![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 51, 36409-36414, December 17, 1999
,From the Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although sphingomyelin (SPH) is a major
constituent of all lipoproteins, its physiological function in plasma
is not known. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that SPH inhibits
lipid peroxidation in low density lipoproteins (LDL) because of its effects on surface fluidity and packing density and that the relative resistance of the buoyant LDL to oxidation, compared with the dense
LDL, is partly due to their higher SPH content. Depletion of SPH by
treatment with SPHase resulted in shortened lag times and increased
rates of oxidation in both LDL subfractions, as measured by the
conjugated diene formation in the presence of Cu2+.
Oxidation of LDL by soybean lipoxygenase was similarly stimulated by
the degradation of SPH. Oxidation-induced fluorescence decay of
diphenylhexatriene-labeled phosphatidylcholine (PC), equilibrated with
LDL-PC, was accelerated significantly by the enzymatic depletion of SPH
from the lipoprotein. Oxidation of 16:0-18:2 PC in the proteoliposomes
was inhibited progressively by the incorporation of increasing amounts
of egg SPH into the liposomes. Treatment of SPH-containing
proteoliposomes with SPHase reversed the effect of SPH, showing that
the presence of intact SPH is necessary for the inhibition of
oxidation. Although the incorporation of SPH into the same liposome as
the PC (intrinsic SPH) protected the PC against oxidation, the addition
of SPH liposomes to PC liposomes (extrinsic SPH) was not effective.
Oxidation of 16:0-18:2 PC in liposomes was also inhibited by the
incorporation of dipalmitoyl-PC, but not by free cholesterol. These
results suggest that SPH acts as a physiological inhibitor of
lipoprotein oxidation, possibly by modifying the fluidity of the
phospholipid monolayer and thereby inhibiting the lateral propagation
of the lipid peroxy radicals.
Oxidative modification of the low density lipoproteins
(LDL)1 is believed to play a
critical role in the infiltration of monocytes and in the formation of
lipid-laden foam cells found in the atherosclerotic lesion (1-3).
Several studies showed that the small dense LDL fractions are more
susceptible to in vitro oxidation than the large buoyant LDL
fractions (4-6). Patients with a higher percentage of dense LDL in
their plasma (Pattern B) are known to be at an increased risk for
atherosclerosis (7, 8). The possible mechanisms for the increased
oxidative susceptibility of small dense LDL fractions is not well
understood. Although a higher concentration of polyunsaturated fatty
acids was reported in the dense LDL, this parameter did not correlate
with the difference in the oxidation rates between dense and buoyant
LDLs (4). Tribble et al. (6) found significantly lower
levels of ubiquinol-10 and In our previous studies on the lipid composition of LDL subfractions,
we found a positive correlation between the size of the LDL particle
and its sphingomyelin (SPH)/phosphatidylcholine (PC) ratio (11).
Because SPH is generally colocalized with FC in various cell membranes
and lipoproteins (12, 13), we investigated the possibility that the
observed correlation between the FC concentration and resistance to
oxidation is actually related to the SPH content rather than the FC
content of the lipoprotein. The basis for this hypothesis is that SPH
is known to decrease the fluidity of the monolayer and that the
fluidity of the monolayer plays a significant role in the rate of lipid
oxidation (14, 15). It has also been shown that SPH inhibits the
oxidation of lipoprotein FC by cholesterol oxidase by increasing the
packing density of the surface monolayer (16). The results presented
here show that altering the SPH content of the isolated LDL
significantly affects its oxidizability in the presence of
Cu2+ or lipoxygenase. Furthermore, we show that the
incorporation of SPH into synthetic liposomes containing unsaturated PC
greatly inhibits the oxidation of PC and that this effect can be
reversed by treatment with sphingomyelinase (SPHase). We propose that
SPH inhibits the rate of peroxidation of PC in the surface of the lipoproteins by retarding the lateral propagation of the lipid-free radicals because of its membrane-rigidifying properties. This inhibition may be physiologically significant because of the high concentrations of SPH found in certain lipoprotein fractions and in the
interstitial fluid.
Materials--
Egg SPH, 16:0-18:2 PC, 16:0-16:0 PC, SLO (Type
IV, 440,000 units/mg), and Staphylococcus aureus SPHase (297 units/mg) were all obtained from Sigma. DPH-PC was purchased from
Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR). Apoprotein A-I was prepared from
delipidated HDL3 as described before (17).
LDL Subfractions--
Fresh plasma, prepared from non-fasting
normal volunteers, was purchased from a commercial source (United Blood
Center, Chicago). LDL subfractions were isolated by sequential
centrifugation of separate aliquots of plasma in the presence of 1 mM EDTA, as described by Tribble et al. (6). The
buoyant LDL was obtained between the densities of 1.026 and 1.032 g/ml,
whereas the dense LDL was obtained between the densities of 1.040 and
1.054 g/ml. All densities were adjusted using solid KBr. Whole LDL was
prepared by centrifugation between the densities of 1.019 and 1.060 g/ml. The lipoproteins were collected by tube-slicing and were dialyzed
against Tris-NaCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM EDTA and
stored in the dark at 4 °C. Before the lipoproteins were used for
oxidation studies, they were dialyzed against the same buffer without EDTA.
Liposomes--
Proteoliposomes containing 16:0-18:2 PC and
apoA-I were prepared by the cholate-dialysis procedure (18), with the
apoprotein/PC ratio at 1:300. Where indicated, egg SPH, 16:0-16:0 PC,
or FC was also included. The concentration of 16:0-18:2 PC was kept at
0.164 µmol/ml in all samples. All liposome preparations were dialyzed
against Tris-NaCl buffer, pH 7.4, and stored in the dark at 4 °C
until used. All samples were used for oxidation within 1 week of
preparation. Where indicated, the proteoliposomes were treated with
S. aureus SPHase in the presence of 0.8 mM
MnCl2, and again dialyzed, to remove the metal ions.
Oxidation--
LDL subfractions were oxidized in the presence of
5 µM CuSO4 at 37 °C in thermostated
cuvettes in a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu), and the formation of
conjugated dienes (CD) was measured by continuous monitoring of the
absorbance at 234 nm. The data were imported and plotted in a
spreadsheet program (Microsoft Excel), and the slopes were calculated
in the linear region. The lag times were determined manually from the
intercepts of the lines of lag phase and propagative phase, as
described (4). The oxidation in the presence of SLO was performed using
500 units/ml of SLO at 37 °C, and the CD formation was monitored as
described above.
Oxidation of DPH-PC incorporated into LDL or liposomes was performed as
described by Hofer et al. (19). DPH-PC was added as ethanol
solution to LDL or the liposomes to give a molar ratio of
DPH-PC/substrate PC of 1:100. Samples were incubated in the dark at
37 °C for 12 h in a water bath for the equilibration of the
label. The oxidation of DPH-PC was initiated by the addition of 10 µM CuSO4, and the decay of fluorescence was
monitored in a spectrofluorometer at 37 °C (excitation wavelength,
360 nm, and emission wavelength, 430 nm). Labeled LDL was depleted of SPH by treatment with S. aureus SPHase (0.8 unit of SPHase/3
mg of LDL protein) for 4 h at 37 °C, in the presence of 0.8 mM MnCl2. The samples were dialyzed against
Tris-NaCl buffer, pH 7.4 (without EDTA), to remove the metal ions.
Control samples without SPHase were incubated and dialyzed under the
same conditions.
Analytical Procedures--
Lipid phosphorus was determined by
the modified Bartlett procedure (20), after the separation of the
phospholipids by silica gel TLC (11). Protein was estimated by the
modified Lowry procedure (21).
Oxidation of Buoyant and Dense LDL Subfractions: Effect of SPH
Depletion--
Fig. 1 shows the
formation of conjugated dienes (CD) in the buoyant and dense LDL
subfractions in the presence of 5 µM Cu2+.
The lag time for the dense LDL was considerably lower (188 min) compared with the buoyant LDL (216 min), in agreement with previous studies. Treatment with SPHase significantly shortened the lag time in
both buoyant and dense LDL fractions, in a dose-dependent manner, showing that the hydrolysis of SPH results in increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidation. However, the differences between the two LDL fractions remained even after the SPHase treatment, indicating that other factors such as the antioxidant content also
contribute to the differences in susceptibility. The slope for the CD
formation increased by 9% in buoyant LDL and by 38% in the dense LDL
after treatment with 0.26 unit of SPHase. SPHase alone did not have any
effect on the oxidation of LDL in the absence of added
Cu2+, showing that the effect of SPHase is not due to the
presence of divalent metal ions in the enzyme preparation. Analysis of phospholipids after treatment with 0.26 unit of the enzyme showed that
the SPH/PC ratio decreased from 0.395 to 0.108 in buoyant LDL and from
0.265 to 0.081 in dense LDL. Although previous studies (22, 23)
reported that LDL gets aggregated after SPHase treatment, we did not
find any aggregation under these conditions (low concentrations of LDL
and metal ions).
Oxidation of LDL with Soybean Lipoxygenase (SLO)--
Because the
lipoxygenase-mediated oxidation is believed to play a major role in the
formation of modified LDL in vivo (24), we tested the effect
of SPH depletion of LDL on the oxidation by SLO. Whole LDL fraction
(d 1.019-1.060 g/ml, 0.3 mg of cholesterol) was first
passed through a PD-10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to remove
EDTA and then treated with 0.48 unit of SPHase for 2 h at
37 °C. The sample was then incubated with 500 units/ml of SLO in a
spectrophotometer cuvette at 37 °C, and the increase in
A234 was recorded. During the oxidation with
SLO, 5 µM EDTA was included in all cuvettes to inhibit
any oxidation due to metal ions in the SPHase preparation. As shown in
Fig. 2, SLO caused an increase in
A234 in intact LDL, with a shorter lag time than observed with Cu2+-mediated oxidation. When LDL was
pretreated with SPHase, the rate of oxidation was stimulated
significantly, the slope being 45% higher than with intact LDL. The
lag period was shortened by about 30 min after treatment with SPHase.
Samples containing only SPHase exhibited a modest increase in
A234, but this increase could not account for
the effect of SPHase in the SLO-mediated oxidation. Analysis of
phospholipid composition showed that the SPHase treatment reduced the
SPH/PC ratio from 0.38 to 0.21, showing that the enzyme was active,
although no metal ions were added, presumably because of the presence
of some metal ions in the enzyme preparation. There was no aggregation
of LDL under these conditions. These results thus show that SPH
inhibits the oxidation of LDL under physiological conditions.
Oxidation of DPH-PC Incorporated into LDL--
The fluorescence
decay of DPH-PC equilibrated with lipoprotein PC has been used as a
sensitive marker of the oxidative susceptibility of the lipoproteins
(19). This fluorescent phospholipid is primarily incorporated into the
surface lipids of LDL, and therefore its degradation may be used as a
specific reporter of surface lipid oxidation. DPH-PC was incorporated
into normal LDL at a concentration of 1 nmol/100 nmol of LDL
phospholipid, and its fluorescence was measured at 37 °C in the
presence of 5 µM Cu2+. As shown in Fig.
3, there was a linear decrease in
fluorescence after an initial lag period in the control LDL. When LDL
was first treated with SPHase, and then oxidized, the lag period was
significantly decreased (860 s versus 1830 s for
control), and the slope was increased by 20%. These results further
support the hypothesis that SPH has a protective effect on the
oxidation of unsaturated phospholipids in LDL.
Effect of SPH on the Oxidation of PC in the Liposomes--
To
directly determine whether SPH can protect the unsaturated PC against
peroxidation, we incorporated varying amounts of SPH into
proteoliposomes containing apoA-I and 16:0-18:2 PC (at a molar ratio
of 1:300) (18) and tested the rate of lipid oxidation in the presence
of 10 µM Cu2+. As shown in Fig.
4, there was a gradual increase in lag
time and decrease in the slope, with increasing ratio of SPH/PC in the
proteoliposomes up to a ratio of 0.75. However, at the highest SPH/PC
ratio tested (1.0), the oxidation was higher than at 0.75, probably due to a phase separation, which is known to occur as the
SPH/PC ratio is increased or when the temperature is decreased (12).
The concentration of PC was kept the same in all the samples, and
therefore the decrease in slope is not due to a decrease in the
oxidizable lipid. These results show that SPH does protect unsaturated
PC against oxidation in a defined system.
Inclusion of SPH in the liposomes similarly protected PC against
oxidation by SLO in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the fluorescence decay of DPH-PC incorporated into the liposomes in the
presence of either Cu2+ or the free radical
generator,
2,2'-azo-bis-(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride, was
protected by SPH in the liposomes (results not shown).
Reversal of SPH Effect in Proteoliposomes by the Action of
SPHase--
To exclude the possibility that the protection by SPH is
due to its nonspecific effects on the structure of the liposomes, we
treated the proteoliposomes containing SPH (with a SPH/PC ratio of
0.75) with SPHase and studied the effect on the
Cu2+-mediated oxidation. As shown in Fig.
5, the hydrolysis of SPH significantly
increased the oxidation of PC, although the rate of oxidation did not
reach that of pure PC alone. Treatment of proteoliposomes containing PC
alone with SPHase did not have any effects on oxidation. These results
show that the presence of intact SPH is necessary for the maximal
protection. Although the product of SPHase reaction (ceramide) remains
with the liposomes, it does not appear to protect PC against
oxidation.
Effect of Extrinsic versus Intrinsic SPH--
To determine the
possible mechanism of inhibition of PC oxidation, we tested the effect
of extrinsic and intrinsic SPH on the oxidation of PC in defined
liposomes. If the protection by SPH is dependent upon its presence in
close proximity to PC, the extrinsic SPH should not be protective. On
the other hand, if SPH acts on the oxidizing agent, it should protect
equally well whether it is in the same liposome or not. As shown in
Fig. 6, there was a stimulation of PC
oxidation, rather than an inhibition, by the addition of SPH-AI
liposomes to the PC-AI liposomes (extrinsic SPH). However, as shown
above, the presence of SPH in the same proteoliposome as the PC
(intrinsic SPH) inhibited the oxidation. These results show that the
effect of SPH is related to its physical interaction with the PC in the
bilayer rather than to its other possible effects such as the chelation
of metal ions or the scavenging of the peroxy radicals. This mechanism
is further supported by the effect of dipalmitoyl-PC on the oxidation
of 16:0-18:2 PC. When 25 mol % dipalmitoyl-PC was incorporated into
the proteoliposomes containing 16:0-18:2 PC, the rate of oxidation
(slope) of the latter by Cu2+ was decreased by 38%, as
compared with a 24% decrease in the presence of 25 mol % SPH (Fig.
7). The lag period in the presence of
dipalmitoyl-PC was 100 min, compared with 65 min in the presence of SPH
and 50 min with 16:0-18:2 PC alone. The presence of 25 mol % FC,
however, had no significant effect on either the lag period or
slope.
SPH is the most abundant phospholipid in the lipoproteins next to
PC, comprising up to 30% of the total phospholipids in certain lipoproteins (11). Its concentration is further increased in apoprotein
E deficiency (25) and in aging and atherosclerosis (12). Although its
importance as a structural component of lipoproteins is well
recognized, its possible involvement in the metabolism of the
lipoproteins has not received much attention because it is relatively
inert in the plasma and there is no plasma enzyme for which it is a
substrate. We have previously demonstrated that SPH is a strong
inhibitor of cholesterol esterification by lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (26) and suggested that, because of its structural similarities to PC, it may act as a competitive inhibitor of
lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as various other
phospholipases. Recent studies by Arimoto et al. (27) and
Lobo and Wilton (28) show that SPH also inhibits the activity of
lipoprotein lipase, suggesting that it may have broader physiological
function as an inhibitor of PC hydrolysis, thus helping maintain the
structural integrity of lipoprotein particle. A similar role has been
proposed for membrane SPH in the protection of membrane PC from the
action of cellular phospholipase A (29). The results presented here demonstrate another possible mechanism by which SPH preserves the
integrity of lipoprotein structure, namely the protection of surface PC
against oxidation, which is also known to lead to extensive degradation
of PC (1).
