JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, R.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 37605-37610, December 31, 1999


A Novel Ggamma Isolated from Drosophila Constitutes a Visual G Protein gamma  Subunit of the Fly Compound Eye*

Simone Schulz, Armin HuberDagger , Karin Schwab, and Reinhard Paulsen

From the Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Visual transduction in the compound eye of flies is a well established model system for the study of G protein-coupled transduction pathways. To characterize key components of the phototransduction cascade we performed substractive hybridization screening. We cloned the cDNA coding for the visual Ggamma (Ggamma e) subunit from Drosophila which had so far eluded identification at the molecular level. Northern blot analysis revealed the presence of a major, 1.4-kilobase(kb) Ggamma e transcript and two minor transcripts of 1.8 and 6 kb in size. The major 1.4-kb mRNA is expressed preferentially in the eye. The spatial expression pattern determined for Ggamma e as well as co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that Ggamma e dimerizes with Gbeta e to form the heterodimeric Gbeta gamma subunit which functions in visual transduction in the Drosophila compound eye. Ggamma e shares common characteristics with the visual Ggamma subunits of human rod and cone photoreceptors although different classes of Galpha subunits are employed in vertebrate and invertebrate phototransduction. By the molecular cloning and characterization of the visual gamma  subunit of Drosophila one of the few missing links in the well studied Drosophila phototransduction cascade has been characterized to complete our knowledge about the Drosophila visual transduction pathway.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The visual cascade in the microvillar photoreceptors of the Drosophila compound eye is activated by light absorption of five rhodopsins which are differentially expressed in a distinct pattern within an ordered array of eight photoreceptor cells (1). The G protein couples light activation of rhodopsin to the activation of the main target enzyme of the phototransduction cascade, the phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase Cbeta (norpA)1 (2-5). At this level the transduction pathways activated by either one of the five distinct rhodopsins converge to a unitary cascade. As a result of G protein activation phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase Cbeta hydrolyzes the membrane lipid phosphatidyl inositol bisphosphate to form the second messengers diacylglycerol and 1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate (6, 7). Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase Cbeta itself is assembled by the PDZ domain protein INAD into a signaling complex together with the major light-activated Ca2+ channel transient receptor potential and the eye-specific protein kinase C (8-14).

A detailed understanding of the activation mechanism transmitting rhodopsin activation to the INAD signaling complex is still missing. Part of the deficit in this knowledge is due to a lack of information on the structure of the visual G protein. Photoreceptor-specifically expressed genes encoding the Galpha (Galpha q) and Gbeta (Gbeta e) subunits of the visual G protein have been isolated (15-17), whereas the visual Ggamma (Ggamma e) subunit had eluded identification at the molecular level. The function of Galpha q and Gbeta e in phototransduction has been studied to some extent by biochemical and genetic studies. Analysis of Drosophila mutants defective in Galpha q revealed a requirement of this Galpha subunit in the activation of the phototransduction cascade, demonstrating that Galpha q indeed is the visual Galpha subunit (18). While Galpha q is believed to activate phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase Cbeta , the main target of the visual beta gamma subunit has not been identified yet. As has been shown by analyzing Drosophila Gbeta e mutants, Gbeta e is essential for phototransduction, especially for proper termination of the signaling cascade (19).

In the absence of any information on the existence of a distinct visual Ggamma subunit, it has been suggested that Drosophila Ggamma 1, the only Ggamma subunit cloned from Drosophila so far, might associate with diverse G proteins, including the visual G protein (20). Ggamma 1, however, is preferentially expressed in the brain. Here we report the isolation of a gene coding for a Ggamma e subunit specifically expressed in the Drosophila eye. By immunoprecipitation experiments we show that Ggamma e is associated with the visual Gbeta subunit. Furthermore, the Ggamma e subunit shares common characteristics with the vertebrate visual Ggamma subunits of rod and cone photoreceptors.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fly Stocks-- Male Calliphora vicina Meig., chalky mutant, were raised at 25 °C in a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and were used for the experiments at an age of 8-10 days after eclosion. The Drosophila fly strains were raised on a standard corn meal diet and were kept under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. Drosophila inaAP226 mutants were provided by W. L. Pak.

Differential Hybridization Screen-- An oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library in vector lambda ZAP II (Stratagene) was produced from poly(A+) RNA isolated from the compound eye of C. vicina. The differential hybridization screen of the library was carried out using cDNA probes derived from mRNA of retinal tissue, of muscle tissue, and with a mixture of cDNAs encoding previously cloned retina-specific genes (Rh1, Rh6, arr1, arr2, dgq, inaD, inaC, trp, trpl, and D19). The hybridizations were performed in 5 × SSC (1 × SSC is 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 0.1% laurylsarcosinate, 0.02% SDS, 1% blocking reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 65 °C according to standard protocols (21). For generating the retinal cDNA probe and the muscle cDNA probe, total RNA was isolated from retinas or flight muscles, respectively, using the TRIzolTM Reagent (Life Technologies). mRNA was isolated with the PolyATtract mRNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions and 3 µg of mRNA were transcribed into cDNA (Ready to Go Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The cDNA was labeled with digoxigenin using the DIG DNA Labeling Mix (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The library was replica-plated on three filter lifts of each plate for hybridization with each of the three probes.

Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction, cDNA Sequencing, and Sequence Analysis-- Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction reactions were carried out using the TitanTM One Tube reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 1 µg of total RNA isolated from heads of Drosophila inaA mutants was reverse transcribed into cDNA and the coding region of Ggamma e was amplified using sequence-specific primers containing either an EcoRI or a XhoI restriction-site (5'-GGCTGAATTCCTCTTGTGTCTGGGGTGGTAT-3', 5'-TCGGCTCGAGGGCGGTATTTCTGTGGTTTACG-3'). The amplified product was cloned into the EcoRI/XhoI site of the pBluescript II SK vector (Stratagene) and sequenced. DNA sequencing was performed with an automated sequencer (Alfexpress, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by the dideoxy chain termination method (22) using either Cy5-labeled vector-primers (Thermosequenase Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or appropriate sequence-specific primers (Alfexpress Autoread Sequencing Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Data base searches for homologous proteins were performed using public internet resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic tree calculations were performed using Vector NTI software (Informax) utilizing the ClustalW algorithm and the Neighbor Joining algorithm (23), respectively. Amino acid sequence identities were calculated from pairwise sequence alignments.

Chromosomal Localization of the DmGgamma e Gene and Northern Blot Analysis-- The chromosomal localization of DmGgamma e was established by hybridization of squashed polytene chromosomes with a biotinylated 0.9-kb BamHI fragment of DmGgamma e cDNA according to Bloomquist et al. (2). The biotinylated probe was detected using a streptavidin-coupled peroxidase (Detek-Horseradish Peroxidase kit, Enzo Diagnostics).

Northern blot analysis with digoxigenin-labeled antisense cRNA probes transcribed from DmGgamma e cDNA was performed as has been described previously (24). Immunological detection of the probe was performed with the DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) using CDP-Star (Tropix, Bedford, MA) as luminescent dye.

Antibodies-- Polyclonal antibodies directed against Calliphora Gbeta e and Ggamma e were generated by immunizing rabbits with recombinantly expressed polypeptides as described previously (8, 9). The peptide used to generate anti-Ggamma e antibodies corresponded to the entire coding region of CvGgamma e, whereas the recombinantly expressed CvGbeta e-peptide comprised amino acids 65-346. The antibodies were affinity purified using the respective antigen. The anti-DmGalpha q antibody was kindly provided by C. Zuker (18).

Immunohistochemistry-- For localization of G protein subunits by confocal laser scanning microscopy Drosophila wild type heads were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by 3 washes in 10% sucrose for 15 min. The heads were infiltrated with 25% sucrose overnight at 4 °C, embedded in boiled liver, covered with Tissue Tek, and cryofixed in melting isopentane. They were sectioned at 10-µm thickness in a cryostat at -25 °C and transferred to coverslips precoated with 0.01% aqueous poly-L-lysine. The cryosections were washed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, incubated in 0.01% Tween 20 for 20 min, followed by two washes in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer. After blocking the sections in 0.1% ovalbumin, 0.5% cold water fish gelatin in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer for 30 min at room temperature, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (anti-DmGalpha q 1:50, anti-CvGbeta e 1:20, anti-CvGgamma e 1:25) overnight at 4 °C. The sections were washed 3 times in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and then incubated with a rhodamine-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody for 3 h at room temperature. The sections were mounted in Mowiol 4.88 and examined with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-SP, Leica).

Immunogold labeling of ultrathin sections for electron microscopy was performed as described by Bentrop et al. (25). Working concentrations for the primary antibody were: anti-DmRh1 1:20, anti-CvGbeta e 1:10, and anti-CvGgamma e 1:10. Secondary goat anti-rabbit antibodies (10 nm gold, Nanoprobes) were used at 1:100-1:150 dilution. Gold labeling was enhanced with silver according to Danscher (26), and thereafter the sections were stained with 2% uranylacetate and examined with a Leo EM 912 ohm electron microscope.

Immunoprecipitation-- For immunoprecipitating Ggamma e and Gbeta e, rhabdomeral photoreceptor membranes of dark adapted Calliphora were isolated as described (27, 28). Rhabdomeral membrane proteins were extracted for 20 min at 4 °C with Triton X-100 buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.42 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.83 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.83 µg/ml aprotinin) in the dark and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Extracts obtained from rhabdomeral membranes of 50 retinas were added to 20 µl of protein A-agarose beads (Bio-Rad) which had been preincubated with anti-CvGbeta e antibodies for 1 h. Immunoprecipitation was performed for 1 h at 4 °C and was followed by 5 washes with 500 µl of Triton X-100 washing buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Precipitated proteins were eluted from protein A-agarose beads with 10 µl of 1 × SDS-PAGE buffer (4% SDS, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 15% glycerol in 65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) for 10 min at 80 °C and were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis-- For Western blot analysis of the visual G protein subunits, compound eyes or heads of Drosophila and retinas or rhabdomeral membranes of Calliphora were collected in 1× SDS-PAGE buffer and homogenized with a plastic pestle. The proteins were extracted for 20 min at room temperature. Insoluble material was sedimented by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid procedure (29). Extracts of Calliphora tissues containing either 5 µg of protein (equivalent of 0.13 retinas or rhabdomeral proteins out of 5 retinas) for Galpha q and Gbeta e or 10 µg of protein for Ggamma e immunoblots and extracts of Drosophila tissues containing 17 µg of protein (equivalent of 1.5 heads or 5 eye cups) were subjected to SDS-PAGE according to Laemmli (30) on 8-20% gradient gels (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Midget System). For immunoblotting, proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) in a transfer buffer containing 50 mM Tris base, 0.1% SDS, 20% methanol for 1 h. The blot membranes were blocked in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 2% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% gelatin, 0.1% NaN3 which greatly increased the sensitivity for detecting Ggamma (31). Probing the blots with primary antibodies was performed in TBS-Nonidet P-40 (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, 0.01% Nonidet P-40) overnight. Thereafter, the membranes were washed with TBS-Nonidet P-40 and incubated either with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated protein A or with 125I-labeled secondary antibodies in TBS-Nonidet P-40 for 1 h. The protein bands were visualized through a chromogenic reaction with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/4-nitro-blue-tertazolium chloride or by exposing the blots to an X-Omat AR Film (Kodak).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation and Sequencing of a Novel Drosophila Ggamma Subunit-- To isolate novel cDNA clones preferentially expressed in the photoreceptor cells of flies, we performed a differential hybridization screen. A high degree of specificity was obtained by hybridizing a Calliphora retinal cDNA library with probes derived from mRNA of retinal tissue, muscle tissue, and with a mixture of cDNAs encoding previously cloned retina-specific proteins such as Rh1 rhodopsin. The clones supposed to encode novel, retina specifically expressed proteins were sequenced. One cDNA clone of 1.5 kb in length contained a 216-base pair open reading frame encoding a polypeptide with homology to gamma  subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. The coding region of this clone was used to probe a Drosophila head cDNA library. The Drosophila Ggamma clones isolated by this homology screen were distinct from a previously reported Drosophila Ggamma gene expressed in the brain (20). The novel genes for Calliphora and Drosophila Ggamma subunits will hereafter be referred to as CvGgamma e and DmGgamma e, respectively, in analogy to the designation of Gbeta e which encodes the eye-specifically expressed beta  subunit of the Drosophila visual G protein (17).

The longest Drosophila Ggamma e clone contained 246 base pairs of the 5'-untranslated region with an in-frame stop codon 15 nucleotides before the first AUG start codon, an open reading frame coding for 72 amino acids (Mr = 8398), and a 642-base pair 3'-untranslated region. For deducing the amino acid sequence, the translation initiation site was assigned to the first AUG codon (CCGCCAUGG) of the open reading frame which fits with the consensus sequence for translation initiation sites, CC(A/G)CCAUGG (32). The deduced amino acid sequences of Calliphora Ggamma e and Drosophila Ggamma e are identical except for a Ser right-arrow Asp and an Ile right-arrow Val substitution at positions 26 and 43, respectively (Fig. 1A). Both, CvGgamma e and DmGgamma e, exhibit a CAAX motif, CVIM (C, cysteine; A, aliphatic amino acid; X, any amino acid), at their C termini (Fig. 1A) suggesting that Ggamma e may become post-translationally modified by isoprenylation. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of DmGgamma e with other Ggamma subunits revealed the highest homology to a Ggamma subunit (gpc-2) of Caenorhabditis elegans (41.9% amino acid identity) and an amino acid identity of about 30% to the visual Ggamma subunits of vertebrate photoreceptors. The intra-specific homology of DmGgamma e to DmGgamma 1 (25.7% identity) is lower than the inter-specific homology to vertebrate visual Ggamma subunits (Fig. 1B). An unusual stretch of highly charged amino acids located near the N terminus of visual Ggamma from squid (33) has no parallel in DmGgamma e.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of the primary structure of selected Ggamma subunits. A, amino acid alignment of selected Ggamma subunits. The deduced amino acid sequences are shown in single-letter code. Identical amino acids are indicated by an asterisk. Amino acids which are identical in four of the six sequences aligned are marked with dots. The CAAX motif at the COOH terminus of the Ggamma subunits is underlined. Black boxes depict amino acids which are characteristic for visual Ggamma subunits. B, phylogenetic relationships between selected Ggamma subunits. Visual gamma  subunits are marked with an asterisk. Accession numbers for sequences used: bovine Ggamma 2, P16874; bovine Ggamma 3, P29798; bovine Ggamma 7, P30671; bovine Ggamma 12, Q28024; bovine Ggamma cone, P50154; bovine Ggamma rod, P02698; C. elegans Ggamma 1 (gpc-1), CAA91806; C. elegans Ggamma 2 (gpc-2), AAC78236; calliphora Ggamma e, AJ 250441, dog Ggamma cone, AAC98924; Drosophila Ggamma 1, P38040; Drosphila Ggamma e, AJ 250440, human Ggamma 4, P50150; human Ggamma 5, P30670; human Ggamma 7, AAC32595; human Ggamma 10, P50151; human Ggamma 11, P50152; human Ggamma cone, O14610; human Ggamma rod, Q08447; mouse Ggamma 4, P50153; rat Ggamma 9, P43426; squid Ggamma , Q01821.

To obtain comprehensive information on the conservation of the G protein subunits expressed in the fly eye we also cloned Galpha q of Calliphora by a homology screen with DmGalpha q (15) and Gbeta e of Calliphora by differential hybridization as described for isolating CvGgamma e. Both subunits proved to be highly homologous to the corresponding genes of Drosophila showing 95.5 and 89.3% amino acid identity for Galpha q and Gbeta e, respectively. The extremely high homology of the Calliphora and Drosophila G protein subunits indicates the conservation between the phototransduction cascades of these flies which is also evident when the homology of other phototransduction proteins of Drosophila and Calliphora is compared, for example, rhodopsin (86%; 34), arrestin 2 (91%; 35), or transient receptor potential protein (77%; 9). It is therefore possible to combine results obtained with either of these visual systems into a common model for fly phototransduction.

Genomic Structure of the Novel Drosophila Ggamma Subunit-- In situ hybridization of a 0.9-kb BamHI fragment of the DmGgamma e cDNA clone to salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila indicated a single locus for Ggamma e at position 30A on chromosome 2L (Fig. 2A). Since this part of the Drosophila genome is already sequenced, we screened the data base of the Drosophila genome project with the DmGgamma e cDNA sequence for matching sequences. This search revealed that the cDNA sequence of DmGgamma e is distributed on the contigs AC005889 and AC005125, the latter of which had to be inverted in order to correspond to DmGgamma e (Fig. 2B). The cytogenetical map position of both contigs is in agreement with the cytogenetical localization of DmGgamma e to position 30A. AC005889 maps to the chromosomal region 30A3-30A6 and AC005125 maps to 30A7-30A8. The genomic sequence of 34,810 kb allowed us to analyze the exon-intron structure of DmGgamma e. The genomic organization of DmGgamma e reveals three exons which are separated by a 15,259-kb intron located in the 5'-untranslated region and a 18,447-kb intron that disrupts the coding region (Fig. 2C). Both introns are flanked by consensus GT/AT splicing sites.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The DmGgamma e gene is localized on chromosome 2L at 30A and has two large introns. A, chromosomal localization of DmGgamma e. A 0.9-kb BamHI fragment of the DmGgamma e cDNA clone was used as a probe to determine the chromosomal localization of DmGgamma e. A single hybridization signal was detected (arrow) at position 30A on the left arm of the second chromosome. GN, goose neck. Scale bar, 50 µm. B, schematic representation of contigs AC005889 and AC005125 which contain the cDNA sequence of DmGgamma e. The exons E1-E3 (gray boxes) and the introns I1 and I2 (lines) are shown. The numbers indicate the base pairs of the corresponding contig. C, genomic organization of DmGgamma e. The three exons (E1-E3) and the two introns (I1 and I2) are shown. The numbers above the introns indicate the intron size, the other numbers indicate the beginning and the end of the exons and the position of the open reading frame (black box) in the corresponding cDNA.

Furthermore, we investigated whether there is evidence for a mutant in the DmGgamma e gene with defects in the phototransduction cascade. The only identified gene locus for a gene showing misfunctions in visual behavior at the cytogenetical map position of Ggamma e is the inactivation no afterpotential A (inaA) mutant which is localized in the chromosomal interval 27F1-38E9 (36). However, Northern blot analysis of the DmGgamma e gene product of inaA flies revealed that Ggamma e is normally expressed with no obvious difference in transcript size or transcript level as compared with the Ggamma e mRNA isolated from wild type flies (Fig. 3A), indicating that inaA mutants are not null mutants or deletion mutants of Ggamma e. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of the coding region of the Ggamma e gene of inaA mutants and sequencing of the amplified product revealed that the Ggamma e gene of the inaA mutant exhibits the same nucleotide sequence as the Ggamma e gene of wild type flies. Consequently, inaA mutants contain a stable and fully functional Ggamma subunit.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Ggamma e is preferentially expressed in the compound eye. A, Northern blot hybridization of Drosophila Ggamma e mRNA. RNA was isolated from heads of wild type (wt) flies (lane 1), eyes absent (eya) mutants (lane 2), Drosophila bodies (lane 3), and heads of inaA mutants (lane 4). 3 µg of total RNA were probed with DmGgamma e antisense cRNA. The arrow indicates the major 1.4-kb transcript which is expressed preferentially in the eyes. B, Western blot analysis of protein extracts separated by SDS-PAGE: 5 µg of protein extracts of Calliphora total retinas (lane 1), rhabdomeral photoreceptor membranes of Calliphora (lane 2), and 17 µg of protein-extracts of heads and eye cups of Drosophila wt flies (lanes 3 and 4), and of heads of Drosophila eya mutants (lane 5) were probed with anti-Galpha q, anti-Gbeta e, and anti-Ggamma e antibodies as indicated. The numbers on the left side of the blots denote the migration of molecular weight markers in kilodalton.

DmGgamma e Is Predominantly Expressed in Photoreceptor Cells and Forms the Visual Gbeta gamma Complex with Gbeta e-- Although the novel Ggamma e subunit was isolated by a differential hybridization screen designed to isolate clones which are preferentially expressed in the eye, it is not certain that Ggamma e codes for the gamma  subunit of the visual G protein. Therefore, we studied the cellular and subcellular localization of the Ggamma e mRNA and the Ggamma e protein and compared it with the spatial distribution of the visual Galpha q and Gbeta e subunits. To determine the tissue distribution of the DmGgamma e transcripts, we performed Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3A). Hybridization with an antisense cRNA transcribed from the full-length DmGgamma e cDNA revealed three transcripts of approximately 1.4, 1.8, and 6 kb (Fig. 3A). The major 1.4-kb transcript was detected only in RNA isolated from heads of wild type flies (Fig. 3A, lane 1) but not in RNA obtained from eyes absent (eya) mutants, indicating that this transcript is predominantly expressed in the eye. The 1.8- and 6-kb RNA are present in wild type and eya heads, showing that the expression of these minor transcripts is not restricted to the eye.

For monitoring the expression pattern of the G protein subunits by Western blot analysis we generated specific antisera against recombinantly expressed peptides corresponding to the coding region of CvGgamma e and amino acids 65-346 of CvGbeta e. The anti-DmGalpha q antibody has been described previously (18). The anti-CvGgamma e antibody recognizes a 8-kDa protein extracted from retina and purified photoreceptor membranes of Calliphora, and from heads and eye cups of Drosophila wild type flies (Fig. 3B). The apparent molecular mass of 8 kDa deduced from the electrophoretic mobility after SDS-PAGE of DmGgamma e corresponds to the molecular mass of 8.398 kDa calculated from the amino acid sequence. When triplicate Western blots were probed with antibodies directed against Galpha q, Gbeta e, and Ggamma e a similar distribution of these G protein subunits was observed (Fig. 3B). A strong signal was obtained in lanes loaded with proteins of purified photoreceptor membranes with each of the three antibodies. This indicates that all three G protein subunits are associated with the light-absorbing photoreceptor membrane which harbors rhodopsin and the INAD signaling complex. Galpha q and Gbeta e were not detected in protein extracts of Drosophila eya mutants lacking the compound eyes (Fig. 3B, lane 5), whereas a weak signal was observed when Western blots of eyes absent extracts probed with anti-Ggamma e antibodies were developed for a prolonged time. The presence of minor amounts of Ggamma e in heads lacking compound eyes may result from the translation of the 1.8- and 6-kb Ggamma e transcripts which are not restricted to the eye.

Immunolocalization studies were carried out to elucidate the spatial distribution of visual G protein subunits. Laser scanning microscopy reveals that Ggamma e is localized in the photoreceptor cells of the retina. Antibody reactivity was also detected in the lamina and the medulla presumably in the axons of the photoreceptor cells which project to these optic ganglia (Fig. 4C). Exactly the same labeling pattern is observed for Galpha q and Gbeta e subunits (Fig. 4, A and B). This finding supports the hypothesis that Ggamma e is part of an eye-specific heterotrimeric G protein. As labeling was not restricted to the rhabdomeres of the photoreceptor cell, we investigated the subcellular localization of Gbeta e and Ggamma e by electron microscopy. The labeling pattern shown in Fig. 5 reveals that both Gbeta e and Ggamma e signals are mainly associated with the rhabdomeres, but labeling is also found in the cytoplasm of the photoreceptor cell. The labeling density of Gbeta e is higher than the labeling density of Ggamma e, which may result from differences in the affinities of the anti-Gbeta e and anti-Ggamma e antibodies for their antigens or from a lower accessibility of the antigenic epitopes on Ggamma e which is embedded in the 5-fold larger Gbeta e protein.


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Immunohistochemical localization of the Drosophila visual G protein subunits demonstrates the co-localization of Ggamma e with Galpha q and Gbeta e. Immunofluorescence images of longitudinal cryo-sections of the Drosophila compound eye after incubation with anti-Galpha q (A), anti-Gbeta e (B), and anti-Ggamma e (C). Bound antibody was detected by using a rhodamine-coupled anti-rabbit IgG as secondary antibody. D, differential interference contrast image corresponding to the fluorescence image in C. R, retina; L, lamina; M, medulla. Scale bar, 50 µm.


View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Subcellular localization of DmGbeta e and DmGgamma e indicates that Gbeta gamma is associated with rhabdomeral membranes. Cross-sections through a Drosophila compound eye at the level of the photoreceptor cell R7. Binding of antibodies directed against (A) DmGbeta e, (B) DmGgamma e, and (C) DmRh1 (positive control), was visualized by silver enhanced immunogold staining. D, negative control without primary antibody. Scale bar in D, 2 µm.

It is possible that photoreceptor cells contain more than one G protein and, accordingly, more than one G protein gamma  subunit. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to identify the beta  subunit to which Ggamma e is attached. We immunoprecipitated proteins of rhabdomeral photoreceptor membranes of Calliphora with anti-CvGbeta e antibodies in order to concentrate our study on proteins of the photoreceptive membrane. Gbeta e and Ggamma e were detected by Western blot analysis in the immunoprecipitates obtained with anti-Gbeta e antibodies, but not in control precipitations without antibody (Fig. 6). This indicates that Ggamma e specifically co-precipitates with Gbeta e and confirms that the newly isolated Ggamma subunit is interacting with Gbeta e to constitute a beta gamma complex in the photoreceptive membrane.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Co-immunoprecipitation shows that Ggamma e and Gbeta e form a beta gamma complex of the photoreceptive membrane. Proteins from Calliphora rhabdomeral membranes were immunoprecipitated with anti-Gbeta e. Extracted proteins (lane 1) and the immunoprecipitates (lane 2) were subjected to Western blot analysis. The blot was cut in half. The upper part was incubated with anti-Gbeta e, the lower part of the blot was incubated with anti-Ggamma e, as indicated. Lanes 3 and 4 show control experiments: protein A beads without antibody were used in order to rule out nonspecific binding of proteins to the beads (lane 3). No probe was added to the antibody-conjugated protein A beads in order to determine which of the protein bands resulted from the presence of antibodies (lane 4).

Taken together, the eye-specific expression and the spatial distribution of Ggamma e which coincides with the distribution of Galpha q and Gbeta e, and the co-immunoprecipitation with Gbeta e strongly suggest that this newly isolated Ggamma subunit associates with Gbeta e of the visual G protein of Drosophila photoreceptors.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heterotrimeric G proteins are obligatory members of the phototransduction pathways activated by rhodopsins. Apart from the squid eye (33) there has been no indication for a distinct visual Ggamma subunit in the majority of invertebrate eyes. Here we report the cloning and characterization of a novel G protein gamma  subunit (DmGgamma e) expressed in the Drosophila eye. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical localization of DmGgamma e at the cellular as well as subcellular level revealed that Ggamma e is co-localized with the visual Galpha q and Gbeta e subunits of Drosophila. Co-immunoprecipitation of Ggamma e with Gbeta e demonstrated a direct association of Ggamma e and Gbeta e into a functional heterodimeric Gbeta gamma subunit. Since Gbeta e has been shown to function as a subunit of the visual G protein with an essential role in terminating the active state of the phototransduction pathway (19), the Ggamma e cloned in the present study most likely represents the visual Ggamma subunit.

It has already been noticed that vertebrate Ggamma subunits can be classified on the basis of sequence information into subgroups that reflect functional similarities, for example, with respect to post-translational modifications and interaction with similar alpha  and beta  subunits (37). Comparison of the amino acid sequences of the newly isolated Ggamma e subunits from Drosophila and Calliphora with other Ggamma subunits provides evidence that Ggamma e is more closely related to visual Ggamma homologs of vertebrates than to most non-visual Ggamma subunits (Fig. 1B). Thus, rhodopsins and Ggamma subunits are members of phototransduction pathways that are conserved, irrespective of the photoreceptor cell type, rhabdomeric or ciliar, and the reaction sequence downstream of the relevant G protein. Common characteristics which distinguish the group of visual Ggamma subunits from non-visual Ggamma subunits include a (Asp/Glu)-(Arg/Lys)-Asp motif near the amino terminus (position 10-12 of DmGgamma e), followed by Leu-Lys (position 14-15), a basic amino acid (Asn, Lys) at position 54, a Asp-Lys sequence (position 57-58), and a glycine at position 67. These sites appear to allow the grouping into visual and non-visual Ggamma subunits, despite a relatively low amino acid identity of about 30% between the most divergent members within the group of visual Ggamma subunits. An exception exists with respect to Ggamma 11 (30, 5% identity with DmGgamma e), which shows distinct features of a visual Ggamma subunit, but is expressed in non-retinal tissues (37). A high homology of Ggamma e exists also to a Ggamma subunit from C. elegans (gpc-2, 41.9% identity) which has been deduced from a cosmid sequence (F08B6) (38) but has not yet been functionally characterized. Drosophila Ggamma 1, the first Ggamma subunit isolated from Drosophila, is more closely related to non-visual Ggamma subunits which are expressed in a variety of tissues and may therefore form Gbeta gamma subunits capable of interacting with different types of Galpha subunits. Both, the phylogenetic relationship and demonstration of the existence of a novel, photoreceptor specific Ggamma subunit indicate that Ggamma 1 is not a visual Ggamma as discussed previously (20). The conservation of the visual Ggamma subunits is also reflected by the exon-intron structure of Ggamma genes. In DmGgamma e and in the visual Ggamma genes of vertebrates, the number and the location of the introns is conserved, with a first intron located in the 5'-untranslated region near to the coding region and a second intron splitting the coding region. Some non-visual Ggamma subunits, notably Drosophila Ggamma 1, show a different gene structure in which the second intron is missing.

Considering that the Galpha subunits of transducins and of the fly visual G proteins belong to different Galpha classes which either activate a cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase or a phospholipase C, respectively, the homology of the corresponding Ggamma subunits is striking. The question arises why Ggamma subunits of G proteins which couple to rhodopsins are conserved, particularly as the associated Gbeta subunits do not mirror this phylogenetic relationship. One reason might be that conserved interactions of visual Ggamma subunits with rhodopsin exist at some stage of G protein activation. It has already been shown that the visual Ggamma subunit from bovine photoreceptors is required for the interaction of rhodopsin with transducin as well as for transducin activation (39-43). In this interaction the farnesylation of the COOH terminus of Ggamma appears to be a crucial requirement. A COOH-terminal CAAX motif commonly found in other Ggamma subunits modified by isoprenylation is also present in DmGgamma e (CVIM). Since Ggamma subunits which exhibit a consensus sequence with a serine or methionine at the carboxyl-terminal position usually carry a farnesyl group (44-46), DmGgamma e subunits are likely to become farnesylated rather than geranylgeranylated. Indeed, apart from the visual Ggamma subunit of squid, all visual Ggamma s share a CAAX motif with a consensus sequence for farnesylation. Non-visual Ggamma subunits, except for Ggamma 11 (37), have a leucine or valine at the carboxyl-terminal position and are therefore expected to become geranylgeranylated. Thus, fly Ggamma e subunits and Ggamma subunits of vertebrate transducins are likely to share functions depending on post-translational fatty acid modification, for example, binding to the membrane and interaction of the G protein with rhodopsin.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. Zuker (University of California, La Jolla) and W. L. Pak (Purdue University, W. Lafayette) for providing the anti-Drosophila Galpha q antibody and Drosophila inaA mutants, respectively. We are grateful to N. Da Silva for preparing cryosections of Drosophila heads and J. Bentrop for helpful comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by European Union Grant BMH4-CT97-2341.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ 250440 (DmGgamma e) and AJ 250441 (CvGgamma e).

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Karlsruhe, Institute of Zoology, Dept. of Cell and Neurobiology, Kornblumenstr. 13, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany. Tel.: 49-721/608-4849 or -2218; Fax: 49-721/608-4848; E-mail: DC05@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: norpA, no receptor potential A; INAD, inactivation-no afterpotentical D; inaA, inactivation-no afterpotential A; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; eya, eyes absent; kb, kilobase(s).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Chou, W. H., Huber, A., Bentrop, J., Schulz, S., Schwab, K., Chadwell, L. V., Paulsen, R., and Britt, S. G. (1999) Development 126, 607-616[Abstract]
2. Bloomquist, B. T., Shortridge, R. D., Schneuwly, S., Perdew, M., Montell, C., Steller, H., Rubin, G., and Pak, W. L. (1988) Cell 54, 723-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Schneuwly, S., Burg, M. G., Lending, C., Perdew, M. H., and Pak, W. L. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24314-24319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. McKay, R. R., Chen, D. M., Miller, K., Kim, S., Stark, W. S., and Shortridge, R. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13271-13276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Pearn, M. T., Randall, L. L., Shortridge, R. D., Burg, M. G., and Pak, W. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4937-4945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Devary, O., Heichal, O., Blumenfeld, A., Cassel, D., Suss, E., Barash, S., Rubinstein, C. T., Minke, B., and Selinger, Z. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 6939-6943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Selinger, Z., Devary, O., Blumenfeld, A., Heichal, O., Barash, S., and Minke, B. (1987) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 249, 169-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Huber, A., Sander, P., and Paulsen, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11710-11717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Huber, A., Sander, P., Gobert, A., Baehner, M., Hermann, R., and Paulsen, R. (1996b) EMBO J. 15, 7036-7045[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Shieh, B. H., and Zhu, M. Y. (1996) Neuron 16, 991-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Tsunoda, S., Sierralta, J., Sun, Y., Bodner, R., Suzuki, E., Becker, A., Socolich, M., and Zuker, C. S. (1997) Nature 388, 243-249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Chevesich, J., Kreuz, A. J., and Montell, C. (1997) Neuron 18, 95-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Xu, X. Z., Choudhury, A., Li, X., and Montell, C. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 545-555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. van Huizen, R., Miller, K., Chen, D. M., Li, Y., Lai, Z. C., Raab, R. W., Stark, W. S., Shortridge, R. D., and Li, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2285-2297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lee, Y. J., Dobbs, M. B., Verardi, M. L., and Hyde, D. R. (1990) Neuron 5, 889-898[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lee, Y. J., Shah, S., Suzuki, E., Zars, T., O'Day, P. M., and Hyde, D. R. (1994) Neuron 13, 1143-1157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Yarfitz, S., Niemi, G. A., McConnell, J. L., Fitch, C. L., and Hurley, J. B. (1991) Neuron 7, 429-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Scott, K., Becker, A., Sun, Y., Hardy, R., and Zuker, C. (1995) Neuron 15, 919-927[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Dolph, P. J., Man, S. H., Yarfitz, S., Colley, N. J., Deer, J. R., Spencer, M., Hurley, J. B., and Zuker, C. S. (1994) Nature 370, 59-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Ray, K., and Ganguly, R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6086-6092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
22. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulsen, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425[Abstract]
24. Huber, A., Wolfrum, U., and Paulsen, R. (1994) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 63, 219-229[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bentrop, J., Schwab, K., Pak, W. L., and Paulsen, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1600-1609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Danscher, G. (1981) Histochemistry 71, 81-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Paulsen, R. (1984) J. Comp. Physiol. A 155, 47-55[CrossRef]
28. Bentrop, J., and Paulsen, R. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 161, 61-67[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 682-685
31. Ueda, H., Morishita, R., Katoh-Semba, R., Kato, K., and Asano, T. (1998) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 124, 1033-1037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Kozak, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19867-19870[Free Full Text]
33. Lott, J. S., Ryba, N. J., Pottinger, J. D., Keen, J. N., Carne, A., and Findlay, J. B. (1992) FEBS Lett. 312, 241-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Huber, A., Smith, D. P., Zuker, C. S., and Paulsen, R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17906-17910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Plangger, A., Malicki, D., Whitney, M., and Paulsen, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26969-26975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pak, W. L., Grossfield, J., and Arnold, K. S. (1970) Nature 227, 518-520[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Ray, K., Kunsch, C., Bonner, L. M., and Robishaw, J. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21765-21771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Jansen, G., Thijssen, K. L., Werner, P., van der Horst, M., Hazendonk, E., and Plasterk, R. H. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 414-419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., and McCormick, F. (1991) Nature 349, 117-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Kisselev, O., and Gautam, N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24519-24522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Kisselev, O., Ermolaeva, M. V., and Gautam, N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21399-21402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Kisselev, O., Ermolaeva, M., and Gautam, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25356-25358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Kisselev, O. G., Meyer, C. K., Heck, M., Ernst, O. P., and Hofmann, K. P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4898-4903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Kinsella, B. T., Erdman, R. A., and Maltese, W. A. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 8934-8938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Reiss, Y., Stradley, S. J., Gierasch, L. M., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 732-736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Ong, O. C., Yamane, H. K., Phan, K. B., Fong, H. K., Bok, D., Lee, R. H., and Fung, B. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8495-8500[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
N. Elia, S. Frechter, Y. Gedi, B. Minke, and Z. Selinger
Excess of G{beta}e over Gq{alpha}e in vivo prevents dark, spontaneous activity of Drosophila photoreceptors
J. Cell Biol., November 7, 2005; 171(3): 517 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Schillo, G. Belusic, K. Hartmann, C. Franz, B. Kuhl, G. Brenner-Weiss, R. Paulsen, and A. Huber
Targeted Mutagenesis of the Farnesylation Site of Drosophila G{gamma}e Disrupts Membrane Association of the G Protein {beta}{gamma} Complex and Affects the Light Sensitivity of the Visual System
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36309 - 36316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page