|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 87-94, January 7, 2000
The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E2 Protein Induces
Apoptosis in the Absence of Other HPV Proteins and via a
p53-dependent Pathway*
Kenneth
Webster ,
Joanna
Parish§,
Maya
Pandya¶,
Peter L.
Stern ,
Anthony R.
Clarke, and
Kevin
Gaston**
From the Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences,
University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom and the
Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS
Trust, Manchester M20 9BX, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human papillomavirus (HPV) E2 protein
regulates viral gene expression and is also required for viral
replication. HPV-transformed cells often contain chromosomally
integrated copies of the HPV genome in which the viral E2 gene is
disrupted. We have shown previously that re-expression of the HPV 16 E2
protein in HPV 16-transformed cells results in cell death via
apoptosis. Here we show that the HPV 16 E2 protein can induce apoptosis
in both HPV-transformed and non-HPV-transformed cell lines. E2-induced apoptosis is abrogated by a trans-dominant negative mutant of p53 or by
overexpression of the HPV 16 E6 protein, but is increased by
overexpression of wild-type p53. We show that mutations that block the
DNA binding activity of E2 do not impair the ability of this protein to
induce apoptosis. In contrast, removal of both N-terminal domains from
the E2 dimer completely blocks E2-induced cell death. Heterodimers
formed between wild-type E2 and N-terminally deleted E2 proteins also
fail to induce cell death. Our data suggest that neither the DNA
binding activity of E2 nor other HPV proteins are required for the
induction of apoptosis by E2 and that E2-induced cell death occurs via
a p53-dependent pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Papillomaviruses infect epithelial cells and generally induce the
formation of benign hyperproliferative lesions. However, some
papillomavirus types are associated with cancer. For example, human
papillomavirus (HPV)1 types
16 and 18 have been linked to cervical cancer in women (1) and bovine
papillomavirus (BPV) types 2 and 4 have been linked to bladder cancer
and cancer of the upper alimentary canal respectively, in cattle (2,
3). Human cervical cancers express the viral E6 and E7 oncogenes, and
the products of these genes increase cell proliferation and promote
cell immortalization (for a review, see Ref. 4). The human
papillomavirus E2 gene, or lack thereof, is also thought to play a
major role in the development of cervical cancer. Most cervical cancers
contain chromosomally integrated copies of the HPV genome in which the
viral E2 gene has been disrupted (5). Furthermore, mutations in the E2
gene increase the immortalization capacity of HPV 16 (6).
The papillomavirus E2 genes encode sequence-specific DNA-binding
proteins that regulate viral gene expression and are also required for
viral DNA replication (reviewed in Ref. 7). The E2 proteins bind as
dimers to multiple copies of an inverted repeat sequence found within
the viral long control region. Depending on the particular virus and
the particular E2 protein being studied, the binding of E2 to these
sites can either activate or repress transcription of the E6 and E7
oncogenes. For example, the HPV 16 E2 protein activates transcription
from the P97 promoter located at the 3' end of the HPV 16 long control
region, whereas, under exactly the same conditions, the BPV1 E2 protein
represses P97 promoter activity (8, 9). Each subunit of the E2 dimer
contains two domains separated by a flexible hinge: the N-terminal
domain of each subunit mediates the regulation of transcription,
whereas the C-terminal domain mediates DNA binding and dimerization
(10). In bovine papillomaviruses, truncated E2 proteins that lack the N-terminal transcriptional domain are also expressed. These truncated E2 proteins (E2-TR) can repress transcription and can also form transcriptionally inactive heterodimers with full-length E2 (11).
The E2 proteins from HPV 16, HPV 18, and BPV1 all have dramatic effects
on the proliferation and survival of cervical carcinoma cell lines. We
have shown that expression of the HPV 16 E2 protein in SiHa cells, an
HPV 16-transformed cell line that contains a single disrupted copy of
the E2 gene, induces cell death via apoptosis (12). Similarly, the HPV
18 E2 protein induces apoptosis in HeLa cells, an HPV 18-transformed
cell line that also contains disrupted copies of the E2 gene (13).
Expression of the BPV1 E2 protein in either SiHa or HeLa cells has been
shown to suppress proliferation, in part at least, by blocking the
transition from G1 to S phase (14-16). Because the
proliferation assays used in these experiments score colony formation
after several days in culture, BPV1 E2 might also induce apoptosis in
these cell lines. There is also some evidence to suggest that the E2
proteins might have effects on non-HPV-transformed cells. Expression of
the HPV 31 E2 protein in HPV-negative normal human foreskin
keratinocytes (NHK cells) using a recombinant adenovirus resulted in S
phase cell cycle arrest and the appearance of cells with
sub-G0 DNA content; a characteristic feature of apoptotic
cell death (17). However, BPV1 E2 has no effect on the proliferation of
C33a cells, an HPV-negative cervical carcinoma cell line, or SAOS
cells, an HPV-negative osteosarcoma cell line (15). Furthermore, the
HPV 18 E2 protein has no effect on the levels of apoptosis in C33a cells, SAOS cells, or HaCat cells, an HPV-negative spontaneously immortalized human keratinocyte cell line (13).
At present, there is no model that can explain satisfactorily the
effects of the E2 proteins on cell proliferation. BPV1 E2 and HPV 18 E2
have been shown to repress transcription of the HPV 18 E6 and E7
oncogenes (14, 13). The E6 protein binds to p53, and this interaction
results in a decrease in the half-life of p53 within cells (18-21).
Because p53 can block cell cycle progression and/or induce apoptosis
(for a review, see Ref. 22), decreased levels of E6 might be expected
to lead to increased levels of p53 and increased levels of cell cycle
arrest and/or cell death (shown schematically in Fig.
1). In keeping with this view, expression of BPV1 E2 in HeLa cells appears to stabilize p53 (14, 13). However,
E2-TR also represses transcription of E6 and E7 in these cells, but
this truncated E2 protein can neither stabilize p53 nor induce
apoptosis (13). In addition, the expression of HPV 31 E2 in NHK cells
appears to destabilize p53 (17).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
E2 regulates E6 and E7 gene expression.
A schematic representation of some of the possible routes from the HPV
16 E2 protein to the induction of apoptosis. The bottom line
represents the integrated HPV genome, and the bent arrow
indicates the P97 promoter. The E2 protein regulates transcription of
the HPV 16 E6 and E7 genes (open boxes). E6 binds to p53 and
this reduces the half-life of p53 within the cell. E7 binds to Rb and
brings about the release of E2F. Both p53 and E2F can bring about
apoptosis (see text for details). E2 could also induce apoptosis
independently of its effects on transcription of E6 and E7.
|
|
The E7 protein binds to the Rb tumor suppressor protein and the
Rb-related proteins p107 and p130 (23, 24). The binding of E7 to Rb
brings about the release of E2F proteins from Rb-E2F complexes and is
also thought to target Rb for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis (25-27). When released from Rb, members of the E2F family
of transcription factors activate the transcription of genes required
for S phase, and overexpression of E2F-1 can induce apoptosis in
serum-starved cells (28, 29). The repression of E7 transcription by E2
might therefore be expected to reduce the levels of free E2F, leading
to cell cycle arrest (see Fig. 1). Expression of BPV1 E2 protein in
HeLa cells is accompanied by decreased levels of E2F-1 mRNA and
protein and by reduced expression of E2F-dependent genes
(16). However, expression of the HPV 16 E2 protein in SiHa cells is
accompanied by increased E2F activity (12). Furthermore, overexpression
of the HPV 31 E2 protein in NHK cells is accompanied by an increase in
E2F-1 mRNA levels (17). Another complication is that unlike BPV1
E2, which represses transcription, the HPV 16 and HPV 18 E2 proteins
have both been shown to activate transcription of the HPV 16 E6 and E7
oncogenes (8, 9). Any increase in the levels of E7 might be expected to
result in increased levels of free E2F and this could in turn lead to
cell death (12).
Models that seek to explain the effects of E2 proteins on cell
proliferation via transcriptional repression or activation of the E6
and E7 genes are obviously limited to HPV-positive cells. However, the
HPV 31 E2 protein appears to induce apoptosis in HPV-negative NHK cells
(17). Moreover, mutations in the HPV 16 long control region that block
the binding of E2 to the promoter proximal E2 sites and prevent
E2-mediated repression of E6 and E7 transcription do not fully relieve
the negative effects of E2 on transformation efficiency (6). These
reports suggest that E2 might influence cell proliferation
independently of its effects on the transcription of E6 and E7. To
address this issue, we have expressed the HPV 16 E2 protein in a
variety of cell lines. We show that this E2 protein can induce
apoptosis in both HPV-transformed and non-HPV-transformed cell lines.
In addition we show that the HPV 16 E2-induced apoptosis is
p53-dependent and that the DNA binding activity of this E2
protein is not required for the induction of cell death.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
The plasmids pCB6+p53 and pCB6+p53173L express
wild-type and mutant p53, respectively, and were kindly supplied by
Drs. Moshe Oren and Andy Phillips. Plasmid pCMX-GFP3 expresses green
fluorescent protein (GFP) and was kindly supplied by Dr. Jeremy
Tavaré. The pWEB plasmid was made by removing an
XhoI-EcoRI fragment carrying the cytomegalovirus
promoter from pUHD 15-1 and using this fragment to replace the
tetracycline-inducible promoter in pUHD 10-3. The HPV 16 E2, E6, and
E7 expression plasmids were produced by cloning the appropriate HPV
sequences into a unique EcoRI site in pWEB, immediately
downstream of the cytomegalovirus promoter.
The E2 gene was amplified by PCR (94 °C for 1 min, 53 °C for 3 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, for 30 cycles) from HPV 16 DNA template using the oligonucleotide primers E25'
(5'-CTACGAATTCATGGAGACTCTTTGCCAACG-3') and
E23' (5'-GATAGAATTCTCATATAGACATAAATCCAG-3'). These primers place EcoRI restriction sites
(highlighted in boldface) at the 5' and 3' ends of the E2 coding
sequence. The PCR product was cloned into the EcoRI site of
pWEB and sequenced using a panel of E2-specific sequencing primers to
check for the occurrence of any point mutations.
The E6 gene was amplified by PCR (95 °C for 1 min, 52 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 2 min, for 30 cycles) from HPV 16 template using
the primers E65'
(5'-TGAGAATTCATGCACCAAAAGAGAACTGCAATGTTTCAG-3') and
E63' (5'-ATCGAATTCTTACAGCTGGGTTTCTCTACG-3'). The PCR product was cloned into the EcoRI site of pWEB
and sequenced using a panel of E6-specific sequencing primers.
The E7 gene was amplified by PCR (94 °C for 1 min, 54 °C for 2 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, for 30 cycles) from HPV 16 template using
the primers E75'
(5'-TCGGAATTCATGCATGGAGATACACCTAC-3') and E73'
(5'-AGCGAATTCTTATGGTTTCTGAGAACAGATGG-3'). The
PCR product was cloned into pWEB and sequenced using the E7 PCR primers.
Mutated E2 constructs were generated using PCR-directed mutagenesis.
The plasmid pWEB-E2DBDm expresses a mutated E2 protein in
which three amino acids within the E2 DNA binding domain (Asn-296, Lys-299, and Arg-304) have been replaced by alanines. The mutations were introduced by PCR (94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 1 min, for 30 cycles) using the primers pWEB5' (5'-ACCTCCATAGAAGACACCGGG-3') and E2 m
(5'-CGACACTGCAGTATACAATGTACAATGCTTTTTAAATGCATATCTTAAACATGCTAAAGTAGCAGCATCACC-3') with pWEB-E2 as template. The bases in italics mismatch the E2 gene and introduce the mutations. The PCR product contains a
PstI site (highlighted in boldface) at its 3' end. This site
and an SstI site located within the cytomegalovirus promoter
were used to replace the wild-type E2 sequence in pWEB-E2 with the
mutated E2DBDm sequence. The entire PCR product was
sequenced using a panel of E2-specific sequencing primers to check for
the occurrence of any unwanted mutations.
The plasmid pWEB-E2Ct expresses a truncated E2 protein that lacks the
N-terminal amino acids of E2 from 1 to 279 but dimerizes and binds DNA
normally.2 To create this
mutant, HPV 16 sequences between base pairs 3592 and 3852 were
amplified by PCR (94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C
for 1 min, for 30 cycles) using the primers E2Ct5' (5'-GAAACAGAATTCATGAACTGTAATAGTAACACTACACCC-3')
and E23' with pWEB-E2 as template. These primers
place EcoRI restriction sites (boldface) at both ends of the
product and introduce a translation start codon (italics). The PCR
product was cloned into the EcoRI site in pWEB and sequenced
using E2-specific primers. The plasmid pWEB-E2CtDBDm
expresses a DNA binding-defective version of E2Ct. This plasmid was
produced exactly as described for pWEB-E2Ct except that
pWEB-E2DBDm was used as template in the PCR.
The 86-amino acid E2Ct and E2CtDBDm proteins were expressed
in Escherichia coli XL1-blue cells using the expression
vector pKK223-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The sequences encoding E2Ct and E2CtDBDm were excised as EcoRI
fragments from pWEB-E2Ct and pWEB-E2CtDBDm, respectively,
and cloned into a unique EcoRI site downstream of the
Ptac promoter in pKK223-3. The inserts were sequenced
using E2-specific and pKK223-3-specific primers.
Protein Purification and Circular Dichroism
Spectroscopy--
E. coli XL1-blue cells containing either
pKK-E2Ct or pKK-E2CtDBDm were grown to an
A600 nm of 0.5. Protein expression was then
induced with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside, and the cells
incubated at 37 °C overnight. The cells were harvested by
centrifugation, resuspended in 50 mM Tris-acetate-EDTA
buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 1%
2-mercaptoethanol and then lysed by sonication at 4 °C. The cell
lysate was cleared by centrifugation (15,000 × g for
30 min at 4 °C) and then incubated with 0·1% DNase I for 30 min
at 20 °C. The cell extract was dialyzed for 3 h against 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.7) containing 1%
2-mercaptoethanol and then recentrifuged. The supernatant was loaded
onto an S-Sepharose cation exchange medium column equilibrated in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.7) containing 10 mM
dithiothreitol. After washing with 50 column volumes of phosphate
buffer, the E2 protein was eluted using a linear gradient of 0.2-1
M NaCl in the same buffer over 500 ml (at 1 ml/min).
Protein peaks (detected by A280 nm) were
collected and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
gel retardation assays (data not shown). Pooled E2 fractions were
dialyzed against 10 volumes of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.7) containing 10 mM dithiothreitol for 3 h and then
applied to a MonoS HR 16/10 cation exchange fast protein liquid
chromatography column equilibrated in the same buffer. E2 was eluted
with a 0.1-1 M NaCl gradient and dialyzed against 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.9) containing 1 mM dithiothreitol for 3 h before being snap frozen and
stored at 70 °C. Isolelectric points (pI) and molecular weight
values were determined from the amino acid sequences of wild-type (pI
9.7; Mr 10016.6) and mutant E2 (pI 9.4;
Mr 9831.4) using Expasy Tools. Molecular weights
were confirmed on a VG Quattro triple quadrupole mass spectrophotometer
with electrospray ionization. Structural integrity was confirmed using
far-UV and near-UV circular dichroism spectroscopy on a Jobin Yvon CD6
spectropolarimeter using a 0.05-cm path length with a 0.5-nm resolution
at 1 nm/min.
Gel Retardation Assays--
A double-stranded oligonucleotide
(100 ng) corresponding to the sequence of the HPV 16 E2 site 1 from
nucleotides 46 to 65 (5'-TTGAACCGAAACCGGTTAGT-3') was end labeled with
[ -32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase.
Unincorporated label was removed using a Sephadex G-50 column
(Stratagene). Labeled oligonucleotides (10,000 cpm) were incubated with
purified proteins in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9),
25 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, 10% glycerol, 0.5 µg/µl bovine serum albumin, 80 ng/µl
poly[d(I·C)]). After 20 min at 20 °C, free and bound labeled DNA
were resolved on 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels run in 0.5× TBE
and visualized by autoradiography. Heterodimers between wild-type E2Ct
and E2CtDBDm were formed by mixing and denaturing the
proteins in 3 M urea (1 h at 20 °C) and then refolding by dilution to 0.1 M urea in binding buffer. The DNA
binding activity of the heterodimers was assayed exactly as described above.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
SiHa, C33a, and COS-7 cells
were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma) and penicillin (100 000 units/liter) and streptomycin (100 mg/liter). NIH 3T3 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% calf serum (Sigma) and penicillin/streptomycin. HeLa cells were
maintained in minimal essential medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. 866, 873, 877, 915, and 808F cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
5% fetal bovine serum, penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM
L-glutamine, 5 µg/ml insulin, 0.01 µg/ml epidermal
growth factor, 0.01 µg/ml cholera toxin, and 0.4 µg/ml
hydrocortisone. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in 5%
CO2.
Prior to transient transfection, cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/well onto coverslips in six-well plates and
incubated overnight to obtain a subconfluent culture. The
liposome-based reagents Tfx-50 (for SiHa and NIH3T3 cells) and Tfx-20
(for all other cell lines) (Promega) were used at a 3:1 liposome:DNA
ratio in 1 ml of serum-free media per transfection, according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The DNAs used in each transfection are
described in the text above. After 18 h (E7 experiments) or
30 h (E2 experiments), the coverslips were washed in
phosphate-buffered saline, and the cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde/phosphate-buffered saline at 22 °C for 30 min.
Following further washes with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were
stained with bisbenzimide (Hoechst no. 33258, Sigma) for 30 min before
being washed in phosphate-buffered saline and mounted onto microscope
slides in 10 µl of MOWIOL (Calbiochem).
Fluorescence Microscopy and Imaging--
Fluorescence microscopy
was carried out using a Leica DM IRBE inverted epifluorescent
microscope fitted with fluorescein isothiocyanate and
4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole filter sets and a × 20 air objective (Leica). Imaging was carried out using a Leica DM IRBE inverted confocal microscope using a × 40 oil objective (Leica) and TCS-NT4 software (Leica).
 |
RESULTS |
In our previous work, we looked at the effects of E2 expression in
SiHa cells using stable cell lines that carry the HPV 16 E2 gene under
the control of the heavy metal-inducible metallothionein promoter (12).
The induction of E2 expression in these cells resulted in reduced cell
proliferation and increased levels of cell death. The E2-induced cell
death showed several of the features characteristic of apoptosis
including: blebbing of the plasma membrane, chromatin condensation, and
the appearance of cell fragments with sub-G0 DNA content
(12). Using this approach to look at the effects of E2 expression in a
variety of cell lines would require the production of numerous stable
cell lines. Because we know that the E2 protein can induce apoptosis in
at least some cell lines, this would be a time-consuming and difficult
task. In addition, to extend our work we also wanted to look at the effects of expressing E6 and E7, either individually or in conjunction with E2. To this end, we have used transient transfection to express the HPV 16 E2, E6, and E7 proteins in different cell lines.
The HPV 16 E2 and E7 Proteins Induce Apoptosis in HeLa
Cells--
The plasmids pWEB-E2, pWEB-E6, and pWEB-E7 express the HPV
16 E2, E6, and E7 proteins, respectively. Each of these plasmids was
transiently transfected into HeLa cells growing on coverslips using
liposomes (Fig. 2). In each experiment,
the plasmid pCMX-GFP3 was co-transfected into the cells; pCMX-GFP3
expresses the GFP and allows transfected cells to be identified by
their fluorescence upon excitation through a fluorescein isothiocyanate
filter set. Because GFP is expressed uniformly throughout the
transfected cell, it also allows the assessment of cellular morphology
(Fig. 2b). The cells were stained with bisbenzimide (Hoechst
stain), which enters the nuclei of all of the cells present, regardless of their transfection status, and allows a comparison of chromatin condensation between untransfected cells and transfected cells within
the population (Fig. 2c). Individual cells were scored as
untransfected or transfected using GFP and then assessed for chromatin
condensation and membrane blebbing using Hoechst stain and GFP,
respectively. A typical transfected cell that is undergoing apoptosis
is indicated in Fig. 2. The percentage of untransfected cells and
transfected cells undergoing apoptosis was determined by counting. At
least 100 untransfected cells and 100 transfected cells were counted,
and each experiment was repeated a minimum of three times. Although
this method is laborious, it is more reliable than other methods used
to count apoptotic cells and allows the assessment of individual
cells.

View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
E2 induces chromatin condensation and
membrane blebbing in HeLa cells. A representative group of HeLa
cells visualized using a × 40 oil immersion lens fitted to an
epifluorescent microscope: a, bright field microscopy;
b, GFP fluorescence (transfected cells were identified using
an fluorescein isothiocyanate filter set); c,
4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole fluorescence. Chromatin was visualized
using bisbenzimide (Hoechst stain) and a 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole
filter set. In each panel, the same apoptotic cell is indicated by the
arrowhead. Membrane blebbing is seen in a and
b. Chromatin condensation is seen in c.
|
|
The percentage of apoptotic HeLa cells seen after transient
transfection with the E2-, E6-, and E7-expressing plasmids is shown in
Fig. 3. In each experiment, around 5% of
the untransfected cells and around 5% of the cells transfected with
the empty pWEB vector are apoptotic. Both the E2 and the E7 expression
plasmids produced a significant increase in the levels of apoptosis
within the transfected population (Fig. 3, a and
b, respectively). In contrast, the E6 expression plasmid had
little or no effect (Fig. 3c). The amount of plasmid
required for the maximum induction of cell death and the time at which
maximum death is observed differ between the E2- and E7-expressing
plasmids. E2-induced apoptosis occurs maximally after around 30 h
and with 300 ng of expression plasmid, whereas E7-induced apoptosis
occurs maximally after around 18 h and with 800 ng of expression
plasmid (not shown). These data demonstrate that the HPV 16 E2 and E7
proteins both induce apoptosis in HeLa cells. We next set out to
determine whether these proteins can induce apoptosis in other cell
lines.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
E2 and E7 but not E6 induce apoptosis in HeLa
cells. a, the GFP-expressing plasmid pCMX-GFP3 and
increasing amounts of either pWEB or pWEB-E2 were transiently
transfected into HeLa cells. Apoptotic cells in the transfected and
untransfected populations were identified as shown in Fig. 2. The
transfection was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three
times. In b and c, the experiment shown in
a was repeated using pWEB-E7 and pWEB-E6, respectively, in
place of pWEB-E2.
|
|
E2 and E7 Induce Apoptosis in Both HPV-transformed and
Non-HPV-transformed Cell Lines--
We assayed the ability of the HPV
16 E2 and E7 proteins to induce apoptosis in six HPV-transformed cell
lines and four non-HPV-transformed cell lines. The results of this
comparison are shown in Table I. In each
experiment, the transfection efficiency varied from 5 to 10% depending
on the cell line. Both E2 and E7 induced high levels of apoptosis in
HeLa cells and SiHa cells, which are HPV 18- and HPV 16-transformed
cervical carcinoma cell lines, respectively. Both E2 and E7 also
induced high levels of apoptosis in human 866, 873, 877, and 915 keratinocytes: 866 cells and 915 cells contain HPV 16, 873 cells
contain HPV 18, and 877 cells contain both HPV 18 and HPV 45 (31).3 Interestingly, both E2
and E7 failed to induce apoptosis in either C33a cells or COS-7 cells,
a non-HPV-transformed cervical carcinoma cell line and an
SV40-transformed monkey fibroblast cell line, respectively. However, E2
and E7 did induce high levels of apoptosis in two other HPV-negative
cell lines: 808F cells and NIH3T3 cells, which are a human fibroblast
cell line and a mouse fibroblast cell line, respectively. Thus, E2 is
capable of inducing apoptosis in at least two HPV-negative cell lines.
Another striking feature of these results is that all the cell lines
induced to undergo apoptosis by E2 are also induced to undergo
apoptosis by E7. Similarly, the cell lines that are not sensitive to E2
expression are not sensitive to E7 expression. These data suggest that
E2 and E7 induce apoptotic cell death via the same pathway or via
pathways that converge at some point.
All of the cell lines that were seen to undergo apoptosis in response
to E2 or E7 expression are thought to contain wild-type p53. For
example, NIH 3T3 cells contain wild-type p53 and can undergo
p53-dependent apoptosis (32). In contrast, C33a cells contain mutated p53 (33), and these cells fail to undergo apoptosis in
response to either E2 or E7. Although COS-7 cells contain wild-type p53, these cells express the SV40 T antigen, which has been shown previously to efficiently sequester p53 (34). To determine whether p53
plays a role in E2 and/or E7-induced cell death, we next looked at the
effects of a trans-dominant negative p53 mutant and expression of the
HPV 16 E6 protein on the levels of apoptosis in cells expressing these proteins.
E2 and E7 Induce Apoptosis via a p53-dependent
Pathway--
HeLa cells were transiently co-transfected with pWEB-E2
or pWEB-E7 and either pCB6+p53, which expresses wild-type p53, or pCB6+p53173L, which expresses a trans-dominant negative p53 mutant. Co-expression of wild-type p53 increased the levels of apoptosis induced by both E2 and E7 by almost 50% (Fig.
4a, compare columns 4 and 5 to columns 7 and 8). In
contrast, co-expression of the trans-dominant negative p53173L mutant
decreased the level of apoptosis induced by both E2 and E7 to near the
basal level (Fig. 4a, columns 6 and 9, respectively). These data suggest that the apoptosis induced by the HPV
16 E2 and E7 proteins occurs through a p53-dependent
pathway. To confirm this conclusion, HeLa cells were transiently
co-transfected with pWEB-E2 or pWEB-E7 and either pWEB-E6 or the empty
pWEB vector. The HPV 16 E6 protein binds p53 in conjunction with the E3
ubiquitin ligase enzyme E6-AP, and this results in the degradation of
p53 via a ubiquitin-dependent protease (19, 35). The
addition of increasing amounts of the pWEB-E6 plasmid resulted in a
gradual decrease in the level of E2-induced apoptosis (Fig.
4b). Similarly, the level of apoptosis induced by the E7
protein was also significantly reduced by the co-expression of E6 (Fig.
4c). In the presence of large amounts of pWEB-E6, the levels
of both E2- and E7-induced apoptosis were reduced to around the basal
level. Taken together, these results firmly establish that functional
p53 is required for apoptosis induced by both the HPV 16 E2 protein and
the HPV 16 E7 protein.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
E2- and E7-induced apoptosis is
p53-dependent. a, HeLa cells were transiently
transfected with the GFP-expressing plasmid pCMX-GFP3; either pWEB
(columns 1-3), pWEB-E2 (columns 4-6), or
pWEB-E7 (columns 7-9); and either 200 ng of pCB6+p53, which
expresses wild-type p53 (wt), or 200 ng of pCB6+p53173L,
which expresses mutant p53 (mt). Apoptotic cells were
identified as in Fig. 2. The transfection was performed in duplicate
and repeated three times. b, 300 ng of pWEB-E2 and
increasing amounts of pWEB-E6 were transiently transfected into HeLa
cells. Details as in Fig. 3. c, 800 ng of pWEB-E7 and
increasing amounts of pWEB-E6 were transiently transfected into HeLa
cells. Details as in Fig. 3.
|
|
The DNA Binding Activity of E2 Is Not Required for the Induction of
Apoptosis--
Although there are several plausible mechanisms whereby
E7 overexpression could result in apoptosis, the route from E2
overexpression to apoptosis is unclear. We originally proposed that in
SiHa cells, E2 might increase transcription of the integrated E7
oncogene and that this might result in E7-induced cell death. However, here we have shown that E2 can induce apoptosis in at least two non-HPV-transformed cell lines (Table I). These data imply that E2 does
not kill cells simply by activating transcription of E7. To confirm
this hypothesis we placed three point mutations within the E2 DNA
binding domain (DBD) at positions known to be important for protein-DNA
interactions. The crystal structures of the HPV 16 E2 DBD and the BPV1
E2 DBD-DNA complex suggest that amino acids Asn-296, Lys-299, and
Arg-304 within the HPV 16 E2 DBD are critical for the recognition of
specific E2 binding sites (36, 37). Using site-directed mutagenesis, we
replaced all three of these amino acids with alanines. The mutations
were introduced in the context of both the full-length E2 protein and
the E2 DNA binding domain alone.
To establish that these mutations abolish DNA binding activity without
disrupting the overall folding of the E2 DBD, we expressed both the
wild-type DBD and the mutated DBD in bacteria. The plasmid pKK-E2Ct
expresses a truncated E2 protein (amino acids 280-365) that can
dimerize and bind DNA normally.2 The plasmid
pKK-E2CtDBDm expresses the equivalent E2 fragment containing the N296A, K299A, and R304A mutations. The E2Ct and E2CtDBDm proteins were purified from bacteria carrying the
respective plasmids (Fig. 5a). Circular
dichroism (CD) was then used to test whether the presence of the
mutations altered the folding or dimerization of the E2 DBD. The CD
spectra for the E2Ct and E2CtDBDm proteins (Fig. 5,
b and c) are very similar. This implies that the
mutations have little or no effect on these properties. Fig.
5d shows the results of a gel retardation assay in which
increasing amounts of the E2Ct protein (lanes 2-4) or the
E2CtDBDm protein (lanes 5-7) were added to
labeled oligonucleotides carrying an E2 binding site. As can be seen
from Fig. 5, E2Ct binds tightly to the labeled DNA, whereas
E2CtDBDm exhibits no detectable binding to this site.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
E2Ct mutated at Asn-296, Lys-299, and Arg-304
folds and dimerizes but fails to bind DNA. a, samples of
purified E2Ct and E2CtDBDm were analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The sizes of the markers used
are indicated at the left (in thousands). b and
c, circular dichroism was used to determine whether the
presence of the Asn-296, Lys-299, and Arg-304 mutations affected the
folding or dimerization of E2CtDBDm. d,
increasing amounts (10, 50, and 250 nM, respectively) of
E2Ct (lanes 2-4) or E2CtDBDm (lanes
5-7) were added to labeled oligonucleotides carrying E2 binding
site 1 from the HPV 16 genome: E2(1). Free and bound DNA was separated
on a 6% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. The
E2Ct-E2(1) complex is indicated by an arrowhead.
|
|
To determine whether the DNA binding activity of E2 is required for the
induction of cell death, we transiently transfected HeLa cells with
plasmids expressing either the wild-type full-length E2 protein
(pWEB-E2) or full-length E2 carrying the N296A, K299A, and R304A
mutations (pWEB-E2DBDm). Somewhat surprisingly, the pWEB-E2
and pWEB-E2DBDm plasmids induced almost identical levels of
cell death (Fig. 6). In contrast, the
plasmid pWEB-E2Ct, which expresses the E2 DBD alone and therefore lacks
the N-terminal transcription activation domain, failed to induce cell
death (Fig. 6). Thus, although the sequence-specific DNA binding
activity of E2 is not required for the induction of apoptosis in HeLa
cells, the N-terminal transcription activation domain is indispensable. To confirm and extend these conclusions, we next looked at the ability
of E2 heterodimers to induce cell death.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
DNA binding is not required for the induction
of apoptosis. The GFP-expressing plasmid pCMX-GFP3 and increasing
amounts of either pWEB-E2, pWEB-E2DBDm, or pWEB-E2Ct were
transiently transfected into HeLa cells. Apoptotic cells were
identified as shown in Fig. 2. The transfection was performed in
duplicate and repeated three times.
|
|
Two Functional N-terminal Domains Are Required for E2-induced Cell
Death--
The BPV1 E2 and E2-TR proteins have previously been shown
to form heterodimers (11). Although these heterodimers are reported to
bind DNA in vitro, they fail to activate transcription in
intact cells (11). In view of this, we wanted to determine whether the
HPV 16 E2 and E2Ct proteins would form heterodimers and whether these
heterodimers would be capable of inducing cell death. To ascertain
whether or not heterodimers could be formed in vitro, we
mixed a fixed amount of wild-type E2Ct, with increasing amounts of the
DNA binding defective E2CtDBDm protein. To facilitate the exchange of subunits, we added 3 M urea to denature both of
the homodimeric proteins and then diluted the urea to 0.1 M
to allow refolding and the random assortment of partners. The DNA
binding activity of the refolded proteins was then determined using a gel retardation assay (Fig.
7a). As expected, refolded
E2Ct bound to a labeled oligonucleotide carrying an E2 site, whereas
refolded E2CtDBDm showed no DNA binding activity (Fig.
7a, lanes 3 and 4, respectively). Adding
increasing amounts of E2CtDBDm to a fixed amount of E2Ct
resulted in a gradual decline in DNA binding activity (Fig. 7a,
lanes 5-8). These data show that at least in this in vitro assay, these E2 proteins can form heterdimers.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
E2-E2Ct heterodimers do not induce apoptosis.
a, the amounts of E2Ct and E2CtDBDm indicated in
the figure were mixed and then denatured in 3 M urea. After
refolding by dilution into 0.1 M urea, the proteins were
added to labeled oligonucleotides carrying the HPV 16 E2 binding site 1 (E2(1)). Free and bound DNA was separated on a 6% polyacrylamide gel
and visualized by autoradiography. The E2Ct-E2(1) complex is indicated
by an arrowhead. b, HeLa cells were transiently
transfected with pWEB-E2 and increasing amounts of the empty pWEB
plasmid (open squares), pWEB-E2Ct and increasing amounts of
pWEB (filled circles), or pWEB-E2 and increasing amounts of
pWEB-E2Ct (filled squares). Apoptotic cells were identified
as in Fig. 2, and the transfection was performed in duplicate and
repeated three times.
|
|
To investigate the formation of heterodimers in intact cells, we
transiently co-transfected pWEB-E2 into HeLa cells along with
increasing amounts of pWEB-E2Ct and determined the percentage of
apoptotic cells exactly as described above. As expected, the pWEB-E2
plasmid induced high levels of cell death in the transfected population, whereas the pWEB-E2Ct plasmid had no effect (Fig. 7b). However, as increasing amounts of the pWEB-E2Ct plasmid
were added to a transfection mixture containing pWEB-E2, the percentage of apoptotic cells in the transfected population showed a steady decline and eventually reached background levels (Fig. 7b).
Increasing amounts of the pWEB-E2CtDBDm plasmid also
decreased the level of pWEB-E2-induced cell death, whereas increasing
amounts of the empty pWEB plasmid had no effect (not shown). Taken
together, these data suggest that heterodimers containing E2 and E2Ct
form in intact cells and that these heterodimers are incapable of
inducing apoptosis. Thus, it appears that the E2 dimer requires two
functional N-terminal domains in order to induce cell death.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The E2 proteins from HPV 16, HPV 18, and BPV1 all have dramatic
effects on the proliferation and/or survival of cervical carcinoma cell
lines (12-14). We previously proposed that the HPV 16 E2 protein induces apoptosis in HPV 16-transformed SiHa cells by activating transcription of the viral E7 gene (12). In contrast, others have
proposed that the HPV 18 E2 protein induces apoptosis in HPV
18-transformed HeLa cells by repressing transcription of the viral E6
and E7 genes (13). Here we have shown that the HPV 16 E2 protein
induces apoptosis in two non-HPV-transformed cell lines, supporting the
demonstration that the HPV 31 E2 protein appears to induce apoptosis in
HPV-negative NHK cells (17). These data show that neither of the above
mechanisms can be entirely correct. Either the E2 proteins induce
apoptosis independently of the HPV genome or these proteins induce
apoptosis via two pathways: one requiring other HPV proteins and one
independent of other HPV proteins.
The E7 protein has been extensively studied, primarily as an
oncoprotein, but also as an inducer of apoptosis. For example, E7 has
been shown to sensitize keratinocytes to undergo both spontaneous apoptosis and apoptosis in response to tumor necrosis factor (38).
There is evidence to suggest that E7-induced apoptosis occurs via
p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways (39, 40, 38).
Here we have shown that in HeLa cells, overexpression of the HPV 16 E7
protein induces apoptosis. The E7-induced apoptosis can be abrogated by
overexpression of the HPV 16 E6 protein or by expression of a
trans-dominant negative mutant of p53. These findings strongly suggest
that the HPV 16 E7 protein induces p53-dependent apoptosis
in these cells. Some controversy has surrounded the role of p53 in
E2-induced cell death. For example, expression of the BPV1 E2 protein
in HeLa cells has been reported to stabilize p53 (16, 13), whereas
expression of the HPV 31 E2 protein in NHK cells has been reported to
destabilize p53 (17). We have shown that, like E7, the HPV 16 E2
protein induces apoptosis in HeLa cells and that this apoptosis is
p53-dependent. Both E7 and E2 induce apoptosis in cells
that contain the HPV 16 E6 gene. Given that E6 binds to p53 and that
this interaction results in a decrease in the half-life of p53
(18-21), this might seem remarkable. However, p53 activity has been
demonstrated in several HPV-positive cell lines (13, 41, 42). For
example, treatment of SiHa and HeLa cells with genotoxic agents results
in increased nuclear p53 levels, increased binding of p53 to a p53
recognition site, and increased expression of the p53-responsive
WAF1/CIP1 gene (42).
The E2 proteins bind to specific DNA sequences and regulate viral gene
expression. We have shown that the sequence-specific DNA binding
activity of the HPV 16 E2 protein is not required for the induction of
apoptosis in HeLa cells. In contrast, the N-terminal domain, including
the transcription activation domain and the hinge region, is essential
for the promotion of cell death. The E2 protein from BPV1 has been
shown to arrest the growth of HeLa cells (14, 15). Growth arrest by
BPV1 E2 requires a functional DNA binding domain and a functional
transcription activation domain (43). These data suggest that the
induction of apoptosis by the HPV 16 E2 protein and the induction of
growth arrest by the BPV1 E2 protein, are brought about by two separate
pathways. Presumably, growth arrest brought about by the BPV1 E2
protein requires transcriptional regulation of the integrated HPV
oncogenes. Thus, BPV1 E2-induced growth arrest could be the result of
transcriptional repression of the integrated E6 and E7 genes (43).
However, it is important to point out that BPV1 E2 could arrest growth
via the regulation of cellular genes. Interestingly, functional
transcription activation domains are required for efficient repression
of transcription by BPV1 E2, as well as for efficient activation of
transcription (11, 43). Repression of E6 transcription would be
expected to result in increased levels of p53, and this could lead to
p53-dependent apoptosis (16, 13). In contrast, the
induction of apoptosis by HPV 16 E2 occurs independently of its DNA
binding activity and independently of the presence of integrated HPV
sequences. Although at present we do not know how the HPV 16 E2 protein
induces apoptosis, the mechanism probably involves changes in E2F
activity. Overexpression of the HPV 16 E2 protein in SiHa cells has
been shown to result in increased E2F activity (12), as has
overexpression of the HPV 31 E2 protein in NHK cells (17). Like HPV 16 E2, the E2F-1 protein can induce p53-dependent apoptosis
(28, 29).
Using E2 heterodimers, we have shown that two functional transcription
activation domains are required for the induction of apoptosis by the
HPV 16 E2 protein. Similar heterodimer experiments with BPV1 E2 and
BPV1 E2-TR showed that two functional activation domains are required
for efficient transcription activation (11). Why two activation domains
per E2 dimer should be essential for either transcription activation or
the induction of apoptosis is not known. However, the activation
domains of BPV1 E2 mediate cooperative interactions between E2 dimers
and bring about the formation of DNA loops (30). Two functional
transcription activation domains per dimer might be required to bring
about these interactions and/or contacts with other proteins involved
in transcription or apoptosis.
In conclusion, although further work is required to elucidate the path
that links E2 to cell death, our findings have clear implications for
the role that the loss of this protein plays in the natural history of
cervical cancer. We have shown that the HPV 16 E2 protein brings about
apoptosis in the absence of other HPV gene products and that this
E2-induced apoptosis is p53-dependent. Integration of the
HPV genome into the host chromosome and the consequent disruption of
the E2 gene removes this proapoptotic signal. Because the integrated
HPV sequences continue to produce the E6 and E7 proteins, these cells
continue to proliferate and are likely to form cervical tumors.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council Ph.D. studentship.
§
Recipient of a United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences
Research Council and Generic Biologicals Ltd. Cooperative Awards in
Science and Engineering Ph.D. studentship.
¶
Present address: School of Biological Sciences, University of
Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, United Kingdom.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0117-954-6852;
Fax: 0117-928-8274; E-mail: Kevin.Gaston@Bristol.ac.uk.
2
Lewis, H., and Gaston, K. (1999) J. Mol.
Biol. 294, 885-896
3
P. Stern, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPV, human
papillomavirus;
BPV, bovine papillomavirus;
DBD, DNA binding domain;
DBDm, mutated DNA binding domain;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
NHK
cell, normal human foreskin keratinocyte;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
TR, trans repressor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
zur Hausen, H.
(1991)
Virology
184,
9-13[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Campo, M. S.,
Jarrett, W. F. H.,
Barron, R.,
O'Neil, B. W.,
and Smith, K. T.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
6898-6904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Campo, M. S.,
O'Neill, B. W.,
Barron, R. J.,
and Jarrett, W. F. H.
(1994)
Carcinogenesis
15,
1597-1601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Crook, T.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1996)
in
Papillomavirus Reviews: Current Research on Papillomaviruses
(Lacey, C., ed)
, pp. 55-60, Leeds University Press, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
| 5.
|
Baker, C. C.,
Phelps, W. C.,
Lindgren, V.,
Braun, M. J.,
Gonda, M. A.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
962-971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Romanczuk, H.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3159-3163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Thierry, F.
(1996)
in
Papillomavirus Reviews: Current Research on Papillomaviruses
(Lacey, C., ed)
, pp. 21-29, Leeds University Press, Leeds, United Kingdom
|
| 8.
|
Bouvard, V.,
Storey, A.,
Pim, D.,
and Banks, L.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5451-5459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Kovelman, R.,
Bilter, G. K.,
Glezer, E.,
Tsou, A. Y.,
and Barbosa, M. S.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
7549-7560[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Giri, I.,
and Yaniv, M.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2823-2829[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Barsoum, J.,
Prakash, S. S.,
Han, P.,
and Androphy, E. J.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
3941-3945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Sanchez-Perez, A.-M.,
Soriano, S.,
Clarke, A. R.,
and Gaston, K.
(1997)
J. Gen. Virol.
78,
3009-3018[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Desaintes, C.,
Demeret, C.,
Goyat, S.,
Yaniv, M.,
and Thierry, F.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
504-514[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hwang, E.-S.,
Riese, D. J., II,
Settleman, J.,
Nilson, L. A.,
Honig, J.,
Flynn, S.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
3720-3729[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Dowhanick, J. J.,
McBride, A. A.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
7791-7799[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Hwang, E.-S.,
Naeger, L. K.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
795-803[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Frattini, M. G.,
Hurst, S. D.,
Lim, H. B.,
Swaminathan, S.,
and Laimins, L. A.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
318-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Werness, B. A.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1990)
Science
248,
76-79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Scheffner, M.,
Werness, B. A.,
Huibregtse, J. M.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1990)
Cell
63,
1129-1136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lechner, M. S.,
Mack, D. H.,
Finicle, A. B.,
Crook, T.,
Vousden, K. H.,
and Laimins, L. A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
3045-3052[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Hubbert, N. L.,
Sedman, S. A.,
and Schiller, J. T.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
6237-6241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Gottlieb, T. M.,
and Oren, M.
(1998)
Semin. Cancer Biol.
8,
359-368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Dyson, N.,
Howley, P. M.,
Münger, K.,
and Harlow, E.
(1989)
Science
243,
934-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Hu, T.,
Ferril, S. C.,
Snider, A.-M.,
and Barbosa, M. S.
(1995)
Int. J. Oncol.
6,
167-174
|
| 25.
|
Boyer, S. N.,
Wazer, D. E.,
and Band, V.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4620-4624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Jones, D. L.,
and Münger, K.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
2905-2912[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Jones, D. L.,
Thompson, D. A.,
and Münger, K.
(1997)
Virology
239,
97-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Wu, X.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3602-3606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Qin, X.-Q.,
Livingston, D. M.,
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.,
and Adams, P. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10918-10922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Knight, J. D.,
Li, R.,
and Botchan, M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3204-3208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Bartholomew, J. S.,
Glenville, S.,
Sarkar, S.,
Burt, D. J.,
Stanley, M. A.,
Ruiz-Cabello, F.,
Chengang, J.,
Garrido, F.,
and Stern, P. L.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
937-942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Chirillo, P.,
Pagano, S.,
Natoli, G.,
Puri, P. L.,
Burgio, V. L.,
Balsano, C.,
and Levrero, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8162-8167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Crook, T.,
Wrede, D.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
873-875[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Farmer, G.,
Bargonetti, J.,
Zhu, H.,
Friedman, P.,
Prywes, R.,
and Prives, C.
(1992)
Nature
358,
83-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Huibregtse, J. M.,
Scheffner, M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
4129-4135[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
and Androphy, E. J.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
284,
1479-1489[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
Grossman, S. R.,
Laimins, L. A.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1992)
Nature
359,
505-512[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Stöppler, H.,
Stöppler, M. C.,
Johnson, E.,
Simbulan-Rosenthal, C. M.,
Smulson, M. E.,
Iyer, S.,
Rosenthal, D. S.,
and Schlegel, R.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1207-1214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Howes, K. A.,
Ransom, N.,
Papermaster, D. S.,
Lasudry, J. G. H.,
Albert, D. M.,
and Windle, J. J.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1300-1310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Pan, H.,
and Griep, A. E.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1285-1299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Scheffner, M.,
Münger, K.,
Byrne, J. C.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5523-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Butz, K.,
Shahabeddin, L.,
Geisen, C.,
Spitkovsky, D.,
Ullmann, A.,
and Hoppe-Seyler, F.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
927-936[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Goodwin, E. C.,
Naeger, L. K.,
Breiding, D. E.,
Androphy, E. J.,
and DiMaio, D.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
3925-3934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mole, S. G. Milligan, and S. V. Graham
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E2 Protein Transcriptionally Activates the Promoter of a Key Cellular Splicing Factor, SF2/ASF
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2009;
83(1):
357 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Johung, E. C. Goodwin, and D. DiMaio
Human Papillomavirus E7 Repression in Cervical Carcinoma Cells Initiates a Transcriptional Cascade Driven by the Retinoblastoma Family, Resulting in Senescence
J. Virol.,
March 1, 2007;
81(5):
2102 - 2116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.T. Herdman, M. R. Pett, I. Roberts, W. O.F. Alazawi, A. E. Teschendorff, X.-Y. Zhang, M. A. Stanley, and N. Coleman
Interferon-{beta} treatment of cervical keratinocytes naturally infected with human papillomavirus 16 episomes promotes rapid reduction in episome numbers and emergence of latent integrants
Carcinogenesis,
November 1, 2006;
27(11):
2341 - 2353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Parish, A. Kowalczyk, H.-T. Chen, G. E. Roeder, R. Sessions, M. Buckle, and K. Gaston
E2 Proteins from High- and Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Types Differ in Their Ability To Bind p53 and Induce Apoptotic Cell Death
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2006;
80(9):
4580 - 4590.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gammoh, H. S. Grm, P. Massimi, and L. Banks
Regulation of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Activity through Direct Protein Interaction with the E2 Transcriptional Activator
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2006;
80(4):
1787 - 1797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Oliveira, L. A. Colf, and A. A. McBride
Variations in the association of papillomavirus E2 proteins with mitotic chromosomes
PNAS,
January 24, 2006;
103(4):
1047 - 1052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Wise-Draper, H. V. Allen, M. N. Thobe, E. E. Jones, K. B. Habash, K. Munger, and S. I. Wells
The Human DEK Proto-Oncogene Is a Senescence Inhibitor and an Upregulated Target of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus E7
J. Virol.,
November 15, 2005;
79(22):
14309 - 14317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Blachon, S. Bellanger, C. Demeret, and F. Thierry
Nucleo-cytoplasmic Shuttling of High Risk Human Papillomavirus E2 Proteins Induces Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 28, 2005;
280(43):
36088 - 36098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. M. Zhang, J. Yuan, P. Cheung, D. Chau, B. W. Wong, B. M. McManus, and D. Yang
Gamma Interferon-Inducible Protein 10 Induces HeLa Cell Apoptosis through a p53-Dependent Pathway Initiated by Suppression of Human Papillomavirus Type 18 E6 and E7 Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2005;
25(14):
6247 - 6258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. McPhillips, T. Veerapraditsin, S. A. Cumming, D. Karali, S. G. Milligan, W. Boner, I. M. Morgan, and S. V. Graham
SF2/ASF Binds the Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Late RNA Control Element and Is Regulated during Differentiation of Virus-Infected Epithelial Cells
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2004;
78(19):
10598 - 10605.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Raj, S. Berguerand, S. Southern, J. Doorbar, and P. Beard
E1{wedge}E4 Protein of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Associates with Mitochondria
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2004;
78(13):
7199 - 7207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Ordonez, A. M. Espinosa, D. J. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Armendariz-Borunda, and J. Berumen
Enhanced oncogenicity of Asian-American human papillomavirus 16 is associated with impaired E2 repression of E6/E7 oncogene transcription
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2004;
85(6):
1433 - 1444.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Horner, R. A. DeFilippis, L. Manuelidis, and D. DiMaio
Repression of the Human Papillomavirus E6 Gene Initiates p53-Dependent, Telomerase-Independent Senescence and Apoptosis in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cells
J. Virol.,
April 15, 2004;
78(8):
4063 - 4073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Piroddi, C Tesi, M A Pellegrino, L S Tobacman, E Homsher, and C Poggesi
Contractile effects of the exchange of cardiac troponin for fast skeletal troponin in rabbit psoas single myofibrils
J. Physiol.,
November 1, 2003;
552(3):
917 - 931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Davidson, P. Sehr, R. L. Faulkner, J. L. Parish, K. Gaston, R. A. Moore, M. Pawlita, H. C. Kitchener, and P. L. Stern
Human papillomavirus type 16 E2- and L1-specific serological and T-cell responses in women with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
J. Gen. Virol.,
August 1, 2003;
84(8):
2089 - 2097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. S. Hall and K. A. Alexander
RNA Interference of Human Papillomavirus Type 18 E6 and E7 Induces Senescence in HeLa Cells
J. Virol.,
May 15, 2003;
77(10):
6066 - 6069.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Hadaschik, K. Hinterkeuser, M. Oldak, H. J. Pfister, and S. Smola-Hess
The Papillomavirus E2 Protein Binds to and Synergizes with C/EBP Factors Involved in Keratinocyte Differentiation
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2003;
77(9):
5253 - 5265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. DeFilippis, E. C. Goodwin, L. Wu, and D. DiMaio
Endogenous Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 Proteins Differentially Regulate Proliferation, Senescence, and Apoptosis in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cells
J. Virol.,
December 20, 2002;
77(2):
1551 - 1563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Wulf, Y.-C. Liou, A. Ryo, S. W. Lee, and K. P. Lu
Role of Pin1 in the Regulation of p53 Stability and p21 Transactivation, and Cell Cycle Checkpoints in Response to DNA Damage
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 6, 2002;
277(50):
47976 - 47979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Hou, S.-Y. Wu, and C.-M. Chiang
Transcriptional Activity among High and Low Risk Human Papillomavirus E2 Proteins Correlates with E2 DNA Binding
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 15, 2002;
277(47):
45619 - 45629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. E. Chang, L. Pena, G. C. Sen, J. K. Park, and L. A. Laimins
Long-Term Effect of Interferon on Keratinocytes That Maintain Human Papillomavirus Type 31
J. Virol.,
July 29, 2002;
76(17):
8864 - 8874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lee, H.-Z. Kim, K. W. Jeong, Y. S. Shim, I. Horikawa, J. C. Barrett, and J. Choe
Human Papillomavirus E2 Down-regulates the Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 26, 2002;
277(31):
27748 - 27756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Boner, E. R. Taylor, E. Tsirimonaki, K. Yamane, M. S. Campo, and I. M. Morgan
A Functional Interaction between the Human Papillomavirus 16 Transcription/Replication Factor E2 and the DNA Damage Response Protein TopBP1
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 14, 2002;
277(25):
22297 - 22303.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Hay and G. Kannourakis
A time to kill: viral manipulation of the cell death program
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2002;
83(7):
1547 - 1564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Zhang, D. F. Spandau, and A. Roman
E5 Protein of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Protects Human Foreskin Keratinocytes from UV B-Irradiation-Induced Apoptosis
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2002;
76(1):
220 - 231.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-C. Peng, F. Kuo, D. E. Breiding, Y.-F. Wang, C. P. Mansur, and E. J. Androphy
AMF1 (GPS2) Modulates p53 Transactivation
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2001;
21(17):
5913 - 5924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Webster, A. Taylor, and K. Gaston
Oestrogen and progesterone increase the levels of apoptosis induced by the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 and E7 proteins
J. Gen. Virol.,
January 1, 2001;
82(1):
201 - 213.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Stevenson, L. C. Hudson, J. E. Burns, R. L. Stewart, M. Wells, and N. J. Maitland
Inverse relationship between the expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 transcription factor E2 and virus DNA copy number during the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
J. Gen. Virol.,
July 1, 2000;
81(7):
1825 - 1832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|