The importance of oxidative modification of lipoproteins in the
development of atherosclerosis has been studied extensively in recent
years (3). Several studies showed that oxidized LDL not only exerts
chemotactic and cytotoxic effects but is also taken up by macrophages
rapidly through an unregulated pathway, leading to the formation of
foam cells (1-3). Furthermore, oxidation of HDL lipids renders this
lipoprotein less efficient in the promotion of cholesterol efflux (30).
Although some studies reported that the antioxidant protection of LDL,
as indicated by the increase in the lag time of CD formation, is not
directly correlated with the atherogenic risk (31), increasing the
resistance of LDL to oxidation is generally accepted to be beneficial.
While previous studies showed that large buoyant LDL are more resistant
to oxidation than the small dense LDL, the possible mechanism for this
is not established. Based on the correlation between the FC content and the oxidizability, Tribble et al. (5) suggested that the FC content of LDL particles may be an important determinant of oxidation. However the effect of FC on lipoprotein oxidation has not been experimentally demonstrated. Our previous studies showed that the
SPH/PC ratios are also positively correlated with the size of LDL
particles (11) and therefore the susceptibility to oxidation is also
inversely correlated with the SPH content. The results presented here
show that the high concentration SPH may contribute in part to the
resistance of the large buoyant LDL particles to oxidation.
The mechanism by which SPH inhibits PC oxidation is yet to be
established. An examination of the structure of SPH reveals the
presence of no easily exchangeable hydrogen atoms, and therefore, it
cannot act as a chain-breaking reagent. It does not chelate metal ions
and thus cannot prevent metal ion-induced amplification of the
hydroperoxy radicals. However one property of SPH that may contribute
to its antioxidant function is its ability to decrease the fluidity of
a membrane or monolayer because of its saturated hydrocarbon chains
(12). Studies by Wiseman and colleagues (14) showed that tamoxifen and
other steroid molecules have "membrane-rigidifying" effects that
correlate strongly with their antioxidant properties. SPH may belong to
this class of antioxidants, which act by retarding the propagation of
oxidation reaction, rather than by preventing the initial formation of
lipid-free radicals. The fact that only the intrinsic SPH protects the
PC while the externally added SPH cannot supports this hypothesis.
Furthermore, treatment of the lipoproteins or liposomes with SPHase
abolished the effect of SPH, suggesting the requirement of an intact
SPH molecule. Ceramide, the product of SPHase action, is more
hydrophobic than SPH and may be localized deeper in the PC monolayer
than SPH and therefore may not block the contact of adjacent PC
molecules. Thus, the propagation of the free radical reaction along the
PC monolayer may be impeded physically by the presence of SPH but not
by ceramide. Similar inhibition was found when dipalmitoyl-PC was
incorporated into 16:0-18:2 PC liposomes, showing that the presence of
a long chain saturated phospholipid molecule prevents the oxidation of unsaturated PC in the same monolayer. However, the presence of FC at a
similar concentration did not have any effect. Unlike some of the well
known antioxidants that scavenge the free radicals, the amount of SPH
needed to block the oxidation by the physical modification of the
monolayer would be expected to be relatively high. The physiological
concentration of SPH and hence the SPH/PC ratio in certain lipoproteins
is indeed quite high (0.406 in large LDL) (11), and at such SPH/PC
ratios the PC oxidation is significantly inhibited in the defined
systems (Fig. 4). In contrast to FC, which can be oxidized (32, 33) and
thus can contribute to the lipoprotein modification, plasma SPH is very
resistant to oxidation under physiological conditions because its acyl
groups are predominantly saturated or monounsaturated (34). It may thus
insulate the unsaturated phospholipids of the lipoproteins against
oxidizing agents in the plasma as well as in the subendothelial space.
