![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 51, 36544-36549, December 17, 1999
,From the Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rad17 gene of
Schizosaccharomyces pombe plays an important role as a
checkpoint protein following DNA damage and during DNA replication. The
human homologue of S. pombe rad17,
Hrad17, was recently identified, but its function has not
yet been established. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we determined
that HRad17 can interact with a nucleolar protein, NHP2L1. This
interaction was also demonstrated biochemically, in human cells.
Immunofluorescence studies revealed that HRad17 and NHP2L1 colocalize
to the nucleolus, and immunogold labeling further resolved the location
of NHP2L1 to the dense fibrillar component of the nucleolus.
Interestingly, the localization of HRad17 in the nucleolus was altered
in response to UV irradiation. These results provide some insight into
the DNA damage and replication checkpoint mechanisms of HRad17.
Cell cycle checkpoint proteins ensure that events of the cell
cycle progress in an orderly fashion. Whenever DNA is damaged or
incompletely replicated, cell cycle checkpoint proteins act to delay
cell cycle progression until the aberrant DNA is repaired or
replication is completed. Without this protective delay, cell division
would occur in the presence of damaged or unreplicated DNA, which would
result in genetic mutations or cell death (1-3).
In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the
rad1+, rad3+,
rad9+, rad17+,
rad26+, and hus1+ genes
are involved in DNA damage and replication checkpoints (3, 4).
Similarly, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the G2-M DNA damage checkpoint is dependent on RAD9,
RAD17, RAD24, MEC1/ESR1, RAD53, MEC3, and PDS1/ESP2
(3, 5). The function and structure of many of these checkpoint genes
share a high degree of conservation between fission and budding yeast,
because some of them are orthologous. For example, the S. pombe
rad1+ gene is structurally related to RAD17
of S. cerevisiae (6); the S. pombe
rad3+ gene is a member of the phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase group and is a homologue of the S. cerevisiae RAD53
gene (7); and the S. pombe rad17+ gene, which
shares some sequence similarity with replication factor C
(RF-C),1 is the homologue of
the budding yeast RAD24 gene (8). Moreover, human homologues
of S. pombe rad1+, rad9+,
rad17+, and hus1+ have
been identified as Hrad1, Hrad9,
Hrad17, and Hhus1, respectively (9-12), and the
S. pombe rad3+ gene has two human homologues,
ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and
Rad3-related) (13-15).
Genetic data in yeast and recent biochemical studies in yeast and human
suggest that an early step in the DNA damage checkpoint response may
involve the activation of Rad3p/ATM/ATR and Chk1 kinases.
Phosphorylation of Chk1 does not occur when checkpoint rad
genes are inactive, placing chk1 downstream of
rad genes in the cascade of events (16). Furthermore, the
Chk1 kinase has been shown to phosphorylate Cdc25c, and it is known
that when phosphorylated on Ser216, Cdc25c is sequestered,
and thus inhibited, by 14-3-3 (17-19). This scenario reveals a
potential link between the checkpoint Rad proteins and Cdk regulation
through Cdc25 (20, 21).
In the last few months, there have been three independent reports of
the cloning of Hrad17, the human homologue of the
Rad17 gene from S. pombe (11, 22, 23). The HRad17
protein has a significant amino acid identity with S. pombe
Rad17p and has been demonstrated to interact physically with HRad1 but
not with HRad9 (11). More recently, we showed that Hrad17 is
highly expressed in human testis and tumor tissues (22), and Li
et al. (23) confirmed the cell-cycle checkpoint
functionality of Hrad17, using a complementation assay in S. pombe rad17 mutants. In the present work, we investigated the
intracellular localization of HRad17, and we report that it
predominantly localizes to the nucleolus. To further investigate the
possible biological roles of Hrad17, yeast two-hybrid
screening was performed to identify potential HRad17 binding partners.
We found that HRad17 interacts and colocalizes with NHP2L1, the human
homologue of an essential S. cerevisiae nuclear protein,
NHP2 (24). In addition, the localization of HRad17 was found to be
sensitive to UV irradiation, as the protein then translocated out of
the nucleoli and assumed a more diffuse nuclear distribution. These
results suggest a functional link between HRad17 and NHP2L1 and
implicate the nucleolus as an important site in the DNA damage
checkpoint response.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening--
The entire open reading frame
(ORF) of HRad17 was amplified by PCR with a pair of primers,
5'-CTGGATCCGCATGAATCAGGTAACAGACT-3' and
5'-GAAGTCGACTATGTCCCATCACTCTCGT-3'. The PCR products were digested by
BamHI and SalI and cloned into vector pAS-2
(CLONTECH, Palo Atlo, CA). The ORF sequence of
human Chk1 was retrieved from the GenBankTM data base
(accession number AF016582), amplified by PCR, and cloned into vector
pACT-2 (CLONTECH). The nucleotide sequence of these
constructs was confirmed by automated sequencing.
The human testis matchmaker cDNA library was purchased from
CLONTECH. The procedures for yeast two-hybrid
screening and elimination of false positives were performed exactly
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, six million
yeast transformants were screened, and 20 positive clones were selected
based on His3 and lacZ reporter gene expression.
After cycloheximide counterselection and yeast mating to eliminate
false positives, a total of six clones remained positive. Plasmids of
these six positive clones were isolated from yeast strain CG1945 and
transformed into Escherichia coli strain KC8. Automated
sequencing allowed for the identification of two of these six clones as
NHP2L1 and two others as KIP. We then proceeded with yeast
cotransformation experiments to confirm the two-hybrid interaction.
pQE and FLAG Expression Constructs--
Hrad17 was cut from the
pAS-2-Hrad17 construct by BamHI and SalI and then
cloned into pQE32 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The ORF region of NHP2L1
was amplified by PCR and cloned into pQE30 (Qiagen). For cloning NHP2L1
and KIP coding sequences in frame into vector pFLAG-CMV2 (Kodak, New
Haven, CT), PCR was used to amplify the ORFs corresponding to each
gene. The amplified fragments were cloned into the NotI and
SalI sites of pFLAG-CMV2. The primers were as follows: for
NHP2L1, 5'-TATGCGGCCGCGATGACTGAGGCTGATGTGAAT-3' and
5'-GCGGTCGACTTAGACTAAGAGCCTTTCAAT-3', and for KIP,
5'-AATGCGGCCGCGATGGGGGGCTCGGGCAGTCGC-3' and
5'-TGCGTCGACTCACAGGACAATCTTAAAGGA-3'. The nucleotide
sequence of these constructs was confirmed by automated DNA sequencing.
Production and Purification of His Tag Fusion Proteins of HRad17
and NHP2L1--
The pQE constructs were transformed into E. coli. strain M15 (pREP4). The expression of His tag fusion protein
was induced with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-D-galactopyranoside at 37 °C for 3-5 h. The bacterial pellets were sonicated in PBS with protease inhibitors (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5%
Nonidet P-40, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml leupeptin,
10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride) and then lysed with 1% Triton X-100. The purification of His
tag fusion proteins was carried out by His.Bind Quick columns (Novagen,
Madison, WI).
Antibodies--
Monoclonal antibodies against HRad17 (31E9) were
developed by immunizing mice with His6-HRad17 and screening
the culture supernatants with recombinant HRad17 protein using ELISA.
NHP2L1 polyclonal antiserum (R86) was raised in rabbits against two
synthetic peptides derived from the amino acid sequences,
KQLRKGANEATKTLNRG and SQLKQQIQSIQQSIERLLV from NHP2L1. The polyclonal
antiserum was further purified by Affi-10 gel (Bio-Rad) column coupled
with His-tagged NHP2L1. After extensive washing with 10 mM
Tris (pH 7.5) and 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 500 mM
NaCl, the antibodies were eluted with 100 mM glycine (pH
2.5) and 100 mM triethylamine (pH 11) and dialyzed with PBS for two days.
Cell Culture--
Human HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies,
Inc.)
Protein Lysates, Immunoprecipitation, and Western
Blotting--
HeLa cell lysates were prepared from cultured cells
grown to 75-90% confluence on 10-cm dishes. Following two washes with cold PBS, the cells were scraped and solubilized for 1 h in 0.5 ml
of lysis buffer with protease inhibitors (50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM
NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml
trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and spun to collect cell extracts (supernatants).
For immunoprecipitation assays, the whole cell extract was diluted with
the same volume of double distilled H2O to reduce ionic
strength interference. Antibodies were incubated with cell extract at
4 °C for 2 h. A protein A-Sepharose and protein G-Sepharose mixture (20 µl 1:1) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitate complexes were washed three times with lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1% bovine hemoglobin, 1 mM iodoacetamide, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, prepared in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 140 mM NaCl, 0.025% NaN3), solubilized in SDS
sample buffer (0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10%
glycerol, 0.6% Transfection Experiments--
For cultures used in
immunoprecipitation assays, HeLa cells were grown to approximately
60-80% confluence on 10-cm dishes. 20 µg of DNA in 40 µl of
Superfect reagent (Qiagen) were added to the cells. For cultures used
for indirect immunofluorescence detection experiments, HeLa cells were
seeded onto glass coverslips, placed in 3-cm dishes, and transfected
with 1-2 µg of DNA in 5 µl of Superfect reagent. Following
incubation at 37 °C for 2-3 h, the DNA-Superfect complex was
replaced with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
fetal bovine serum. 48 h after transfection, the cells were either
fixed for microscopic analysis (immunofluorescence) or lysed, and cell
extracts were prepared for immunoprecipitation.
Immunocytochemistry--
For indirect immunofluorescence, cells
grown on coverslips were fixed in cold methanol (
For immunogold labeling, HeLa cells were fixed for 30 min with
0.1% glutaraldehyde in Zamboni fixative (2% paraformadehyde and 1:6
dilution of a saturated picric acid solution in 0.1 M PBS).
Samples were then cryoprotected and frozen in liquid nitrogen as
described (25). Ultrathin cryosections were prepared and incubated with
the primary antiserum for 30 min, followed by incubation for 30 min
with goat anti-rabbit IgG and gold conjugates of 10 nm gold particle
size (10 µg/ml). Sections were thoroughly washed with PBS and stained
for 2 min in 1% neutral uranyl acetate and then 2 min in 4%
unbuffered uranyl acetate. Samples were mounted in a thin film of
1.25% methylcellulose (Fluka Chemical Co., Donkokomo, NY) and examined
with a JEOL 100-cx transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA).
UV Irradiation--
UV doses were delivered with a single pulse
using the UV Stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Culture
medium was removed prior to UV irradiation and replaced immediately
after treatment. In most of these experiments, a dose of 40 J/m2 was used, and the cells were observed after an
additional 2 h of culture.
The Subcellular Localization of HRad17--
To address the
subcellular distribution of HRad17, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)
against HRad17 were generated. The mAb 31E9 was found to recognize a
protein of 75 kDa by Western blotting of HeLa total cell lysates (Fig.
1A, lane 1) and
immunoprecipitation (lanes 2 and 3). This
corresponds to the predicted molecular mass of HRad17. The two major
bands below Hrad17 come from the IgG used for immunoprecipitation, as
confirmed by an experiment where a control antibody (25G10) was used
(not shown). The 31E9 antibody also recognizes a single 75-kDa band in
extracts of insect cells expressing HRad17 (data not shown).
Immunostaining analysis of HeLa cells with the 31E9 antibody showed
that HRad17 localized to the nucleus, exhibiting a punctate pattern
with concentration mostly in the nucleoli (Fig. 1B).
Identification of an HRad17 Interacting Protein, NHP2L1--
Using
the yeast two-hybrid method with HRad17 as the bait protein,
approximately six million human testis cDNA library transformants were screened, and a total of six colonies were found that were HIS3 and lacZ positive. Two of them were
identified by sequencing as NHP2L1, representing two
different mRNA transcripts, 0.7 and 1.3 kilobases, as described
previously by others (26). Another two colonies were identified as
CIB/KIP (27, 28). The specificity of the
interaction between KIP/NHP2L1 and HRad17 was further confirmed by
cotransformation of HRad17 with NHP2L1 and KIP into yeast strain CG1945. In addition, pACT-2-PCNA and pACT-2-Chk1 were constructed as
controls. The result showed that NHP2L1 and KIP can specifically interact with HRad17 using the yeast two-hybrid method (Fig.
2A).
To investigate whether NHP2L1 and KIP interact with HRad17 in mammalian
cells, immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out. HeLa cells
were transfected with N-terminal FLAG-tagged NHP2L1 or KIP. Cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated with either 31E9 or anti-FLAG mAbs and
analyzed by Western blotting with corresponding antibodies.
Immunoprecipitation with the 31E9 anti-HRad17 antibody followed by
Western blotting with anti-FLAG antibody revealed Hrad17 and NHP2L1 in
the same immunocomplex (Fig. 2C). The opposite experiment,
immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody and Western blotting with
31E9, also showed an association between HRad17 and NHP2L1 (Fig.
2D). As was the case for Fig. 1, the two major bands seen in
Fig. 2 (C and D) come from the IgG used for
immunoprecipitation, as confirmed by a set of experiments where lysates
were substituted for lysis buffer alone (not shown). These results
demonstrate that HRad17 and NHP2L1 can interact in HeLa cells. However,
we were unable to detect co-immunoprecipitation of HRad17 and KIP (Fig.
2, C and D).
Two New Homologues of NHP2L1 in S. cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis
elegans--
Although NHP2 shares some similarity with
NHP2L1, a search of the GenBankTM data base
revealed an open reading frame from S. cerevisiae even more
closely related to NHP2L1. S. cerevisiae NHP2 and human
NHP2L1 have only 33% identity (Fig. 3),
but this novel S. cerevisiae ORF (GenBankTM
accession number S15037) is 69% identical to human NHP2L1. Therefore,
the homology of NHP2L1 to this new gene is likely to be much more
relevant than its homology to NHP2. Similarly, we found a C. elegans sequence (Swiss-Prot number Q21568) that is 77% identical
to NHP2L1, suggesting that this is a highly conserved protein.
NHP2L1 Is a Nucleolar Protein--
Because HRad17 and NHP2L1
could interact in HeLa cells, we set out to examine whether NHP2L1
localized in the nucleolus. First, HeLa cells were transfected with
FLAG-tagged NHP2L1. Immunofluorescent labeling with the anti-FLAG
antibody showed that NHP2L1 indeed located to the nucleoli (Fig.
4A). Second, a GFP-NHP2L1
fusion construct was made to transfected into HeLa cells. Again, the NHP2L1 green signal was found to reside in the nucleoli (data not
shown). Third, a rabbit polyclonal antiserum, R86, was raised against
NHP2L1 using two NHP2L1 synthetic peptides, and an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody was prepared. The affinity-purified antibody specifically recognized one band in the nuclear preparation of HeLa
cells, whose size corresponds to that of NHP2L1 (Fig. 4E). Staining of HeLa cells with this affinity-purified antibody
predominantly localized to the nucleoli, with only fainter, punctate
labeling in other nuclear regions (Fig. 4B). Control
experiments using preimmunized rabbit serum and synthetic peptides for
immunocompetition did not show a nucleolar signal (Fig. 4, C
and D). These results demonstrate that NHP2L1 is a nucleolar
protein.
NHP2L1 Is Concentrated in the Dense Fibrillar Component of
the Nucleolus--
To more precisely determine where HRad17 and NHP2L1
resided within the nucleolus, immunogold labeling of ultrathin
cryosections prepared from HeLa cells was performed. The anti-HRad17
monoclonal antibody 31E9 was incompatible with our electron microscopy
fixation procedures. However, immunogold labeling with polyclonal
anti-NHP2L1 antiserum R86 showed that NHP2L1 is largely concentrated in
the dense fibrillar component of the nucleolus (Fig.
5). No signal was found in the same
region when preimmunized serum was used.
HRad17 Colocalizes with NHP2L1--
To test whether HRad17 and
NHP2L1 colocalized in the nucleolus, double staining experiments were
performed. Using simultaneous labeling of HeLa cells with anti-HRad17
and anti-NHP2L1 antibodies followed by rhodamine and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies, large overlapping areas
of staining could be visualized in the nucleoli. These are shown in
yellow in the superimposed confocal images (Fig.
6).
Redistribution of HRad17 after UV Irradiation--
To investigate
whether the localization of HRad17 may be responsive to
DNA damage, HeLa cells were irradiated
with UV light (40 J/m2) and cultured for another 2 h.
Interestingly, HRad17 staining was no longer seen in the nucleoli,
although the nucleolar structures could still be detected by phase
contrast microscopy. Instead, we observed only the punctate nuclear
labeling pattern after UV treatment (Fig.
7B). The total amount of
HRad17 protein appeared unchanged (Fig. 7A), however,
suggesting that the disappearance of HRad17 nucleolar labeling was
caused by protein redistribution rather than degradation. This effect
was also observed with lower UV doses, but complete disappearance of
Hrad17 nucleolar labeling occurred only after longer post-irradiation
incubation periods (e.g. 16 h at 20 J/m2).
In control experiments, MPP10, a human U3 small nucleolar
ribonucleoprotein component (29) still localized to the nucleolus after
UV irradiation (Fig. 7, C and D). Finally,
redistribution of HRad17 was also be observed when the cells were
treated with methyl methanesulfonate, mitomycin C, adriamycin, or a
combination of We recently isolated an Hrad17 cDNA clone on the
basis of its high levels of expression in human testis and tumor
tissues (22). In the present work, we used the yeast two-hybrid method to identify interacting proteins. Our screen revealed two HRad17 interacting proteins, NHP2L1 and KIP. KIP is related to the phosphatase calcineurin B and was reported to bind to DNA-dependent
protein kinase (28), which is a relative of Rad3p/ATM/ATR kinases, with a C-terminal domain homologous to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and is
required for V(D)J rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes, recombination, and repair of radiation-induced double-stranded breaks
(30). Therefore, KIP may participate in the regulation of DNA
double-strand break repair via the regulation of phosphorylation and
dephosphorylation processes (28). Although HRad17 and KIP could clearly
interact within the confines of the yeast two-hybrid system, we could
not detect such an association in human cells by
co-immunoprecipitation. Although this does not rule out that an
in vivo interaction may occur in human cells, we
concentrated our efforts on the other Hrad17-binding protein, NHP2L1.
NHP2L1 is a putative human homologue of the NHP2
gene in S. cerevisiae (26). NHP2 is related to the high
mobility group (HMG) proteins based on the contents of basic and acidic
amino acids, and is essential in yeast (24). Typically, HMG proteins have a molecular mass that is <30 kDa and are highly charged. HMG
domains can bind to a variety of non-B-DNA structures, such as B-Z DNA
junction and platinated DNA (31, 32). An RNA binding motif that was
hypothesized to deliver additional activity to the ribosome was also
found in NHP2 (33). No obvious HMG domain or RNA-binding motif can be
identified in human NHP2L1 protein. Two other homologues of human
NHP2L1 were identified in C. elegans and S. cerevisiae (Fig. 3). To assess the importance of the new yeast
NHP2L1, we used the single step method (34) to create a null
mutant of NHP2L1 in S. cerevisiae. After
screening more than 200 transformants containing HIS3 or
TRP1 marker genes, however, we were unable to obtain a null
mutant of NHP2L1 in S. cerevisiae,2 suggesting
that NHP2L1 may be an essential gene in yeast.
HRad17 and NHP2L1 were found to localize to the nucleolus. The
nucleolus is the site of rDNA transcription, processing of rDNA
transcripts, and formation of preribosomal particles (35). It can be
divided into three compartments, the fibrillar centers (FCs), the dense
fibrillar component (DFC), and the granular component. Early work
showed that the FC is a reservoir for rDNA and RNA polymerase I (36,
37). The DFC is thought to be the likely site of rRNA transcription,
because nascent Br-UTP-labeled rRNA was detected at the boundary of FC
and DFC (38, 39). However, another line of evidence attributed the site
of rRNA transcription to the FC region (40). Later rRNA processing and
preribosome assembly take place in the granular component region (35).
Immunogold labeling of NHP2L1 showed that it resides primarily in the
DFC region of nucleolus (Fig. 4), suggesting that the function of NHP2L1 may be related to rRNA transcription or processing. We were
unable to determine the precise location of Hrad17 within the
nucleolus. However, its localization in the nucleolus suggests it may
play a role in one or more nucleolar processes.
Recently, it has been reported that nucleolar function may be involved
in the aging process. In aging S. cerevisiae cells, the Sir
complex, consisting of Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p, is found to relocalize
from the telomere to the nucleolus, and the number of the
extrachromosomal rDNA circles is dramatically increased (41-44). In
humans, the Werner syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder
characterized by premature aging. The Werner syndrome protein, which
encodes an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, was found to
localize within the nucleolus in human cells (45). The S. pombe Rad17p protein is required for DNA damage and replication checkpoints. If HRad17 plays a similar checkpoint function, its localization raises the possibility of a heretofore unsuspected role
for the nucleolus in the DNA damage response.
DNA damage induced by UV light has been well studied, and a variety of
DNA repair mechanisms are triggered to restore the genomic integrity in
most organisms (46). Given the rapidity of the cellular response to
genome damage one would expect that both the damage sensing mechanisms
and the immediate downstream elements of the signal transduction
pathway would be constitutively present within the nucleus. Indeed,
both ATM and Hrad1, two human proteins with known cell cycle checkpoint
functionalities (7, 47), display constant protein levels after such DNA
damaging stresses as UV or One plausible function of HRad17 in the cell cycle checkpoint process
is suggested by its similarity to RF-C components. Human RF-C is a
complex composed of five proteins of molecular masses 36, 37, 38, 40, and 140 kDa. During DNA replication, the RF-C complex recognizes primed
DNA at the 3'-OH of the pre-Okazaki fragment and recruits trimeric PCNA
molecules onto DNA in the presence of ATP. Subsequent ATP hydrolysis
catalyzed by RF-C is required for polymerase In summary, we characterized the nuclear localization of the putative
checkpoint protein Hrad17 as an overall dotted pattern with prominent
staining in the nucleoli. The nucleolar portion of Hrad17 redistributed
upon treatment with DNA damaging agents indicating a possible role of
this organelle and of Hrad17 in the DNA damage and
replication checkpoint pathways.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol), separated by SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis, and electrophoretically transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in PBS with 0.1%
Tween 20 and 5% dried milk, probed with anti-HRad17 antibody (1:500
dilution), and processed with the ECL Western blotting detection system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
20 °C) for 10 min, washed in PBS, and incubated with polyclonal R86 antiserum or
monoclonal 31E9 antibody at 37 °C for 1 h. After rinsing with
PBS, anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with rhodamine or
fluorescein isothiocyanate (Jackson Immuno Research, West Grove, PA)
were applied at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, DNA was labeled with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and coverslips were mounted in antifade
solution (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR). For double immunofluorescence labeling, both primary or secondary antibodies were
mixed and applied together. Confocal images were recorded using a LSM
410 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and
printed with the Fujix Pictrography 3000 color printer (Fujifilm,
Japan) using Adobe PhotoShop software (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Specificity of the anti HRad17 mAb,
31E9. A, HeLa cells were lysed in the lysis buffer as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The supernatant fraction
was collected for immunoprecipitation and analyzed by Western blotting
using mAb 31E9. Lane 1, HeLa whole cell lysate solubilized
in SDS sample buffer; lane 2, the supernatant fraction
immunoprecipitated with a control mAb (25G10); lane 3, the
supernatant fraction immunoprecipitated with the mAb 31E9.
B, subcellular distribution of HRad17. HeLa cells grown on
coverslips were fixed in cold methanol, incubated with mAb 31E9, and
rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse antibody. Phase contrast micrograph
shows the same field as the fluorescently labeled cell. Bar,
10 µm.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Identification of NHP2L1 as an HRad17
interacting protein. A, pAS2-Hrad17 and human testis
library were cotransformed into S. cerevisiae strain CG1945.
Six million transformants were screened for HIS3 gene
expression and
-gal activity, and NHP2L1 and KIP were identified as
HRad17 interacting proteins. Human Chk1 constructs were used as
control. +++ indicates the relative colony size and color density.
B, HeLa cells were transfected separately with either
FLAG-KIP (lane K) or FLAG-NHP2L1 (lane N), and
cell extracts were prepared. Monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody
(M2) was used to determined the expression of FLAG-KIP and
FLAG-NHP2L1 in HeLa cells. C, Cell lysates prepared as in
B were immunoprecipitated with mAb 31E9 and analyzed by
Western blot using mAb M2. HRad17 and FLAG-NHP2L1 were found in the
same complex. D, cell lysates prepared as in B
were immunoprecipitated with mAb M2 and analyzed by Western blot using
mAb 31E9. As shown in B, HRad17 and FLAG-NHP2L1 were found
in the same complex. IP, antibody used for
immunoprecipitation; WB, antibody used for Western
blotting.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Amino acid sequence alignment of human,
C. elegans, and S. cerevisiae
NHP2L1 proteins with S. cerevisiae NHP2.
Alignments were determined using the GCG Prettyplot program. Gaps were
introduced to optimize the alignment and shown as dashes.
C. elegans and S. cerevisiae amino acid sequences
were retrieved from the Swiss-Prot and GenBankTM data bases
(accession numbers Q21568 and S15037, respectively). ce,
C. elegans; hs, Homo sapiens;
sc, S. cerevisiae.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Nucleolar localization of NHP2L1. HeLa
cells were grown on coverslips and transfected with FLAG-NHP2L1. After
48 h, cells were fixed in cold methanol and immunostained with the
anti-FLAG mAb M2 (A). A similar distribution of NHP2L1 could
be observed in HeLa cells that were fixed in cold methanol an
immunofluorescently labeled using the purified anti-NHP2L1 antiserum
R86 (B). Phase contrast micrographs (A' and
B') represent the same microscopic fields as the
corresponding fluorescently labeled micrographs. Immunofluorescent
labeling with the preimmune serum (C) or with a mixture of
R86 affinity-purified antibodies and NHP2L1-peptides (peptide block,
D) showed no nuclear labeling. Bar, 10 µm.
E, Western blotting of nuclear extracts from HeLa cells,
using either R86 affinity-purified antibodies (lane 1) or
the preimmune antibody preparation (lane 2).

View larger version (93K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Localization of NHP2L1 to the dense fibrillar
component of the nucleolus. HeLa cells were fixed in 0.1%
glutaraldehyde in Zamboni fixative. Ultrathin cryosections were
prepared, incubated with preimmune rabbit antibodies (A) or
with anti-NHP2L1 polyclonal antibody R86 (B), followed by
goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and gold conjugate. After
immunogold labeling, sections were stained as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Bar, 0.2 µm. GC,
granular component.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Colocalization of HRad17 and NHP2L1 in HeLa
cells. HeLa cells were labeled with a mixture of anti-HRad17 mAb
31E9 (A) and anti-NHP2L1 polyclonal antiserum R86
(B). The overlay of images A and B
reveals large areas of colocalization in the nucleoli that are shown in
yellow (C). Bar, 10 µm.
irradiation and cis-platinum,2
suggesting that this translocation of HRad17 out of the nucleolus indeed accompanies DNA damage. In contrast, the localization of NHP2L1
remained nucleolar when these DNA damage stimuli were used (data not
shown).

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Redistribution of HRad17 after UV
irradiation. A, HeLa cells were mock-treated
(lane 1) or irradiated with 40 J/m2 UV
(lane 2). Cell extracts were prepared 2 h after
treatment and analyzed by Western blotting using mAb 31E9. Each lane
was loaded with 20 µg of protein. B, HeLa cells were
stained with 31E9 mAb at 2 h post UV irradiation (40 J/m2, B). Phase contrast micrograph represents
the same field as fluorescently labeled cells (B'). For
comparison, HeLa cells were immunofluorescently labeled with the
antibody MPP10 that showed nucleolar labeling both before
(C) and 2 h after UV irradiation with 40 J/m2 (D). Bar, 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
irradiation or treatment with the
radiomimetic drug neocarzinostatin (47, 48). Our finding of a stable
level of Hrad17 protein upon UV irradiation fits well with these
observations and suggests that perhaps the entire apparatus of DNA
damage sensing and repair is constitutively present in the nucleus,
circumventing the need for time-consuming protein synthesis in the
response to DNA damage. However, ATM and Hrad1 display punctate nuclear labeling patterns excluding nucleoli in the basal state, and this pattern did not change when the cells were treated with DNA damaging agents (49).2 This contrasts with the observations reported
here of a strong Hrad17 staining in the nucleoli, in addition to
fainter, punctate nuclear labeling. Most striking is the disappearance
of Hrad17 nucleolar labeling following DNA damage, apparently because
of a redistribution of Hrad17 protein to its extranucleolar pool. The
significance of this redistribution remains to be determined, but it
may be noteworthy that other proteins involved in DNA repair have been
shown to redistribute in response to UV irradiation, including the
Xeroderma pigmentosum type G protein and BRCA1 (46, 50).
to join the complex
and initiate chain elongation (51). Therefore, HRad17 may interact with
the RF-C complex and interfere with its replication activity, causing
cell cycle arrest. In fact, we have found HRad17 and RFC140 in the same
immunocomplex generated with Hrad17 antibody 31E9 and RFC140 monoclonal
antibodies from Dr. Bruce Stillman, Cold Spring
Harbor.2
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Drs. Tso-Pang Yao, Kin-Ming Lo, and Edmond Cheng for valuable discussions and helpful comments on this article. We also thank Dr. Yuhui Xu for assistance with electron microscopy procedures. Anti-MPP10 antiserum was a gift from Dr. Westendorf.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant CA38493-12.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported in part by a fellowship from the Cancer Research Fund of
the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Foundation.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dana-Farber Cancer Inst., Dept. of Cancer Biology, Rm. SM1058, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-632-3386; Fax: 617-632-4470; E-mail: drchen@shore.net.
2 M.-S. Chang, H. Sasaki, M. S. Campbell, S.-K. Kraeft, R. Sutherland, C.-Y. Yang, Y. Liu, D. Auclair, L. Hao, H. Sonoda, L. H. Ferland, and L. B. Chen, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: RF-C, replication factor C; ORF, open reading frame; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; mAb, monoclonal antibody; HMG, high mobility group; FC, fibrillar center; DFC, dense fibrillar component.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Hartwell, L. H.,
and Weinert, T. A.
(1989)
Science
246,
629-634 |
| 2. | Carr, A. M. (1995) Semin. Cell Biol. 6, 65-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Murray, A. W. (1995) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 5-11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Kitazono, A., and Matsumoto, T. (1998) Bioessays 20, 391-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Paulovich, A. G., Margulies, R. U., Garvik, B. M., and Hartwell, L. H. (1997) Genetics 145, 45-62[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Siede, W.,
Nusspaumer, G.,
Portillo, V.,
Rodriguez, R.,
and Friedberg, E. C.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
1669-1675 |
| 7. | Hoekstra, M. F. (1997) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 170-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Griffiths, D. J., Barbet, N. C., McCready, S., Lehmann, A. R., and Carr, A. M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5812-5823[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Parker, A. E.,
Van de Weyer, I.,
Laus, M. C.,
Oostveen, I.,
Yon, J.,
Verhasselt, P.,
and Luyten, W. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18332-18339 |
| 10. |
Lieberman, H. B.,
Hopkins, K. M.,
Nass, M.,
Demetrick, D.,
and Davey, S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13890-13895 |
| 11. |
Parker, A. E.,
Van de Weyer, I.,
Laus, M. C.,
Verhasselt, P.,
and Luyten, W. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18340-18346 |
| 12. | Kostrub, C. F., Knudsen, K., Subramani, S., and Enoch, T. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2055-2066[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Savitsky, K.,
Bar-Shira, A.,
Gilad, S.,
Rotman, G.,
Ziv, Y.,
Vanagaite, L.,
Tagle, D. A.,
Smith, S.,
Uziel, T.,
Sfez, S.,
et al..
(1995)
Science
268,
1749-1753 |
| 14. | Bentley, N. J., Holtzman, D. A., FLAGgs, G., Keegan, K. S., DeMaggio, A., Ford, J. C., Hoekstra, M., and Carr, A. M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6641-6651[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Cimprich, K. A.,
Shin, T. B.,
Keith, C. T.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2850-2855 |
| 16. | Walworth, N. C., and Bernards, R. (1996) Science 271, 353-356[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Furnari, B.,
Rhind, N.,
and Russell, P.
(1997)
Science
277,
1495-1497 |
| 18. |
Sanchez, Y.,
Wong, C.,
Thoma, R. S.,
Richman, R.,
Wu, Z.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1997)
Science
277,
1497-1501 |
| 19. |
Peng, C. Y.,
Graves, P. R.,
Thoma, R. S.,
Wu, Z.,
Shaw, A. S.,
and Piwnica-Worms, H.
(1997)
Science
277,
1501-1505 |
| 20. |
Weinert, T.
(1997)
Science
277,
1450-1451 |
| 21. | Wang, J. Y. (1998) Curr Opin Cell Biol 10, 240-247[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Bao, S.,
Chang, M. S.,
Auclair, D.,
Sun, Y.,
Wang, Y.,
Wong, W. K.,
Zhang, J.,
Liu, Y.,
Qian, X.,
Sutherland, R.,
Magi-Galluzi, C.,
Weisberg, E.,
Cheng, E. Y.,
Hao, L.,
Sasaki, H.,
Campbell, M. S.,
Kraeft, S. K.,
Loda, M.,
Lo, K. M.,
and Chen, L. B.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
2023-2028 |
| 23. | Li, L., Peterson, C. A., Kanter-Smoler, G., Wei, Y. F., Ramagli, L. S., Sunnerhagen, P., Siciliano, M. J., and Legerski, R. J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 1689-1699[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Kolodrubetz, D., and Burgum, A. (1991) Yeast 7, 79-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Xu, Y., and Slayter, H. S. (1994) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 42, 1365-1376[Abstract] |
| 26. | Saito, H., Fujiwara, T., Shin, S., Okui, K., and Nakamura, Y. (1996) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 72, 191-193[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Naik, U. P.,
Patel, P. M.,
and Parise, L. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4651-4654 |
| 28. | Wu, X., and Lieber, M. R. (1997) Mutat. Res. 385, 13-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Westendorf, J. M.,
Konstantinov, K. N.,
Wormsley, S.,
Shu, M. D.,
Matsumoto-Taniura, N.,
Pirollet, F.,
Klier, F. G.,
Gerace, L.,
and Baserga, S. J.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
437-449 |
| 30. | Hartley, K. O., Gell, D., Smith, G. C., Zhang, H., Divecha, N., Connelly, M. A., Admon, A., Lees-Miller, S. P., Anderson, C. W., and Jackson, S. P. (1995) Cell 82, 849-856[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Grosschedl, R., Giese, K., and Pagel, J. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 94-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Baxevanis, A. D.,
and Landsman, D.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
1604-1613 |
| 33. |
Koonin, E. V.,
Bork, P.,
and Sander, C.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2166-2167 |
| 34. |
Baudin, A.,
Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O.,
Denouel, A.,
Lacroute, F.,
and Cullin, C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3329-3330 |
| 35. | Shaw, P. J., and Jordan, E. G. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 93-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Thiry, M., and Thiry-Blaise, L. (1989) Eur J. Cell Biol. 50, 235-243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Scheer, U.,
and Rose, K. M.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
1431-1435 |
| 38. | Dundr, M., and Raska, I. (1993) Exp. Cell Res. 208, 275-281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Hozak, P., Cook, P. R., Schofer, C., Mosgoller, W., and Wachtler, F. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 639-648[Abstract] |
| 40. | Thiry, M. (1993) J. Cell Sci. 105, 33-39[Abstract] |
| 41. |
Guarente, L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2449-2455 |
| 42. | Johnson, F. B., Marciniak, R. A., and Guarente, L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 332-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Sinclair, D. A., and Guarente, L. (1997) Cell 91, 1033-1042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Sinclair, D. A.,
Mills, K.,
and Guarente, L.
(1997)
Science
277,
1313-1316 |
| 45. |
Marciniak, R. A.,
Lombard, D. B.,
Johnson, F. B.,
and Guarente, L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6887-6892 |
| 46. |
Park, M. S.,
Knauf, J. A.,
Pendergrass, S. H.,
Coulon, C. H.,
Strniste, G. F.,
Marrone, B. L.,
and MacInnes, M. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8368-8373 |
| 47. |
Freire, R.,
Murguia, J. R.,
Tarsounas, M.,
Lowndes, N. F.,
Moens, P. B.,
and Jackson, S. P.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2560-2573 |
| 48. |
Brown, K. D.,
Ziv, Y.,
Sadanandan, S. N.,
Chessa, L.,
Collins, F. S.,
Shiloh, Y.,
and Tagle, D. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1840-1845 |
| 49. | Watters, D., Khanna, K. K., Beamish, H., Birrell, G., Spring, K., Kedar, P., Gatei, M., Stenzel, D., Hobson, K., Kozlov, S., Zhang, N., Farrell, A., Ramsay, J., Gatti, R., and Lavin, M. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1911-1921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Scully, R., Chen, J., Ochs, R. L., Keegan, K., Hoekstra, M., Feunteun, J., and Livingston, D. M. (1997) Cell 90, 425-435[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Stillman, B. (1994) Cell 78, 725-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. H.Y. He, C. C. Helbing, M. J. Wagner, C. W. Sensen, and K. Riabowol Phylogenetic Analysis of the ING Family of PHD Finger Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 104 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Libby, L. G. Reinholdt, and J. C. Schimenti From the Cover: Positional cloning and characterization of Mei1, a vertebrate-specific gene required for normal meiotic chromosome synapsis in mice PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 15706 - 15711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, C. C. Query, and U. T. Meier Immunopurified Small Nucleolar Ribonucleoprotein Particles Pseudouridylate rRNA Independently of Their Association with Phosphorylated Nopp140 Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2002; 22(24): 8457 - 8466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Daniely, D. D. Dimitrova, and J. A. Borowiec Stress-Dependent Nucleolin Mobilization Mediated by p53-Nucleolin Complex Formation Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 6014 - 6022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K.L. Leung and A. I. Lamond In vivo analysis of NHPX reveals a novel nucleolar localization pathway involving a transient accumulation in splicing speckles J. Cell Biol., May 13, 2002; 157(4): 615 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Domingos, P. M. Fonseca, W. Nadruz Jr., and K. G. Franchini Load-induced focal adhesion kinase activation in the myocardium: role of stretch and contractile activity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H556 - H564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Lindsey-Boltz, V. P. Bermudez, J. Hurwitz, and A. Sancar Purification and characterization of human DNA damage checkpoint Rad complexes PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 11236 - 11241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kataoka, N. Sadanaga, K. Mimori, H. Ueo, G. F. Barnard, K. Sugimachi, D. Auclair, L. B. Chen, and M. Mori Overexpression of HRad17 mRNA in Human Breast Cancer: Correlation with Lymph Node Metastasis Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2001; 7(9): 2815 - 2820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. San-Segundo and G. S. Roeder Role for the Silencing Protein Dot1 in Meiotic Checkpoint Control Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2000; 11(10): 3601 - 3615. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Franchini, A. S. Torsoni, P. H. A. Soares, and M. J. A. Saad Early Activation of the Multicomponent Signaling Complex Associated With Focal Adhesion Kinase Induced by Pressure Overload in the Rat Heart Circ. Res., September 29, 2000; 87(7): 558 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||