|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 51, 36649-36655, December 17, 1999
A Methylation-responsive MDBP/RFX Site Is in the First Exon
of the Collagen 2(I) Promoter*
Pritam K.
Sengupta ,
Melanie
Ehrlich¶, and
Barbara D.
Smith §
From the Department of Biochemistry, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, the
§ Boston Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Boston, Massachusetts 02118, and the ¶ Human Genetics Program
and Department of Biochemistry, Tulane Medical School,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
 |
ABSTRACT |
DNA methylation inhibits transcription driven by
the collagen 2(I) promoter and the 5' end of the gene in transient
transfection and in vitro transcription assays. DNA-binding
proteins in a unique family of ubiquitously expressed proteins,
methylated DNA-binding protein (MDBP)/regulatory factor for X box
(RFX), form specific complexes with a sequence overlapping the
transcription start site of the collagen 2(I) gene. Complex
formation increased when the CpG site at +7 base pairs from the
transcription start site was methylated. The identity of the protein
was demonstrated by co-migration and cross-competition for a
characteristic slowly migrating doublet complex formed on MDBP/RFX
recognition sequences and the collagen sequences by band shift assays.
A RFX1-specific antibody supershifted the collagen DNA-protein
complexes. Furthermore, in vitro translated RFX1 protein
formed a specific complex with the collagen sequence that was also
supershifted with the RFX1 antibody. MDBP/RFX displayed a higher
affinity binding to the collagen sequence if the CpG at +7 was mutated
in a manner similar to TpG. This same mutation within reporter
constructs inhibited transcription in transfection and in
vitro transcription assay. These results support the hypothesis
that DNA methylation-induced inactivation of collagen 2(I) gene
transcription is mediated, in part, by increased binding of MDBP/RFX to
the first exon in response to methylation in this region.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Type I collagen, the most abundant collagen molecule within the
collagen family, normally consists of a heterotrimer of two 1(I)
chains and one 2(I) chain. Synthesis of these genes is often
down-regulated upon oncogenic transformation of cells in culture
(1-4). We have previously demonstrated down-regulation of the collagen
2(I) gene, encoding one of the subunits of Type I collagen in an
epithelial-like cell line from rat liver, K16 cells upon their
conversion to a tumorigenic line, W8, after treatment with the
carcinogen 2-N-(acetoxyacetyl)-aminofluorine (3). The
promoter-5' region of the 2 gene was methylated in the nonexpressing W8 cells and not in the expressing K16 cells (5). Furthermore, reporter
gene expression downstream of the
218-bp1 promoter and the
54-bp 5' region of the rat and human collagen 2(I) genes was
inactivated by in vitro DNA methylation in transient transfection experiments, whereas an analogous expression plasmid with
the SV40 early promoter/enhancer driving expression was not (6). We
also demonstrated that a minimal collagen 2(I) promoter containing
the preinitiation region ( 41 to +54) driving expression of the
luciferase reporter gene was inactivated by DNA methylation (7). The
inhibition of reporter gene expression was attributable to CpG
methylation, specifically of collagen 2(I) sequences. However, all
the methylation sites were located in the first exon, not in the promoter.
DNA methylation in the promoter and 5' region of genes often correlates
with decreased transcription of vertebrate genes, and many studies
indicate that this methylation is often causally involved in
down-regulation of gene expression (8-14). Different mechanisms have
been hypothesized to explain the inactivation due to methylation. In
certain cases, methylation inhibits binding of positive transactivating
factors. Alternatively, DNA methylation can induce the binding of the
nonspecific methyl-sensitive proteins, such as MeCP1 or MeCP2, that
bind to methylated cytosine regardless of surrounding bases and act as
global repressors by condensing chromatin. In addition, a family of
closely related proteins called methylated DNA-binding protein (MDBP)
or regulatory factor for X box (RFX) 1-4 (15-18) can bind methylated
DNA sequences with higher affinity within a sequence-specific 14-bp
consensus sequence, 5'-RT(m5C/T)RYYA(m5C/T)RG(m5C/T)RAY-3'
(where (m5C/T) indicates 5-methylcytosine or T, R indicates
G or A, and Y indicates C or T). Methylation-dependent
binding sites were located for this protein at the beginning of the
human genes for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase;
-galactosidase A; human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-A2, -A3, and -A25
antigens; and the apoferritin H gene (19). For the first two X-linked
genes, DNA methylation may help down-regulate gene expression on the
inactive X chromosome by increasing binding of MDBP at the three MDBP
sites in the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase promoter/5' region
(20). The MDBP sites at the beginning of the first exon of the
-galactosidase A gene are at least partially methylated on the
inactive X chromosome but completely unmethylated on the active X
chromosome (21).
Cytosine methylation-independent sites have been identified that
contain T residues replacing 5-methylcysteine residues (22) in
hepatitis B virus, polyoma virus enhancers, cytomegalovirus (CMV)
enhancers and c-Myc intron (19, 23-27). Therefore, MDBP family
proteins, consisting of homo- or heterodimers of RFX1-4 subunits (17),
can bind in a cytosine methylation-independent or
-dependent fashion to their cognate sites, depending on the sequence of these sites. These constitutively expressed proteins can
act as repressors or activators in a context-dependent
fashion (28, 29). An activation domain containing a glutamine-rich region is found in the N-terminal half of RFX1, whereas a region with
repressor activity overlaps the C-terminal dimerization domain.