The oxidation of cholesterol by cholesterol oxidase has also been shown
to be inhibited by SPH in vitro (16). It is of interest to
note that the lipoproteins in the interstitial fluid have high SPH/PC
ratios compared with plasma lipoproteins (35), and this may be
physiologically important in the protection of unsaturated
phospholipids against oxidation in this compartment. Studies by Tabas
and colleagues (22) show that the arterial SPHase may be involved in
the aggregation of LDL particles, leading to an increased uptake by
macrophages. The results presented here suggest another possible
mechanism by which arterial SPHase may influence the atherogenicity of
LDL, because the depletion of LDL SPH by this enzyme would increase the
susceptibility of LDL to the oxidation in the subendothelial space and
convert it into a more atherogenic particle.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-tocopherol in the dense LDL, compared
with the buoyant LDL. However, the variation in these antioxidants
could account for less than 35% of the variation in oxidation rates
(6). Furthermore, the antioxidant status of LDL is in general not
correlated with the lag phase of oxidation (9). On the basis of the
oxidizability of selectively localized probes in LDL particles, Tribble
et al. (10) proposed that the greater susceptibility of
small dense LDL is due to differences in the surface lipid composition
rather than the core lipid or protein composition. In an earlier study (5), they found an inverse correlation between the free cholesterol (FC) content of the LDL particle and its rate of oxidation and suggested that FC might protect against peroxidation of the surface lipids by altering the fluidity of the monolayer. However, the effect
of FC on the oxidative susceptibility of LDL or defined liposomes was
not experimentally tested.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of SPH depletion on the oxidizability
of LDL subfractions. The buoyant and dense LDL subfractions (200 µg of protein/ml) were dialyzed against EDTA-free buffer and
incubated with 5 µM CuSO4 at 37 °C in a
spectrophotometer cuvette, and the absorbance at 234 nm was recorded at
10-min intervals. Where indicated, S. aureus SPHase (0.13 or
0.26 unit/ml) was added to each cuvette before the start of the
oxidation. Control tubes containing only LDL and SPHase (no
CuSO4) were included to determine the effect of any metal
ions in the enzyme preparation. The slopes and lag times were
calculated for each curve as described in the text. There was no
aggregation of LDL under these conditions.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Oxidation of LDL by SLO: effect of SPH
depletion. Whole LDL preparation (d 1.019-1.60 g/ml)
(300 µg of protein) was first passed through a PD-10 column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) to remove EDTA and then treated with 0.48 unit of
bacterial SPHase for 2 h at 37 °C. The sample (and the
untreated control) was then incubated with 500 units/ml of SLO at
37 °C in a spectrophotometer cuvette, and the absorbance was
recorded at 234 nm. All cuvettes contained 5 µM EDTA to
minimize the oxidation due to contaminating metal ions in the SPHase
preparation.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Oxidation of DPH-PC incorporated into LDL:
effect of SPH depletion. DPH-PC was added as ethanol solution to
whole LDL to give a molar ratio of DPH-PC to LDL-PC of 1:100 and
incubated at 37 °C for 12 h in the dark to equilibrate the label
with endogenous PC. An aliquot of the labeled LDL was treated with
SPHase (0.5 units/ml for 4 h) in the presence of 0.8 mM MnCl2, and the sample was dialyzed against
Tris-NaCl buffer, pH 7.4, to remove the metal ions. The control and the
SPHase-treated LDLs were then oxidized in the presence of 5 µM Cu2+, and the fluorescence was monitored
in a spectrofluorometer (SLM-Aminco) with the excitation and emission
wavelengths set at 360 nm and 430 nm, respectively.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of SPH on the oxidation of 16:0-18:2
PC incorporated into proteoliposomes. Proteoliposomes containing
apoA-I and 16:0-18:2 PC at the molar ratio of 1:300 and varying
amounts of egg SPH were prepared by the cholate dialysis (18). The
concentration of 16:0-18:2 PC was the same (0.164 mM) in
all the samples. Oxidation of the samples was carried out at 37 °C
in the presence of 10 µM CuSO4, and the
absorbance at 234 nm was recorded. The calculated slopes and lag times
are shown in the lower panel.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of SPH depletion in
proteoliposomes. The proteoliposomes containing either PC alone
(control) or SPH/PC ratio of 0.75 were treated with SPHase (0.5 unit of
enzyme/ml, in the presence of 0.8 mM MnCl2) and
then dialyzed to remove the metal ions. The untreated proteoliposomes
were also dialyzed under the same conditions. All samples were oxidized
in the presence of 20 µM Cu2+, and the CD
formation was monitored at 234 nm.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of intrinsic versus
extrinsic SPH. Proteoliposomes containing 16:0-18:2 PC and
apoA-I or egg SPH and apoA-I were prepared by cholate dialysis at the
molar ratio of phospholipid/apoA-I at 300:1. Proteoliposomes containing
both PC and SPH in equal concentrations were also prepared. In the
extrinsic assay, equal volumes of the PC liposomes and SPH liposomes
were present in the reaction mixture, whereas in the intrinsic assay
the PC-SPH proteoliposome were present (1:1 molar ratio). All samples
were oxidized in the presence of 20 µM Cu2+
at 37 °C.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of disaturated PC and FC on the
oxidation of unsaturated PC. Proteoliposomes containing PC alone,
PC + 25 mol % egg SPH, PC + 25 mol % FC, and PC + 25 mol % dipalmitoyl-PC (Di16:0 PC) were prepared by cholate dialysis and
oxidized in the presence of 20 µM Cu2+.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-52597 and by funds from the Max Baer Heart Fund of the Fraternal Order of Eagles.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, Rush Medical College, 1653 W. Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-455-2439; Fax: 312-455-9814; E-mail: psubbaia@rush.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LDL, low density lipoproteins; HDL, high density lipoproteins; CD, conjugated dienes; DPH, diphenylhexatriene; FC, free cholesterol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SLO, soybean lipoxygenase; SPH, sphingomyelin; SPHase, sphingomyelinase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Steinberg, D., Parthasarathy, S., Carew, T. E., Khoo, J. C., and Witztum, J. L. (1989) N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 915-924[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Haberland, M. E., and Steinbrecher, U. P. (1992) Monogr. Hum. Genet. 14, 35-61 |
| 3. |
Diaz, M. N.,
Frei, B.,
Vita, J. A.,
and Keaney, J. F.
(1997)
N. Engl. J. Med.
337,
408-416 |
| 4. | de Graaf, J., Hak-Lemmers, H. L. M., Hectors, M. P. C., Demacker, P. N. M., Hendriks, J. C. M., and Stalenhoef, A. F. H. (1991) Arteriosclerosis 11, 298-306[Abstract] |
| 5. | Tribble, D. L., Holl, L. G., Wood, P. D., and Krauss, R. M. (1992) Atherosclerosis 93, 189-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Tribble, D. L.,
Van den Berg, J. J. M.,
Motchnik, P. A.,
Ames, B. N.,
Lewis, D. M.,
Chait, A.,
and Krauss, R. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1183-1187 |
| 7. | Austin, M. A. (1994) Int. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 24, 187-192[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Chait, A., Brazg, R. L., Tribble, D. L., and Krauss, R. M. (1993) Am. J. Med. 94, 350-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Esterbauer, H., Gebicki, J., Puhl, H., and Jürgens, G. (1992) Free Radical Biol. Med. 13, 341-390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Tribble, D. L., Krauss, R. M., Lansberg, M. G., Thiel, P. M., and van den Berg, J. J. M. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 662-671[Abstract] |
| 11. |
Liu, M.,
Krul, E. S.,
and Subbaiah, P. V.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5139-5147 |
| 12. | Barenholz, Y. (1984) in Physiology of Membrane Fluidity (Shinitzky, M., ed) , pp. 131-174, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL |
| 13. | Brown, R. E. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 1-9[Abstract] |
| 14. | Wiseman, H., Quinn, P., and Halliwell, B. (1993) FEBS Lett. 330, 53-56[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Janero, D. R., and Burghardt, B. (1989) Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 63, 163-173[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Slotte, J. P., and Grönberg, L. (1990) J. Lipid Res. 31, 2235-2242[Abstract] |
| 17. | Subbaiah, P. V., Liu, M., Bolan, P. J., and Paltauf, F. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1128, 83-92[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Chen, C. H., and Albers, J. J. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 680-691[Abstract] |
| 19. | Hofer, G., Lichtenberg, D., and Hermetter, A. (1995) Free Radical Res. 23, 317-327[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Marinetti, G. V. (1962) J. Lipid Res. 3, 1-20 |
| 21. | Markwell, M. A. K., Hass, S. M., Bieber, L. L., and Tolbert, N. E. (1978) Anal. Biochem. 87, 206-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Schissel, S. L., Tweedie-Hardman, J., Rapp, J. H., Graham, G., Williams, K. J., and Tabas, I. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 1455-1464[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Oorni, K.,
Hakala, J. K.,
Annila, A.,
Ala-Korpela, M.,
and Kovanen, P. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29127-29134 |
| 24. | Rankin, S. M., Parthasarathy, S., and Steinberg, D. (1991) J. Lipid Res. 32, 449-456[Abstract] |
| 25. | Jeong, T. S., Schissel, S. L., Tabas, I., Pownall, H. J., Tall, A. R., and Jiang, X. C. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 905-912[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Subbaiah, P. V.,
and Liu, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20156-20163 |
| 27. |
Arimoto, I.,
Saito, H.,
Kawashima, Y.,
Miyajima, K.,
and Handa, T.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
143-151 |
| 28. | Lobo, L. I. B., and Wilton, D. C. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1349, 122-130[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Koumanov, K., Wolf, C., and Bereziat, G. (1997) Biochem. J. 326, 227-233 |
| 30. | Morel, D. W. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 200, 408-416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Fruebis, J., Bird, D. A., Pattison, J., and Palinski, W. (1997) J. Lipid Res. 38, 2455-2464[Abstract] |
| 32. | Chang, Y. H., Abdalla, D. S. P., and Sevanian, A. (1997) Free Radical Biol. Med. 23, 202-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Patel, R. P., Diczfalusy, U., Dzeletovic, S., Wilson, M. T., and Darleyusmar, V. M. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 2361-2371[Abstract] |
| 34. | Myher, J. J., Kuksis, A., and Pind, S. (1989) Lipids 24, 408-418[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Reichl, D., and Sterchi, J. M. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1127, 28-32[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Nilsson and R.-D. Duan Absorption and lipoprotein transport of sphingomyelin J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 154 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gago-Dominguez, J. E. Castelao, M. C. Pike, A. Sevanian, and R. W. Haile Role of Lipid Peroxidation in the Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2829 - 2839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. V. Subbaiah, L. R. Gesquiere, and K. Wang Regulation of the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins by sphingomyelin J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2699 - 2705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Boyanovsky, A. Karakashian, K. King, N. Giltiay, and M. Nikolova-Karakashian Uptake and Metabolism of Low Density Lipoproteins with Elevated Ceramide Content by Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGULATION OF APOPTOSIS J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26992 - 26999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Garner, D. J. Harvey, L. Royle, M. Frischmann, F. Nigon, M. J. Chapman, and P. M. Rudd Characterization of human apolipoprotein B100 oligosaccharides in LDL subfractions derived from normal and hyperlipidemic plasma: deficiency of {alpha}-N-acetylneuraminyllactosyl-ceramide in light and small dense LDL particles Glycobiology, October 1, 2001; 11(10): 791 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Safa, K. Hensley, M. D. Smirnov, C. T. Esmon, and N. L. Esmon Lipid Oxidation Enhances the Function of Activated Protein C J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2001; 276(3): 1829 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |