Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kamataki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kamataki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 52, 37117-37124, December 24, 1999


Cooperative Regulation of CYP2C12 Gene Expression by STAT5 and Liver-specific Factors in Female Rats*

Yasumasa Sasaki, Yoshiki Takahashi, Kazuo Nakayama, and Tetsuya KamatakiDagger

From the Laboratory of Drug Metabolism, Division of Pharmacobiodynamics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12W6, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanism(s) responsible for the growth hormone (GH)-induced expression of the CYP2C12 gene. To identify a functional GH-responsive element (GHRE) in vivo, we performed the direct injection of promoter-luciferase chimeric genes into female rat livers. The results showed that the luciferase activity was decreased to approximately 20% by the deletion of the sequence between nucleotides -4213 and -4161. Within this region, two copies of a possible GHRE were present. The sequence of the GHRE was overlapped with that of an interferon-gamma -activated sequence, known to be recognized by the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. In fact, a supershift assay showed that STAT5 was capable of binding to the core sequence of the GHRE. Furthermore, a luciferase assay with reporter plasmids, Delta -4161/-3781, mutated hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4), and mutated HNF-6, revealed that the GH-stimulated expression of the CYP2C12 gene was regulated cooperatively by STAT5, HNF-4, HNF-6, and the factor(s) that binds to the elements, 2C12-I (-4095 to -4074) and 2C12-II (-4072 to -4045). The cooperative regulation by STAT5 and the liver-enriched transcription factors account for the GH-dependent and the liver-specific expression of the CYP2C12 gene in female rats.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CYP2C12 is known to be one of the steroid hydroxylases and is constitutively expressed in female rats but not in male rats (1-4). The sex-specific expression of the CYP2C12 gene is regulated by the plasma growth hormone (GH)1 pattern (5-12). Although the pattern of GH secretion in male rats is characterized by the peaks of large amplitude every 3-4 h with undetectable levels in interpulse periods, the pattern of GH secretion in female rats shows more frequent oscillation of small amplitude (13, 14). Thus, the transcription of the CYP2C12 gene is thought to be activated by the constant level of GH seen in female rats (9, 10, 12).

The effects of GH are mediated by a GH receptor, which belongs to a cytokine/hematopoietin receptor superfamily (15). On the basis of a proposed pathway for the induction of gene expression by GH, the binding of GH to the GH receptor promotes the association of the GH receptor with Janus kinase 2 and the tyrosyl phosphorylation of the Janus kinase 2. (16). Subsequently, the activated Janus kinase 2 phosphorylates the tyrosine residues of the STAT protein. After the formation of the homodimer of the STAT protein or the heterodimer of the STAT protein with other factor(s) in the cytoplasm, the complex translocates to the nucleus and then binds to target sequences (17). Among the STAT family, STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 have been identified as GH-stimulated proteins (15, 18). Particularly, STAT5 (19) has been reported to participate in the GH-related expression of some genes including c-fos (20), serine protease inhibitor 2.1 (21), and the acid-labile subunit gene (22). Pulsatile plasma GH secretion seen in male rats but not in female rats has been shown to activate STAT5 in the liver (23, 24). Based on these lines of evidence, STAT5 has been regarded as the male-specific regulator for the expression of genes including the sex-limited protein gene (25) and CYP3A10 (26).

To date, the mechanism responsible for the GH-dependent activation of the CYP2C12 gene in females has been studied in vitro. HNF-6 has been reported to be involved in the GH-dependent transcription of the CYP2C12 gene (27). Additionally, it was found that the female-enriched GH-dependent complex, termed GHNF, bound to five distinct regions within the CYP2C12 promoter region between nucleotides -1560 and +60 (28). However, it has not been clarified as yet whether or not the above factors play a key role in the in vivo expression of the CYP2C12 gene. In addition to the uncertainty of the in vivo role of these factors, a functional GH-responsive element(s) has not yet been clarified in the regulatory region of the CYP2C12 gene.

To identify a functional factor(s) responsible for the modulation of the GH-dependent transcription of the CYP2C12 gene, we attempted to search the cultured cells to show the inducibility of CYP2C12 by GH. However, no suitable cultured cells were found. Recently, it has been reported that the direct injection of plasmid DNA into the liver is a useful method to assay the in vivo activity of the CYP2B and CYP2C promoters (29). Thus, we employed the direct injection method to search for a critical factor(s) responsible for the GH-dependent expression and to determine the relative contribution of each transcription factor to the GH-dependent expression of the CYP2C12 gene.

In the present study, we provide evidence that the GH-dependent and liver-specific expression of the CYP2C12 gene in female rats results from a cooperative regulation with STAT5, HNF-4, HNF-6, and factors that bind to elements 2C12-I and 2C12-II in the upstream region of the CYP2C12 gene.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animal Treatments-- Adult female Harlan Sprague Dawley rats (8 weeks old; Sankyo Experimental Animals, Tokyo, Japan) were used. When necessary, female rats were hypophysectomized at 6 weeks of age. Recombinant human methionylated GH (Somatonorm, Kabi Vitrum, Stockholm, Sweden) was kindly supplied by Sumitomo Pharmaceutical Co. (Osaka, Japan). Human GH was administered by a continuous infusion (0.94 IU/kg·day), which mimics female-type GH secretion, with an osmotic minipump (model 2001, Alza, Palo Alto, CA) or by a pulsatile injection (0.94 IU/kg·day), which mimics male-type GH secretion (10), for 6 days.

Isolation of the 5'-Flanking Region of the CYP2C12 Gene-- To isolate the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2C12 gene (30), a gene library prepared from the rat genomic DNA, which had been cleaved by Sau3A I and cloned into lambda FIXII vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), was screened with the fragment of a CYP2C12 promoter as a probe. Consequently, a positive clone containing the 9-10-kilobase fragment of the CYP2C12 gene was obtained. The clone was digested with XhoI and HindIII to obtain a 5'-flanking region between nucleotides -5132 and +113 from the transcription start site (30). The resultant fragment was subcloned to the XhoI/HindIII site of pUC19 (pUC5.2).

Construction of 5'-Deletion Mutants for Luciferase Assay-- Luc5132 reporter plasmid was constructed as follows. A HindIII site was introduced downstream of the nucleotide +16 of pUC5.2 by site-directed mutagenesis (pUC5.2(+16)). pUC5.2(+16) was then cleaved with XhoI and HindIII. The fragment corresponding to nucleotides from -5132 to +16 was ligated into the unique XhoI-HindIII site of basic vector 2 (Toyoinki, Tokyo, Japan). Reporter plasmids, Luc4213, Luc4118, and Luc1944, were constructed by the digestion of Luc5132 with restriction enzymes, HincII, BstXI, and BamHI, respectively. Luc4200, Luc4187, and Luc4161 were generated by polymerase chain reaction using S-4200, S-4187, or S-4161 as a 5'-primer and AS-3614 as a 3'-primer. Synthesized fragments were digested with BglII at position -3780 in the CYP2C12 gene. Resultant fragments were inserted into the SmaI/BglII site of Luc3780. To construct Luc4200Delta GHRE2 without the region between nucleotides -4174 and -4162, the region corresponding to nucleotides from -4200 to -4175 was inserted into the KpnI site of Luc4161. To confirm the contribution of GHRE to GH-dependent transcriptional activity, reporter plasmids, 1×GHRE-LucTK, 2×GHRE-LucTK, 4×GHRE-LucTK, and GHRE-Luc1944 were constructed. TK promoter was inserted into the BglII/HindIII site of basic vector 2 (LucTK). 1×GHRE, 2×GHRE, or 4×GHRE was then introduced into the XhoI site of LucTK. The copy number and the direction of the oligonucleotides inserted into the reporter plasmids were confirmed by a sequence analysis (31). To construct Luc4200Delta (-4161/-3781) or Luc4200Delta (-4161/-4118), the region corresponding to nucleotides from -4200 to -4162 was inserted into the KpnI/NheI site of Luc3780 or Luc4118. To construct Luc4200Delta (-3776/-3138), Luc4200Delta (-3137/-1944), Luc4200Delta (-1939/-536), Luc4200Delta (-535/-81), Luc4200Delta (-4122/-4036), or Luc4200Delta (-4030/-3781), Luc4200 was digested with BglII/EcoRV, EcoRV/BamHI, BamHI/StuI, StuI/MscI, BstXI/HgaI, or HgaI/BglII, respectively. Resultant fragments were blunt-ended and self-ligated. To construct GHRE-Luc3780, the region corresponding to nucleotides from -4200 to -4162 was inserted into the KpnI/NheI site of Luc3780. To construct GHRE-2C12-I-Luc3780 and GHRE-2C12-II-Luc3780, the regions corresponding to nucleotides from -4095 to -4074 (2C12-I) and from -4072 to -4045 (2C12-II) were cloned into the GHRE-Luc3780. To construct GHRE-2C12-I/II-Luc3780, the region corresponding to nucleotides from -4072 to -4045 (2C12-II) was cloned into the GHRE-2C12-I-Luc3780. Luc4200mtC/EBP, Luc4200mtHNF-4, and Luc4200mtHNF-6 were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. The oligonucleotide primers used for the synthesis of DNA fragment or site-directed mutagenesis are as follows: S-4200, 5'-AAATTTCCTAGAAGTGAAATTG-3'; S-4187, 5'-GTGAAATTGTGGTAAATTCC-3'; S-4161, 5'-TCATTGCCAGAGGAGACA-3'; AS-3614, 5'-TGATGAGTGAGAACATTCTA-3'; -4200/-4175, 5'-CAAATTTCCTAGAAGTGAAATTGTGGTGGTAC-3' (sense strand) and 3'-CATGGTTTAAAGGATCTTCACTTTAACACCAC-5' (antisense strand); -4200/-4162, 5'-CAAATTTCCTAGAAGTGAAATTGTGGTAAATTCCTAGAACG-3' (sense strand) and 3'-CATGGTTTAAAGGATCTTCACTTTAACACCATTTAAGGATCTTGCGATC-5' (antisense strand); GHRE, 5'-TCGAGTTTCCTAGAAGCTCGAGTTTCCTAGAAGC-3' (sense strand) and 3'-CAAAGGATCTTCGAGCTCAAAGGATCTTCGAGCT-5' (antisense strand); mutated 2C12-C/EBP (-228/-205) (32), 5'-TGAGTGTAGATATCGGTGTTACAT-3' and 3'-ACTCACATCTATAGCCACAATGTA-5'; mutated 2C12-HNF-4 (-122/-96) (33), 5'-ATCATTGAGTCTGTCTTCATTTGAAAG-3' and 3'-TAGTAACTCAGACAGAAGTAAACTTTC-5'; mutated 2C12-HNF-6 (-52/-30) (27), 5'-GCAAAAGATGGTTTTTTATGGTG-3' and 3'-CGTTTTCTACCAAAAAATACCAC-5'.

Direct DNA Injection-- Direct DNA injection was performed with minor modifications of the method previously described (34, 29). The CYP2C12-Luc chimeric genes (600 µg of plasmid DNA diluted with 1.5 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Nisssui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan)) were injected into the peripheral site of single liver lobes. Rats were sacrificed 7 days later to obtain the injected liver weighing from 0.1 to 0.2 g. Human GH was administered 1 day after the DNA injection by a continuous infusion for 6 days (30). When a reporter plasmid with TK promoter was injected into the livers of hypophysectomized rats, GH was administered 5 days prior to the DNA injection. Rats were sacrificed 1 day after the DNA injection, when the highest luciferase activity was seen.

Luciferase Assay-- Three ml of LCbeta /PGC-51 lysis buffer (Toyoinki, Tokyo, Japan) per 1 g of liver tissue was added to prepare liver cell extracts. After homogenization with a Dounce homogenizer, insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were kept frozen at -80 °C until use. Luciferase activity was measured using a Berthold Lumat LB 9501 luminometer with photon detection integrated over 10-s intervals. Statistical significance was judged by a Mann-Whitney U test.

Preparation of Rat Liver Nuclear Extracts-- Nuclear extracts were prepared from the livers from hypophysectomized rats and from the hypophysectomizd rats treated with GH by the constant infusion as described elsewhere (35) except for 1% aprotinin (Sigma) in an initial homogenization buffer. Subsequently, the extracts were snap-frozen in 0.01-ml aliquots at 5-10 mg of protein/ml and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage.

Gel Shift Assay-- The gel shift assay was performed with 20 µl of a reaction mixture containing 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.8), 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5% glycerol, 2% Ficoll 400, 10 µg of liver nuclear extracts, and a 32P-labeled probe (10 fmol). The mixture was incubated at 0 °C for 90 min. Resulting DNA-protein complex was subjected to a 6% polyacrylamide gel in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris borate and 0.5 mM EDTA. For a competition assay, liver nuclear extracts were preincubated at 0 °C for 30 min with a 20-fold molar excess of an unlabeled oligonucleotide. CRE and mutated CRE used for a competition assay were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). For a supershift assay, liver nuclear extracts were preincubated at 0 °C for 30 min with 1 µl of antibodies to STAT1alpha , STAT3, STAT5, STAT5a, CREB1, or CREB2. These antibodies to STAT proteins were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. After a labeled probe was added, the mixture was incubated at 0 °C for 90 min. The oligonucleotide primers used as a probe are as follows: GHRE1, 5'-AAAATTTCCTAGAAGTG-3' and 3'-TTAAAGGATCTTCACTT-5'; GHRE2, 5'-GAAATTGTGGTAAATTCCTAGAACTC-3' and 3'-TTAACACCATTTAAGGATCTTGAGTA-5'; Ly6E interferon gamma -activated sequence core site (36), 5'-GATCATATTCCTGTAAGTGAT-3' and 3'-TATAAGGACATTCACTACTAG-5'; M67 sis-inducible element from c-fos (37), 5'-GATCCATTTCCCGTAAATCAT-3' and 3'-GTAAAGGGCATTTAGTACTAG-5'; rat alpha 2-macroglobulin acute-phase response element (38), 5'-GATCGGAATTCCCAGAAGGAT-3' and 3'-CCTTAAGGGTCTTCCTACTAG-5'; rat beta -casein gene STAT5/mammary gland factor response element (39), 5'-GATCGGACTTCTTGGAATTAAGGGA-3 and 3'-CCTGAAGAACCTTAATTCCCTCTAG-5'; mutated beta -casein, 5'-GATCGGACTTAGTTTAATTAAGGGA-3' and 3'-CCTGAATCAAATTAATTCCCTCTAG-5'; mouse alpha -globin GATA-1 binding site (40), 5'-TCCGGCAACTGATAAGGATTCCCT-3' and 3'-AGGCCGTTGACTATTCCTAAGGGA-5'; TTR (41), 5'-TCTGATTATTGACTTAGTCAAG-3' and 3'-AGACTAATAACTGAATCAGTTC -5'; TAT (42), 5'-GACGTTTCTCAATATTTGCTCTGGCAG-3' and 3'-TGCAAAGAGTTATAAACGAGACCGTCT-5'.

Southwestern Blot Analysis-- Southwestern blot analysis was performed according to the method of Miskimins et al. (43).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Direct Injection of the 5'-Deletion Mutants of the CYP2C12 Gene into Female Rat Livers-- To examine whether or not the Luc5132 reporter gene was activated in vivo by GH secreted in a female-type pattern, we injected the DNA of Luc5132 into the liver of female rats (Fig. 1A). As expected, the luciferase activity was detected in the liver transfected with Luc5132. Hypophysectomy of female rats resulted in the abolishment of the luciferase activity. However, the activity was restored to the level seen in intact rats by the continuous infusion of GH to the livers of hypophysectomized female rats. These results indicate that the direct DNA injection is a useful method to clarify the mechanism responsible for the GH-dependent transcriptional regulation of the CYP2C12 gene.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Identification of GH-responsive regions in the CYP2C12 gene. A, effect of hypophysectomy or GH administration on luciferase activity in the liver transfected with Luc5132. A Luc5132 deletion mutant was injected into the livers of nontreated (NT) and hypophysectomized (Hypox) female rats and female rats that were hypophysectomized and received the infusion of human GH for 6 days (Hypox + GH). B, luciferase assay with the 5'-deletion mutants of the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2C12 gene. The construction of deletion mutants is described under "Materials and Methods." The numbers given to the deletion mutants indicate the 5'-ends of the 5'-flanking sequence of the CYP2C12 gene counted negatively from a transcriptional start site. These mutants were injected into the liver of adult female rats. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from independent experiments shown in parentheses. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with Luc5132. *, p < 0.05, significantly different between two groups (Mann-Whitney U test).

Identification and Characterization of GHREs in the Upstream Region of the CYP2C12 Gene-- To identify possible regulatory element(s) involved in the GH-induced expression of the CYP2C12 gene, the 5'-deletion mutants of the gene were constructed as shown in Fig. 1B. When the mutants were injected into livers of female rats, the maximal activity of luciferase was seen in the liver that received Luc4213. The activity was decreased to approximately 20% by the deletion of the nucleotide sequences between -4213 and -4161. Further deletion between -4118 and -1944 also resulted in a significant decrease to a basal activity. These results suggest that at least two regions are necessary for the GH-dependent expression of the CYP2C12 gene in female rats.

The sequence of the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2C12 gene was found to contain 9-bp palindrome sequences (5'-TTCCTAGAA-3'), designated as GHRE1 and GHRE2, in a region between nucleotides -4213 and -4161 (Fig. 2A). Compared with elements reported so far, the sequence of the GHREs overlapped with those of the interferon gamma -activated sequence and acute-phase response element (5'-TTCCNNNAA-3'), known to be the binding sites of STAT proteins. As can be seen in Fig. 2B, the deletion of either the GHRE1 or the GHRE2 caused an 80-90% decrease in the luciferase activity. This result indicates that both GHREs contribute to the GH-dependent activation of the CYP2C12 gene in female rats. Furthermore, a gel shift assay using the GHRE1 or the GHRE2 as a probe showed that a factor(s) in nuclear extracts from female livers bound to each GHRE (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, the binding of the constitutive factor(s) to the GHREs disappeared with the hypophysectomy of female rats. The binding of the factor(s) to the GHREs was, however, restored by the continuous infusion of GH, which mimics female-type GH secretion, to hypophysectomized female rats. To further confirm the contribution of the GHREs to the GH-dependent expression of the CYP2C12 gene, GHRE-Luc1944, which contains 10 copies of the GHRE, was injected into the liver of female rats (Fig. 3A). The results indicate that the luciferase activity in the liver transfected with GHRE-Luc1944 is much higher than that in the liver transfected with Luc1944. In the livers from hypophysectomized female rats, the activation of the GHRE-Luc1944 was not seen. The continuous infusion of GH to hypophysectomized rats elevated the luciferase activity of GHRE-Luc1944 by approximately 10-fold. To further characterize GHRE, 1×GHRE-, 2×GHRE-, and 4×GHRE-LucTK were used for a luciferase assay. The luciferase activity was significantly increased with the copy number of GHRE (Fig. 3B). Additionally, the luciferase activity with 4×GHRE-LucTK was elevated by the infusion of GH to the livers of hypophysectomized rats (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Characterization of two GHREs found in the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2C12 gene. A, nucleotide sequence of the CYP2C12 gene between nucleotides -4213 and -4161. Possible STAT-binding elements, GHRE1 and GHRE2, are shown in boldface type. B, effects of the deletion of GHRE1 and/or GHRE2 on transcriptional activity. The construction of deletion mutants is described under "Materials and Methods." All values represent the mean ± S.D. from four independent experiments. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with Luc4200. *, p < 0.05, significantly different from the activity in the liver transfected with Luc4200. C, gel shift assay with two GHREs. Gel shift assay was performed as described under "Materials and Methods." Synthetic GHRE1 and GHRE2 were used as labeled probes. Nuclear extracts were prepared from nontreated females (NT), hypophysectomized females (Hypox), and hypophysectomized females infused with human GH for 6 days (Hypox + GH).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   GH-dependent activation of the CYP2C12 or TK promoter through the GHRE. A, GHRE-Luc1944 was constructed as described under "Materials and Methods." The reporter plasmid was injected into the livers of nontreated females (NT), hypophysectomized females (Hypox), and hypophysectomized females infused with human GH for 6 days (Hypox + GH). B, effects of the copy number of GHRE on the transcriptional activity of TK promoter. C, GH-dependent activation of 4×GHRE-LucTK. 4×GHRE-LucTK was injected into the livers of hypophysectomized females (Hypox) or hypophysectomized females infused with human GH for 5 days (Hypox + GH). All values represent the mean ± S.D. from independent experiments shown in parentheses. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with GHRE-Luc1944 or 4×GHRE-LucTK in female rats. * and **, significantly different between two groups at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

Binding of STAT5 to the GHRE of the CYP2C12 Gene-- Searching the sequence similar to the GHRE, we found that the sequence of the GHRE overlapped with those of STAT-binding sites (Fig. 4). Particularly, the sequence of the GHRE was completely identical to the STAT5 binding sequence found in the acid-labile subunit gene (22) and interleukin-2 receptor alpha  gene (44). The STAT3 binding sites of the alpha 2-macrogloblin gene (38) and the STAT5 binding sites of the beta -casein gene (39) possessed only one base change as compared with the GHRE sequence. To confirm the binding of STAT protein to the GHRE2, we performed a competition assay with STAT-binding sequences seen in the rat beta -casein, rat alpha 2-macroglobulin, and human Ly6E and M67 genes (Fig. 5A). We found that the binding of the GH-stimulated factor(s) to the GHRE2 disappeared with the presence of a 20-fold molar excess of the STAT-binding sequences of the beta -casein and alpha 2-macroglobulin genes. The competitor of Ly6E and M67 partially inhibited the formation of the complex of the GH-stimulated factor(s) with the GHRE2. Unlike the competitors, the beta -casein, alpha 2-macroglobulin, Ly6E, and M67 genes, mutated beta -casein, and nonspecific competitor, GATA-1, did not affect the binding of the complex to the GHRE2. To identify a STAT protein to bind to the GHRE, a supershift assay using antibodies to STAT1alpha , STAT3, STAT5, and STAT5a was performed (Fig. 5, B and C). The results showed that a supershifted band appeared in the presence of antibodies against STAT5 and STAT5a. Thus, it appeared that STAT5a is one of the modulators for the expression of CYP2C12 in the livers of female rats.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Alignment of the binding Sites of STATs. The sequences are aligned with 9-bp nucleotides, TTCCNNNAA, known to be a consensus binding motif for STAT proteins.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Binding of STAT5 to the GHRE. A, effects of competitors on the binding of STAT proteins to GHRE2. A 32P-labeled double strand GHRE2 was incubated with 10 µg of nuclear extracts prepared from the liver of female rats in the presence of a 20-fold molar excess amount of a competitor at 0 °C for 90 min. mt, mutated; alpha 2-MG, alpha 2-macroglobulin. B and C, supershift assay using antibodies to STAT1alpha , STAT3, STAT5, and STAT5a. A 32P-labeled double strand GHRE2 was incubated with nuclear extracts prepared from the liver of female rats in the presence of antibodies to STAT1alpha , STAT3, STAT5, or STAT5a as described under "Materials and Methods."

Cooperative Regulation of the CYP2C12 Gene by STAT5 and Other Transcriptional Factors-- The liver-specific expression of CYP2C12 may not be accounted for solely by STAT5, since this protein is also expressed in extrahepatic tissues. Thus, we postulated that liver-specific factors other than STAT5 were required for the expression of CYP2C12 in the livers of female rats. To identify the regulatory regions necessary for the liver-specific expression of the CYP2C12 gene, we performed a luciferase assay with reporter plasmids, Luc4200Delta (-4161/-3781), Luc4200Delta (-3776/-3138), Luc4200Delta (-3137/-1944), Luc4200Delta (-1939/-536), or Luc4200Delta (-535/-81) (Fig. 6A). The deletion of the nucleotides from -4161 to -3781 or from -535 to -81 lowered the transcriptional activity, although the deletion from -3776 to -3138 increased the luciferase activity. The region from -3776 to -3138 may be a negative regulatory region. Within the region between -535 and -81, the putative binding sites of C/EBPalpha and HNF-4, which is known to be a liver-enriched factor, were present. The mutation within the C/EBPalpha -binding sequence did not significantly affect the transcriptional activity (Fig. 6B). However, the mutation of the consensus sequence of HNF-4 decreased the activity to approximately one-twentieth of the level seen with Luc4200. Similarly, it was found that the mutation of the sequence of HNF-6 caused the loss of the transcriptional activity. In addition to these results, we identified that a novel regulatory region was located in the region between nucleotides -4161 and -3781 (Fig. 6A). Further study using Luc4200Delta (-4161/-4118), Luc4200Delta (-4122/-4036), and Luc4200Delta (-4030/-3781) demonstrated that enhancer elements existed between nucleotides -4122 and -4036 (Fig. 6C). A computer search revealed that this region contained putative CRE (-4095 to -4074) and HNF-3 (-4072 to -4045) sequences. We designated these elements as 2C12-I (-4095 to -4074) and 2C12-II (-4072 to -4045), respectively (Fig. 7A). No factors bound to any region other than 2C12-I and 2C12-II (data not shown). To characterize a factor(s) binding to 2C12-I, a gel shift assay using a mutated probe or competitors was performed (Fig. 7B). The result showed that five factors (I to V) bound to 2C12-I. These factors did not recognize mt2C12-I. Two shifted bands (I and II) disappeared by the addition of a 20-fold molar excess of the consensus CRE sequence. Unlike the CRE, mutated CRE did not affect the binding of the factors to 2C12-I. Furthermore, two shifted bands (II and III) were supershifted by antibodies against CREB1 (Fig. 7B). This result indicates that CREB1 but not CREB2 recognizes 2C12-I. Unknown factors (I, IV, and V) are currently under examination. 2C12-II contained a sequence similar to the binding sequence of HNF-3 (Fig. 7A). To examine whether or not HNF-3 bound to 2C12-II, a gel shift assay with mutant probes or competitors was carried out (Fig. 7C). The binding of factors to 2C12-II was diminished by the introduction of mutations (mt2) in the core sequence of HNF-3 binding sequence. Neither mt1 nor mt2 was effective. The sequences of TTR (5'-TCTGATTATTGACTTAGTCAAG-3') and TAT (5'-GACGTTTCTCAATATTTGCTCTGGCAG-3') were reported to be the typical binding sites of HNF-3 (41, 42). The binding of HNF-3 to TTR was not inhibited even in the presence of a 250-fold molar excess of the 2C12-II sequence, although the band decreased in the presence of TAT. Thus, it appeared that the factors binding to 2C12-II were not identical to HNF-3. Southwestern blot analysis using 2C12-II as a probe demonstrated that at least five nuclear factors specifically recognized the sequence of 2C12-II (Fig. 7D). The molecular masses of these binding factors were estimated to be 63, 47.5, 40, 36, or 34.5 kDa. The molecular weights of HNF-3alpha , -3beta , and -3gamma have been reported to be 50, 47, and 42 kDa (45), respectively. Although the molecular mass of a factor (47.5 kDa) was similar to that of HNF-3beta , other four factors were different from HNF-3. These results indicate that the factors distinct from HNF-3 recognize 2C12-II.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Identification of regulatory regions coupled with the GHREs. A, luciferase assay with the 5'-deletion mutants, Luc4200Delta (-4161/-3781), Luc4200Delta (-3776/-3138), Luc4200Delta (-3137/-1944), Luc4200Delta (-1939/-536), or Luc4200Delta (-535/-81). B, effects of mutations into C/EBP, HNF-4, or HNF-6 binding sites on transcriptional activity. C, luciferase assay with the 5'-deletion mutants, Luc4200Delta (-4161/-3781), Luc4200Delta (-4161/-4118), Luc4200Delta (-4122/-4036), or Luc4200Delta (-4030/-3781). These mutants were injected into the liver of adult female rats. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from independent experiments shown in parentheses. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with Luc4200. ** and ***, significantly different from the transcriptional activity in the liver transfected with Luc4200 at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Characterization of 2C12-I and 2C12-II found in the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2C12 gene. A, nucleotide sequences of 2C12-I and 2C12-II. CRE and HNF-3 binding elements are in boldface type. The sites of mutated (mt) sequences are underlined. B, gel shift assay using 2C12-I and mt2C12-I. C, gel shift assay with 2C12-II or mutant probes. To examine the effects of competitors on the binding of HNF-3 to a TTR probe, a competitor DNA, TTR, 2C12-II, or TAT was added at a 25-, 100-, or 250-fold molar excess of the probe TTR. D, Southwestern blot analysis. Nuclear extracts (60 µg) from the liver of female rats were incubated with 32P-labeled 2C12-II or mt2. E, function of 2C12-I or/and 2C12-II in GH-dependent activation. The construction of deletion mutants is described under "Materials and Methods." These mutants were injected into the liver of adult female rats. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from independent experiments shown in parentheses. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with GHRE-2C12-I/II-Luc3780. **, significantly different from the transcriptional activity in the liver transfected with GHRE-2C12-I/II-Luc3780 at p < 0.01.

To examine whether 2C12-I and 2C12-II were responsible for the regulation of the CYP2C12 promoter by GH, we constructed deletion mutants with GHRE and 2C12-I or/and 2C12-II (Fig. 7E). Insertion of both 2C12-I and 2C12-II restored the transcriptional activity to the level seen in the liver transfected with Luc4200, although the injection of a reporter plasmid carrying 2C12-I or 2C12-II alone did not induce the activity. Taking these results together, we conclude that the GH-dependent expression of the CYP2C12 gene is regulated cooperatively by STAT5, HNF-4, HNF-6, and an unknown factor(s), which binds to 2C12-I and 2C12-II.

Activation of CYP2C12 Promoter by GH Secreted in Male Rats-- To examine whether or not the luciferase activity derived from the Luc5132 reporter plasmid was activated by GH secreted in male rats, we injected Luc5132 into the livers of male rats (Fig. 8). Interestingly, it was found that the luciferase activity was detected not only in female rats but also in male rats. The hypophysectomy of rats abolished the luciferase activity. As expected, the pulsatile as well as constant infusion of GH to hypophysectomized rats increased the activity. These results indicate that the pulsatile GH secretion also induces transcription factors responsible for the induction of CYP2C12.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of pulsatile GH secretion on luciferase activity in the liver transfected with Luc5132. Luc5132 was injected into livers of nontreated rats (NT), hypophysectomized (Hypox) rats, and rats hypophysectomized and receiving the infusion of human GH by a continuous infusion (GH(c)) or a pulsatile infusion (GH(p)) (10) for 6 days. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from independent experiments shown in parentheses. The data are expressed as the ratio of the luciferase activity of each deletion mutant to the basal activity obtained with Luc5132 in nontreated female rats. M, male rats; F, female rats.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In an attempt to study the mechanism responsible for the transcriptional regulation of a certain gene, cultured cells in which the gene expression is seen are generally used, since the cultured cells possess a transcription factor(s) necessary for the gene expression. However, to our knowledge, suitable cultured cells that show the inducibility of CYP2C12 by GH have not been found. In addition, it is hard to reproduce the female- or male-type GH stimulation with cells in culture. Therefore, we employed the direct DNA injection system developed by Kemper et al. (29). As expected, a luciferase activity in the liver transfected with Luc5132 was clearly detected. Thus, the direct DNA injection was evaluated to be a useful tool to explore the mechanism of GH-dependent transcriptional regulation.

The binding sites of HNF-4 (33), HNF-6 (27), C/EBPalpha (32), insulin response element-A-binding protein (46), and GHNF (28) have been reported as the transcriptional regulator of the CYP2C12 gene. These elements were located between nucleotides -1560 and +60 in the CYP2C12 gene. On the other hand, the GHREs were located in the upstream region between nucleotides -4200 and -4161 and possessed functional STAT5-binding sites. The GHREs identified in the present study are expected to be distinct from the elements reported so far. In the CYP2C12 gene, two GHREs, GHRE1 and GHRE2, were present in tandem. We showed in this paper that both GHRE1 and GHRE2 were essential for the transcriptional activation of the CYP2C12 gene (Fig. 2B). This finding suggests that the two GHREs seem to function synergistically. Supporting this phenomenon, it has been reported that two copies of the STAT5 binding site are required for the maximal induction of serine protease inhibitor 2.1 by GH (21).

The sequence of GHRE, TTCCTAGAA, was identical to that of interferon gamma -activated sequence seen in the bovine beta -casein (47) and mouse acid-labile subunit genes (22), known to be recognized by both STAT5a and STAT5b. However, STAT5b was reported to be suppressed by GH secreted in female rats but not male rats. In fact, the amount of STAT5b in the female rat livers was estimated to be low (24, 49, 50). Our result of a supershift assay demonstrated that STAT5a is a major regulator of the CYP2C12 gene in females. It has been reported that STAT5a-STAT5b heterodimer was necessary for the expression of female-specific CYP2B enzyme (51). Thus, the heterodimerization of STAT5 proteins may be important for the expression of CYP2C12 in rats and mice.

CYP2C12 is unique in that its expression is female-specific. On the other hand, STAT5 is considered to be a male-enriched transcriptional factor, although we have shown that STAT5 serves as the modulator of CYP2C12 gene expression in female as well as male rats. Actually, the activation of the Luc5132 reporter gene was also seen in male rats (Fig. 8). An unknown suppressor protein(s) involved in the gender-related difference in the expression of the CYP2C12 may be present in male rat livers. Additionally, it is also possible to assume that the CYP2C12 gene is inactivated at a chromatin level in male rats. Since a naked plasmid was transfected into the livers, sex difference in chromatin structure cannot be seen in the present experiments. These possibilities remain to be examined.

HNF-6 has also been reported to show a sex difference in the expression level (27). However, HNF-6 functioned as the activator of the Luc5132 reporter gene in male rats (Fig. 8). Thus, HNF-6 may not be a critical factor determining the sex-related difference.

We demonstrated that HNF-4 was a major factor to regulate the expression of the CYP2C12 gene. Our result does not agree with a previous work (33). Although the transactivation of the CYP2C12 gene by HNF-4 alone was weak (33), HNF-4 was needed for the expression of CYP2C12 when it cooperated with STAT5 and the factors binding to 2C12-I and 2C12-II. In addition, the contribution of C/EBPalpha to the CYP2C12 expression was small as compared with the results of the previous work (32). This disagreement may be explained as follows. The methodology of direct DNA injection was employed in the present study, while primary hepatocytes and cultured cells such as HepG2 were used in the previous work. The C/EBPalpha expression plasmid was transfected into the cultured cells. Cultured cells transfected with C/EBPalpha may not reflect the in vivo expression of the CYP2C12 gene.

To date, it has been reported that a SRY-like protein inhibits the binding of C/EBPalpha in cultured cells (46). Since the in vivo function of a SRY-like protein is not analyzed in the present study, we cannot exclude the possibility that a SRY-like protein is related to the in vivo expression of CYP2C12. The regulation of the CYP2C12 gene by a SRY-like protein is currently under examination.

We identified novel regulatory regions, 2C12-I and 2C12-II. CREB is known to be a transcription factor bound to CRE (52) and known to interact with p300/CBP (53), which functions as histone acetyltransferase. In addition to CREB, STAT5 also interacts directly with p300/CBP (54). Therefore, STAT5 may function synergistically with CREB through p300/CBP.

It has been reported that Ca2+ channel blocker inhibits the expression of the CYP2C12 gene in rat hepatocytes (55). The activation of CREB occurs in response to elevated intracellular Ca2+ through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (56). Thus, the Ca2+-dependent expression of the CYP2C12 gene can be explained by the activation of CREB.

In addition to 2C12-I and 2C12-II, negative regulatory region (-3776 to -3138) was present in the upstream region of the CYP2C12 gene. However, we could not find a typical negative regulatory region reported so far. Further study is needed for the identification of a factor(s) involved in the negative regulation.

It has been proven that STAT5 interacts directly with a glucocorticoid receptor (48) or a p300/CBP (54). These complexes regulate cooperatively the prolactin-dependent expression of the beta -casein gene in the mammary gland. We demonstrated in this study that CREB and liver-specific factors together with STAT5 were required for the transcriptional activation of the CYP2C12 promoter by GH. The GH-stimulated and the liver-specific expressions of CYP2C12 in female rats were confirmed as explicable by the cooperative regulation by STAT5, the liver-specific factors, and other factors such a CREB.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Sumitomo Pharmaceutical Co. (Osaka, Japan) for kindly supplying human recombinant GH.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, and the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the Organization for Drug ADR Relief, R & D Promotion and Product Review of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Drug Metabolism, Division of Pharmacobiodynamics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12W6, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan. Tel./Fax: 81-11-706-4978; E-mail: kamataki@pharm.hokudai.ac.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GH, growth hormone; GHNF, GH nuclear factor; GHRE, GH-responsive element; CRE, cyclic AMP-response element; CREB, CRE-binding protein; CBP, CREB-binding protein; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; HNF, hepatocyte nuclear factor; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TAT, tyrosine aminotransferase; TK, thymidine kinase; TTR, transthyretin; bp, base pair(s).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kamataki, T., Maeda, K., Yamazoe, Y., Nagai, T., and Kato, R. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 225, 758-770[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. MacGeoch, C., Morgan, E. T., Halpert, J., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 15433-15439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kamataki, T., Maeda, K., Shimada, M., Kitani, K., Nagai, T., and Kato, R. (1985) J. Pharmcol. Exp. Ther. 233, 222-228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Zaphiropoulos, P. G., Mode, A., Ström, A., Möller, C., Fernandez, C., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 4214-4217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Kamataki, T., Shimada, M., Maeda, K., and Kato, R. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 130, 1247-1253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. MacGeoch, C., Morgan, E. T., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1985) Endocrinology 117, 2085-2092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kato, R., Yamazoe, Y., Shimada, M., Murayama, N., and Kamataki, T. (1986) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 100, 895-902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Yamazoe, Y., Shimada, M., Kamataki, T., and Kato, R. (1986) Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 42, 371-382[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. MacGeoch, C., Morgan, E. T., Cordell, B., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 143, 782-788[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Legraverend, C., Mode, A., Westin, S., Ström, A., Eguchi, H., Zaphiropoulos, P. G., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 259-266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Mode, A. (1993) J. Reprod. Fertil. 46 (suppl.), 77-86[CrossRef]
12. Sundseth, S. S., Alberta, J. A., and Waxman, D. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 3907-3914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Tannenbaum, G. S., and Martin, J. B. (1976) Endocrinology 98, 562-570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Edén, S. (1979) Endocrinology 105, 555-560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Argetsinger, L. S., and Carter-Su, C. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 1089-1107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Argetsinger, L. S., Campbell, G. S., Yang, X., Witthuhn, B. A., Silvennoinen, O., Ihle, J. N., and Carter-Su, C. (1993) Cell 74, 237-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Darnell, J. E., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415-1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Ram, P. A., Park, S.-H., Choi, H. K., and Waxman, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5929-5940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Wood, T. J. J., Sliva, D., Lobie, P. E., Pircher, T. J., Gouilleux, F., Wakao, H., Gustafsson, J.-Å., Groner, B., Norstedt, G., and Haldosén, L.-A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9448-9453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Gronowski, A. M., Zhong, Z., Wen, Z., Thomas, M. J., Darnell, J. E., and Rotwein, P. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 171-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Sliva, D., Wood, T. J. J., Schindler, C., Lobie, P. E., and Norstedt, G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26208-26214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Ooi, G. T., Hurst, K. R., Poy, M. N., Rechler, M. M., and Boisclair, Y. R. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 675-687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Waxman, D. J., Ram, P. A., Park, S.-H., and Choi, H. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13262-13270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Gebert, C. A., Park, S.-H., and Waxman, D. J. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 400-414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Varin-Blank, N., Dondi, E., Tosi, M., Hernandez, C., Boucontet, L., Gotoh, H., Shiroishi, T., Moriwaki, K., and Meo, T. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8750-8755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Subramanian, A., Teixeira, J., Wang, J., and Gil, G. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4672-4682[Abstract]
27. Lahuna, O., Fernandez, L., Karlsson, H., Maiter, D., Lemaigre, F. P., Rousseau, G. G., Gustafsson, J.-Å., and Mode, A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12309-12313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Waxman, D. J., Zhao, S., and Choi, H. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29978-29987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Park, Y., Li, H., and Kemper, B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23725-23728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Zaphilopous, P. G., Westin, S., Ström, A., Mode, A., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1990) DNA Cell Biol. 9, 49-56[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Tollet, P., Lahuna, O., Ahlgren, R., Mode, A., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1771-1781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Ström, A., Westin, S., Eguchi, H., Gustafsson, J.-Å., and Mode, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11276-11281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Malone, R. W., Hickman, M. A., Lehmann-Bruinsma, K., Sih, T. R., Walzem, R., Carlson, D. M., and Powell, J. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29903-29907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Gorski, K., Carneiro, M., and Schibler, U. (1986) Cell 47, 767-776[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Khan, K. D., Shuai, K., Lindwall, G., Maher, S. E., Darnell, J. E., and Bothwell, A. L. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6806-6810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Wagner, B. J., Hayes, T. E., Hoban, C. J., and Cochran, B. H. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 4477-4484[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Wegenka, U. M., Buschmann, J., Lütticken, C., Heinrich, P. C., and Horn, F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 276-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Wakao, H., Gouilleux, F., and Groner, B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2182-2191[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Tsai, S.-F., Martin, D. I. K., Zon, L. I., D'Andrea, A. D., Wong, G. G., and Orkin, S. H. (1989) Nature 339, 446-451[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Costa, R. H., Grayson, D. R., and Darnell, J. E. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1415-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Nitsch, D., and Schütz, G. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4494-4504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Miskimins, W. K., Roberts, M. P., McClelland, A., and Ruddle, F. H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 6741-6744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Lécine, P., Algarté, M., Rameil, P., Beadling, C., Bucher, P., Nabholz, M., and Imbert, J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6829-6840[Abstract]
45. Lai, E., Prezioso, V. R., Tao, W., Chen, W. S., and Darnell, J. E. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 416-427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Buggs, C., Nasrin, N., Mode, A., Tollet, P., Zhao, H.-F., Gustafsson, J.-Å., and Alexander-Bridges, M. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 1294-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Cella, N., Groner, B., and Hynes, N. E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1783-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Stöcklin, E., Wissler, M., Gouilleux, F., and Groner, B. (1996) Nature 383, 726-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Fernández, L., Flores-Morales, A., Lahuna, O., Sliva, D., Norstedt, G., Haldosén, L.-A., Mode, A., and Gustafsson, J.-Å. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 1815-1824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Gebert, C. A., Park, S.-H., and Waxman, D. J. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 213-227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Park, S.-H., Liu, X., Hennighausen, L., Davey, H. W., and Waxman, D. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7421-7430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Comb, M., Birnberg, N. C., Seasholtz, A., Herbert, E., and Goodman, H. M. (1986) Nature 323, 353-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Chrivia, J. C., Kwok, R. P. S., Lamb, N., Hagiwara, M., Montminy, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1993) Nature 365, 855-859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Pfitzner, E., Jähne, R., Wissler, M., Stoecklin, E., and Groner, B. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 1582-1593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Tollet, P., Hamberg, M., Gustafsson, J.-Å., and Mode, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12569-12577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Matthews, R. P., Guthrie, C. R., Wailes, L. M., Zhao, X., Means, A. R., and McKnight, G. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6107-6116[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
R. M. Sawaya and D. S. Riddick
Cytochrome P450 2C11 5'-Flanking Region and Promoter Mediate in Vivo Suppression by 3-Methylcholanthrene
Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1803 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. G. Holloway, G. D. Miles, A. A. Dombkowski, and D. J. Waxman
Liver-Specific Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4{alpha} Deficiency: Greater Impact on Gene Expression in Male than in Female Mouse Liver
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1274 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Jiang, Y. Wang, M. Wu, Z. Gu, S. J. Frank, and R. Torres-Diaz
Growth Hormone Stimulates Hepatic Expression of Bovine Growth Hormone Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid through Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Activation of a Major Growth Hormone Receptor Gene Promoter
Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3307 - 3315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C. Gardmo and A. Mode
In vivo transfection of rat liver discloses binding sites conveying GH-dependent and female-specific gene expression
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 37(3): 433 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. J. Waxman and C. O'Connor
Growth Hormone Regulation of Sex-Dependent Liver Gene Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 20(11): 2613 - 2629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Endo, Y. Takahashi, Y. Sasaki, T. Saito, and T. Kamataki
Novel Gender-Related Regulation of CYP2C12 Gene Expression in Rats
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 19(5): 1181 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S Eleswarapu and H Jiang
Growth hormone regulates the expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 gamma and other liver-enriched transcription factors in the bovine liver
J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 95 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Kotokorpi, C. Gardmo, C. S. Nystrom, and A. Mode
Activation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor or Liver X Receptors Interferes with Growth Hormone-Induced akr1b7 Gene Expression in Rat Hepatocytes
Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5704 - 5713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Helander, J.-A. Gustafsson, and A. Mode
Possible Involvement of Truncated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-5 in the GH Pattern-Dependent Regulation of CYP2C12 Gene Expression in Rat Liver
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2002; 16(7): 1598 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-H. Park and D. J. Waxman
Inhibitory Cross-talk between STAT5b and Liver Nuclear Factor HNF3beta . IMPACT ON THE REGULATION OF GROWTH HORMONE PULSE-STIMULATED, MALE-SPECIFIC LIVER CYTOCHROME P-450 GENE EXPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43031 - 43039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. C. Garcia, C. Thangavel, and B. H. Shapiro
Epidermal Growth Factor Regulation of Female-Dependent CYP2A1 and CYP2C12 in Primary Rat Hepatocyte Culture
Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2001; 29(2): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. B. Ehret, P. Reichenbach, U. Schindler, C. M. Horvath, S. Fritz, M. Nabholz, and P. Bucher
DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins. COMPARISON OF IN VITRO SPECIFICITY WITH NATURAL TARGET SITES
J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6675 - 6688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Delesque-Touchard, S.-H. Park, and D. J. Waxman
Synergistic Action of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factors 3 and 6 on CYP2C12 Gene Expression and Suppression by Growth Hormone-activated STAT5b. PROPOSED MODEL FOR FEMALE-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF CYP2C12 IN ADULT RAT LIVER
J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2000; 275(44): 34173 - 34182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kamataki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kamataki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement