JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, S.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 51, 36052-36057, December 17, 1999


Direct Activation of the Fission Yeast PAK Shk1 by the Novel SH3 Domain Protein, Skb5*

Peirong YangDagger , Ruth PimentalDagger , Hong Lai, and Stevan Marcus§

From the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The p21-activated kinase (PAK) homolog Shk1 is essential for cell viability in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Roles have been established for Shk1 in the regulation of cell morphology, sexual differentiation, and mitosis in S. pombe. In this report, we describe the genetic and molecular characterization of a novel SH3 domain protein, Skb5, identified as a result of a two-hybrid screen for Shk1 interacting proteins. S. pombe cells carrying a deletion of the skb5 gene exhibit no discernible phenotypic defects under normal growth conditions, but when subjected to hypertonic stress, become spheroidal in shape and growth impaired. Both of these defects can be suppressed by overexpression of the Shk1 modulator, Skb1. The growth inhibition that results from overexpression of Shk1 in S. pombe cells is markedly suppressed by a null mutation in the skb5 gene, suggesting that Skb5 contributes positively to the function of Shk1 in vivo. Consistent with this notion, we show that Skb5 stimulates Shk1 catalytic function in S. pombe cells. Furthermore, and perhaps most significantly, we show that bacterially expressed recombinant Skb5 protein directly stimulates the catalytic activity of recombinant Shk1 kinase in vitro. These and additional data described herein demonstrate that Skb5 is a direct activator of Shk1 in fission yeast.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p21-activated kinases (PAKs)1 comprise a highly conserved family of serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by the p21 G proteins Cdc42 and Rac, but not by other small G proteins, such as Ras and Rho (1). PAKs share a common structural organization consisting of a C-terminal catalytic domain and a substantial N-terminal regulatory domain that typically comprises at least half the length of the protein. The p21-binding site is invariably located in the N-terminal regulatory domain of PAKs. Diverse functions have been attributed to PAKs in eukaryotic organisms, including roles in regulation of cytoskeletal organization and cellular morphology (2-5), growth factor-induced signaling pathways (2, 6-8), and cell cycle control (9-11) in organisms ranging from yeasts to mammals and cell motility (1), neurological function (12), and apoptosis (9, 13) in vertebrates. Indeed, the biological functions attributed to PAKs in eukaryotes match or exceed those attributed to the similarly conserved mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, with which, in some cases, PAKs have been shown to functionally interact (6, 8, 14).

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe possesses two known PAKs, Shk1 (2) (also known as Pak1 (3) and Orb2 (11)) and Shk2 (15) (also known as Pak2 (16)). Shk1 is essential for viability of S. pombe cells and has been shown to play roles in the regulation of cell morphology, sexual differentiation, and mitosis (2, 3, 10, 11, 17). The cellular functions of Shk1 are virtually indistinguishable from those of Cdc42 (2, 18, 19), and various molecular and genetic data suggest that Shk1 is a critical effector for Cdc42 in fission yeast (2, 3, 15). A second positive modulator of Shk1, Skb1, was identified by our laboratory from a two-hybrid screen for Shk1-interacting proteins (17). Skb1 functions as a dosage-dependent mitotic inhibitor in S. pombe, and this function is at least partially dependent on Shk1 (10). Unlike Shk1 and Cdc42, Skb1 is not required for viability or mating of S. pombe cells (17). The second known fission yeast PAK, Shk2, is also nonessential, and genetic analyses suggest that it is largely redundant in function with Shk1 (15, 16).

In this report, we describe the genetic and molecular characterization of skb5 (for Shk1 kinase binding protein 5), a gene encoding a novel SH3 domain protein that interacts with Shk1 in vivo and in vitro. We present genetic evidence for functional interaction between Skb5 and Shk1 in S. pombe and biochemical evidence that Skb5 is a direct stimulator of Shk1 catalytic function. Our results provide what is to our knowledge the first example of direct activation of a PAK by an SH3 domain protein.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Strains, Manipulation, Genetic Analyses, and Two-hybrid Assays-- S. pombe strains used in this study were SP870 (h90 ade6-210 leu1-32 ura4-D18) (from D. Beach), SP870D (h90 ade6-210 leu1-32 ura4-D18/h90 ade6-210 leu1-32 ura4-D18) (from V. Jung), CHP428 (h+ ade6-210 his7-366 leu1-32 ura4-D18) (from E. Chang), SP42N17 (h90 ade6-216 leu1-32 ura4::adh1-cdc42N17) (2), SPSKB5U (h90 ade6-210 leu1-32 ura4-D18 skb5::ura4) (see below), 137 (h- leu1-32 ura4-D18 wee1::ura4). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid tester strain used was L40 (MATa ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 LYS2::lexA-HIS3 URA3::lexA-lacZ) (20). Standard yeast culture media and genetic methods were used (21, 22). S. pombe cultures were grown on either rich medium (YEA) or synthetic minimal medium (EMM) with appropriate auxotrophic supplements (21). S. cerevisiae cultures were grown on either rich medium (YPD) or drop-out medium (DO) with appropriate auxotrophic supplements (22). Yeast were transformed by the lithium acetate procedure (22). The skb5::ura4 strain SPSKB5U was constructed by transformation of SP870D with a 2.6-kb NdeI skb5::ura4 fragment from the plasmid pBSIISkb5::ura4. Diploid transformants carrying a single disrupted and a single wild-type copy of skb5 were identified by Southern blot analysis and skb5::ura4 transformants were isolated by tetrad dissection. The liquid assay for beta -galactosidase activity was performed as described previously (22).

Plasmids-- The two-hybrid plasmids pGADGH (for expression of GAD fusions) and pBTM116 and pVJL11 (for expression of LBD fusions) have been described previously (19, 20, 23, 24). The plasmids pLBDShk1, pLBDShk1 (308-658), pLBDRas1, pGADGHByr2, and pLBDlamin have also been described before (2, 17, 19, 24). The S. pombe-Escherichia coli shuttle vector pAAUCM and pART1CM were used for high level expression of coding sequences from the S. pombe adh1 promoter (2). pREP1 (25) was used for expressing coding sequences from the S. pombe nmt1 promoter. pAAUCMShk1, pAAUCMShk1Delta N118, pART1CMShk1Delta N118, pART1CMShk1, pAAUGSTShk1, and pAAUGSTShk1Delta N118 have been described previously (2, 10, 17). pTrcHis-Ha-Ras has also been described previously (26). pTrcHisShk1 was made by cloning BamHI-SalI fragment of Shk1 into the BamHI-XhoI sites of pTrcHisB. The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify the full-length skb5 protein coding sequence for cloning into pAAUCM, pART1CM, pREP1, pGADGH, and pRP259, producing pAAUCMSkb5, pART1CMSkb5, pREP1Skb5, pGADGHSkb5, and pRP259Skb5, respectively. The primer pair SKB5KOP3 (5'-GAAGCTTCAGGAAGAAGCG) and SKB5KOP6 (5'-CAGGCTCGAGAATGTCCATTATTCGTGATCA) was used to amplify a 0.95-kb fragment of the 3'-end of skb5. This fragment was then digested with HindIII and EcoRV and cloned into HindIII and HincII sites of pBluescriptII, producing pBSIIskb5-3. The primer pair SKB5KOP7 (5'-ACTATATGGTGGAGCTCAGTGCAA) and SKB5KOP2 (5'-ACACAAGCTTCAATCACACGAGCAT) was used to amplify a 0.8-kb fragment of the 5'-end of skb5, which was digested with SacI and HindIII and cloned into the corresponding sites of pBSIIskb5-3 generating pBSIIskb5KO. This pBSIIskb5KO was digested with HindIII and ligated with a 1.8-kb HindIII fragment of the ura4 gene to produce pBSIIskb5::ura4. Shk1 (1-380) and Skb5 (1-88) protein coding sequences were both obtained by polymerase chain reaction and then cloned into pVJL11 and pGADGH, respectively, generating pVJL11Shk1 (1-380) and pGADGHSkb5 (1-88).

Kinase Assays and Coprecipitation Experiments-- For kinase assays and coprecipitation experiments using proteins purified from S. pombe cell lysates, S. pombe cells expressing GST fusion proteins, either alone or in combination with CMSkb5, were grown in EMM to about 107 cells/ml, washed with yeast lysis buffer, and resuspended in yeast lysis buffer before lysing using glass beads as described previously (15). GST fusion proteins were precipitated from yeast cell lysates using glutathione-agarose beads as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For coprecipitation experiments, immunoblots were performed as described previously using anti-GST antibody (Pierce) and anti-c-Myc antibody 9E10 (27). Kinase assays of purified GST proteins were carried out at 30 °C in 25 µl of kinase buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM MnCl2, 0.1 µg/µl MBP, 50 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol)). Reactions were terminated after 20 min by adding 4 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer (Novex) and boiling for 5 min. Assays were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subsequent autoradiography.

GST and GST-Skb5 were purified from bacterial lysates using glutathione-agarose following the manufacturer's recommendations (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), except that protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM pepstatin A, 50 µg/ml leupeptin, 36 µg/ml E-64, 10 µg/ml aprotinin) were used in the lysis buffer. Bacterial cells expressing His6-Shk1 were lysed by sonication in lysis buffer B (50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM C3H7O6PNa2, 137 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 10% glycerol), while His6-Ha-Ras cultures were lysed in lysis buffer C (10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 10%, glycerol, and 0.5% dodecyl-beta -D-maltoside (Calbiochem). His6-tagged proteins were purified using nickel-agarose beads following the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Proteins were concentrated and exchanged into storage buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol) using Centriprep-5 concentrators (Millipore). Kinase assays were performed at 30 °C in kinase buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM MnCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05% Triton X-100, 0.04 µg/µl MBP, 20 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol)). Reactions were terminated after 20 min by addition of 4 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer (Novex) and boiling for 5 min prior to resolving on a 4-15% SDS-PAGE gradient gel (Bio-Rad) and subsequent autoradiography.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We previously described a two-hybrid screen for identification of Shk1-interacting proteins (17). Partial cDNAs corresponding to two distinct S. pombe genes were identified as a result of this screen, skb1, which has been described previously (17), and skb5 (previously referred to as skb2 (17)), which we describe in this report. The full-length skb5 gene was cloned by a hybridization screen of an S. pombe genomic library. Sequence analysis revealed that the skb5 gene (GenBankTM accession number AF192549) contains an uninterrupted open reading frame encoding a small protein, 140 amino acids in length, with a predicted molecular mass of approximately 16 kDa (Fig. 1A). The Skb5 protein contains a single C-terminal SH3 domain (amino acids 87-136) and a highly acidic N terminus. BLAST searches of the nucleic acid and protein sequence data bases revealed that Skb5 shares structural homology with an unpublished S. cerevisiae protein, Nbp2 (35% overall identity), and an alternative, non-tyrosine kinase product, c-Scr, encoded by the chicken c-src gene (28) (26% identity) (Fig. 1B). The SH3 domain of Skb5 is 50% identical with the SH3 domain of Nbp2 and 36% identical with the SH3 domain of c-Scr. We determined that the SH3 domain of Skb5 is both necessary and sufficient for interaction with Shk1 in the two-hybrid system (Table I). N- and C-terminal deletion mutants of Shk1 were used to determine that Skb5 interacts with the N-terminal regulatory domain of Shk1 (Table I). This result suggested that Skb5 might be a Shk1 regulator.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Sequence analysis of the skb5 gene and alignment of the predicted Skb5 protein with related proteins from budding yeast and chicken. A, nucleotide sequence and translation of the skb5 gene. The SH3 domain of the Skb5 protein is indicated by black boxes with white text. In-frame stop codons are indicated by the asterisks. B, alignment of amino acids 1-136 of Skb5 with amino acids 1-166 of S. cerevisiae Nbp2 (GenBankTM accession number D43693) and 1-137 of chicken c-Scr. Identical amino acids are indicated by black boxes with white text and similar amino acids by gray boxes with black text.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Two-hybrid interactions between Skb5 and Shk1 proteins
Values indicate the beta -galactosidase activity detected between pairs of LBD and GAD fusion proteins using the quantitative liquid beta -galactosidase assay (see "Experimental Procedures"). The SH3 domain of Skb5 comprises amino acids 87-136. The regulatory domain of Shk1 comprises amino acids 1-380, while the catalytic domain consists of amino acids 381-658. Values are expressed as Miller units and represent the average activity detected for at least two independent transformants.

Genetic and molecular analyses were performed to establish whether the interaction between Skb5 and Shk1 is biologically significant. We first expressed Skb5 as a c-Myc epitope-tagged protein (CMSkb5) in fission yeast to determine whether it coprecipitates with full-length Shk1, as well as the original Shk1 two-hybrid bait protein, Shk1Delta N118, which were each fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST-Shk1 and GST-Shk1Delta N118, respectively). Shk1Delta N118 corresponds to the originally published Shk1 protein sequence (2), which was truncated by 118 amino acids due to a sequencing error. Shk1Delta N118 can substitute for full-length Shk1 protein in S. pombe cells.2 CMSkb5 coprecipitated with GST-Shk1 and GST-Shk1Delta N118 from S. pombe cell lysates, but did not coprecipitate with GST (Fig. 2), demonstrating that Skb5 and Shk1 proteins form a complex in S. pombe.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Skb5 associates with Shk1 in fission yeast. Wild-type S. pombe cells expressing CMSkb5, in combination with GST, GST-Shk1, or GST-Shk1Delta N118, were lysed, and GST complexes were purified and resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using either anti-c-Myc antibody to detect bound CMSkb5 (top) or anti-GST antibody to detect GST fusion proteins (bottom). CMSkb5 was associated with GST-Shk1 and GST-Shk1Delta N118, but not with GST. GST degradation products were detected for GST-Shk1 and GST-Shk1Delta N118. Such degradation is commonly observed for large GST fusion proteins expressed in S. pombe.

An skb5 null (skb5Delta ) mutation was generated in which most of the skb5 protein coding sequence was replaced by the ura4 gene (Fig. 3A). Unlike shk1Delta mutants, skb5Delta mutants were viable and exhibited no obvious phenotypic defects under normal growth conditions in either rich or minimal media (data not shown). skb5Delta mutants were also indistinguishable from wild-type cells when grown at either 20 or 36 °C, indicating that the skb5Delta mutation does not cause cold or temperature sensitive phenotypes, respectively (data not shown). Recent studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that Cdc42, Shk1, and Skb1 are each required for normal response to hypertonic stress in S. pombe.3 S. pombe mutants expressing a dominant inhibitory mutant allele of cdc42 are inviable and cells deficient in Shk1 expression are growth impaired when cultured in hypertonic medium. skb1Delta mutants, which are normally only modestly shorter than wild-type cells, become ellipsoidal in shape when subjected to hypertonic stress. These observations prompted us to investigate whether the growth or morphology of skb5Delta mutants is affected by hypertonic stress. Indeed, we found that skb5Delta mutants grew slower than wild-type cells and became ellipsoidal in morphology when grown in 1.5 M KCl (Fig. 3, B and C), demonstrating that Skb5, like Cdc42, Shk1, and Skb1, is required for normal growth and morphology of S. pombe cells in hypertonic medium.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Genetic characterization of skb5. A, Construction of the skb5 null mutation. Position of the Skb5 protein coding sequence is indicated by the black and gray box. The majority of the Skb5 protein coding sequence was replaced by the S. pombe ura4 gene (see "Experimental Procedures"). B, growth inhibition of the skb5Delta mutant induced by hypertonic stress can be suppressed by overexpression of Skb1. Wild-type S. pombe strain SP870 was transformed with the control plasmid pREP1 (open circle ) or a plasmid for overexpressing Skb1, pREP1Skb1 (), and the growth rate of the resulting transformants in EMM with 1.5 M KCl was compared with that of skb5Delta (SPSKB5U) cells transformed with either pREP1 () or pREP1Skb1 (black-square) and grown in the same medium. C, skb5Delta cells are morphologically aberrant in hypertonic medium. Wild-type cells (top), skb5Delta cells (middle), and skb5Delta cells overexpressing Skb1 from the plasmid pREP1Skb1 (pSkb1) (bottom) were grown in either EMM (left) or EMM with 1.5 M KCl (right) for several generations and then observed microscopically. Skb1 overexpression restored normal morphology to skb5Delta cells in EMM with 1.5 M KCl. D, the skb5Delta mutation suppresses the growth inhibition caused by overexpression of Shk1. Wild-type (bottom) and skb5Delta (top) strains were transformed with either the control plasmid pART1CM (left) or pART1CMShk1, for overexpression of Shk1 (right). Fresh transformants were assayed for growth by streaking onto EMM plates and incubating at 30 °C for 3 days. E, growth inhibition caused by combining overexpression of Skb5 with expression of the dominant inhibitory Cdc42T17N mutant protein can be suppressed by overexpression of Shk1Delta N118. Wild-type cells transformed with the control plasmid pREP1 (Control) or a plasmid for overexpressing Skb5, pREP1Skb5 (pSkb5), were streaked onto EMM plates and incubated for 3 days at 30 °C (top panel). Skb5 overexpression did not affect the growth rate of wild-type S. pombe cells. A strain expressing the dominant inhibitory Cdc42T17N mutant protein (SP42T17N) was transformed with either the control plasmids pREP1 and pAAUCM (Control), pREP1 and pAAUCMShk1Delta N118 (pShk1Delta N118), pREP1Skb5 and pAAUCM (pSkb5), or pREP1Skb5 and pAAUCMShk1Delta N118 (pSkb5 + pCMShk1Delta N118) (bottom panel). Skb5 overexpression was highly inhibitory to the growth of the SP42T17N strain and this phenotype was suppressed by overexpression of Shk1Delta N118.

Additional genetic analyses were performed to further establish a functional link between Skb5 and Shk1. We determined that overexpression of Shk1 is significantly less inhibitory to the growth of skb5Delta cells than to wild-type cells (Fig. 3D), providing evidence that Skb5 might be required for normal Shk1 function in S. pombe. We found further that Skb5 overexpression was inhibitory to the growth of S. pombe cells expressing a dominant inhibitory mutant allele of cdc42, cdc42T17N, and that this growth defect could be suppressed by overexpression of Shk1Delta N118 (Fig. 3E). Shk1Delta N118 was used for this experiment because, for reasons that at present are unclear, overexpression of full-length Shk1 is highly toxic to cells expressing Cdc42T17N.4 Interestingly, we observed that wild-type cells that overexpressed Skb5 were spheroidal in morphology (data not shown), suggesting that Skb5 overexpression may have a dominant inhibitory effect with respect to function of the Cdc42/Shk1 morphological control pathway in S. pombe, possibly due to sequestration of Shk1 from proper interaction with its other regulators and/or targets. This idea is consistent with the observation that overexpression of Skb5 was inhibitory to growth of cells expressing Cdc42T17N and that overexpression of Shk1Delta N118 could suppress this growth defect. Although overexpression of Shk1 could not suppress hypertonic stress-induced growth or morphological defects of the skb5Delta mutant (data not shown), these defects were suppressed by overexpression of the Shk1 modulator Skb1 (Fig. 3, B and C). These various genetic data provide strong evidence that Skb5 and Shk1 interact functionally in S. pombe, with Skb5 possibly functioning as a positive regulator of Shk1.

Biochemical experiments were performed to establish whether Skb5 regulates the catalytic function of Shk1. S. pombe cells expressing GST or GST-Shk1Delta N118, both with and without co-overexpression of Skb5, were lysed and GST and GST-Shk1Delta N118 proteins purified from the resulting cell lysates. Kinase assays were then performed to measure the ability of GST-Shk1Delta N118 to both autophosphorylate and phosphorylate MBP. GST-Shk1Delta N118 was used for this experiment, because we found that a GST fusion of the full-length Shk1 protein was expressed at a substantially higher level in cells that overexpressed Skb5, making it impossible to obtain meaningful comparisons of Shk1 kinase activity between cells that overexpressed Skb5 and cells that did not. As shown in Fig. 4A, the phosphorylation of MBP by GST-Shk1Delta N118 was significantly greater for protein isolated from cells that overexpressed Skb5 than from cells that did not, while autophosphorylation of GST-Shk1Delta N118 was only slightly increased for protein isolated from cells that overexpressed Skb5 (Fig. 4A). No detectable kinase activity was observed for the GST samples. These results suggest that Skb5 stimulates Shk1 catalytic activity in vivo and that it might do so without substantially affecting Shk1 autophosphorylation.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Skb5 stimulates Shk1 catalytic activity in vivo and in vitro. A, wild-type S. pombe cells were transformed with plasmids for expressing either GST (pAAUGST) or GST-Shk1Delta N118 (pAAUGSTShk1Delta N118) in combination with pREP1Skb5 or the control plasmid pREP1. GST proteins (approximately 4 µg of GST and 0.5 µg of GST-Shk1Delta N118) were purified from cell lysates and assayed for kinase activity. Skb5 overexpression resulted in a marked increase in the ability of Shk1Delta N118 to phosphorylate MBP (bottom), but only slightly increased Shk1Delta N118 autophosphorylation (top). B, Analysis of recombinant GST, GST-Skb5, His6-Ha-Ras, and His6-Shk1 proteins purified from bacterial cells (see "Experimental Procedures"). GST and GST-Skb5 were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then gels were stained with Coomassie Blue dye (left). His6-Ha-Ras and His6-Shk1 proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-Express antibody (Invitrogen) (right). C, recombinant GST (15 µg), GST-Skb5 (4 µg), His6-Ha-Ras (0.25 µg), and His6-Shk1 (25 ng) expressed and purified from bacterial cells were mixed together in the indicated combinations and subjected to kinase assays for measuring Shk1 autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of MBP. GST-Skb5, but not GST, strongly stimulated the ability of Shk1 to phosphorylate MBP, but did not stimulate Shk1 autophosphorylation. D, same assays as those shown in C were performed in the absence of MBP.

We next asked whether Skb5 directly stimulates Shk1 catalytic function by determining whether recombinant Skb5 protein purified from bacterial cells directly stimulates the catalytic function of bacterially expressed Shk1 protein. Skb5 was purified in recombinant form as a GST fusion protein (GST-Skb5), while Shk1 was purified as a polyhistidine-tagged protein (His6-Shk1) (Fig. 4B). GST-Skb5 and His6-Shk1, as well as the control proteins GST and His6-Ha-Ras, were mixed together in various combinations and assayed for kinase activity. Strikingly, we observed that GST-Skb5 strongly stimulated the ability of His6-Shk1 to phosphorylate MBP, but without stimulating Shk1 autophosphorylation (Fig. 4C). This result demonstrates that Skb5 directly stimulates Shk1 catalytic function in vitro. The observed decrease in His6-Shk1 autophosphorylation in the presence of GST-Skb5 (Fig. 4C) was most likely due to substrate competition by MBP, since in assays lacking MBP, GST-Skb5 had no affect on the autophosphorylation of Shk1 (Fig. 4D). In addition to stimulating Shk1 catalytic function, GST-Skb5 was also phosphorylated by Shk1 in vitro (Fig. 4, C and D). We have determined from in vivo labeling experiments that Skb5 is also a phosphoprotein in S. pombe (data not shown); however, we do not yet know whether its in vivo phosphorylation is dependent on Shk1.

In summary, we have described the genetic and molecular characterization of a novel SH3 domain protein, Skb5, that positively regulates the function of the fission yeast PAK Shk1. Skb5 clearly plays only an auxiliary role in regulating the overall function of Shk1. While the shk1Delta mutation is lethal to S. pombe cells, skb5Delta cells lack any discernible phenotypic defects under normal growth conditions. Even under conditions of hypertonic stress, skb5Delta mutants, while spheroidal in shape, are only modestly inhibited for growth. It is possible that Skb5 plays a more significant cellular role under environmental conditions that we have not tested or that Skb5 is functionally redundant with another protein(s) (e.g. another Skb5-related protein). Alternatively, it is conceivable that the proper regulation of cell morphology under conditions of hypertonic stress does not represent an essential function of Shk1. Although its cellular role, as presently defined, is potentially modest, the identification and characterization of Skb5 is significant, because it represents what is to our knowledge the first example of an SH3 domain protein capable of directly stimulating the catalytic activity of a purified PAK.

Previous studies have demonstrated interactions between mammalian PAKs and SH3 domain proteins, specifically, the SH2/SH3 adaptor protein Nck (29) and the Cdc42/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor proteins alpha -and beta -PIX (30, 31). Nck and PIX proteins are thought to function in recruiting PAKs to Cdc42 and/or Rac complexes in the cell, where the PAKs are subsequently activated by the p21 G proteins (29, 30). A mutated form of PIX lacking its guanine nucleotide exchange factor domain was capable of stimulating the kinase activity of a PAK immune complex in vitro, suggesting that PIX also has Cdc42/Rac-independent PAK stimulatory function (32). However, since these experiments used PAK immune complexes, they did not provide an indication of whether PIX function is sufficient to directly stimulate PAK catalytic function, as other proteins in the immune complex may have been required for this activity. The founding member of the PAK family, the budding yeast Ste20 kinase (7, 33), has also been shown to form a complex with the SH3 domain protein Bem1 (34), although the functional nature of this interaction has not yet been defined. Based on these previously described findings and those presented in this report, it is reasonable to speculate that functional regulation by SH3 domain proteins represents a broadly conserved primordial feature of eukaryotic PAKs that has been modified and reiterated through the course of evolution to provide multiple mechanisms for PAK activation, thereby allowing these kinases to regulate numerous and diverse cellular processes. Moreover, our results raise the exciting possibility that PAKs in higher organisms might, in some cases, be directly activated by SH3 domain proteins. This potential alternative mechanism for PAK activation may ultimately help to explain how PAKs are functionally regulated such that they can be targeted to perform the diverse cellular functions to which they have been linked in eukaryotic organisms.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Ramesh Gadiraju, Mary Gilbreth, and Anjana Kundu for technical assistance; and Anthony Polverino and members of the Marcus laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01GM53239. DNA sequencing was performed by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Core DNA Sequencing Facility, which is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant P30CA16672.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF192549 (for skb5).

Dagger These authors contributed equally to this work.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 713-745-2032; Fax: 713-794-4394; E-mail: smarcus@notes.mdacc.tmc.edu.

2 S. M., unpublished results.

3 P. Yang, R. Pimental, H. Lai, and S. Marcus, manuscript in preparation.

4 P. Yang and S. Marcus, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PAK, p21-activated kinase; kb, kilobase pair; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MBP, myelin basic protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; LBD, LexA DNA binding domain.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sells, M. A., and Chernoff, J. (1997) Trends Cell Biol 7, 162-167
2. Marcus, S., Polverino, A., Chang, E., Robbins, D., Cobb, M. H., and Wigler, M. H. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 6180-6184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Ottilie, S., Miller, P. J., Johnson, D. I., Creasy, C. L., Sells, M. A., Bagrodia, S., Forsburg, S. L., and Chernoff, J. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5908-5919[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Manser, E., Huang, H. Y., Loo, T. H., Chen, X. Q., Dong, J. M., Leung, T., and Lim, L. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1129-1143[Abstract]
5. Sells, M. A., Knaus, U. G., Bagrodia, S., Ambrose, D. M., Bokoch, G. M., and Chernoff, J. (1997) Curr. Biol 7, 202-210
6. Polverino, A., Frost, J., Yang, P., Hutchison, M., Neiman, A. M., Cobb, M. H., and Marcus, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26067-26070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Leberer, E., Dignard, D., Harcus, D., Thomas, D. Y., and Whiteway, M. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4815-4824[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Frost, J. A., Xu, S., Hutchison, M. R., Marcus, S., and Cobb, M. H. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3707-3713[Abstract]
9. Faure, S., Vigneron, S., Doree, M., and Morin, N. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5550-5561[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Gilbreth, M., Yang, P., Bartholomeusz, G., Pimental, R. A., Kansra, S., Gadiraju, R., and Marcus, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14781-14786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Verde, F., Wiley, D. J., and Nurse, P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7526-7531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Allen, K. M., Gleeson, J. G., Bagrodia, S., Partington, M. W., MacMillan, J. C., Cerione, R. A., Mulley, J. C., and Walsh, C. A. (1998) Nat. Genet. 20, 25-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Rudel, T., and Bokoch, G. M. (1997) Science 276, 1571-1574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Zhang, S., Han, J., Sells, M. A., Chernoff, J., Knaus, U. G., Ulevitch, R. J., and Bokoch, G. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23934-23936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Yang, P., Kansra, S., Pimental, R. A., Gilbreth, M., and Marcus, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18481-18489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Sells, M. A., Barratt, J. T., Caviston, J., Ottilie, S., Leberer, E., and Chernoff, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18490-18498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Gilbreth, M., Yang, P., Wang, D., Frost, J., Polverino, A., Cobb, M. H., and Marcus, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13802-13807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Miller, P. J., and Johnson, D. I. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1075-1083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Chang, E. C., Barr, M., Wang, Y., Jung, V., Xu, H. P., and Wigler, M. H. (1994) Cell 79, 131-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Vojtek, A. B., Hollenberg, S. M., and Cooper, J. A. (1993) Cell 74, 205-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Alfa, C., Fantes, P., Hyams, J., McLeod, M., and Warbrick, E. (1993) Experiments with Fission Yeast: A Laboratory Course Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
22. Rose, M. D., Winston, F., and Hieter, P. (1990) Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
23. Van Aelst, L., Barr, M., Marcus, S., Polverino, A., and Wigler, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6213-6217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Marcus, S., Polverino, A., Barr, M., and Wigler, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7762-7766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Maundrell, K. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10857-10864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Shibuya, E. K., Polverino, A. J., Chang, E., Wigler, M., and Ruderman, J. V. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9831-9835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Evan, G. I., Lewis, G. K., Ramsay, G., and Bishop, J. M. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 3610-3616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Dorai, T., and Wang, L. H. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4068-4079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Bokoch, G. M., Wang, Y., Bohl, B. P., Sells, M. A., Quilliam, L. A., and Knaus, U. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25746-25749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Manser, E., Loo, T. H., Koh, C. G., Zhao, Z. S., Chen, X. Q., Tan, L., Tan, I., Leung, T., and Lim, L. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 183-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Bagrodia, S., Taylor, S. J., Jordon, K. A., Van Aelst, L., and Cerione, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23633-23636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Daniels, R. H., Zenke, F. T., and Bokoch, G. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6047-6050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Ramer, S. W., and Davis, R. W. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 452-456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Leeuw, T., Fourest-Lieuvin, A., Wu, C., Chenevert, J., Clark, K., Whiteway, M., Thomas, D. Y., and Leberer, E. (1995) Science 270, 1210-1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MycologiaHome page
C. F. Hughes and M. H. Perlin
Differential expression of mepA, mepC and smtE during growth and development of Microbotryum violaceum
Mycologia, May 1, 2005; 97(3): 605 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. J. Winters and P. M. Pryciak
Interaction with the SH3 Domain Protein Bem1 Regulates Signaling by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae p21-Activated Kinase Ste20
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2177 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
A. Yamada, B. Duffy, J. A. Perry, and S. Kornbluth
DNA replication checkpoint control of Wee1 stability by vertebrate Hsl7
J. Cell Biol., December 6, 2004; 167(5): 841 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C. Hofmann, M. Shepelev, and J. Chernoff
The genetics of Pak
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2004; 117(19): 4343 - 4354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Yang, Y. Qyang, G. Bartholomeusz, X. Zhou, and S. Marcus
The Novel Rho GTPase-activating Protein Family Protein, Rga8, Provides a Potential Link between Cdc42/p21-activated Kinase and Rho Signaling Pathways in the Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 48821 - 48830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Ohkuni, A. Okuda, and A. Kikuchi
Yeast Nap1-Binding Protein Nbp2p Is Required for Mitotic Growth at High Temperatures and for Cell Wall Integrity
Genetics, October 1, 2003; 165(2): 517 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Kim, P. Yang, P. Catanuto, F. Verde, H. Lai, H. Du, F. Chang, and S. Marcus
The Kelch Repeat Protein, Tea1, Is a Potential Substrate Target of the p21-activated Kinase, Shk1, in the Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30074 - 30082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Jorgensen, B. Nelson, M. D. Robinson, Y. Chen, B. Andrews, M. Tyers, and C. Boone
High-Resolution Genetic Mapping With Ordered Arrays of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Deletion Mutants
Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1091 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Bao, Y. Qyang, P. Yang, H. Kim, H. Du, G. Bartholomeusz, J. Henkel, R. Pimental, F. Verde, and S. Marcus
The Highly Conserved Protein Methyltransferase, Skb1, Is a Mediator of Hyperosmotic Stress Response in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 14549 - 14552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Bose, J. E. Irazoqui, J. J. Moskow, E. S. G. Bardes, T. R. Zyla, and D. J. Lew
Assembly of Scaffold-mediated Complexes Containing Cdc42p, the Exchange Factor Cdc24p, and the Effector Cla4p Required for Cell Cycle-regulated Phosphorylation of Cdc24p
J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2001; 276(10): 7176 - 7186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.