![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 37605-37610, December 31, 1999
Isolated from Drosophila Constitutes a
Visual G Protein
Subunit of the Fly Compound Eye*
,From the Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Visual transduction in the compound eye of flies
is a well established model system for the study of G protein-coupled
transduction pathways. To characterize key components of the
phototransduction cascade we performed substractive hybridization
screening. We cloned the cDNA coding for the visual G The visual cascade in the microvillar photoreceptors of the
Drosophila compound eye is activated by light absorption of
five rhodopsins which are differentially expressed in a distinct
pattern within an ordered array of eight photoreceptor cells (1). The G
protein couples light activation of rhodopsin to the activation of the
main target enzyme of the phototransduction cascade, the phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C A detailed understanding of the activation mechanism transmitting
rhodopsin activation to the INAD signaling complex is still missing.
Part of the deficit in this knowledge is due to a lack of information
on the structure of the visual G protein. Photoreceptor-specifically expressed genes encoding the G In the absence of any information on the existence of a distinct visual
G Fly Stocks--
Male Calliphora vicina Meig., chalky
mutant, were raised at 25 °C in a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle
and were used for the experiments at an age of 8-10 days after
eclosion. The Drosophila fly strains were raised on a
standard corn meal diet and were kept under a 12 h light/12 h dark
cycle. Drosophila inaAP226 mutants were provided
by W. L. Pak.
Differential Hybridization Screen--
An oligo(dT)-primed
cDNA library in vector Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction, cDNA
Sequencing, and Sequence Analysis--
Reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction reactions were carried out
using the TitanTM One Tube reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 1 µg of total
RNA isolated from heads of Drosophila inaA mutants was
reverse transcribed into cDNA and the coding region of
G Chromosomal Localization of the DmG
Northern blot analysis with digoxigenin-labeled antisense cRNA probes
transcribed from DmG Antibodies--
Polyclonal antibodies directed against
Calliphora G Immunohistochemistry--
For localization of G protein subunits
by confocal laser scanning microscopy Drosophila wild type
heads were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by
3 washes in 10% sucrose for 15 min. The heads were infiltrated with
25% sucrose overnight at 4 °C, embedded in boiled liver, covered
with Tissue Tek, and cryofixed in melting isopentane. They were
sectioned at 10-µm thickness in a cryostat at
Immunogold labeling of ultrathin sections for electron microscopy was
performed as described by Bentrop et al. (25). Working concentrations for the primary antibody were: anti-DmRh1 1:20, anti-CvG Immunoprecipitation--
For immunoprecipitating
G SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis--
For Western blot
analysis of the visual G protein subunits, compound eyes or heads of
Drosophila and retinas or rhabdomeral membranes of
Calliphora were collected in 1× SDS-PAGE buffer and homogenized with a plastic pestle. The proteins were extracted for 20 min at room temperature. Insoluble material was sedimented by
centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C.
Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid
procedure (29). Extracts of Calliphora tissues containing
either 5 µg of protein (equivalent of 0.13 retinas or rhabdomeral
proteins out of 5 retinas) for G Isolation and Sequencing of a Novel Drosophila G
The longest Drosophila G
To obtain comprehensive information on the conservation of the G
protein subunits expressed in the fly eye we also cloned G Genomic Structure of the Novel Drosophila G
Furthermore, we investigated whether there is evidence for a mutant in
the DmG DmG
For monitoring the expression pattern of the G protein subunits by
Western blot analysis we generated specific antisera against recombinantly expressed peptides corresponding to the coding region of
CvG
Immunolocalization studies were carried out to elucidate the spatial
distribution of visual G protein subunits. Laser scanning microscopy
reveals that G
It is possible that photoreceptor cells contain more than one G protein
and, accordingly, more than one G protein
Taken together, the eye-specific expression and the spatial
distribution of G Heterotrimeric G proteins are obligatory members of the
phototransduction pathways activated by rhodopsins. Apart from the squid eye (33) there has been no indication for a distinct visual G It has already been noticed that vertebrate G Considering that the G
(G
e) subunit from Drosophila which had
so far eluded identification at the molecular level. Northern blot
analysis revealed the presence of a major, 1.4-kilobase(kb) G
e transcript and two minor transcripts of 1.8 and 6 kb
in size. The major 1.4-kb mRNA is expressed preferentially in the
eye. The spatial expression pattern determined for G
e as
well as co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that
G
e dimerizes with G
e to form the heterodimeric G
subunit which functions in visual transduction in
the Drosophila compound eye. G
e shares
common characteristics with the visual G
subunits of human rod and
cone photoreceptors although different classes of G
subunits are
employed in vertebrate and invertebrate phototransduction. By the
molecular cloning and characterization of the visual
subunit of
Drosophila one of the few missing links in the well studied
Drosophila phototransduction cascade has been characterized
to complete our knowledge about the Drosophila visual
transduction pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(norpA)1 (2-5).