In our previous studies (7), we demonstrated that methylation sites
within the first exon, which inactivated the 2(I) collagen promoter,
bind to a sequence-specific methylation-responsive protein. Also, there
was decreased formation of a TATA binding complex on methylated DNA
ligands in gel shift experiments. This report demonstrates that
MDBP/RFX1 binds to the first 20 bases of the first exon. When this
sequence, which matches the consensus sequence for MDBP at 10 out of 14 positions in the center of the oligonucleotide, is methylated at its
one CpG dinucleotide pair or is mutated to TpG at this site, there is
increased binding of MDBP/RFX and inhibition of collagen gene
transcription. Therefore, MDBP/RFX protein is likely to contribute to
down-regulation of collagen gene repression and might do so in response
to increased methylation associated with oncogenic transformation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
Rat skin fibroblasts cells (FR) (CRL-1213,
American Type Culture Collection) were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1%
penicillin G/streptomycin sulfate, 1% sodium pyruvate, and 1%
L-glutamine.
Electrophoretic Mobility Gel Shift Assay--
Nuclear extracts
were prepared essentially according to Dignam et al. (30),
with some modifications. Extractions of protein from isolated nuclei
were performed at higher salt conditions than normal using 500 mM NaCl or 420 mM NaCl rather than 350 mM NaCl in Buffer C. All buffers contained the protease
inhibitors leupeptin (40 µg/ml), aprotinin (200 µg/ml), pepstatin A
(40 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.5 mM) as
well as the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate (1 mM).
Protein concentration of the extracts was determined by the Bradford
reagent using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Collagen sequences
(Table I) or MDBP/RFX consensus sequences (Table II) with
HindIII overhangs were synthesized (Oligo Etc. and
Integrated DNA Technology) as complementary strands, annealed to make
double stranded oligonucleotides and radiolabeled using the
[ -32P]dATP and the Klenow fragment to fill in the
HindIII overhang. For the DNA mobility shift assay, the
binding reaction was performed for 30 min at room temperature in 20 µl of binding buffer containing 90,000-100,000 cpm/200 fmol of
labeled probe, 1 µg of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), and nuclear extract
containing 4.5-5.0 µg of protein. Double-stranded annealed
complementary oligonucleotides (Oligo Etc. and Integrated DNA
Technology) were used as competitors (Tables I and II). Separation of
free radiolabeled DNA from DNA-protein complexes was carried out on a
4-5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel with a standard Tris-borate
electrophoresis buffer at 300 V in the cold (4 °C). Autoradiography
was performed by overnight exposure to Kodak Biomax film (Eastman Kodak
Co.). The intensities of the bands were quantified using Instant Imager
(Packard Instrument Co.). In the antibody experiment, the nuclear
extract and antibodies were preincubated for 20 min at room temperature
before the radiolabeled probe was added, followed by another 20 min
incubation with the probe. The antibody (kindly supplied by Dr. W. Reith to Dr. M. Ehrlich) is a polyclonal antibody to recombinant RFX1
(31), and its specificity for other family members has been described
(16).
In Vitro Transcription and Translation--
The RFX1 cDNA in
the sense orientation in the pBK-RSV vector (Stratagene) was
transcribed and translated in vitro using a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate (Promega; TNT translation kit) following the
manufacturer's protocol. The in vitro translated proteins were used in electrophoretic mobility gel shift assay.
In Vitro Mutagenesis--
Mutation at the +7 and at +23 sites (C
to T) in the collagen 2(I) gene (all positions given relative to the
transcription start site) were performed by site-directed mutagenesis
based upon Kunkel's method (Muta-Gene phagemid mutagenesis kit,
Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's protocol. The mutated constructs were then cloned into pH 20 ( 220 to +54 of the collagen 2(I) fused
to the luciferase coding sequence) at
SmaI-HindIII sites. The DNA sequence of the
mutated constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing (U. S. Biochemical
Corp.) prior to their use in transfection and in vitro
transcription assays.
Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assays--
Plasmid DNA
was transfected by lipofection (LipofectAMINE, Life Technologies, Inc.)
into rat fibroblasts 24 h after plating cells. Plasmids containing
the wild type or mutated bp in 220 to +54 of collagen 2(I)
promoter/5' region driving expression of the luciferase coding sequence
were co-transfected with a reference plasmid, pCMV-green fluorescent
protein (CLONTECH) containing the CMV immediate
early promoter driving expression of the gene encoding the green
fluorescent protein. CMV-green fluorescent protein was used to
normalize the transfection efficiency.
Luciferase assays were performed under standard conditions (Luciferase
kit; Promega Corp.). Briefly, the cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline buffer and scraped with lysis reagent. The
cells and solution were centrifuged at 12,000 × g to
pellet the debris. The cell extract was mixed with the luciferase assay
reagent, and light emission was measured in a scintillation counter.
The luciferase activity was assayed in duplicate within the linear
range of the instrument. Ten readings at 60-s intervals were averaged
in each assay. Values were normalized to fluorescence of the green
fluorescent protein.
In Vitro Transcription Assay--
The reaction mixture for
in vitro transcription contained 50-90 µg of nuclear
extract, 1 µg of super-coiled template DNA (purified on a CsCl
gradient), 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 4 mM
MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 12% glycerol, 600 µM of
each of rNTP in a final volume of 25 µl. Reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 1 h and terminated by the addition of 175 µl of
stop solution, which contained 0.3 M sodium acetate, 0.5%
SDS, 3 µg/ml tRNA, pH 5.2. After extraction of protein with
phenol/chloroform, the RNA was precipitated by ethanol. To detect the
newly synthesized transcript, antisense oligonucleotide primer
corresponding to a sequence in the luciferase gene was generated (Table
I). The primer was end labeled with polynucleotide kinase and
[ -32P]ATP, hybridized to in vitro
transcription products and extended using Moloney murine leukemia virus
reverse transcriptase. The primer-extended products were analyzed by
5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis containing 7 M urea.
