JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 51, 36649-36655, December 17, 1999


A Methylation-responsive MDBP/RFX Site Is in the First Exon of the Collagen alpha 2(I) Promoter*

Pritam K. SenguptaDagger , Melanie Ehrlich, and Barbara D. SmithDagger §||

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, the § Boston Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, and the  Human Genetics Program and Department of Biochemistry, Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA methylation inhibits transcription driven by the collagen alpha 2(I) promoter and the 5' end of the gene in transient transfection and in vitro transcription assays. DNA-binding proteins in a unique family of ubiquitously expressed proteins, methylated DNA-binding protein (MDBP)/regulatory factor for X box (RFX), form specific complexes with a sequence overlapping the transcription start site of the collagen alpha 2(I) gene. Complex formation increased when the CpG site at +7 base pairs from the transcription start site was methylated. The identity of the protein was demonstrated by co-migration and cross-competition for a characteristic slowly migrating doublet complex formed on MDBP/RFX recognition sequences and the collagen sequences by band shift assays. A RFX1-specific antibody supershifted the collagen DNA-protein complexes. Furthermore, in vitro translated RFX1 protein formed a specific complex with the collagen sequence that was also supershifted with the RFX1 antibody. MDBP/RFX displayed a higher affinity binding to the collagen sequence if the CpG at +7 was mutated in a manner similar to TpG. This same mutation within reporter constructs inhibited transcription in transfection and in vitro transcription assay. These results support the hypothesis that DNA methylation-induced inactivation of collagen alpha 2(I) gene transcription is mediated, in part, by increased binding of MDBP/RFX to the first exon in response to methylation in this region.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Type I collagen, the most abundant collagen molecule within the collagen family, normally consists of a heterotrimer of two alpha 1(I) chains and one alpha 2(I) chain. Synthesis of these genes is often down-regulated upon oncogenic transformation of cells in culture (1-4). We have previously demonstrated down-regulation of the collagen alpha 2(I) gene, encoding one of the subunits of Type I collagen in an epithelial-like cell line from rat liver, K16 cells upon their conversion to a tumorigenic line, W8, after treatment with the carcinogen 2-N-(acetoxyacetyl)-aminofluorine (3). The promoter-5' region of the alpha 2 gene was methylated in the nonexpressing W8 cells and not in the expressing K16 cells (5). Furthermore, reporter gene expression downstream of the 218-bp1 promoter and the 54-bp 5' region of the rat and human collagen alpha 2(I) genes was inactivated by in vitro DNA methylation in transient transfection experiments, whereas an analogous expression plasmid with the SV40 early promoter/enhancer driving expression was not (6). We also demonstrated that a minimal collagen alpha 2(I) promoter containing the preinitiation region (-41 to +54) driving expression of the luciferase reporter gene was inactivated by DNA methylation (7). The inhibition of reporter gene expression was attributable to CpG methylation, specifically of collagen alpha 2(I) sequences. However, all the methylation sites were located in the first exon, not in the promoter.

DNA methylation in the promoter and 5' region of genes often correlates with decreased transcription of vertebrate genes, and many studies indicate that this methylation is often causally involved in down-regulation of gene expression (8-14). Different mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain the inactivation due to methylation. In certain cases, methylation inhibits binding of positive transactivating factors. Alternatively, DNA methylation can induce the binding of the nonspecific methyl-sensitive proteins, such as MeCP1 or MeCP2, that bind to methylated cytosine regardless of surrounding bases and act as global repressors by condensing chromatin. In addition, a family of closely related proteins called methylated DNA-binding protein (MDBP) or regulatory factor for X box (RFX) 1-4 (15-18) can bind methylated DNA sequences with higher affinity within a sequence-specific 14-bp consensus sequence, 5'-RT(m5C/T)RYYA(m5C/T)RG(m5C/T)RAY-3' (where (m5C/T) indicates 5-methylcytosine or T, R indicates G or A, and Y indicates C or T). Methylation-dependent binding sites were located for this protein at the beginning of the human genes for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; alpha -galactosidase A; human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-A2, -A3, and -A25 antigens; and the apoferritin H gene (19). For the first two X-linked genes, DNA methylation may help down-regulate gene expression on the inactive X chromosome by increasing binding of MDBP at the three MDBP sites in the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase promoter/5' region (20). The MDBP sites at the beginning of the first exon of the alpha -galactosidase A gene are at least partially methylated on the inactive X chromosome but completely unmethylated on the active X chromosome (21).

Cytosine methylation-independent sites have been identified that contain T residues replacing 5-methylcysteine residues (22) in hepatitis B virus, polyoma virus enhancers, cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancers and c-Myc intron (19, 23-27). Therefore, MDBP family proteins, consisting of homo- or heterodimers of RFX1-4 subunits (17), can bind in a cytosine methylation-independent or -dependent fashion to their cognate sites, depending on the sequence of these sites. These constitutively expressed proteins can act as repressors or activators in a context-dependent fashion (28, 29). An activation domain containing a glutamine-rich region is found in the N-terminal half of RFX1, whereas a region with repressor activity overlaps the C-terminal dimerization domain.

In our previous studies (7), we demonstrated that methylation sites within the first exon, which inactivated the alpha 2(I) collagen promoter, bind to a sequence-specific methylation-responsive protein. Also, there was decreased formation of a TATA binding complex on methylated DNA ligands in gel shift experiments. This report demonstrates that MDBP/RFX1 binds to the first 20 bases of the first exon. When this sequence, which matches the consensus sequence for MDBP at 10 out of 14 positions in the center of the oligonucleotide, is methylated at its one CpG dinucleotide pair or is mutated to TpG at this site, there is increased binding of MDBP/RFX and inhibition of collagen gene transcription. Therefore, MDBP/RFX protein is likely to contribute to down-regulation of collagen gene repression and might do so in response to increased methylation associated with oncogenic transformation.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- Rat skin fibroblasts cells (FR) (CRL-1213, American Type Culture Collection) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin G/streptomycin sulfate, 1% sodium pyruvate, and 1% L-glutamine.

Electrophoretic Mobility Gel Shift Assay-- Nuclear extracts were prepared essentially according to Dignam et al. (30), with some modifications. Extractions of protein from isolated nuclei were performed at higher salt conditions than normal using 500 mM NaCl or 420 mM NaCl rather than 350 mM NaCl in Buffer C. All buffers contained the protease inhibitors leupeptin (40 µg/ml), aprotinin (200 µg/ml), pepstatin A (40 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.5 mM) as well as the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate (1 mM). Protein concentration of the extracts was determined by the Bradford reagent using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Collagen sequences (Table I) or MDBP/RFX consensus sequences (Table II) with HindIII overhangs were synthesized (Oligo Etc. and Integrated DNA Technology) as complementary strands, annealed to make double stranded oligonucleotides and radiolabeled using the [alpha -32P]dATP and the Klenow fragment to fill in the HindIII overhang. For the DNA mobility shift assay, the binding reaction was performed for 30 min at room temperature in 20 µl of binding buffer containing 90,000-100,000 cpm/200 fmol of labeled probe, 1 µg of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), and nuclear extract containing 4.5-5.0 µg of protein. Double-stranded annealed complementary oligonucleotides (Oligo Etc. and Integrated DNA Technology) were used as competitors (Tables I and II). Separation of free radiolabeled DNA from DNA-protein complexes was carried out on a 4-5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel with a standard Tris-borate electrophoresis buffer at 300 V in the cold (4 °C). Autoradiography was performed by overnight exposure to Kodak Biomax film (Eastman Kodak Co.). The intensities of the bands were quantified using Instant Imager (Packard Instrument Co.). In the antibody experiment, the nuclear extract and antibodies were preincubated for 20 min at room temperature before the radiolabeled probe was added, followed by another 20 min incubation with the probe. The antibody (kindly supplied by Dr. W. Reith to Dr. M. Ehrlich) is a polyclonal antibody to recombinant RFX1 (31), and its specificity for other family members has been described (16).

In Vitro Transcription and Translation-- The RFX1 cDNA in the sense orientation in the pBK-RSV vector (Stratagene) was transcribed and translated in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega; TNT translation kit) following the manufacturer's protocol. The in vitro translated proteins were used in electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay.

In Vitro Mutagenesis-- Mutation at the +7 and at +23 sites (C to T) in the collagen alpha 2(I) gene (all positions given relative to the transcription start site) were performed by site-directed mutagenesis based upon Kunkel's method (Muta-Gene phagemid mutagenesis kit, Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's protocol. The mutated constructs were then cloned into pH 20 (-220 to +54 of the collagen alpha 2(I) fused to the luciferase coding sequence) at SmaI-HindIII sites. The DNA sequence of the mutated constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) prior to their use in transfection and in vitro transcription assays.

Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assays-- Plasmid DNA was transfected by lipofection (LipofectAMINE, Life Technologies, Inc.) into rat fibroblasts 24 h after plating cells. Plasmids containing the wild type or mutated bp in -220 to +54 of collagen alpha 2(I) promoter/5' region driving expression of the luciferase coding sequence were co-transfected with a reference plasmid, pCMV-green fluorescent protein (CLONTECH) containing the CMV immediate early promoter driving expression of the gene encoding the green fluorescent protein. CMV-green fluorescent protein was used to normalize the transfection efficiency.

Luciferase assays were performed under standard conditions (Luciferase kit; Promega Corp.). Briefly, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline buffer and scraped with lysis reagent. The cells and solution were centrifuged at 12,000 × g to pellet the debris. The cell extract was mixed with the luciferase assay reagent, and light emission was measured in a scintillation counter. The luciferase activity was assayed in duplicate within the linear range of the instrument. Ten readings at 60-s intervals were averaged in each assay. Values were normalized to fluorescence of the green fluorescent protein.

In Vitro Transcription Assay-- The reaction mixture for in vitro transcription contained 50-90 µg of nuclear extract, 1 µg of super-coiled template DNA (purified on a CsCl gradient), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 4 mM MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 12% glycerol, 600 µM of each of rNTP in a final volume of 25 µl. Reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 1 h and terminated by the addition of 175 µl of stop solution, which contained 0.3 M sodium acetate, 0.5% SDS, 3 µg/ml tRNA, pH 5.2. After extraction of protein with phenol/chloroform, the RNA was precipitated by ethanol. To detect the newly synthesized transcript, antisense oligonucleotide primer corresponding to a sequence in the luciferase gene was generated (Table I). The primer was end labeled with polynucleotide kinase and [gamma -32P]ATP, hybridized to in vitro transcription products and extended using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. The primer-extended products were analyzed by 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis containing 7 M urea. Transcription reaction and primer extension reactions always included an RNase inhibitor (RNase inhibitor protein, cloned human pancreatic RNase A lytic enzyme inhibitor, Ambion, Inc.). Gels were dried and autoradiographed at -80 °C with an intensifying screen.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In our earlier study (7), we demonstrated that the -25 to +30 sequence of alpha 2(I) promoter could bind sequence-specific nuclear proteins preferentially when CpGs were methylated. This sequence contains two CpG sites, at +7 and +23, respectively, relative to the transcription start site. In order to investigate which sites are important for the methylation responsiveness, a gel shift experiment was performed using the wild type and mutated probes (both unmethylated and methylated) with rat fibroblast nuclear extracts (Fig. 1). The DNA fragment with a CpG to TpG transition at position +23 specifically complexed with proteins in the extract in a similar manner as the wild type DNA fragment. There was a 3-fold increase in binding when the CpG at position +7 was methylated whether or not the +23 site was mutated. This result suggests that the +23 CpG site is not important for the increased binding upon cytosine methylation. On the other hand, there was no difference in binding between unmethylated and methylated DNA fragments when the ligand had a CpG to TpG mutation at the +7 position, and only the +23 CpG was differentially methylated. This indicates that only the +7 site is important for increasing protein binding on methylated constructs. In addition, the amount of complex formation with the +7 mutated DNA fragment was approximately 3 times more than with the analogous wild type unmethylated fragment.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Methylation and mutation at the +7 CpG site increases the protein-DNA complex formation on the alpha 2(I) initiator probe as judged by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Duplex oligonucleotide sequences corresponding to positions -25 to +30 of the alpha 2(I) gene containing C to T mutations at +7, +23, or both were incubated with Sss I methylase with (M) and without (U) S-adenosylmethionine as described under "Materials and Methods." Nuclear extracts (5 µg of protein) were incubated with wild type or mutated radiolabeled probes (specific activity of all probes, 90,000 cpm/200 fmol) and subjected to electromobility shift assay. This x-ray is representative of five experiments with three different extracts.

Ten base pairs out of 14 in the CpG methylated sequence from position -1 to +13 of the collagen alpha 2(I) 5' region match the consensus sequence for the transcription regulatory protein MDBP/RFX (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the CpG of this sequence is in the same position as the CpG of several previously described methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX sites (19). Lastly, CpG to TpG transitions in the methylation-dependent sites have been shown to increase binding by MDBP/RFX in a similar fashion to cytosine methylation at these sites. Therefore, we suspected that the collagen alpha 2(I) sequence in this region is an MDBP/RFX site.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Methylation-dependent sequence-specific binding activity is located at the transcription start site of alpha 2(I) collagen gene (-1 to +13). A, sequence homology between consensus sequence for MDBP/RFX and alpha 2(I) collagen at the transcription start site (-1 to +13). R, purine; m, methylated C or T; Y, pyrimidine. B, methylation-sensitive and sequence-specific binding to the alpha 2(I) collagen transcription start site in electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Unmethylated (U) and methylated (M) probes (alpha 2(I) -1 to +20 with HindIII ends; see Table I) are compared in lanes 1 and 2. Methylation status of the probe and the competitor is indicated at the top. Competitors at 50-fold molar excess over the labeled ligand (200 fmol of labeled ligand) were incubated with nuclear proteins, and then radioactive probes were added. Different regions of the alpha 2(I) collagen gene were used as competitors as follows: lane 3 and 7, -1 to +20; lane 4, -14 to +6; lane 5, -20 to +1; lanes 6 and 8, +10 to +30 (see Table I for sequence information). Competitor sequences are methylated in lanes 7 and 8. The assay conditions were the same as in Fig. 1. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX and alpha 2(I) sequence.

Four short oligonucleotides from different parts of the 55-bp alpha 2(I) initiator region DNA fragment (position -25 to +30) initially were used as ligands in electrophoretic mobility shift assays to determine whether there was methylation sensitive binding of a nuclear protein to these shorter probes. Nuclear extracts from rat skin fibroblasts were used in these assays with oligonucleotide duplexes containing alpha 2(I) sequences -20 to +1, -14 to +6, +10 to +30, or -1 to +20 bordered by a HindIII site (AAGCTT) added to ends of both strands (see Table I). The sequence in the beginning of the first exon of the alpha 2(I) gene containing the region homologous to MDBP/RFX was the only sequence that resulted in a methylation responsive formation of a specific complex when used as a radiolabeled ligand (data not shown). Two specific, slowly migrating DNA-protein complexes formed with the -1 to +20 oligonucleotide that migrated only slightly faster (commensurate with the small size of the ligand) than the methylation-responsive complexes formed from the longer -25 to +30 oligonucleotide. Furthermore, just as methylation increased the amount of this specific complex formation from the -25 to +30 oligonucleotide, methylation increased binding by the smaller -1 to +20 oligonucleotide 2.5-3-fold (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 2). This complex formation was specific, as it is competed by an excess of the identical unlabeled sequence (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and 7) but not a similar excess of other tested alpha 2(I) sequences (-14 to +6, +10 to +30, and -20 to +1) (Fig. 2B, lanes 4-6 and 8). Competition for binding to methylated sequence (-1 to +20) probe increased when the specific competitor was methylated (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 7), whereas methylation of the +10 to 30 competitor did not visibly change the amount of labeled complex formation (Fig. 2B, lanes 6 and 8).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Sequences of the collagen oligonucleotides used in experiments
All of the collagen sequences are derived from GeneBankTM sequences, shown in uppercase letters. Lowercase letters are HindIII overhangs used for labeling.

The ability of various other oligonucleotide duplexes to compete for complex formation with the methylated alpha 2(I) probe was also tested (Fig. 3A). Sequences unrelated to MDBP/RFX sites, namely mTAE (Fig. 3A, lane 9; Table I) and a sequence in the alpha 1(I) gene (Fig. 3A, lane 8; Table I) did not compete for complex formation. In contrast, the known binding sites for MDBP/RFX sequences (Table II) competed at 50-fold molar excess over the labeled ligand (Fig. 3A, lanes 2-7). These include EP (a high affinity, cytosine methylation-independent MDBP/RFX binding site present in hepatitis B viral enhancer (29)) Py1 (a similar binding site in polyomavirus enhancer B), and pB1 (an in vitro methylated cytosine methylation-dependent site in the plasmid pBR322 (19)). In addition, two methylation-dependent human MDBP/RFX sites, the human alpha -galactosidase A site, close to the transcription start site (alpha -GalA, +49), and the human apoferritin H (hFer +202) site, as well as a cytosine methylation-independent site known as X-box in the MHC class II gene promoters, competed effectively for binding to the alpha 2(I) site (29). The complexes that formed on all of these MDBP/RFX sites co-migrated with the alpha 2(I) promoter-protein complexes with the same rat fibroblast nuclear extract (Fig. 3B, lanes 3-7). In addition, the collagen sequence was as methylation sensitive under our conditions as pB1 and was more sensitive than alpha -GalA or hFer sequences (not shown).


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The MDBP/RFX recognition sites compete for protein-DNA complex formed on the alpha 2(I) sequence (A), and the alpha 2(I) protein complex co-migrates with the MDBP/RFX protein-DNA complex (B). A, competitors at 50-fold molar excess over the labeled ligand (200 fmol of labeled ligand) were incubated with nuclear proteins, and then radioactive probes were added as in Fig. 2B. MDBP/RFX sites used as competitors are shown in lanes 2-7 (lane 2, EP from hepatitis B virus enhancer 1; lane 3, X box from MHC type II gene; lane 4, Py1 from polyomovirus enhancer B enhancer; lane 5, alpha -GalA from the alpha -galactosidase A gene; lane 6, pBsite1 from pBR322; lane 7, hFer from apoferritin gene) (Table II). The methylation-sensitive competitor sites (alpha GalA, hFer, and pB1) were methylated (lanes 5-7). Competitor sequences unrelated to MDBP/RFX binding sites are alpha 1(I) (lane 8) and mTAE (lane 9) (Table I). Lane 1 contains no competitors. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX and the alpha 2(I) methylated sequence. B, nuclear extracts were incubated with the same five known MDBP/RFX ligands in addition to the alpha 2(I) sequence from position -1 to +20. All probes were labeled at the same specific activity (100,000 cpm/200 fmol). MDBP/RFX sites used as probes are shown in lanes 3-7 (lane 3, EP from hepatitis B virus enhancer 1; lane 4, X box from MHC type II; lane 5, alpha -GalA from the alpha -galactosidase A gene; lane 6, pBsite1 from pBR322; lane 7, hFer from the apoferritin gene) (Table II). Methylation status of probes is indicated at the top. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX and the alpha 2(I) methylated sequence.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Sequences of the MBDP/RFX consensus oligonucleotides used in experiments
All of the collagen sequences are derived from GenBankTM sequences, shown in uppercase letters. Lowercase letters are HindIII overhangs used for labeling.

Use of antiserum specific for the RFX1 polypeptide of MDBP/RFX complex also indicated that the methylation-responsive protein recognizing the -1 to +20 sequence of the alpha 2(I) gene is MDBP/RFX. Preincubating the reaction mixture for the electrophoretic mobility shift assay with this antibody resulted in much slower migration of the protein-DNA complex formed between the nuclear protein and the alpha 2(I) sequence (Fig. 4A, lanes 1-3). The same supershift was obtained when the known MDBP/RFX-specific EP DNA sequence was used as the ligand (Fig. 4A, lanes 4-6). Presumably, the large size of the MDBP/RFX dimer complexed with the antibody, as well as with the DNA ligand, was responsible for these supershifted alpha 2(I) or EP ligands not entering the gel.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The complexes formed on alpha 2(I) sequence by nuclear extracts (A) or in vitro translated RFX protein (B) are supershifted by specific antibody to MDBP/RFX. A, nuclear extracts were incubated with methylated alpha 2(I) probe (lanes 1-3) or EP (lanes 4-6) radiolabeled probes. Specific MDBP/RFX1 antibody was added at a 1:100 dilution (lanes 3 and 6), and nonimmune (NI) serum was added at a 1:100 dilution (lanes 2 and 5). The upper arrow indicates the supershifted protein-DNA complexes, and the lower arrow indicates the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX and the methylated alpha 2(I) sequence. B, RFX1 cDNA was in vitro transcribed and translated and the product used for mobility shift assays. Specific RFX1 antibody (lane 3 and 6) or nonimmune (NI) serum (lanes 4 and 7) at a 1:100 dilution was added to the reaction mixture containing the in vitro translated protein (lanes 2-4) or, as a control, just the reticulocyte lysate (lanes 5-7) for 20 min before the addition of radiolabeled alpha 2(I) ligand. Lane 8 contained nuclear extracts instead of the in vitro translation product incubated with the ligand. Lane 1 contained probe without protein. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX and the alpha 2(I) methylated sequence. NS, nonspecific binding from the reticulocyte lysate.

Further evidence for the identity of the protein binding in a sequence-specific and methylation-specific manner to the methylated -1 to +20 sequence from the alpha 2(I) gene was provided in electrophoretic mobility shift assays with in vitro translated MDBP/RFX1 protein. This protein product formed a complex with the methylated -1 to +20 sequence that comigrated with a complex formed between the same ligand and rat fibroblast nuclear extracts (Fig. 4B, lanes 2 and 8). Because MDBP/RFX from nuclear extracts contains different related homodimers or heterodimers of related polypeptide chains and the RFX1 homodimer is the largest of these, it is not surprising that the main complex seen from the in vitro translation product corresponds to the slower moving of the two bands observed in binding reactions with the nuclear extract. We also tested the ability of RFX1 antiserum to supershift complex formed using the in vitro transcribed/translated MDBP/RFX1protein (Fig. 4B, lane 3). The same supershift was seen as for the nuclear protein Fig. 4A, lanes 3 and 6). Rabbit control antiserum did not bind to the protein-DNA complex (Fig. 4B, lane 4).

To test for control of gene expression at this sequence in the beginning of the alpha 2(I) gene, C to T mutations at +7 and/or +23 sites were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis into the alpha 2(I) promoter-luciferase construct, pH 20, containing the -220 to +54 region of the promoter. These expression plasmids were transfected into rat fibroblast cells. The +7 mutation inhibited transcription to a greater extent (80 ± 2.6% (S.D.)) than did the +23 mutation (47 ± 3.8%) (Fig. 5A). The same constructs were used in an in vitro transcription assay. The +7 mutation decreased the transcription by 56% but the +23 mutation decreased only 23% (Fig. 5B) in a representative experiment repeated three times. Therefore, a CpG-to-TpG mutation at the +7 site, which increases the formation of specific protein complexes in vitro, also decreases transcription in vivo and in reaction mixtures containing a nuclear extract. This mutation had more of an effect on transcription than did an analogous mutation at position +23, which does not match the MDBP/RFX consensus sequences.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutation of two CpG sequences to TpG sequences (+7 or +23) in the collagen alpha 2(I) exon inhibited transcription in transient transfection (A) and in vitro transcription assays (B). A, rat skin fibroblasts were transfected by the LipofectAMINE method with collagen promoter-luciferase constructs (2 µg) containing C to T mutations at +7 or +23. A CMV promoter driving the green fluorescent protein gene (1 µg) was co-transfected to normalize the transfection efficiency. The graph represents the average luciferase activity/µg of protein with standard error from four different experiments performed in duplicate. B, the control and mutated alpha 2(I) collagen promoter-luciferase constructs (1 µg) containing bases -220 to +54 of the collagen gene were transcribed in vitro with rat fibroblast nuclear extract. The RNA transcript was detected by primer extension as described under "Materials and Methods." This is a representative of an experiment performed three times.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

One of the unusual characteristics of MDBP/RFX proteins is their behavior with respect to CpG-containing recognition sites. These sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins show increased binding to these sites in their CpG-methylated form. The sequence specificity of the binding site distinguishes these proteins from methylated DNA-binding proteins, such as MeCP1, MeCP2, DBP-m, and MDBP-2-H1 (22, 32-35). We demonstrated that the MDBP/RFX could bind to a sequence at the very beginning of the alpha 2(I) gene first exon in the rodent and human genomes in a methylation-dependent manner. Similar methylation-responsive MDBP sites are present at the beginning of the human genes for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; HLA-A2, -A3, -A25 antigens; and alpha -galactosidase A (19).

MDBP/RFX also binds to many of its sites in a cytosine methylation-independent manner if 1-3 of the CpGs in the consensus sequence are replaced by TpG or TpA. There is a CpG site 7 base pairs downstream from the transcription start site of the alpha 2(I) gene that is within the MDBP/RFX site. This CpG matches the central CpG of the MDBP/RFX consensus sequence (Fig. 2A), which confers methylation-dependent binding on other methylation-responsive binding sites for this family of closely related proteins (19). The location of this MDBP/RFX site in the alpha 2(I) gene was defined by homology to many known MDBP/RFX sites, electrophoretic mobility shift assays with rat fibroblast nuclear extracts and with the in vitro transcription/translation product from an MDBP/RFX1 template, and supershift assays using specific antibody to MDBP/RFX1 (Figs. 2-4). When we replaced this unmethylated CpG within the MDBP/RFX site with a TpG, there was increased specific complex formation comparable to the increase seen upon methylation of this CpG dinucleotide pair (Fig. 1), just as has been observed with other methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX sites (19). When the next downstream CpG in this region of the alpha 2(I) gene, namely, the CpG at position +23, was converted to a TpG, there was no effect on complex formation with MDBP/RFX proteins in a nuclear extract, as expected, because this dinucleotide is outside the MDBP/RFX site.

A reporter containing the alpha 2(I) promoter/5' region gene driving expression of a luciferase gene was equivalently mutated at the CpG at position +7. The observed decrease in promoter activity in the TpG mutant in both transfection experiments in cultured rat fibroblast and in vitro transcription with fibroblast extracts may be due to increased binding of MDBP/RFX to the mutated sequence (Fig. 5). Although this mutation may also affect formation of the preinitiation complex for transcription in a manner independent of MDBP/RFX binding, a similar mutation in a more downstream methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX site (48 bp downstream of the major transcription start site) in the human alpha -galactosidase A also decreases gene expression in transient transfection assays. Furthermore, when that MDBP/RFX site was mutated to a yeast GAL4 binding site and yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain chimeras with mammalian transcription factors were present, a hybrid GAL4 DNA-binding domain-MDBP/RFX down-regulated reporter gene expression, whereas the intact GAL4 transcription factor and a hybrid GAL4 DNA-binding domain-VP16 activation domain up-regulated expression of the reporter gene.2

All of the homo- and heterodimeric members of the MDBP/RFX1-3 family of DNA-binding protein exhibit methylation-dependent binding to certain of their cognate sites (16, 17). In contrast, RFX5 is a more distant member of this family, which is involved in positive regulation of major histocompatibility type II genes and does not display methylation-dependent binding (17). Yeast proteins involved in cell cycle control and DNA damage are also present in this family (36, 37). MDBP/RFX family members have very similar DNA binding domains but different N-terminal regions. RFX2-4 show appreciable tissue-specificity in their distribution, whereas RFX1 is present at similar levels in a variety of examined tissues (16).

RFX1 homodimer, a large protein with 979-amino acids per subunit, contains both transcription repression and activation domains, the ability of which to positively or negatively modulate transcription may vary depending upon the location of its cognate sites in a given gene region and the other proteins with which it interacts (28, 29). Positive regulation of transcription by MDBP/RFX has been demonstrated for the methylation-independent binding site in the EP sequence of the hepatitis B virus enhancer (38). In contrast, one of us previously demonstrated that a low affinity methylation-independent binding site beginning at position +5 of the CMV IE transcription unit can down-regulate transcription when its binding by MDBP/RFX is increased by mutation (39).

Dual function transcription factors have been described that switch their function by interaction with different co-activators or co-repressors (40-42), different neighboring transacting factors (43-45), or interaction with specific DNA sequences in different locations relative to the transcription start site (46). MDBP/RFX interacts with c-Abl, greatly stimulating its autophosphorylation (47). We have preliminary data using antibody supershifting experiment suggesting that c-Abl protein is present in the complex formed with the collagen sequence.3 MDBP/RFX can also interact with at least one TAFII factor.4 Furthermore, MDBP/RFX binding sites implicated in transcription control are sometimes located in the proximal promoter region (48) or intron sequences (49), as well as in DNA sequences immediately downstream of or spanning the transcription start site, as in the alpha 2(I) sequence described in this report. In the proximal promoter of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), there is an MBDP/RFX binding site that overlaps with a cAMP response element-binding site (48, 50, 51). Using mutation analysis in and surrounding the RFX binding site, it was demonstrated that binding of RFX protein inversely correlates with transcription activation of the promoter. Therefore, MDBP/RFX plays an inhibitory role along with the retinoblastoma-related tumor suppressor protein, p107, in inhibiting activation of the PCNA promoter activity. RFX also represses gene expression of c-Myc at a site in the first intron (26, 52).

The data presented here indicate that MDBP/RFX behaves as transcriptional repressor in the context of methylated collagen alpha 2(I) sequence. We have previously demonstrated that in a rat cell line that has lost expression of this gene, there is methylation in the promoter region and that treatment of this cell line with the DNA demethylating agent 5-azacytidine results in the gain of expression of this gene (43). Because abnormal hypermethylation of the 5' region of tumor suppressor genes is so frequent in cancer and down-regulation of collagen gene expression has been proposed to contribute to carcinogenesis, abnormal methylation of the 5' region of the alpha 2(I) gene, including the MDBP/RFX site, might occur in cancers and play a role in down-regulation of the expression of this gene. Future genomic sequencing experiments will allow testing of this hypothesis and of the possibility that the RFX/MDBP is a transcriptional repressor involved in tissue-specific regulation of the collagen alpha 2(I) gene transcription in response to naturally occurring differential methylation.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-CA23540 and P50-HL56386 and by the Department of Veterans Affairs merit review program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118. Tel.: 617-638-4159; Fax: 617-638-5339; E-mail: smith@biochem.bumc.bu.edu.

2 M. Ehrlich, manuscript in preparation.

3 P. K. Sengupta and B. D. Smith, unpublished data.

4 M. Ehrlich, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: bp, base pair(s); MDBP, methylated DNA-binding protein; RFX, regulatory factor for X box; CMV, cytomegalovirus; Gal, galactosidase; hFer, human apoferritin H; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; HLA, human leucocyte antigens; EP, hepatitis B viral enhancer; Py1, polyomovirus enhancer; pB1, methylation-dependent site in pBR322.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Adams, S. L., Sobel, M. E., Howard, B. H., Olden, K., Yamada, K. M., de Crombrugghe, B., and Pastan, I. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 3399-3403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Rowe, D. W., Moen, R. C., Davidson, J. M., Byers, P. H., Bornstein, P., and Palmiter, R. D. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 1581-1590[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Smith, B. D., and Niles, R. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 1820-1825[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sandmeyer, S., Smith, R., Kiehn, D., and Bornstein, P. (1981) Cancer Res. 41, 830-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Smith, B. D., and Marsilio, E. (1988) Biochem. J. 253, 269-273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Guenette, D. K., Ritzenthaler, J. D., Foley, J., Jackson, J. D., and Smith, B. D. (1992) Biochem. J. 283, 699-703
7. Sengupta, P. K., and Smith, B. D. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1443, 75-89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Umezawa, A., Yamamoto, H., Rhodes, K., Klemsz, M. J., Maki, R. A., and Oshima, R. G. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4885-4894[Abstract]
9. Okuse, K., Matsuoka, I., and Kurihara, K. (1997) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 46, 197-207[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Singal, R., Ferris, R., Little, J. A., Wang, S. Z., and Ginder, G. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13724-13729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Wolff, G. L., Kodell, R. L., Moore, S. R., and Cooney, C. A. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 949-957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kudo, S., and Fukuda, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13298-13302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kirillov, A., Kistler, B., Mostoslavsky, R., Cedar, H., Wirth, T., and Bergman, Y. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 435-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Iannello, R. C., Young, J., Sumarsono, S., Tymms, M. J., Dahl, H. H., Gould, J., Hedger, M., and Kola, I. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 612-619[Abstract]
15. Huang, L. H., Wang, R., Gama-Sosa, M. A., Shenoy, S., and Ehrlich, M. (1984) Nature 308, 293-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Reith, W., Ucla, C., Barras, E., Gaud, A., Durand, B., Herrero-Sanchez, C., Kobr, M., and Mach, B. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1230-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Emery, P., Durand, B., Mach, B., and Reith, W. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 803-807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Zhang, X. Y., Jabrane-Ferrat, N., Asiedu, C. K., Samac, S., Peterlin, B. M., and Ehrlich, M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6810-6818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Zhang, X. Y., Asiedu, C. K., Supakar, P. C., Khan, R., Ehrlich, K. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6253-6260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hornstra, I. K., and Yang, T. P. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1419-1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Samac, S., Rice, J. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1998) Biol. Chem. 379, 541-544[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Zhang, X. Y., Supakar, P. C., Khan, R., Ehrlich, K. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 1459-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Ghazal, P., Lubon, H., Fleckenstein, B., and Hennighausen, L. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 3658-3662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Karpen, S., Banerjee, R., Zelent, A., Price, P., and Acs, G. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 5159-5165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Ostapchuk, P., Scheirle, G., and Hearing, P. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2787-2797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Zhang, X. Y., Supakar, P. C., Wu, K. Z., Ehrlich, K. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1990) Cancer Res. 50, 6865-6869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Zhang, X. Y., Inamdar, N. M., Supakar, P. C., Wu, K., Ehrlich, K. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1991) Virology 182, 865-869[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Katan, Y., Agami, R., and Shaul, Y. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3621-3628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Katan-Khaykovich, Y., and Shaul, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24504-24512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Dignam, J. D., Martin, P. L., Shastry, B. S., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 582-598[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Herrero Sanchez, C., Reith, W., Silacci, P., and Mach, B. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4076-4083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Nan, X., Cross, S., and Bird, A. (1998) Novartis Found. Symp. 214, 6-16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Nan, X., Ng, H. H., Johnson, C. A., Laherty, C. D., Turner, B. M., Eisenman, R. N., and Bird, A. (1998) Nature 393, 386-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lewis, J. D., Meehan, R. R., Henzel, W. J., Maurer-Fogy, I., Jeppesen, P., Klein, F., and Bird, A. (1992) Cell 69, 905-914[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Schwarz, S., Hess, D., and Jost, J. P. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 5052-5056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Wu, S. Y., and McLeod, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1479-1488[Abstract]
37. Huang, M., Zhou, Z., and Elledge, S. J. (1998) Cell 94, 595-605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Siegrist, C. A., Durand, B., Emery, P., David, E., Hearing, P., Mach, B., and Reith, W. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6375-6384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Zhang, X. Y., Ni, Y. S., Saifudeen, Z., Asiedu, C. K., Supakar, P. C., and Ehrlich, M. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3026-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Shi, Y., Seto, E., Chang, L. S., and Shenk, T. (1991) Cell 67, 377-388[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Treitel, M. A., and Carlson, M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3132-3136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Maheswaran, S., Park, S., Bernard, A., Morris, J. F., Rauscher, F. J. D., Hill, D. E., and Haber, D. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5100-5104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Smith, K. J., Smith, W. J., Hamilton, T., Skelton, H. G., Graham, J. S., Okerberg, C., Moeller, R., and Hackley, B. E., Jr. (1998) Am. J. Dermatopathol. 20, 22-28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Ip, Y. T. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 1-3[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Lehming, N., Thanos, D., Brickman, J. M., Ma, J., Maniatis, T., and Ptashne, M. (1994) Nature 371, 175-179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Kurokawa, R., Soderstrom, M., Horlein, A., Halachmi, S., Brown, M., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Glass, C. K. (1995) Nature 377, 451-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Agami, R., and Shaul, Y. (1998) Oncogene 16, 1779-1788[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Liu, M., Lee, B. H., and Mathews, M. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15433-15439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Reinhold, W., Emens, L., Itkes, A., Blake, M., Ichinose, I., and Zajac-Kaye, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3041-3048[Abstract]
50. Lee, B. H., Liu, M., and Mathews, M. B. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 1138-1145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Labrie, C., Lee, B. H., and Mathews, M. B. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3732-3741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Blake, M., Niklinski, J., and Zajac-Kaye, M. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 6060-6066[Abstract]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xu, S. R. Farmer, and B. D. Smith
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Interacts with CIITA{middle dot}RFX5 Complex to Repress Type I Collagen Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26046 - 26056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xu, P. K. Sengupta, E. Seto, and B. D. Smith
Regulatory Factor for X-box Family Proteins Differentially Interact with Histone Deacetylases to Repress Collagen {alpha}2(I) Gene (COL1A2) Expression
J. Biol. Chem., April 7, 2006; 281(14): 9260 - 9270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T. Ohi, Y. Uehara, M. Takatsu, M. Watanabe, and T. Ono
Hypermethylation of CpGs in the Promoter of the COL1A1 Gene in the Aged Periodontal Ligament.
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2006; 85(3): 245 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. I. Niesen, A. R. Osborne, H. Yang, S. Rastogi, S. Chellappan, J. Q. Cheng, J. M. Boss, and G. Blanck
Activation of a Methylated Promoter Mediated by a Sequence-specific DNA-binding Protein, RFX
J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 38914 - 38922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
C. W. Park, B. T. Kren, D. A. Largaespada, and C. J. Steer
DNA methylation of Sleeping Beauty with transposition into the mouse genome
Genes Cells, August 1, 2005; 10(8): 763 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Sengupta, Y. Xu, L. Wang, R. Widom, and B. D. Smith
Collagen {alpha}1(I) Gene (COL1A1) Is Repressed by RFX Family
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21004 - 21014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]