At this level the transduction pathways activated by either one of the
five distinct rhodopsins converge to a unitary cascade. As a result of
G protein activation phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C
hydrolyzes the membrane lipid phosphatidyl inositol bisphosphate to
form the second messengers diacylglycerol and 1,4,5-inositol
trisphosphate (6, 7). Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C
itself is assembled by the PDZ domain protein INAD into a signaling
complex together with the major light-activated Ca2+
channel transient receptor potential and the eye-specific protein kinase C (8-14).
(G
q) and G
(G
e) subunits of the visual G protein have been isolated
(15-17), whereas the visual G
(G
e) subunit had
eluded identification at the molecular level. The function of
G
q and G
e in phototransduction has been
studied to some extent by biochemical and genetic studies. Analysis of Drosophila mutants defective in G
q revealed a
requirement of this G
subunit in the activation of the
phototransduction cascade, demonstrating that G
q indeed
is the visual G
subunit (18). While G
q is believed to
activate phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C
, the main target
of the visual 
subunit has not been identified yet. As has been
shown by analyzing Drosophila G
e mutants,
G
e is essential for phototransduction, especially for
proper termination of the signaling cascade (19).
subunit, it has been suggested that Drosophila G
1, the only G
subunit cloned from
Drosophila so far, might associate with diverse G proteins,
including the visual G protein (20). G
1, however, is
preferentially expressed in the brain. Here we report the isolation of
a gene coding for a G
e subunit specifically expressed in
the Drosophila eye. By immunoprecipitation experiments we
show that G
e is associated with the visual G
subunit.
Furthermore, the G
e subunit shares common
characteristics with the vertebrate visual G
subunits of rod and
cone photoreceptors.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ZAP II (Stratagene) was produced from
poly(A+) RNA isolated from the compound eye of C. vicina. The differential hybridization screen of the library was
carried out using cDNA probes derived from mRNA of retinal
tissue, of muscle tissue, and with a mixture of cDNAs encoding
previously cloned retina-specific genes (Rh1,
Rh6, arr1, arr2, dgq,
inaD, inaC, trp, trpl, and
D19). The hybridizations were performed in 5 × SSC
(1 × SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium
citrate, pH 7.0), 0.1% laurylsarcosinate, 0.02% SDS, 1% blocking
reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 65 °C according to
standard protocols (21). For generating the retinal cDNA probe and
the muscle cDNA probe, total RNA was isolated from retinas or
flight muscles, respectively, using the TRIzolTM Reagent
(Life Technologies). mRNA was isolated with the PolyATtract mRNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions and 3 µg of mRNA were transcribed into cDNA
(Ready to Go Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The cDNA was labeled
with digoxigenin using the DIG DNA Labeling Mix (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
library was replica-plated on three filter lifts of each plate for
hybridization with each of the three probes.
e was amplified using sequence-specific primers
containing either an EcoRI or a XhoI
restriction-site (5'-GGCTGAATTCCTCTTGTGTCTGGGGTGGTAT-3',
5'-TCGGCTCGAGGGCGGTATTTCTGTGGTTTACG-3'). The amplified
product was cloned into the EcoRI/XhoI site of
the pBluescript II SK vector (Stratagene) and sequenced. DNA sequencing was performed with an automated sequencer (Alfexpress, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by the dideoxy chain termination method (22) using
either Cy5-labeled vector-primers (Thermosequenase Kit, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) or appropriate sequence-specific primers (Alfexpress
Autoread Sequencing Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Data base
searches for homologous proteins were performed using public internet
resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic tree
calculations were performed using Vector NTI software (Informax)
utilizing the ClustalW algorithm and the Neighbor Joining algorithm
(23), respectively. Amino acid sequence identities were calculated from
pairwise sequence alignments.
e Gene and
Northern Blot Analysis--
The chromosomal localization of
DmG
e was established by hybridization of squashed
polytene chromosomes with a biotinylated 0.9-kb BamHI
fragment of DmG
e cDNA according to Bloomquist
et al. (2). The biotinylated probe was detected using a
streptavidin-coupled peroxidase (Detek-Horseradish Peroxidase kit, Enzo Diagnostics).
e cDNA was performed as has been described previously (24). Immunological detection of the probe was
performed with the DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) using CDP-Star (Tropix, Bedford, MA) as luminescent dye.
e and G
e were
generated by immunizing rabbits with recombinantly expressed polypeptides as described previously (8, 9). The peptide used to
generate anti-G
e antibodies corresponded to the entire coding region of CvG
e, whereas the recombinantly expressed
CvG
e-peptide comprised amino acids 65-346. The
antibodies were affinity purified using the respective antigen. The
anti-DmG
q antibody was kindly provided by C. Zuker
(18).
25 °C and
transferred to coverslips precoated with 0.01% aqueous
poly-L-lysine. The cryosections were washed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, incubated in 0.01% Tween 20 for
20 min, followed by two washes in 0.1 M sodium phosphate
buffer. After blocking the sections in 0.1% ovalbumin, 0.5% cold
water fish gelatin in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer for 30 min at room temperature, the sections were incubated with the primary
antibodies diluted in blocking solution (anti-DmG
q 1:50,
anti-CvG
e 1:20, anti-CvG
e 1:25) overnight at 4 °C. The
sections were washed 3 times in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and then incubated with a rhodamine-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody for 3 h at room temperature. The sections were mounted in Mowiol 4.88 and examined with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-SP, Leica).
e 1:10, and anti-CvG
e 1:10.
Secondary goat anti-rabbit antibodies (10 nm gold, Nanoprobes) were
used at 1:100-1:150 dilution. Gold labeling was enhanced with silver
according to Danscher (26), and thereafter the sections were stained
with 2% uranylacetate and examined with a Leo EM 912 ohm electron microscope.
e and G
e, rhabdomeral photoreceptor
membranes of dark adapted Calliphora were isolated as
described (27, 28). Rhabdomeral membrane proteins were extracted for 20 min at 4 °C with Triton X-100 buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.42 µg/ml leupeptin,
0.83 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.83 µg/ml aprotinin) in the dark and
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Extracts obtained from rhabdomeral membranes of 50 retinas were added
to 20 µl of protein A-agarose beads (Bio-Rad) which had been
preincubated with anti-CvG
e antibodies for 1 h.
Immunoprecipitation was performed for 1 h at 4 °C and was
followed by 5 washes with 500 µl of Triton X-100 washing buffer
(0.1% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Precipitated proteins were eluted from protein
A-agarose beads with 10 µl of 1 × SDS-PAGE buffer (4% SDS, 1%
2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 15% glycerol in 65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) for 10 min at 80 °C and were
subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
q and G
e
or 10 µg of protein for G
e immunoblots and extracts of
Drosophila tissues containing 17 µg of protein (equivalent of 1.5 heads or 5 eye cups) were subjected to SDS-PAGE according to
Laemmli (30) on 8-20% gradient gels (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Midget System). For immunoblotting, proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) in a
transfer buffer containing 50 mM Tris base, 0.1% SDS, 20%
methanol for 1 h. The blot membranes were blocked in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 100 mM
NaCl, 2% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% gelatin, 0.1% NaN3
which greatly increased the sensitivity for detecting G
(31).
Probing the blots with primary antibodies was performed in TBS-Nonidet
P-40 (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl,
0.01% Nonidet P-40) overnight. Thereafter, the membranes were washed with TBS-Nonidet P-40 and incubated either with alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated protein A or with 125I-labeled
secondary antibodies in TBS-Nonidet P-40 for 1 h. The protein
bands were visualized through a chromogenic reaction with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/4-nitro-blue-tertazolium chloride
or by exposing the blots to an X-Omat AR Film (Kodak).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Subunit--
To isolate novel cDNA clones preferentially expressed
in the photoreceptor cells of flies, we performed a differential
hybridization screen. A high degree of specificity was obtained by
hybridizing a Calliphora retinal cDNA library with
probes derived from mRNA of retinal tissue, muscle tissue, and with
a mixture of cDNAs encoding previously cloned retina-specific
proteins such as Rh1 rhodopsin. The clones supposed to encode novel,
retina specifically expressed proteins were sequenced. One cDNA
clone of 1.5 kb in length contained a 216-base pair open reading frame
encoding a polypeptide with homology to
subunits of heterotrimeric
G proteins. The coding region of this clone was used to probe a
Drosophila head cDNA library. The Drosophila
G
clones isolated by this homology screen were distinct from a
previously reported Drosophila G
gene expressed in the
brain (20). The novel genes for Calliphora and
Drosophila G
subunits will hereafter be referred to as
CvG
e and DmG
e, respectively, in analogy
to the designation of G
e which encodes the
eye-specifically expressed
subunit of the Drosophila
visual G protein (17).
e clone contained 246 base pairs of the 5'-untranslated region with an in-frame stop codon 15 nucleotides before the first AUG start codon, an open reading frame
coding for 72 amino acids (Mr = 8398), and a
642-base pair 3'-untranslated region. For deducing the amino acid
sequence, the translation initiation site was assigned to the first AUG
codon (CCGCCAUGG) of the open reading frame which fits with
the consensus sequence for translation initiation sites, CC(A/G)CCAUGG
(32). The deduced amino acid sequences of Calliphora
G
e and Drosophila G
e are identical except for a Ser
Asp and an Ile
Val substitution at
positions 26 and 43, respectively (Fig.
1A). Both, CvG
e
and DmG
e, exhibit a CAAX motif, CVIM (C,
cysteine; A, aliphatic amino acid; X, any amino acid), at
their C termini (Fig. 1A) suggesting that G
e
may become post-translationally modified by isoprenylation. Comparison
of the amino acid sequences of DmG
e with other G
subunits revealed the highest homology to a G
subunit (gpc-2) of
Caenorhabditis elegans (41.9% amino acid identity) and an
amino acid identity of about 30% to the visual G
subunits of
vertebrate photoreceptors. The intra-specific homology of
DmG
e to DmG
1 (25.7% identity) is lower
than the inter-specific homology to vertebrate visual G
subunits
(Fig. 1B). An unusual stretch of highly charged amino acids
located near the N terminus of visual G
from squid (33) has no
parallel in DmG
e.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of the primary structure of
selected G
subunits. A, amino
acid alignment of selected G
subunits. The deduced amino acid
sequences are shown in single-letter code. Identical amino acids are
indicated by an asterisk. Amino acids which are identical in
four of the six sequences aligned are marked with dots. The
CAAX motif at the COOH terminus of the G
subunits is
underlined. Black boxes depict amino acids which
are characteristic for visual G
subunits. B, phylogenetic
relationships between selected G
subunits. Visual
subunits are
marked with an asterisk. Accession numbers for sequences
used: bovine G
2, P16874; bovine G
3,
P29798; bovine G
7, P30671; bovine G
12,
Q28024; bovine G
cone, P50154; bovine G
rod, P02698; C. elegans G
1 (gpc-1), CAA91806; C. elegans
G
2 (gpc-2), AAC78236; calliphora
G
e, AJ 250441, dog G
cone, AAC98924; Drosophila
G
1, P38040; Drosphila G
e, AJ
250440, human G
4, P50150; human G
5,
P30670; human G
7, AAC32595; human G
10,
P50151; human G
11, P50152; human G
cone, O14610;
human G
rod, Q08447; mouse G
4, P50153; rat G
9,
P43426; squid G
, Q01821.
q of Calliphora by a homology screen with
DmG
q (15) and G
e of Calliphora
by differential hybridization as described for isolating CvG
e. Both subunits proved to be highly homologous to
the corresponding genes of Drosophila showing 95.5 and
89.3% amino acid identity for G
q and G
e,
respectively. The extremely high homology of the Calliphora
and Drosophila G protein subunits indicates the conservation
between the phototransduction cascades of these flies which is also
evident when the homology of other phototransduction proteins of
Drosophila and Calliphora is compared, for
example, rhodopsin (86%; 34), arrestin 2 (91%; 35), or transient
receptor potential protein (77%; 9). It is therefore possible to
combine results obtained with either of these visual systems into a
common model for fly phototransduction.
Subunit--
In situ hybridization of a 0.9-kb
BamHI fragment of the DmG
e cDNA clone to
salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila indicated a single
locus for G
e at position 30A on chromosome 2L (Fig. 2A). Since this part of the
Drosophila genome is already sequenced, we screened the data
base of the Drosophila genome project with the
DmG
e cDNA sequence for matching sequences. This
search revealed that the cDNA sequence of DmG
e is
distributed on the contigs AC005889 and AC005125, the latter of which
had to be inverted in order to correspond to DmG
e (Fig.
2B). The cytogenetical map position of both contigs is in
agreement with the cytogenetical localization of DmG
e to
position 30A. AC005889 maps to the chromosomal region 30A3-30A6 and
AC005125 maps to 30A7-30A8. The genomic sequence of 34,810 kb allowed
us to analyze the exon-intron structure of DmG
e. The
genomic organization of DmG
e reveals three exons which are separated by a 15,259-kb intron located in the 5'-untranslated region and a 18,447-kb intron that disrupts the coding region (Fig.
2C). Both introns are flanked by consensus GT/AT splicing sites.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The DmG
e
gene is localized on chromosome 2L at 30A and has two large
introns. A, chromosomal localization of
DmG
e. A 0.9-kb BamHI fragment of the
DmG
e cDNA clone was used as a probe to determine the
chromosomal localization of DmG
e. A single hybridization
signal was detected (arrow) at position 30A on the left arm
of the second chromosome. GN, goose neck. Scale
bar, 50 µm. B, schematic representation of contigs
AC005889 and AC005125 which contain the cDNA sequence of
DmG
e. The exons E1-E3 (gray boxes) and the
introns I1 and I2 (lines) are shown. The numbers
indicate the base pairs of the corresponding contig. C,
genomic organization of DmG
e. The three exons (E1-E3)
and the two introns (I1 and I2) are shown. The numbers above
the introns indicate the intron size, the other numbers indicate the
beginning and the end of the exons and the position of the open reading
frame (black box) in the corresponding cDNA.
e gene with defects in the phototransduction cascade. The only identified gene locus for a gene showing misfunctions in visual behavior at the cytogenetical map position of
G
e is the inactivation no afterpotential A
(inaA) mutant which is localized in the chromosomal interval
27F1-38E9 (36). However, Northern blot analysis of the
DmG
e gene product of inaA flies revealed that
G
e is normally expressed with no obvious difference in
transcript size or transcript level as compared with the
G
e mRNA isolated from wild type flies (Fig.
3A), indicating that
inaA mutants are not null mutants or deletion mutants of
G
e. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of
the coding region of the G
e gene of inaA
mutants and sequencing of the amplified product revealed that the
G
e gene of the inaA mutant exhibits the same
nucleotide sequence as the G
e gene of wild type flies.
Consequently, inaA mutants contain a stable and fully
functional G
subunit.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
G
e is
preferentially expressed in the compound eye. A,
Northern blot hybridization of Drosophila G
e
mRNA. RNA was isolated from heads of wild type (wt) flies
(lane 1), eyes absent (eya) mutants
(lane 2), Drosophila bodies (lane 3),
and heads of inaA mutants (lane 4). 3 µg of
total RNA were probed with DmG
e antisense cRNA. The
arrow indicates the major 1.4-kb transcript which is
expressed preferentially in the eyes. B, Western blot
analysis of protein extracts separated by SDS-PAGE: 5 µg of protein
extracts of Calliphora total retinas (lane 1),
rhabdomeral photoreceptor membranes of Calliphora
(lane 2), and 17 µg of protein-extracts of heads and eye
cups of Drosophila wt flies (lanes 3 and
4), and of heads of Drosophila eya mutants
(lane 5) were probed with anti-G
q,
anti-G
e, and anti-G
e antibodies as
indicated. The numbers on the left side of the
blots denote the migration of molecular weight markers in
kilodalton.
e Is Predominantly Expressed in Photoreceptor
Cells and Forms the Visual G
Complex with
G
e--
Although the novel G
e subunit
was isolated by a differential hybridization screen designed to isolate
clones which are preferentially expressed in the eye, it is not certain
that G
e codes for the
subunit of the visual G
protein. Therefore, we studied the cellular and subcellular
localization of the G
e mRNA and the
G
e protein and compared it with the spatial distribution
of the visual G
q and G
e subunits. To
determine the tissue distribution of the DmG
e
transcripts, we performed Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3A). Hybridization with an antisense cRNA transcribed from the full-length DmG
e cDNA revealed three transcripts of
approximately 1.4, 1.8, and 6 kb (Fig. 3A). The major 1.4-kb
transcript was detected only in RNA isolated from heads of wild type
flies (Fig. 3A, lane 1) but not in RNA obtained
from eyes absent (eya) mutants, indicating that this
transcript is predominantly expressed in the eye. The 1.8- and 6-kb RNA
are present in wild type and eya heads, showing that the
expression of these minor transcripts is not restricted to the eye.
e and amino acids 65-346 of CvG
e. The
anti-DmG
q antibody has been described previously (18).
The anti-CvG
e antibody recognizes a 8-kDa protein
extracted from retina and purified photoreceptor membranes of
Calliphora, and from heads and eye cups of
Drosophila wild type flies (Fig. 3B). The
apparent molecular mass of 8 kDa deduced from the electrophoretic
mobility after SDS-PAGE of DmG
e corresponds to the
molecular mass of 8.398 kDa calculated from the amino acid sequence.
When triplicate Western blots were probed with antibodies directed
against G
q, G
e, and G
e a
similar distribution of these G protein subunits was observed (Fig.
3B). A strong signal was obtained in lanes loaded with
proteins of purified photoreceptor membranes with each of the three
antibodies. This indicates that all three G protein subunits are
associated with the light-absorbing photoreceptor membrane which
harbors rhodopsin and the INAD signaling complex. G
q and
G
e were not detected in protein extracts of
Drosophila eya mutants lacking the compound eyes (Fig.
3B, lane 5), whereas a weak signal was observed
when Western blots of eyes absent extracts probed with anti-G
e antibodies were developed for a prolonged time.
The presence of minor amounts of G
e in heads lacking
compound eyes may result from the translation of the 1.8- and 6-kb
G
e transcripts which are not restricted to the eye.
e is localized in the photoreceptor cells
of the retina. Antibody reactivity was also detected in the lamina and
the medulla presumably in the axons of the photoreceptor cells which
project to these optic ganglia (Fig.
4C). Exactly the same labeling
pattern is observed for G
q and G
e
subunits (Fig. 4, A and B). This finding supports
the hypothesis that G
e is part of an eye-specific
heterotrimeric G protein. As labeling was not restricted to the
rhabdomeres of the photoreceptor cell, we investigated the subcellular
localization of G
e and G
e by electron
microscopy. The labeling pattern shown in Fig.
5 reveals that both G
e and
G
e signals are mainly associated with the rhabdomeres, but labeling is also found in the cytoplasm of the photoreceptor cell.
The labeling density of G
e is higher than the labeling density of G
e, which may result from differences in the
affinities of the anti-G
e and anti-G
e
antibodies for their antigens or from a lower accessibility of the
antigenic epitopes on G
e which is embedded in the 5-fold
larger G
e protein.

View larger version (182K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunohistochemical localization of the
Drosophila visual G protein subunits demonstrates the
co-localization of G
e with
G
q and
G
e. Immunofluorescence images
of longitudinal cryo-sections of the Drosophila compound eye
after incubation with anti-G
q (A),
anti-G
e (B), and anti-G
e
(C). Bound antibody was detected by using a
rhodamine-coupled anti-rabbit IgG as secondary antibody.
D, differential interference contrast image
corresponding to the fluorescence image in C. R, retina; L, lamina; M, medulla.
Scale bar, 50 µm.

View larger version (159K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Subcellular localization of
DmG
e and
DmG
e indicates that
G
is associated with rhabdomeral
membranes. Cross-sections through a Drosophila compound
eye at the level of the photoreceptor cell R7. Binding of antibodies
directed against (A) DmG
e, (B)
DmG
e, and (C) DmRh1 (positive control), was
visualized by silver enhanced immunogold staining. D,
negative control without primary antibody. Scale bar in
D, 2 µm.
subunit. Therefore, it is
of crucial importance to identify the
subunit to which
G
e is attached. We immunoprecipitated proteins of
rhabdomeral photoreceptor membranes of Calliphora with
anti-CvG
e antibodies in order to concentrate our study
on proteins of the photoreceptive membrane. G
e and
G
e were detected by Western blot analysis in the
immunoprecipitates obtained with anti-G
e antibodies, but not in control precipitations without antibody (Fig.
6). This indicates that G
e
specifically co-precipitates with G
e and confirms that
the newly isolated G
subunit is interacting with G
e
to constitute a 
complex in the photoreceptive membrane.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Co-immunoprecipitation shows that
G
e and
G
e form a

complex of the photoreceptive
membrane. Proteins from Calliphora rhabdomeral
membranes were immunoprecipitated with anti-G
e.
Extracted proteins (lane 1) and the immunoprecipitates
(lane 2) were subjected to Western blot analysis. The blot
was cut in half. The upper part was incubated with
anti-G
e, the lower part of the blot was
incubated with anti-G
e, as indicated. Lanes 3 and 4 show control experiments: protein A beads without
antibody were used in order to rule out nonspecific binding of proteins
to the beads (lane 3). No probe was added to the
antibody-conjugated protein A beads in order to determine which of the
protein bands resulted from the presence of antibodies (lane
4).
e which coincides with the distribution
of G
q and G
e, and the
co-immunoprecipitation with G
e strongly suggest that
this newly isolated G
subunit associates with G
e of
the visual G protein of Drosophila photoreceptors.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunit in the majority of invertebrate eyes. Here we report the
cloning and characterization of a novel G protein
subunit (DmG
e) expressed in the Drosophila eye.
Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical localization of
DmG
e at the cellular as well as subcellular level
revealed that G
e is co-localized with the visual
G
q and G
e subunits of
Drosophila. Co-immunoprecipitation of G
e with
G
e demonstrated a direct association of
G
e and G
e into a functional heterodimeric
G
subunit. Since G
e has been shown to function as
a subunit of the visual G protein with an essential role in terminating
the active state of the phototransduction pathway (19), the
G
e cloned in the present study most likely represents
the visual G
subunit.
subunits can be
classified on the basis of sequence information into subgroups that
reflect functional similarities, for example, with respect to
post-translational modifications and interaction with similar
and
subunits (37). Comparison of the amino acid sequences of the newly
isolated G
e subunits from Drosophila and
Calliphora with other G
subunits provides evidence that
G
e is more closely related to visual G
homologs of
vertebrates than to most non-visual G
subunits (Fig. 1B).
Thus, rhodopsins and G
subunits are members of phototransduction
pathways that are conserved, irrespective of the photoreceptor cell
type, rhabdomeric or ciliar, and the reaction sequence downstream of
the relevant G protein. Common characteristics which distinguish the
group of visual G
subunits from non-visual G
subunits include a
(Asp/Glu)-(Arg/Lys)-Asp motif near the amino terminus (position 10-12
of DmG
e), followed by Leu-Lys (position 14-15), a basic
amino acid (Asn, Lys) at position 54, a Asp-Lys sequence (position
57-58), and a glycine at position 67. These sites appear to allow the
grouping into visual and non-visual G
subunits, despite a relatively
low amino acid identity of about 30% between the most divergent
members within the group of visual G
subunits. An exception exists
with respect to G
11 (30, 5% identity with
DmG
e), which shows distinct features of a visual G
subunit, but is expressed in non-retinal tissues (37). A high homology
of G
e exists also to a G
subunit from C. elegans (gpc-2, 41.9% identity) which has been deduced from a
cosmid sequence (F08B6) (38) but has not yet been functionally characterized. Drosophila G
1, the first G
subunit isolated from Drosophila, is more closely related to
non-visual G
subunits which are expressed in a variety of tissues
and may therefore form G
subunits capable of interacting with
different types of G
subunits. Both, the phylogenetic relationship
and demonstration of the existence of a novel, photoreceptor specific
G
subunit indicate that G
1 is not a visual G
as
discussed previously (20). The conservation of the visual G
subunits
is also reflected by the exon-intron structure of G
genes. In
DmG
e and in the visual G
genes of vertebrates, the
number and the location of the introns is conserved, with a first
intron located in the 5'-untranslated region near to the coding region
and a second intron splitting the coding region. Some non-visual G
subunits, notably Drosophila G
1, show a
different gene structure in which the second intron is missing.
subunits of transducins and of the fly visual
G proteins belong to different G
classes which either activate a
cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase or a phospholipase C, respectively,
the homology of the corresponding G
subunits is striking. The
question arises why G
subunits of G proteins which couple to
rhodopsins are conserved, particularly as the associated G
subunits
do not mirror this phylogenetic relationship. One reason might be that
conserved interactions of visual G
subunits with rhodopsin exist at
some stage of G protein activation. It has already been shown that the
visual G
subunit from bovine photoreceptors is required for the
interaction of rhodopsin with transducin as well as for transducin
activation (39-43). In this interaction the farnesylation of the COOH
terminus of G
appears to be a crucial requirement. A COOH-terminal
CAAX motif commonly found in other G
subunits modified by
isoprenylation is also present in DmG
e (CVIM). Since
G
subunits which exhibit a consensus sequence with a serine or
methionine at the carboxyl-terminal position usually carry a farnesyl
group (44-46), DmG
e subunits are likely to become
farnesylated rather than geranylgeranylated. Indeed, apart from the
visual G
subunit of squid, all visual G
s share a CAAX
motif with a consensus sequence for farnesylation. Non-visual G
subunits, except for G
11 (37), have a leucine or valine
at the carboxyl-terminal position and are therefore expected to become
geranylgeranylated. Thus, fly G
e subunits and G
subunits of vertebrate transducins are likely to share functions
depending on post-translational fatty acid modification, for example,
binding to the membrane and interaction of the G protein with rhodopsin.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank C. Zuker (University of California,
La Jolla) and W. L. Pak (Purdue University, W. Lafayette) for
providing the anti-Drosophila G
q antibody and
Drosophila inaA mutants, respectively. We are grateful to N. Da Silva for preparing cryosections of Drosophila heads and
J. Bentrop for helpful comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by European Union Grant BMH4-CT97-2341.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ 250440 (DmG
e) and AJ 250441 (CvG
e).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of
Karlsruhe, Institute of Zoology, Dept. of Cell and Neurobiology, Kornblumenstr. 13, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany. Tel.: 49-721/608-4849 or
-2218; Fax: 49-721/608-4848; E-mail: DC05@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: norpA, no receptor potential A; INAD, inactivation-no afterpotentical D; inaA, inactivation-no afterpotential A; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; eya, eyes absent; kb, kilobase(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Chou, W. H., Huber, A., Bentrop, J., Schulz, S., Schwab, K., Chadwell, L. V., Paulsen, R., and Britt, S. G. (1999) Development 126, 607-616[Abstract] |
| 2. | Bloomquist, B. T., Shortridge, R. D., Schneuwly, S., Perdew, M., Montell, C., Steller, H., Rubin, G., and Pak, W. L. (1988) Cell 54, 723-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Schneuwly, S.,
Burg, M. G.,
Lending, C.,
Perdew, M. H.,
and Pak, W. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24314-24319 |
| 4. |
McKay, R. R.,
Chen, D. M.,
Miller, K.,
Kim, S.,
Stark, W. S.,
and Shortridge, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13271-13276 |
| 5. |
Pearn, M. T.,
Randall, L. L.,
Shortridge, R. D.,
Burg, M. G.,
and Pak, W. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4937-4945 |
| 6. |
Devary, O.,
Heichal, O.,
Blumenfeld, A.,
Cassel, D.,
Suss, E.,
Barash, S.,
Rubinstein, C. T.,
Minke, B.,
and Selinger, Z.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6939-6943 |
| 7. | Selinger, Z., Devary, O., Blumenfeld, A., Heichal, O., Barash, S., and Minke, B. (1987) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 249, 169-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Huber, A.,
Sander, P.,
and Paulsen, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11710-11717 |
| 9. | Huber, A., Sander, P., Gobert, A., Baehner, M., Hermann, R., and Paulsen, R. (1996b) EMBO J. 15, 7036-7045[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Shieh, B. H., and Zhu, M. Y. (1996) Neuron 16, 991-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Tsunoda, S., Sierralta, J., Sun, Y., Bodner, R., Suzuki, E., Becker, A., Socolich, M., and Zuker, C. S. (1997) Nature 388, 243-249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Chevesich, J., Kreuz, A. J., and Montell, C. (1997) Neuron 18, 95-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Xu, X. Z.,
Choudhury, A.,
Li, X.,
and Montell, C.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
545-555 |
| 14. | van Huizen, R., Miller, K., Chen, D. M., Li, Y., Lai, Z. C., Raab, R. W., Stark, W. S., Shortridge, R. D., and Li, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2285-2297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Lee, Y. J., Dobbs, M. B., Verardi, M. L., and Hyde, D. R. (1990) Neuron 5, 889-898[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Lee, Y. J., Shah, S., Suzuki, E., Zars, T., O'Day, P. M., and Hyde, D. R. (1994) Neuron 13, 1143-1157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Yarfitz, S., Niemi, G. A., McConnell, J. L., Fitch, C. L., and Hurley, J. B. (1991) Neuron 7, 429-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Scott, K., Becker, A., Sun, Y., Hardy, R., and Zuker, C. (1995) Neuron 15, 919-927[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Dolph, P. J., Man, S. H., Yarfitz, S., Colley, N. J., Deer, J. R., Spencer, M., Hurley, J. B., and Zuker, C. S. (1994) Nature 370, 59-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Ray, K.,
and Ganguly, R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6086-6092 |
| 21. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 22. |
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulsen, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467 |
| 23. | Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425[Abstract] |
| 24. | Huber, A., Wolfrum, U., and Paulsen, R. (1994) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 63, 219-229[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Bentrop, J., Schwab, K., Pak, W. L., and Paulsen, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1600-1609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Danscher, G. (1981) Histochemistry 71, 81-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Paulsen, R. (1984) J. Comp. Physiol. A 155, 47-55[CrossRef] |
| 28. | Bentrop, J., and Paulsen, R. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 161, 61-67[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 682-685 |
| 31. |
Ueda, H.,
Morishita, R.,
Katoh-Semba, R.,
Kato, K.,
and Asano, T.
(1998)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
124,
1033-1037 |
| 32. |
Kozak, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19867-19870 |
| 33. | Lott, J. S., Ryba, N. J., Pottinger, J. D., Keen, J. N., Carne, A., and Findlay, J. B. (1992) FEBS Lett. 312, 241-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Huber, A.,
Smith, D. P.,
Zuker, C. S.,
and Paulsen, R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17906-17910 |
| 35. |
Plangger, A.,
Malicki, D.,
Whitney, M.,
and Paulsen, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26969-26975 |
| 36. | Pak, W. L., Grossfield, J., and Arnold, K. S. (1970) Nature 227, 518-520[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Ray, K.,
Kunsch, C.,
Bonner, L. M.,
and Robishaw, J. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21765-21771 |
| 38. | Jansen, G., Thijssen, K. L., Werner, P., van der Horst, M., Hazendonk, E., and Plasterk, R. H. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 414-419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., and McCormick, F. (1991) Nature 349, 117-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Kisselev, O.,
and Gautam, N.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
24519-24522 |
| 41. |
Kisselev, O.,
Ermolaeva, M. V.,
and Gautam, N.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21399-21402 |
| 42. |
Kisselev, O.,
Ermolaeva, M.,
and Gautam, N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25356-25358 |
| 43. |
Kisselev, O. G.,
Meyer, C. K.,
Heck, M.,
Ernst, O. P.,
and Hofmann, K. P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4898-4903 |
| 44. |
Kinsella, B. T.,
Erdman, R. A.,
and Maltese, W. A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8934-8938 |
| 45. |
Reiss, Y.,
Stradley, S. J.,
Gierasch, L. M.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
732-736 |
| 46. |
Ong, O. C.,
Yamane, H. K.,
Phan, K. B.,
Fong, H. K.,
Bok, D.,
Lee, R. H.,
and Fung, B. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8495-8500 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Elia, S. Frechter, Y. Gedi, B. Minke, and Z. Selinger Excess of G{beta}e over Gq{alpha}e in vivo prevents dark, spontaneous activity of Drosophila photoreceptors J. Cell Biol., November 7, 2005; 171(3): 517 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schillo, G. Belusic, K. Hartmann, C. Franz, B. Kuhl, G. Brenner-Weiss, R. Paulsen, and A. Huber Targeted Mutagenesis of the Farnesylation Site of Drosophila G{gamma}e Disrupts Membrane Association of the G Protein {beta}{gamma} Complex and Affects the Light Sensitivity of the Visual System J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36309 - 36316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|