|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 159-166, January 7, 2000
Sulfation of "Estrogenic" Alkylphenols and 17 -Estradiol
by Human Platelet Phenol Sulfotransferases*
Robert M.
Harris,
Rosemary H.
Waring,
Christopher J.
Kirk , and
Philip J.
Hughes
From the School of Biosciences, the University of Birmingham,
Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have investigated the ability of alkylphenols
to act as substrates and/or inhibitors of phenol sulfotransferase
enzymes in human platelet cytosolic fractions. Our results indicate:
(i) straight chain alkylphenols do not interact with the
monoamine-sulfating phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A3); (ii) short chain
4-n-alkylphenols (C < 8) are substrates for the
phenol-sulfating enzymes (SULT1A1/2), which exhibit two activity maxima
against substrates with alkyl chain lengths of C1-2 and C4-5; (iii)
long chain 4-n-substituted alkylphenols (C 8) are
poor substrates and act as inhibitors of SULT1A1/2; (iv) human
platelets contain two activities, of low and high affinity, capable of
sulfating 17 -estradiol, and 4-n-nonylphenol is a partial
mixed inhibitor of the low affinity form of this activity. We conclude
that by acting either as substrates or inhibitors of SULT1A1/2,
alkylphenols may influence the sulfation, and hence the excretion, of
estrogens and other phenol sulfotransferase substrates in humans.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Endocrine disrupters are exogenous substances in the environment
which can influence endocrine function in humans and other animals (1).
A number of these chemicals have estrogenic activity and are thus
termed "xenoestrogens." Phytoestrogens are naturally occurring
xenoestrogens produced by plants. Man-made xenoestrogens include the
alkylphenols, nonylphenol and octylphenol, and bisphenol A;
environmental exposure to these compounds has been reported to modify
sexual development and reproductive function in amphibians (2, 3),
crustacea (4, 5), and fish (6). In mammals, evidence is less clear, but
there is widespread public concern that they may exert similar effects
on human reproductive health and be involved in the initiation of some
hormone-dependent cancers (7-14).
17 -Estradiol and alkylphenols share a common structural motif in the
phenolic A ring of 17 -estradiol and the phenol moiety of
alkylphenols (Fig. 1), and it has been
suggested that alkylphenols may act as endocrine disrupters by
mimicking the activity of 17 -estradiol at estrogen receptors.
Indeed, in a variety of cells transfected with human estrogen
receptors, alkylphenols have been shown to bind weakly and provoke
modest estrogenic effects (15-17). Conversely, alkylphenols have been
reported to promote estrogenic signaling by inhibiting androgen
receptor activation in some tissues (18, 19). However, there is also
evidence that alkylphenols can disrupt endocrine-mediated events by
inhibiting enzymes involved in the metabolism of sex steroids. Thus
exposure of rats to octylphenol during fetal or perinatal development
has been shown to decrease the expression of P450
17 -hydroxylase/C17-20 lyase (20, 21), the enzyme system responsible
for the transformation of C21 steroids into C19
steroids. Hence, exposure to alkylphenols may disrupt the production of
both androgens and estrogens at key times during development.
By acting as structural mimetics, alkylphenols may also disrupt the
elimination of steroids from the body. Estrogenic hormones are excreted
from the body following metabolic conversion to biologically less
active water-soluble metabolites via cytochrome P450-mediated hydroxylation, glucuronidation, O-methylation, or sulfation
(22), and many of these pathways are also utilized for the metabolism of alkylphenols in fish and mammals (23-27). Exposure of the
invertebrate Daphnia magna to either nonylphenol
polyethoxylate or nonylphenol has been shown to disrupt endocrine
function by decreasing both the glucuronidation and sulfation of
testosterone (28), but it was not demonstrated whether the alkylphenols
were substrates for the D. magna testosterone
sulfotransferase in this study.
Sulfation has a major role in regulating the active concentrations of a
variety of biologically important molecules, including steroids,
catecholamines, and peptides, and it is also important in the
detoxification of many xenobiotics (29, 30). In humans, the balance of
sulfation and desulfation plays an important role in modulating the
activity and transport of steroid hormones: the "inactive" sulfated
forms of many steroids, particularly estrone and
dehydroepiandrosterone, are found in the circulation at concentrations 10-30-fold higher than the unconjugated steroids. Furthermore, sulfation appears to prolong the half-life of these compounds in the
circulation. Hence steroid sulfates represent an important depot of
potentially "active" steroids following desulfation by steroid
sulfatases (31-33). Hydrolysis of estrone sulfate by steroid sulfatase
is the major source of plasma estrogens in men and postmenopausal women, and the activity of steroid sulfatase is elevated in breast tumors (33). In fact, there is a strong inverse correlation between the
level of expression of steroid sulfatase within breast tumors and
disease-free survival times (34). In many breast tumors, estrogen
sulfotransferase activity is much lower than in normal breast tissue,
and loss of this "inactivating" pathway may explain why tumor cells
are extremely sensitive to the mitogenic effects of estradiol and
estrone sulfate (35, 36).
Sulfation reactions require
PAPS1 as a sulfate donor and
are catalyzed by members of the SULT family. These enzymes are widely expressed in human tissues and have been classified into two broad subtypes: the phenol sulfotransferases (SULT1) and steroid
sulfotransferases (SULT2) (29, 30). The human SULT1 family is made up
of at least six homodimeric enzymes with amino acid identities ranging from 47 to 96%. SULT1A3, sometimes called monoamine-sulfating phenol
sulfotransferase, exhibits a strong substrate preference for
catecholamines such as dopamine. Two closely related but kinetically distinct isoforms, SULT1A1 and SULT1A2, also known as phenol-sulfating phenol sulfotransferases, show a distinct preference for phenols such
as 4-nitrophenol (30, 37, 38). On the basis of their structural
similarity to these sulfotransferase substrates (Fig. 1), it seems
likely that alkylphenols may be substrates or inhibitors of either
SULT1A1/2 and/or SULT1A3. Furthermore, SULT1A1/2 can sulfate
17 -estradiol and other estrogens in human liver extracts and is the
major route of estrogen sulfation in some breast cancer cell lines
(39-42). Hence, if alkylphenols do influence SULT1A1/2 activity, they
might also be expected to interfere with estrogen sulfation in these,
and possibly other, cancer cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Radiolabeled 5'-[35S]PAPS (mean
activity 1.9 Ci/mmol) was from NEN Life Science Products. Barium
acetate, phenol, ethanol, orthophosphoric acid, zinc sulfate, and
Optiphase Hisafe 3 scintillation mixture were from Fisher Scientific.
2,6-Dichloro-4-nitrophenol (DCNP) was from Fluka. Barium hydroxide
solution, Brilliant Blue G, bovine serum albumin, 2-, 3-, and
4-methylphenol, dimethyl sulfoxide, dopamine, 2-mercaptoethanol, PAPS,
and TES were from Sigma. Sodium chloride and sucrose were from BDH Ltd.
Alkylphenols (minimum purity 96%) were bought from the Aldrich
Chemical Company with the exceptions of 3-ethylphenol
(Riedel-deHaën, Germany); 4-n-amylphenol (4-n-pentylphenol), 4-n-butylphenol,
4-n-heptylphenol, and 4-n-nonylphenol (Lancaster
Synthesis Ltd., U. K.).
Preparation of Platelet Cytosol Fractions from Platelet
Concentrates--
Apheresis packs of platelet concentrates (stored in
acid citrate buffer at 22 °C) were obtained within 5 days of
donation from the National Blood Service, Birmingham, U. K. Red blood
cell and lymphocyte contamination of the platelet concentrates was 0.1% (v/v). Platelets were collected by centrifugation at
8,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed
three times with 10 mM TES-buffered saline containing 4 mM EDTA (pH 7.0 at 4 °C) and finally resuspended in
one-eighth of the original pack volume of 10 mM TES storage
buffer containing 0.25 M sucrose and 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.0 at 37 °C). The platelets were disrupted by
ultrasonication for 3 × 10-s bursts at 4 °C and then
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min. The supernatant
was stored in 1-ml portions at 20 °C before use.
Measurement of Sulfotransferase Activity--
Sulfotransferase
activity was measured in the platelet cytosol fractions by assessing
incorporation of 35S into dopamine (SULT1A3) and
4-nitrophenol (SULT1A1/2), essentially as described in Refs. 43 and 44.
These compounds are routinely used as standard substrates to assess
SULT1A activities in many laboratories. To simulate in vivo
conditions, TES buffer was used to adjust the pH of the assays to 7.0 at 37 °C (45). It is probable that total platelet phenol-sulfating
activity is a measure of SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 activity. Hence, we have
adopted the nomenclature SULT1A1/2 in the text where there may be
involvement of the SULT1A2 isoform. However, the concentration of
4-nitrophenol (6.7 mM) used in most of our experiments was
well below the reported Km of SULT1A2 for this
substrate (41); we therefore believe that under these conditions, the
majority of measured phenol-sulfating phenol sulfotransferase activity
was SULT1A1. Alkylphenols were dissolved and diluted in dimethyl
sulfoxide, and the final concentration of the vehicle was 1% (v/v) in
all incubations, including controls. Prior to use, the platelet
homogenate was diluted with TES storage buffer so that the amount of
PAPS consumed in the reaction was about 10% for screening enzyme
activity and less than 5% for the determination of apparent kinetic
constants. Platelet protein concentration was measured by the method of
Bradford (46) using bovine serum albumin as standard.
Diluted homogenate (20 µl) was incubated with 6.7 µM
PAPS (containing 6-90 nCi of [35S]PAPS) in a final
volume of 150 µl of 20 mM TES buffer containing 1%
dimethyl sulfoxide. Standard substrates (4-nitrophenol for SULT1A1/2
and dopamine for SULT1A3, both at a saturating concentration of 6.7 µM), SULT1A1/2 inhibitor (6.7 µM DCNP), and
alkylphenols (0.1-100 µM) were added as appropriate. In
some experiments, 17 -estradiol was included at final concentrations
ranging from 0.1-200 µM. There is no known inhibitor
that is specific for SULT1A3; however 6.7 µM DCNP
inhibits the SULT1A1/2-catalyzed sulfation of 6.7 µM
4-nitrophenol by > 95% and has no significant effect on the sulfation of 6.7 µM dopamine by SULT1A3. Therefore,
SULT1A1/2 activity was calculated by subtracting sulfation in the
presence of DCNP (SULT1A3 activity) from total sulfation in the absence of DCNP. Reactions were started by the addition of platelet cytosol fraction, followed immediately by PAPS, and incubated at 37 °C for
40 min. The tubes were then transferred to ice and the reaction stopped
by the addition of 0.1 M barium acetate (200 µl). Any protein, unreacted PAPS, and free sulfate were precipitated by two
additions of 0.1 M barium hydroxide (200 µl) followed by
0.1 M zinc sulfate (200 µl). The tubes were vortexed and
centrifuged at 11,500 × g for 3 min after each
addition and the radioactivity measured in 500 µl of the final
supernatant. The total radioactivity added to each assay was determined
in triplicate tubes containing radiolabeled PAPS and solvents only. The
radioactivity recovered in each tube was corrected for radioactive
decay and the results expressed relative to the activity against 6.7 µM of the appropriate standard substrate to allow for
variations in enzyme activity between platelet samples. Because many of
the sulfotransferases are subject to substrate inhibition (discussed
later), we undertook a number of preliminary experiments prior to the
determination of the kinetic constants to ensure that the enzyme
reactions were linear with respect to assay time over the desired
concentration range. Kinetic parameters were estimated by nonlinear
regressional analysis using the Enzfitter software package.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Alkylphenols Are Not Substrates for SULT1A3 in Platelet
Cytosol--
Sulfotransferases accept a wide range of compounds as
substrates, reflecting their role in xenobiotic detoxification. In view of the structural similarities between alkylphenols and known sulfotransferase substrates (Fig. 1), it seemed likely that these xenoestrogens may be able to influence the sulfation of other compounds
by competing for multiple sulfotransferase isoforms or for the
available pool of PAPS. To determine whether the alkylphenols are
substrates for SULT1A3, a range of these compounds (both straight and
branched chain) were incubated with platelet cytosol (± 6.7 µM DCNP to inhibit SULT1A1/2 activity). Fig.
2, a and b, shows that, at a concentration of 6.7 µM, none of the straight
or branched chain 4-alkylphenols tested was a significant substrate for
SULT1A3 because sulfation was consistently < 10% of that
observed with a similar concentration of dopamine. These results concur
with a recent study that reported that 4-methylphenol acted as a
substrate for recombinant SULT1A1 but not for recombinant SULT1A3 (47). We have also examined 35S incorporation into a limited
number of commercially available alkylphenols (all at a final
concentration of 6.7 µM, ± DCNP) with straight or
branched alkyl chains on the 2- or 3-position of the phenol. In the
presence of DCNP, 35S was incorporated into 2-methylphenol,
2-ethylphenol, 2-n-propylphenol, 3-methylphenol, and
3-ethylphenol at approximately 10-25% of the rate of 35S
incorporation into dopamine (Fig. 2b). At present we cannot distinguish whether these compounds were acting as poor substrates for
SULT1A3 or were overcoming the DCNP inhibition and hence acting as weak
substrates for SULT1A1/2. Fig. 3,
a and b (open bars), shows that total
SULT1A3 activity against coincubations containing 6.7 µM
alkylphenols and 6.7 µM dopamine was similar to that
determined with dopamine as the sole substrate; the results in Fig. 2
clearly indicate that dopamine sulfate is likely to be the major
product in these coincubations.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Short chain alkylphenols are substrates for
SULT1A1/2 but not SULT1A3 in human platelet cytosol. Human
platelet cytosol fractions were incubated with alkylphenols or standard
substrates at a final concentration of 6.7 µM as
described under "Experimental Procedures." SULT1A3 activity was
determined in the presence of 6.7 µM DCNP (open
symbols/bars), and SULT1A1/2 activity was calculated as
total sulfation in the absence of DCNP less that in the presence
of the inhibitor (closed symbols/bars). Sulfation
of the alkylphenols is expressed relative to sulfation of appropriate
standard substrates (4-nitrophenol for SULT1A1/2 and dopamine for
SULT1A3) in parallel incubations. Data in panel a
are means ± S.E. for 9-12 determinations from three separate
platelet preparations. Data in panel b are
means ± S.E. from triplicate determinations from a single
platelet preparation.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Long chain (C > 7)
4-n-alkylphenols (panel a)
and selected branched chain alkylphenols (panel
b) inhibit SULT1A1/2-mediated sulfation of
4-nitrophenol but have no effect on SULT1A3-mediated sulfation of
dopamine in human platelet cytosol. Total sulfate incorporated in
coincubations of 6.7 µM 4-n-alkylphenol with
6.7 µM dopamine + DCNP (SULT1A3 activity, ) or 6.7 µM 4-nitrophenol (± DCNP) was determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." SULT1A1/2 activity was calculated
as described for Fig. 2 ( ). Data are means ± S.E. of duplicate
determinations from three experiments using two separate platelet
preparations.
|
|
Alkylphenols with Alkyl Chains of C < 8 Are Substrates for
SULT1A1/2 in Platelet Cytosol--
Phenol and a series of
4-n-alkylphenols with straight alkyl chains increasing from
1 to 9 carbons in length were tested as substrates for SULT1A1/2. Fig.
2a shows that their ability to act as substrates for
SULT1A1/2 was inversely related to the alkyl chain length and hence the
hydrophobicity of the compounds. At a concentration of 6.7 µM, 4-methylphenol and 4-ethylphenol were sulfated by
SULT1A1/2 at a rate similar to that of a saturating concentration of
4-nitrophenol. However, the chain length/sulfation profile was
biphasic: the rate of 4-n-propylphenol sulfation was significantly lower than that of either 4-ethyl- (p < 0.001) or 4-n-butylphenol (p < 0.01). A
possible explanation for this biphasic profile is that SULT1A1 and
SULT1A2 may have slightly different preferences for the short chain alkylphenols.
Fig. 2b also shows that at a concentration of 6.7 µM, 2-methylphenol, 2-ethylphenol,
2-n-propylphenol, 3-methylphenol, and 3-ethylphenol can be
sulfated by human platelet SULT1A1/2. Unfortunately, alkylphenols with
longer alkyl chains on the 2- or 3- positions were not commercially
available so we were unable to investigate whether these compounds were
SULT1A1/2 substrates or inhibitors. We also tested a limited number of
branched chain alkylphenols as substrates for SULT1A1/2. Fig.
2b shows that their ability to act as substrates decreased
as the bulk of the alkyl side chain increased. This is most clearly
shown by the 4-butylphenol series, where the rates of sulfation of 6.7 µM 4-n-butylphenol,
4-sec-butylphenol, and 4-tert-butylphenol
were ~ 90%, ~ 65%, and ~ 28%, respectively, of that
of 6.7 µM 4-nitrophenol.
To examine these phenomena further we compared the kinetic properties
of the sulfation of 4-nitrophenol with those of a series of
4-substituted straight chain alkylphenols. The results (Fig. 4) show that the kinetic profiles for the
sulfation of both 4-nitrophenol and two short chain 4-alkylphenols
(4-methylphenol and 4-n-amylphenol) were essentially
identical: as the substrate concentration was increased, the initial
rates rose to a peak value before falling to a lower plateau. All
experiments were performed at a saturating concentration of PAPS, so
these results cannot be explained by depletion of this vital
cosubstrate. Hence it is likely that binding of the substrate affects
the initial rate of catalysis. A similar effect has recently been
reported with SULT1A1/2 (48) and recombinant human estrogen
sulfotransferase (SULT1E) (49). Zhang and co-workers (49) have examined
this phenomenon in some detail using recombinant human SULT1E and have
shown that two estrogen molecules bind per SULT1E monomer. They suggest
that the partial inhibition occurs after the binding of estrogen to an
allosteric regulatory site. We suggest that 4-nitrophenol and short
chain 4-alkylphenols may also interact with two common sites on each
SULT1A1/2 monomer, thus influencing the initial rate of catalysis.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Partial substrate inhibition of
SULT1A1/2-mediated sulfation of 4-nitrophenol (panel
a) and short chain 4-n-alkylphenols
(panel b). The initial rate of
4-nitrophenol (panel a, ), 4-methylphenol
(panel b, ), or 4-n-amylphenol
(panel b, ) sulfation was determined as a
function of increasing substrate concentration (0.1-100
µM). Each data point is expressed as the mean of
duplicate determinations from at least three separate experiments and
three separate platelet preparations. The data are expressed relative
to the initial velocity of 6.7 µM 4-nitrophenol sulfation
measured in the same experiment.
|
|
The kinetic data shown in Fig. 4 were fitted to an equation (Equation 1) describing the behavior of an enzyme system in which substrate
molecules bind first to the active site to generate product and second
to an allosteric site that inhibits catalysis (50).
|
(Eq. 1)
|
The kinetic constants Vmax and
Km were obtained from initial rate studies using low
substrate concentrations at which inhibitory effects were negligible.
For each substrate, Vmin was set at a value
slightly below the rate of product accumulation during the plateau
phase (49, 50). The equation assumes that the PAPS concentration used
in the assay was saturating and that substrate binding was at
equilibrium. The best fit Ki values for
4-nitrophenol, 4-n-ethylphenol, and
4-n-amylphenol were 5.2 ± 0.8, 12.3 ± 3.2, and
15.1 ± 0.32 µM, respectively. Hence the kinetic
behavior of 4-nitrophenol and the short chain 4-alkylphenols (Fig. 4)
is consistent with the possibility that, as has been suggested for the
interaction of estradiol and SULT1E (49), these compounds act both as
substrates for SULT1A1/2 and at an allosteric site that inhibits catalysis.
The kinetic parameters for a series of straight chain alkylphenols were
determined at low concentrations so that the inhibitory influences of
the allosteric regulatory site were negligible (Table I). Although the Km
values obtained will be useful for comparing the substrate preferences
of SULT1A1/2 for the different alkylphenols, they do not represent a
direct measure of substrate affinity. Rather, they will be a compound
reflection of several processes in the catalytic cycle and will be
highly dependent on the rate constants for catalysis itself and for
product release. Therefore, a better indicator of substrate preference
is the ratio Vmax/Km which is
known as the specificity constant (51). Because the absolute magnitude
of Vmax for each substrate will vary slightly
among platelet preparations, the ratio of the specificity constants for
the alkylphenols relative to that of 4-nitrophenol measured in the same
experiment can be used to determine the substrate preferences of human
platelet SULT1A1/2 (Table I). Of the 4-substituted phenols,
4-methylphenol was the optimal SULT1A1/2 substrate, having a
specificity constant slightly greater than that of 4-nitrophenol (as
did 2-methylphenol and 2-ethylphenol), which is in agreement with the
35S incorporation experiments shown in Fig. 2.
4-n-Propylphenol appeared to be the least favorable
substrate, having a specificity constant just 5% that of
4-nitrophenol. As the alkyl chain length increased there was a slight
recovery in activity relative to 4-nitrophenol; however, the
specificity constants for 4-n-butylphenol and
4-n-amylphenol were still only 30% that of 4-nitrophenol. Because longer chain 4-n-alkylphenols were such poor
substrates, it was not possible to obtain accurate specificity
constants for these compounds.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Kinetic parameters of SULT1A1/2-mediated sulfation of straight chain
alkylphenols compared with 4-nitrophenol
Enzyme activities were determined in duplicate samples from platelet
cytosol preparations from three separate individuals as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Km and
Vmax values were calculated using the EnzFitter
software program and are given as means ± S.E. For further
explanation, see "Results and Discussion."
|
|
4-Ethylphenol was a moderately good substrate for SULT1A1/2; the
results in Table I and Fig. 3b suggest that it may compete with other substrates for this enzyme. This is of particular interest in view of recent evidence that 4-ethylphenol is a major metabolite of
the dietary phytoestrogen genistein in rats and humans (52). The daily
exposure of humans to genistein may be several hundredfold greater than
that to environmental alkylphenols (53), but it remains to be
determined if dietary phytoestrogens can generate sufficient
4-ethylphenol to compromise SULT1A1/2 activity in target tissues.
The conformation of the 4-alkylphenol chain also plays an important
role in determining whether the alkylphenols were SULT1A1/2 substrates.
This is best illustrated with the 4-butylphenol series (Table
II); the specificity constant of
4-n-butylphenol was approximately 27% of that of
4-nitrophenol, whereas the relative specificity constants for
4-sec-butylphenol and 4-tert-butylphenol
were ~ 3% and < 1%, respectively. For each of these
compounds the Vmax values were similar, but
Km increased with increasing chain branching.
Therefore, introduction of bulky side groups onto the 4-position may
affect substrate binding or orientation within the active site.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effect of chain conformation on the kinetic parameters of
SULT1A1/2-mediated sulfation of 4-butylphenol compared with
4-nitrophenol
Enzyme activities were determined in duplicate samples from platelet
cytosol preparations from three separate individuals as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Km and
Vmax values were calculated using the EnzFitter
software program and are given as means ± S.E. For further
explanation, "Results and
Discussion."
|
|
We have been able to test the effects of changing the position of the
alkyl chain relative to the phenolic hydroxyl group for both
methylphenol and ethylphenol. Both of these compounds were substrates
for SULT1A1/2 irrespective of the position of the alkyl group on the
phenol ring (Fig. 2b). However, the kinetic data in Table I
indicate that for both methyl- and ethylphenol, the 2-substituted
compounds were the preferred substrates. It has been noted that the
catecholestrogens, and 2-hydroxyestradiol in particular, are much
better SULT1A1/2 substrates than is 17 -estradiol (42). Perhaps
having a small methyl- or ethyl- group adjacent to the phenolic
hydroxyl group may serve as a structural mimetic of the
catecholestrogen motif.
Long Straight Chain and Branched, 2-Substituted, Short Chain
Alkylphenols Inhibit Human Platelet SULT1A1/2 Activity--
Longer
straight chain alkylphenols such as 4-n-octylphenol and
4-n-nonylphenol were very poor substrates for either SULT1A1 or SULT1A2 because they were sulfated at < 10% of the rate of 4-nitrophenol, even at concentrations up to 100 µM.
However, 6.7 µM 4-n-heptyl-,
4-n-octyl-, and 4-n-nonylphenol significantly reduced (by 30%, p < 0.005; 24%, p < 0.005; and 17%, p = 0.05, respectively) the
accumulation of sulfated products generated in coincubations with 6.7 µM 4-nitrophenol (these are likely to be almost
exclusively 4-nitrophenol sulfate, Fig. 3a). When these coincubation experiments were repeated with 6.7 µM
4-nitrophenol and 100 µM 4-n-heptyl-,
4-n-octyl-, or 4-n-nonylphenol, the accumulation of sulfated products was decreased by 57%, 82%, and 86%,
respectively (p < 0.001 in each case, results not
shown). Hence, although 4-n-nonylphenol is not a significant
substrate for SULT1A1/2 (even at 100 µM, results not
shown), it can inhibit sulfation of 4-nitrophenol, perhaps via the
putative allosteric site.
In most cases, coincubating 6.7 µM branched chain
alkylphenols with 6.7 µM 4-nitrophenol did not
significantly alter total 35S incorporation into sulfated
products, regardless of the position of substitution. The highly
branched 4-tert-octylphenol had no discernible effect upon
total sulfation in the presence of either standard substrate, even at a
concentration of 100 µM. However, coincubation of
4-nitrophenol with either 2-sec-propylphenol or 2-sec-butylphenol, both poor substrates for SULT1A1/2,
caused a significant (Fig. 3b, ~ 70%, p 0.001)
inhibition of the accumulation of sulfated products. The structure of
2-sec-propylphenol is similar to that of the aspirin
metabolite salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid), which we have
previously shown to be a highly selective inhibitor of 4-nitrophenol
sulfation (54). Coincubation of 4-nitrophenol with 2-ethylphenol,
2-n-propylphenol, or 2-tert-butylphenol caused much less inhibition of total sulfation (~ 10-20%), suggesting that
although a branched chain is important for inhibition, it may also be
necessary for the alkylphenol to adopt a planar configuration to
interact with the enzyme(s).
17 -Estradiol Is Sulfated in Human Platelet Cytosol by Two
Separate Sulfotransferase Activities That Are Inhibited by
4-n-Nonylphenol--
It has been reported that human platelets do not
express estrogen sulfotransferase activity (55). However, because
17 -estradiol has been shown to be a SULT1A1/2 substrate in human
liver, breast cancer cells, and fetal lung extracts
(Km ~ 2-5 µM) (39-42, 56), it
seemed likely that it may be sulfated by a similar route in platelets.
Fig. 5a shows that
17 -estradiol (0.1-200 µM) was sulfated in human
platelet cytosol in a concentration-dependent fashion. The
pattern of 17 -estradiol sulfation was different from that seen with
4-nitrophenol and the short chain 4-alkylphenols. Thus the rate of
sulfate incorporation increased with substrate concentration between
0.1 and 30 µM; above 30 µM the rate of
sulfate incorporation reached a plateau that was approximately 20% of
the maximal rate of 4-nitrophenol sulfation. We interpret these data to
indicate that 17 -estradiol is not able to influence the catalytic
function of the enzyme by binding to the putative allosteric site.
However, 17 -estradiol sulfation does not appear to follow strict
Michaelis-Menten kinetics. An Eadie-Hofstee transformation of the
kinetic data in Fig. 5b shows that human platelets contain
two enzyme species capable of sulfating 17 -estradiol. One species
had a relatively low affinity (Km 2.4 ± 0.15 µM) of the same order of magnitude as the reported
Km of human SULT1A1/2 for 17 -estradiol (39-42).
The second species had a much higher affinity for 17 -estradiol (Km = 0.043 ± 0.01 µM); this
value is approximately an order of magnitude greater than the reported
Km (5 nM) of recombinant human estrogen
sulfotransferase (49). Because the platelet preparations are
essentially devoid of contamination with other blood cells it is likely
that this "high" affinity activity is a true platelet protein. The
identity of this enzyme is unknown at present, and its relatively low
activity precluded further investigation in the present study.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
17 -Estradiol is
sulfated by two enzymatic activities in human platelet cytosol,
concentration dependence (panel a), and Eadie-Hofstee
transformation (panel b). The initial rate of
17 -estradiol sulfation was determined as a function of increasing
substrate concentration (0.1-100 µM). Each data point is
the mean of duplicate determinations from at least three independent
experiments using separate platelet preparations. All data are
expressed relative to the initial velocity of 6.7 µM
4-nitrophenol sulfation measured in the same experiments.
|
|
We have examined the effects of 4-n-nonylphenol (1-20
µM) on the sulfation of 17 -estradiol in human
platelets by the "low" affinity activity, which we presume to be
SULT1A1/2. Despite its low affinity for 17 -estradiol, this activity
may be of significance in estrogen-dependent mammary
tumors, where the local concentration of the hormone has been reported
to approach 1 µM in some cases (57). The transformations
of the kinetic data describing the effects of
4-n-nonylphenol on estradiol sulfation by SULT1A1/2 are
shown in Fig. 6; they demonstrate that
4-n-nonylphenol acts as a partial mixed inhibitor of
SULT1A1/2-mediated 17 -estradiol sulfation. This behavior is similar
to that of several other known inhibitors of SULT1A1/2 activity
including vanillin (58) and quercetin (59). We suggest that the most
likely explanation of this complex enzymatic behavior is that
4-n-nonylphenol can bind to free SULT1A1/2 yielding an
enzyme-inhibitor complex (dissociation constant Ki = 2.8 µM) and also bind to the SULT1A1/2-17 -estradiol complex giving an unreactive enzyme-substrate/inhibitor complex (dissociation K'i = 5.4 µM). Thus 4-n-nonylphenol may both
competitively antagonize the binding of 17 -estradiol to the active
site and also interact noncompetitively with the allosteric regulatory
site to decrease sulfation. Further work using purified recombinant
SULT1A1/2 will be needed to establish the exact nature of the
inhibition of 17 -estradiol sulfation by
4-n-nonylphenol and other alkylphenols.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
4-n-Nonylphenol is a partial
mixed inhibitor of low affinity SULT1A1/2-mediated estradiol
sulfation in platelet cytosol. The initial rate of 17 -estradiol
(2 µM, and 5 µM, ) sulfation was
determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of
4-n-nonylphenol (1-20 µM). Panel a
shows a Dixon transformation of the kinetic data. Panel b
shows a plot of s/v versus 4-n-nonylphenol
concentration. Each data point is the mean of duplicate determinations
from two independent platelet preparations. A regression line was
fitted to each set of data using the Sigmaplot software package.
|
|
Agents that inhibit SULT1A1/2 activity, such as
4-n-nonylphenol, may be able to increase local estradiol
concentrations in those tissues in which SULT1A1/2 is the only route of
steroid sulfation. This may be the case in
hormone-dependent tumors of the breast. For example, the
MCF-7 hormone-dependent breast cancer cell line has a very
active estrone sulfatase pathway (34-36), but no significant cytosolic
estrogen or hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase activity can be detected
(39-41), and SULT1A1/2 is the only relevant pathway for steroid
sulfation (42). If a similar situation exists in human mammary tumors,
alkylphenols may be able to interfere with the "detoxification" of
high levels of 17 -estradiol in these tissues. This may be an
important clinical factor because reduced estrogen and
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfation in tumor homogenates from breast
cancer patients is associated with a poor responsiveness to endocrine
or ablative therapy and a grim clinical prognosis (60, 61).
In conclusion, it appears that a number of alkylphenols may be sulfated
by SULT1A1/2 and/or act as inhibitors of these enzymes. The sulfation
of short chain alkylphenols probably represents a detoxification
pathway, but in organisms subject to high levels of exposure to these
compounds, extensive alkylphenol sulfation may reduce the sulfation and
elimination of endogenous substrates such as estrogens by competing for
the available pool of PAPS. Longer chain and branched chain
alkylphenols, which are now widespread in the environment, are potent
inhibitors of SULT1A1/2 and would be expected to reduce the sulfation
of endogenous estrogens, especially in tissues such as mammary tumors
where this pathway represents a major route of steroid sulfation and
elimination (42). It is also possible that alkylphenol sulfates may
themselves present a toxic threat to the organism by influencing the
activity of a variety of endogenous sulfatases (62). The ability of
alkylphenols to reduce estrogen sulfation may lead to a localized
accumulation of free estrogens in tissues, thereby provoking the
"environmental estrogenic" effects with which these compounds have
become associated.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a development grant from the
Endocrine Modulator Steering Group of the European Chemical Industry Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44 121-414-5414;
Fax: 44 121-414-6840; E-mail: C.J.Kirk@bham.ac.uk.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PAPS, adenosine
3'-phosphate 5'-phosphosulfate;
DCNP, 2,6-dichloro-4-nitrophenol;
TES, N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
US-EPA.
(1998)
Endocrine Disrupter Screening and Testing Advisory Committee Draft Report.
, Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., Washington, D.C.
|
| 2.
|
Lutz, I.,
and Kloas, W.
(1999)
Sci. Total Environ.
225,
49-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kloas, W.,
Lutz, I.,
and Einspanier, R.
(1999)
Sci. Total Environ.
225,
59-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Ganmo, A.,
Ekelund, R.,
Magnusson, K.,
and Berggren, M.
(1989)
Environ. Pollut.
59,
115-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Zou, E.,
and Fingerman, M.
(1999)
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety
42,
185-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sumpter, J.
(1998)
Toxicol. Lett.
102/103,
337-342
|
| 7.
|
Toppari, J.,
Larsen, J.,
Christiansen, P.,
Giwercman, A.,
Grandjean, P.,
Guillette, L.,
Jegou, B.,
Jensen, T.,
Jouannet, P.,
Keiding, N.,
Leffers, H.,
McLaclan, J.,
Meyer, O.,
Muller, J.,
Rajpert-DeMeyts, E.,
Scheike, T.,
Sharpe, R.,
Sumpter, J.,
and Skakkebaek, N.
(1996)
Environ. Health Perspect.
104 (Suppl. 4),
741-803
|
| 8.
|
Miller, W.,
and Sharpe, R.
(1998)
Endocr. Rel. Cancer
5,
69-96[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Sharpe, R.,
Atanassova, N.,
McKinnell, C.,
Parte, P.,
Turner, J.,
Fisher, J.,
Kerr, J.,
Groome, N.,
Macpherson, S.,
Millar, M.,
and Sanders, P.
(1998)
Biol. Reprod.
59,
1084-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Roy, D.,
Palangat, M.,
Chen, C.-W.,
Thomas, R.,
Colerangle, J.,
Atkinson, A.,
and Yan, Z.-J.
(1997)
J. Toxicol. Environ. Health
50,
1-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Ashby, J.,
Tinwell, H.,
Lefevre, P.,
Odum, J.,
Paton, S.,
Milward, S.,
Tittensor, S.,
and Brooks, A.
(1997)
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
26,
102-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Cunny, H.,
Mayes, B.,
Rosica, K.,
Trutter, J.,
and Van Miller, J.
(1997)
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
26,
172-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Odum, J.,
Pyrah, I.,
Foster, R.,
Van Miller, J.,
Joiner, R.,
and Ashby, J.
(1999)
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
29,
184-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Nagel, S.,
Vom Saal, F.,
and Welshons, W.
(1999)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
69,
343-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Routledge, E.,
and Sumpter, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3280-3288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Pennie, W.,
Aldridge, T.,
and Brooks, A.
(1998)
J. Endocrinol.
158,
R11-R14[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Tabira, Y.,
Nakai, M.,
Asai, D.,
Yakabe, Y.,
Tahara, Y.,
Shinoyokuma, T.,
Noguchi, M.,
Takatsuki, M.,
and Shimohigashi, Y.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
262,
240-245[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sohoni, P.,
and Sumpter, J.
(1998)
J. Endocrinol.
158,
327-339[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Tran, D.,
Klotz, D.,
Ladlie, B.,
Ide, C.,
McLachlan, J.,
and Arnold, S.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
229,
518-523[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Majdic, G.,
Sharpe, R.,
O'Shaughnessy, P.,
and Saunders, P.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
1063-1070[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Saunders, P.,
Majdic, G.,
Parte, P.,
Millar, M.,
Fisher, J.,
Turner, K.,
and Sharpe, R.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
424,
99-110[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Zhu, B.,
and Conney, A.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
1-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Meldahl, A.,
Nithipatikom, K.,
and Lech, J.
(1996)
Xenobiotica
26,
1167-1180[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Thibaut, R.,
Debrauwer, L.,
Rao, D.,
and Cravedi, J.
(1998)
Xenobiotica
28,
745-757[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Lee, P.,
Marquardt, M.,
and Lech, J.
(1998)
Toxicol. Lett.
99,
117-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Hosea, N.,
and Guengerich, P.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
353,
365-373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Certa, H.,
Fedtke, N.,
Wiegand, H.-J.,
Muller, H.,
and Bolt, H.
(1996)
Arch. Toxicol.
71,
112-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Baldwin, W.,
Graham, S.,
Shea, D.,
and LeBlanc, G.
(1998)
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety.
39,
104-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Coughtrie, M.,
Sharp, S.,
Maxwell, K.,
and Innes, N.
(1998)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
109,
3-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Falany, C.
(1997)
FASEB J.
11,
206-216[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Pasqualini, J.,
Gelly, C.,
Nguyen, B.,
and Vella, C.
(1989)
J. Steroid Biochem.
34,
155-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ruder, H.,
Loriaux, L.,
and Lipsett, M.
(1972)
J. Clin. Invest.
51,
1022-1033
|
| 33.
|
Santner, R.,
Feil, P.,
and Santen, R.
(1984)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
59,
29-33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Utsumi, T.,
Yoshimura, N.,
Takeuchi, S.,
Ando, J.,
Maruta, M.,
Maeda, K.,
and Harada, N.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
377-381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Qian, Y.,
Deng, C.,
and Song, W.-C.
(1998)
J. Pharm. Exp. Ther.
286,
555-560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Le Bail, J.,
Allen, K.,
Nicolas, J.,
and Habrioux, G.
(1998)
Anticancer Res.
18,
1683-1688[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Ozawa, S.,
Nagata, K.,
Shimada, M.,
Ueda, M.,
Tsuzuki, T.,
Yamazoe, T.,
and Kato, R.
(1995)
Pharmacogenetics
5,
S135-S140
|
| 38.
|
Zhu, X.,
Veronese, M.,
Iocco, P.,
and McManus, M.
(1996)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
28,
565-571[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Hernandez, J. S.,
Watson, R. W. G.,
Wood, T. C.,
and Weinshilboum, R. M.
(1992)
Drug Metab. Dispos.
20,
413-422[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Falany, J.,
Lawing, L.,
and Falany, C.
(1993)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
46,
481-487[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Falany, J.,
and Falany, C.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
1551-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Falany, C.,
Wheeler, J.,
Oh, T.-S.,
and Falany, J.
(1994)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
48,
369-375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Foldes, A.,
and Meek, J.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
327,
365-374
|
| 44.
|
Anderson, R.,
and Weinshilboum, R.
(1980)
Clin. Chem. Acta
103,
79-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Sage, S.,
Jobson, T.,
and Rink, T.
(1990)
J. Physiol.
420,
31-45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Bradford, M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Dajani, A.,
Hood, A.,
and Coughtrie, M.
(1988)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
942-948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Duffel, M.,
and Jakoby, W.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
11123-11127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Zhang, H.,
Varmalova, O.,
Vargas, F.,
Falany, C.,
and Leyh, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10888-10892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Fromm, H.
(1975)
Initial Rate Enzyme Kinetics
, p. 145, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 51.
|
Cornish-Bowden, A.
(1995)
Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics
, Portland Press Ltd., London
|
| 52.
|
Setchell, K. D. R.
(1998)
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
68,
1333S-1340S[Abstract]
|
| 53.
|
Muller, S.,
and Schlatter, C.
(1998)
Pure Appl. Chem.
70,
1847-1853
|
| 54.
|
Harris, R.,
Hawker, R.,
Langman, M.,
Singh, S.,
and Waring, R.
(1998)
Gut
42,
272-275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Borthwick, E.,
Burchell, A.,
and Coughtrie, M.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
289,
719-725
|
| 56.
|
Jones, A.,
Hume, R.,
Bamforth, J.,
and Coughtrie, M.
(1992)
Early Hum. Dev.
28,
65-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Millington, D. S.
(1975)
J. Steroid Biochem.
6,
239-245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Cruickshank, D.,
and Sansom, L.
(1993)
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.
1,
41-47
|
| 59.
|
Walle, T.,
Eaton, E.,
and Walle, U.
(1995)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
50,
731-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Purhoit, A.,
de Giovani, C.,
and Reed, M.
(1999)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
68,
129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Dao, T.,
and Libby, P.
(1971)
Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.
34,
205-210
|
| 62.
|
Anderson, C.,
Freeman, J.,
Lucas, L. H.,
Farley, M.,
Dalhoumi, H.,
and Widlanski, T. S.
(1977)
Biochemistry
36,
2586-2594
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Xiang, R. K. Peters, S. L. Kjos, C. Ochoa, A. Marroquin, J. Goico, S. Tan, C. Wang, S. P. Azen, C.-r. Liu, et al.
Effect of Thiazolidinedione Treatment on Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Premenopausal Women at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2005;
90(4):
1986 - 1991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Barnett, S. Tsvetanov, N. Gamage, J. L. Martin, R. G. Duggleby, and M. E. McManus
Active Site Mutations and Substrate Inhibition in Human Sulfotransferase 1A1 and 1A3
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 30, 2004;
279(18):
18799 - 18805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Harris, D. M. Wood, L. Bottomley, S. Blagg, K. Owen, P. J. Hughes, R. H. Waring, and C. J. Kirk
Phytoestrogens Are Potent Inhibitors of Estrogen Sulfation: Implications for Breast Cancer Risk and Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2004;
89(4):
1779 - 1787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Maiti and G. Chen
Tamoxifen Induction of Aryl Sulfotransferase and Hydroxysteroid Sulfotransferase in Male and Female Rat Liver and Intestine
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
May 1, 2003;
31(5):
637 - 644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. A. Kester, S. Bulduk, H. van Toor, D. Tibboel, W. Meinl, H. Glatt, C. N. Falany, M. W. H. Coughtrie, A. G. Schuur, A. Brouwer, et al.
Potent Inhibition of Estrogen Sulfotransferase by Hydroxylated Metabolites of Polyhalogenated Aromatic Hydrocarbons Reveals Alternative Mechanism for Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disrupters
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
March 1, 2002;
87(3):
1142 - 1150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Seth, K. L. Lunetta, D. W. Bell, H. Gray, S. M. Nasser, E. Rhei, C. M. Kaelin, D. J. Iglehart, J. R. Marks, J. E. Garber, et al.
Phenol Sulfotransferases: Hormonal Regulation, Polymorphism, and Age of Onset of Breast Cancer
Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2000;
60(24):
6859 - 6863.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|