Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wijesuriya, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wijesuriya, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 38097-38106, December 31, 1999


Transcriptional Regulatory Elements of the Human Gene for Cytochrome P450c21 (Steroid 21-Hydroxylase) Lie within Intron 35 of the Linked C4B Gene*

Sujeewa D. Wijesuriya, Guangren Zhang, Andrea DardisDagger , and Walter L. Miller§

From the Department of Pediatrics and the Metabolic Research Unit, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0978

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The CYP21 gene, which encodes P450c21, the adrenal steroid 21-hydroxylase needed for glucocorticoid synthesis, lies in the major histocompatibility locus only 2.3 kilobase pairs (kb) downstream from the C4 gene. A 300-base pair (bp) proximal promoter and two upstream regions within C4 are needed for expression of mouse CYP21; the human gene also has a proximal promoter, but upstream elements have not been studied. To search for upstream regulatory elements in human CYP21B, we examined up to 9 kb of 5'-flanking DNA by transient transfection into human adrenal NCI-H295A cells. The 300-bp proximal promoter had substantial activity, but constructs retaining the DNA between -4.6 and -5.6 kb had increased activity, indicating the presence of distal elements. This region does not correspond to the mouse upstream regions, lying further upstream within intron 35 of C4B, which encompasses the previously described "Z promoter." DNase I footprinting located two elements, F1 and F2, lying -186 to -195 bp and -142 to -151 bp upstream from the Z cap site (-4862 to -4871 and -4818 to -4827 bp upstream of the CYP21B cap site). Each element formed a specific DNA-protein complex and conferred orientation-independent expression to a heterologous promoter. Mutations abolished formation of the DNA-protein complexes but only partially decreased expression. We identified a third site, F3, lying at -33 to -42 bp from Z. Competitive gel mobility supershift assays and co-transfection studies with SF-1 produced in vitro indicate F2 and F3 bind SF-1; BLAST searches and Southwestern blotting suggest that NF-W2 may bind F1. These results indicate that the Z promoter is a component of the CYP21 promoter needed to drive its adrenal-specific expression and that CYP21 transcription elements within C4 have kept these two genes linked during evolution.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)1 is a group of inborn errors of human steroid hormone biosynthesis (1) that occurs in about 1 in 14,000 individuals (2). Although mutation of the genes of any of the steroidogenic enzymes may cause CAH, over 95% of cases are due to mutations in steroid 21-hydroxylase; hence, this genetic locus has been the subject of intensive study (3-5). Adrenal 21-hydroxylation is catalyzed by cytochrome P450c21 (6), although other, unidentified enzymes can catalyze some steroid 21-hydroxylation in extra-adrenal tissues (7). Human P450c21 is encoded by the CYP21B gene, which lies in a complex array of genes on chromosome 6p21.3. The human (8-10), bovine (11, 12), and rodent (13, 14) genomes have duplicated CYP21A and CYP21B genes, but these duplications postdate mammalian speciation and have different duplication boundaries (15). Only the human 21B gene encodes P450c21, as the 21A gene carries three mutations that destroy the reading frame (8-10). By contrast, the mouse 21A gene is active while the corresponding 21B gene carries a single large internal deletion (13, 14), and in cattle both genes are active (11, 12, 16). The human, rodent, and bovine CYP21 genes are located in the major histocompatibility locus and are duplicated in tandem with the closely linked C4 genes for the fourth component of serum complement so that the array is 5' C4A, 21A, C4B, 21B 3' from telomere to centromere (8-17) (Fig. 1). The 5' ends (transcriptional start sites) of the human CYP21A and CYP21B genes lie only 2466 bp downstream from the polyadenylation sites of the corresponding C4A and C4B genes (15, 18).

In addition to the C4 and CYP21 genes, at least nine other transcription units overlap the human C4 and C21 genes. XB encodes the extracellular matrix protein tenascin-X (19-22); XB-S is a truncated XB transcript that arises from a promoter within an intron of XB and encodes a protein of unknown function (23); XA is an expressed, truncated XB gene that carries an internal deletion and does not encode protein (15); YA-S, YA-L, YB-S, and YB-L are short (S) and long (L) alternately spliced transcripts that arise at or near the CYP21A and B transcriptional start sites but have a different exonic array and lack open reading frames (24); the ZA and ZB transcripts arise from promoters within intron 35 of the C4A and C4B genes and have the potential to encode a protein identical to the carboxyl-terminal 131 amino acids of C4 (25) (Fig. 1). The three X transcripts are encoded on the DNA strand antisense to all the other transcripts and overlap the CYP21 and Y transcripts by several hundred bases and are transcribed in the same cells (20), but these sense and antisense strands do not form significant RNA:RNA duplexes in vivo (26). The two C4 genes are expressed almost exclusively in the liver (27), and XB is expressed in a wide variety of tissues (20, 28); all of the remaining transcripts (CYP21B, XA, XB-S, YA-S, YA-L, YB-S, YB-L, ZA, and ZB) are expressed only in the adrenal cortex (15, 23-25). Thus, this locus is especially well suited for studies aimed at identifying the requirements for adrenal-specific transcription.

Although the high frequency of 21-hydroxylase deficiency has stimulated intense study of human CYP21 genetics, less attention has been directed to the regulation of human CYP21 transcription. Studies of the mouse CYP21A gene showed that a small promoter fragment of only 230-330 bases upstream from the transcriptional start site is sufficient to confer both basal and cAMP-induced transcription in mouse adrenal Y-1 cells (29-33). These initial observations contributed to the discovery of the orphan nuclear receptor called SF-1 or Ad4-BP, which is required for the expression of steroidogenic enzymes in the adrenals and gonads (Refs. 34-36; for review, see Ref. 37). However, this proximal promoter region was necessary but not sufficient, as two small regions located 5.3 and 6.0 kb upstream from the mouse CYP21A gene were required for its expression in transgenic mice (38). Preliminary experiments with the promoter of the human CYP21B gene similarly identified basal and cAMP-responsive elements within a 200-bp proximal promoter adjacent to the transcriptional start site (39, 40), but far upstream sequences have not been studied.

We previously identified a 1-kb adrenal-specific transcript, operationally termed Z, that arises from a transcriptional start site in intron 35 of the human C4 gene, 55 bases upstream from the 5' end of exon 36 of C4 and 4676 bases upstream from the cap site of CYP21B (25). The "Z promoter," comprising as little as 235 bp upstream from the Z cap site, drove robust expression of a luciferase reporter when transfected into human adrenal NCI-H295 cells, but not when transfected into human placental JEG-3 cells, human liver HepG2 cells, or monkey kidney COS-1 cells (25). Because no function could be found for the Z transcript and because the Z promoter lies near to but upstream from the regions corresponding to the -5.3 and -6.0 regions of the mouse C21A gene tested by Milstone et al. (38), we suggested that the Z promoter is a component required for efficient adrenal-specific expression of the human CYP21B gene (25). We have now confirmed this hypothesis by characterizing large segments of the human CYP21B promoter, identifying specific sites of DNA/protein interaction.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Constructions-- A pWE15 human cosmid library (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was screened under stringent conditions for C4/C21 sequences using a 372-bp PCR probe containing sequences from intron 35 of the C4-Z promoter region (-5254 to -4882 of the CYP21B gene) (Fig. 1). To isolate C4B/CYP21B clones, secondary screening was performed by PCR of primary clones using 21B specific oligonucleotides resulting in a 670-bp product (-64 to -729 of CYP21B), which excluded amplification of CYP21A sequences. Positive cosmids were then digested with EcoRI and BamHI and hybridized with the 670-bp PCR probe. Positive DNA fragments were purified and used to assemble the constructs. The luciferase reporter constructs were built by cloning contiguous and internally deleted 5'-flanking DNA fragments of the CYP21B gene extending from +13 bp to -9 kb (CYP21B transcription initiation site is designated as -1). These fragments were cloned upstream from the firefly luciferase reporter gene in the PGL3-Basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI) at various restriction sites within the polylinker. The constructs were named according to the approximate length of the DNA segment cloned from the CYP21B gene with the bases numbered according to the sequence of the human C4A gene (18) (Fig. 1).

Mutations were introduced into various functional elements by site-directed mutagenesis using a modification of the PCR protocol of Weiner et al. (41). Using 200 ng of wild type plasmid DNA as template, PCR was performed in reactions containing 500 µM dNTPs, 2 units of Pfu polymerase, and 250 ng each of the sense and antisense mutant oligos (Tm = 75 °C). The reaction conditions were: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 20 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 65 °C for 25 min (2.5 min/kb DNA). PCR products were directly treated with 20 units of DpnI at 37 °C for 90 min, and the treated products used to transform Escherichia coli DH5alpha . To prevent the need for sequencing the resulting mutant clones in their entirety, restriction fragments encompassing the mutant regions were subcloned into the respective wild type constructs.

Constructs used for heterologous promoter experiments consisted of single and multiple tandem copies of the wild type and mutant oligos used in the electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Table I) inserted upstream from an 86-bp fragment of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter (42) extending from -32 to +55, lying immediately upstream from the firefly luciferase gene (HSV-TK32/Luc). Double-stranded oligonucleotides were blunt-end cloned into the SmaI site. The fidelity of all constructs was verified by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing.

Cell Culture, Transfection, and Dual Luciferase Reporter Assays-- An adherent subline (NCI-H295A) (43) of human adrenocortical carcinoma NCI-H295 cells (44, 45) was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum and antibiotics (penicillin, 20 units/ml; streptomycin, 20 µg/ml), selenium (5 ng/ml), insulin (5 µl/ml), and transferrin (5 µl/ml). Mouse Y1 adrenal carcinoma cells (46), a generous gift from Dr. B. Schimmer (University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada), were grown in 50% Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)-H16:50% Ham's F12 with 15% heat-inactivated horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, and antibiotics. Monkey kidney COS-1 cells and human HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells were grown in DMEM-H21 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Human JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cells (47) were grown in DMEM-H21 media supplemented with 5% horse serum and 0.2 mM gentamycin. Mouse MA-10 Leydig cells (48) were grown in Weymouth's medium supplemented with 15% horse serum, 2.5% HEPES buffer, and 0.2 mM gentamycin. All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. For transient transfection with the luciferase reporter constructs, cells were grown to 80% confluence in 10-cm Petri dishes and split into six-well plates 24 h prior to transfection. For the NCI-H295A cells, the DMEM-H16 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum was used for transfection and replaced with growth medium 12 h after transfection.

Plasmid constructs used for transfection studies were purified using Qiagen columns (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Equal molar amounts of plasmid DNA containing varying lengths of contiguous and internally deleted CYP21B 5'-flanking DNA were transfected using the calcium phosphate-DNA co-precipitation method. Following incubation for 12 h, the medium was removed, and fresh medium was added and incubated for another 12 h. Cells were harvested and cellular extracts were assessed for luciferase activity by the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Transfection efficiencies were normalized by co-transfecting with the pRL-CMV plasmid (Promega) containing the Renilla luciferase gene driven by the CMV promoter. Luciferase activity values were normalized by initial division of all pRL-CMV-luciferase values by the lowest value obtained and the result used to divide the luciferase values obtained from the corresponding constructs. All constructs were transfected in triplicate, and the means of two independent experiments are shown.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays-- Nuclear extracts from NCI-H295A, JEG-3, COS-1, HepG2, MA-10, and Y1 cells were extracted using a method adapted from Dignam et al. (49). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Double-stranded probes were prepared by hybridization of [32P]dATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) end-labeled complementary oligonucleotides (Table I). Mobility shift binding reactions typically contained 5-10 µg of nuclear extract and 40,000 cpm (less than 0.5 ng) of end-labeled double-stranded probe in a final buffer composition of 4% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 50 mM or 100 mM KCl. Poly(dI-dC) (1 µg) was included as a nonspecific competitor in all reactions. When competitive binding studies were being performed, 5- 50 ng (10-100-fold excess) of unlabeled specific and nonspecific oligonucleotides were pre-mixed with the probe for 1-2 min prior to addition of the nuclear extract. The reactions were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and electrophoresed through an 8% native polyacrylamide gel in 50 mM Tris base, 0.38 M glycine, 2 mM EDTA and analyzed by autoradiography or phosphorimaging.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Oligonucleotides used in this study
The altered bases in the mutant oligonucleotides are shown in boldface.

In Vitro Transcription/Translation of SF-1 Protein-- SF-1 cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription-PCR of human adrenal RNA. cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of random-primed RNA. Specific oligonucleotides designed at the 5' and 3' end of the gene to amplify the cDNA in the correct reading frame were used in a PCR reaction containing 2 mM MgCl2, 5% Me2SO, 200 µM dNTPs, 0.6 mM oligonucleotides, and 2.5 units of Pfu DNA polymerase. The 1.3-kb cDNA fragment was cloned into the BamHI-EcoRI site of the pCDNA3 vector (Stratagene). SF-1 protein was obtained by in vitro transcription and translation using the TnT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system kit (Promega). 5 µl of lysate containing SF-1 protein or protein from lysate containing empty pCDNA3 vector were used in mobility shift assays.

DNase I Footprinting Assay-- Probes were generated by PCR of the CYP21B -4.6 to -5.6 kb region using the C21/-5.0kb/Luc and C21/-5.6kb/Luc constructs as templates and [32P]dATP-end-labeled oligonucleotides. Both the -94 to -310 fragment from the C21/-5.0kb/Luc construct and the -717 to -937 fragment from the C21/-5.6kb/Luc construct were amplified using a vector-specific sense oligonucleotide. All other probes were obtained using the C21/-5.6kb/Luc construct. PCR products were purified using the Qiagen PCR purification kit and 70,000 cpm used in each assay. Probe DNA was incubated with varying concentrations of NCI-H295A and Y1 nuclear cell extracts (5-70 µg) in reactions containing 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 20 mM HEPES buffer, 10% glycerol, and 0.5 mM DTT. Poly(dI-dC) (1 µg) was included to prevent nonspecific DNA-binding proteins from binding to the labeled DNA. Reactions were incubated at 25 °C for 15 min, followed by the addition of 5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgCl2 and digestion with 0.1 units of DNase I. The reactions were terminated by adding 20 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 0.2 M NaCl, and 250 ng/ml yeast tRNA. Phenol/chloroform-purified and ethanol-precipitated products were resuspended in formamide loading buffer and separated by electrophoresis through an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Dried gels were subjected to autoradiography.

