|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 37693-37704, December 31, 1999
Peptide Inhibition of Constitutively Activated Epithelial
Na+ Channels Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes*
Hong-Long
Ji,
Catherine M.
Fuller, and
Dale J.
Benos
From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0005
 |
ABSTRACT |
The hypothesis that 30-amino acid peptides
corresponding to the C-terminal portion of the - and/or -rat
epithelial sodium channel (rENaC) subunits block constitutively
activated ENaC was tested by examining the effects of these peptides on
wild-type (wt) rENaC (  -rENaC), truncated Liddle's mutants
( T -,   T-, and
 T T-rENaC), and point mutants
( Y -,   Y-rENaC) expressed in
Xenopus oocytes. The chord conductances of
 T -,   T-, and  T T-rENaC were 2- or 3-fold greater
than for wt   -rENaC. Introduction of peptides into oocytes
expressing  T -,   T-, and
 T T-rENaC produced a
concentration-dependent inhibition of the
amiloride-sensitive Na+ conductances, with apparent
dissociation constants (Kd) ranging from 1700 to
160 µM, depending upon whether individual peptides or
their combination was used. Injection of peptides alone or in
combination into oocytes expressing wt   -rENaC or single-point
mutants did not affect the amiloride-sensitive whole-cell currents. The
single channel conductances of all the mutant ENaCs were the same as
that of wild type (  -). The single channel activities
(N·Po) of the mutants were
~2.2-2.6-fold greater than wt   -rENaC (1.08 ± 0.24, n = 7) and were reduced to 1.09 ± 0.17 by 100 µM peptide mixture (n = 9). The peptides
were without effect on the single channel properties of either wt or
single-point mutants of rENaC. Our data demonstrate that the C-terminal
peptides blocked the Liddle's truncation mutant
( T T) expressed in Xenopus oocytes but not the single-point mutants ( Y or
  Y). Moreover, the blocking effect of both peptides
in combination on  T T-rENaC was synergistic.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Hypertension is a common multifactorial disease imparting an
increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and end-stage renal
disease. Epidemiological studies suggest that up to 30% of human
hypertension may have a genetic basis (1). Epithelial sodium channels
(ENaC)1 play a key role in
regulating salt and water homeostasis by controlling sodium
reabsorption in the distal nephron. The cDNAs encoding ENaC have
been identified, and a heteromultimeric structure of the channel,
comprised of three homologous , , and subunits, has been
proposed (2-4). Each subunit contains a large extracellular loop,
located between two transmembrane domains, and two short intracellular
N- and C-terminal domains. ENaC activities are controlled by insulin,
corticosteroids, aldosterone (Ref. 5; for reviews see Refs. 6 and 7),
protein kinases (8), proteases (9), cations (10-12), the cytoskeleton
(13), and osmotic pressure (14). Shimkets et al. (8)
confirmed that protein kinase A, kinase C, and insulin could
phosphorylate the C-terminal regions of both - and -ENaC
subunits. It is likely that the cytoplasmic N- and C-terminal segments
of each subunit may contain the regulatory sites of many of the other
aforementioned ENaC modulators.
The role of ENaC in the pathogenesis of genetic hypertension, namely
Liddle's syndrome (pseudo-hyperaldosteronism), has been demonstrated
by linkage analyses of the genes encoding the ENaC subunits in families
with a history of salt-sensitive, low-renin, volume-expanded
hypertension. These studies suggested that Liddle's syndrome resulted
from truncating or missense mutations deleting a PPPXY motif
in the cytoplasmic C terminus of either the - (15-20) or -ENaC
subunits (21). Systemic mutagenesis of the rat ENaC homolog, rENaC,
suggested that normal ENaC activity could be modified by altering the
consensus PPPXY sequence in an individual - or -ENaC
subunit (22). Each of these mutations resulted in increased channel
activity when co-expressed with the other wt rENaC subunits in
Xenopus oocytes, consistent with increased sodium
reabsorption in the distal nephron (22, 23). Similarly, stimulated
amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in oocytes expressing the
Liddle's mutants of human ENaC were also observed (20, 24).
At present, two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms have been posited to
account for the enhanced macroscopic Na+ channel activity
resulting from Liddle's mutations, namely an increased surface density
of channel protein and/or increased channel open probability
(Po) (24-26). While an increased residence time
of ENaC at the cell surface has been attributed to defective internalization of the channel protein for ENaC constructs containing Liddle's mutations, the mechanisms by which these mutations in the
- or -ENaC subunits lead to an increase in single channel Po are not well understood. Interestingly, the
currents associated with Liddle's mutants expressed in oocytes were
not down-regulated by elevated intracellular Na+
concentration in contrast to wt ENaC currents (27). Furthermore, Dinudom et al. (28) suggested that elevated intracellular
Na+ promotes the interaction of Nedd4 with the PY motif of
-rENaC. Hence, feedback inhibition of ENaC by intracellular
Na+ would be lost with Liddle's mutations. The differences
between the regulation of wt ENaC and Liddle's mutants have not been
explored in detail. However, like other cation channels (29-31), the
activity of truncated Liddle's -ENaC mutants immunopurified from
human lymphocytes were also inhibited by synthesized peptides when
reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers (32).
We had previously demonstrated in planar lipid bilayer studies that
truncation of the C termini of - or -rENaC led to increased channel Po (32, 33). We wished to test further
the hypothesis that the C-terminal peptides of these subunits could
function as inhibitory peptides of rENaC expressed in
Xenopus oocytes. In the present study, we investigated the
effect of the 30-amino acid C-terminal peptides of - or -rENaC
subunits on the currents associated with the truncation and point
mutants found in Liddle's syndrome using whole-cell and single channel
recording techniques. The results showed that both the individual
peptides SP30 or SP30 and a mixture of
both peptides decreased the macroscopic currents of truncated Liddle's
mutants expressed in oocytes but had no effect on the currents
associated with expression of the Liddle's point mutants. The single
channel activity (N·Po) of the
truncated Liddle's mutant was down-regulated by the peptides due to
decreases in Po and the number of channels per
patch. The conclusions of the present study were that the increased
channel Po of the truncated Liddle's mutants
expressed in Xenopus oocytes could be reversed by the
synthetic peptides, thus the C termini cytoplasmic tails of the and
subunits act in concert to form part of the normal gating mechanism
of a functional ENaC.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Peptide Synthesis and Purification--
rENaC constructs,
including wt   -rENaC and and subunits of Liddle's
mutations R564 ( T), R574
( T), Y618A ( Y), and Y628A ( Y) were kind gifts of Drs. Cecilia
Canessa (Yale University) and Bernard Rossier (Universität de
Lausanne). In vitro translation of each rENaC subunit and
their mutations were performed as described previously (34).
Peptides SP30 , SP30 , and
Pro-SP30 were synthesized by Research Genetics
(Huntsville, AL). Following synthesis, the peptides were purified (to
>90% purity) by reversed-phase high performance liquid
chromatography. The amino acid sequence of each peptide was verified by
mass spectroscopy. The primary amino acid sequences of the synthetic
peptides were as follows: SP30 ,
611PIPGTPPPNYDSLRLQPLDVIESDSEGDAI640;
SP30 ,
620PGTPPPKYNTLRLERAFSNQLTDTQMLDEL649;
Pro-SP30 ,
611PPPGTPPPNYDSLRLQPLDPPESDSEGDAD640.
Peptide concentration was calculated based upon the exact molecular mass of each peptide. The 1:1 peptide mixtures were equimolar, i.e. a 276 µM mixture was a 1:1 mix of two
solutions of 276 µM, yielding a final concentration of
each peptide of 138 µM.
Oocyte Expression of ENaC--
The methods for isolation of
oocytes and expression of rENaC cRNA were as described previously
(34). Briefly, ovarian tissue was removed from frogs
(Xenopus Express, Burley Hills, FL) under anesthesia through
a small incision in the lower abdomen. Oocytes were digested with 2-4
mg/ml collagenase in Ca2+-free OR-2 solution for 2 h
on a shaker. Following several washes in Ca2+-free or
regular OR-2 media, oocytes were manually defolliculated. Healthy
oocytes at maturation stage V and VI were identified and maintained in
L-15 medium at 18 °C. Oocytes were incubated overnight before cRNA
injection. A Nanoject microinjector (Drummond Scientific Co., Broomall,
PA) was used for injection of 50 nl of rENaC cRNA per oocyte in the
ration of 1:1:1 ( : : ) or the same volume of RNase free water
(control). The total cRNA of all 3 subunits injected into each oocyte
varied from 5 to 25 ng. Injected oocytes were transferred to MBS medium
or L-15 medium and incubated at 18 °C for 48 h
before recording whole-cell and single channel data.
Solutions and Chemicals--
Ca2+-free OR-2 medium
was used to wash oocytes before and after digestion with collagenase.
This medium contained (in mM) 85.2 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 10 NaHEPES, 1.0 Na2HPO4, 0.5% streptomycin, pH 7.5. Calcium chloride (1.8 mM) was added to
Ca2+-free OR-2 medium to make regular OR-2 medium. The
incubation medium was modified Barth's solution (MBS) with the
following composition (mM): 85 NaCl, 1 KCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 0.4 CaCl2, 0.3 Ca(NO3)2, 0.8 MgSO4, 10 HEPES, 1%
antibiotic/antimycotic, pH 7.4. An alternative medium for incubation
was L-15 medium containing 1/2 strength of Leibovitz-15 powder, 15 mM NaHEPES, 5% heat-inactivated horse serum, 1%
antibiotic/antimycotic, pH 7.5. L-15 powder, antibiotic/antimycotic, and heat-inactivated horse serum were from Life Technologies, Inc.
Collagenase was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, and a
fresh solution was prepared for each experiment. Amiloride was obtained
from Research Biochemicals Int. (Natick, MA), and 5 mM
stock (1:1 Me2SO:H2O, v/v) was stored at
4 °C in a container wrapped with aluminum foil. The perfusate for
two-electrode voltage clamp experiments consisted of (mM)
116 NaCl, 2.0 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 5.0 NaHEPES, pH 7.4.
For patch clamp experiments, we used a hypertonic solution for
stripping the vitelline membrane from the oocytes composed of (in
mM), 200 potassium aspartate, 20 KCl, 1 MgCl2,
10 EGTA, 10 NaHEPES, pH 7.4. The basal extracellular medium contained
(in mM) 100 LiCl, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4. To obtain outside-out
patches, 1.8 mM CaCl2 was included in the
extracellular medium. In order to measure the permeability ratio of
Li+:K+, equimolar potassium was used to replace
lithium. Peptides were dissolved in water to 100 mM and
stored at 4 °C until used. All other reagents were obtained from Sigma.
Two-electrode Voltage Clamp--
Whole-cell currents were
measured in oocytes held at room temperature (22-25 °C) 24 h
after cRNA injection. The currents were analyzed using pCLAMP software
(Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Voltage clamp potentials were
evoked using a TEA-200 voltage clamp (Dagan Corp., Minneapolis, MN)
controlled by a personal computer connected via a TL-1 interface (Axon
Instruments). The injected oocyte was placed in a small holding chamber
(<50 µl) and was initially superfused with the desired solution at a
flow rate of 1.0 ml/min for at least 5 min before recording.
Microelectrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had a tip
resistance of 0.5-2.0 M . The bath electrodes consisted of two
chloride-coated silver wires that made electrical contact with the bath
through 3% agar bridges immersed in 3 M KCl. For peptide
injection, a third glass electrode (Drummond Scientific Co.) filled
with a stock solution of peptide (usually 100 mM) was
inserted into an oocyte subsequent to impalement with the two recording
electrodes. The desired concentration of peptides within an oocyte was
defined by injecting a known volume of the peptide stock using an
adjustable nanoliter injector (WPI, Sarasota, FL) and calculating the
oocyte volume by assuming the oocyte was a prolate spheroid. The
oocytes were clamped at a holding potential of 100 mV. Data were
filtered at 0.5-1 KHz, digitized, and stored on hardware for off-line
analysis. For ramp I-V recordings, test voltages were elicited from a
holding potential of 100 to 140 mV through +60 mV at a rate of 10 mV/25 ms for 500 ms. Currents at 100 mV were sampled at 20-s
intervals. Capacitance neutralization was done for each recording using
the circuit built into the TEA-200 voltage-clamp amplifier. In
addition, the small volume of the holding chamber (<50 µl) also
helped minimize the capacitance at the input of the head stage. The
resting membrane potentials were read directly from the monitor window
of the voltage clamp before and after application of amiloride.
Single Channel Recordings--
The oocytes used for patch clamp
experiments were first placed in a hypertonic medium at room
temperature for 5-20 min. The vitelline membrane was then manually
removed from the shrunken oocytes using fine forceps (35). The
devitellinized oocyte was immediately transferred to a recording
chamber (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) and perfused with isoosmotic
extracellular solution before patch clamping the cell.
All three configurations (cell-attached, excised inside-out, and
outside-out) of patch clamp recordings were used (36). The reference
electrode was an Ag/AgCl pellet bathed in the same solution as the
bath. For constructing current-voltage (I-V) curves and calculating
Po, data obtained from cell-attached,
inside-out, and outside-out patches were included. For plotting
concentration dependence curves of amiloride inhibition, the
outside-out patch configuration was employed, and a series (from 0 to
10 µM) of concentrations of amiloride was applied. Patch
pipettes were made of borosilicate glass, pulled in two steps with a
PP83 vertical puller (Narishige, Japan). The tip resistance of the
electrodes was 1-10 M . Single channel currents were recorded with
an Axopatch 1-B current-voltage clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments,
Inc., Burlingame, CA). The current traces were displayed both by
CLAMPEX version 7.0 associated Axoscope software on the monitor and on
an oscilloscope and were stored on a hard drive connected with the
working computer through the internet. By convention, for the
outside-out configuration, the intracellular potential corresponds to
the pipette potential (Vp), and negative (downward)
single currents correspond to cation influx from the extracellular to
the intracellular side of the membrane. For the cell-attached
configuration, the membrane potential should be close to the actual
potential across the membrane patch because the oocyte membrane
potential is close to 0 mV measured by two-electrode voltage clamp
under our experimental conditions.
Current signals were filtered at 1 kHz with an 8-pole Bessel filter
(Frequency Devices Inc., Haverhill, MA) and digitized at 2 kHz using a
Digidata 1200 interface and CLAMPEX software (Axon Instruments, Inc.,
Foster City, CA). For display, currents were low-pass filtered at
100-200 Hz.
Data Analysis--
Amiloride-sensitive macroscopic whole-cell
currents were calculated by subtracting the currents in the presence of
10 µM amiloride from the currents in the absence of
amiloride. Student's t test was used to analyze the
differences of amiloride-sensitive currents among each group. The
results were presented as mean ± S.E., and the degree of
significance was assessed using the Student's t test. Data
from rENaC expressing oocytes for quantifying the inhibitory effect of
peptide were normalized to the maximum current in the absence of
peptide. The apparent inhibition dissociation constants Kd were computed according to Equation 1,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where Kd is the apparent dissociation
constant and n is the Hill coefficient. I and
I0 represent the amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in the presence or absence of the C-terminal
peptides, respectively. [Pep] indicates the concentration of
individual peptide or the peptide mixture injected into oocytes. Thus,
a plot of log(IPep/I IPep) versus log[Pep] should yield
a straight line with slope n (see Ref. 37 for discussion).
Analysis of single channel data was performed using FETCHAN and pSTAT
program of software CLAMPEX version 7.0 (Axon Instruments). The holding
potentials (or the polarity of the single channel currents) were
corrected accordingly. Assuming the lowest level during more than 3 and
up to 30 min of continuous recordings was the closed level, the single
channel open probability (Po) was calculated
from using Equation 2,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where N is total number of channels,
is the mean current over the period of
observations, and i is the main state unitary current
determined from all points current amplitude histograms produced by
FETCHAN. The mean current over the period of observation was calculated
using the events list files generated by CLAMPEX version 7.0 software
and Equation 3,
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where im is an event current (all level
including the 0 level); tm is an event dwell time,
and M is the total number of events. The parameters
calculated according to the above method may be underestimated due to
the long open and closed transitions and multichannel nature of the
patches of ENaC expressed in oocytes. Data are expressed as mean
value ± S.E. for n patches. Because the pSTAT program
could not used to analyze the results of multichannel patches with more
than five conductance levels, the program GAUSS (supplied to us by Dr.
James Kenyon of the Department of Physiology, University of Nevada) was
used to analyze channel data consisting of six or more discrete current levels (38).
The permeability ratios of wt   -rENaC and Liddle's mutants
expressed in oocytes were computed from the measured reversal potentials using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) equation.
 |
RESULTS |
Macroscopic Currents of Truncation Mutants Are Inhibited by Peptide
Injection--
In order to test the hypothesis that peptides
corresponding to the C termini of the - and/or -rENaC subunits
(SP30 and SP30 ) inhibit Liddle's
mutations inserted into rENaC, the -rENaC subunit truncated at amino
acid position Arg-564 ( T) and the -rENaC subunit
truncated at amino acid position Arg-574 ( T) were
expressed in oocytes in combination with the wt -rENaC subunit ( T T). Fig.
1 shows representative current traces in
oocytes evoked by a voltage ramp from 140 mV to 60 mV. The chord
conductance of  T T-rENaC-associated
currents at hyperpolarizing potentials was ~3-fold greater than that
of wt   -rENaC. Injection of a mixture of + C-terminal
peptides (1:1, 138 µM each) into oocytes expressing the
truncated ENaC constructs ( T T-rENaC)
decreased the current by approximately 63% at hyperpolarizing
potentials. In contrast, the current in oocytes expressing wt
  -rENaC was not affected by the same concentration of peptide
mixture. The  T T-rENaC-associated
current was not decreased by water injection or by injection of either
of two control peptides, one comprised of the last 13 amino acids of
the C terminus of CFTR (KEETEEEVQDTRL, final concentration = 1.7 mM; n = 4) or a 30-mer peptide identical in
all respects to SP30 except for substitution of 3 prolines for the single valine and two isoleucines
(Pro-SP30 ). Fig. 2 shows
the time course of peptide inhibition of inward Na+ current
in  T T-rENaC-expressing oocytes (Fig.
2A) and the lack of effect of the control
Pro-SP30 peptide (Fig. 2B). Although Pro-SP30 and the CFTR peptides carried the same or a
greater total number of negative charges as the C-terminal peptides
SP30 and SP30 , neither the CFTR nor
Pro-SP30 peptides had any effect on the whole-cell
Na+ currents induced by
 T T-rENaC expression. Similarly, in
parallel patch clamp experiments the addition of the C-terminal CFTR
peptide to the bath (n = 3, 500 µM) or
Pro-SP30 (n = 3, 1.7 mM)
failed to alter the gating behavior of
 T T-rENaC in inside-out patches (data
not shown).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Representative recordings showing effect of
30-mer peptide mixture injection into Xenopus oocytes
on amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents induced by expression
of   - and
 T T-rENaC.
Recordings were made 24 h after cRNA injection for both   -
and  T T-rENaC. Currents were elicited
with a ramp voltage pulse from 140 to +60 mV starting at a holding
potential of 100 mV. Amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents
shown in this figure were calculated by subtracting the currents
recorded in the presence of amiloride from those in the absence of
amiloride (10 µM). The left panels show
amiloride-sensitive currents of wt   - and
 T T-rENaC, and the right
panels show effect of peptide mixture (276 µM; 1:1
of SP30 + SP30 ) or water as a control on
the corresponding currents in the same oocyte. Injection of the peptide
mixture does not affect the current of   -rENaC (B)
but significantly inhibits
 T T-rENaC-associated Na+
current by approximately 63% (F). The amplitude of
 T T-rENaC-associated Na+
current (C and E) at 100 mV is approximately
3-fold greater than that of   -rENaC (A). Injection
of same volume of nuclease-free water (13.8 nl) into an oocyte
expressing  T T-rENaC (D)
does not show an inhibitory effect on the currents of
 T T-rENaC. These experiments were each
repeated four times.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of 30-mer peptide mixture on
macroscopic currents in
 T T-rENaC
expressing oocytes. A, continuous recording of inward
current at 100 mV from an
 T T-rENaC-expressing oocyte, showing
the effects of both amiloride (10 µM) and 100 µM SP30 + 100 µM
SP30 . B, continuous current recording from an
 T T-rENaC-expressing oocyte showing the
lack of inhibitory effect of a control peptide Pro-SP30
at 1.7 mM. C, typical ramp current-voltage
curves for  T T-rENaC-expressing oocytes
without injection of Pro-SP30 . D, typical
ramp current-voltage relation for
 T T-rENaC-expressing oocytes previously
injected with 1.7 mM Pro-SP30 .
|
|
Summarized data showing inhibition of wt and
 T T-rENaC-induced macroscopic
Na+ currents both for the individual peptides and a 1:1
mixture of SP30 and SP30 peptides (138 µM each) are plotted in Fig.
3. The mean chord conductance of
 T T-rENaC-expressing oocytes was 123.7 ± 12.6 µS (n = 11). This value was more
than twice that of wt   -rENaC-expressing oocytes (51.9 ± 50 µS, n = 5; p < 0.001). Injection
into oocytes of the mixture of SP30 plus
SP30 peptides decreased the
 T T-rENaC-associated Na+
conductance to 37.6 ± 10.7 µS (n = 11), a value
statistically indistinguishable from wild-type (p > 0.4). The individual peptides, at the same final concentration as the
mixture, i.e. 276 µM, also inhibited the
macroscopic inward Na+ currents but were not nearly as
effective as the peptide mixture. In contrast, neither the individual
peptides nor the peptide mixture inhibited wt
  -rENaC-associated Na+ conductance (Fig. 3).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Summarized data showing the effect of the
individual peptides or the peptide mixture injection on wt
  - and
 T T-rENaC
conductance in oocytes. The data are averaged amiloride-sensitive
Na+ chord conductances determined as the slope of the
current-voltage relation between 140 and 0 mV. Each oocyte was
injected with a total of 276 µM peptide (individual or in
combination) or an equivalent volume of water. n stands for
the number of eggs recorded, and the standard errors (S.E.) are shown.
Without injection of the C-terminal peptides, the amiloride-sensitive
Na+ conductances for   - and
 T T-rENaC were 52.0 ± 5.0 µS
(n = 6) and 123.7 ± 12.6 µS (n = 11), respectively. Injection of the individual peptides
SP30 , SP30 , or the peptide mixture
decreased the conductances of  T T-rENaC
by 103.4 ± 3.7 µS (n = 5), 79.8 ± 5.7 µS (n = 4), and 37.6 ± 10.7 µS
(n = 11), respectively. In contrast, the
amiloride-sensitive Na+ conductance of   -rENaC did
not decline after injection of either the peptide mixture (53.0 ± 4.3 µS, n = 6) or injection of the individual
peptides SP30 (51.8 ± 5.4 µS, n = 6) and SP30 (48.1 ± 6.4 µS, n = 5).
|
|
To study the inhibitory kinetics of the individual peptides and their
mixture, increasing concentrations of the SP30 and/or SP30 , varying from 92 to 1732 µM, were
injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes expressing
 T -,   T-, and
 T T-rENaC. The concentration-response curves of peptide(s) on amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in
oocytes injected with cRNA of rENaC constructs associated with
Liddle's syndrome (Fig. 4A)
were well described by the Hill equation (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Concentration dependence of the C-terminal
peptides inhibition on macroscopic Na+ currents of
 T ,
  T, or
 T T-rENaC
expressed in oocytes. A, the normalized
amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents of
 T T-rENaC are plotted as a function of
peptide concentrations injected into oocytes (from 0 to 1732 µM). The individual concentration of peptide was varied
from 0 to 1732 µM by repeated injections into the same
oocyte. The dose-response curves were fit with the Hill equation:
I/I0 = 1/{1+([Pep]/Kd)n}. The two far
right dashed lines are the double truncation mutant
( T T-rENaC) injected with
SP30 (closed squares) and SP30
(closed circles). The remaining lines (open
symbols) represent single truncation mutant
 T -rENaC injected with SP30 peptide
(open squares) and   T injected with
peptide SP30 (open circles), respectively.
The open triangles represent data obtained from
 T T-rENaC-expressing oocytes injected
with a 1:1 combination of SP30 and SP30
peptides. The apparent dissociation constants (Kd)
and the corresponding Hill coefficient constants determined from the
associated Hill plots (B) are listed in Table I.
|
|
The Kd values and the corresponding Hill coefficient
are summarized in Table I. The Hill
coefficients for the individual peptides and the peptide mixture range
from 0.7 to 1. These results suggested that the individual C-terminal
peptides and their mixture interact with one rENaC subunit or with a
single binding site.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Estimated parameters of peptide inhibition on rENaC constructs by
fitting with Hill equation
The numbers in the parentheses in the 1st column indicated the number
of oocytes used. Kd stands for the apparent
equilibrium dissociation constant in µM. The individual
peptides (SP30 or SP30 ) or the peptide mixtures
(SP30 ( + )) were injected into oocytes expressing
single ( T or   T) or double
( T T) mutation rENaC constructs. Means ± S.E. are presented.
|
|
Macroscopic Currents of Point Mutants Are Not Inhibited by
Peptides--
Among the Liddle's ENaCs, both and C-terminal
truncated (nonsense) mutants and the single amino acid point mutants
resulted in greater amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents
compared with the wild-type construct when expressed in
Xenopus oocytes (22). Because the C-terminal peptides
inhibited the currents associated with  T -,
  T-, and  T T-rENaC
expressed in oocytes, the question arose as to whether this specific
effect was based on the ability of the peptides to restore the
wild-type nature of these truncation mutants through the specific
interaction with the truncated channel or by involvement of
intracellular secondary components. To test this hypothesis, subunits
containing point mutations associated with Liddle's syndrome,
Y618A ( Y) or Y628A
( Y), combined with the two complementary subunits of wt
rENaC, were expressed in oocytes, and the effect of the peptides was examined.
In oocytes injected with wt   -rENaC and point mutant
constructs,  Y and   Y, three
parallel groups of oocytes from the same frog were injected on the same
day. The amiloride-sensitive conductance in oocytes injected with
 Y -rENaC and   Y-rENaC were
45.77 ± 3.8 µS (n = 6) and 43.5 ± 3.9 µS (n = 7), respectively. In comparison, the chord
conductance of wt   -rENaC was 15.7 ± 4.0 µS
(n = 6, p < 0.001). The reversal
potentials among each group did not show a statistically significant
difference, indicating that the cationic selectivity was not modified
by point mutagenesis of the tyrosines in the - (in position 618) or
- (in position 628) rENaC subunit. The reason why the absolute value
of Na+ conductance in this batch of oocytes was lower than
that measured in the experiments presented in Fig. 3 was because less
ENaC cRNA was injected (7.5 versus 25 ng/oocyte).
As shown in Fig. 5, following an
injection of either 276 µM SP30 or
SP30 into oocytes expressing
 Y -rENaC, the current amplitudes were slightly
increased to 108.91 ± 2.5 and 114.07 ± 1.83%,
respectively. For oocytes expressing   Y-rENaC, the Na+ currents were decreased slightly to 85.31 ± 2.4 and 91.53 ± 2.4%, respectively, following - or -peptide
injection. No significant inhibitory effects of the individual peptides
were found (variation less than 15%) on  Y - and
  Y-rENaC-associated amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in oocytes (Fig. 5). Similarly, injection of
the peptide mixture into oocytes expressing either
 Y - or   Y-rENaC did not
significantly affect the current amplitudes (Fig. 5). The above
experiments were repeated using the peptides at a concentration of 1732 µM; comparable results, i.e. no significant
current inhibition (within 15% of the preinjection control), were
observed (n = 3 each; data not shown).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of macroscopic Na+
currents of wt and and point mutations of rENaC by individual peptides and the peptide
mixture. The protocol for peptide injection into wt and point
mutations ( Y -,   Y-rENaC) is
described under "Materials and Methods." The amiloride-sensitive
Na+ currents in oocytes without peptide injection were
normalized to 100%. Injection of SP30 ,
SP30 , or the peptide mixture (276 µM)
showed no significant inhibitory effect on wt   -
(top),  Y - (middle), and
  Y-rENaC (bottom) expressed in oocytes.
Variation of amiloride-sensitive currents in the presence of peptides
was less than 15% of the control post-peptide injection for each
group.
|
|
Amiloride Blockade of rENaCs Expressed in Oocytes--
One of the
defining features of ENaC is its sensitivity to the potassium sparing
diuretic amiloride, which reversibly blocks the channel at nanomolar to
micromolar concentrations (for review see Ref. 7). To identify that the
currents were carried by exogenous rENaC expression, inhibition of
current by amiloride was studied in rENaC-injected oocytes and in
H2O-injected oocytes as a control. Under voltage clamp
conditions, amiloride-blockable Na+ currents could not be
detected in H2O-injected oocytes
(I 140 = 100 nA). In comparison to the small
currents observed in uninjected or water-injected oocytes, large
amiloride-sensitive inward Na+ currents of 5-10 µA in
oocytes injected with cRNA of wt rENaC were seen, indicative of the
fact that the currents recorded were indeed produced by exogenous rENaC
expression (data not shown).
In order to verify that the currents we observed were produced by
exogenous cRNAs of rENaC rather than by activation of an endogenous
cation channel, amiloride was applied to outside-out patches.
Outside-out patches from oocytes expressing rENaC (wt or mutant
varieties) invariably contained multiple channels. Similar continuous
recordings were made on oocytes expressing all of the other Liddle's
truncation constructs used in these experiments (Fig.
6). When perfused with 100 nM
amiloride, the multichannel currents of rENaC and the Liddle's mutants
became flickery. After washing out amiloride, the original multichannel
traces were recovered, indicating that the inhibitory effect of
amiloride was reversible. In contrast, no amiloride-sensitive single
channel currents could be seen in 10 outside-out patches of
H2O-injected oocytes.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Amiloride blockade of single channel currents
of wt   -rENaC and
the Liddle's mutations. A, outside-out patches were
isolated from oocytes expressing   - (top left),
 T T- (bottom left),
 Y - (bottom left), and
  Y-rENaC (bottom right). In the absence
of amiloride, each patch contained around five channels for the
Liddle's mutations but less than three channels for wt
  -rENaC. Superfusion of amiloride from 0 to 10 µM
to the extracellular side of rENaC channels caused the current traces
to flicker due to decrease in open time constant, especially when the
concentrations of amiloride are above 100 nM. The blocking
of amiloride on rENaCs was reversible and
concentration-dependent. For illustration purposes, the effects
of only a single concentration of amiloride are shown, and only partial
records are presented for simplicity. B, log dose-response
curves of amiloride inhibition of wt   and Liddle's mutations.
The data are expressed as percent inhibition of
NPo determined from channel activity in outside
patches of oocyte membrane. The data points and the error
bars represent the mean and the S.E. for at least 3 separate
experiments.
|
|
In order to determine whether the efficacy of amiloride was changed by
any of these truncation mutations, we constructed dose-response curves
for amiloride inhibition of channel activity
(N·Po) in these outside-out patches
(Fig. 6B). Kd for wt   -,  T T-,  Y -,
  Y-rENaC at a holding potential of 20 mV were 55.4, 71.8, 76.4, and 96.7 nM, respectively
(p > 0.1, analysis of variance). These results
indicate that there was no difference in amiloride sensitivity between
wt   -rENaC and the Liddle's mutants. Furthermore, amiloride
inhibited single channel activity (N·Po) by acting as an open channel
blocker (39).
Effect of a 1:1 Peptide Mixture on Single Channel Currents of
Truncated Mutants--
We also used single channel analysis to assay
the inhibitory effect of the C-terminal peptides on wt   -rENaC
and the Liddle's constructs when expressed in oocytes. Fig.
7 shows the single channel current traces
for   (top) and  T T-rENaC
(middle) and their respective I-V curves (bottom) in inside-out patches of oocytes membrane under bi-ionic conditions. The unitary conductances of both wt   (n = 9) and
 T T-rENaC (n = 6)
averaged around 7 pS. The reversal potentials under bi-ionic conditions
averaged 97 mV, indicating a
PLi/PK of 42.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Current-voltage relationship curves of
wt   - and
 T T-rENaC
expressed in oocytes. A and B show the
original current traces recorded from inside-out patches displaying
single channel activities of wt   - and
 T T-rENaC. The pipette medium consisted
of 100 mM LiCl, and 100 mM KCl was included in
the bath solution. The pH of the media was adjusted to 7.4 with HEPES
buffer at 25 °C. C, the current data for wt   -
(open circles) and  T T-rENaC
(closed squares) are the averaged values came from 6 separate experiments, and the error bars indicate the S.E.
The data were fit by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz current equation for the
bi-ionic situation to estimate the unitary conductance, ionic
permeability, and the reversal potential. No significant changes were
detected in either the conductance 7 pS (n = 6) or the
reversal potential (97.4 ± 3.1 mV, n = 6) for
 T T-rENaC expressed in oocytes, as
compared with wt rENaC.
|
|
The effects of 1000 µM peptide mixture on the kinetics of
the double-truncated Liddle's mutant
( T T) are shown in Fig.
8. It can be seen that the peptide
mixture decreased NPo, but not the conductance
of  T T-rENaC, and was completely
reversible (Fig. 8C). The inhibition produced by the
peptides on  T T-rENaC was very
different than that seen for amiloride (cf. Fig.
6A), i.e. the peptides did not appear to act as
open channel blockers.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Single channel inhibition of
 T T-rENaC
by the peptide mixture. Continuous single channel records
(inside-out patches) of wt   -rENaC (A) or
 T T-rENaC (B and
C) expressed in oocytes are shown. Excised inside-out
patches were prepared in order to apply the C-terminal peptides to the
cytosolic side of the rENaC channels. The desired concentration of
peptide was added directly to a small (0.3 ml) chamber. The effect of
SP30 + SP30 on the wt (A) and
 T T channel (C) and the lack
of effect of 200 µM Pro-SP30 peptide on
 T T-rENaC (B) are depicted.
The holding potential was 40 mV. Each condition was replicated six
times.
|
|
If the C-terminal regions of the - and -ENaC subunits act as
intrinsic gating particles, exogenously added and C-terminal peptides should not block wt   -rENaC because of the presence of
intact - and -ENaC C termini. The effect of the peptide mixture on wt   -rENaC was thus explored following application of
peptides to inside-out patches (Fig. 8A). In contrast to
 T T-rENaC, the C-terminal peptides had
no effect on the gating of wt   -rENaC currents nor did 1000 µM Pro-SP30 peptide produce any inhibition of  T T-rENaC (Fig. 8B),
consistent with the macroscopic current recordings (Fig. 1). The single
channel activity (N·Po) and
Po of each group are summarized in Fig.
9.
N·Po of
 T T was approximately 3-fold greater
than wt   -rENaC at a holding potential of 40 mV, consistent
with whole-cell current measurements. The corresponding Po of  T T-rENaC
increased by 41.5% compared with wt   -rENaC.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Inhibition of the peptide mixture on the
number of channel per patch, single channel activity, and open
probability of
 T T-rENaC.
The summarized data on single channel activity (normalized
N·Po of wt   -rENaC as 1.0, middle), the number of channel per patch (N,
bottom), and open probability (Po,
top) for wt   - and
 T T-rENaC are averaged from the results
of five experiments. The peptide mixture of SP30 and
SP30 (1:1, 100 µM) was applied to the
isolated inside-out patches from oocytes expressing wt   - and
 T T-rENaC. All three investigated
parameters for  T T-rENaC exceeded those
for wt   -rENaC by the order of 2- or 3-fold, in accordance with
the macroscopic currents depicted in Figs. 1 and 2 before the addition
of the peptide mixture.
|
|
Effect of SP30 :SP30 Peptides on
Single Channel Current of Point Mutants--
Fig.
10 presents representative single
channel current traces for wt   -,  Y -, and
  Y-rENaC in cell-attached patches of Xenopus oocyte membranes. The Liddle's point mutants
expressed in oocytes had similar biophysical characteristics to those
of wt   -rENaC. The channel number (N), the single
channel activity (N·Po), and mean
Po are summarized in Table
II.
N·Po of  Y and   Y were 2.65- and 2.18-fold over that of wt
  -rENaC, respectively, at a holding potential of 40 mV. The
corresponding Po of  Y and
  Y increased only slightly, namely by 6.8 and
4.5%, respectively (Table II), values not significantly different than
that for the wild-type channel. The number of channels per patch and
the single channel activity of  Y - and
  Y-rENaC on the other hand were significantly
increased compared with wt rENaC, p < 0.01.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The unitary current-voltage curve for
wt   -,
 Y -,
and
  Y-rENaC
expressed in oocytes. The top panels show the single
channel recordings elicited from cell-attached patches from oocytes
expressing wt   -,  Y -, and
  Y-rENaC. The traces were recorded at the sampling
rate of 2 kHz and filtered at 200 Hz. The data illustrated at the
bottom of the figure are the averaged unitary currents for
wt   - (closed circles),  Y -
(closed squares), and   Y-rENaC
(open squares). The unitary conductances for
 Y - and   Y-rENaC are 6.61 ± 0.006 pS (n = 5) and 6.68 ± 0.002 pS
(n = 10), respectively.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effect of the peptide mixture on the single channel features of
Liddle's mutations in excised inside-out patches
The channel number per patch (n), the open probability
(Po), and the single channel activity
(N · Po) in the absence (control)
or presence (+ peptide) of the peptide mixture (100 µM
SP30 + 100 µM SP30 ) are
included. The numbers in parentheses in the 1st column are the number
of patches. Data are presented as mean ± S.E. of 4-15
experiments and were calculated at a holding potential of 40 mV.
|
|
The unitary conductances of  Y and
  Y-rENaC were 6.61 ± 0.01 (n = 5), and 6.68 ± 0.02 (n = 10), respectively
(Fig. 10), indicating that these single-point mutations in the C
terminus did not influence single channel conductance. The cation
permeability ratios
(PLi/PK) for
 Y - and   Y-rENaC were similar
to that of wt   -rENaC when expressed in Xenopus
oocytes, i.e. around 40 (Fig. 10, bottom).
The effect of peptides on  Y - and
  Y-rENaC was also assessed using the inside-out
patch configuration. As shown in Fig. 11, no change in channel activity was
recorded for both  Y - and   Y-rENaC. Unlike the truncated Liddle's mutant,
the number of channels per patch, the single channel activity, and the
Po were not affected by application of the
peptide mixture to the cytosolic side of the patch from the oocytes
expressing  Y - or   Y-rENaC (Fig. 12 and Table II). Taken together,
these data indicated that the C-terminal peptides inhibited the
amiloride-sensitive macroscopic Na+ currents and the single
channel activity of  T T-rENaC but not those of  Y - and   Y-rENaC,
consistent with a role for the C terminus acting as an intrinsic
inhibitory particle of ENaC.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
No response to the peptide mixture treatment
of single channel currents in oocytes expressing Liddle's missense
mutations. Single channel traces of  Y -
(top) and   Y-rENaC (bottom)
are shown obtained from the excised inside-out patches. The right
half of each trace shows the effect of the peptide
mixture (SP30 + SP30 in a ratio of 1:1,
100 µM) application. The single channel behavior of both
 Y - and   Y-rENaC is not
sensitive to superfusion of the peptide mixture.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Summarized data of the C-terminal peptides
on the single channel activity, the number of channels per patch, and
open probability of Liddle's point mutations. The protocols for
recording and analysis of Liddle's point mutations are identical to
those described in Fig. 10. The data are expressed as mean ± S.E.
The averaged results of N·Po,
Po, and N in the absence of the
peptide mixture (control) for  Y -rENaC
(left panels) are 2.87 ± 0.37, 0.44 ± 0.03, and
6.53 ± 0.36, respectively (n = 5). Similar
results are observed for   Y-rENaC (right
panels). The cytoplasmic membrane in inside-out patches perfusion
with the peptide mixture (100 µM) seems not to influence
the preceding parameters of  Y - (left)
and   Y-rENaC (right).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The hypothesis that the cytosolic tails of - or -ENaC
subunits may function as inherent inhibitory particles involved in the
normal gating behavior of epithelial Na+ channels arose
from our previous observations made in planar lipid bilayers that
synthetic peptides made up of the last 10 or the last 30 amino acids of
either - or -ENaC could inhibit Na+ channels whose
Po was increased because they possessed
Liddle's truncation mutations (40, 41). In the present study, we
extended these initial observations to the oocyte expression system,
using a combination of two-electrode voltage clamping and excised patch clamping, to confirm the inhibitory actions of these peptides on ENaCs
containing truncations in their and/or subunits when expressed
in a more native environment.
Expression of Liddle's Mutants--
Two non-mutually exclusive
mechanisms have been proposed to account for the basal-activated,
macroscopic amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents induced by
expression of the Liddle's mutants: the retrieval theory
(i.e. decreased channel internalization) and/or enhanced single channel activity (42). Identification of specific Nedd4 and
spectrin binding domains in the cytosolic region of the ENaC subunits
(43, 44) and the interactions of ENaC with actin and other cytoskeletal
elements (45) supported the idea that the fundamental problem in
Liddle's disease could be inefficient internalization of the channel
from the cell surface. Furthermore, observations by Snyder et
al. (24) that suggested that >90% of the basal-activated
Na+ currents are correlated to an increase in ENaC
expression at the cell surface. This finding was verified in oocytes
expressing a rENaC construct containing a truncated version of the subunit (R564X). Cell surface expression of
 R564X -rENaC was increased over wt rENaC
expression, corresponding to a 5.6-fold increase in ENaC currents (25).
However, we previously reported that a 35% increase in the
fluorescence intensity in oocytes injected with
 R564X -rENaC was accompanied by a 4.4-fold
increase in amiloride-sensitive Na+ current (26). Thus, a
smaller increase in cell surface channel density was associated with a
large increase in current, suggesting that the retrieval theory alone
did not adequately explain the large macroscopic Na+
current seen in Liddle's mutants (46). It is possible that the
differences between these studies could be due to different responses
produced by rENaC and hENaC (24).
The idea that ~90% of the ENaC channels at the cell surface are
inactive and only 10% are active (27) underscores the methodological limitations in quantitatively determining not only active ENaC channel
number at the cell surface but also single channel
Po. Electrophysiological recordings, including
two-electrode voltage and patch clamping, report only electrically
active ENaC channels at the cell surface and cannot reveal the
existence of quiescent channels within the plasma membrane. The
assessment of single channel activity, specifically open probability,
can only be done if the total number of channels (active plus inactive)
per patch is known. The relationship between macroscopic currents and
single channel activity is given by = i·N·Po where
is the mean current amplitude; i
indicates the amplitude of the unitary current; N represents
the number of active channels at the cell surface, and
Po is the open probability of the channel.
Therefore, in a case where the majority of channels are quiescent, the
true Po will be very low. Thus, a significant
component of the basal-activated ENaC currents that is not due to
increased ENaC channel expression at the cell surface can result
from altered single channel behavior. Such alterations may include an
increase in Po or an increase in single channel
unitary conductance.
The findings of the present study showed that the unitary conductances
for both the truncation mutants
( T T-rENaC) and the missense Liddle's
mutants ( T - and   T-rENaC) did
not differ from that of wt   -rENaC, in accordance with the
observations of others (23, 24). However, the electrically active ENaC number at the cell surface of Liddle's mutants described as the number
per patch were 1.8-2.5-fold over that of wt   -rENaC. Significantly, in our experiments, Po for
 T T-rENaC was 40% higher as compared
with wt   -rENaC (Table II). The single channel activity
(N·Po) for all the mutant channels
showed a ~3-fold increase, paralleling the macroscopic ENaC currents
in oocytes expressing ENaC-containing Liddle's mutations. Moreover,
the PLi/PK permeability ratios for all of the mutant channels were comparable to those of wt
  -rENaC expressed in oocytes or of the native ENaC in epithelia
(47-49), as was the amiloride sensitivity. Thus, like Firsov et
al. (25) and Ismailov et al. (32), we propose the open
probability of Liddle's mutations producing truncations of the or
subunit carboxyl tails is also an important parameter contributing
to enhanced macroscopic ENaC currents seen in this disease.
It is important to reconcile our findings with those of other
laboratories claiming that single channel Po
does not change when a or subunit truncating Liddle's mutation
is present in ENaC (24, 50). As indicated above, analyses of
Po from single channel data recorded by patch
clamp are difficult because the true number of channels in the patch
must be known. Moreover, appropriate observation times must also be
attained. Fyfe and Canessa (50) concluded that subunit composition of
ENaC primarily determines channel kinetics, yet only two, not three,
subunit channels were used in their studies. As they and others
(50-53) indicate, the Po of ENaC is quite
variable, ranging from 0.01 to 0.9. This variability in basal
Po reflects uncertainties in channel number
within any given patch. If the channel number is underestimated, for
example, due to the presence of quiescent channels, then higher values
of Po will be calculated. More reliable estimates of Po for wild-type ENaC would be
obtained because there would be on average fewer quiescent channels
present. In our experiments, wide variability in
Po was not observed from patch-to-patch.
Although our experiments also suffer from lack of certainty of the
absolute number of channels per patch, we only performed our analyses
on multichannel patches (2-7 channels), not "single" channel
patches, so that a more representative (and potentially more reliable) determination of channel number could be made.
Peptide Inhibition of Liddle's Mutants--
By using the
whole-cell configuration of the patch clamp technique, the ability of a
10-amino acid polypeptide (200 µM) identical to either
the cytosolic tail of -rENaC or -hENaC to inhibit amiloride-sensitive inward Na+ currents in lymphocytes of
Liddle's disease was found (41). This finding was confirmed in planar
lipid bilayers reconstituted with the Na+ channel complex
immunopurified from lymphocytes derived from patients affected with
Liddle's disease (32). Unresolved questions concern the molecular
mechanism underlying peptide inhibition of ENaC and whether peptides
comprising the missing segments of the intracellular C-terminal tails
of the or subunit can inhibit basal-activated Na+
currents caused by both single and double truncation mutations ( T -rENaC,   T-rENaC, and
 T T-rENaC) and missense mutations ( Y - and   Y-rENaC) identified
in Liddle's syndrome cases. In the present study, a combination of the
two peptides markedly inhibited
 T T-rENaC-associated
amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents in a
dose-dependent fashion. Whereas the individual peptides
were also inhibitory, their efficacy was much reduced (Fig. 4).
Expression of only one truncation mutant of either the subunit
( T) or the subunit ( T) combined with
complementary wt ENaC subunits also induced a 3-fold increase in
macroscopic amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents (Refs. 23, 24,
and 27 and present study). The significantly lower inhibitory effect of
the individual peptides compared with the peptide mixture on
 T T-rENaC suggests that both the and subunit C termini are required for efficient inhibition of an
activated ENaC. This idea is supported by our data showing that the
efficacy of either SP30 or SP30 used
individually was enhanced in the single subunit truncation mutant
(  T and  T constructs as
compared with the double truncation constructs ( T T)). Furthermore, the fact that
these peptides did not block the point mutant channels
( Y or   Y) and the fact that
these channels did not have an increased Po is
consistent with the argument that the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails of
- and -ENaC are involved in the normal gating of ENaC. We
hypothesize that there is -sheet formation between the C-terminal
tails of and that, in essence, forces the tails to act as a
single binding peptide. Evidence supporting such an interaction comes
from intrinsic fluorescence and circular dichroism studies of these
synthetic peptides in solution (33). Measured Hill coefficients of 1 for the peptide mixture are also consistent with this hypothesis.
The specificity of the peptide inhibition on Liddle's ENaC (truncation
mutants) was verified in experiments using non-ENaC peptides
(e.g., a 14-amino acid-mer of CFTR or
Pro-SP30 ). Cytoplasmic injection or perfusion of either
of these peptides at the same concentrations used for the peptide
mixture did not cause any decrease of
 T T-rENaC-associated
amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents. Because rENaC activity is
down-regulated by hypo-osmotic stress (14) and peptide injection may
have increased the oocyte volume (the cell volume increased ~13%
assuming the mean liquid volume of oocyte is 500 nl), it is also
possible that the decreased channel activity could be due to oocyte
swelling. However, injection of the same volume of distilled water had
no effect on the current amplitude (Fig. 1). The observations of
Kellenberger and colleagues (27) excluded the possibility that the
inhibitory effects of the C-terminal peptides of rENaC on the
basal-activated currents of Liddle's mutations result from rundown.
Their examination of the rundown phenomenon suggested that the wt
rENaC-associated, rather than the Liddle's mutant-associated,
Na+ current shows a time-dependent decrease (by
27% in 25 min). In the present study, the C-terminal peptides did not
exert any effect on wt rENaC or the point mutant constructs
( Y ,   Y-rENaC), indicating that
they did not have untoward nonspecific effects in this expression
system. The amiloride-sensitive Na+ currents generally
achieved stabilization after ~10 min of perfusion under our
experimental conditions, and the rundown of wt rENaC currents was
correlated to the accumulation of intracellular Na+ (27).
Comparable experiments were performed on excised inside-out patches of
oocyte membranes containing active ENaC.
Our data show that the  T T-rENaC number
per patch, Po, and thus overall channel activity
(N·Po) were inhibited to wild-type levels by the peptide mixture, similar to that seen in the macroscopic experiments. The inhibition of the channel by peptide occurs only from
the cytoplasmic side and is dissimilar to that produced by amiloride,
in that a "flickering"-type block was not evident. These results
are essentially identical to those seen in the bilayer, in that
increasing concentrations of the peptides increase a second slow
component of channel closed time distribution, leaving the open time
distribution unaffected (33), again consistent with the reconstituted
planar lipid bilayer system (33).
Deletion of the C termini of the - and -ENaC subunits leads to
loss of the PPPXY conserved sequence. The PPPXY
motifs located within the C termini have been found to play an
important physiological role in controlling Nedd4-induced
Ca2+-dependent retrieval and clathrin-mediated
endocytosis of ENaC (44, 53). Thus, the possibility that the applied
C-terminal peptides can function as a sensor for ENaC internalization
signaling pathways and thereby result in a decrease in the number of
channels per unit at the cell surface cannot be excluded. More likely, however, is that the decrease in the active channel number per patch
seen subsequent to peptide addition is due to a decrease in the
fraction of the electrically detected rENaC per unit of cell surface,
simply by a reduction in Po. Because the
C-terminal domains of the - and -ENaC subunits contain
phosphorylation sites for protein kinase A and protein kinase C (8),
in vivo the C-terminal regions may interact with some target
for protein kinase A- or protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation on
rENaC (subunits or associated cytoskeletal elements) and therefore
regulate the activity of rENaC by altering its phosphorylation state
(32, 46). The enhanced sensitivity to the activating effects (via protein kinase A) of normal endogenous cAMP levels in affected lymphocytes of Liddle's disease (41) is consistent with this possibility. Also, based on the finding that the channel activity of
truncated Liddle's mutants is no longer down-regulated in a feedback
manner by the increasing intracellular Na+ concentration
and that <10% of ENaC population located at the cell surface is in
the active channel pool, it has been proposed that a greater fraction
of "silent" rENaCs has escaped from the inactive pool due to the
rise in cytosolic Na+ concentration and thus has
contributed to the increased electrically detected number of channels
per patch (27).
In summary, our results demonstrate that both a greater ENaC number of
channels at the cell surface and an increased Po
contribute to the increased basal ENaC currents associated with
expression of ENaC truncation mutants identified in Liddle's disease.
In addition, C-terminal peptides structurally identical to the
cytoplasmic tails of individual ENaC subunits afforded us an
opportunity to examine the regulatory function imposed by the
C-terminal tails of rENaC and thus further elucidate the pathogenesis
of Liddle's disease. The results in the present study confirmed that
the constitutively activated Na+ absorption through
truncation mutants of the ENaC channel located on the apical membrane
of kidney collecting duct correlates to the loss of the inhibitory
tails of the and/or subunits. Physical addition of the missing
regions for both subunits of the truncation Liddle's mutations could
achieve successful correction of currents in vitro, both at
the macroscopic and single channel levels. Combined with similar
observations obtained from patch clamping on human B lymphocytes (41),
dual-electrode voltage clamping on oocytes expressing ENaC (26), and
planar lipid bilayer incorporation experiments (32, 33), our results
provide an experimental basis for understanding inherent ENaC function.
Our results also support the idea that different Liddle's mutations,
e.g. truncation versus point mutations, produce
enhanced macroscopic Na+ currents through different mechanisms.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Eddie J. Walthall (Department of
Physiology and Biophysics, University of Alabama, Birmingham) for the
superb technical assistance in the construction of the patch clamp
setup. We thank Drs. C. Canessa (Department of Physiology, Yale
University) and L. Schild (Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology,
Lausanne, Switzerland) for their kind gifts of ENaC, and Drs. S. Kellenberger (Lausanne, Switzerland) and Dr. Y. L. Zhu (Physiology,
State University of New York, Buffalo) for their helpful discussion. We
thank C. Guy for excellent secretarial service.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NIDDKD Grant DK37206 from the
National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology
and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, MCLM 704, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005. Tel.: 205-934-6200; Fax: 205-934-1445; E-mail: Benos@phybio.bhs.uab.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ENaC, epithelial
sodium channels;
rENaC, rat epithelial sodium channels;
hENaC, human
epithelial sodium channels;
wt, wild type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lifton, R. P.,
and Jeunemaitre, X.
(1993)
J. Hypertens.
11,
231-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Canessa, C. M.,
Schild, L.,
Buell, G.,
Thoreus, B.,
Gantschl, I.,
Horisberger, J.-D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1994)
Nature
367,
463-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Lingueglia, E.,
Renard, N.,
Waldmann, R.,
Voilley, N.,
Champigny, G.,
Plass, H.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13736-13739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Canessa, C. M.,
Merillat, A. M.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C1682-C1690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Sorscher, E. J.,
Brenner, B. M.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
13875-13879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Benos, D. J.,
Awayda, M. S.,
Ismailov, I. I.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(1995)
J. Membr. Biol.
143,
1-148[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Garty, H.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
359-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Shimkets, R. A.,
Lifton, R.,
and Canessa, C. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. U. S. A.
95,
3301-3305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Chraibi, A.,
Vallet, V.,
Firsov, D.,
Hess, S. K.,
and Horisberger, J. D.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
127-138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Palmer, L. G.
(1985)
J. Membr. Biol.
83,
57-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Ismailov, I. I.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1995)
J. Gen. Physiol.
106,
445-466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ishikawa, T.,
Marunaka, Y.,
and Rotin, D.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
825-846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Smith, P. R.,
Saccomani, G.,
Joe, E. H.,
Angelides, K. J.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. U. S. A.
88,
6971-6975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ji, H. L.,
Fuller, C. M.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C1182-C1190
|
| 15.
|
Shimkets, R. A.,
Warnock, D. G.,
Bositis, C. M.,
Nelson-Williams, C.,
Hansson, J. H.,
Schambelan, M.,
Gill, J. R.,
Ulick, S.,
Milora, R. V.,
and Findling, J. W.
(1994)
Cell
79,
407-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hansson, J. H.,
Schild, L.,
Lu, Y.,
Wilson, T. A.,
Gautschi, I.,
Shimkets, R.,
Nelson-Williams, C.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Lifton, R. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. U. S. A.
92,
11495-11499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Tamura, H.,
Schild, L.,
Enomoto, N.,
Matsui, N.,
Marumo, F.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Sasaki, S.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
1780-1784[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Baker, E. H.,
Dong, Y. B.,
Sagnella, G. A.,
Rothwell, M.,
Onipinla, A. K.,
Markandu, N. D.,
Cappuccio, F. P.,
Cook, D. G.,
Persu, A.,
Corvol, P.,
Jeunemaitre, X.,
Carter, N. D.,
and MacGregor, G. A.
(1998)
Lancet
351,
1388-1392[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Inoue, T.,
Okauchi, Y.,
Matsuzaki, Y.,
Kuwajima, K.,
Kondo, H.,
Horiuchi, N.,
Nakao, K.,
Iwata, M.,
Yokogoshi, Y.,
Shintani, Y.,
Bando, H.,
and Saito, S.
(1998)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
138,
691-697[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Jackson, S. N.,
Williams, B.,
Houtman, P.,
and Trembath, R. C.
(1998)
J. Med. Gen.
35,
510-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Hansson, J. H.,
Nelson-Williams, C.,
Suzuki, H.,
Schild, L.,
Shimkets, R.,
Lu, Y.,
Canessa, C.,
Iwasaki, T.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Lifton, R. P.
(1995)
Nature Genet.
11,
76-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Schild, L.,
Lu, Y.,
Gautschi, I.,
Schneeberger, E.,
Lifton, R. P.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2381-2387[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Schild, L.,
Canessa, C. M.,
Shimkets, R. A.,
Gautschi, I.,
Lifton, R. P.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5699-5703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Snyder, P. M.,
Price, M. P.,
McDonald, F. J.,
Adams, C. M.,
Volk, K. A.,
Zeiher, B. G.,
Stokes, J. B.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1995)
Cell
83,
969-978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Firsov, D.,
Schild, L.,
Gautschi, I.,
Merillat, A. M.,
Schneeberger, E.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. U. S. A.
93,
15370-15375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Awayda, M. S.,
Tousson, A.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C1889-C1899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Kellenberger, S.,
Gautschi, I.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Schild, L.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
2741-2750[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Dinudom, A.,
Harvey, K. F.,
Komwatana, P.,
Young, J. A.,
Kumar, S.,
and Cook, D. I.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. U. S. A.
95,
7169-7173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Vassilev, P. M.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1988)
Science
241,
1658-1661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Eaholtz, G.,
Zagotta, W. N.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
75-82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
French, R. J.,
Prusak-Sochaczewski, E.,
Zamponi, G. W.,
Becker, S.,
Kularatna, A. S.,
and Horn, R.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
407-413[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ismailov, I. I.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
Fuller, C. M.,
Bradford, A. L.,
Lifton, R. P.,
Warnock, D. G.,
Bubien, J. K.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C214-C223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ismailov, I. I.,
Shlyonsky, V. G.,
Serpersu, E. H.,
Fuller, C. M.,
Cheung, H. C.,
Muccio, D.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
354-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Ji, H. L.,
DuVall, M. D.,
Patton, H. K.,
Satterfield, C. L.,
Fuller, C. M.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
C455-C464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Methfessel, C.,
Witzemann, V.,
Takahashi, T.,
Mishina, M.,
Numa, S.,
and Sakmann, B.
(1986)
Pflügers Arch.
407,
577-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Hamill, O. P.,
Marty, A.,
Nether, E.,
Sakmann, B.,
and Sigworth, F. J.
(1981)
Pflügers Arch.
991,
85-100
|
| 37.
|
Benos, D. J.,
Mandel, L. J.,
and Balaban, R. S.
(1979)
J. Gen. Physiol.
93,
307-326
|
| 38.
|
Bauer, R. J.,
Carl, A.,
Kapicka, C. L.,
and Kenyon, J. L.
(1996)
J. Neurosci. Meth.
68,
101-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Neher, E.,
and Steinbach, J. H.
(1978)
J. Physiol. (Lond.).
277,
153-176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Fuller, C. M.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
Shlyonsky, V. G.,
Ismailov, I. I.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
72,
1622-1632[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Bubien, J. K.,
Ismailov, I. I.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
Cornwell, T.,
Lifton, R. P.,
Fuller, C. M.,
Achard, J.-M.,
Benos, D. J.,
and Warnock, D. G.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C208-C213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Horisberger, J.-D.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
443-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Rotin, D.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
O'Brodovich, H.,
Merilainen, J.,
Lehto, V. P.,
Canessa, C. M.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Downey, G. P.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4440-4450[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Staub, O.,
Dho, S.,
Henry, P. C.,
Corrrea, J.,
Ishikawa, T.,
McGlade, J.,
and Rotin, D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2371-2380[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Cantiello, H. F.
(1995)
Kidney Int.
48,
970-984[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Warnock, D. G.
(1998)
Kidney Int.
53,
18-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Fuchs, W.
(1977)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
267,
137-166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
Edelman, I. S.,
and Lindemann, B.
(1980)
J. Membr. Biol.
57,
59-71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Palmer, L. G.
(1982)
J. Membr. Biol.
67,
91-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Fyfe, G. K.,
and Canessa, C. M.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
112,
423-432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
and Frindt, G.
(1996)
J. Gen. Physiol.
107,
35-45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
Sackin, H.,
and Frindt, G.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Camb.)
509,
151-162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Shimkets, R. A.,
Lifton, R. P.,
and Canessa, C. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25537-25541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Ji, W. Song, Z. Gao, X.-F. Su, H.-G. Nie, Y. Jiang, J.-B. Peng, Y.-X. He, Y. Liao, Y.-J. Zhou, et al.
SARS-CoV proteins decrease levels and activity of human ENaC via activation of distinct PKC isoforms
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
March 1, 2009;
296(3):
L372 - L383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Ji, L. R. Bishop, S. J. Anderson, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos
The Role of Pre-H2 Domains of {alpha}- and {delta}-Epithelial Na+ Channels in Ion Permeation, Conductance, and Amiloride Sensitivity
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
8428 - 8440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Booth, Q. Tong, J. Medina, P. M. Snyder, P. Patel, and J. D. Stockand
A Region Directly Following the Second Transmembrane Domain in {gamma}ENaC Is Required for Normal Channel Gating
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
41367 - 41379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Berdiev, J. Xia, L. A. McLean, J. M. Markert, G. Y. Gillespie, T. B. Mapstone, A. P. Naren, B. Jovov, J. K. Bubien, H.-L. Ji, et al.
Acid-sensing Ion Channels in Malignant Gliomas
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 2003;
278(17):
15023 - 15034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kamynina and O. Staub
Concerted action of ENaC, Nedd4-2, and Sgk1 in transepithelial Na+ transport
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2002;
283(3):
F377 - F387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Ji, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos
Intrinsic gating mechanisms of epithelial sodium channels
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2002;
283(2):
C646 - C650.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Jovov, B. K. Berdiev, C. M. Fuller, H.-L. Ji, and D. J. Benos
The Serine Protease Trypsin Cleaves C Termini of beta - and gamma -Subunits of Epithelial Na+ Channels
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 1, 2002;
277(6):
4134 - 4140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kunzelmann and M. Mall
Electrolyte Transport in the Mammalian Colon: Mechanisms and Implications for Disease
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2002;
82(1):
245 - 289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Berdiev, T. B. Mapstone, J. M. Markert, G. Y. Gillespie, J. Lockhart, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos
pH Alterations "Reset" Ca2+ Sensitivity of Brain Na+ Channel 2, a Degenerin/Epithelial Na+ Ion Channel, in Planar Lipid Bilayers
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 12, 2001;
276(42):
38755 - 38761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Ji, S. Parker, A. L. B. Langloh, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos
Point mutations in the post-M2 region of human {alpha}-ENaC regulate cation selectivity
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2001;
281(1):
C64 - C74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Copeland, B. K. Berdiev, H.-L. Ji, J. Lockhart, S. Parker, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos
Regions in the carboxy terminus of {alpha}-bENaC involved in gating and functional effects of actin
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2001;
281(1):
C231 - C240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. Ji, M. L. Chalfant, B. Jovov, J. P. Lockhart, S. B. Parker, C. M. Fuller, B. A. Stanton, and D. J. Benos
The Cytosolic Termini of the beta - and gamma -ENaC Subunits Are Involved in the Functional Interactions between Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator and Epithelial Sodium Channel
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 1, 2000;
275(36):
27947 - 27956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|