|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 53, 38225-38231, December 31, 1999
Serine 157, a Retinoic Acid Receptor Residue Phosphorylated
by Protein Kinase C in Vitro, Is Involved in RXR·RAR
Heterodimerization and Transcriptional Activity*
Marie-Hélène
Delmotte ,
Ali
Tahayato§,
Pierre
Formstecher, and
Philippe
Lefebvre¶
From INSERM Unité 459, Faculté de Médecine Henri
Warembourg, 1, place de Verdun, 59045 Lille cedex, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
Retinoic acid (RA) regulation of cellular
proliferation and differentiation is mediated, at least in part,
through two related nuclear receptors, RAR and RXR. RA-induced
modulation of gene expression leads generally to cellular
differentiation, whereas stimulation of the protein kinase C (PKC)
signaling pathway is associated with cellular proliferation. Pursuant
to our discovery that prolonged activation of PKCs induced a strong
decrease in RA responsiveness of a retinoid-inducible reporter gene, we
have further investigated the connections between these two signaling pathways. We demonstrate that PKC isoforms and are able to phosphorylate human RAR (hRAR ) in vitro on a single
serine residue located in the extended DNA binding domain (T box). The
introduction of a negative charge at this position (serine 157)
strongly decreased hRAR transcriptional activity, whereas a similar
mutation at other PKC consensus phosphorylation sites had no effect.
The effect on transcriptional activation was correlated with a decrease
in the capacity of hRAR to heterodimerize with hRXR . Thus hRAR is a direct target for PKC and , which may control retinoid receptor transcriptional activities during cellular proliferation and differentiation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
External stimuli (neurotransmitters, hormones, mitogens)
activating G-protein-coupled receptors and growth factor receptors induce the activity of phospholipases, which in turn generate membrane
lipid metabolites. Among them, diacylglycerol
(DAG)1 and others are able to
modulate cellular protein kinase C (PKC) activities needed for
sustained cellular responses (1, 2). The PKC superfamily contains to
date 11 isoforms encoded by 10 genes. The isoforms can be classified
into three groups based on sequence homologies and biochemical
properties: conventional PKCs (isoforms , 1, 2, and ) are
DAG- and calcium-dependent kinases; novel PKCs (isoforms
, , , ) are dependent only on DAG; and a third group of
atypical PKCs (isoforms , / ) is unresponsive to DAG and
calcium. The µ isoform (mouse protein kinase D) is a high molecular
weight enzyme with specific properties such as a transmembrane domain,
but it can be considered an atypical PKC in view of its very low
affinity for DAG (for review, see Refs. 3 and 4). All of these kinases
need negatively charged phospholipids (phosphatidylserine) to exert
their phosphorylating activities, triggering major cellular events such
as differentiation and proliferation. Although a clear physiological
role for each isozyme has not been established definitively, the
existence of these isotypes with unique subcellular and tissue
distribution suggests a specialized role for each isoform (for review,
see Ref. 5). Most notably, gene transfer experiments have underlined a
role of these protein kinases in cellular proliferation and tumor
growth progression.
Nuclear receptors are ligand-dependent transcription
factors that control a wide range of cellular events, including
cellular proliferation and differentiation. Several lines of evidence
point to a direct role of the PKC signaling pathway in modulating the transcriptional activity of some members of this superfamily. The
thyroid hormone receptor appears to be a target for PKC (6) as well as
the human vitamin D receptor (hVDR). hVDR is phosphorylated by PKC
in the DNA binding domain (DBD), and phosphorylated serine (Ser-51) is
important for hVDR transactivation properties (7, 8). Regulation of
other nuclear receptors (glucocorticoid receptor, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor, estrogen receptor) through activation
of the MAP kinase cascade has also been documented and suggests that
PKC, as an activator of the MAP kinase pathway, might participate
indirectly in the control of the transcriptional activity of these
nuclear receptors (9-13).
Our previous experiments pointed to a role of PKC in the regulation of
hRAR transcriptional activity. They indicated that chronic treatment
of COS-7 cells with TPA led to the specific inhibition of the activity
of a retinoid-inducible reporter gene. We determined that hRAR is a
substrate for PKC in vitro, and preliminary results
suggested that two to four phosphorylation sites occurred out of the
ligand binding domain (LBD) of this nuclear receptor (14). In light of
these results, we addressed in this study several questions to
elucidate further the role of PKC isozymes in the regulation of the
transcriptional activity of hRAR . We characterized PKC isoforms for
their capacity to phosphorylate hRAR in vitro and
identified the target amino acid. Mutation of the phosphorylated serine
affected hRAR transcriptional activity, and the molecular basis for
the observed inhibition was investigated. Our results support the
hypothesis that PKC and PKC are direct regulators of hRAR
transcriptional activity by altering its ability to dimerize with RXRs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
TPA and atRA were obtained from Sigma (Saint
Quentin Fallavier, France). Purified rat brain PKC was purchased from
Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp. (Meudon, France).
[ -32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol), the ECLplus detection kit,
and polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membranes were from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech (Les Ulis, France). DNA restriction and modifications
enzymes were from Promega (Charbonnieres, France). Site-directed
mutagenesis reactions were carried out using the QuickChange system
from Stratagene (San Diego, CA). Polyethyleneimine (ExGen 500) was from
EuroMedex (Souffelweyersheim, France). Oligonucleotides were purchased
from Eurogentec (Le Sart-Tilman, Belgium).
Plasmids--
Constructs containing either the wild-type (wt)
hRAR and wt hRXR cDNAs subcloned into pSG5 (Stratagene) or
pQE9 (Qiagen, Diagen Gmbh, Dusseldorf, Germany). ) have been described
in (15, 16). Mutations at potential phosphorylation sites were
generated using the appropriate oligonucleotide that contained the
desired mutation and a silent mutation introducing or inactivating a
restriction site. The following mutagenic primers were used in this
study (parentheses indicate the new restriction site, mutations are indicated in bold characters).
S115G: 5'-ggcttcttccgccgcggcatccagaagaacatg-3'
(SacII);
S115D:
5'-cgccgcgacatccagaagaacatggtgtacacgtgtcaccgggacaagaactgcatcatcaacaaggtgactcggaaccgc-3' (BstEII);
S154A:
5'-gaagtgggcatggccaaggagtctgtgagaaacgatcgaaacaagaagaag-3'
(PvuI);
S157A:
5'-atgtccaaggaggctgtgagaaacgatcgaaacaagaagaag-3'
(PvuI);
S154A,S157A: 5'-
gccgactgcagaagtgcttcgaagtgggcatggccaaggaggctgtgagaaacgaccg-3' (XmnI);
S154D:
5'-actcggaaccgctgccagtactgccgactgcagaagtgctttgaagtgggcatggacgtgagaaac-3'
(BstEII);
S157D:
5'-atgtccaaggaggctgtgagaaacggacgaaacaagaagaag-3'
(PvuI);
S154D,S157D:
5'-atgtccaaggaggctgtgggcatggacaaggaggatgtgagaaac-3'
(PvuI);
S232A:
5'-gggacaagttcagtgagctcgctaccaagtgcatc-3'
(SacI);
S232D:
5'-cgtgtctctctagacattgacctctgggacaagttcagttcagtgaactcgccacctcgcc-3'
(XbaI);
S388A:
5'-gaagattactgacctgaggagcatcgccgccaagggggctgagcggg-3'
(Bsu36I);
S388D:
5'-gaagattacctgacctgaggagcatcgacgccaagggggctgagcggg-3'
(Bsu36I);
S452A:
5'-ccaggcagctgtagcccaagcttaagccccagcgccaacagaagcagccc-3' (HindII);
S452D:
5'-gccaggcagctgcagccccagcctcagccccagcgacaacagaagcagcc-3'
(PstI).
All mutations were checked by restriction analysis and automatic
sequencing. Detailed sequence information is available upon request.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
HeLa cells were cultured as
monolayers in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with
10% fetal calf serum. Cells were treated when indicated with TPA
and/or retinoids to a final concentration of 10 7
M and 10 6 M, respectively.
Transfections were carried out using the polyethyleneimine coprecipitation method as described (17). The luciferase assay was
performed as described (15).
Receptor Purification and Phosphorylation Analysis--
A
detailled procedure has been published elsewhere (18). Briefly,
His6-hRAR was overexpressed in Escherichia
coli and purified to homogeneity by nickel-immobilized affinity
chromatography. The purified polypeptide was phosphorylated and
purified further by 8% SDS-PAGE. Gel slices containing the
phosphorylated receptor were desiccated and rehydrated with trypsin
digestion buffer, and trypsin was added to a 1:50 (w:w) ratio. Peptides
were extracted and purified on a C18 column and submitted to Edman
degradation reaction for sequencing. Phosphoamino acid determination
was as follows. The phosphorylated hRAR was purified by 8% SDS-PAGE and transfer onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Bands containing the radioactive receptor were cut out and transferred into
an Eppendorf tube containing 200 µl of 5.7 N HCl. After a 1-h incubation at 110 °C, the hydrolysate was dried and resuspended in 20 µl of electrophoresis buffer (0.5% acetic acid, 0.5% pyridine at pH 3.5). 10 µg of phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, and
phosphotyrosine (Sigma) were added to the sample, which was submitted
to electrophoresis on a cellulose glass-backed plate for 30 min at
1,000 V (30 mA). Plates were then dried and sprayed with ninhydrin to
locate phosphoamino acid standard. 32P-Labeled amino acids
were identified by autoradiography.
Western Blotting and Antibodies--
Antibodies directed against
isoforms of PKC were obtained from Transduction Laboratories
(Lexington, KY). The anti-MRGS(His)6 and
anti-(His)5 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from
Qiagen. The anti-RAR monoclonal antibody was from Affinity
BioReagents (Neshanic Station, NJ). Peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse and
anti-rabbit IgGs were from Sigma. Immunodetections were carried out as
described previously using the Amersham ECLplus detection system.
SDS-PAGE, electrotransfer of proteins, and immunodetection procedures
have been described in Ref. 14.
Protein-Protein Interaction Assays--
Protocols for
glutathione S-transferase pull-down experiments have been
described elsewhere (17, 19). Matrix-bound receptors were then resolved
by 8% SDS-PAGE and detected by autoradiography or quantified using a
Storm PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The RXR binding assay used
in Fig. 6B was carried out as described in Ref. 16. Briefly,
native or PKC-phosphorylated purified His6-hRAR was
diluted to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml in 1 × phosphate-buffered saline and adsorbed (~ 0.5 µg/well) to a Corning
96-well tissue culture-treated plate for 16 h at 4 °C. Wells
were then washed three times with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline
and coated for 3 h with a 5% fetal calf serum solution in 1 × phosphate-buffered saline to saturate nonspecific binding sites.
Wells were washed three times with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline,
and 106 cpm of 35S-labeled hRXR was loaded
into each well and incubated for 90 min at 4 °C in 30 µl of
binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 130 mM
KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM -mercaptoethanol,
0.05% Nonidet P-40, and 20% glycerol). Unbound hRXR was removed by
four washes with ice-cold binding buffer, and the specifically adsorbed
35S-labeled hRXR was released by incubation with 50 µl
of 0.1% SDS, 0.4 M HCl. Radioactivity was quantified by
scintillation counting. Protein assays were carried out according to
Bradford (20) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Statistical Analysis--
All incubations or assays were
performed at least in triplicate. Measured values were used to
calculate a mean ± S.E., and groups of data were compared using a
two-sided analysis of variance test followed by a Dunnett test.
Significance was defined as p < than 0.01. Calculations were carried out using the Prism software (GraphPad Inc.,
San Diego, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
hRAR Is Phosphorylated by PKC and PKC on Serine Residues
in Vitro--
We reported previously that one or two amino acids in
the hRAR sequence located outside of the LBD were phosphorylated by PKCs purified from rat brain (14). We thus determined which isoforms of
PKC were present in these commercial preparations by Western blotting
analysis using a panel of isozyme-selective monoclonal antibodies. We
found that rat brain extracts contained exclusively the PKC and isoforms, with trace amounts of the µ isoform (Fig.
1A). Using this protein kinase
mixture in an in vitro phosphorylation reaction with
purified His6-tagged hRAR as a substrate, we found that
this receptor was a substrate for PKCs, as reported previously (Fig.
1B). PKCs were able, in these conditions, to display
autophosphorylating activity as documented previously (for review, see
Ref. 21), but no kinase activity was detected in purified hRAR
preparations. The PKC-catalyzed hRAR phosphorylation was inhibited
by GF109203X, a specific but general inhibitor of PKCs, and by an
inhibitor specific for , , and isoforms (Gö6976; Ref.
22). Gö6976 strongly inhibited PKC-directed phosphorylation of
hRAR , but phosphate incorporation was still detectable, suggesting
that PKCµ may display some weak phosphorylating activity in these
conditions. From these experiments, we conclude that PKC and/or
PKC is the most active isozyme phosphorylating hRAR in
vitro.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Phosphorylation of hRAR
by PKCs in vitro. Panel A, identification
of PKC isoforms purified from rat brain. 1 ng of purified
rat brain PKC (Calbiochem) was fractionated by 8% SDS-PAGE and blotted
on a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Immunodetection of each
isoform was carried out using specific monoclonal antibodies as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Molecular masses are
indicated on the left. Panel B, hRAR is
phosphorylated by PKC and PKC in vitro.
His6-tagged hRAR was purified to near homogeneity from
E. coli extracts using NiTA affinity chromatography and
incubated with purified rat brain PKCs and [ -32P]ATP,
in the presence of a PKC inhibitor (100 nM GF109203X) or an
inhibitor specific for , , and isoforms (100 nM
Gö6976). Phosphorylated proteins were analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE,
and gels were either silver stained (left panel) or
autoradiographed (right panel). Panel C, PKC
and PKC phosphorylate hRAR on serine residues. hRAR was
phosphorylated by rat brain PKCs and gel purified as in panel
B. The polypeptide was submitted to total acid hydrolysis, and
reaction products were separated by thin layer chromatography and
identified by comigration with phosphoamino acid standards.
|
|
Phosphorylated hRAR was gel purified and submitted to acid
hydrolysis to determine which type of amino acid was phosphorylated in
these conditions. Products were analyzed by thin layer chromatography and identified by comigration with phosphoamino acid standards (Fig.
1C). Only phosphoserine was detected in these conditions, suggesting that hRAR is phosphorylated by PKC only on serine(s) located outside of the LBD.
Identification of Serine Residues Phosphorylated in Vitro by PKC
and PCK --
To identify hRAR amino acids phosphorylated by
PKC and isoforms further, we submitted the purified, denatured,
phosphorylated receptor to trypsin digestion. Proteolysis products were
fractionated by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography,
and two labeled peptides (Fig.
2B) were reproducibly detected
in these conditions, albeit in varying
ratio.2 These peptides were
NH2-terminally sequenced by the Edman reaction. Peak I
corresponded to the sequence (K)148CFEVGMS, whereas peak II
was identified as peptide (R)139CQYCRLQ. The occurrence of
lysine (K) and of arginine (R) upstream of the cleavage site in the
primary sequence of hRAR identified these peptides as products of
trypsin cleavage. These results indicated, however, that partial
tryptic digests were generated in our conditions but nevertheless
mapped phosphorylated serine(s) to the same region of the DBD, spanning
the T and A boxes. A PKC consensus phosphorylation site is found at
position 157. Because partial proteolysis was likely, Ser-154 remained
a possible target for PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation, although this
amino acid is not surrounded by amino acids usually defining a
PKC-directed phosphorylation site (RXXS/TXR).
Thus we converted Ser-157 and Ser-115, Ser-154, Ser-232, and Ser-388
into an alanine (A) to determine whether these serine residues could be
minor phosphorylation sites undetected in our phosphopeptide mapping
experiments. His-tagged wt and mutated hRAR were expressed in
bacteria, purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography, and
tested for their ability to serve as a substrate for PKC.
Phosphorylation reactions were carried out as described above, using an
identical amount of each receptor derivative, and products were
subjected to SDS-PAGE. Receptor concentrations were controlled by
silver staining (Fig. 3, left panels) of gels, which were then dried and autoradiographed (Fig. 3, right panels). We found that only mutation of Ser-157
severely compromised PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation, whereas all other
substitutions designed to inactivate other consensus sequences had no
significant effect on the phosphate content of hRAR . Residual
phosphate incorporation was, however, observed with the S157A mutant,
suggesting that other sites may represent poor substrates for PKC.
Alternatively, this residual activity might result from contaminating,
unidentified protein kinases in the rat brain extract. Thus Ser-157
appeared to be the major target for PKC in vitro, and these
data support both peptide mapping results and our previous conclusion
that putative phosphorylation site(s) lie outside of the LBD (14). Ser-157 is located in the DBD of the receptor, in a region lying COOH-terminally of the second zinc finger motif. Sequence alignment between RAR and RXR isoforms showed that Ser-157 is found only in
RAR and RAR (Fig. 4) and is located
in the so-called T box region, which has been reported to be important
for dimerization and DNA binding activities of several nuclear
receptors (23, 24).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of PKC phosphorylation sites
along the hRAR primary sequence. hRAR
was used as a substrate for purified PKCs and gel purified as above.
The denaturated polypeptide was then digested with TPCK-treated
trypsin, and cleaved peptides were fractionated on a C18 reverse phase
HPLC column. Peptides were identified by monitoring OD at 225 nm
(panel A), and phosphorylated species were localized by
quantifying radioactivity in each fraction (panel B).
Fractions containing phosphorylated peptides (I and II) were
lyophilized and subjected to automatic Edman degradation. The first
radioactive peak (panel B) corresponds to unbound
radioactivity, and the dotted lines indicate the
acetonitrile concentration in percent (right axis).
|
|

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Mutation of serine 157 prevents
phosphorylation of hRAR by PKCs.
Wild-type or mutated hRAR was overexpressed in E. coli
and purified by NiTA chromatography. Each receptor was submitted to a
phosphorylation reaction in the presence of [ -32P]ATP
and PKCs from rat brain. Samples were resolved by 8% SDS-PAGE, gels
were silver stained (left panels, Proteins) and
autoradiographed (right panels, 32P).
Positions of molecular mass markers are indicated on the
left, and the hRAR position is indicated by an
arrowhead (right). Note that electrophoresis
conditions were slightly different for mutants S157A and S388A,
explaining the observed different mobility for labeled polypeptides of
~25 and 18 kDa.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Localization of phosphorylated serine 157 in
hRAR domain D. Sequence alignment of
hRAR 1, hRAR 2, hRAR 2, hRXR , and hRXR 1 is shown. The
phosphorylated serine are located in the D domain (amino acids 153-198
of hRAR ) and map to the T box (amino acids 154-165), a region
involved in receptor dimerization and DNA binding. The NCoR box maps to
the COOH terminus of domain D from residue 181 to residue 198.
|
|
Converting Serine 157 into Aspartic Acid Decreases Transcriptional
Activity of hRAR --
To examine the role of this phosphorylatable
amino acid in regulating the transcriptional activity of hRAR , we
constructed eukaryotic expression vectors encoding Ser to Ala or Gly,
and Ser to Asp hRAR mutants, either to prevent constitutive
phosphorylation by PKC (Ser to Ala/Gly mutants) or to mimic the net
charge increase brought by phosphorylation (Ser to Asp mutants). As for
in vitro experiments, we deliberately mutated all potential
phosphorylation sites for PKC (Ser-115, Ser-157, Ser-232, Ser-388, and
Ser-452) and compared the activity of Ser to Ala and of Ser to Asp
mutants with that of the wt hRAR . HeLa cells express low levels of
RARs and RXRs which are able to activate prototypical retinoid response elements such as the direct repeat found in the RAR 2 gene promoter (DR5). To avoid any interference with endogenous receptors, we used the
luciferase reporter gene driven by the synthetic, palindromic thyroid
response element TREpal, which is also activated by retinoids but
necessitates high levels of receptors which are only achieved upon
transfection of RAR and/or RXR expression vectors (17, 25). We thus
monitored the transcriptional activity of Ser to Ala and of Ser to Asp
mutants in the presence of hRXR in this system and compared them
with the activity of wt hRAR , using atRA as an inducer at a
10 6 M final concentration (Fig.
5). The basal level of luciferase activity measured in the presence of wt hRAR or mutant receptors did
not fluctuate significantly, suggesting that these receptors have a
similar affinity for nuclear corepressors. In vitro
protein-protein interaction assays revealed that all of these receptors
bound to the nuclear corepressor SMRT with a wt
affinity.3 The addition of atRA
to the culture medium leads typically to a 5-10-fold increase in
luciferase activity: only two mutations affected the ability of hRAR
to respond to atRA, S115G and S157D, although both receptors were
expressed at levels comparable to that of wt hRAR .3
S115G activity decreased by 30% compared with wt hRAR . Because Ser-115 is not phosphorylated by PKCs (Fig. 3), and S115D displayed a
wt activity, it is likely that the observed decreased activity results
from structural alterations of the DBD and not from direct phosphorylation. Ser-115 is indeed located between the two zinc fingers
of hRAR , and mutations at this position in the hVDR sequence (S51)
were proposed to alter the -helical structure of this region (8). A
decrease of at least 50% was observed in atRA-induced luciferase
activity in cells overexpressing S157D, whereas S157A retained wt
activity, consistent with our working hypothesis of a PKC-mediated
inactivation of hRAR . The latter observation also suggests that no
phosphorylation of Ser-157 occurs in nonstimulated cells, in agreement
with a previous report (27). We also note that this decrease in
activity is similar to that observed upon chronic treatment of cells
with TPA (14), and therefore identify Ser-157 as a functional substrate
for PKCs.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the transcriptional activities
of hRAR mutants in HeLa cells. HeLa cells
were cotransfected with (TREpal)TATA3Luc, pSG5
wt hRAR , or mutants and pSG5hRXR . Basal and
ligand-induced activities of the (TREpal)3 luciferase
reporter gene are represented as bar chart for each mutant,
in the presence (atRA) or absence (basal) of 1 µM atRA. Each mutant activity was assayed when
overexpressed together with hRXR , thus reflecting heterodimeric RAR
activity. The average luciferase activity from at least six experiments
(± S.E.) is given for each mutant, with the level of luciferase
activity of wt hRAR observed in the presence of 1 µM
atRA taken as 100%. * p = 0.01; **p = 0.04.
|
|
Phosphorylation of Serine 157 Decreases the Ability of hRAR to
Heterodimerize with RXR--
The effects of the Ser-157 mutation on
RAR properties were investigated: the ability of the mutated receptor
to bind natural and synthetic ligands, its subcellular localization in
response to ligand as well as its half-life, its interaction with
nuclear corepressor (SMRT) and coactivators (SRC-1, RIP140) were
tested. None of these assays revealed functional alterations of the
receptor.3 The ability of the receptor to interact with RXR
in a ligand-dependent manner in the absence of DNA was
quantified in glutathione S-transferase pull-down
experiments (Fig. 6). A Sepharose GST-RXR
affinity matrix was used as a bait for 35S-labeled wt
hRAR and receptor mutants S157A and S157D, in the presence or not of
1 µM atRA. Similar amounts of receptors were used in each
condition and high salt washes allowed to monitor the ligand-induced
stabilization of RAR-RXR interaction. Heterodimer formation was
stimulated 3-fold for wt hRAR and the S157A mutant (Fig.
6A). S157D displayed a slightly but significantly decreased constitutive dimerization (in the absence of atRA) and a 2-fold reduction in its ability to dimerize with RXR in the presence of atRA.
This result was confirmed using an independent assay in which
phosphorylated or native His-tagged RAR was immobilized on a
hydrophobic matrix (8). 35S-Labeled RXR was then incubated,
in the presence of 1 µM atRA, with this matrix, and
specifically bound receptors were quantified (Fig. 6B). RAR
phosphorylation by PKC, in conditions where more than 80% of the
receptor was phosphorylated by PKCs, led to a 50% decrease in RXR
retention on this matrix, in agreement with results generated by the
glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay. Thus to a 50%
decreased transcriptional activity is associated with a decreased
ability to form a dimer with hRXR , strongly suggesting that
PKC-catalyzed post-translational modification of hRAR is controlling
the ability of RAR to heterodimerize with RXR.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
hRAR
heterodimerization with hRXR is
inhibited by phosphorylation of serine 157. Panel A,
35S-Labeled hRAR polypeptides were produced by in
vitro coupled transcription-translation, incubated for 2 h
with dimethyl sulfoxide or 1 µM atRA, and adsorbed on a
Sepharose-GST-hRXR affinity matrix. Bound receptors were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. Results are shown
as the average of three independent experiments (± S.D.) and are
presented with a typical autoradiogram. Results from analysis were
normalized for translation efficiency using the protein input lane as a
reference (which represents 20% of total input) and expressed as the
ratio of bound receptor to 20% input protein. Panel B,
purified wt hRAR was submitted to a phosphorylation reaction in the
presence of rat brain purified PKCs, ATP in the presence or not of a
specific inhibitor (100 nM GF109203X) and adsorbed to
microtiter wells. After extensive washing to remove unbound ATP,
106 cpm of 35S-labeled hRXR was added to the
wells and incubated for 2 h with 1 µM atRA. Bound
material was quantified by scintillation counting, and the results are
expressed as means ± S.D. of three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Modulation of the phosphorylation state plays an important role in
the reversible control of the activity of many proteins, including
nuclear receptors. In the case of hRAR 1, heterodimerization properties have been shown to be altered by protein phosphatases 1 and
2A (15) and the NH2-terminal function AF-1 to be activated through the proline-directed Cdk7 (27). We now show that dimerization of hRAR with hRXR can be modulated by PKC-dependent
phosphorylation. Several potential phosphorylation sites by PKCs are
located along the hRAR sequence. Phosphopeptide mapping studies as
well as mutagenesis of hRAR identified Ser-157 as the major target
for PKC and PKC isoforms (Figs. 2 and 3). This amino acid is
located in the T box of hRAR , which, together with the A box, are
part of a larger region (hinge domain) that is organized into an
-helical structure in the RXR·T3R DBD dimer (23).
Molecular modeling of RXR·RAR dimers suggested that the T box,
forming a loop interrupted by an -helical turn perpendicular to the
DNA axis, engages dimerization contacts with the RXR DBD.
Interestingly, Ser-157 neighbors amino acids that, in
RXR·T3R and RXR·VDR dimer structures, establish salt
bridges with the RXR DBD (Asp-69 and Glu-69, respectively). Thus
phosphorylation of Ser-157 may introduce strong conformational constraints on this dimerization region and, as observed, decrease the
relative affinity of RAR DBD for RXR DBD and inhibit dimerization. Alternatively, phosphorylation of Ser-157 may perturb the relative orientation of RAR DBD and LBD as suggested for VDR (24) and in turn
modify the orientation of the strong dimerization interface located in
the hRAR LBD (8). Protein kinases C are a family of Ser/Thr kinases
whose activities are involved in the regulation of complex biological
responses such as differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. They
are organized in two domains, a COOH-terminal catalytic domain and an
NH2 -terminal regulatory domain. Their tissue distribution
is in most cases ubiquitous, with the exception of PKC , which is
expressed specifically in the brain and spinal cord. Response to
agonists (hormones, neurotransmitters, growth factors) is mediated
through a transient short term production of DAG, essentially through
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate hydrolysis. A more sustained
response may be observed with phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis or phorbol
ester treatment. The basic model of PKC activation suggests that PKC
translocation to the plasma membrane is the main event regulating this
signaling cascade. However, PKC is often found, irrespective of its
activation state, in the particulate fraction (membranes, organelles,
and nuclei) of cultured cells and in nuclei themselves. HeLa cells were
found to express , , , µ, , and isozymes, among which
and isozymes appeared to be sensitive to TPA-induced
down-regulation.3 Both PKC and can be found in
nuclei of HeLa cells.3 A prolonged activation of PKCs by
phorbol esters or repeated DAG stimulation leads to cellular depletion
in PKCs by inducing a high rate of proteolytic clipping of
DAG-dependent kinases, concomitantly with the nuclear
translocation of the catalytic domain (PKM), which displays unregulated
kinase activity (28). We observed that the catalytic domain of PKC
and (PKM) was almost exclusively nuclear and that PKM accumulated
in nuclei upon TPA treatment, to reach a 3-5-fold higher concentration
than in control cells.3 However, this treatment, much like
PKC overexpression, also led to strong alteration of the cellular
morphology as well as perturbation of the cell cycle, and therefore
made a direct correlation between PKC activation/translocation and
hRAR inhibition very difficult to establish. However, in these types
of experiments, S157A displayed a very low sensitivity to TPA
treatment, in opposition to wt hRAR .3 Several nuclear
proteins are potential or known substrates for PKCs: LIM-containing
proteins (29), p53 (30), WT1 (31), c-myc (32), and nuclear receptors
such as T3R (6), VDR (7), RAR (14 and this report) and
RXR.2 PKC activation has been reported to inhibit
VDR-controlled transcription (33) through a mechanism involving direct
phosphorylation of the DBD (8). RAR-mediated transactivation has also
been reported to be strongly potentiated by short term phorbol ester
treatment in T cells (34). However, similar experiments carried out in HeLa cells demonstrated a strong inhibition of the atRA-induced transcriptional response, in agreement with the proposed inhibition of
the retinoid pathway by the AP-1 signaling
module.4 It is therefore likely
that the reported potentiation arises from an AP-1 independent,
cell-type specific indirect mechanism.
atRA has been described as an effector able to modulate PKC isozymes
expression (35-38) and/or PKC subcellular repartition in several cell
lines (39, 40). However, our data neither provided evidence for
significant variation of PKC isoform content in atRA-treated cells, nor
we were able to document alteration of the cellular partitioning of
expressed intact isoforms by indirect immunofluorescence.3
This set of data clearly suggests that interferences between the PKC
and retinoid signaling pathways are cell-specific and diverse and that,
in this respect, one must distinguish between short term events (AP-1
induction, PKC activation) and long term events (alteration of PKC
expression rate). Short term TPA treatment of HeLa cells may activate
several signaling pathways involving PKCs, MAP kinases, and c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase (JNK). PKC down-regulation has been
reported to block completely JNK activation by phorbol esters in HeLa
cells (41), and MAP kinase overexpression in COS cells did not modify
the phosphorylation pattern of hRAR (27). No increase in MAP kinase
activity was detected in TPA-treated HeLa cells,3 thus
ruling out a potential involvement of these two protein kinases in the
observed inactivation of hRAR .
Furthermore, additional cross-talk processes can be also considered
based on the nongenomic effects of steroid and of others ligands for
nuclear receptors. For example, vitamin D3 has been shown to activate
the MAP kinase signaling cascade through activation of PKC (42) and is
able to induce subcellular redistribution of
calcium-dependent PKCs. Tamoxifen, a
therapeutic/chemopreventive nonsteroidal antagonist of estrogen
receptor, induces PKC translocation to the membrane and down-regulation
of this enzyme through oxidative stress (43). Finally, retinoids,
estrogens, and vitamin D3 treatment of cells modulate the rate of
expression of PKC isoforms (26, 44-46), underlining a complex network
of intertwined, and often antagonistic, signaling pathways eventually
controlling cell differentiation, growth, and death.
In conclusion, our findings establish that PKC isoforms are able to
phosphorylate hRAR and control its dimerization properties, very
likely through T box conformational alteration. The observed inhibition
may be of importance in differentiation and proliferation processes
during which sustained activation of PKCs is necessary to induce a full
biological response to external stimuli.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from INSERM, Ligue
Nationale contre le Cancer, and Association pour la Recherche sur le
Cancer. INSERM U 459 is part of IFR 22 (INSERM, Centre Hospitalier
Régional Universitaire, Centre Oscar Lambret, and University of
Lille 2).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a fellowship from Région Nord-Pas de Calais and CHRU.
§
Present address: Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, Rockefeller
University, 1230 York Ave., New York NY 10021.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-3-2062-6887; Fax: 33-3-2062-6884; E-mail:
p.lefebvre@lille.inserm.fr.
2
A. Tahayato, P. Formstecher, and P. Lefebvre,
unpublished data.
3
M.-H. Delmotte and P. Lefebvre, unpublished data.
4
M.-H. Delmotte, M. Benkoussa, and P. Lefebvre,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DAG, diacylglycerol;
PKC, protein kinase C;
VDR, vitamin D3 receptor;
h, human;
DBD, DNA
binding domain;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
LBD, ligand binding
domain;
wt, wild-type;
RAR, retinoic acid receptor;
RXR, 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor;
atRA, all-trans-retinoic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
T3R, thyroid hormone receptor;
SMRT, silencing mediator of
RAR and T3R;
RIP140, 140-kDa receptor interacting protein;
SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nishizuka, Y.
(1992)
Science
258,
607-614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Nishizuka, Y.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
484-496[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Blobe, G. C.,
Stribling, S.,
Obeid, L. M.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1996)
Cancer Surv.
27,
213-248[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Jaken, S.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
168-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hofmann, J.
(1997)
FASEB J.
11,
649-669[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
VI,
Goldberg, Y.,
Glineur, C.,
Gesquiere, J. C.,
Ricouart, A.,
Sap, J.,
Vennstrom, B.,
and Ghysdael, J.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2425-2433[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Hsieh, J. C.,
Jurutka, P. W.,
Galligan, M. A.,
Terpening, C. M.,
Haussler, C. A.,
Samuels, D. S.,
Shimizu, Y.,
Shimizu, N.,
and Haussler, M. R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9315-9319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Hsieh, J. C.,
Jurutka, P. W.,
Nakajima, S.,
Galligan, M. A.,
Haussler, C. A.,
Shimizu, Y.,
Shimizu, N.,
Whitfield, G. K.,
and Haussler, M. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15118-15126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Ueda, Y.,
Hirai, S.-i,
Osada, S.-i,
Suzuki, A.,
Mizuno, K.,
and Ohno, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23512-23519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Schonwasser, D. C.,
Marais, R. M.,
Marshall, C. J.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
790-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Krstic, M. D.,
Rogatsky, I.,
Yamamoto, K. R.,
and Garabedian, M. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3947-3954[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Hu, E. D.,
Kim, J. B.,
Sarraf, P.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1996)
Science
274,
2100-2103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kato, S.,
Endoh, H.,
Masuhiro, Y.,
Kitamoto, T.,
Uchiyama, S.,
Sasaki, H.,
Masushige, S.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Nishida, E.,
Kawashima, H.,
Metzger, D.,
and Chambon, P.
(1995)
Science
270,
1491-1494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Tahayato, A.,
Lefebvre, P.,
Formstecher, P.,
and Dautrevaux, M.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
1642-1653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lefebvre, P.,
Gaub, M. P.,
Tahayato, A.,
Rochette-Egly, C.,
and Formstecher, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10806-10816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Rachez, C.,
Sautiere, P.,
Formstecher, P.,
and Lefebvre, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17996-18006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Lefebvre, B.,
Mouchon, A.,
Formstecher, P.,
and Lefebvre, P.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
9240-9249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Tahayato, A.,
Rachez, C.,
Formstecher, P.,
and Lefebvre, P.
(1997)
in
Retinoid Protocols
(Redfern, C., ed)
, pp. 277-291, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
|
| 19.
|
Mouchon, A.,
Delmotte, M.-H.,
Formstecher, P.,
and Lefebvre, P.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3073-3085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Dutil, E. M.,
Toker, A.,
and Newton, A. C.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1366-1375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Martiny-Baron, G.,
Kazanietz, M. G.,
Misschak, H.,
Blumberg, P. M.,
Kochs, G.,
Hug, G.,
Marme, D.,
and Schachtele, C.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
268,
9194-9197
|
| 23.
|
Rastinejad, F.,
Perlmann, T.,
Evans, R. M.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1995)
Nature
375,
203-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Quack, M.,
Szafranski, K.,
Rouvinen, J.,
and Carlberg, C.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
5372-5378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Zhang, X. K.,
Salbert, G.,
Lee, M. O.,
and Pfahl, M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4311-4323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Simboli-Campbell, M.,
Gagnon, A.,
Franks, D. J.,
and Welsh, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3257-3264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Rochette-Egly, C.,
Adam, S.,
Rossignol, M.,
Egly, J. M.,
and Chambon, P.
(1997)
Cell
90,
97-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
James, G.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
863-874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Kuroda, S.,
Tokunaga, C.,
Kiyohara, Y.,
Higuchi, O.,
Konishi, H.,
Mizuno, K.,
Gill, G. N.,
and Kikkawa, U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31029-31032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Chernov, M. V.,
Ramana, C. V.,
Adler, V. V.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2284-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ye, Y.,
Raychaudhuri, B.,
Gurney, A.,
Campbell, C. E.,
and Williams, B. R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5606-5615[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Pollok, K. E.,
and Snow, E. C.
(1991)
Cell Signal.
3,
435-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Krishnan, A. V.,
and Feldman, D.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
605-612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Yang, Y. L.,
Minucci, S.,
Zand, D. J.,
Ozato, K.,
and Ashwell, J. D.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1370-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Khuri, F. R.,
Cho, Y. H.,
and Talmage, D. A.
(1996)
Cell Growth Differ.
7,
595-602[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Kindregan, H. C.,
Rosenbaum, S. E.,
Ohno, S.,
and Niles, R. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27756-27761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Gruber, J. R.,
Ohno, S.,
and Niles, R. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13356-13360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Rosewicz, S.,
Brembeck, F.,
Kaiser, A.,
Marschall, Z. V.,
and Riecken, E. O.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
3340-3347[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Kurie, J. M.,
Younes, A.,
Miller, W. H.,
Burchert, M.,
Chiu, C. F.,
Kolesnick, R.,
and Dmitrovsky, E.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1179,
203-207[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Cho, Y. H.,
Tighe, A. P.,
and Talmage, D. A.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
172,
306-313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Werlen, G.,
Jacinto, E.,
Xia, Y.,
and Karin, M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3101-3111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Beno, D. W. A.,
Brady, L. M.,
Bissonnette, M.,
and Davis, B. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3642-3647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Gundimeda, U.,
Chen, Z. H.,
and Gopalakrishna, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13504-13514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Marino, M.,
Pallottini, V.,
and Trentalance, A.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
245,
254-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Berry, D. M.,
Antochi, R.,
Bhatia, M.,
and Meckling-Gill, K. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16090-16096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Lissoos, T. W.,
Beno, D. W. A.,
and Davis, B. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25132-25138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Pondugula, C. Brimer-Cline, J. Wu, E. G. Schuetz, R. K. Tyagi, and T. Chen
A Phosphomimetic Mutation at Threonine-57 Abolishes Transactivation Activity and Alters Nuclear Localization Pattern of Human Pregnane X Receptor
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
April 1, 2009;
37(4):
719 - 730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gineste, A. Sirvent, R. Paumelle, S. Helleboid, A. Aquilina, R. Darteil, D. W. Hum, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels
Phosphorylation of Farnesoid X Receptor by Protein Kinase C Promotes Its Transcriptional Activity
Mol. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2008;
22(11):
2433 - 2447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J Delvecchio and J. P Capone
Protein kinase C {alpha} modulates liver X receptor {alpha} transactivation
J. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2008;
197(1):
121 - 130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Miranda, R. L. Redner, and D. E. Johnson
Inhibition of Src family kinases enhances retinoic acid induced gene expression and myeloid differentiation
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
December 1, 2007;
6(12):
3081 - 3090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sun, V. Montana, K. Chellappa, Y. Brelivet, D. Moras, Y. Maeda, V. Parpura, B. M. Paschal, and F. M. Sladek
Phosphorylation of a Conserved Serine in the Deoxyribonucleic Acid Binding Domain of Nuclear Receptors Alters Intracellular Localization
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2007;
21(6):
1297 - 1311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Germain, B. Staels, C. Dacquet, M. Spedding, and V. Laudet
Overview of Nomenclature of Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2006;
58(4):
685 - 704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Rosenfeld, V. V. Lunyak, and C. K. Glass
Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response
Genes & Dev.,
June 1, 2006;
20(11):
1405 - 1428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Martin, V. Lardeux, and P. Lefebvre
The proliferating cell nuclear antigen regulates retinoic acid receptor transcriptional activity through direct protein-protein interaction
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 29, 2005;
33(13):
4311 - 4321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Barry and V. Giguere
Epidermal Growth Factor-Induced Signaling in Breast Cancer Cells Results in Selective Target Gene Activation by Orphan Nuclear Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor {alpha}
Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2005;
65(14):
6120 - 6129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Blanquart, R. Mansouri, R. Paumelle, J.-C. Fruchart, B. Staels, and C. Glineur
The Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathway Regulates a Molecular Switch between Transactivation and Transrepression Activity of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2004;
18(8):
1906 - 1918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kambhampati, Y. Li, A. Verma, A. Sassano, B. Majchrzak, D. K. Deb, S. Parmar, N. Giafis, D. V. Kalvakolanu, A. Rahman, et al.
Activation of Protein Kinase C{delta} by All-trans-retinoic Acid
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
32544 - 32551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Boskovic, D. Desai, and R. M. Niles
Regulation of Retinoic Acid Receptor alpha by Protein Kinase C in B16 Mouse Melanoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 12, 2002;
277(29):
26113 - 26119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Benkoussa, C. Brand, M.-H. Delmotte, P. Formstecher, and P. Lefebvre
Retinoic Acid Receptors Inhibit AP1 Activation by Regulating Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and CBP Recruitment to an AP1-Responsive Promoter
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2002;
22(13):
4522 - 4534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Braun, M.-N. Vo, and K. H. Kim
Positive Regulation of Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha by Protein Kinase C and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod,
July 1, 2002;
67(1):
29 - 37.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Gay, P. Barath, C. Desbois-Le Peron, R. Metivier, R. Le Guevel, D. Birse, and G. Salbert
Multiple Phosphorylation Events Control Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor I Orphan Nuclear Receptor Activity
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2002;
16(6):
1332 - 1351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Parrado, G. Despouy, R. Kraiba, C. L. Pogam, S. Dupas, M. Choquette, M. Robledo, J. Larghero, H. Bui, I. L. Gall, et al.
Retinoic acid receptor {alpha}1 variants, RAR{alpha}1{Delta}B and RAR{alpha}1{Delta}BC, define a new class of nuclear receptor isoforms
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 15, 2001;
29(24):
4901 - 4908.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Depoix, M.-H. Delmotte, P. Formstecher, and P. Lefebvre
Control of Retinoic Acid Receptor Heterodimerization by Ligand-induced Structural Transitions. A NOVEL MECHANISM OF ACTION FOR RETINOID ANTAGONISTS
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 16, 2001;
276(12):
9452 - 9459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Barger, A. C. Browning, A. N. Garner, and D. P. Kelly
p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activates Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha . A POTENTIAL ROLE IN THE CARDIAC METABOLIC STRESS RESPONSE
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 2001;
276(48):
44495 - 44501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|