end points are given numerically and are symbolized by
dotted lines, and the schematic depicts the 5'
terminus of the deletion relative to the stem-loop structure. The
3'-ends are marked by diagonal arrows. For the wild type
(wt), 3'-ends were precisely mapped in a previous study (27)
and are underlined within the surrounding sequence context.
For the deletion mutants, the 10 nucleotides surrounding the estimated
3' termini are shown; the numbers indicate the mapped
terminus ±5 nucleotides.
|
|
The mapped 3'-ends of wild-type atpB mRNA and those of
the deletion mutants in the crp3 background are presented in
Fig. 5C. The 3'-ends in all of the deletion mutants are
clustered in an ~195-nucleotide region >2 kilobases downstream of
the atpB translation termination codon in wild-type cells.
However, because of the extents of the deletions, the most proximal
3'-ends in atpB 24, atpB 26, and atpB 27 are ~70, 100, and 85 nucleotides downstream of the termination codon, respectively, as
compared with 92-93 nucleotides in wild-type cells. Each of these ends
and the more distal termini found in atpB 24 and atpB 26 map in
very dissimilar sequences, ranging from 100% A + U to 80% G + C. Thus, a consensus sequence that might serve as a target for the
crp3 product cannot be derived from these data. One possible
explanation for this result is that the 3'-processing machinery in the
mutant cells may be sterically hindered by an RNA structure near the
end of the atpB coding region, which would be present in
each strain. Such a structure would be expected to impede the activity
of an exoribonuclease whose activity could be altered in
crp3; 5' 3' exonucleolytic activity is the final step in
atpB 3'-end maturation in wild-type cells (27).
The crp3 Mutation Is Non-allelic to Another Mutation That Affects
Accumulation of mRNAs from the atpA Gene Cluster--
Another
Chlamydomonas nuclear mutant has been isolated, in which the
accumulation of transcripts from the atpA gene is altered (31). In strains carrying ncc1, the accumulation of
monocistronic atpA mRNA (RNA 4) is strongly reduced,
although there is no net effect on the level of the atpA
gene product, the -subunit of the ATP synthase. Thus, like
crp3, ncc1 does not cause a non-photosynthetic phenotype. Although ncc1 and crp3 affect
different RNAs of the atpA gene cluster, the two mutations
could represent alleles at the same locus or interact in some way. To
test this possibility, ncc1-mt was crossed
with atpB 26-crp3-mt+. Tetrad progeny of this
cross were scored by RNA filter hybridizations using atpA
and atpB probes, as shown in Fig.
6. A reduction in RNA 4 relative to RNA 3 was taken as evidence that the mutant allele of ncc1 was
present, whereas a reduction in RNAs 2 and 3 and a discrete
atpB transcript indicated that the strain carried crp3 (all progeny carry the atpB 3'-UTR deletion,
atpB 26, contributed by the mt+ parent).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Independence of the two mutations
ncc1 and crp3. Total RNA from
the indicated strains was subjected to gel electrophoresis and filter
hybridization as described under "Experimental Procedures," using a
atpA coding region probe or atpB to determine
crp3 genotype. The deduced or known genotypes at
ncc1 and crp3 are shown as w
(wild-type (wt) allele) or m (mutant allele). RNA
species identified by numbers in the atpA
panel refer to the diagram in Fig. 1.
|
|
The simplest interpretation of the data is that crp3 and
ncc1 represent independently segregating loci and that the
two phenotypes are additive. The majority of the 10 complete tetrads
obtained appeared to be tetratypes, such as the one shown in Fig. 6.
Tetrad progeny a and d are phenotypically similar
to the ncc1 and crp3 parents, respectively.
Product c appears to have wild-type alleles at both loci and
resembles atpB 26. Product b is most likely the double
mutant, which exhibits reduced accumulation of RNAs 2-4, but
accumulates a discrete atpB transcript, although RNA 2 is not well resolved in this experiment. These results indicate that at
least two nuclear gene products participate in the maturation and/or
stability of mRNAs transcribed from the atpA gene cluster.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Specificity of the crp3 Mutation--
We have reported here a
detailed analysis of a Chlamydomonas nuclear mutation that
affects the maturation and/or stability of multiple chloroplast
mRNAs. Although crp3 is a recessive and therefore
probably a loss-of-function mutation, its primary phenotype is the
appearance of new RNAs in the chloroplast. These include a discrete
atpB transcript lacking a 3'-stem-loop, processing intermediates between the 3'-end of petD and trnR
(22), as well as new 3'-ends for psbI- and
cemA-containing mRNAs and the stabilization of
additional atpB 3'-UTR deletions, as reported here. All of these new RNAs may be produced transiently in wild-type cells; thus,
CRP3 might encode or activate a ribonuclease that is
responsible for their degradation. Alternatively, CRP3 could
encode an RNA-binding protein that is essential for correct
3'-processing and/or that regulates RNA stability; candidates for such
factors have arisen from in vitro biochemical studies using
chloroplast protein extracts (32-36). In two cases, these chloroplast
RNA-binding proteins also have been shown to have ribonuclease activity
(32, 37), which is yet another possibility for CRP3.
Two features of crp3 distinguish it from most other nuclear
mutations that affect Chlamydomonas chloroplast RNA
metabolism. First, we have shown that the target of crp3 is
the 3'-UTR, at least for psbI and most likely for
atpB and petD as well (22). Other mRNA
stability mutations analyzed in Chlamydomonas act on the
5'-UTR (8, 9), although ncc1, which we determined is not
allelic to crp3, appears to act on the atpA
3'-UTR (31). Although we have examined only a small number of mRNAs
in the crp3 background, we have never seen any change in
mRNA 5' termini. A second feature is that crp3 is not
gene-specific, unlike other mutations affecting RNA stability in
Chlamydomonas (8, 38-41). It is likely that additional
nuclear loci with functions and mutant phenotypes similar to
crp3 will be found. Since crp3 was isolated as a
suppressor of a light-sensitive growth phenotype caused by unstable
RNA, this type of screen may prove useful in the future.
In vascular plants, and in particular in maize and
Arabidopsis, nuclear mutants have been studied in which
multiple chloroplast RNAs are affected. For example, crp1 in
maize affects both RNA processing and translation (3), and the
crs mutants generally affect splicing of numerous mRNAs
(5). In Arabidopsis, several mutants have been isolated that
display highly altered RNA accumulation patterns, which are difficult
to explain by a single target for the product of the affected nuclear
locus (4, 6, 7). These Arabidopsis mutants appear to be even
more pleiotropic than crp3, although it is possible that
other alleles of crp3 could have more variable phenotypes.
The dissimilarity between the type of mutation most often isolated in
Chlamydomonas and that most frequently found in vascular
plants may simply be a consequence of the type of genetic screens
available or the relatively small number of mutants that have been
carefully studied to date, or it could reflect fundamental differences
in gene expression strategies. It should be noted that nearly all
mature Chlamydomonas chloroplast transcripts are
monocistronic, whereas polycistronic transcripts are common in vascular
plants. However, this may simply be a consequence of efficient
processing of polycistronic transcripts in Chlamydomonas, as
discussed further below, rather than a difference in chloroplast gene
expression mechanisms.
Accumulation of New mRNA 3' Termini--
Loss-of-function
mutations in some bacterial ribonuclease genes cause phenotypes that
may be related to crp3. For example, when transcripts of the
dicistronic rpsO-pnp operon of Escherichia coli
are examined in RNase III or RNase E temperature-sensitive mutants at
the nonpermissive temperature, RNAs with new 5' or 3' termini
accumulate (42). This occurs because the primary transcripts are
rapidly processed in the wild-type background. Similar phenomena have
been reported for other RNAs, e.g. puf and unc
(43, 44). Thus, crp3 may be a partial loss-of-function mutant, in which the accumulation of intermediates is a consequence of
inefficient processing or degradation by the mutant ribonuclease. This
in turn suggests that processing of primary transcripts may be common
in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts and indeed may even be more
efficient than in vascular plants, where partially processed RNAs
accumulate readily (e.g. Refs. 45-47). For example, the
Chlamydomonas petD transcript matures rapidly, and its
processing pathway can be discerned only from mutant strains (48, 49).
Furthermore, 3'-processing of transcripts such as atpB is
efficient both in vivo and in vitro (27).
Definition of crp3 Targets--
We attempted to define a molecular
target for the crp3 product in two ways. First, we inserted
two putative targets into a chimeric reporter gene and tested whether
accumulation of the reporter gene transcripts responded to the
crp3 genotype. As shown in Fig. 3, a psbI 3'-UTR
sequence did respond as expected, whereas a cemA 3'-UTR
sequence did not. This implies that in the case of cemA
3'-end formation, RNA structures formed through long-range interactions, rather than a specific primary sequence, may constitute the key elements. A second hint at a crp3 target came from
its lack of specificity in suppressing atpB 3'-UTR deletions
(Figs. 4 and 5). Since each RNA differed at its 3'-end but contained the same coding region, one interpretation of the ability of
crp3 to allow stable mRNA accumulation is that an
element within the atpB coding region determines the
atpB 3' terminus. This would also account for the fact that
each stable RNA in the crp3 background was of approximately
the same length.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank members of the Stern and Kindle
laboratories and Francis-André Wollman for helpful discussions
and suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Award
MCB-9723274.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Israeli Inst. for Biological Research, P. O. Box
19, 70450 Nes-Ziona, Israel.
Present address: Cereon Genomics LLC, Cambridge, MA 02139.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Boyce Thompson Inst.
for Plant Research, Cornell University, Tower Road, Ithaca, NY
14853-1801. Tel.: 607-254-1306; Fax: 607-255-6695; E-mail: ds28@cornell.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
UTR, untranslated
region;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rochaix, J.-D.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
32,
327-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Stern, D. B.,
Higgs, D. C.,
and Yang, J.
(1997)
Trends Plant Sci.
2,
308-315[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Barkan, A.,
Walker, M.,
Nolasco, M.,
and Johnson, D.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3170-3181[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Dinkins, R. D.,
Bandaranayake, H.,
Baeza, L.,
Griffiths, A. J. F.,
and Green, B. R.
(1997)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
113,
1023-1031[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Jenkins, B. D.,
Kulhanek, D. J.,
and Barkan, A.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
283-296[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Meurer, J.,
Berger, A.,
and Westhoff, P.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
1193-1207[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Meurer, J.,
Grevelding, C.,
Westhoff, P.,
and Reiss, B.
(1998)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
258,
342-351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Drager, R. G.,
Girard-Bascou, J.,
Choquet, Y.,
Kindle, K. L.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1998)
Plant J.
13,
85-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Nickelsen, J.,
van Dillewijn, J.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3182-3191[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Nickelsen, J.,
Fleischmann, M.,
Boudreau, E.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1999)
Plant Cell
11,
957-970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Sakamoto, W.,
Chen, X.,
Kindle, K. L.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1994)
Plant J.
6,
503-512[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Mayfield, S. P.,
Cohen, A.,
Danon, A.,
and Yohn, C. B.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1537-1545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Lee, H.,
Bingham, S. E.,
and Webber, A. N.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
31,
337-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Stern, D. B.,
and Gruissem, W.
(1987)
Cell
51,
1145-1157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Stern, D. B.,
Radwanski, E. R.,
and Kindle, K. L.
(1991)
Plant Cell
3,
285-297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Drager, R. G.,
Zeidler, M.,
Simpson, C. L.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1996)
RNA
2,
652-663[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Staub, J. M.,
and Maliga, P.
(1994)
Plant J.
6,
547-553[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Blowers, A. D.,
Klein, U.,
Ellmore, G. S.,
and Bogorad, L.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
238,
339-349[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Rott, R.,
Liveanu, V.,
Drager, R. G.,
Stern, D. B.,
and Schuster, G.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
36,
307-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Rott, R.,
Levy, H.,
Drager, R. G.,
Stern, D. B.,
and Schuster, G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4605-4611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Kindle, K. L.,
Suzuki, H.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
187-200[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Levy, H.,
Kindle, K. L.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
825-836[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Harris, E. H.
(1989)
The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook: A Comprehensive Guide to Biology and Laboratory Use
, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego
|
| 24.
|
Drapier, D.,
Suzuki, H.,
Levy, H.,
Rimbault, B.,
Kindle, K. L.,
Stern, D. B.,
and Wollman, F.-A.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
117,
629-641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Rott, R.,
Drager, R. G.,
Stern, D. B.,
and Schuster, G.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252,
676-683[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Holton, T. A.,
and Graham, M. W.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
1156[Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Stern, D. B.,
and Kindle, K. L.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2277-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Kunstner, P.,
Guardiola, A.,
Takahashi, Y.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9651-9654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Rolland, N.,
Dorne, A. J.,
Amoroso, G.,
Sultemeyer, D. F.,
Joyard, J.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6713-6726[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4083-4090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Drapier, D.,
Girard-Bascou, J.,
and Wollman, F.-A.
(1992)
Plant Cell
4,
283-295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Nickelsen, J.,
and Link, G.
(1993)
Plant J.
3,
537-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Chen, H. C.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
4380-4388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Stern, D. B.,
Jones, H.,
and Gruissem, W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
18742-18750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Memon, A. R.,
Meng, B.,
and Mullet, J. E.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
30,
1195-1205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Schuster, G.,
and Gruissem, W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1493-1502[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Yang, J.,
Schuster, G.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
1409-1420[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Gumpel, N. J.,
Ralley, L.,
Girard-Bascou, J.,
Wollman, F.-A.,
Nugent, J. H.,
and Purton, S.
(1995)
Plant Mol. Biol.
29,
921-932[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kuchka, M. R.,
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.,
van Dillewijn, J.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1989)
Cell
58,
869-876[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Monod, C.,
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1992)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
231,
449-459[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Sieburth, L. E.,
Berry-Lowe, S.,
and Schmidt, G. W.
(1991)
Plant Cell
3,
175-189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Regnier, P.,
and Hajnsdorf, E.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
217,
283-292[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Klug, G.,
Jock, S.,
and Rothfuchs, R.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
121,
95-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Patel, A. M.,
and Dunn, S. D.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
3541-3548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Barkan, A.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2637-2644[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Stollar, N. E.,
and Hollingsworth, M. J.
(1994)
J. Plant Physiol.
144,
141-149
|
| 47.
|
Westhoff, P.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
171,
551-564[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Sakamoto, W.,
Sturm, N. R.,
Kindle, K. L.,
and Stern, D. B.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6180-6186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Sturm, N.,
Kuras, R.,
Buschlen, S.,
Sakamoto, W.,
Kindle, K. L.,
Stern, D. B.,
and Wollman, F.-A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6171-6179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|