Southwestern Blot Assay-- Southwestern blotting was done essentially as described (50); 100 µg of NCI-H295A cell nuclear extract was electophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred on to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bradford, MA) treated according to the manufacturer's protocol. The membranes were incubated in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 8% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 5% nonfat dry milk powder, and 10 µg/ml poly(dA-dT) for 1.5 h at 25 °C. The membranes were then transferred to hybridization buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 8% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 0.25% nonfat dry milk powder) containing 2 × 106 cpm/ml labeled probe for 2 h at 25 °C. The membranes were washed three times for 15 min each in hybridization buffer without probe at 25 °C and exposed to autoradiography or phosphorimaging.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transient Transfection of CYP21B Promoter/Reporter Constructions-- The 5' upstream DNA for both the human CYP21A and 21B genes is active, but expression from the 21A promoter occurs at only about 20% of the level of the 21B promoter (24, 51), due at least in part to a 4-bp difference in the proximal promoter segment (51, 52). As the 21B promoter is more active and is required for human adrenal P450c21 production, all studies were done with 21B. An initial series of promoter/reporter constructions was built specifically to test the potential roles of the proximal promoter (-300 bp), of upstream regions lacking the A and B regions of Milstone (33) (-3.4 kb), of region A (-3.8 kb), of regions A and B (-4.6 kb), of regions A+B and the Z promoter (-5.0 and -5.6 kb), and far upstream regions (-9 kb) (Fig. 1). These constructs were transfected into human adrenal NCI-H295A cells, as this cell line expresses its endogenous CYP21B gene in a physiologically appropriate, hormonally responsive fashion (45). We have observed substantial species-specific differences in the behaviors of the promoters of the human CYP11A and CYP17 genes for the steroidogenic enzymes P450scc and P450c17 when expressed in human adrenal NCI-H295A cells as compared with their expression in mouse adrenal Y1 cells (43); hence, we also examined the behavior of the various human CYP21B promoter/reporter constructions in Y1 cells. The 300-bp "basal promoter" exhibited substantial activity in the NCI-H295A cells. Addition of DNA segments to -3.8 kb (including the A region of Milstone) or -4.6 kb (including the A+B region of Milstone) had little effect, but addition of DNA to -5.0 kb (including the "Z" promoter) increased reporter activity about 2.6-fold over the basal C21/0.3kb/Luc construct (Fig. 2A). This increase was maintained in the longer C21/-5.6kb/Luc construct. A generally similar pattern was seen when these same constructs were transfected into mouse adrenal Y1 cells; constructs containing up to -4.6 kb showed little change compared with -0.3 kb, but activity increased 3.5-fold with DNA to -5.0 kb and 5.2-fold with DNA to -5.6 kb (Fig. 2B). No activity was detected for any of these constructs when transfected into human placental JEG-3 cells, human liver HepG2 cells or monkey kidney COS-1 cells (data not shown). Thus, the activity of the human CYP21B promoter is adrenal-specific and shows major activity in the basal 300-bp region and in the -4.6 to -5.0 kb region.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Top, diagram of the human C4/P450c21 gene locus on chromosome 6p21.3. The centromere is to the right and the telomere to the left. The duplication boundaries (15) are represented by vertical dotted lines, and the arrows indicate transcriptional orientation. The approximate positions of the probes used to screen the pWE15 cosmid library are depicted below. Middle, scale diagram of the CYP21B 5'-flanking DNA showing the relevant restriction sites used to create the deletional mutants, and the locations of the elements discussed in the text. Bottom, P450c21 luciferase constructs built for this study. The constructs are named according to the approximate length of the DNA segment cloned (from the CYP21B transcription initiation site). C21/0.3+(4.6-5.0)kb/Luc and C21/0.3+(4.6-5.6)kb/Luc represent internal deletion constructs retaining 300 bp of the CYP21B promoter and the segments from -4.6 to -5.0 kb or to -5.6 kb, which, respectively, correspond to 400 bp and 1 kb of the Z promoter. Z235 and Z542 are the Z promoter constructs retaining 235- and 542-bp fragments of the Z promoter (25) cloned into PGL3-Basic vector. Black boxes A and B correspond to the mouse regions identified at -5.3 and -5.8 kb in the mouse C21A gene (38), and the gray boxes represent the Z promoter (25).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Transcriptional activity from the CYP21B constructions. A, luciferase activity of the constructs retaining contiguous CYP21B 5'-flanking DNA, internally deleted constructs retaining 300 bp of CYP21B 5'-flanking DNA and 400 bp or 1 kb of the 5'-flanking region of the Z promoter and constructs retaining only 5'-flanking DNA of the Z promoter when transfected into human adrenal NCI-H295A cells. B, activity of the constructs used in panel A when transfected in to mouse adrenal Y1 cells. Data are means of two independent transfections, each performed in triplicate.

To examine further the contribution of the DNA sequences between -4.6 and -5.6 kb, we built internal deletion constructs C21/0.3+(4.6-5.0)/Luc and C21/0.3+(4.6-5.6)/Luc containing the 0.3-bp basal promoter fused to 400-bp (4.6-5.0) or 1-kb fragments (4.6-5.6) of the Z promoter, thus deleting the entire DNA between -300 bp and -4.6 kb (Fig. 1). When expressed in NCI-H295A cells or Y1 cells, both of these constructions exhibited levels of activity comparable to the 5.0- or 5.6-kb constructs, indicating that the elements in the Z promoter can exert a positive activity in the absence of the A and B regions or other DNA between -300 and -4.6 kb (Fig. 2). Two additional constructs (Z235 and Z542), which had previously been used in the study of Z gene transcription (25) were also analyzed. For methodological consistency, these Z constructs were re-cloned in to the same PGL3-Basic vector used for the other constructs. The Z constructs, which lack the first 4667 of the 21B promoter and hence examine the region between -4667 and -5209, had activities corresponding to the degree of increase observed between -4.6 and -5.0 kb in NCI-H295A cells and activity comparable to the 300-bp basal promoter in Y1 cells. Thus, our promoter/reporter analyses localized positive regulatory elements between -4.6 and -5.0 kb.

Identification of Specific Functional cis Elements-- To identify the active DNA sequences between -4.6 and -5.0 kb, we performed DNase I footprinting of this region by analyzing two overlapping fragments that extended from approximately -4.6 to -4.8 and -4.8 to -5.0. When incubated with nuclear extracts from NCI-H295A cells or Y1 cells, no footprinted regions were seen between -4.6 and -4.8 (data not shown); however, two clear and reproducible footprints were seen between -4.6 and -4.8 (Fig. 3A). These footprinted regions lie within the Z promoter close to the Z cap site at -4676 with respect to CYP21B (25); therefore, the base numbers in this region are described with respect to the Z promoter. On the antisense strand, the upstream footprint (designated F1) encompasses the sequence 5'-CGTCCATGATGCAAGACTCTGC-3', from bases -200 to -179 of the Z promoter (-4876 to -4855 of CYP21B) (25). The downstream footprint (designated F2) encompasses the sequence 5'-CGACTGGGGCAAGGTCACCCTCTGGGAA-3', corresponding to bases -159 to -132 of the Z promoter (-4835 to -4799 of CYP21B) (25). This region includes a sequence nearly identical to the consensus PyCAAGGTCA sequence (underlined) recognized by SF-1 (53) and includes a DNase I-hypersensitive G at position 156. On the sense strand, the closely corresponding regions -201 to -179 and -156 to -114 were footprinted, showing that these two regions interact with proteins that protect both strands. A third, rather poorly resolved footprint was also seen at -129 to -114 (GAAGTCACCAGAGACC) on the antisense strand, but was not seen on the sense strand. Thus, DNase I footprinting localized DNA-protein interactions to the same -4.8 to -5.0 kb region that constitutes the Z promoter (25) and which confers increased cell-specific transcription to the CYP21B proximal promoter.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Identification of the cis elements in the Z promoter. A, DNase I footprinting. Left, DNase I footprint of a PCR-amplified 200-bp probe prepared with 32P-end-labeled -94/-119 antisense primer. Lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8 show the labeled 200-bp fragment digested with DNase I. In lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6, the labeled 200-bp fragment was incubated with 5, 25, 50, and 60 µg, respectively, of NCI-H295A nuclear cell extract. Lane 9 shows a G sequencing reaction of the same DNA fragment. The protected regions representing nuclear protein binding sites are indicated at -179 to -200 (F1), -132 to -159 (F2), and -114 to -129. Right, DNase I footprint of the same 200-bp PCR probe prepared with 32P-end-labeled vector specific sense primer. Lanes G, A, T, and C show the sequence of the DNA fragment initiated by the same primer. Lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8 show the labeled 200-bp fragment digested with DNase I. Lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6 show the labeled 200-bp fragment incubated with 5, 25, 50, and 60 µg, respectively, of NCI-H295A nuclear extract. The protected regions are indicated at -114 to -156 and -179 to -201 and correspond to the -132 to -159 and -179 to -200 sites observed on the antisense strand. B, footprints 1 and 2 form complexes I and II. Double-stranded 32P-end-labeled probes were incubated with NCI-H295A cell nuclear extracts. Left, the -162/-129 wild-type probe forms complex II and a slower nonspecific complex (NS); competition with 20- and 100-fold excess of unlabeled -162/-129 eliminated complex II, but competition with nonspecific DNA from the human P450scc gene did not. Right, the -205/-177 wt probe formed DNA-protein complex I; competition was observed with 20- and 100-fold excess of unlabeled -205/-177 but not with human P450scc -85/-66 DNA.

To characterize the DNA/protein interactions in the regions identified by DNase I footprinting, we performed a series of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Double-stranded oligonucleotides encompassing bases -162 to -129 and -205 to -177, corresponding to the two principal footprints seen in Fig. 3A, each produced DNA/protein complexes (Fig. 3B), but a double-stranded probe encompassing bases -134 to -106, did not yield a specific complex (data not shown). The -162/-129 probe formed a nonspecific complex and a distinct specific complex termed complex II, that could be competed by a 20-fold or 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled -162/-129 DNA, but not by a 100-fold molar excess of an unrelated sequence encompassing bases -85 to -66 of the human CYP11A (P450scc) promoter (54). The -205/-177 probe consistently produced a diffuse complex that appeared to consist of 2-3 bands, which were collectively termed complex I. Complex I migrated more slowly than a lower nonspecific complex, which was not competed. Altering the size of the double-stranded probe or electrophoresis of the complex at lower temperatures, higher voltage or varying salt conditions did not increase the resolution of complex I. Complex I was competed by a 20- or 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled -205/-177 DNA, but not by a 100-fold molar excess of oligonucleotides corresponding to the -85/-66 regions of human P450scc promoter. Thus, the two footprinted regions form different specific DNA/protein complexes; footprint F1 corresponds to complex I, and footprint F2 corresponds to complex II.

Characterization of the DNA/Protein Interactions-- Wild type and mutant oligonucleotides spanning the sequence covered by footprint F2 were used to perform a series of electrophoretic mobility shift experiments (Fig. 4). In the presence of the wild-type -162/-129 probe, competitor DNA mutated at -162 to -158, -136 to -129, or -159 to -150 bases would still compete for formation of complex II equivalently to the competition observed with the wild-type sequence, but unlabeled oligonucleotides containing internally mutated bases -150 to -142 or -149 to -144 did not compete for formation of complex II (Fig. 4A). When mutant probes were used, formation of complex II was still observed with mutations at bases -162 to -158, -159 to -150, or -136 to -129 of the -162/-129 sequence but mutation of the 6 internal bases (-149/-144) eliminated the formation of complex II (Fig. 4B). Thus, complex II requires the AAGGTC core sequence, suggesting that the protein forming complex II may be SF-1. This was confirmed by three additional experiments. First, an oligonucleotide comprising bases -84 to -55 of the rat P450c17 promoter, which has previously been shown to bind SF-1 at bases -69 to -58 (55) specifically competed complex II, but its mutant counterpart did not (Fig. 4C). By contrast, the rat P450c17 probe -447 to -419, which binds COUP-TF, NGFI-B and two newly described proteins called StF-IT-1 and -2 (56), and oligonucleotides encompassing -155 to -131 and -85 to -66 of human P450scc, which bind a variety of factors (54, 57), did not compete for the formation of complex II. Second, gel mobility shift assays performed using SF-1 protein transcribed and translated in vitro produced a DNA-protein complex of the same mobility as that observed with NCI-H295A nuclear extract whereas the mutant probe did not (Fig. 4D). Third, as the CAAGGTCA sequences can also bind NGFI-B (a cAMP-induced early response gene also involved in transcriptional regulation of steroidogenic genes), mobility shift assays were performed using the -162 to -129 wild type probe with cAMP treated and untreated NCI-H295A nuclear extracts in order to identify a different DNA-protein complex on cAMP stimulation. Both extracts produced complexes of identical mobility (data not shown). Thus, competition with heterologous DNA, mutated homologous DNA, and SF-1 protein produced in vitro all strongly suggest that the GCAAGGTCAC sequence between bases -151 to -142 functions by binding SF-1.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Complex II is formed by SF-1. A, mutant competitors localize complex II to bases -149 to -144 (AAGGTC). The -162/-129 wild type probe was incubated with NCI-H295A nuclear extract and with competitor oligonucleotides mutated at the indicated bases; mutation at bases -150 to -142 or at -149 to -144 failed to compete complex II. B, mutant probes localize complex II to bases -149 to -144. Complex II is formed when the -162/-129 probe is mutated at -159 to -150, -136 to -129, and -162 to -158, but not when mutated at -149 to -144. C, a rat SF-1 site competes complex II. The -162/-129 wt probe forms complex II, which is competed by excess unlabeled -162/-129 and the rat -84/-55 sequence which binds SF-1, but not by the -69/-58 mutant of rat -84/-55, by rat -447/-419 which binds NGFI-B, or human P450scc promoter sequences. D, SF-1 protein produced in vitro forms complex II. Left, incubation of the -162/-129 wt probe with NCI-H295A nuclear extract forms both the nonspecific complex (NS) and complex II, which is competed by excess wild-type but not mutant unlabeled DNA. Incubation of the -162/-129 wt probe with SF-1 protein produced in vitro forms only complex II, and protein prepared from the empty pCDNA3 vector alone formed neither complex. Right, the same experiment as in the left panel, performed with a probe mutated at -149 to -144. Complex II was not formed with NCI-H295A extract or SF-1 protein produced in vitro; however, a nonspecific complex was observed with the nuclear extract.

Activities of the Two cis-Acting Elements to Drive a Heterologous Promoter-- To assess the functional significance of the DNA elements comprising F1 and F2, we assessed their ability to stimulate transcription from a heterologous promoter. One, two, and three copies of wild type and mutant oligonucleotides encompassing the F1 (-205/-177) and F2 (-162/-129) elements were cloned in both forward and reverse orientations upstream from a heterologous promoter/reporter system (HSV-TK32/Luc) and transient transfection assays were performed in NCI-H295A, JEG-3, COS-1, HepG2, MA-10, HeLa, and Y1 cells. Mutant reporter constructs were also tested that contained the -193 to -188 and the -149 to -144 substitutions that abolished the formation of complexes I and II, respectively. In NCI-H295A cells, each of the wild type constructs drove the HSV-TK32 promoter in an orientation-independent manner, although activities were generally lower in the reverse orientation (Fig. 5A); similar results were seen in Y1 cells (data not shown). A single copy of the F1 element increased TK32 basal activity 2-fold, while three tandem copies increased activity 7-fold. Similarly, a single copy of the F2 element increased basal TK32 activity 3-fold, while two copies increased activity 8-fold. By contrast, the mutant F1 and F2 elements had considerably lower activity. There was no increase in reporter gene activity when the wild-type F1 or F2 elements were transfected into HepG2, COS-1, MA-10, and HeLa cells, although one copy of the F1 element elicited a 4-fold increase in JEG-3 cells, while its mutant counterpart showed a 2-fold increase (data not shown).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activities of the F1 and F2 elements. A, activities of the -205/-177 F1 element and -162/129 F2 element linked to the TK32 promoter. One, two, or three copies of the F1 element; one or two copies of the F2 element; one or two copies of F1 mutated at -193 to -188; and F2 mutated at -149 to -144 were assayed in both the forward and reverse orientations. Luciferase activity is expressed relative to the TK32/Luc construct. The data are the means of two independent experiments performed in triplicate. B, activities of the F1 and F2 elements in various CYP21B promoter contexts. The mutant F1 and F2 elements are as in panel A. Data are the mean relative from two experiments performed in triplicate.

Mutants in either the GATGCA sequence of F1 (-193 to -188) or the AAGGTC sequence of F2 (-149 to -144), or both, were also incorporated into the C21/-5.0kb/Luc and C21/-5.6kb/Luc constructs, the C21/0.3+(4.6-5.0kb)/Luc and C21/0.3+(4.6-5.6kb)/Luc deletion constructs and the two Z promoter constructs Z235 and Z542, and their activities were assessed in NCI-H295A cells (Fig. 5B). The activities of either the C21/-5.0kb/Luc or C21/-5.6kb/Luc wild type constructs were 2.5-3.0-fold higher than the C21/-0.3kb/Luc basal promoter, consistent with the data in Fig. 2. Mutation of F1 or F2 singly resulted in variable and rather modest diminutions in activity, but mutation of both elements consistently decreased activity. In the constructs lacking the sequences from -0.3 to -4.6 kb, the basal activities were much the same as for the -5.0 and -5.6 kb constructs, again consistent with Fig. 2, but the effects of mutating either the F1 or F2 sequences caused a more dramatic effect in these internally deleted constructs, reducing activity to the level seen with the 0.3-kb basal promoter. Similarly, the mutation of either element reduced the activity of the two Z promoter constructs. The mutations of both elements did not consistently reduce the level of transcription below the level seen with either single mutation. Thus, both elements had to be present together, indicating a cooperative interaction between them to promote CYP21B gene transcription.

Identification of a Second Upstream SF-1 Site (F3)-- As several experiments indicate that the F2 element bound SF-1, we tested the activity of F2 in COS-1 cells, which lack SF-1. The C21/-5.0kb/Luc contiguous construct, the C21/0.3+(4.6-5.0)kb/Luc internally deleted construct, and the Z235 construct were all inactive in COS-1 cells, and all showed substantial activity when co-transfected with a vector expressing SF-1, consistent with the role of F2 as an SF-1 binding site. However, when the F2 sequence was mutated, SF-1-induced activity persisted, even in the small Z235 construct; thus there appeared to be another SF-1 binding site in Z235 that had not been identified by the footprinting experiments. Four sequences related to the GCAAGGTCA SF-1 consensus were identified between -4.6 and -5.0 kb, including three clustered between -43 and -81 with respect to the Z cap site. Double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to all four potential SF-1 sites were tested with nuclear extracts from NCI-H295A cells, but only the -73/-51 oligonucleotide containing the sequence GAAGGACA (-58 to -65 with respect to the Z cap site) formed a specific DNA/protein complex, termed complex III (Fig. 6A). Complex III was competed by a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled -73/-51 and -162/-129 (F2 element), but not by an oligonucleotide mutated at bases -65/-58, by unrelated DNA from the gene for P450scc or the -205/-177 (F1) sequence. A similar result was observed when this probe was incubated with SF-1 protein produced in vitro. The mutant probe was unable to form complex III with either NCI-H295A nuclear extract or SF-1 protein produced in vitro. These results confirmed that this sequence, termed F3, binds SF-1.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Characterization of the F3 element. A, electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Left, the wild type probe, comprising bases -73 to -51 of the Z promoter, forms a nonspecific complex and complex III with nuclear extract from NCI-H295A cells. Complex III is competed by wild type F3 or F2 competitors, but not by mutant or unrelated competitors (-85 to -66 of P450scc or the -205/-177 (F1) element). Right, equivalent binding and competition are seen with the wild type F3 probe and SF-1 protein produced in vitro. The mutant -73/-51M probe was unable to form complex III with either nuclear extract or SF-1 protein produced in vitro. B, transcriptional activity of CYP21B and Z constructions with mutations in the F3 sequence transfected into NCI-H295A cells; data are means of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. C, transcriptional activity of CYP21B and Z constructions transfected into COS-1 cells without (light bars) or with (dark bars) co-transfection of 250 ng of vector expressing SF-1. Data are means of two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate.

To determine the functional significance of F3, this sequence was mutated in the C21/-5.0kb/Luc contiguous construct and the Z promoter construct, and transfected into NCI-H295A cells (Fig. 6B). Consistent with the data in Fig. 2A, the -5.0 kb construct had about 2.5-fold more activity than the 0.3-kb basal promoter. When all three elements in the Z promoter (F1, F2, and F3) were mutated, the activity of the 5.0-kb construct was reduced to that of the 0.3-kb construct. In the context of the 235-bp Z promoter construct, mutation of F1 had no effect, mutation of either of the SF-1 sites (F2 or F3) reduced activity and mutation of both F2 and F3 with or without mutation of F1 decreased activity further to about 35% of the Z235 wild type construct.

To show that F3 functions by binding SF-1, COS-1 cells were co-transfected with the various promoter-reporter constructs and a vector expressing SF-1 (Fig. 6C). In the absence of SF-1, none of the constructs had significant activity. When co-transfected with SF-1, the 0.3-kb basal promoter (which contains an SF-1 site) showed about a 3-fold induction. The -5.0 kb contiguous construct and the internally deleted 0.3+(4.6-5.0)-kb construct showed robust activity with SF-1 (13- and 20-fold above the 0.3-kb basal promoter, respectively), but mutation of the F1, F2, and F3 sites reduced this to the level of the 0.3-kb basal promoter. Similarly, SF-1 induced substantial activity in the Z235 construct (8-fold above the 0.3-kb basal promoter), which was largely eliminated by mutating the F1, F2, and F3 sites.

Characterization of F1/Complex I-- Mutation of F1 in the Z235 construct had no effect (Fig. 6B), but mutation of the TK32/Luc constructs (Fig. 5A), and the long constructs (particularly the internally deleted 0.3+(4.6-5.0)-kb construct) (Fig. 5B), indicate that F1 plays a functional role. Therefore, we characterized the protein binding to the -205/-177 F1 region further. Mobility shift experiments showed that oligonucleotides mutated at bases -205 to -199 or at -182 to -177 compete with the wild type -205/-177 probe for formation of complex I, but no competition was observed with mutations at bases -195 to -186 or -193 to -188 (Fig. 7A). Similarly, complex I could still be formed by labeled probes carrying mutations at either end (-182/-177 and -205/-199), but probes carrying internal mutations at -195 to -186 or at -193 to -188 did not form complex I (Fig. 7B). Thus, even though complex I appears to be a multi-protein complex, the formation of all components of this complex was prevented by mutating the internal core GATGCA sequence. To estimate the approximate size of the protein binding to the F1 element, we performed a Southwestern blot (Fig. 8). An SDS gel of proteins from NCI-H295A cell nuclear extract was probed with a single copy of radiolabeled wild type F1 element (-205 to -177) identifying a protein of 97 kDa. By contrast, when the probe was mutated at bases -195 to -186, the protein was not detected. A BLAST search of the F1 sequence identified two proteins: the B-lymphocyte factor NF-W1 and the widely expressed factor NF-W2 (58). Both of these factors bind to the sequence GTTGCATC, which matches the F1 sequence at 7 contiguous bases on the antisense strand. Furthermore, NF-W2 has an estimated size of ~93 kDa (58), which is close to the 97 kDa inferred from Fig. 8. Thus, NF-W2 or a related factor may be a good candidate for the protein binding to F1.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Characterization of complex I by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. A, labeled wild type F1 element incubated with nuclear extract from NCI-H295A cells and with various competitor DNAs. The -205/-177 probe forms a nonspecific complex and complex I, which can be competed by a 5-20-fold molar excess of -205/-177. Oligonucleotides containing mutations at bases -195/-186, bases -193/-188 or an unrelated sequence from P450scc did not compete for the formation of complex I, but sequences mutated at either end (-205/-199 and -182/-177) did compete. B, mutant probes incubated with NCI-H295A nuclear extract and various competitors. Retention of the -193/-188 sequence in the probe results in the formation of complex I, which can be competed specifically as in panel A, but mutation of the -193/-188 sequence eliminates formation of complex I.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Southwestern blot. Nuclear proteins from NCI-H295A cells were displayed by electrophoresis on several lanes of an SDS 10% acrylamide gel, blotted to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and probed with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides. Wild type probe comprised bases -205 to -177 of the Z promoter, and the mutant was altered at bases -193 to -188. The first (blank) lane contains the non-radioactive molecular size standards shown at the left. The wild type probe consistently detects a single protein of about 97 kDa.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The CYP21 gene(s) encoding the adrenal steroid 21-hydroxylase are intimately linked to the C4 genes in the major histocompatibility locus in the human, rodent, and bovine genomes (17, 59-61). Although the distance between the duplicated C4A/21A and C4B/21B clusters differs by about 30 kb in the mouse and human genomes (15, 18), the 3' end of a C4 gene is always close to the 5' end of a CYP21 gene, suggesting a functional significance to this genomic array. We found that a segment of only about 300 bp of CYP21B 5'-flanking DNA was sufficient to confer transcriptional activity above basal levels in human adrenal NCI-H295A cells and mouse Y1 cells, confirming previous reports with both the mouse (29-33) and human (39, 40) promoters. This region contains several sites that might bind transcription factors, including SF-1, SP1, Nur77 (51), and various cAMP response factors (39), which may include SF-1 itself (55). SP1 is expressed ubiquitously and increases the basal transcription of many promoters and thus may play a role in CYP21B transcription. Nur77 and SF-1 are specifically associated with transcriptional regulation in the adrenals and gonads, and may be involved in the tissue specific expression of genes for steroidogenic enzymes. SF-1 appears to be a constitutively acting steroidogenic factor, while Nur77 binds to a very similar cis element to confer cAMP responsiveness. Thus, the 300-bp CYP21B basal promoter contains several elements that appear to be crucial both for basal and tissue-specific and hormonally induced transcription. However, the 300-bp basal promoter is clearly insufficient for the expression of 21-hydroxylase in mice in vivo (38); therefore, we studied another 9 kb of upstream DNA.

The search for upstream regulatory elements was guided by the studies of Milstone et al. (38), which identified the A and B elements located 5.3 and 6.0 kb upstream from the mouse CYP21A transcriptional start site, and by our previous identification of the adrenal specific Z promoter located 4676 bp upstream from the human CYP21B transcriptional start site (25). There are important differences in the mouse and human C4/C21 gene complexes, with a greater distance between C4 and CYP21 in the mouse; thus, Milstone's -5.3 and -6.0 kb elements correspond to ~-3.5 and ~-4.0 kb in the human sequence (15, 25) so that the murine region corresponding to the human Z promoter was not examined by Milstone et al. (38). We found that sequences up to 4.6 kb upstream from the human CYP21B transcription initiation site had little effect on the transcriptional activity of this promoter in either NCI-H295A or Y1 cells, even though this DNA contained the regions corresponding to Milstone's A and B elements that appear to be crucial to the mouse gene. However, sequences further upstream between -4.6 and -5.6 kb increased transcription from the C21 promoter up to 3-fold in NCI-H295A cells, and to 3-5-fold in Y1 cells.

The region between -4.6 and -5.6 kb encompasses most of intron 35 of the C4 gene. Transcription of the human C4 gene is under the regulation of a strong, almost exclusively liver-specific promoter whose regulatory elements appear to be confined to the first 200 bp, although there is a low level C4 transcription in the human adrenal (23). However, within its intron 35, the C4 gene contains the Z promoter, which drives transcription of the Z transcript in an adrenal-specific manner (25). The Z transcript is initiated at base -4676 with respect to the CYP21B cap site, 55 bp upstream from the 5' end of exon 36 of human C4; it overlaps the last seven exons of the C4 gene, and maintains the same open reading frame (25). The Z transcript is found only in the adrenal cortex, and the Z promoter can function in human adrenal NCI-H295A cells but not in human placental JEG-3 cells, mouse Leydig MA-10 cells, or monkey kidney COS-1 cells, suggesting that these adrenal-specific elements may participate in the transcriptional regulation of the CYP21B gene (25). Our present results show that the Z promoter enhances transcription of the CYP21 gene, as the DNA between -4.6 and -5.6 kb conferred a substantial increase in transcriptional activity, either with or without retention of the DNA between -300 and -4.6 kb. Deletional mutagenesis then identified the DNA between -4.6 and -5.0 kb as the important region. The -4.6 to -5.0 kb region encompasses the Z promoter in intron 35 of human C4. The corresponding region of mouse C4 intron 35 has substantial sequence similarity, but the mouse and human sequences diverge drastically upstream from -4.9 kb (base -222 of the Z promoter) (25), further indicating the importance of this region.

DNase I footprinting studies identified three potential protein binding sites in the conserved DNA just upstream from the Z cap site. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed that two of these regions formed specific DNA-protein interactions. Footprint F2 contained an CAAGGTCA motif, which may be recognized by the transcription factors NGFI-B, SF-1, NP-III, and ApoCIIIp2; competitive gel mobility shift studies and transfection studies indicated that this footprinted DNA binds SF-1. Footprint F2 corresponds exactly to the sequence we previously suggested may be a SF-1 binding site participating in the regulation of the Z promoter (25). Bandshifts and functional studies demonstrated another site (F3) at -58 to -65 of the Z promoter as binding SF-1. Another putative SF-1 site lies within the -300 bp proximal promoter sequence of CYP21B, but actual binding of SF-1 to this proximal element has not been established. Thus, our deletional mutagenesis data, including excision of the DNA from -300 to -4.6 kb, suggest that all three of these SF-1 sites are needed for full transcriptional activity of the human CYP21B gene.

SF-1 regulates the adrenal and gonadal expression of steroidogenic genes and is required for the differentiation of these tissues (37, 62). SF-1 is also essential for basal transcription of the gene for the human ACTH receptor (63) and acts synergistically with an early growth response protein (Egr-1) to increase expression of the rat gene for the beta  subunit of luteinizing hormone (64). Thus, while SF-1 may be necessary for adrenal specific expression of CYP21B, other factors are clearly required to limit its expression to the adrenal cortex.

The SF-1 site in footprint F2 lies 35 bases downstream from the ATGATGCAAG sequence comprising footprint F1. Mobility shift experiments indicated that at least one, and possibly as many as three proteins bind to the F1 element, as several shifted bands were seen. Mutation of bases GATGCA in this sequence abolished the band shift pattern and reduced transcriptional activity of the complete CYP21B promoter and of this region fused to the basal TK32 promoter. Southwestern blotting identified a protein of about 97 kDa and BLAST searches suggest it may be related to NF-W2 (58).

Thus, the Z promoter in the C4 gene is indeed an intrinsic part of the CYP21 promoter that participates in basal adrenal-specific expression of CYP21 providing the evolutionary constraint for keeping these otherwise unrelated genes tightly linked. Both the CYP21A and CYP21B promoters are functional only in the adrenal, albeit at substantially different levels, and the nearby ZA, ZB, and XA promoters also appear to be adrenal-specific. Thus, it is not clear whether a single adrenal-specific element drives the CYP21A and 21B genes, or whether each has its own adrenal-specific element. However, the minimal expression of C4 in the adrenal suggests each gene cluster has its own locally acting element.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Henry Rodriguez and Glenn K. Fu for their assistance in the preliminary phases of this work, Dr. Bernard Schimmer for the Y1 cells, and Dr. Synthia H. Mellon for the rat P450c17 oligonucleotides and helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK37922 and DK42154 (to W. L. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported in part by the International Scholars program of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society.

§ To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics, Bldg. MR-IV, Rm. 209, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0978.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CAH, congenital adrenal hyperplasia; HSV, herpes simplex virus; TK32, 32-base proximal promoter of the HSV thymidine kinase gene; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s); wt, wild type; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; CMV, cytomegalovirus; DTT, dithiothreitol.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Miller, W. L., and Levine, L. S. (1987) J. Pediatr. 111, 1-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Therrell, B. L. J., Berenbaum, S. A., Manter-Kapanke, V., Simmank, J., Korman, K., Prentice, L., Gonzalez, J., and Gunn, S. (1998) Pediatrics 101, 583-590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Matteson, K. J., Phillips, J. A., III, Miller, W. L., Chung, B., Orlando, P. J., Frisch, H., Ferrandez, A., and Burr, I. M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 5858-5862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Morel, Y., and Miller, W. L. (1991) Adv. Hum. Genet. 20, 1-68[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. White, P. C., Tusie-Luna, M. T., New, M. I., and Speiser, P. W. (1994) Hum. Mutat. 3, 373-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kominami, S., Ochi, H., Kobayashi, Y., and Takemori, S. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 3386-3394[Free Full Text]
7. Mellon, S. H., and Miller, W. L. (1989) J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1497-1502
8. Higashi, Y., Yoshioka, H., Yamane, M., Gotoh, O., and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2841-2845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. White, P. C., New, M. I., and Dupont, B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 5111-5115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Rodrigues, N. R., Dunham, I., Yu, C. Y., Carroll, M. C., Porter, R. R., and Campbell, R. D. (1987) EMBO. J. 6, 1653-1661[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Chung, B., Matteson, K. J., and Miller, W. L. (1985) DNA 4, 211-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Chung, B., Matteson, K. J., and Miller, W. L. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 4243-4247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Parker, K. L., Chaplin, D. D., Wong, M., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Schimmer, B. P. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 7860-7864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Chaplin, D. D., Galbraith, L. J., Seidman, J. G., White, P. C., and Parker, K. L. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9601-9605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Gitelman, S. E., Bristow, J., and Miller, W. L. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2124-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. John, M. E., Okamura, T., Dee, A., Adler, B., John, M. C., White, P. C., Simpson, E. R., and Waterman, M. R. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 2846-2853[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Skow, L. E., Womack, J. E., Petresh, J. M., and Miller, W. L. (1988) DNA 7, 143-149[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Yu, C. Y. (1991) J. Immunol. 146, 1057-1066[Abstract]
19. Morel, Y., Bristow, J., Gitelman, S. E., and Miller, W. L. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6582-6586[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Bristow, J., Tee, M. K., Gitelman, S. E., Mellon, S. H., and Miller, W. L. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 265-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Speek, M., Barry, F., and Miller, W. L. (1996) Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1749-1758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Burch, G. H., Gong, Y., Liu, W., Dettman, R., Curry, C. J., Smith, L., Miller, W. L., and Bristow, J. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 104-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Tee, M. K., Thomson, A. A., Bristow, J., and Miller, W. L. (1995) Genomics 28, 171-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bristow, J., Gitelman, S. E., Tee, M. K., Staels, B., and Miller, W. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12919-12924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Tee, M. K., Babalola, G. O., Aza-Blanc, P., Speek, M., Gitelman, S. E., and Miller, W. L. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 2109-2116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Speek, M., and Miller, W. L. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1655-1665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Martin, H., and Loos, M. (1989) in Macrophage-derived Cell Regulatory Factors: Cytokines (Sorg, C., ed) , pp. 155-172, Karger, Basel, Switzerland
28. Burch, G. H., Bedolli, M. A., McDonough, S., Rosenthal, S. M., and Bristow, J. (1995) Dev. Dyn. 203, 491-504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Parker, K. L., Schimmer, B. P., Chaplin, D. D., and Seidman, J. G. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15353-15355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Handler, J. D., Schimmer, B. P., Flynn, T. R., Szyf, M., Seidman, J. G., and Parker, K. L. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13068-13073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Rice, D. A., Kronenberg, M. S., Mouw, A. R., Aitken, L. D., Franklin, A., Schimmer, B. P., and Parker, K. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 8052-8058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rice, D. A., Mouw, A. R., Bogerd, A. M., and Parker, K. L. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 1552-1561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Parissenti, A. M., Parker, K. L., and Schimmer, B. P. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 283-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Morohashi, K., Honda, S., Inomata, Y., Handa, H., and Omura, T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17913-17919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Lala, D. S., Rice, D. A., and Parker, K. L. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 1249-1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Morohashi, K. (1999) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 10, 169-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Parker, K. L., and Schimmer, B. P. (1997) Endocr. Rev. 18, 361-377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Milstone, D. S., Shaw, S. K., Parker, K. L., Szyf, M., and Seidman, J. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21924-21927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Kagawa, N., and Waterman, M. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11299-11305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Kagawa, N., and Waterman, M. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11199-11204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Weiner, M. P., Costa, G. L., Schoettlin, W., Cline, J., Mathur, E., and Bauer, J. C. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 151, 119-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. McKnight, S. L., Gavis, E. R., and Kingsbury, R. (1981) Cell 25, 385-398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Rodriguez, H., Hum, D. W., Staels, B., and Miller, W. L. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 365-371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Gazdar, A. F., Oie, H. K., Shackleton, C. H., Chen, T. R., Triche, T. J., Myers, C. E., Chrousos, G. P., Brennan, M. F., Stein, C. A., and LaRocca, R. V. (1990) Cancer. Res. 50, 5488-5496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Staels, B., Hum, D. W., and Miller, W. L. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 423-433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Yasamura, Y., Buonassisi, V., and Sato, G. H. (1966) Cancer Res. 26, 529-535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Kohler, P. O., and Bridson, W. E. (1971) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 65, 122-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Ascoli, M. (1981) Endocrinology 108, 88-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Dignam, J. D., Martin, P. L., Shastry, B. S., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 582-598[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Miskimins, W. K., Roberts, M. P., McClelland, A., and Ruddle, F. H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 6741-6744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Chang, S. F., and Chung, B. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1330-1336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Endoh, A., Yang, L., and Hornsby, P. J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 137, 13-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Wilson, T. E., Fahrner, T. J., and Milbrandt, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5794-5804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Hum, D. W., Aza-Blanc, P., and Miller, W. L. (1995) DNA Cell Biol. 14, 451-463[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Zhang, P., and Mellon, S. H. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 147-158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Zhang, P., and Mellon, S. H. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 891-904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Moore, C. C. D., Hum, D. W., and Miller, W. L. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 2045-2058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Dorn, A., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 312-320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. White, P. C., Chaplin, D. D., Weis, J. H., Dupont, B., New, M. I., and Seidman, J. G. (1984) Nature 312, 465-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Carrol, M. C., Campbell, R. D., and Porter, R. R. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 521-525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. White, P. C., Grossberger, D., Onufer, B. J., Chaplin, D. D., New, M. I., Dupont, B., and Strominger, J. L. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 1089-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Morohashi, K., and Omura, T. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 1569-1577[Abstract]
63. Marchal, R., Naville, D., Durand, P., Begeot, M., and Penhoat, A. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247, 28-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Halvorson, L. M., Ito, M., Jameson, J. L., and Chin, W. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14712-14720[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Parmar, R. E. Key, and W. E. Rainey
Development of an Adrenocorticotropin-Responsive Human Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cell Line
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4542 - 4546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Doghman, T. Karpova, G. A. Rodrigues, M. Arhatte, J. De Moura, L. R. Cavalli, V. Virolle, P. Barbry, G. P. Zambetti, B. C. Figueiredo, et al.
Increased Steroidogenic Factor-1 Dosage Triggers Adrenocortical Cell Proliferation and Cancer
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2968 - 2987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Araujo, B. B. Mendonca, A. S. Barbosa, C. J. Lin, J. A. M. Marcondes, A. E. C. Billerbeck, and T. A. S. S. Bachega
Microconversion between CYP21A2 and CYP21A1P Promoter Regions Causes the Nonclassical Form of 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 4028 - 4034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. N. Winnay and G. D. Hammer
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Mediated Signaling Cascades Coordinate a Cyclic Pattern of Steroidogenic Factor 1-Dependent Transcriptional Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2006; 20(1): 147 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
N. Huang, A. Dardis, and W. L. Miller
Regulation of Cytochrome b5 Gene Transcription by Sp3, GATA-6, and Steroidogenic Factor 1 in Human Adrenal NCI-H295A Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 2020 - 2034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Pandey and W. L. Miller
Regulation of 17,20 Lyase Activity by Cytochrome b5 and by Serine Phosphorylation of P450c17
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13265 - 13271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. H. Payne and D. B. Hales
Overview of Steroidogenic Enzymes in the Pathway from Cholesterol to Active Steroid Hormones
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 947 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. E. Fluck and W. L. Miller
GATA-4 and GATA-6 Modulate Tissue-Specific Transcription of the Human Gene for P450c17 by Direct Interaction with Sp1
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2004; 18(5): 1144 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
T. Xie, L. Rowen, B. Aguado, M. E. Ahearn, A. Madan, S. Qin, R. D. Campbell, and L. Hood
Analysis of the Gene-Dense Major Histocompatibility Complex Class III Region and Its Comparison to Mouse
Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2621 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. E. Fluck, J. W. M. Martens, F. A. Conte, and W. L. Miller
Clinical, Genetic, and Functional Characterization of Adrenocorticotropin Receptor Mutations Using a Novel Receptor Assay
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4318 - 4323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. M. Baumgartner-Parzer, E. Schulze, W. Waldhausl, S. Pauschenwein, S. Rondot, P. Nowotny, K. Meyer, H. Frisch, F. Waldhauser, and H. Vierhapper
Mutational Spectrum of the Steroid 21-Hydroxylase Gene in Austria: Identification of a Novel Missense Mutation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4771 - 4775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. J. Lin, J. W. M. Martens, and W. L. Miller
NF-1C, Sp1, and Sp3 Are Essential for Transcription of the Human Gene for P450c17 (Steroid 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase) in Human Adrenal NCI-H295A Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2001; 15(8): 1277 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wijesuriya, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wijesuriya, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement