|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 37544-37550, December 31, 1999
Extensive Post-translational Modification, Including Serine
to D-Alanine Conversion, in the Two-component
Lantibiotic, Lacticin 3147*
Máire P.
Ryan §¶,
Ralph W.
Jack **,
Michaele
Josten ,
Hans-Georg
Sahl ,
Günther
Jung **,
R. Paul
Ross §§, and
Colin
Hill§¶¶
From the Dairy Products Research Centre, Teagasc,
Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland, the § National Food
Biotechnology Centre, University College, Cork, Ireland, the
¶¶ Department of Microbiology, University College, Cork,
Ireland, ECHAZ Microcollections, Sindelfinger-Str-3, 720700 Tübingen, Germany, the ** Institute for Organic Chemistry,
University of Tübingen 720700 Tübingen, Germany, and the
 Institute for Medical Microbiology and
Immunology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freund-Str-25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
Lacticin 3147 is a two-component bacteriocin
produced by Lactococcus lactis subspecies
lactis DPC3147. In order to further characterize the
biochemical nature of the bacteriocin, both peptides were isolated
which together are responsible for the antimicrobial activity. The
first, LtnA1, is a 3,322 Da 30-amino acid peptide and the second
component, LtnA2, is a 29-amino acid peptide with a mass of 2,847 Da.
Conventional amino acid analysis revealed that both peptides contain
the thioether amino acid, lanthionine, as well as an excess of alanine
to that predicted from the genetic sequence of the peptides. Chiral
phase gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry of amino acid
composition indicated that both LtnA1 and LtnA2 contain
D-alanine residues and amino acid sequence analysis of
LtnA1 confirmed that the D-alanine results from
post-translational modification of a serine residue in the primary
translation product. Taken together, these results demonstrate that
lacticin 3147 is a novel, two-component, D-alanine
containing lantibiotic that undergoes extensive post-translational
modification which may account for its potent antimicrobial activity
against a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The term bacteriocin, particularly when applied to those produced
by Gram-positive bacteria, defines a large group of proteinaceous compounds which display an antimicrobial activity directed primarily against other Gram-positive organisms (1). One subclass of these
antimicrobial peptides comprises the lantibiotics, which are produced
by many different strains of Gram-positive organisms, including the
lactic acid bacteria (1, 2). Lantibiotics are distinguished from other
bacteriocins in that they undergo extensive post-translational
modification, with modifications of serine, threonine, and cysteine
residues being particularly common. Typically, the hydroxy amino acids
(Ser and Thr) are selectively dehydrated to form dehydroalanine
(Dha)1 and dehydrobutyrine
(Dhb), respectively (3). The resultant , -unsaturated residues may
then undergo Michael addition reactions with the thiol group of
specific cysteine residues to form lanthionine (Lan) and
-methyl-lanthionine (MeLan), the characteristic features of these
peptides (1). The precise role of these lanthionine residues remains
unclear, but they have been shown to contribute to enhanced stability
under extreme temperatures (4) and oxidizing conditions (5) and have
also been implicated in increased tolerance to acids (6) as well as in
resistance to proteolytic activities (7). The best known lantibiotic is
nisin which contains five lanthionine rings. This lantibiotic is well
characterized at the biochemical and molecular level and has found
widespread application as a biopreservative in the food industry
(8).
In addition to lanthionine, other unusual modified amino acids such as
2-oxobutyrate (9), 2S,8R-lysinoalanine (10, 11), and D-alanine (12) have been identified in certain
lantibiotic peptides. Identification of D-alanine in the
lantibiotic lactocin S is of particular interest in that it was the
first reported example of the incorporation of a D-amino
acid in a ribosomally synthesized prokaryotic peptide (12). Analysis of
the genetic sequence predicted serine residues in certain positions in
the propeptide, whereas D-alanine was detected in the
mature peptide, suggesting the conversion was the result of a more
complex mechanism than a simple isomerase conversion from
L-alanine. Although the exact mechanism remains to be
elucidated, the authors proposed a model for stereoinversion based on
the -epimerization sequence (13) and on the stereoinversion involved
in lanthionine formation (14). In this mechanism, the
D-alanine residues are thought to be introduced by a
two-step -carbon stereoinversion in which serine is initially
dehydrated in the same manner as in the first step of lanthionine
formation. The resultant dehydroalanine residue is then further
modified by an unidentified stereospecific hydrogenating enzyme or
enzyme system.
This study involved the purification and biochemical characterization
of the novel two-component antimicrobial peptide lacticin 3147 (15).
The results presented allow the two peptides to be ascribed to two
genes, ltnA1 and ltnA2 (previously described as ltnA and ltnB) in a gene cluster contained within
a large conjugative plasmid pMRC01 (16). Interestingly, this cluster
contains a number of open reading frames with homology to genes known
to be involved in lantibiotic biosynthesis, including two
lanM genes associated with dehydration and lanthionine
formation. Moreover, a complex array of post-translational
modifications of lacticin 3147 are demonstrated, which includes serine
to D-alanine conversion, dehydration of serines and
threonines, lanthionine formation, and leader peptide cleavage. Taken
together, these results reveal a two-peptide bacteriocin with a highly
modified structure, which may account for its potent antimicrobial
action against a wide variety of Gram-positive bacteria (17-21).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Culture Conditions, and Bacteriocin Assays
The producing strain L. lactis DPC3147, as well as
the sensitive indicator strains L. lactis HP and L. lactis AM2 were maintained by weekly subculture in M17 (Difco,
Detroit, MI) supplemented with 0.5% lactose (LM17) and all strains
were stocked at 70 °C in 40% glycerol. For production of
bacteriocin activity, a modified tryptone/yeast extract medium (15),
was used from which hydrophobic components which interfered in
subsequent purification procedures had been removed by adsorption to
the chromatographic medium XAD-16 (Sigma-Aldrich, Dublin, Ireland).
Bacteriocin activity was assayed after each step using L. lactis HP as the indicator strain and the method previously
described by McAuliffe et al. (20). In order to locate
complementary activity, 10-µl aliquots of putative A1 fractions were
cross-tested with isolated peptide A2 and vice versa. To demonstrate
complementary activity, 10-µl aliquots of isolated fractions, A1,
A1', and A2 were each dispensed into separate, triangularly arranged
agar wells formed in an agar plate which had previously been seeded with the sensitive indicator strain L. lactis AM2.
Synergistic activity between the peptides was indicated by a zone of
inhibition between the wells, while activity from individual peptides
was observed as a zone around a well on the side facing away from all
other fractions.
Purification of the Inhibitory Peptides
An overnight culture of the producing strain, L. lactis DPC3147 was inoculated into 8 liters of modified
tryptone-yeast broth. The inoculated medium was incubated overnight at
30 °C and the cells were subsequently removed by centrifugation at
10,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was applied to a column
(3 × 23 cm) containing a 50-g bed of XAD-16 resin (Sigma-Aldrich)
at a flow rate of 15 ml/min and the column was then washed with 2 liters of 40% aqueous ethanol (pH 6). The bacteriocin was subsequently eluted with 1 liter of 70% propan-2-ol adjusted to approximately pH 2 by the addition of HCl. The propan-2-ol was removed by rotary evaporation and the resultant bacteriocin preparation was fractionally precipitated with the addition of solid ammonium sulfate to a final
saturation of 30% at 4 °C. Following gentle stirring overnight at
4 °C, the precipitated bacteriocin was recovered by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min and resuspended in 20 ml of sodium
phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7). This concentrated
preparation was desalted on a column (5 × 30 cm) with a bed
volume of 25 g of XAD-2 resin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) and the
bacteriocin was again eluted in 70% propan-2-ol/HCl (pH 2), with
subsequent concentration by rotary evaporation yielding approximately 4 ml of crude preparation. Aliquots of 2 ml were then applied to a C18
reverse phase (RP)-HPLC column (Nucleosil ODS II, 4.6 × 250 mm)
previously equilibrated with 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid. The
column was subsequently developed in a gradient of 30 to 60%
propan-2-ol containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Fractions were collected manually and assayed for activity. The
two fractions, A1 and A2, containing the bacteriocin activity were
concentrated separately by rotary evaporation and each fraction was
then reapplied to the C18 RP-HPLC column. A gradient of 40 to 46%
propan-2-ol (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) in 30 min was applied to
further fractionate the A1 component while fraction A2 was developed in
a gradient of 44 to 50% propan-2-ol (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) in 30 min. The procedure was repeated until homogenous, biologically active peaks were obtained.
Chemical or Enzyme-mediated Peptide Modifications
Reduction with 1-Propanethiol--
To facilitate protein
sequencing, peptide samples containing dehydrated amino acids were
first modified essentially by the method of Meyer et al.
(22). Briefly samples containing sufficient material for sequencing
(100 to 200 pmol) were dissolved in 15 µl of a freshly prepared
solution containing 280 µl of ethanol, 200 µl of H2O,
65 µl of 5 M aqueous NaOH solution, and 60 µl of 1-propanethiol (all from Merck, Damstadt, Germany). The samples were
heated under an inert gas atmosphere (Ar) at 50 °C for 1 h in a
heated block, diluted 1:1 in glacial acetic acid, and sequenced (as
described below) without further treatment.
Enzyme-mediated Digestion--
Peptides for digestion were
dissolved in 50 µl of a solution of 1% acetic acid adjusted to pH
8.5 with ammonia solution and 1 to 2 µl of enzyme (dissolved in
H2O) was added to give a final enzyme to peptide ratio of
1:25. Digestions were incubated for 16 to 18 h at 35 °C in a
heated block and the reaction was terminated by the addition of 2 µl
of trifluoroacetic acid. Reactions were controlled by simultaneously
digesting appropriate synthetic peptides possessing the required sites
for digestion (EMC, Tübingen, Germany). All enzymes were obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich and were of sequencing grade quality.
Mass Spectrometry
Electrospray ionization (ES)-mass spectra were accumulated and
analyzed on a VG Quattro II triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS)
outfitted with Mass-Lynx software (Micromass). Samples were introduced
in the liquid phase in a continuous stream of 50% aqueous acetonitrile
containing 0.05% formic acid at flow rates of 5-30 µl/min, either
from a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus) or a model 232XL autosampler
(Gilson-Abimed) connected to a HPLC pump. For HPLC-MS experiments,
samples were introduced into the mass spectrometer at a flow rate of 45 µl/min after separation through a HPLC column (100 × 1-mm
Nucleosil ODS II: Grom, Herrenberg, Germany) connected to an Integral
microanalytical workstation (PE-Biosystems, Germany); the HPLC
separation was achieved using appropriate binary gradients of water and
acetonitrile, each containing either 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid or
0.1% formic acid. All mass spectra were collected in the positive mode
using cone voltages between 25 and 65 V.
Amino Acid Sequencing
Automated Edman degradation-based amino acid sequence analysis
was performed using a model 477A pulsed liquid-gas phase protein sequencer coupled on-line to a model 120A
phenylthiohydantoin-derivative analyzer (both from PE-Biosystems).
Samples to be sequenced were applied to a trifluoroacetic acid
pretreated glass fiber filter coated with 15 µl of Biobrene Plus
(PE-Biosystems) and were both subjected to Edman degradation as well as
analyzed using the manufacturers chemicals, standard microcartridge
protocols and software. For the visualization of propanethiol-modified
residues (S-propyl-cysteine and
3-methyl-S-propyl-cysteine), the standard analyzer gradient was elongated for a further 8 min.
Amino Acid Analysis
Peptides for amino acid analysis were hydrolyzed in an inert gas
atmosphere (N2) in 6 M HCl at 110 °C for
16 h in sealed glass vials. Following subsequent removal of HCl
under vacuum, the amino acid composition of the samples was determined
after ortho-phthaldialdehyde derivatization by a previously
described method specifically optimized for the identification of Lan
and MeLan (23). In order to quantitate Pro (for which the above method
is unsuitable), hydrolysates prepared as above were analyzed on a model
420 derivatizer connected to an on-line narrow bore model 130A
phenythiocarbamoyl-derivative analyzer and model 920A data analysis
module (all from PE-Biosystems) using the manufacturers chemicals,
protocols, and software. The enantiomeric purity of amino acids was
determined by gas chromatography (GC)-MS by a previously described
method (24). The peptides were hydrolyzed in DCl/D2O at
110 °C for 24 h prior to derivatization and analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of Lacticin 3147--
We previously reported the
partial purification of lacticin 3147, a broad spectrum bacteriocin
produced by L. lactis DPC3147 (15). The final RP-FPLC step
of that procedure allowed the identification of two subunits, both of
which were required for full biological activity. In the present study,
we applied a modified purification protocol, which was successfully
used to separate and isolate the lacticin 3147 subunits. The peptides
obtained were subsequently subjected to detailed biochemical characterization.
A 30% saturation ammonium sulfate fractionation proved particularly
valuable to both concentrate and further purify the bacteriocin peptides. A further deviation from the previous purification procedure was the replacement of C18 RP-FPLC with C18 RP-HPLC which provided enhanced resolution of the peptides. LtnA2, the more hydrophobic of the
two bacteriocin components eluted at approximately 54% propan-2-ol,
whereas LtnA1 was comparatively more hydrophilic and eluted at
approximately 44% propan-2-ol (Fig. 1).
Concomitant with the separation of the two peptides, a significant loss
in activity was observed when each were assayed individually against the indicator strain, L. lactis HP. However, as observed
previously, complementation of fraction A1 with fraction A2 resulted in
recovery of full activity (Fig. 1).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Purification and comparison of relative and
complementary activities of LtnA1, LtnA1', and LtnA2. Upper
panel, RP-HPLC separation and fractionation of crude bacteriocin
preparation indicating regions where the respective LtnA1 and LtnA2
activities eluted. Lower left panel, RP-HPLC separation of
isolated LtnA1 and (inset) LtnA1'. Lower right
panel, RP-HPLC separation of isolated LtnA2. Central
panel, activity test of isolated fractions where zones of
inhibition of indicate bacteriocin activity. Zones between wells
indicate complementary activity, while a zone surrounding a well
indicates the individual activity of that peptide. For illustrative
purposes, the extent of diffusion of each peptide necessary for
activity is indicated by the dotted circles. Both A1 and A1'
can complement A2, and A1 has some residual activity when assayed alone
which can be significantly increased on complementation with
LtnA2.
|
|
Repeated chromatographic separation by HPLC revealed that LtnA1
activity correlated to two individual peaks as characterized by a
variation in their respective retention times. The individual peaks
were designated LtnA1 and LtnA1', respectively (Fig. 1). By contrast,
LtnA2 activity corresponded to an apparently single homogenous peak.
Interestingly, when each of these components were assayed against the
sensitive strain, L. lactis AM2, LtnA1 produced a
significant zone of inhibition, whereas either LtnA1' or LtnA2 alone
remained inactive. However, both LtnA1 and LtnA1' were capable of
complementing LtnA2 when 10 µl of each were placed in wells in close
proximity to 10 µl of LtnA2, as indicated by a zone of inhibition
between them. No complementary activity was observed between LtnA1 and
LtnA1'. All three active fractions were further characterized by a
number of biochemical techniques.
Analysis of Amino Acid Composition--
Both forms of LtnA1, as
well as LtnA2 were hydrolyzed under vacuum for 16 h in 6 M HCl and then derivatized with
ortho-phthaldialdehyde whereupon, they were subjected to
amino acid analysis by RP-HPLC (with the exception of the Pro values
which were determined by the alternative phenythiocarbamoyl-based
procedure). The resulting analyses for LtnA1 (similar results were
obtained for LtnA1') and LtnA2 are summarized in Table
I. In addition to representatives of the
usual amino acids, we detected the modified residues, Lan and MeLan in
both peptides. Interestingly, amino acid analyses suggested that both
peptides contained significantly more alanine than would be predicted
from the translated gene sequences (Fig. 2); LtnA1 contained at least one
additional residue while LtnA2 contained two additional residues of
alanine.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Predicted protein sequence of the two
precursor peptides, LtnA1 and LtnA2. Amino acids are indicated in
standard single letter code and the cleavage sites for the prepeptides
are indicated by the arrows.
|
|
The configurations of the amino acids detected in the hydrolysates of
LtnA1 and LtnA2 were also characterized by chiral-phase GC coupled to
MS. Surprisingly, while most of the amino acids were present as the
expected L-isomer, a considerable proportion (approximately
33%) of the Ala content of both LtnA1 and LtnA2 was found to be
present as the D-isomer (data not shown). From the results,
it could be determined that LtnA1 contains one residue of
D-alanine while LtnA2 contains two such residues. Control
hydrolysates of the lantibiotic gallidermin (25) provided standards for
the unusual amino acids Lan and MeLan and demonstrated that Ala was not
artifactually undergoing racemization during either hydrolysis or the analysis.
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis--
Edman degradation of LtnA1 and
LtnA1' revealed several interesting features. Initial attempts to
sequence the native peptides failed to yield interpretable results and
so purified peptides were subjected to 1-propanethiol derivatization
which enabled sequencing through to residues 16 and 18 for LtnA1 and
LtnA1' respectively. The results of this analysis yielded the following sequences: XXXNXFALXDYWGNNG and
XXXNXFALXDYWG-NNGAW (for LtnA1 and
LtnA1', respectively), where X represents an unidentified amino acid. From previous experience and utilizing an extended HPLC
gradient we were able to detect peaks with retention times corresponding to either S-propylcysteine or
3-methyl-S-propylcysteine for several of these unidentified
residues which are consistent with the presence of Lan, MeLan, Dha, or
Dhb residues in these positions. Furthermore, at position 7 where
either a Ser or Dha residue was expected from the gene sequence (Fig.
2), an Ala residue (Fig. 3) was
identified, consistent with the additional Ala residue indicated from
the amino acid analyses.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
ES-MS analysis of LtnA1 and LtnA2. The
purified peptides were introduced into the ion-spray source in a
continuous flow of 50% aqueous acetonitrile containing 5 µl/min.
Positive ion-mode spectra were accumulated using cone voltages ranging
from 30 to 55 V. From the recorded multiply charged ions, experimental
masses of 3,322.34 ± 0.80 Da and 2,847.47 ± 0.53 Da could
be calculated for LtnA1 and LtnA2, respectively.
|
|
By contrast, sequence analysis of both native and chemically modified
LtnA2 failed to yield sequence data, apparently due to the absence of a
free N terminus. The predicted LtnA2 prepeptide (Fig. 2) contains a
putative "double glycine" cleavage site (P1 = Gly,
P2 = Gly) followed by a Thr residue at position
P'1, which can be further dehydrated to give Dhb. Since
, -unsaturated amino acids are unstable when located at the N
terminus (1), the sequencing results are consistent with cleavage at
the predicted site (Fig. 2), the result of which would be the formation
of a LtnA2 peptide with a modified N terminus analogous to that found in other lantibiotics such as Pep5 (9).
In an attempt both to localize the predicted D-Ala residues
and to gather sequence data for LtnA2, the peptide was digested separately with either trypsin or -chymotrypsin, however, both enzymes failed to digest the peptide even at enzyme to peptide ratios
of 1:5. Since both sides of the trypsin cleavage site are surrounded by
potentially modified residues, it is possible the modified peptide is
no longer a suitable substrate for trypsin. Similarly, HPLC-purified,
fully reduced LtnA2 proved to be an unacceptable substrate for
-chymotrypsin.
Mass Spectrometry--
The mass spectra for the purified peptides
are shown in Fig. 4. From the multiply
charged ions detected, the masses estimated for LtnA1 was 3,322.34 ± 0.80 Da, while the mass of LtnA2 was estimated to be 2,847.47 ± 0.53 Da. As indicated above, two forms of LtnA1 exist which differ
slightly in their hydrophobicity. To further investigate this
phenomenon, each of the two species, LtnA1 and LtnA1' which differ
slightly in their hydrophobicity were studied using an alternative HPLC
buffer system (0.1% formic acid) which provided a considerably
improved separation as well as increased MS sensitivity. With this
system, it was observed that although both LtnA1 and LtnA1' have
identical masses, each form appears to vary in its susceptibility to
dehydration. From the respective mass chromatograms, we calculated that
more than 98% of LtnA1 is 6-fold dehydrated, while approximately 33%
of the LtnA1' sample contains an additional dehydration (Fig.
5).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Amino acid sequence analysis of LtnA1
indicating an Ala residue at position 7. Upper panel,
cycle 6; middle panel, cycle 7; lower panel,
cycle 8. The expected positions of Ser and Ala are shown in the
upper panel.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
HPLC-ES-MS analysis of: A,
LtnA1; B, LtnA1'; and C,
LtnA2. Peptides were separated by HPLC and eluted peaks were
detected and characterized by on-line ES-MS. The chromatograms shown
represent the raw total ion chromatogram and the inset at
the left of each spectrum shows the mass spectra for the
respective eluted peaks. The peak integration values shown as an
inset at right were calculated from integration
of the mass chromatograms, the specific masses used for the generation
of the mass chromatograms (not shown) are indicated in the left
column of each table. Values above peaks indicate
relative retention time. The boxed area in each case was
used to generate the mass spectra.
|
|
Following the observation that LtnA1 exists in various states of
dehydration, we also checked preparations of LtnA2 for this microheterogeneity. Although we could separate a small additional peak
with apparent increased hydrophilicity, analysis of the masses of the
two forms revealed a difference of 16 Da, both the mass and
characteristic earlier elution of this peak suggest oxidation of the
peptide. In the example given in Fig. 5, 14.74% of the total peptide
was in the oxidized form but unfortunately, it was not possible to
separate sufficiently the oxidized form for further biological characterization.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we reveal that the two-component antimicrobial
peptide lacticin 3147 undergoes a series of complex post-translational modifications including conversion of serine residues to
D-alanine and the formation of lanthionine bridges. This is
a very significant finding given that this is only the second instance
of D-alanine occurring in ribosomally synthesized peptide
and the first instance of it in a two-component biologically active
peptide. The bacteriocin acts by selectively dissipating the membrane
potential of target cells through the formation of pores allowing cell
leakage of potassium and inorganic phosphate (15). Based on the amino
acid sequence and compositional analysis, in addition to mass
spectrometry, the structural genes for lacticin 3147 can now be
positively assigned to ltnA1 and ltnA2, two small
open reading frames contained at the start of the larger of two
divergent gene clusters encoded on the conjugative plasmid pMRC01.
Interestingly, three larger open reading frames follow these structural
genes in the cluster, two of which, ltnM1 and
ltnM2, share homology to modification genes involved in
dehydration/lanthionine formation. These putative modification genes
are separated by the open reading frame, ltnT, which
probably encodes an ABC-transporter based on data base homologies. This
transporter contains a proteolytic domain which is probably involved in
the cleavage of the leader peptides during export. Indeed, the results
obtained allow us to assign the cleavage site of the leader peptide in
both structural components (Fig. 2).
One striking feature of the structural analyses of LtnA1 and LtnA1' is
the identification of an additional Ala, both in the amino acid
compositional analysis and during N-terminal sequencing of position 7 of the peptide; the genetic sequence clearly encodes a Ser residue at
this position (16). Indeed, this is only the second instance where such
a substitution has been reported in a ribosomally synthesized
prokaryotic peptide. Analysis of component amino acid chirality
demonstrates that one of the three Ala residues is present as the
D-isomer, while all other common amino acids are present as
the L-isomer. The lantibiotic lactocin S (12) has also been
reported to contain D-Ala which has been proposed to arise
from the stereospecific hydrogenation of Dha which is formed from the
dehydration of a gene-encoded Ser residue, although the mechanism and
enzyme(s) responsible are still unknown. Thus, we propose that by
analogy to lactocin S, position 7 of LtnA1 is occupied by
D-Ala, although the more complicated but unlikely possibility that this residue is in the L-configuration and
that one of the additional two gene-encoded L-Ala residues
has been converted to D-Ala by an unidentified
L-Ala isomerase cannot be excluded. While the X
residues corresponding to some of the serine and threonine residues
have yet to be positively identified, they most likely exist as
dehydrated derivatives, given that both lanthionine and
D-alanine which have been demonstrated to exist in both
peptides, probably require a dehydrated intermediate for their formation.
In addition, the calculated mass for the predicted LtnA1 peptide
(3,430.88 Da), assuming that it contains six dehydrations ( 108.06
Da), four of which are necessary precursors for the formation of
Lan/MeLan, and a single residue of alanine formed by the hydrogenation of a Dha (+2 Da) is 3,324.82 Da. This value is in reasonable agreement with the measured mass of 3,322.34 ± 0.80 Da, although not so close that we can rule out the possibility of further minor
modifications. A further interesting feature of LtnA1 production is the
identification of two species, LtnA1 and LtnA1', which differ slightly
in their relative hydrophobicity. In addition, these forms differ with respect to their biological activity, in that while both can be complemented by LtnA2, the LtnA1 form possesses an independent antimicrobial activity, while the purified LtnA1' form is inactive. As
observed in Fig. 1, a higher concentration of LtnA1 appears to be
required to give inhibition on its own, compared with that required to
give complementary activity with LtnA2, as implied by the smaller
circle encompassing the zone of inhibition formed by LtnA1 alone.
Further analysis of the LtnA1 and LtnA1' fractions also revealed
another significant difference in that the LtnA1' peptide is apparently
more susceptible to dehydration, with approximately 38% of LtnA1'
being 7-fold dehydrated. While, such distinguishing features point to
some structural difference between the two forms of LtnA1, it is also
important to highlight the similarities between LtnA1 and LtnA1'. Both
forms complement LtnA2, have identical masses and sequence (at least to
Gly16) as well as similar amino acid composition (data not
shown). One hypothesis which offers an explanation for these results is that a differing thioether bridging pattern exists in the two forms.
Such a feature would explain the similarities in mass and sequence
between the two peptides, yet could also allow for differences in
hydrophobicity between two forms with different tertiary structures. This could also account for their characteristic biological activities.
Analysis of LtnA2 demonstrates that, in addition to Lan/MeLan, it also
contains several noteworthy features. First, LtnA2 possesses a blocked
N terminus. Since the gene sequence for LtnA2 encodes a Thr residue in
the position just after the putative cleavage site, it would appear
that this hydroxy amino acid is dehydrated during post-translational
modification of LtnA2. After cleavage of the leader peptide, the
addition of water followed by deamination should take place, as has
been proposed for the N-terminal located , -unsaturated residues
resulting in formation of a 2-oxobutyryl group in analogy to that found
in lantibiotics such as Pep5 (9). Hence, the inability to generate
N-terminal sequence from LtnA2 may be explained by this reaction and
tends to confirm the previously postulated cleavage site for the leader peptide. Second, amino acid analysis demonstrated that LtnA2, like
LtnA1 contains an excess of Ala residues (Ala = 6) over that predicted from the gene sequence (Ala = 4) and chiral phase
analysis demonstrated that two of these additional Ala residues are
present as the non-natural D-isomers. Unfortunately, due to
the difficulties encountered in digesting the peptide, we were unable
to further localize the position of the residues.
Furthermore, from the mass determined for the peptide, additional
predictions can be made for the structure of LtnA2. The mass determined
(2,847.84 ± 0.33 Da) is in extremely close agreement to that of a
LtnA2 peptide (initial predicted mass 2,987.46 Da) which undergoes
7-fold dehydration ( 144.08 Da), contains three Lan/MeLan residues (no
mass change) and two additional residues of Ala replacing two Dha
residues (+4 Da), and possesses a 2-oxobutyryl group at the N terminus
(+1 Da) to give a peptide with a calculated mass of 2,848.45 Da. In
addition, because of this close agreement between calculated and
experimentally determined mass, other modifications are unlikely.
In contrast to LtnA1, careful examination of the peptide in
HPLC-ES-MS experiments suggested that LtnA2 is isolated in a single state of dehydration. We did observe a small amount of material (about
15%) which elutes in a manner suggesting that it is more hydrophilic
than the main peak. However, unlike LtnA1, this peak has a mass which
is 16 Da greater than the main peak, suggesting oxidation of the
molecule. Since LtnA2 does not contain Met, the next most likely
explanation for this observation would be that there is some limited
oxidation of one of the other thioether-containing residues
(i.e. Lan or MeLan); the lantibiotic, actagardine contains such a MeLanO residue, the origin of which remains obscure (26).
While lanthione groups have previously been demonstrated in cytolysin
(27) and staphylococcin C55 (28, 29), both of which are two-component
antimicrobial peptides, this is the first report of serine to
D-alanine conversion in such systems. Moreover, chiral
phase GC analysis has demonstrated that D-alanine is
present in both components of the bacteriocin. The presence of these
residues, in addition to the formation of dehydrated residues and
lanthionine rings, may account for the broad antimicrobial inhibitory
spectrum associated with lacticin 3147. Such modifications are
undoubtedly enzymatic and are forming a main focus of our future
research into this system. This may uncover unique activities which
could be harnessed as a tool(s) toward the development of novel
biologically active peptides in the future.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We express our gratitude to G. Nicholson for
expert chiral-phase gas chromatographic analysis of amino acid
enantiomers and F. Götz for kindly providing purified gallidermin
for control experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid under the
Food Sub-Program of the Operational Program for Industrial Development, which is administered by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and
Forestry, the National and European Union funds, the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 323).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported by the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Program.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dairy Products
Research Centre, Moorepark, Teagasc, Fermoy, Co. Cork. Tel.:
353-25-42229; Fax: 353-25-42340; E-mail:
pross@moorepark.teagasc.ie.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Dha, dehydroalanine;
Dhb, dehydrobutyrine;
Lan, lanthionine;
MeLan, -methyl-lanthionine;
RP, reverse phase;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography;
ES-MS, electrospray ionization-mass
spectra.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Jack, R. W., Bierbaum, G., and Sahl, H.-G.
(eds)
(1998)
Lantibiotics and Related Peptides
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
|
| 2.
|
Sahl H-G,
and Bierbaum, G.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
52,
41-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Gross, E.,
and Morrell, J. L.
(1971)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
93,
4634-4635[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hurst, A.
(1981)
in
Advances in Applied Microbiology
(Perlman, D.
, and Laskin, A. I., eds), Vol. 27
, pp. 85-123, Academic Press, New York
|
| 5.
|
Sahl, H.-G.,
Jack, R. W.,
and Bierbaum, G.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
230,
827-853[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
De Vuyst, L.,
and Vandamme, E. J.
(1994)
in
Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria
(De Vuyst, L.
, and Vandamme, E. J., eds)
, pp. 151-221, Blackie Academic and Professional
|
| 7.
|
Bierbaum, G.,
Szekat, C.,
Josten, M.,
Heidrich, C.,
Kempter, C.,
Jung, G.,
and Sahl, H.-G.
(1996)
Appl. Eviron. Microbiol.
62,
385-392[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Delves-Broughton, J.
(1990)
Food Tech.
44,
100-117
|
| 9.
|
Kellner, R.,
Jung, G.,
and Sahl, H.-G.
(1991)
in
Nisin and Novel Lantibiotics
(Sahl, H.-G.
, and Jung, J., eds)
, pp. 141-158, ESCOM Scientific Publishers BV, Leiden
|
| 10.
|
Fredenhagen, A.,
Märki, F.,
Fendrich, G.,
Märki, W.,
Gruner, J.,
van Oostrum, J.,
Raschdorf, F.,
and Peter, H. H.
(1991)
in
Nisin and Novel Lantibiotics
(Sahl, H.-G.
, and Jung, J., eds)
, pp. 131-140, ESCOM Scientific Publishers BV, Leiden
|
| 11.
|
Kessler, H.,
Steuernagel, S.,
Will, M.,
Jung, G.,
Kellner, R.,
Gillessen, D.,
and Kamiyama, T.
(1988)
Helv. Chim. Acta
71,
1924-1929[CrossRef]
|
| 12.
|
Skaugen, M.,
Nissen-Meyer, J.,
Jung, G.,
Stevanovic, S.,
Sletter, K.,
Inger, C.,
Mortvedt, A.,
and Nes, I. F.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27183-27185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Bycroft, B. W.
(1969)
Nature
224,
595-597[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Mor, A.,
Amiche, M.,
and Nicolas, P.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
481-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
McAuliffe, O.,
Ryan, M. P.,
Ross, R. P.,
Hill, C.,
Breeuwer, P.,
and Abee, T.
(1998)
Appl. Env. Microbiol.
64,
439-445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Dougherty, B. A.,
Hill, C.,
Weidman, J. F.,
Richardson, D. R.,
Venter, J. C.,
and Ross, R. P.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
29,
1029-1038[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ryan, M. P.,
Meaney, W. J.,
Ross, R. P.,
and Hill, C.
(1998)
Appl. Env. Microbiol.
64,
2287-2290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Ryan, M. P.,
Rea, M. C.,
Hill, C.,
and Ross, R. P.
(1996)
Appl. Env. Microbiol.
62,
612-619[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Ross, R. P.,
Galvin, M.,
McAuliffe, O.,
Morgan, S. M.,
Ryan, M. P.,
Twomey, D. P.,
Meaney, W. J.,
and Hill, C.
(1999)
FEMS Micro. Rev.
76,
337-346
|
| 20.
|
McAuliffe, O.,
Hill, C.,
and Ross, R. P.
(1999)
J. Appl. Microbiol.
86,
251-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Fenelon, M. A.,
Ryan, M. P.,
Rea, M. C.,
Guinee, T. P.,
Ross, R. P.,
Hill, C.,
and Harrington, D.
(1998)
J. Dairy Sci.
82,
10-22
|
| 22.
|
Meyer, H. E.,
Heber, M.,
Eisermann, B.,
Korte, H.,
Metzger, J. W.,
and Jung, G.
(1994)
Anal. Biochem.
223,
185-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Sahl, H.-G.,
Grossgarten, M.,
Widger, W. R.,
Cramer, W. A.,
and Brandis, H.
(1985)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
27,
836-840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Gerharolt, J.,
and Nicholson, G. J.
(1994)
in
Peptides: Chemistry, Structure, and Biology
(Hodges, R. S.
, and Smith, J. A., eds)
, pp. 241-243, Escom Scientific Publishers BV, Leiden
|
| 25.
|
Kellner, R.,
Jung, G.,
Horner, T.,
Zahner, H.,
Schenell, N.,
Entian, K.-D.,
and Götz, F.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
177,
53-59[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Zimmermann, N.,
Metzger, J. W.,
and Jung, G.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
228,
786-797[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Booth, M. C.,
Bogie, C. P.,
Sahl, H.-G.,
Siezen, R. J.,
Hatter, K. L.,
and Gilmore, M. S.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
269,
27183-27185
|
| 28.
|
Navaratna, M. A. D. B.,
Sahl, H.-G.,
and Tagg, J. R.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
4268-4271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Navaratna, M. A. D. B.,
Sahl, H.-G.,
and Tagg, J. R.
(1998)
Appl. Env. Microbiol.
64,
4803-4808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuipers, J. Meijer-Wierenga, R. Rink, L. D. Kluskens, and G. N. Moll
Mechanistic Dissection of the Enzyme Complexes Involved in Biosynthesis of Lacticin 3147 and Nisin
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
November 1, 2008;
74(21):
6591 - 6597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. F. Nes, D. B. Diep, and H. Holo
Bacteriocin Diversity in Streptococcus and Enterococcus
J. Bacteriol.,
February 15, 2007;
189(4):
1189 - 1198.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. McClerren, L. E. Cooper, C. Quan, P. M. Thomas, N. L. Kelleher, and W. A. van der Donk
Discovery and in vitro biosynthesis of haloduracin, a two-component lantibiotic
PNAS,
November 14, 2006;
103(46):
17243 - 17248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Cotter, L. A. Draper, E. M. Lawton, O. McAuliffe, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross
Overproduction of wild-type and bioengineered derivatives of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
June 1, 2006;
72(6):
4492 - 4496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Cotter, P. M. O'Connor, L. A. Draper, E. M. Lawton, L. H. Deegan, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross
Posttranslational conversion of L-serines to D-alanines is vital for optimal production and activity of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147
PNAS,
December 20, 2005;
102(51):
18584 - 18589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Morgan, P. M. O'Connor, P. D. Cotter, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill
Sequential Actions of the Two Component Peptides of the Lantibiotic Lacticin 3147 Explain Its Antimicrobial Activity at Nanomolar Concentrations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
July 1, 2005;
49(7):
2606 - 2611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yonezawa and H. K. Kuramitsu
Genetic Analysis of a Unique Bacteriocin, Smb, Produced by Streptococcus mutans GS5
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
February 1, 2005;
49(2):
541 - 548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. O'Sullivan, M. P. Ryan, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill
Generation of Food-Grade Lactococcal Starters Which Produce the Lantibiotics Lacticin 3147 and Lacticin 481
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
June 1, 2003;
69(6):
3681 - 3685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gomez, M. Ladire, F. Marcille, and M. Fons
Trypsin Mediates Growth Phase-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation of Genes Involved in Biosynthesis of Ruminococcin A, a Lantibiotic Produced by a Ruminococcus gnavus Strain from a Human Intestinal Microbiota
J. Bacteriol.,
January 1, 2002;
184(1):
18 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Cintas, M. P. Casaus, C. Herranz, I. F. Nes, and P. E. Hernandez
Review: Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria
Food Science and Technology International,
August 1, 2001;
7(4):
281 - 305.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Holo, Z. Jeknic, M. Daeschel, S. Stevanovic, and I. F. Nes
Plantaricin W from Lactobacillus plantarum belongs to a new family of two-peptide lantibiotics
Microbiology,
March 1, 2001;
147(3):
643 - 651.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Uguen, J.-P. Le Pennec, and A. Dufour
Lantibiotic Biosynthesis: Interactions between Prelacticin 481 and Its Putative Modification Enzyme, LctM
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 2000;
182(18):
5262 - 5266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. McAuliffe, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross
Each peptide of the two-component lantibiotic lacticin 3147 requires a separate modification enzyme for activity
Microbiology,
September 1, 2000;
146(9):
2147 - 2154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|