Transcription reaction and primer extension reactions always included
an RNase inhibitor (RNase inhibitor protein, cloned human pancreatic
RNase A lytic enzyme inhibitor, Ambion, Inc.). Gels were dried and
autoradiographed at 80 °C with an intensifying screen.
 |
RESULTS |
In our earlier study (7), we demonstrated that the 25 to +30
sequence of 2(I) promoter could bind sequence-specific nuclear proteins preferentially when CpGs were methylated. This sequence contains two CpG sites, at +7 and +23, respectively, relative to the
transcription start site. In order to investigate which sites are
important for the methylation responsiveness, a gel shift experiment
was performed using the wild type and mutated probes (both unmethylated
and methylated) with rat fibroblast nuclear extracts (Fig.
1). The DNA fragment with a CpG to TpG transition at position +23 specifically complexed with proteins in the
extract in a similar manner as the wild type DNA fragment. There was a
3-fold increase in binding when the CpG at position +7 was methylated
whether or not the +23 site was mutated. This result suggests that the
+23 CpG site is not important for the increased binding upon cytosine
methylation. On the other hand, there was no difference in binding
between unmethylated and methylated DNA fragments when the ligand had a
CpG to TpG mutation at the +7 position, and only the +23 CpG was
differentially methylated. This indicates that only the +7 site is
important for increasing protein binding on methylated constructs. In
addition, the amount of complex formation with the +7 mutated DNA
fragment was approximately 3 times more than with the analogous wild
type unmethylated fragment.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Methylation and mutation at the +7 CpG site
increases the protein-DNA complex formation on the
2(I) initiator probe as judged by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Duplex oligonucleotide
sequences corresponding to positions 25 to +30 of the 2(I) gene
containing C to T mutations at +7, +23, or both were incubated with Sss
I methylase with (M) and without (U)
S-adenosylmethionine as described under "Materials and
Methods." Nuclear extracts (5 µg of protein) were incubated with
wild type or mutated radiolabeled probes (specific activity of all
probes, 90,000 cpm/200 fmol) and subjected to electromobility shift
assay. This x-ray is representative of five experiments with three
different extracts.
|
|
Ten base pairs out of 14 in the CpG methylated sequence from position
1 to +13 of the collagen 2(I) 5' region match the consensus
sequence for the transcription regulatory protein MDBP/RFX (Fig.
2A). Furthermore, the CpG of
this sequence is in the same position as the CpG of several previously
described methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX sites (19).
Lastly, CpG to TpG transitions in the methylation-dependent sites have been shown to increase binding by MDBP/RFX in a similar fashion to cytosine methylation at these sites. Therefore, we suspected
that the collagen 2(I) sequence in this region is an MDBP/RFX
site.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Methylation-dependent
sequence-specific binding activity is located at the transcription
start site of 2(I) collagen gene ( 1 to +13).
A, sequence homology between consensus sequence for MDBP/RFX
and 2(I) collagen at the transcription start site ( 1 to +13).
R, purine; m, methylated C or T; Y,
pyrimidine. B, methylation-sensitive and sequence-specific
binding to the 2(I) collagen transcription start site in
electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Unmethylated (U) and
methylated (M) probes ( 2(I) 1 to +20 with
HindIII ends; see Table I) are compared in lanes
1 and 2. Methylation status of the probe and the
competitor is indicated at the top. Competitors at 50-fold
molar excess over the labeled ligand (200 fmol of labeled ligand) were
incubated with nuclear proteins, and then radioactive probes were
added. Different regions of the 2(I) collagen gene were used as
competitors as follows: lane 3 and 7, 1 to +20;
lane 4, 14 to +6; lane 5, 20 to +1;
lanes 6 and 8, +10 to +30 (see Table I for
sequence information). Competitor sequences are methylated in
lanes 7 and 8. The assay conditions were the same
as in Fig. 1. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes
generated by MDBP/RFX and 2(I) sequence.
|
|
Four short oligonucleotides from different parts of the 55-bp 2(I)
initiator region DNA fragment (position 25 to +30) initially were
used as ligands in electrophoretic mobility shift assays to determine
whether there was methylation sensitive binding of a nuclear protein to
these shorter probes. Nuclear extracts from rat skin fibroblasts were
used in these assays with oligonucleotide duplexes containing 2(I)
sequences 20 to +1, 14 to +6, +10 to +30, or 1 to +20 bordered by
a HindIII site (AAGCTT) added to ends of both strands (see
Table I). The sequence in the beginning of the first exon of the 2(I) gene containing the region homologous to MDBP/RFX was the only sequence that resulted in a methylation responsive formation of a specific complex when used as a radiolabeled ligand (data not shown). Two specific, slowly migrating DNA-protein complexes formed with the 1 to +20 oligonucleotide that migrated only
slightly faster (commensurate with the small size of the ligand) than
the methylation-responsive complexes formed from the longer 25 to +30
oligonucleotide. Furthermore, just as methylation increased the amount
of this specific complex formation from the 25 to +30
oligonucleotide, methylation increased binding by the smaller 1 to
+20 oligonucleotide 2.5-3-fold (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and
2). This complex formation was specific, as it is competed by an excess of the identical unlabeled sequence (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and 7) but not a similar excess of other tested
2(I) sequences ( 14 to +6, +10 to +30, and 20 to +1) (Fig.
2B, lanes 4-6 and 8). Competition for binding to
methylated sequence ( 1 to +20) probe increased when the specific
competitor was methylated (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and
7), whereas methylation of the +10 to 30 competitor did not
visibly change the amount of labeled complex formation (Fig. 2B,
lanes 6 and 8).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sequences of the collagen oligonucleotides used in experiments
All of the collagen sequences are derived from GeneBankTM
sequences, shown in uppercase letters. Lowercase letters are
HindIII overhangs used for labeling.
|
|
The ability of various other oligonucleotide duplexes to compete for
complex formation with the methylated 2(I) probe was also tested
(Fig. 3A). Sequences unrelated
to MDBP/RFX sites, namely mTAE (Fig. 3A, lane 9; Table I)
and a sequence in the 1(I) gene (Fig. 3A, lane 8; Table
I) did not compete for complex formation. In contrast, the known
binding sites for MDBP/RFX sequences (Table
II) competed at 50-fold molar excess over
the labeled ligand (Fig. 3A, lanes 2-7). These include EP
(a high affinity, cytosine methylation-independent MDBP/RFX binding
site present in hepatitis B viral enhancer (29)) Py1 (a similar binding
site in polyomavirus enhancer B), and pB1 (an in
vitro methylated cytosine methylation-dependent site
in the plasmid pBR322 (19)). In addition, two
methylation-dependent human MDBP/RFX sites, the human
-galactosidase A site, close to the transcription start site
( -GalA, +49), and the human apoferritin H (hFer +202) site, as well
as a cytosine methylation-independent site known as X-box in the MHC
class II gene promoters, competed effectively for binding to the
2(I) site (29). The complexes that formed on all of these MDBP/RFX
sites co-migrated with the 2(I) promoter-protein complexes with the
same rat fibroblast nuclear extract (Fig. 3B, lanes 3-7).
In addition, the collagen sequence was as methylation sensitive under
our conditions as pB1 and was more sensitive than -GalA or hFer
sequences (not shown).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The MDBP/RFX recognition sites compete for
protein-DNA complex formed on the 2(I)
sequence (A), and the 2(I)
protein complex co-migrates with the MDBP/RFX protein-DNA complex
(B). A, competitors at 50-fold molar
excess over the labeled ligand (200 fmol of labeled ligand) were
incubated with nuclear proteins, and then radioactive probes were added
as in Fig. 2B. MDBP/RFX sites used as competitors are shown
in lanes 2-7 (lane 2, EP from hepatitis B virus
enhancer 1; lane 3, X box from MHC type II gene; lane
4, Py1 from polyomovirus enhancer B enhancer; lane 5, -GalA from the -galactosidase A gene; lane 6, pBsite1
from pBR322; lane 7, hFer from apoferritin gene) (Table II).
The methylation-sensitive competitor sites ( GalA, hFer, and pB1)
were methylated (lanes 5-7). Competitor sequences unrelated
to MDBP/RFX binding sites are 1(I) (lane 8) and mTAE
(lane 9) (Table I). Lane 1 contains no
competitors. The arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes
generated by MDBP/RFX and the 2(I) methylated sequence.
B, nuclear extracts were incubated with the same five known
MDBP/RFX ligands in addition to the 2(I) sequence from position 1
to +20. All probes were labeled at the same specific activity (100,000 cpm/200 fmol). MDBP/RFX sites used as probes are shown in lanes
3-7 (lane 3, EP from hepatitis B virus enhancer 1;
lane 4, X box from MHC type II; lane 5, -GalA
from the -galactosidase A gene; lane 6, pBsite1 from
pBR322; lane 7, hFer from the apoferritin gene) (Table II).
Methylation status of probes is indicated at the top. The
arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by
MDBP/RFX and the 2(I) methylated sequence.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Sequences of the MBDP/RFX consensus oligonucleotides used in
experiments
All of the collagen sequences are derived from GenBankTM sequences,
shown in uppercase letters. Lowercase letters are HindIII
overhangs used for labeling.
|
|
Use of antiserum specific for the RFX1 polypeptide of MDBP/RFX
complex also indicated that the methylation-responsive protein recognizing the 1 to +20 sequence of the 2(I) gene is MDBP/RFX. Preincubating the reaction mixture for the electrophoretic mobility shift assay with this antibody resulted in much slower migration of the
protein-DNA complex formed between the nuclear protein and the 2(I)
sequence (Fig. 4A, lanes
1-3). The same supershift was obtained when the known
MDBP/RFX-specific EP DNA sequence was used as the ligand (Fig.
4A, lanes 4-6). Presumably, the large size of the MDBP/RFX
dimer complexed with the antibody, as well as with the DNA ligand, was
responsible for these supershifted 2(I) or EP ligands not entering
the gel.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The complexes formed on
2(I) sequence by nuclear extracts
(A) or in vitro translated RFX
protein (B) are supershifted by specific antibody to
MDBP/RFX. A, nuclear extracts were incubated with
methylated 2(I) probe (lanes 1-3) or EP (lanes
4-6) radiolabeled probes. Specific MDBP/RFX1 antibody was added
at a 1:100 dilution (lanes 3 and 6), and
nonimmune (NI) serum was added at a 1:100 dilution
(lanes 2 and 5). The upper arrow
indicates the supershifted protein-DNA complexes, and the lower
arrow indicates the protein-DNA complexes generated by MDBP/RFX
and the methylated 2(I) sequence. B, RFX1 cDNA was
in vitro transcribed and translated and the product used for
mobility shift assays. Specific RFX1 antibody (lane 3 and
6) or nonimmune (NI) serum (lanes 4 and 7) at a 1:100 dilution was added to the reaction mixture
containing the in vitro translated protein (lanes
2-4) or, as a control, just the reticulocyte lysate (lanes
5-7) for 20 min before the addition of radiolabeled 2(I)
ligand. Lane 8 contained nuclear extracts instead of the
in vitro translation product incubated with the ligand.
Lane 1 contained probe without protein. The
arrows indicate the protein-DNA complexes generated by
MDBP/RFX and the 2(I) methylated sequence. NS,
nonspecific binding from the reticulocyte lysate.
|
|
Further evidence for the identity of the protein binding in a
sequence-specific and methylation-specific manner to the methylated 1
to +20 sequence from the 2(I) gene was provided in electrophoretic mobility shift assays with in vitro translated MDBP/RFX1
protein. This protein product formed a complex with the methylated 1
to +20 sequence that comigrated with a complex formed between the same
ligand and rat fibroblast nuclear extracts (Fig. 4B, lanes 2 and 8). Because MDBP/RFX from nuclear extracts contains
different related homodimers or heterodimers of related polypeptide
chains and the RFX1 homodimer is the largest of these, it is not
surprising that the main complex seen from the in vitro
translation product corresponds to the slower moving of the two bands
observed in binding reactions with the nuclear extract. We also tested
the ability of RFX1 antiserum to supershift complex formed using the in vitro transcribed/translated MDBP/RFX1protein (Fig.
4B, lane 3). The same supershift was seen as for the nuclear
protein Fig. 4A, lanes 3 and 6). Rabbit control
antiserum did not bind to the protein-DNA complex (Fig.
4B, lane 4).
To test for control of gene expression at this sequence in the
beginning of the 2(I) gene, C to T mutations at +7 and/or +23 sites
were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis into the 2(I)
promoter-luciferase construct, pH 20, containing the 220 to +54
region of the promoter. These expression plasmids were transfected into
rat fibroblast cells. The +7 mutation inhibited transcription to a
greater extent (80 ± 2.6% (S.D.)) than did the +23 mutation
(47 ± 3.8%) (Fig. 5A).
The same constructs were used in an in vitro transcription
assay. The +7 mutation decreased the transcription by 56% but the +23
mutation decreased only 23% (Fig. 5B) in a representative
experiment repeated three times. Therefore, a CpG-to-TpG mutation at
the +7 site, which increases the formation of specific protein
complexes in vitro, also decreases transcription in
vivo and in reaction mixtures containing a nuclear extract. This
mutation had more of an effect on transcription than did an analogous
mutation at position +23, which does not match the MDBP/RFX consensus
sequences.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mutation of two CpG sequences to TpG
sequences (+7 or +23) in the collagen 2(I)
exon inhibited transcription in transient transfection
(A) and in vitro transcription assays
(B). A, rat skin fibroblasts were
transfected by the LipofectAMINE method with collagen
promoter-luciferase constructs (2 µg) containing C to T mutations at
+7 or +23. A CMV promoter driving the green fluorescent protein gene (1 µg) was co-transfected to normalize the transfection efficiency. The
graph represents the average luciferase activity/µg of protein with
standard error from four different experiments performed in duplicate.
B, the control and mutated 2(I) collagen
promoter-luciferase constructs (1 µg) containing bases 220 to +54
of the collagen gene were transcribed in vitro with rat
fibroblast nuclear extract. The RNA transcript was detected by primer
extension as described under "Materials and Methods." This is a
representative of an experiment performed three times.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
One of the unusual characteristics of MDBP/RFX proteins is their
behavior with respect to CpG-containing recognition sites. These
sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins show increased binding to these
sites in their CpG-methylated form. The sequence specificity of the
binding site distinguishes these proteins from methylated DNA-binding
proteins, such as MeCP1, MeCP2, DBP-m, and MDBP-2-H1 (22, 32-35). We
demonstrated that the MDBP/RFX could bind to a sequence at the very
beginning of the 2(I) gene first exon in the rodent and human
genomes in a methylation-dependent manner. Similar
methylation-responsive MDBP sites are present at the beginning of the
human genes for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; HLA-A2, -A3,
-A25 antigens; and -galactosidase A (19).
MDBP/RFX also binds to many of its sites in a cytosine
methylation-independent manner if 1-3 of the CpGs in the consensus sequence are replaced by TpG or TpA. There is a CpG site 7 base pairs
downstream from the transcription start site of the 2(I) gene that
is within the MDBP/RFX site. This CpG matches the central CpG of the
MDBP/RFX consensus sequence (Fig. 2A), which confers methylation-dependent binding on other
methylation-responsive binding sites for this family of closely related
proteins (19). The location of this MDBP/RFX site in the 2(I) gene
was defined by homology to many known MDBP/RFX sites, electrophoretic
mobility shift assays with rat fibroblast nuclear extracts and with the in vitro transcription/translation product from an MDBP/RFX1
template, and supershift assays using specific antibody to MDBP/RFX1
(Figs. 2-4). When we replaced this unmethylated CpG within the
MDBP/RFX site with a TpG, there was increased specific complex
formation comparable to the increase seen upon methylation of this CpG
dinucleotide pair (Fig. 1), just as has been observed with other
methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX sites (19). When the next
downstream CpG in this region of the 2(I) gene, namely, the CpG at
position +23, was converted to a TpG, there was no effect on complex
formation with MDBP/RFX proteins in a nuclear extract, as expected,
because this dinucleotide is outside the MDBP/RFX site.
A reporter containing the 2(I) promoter/5' region gene driving
expression of a luciferase gene was equivalently mutated at the CpG at
position +7. The observed decrease in promoter activity in the TpG
mutant in both transfection experiments in cultured rat fibroblast and
in vitro transcription with fibroblast extracts may be due
to increased binding of MDBP/RFX to the mutated sequence (Fig. 5).
Although this mutation may also affect formation of the preinitiation
complex for transcription in a manner independent of MDBP/RFX binding,
a similar mutation in a more downstream
methylation-dependent MDBP/RFX site (48 bp downstream of
the major transcription start site) in the human -galactosidase A
also decreases gene expression in transient transfection assays.
Furthermore, when that MDBP/RFX site was mutated to a yeast GAL4
binding site and yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain chimeras with mammalian
transcription factors were present, a hybrid GAL4 DNA-binding
domain-MDBP/RFX down-regulated reporter gene expression, whereas the
intact GAL4 transcription factor and a hybrid GAL4 DNA-binding
domain-VP16 activation domain up-regulated expression of the reporter
gene.2
All of the homo- and heterodimeric members of the MDBP/RFX1-3 family
of DNA-binding protein exhibit methylation-dependent binding to certain of their cognate sites (16, 17). In contrast, RFX5
is a more distant member of this family, which is involved in positive
regulation of major histocompatibility type II genes and does not
display methylation-dependent binding (17). Yeast proteins
involved in cell cycle control and DNA damage are also present in this
family (36, 37). MDBP/RFX family members have very similar DNA binding
domains but different N-terminal regions. RFX2-4 show appreciable
tissue-specificity in their distribution, whereas RFX1 is present at
similar levels in a variety of examined tissues (16).
RFX1 homodimer, a large protein with 979-amino acids per subunit,
contains both transcription repression and activation domains, the
ability of which to positively or negatively modulate transcription may
vary depending upon the location of its cognate sites in a given gene
region and the other proteins with which it interacts (28, 29).
Positive regulation of transcription by MDBP/RFX has been demonstrated
for the methylation-independent binding site in the EP sequence of the
hepatitis B virus enhancer (38). In contrast, one of us previously
demonstrated that a low affinity methylation-independent binding site
beginning at position +5 of the CMV IE transcription unit can
down-regulate transcription when its binding by MDBP/RFX is increased
by mutation (39).
Dual function transcription factors have been described that switch
their function by interaction with different co-activators or
co-repressors (40-42), different neighboring transacting factors (43-45), or interaction with specific DNA sequences in different locations relative to the transcription start site (46). MDBP/RFX interacts with c-Abl, greatly stimulating its autophosphorylation (47).
We have preliminary data using antibody supershifting experiment
suggesting that c-Abl protein is present in the complex formed with the
collagen sequence.3 MDBP/RFX
can also interact with at least one TAFII
factor.4 Furthermore,
MDBP/RFX binding sites implicated in transcription control are
sometimes located in the proximal promoter region (48) or intron
sequences (49), as well as in DNA sequences immediately downstream of
or spanning the transcription start site, as in the 2(I) sequence
described in this report. In the proximal promoter of proliferating
cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), there is an MBDP/RFX binding site that
overlaps with a cAMP response element-binding site (48, 50, 51). Using
mutation analysis in and surrounding the RFX binding site, it was
demonstrated that binding of RFX protein inversely correlates with
transcription activation of the promoter. Therefore, MDBP/RFX plays an
inhibitory role along with the retinoblastoma-related tumor suppressor
protein, p107, in inhibiting activation of the PCNA promoter activity. RFX also represses gene expression of c-Myc at a site in the first intron (26, 52).
The data presented here indicate that MDBP/RFX behaves as
transcriptional repressor in the context of methylated collagen 2(I)
sequence. We have previously demonstrated that in a rat cell line that
has lost expression of this gene, there is methylation in the promoter
region and that treatment of this cell line with the DNA demethylating
agent 5-azacytidine results in the gain of expression of this gene
(43). Because abnormal hypermethylation of the 5' region of tumor
suppressor genes is so frequent in cancer and down-regulation of
collagen gene expression has been proposed to contribute to
carcinogenesis, abnormal methylation of the 5' region of the 2(I)
gene, including the MDBP/RFX site, might occur in cancers and play a
role in down-regulation of the expression of this gene. Future genomic
sequencing experiments will allow testing of this hypothesis and of the
possibility that the RFX/MDBP is a transcriptional repressor involved
in tissue-specific regulation of the collagen 2(I) gene
transcription in response to naturally occurring differential methylation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants R01-CA23540 and P50-HL56386 and by the Department of
Veterans Affairs merit review program.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St.,
Boston, MA 02118. Tel.: 617-638-4159; Fax: 617-638-5339; E-mail:
smith@biochem.bumc.bu.edu.
2
M. Ehrlich, manuscript in preparation.
3
P. K. Sengupta and B. D. Smith,
unpublished data.
4
M. Ehrlich, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
bp, base pair(s);
MDBP, methylated DNA-binding protein;
RFX, regulatory factor for X box;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
Gal, galactosidase;
hFer, human apoferritin H;
MHC, major histocompatibility complex;
HLA, human leucocyte antigens;
EP, hepatitis B viral enhancer;
Py1, polyomovirus enhancer;
pB1, methylation-dependent site in pBR322.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, S. L.,
Sobel, M. E.,
Howard, B. H.,
Olden, K.,
Yamada, K. M.,
de Crombrugghe, B.,
and Pastan, I.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
3399-3403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Rowe, D. W.,
Moen, R. C.,
Davidson, J. M.,
Byers, P. H.,
Bornstein, P.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(1978)
Biochemistry
17,
1581-1590[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Smith, B. D.,
and Niles, R.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
1820-1825[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Sandmeyer, S.,
Smith, R.,
Kiehn, D.,
and Bornstein, P.
(1981)
Cancer Res.
41,
830-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Smith, B. D.,
and Marsilio, E.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
253,
269-273[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Guenette, D. K.,
Ritzenthaler, J. D.,
Foley, J.,
Jackson, J. D.,
and Smith, B. D.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
283,
699-703
|
| 7.
|
Sengupta, P. K.,
and Smith, B. D.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1443,
75-89[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Umezawa, A.,
Yamamoto, H.,
Rhodes, K.,
Klemsz, M. J.,
Maki, R. A.,
and Oshima, R. G.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4885-4894[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Okuse, K.,
Matsuoka, I.,
and Kurihara, K.
(1997)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
46,
197-207[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Singal, R.,
Ferris, R.,
Little, J. A.,
Wang, S. Z.,
and Ginder, G. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13724-13729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Wolff, G. L.,
Kodell, R. L.,
Moore, S. R.,
and Cooney, C. A.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
949-957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kudo, S.,
and Fukuda, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13298-13302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kirillov, A.,
Kistler, B.,
Mostoslavsky, R.,
Cedar, H.,
Wirth, T.,
and Bergman, Y.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
435-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Iannello, R. C.,
Young, J.,
Sumarsono, S.,
Tymms, M. J.,
Dahl, H. H.,
Gould, J.,
Hedger, M.,
and Kola, I.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
612-619[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Huang, L. H.,
Wang, R.,
Gama-Sosa, M. A.,
Shenoy, S.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1984)
Nature
308,
293-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Reith, W.,
Ucla, C.,
Barras, E.,
Gaud, A.,
Durand, B.,
Herrero-Sanchez, C.,
Kobr, M.,
and Mach, B.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1230-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Emery, P.,
Durand, B.,
Mach, B.,
and Reith, W.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
803-807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Jabrane-Ferrat, N.,
Asiedu, C. K.,
Samac, S.,
Peterlin, B. M.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6810-6818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Asiedu, C. K.,
Supakar, P. C.,
Khan, R.,
Ehrlich, K. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
6253-6260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Hornstra, I. K.,
and Yang, T. P.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1419-1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Samac, S.,
Rice, J. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1998)
Biol. Chem.
379,
541-544[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Supakar, P. C.,
Khan, R.,
Ehrlich, K. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
1459-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Ghazal, P.,
Lubon, H.,
Fleckenstein, B.,
and Hennighausen, L.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
3658-3662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Karpen, S.,
Banerjee, R.,
Zelent, A.,
Price, P.,
and Acs, G.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
5159-5165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Ostapchuk, P.,
Scheirle, G.,
and Hearing, P.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2787-2797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Supakar, P. C.,
Wu, K. Z.,
Ehrlich, K. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
6865-6869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Inamdar, N. M.,
Supakar, P. C.,
Wu, K.,
Ehrlich, K. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1991)
Virology
182,
865-869[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Katan, Y.,
Agami, R.,
and Shaul, Y.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3621-3628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Katan-Khaykovich, Y.,
and Shaul, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24504-24512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
Martin, P. L.,
Shastry, B. S.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
101,
582-598[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Herrero Sanchez, C.,
Reith, W.,
Silacci, P.,
and Mach, B.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4076-4083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Nan, X.,
Cross, S.,
and Bird, A.
(1998)
Novartis Found. Symp.
214,
6-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Nan, X.,
Ng, H. H.,
Johnson, C. A.,
Laherty, C. D.,
Turner, B. M.,
Eisenman, R. N.,
and Bird, A.
(1998)
Nature
393,
386-389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Lewis, J. D.,
Meehan, R. R.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Maurer-Fogy, I.,
Jeppesen, P.,
Klein, F.,
and Bird, A.
(1992)
Cell
69,
905-914[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Schwarz, S.,
Hess, D.,
and Jost, J. P.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
5052-5056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Wu, S. Y.,
and McLeod, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1479-1488[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Huang, M.,
Zhou, Z.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1998)
Cell
94,
595-605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Siegrist, C. A.,
Durand, B.,
Emery, P.,
David, E.,
Hearing, P.,
Mach, B.,
and Reith, W.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6375-6384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Zhang, X. Y.,
Ni, Y. S.,
Saifudeen, Z.,
Asiedu, C. K.,
Supakar, P. C.,
and Ehrlich, M.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
3026-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Shi, Y.,
Seto, E.,
Chang, L. S.,
and Shenk, T.
(1991)
Cell
67,
377-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Treitel, M. A.,
and Carlson, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3132-3136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Maheswaran, S.,
Park, S.,
Bernard, A.,
Morris, J. F.,
Rauscher, F. J. D.,
Hill, D. E.,
and Haber, D. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5100-5104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Smith, K. J.,
Smith, W. J.,
Hamilton, T.,
Skelton, H. G.,
Graham, J. S.,
Okerberg, C.,
Moeller, R.,
and Hackley, B. E., Jr.
(1998)
Am. J. Dermatopathol.
20,
22-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Ip, Y. T.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Lehming, N.,
Thanos, D.,
Brickman, J. M.,
Ma, J.,
Maniatis, T.,
and Ptashne, M.
(1994)
Nature
371,
175-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Kurokawa, R.,
Soderstrom, M.,
Horlein, A.,
Halachmi, S.,
Brown, M.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.,
and Glass, C. K.
(1995)
Nature
377,
451-454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Agami, R.,
and Shaul, Y.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1779-1788[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Liu, M.,
Lee, B. H.,
and Mathews, M. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
15433-15439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Reinhold, W.,
Emens, L.,
Itkes, A.,
Blake, M.,
Ichinose, I.,
and Zajac-Kaye, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3041-3048[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Lee, B. H.,
Liu, M.,
and Mathews, M. B.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
1138-1145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Labrie, C.,
Lee, B. H.,
and Mathews, M. B.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
3732-3741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Blake, M.,
Niklinski, J.,
and Zajac-Kaye, M.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
6060-6066[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Niesen, A. R. Osborne, W. R. Lagor, H. Zhang, K. Kazemfar, G. C. Ness, and G. Blanck
Technological advances in the study of HLA-DRA promoter regulation: Extending the functions of CIITA, Oct-1, Rb, and RFX
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin,
March 1, 2009;
41(3):
198 - 205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Chen, A. Dhupelia, and C. J. Schoenherr
The Igf2/H19 imprinting control region exhibits sequence-specific and cell-type-dependent DNA methylation-mediated repression
Nucleic Acids Res.,
February 1, 2009;
37(3):
793 - 803.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, S. R. Farmer, and B. D. Smith
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Interacts with CIITA{middle dot}RFX5 Complex to Repress Type I Collagen Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 7, 2007;
282(36):
26046 - 26056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, P. K. Sengupta, E. Seto, and B. D. Smith
Regulatory Factor for X-box Family Proteins Differentially Interact with Histone Deacetylases to Repress Collagen {alpha}2(I) Gene (COL1A2) Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 7, 2006;
281(14):
9260 - 9270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ohi, Y. Uehara, M. Takatsu, M. Watanabe, and T. Ono
Hypermethylation of CpGs in the Promoter of the COL1A1 Gene in the Aged Periodontal Ligament
Journal of Dental Research,
March 1, 2006;
85(3):
245 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Niesen, A. R. Osborne, H. Yang, S. Rastogi, S. Chellappan, J. Q. Cheng, J. M. Boss, and G. Blanck
Activation of a Methylated Promoter Mediated by a Sequence-specific DNA-binding Protein, RFX
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 25, 2005;
280(47):
38914 - 38922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Park, B. T. Kren, D. A. Largaespada, and C. J. Steer
DNA methylation of Sleeping Beauty with transposition into the mouse genome
Genes Cells,
August 1, 2005;
10(8):
763 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Sengupta, Y. Xu, L. Wang, R. Widom, and B. D. Smith
Collagen {alpha}1(I) Gene (COL1A1) Is Repressed by RFX Family
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 3, 2005;
280(22):
21004 - 21014.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, L. Wang, G. Buttice, P. K. Sengupta, and B. D. Smith
Major Histocompatibility Class II Transactivator (CIITA) Mediates Repression of Collagen (COL1A2) Transcription by Interferon {gamma} (IFN-{gamma})
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 1, 2004;
279(40):
41319 - 41332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, L. Wang, G. Buttice, P. K. Sengupta, and B. D. Smith
Interferon {gamma} Repression of Collagen (COL1A2) Transcription Is Mediated by the RFX5 Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 5, 2003;
278(49):
49134 - 49144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Sengupta, E. M. Smith, K. Kim, M. J. Murnane, and B. D. Smith
DNA Hypermethylation Near the Transcription Start Site of Collagen {alpha}2(I) Gene Occurs in Both Cancer Cell Lines and Primary Colorectal Cancers
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2003;
63(8):
1789 - 1797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nakayama, H. Murakami, N. Maeyama, N. Yamashiro, A. Sakakibara, N. Mori, and M. Takahashi
Role for RFX Transcription Factors in Non-neuronal Cell-specific Inactivation of the Microtubule-associated Protein MAP1A Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
233 - 240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kloti, X. He, I. Potrykus, T. Hohn, and J. Futterer
Tissue-specific silencing of a transgene in rice
PNAS,
August 6, 2002;
99(16):
10881 - 10886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Sengupta, J. Fargo, and B. D. Smith
The RFX Family Interacts at the Collagen (COL1A2) Start Site and Represses Transcription
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 5, 2002;
277(28):
24926 - 24937.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Ghosh
Factors Involved in the Regulation of Type I Collagen Gene Expression: Implication in Fibrosis
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
May 1, 2002;
227(5):
301 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Tierney, H. Kirby, J. Nagra, A. Rickinson, and A. Bell
The Epstein-Barr Virus Promoter Initiating B-Cell Transformation Is Activated by RFX Proteins and the B-Cell-Specific Activator Protein BSAP/Pax5
J. Virol.,
November 15, 2000;
74(22):
10458 - 10467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Tierney, H. E. Kirby, J. K. Nagra, J. Desmond, A. I. Bell, and A. B. Rickinson
Methylation of Transcription Factor Binding Sites in the Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Cycle Promoter Wp Coincides with Promoter Down-Regulation during Virus-Induced B-Cell Transformation
J. Virol.,
November 15, 2000;
74(22):
10468 - 10479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. He, J. Futterer, and T. Hohn
Sequence-specific and Methylation-dependent and -independent Binding of Rice Nuclear Proteins to a Rice Tungro Bacilliform Virus Vascular Bundle Expression Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 19, 2001;
276(4):
2644 - 2651.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|