![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 52, 37093-37096, December 24, 1999
From the Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Specific aminoacylation of tRNAs involves
activation of an amino acid with ATP followed by amino acid transfer to
the tRNA. Previous work showed that the transfer of alanine from
Escherichia coli alanyl-tRNA synthetase to a cognate RNA
minihelix involves a transition state sensitive to changes in the tRNA
acceptor stem. Specifically, the "discriminator" base at position
73 of minihelixAla is a critical determinant of the
transfer step of aminoacylation. This single-stranded nucleotide has
previously been shown by solution NMR to be stacked predominantly onto
G1 of the first base pair of the alanine acceptor stem
helix. In this work, RNA duplexAla variants were prepared
to investigate the role of specific discriminator base atomic groups in
aminoacylation catalytic efficiency. Results indicate that the purine
structure appears to be important for stabilization of the transition
state and that major groove elements are more critical than those
located in the minor groove. This result is in accordance with the
predicted orientation of a class II synthetase at the end of the
acceptor helix. In particular, substitution of the exocyclic amino
group of A73 with a keto-oxygen resulted in negative
discrimination at this site. Taken together, these new results are
consistent with the involvement of major groove atomic groups of the
discriminator base in the formation of the transition state for the
amino acid transfer step.
Aminoacylation, which refers to the covalent attachment of an
amino acid to its cognate tRNA, occurs via a two-step enzyme-catalyzed reaction. In the first step, an amino acid reacts with ATP to form an
aminoacyl-adenylate (aminoacyl-AMP) intermediate in the active site of
the appropriate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. While still bound by the
synthetase, the amino acid is then transferred to the 3'-end of the
tRNA. The so-called "discriminator" base at position 73 and other
acceptor stem elements proximal to the site of amino acid attachment
are critical determinants of specificity and catalytic efficiency in
most synthetase systems (1, 2).
In the period since the original discriminator site hypothesis (3), the
fourth single-stranded nucleotide from the 3'-end of tRNAs
(N73) has been the subject of extensive investigation.
Indeed, although the details of the original hypothesis, which proposed
a relationship been the nature of the amino acid and the identity of
the base at position 73, are not entirely correct, biochemical and
genetic experiments have shown that N73 is generally
important for aminoacylation (1, 4, 5). Despite the importance of this
position, to our knowledge, the energetic contribution of individual
discriminator base functional groups to aminoacylation catalytic
efficiency has not been examined in detail.
In the case of Escherichia coli tRNAAla, it has
been shown that mutagenesis of wild-type A73 to other
standard nucleotides does not completely eliminate aminoacylation in vitro as long as the substrate contains the critical
G3:U70 base pair (6, 7), which is the major
determinant in this system (8, 9). Although a detailed kinetic analysis
was not reported, N73 substitution in
minihelixAla reduced the extent of aminoacylation to In accordance with the relatively weak binding affinity between tRNAs
and synthetases, presumably due to the need for rapid turnover during
protein synthesis, the transition state of catalysis has often been
found to be a more significant factor in discrimination than the
binding step. To determine the mechanism by which N73
modulates aminoacylation with alanine, Shi and Schimmel (7) studied the
single turnover charging of wild-type minihelixAla and
three N73 variants (U73, C73, and
G73). Using preformed, enzyme-bound aminoacyl-adenylate,
they determined that modulation of the reaction upon N73
substitution does not arise from hydrolysis of the adenylate or a
transiently charged RNA, but rather from a reduced rate of alanine
transfer to the minihelix substrate. They hypothesized that this
reduced efficiency is most likely due to a conformational change, which
is sensitive to the discriminator base, and that this change occurs
during the transition state of the transfer step. Although the transfer
reaction was previously shown to proceed more slowly with
N73 variants of minihelixAla (7), the specific
atomic groups responsible for this defect were not identified. In the
present work, we wished to further define the critical elements for the
amino acid transfer reaction by examining the effect of atomic group
substitutions at position 73 of duplexAla variants.
Chemicals--
Inosine and all four standard RNA phosphoramidite
monomers were purchased from Chemgenes (Waltham, MA). All other
modified bases and RNA synthesis chemicals were from Glen Research
Corp. (Sterling, VA).
RNA Preparation--
Solid-phase synthesis of RNA
oligonucleotides was accomplished using the phosphoramidite method on a
Gene Assembler Special (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (13, 14). The
oligonucleotides were gel-purified on 16% polyacrylamide gels, eluted,
and desalted as described (13, 14).
Aminoacylation Assays--
E. coli histidine-tagged
alanyl-tRNA synthetase was purified as described previously (15). RNA
duplex substrates were annealed immediately before use by heating at
80 °C for 2 min, cooling to 60 °C for 2 min, adding
MgCl2 to 10 mM, and placing on ice. Aminoacylation assays were performed at room temperature using published conditions (16). RNA duplexes (4.5 µM) and all
other assay components were pre-equilibrated to room temperature prior to initiating the reaction with E. coli alanyl-tRNA
synthetase (45 nM). Initial rates of aminoacylation are
proportional to RNA concentration under the conditions used for these
experiments. Thus, Vo/[S] is an accurate
reflection of kcat/Km.
RNA duplexes that mimic the acceptor stem of tRNAAla
are specific substrates for aminoacylation by E. coli
alanyl-tRNA synthetase (16) (Fig. 2). In
this work, we examined aminoacylation of eight duplexAla
variants containing both standard and modified bases at position 73 (Fig. 3). As expected from previous
reports (6, 7, 17, 18), substitution of A73 with the other
three standard bases caused significant decreases in aminoacylation
activity. The cytosine and uracil substitutions resulted in 34- and
67-fold decreases in aminoacylation efficiency, respectively (Table
I). Whereas pyrimidine substitutions are not well tolerated, an even greater decrease occurred upon substitution of another purine base, guanine, which reduced the activity by 100-fold
relative to the wild-type duplex (Table I). The guanine substitution
replaced the 6-amino group of adenine with a keto-oxygen and also added
an N-1 proton and an amino group at position 2.
Identification of Discriminator Base Atomic Groups That Modulate
the Alanine Aminoacylation Reaction*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
6%
of the wild-type minihelix. Thus, the nucleotide at position 73 modulates the efficiency of the aminoacylation reaction in the presence
of the essential G3:U70 base pair (6, 7). This
nucleotide has been shown by solution NMR spectroscopy to stack onto
the end of the helix and to stabilize the
G1:C72 base pair (10-12). Stacking of
A73 with the first base pair occurs predominantly with
G1 on the opposite strand (Fig.
1). In addition, NMR experiments indicate
that A73, C74, and C75 all stack
onto each other in a manner that resembles stacking within each strand
of a double helix (12).1

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Base stacking interactions involving
G1:C72 and A73 of
microhelixAla. This view, taken from the average NMR
structure of microhelixAla (12), demonstrates the extensive
stacking overlap of A73 (light gray) with
G1 of the first base pair (dark gray).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Structure of duplexAla used in
this study. The duplex is derived from the acceptor-T
C stem of
E. coli tRNAAla (16). The shaded box
indicates the essential G3:U70 base pair, and
the discriminator base position 73 studied here is indicated by the
unshaded box. Numbering of the nucleotides is based on their
positions in the full-length tRNA.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Structures of bases incorporated at position
73 of duplexAla. The numbers in
parentheses are the 

G
values calculated as indicated in Table I (Footnote c).
Arrows point to single and double atomic group changes
relative to wild-type A73.
Aminoacylation efficiency of duplexAla substrates containing
base substitutions at position 73
Because standard nucleotide substitutions result in multiple atomic group changes relative to the wild-type base, they are not as useful in elucidating specific major groove versus minor groove effects. For this reason, atomic group mutagenesis was next performed using modified purine nucleotides. When 2'-deoxynebularine (Neb)2 was substituted at position 73, activity was only reduced ~2-fold relative to the wild-type duplex (Table I). This base lacks all exocyclic functional groups, but retains significant activity, suggesting that the major groove amino group of adenine is only a minor contributor to the overall activity. Furthermore, it suggests that the purine structure alone is sufficient for efficient aminoacylation. The substitution of 2'-deoxy-7-deazaadenine (7DAA), which lacks the N-7 atom that can function as a hydrogen bond acceptor, resulted in a significant decrease in aminoacylation catalytic efficiency. The 14-fold decrease relative to the wild-type duplex corresponds to a 1.6 kcal/mol contribution to transition state formation.
To probe the minor groove, 2'-deoxy-2-aminoadenine (2AA) was substituted at position 73. This substitution results in the addition of an exocyclic 2-amino group to the wild-type base. Interestingly, this change resulted in a small (1.3-fold) but reproducible increase in activity relative to the wild-type substrate. A second substitution, that of 2'-deoxy-2-aminopurine (2AP), confirmed this result. 2AP lacks the 6-amino group of adenine, but contains a minor groove amino group; thus, when compared with Neb, it specifically tests the effect of placing an amino group in the minor groove. This substitution retained 67% of the wild-type activity and was 1.4-fold more active than the Neb73 variant.
Finally, substitution of A73 with inosine, a guanine analog
lacking the exocyclic 2-amino group, reduced aminoacylation efficiency by 200-fold relative to the wild-type duplex. This decrease in activity
is even greater than that observed upon A73
G
substitution and supports the hypothesis that introduction of a major
groove 6-keto-oxygen results in a blocking effect.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using atomic group mutagenesis, we previously showed that tRNA acceptor stem recognition by alanyl-tRNA synthetase involves minor groove recognition at an internal (3:70) position (19, 20) and major groove discrimination at the terminal base pair (1:72) of the acceptor stem helix (15). We now extend this analysis to the discriminator base position. This nucleotide is of particular interest because it is a well known determinant for recognition by most synthetases, including alanyl-tRNA synthetase (5). Moreover, standard base substitutions at this site in minihelixAla are known to slow transition state formation for the amino acid transfer step of the alanine aminoacylation reaction (7). The 2'-hydroxyl group has previously been shown to be dispensable at this site (20); however, the function of specific nucleotide base atomic groups was not examined in this earlier work. In the present study, using duplexAla substrates, both positive determinants and negative or "antideterminants" involved in the function of this key single-stranded acceptor stem nucleotide were elucidated. Similar to our previous results at the adjacent 1:72 base pair (15), we found that major groove substitutions at position 73 significantly affected aminoacylation activity, whereas minor groove substitutions had only small effects. The importance of major groove interactions at the end of the tRNAAla acceptor stem helix is in accordance with the hypothesis, based primarily on known x-ray crystal structures of synthetase-tRNA complexes, that class II synthetases approach the top of the acceptor stem from the major groove side (21, 22).
The largest positive contribution by a single atomic group of
A73 was observed upon removal of a hydrogen bond acceptor
at position 7. By substituting N-7 of A73 with a carbon
atom (A73
7DAA), we determined that this position
contributes 1.6 kcal/mol to the free energy of transition state
formation. Introducing a 6-keto-oxygen and an N-1 proton in the major
groove (A73
I) has a negative effect on aminoacylation.
A similar effect was previously observed in a study of the 1:72
position (15). At both positions 72 (15) and 73 (Fig. 3 and Table I),
the negative contribution of these functionalities is worth ~3
kcal/mol. The large decrease in aminoacylation efficiency upon
A73
I substitution can be largely attributed to a
blocking element rather than to the loss of the 6-amino group of
A73 because Neb substitution, which removes all exocyclic
functional groups (Fig. 3), is well tolerated
(

G = 0.43 kcal/mol). Thus, the N-6-amino group
is not a major contributor to transition state stabilization. The minor
groove of A73 was also found to contribute very little to
catalytic efficiency. Interestingly, the addition of an exocyclic
2-amino group to the minor groove had a small but reproducible positive
impact on aminoacylation. Comparison of A73
2AA, Neb
2AP, and I
G indicates that the presence of a 2-amino group
contributes 0.17-0.4 kcal/mol to transition state stabilization (Fig.
3 and Table I). It should be noted that for the purine substitutions,
atomic group changes are unlikely to significantly affect stacking
interactions at the end of the helix (23, 24).
The atomic group mutagenesis data presented here allow us to begin to
understand the strong preference for A73 over
G73 in the alanine system. Although the 6-amino group of
A73 is not a major positive recognition element, the
presence of the 6-keto-oxygen of G results in a significant block to
aminoacylation, presumably by slowing the amino acid transfer step (7).
The preference for a purine base at N73 of the
tRNAAla acceptor stem is also evident from this work. At
least part of the reduction in activity upon pyrimidine substitution
can be explained by the lack of the positive N-7 determinant present in
the purine bases. A recent high resolution NMR structure of microhelixAla also sheds light on the preference for a
purine discriminator base (12). The structure shows that there is
substantial base stacking between the A at position 73 and the guanine
located on the opposite strand of the first base pair (G1)
(Fig. 1). This stacking interaction may contribute to proper orientation of the discriminator base during amino acid transfer. Moreover, according to nearest-neighbor free energy parameters (25,
26), an RNA duplex closed with a 5'-G:C-3' pair containing a 3'-A
single base overhang is predicted to have greater stability than the
same duplex with a 3'-pyrimidine overhang (
G = 0.5-0.9 kcal/mol). Thus, the local conformation and stability of the
RNA are likely to be altered upon pyrimidine substitution at position 73.
NMR studies of acceptor stem microhelices previously showed that the
conformation of the CCA 3'-end and the stability of the first base pair
are dependent on the identity of N73 (27, 28). In
particular, in the context of an E. coli
microhelixfMet variant containing a terminal
G1:C72 base pair, the presence of an A at
position 73 results in an extended CCA 3'-end (27), similar to the
conformation observed in the high resolution structure of
microhelixAla (12). In contrast, a U73
substitution results in a fold-back conformation with the terminal A76 in close proximity to G1 (27). The
conformation of the CCA 3'-end in duplexAla variants
containing subtle atomic group changes, such as 7DAA73, is
unlikely to be altered in such a dramatic way. However, even small
changes in stability and stacking can have large effects on
aminoacylation. For example, a discriminator base change from A73 to G in human tRNALeu switches acceptor
specificity from leucine to serine (29). Moreover, structural studies
of human microhelixLeu variants support a close correlation
between the identity of the nucleotide at position 73 and terminal base
pair stability (28). In particular, an A73
G change
resulted in a destabilization of the G1:C72
pair also present in this system.
A previous study of discriminator base recognition in the human tRNASer system used atomic group mutagenesis to incorporate modified bases into position 73 of semi-synthetic tRNAs (30). Although a detailed kinetic analysis was not carried out, when wild-type G73 was changed to 2AP, tRNASer could be aminoacylated, albeit very weakly. An I73 substitution completely eliminated charging (30). Thus, in contrast to the alanine case, a minor groove atomic group is critical in the human serine system. Since seryl-tRNA synthetase also belongs to class II, major versus minor groove effects at the discriminator base do not appear to be a class-specific feature of tRNA aminoacylation.
In summary, in E. coli tRNAAla, an
A73 discriminator base is required for optimal formation of
the transition state for the amino acid transfer step in the
aminoacylation reaction. Insights into the strong preference for an
adenine over the other three natural bases are gained from the atomic
group mutagenesis results presented here. The positive contribution of
a purine N-7 and a strong negative effect upon introduction of a
6-keto-oxygen substitution indicate that major groove determinants are
critical at this site. Whether these functional groups exert their
effect via a direct or an indirect mechanism remains to be determined.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Professor Paul Schimmel for helpful comments on the manuscript and Maria Nagan for assistance in the preparation of Fig. 1.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant GM49928 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry,
University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. S. E., Minneapolis, MN
55455. Tel.: 612-624-0286; Fax: 612-626-7541; E-mail: musier@chem. umn.edu.
1 The structure of the single-stranded region of microhelixAla resembles that of a strand within a double helix (12). We will therefore refer to functional groups of A73 as located in "grooves." For example, N-6 and N-7 are in what would be the major groove of a double helical region, and position 2 is in the minor groove.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: Neb, 2'-deoxynebularine; 7DAA, 2'-deoxy-7-deazaadenine; 2AA, 2'-deoxy-2-aminoadenine; 2AP, 2'-deoxy-2-aminopurine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Giegé, R.,
Sissler, M.,
and Florentz, C.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
5017-5035 |
| 2. | Musier-Forsyth, K., and Schimmel, P. (1999) Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 368-375[CrossRef] |
| 3. |
Crothers, D. M.,
Seno, T.,
and Söll, D. G.
(1972)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
69,
3063-3067 |
| 4. | Shimizu, M., Asahara, H., Tamura, K., Haseqawa, T., and Himeno, H. (1992) J. Mol. Evol. 35, 436-443[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Hou, Y.-M. (1997) Chem. Biol. 4, 93-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Shi, J.-P., Francklyn, C., Hill, K., and Schimmel, P. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 3621-3626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Shi, J.-P.,
and Schimmel, P.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2705-2708 |
| 8. | Hou, Y.-M., and Schimmel, P. (1988) Nature 333, 140-145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
McClain, W. H.,
and Foss, K.
(1988)
Science
240,
793-796 |
| 10. |
Limmer, S.,
Hofmann, H.-P.,
Ott, G.,
and Sprinzl, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6199-6202 |
| 11. | Limmer, S., Reif, B., Ott, G., Lubos, A., and Sprinzl, M. (1996) FEBS Lett. 385, 15-20[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Ramos, A.,
and Varani, G.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2083-2090 |
| 13. |
Scaringe, S. A.,
Francklyn, C.,
and Usman, N.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5433-5441 |
| 14. | Sproat, B., Colonna, F., Mullah, B., Tsou, D., Andrus, A., Hampel, A., and Vinayak, R. (1995) Nucleosides Nucleotides 14, 255-273 |
| 15. | Beuning, P. J., Gulotta, M., and Musier-Forsyth, K. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 8397-8402[CrossRef] |
| 16. |
Musier-Forsyth, K.,
Scaringe, S.,
Usman, N.,
and Schimmel, P.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
209-213 |
| 17. |
McClain, W. H.,
Foss, K.,
Jenkins, R. A.,
and Schneider, J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9272-9276 |
| 18. | Buechter, D. D., and Schimmel, P. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 6014-6019[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Musier-Forsyth, K.,
Usman, N.,
Scaringe, S.,
Doudna, J.,
Green, R.,
and Schimmel, P.
(1991)
Science
253,
784-786 |
| 20. | Musier-Forsyth, K., and Schimmel, P. (1992) Nature 357, 513-515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Ruff, M.,
Krishnaswamy, S.,
Boeglin, M.,
Poterszman, A.,
Mitschler, A.,
Podjarny, A.,
Rees, B.,
Thierry, J. C.,
and Moras, D.
(1991)
Science
252,
1682-1689 |
| 22. | Cusack, S., Yaremchuk, A., and Tukalo, M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2834-2842[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Turner, D. H., Sugimoto, N., Kierzek, R., and Dreiker, S. D. (1987) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 3783-3785[CrossRef] |
| 24. | Santa-Lucia, J., Jr., Kierzek, R., and Turner, D. H. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 4313-4322[CrossRef] |
| 25. | Sugimoto, N., Kierzek, R., and Turner, D. H. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 4554-4558[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Turner, D. H., Sugimoto, N., and Freier, S. M. (1988) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17, 167-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Puglisi, E. V.,
Puglisi, J. D.,
Williamson, J. R.,
and RajBhandary, U. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11467-11471 |
| 28. |
Metzger, A. U.,
Heckl, M.,
Willbold, D.,
Breitschopf, K.,
RajBhandary, U. L.,
Rösch, P.,
and Gross, H. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4551-4556 |
| 29. | Breitschopf, K., and Gross, H. J. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3166-3169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Breitschopf, K.,
and Gross, H. J.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
405-410 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Wolfson and O. C. Uhlenbeck Modulation of tRNAAla identity by inorganic pyrophosphatase PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 5965 - 5970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Guo, Q. Gong, K.-L. Tong, B. Vestergaard, A. Costa, J. Desgres, M. Wong, H. Grosjean, G. Zhu, J. T.-F. Wong, et al. Recognition by Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetases of Discriminator Base on tRNATrp from Three Biological Domains J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 14343 - 14349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Gerdeman, T. M. Henkin, and J. V. Hines In vitro structure-function studies of the Bacillus subtilis tyrS mRNA antiterminator: evidence for factor-independent tRNA acceptor stem binding specificity Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2002; 30(4): 1065 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Nagan, P. Beuning, K. Musier-Forsyth, and C. J. Cramer Importance of discriminator base stacking interactions: molecular dynamics analysis of A73 microhelixAla variants Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2000; 28(13): 2527 - 2534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |