![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 141-146, January 7, 2000
B-dependent Gene Expression, in Macrophages
Challenged with Pseudomonas aeruginosa*
§,
**
From the Departments of
Pediatrics, ¶ Medicine,
and
Pharmacology, Columbia University,
New York, New York 10032
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Macrophages respond to Gram-negative bacterial
pathogens by phagocytosis and pro-inflammatory gene expression. These
responses may require GTPases that have been implicated in cytoskeletal alterations and activation of NF- Phagocytic leukocytes, such as macrophages and polymorphonuclear
leukocytes, respond to bacterial pathogens by the process of
phagocytosis, an early and essential step in the leukocyte bactericidal
response. Bacterial ingestion is accompanied by the expression of
pro-inflammatory gene products, which is a major mechanism utilized by
phagocytes to orchestrate an anti-bacterial immune response. Although
the relationship between phagocytosis and gene expression is uncertain,
several studies have suggested that phagocytosis per se
triggers gene expression (1-7). Whether phagocytosis and its
underlying cytoskeletal alterations directly contribute to gene
expression is unclear, but the ability of several phagocytosis-promoting receptors to trigger the activation of NF- Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative
bacterium that causes infections in immunocompromised hosts, such as
individuals with cystic fibrosis, burn victims, and patients infected
with human immunodeficiency virus (for review, see Ref. 20). The interaction of Pseudomonas with macrophages occurs via
multiple cell surface receptors, and is accompanied by the formation of pseudopods that resemble those that arise during Fc Cells and Reagents--
RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells (11), a subline of
the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage-like cell line (22), were cultured in
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml
penicillin G, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and maintained at 37 °C
in a 5% CO2 incubator. Myc-tagged Rac1 N17, Cdc42 N17, or
the GAP domain of n-chimaerin (Chim-GAP) subcloned into
pCMV3Rluc, were used for transfections as described previously (11).
Myc-tagged Rac1 L61 and Cdc42 L61 subcloned in pRK5 (23) were kindly
provided by Dr. Alan Hall (University College London, United Kingdom). A plasmid containing I Bacterial Association and Phagocytosis Assays--
Sixteen hours
following transfection of plasmids encoding the indicated constructs,
adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells were incubated with 4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by washing
non-adherent bacteria and incubation with PAO1 antiserum at 4 °C (to
detect bound, uningested bacteria), followed by FITC-conjugated
anti-rabbit IgG. The cells were subsequently fixed in 3.7%
formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and stained with
PAO1 antiserum, followed by rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG to
detect all cell-associated bacteria. Stained cells were visualized
using fluorescence microscopy and scored for the presence of attached,
but uningested (green) and total (red) bacteria. Ingested bacteria
represent the difference between total and attached, uningested
bacteria (i.e. red minus green). Myc-expressing cells were
identified using a mAb against Myc and AMCA-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.
Data are presented as association index (number of PAO1 either bound
to, or ingested by, 100 macrophages) and phagocytosis index (number of
PAO1 ingested by 100 macrophages). A total of 100 Myc-expressing and
100 non-Myc-expressing cells, in at least 7 microscopic fields, were
analyzed in each experiment, which was repeated three times.
Assay for Nuclear Localization of p65 NF- Single Cell Assays for Detection of iNOS, COX-2, and TNF- Detection of iNOS, COX-2, and TNF- Rac1 and Cdc42 Are Required for Phagocytosis of Unopsonized P. aeruginosa by Murine Macrophages--
Rac1 and Cdc42 have been
implicated in phagocytosis of IgG-coated particles (11-13) and
S. typhimurium (14). To determine whether these GTPases
participate in the phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa, we
expressed guanine nucleotide binding-deficient alleles of Rac1 or
Cdc42, or a GAP for both proteins, in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells, and
performed association and phagocytosis assays. Expression of any of
these proteins resulted in a marked (88-92%) inhibition of the
macrophage phagocytic capacity for PAO1. Expression of these same
constructs resulted in a moderate (33-45%) inhibition of the total
number of bacteria associated with the macrophages (Fig.
1). When expressed as percentage of
ingestion, control macrophages ingested 66% of cell-associated
bacteria while macrophages expressing any of these constructs ingested
9-12% of cell-associated bacteria. Phagocytosis was inhibited by
97 ± 0.7% in the presence of 2 µm cytochalasin D,
demonstrating an essential role for actin polymerization in
phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa. These results indicate that, similar to ingestion of IgG-coated erythrocytes and
Salmonella, intact Rac1 and Cdc42 function is required for
phagocytosis of unopsonized P. aeruginosa by murine
macrophages.
Lack of Requirement for Rac1 and Cdc42 in the Activation of NF- Expression of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF- Rac1 and Cdc42 Are Not Required for Expression of iNOS, COX-2, and
TNF- Neither Bacterial Binding nor Ingestion Is Required for Induction
of iNOS, COX-2, and TNF- The data presented in this study indicate an essential role for
intact Rac1 and Cdc42 function in phagocytosis, but not
pro-inflammatory protein expression, induced by unopsonized P. aeruginosa. The requirement for Rac1 and Cdc42 in bacterial
phagocytosis is consistent with an essential role for actin assembly in
the ingestion of this Gram-negative pathogen. In this respect,
phagocytosis of Pseudomonas resembles
Fc Pro-inflammatory gene expression induced by various bacteria has been
ascribed to phagocytosis per se (1-4, 6, 7). These studies
employed cytochalasins, fungal metabolites that inhibit actin assembly.
Addition of cytochalasins to cells produces dramatic alterations in the
cytoskeleton independent of phagocytosis. Many cellular functions are
adversely affected by disruption of cytoskeletal integrity, including
protein synthesis (37) and insulin-stimulated DNA synthesis, c-Fos
expression, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation (38).
Cytochalasins have been reported either to inhibit (39) or have no
effect (40) on NF- The mechanism of activation of NF- In summary, we have presented evidence for an essential role of Rac1
and Cdc42 in the phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa by a murine macrophage cell line. The lack of requirement for these GTPases in
NF-
B. To determine the role of Rac1
and Cdc42 in signal transduction events triggered by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we expressed GTP binding-deficient alleles of Rac1 or
Cdc42, or Chim-GAP, a Rac1/Cdc42-specific GTPase-activating protein
domain, in a subline of RAW 264.7 cells, and challenged the transfected
cells with a laboratory strain of P. aeruginosa, PAO1.
Expression of Rac1 N17, Cdc42 N17, or Chim-GAP led to a marked
reduction of phagocytosis. In contrast, nuclear translocation of p65
NF-
B was unaffected by expression of the same constructs. Incubation
of macrophages with PAO1 led to NF-
B-dependent
expression of inducible nitric-oxide synthase, COX-2, and tumor
necrosis factor-
, which was unaffected by inhibition of Rac1 or
Cdc42 function. Isogenic strains of PAO1 that lacked surface adhesins were poorly ingested; however, they induced pro-inflammatory gene expression with an efficiency equal to that of PAO1. These results indicate that the signal transduction events leading to phagocytosis and pro-inflammatory protein expression are distinct. Rac1 and Cdc42
serve as effectors of phagocytosis, but not
NF-
B-dependent gene expression, in the macrophage
response to P. aeruginosa.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B
suggests one way in which phagocytosis may contribute to gene
expression (8-10). In addition, phagocytosis of IgG-coated particles
(11-13) and Salmonella typhimurium (14) requires the participation of Rac1 and Cdc42, GTPases that trigger cytoskeletal alterations and have the capacity to activate transcriptional pathways,
including AP-1, via c-Jun N-terminal kinase (15), and NF-
B (16, 17).
Furthermore, Rac is a component of the NADPH oxidase (18), which
produces superoxide anion upon activation, leading to the accumulation
of other reactive oxygen intermediates. One or more of these reactive
compounds may serve to activate transcriptional pathways, including
NF-
B, in vivo (19).
receptor (Fc
R)1-mediated
phagocytosis (21). However, the role of the actin-based cytoskeleton
and the signal transduction mechanisms that govern phagocytosis of
Pseudomonas are unknown, and the relationship between
phagocytosis and gene expression is unclear. In this study, we
investigated the role of Rac1 and Cdc42 in the phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa by macrophages, and determined whether these GTPases
contributed to the production of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
, gene
products that contain multiple
B enhancer sites in their promoters.
We addressed the question whether phagocytosis, or signal transduction
events that underlie it, are required for NF-
B-dependent
gene expression.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B
was kindly provided by Dr. Dimitrios Thanos (Columbia University, New York, NY). The following isogenic strains of P. aeruginosa were maintained on LB agar plates
supplemented with 50 µg/ml ampicillin: PAO1, PA 340 (Pil
F116r PO4r (Ref.
24) and AK1152 (Fla
Mot
; Ref. 25), and PA
477 (Pil
/Fla
; provided by Dr. Alice Prince,
Columbia University, New York, NY). Rabbit serum against PAO1 was a
gift from Dr. Alice Prince. A mouse mAb against the Myc epitope was
from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Rabbit IgG (C-20) against p65
NF-
B, mouse mAb (H-4) against I
B
, and rabbit IgG (M-19)
against iNOS were from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Santa Cruz, CA).
Rabbit IgG against COX-2 was from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI).
Rat IgG against TNF-
was from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Rhodamine-
and FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG,
AMCA-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, biotin-conjugated anti-rabbit and
anti-goat IgG, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin were
from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA). Rhodamine-conjugated
streptavidin and fluorescein-phalloidin were from Molecular Probes
(Eugene, OR).
B--
Sixteen hours
following transfection of plasmids encoding the indicated constructs,
adherent macrophages were incubated in the presence or absence of
4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 30 min at 37 °C. Following
fixation with 3.7% formaldehyde and permeabilization with 0.2% Triton
X-100, cells were stained with anti-p65 NF-
B followed by
rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG to detect NF-
B and with either
mAb anti-Myc followed by FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG to detect
Myc-tagged proteins, or mAb anti-I
B
followed by FITC-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG to detect those cells overexpresing I
B
. In some
experiments, F-actin was visualized using fluorescein-phalloidin and
Myc-tagged proteins were visualized using mAb anti-Myc followed by
AMCA-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. Nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B was
scored as "positive" if fluorescence was clearly visible over the
nucleus, there was a clear demarcation between nuclear and cytoplasmic
fluorescence, and the intensity of nuclear fluorescence exceeded that
of the cytoplasm. A total of 50 Myc-expressing cells and 50 non-Myc-expressing cells, in at least 7 microscopic fields, were
analyzed in each experiment, which was repeated three times.
Protein--
Sixteen hours following transfection of plasmids encoding
the indicated constructs, adherent macrophages were incubated in the
presence of absence of 4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 6 h at 37 °C. Following fixation with 3.7% formaldehyde and
permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100, cells were stained with
either rabbit IgG against iNOS or COX-2, or with goat IgG against
murine TNF-
, followed by biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies and
rhodamine-conjugated streptavidin. Myc expression was detected using a
mAb against Myc and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. I
B
expression
was detected as described above. Quantitation of iNOS, COX-2, and
TNF-
protein was done by measuring cell-associated fluorescence
using single-cell microspectrofluorometry (11). Fluorescence values
were corrected for nonspecific fluorescence by using either non-immune
rabbit IgG for iNOS and COX-2, or a rat myeloma IgG1 for
TNF-
. The nonspecific fluorescence did not exceed 10% of the total
fluorescence. Myc-expressing cells were selected using fluorescein
optics in a random fashion and without knowledge of rhodamine
intensity. Control cells that did not demonstrate Myc expression were
selected from the same slides. A total of 30 Myc-expressing cells and
30 non-Myc-expressing cells, in at least 7 microscopic fields, were
analyzed in each experiment, which was repeated three times.
Protein by
Immunoblotting--
Adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 macrophages (5 × 105) were incubated in the absence or presence of the
indicated number of bacteria for 5 h at 37 °C. For measurements
of TNF-
, 50 µM brefeldin A was added to the cells to
inhibit TNF-
secretion. Cells were subjected to detergent lysis (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) at 4 °C,
and lysates were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and immunoblotting using anti-iNOS, anti-COX-2, and anti-TNF-
IgG.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Phagocytosis of unopsonized P. aeruginosa by RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells requires intact Rac1 and
Cdc42 function. Adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells transfected with
Myc-tagged Rac1 N17, Cdc42 N17, or Chim-GAP were challenged with
4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1. Association (black
bars) and phagocytosis (hatched bars) indices were
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Controls
denote cells present on the same slide but not expressing the Myc
epitope. Data represent mean ± S.E., n = 3. Differences between phagocytosis in Rac1 N17-, Cdc42 N17-, or
Chim-GAP-expressing cells and controls were statistically significant
(p < 0.0001).
B
by P. aeruginosa in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 Cells--
Because transfection of
RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells results in a small percentage of cells expressing
the gene of interest, we resorted to co-transfection of plasmids
containing Rac1 and Cdc42 alleles with plasmids containing an NF-
B
reporter construct. However, the co-transfection efficiency of these
cells proved to be variable, prompting us to utilize other means of
assessing the state of NF-
B activation in transfected cells.
Expression of activated alleles of Rac1 or Cdc42 leads to nuclear
translocation and/or activation of NF-
B in COS-7 cells, NIH 3T3
cells (17), and Swiss-3T3 cells (26). To assess whether Rac1 and Cdc42
are capable of activating NF-
B in mouse macrophages, we transfected
plasmids encoding either Myc-Rac1 L61 or Myc-Cdc42 L61 in RAW
LR/FMLPR.2 cells and assessed whether their expression influenced the
nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B. Expression of either Myc-Rac1 L61
or Myc-Cdc42 L61 led to either membrane ruffling or filopodia (Fig. 2A), consistent with
previously published results (27). In either case, p65 NF-
B was
localized to the cytoplasm and was particularly prominent in membrane
ruffles in Rac1-transfected cells; there was no nuclear enrichment of
p65 NF-
B in Myc-Rac1 L61- or Myc-Cdc42 L61-expressing cells. It is
still possible that Rac1 or Cdc42, while insufficient to trigger
activation of NF-
B directly, might be required for activation of
NF-
B by other stimuli, including bacteria. Addition of PAO1 to
adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells led to nuclear translocation of p65
NF-
B in nearly all cells. However, expression of Rac1 N17 (Fig. 2,
B and C), Cdc42 N17, or Chim-GAP (Fig.
2C) did not inhibit PAO1-induced nuclear translocation of p65 NF-
B. These results indicate that nuclear translocation of p65
NF-
B in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells in response to P. aeruginosa is independent of intact Rac1 and Cdc42 function.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Nuclear translocation of p65
NF-
B in response to unopsonized P. aeruginosa in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells does not require intact
Rac1 and Cdc42 function. A, adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2
cells transfected with plasmids bearing the indicated Myc-tagged
constructs were fixed and stained for F-actin, for Myc expression, and
for p65 NF-
B as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Arrows indicate Myc-expressing cells identified using AMCA
optics (data not shown). B, effect of expression of Myc-Rac1
N17 on nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B in the absence or presence
of PAO1. Adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells, transfected with Myc-tagged
Rac1 N17 and incubated in the presence or absence of 4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 30 min at 37 °C, were fixed and stained
for the presence of the Myc epitope and for p65 NF-
B as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Arrows point to cells
expressing Myc-Rac1 N17. Note lack of effect of expression of Myc-Rac
N17 on nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B. Micrographs are
representative of seven similar experiments. C, cells
expressing the indicated constructs incubated in the absence
(black bars) or presence (hatched bars) of
4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 30 min at 37 °C and scored
for nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B. Data represent mean ± S.E., n = 3.
in Response to P. aeruginosa
Is NF-
B-dependent--
Macrophages produce many
pro-inflammatory proteins in response to bacterial products, including
COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
. The promoters for each of these contain
multiple
B enhancers, and use of reporter constructs or
pharmacological inhibitors implicates activation of NF-
B in the
pathway leading to expression of these proteins by multiple stimuli
(for review, see Ref. 28). To determine whether expression of COX-2,
iNOS, and TNF-
induced by P. aeruginosa requires the
participation of NF-
B, we overexpressed I
B
, an inhibitory
subunit of NF-
B that has been shown to inhibit NF-
B activation by
a variety of stimuli (29, 30). Overexpression of I
B
in RAW
LR/FMLPR.2 cells resulted in a decrease in the number of cells
demonstrating nuclear localization of p65 NF-
B in response to PAO1
(Fig. 3A). Expression of
I
B
also resulted in decreased expression of COX-2, iNOS, and
TNF-
(Fig. 3B), which was most marked for iNOS and
TNF-
. These data indicate that NF-
B is required for optimal
expression of several pro-inflammatory proteins in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells
in response P. aeruginosa.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Role of NF-
B in the
production of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
by RAW
LR/FMLPR.2 cells in response to P. aeruginosa.
Adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells transfected with a plasmid encoding
I
B
were incubated in the presence of absence of 4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 30 min at 37 °C followed by fixation
and indirect immunofluorescence. A, cells were stained for
p65 NF-
B to determine nuclear localization of this NF-
B subunit,
and for I
B
to detect transfected cells. Nuclear localization of
p65 NF-
B was determined for I
B
-expressing cells (hatched
bars) and non-expressing controls (black bars)
incubated in the absence or presence of PAO1. Data represent mean ± S.E., n = 3. The difference between nuclear
localization of p65 NF-
B in PAO1-stimulated I
B
-expressing
cells and non-expressing controls was statistically significant
(p < 0.0001). B, transfected cells were
incubated in the absence or presence of 4.5 × 107 CFU
PAO1 for 6 h at 37 °C as described under "Experimental
Procedures," followed by fixation and staining for I
B
to detect
transfected cells and for iNOS, COX-2, or TNF-
. Quantitation of
protein expression was performed using microspectrofluorometry as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are depicted as
-fold increase in protein expression in cells incubated with PAO1 as
compared with unstimulated controls in I
B
-expressing cells
(hatched bars) and non-expressing controls (black
bars). Data represent mean ± S.E., n = 3. Differences between expression of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
in
I
B
-expressing cells and non-expressing controls were
statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.0001, respectively).
in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 Cells Incubated with P. aeruginosa--
Our
data indicate that Rac1 and Cdc42 are incapable of autonomously
activating nuclear translocation of p65 NF-
B in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells, and do not inhibit nuclear translocation of p65 NF-
B in response to PAO1. To determine whether intact function of either GTPase
is required for pro-inflammatory protein expression, we expressed Rac1
N17, Cdc42 N17, or Chim-GAP in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells and measured
expression of either COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
in response to PAO1. To
prevent secretion of TNF-
, we added brefeldin A to those cells in
which TNF-
expression was measured. Expression of levels of Rac1
N17, Cdc42 N17, or Chim-GAP sufficient to markedly inhibit phagocytosis
(Fig. 1) had no significant effect on expression of either COX-2 (Fig.
4A) or iNOS (Fig.
4B), and had a minor effect on production of TNF-
(Fig.
4C).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of COX-2, iNOS, and
TNF-
by RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells in response to
unopsonized P. aeruginosa does not depend on intact
Rac1 and Cdc42 function. Adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells transfected
with plasmids containing the indicated constructs were challenged with
4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 for 6 h at 37 °C, followed
by fixation and staining for the Myc epitope and for either COX-2
(A), iNOS (B), or TNF-
(C).
Quantitation of protein expression was performed using
microspectrofluorometry as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data are depicted as -fold increase in protein
expression in cells incubated with PAO1 as compared with unstimulated
cells. Data represent mean ± S.E., n = 3 (COX-2,
iNOS) or n = 4 (TNF-
). Differences between
expression of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
in Rac1 N17-, Cdc42 N17-, or
Chim-GAP-expressing cells and non-expressing controls were not
statistically significant.
Production by
Macrophages--
Pro-inflammatory gene expression induced by various
bacteria has been ascribed to phagocytosis per se (1-4, 6,
7). However, the inability of inhibitors of Rac1 and Cdc42 function to
inhibit gene expression, despite their inhibition of phagocytosis (Figs. 1 and 4) suggested that phagocytosis is not required for pro-inflammatory gene expression. To determine whether phagocytosis or
bacterial adherence influenced expression of COX-2, iNOS, or TNF-
,
we utilized mutant isogenic strains of PAO1 that lacked putative
adhesins for leukocytes (31). PA 340, which lacks pilin (Pil
) adhered poorly to RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells when
compared with PAO1 (Fig. 5A).
However, the absence of pilin did not prevent phagocytosis of those
bacteria that did adhere to the macrophages (Fig. 5, A and
B), indicating that the presence of pilin is required for adherence, but not phagocytosis, per se. In contrast, an
intact flagellum was necessary for both binding and phagocytosis, since strain AK1152, which lacks flagellin (Fla
), and PA 477, which lacks both pilin and flagellin
(Pil
/Fla
), were neither bound to, nor
ingested by, RAW LR/FMLPR.2. cells (Fig. 5, A and
B). These data confirm a requirement for an intact flagellum
in phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa (31). We incubated adherent
RAW LR/FMLPR.2. cells with PAO1, AK1152, or PA477, and subjected the
cells to detergent lysis and immunoblotting. We included the fungal
metabolite brefeldin A in some samples to inhibit secretion of TNF-
.
Immunoblotting revealed the presence of COX-2, iNOS, and the
unprocessed form of TNF-
in cells incubated with bacteria. Despite
the lack of phagocytosis and/or attachment of adhesin-deficient
bacterial strains, all strains produced equivalent expression of all
three pro-inflammatory proteins (Fig.
6).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Role of pilin and flagellin in phagocytosis
of P. aeruginosa by RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells.
A, adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells were challenged with
4.5 × 107 CFU PAO1 WT (PAO1) or isogenic mutants PA
340 (Pil
), AK1152 (Fla
), or PA 477 (Pil
/Fla
) for 45 min at 37 °C.
Association indices (number of PAO1 bound per 100 RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells;
black bars) and phagocytosis indices (number of PAO1
ingested per 100 RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells; hatched bars) were
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures."
B, phagocytosis expressed as percent of total
cell-associated bacteria. Data represent mean ± S.E.,
n = 3.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Role of Pseudomonas pilin
and flagellin on expression of COX-2, iNOS, and TNF-
in RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells. adherent RAW LR/FMLPR.2 cells
(5 × 105) were either not challenged (lane
1) or challenged with 4.5 × 105 (lanes
4, 7, and 10), 4.5 × 104
(lanes 3, 6, and 9), or 4.5 × 103 (lanes 2, 5, and 8)
CFU of PAO1 (lanes 2-4), PA 340 (Pil
) (lanes 5-7), or AK1152
(Fla
) (lanes 8-10) for 5 h at
37 °C. Cells were subjected to detergent lysis, SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies.
Molecular weight markers appear at the left. Similar results
were seen in four independent experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
R-mediated phagocytosis and ruffling triggered by
colony stimulating factor-1 and the chemotactic peptide, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (11). Precisely how these responses are coupled to activation of Rac1 and Cdc42 is unknown, although they are likely to occur through activation of one or more
guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). Among the best characterized GEFs is Vav, a pleckstrin homology domain containing protein that accelerates GTP exchange by Rac1 and Cdc42 in a tyrosine kinase- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent manner
(32, 33). However, macrophages derived from Vav1 knock-out mice do not
demonstrate impaired phagocytosis or membrane
ruffling,2 and
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors do not block
Fc
R-directed actin assembly (34). Another recently
characterized Rho family GEF is SopE, a protein derived from S. typhimurium that is introduced into epithelial cells by a type III
secretion system, thereby stimulating localized actin assembly and
phagocytosis (35). P. aeruginosa also expresses a type III
secretion system (36), although it is unknown whether it plays a role
in its phagocytosis by macrophages. Macrophages express multiple
phagocytosis-promoting receptors, including several types of
Fc
receptors, complement receptor 1, complement receptor
3, and the macrophage mannose receptor. All of these have been
implicated in phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa (21). Since
phagocytosis mediated by these receptors can be triggered by inert
particles opsonized with their respective ligands, it is doubtful that
a type III secretion system is indispensable for Pseudomonas
phagocytosis. In addition, because a functional type III secretion
system requires bacteria-target cell contact (36), our findings using
poorly adherent Pil
or Fla
bacterial
strains indicate that a type III secretion system also is not required
for pro-inflammatory gene expression in murine macrophages.
B activation induced by microbial pathogens. We
found that cytochalasins inhibited expression of COX-2, iNOS, and
TNF-
induced by PAO1 (data not shown), but we could not ascribe this
to a specific blockade of phagocytosis. Since inhibition of Rac1 and
Cdc42 led to impaired phagocytosis but not pro-inflammatory protein
expression, this suggests that bacterial phagocytosis is not required
for gene expression. Indeed, results using adhesin-deficient strains of PAO1 (Fig. 6) demonstrate that bacterial ingestion or attachment does
not play a major role in the activation of NF-
B or the promotion of
NF-
B-dependent gene expression in murine macrophages.
P. aeruginosa secretes membrane vesicles into the medium
(for review, see Ref. 41). These vesicles contain cell wall components,
such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other potential inflammatory
mediators, including proteases, alkaline phosphatase, phospholipase C,
and pro-elastase. It is likely that one or more of these is responsible
for induction of iNOS, COX-2, and TNF-
. We found that polymyxin B,
which chelates and neutralizes LPS, partially inhibited nuclear
translocation of p65 NF-
B induced by highly diluted bacterial
supernatants; however, this inhibition was overcome by use of more
concentrated supernatants, reflecting either a molar excess of LPS or
the presence of additional pro-inflammatory substances (data not shown).
B is under intense scrutiny (for
review, see Ref. 42). This ubiquitous transcription factor is activated
by many stimuli, including LPS (43) and a variety of Gram-positive (44,
45) and Gram-negative (40, 46, 47) bacteria. A role for Rho family
GTPases in the activation of NF-
B has been reported for several
agonists, including interleukin-1 (16) and TNF-
(48). The mechanism
by which Rac1 participates in activation of NF-
B may involve the
production of reactive oxygen intermediates, such as
H2O2, by a Rac-sensitive pathway, and oxidation
of a kinase or phosphatase that regulates either I
B kinase or
another component of the NF-
B signaling pathway. Addition of
exogenous H2O2 is capable of activating NF-
B
in several lymphocyte and fibroblast cell lines (19), and antioxidants inhibited Rac-mediated NF-
B-dependent gene expression
(16). However, the activation of NF-
B by TNF-
was not inhibited
by expression of Rac1 N17 (48), arguing against a requisite role for
Rac-dependent oxidant generation in the activation of
NF-
B. In addition, activation of NF-
B in human neutrophils by
Staphylococcus aureus was insensitive to several
anti-oxidants (49) and N-acetylcysteine failed to inhibit
interleukin-1- and TNF-activated NF-
B in EL4.NOB-1 and KB cells,
respectively (50). Together, these data argue that activation of
NF-
B does not necessarily depend on oxidant generation. The
sensitivity to anti-oxidants of NF-
B activation in a given cell type
may depend on the constitutive activity of redox-sensitive negative
regulatory elements, such as phosphatases. Another mechanism by which
Rac may be required for activation of NF-
B is through its
association with POSH, a 93-kDa Rac-interacting protein whose
overexpression triggers NF-
B activation (26). However, activation of
NF-
B by Rac/POSH may be indirect, utilizing an autocrine/paracrine
pathway (26). This implies that Rac is not directly coupled to the
intracellular signal transduction machinery leading to NF-
B
activation. We found that activated alleles of either Rac1 or Cdc42
sufficient to induce marked cytoskeletal changes failed to induce
nuclear translocation of p65 NF-
B. Together with the fact that
neither nuclear translocation of NF-
B nor expression of COX-2, iNOS,
and TNF-
was sensitive to inhibition of Rac1 or Cdc42 function,
these data suggest that macrophages do not utilize these GTPases to
effect the transcriptional program leading to pro-inflammatory gene
expression in response to P. aeruginosa. It is possible that
either or both of these GTPases are required for activation of other
pathways in macrophages, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase or p38
mitogen-activated protein kinases.
B-dependent gene expression underscores that any role
for these enzymes in activation of NF-
B is likely to be cell type- and stimulus-specific.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge helpful comments from Alice Prince and Ruth Bryan.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grants HL54164 and AI42848 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.
** Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Depts. of Medicine and Pharmacology/PH8C, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Tel.: 212-305-1586; Fax: 212-305-1146; E-mail: greenberg@cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu.
2 S. Greenberg and V. L. Tybulewicz, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
Fc
R, receptor for the Fc portion of IgG;
AMCA, aminomethylcoumarin;
AP-1, activator protein-1;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein;
Chim-GAP, the
GTPase-activating protein domain of n-chimaerin;
COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
iNOS, inducible
nitric-oxide synthase;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
mAb, monoclonal
antibody;
CFU, colony-forming unit(s);
GEF, guanine nucleotide
exchange factor;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Shattock, R. J.,
Friedland, J. S.,
and Griffin, G. E.
(1994)
J. Gen. Virol.
75,
849-856 |
| 2. |
Schwan, W. R.,
and Goebel, W.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6428-6432 |
| 3. | Yao, L., Bengualid, V., Lowy, F. D., Gibbons, J. J., Hatcher, V. B., and Berman, J. W. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 1835-1839[Abstract] |
| 4. | Goodrum, K. J., Dierksheide, J., and Yoder, B. J. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 3715-3717[Abstract] |
| 5. | Shibata, Y. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 2878-2887[Abstract] |
| 6. | Filler, S. G., Pfunder, A. S., Spellberg, B. J., Spellberg, J. P., and Edwards, J. E., Jr. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 2609-2617[Abstract] |
| 7. | Fulton, S. A., Johnsen, J. M., Wolf, S. F., Sieburth, D. S., and Boom, W. H. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 2523-2531[Abstract] |
| 8. |
Muroi, M.,
Muroi, Y.,
and Suzuki, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30561-30568 |
| 9. |
Tsitsikov, E. N.,
Fuleihan, R.,
McIntosh, K.,
Scholl, P. R.,
and Geha, R. S.
(1995)
Int. Immunol.
7,
1665-1670 |
| 10. | McDonald, P. P., and Cassatella, M. A. (1997) FEBS Lett. 412, 583-586[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Cox, D.,
Chang, P.,
Zhang, Q.,
Reddy, P. G.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
and Greenberg, S.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1487-1494 |
| 12. | Massol, P., Montcourrier, P., Guillemot, J.-C., and Chavrier, P. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6219-6229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Caron, E.,
and Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
282,
1717-1721 |
| 14. |
Chen, L.-M.,
Hobbie, S.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1996)
Science
274,
2115-2118 |
| 15. | Minden, A., Lin, A. N., Claret, F. X., Abo, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Cell 81, 1147-1157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Sulciner, D. J., Irani, K., Zu-xi, Y., Ferrans, V. J., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P., and Finkel, T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 7115-7121[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Perona, R.,
Montaner, S.,
Saniger, L.,
Sanchez-Perez, I.,
Bravo, R.,
and Lacal, J. C.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
463-475 |
| 18. | Abo, A., Pick, E., Hall, A., Totty, N., Teahan, C. G., and Segal, A. W. (1991) Nature 353, 668-670[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Schreck, R., Rieber, P., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2247-2258[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Wilson, R.,
and Dowling, R. B.
(1998)
Thorax
53,
213-219 |
| 21. | Speert, D. P., Wright, S. D., Silverstein, S. C., and Mah, B. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82, 872-879 |
| 22. | Raschke, W. C., Baird, S., Ralph, P., and Nakoinz, I. (1978) Cell 15, 261-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Lamarche, N., Tapon, N., Stowers, L., Burbelo, P. D., Aspenstrom, P., Bridges, T., Chant, J., and Hall, A. (1996) Cell 87, 519-529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Tang, H., Kays, M., and Prince, A. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 1278-1285[Abstract] |
| 25. | Drake, D., and Montie, T. C. (1988) J. Gen. Microbiol. 134, 43-52[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Tapon, N., Nagata, K., Lamarche, N., and Hall, A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1395-1404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Allen, W. E., Jones, G. E., Pollard, J. W., and Ridley, A. J. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 707-720[Abstract] |
| 28. | Sweet, M. J., and Hume, D. A. (1996) J. Leukocyte Biol. 60, 8-26[Abstract] |
| 29. | Tebo, J. M., Chaoqun, W., Ohmori, Y., and Hamilton, T. A. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4713-4720[Abstract] |
| 30. |
Wrighton, C. J.,
Hofer-Warbinek, R.,
Moll, T.,
Eytner, R.,
Bach, F. H.,
and de Martin, R.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
1013-1022 |
| 31. | Mahenthiralingam, E., and Speert, D. P. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 4519-4523[Abstract] |
| 32. | Crespo, P., Schuebel, K. E., Ostrom, A. A., Gutkind, J. S., and Bustelo, X. R. (1997) Nature 385, 169-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Han, J. W.,
Luby-Phelps, K.,
Das, B.,
Shu, X. D.,
Xia, Y.,
Mosteller, R. D.,
Krishna, U. M.,
Falck, J. R.,
White, M. A.,
and Broek, D.
(1998)
Science
279,
558-560 |
| 34. |
Cox, D.,
Tseng, C.-C.,
Bjekic, G.,
and Greenberg, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1240-1247 |
| 35. | Hardt, W.-D., Chen, L.-M., Schuebel, K. E., Bustelo, S. R., and Galan, J. E. (1998) Cell 93, 815-826[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Frank, D. W. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 26, 621-629[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Fasshauer, M., Iwig, M., and Glaesser, D. (1998) Eur J. Cell Biol. 77, 188-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Tsakiridis, T.,
Bergman, A.,
Somwar, R.,
Taha, C.,
Aktories, K.,
Cruz, T. F.,
Klip, A.,
and Downey, G. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28322-28331 |
| 39. | Sporn, L. A., Sahni, S. K., Lerner, N. B., Marder, V. J., Silverman, D. J., Turpin, L. C., and Schwab, A. L. (1997) Infect. Immun. 65, 2786-2791[Abstract] |
| 40. |
Hauf, N.,
Goebel, W.,
Serfling, E.,
and Kuhn, M.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
2740-2747 |
| 41. |
Kadurugamuwa, J. L.,
and Beveridge, T. J.
(1997)
J. Antimicrobial. Chemother.
40,
615-621 |
| 42. | Mercurio, F., and Manning, A. M. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 226-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Sen, R., and Baltimore, D. (1986) Cell 47, 921-928[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Busam, K.,
Gieringer, C.,
Freudenberg, M.,
and Hohmann, H. P.
(1992)
Infect. Immun.
60,
2008-2015 |
| 45. |
Hauf, N.,
Goebel, W.,
Fiedler, F.,
Sokolovic, Z.,
and Kuhn, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
9394-9399 |
| 46. | Noel, R. J., Sato, T. T., Mendez, C., Johnson, M. C., and Pohlman, T. H. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 4046-4053[Abstract] |
| 47. |
Li, J. D.,
Feng, W. J.,
Gallup, M.,
Kim, J. H.,
Gum, J.,
Kim, Y.,
and Basbaum, C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5718-5723 |
| 48. |
Montaner, S.,
Perona, R.,
Saniger, L.,
and Lacal, J. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12779-12785 |
| 49. | Vollebregt, M., Hampton, M. B., and Winterbourn, C. C. (1998) FEBS Lett. 432, 40-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Brennan, P., and O'Neill, L. A. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1260, 167-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. T. Sadikot, T. S. Blackwell, J. W. Christman, and A. S. Prince Pathogen-Host Interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2005; 171(11): 1209 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sendide, N. E. Reiner, J. S. I. Lee, S. Bourgoin, A. Talal, and Z. Hmama Cross-Talk between CD14 and Complement Receptor 3 Promotes Phagocytosis of Mycobacteria: Regulation by Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Cytohesin-1 J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4210 - 4219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Bu, M. Cushion, T. B. Kinane, H. Avraham, and H. Koziel Cdc42 and RhoB Activation Are Required for Mannose Receptor-mediated Phagocytosis by Human Alveolar Macrophages Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 824 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Equils, Z. Madak, C. Liu, K. S. Michelsen, Y. Bulut, and D. Lu Rac1 and Toll-IL-1 Receptor Domain-Containing Adapter Protein Mediate Toll-Like Receptor 4 Induction of HIV-Long Terminal Repeat J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7642 - 7646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Rocha, J. Coburn, E. A. Rucks, and J. C. Olson Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exoenzyme S as a Bifunctional Enzyme in J774A.1 Macrophages Infect. Immun., September 1, 2003; 71(9): 5296 - 5305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhong, K. Jiang, D. L. Gilvary, P. K. Epling-Burnette, C. Ritchey, J. Liu, R. J. Jackson, E. Hong-Geller, and S. Wei Human neutrophils utilize a Rac/Cdc42-dependent MAPK pathway to direct intracellular granule mobilization toward ingested microbial pathogens Blood, April 15, 2003; 101(8): 3240 - 3248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Morehead, I. Coppens, and N. W. Andrews Opsonization Modulates Rac-1 Activation during Cell Entry by Leishmania amazonensis Infect. Immun., August 1, 2002; 70(8): 4571 - 4580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |