|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 343-350, January 7, 2000
Mlp2p, A Component of Nuclear Pore Attached Intranuclear
Filaments, Associates with Nic96p*
Buket
Kosova,
Nelly
Panté ,
Christiane
Rollenhagen ,
Alexandre
Podtelejnikov§,
Matthias
Mann§,
Ueli
Aebi¶, and
Ed
Hurt
From BZH, Biochemie-Zentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
A fraction of the yeast nucleoporin Nic96p is
localized at the terminal ring of the nuclear basket. When Nic96p was
affinity purified from glutaraldehyde-treated spheroplasts, it was
found to be associated with Mlp2p. Mlp2p, together with Mlp1p, are the yeast Tpr homologues, which form the nuclear pore-attached intranuclear filaments (Strambio-de-Castillia, C., Blobel, G., and Rout, M. P. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 839-855). Double disruption
mutants of MLP1 and MLP2 are viable and
apparently not impaired in nucleocytoplasmic transport. However,
overproduction of MLP1 causes nuclear accumulation of
poly(A)+ RNA in a chromatin-free area of the nucleus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nuclear pore complexes are complex structures within the nuclear
membrane, which mediate nuclear import and export of transport substrates and shuttling receptors (1). Each nuclear pore complex (NPC)1 consists of a basic
framework (i.e. the ring/spoke complex) which exhibits an
8-fold symmetry and spans the double nuclear membrane (2-4). The NPC
is attached to peripheral structures such as the short cytoplasmic
filaments, the nuclear basket, the nuclear envelope lattice,
pore-attached intranuclear filaments, and the nuclear lamina (5-13).
Recently, some of these peripheral elements of the NPC gained increased
attention since they were proposed to play an important role in the
initial docking step of the transport substrate to the pores and the
final release from the pores (8, 14-19). In particular, the large
nucleoporin Nup358, located at the tips of the short cytoplasmatically
attached NPC filaments, is thought to mediate one of the first contacts
with transport cargos via the importin/karyopherin / complex (15,
19-21). On the other side of the nuclear envelope, release of the
import cargo from the nuclear pores appears to occur at the terminal ring of the nuclear basket, and Nup153 might be involved in this final
process (16, 18, 22). However, electron microscopy revealed that NPCs
do not abruptly end at the nuclear basket, but are connected to a
complicated meshwork of intranuclear structures. These structures
consist of pore-attached filaments, which deeply penetrate into the
nuclear interior or an underlying nuclear envelope lattice (6, 7, 11,
23-26). Therefore, it could be hypothesized that nuclear transport
does not end after release of the import cargo from the nuclear basket
and followed by intranuclear diffusion, but instead the facilitated
transport through the pore could continue on intranuclear "tracks"
to distinct intranuclear sites. In a similar way, export cargos may use
intranuclear filaments for transport from the nuclear interior to the
NPCs. Accordingly, the "gene gating hypothesis" was presented to
propose that nuclear pores are connected via intranuclear tracks to
distinct locations inside the nucleus (27).
The molecular composition of the intranuclear filamentous system (often
referred to as the "nuclear skeleton" or "nuclear matrix"),
which has been visualized by a variety of electron microscopy techniques is still poorly characterized (28-36). This is surprising since the nuclear skeleton/nuclear matrix has been assigned many roles
in nuclear and chromatin organization, nuclear division, and chromosome
segregation, DNA replication and repair, RNA transcription and
processing, and intranuclear transport. To date, only the long
pore-attached filaments, which deeply penetrate into the nuclear
interior and were identified almost 30 years ago by electron microscopy
(23), have been characterized on a molecular level. Tpr (for
translocated promoter region) was recently shown to be a constituent of
these long pore-attached intranuclear fibrils (7, 37, 38). However, it
is not completely clear whether Tpr is also located at the short
NPC-associated cytoplasmic filaments (5). It was suggested that nuclear
pore complex-associated filamentous proteins provide the structural
connection between the nuclear interior and the nuclear periphery.
However, it is not yet known whether these filaments form channels
through which transport occurs, or whether they constitute tracks,
along which transport cargos move along (38). Moreover, it was reported that importin/karyopherin is physically associated with
Xenopus Tpr (22) and overproduction of Tpr in mammalian
cells inhibits poly(A)+ RNA export, but not protein import
(39).
Yeast peripheral NPC elements, such as the nuclear basket and the
cytoplasmic filaments can be discerned by electron microscopy (40). In
the past, we have focussed on various Nsp1p subcomplexes, one
consisting of Nsp1p, Nup57p, Nup49p, and Nic96p (41), and another
subcomplex between Nsp1p and Nup82p (42), in which Nup159p is also
present (43, 44). Recently, Nsp1p and its interacting partners were
located by immunoelectron microscopy to distinct sites within the NPC
fine structure; accordingly, Nsp1p and Nic96p exhibit a dual location
on both sides of the central gated channel, and at the terminal ring of
the nuclear basket (40). Thus, the fraction of Nic96p, which is located
at the terminal ring, could directly contact to pore-attached
intranuclear filaments.
To identify additional Nic96p-interacting proteins in yeast, we treated
yeast spheroplasts with glutaraldehyde prior to affinity purification.
This allowed us to identify Mlp2p, which associates with protein
A-tagged Nic96p (ProtA-Nic96p). Mlp2p is highly homologous to Mlp1p, a
previously identified myosin-like protein in yeast (45). Both Mlp1p and
Mlp2p are the two closest homologues of the higher eukaryotic Tpr
proteins which form NPC-attached intranuclear filaments.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Yeast Strains and Plasmids--
The yeast strains used in this
study are listed in Table I. Cells were
grown in minimal SDC or rich YPD medium. Genetic manipulations of yeast
were performed as described (46). The following yeast plasmids were
used: pHT4467, ARS/CEN plasmid with the URA3 and ADE3 marker; pUN100, pRS314, pRS316, YCplac33, and pASZ11,
ARS/CEN plasmids with the LEU2, URA3,
and ADE2 marker, respectively. pRS424 and YEplac112, 2 µ plasmids with the TRP1 marker. pRS426, YEp352, and YEp420,
2-µm plasmids with the URA3 marker. pRS425, 2-µm plasmid with the LEU2 marker. Manipulation and analysis of DNA such
as restriction analysis, end-filling, ligations, DNA sequencing, and
PCR amplifications were performed according to Ref. 47. Gene
disruptions were made by the one-step disruption method (48).
Plasmid Constructions and Gene Disruptions--
Construction of
strains with integrated MLP2 constructs was done as follows:
by PCR, a NotI site was generated at the stop codon. This
yielded plasmid YEplac112-MLP2-C (NotI). The genes encoding
ProtA and GFP, each available as NotI restriction fragment, were inserted into the corresponding NotI site within
YEplac112-MLP2-C (NotI). The unique SpeI site
within the 3'-UTR of MLP2 was used for the blunt end
insertion of the HIS3 gene. For integration of tagged
MLP2-ProtA::HIS3 and
MLP2-GFP::HIS3, the plasmids were cut with
convenient restriction enzymes to release the integration fragments.
The RS453 diploid strain was transformed with these linearized DNA
fragments and colonies that grew on SDC-His plates were selected. After
sporulation on YPA plates and tetrad analysis, haploid progeny, which
contained the correct integration were selected. Integrations were
verified by PCR analysis. Whole cell extracts from these strains were
prepared and analyzed for the expression of the GFP- and ProtA-tagged
Mlp2p by Western blotting using anti-GFP and anti-ProtA antibodies,
respectively. For the disruption of the entire MLP2 ORF, a
linear mlp2::HIS3 fragment was generated and used
to transform the RS453 diploid strain. Colonies that grew on SDC-His
plates and showed the correct integration (as verified by PCR Southern
analysis) were sporulated on YPA. Tetrad analysis showed a 4:0
segregation for cell viability on YPD plates, and a 2:2 segregation of
the HIS3 marker. To recover the full-length MLP2
gene from the chromosome, the "GAP-repair" method was used. To do
so, the joined 5'- and 3'-UTR fragments of MLP2 (derived
from pUN100-mlp2 ) were inserted into high copy number plasmids
pRS424 and pRS426. For gap repair, these constructs were digested with
NotI/SpeI, releasing an internal 0.1-kilobase fragment. The gel-purified pRS424-5'/3'-UTR-MLP2 and
pRS426-5'/3'-UTR-MLP2 fragments were transformed into a haploid RS453
strain carrying integrated MLP2-GFP::HIS3.
Colonies were selected on SDC-Trp or SDC-Ura plates, respectively.
Transformants were screened for an increased GFP signal in the
fluorescence microscope, which allowed identification of colonies which
contained pRS424-MLP2-GFP and pRS426-MLP2-GFP, respectively. GST-tagged
Mlp2p-C constructs were made by PCR from genomic DNA and cloned into
pGEX-4T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For expression of GFP-tagged
Mlp2p-C constructs in yeast, PCR-derived DNA was cloned into
pRS425-PNOP1-GFP. For tagging of the MLP1 gene,
a NotI restriction site was generated by PCR immediately
before the stop codon to yield YEp420-MLP1. The generated
NotI site of YEp420-MLP1 (NotI) was used to
insert ProtA, TEV-ProtA, and GFP, as NotI cassettes as
described above. To generate GFP-tagged Mlp1p-C (residue 1446-1875),
the last 429 amino acids from Mlp1p were amplified by PCR from genomic
DNA and cloned into pRS425-PNOP1-GFP.
Affinity Purification of Nic96p and Seh1p--
Affinity
purification of ProtA-Nic96p and Seh1p-ProtA from yeast spheroplasts
treated with 0.1% glutaraldehyde was done as follows: a yeast strain
expressing ProtA-NIC96 (41) was grown in 2 liters of SDC-Leu medium for
14 h at 30 °C to an A600 nm of 1. Cells
were collected by centrifugation, spheroplasted with 5 mg of 20T
Zymolyase/g of cells, resuspended in 100 ml of sorbitol buffer (1.2 M sorbitol, 0.02 M KPi, pH 7.4),
and split into four 25-ml aliquots. Increasing concentrations of
glutaraldehyde were added: 0, 0.01, 0.1, and 1% and it was incubated
for 30 min on ice. After two washing steps with sorbitol buffer,
ProtA-Nic96p affinity purification on IgG-Sepharose beads was done as
described previously (49).
Mass Spectrometry--
Mass spectrometry of bands excised from
SDS-polyacrylamide gels was done as described elsewhere (50). Tryptic
peptide mixtures obtained as a result of in-gel digestion were analyzed
on a matrix-assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometer
(REFLEX III, Bruker-Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Matrix and samples
were prepared as described (51). Proteins were identified via
non-redundant protein sequence data base search with a list of detected
tryptic peptides using PeptideSearch software.
Purification of Karyopherin and and GST-Mlp2p-C from
Escherichia coliand Solution Binding Assay--
Expression and
purification of recombinant karyopherin and , and purification
of thrombin-cleaved proteins were done as outlined by Ref. 52.
Construction of recombinant GST-Mlp2p-C (COOH-terminal domain ranging
from residues 1500-1679), GST-Mlp2-C-NLS, and GST-Mlp2-C-FSFG was done
by PCR and the fusion constructs were inserted into the E. coli expression plasmid pGEX-4T-3 vector (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Induction of GST alone or GST-tagged fusion proteins and
their subsequent purification on glutathione-Sepharose beads was done
as described (53). After washing with universal buffer, purified
karyopherin (~2 µg) and karyopherin (~2 µg), either as
single subunits or complex, were mixed in 100 µl of buffer with GST
beads or GST fusion protein beads. After incubating at 4 °C for
1 h, columns were washed and the bound proteins were eluted by SDS
sample buffer. Bound and unbound fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and Coomassie/silver staining, or Western blotting using the
anti-Kap60p and Kap95p antibodies.
Fluorescence Microscopy--
To detect GFP in vivo,
the GFP signal was analyzed in the fluorescein channel of a Zeiss
Axioskop fluorescence microscope. Pictures were taken with a Xillix
Microimager CCD camera and digital pictures processed by the software
program Openlab (Improvision, Coventry, United Kingdom).
Yeast Survival Analysis after UV Irradiation--
UV light
sensitivity of mlp1 ,
mlp2 , and
mlp1 /mlp2 mutants was
analyzed by diluting freshly growing yeast strains in YPD medium and
spotting equivalent amounts of cells (diluted in 10 1
steps) onto YPD plates. The plates were UV-irradiated (Stratalinker UV
cross-linker/254 nm UV light bulbs; model 1800) with an intensity from
0 to 150,000 µJ/cm2 and plates were incubated for 3 days
at 30 °C.
Electron Microscopy--
Glycerol spraying/low-angle rotary
metal shadowing of the purified Mlp1p was performed as described (54).
Embedding, thin sectioning, and immuno-gold labeling of cells
expressing Mlp2p-ProtA and Mlp1p-ProtA was performed according to Ref.
40 with one modification: the Mlp2p-ProtA and Mlp1p-ProtA spheroplasts
were extracted with 0.02% Triton X-100 before labeling with the
anti-protein A antibody directly conjugated to colloidal gold.
Miscellaneous--
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
Western blotting, indirect immunofluorescence, and analysis of
poly(A)+ RNA export were performed as described earlier
(55).
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of Nic96p from Glutaraldehyde-fixed Spheroplasts
Reveals an Association with Mlp2p Which Is Homologous to the Vertebrate
Tpr Proteins--
Affinity purification of ProtA-Nic96p from yeast
spheroplasts has shown an interaction with Nsp1p, Nup49p, and Nup57p
(41). To find components that associate less strongly with Nic96p, we treated yeast spheroplasts with glutaraldehyde (to stabilize/cross-link protein complexes) prior to affinity purification of ProtA-Nic96p. Interestingly, the ProtA-Nic96p eluate derived from the lysate treated
with 0.1%, but not 0.01% glutaraldehyde revealed, besides Nup49p,
Nup57p, and Nsp1p, an additional band of about 160 kDa on the
silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Fig.
1A, lane 8). The 160-kDa band
was excised from the gel, in-gel digested with trypsin, and analyzed by
matrix-associated laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry,
followed by a data base search on the detected peptide masses. In
total, 21 peptides from this band were detected which corresponded to a
15% protein sequence coverage. According to our general criteria (51),
this sequence coverage and mass accuracy was good enough for the
unambiguous identification of this band which corresponds to the yeast
ORF YIL149c, which has a predicted molecular mass of 195 kDa. In the
course of this work, Blobel and colleagues (56) identified and
characterized this ORF and called it Mlp2p, one of the two yeast Tpr
homologues. Mlp2p is homologous to yeast Mlp1p (myosin-like protein),
which was found earlier as a 218-kDa coiled-coil protein (45). As deduced from the amino acid sequence, Mlp2p (as well as Mlp1 and other
Tpr proteins) can be divided into two distinct domains: an
amino-terminal domain of roughly 1500 amino acids, which has numerous
heptad repeats with the potential to form -helical coiled-coil structures (56) and a short carboxyl-terminal domain of roughly 180 amino acids, which is devoid of heptad repeats, but exhibits one
FXFG motif typically found in repeat sequence containing
nucleoporins such as Nsp1p and Nup1p, and a putative bipartite basic
NLS (see also later). To show that Mlp2p is specifically associated
with Nic96p under conditions of glutaraldehyde fixation, another
nucleoporin, Seh1p-ProtA, which is organized with five other components
in the Nup84p complex (57), was affinity purified under similar conditions from spheroplasts, treated with 0.1% glutaraldehyde. When
the two different ProtA-fusion protein preparations were compared by
SDS-PAGE and silver staining, the 160-kDa band corresponding to Mlp2p
is only seen in the ProtA-Nic96p, but not Seh1p-ProtA eluate (Fig.
1B). This shows that Mlp2p specifically associates with
Nic96p under the chosen conditions of glutaraldehyde treatment.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Purification of ProtA-Nic96p from
glutaraldehyde-treated cells reveals interaction with the yeast
Tpr-like protein Mlp2p. A, purification of ProtA-Nic96p
from yeast spheroplasts which were incubated with different
concentrations of glutaraldehyde. 25 µl of whole cell extracts
(lanes 1-4) and derived ProtA-Nic96p eluates (lanes
6-9) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining.
1 and 6, no glutaraldehyde; 2 and
7, 0.01% glutaraldehyde; 3 and 8,
0.1% glutaraldehyde; 4 and 9, 1%
glutaraldehyde; 5, high molecular mass protein standard
(kDa). The 160-kDa band which co-purified with ProtA-Nic96p was
identified by mass spectrometry to be yeast ORF YIL149c (Mlp2p).
B, purification of ProtA-Nic96p and Seh1p-ProtA,
respectively, from yeast spheroplasts which were incubated with no
( GA) and with 0.1% glutaraldehyde (+GA) prior
to isolation. 25 µl of ProtA-Nic96p and Seh1p-ProtA eluates were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and silver staining. Indicated are Mlp2p (also by
an asterisk within the gel) and ProtA-Nic96p (filled
arrows), and the subunits of the Nup84p complex including
Seh1p-ProtA (open arrows).
|
|
Mlp2p and Mlp1p Are Nuclear Pore-associated Proteins--
To
determine its intracellular location, Mlp2p was tagged with GFP at its
carboxyl-terminal end and the construct was integrated at the authentic
gene locus to replace endogenous MLP2 by
MLP2-GFP. Mlp2p-GFP gave a distinct nuclear envelope
labeling which was punctate and often excluded from the area in which
the nuclear membrane is adjacent to the vacuole (Fig.
2A). This staining is typical
for a NPC distribution in yeast and suggests that Mlp2p is restricted
to the part of nuclear envelope which also contains nuclear pores. This
conclusion is further supported by the finding that Mlp2p-GFP
co-clusters with nuclear pores in nup133 cells
(Fig. 2A; see also Ref. 58). However, a residual
intranuclear staining also becomes visible under these conditions.
Accordingly, Mlp2p is nuclear pore-associated, but it is also found
inside the nucleus. Since Mlp1p is highly homologous to Mlp2p, Mlp1p was also tagged with GFP and its subcellular location was determined by
fluorescence microscopy. Similar to Mlp2p, Mlp1p shows a nuclear pore
distribution in yeast (Fig. 2B). This result is in contrast to a previous finding, in which Mlp1p was located to dot-like structures adjacent to the nucleus by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (45). However, in this case Mlp1p was overproduced, whereas
here the GFP-tagged MLP1 was expressed under its authentic promoter and inserted into a low copy ARS/CEN plasmid. To
test whether overproduced Mlp1p-GFP and Mlp2p-GFP form aggregates, both
fusion genes were inserted into high copy number plasmids and expressed
in yeast. Overproduction of Mlp2p-GFP or Mlp1p-GFP caused the
appearance of an extremely bright fluorescent spot, often close to the
nuclear envelope (data not shown). This suggests that overproduction
causes aggregate formation of both Mlp2p and Mlp1p (see also Ref. 56).
Since it is possible that Mlp2p and Mlp1p form a coiled-coil
heterodimer, we overexpressed both proteins in yeast. However, the same
GFP aggregates formed under the condition of co-overproduction (data
not shown).

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Mlp1p and Mlp2p are NPC-associated
proteins. Nuclear envelope and nuclear pore location of Mlp2p-GFP
(A) and Mlp1p-GFP (B). A haploid double mutant
MLP2-GFP::HIS3/nup133::HIS3 was
generated. Mlp1p-GFP was expressed from a single copy plasmid
(ARS/CEN) transformed into the mlp1
single or mlp1 /nup133
double disrupted strain. Shown are fluorescence and Nomarski pictures.
In the case of MLP2-GFP::HIS3 cells (upper
panel in A), the fluorescence and Nomarski pictures
were merged. C, immunoelectron microscopy localization of
Mlp1p and Mlp2p. a, overview of nuclei cross-sections of
Mlp1p-ProtA and Mlp2p-ProtA pre-embedding labeled with anti-ProtA
antibody directly conjugated to 8-nm colloidal gold particles.
b-d, a gallery of selected examples of gold-labeled nuclear
pore cross-sections from Mlp1p-ProtA and Mlp2p-ProtA strains. Mlp2p was
located at the nuclear periphery of the pore (at 51 ± 10 nm from
the central plane of the pore), whereas Mlp1p was found associated with
pore-attached filaments at two distinct locations: at 90 ± 20 nm
(arrowheads) and 180 ± 38 nm (arrows) from
the central plane of the pore. c, cytoplasm; n,
nucleus. Scale bars correspond to 200 (a) and 100 (b-d) nm.
|
|
To determine the localization of Mlp1p and Mlp2p on the ultrastructural
level, strains expressing Mlp1p-ProtA and Mlp2p-ProtA, respectively,
were prepared by pre-embedding immunoelectron microscopy using a
colloidal gold-conjugated anti-ProtA antibody (40). As shown in Fig.
2C, the anti-ProtA antibody labeled the nuclear periphery of
the nuclear pores of both ProtA-tagged Mlp1p and Mlp2p. For Mlp2-ProtA,
gold particles were located at 51 ± 10 nm (mean ± S.D.,
n = 15) from the central plane of the pore. Gold particles were also found in the nucleus. However, the number of
nuclear gold particles significantly varied from cell to cell (going
from 0 to 30% of the total gold particles), and their distribution seemed to be random with an unclear association with closest pores. In
contrast to Mlp2p, most of the gold particles for Mlp1p-ProtA were
found in the nucleus (60% nuclear, 38% at the pores, and 2%
cytoplasmic). For the gold particles associated with pores, two
distinct locations were found, one at 90 ± 20 nm (mean ± S.D., n = 15; see Fig. 2C, arrowheads) and
the other at 180 ± 38 nm (mean ± S.D., n = 15; see Fig. 2C, arrows) from the central plane of the pore.
In both cases, the gold particles were often aligned on tracks and
seemed to be associated with pore-attached filaments (see Fig.
2C).
ProtA-tagged Mlp2p and Mlp1p (containing the TEV proteolytic cleavage
site) were affinity purified under standard conditions previously used
to purify bona fide nucleoporins (58). The Coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel showed basically a single band with a good yield
for the purification of Mlplp after TEV cleavage (Fig.
3A). When Mlp2p-ProtA was
affinity purified, full-length Mlp2p-ProtA was clearly visible, but the
yield was lower as compared with Mlp1p and the preparation was less
pure (data not shown). Western blot analysis of the Mlp2p-ProtA and
Mlp1p-ProtA eluates did not show co-enrichment of Nic96p (data not
shown). To test for heterodimer formation, purified Mlp2p-ProtA was
blotted onto nitrocellulose and probed with affinity purified
anti-Mlp1p antibodies; however, no Mlp1p was detected in the purified
Mlp2p-ProtA fraction (data not shown). This shows that under conditions
used to purify subcomplexes of the NPC (e.g. Nsp1p or Nup84p
complex), Mlp2p and Mlp1p predominantly purify as single
components.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Purification and structure of Mlp1p.
A, affinity purification of Mlp1p-TEV-ProtA by IgG-Sepharose
chromatography and cleavage by the TEV protease, or acetic acid
elution, was performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A cell homogenate (1), soluble supernatant
(2), insoluble pellet (3), flow-through
(4), and a 200-fold equivalent of the TEV-cleaved and eluted
Mlp1p (5) were analyzed by SDS-8% PAGE, followed by
Coomassie staining and Western blotting, using anti-ProtA antibodies. A
protein standard, i.e. 10-kDa ladder with a stronger 50-kDa
band, is also shown (6). The position of Mlp1p is indicated.
In the case of Western blot analysis, Mplp1-ProtA was not cleaved by
TEV, but eluted from the IgG-Sepharose column by acetic acid.
B, electron microscopic appearance of purified yeast Mlp1p
after glycerol spraying/low-angle rotary metal shadowing. A gallery of
long, mostly curved filamentous molecules with a tendency to anneal
head to tail (see last panel down) is displayed. The
scale bar represents 100 nm.
|
|
We analyzed the structure of purified Mlp1p by electron microscopy
after glycerol spraying/low-angle rotary metal shadowing (54). Although
the isolated Mlp1p was more than 95% pure, as judged from the
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, the sample yielded a rather heterogeneous
morphology in the electron microscope. Nevertheless, about 10% of the
particles appeared as long, thin and mostly curved filamentous
molecules (Fig. 3B). In a control, another yeast
ProtA-tagged nucleoporin (ProtA-Nup85p) was affinity purified and
prepared for glycerol spraying/low-angle rotary metal shadowing under
identical conditions, but no thin and filamentous structures were seen
in the electron
microscope.2
A Short Sequence within C-domain of Mlp2p Binds in Vitro to the
Karyopherin / --
Since both GFP-tagged Mlp2p and Mlp1p
exhibit, besides a distinct nuclear envelope location, an intranuclear
staining (see also Fig. 2), it is possible that they are imported into
the nucleus with the help of an NLS. It was found recently that the
C-domain, but not the coiled-coil N-domain of mammalian Tpr, contains a nuclear localization signal (39, 59). According to these findings, we
tested whether the C-domains of Mlp2p (see also Fig.
4A for sequence) and Mlp1p
exhibit a nuclear localization sequence which can target an attached
reporter protein into the nucleus. Therefore, the C-domains of Mlp2p
and Mlp1p were fused to GFP and the in vivo location of the
corresponding fusion proteins was determined by fluorescence microscopy
(Fig. 4B). This revealed that both Mlp2p-C and Mlp1p-C
domains can mediate efficient transport of GFP into the nucleus. GFP
alone does not accumulate inside the nucleus (60). Although both GFP
fusion proteins are strongly concentrated inside the nucleus,
GFP-Mlp2p-C, but not GFP-Mlp1p-C, was also detected in the cytoplasm.
Since GFP-Mlp2p-C has a calculated molecular mass of ~40 kDa, it may
not be efficiently retained inside the nucleus due to diffusion back
into the cytoplasm. In contrast, GFP-Mlp1p-C is larger (~60 kDa) and
therefore may be better retained inside the nucleus. We therefore made
a 2× GFP-Mlp2p-C construct and expressed it in yeast. The extent of
nuclear accumulation of 2× GFP-Mlp2p-C increased and the cytoplasmic
signal decreased. However, a small cytoplasmic signal was still visible
(Fig. 4B). This could suggest that the NLS of Mlp2p is less
strong as compared with the Mlp1p-NLS. In conclusion, the C-domains of
Mlp2p and Mlp1p contain NLSs which most likely target the corresponding full-length proteins into the nucleus.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The C-domain of Mlp2p has nuclear targeting
activity and interacts with the karyopherin
/ complex.
A, the carboxyl-terminal domain of Mlp2p contains a putative
bipartite NLS and a FSFG motif typically found in FXFG
repeat sequences containing nucleoporins. Shown is the Mlp2p sequence
from residue 1500-1679. Indicated in bold is the FSFG
motif, and asterisks indicate lysine and arginines within a
putative NLS. B, the C-domains of Mlp2p (residues
1500-1679) and Mlp1p (residue 1446-1875) can target GFP into the
nucleus. The subcellular location of the corresponding GFP fusion
proteins was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy; cells were also
viewed by Nomarski optics. C, the C-domain of Mlp2p binds
in vitro to the karyopherin / complex. GST or
GST-Mlp2p-C were purified by affinity chromatography. Beads with
immobilized GST or GST-Mlp2p were incubated with E. coli
purified yeast karyopherin (Kap60p) and karyopherin (Kap95p),
or both together. The bound fractions 1-6 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and silver staining. 1 and 4, Kap60p;
2 and 5, Kap95p; 3 and 6,
Kap60p mixed with Kap95p; 7, input Kap60p; 8,
input Kap95p. The positions of GST, GST-tagged Mlp2p-C, Kap60p, and
Kap95p are indicated. D, the putative bipartite NLS within
of Mlp2p-C binds in vitro to karyopherin / . GST,
GST-Mlp2p-C-NLS, and GST-Mlp2p-C-FSFG were purified by affinity
chromatography and incubated with karyopherin / . Shown are the
bound fractions. 1, GST incubated with karyopherin / ;
2, GST-Mlp2p-C incubated with karyopherin / ;
3, GST-Mlp2p-C-FSFG (residue 1500-1649) incubated with
karyopherin / ; 4, GST-Mlp2p-C-NLS (residue 1640-1679)
incubated with karyopherin / . E, the putative
bipartite NLS of Mlp2p-C (residues 1640-1679) can target GFP into the
nucleus. The subcellular location of the corresponding GFP-fusion
proteins, GFP-Mlp2p-C-NLS and GFP-Mlp2p-C-FSFG, were analyzed by
fluorescence microscopy.
|
|
The COOH-terminal domain of Mlp2p contains a sequence which resembles a
bipartite NLS; in addition, this domain also exhibits one
FXFG motif typically found in repeat sequences containing nucleoporins such as Nsp1p, Nup1p, and Nup2p (Fig. 4A). We
therefore tested whether the C-domain of Mlp2p can interact with
karyopherin , karyopherin , or both. The last 180 amino acids
from Mlp2p were fused to the GST protein and GST-Mlp2p-C was expressed
in E. coli. After purification by glutathione affinity
chromatography, recombinant and purified karyopherin (Kap60p) and
karyopherin (Kap95p) were added separately or as a reconstituted
complex to the immobilized GST-Mlp2p-C (Fig. 4C). Kap60p or
Kap95p monomers did not significantly bind to GST-Mlp2p-C; in contrast,
a strong and cooperative binding of the Kap60p·Kap95p complex to
GST-Mlp2p-C beads was observed (Fig. 4C). The immobilized
GST alone served as a negative control, to which no binding of the
karyopherin / complex could be detected (Fig. 4C). It
was recently shown that the karyopherin / complex cooperatively
binds to FXFG, but not GLFG repeat sequences-containing
nucleoporins (52). This could suggest that the C-domain of Mlp2p binds
via its FXFG containing sequence or via a NLS to karyopherin
/ . We therefore separated the sequence containing the FSFG motif
(residue 1500-1649) from the putative bipartite NLS (residue
1640-1679) and fused both domains to GST. Whereas GST-Mlp2p-C-FSFG no
longer bound to karyopherin / , the GST-Mlp2p-C-NLS fusion
construct retained karyopherin / binding activity (Fig.
4D). This shows that the putative bipartite NLS within
Mlp2p-C can interact with karyopherin / . Finally, this
bipartite-type NLS was fused to GFP and expressed in yeast. This
revealed that the NLS-like sequence, but not the FSFG-containing part,
exhibits nuclear targeting activity (Fig. 4E).
The mlp1 /mlp2 Double Mutant Is Viable,
but Shows an Increased Sensitivity to UV Light--
To study the
in vivo role of Mlp2p and to find out whether it
functionally overlaps with Mlp1p, the complete MLP2 ORF was replaced by the HIS3 gene in a diploid yeast strain (see
"Experimental Procedures"). After sporulation of the heterozygous
mlp2::HIS3/MLP2 diploid strain and
tetrad analysis, four viable spores were recovered, of which the two
mlp2::HIS3 containing progeny (further designated as mlp2 ) grew similar as compared with the
MLP2+ progeny (data not shown). Since Mlp1p may
compensate for the loss of the Mlp2p function, a haploid double
disruptant was generated by mating and tetrad analysis. This
mlp1 /mlp2 strain was
still viable and no clear growth defect was noticed at the various
tested temperatures as compared with
MLP1+/MLP2+ progeny.
However, a dot-spot growth analysis revealed that the double disrupted
strain forms heterogeneous colonies (Fig.
5). In addition to colonies of normal
size, smaller colonies also became visible in
mlp1 /mlp2 mutants.
This shows that the two yeast Tpr-like proteins are required for
optimal cell growth. Since mlp1 mutants were shown to have
an increased sensitivity to UV light (45), and the observed heterogeneous colony size in the double mutant would be consistent with
a defect in DNA repair, we analyzed whether the
mlp1 /mlp2 null
mutants are hypersensitive to UV light causing DNA damage (61). Indeed,
the mlp1 /mlp2 double
disrupted strain displayed a significantly increased sensitivity to
ultraviolet radiation (Fig. 5), whereas the single disrupted mlp1 and mlp2 strains
were less sensitive to this treatment (Fig. 5). Thus, the
mlp1 /mlp2 double
mutant is vulnerable to DNA damaging methods such as UV light
irradiation (see also "Discussion").

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The
mlp1 /mlp2
double disruption mutant is viable, but exhibits an increased
sensitivity to UV light. The same amount of cells derived from the
four spores of a complete tetrad (strains
MLP1+/MLP2+ or
mlp1 /mlp2 ), and from
mlp1 and mlp2 single
disrupted strains which were also complemented by plasmid-borne
MLP1 and MPL2, respectively, were diluted in
10 1 steps, spotted onto YPD plates, and exposed to the
indicated doses of UV light. It was grown for 4 days at 30 °C in the
dark.
|
|
Poly(A)+ RNA Export Is Inhibited in Mlp1p-overproducing
Cells--
To find out whether nucleocytoplasmic transport is affected
in the mlp2 or mlp1 disruption mutants, nuclear
protein import of Npl3p-GFP and NLS-GFP-lacZ, and mRNA export were
analyzed. No apparent defect in nuclear import and export was observed
in neither the single nor the double disrupted strains (data not shown). However, overproduction of Mlp1p (achieved by transforming a
haploid RS453 wild-type strain with a high-copy number plasmid containing MLP1) caused nuclear accumulation of mRNA
(Fig. 6A). In contrast, overproduction of
MLP2-GFP did not reveal such impairment, whereas
overexpression of both MLP1 and MLP2-GFP enhanced
the inhibition of poly(A)+ RNA
export. We noticed that the
poly(A)+ RNA signal which accumulated in
Mlp1p-overproducing cells did not coincide with the DNA staining. To
find out in which part of the nucleus the mRNA accumulated,
indirect immunofluorescence was performed using anti-Nsp1p (Fig.
6B) and anti-Nop1p antibodies (Fig. 6C). Clearly,
the bright poly(A)+ RNA spot seen in Mlp1p-overproducing
cells is confined within the nucleus, in an area which is devoid of
chromatin, but is not the nucleolus (Fig. 6, B and
C, see also "Discussion").

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Overproduction of Mlp1p causes intranuclear
poly(A)+ RNA accumulation. In situ
poly(A)+ RNA hybridization (A) combined with
anti-Nsp1p (B) and anti-Nop1p (C) indirect
immunofluorescence. Haploid RS453 cells transformed with a 2-µm
plasmid carrying MLP1 and MLP2-GFP were processed
for both in situ poly(A)+ RNA hybridization and
indirect immunofluorescence using anti-Nsp1p and anti-Nop1p antibodies;
a and e, anti-Nsp1p staining; b and
f, poly(A)+ RNA staining; c and
g, DNA staining with DAPI; d, Nomarski picture;
h, merged pictures from e, f, and g. Pictures in
B and C were colored and merged by digital image
processing using the software program "Openlab" (Improvision,
Coventry, United Kingdom).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Nucleocytoplasmic trafficking through the nuclear pore complexes
is a bidirectional process. However, it is not known whether guided
transport continues after translocation through the pore channel on
NPC-attached intranuclear and cytoplasmic filaments. During nuclear
protein import, termination of transport was suggested to occur at the
nuclear basket (i.e. the terminal ring) in
Xenopus oocyte nuclei (16), but in vivo
facilitated transport of certain import cargos may continue from the
nuclear pores to distinct intranuclear sites (for discussion see Ref.
60). Conversely, intranuclear transport of export cargoes
(e.g. mRNPs) may also be facilitated by guided transport on
track-like structures.
Intranuclear filaments, which are attached to the inner site of nuclear
pore complexes could play a role in facilitated intranuclear transport
steps, either by serving as tracks or forming intranuclear channels. It
is now clear that Tpr proteins are constituents of the NPC-attached
intranuclear filaments. Our work shows that the yeast Tpr protein,
Mlp2p, physically associates with Nic96p (or a member of the Nic96p
complex). Although this interaction was found when spheroplasts were
treated with glutaraldehyde prior to affinity purification of
ProtA-Nic96p, it seems that Mlp2p was not covalently cross-linked to
Nic96p; the apparent molecular mass of the putative cross-link product
on SDS-PAGE (~160 kDa) does not match with the calculated molecular
mass (~300 kDa). How glutaraldehyde fixation allows a better
co-enrichment of Mlp2p during ProtA-Nic69p purification is not clear.
However, Mlp2p does not unspecifically co-purifiy with any nucleoporin
during purification from glutaraldehyde-treated spheroplasts as a
source. When Seh1p-ProtA was affinity purified under similar conditions from 0.1% glutaraldehyde fixed spheroplasts, the 160-kDa Mlp2p band
was completely absent. This result argues against an unspecific binding
of Mlp2 to any nucleoporin since the Nup84p complex is located at the
cytoplasmic periphery of the
NPC,3 which should not be in
physical contact with the NPC-attached intranuclear filaments. In
conclusion, mild glutaraldehyde fixation somehow stabilizes interaction
between Nic96p and Mlp2p, allowing co-purification of Mlp2p. This
agrees well with the immuno-EM data which showed that Mlp2p-ProtA is in
close vicinity to the nuclear basket. Previous findings demonstrated
that a pool of Nic96p is located at the terminal ring of the nuclear
basket (40), where it would be expected if it functions as docking
protein for the Tpr-containing filaments. Accordingly, Nic96p could
serve as an NPC-attachment site for Mlp2p. However, it is possible that Nic96p is more dynamic at the NPC as recently suggested for vertebrate Nup153 (62), and Mlp2p provides an anchoring site for Nic96p on the
nuclear basket of the NPC. Whether Mlp1p also interacts with Nic96p is
not known, but interestingly Mlp1p-ProtA is less close to the nuclear
basket than Mlp2-ProtA.
Since no heterodimer formation between Mlp1p and Mpl2p was observed,
these coiled-coil proteins may be monomers or homodimers. However, more
work is required to address this adequately. In an attempt to obtain a
first glimpse of the structure of the yeast Tpr proteins, Mlp1p was
purified and analyzed by electron microscopy after glycerol
spraying/low-angle rotary metal shadowing. This revealed that Mlp1p is
a thin, mostly curved filamentous molecule with a length in excess of
100 nm. Although biochemically pure, morphologically the sample
appeared rather heterogeneous with only about 10% of the particles
exhibiting an elongated structure. The reason for this behavior is not
known, but the long and thin Mlp1p molecules may have a tendency to
break during purification and/or spraying, and bend, kink, or fold back
during specimen preparation. As both Mlp2p and Mlp1p harbor a long
heptad-repeat containing NH2-terminal domain, they may
dimerize to form a parallel 2-stranded -helical coiled-coil domain,
thus giving the molecules their long filamentous appearance.
Do Mlp1p and Mlp2p perform an overlapping function in yeast? Although
both proteins exhibit a strong homology, they do not overlap in
vivo in a synthetically lethal relationship. One possibility is
that both have a redundant role in optimizing nucleocytoplasmic transport reactions, e.g. in nuclear protein import (56) and mRNA export from intranuclear sites to the nuclear pores. Mlp1p and
Mlp2p may have additional roles, e.g. in intranuclear
organization or linking intranuclear structures such as peripheral
chromatin or chromatin-associated proteins to the nuclear envelope
and/or nuclear pores. It has been shown by immunoelectron microscopy that chromatin directly contacts the NPC-attached intranuclear filaments (63). Interesting in this context is the increased sensitivity of the mlp1/mlp2 double disruption mutant to UV
light. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomeric chromatin is
associated with the nuclear envelope; SIR proteins and Rap1p play an
important role in the segregation of telomeric heterochromatin to the
nuclear envelope (64). Recently, it was found that cells lacking the chromatin assembly factor-I exhibit an increased ultraviolet radiation sensitivity and reduction of telomeric silencing (65). Thus, chromatin
assembly and organization with respect to telomeric silencing and DNA
repair are processes in yeast that appear to require the nuclear periphery.
The C-domains of both Mlp2p and Mlp1p contain, like their higher
eukaryotic counterparts (39, 59), nuclear targeting signals. In the
case of Mlp2p, we could identify a short sequence at the COOH-terminal
end that not only resembles a basic bipartite NLS, but binds
cooperatively in vitro to the karyopherin / complex and mediates nuclear accumulation of a GFP reporter protein. Thus, the
observed interaction between Mlp2p and karyopherin / may be used
for nuclear uptake of Mlp2p. Since the C-domain of Mlp2p contains one
FXFG motif and an extended sequence with moderate resemblance to degenerate repeat domains of classical nucleoporins, it
is possible that the C-domain of Mlp2p directly interacts with karyopherin and other -like transport factors. However, the significance of this FSFG motif within Mlp2p remains to be shown. In
any case, the C-domains of Mlp2p and Mlp1p appear to extend from the
predicted filament-forming N-domain and therefore should be accessible
to bind to transport factors.
Although nuclear mRNA export is not inhibited in
mlp1 or mlp2 cells,
overproduction of Mlp1p causes poly(A)+ RNA accumulation
inside the nucleus. Interestingly, mRNA accumulates in a distinct
area of the nucleus which is devoid of chromatin and is neither the
nucleolar compartment. Since overproduction of Mlp1p causes formation
of intranuclear aggregates, it is possible that mRNPs get trapped in
these Mlp1p-containing intranuclear structures. It has been shown
recently that overproduction of Mlp1p causes an extensive
electron-dense fibrillogranular network, which extends from the nuclear
envelope toward the nuclear interior and is highly permeable, even for
large macromolecules (56). It is thus possible that mRNPs together with
transport factors become trapped within these Mlp1p aggregates.
Interesting in this context we found an association of Mlp2p with the
Mex67p/Mtr2p mRNA exporter complex under conditions of
dominant-negative RanGTP expression.4 It is possible
that this interaction represents a translocational intermediate trapped
on intranuclear tracks, allowing co-isolation of Mlp2p with
Mex67p/Mtr2p.
In summary, we characterized two NPC-associated proteins, Mlp2p and
Mlp1p, which are the closest yeast homologues of higher eukaryotic Tpr
proteins. We found that purified Nic96p is associated with a pool of
Mlp2p. This implies that Nic96p (or a Nic96p complex at the terminal
ring) links the yeast Tpr protein Mlp2p to the nuclear pores. Since
Mlp2p can interact with protein import and nuclear mRNA export
factors, and overproduction of Mlp1p inhibits mRNA export, we
suggest that yeast Tpr proteins form filaments, which participate in
intranuclear transport toward and away from the nuclear pores.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Kölling
(University of Düsseldorf, Germany) for providing the
MLP1 clone, strains, and anti-Mlp1 antibodies; to Dr. M. Rexach (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) for the karyopherin and
clones. We are also grateful to the members of our laboratory for
critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the Human
Frontiers Science Program (HFSP) (to U. A. and E. C. H.), the M. E. Müller Foundation of Switzerland, and the
Swiss National Science Foundation (to N. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Institute of Biochemistry, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology (ETH), Universitätsstr. 16, CH-8092
Zürich, Switzerland.
§
Present address: CEBI Odense University, Staermosegaardsvej 16, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.
¶
Present address: M. E. Müller Institute for
Microscopy, Biozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Recipient of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB352. To
whom all correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-6221-54-41-73; Fax: 49-6221-54-43-69; E-mail: cg5@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de.
2
U. Aebi, unpublished results.
3
B. Fahrenkrog and U. Aebi, unpublished results.
4
H. Santos-Rosa and E. Hurt, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
NPC, nuclear pore
complex;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
UTR, untranslated region;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electorphoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ohno, M.,
Fornerod, M.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1998)
Cell
92,
327-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Akey, C. W.,
and Radermacher, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
1-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Hinshaw, J. E.
(1994)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
47,
15-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Yang, Q.,
Rout, M. P.,
and Akey, Ch. W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
223-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Byrd, D. A.,
Sweet, D. J.,
Panté, N.,
Konstantinov, K. N.,
Guan, T.,
Saphire, A. C. S.,
Mitchell, P. J.,
Cooper, C. S.,
Aebi, U.,
and Gerace, L.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1515-1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Cordes, V. C.,
Reidenbach, S.,
Köhler, A.,
Stuurman, N.,
van Driel, R.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1333-1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Cordes, V. C.,
Reidenbach, S.,
Rackwitz, H. R.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
515-529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Feldherr, C. M.,
Kallenbach, E.,
and Schultz, N.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
2216-2222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
| Franke, W. W., and Scheer, U. (1974) in The Cell
Nucleus (Busch, H., ed) New York
|
| 10.
|
Gerace, L.
(1986)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
11,
443-446[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Goldberg, M. W.,
and Allen, T. D.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1429-1440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Panté, N.,
and Aebi, U.
(1995)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
162,
225-255
|
| 13.
|
Ris, H.
(1997)
Scanning
19,
368-375[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Daneholt, B.
(1997)
Cell
88,
585-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Delphin, C.,
Guan, T.,
Melchior, F.,
and Gerace, L.
(1997)
Mol. Biol. Cell
8,
2379-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Görlich, D.,
Panté, N.,
Kutay, U.,
Aebi, U.,
and Bischoff, F. R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5584-5594[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Melchior, F.,
Guan, T. L.,
Yokoyama, N.,
Nishimoto, T.,
and Gerace, L.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
571-581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Panté, N.,
and Aebi, U.
(1996)
Science
273,
1729-1732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wu, J.,
Matunis, M. J.,
Kraemer, D.,
Blobel, G.,
and Coutavas, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14209-14213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Wilken, N.,
Senécal, J. L.,
Scheer, U.,
and Dabauvalle, M. C.
(1995)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
68,
211-219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Yokoyama, N.,
Hayashi, N.,
Seki, T.,
Panté, N.,
Ohba, T.,
Nishii, K.,
Kuma, K.,
Hayashida, T.,
Miyata, T.,
Aebi, U.,
Fukui, M.,
and Nishimoto, T.
(1995)
Nature
376,
184-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Shah, S.,
Tugendreich, S.,
and Forbes, D.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
31-49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Franke, W. W.,
and Scheer, U.
(1970)
J. Ultrastruct. Res.
30,
288-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Ris, H.
(1989)
Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser.
98,
657-662
|
| 25.
|
Ris, H.,
and Malecki, M.
(1993)
J. Struct. Biol.
111,
148-157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Goldberg, M. W.,
and Allen, T. D.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
301-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Blobel, G.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
8527-8529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Jackson, D. A.,
and Cook, P. R.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3667-3677[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Beven, A.,
Guan, Y.,
Peart, J.,
Cooper, C.,
and Shaw, P.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
98,
293-302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kallajoki, M.,
Weber, K.,
and Osborn, M.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
3351-3362[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Nakayasu, H.,
and Berezney, R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10312-10316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Georgatos, S. D.
(1994)
J. Cell. Biochem.
55,
69-76[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Gueth-Hallonet, C.,
Weber, K.,
and Osborn, M.
(1997)
Exp. Cell Res.
233,
21-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Merdes, A.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
71-79[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Clubb, B. H.,
and Locke, M.
(1998)
J. Cell. Biochem.
70,
240-251[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Gueth-Hallonet, C.,
Wang, J.,
Harborth, J.,
Weber, K.,
and Osborn, M.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
243,
434-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Zimowska, G.,
Aris, J. P.,
and Paddy, M. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
927-944[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Paddy, M. R.
(1998)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
63,
305-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Bangs, P.,
Burke, B.,
Powers, C.,
Craig, R.,
Purohit, A.,
and Doxsey, S.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1801-1812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Fahrenkrog, B.,
Hurt, E. C.,
Aebi, U.,
and Panté, N.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
577-588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Grandi, P.,
Schlaich, N.,
Tekotte, H.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
76-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Grandi, P.,
Emig, S.,
Weise, C.,
Hucho, F.,
Pohl, T.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
1263-1273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Belgareh, N.,
Snay-Hodge, S.,
Pasteau, F.,
Dahger, S.,
Cole, C.,
and Doye, V.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3475-3492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Hurwitz, M. E.,
Strambio-de-Castillia, C.,
and Blobel, G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11241-11245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Kölling, R.,
Nguyen, T.,
Chen, E. Y.,
and Botstein, D.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
237,
359-369[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Sherman, F.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
194,
3-20
|
| 47.
|
Maniatis, T.,
Fritsch, E. T.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1982)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 48.
|
Rothstein, R.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
101,
202-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Santos-Rosa, H.,
Moreno, H.,
Simos, G.,
Segref, A.,
Fahrenkrog, B.,
Panté, N.,
and Hurt, E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6826-6838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Shevchenko, A.,
Jensen, O. N.,
Podtelejnikov, A. V.,
Sagliocco, F.,
Wilm, M.,
Vorm, O.,
Mortensen, P.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Boucherie, H.,
and Mann, M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14440-14445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Jensen, O. N.,
Podtelejnikov, A.,
and Mann, M.
(1996)
Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom.
19,
1371-1378
|
| 52.
|
Rexach, M.,
and Blobel, G.
(1995)
Cell
83,
683-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Künzler, M.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
433,
185-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Häner, M.,
Bremer, A.,
and Aebi, U.
(1997)
in
Cell Biology: A Laboratory Hand Book
(Celis, J. E., ed), 2nd Ed., Vol. 3
, pp. 292-298, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 55.
|
Segref, A.,
Sharma, K.,
Doye, V.,
Hellwig, A.,
Huber, J.,
Lührmann, R.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3256-3271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Strambio-de-Castillia, C.,
Blobel, G.,
and Rout, M. P.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
839-855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Siniossoglou, S.,
Wimmer, C.,
Rieger, M.,
Doye, V.,
Tekotte, H.,
Weise, C.,
Emig, S.,
Segref, A.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1996)
Cell
84,
265-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Bailer, S. M.,
Siniossoglou, S.,
Podtelejnikov, A. V.,
Hellwig, A.,
Mann, M.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1107-1119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Cordes, V. C.,
Hase, M. E.,
and Müller, L.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Exp. Cell Res.
245,
43-56
|
| 60.
|
Senger, B.,
Simos, G.,
Bischoff, F. R.,
Podtelejnikov, A. V.,
Mann, M.,
and Hurt, E. C.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2196-2207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Hampsey, M.
(1997)
Yeast
13,
1099-1133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Nakielny, S.,
Shaikh, S.,
Burke, B.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1982-1995[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Arlucea, J.,
Andrade, R.,
Alonso, R.,
and Aréchaga, J.
(1998)
J. Struct. Biol.
124,
51-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Kennedy, B. K.,
Gotta, M.,
Sinclair, D. A.,
Mills, K.,
McNabb, D. S.,
Murthy, M.,
Pak, S. M.,
Laroche, T.,
Gasser, S. M.,
and Guarente, L.
(1997)
Cell
89,
381-391[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Kaufman, P. D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
and Stillman, B.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
345-357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Fasken, M. Stewart, and A. H. Corbett
Functional Significance of the Interaction between the mRNA-binding Protein, Nab2, and the Nuclear Pore-associated Protein, Mlp1, in mRNA Export
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2008;
283(40):
27130 - 27143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. M. Xu, A. Rose, S. Muthuswamy, S. Y. Jeong, S. Venkatakrishnan, Q. Zhao, and I. Meier
NUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR, the Arabidopsis Homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/Megator, Is Involved in mRNA Export and SUMO Homeostasis and Affects Diverse Aspects of Plant Development
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2007;
19(5):
1537 - 1548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Dieppois, N. Iglesias, and F. Stutz
Cotranscriptional Recruitment to the mRNA Export Receptor Mex67p Contributes to Nuclear Pore Anchoring of Activated Genes
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 1, 2006;
26(21):
7858 - 7870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Niepel, C. Strambio-de-Castillia, J. Fasolo, B. T. Chait, and M. P. Rout
The nuclear pore complex-associated protein, Mlp2p, binds to the yeast spindle pole body and promotes its efficient assembly
J. Cell Biol.,
July 18, 2005;
170(2):
225 - 235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Casolari, C. R. Brown, D. A. Drubin, O. J. Rando, and P. A. Silver
Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes
Genes & Dev.,
May 15, 2005;
19(10):
1188 - 1198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhao and G. Blobel
From The Cover: A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization
PNAS,
March 29, 2005;
102(13):
4777 - 4782.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhao, C.-Y. Wu, and G. Blobel
Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality
J. Cell Biol.,
November 22, 2004;
167(4):
605 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dimaano and K. S. Ullman
Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: Integrating mRNA Production and Turnover with Export through the Nuclear Pore
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2004;
24(8):
3069 - 3076.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Hase and V. C. Cordes
Direct Interaction with Nup153 Mediates Binding of Tpr to the Periphery of the Nuclear Pore Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2003;
14(5):
1923 - 1940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Lei, C. A. Stern, B. Fahrenkrog, H. Krebber, T. I. Moy, U. Aebi, and P. A. Silver
Sac3 Is an mRNA Export Factor That Localizes to Cytoplasmic Fibrils of Nuclear Pore Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2003;
14(3):
836 - 847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Green, C. P. Johnson, H. Hagan, and A. H. Corbett
The C-terminal domain of myosin-like protein 1 (Mlp1p) is a docking site for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins that are required for mRNA export
PNAS,
February 4, 2003;
100(3):
1010 - 1015.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Frosst, T. Guan, C. Subauste, K. Hahn, and L. Gerace
Tpr is localized within the nuclear basket of the pore complex and has a role in nuclear protein export
J. Cell Biol.,
February 18, 2002;
156(4):
617 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Hase, N. V. Kuznetsov, and V. C. Cordes
Amino Acid Substitutions of Coiled-Coil Protein Tpr Abrogate Anchorage to the Nuclear Pore Complex but Not Parallel, In-Register Homodimerization
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2001;
12(8):
2433 - 2452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. A. Fontoura, S. Dales, G. Blobel, and H. Zhong
The nucleoporin Nup98 associates with the intranuclear filamentous protein network of TPR
PNAS,
March 13, 2001;
98(6):
3208 - 3213.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Shulga, N. Mosammaparast, R. Wozniak, and D. S. Goldfarb
Yeast Nucleoporins Involved in Passive Nuclear Envelope Permeability
J. Cell Biol.,
May 29, 2000;
149(5):
1027 - 1038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Frosst, T. Guan, C. Subauste, K. Hahn, and L. Gerace
Tpr is localized within the nuclear basket of the pore complex and has a role in nuclear protein export
J. Cell Biol.,
February 18, 2002;
156(4):
617 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|