J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 10, 6712-6716, March 10, 2000
NMR Studies of Bacillus subtilis tRNATrp
Hyperexpressed in Escherichia coli
ASSIGNMENT OF IMINO PROTON SIGNALS AND DETERMINATION OF THERMAL
STABILITY*
Xianzhong
Yan,
Hong
Xue,
Hongzhi
Liu,
Jun
Hang,
J. Tze-Fei
Wong, and
Guang
Zhu
From the Department of Biochemistry, The Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
 |
ABSTRACT |
15N-Labeled Bacillus
subtilis tRNATrp wild type and a series of mutants
were hyperexpressed in Escherichia coli and purified for NMR studies with the use of two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect
spectroscopy (NOESY) and heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) and three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC techniques. These made possible
chemical shift assignments of imino protons and determination of the
thermal stability of the tRNATrp molecules. Almost all of
the imino protons in the helical regions and the tertiary base pairs
were assigned, except three imino protons of the AU base pairs whose
peaks were not clearly observed. Several base triplets found in the
crystal structure of tRNA were observed in the present study as well.
These studies also revealed two components of tRNATrp,
which could not be separated by high pressure liquid chromatography, corresponding to s4U and U at position 8 of the
tRNATrp, as indicated by two different sets of peaks for
the T
C and D arms. The modification at position 8 altered the local
conformation of the core region of the tRNA. Thermal unfolding
experiments showed that the unfolding process is cooperative in the
presence of a high concentration of magnesium ions and that the
component corresponding to the s4U8 is more stable than the
U8 component, thus providing evidence that the thiolation of U8
stabilizes the tertiary structure of tRNA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Transfer RNAs play a key role in decoding genetic information and
protein synthesis. Although all tRNAs have similar shapes in order to
fit properly to the ribosome, they each have distinct structural
features that allow accurate recognition by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to ensure faithful translation in accordance to the genetic code (1). To understand the detailed mechanisms of the
biochemical steps involved requires knowledge of the structures of
tRNAs and their complexes at atomic resolution. Efforts in the past 20 years have resulted in obtaining crystal structures of several tRNAs
(2-7) and complexes of tRNAs with their cognate synthetases (8-9).
Unfortunately, due to its large molecular weight, there has been no
single solution structure of tRNA established until now. As a powerful
tool for structural determination of biomolecules in solution, NMR has
long been used to study the structure of tRNAs (10, 11). As we know,
tRNAs have cloverleaf-shaped secondary structures (12), and there are
many base pairs in the arms. In each base pair, there is at least one
imino proton that is hydrogen-bonded to another base. It is possible to
study the structures of tRNAs by observing the spectrum of imino
protons whose chemical shifts are well separated from those of other
protons. By using the nuclear Overhauser effect
(NOE),1 the imino protons of
many tRNAs have been assigned (13-15). Based on the assignments, the
thermal stability of these molecules was studied. It is difficult to
assign these imino protons in the spectra because of the overlapping of
signals and paucity of direct evidence. Stable isotope labeling is an
effective method to solve the problem of spectral overlapping. With the
incorporation of 15N into tRNAs, multidimensional NMR can
be employed to facilitate spectral assignments and to study
interactions of tRNAs with cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other
enzymes (16, 17).
Among the tRNAs, it is particularly difficult to obtain a large amount
of tRNATrp for physical and enzymatic studies due to its
low content in cells (18). Recently, the Bacillus subtilis
tRNATrp gene has been cloned and hyperexpressed in
Escherichia coli, and with this heterologous hyperexpression
system 28% of total tRNA can be obtained in the form of
tRNATrp (19). The hyperexpressed tRNATrp
largely adopts the base modification pattern of E. coli
tRNATrp (20), rather than that of native B. subtilis tRNATrp (21). The identity elements of this
tRNA have been determined (22). In order to understand its structural
features, we uniformly labeled the tRNATrp with
15N. Wild type and mutant tRNAs were studied by proton and
15N multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Imino protons in
hydrogen-bonded base pairs, including several tertiary base pairs, were
assigned. The thermal stability of tRNATrp was also
analyzed. Two components with different base modifications endowed with
different thermal stability can be distinguished.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation of tRNATrp--
B. subtilis
tRNATrp was hyperexpressed in E. coli and
purified as described by Xue et al. (19). Briefly, E. coli JM109 cells, transformed by recombinant pGEM-9Zf (
)-derived
plasmid containing synthetic B. subtilis tRNATrp
gene between the SfiI and HindIII sites, were
grown in M9-glycerol medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin.
When the cells reached an absorbance of about 0.15 at 600 nm,
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 0.2 mM. About 4 h later, the
cells were harvested by centrifugation. Total tRNAs were prepared by
phenol extraction and further purified using a DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B
column. Purification of tRNATrp was achieved by HPLC using
a 250 × 10 mm Vydac C4-derivatized silica column. Peaks I and II
were pooled separately and precipitated by ethanol.
15N-Labeled tRNATrp samples were prepared as
above except that NH4Cl was replaced by
15NH4Cl (Isotec Inc.) in the M9-glycerol
minimal medium.
For the NMR experiments, the samples were dissolved in a buffer
containing 10 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM
sodium chloride, and 10 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5, and
then concentrated and washed three times using a Centracon-10
concentrator (Amicon). The final volumes of the samples were about 0.5 ml with 25 µl of D2O added. Sample concentrations were
1-2 mM in tRNA. A small amount of
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonic acid was added as an internal
reference for proton chemical shift.
NMR Spectroscopy--
All the NMR experiments were performed on
Varian INOVA 500 and 750 spectrometers. One-dimensional NMR spectra
were recorded using jump-and-return sequence (23) to suppress water
signal, with the carrier on the water frequency and the delay set to
yield the maximum intensity at the middle of the imino proton region. Phase-sensitive two-dimensional NOESY spectra were recorded at 30 °C
with the hypercomplex method (24) for quadrature detection in the F1
dimension. 256 t1 increments were recorded over
a spectral width of 12,000 Hz, each with 4096 data points and a mixing
time of 120 ms. Solvent suppression was achieved by replacing the third pulse by the jump-and-return sequence, with the carrier and delay set
as in the one-dimensional experiments.
Sensitivity-enhanced gradient two-dimensional
1H-15N HSQC spectra (25) were recorded at
30 °C. Spectral widths at the proton and nitrogen dimensions were
12,000 and 6000 Hz, respectively. A total of 128 t1 increments were acquired, each with 2048 points. Three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC spectra were also recorded using a
gradient sensitivity-enhanced version (26) with NOESY mixing time of 70 ms. The size of the data set was 512 × 128 × 32 complex points. The spectral widths were 3041 Hz for the nitrogen dimension and
12,000 Hz for both proton dimensions. Data were processed using NMR
pipe (27). Linear prediction method (28) was used in both
non-acquisition dimensions to improve resolution. Variable temperature
experiments were carried out on Varian INOVA 750 spectrometer equipped
with a triple resonance probe.
 |
RESULTS |
Assignment of Imino Protons--
In tRNA, the imino protons in
each base pair can be observed in the proton spectrum in the low field
region. Two-dimensional NOESY, two-dimensional
1H-15N HSQC, and three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC
experiments were employed to assign these imino protons. There is
little difference between wild type and A73 mutant spectra (Fig.
1, B and C) except
for the relative intensities of some peaks owing to the different percentages of a minor form in the sample, as discussed below. The
peaks in the spectrum were labeled with their positions in sequence.
Some imino groups with degenerate proton chemical shifts, but different
nitrogen chemical shifts, were clearly observable in the HSQC spectrum
of A73 mutant (Fig. 2).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloverleaf structure of B. subtilis tRNATrp hyperexpressed in E. coli (A) and proton NMR spectra of wild
type (B) and A73 mutant (C) in 10 mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM MgCl2,
100 mM NaCl, pH 6.5, acquired at 30 °C.
|
|
D Stem--
The GU wobble pairs in this tRNA provided a suitable
starting point for the chemical shift assignments of the imino protons, because the two imino protons in GU pairs appear at the up-field part
of the imino proton spectral region and give rise to strong mutual NOE
cross-peaks (29). In the two-dimensional NOESY spectrum of
tRNATrp (Fig. 3), there were
strong mutual NOE cross-peaks between peaks at 12.15 and 9.75 ppm and
11.33 and 10.00 ppm, respectively, which were assigned to the two GU
pairs, G22-U13 and G51-U63 as shown in the cloverleaf structure of
tRNATrp (Fig. 1A). The peak at 14.69 ppm was
assigned to s4U8, which comes from one of the two conserved
reversed Hoogsteen pairs in the tRNA tertiary structure (10), namely
T54-A58 and s4U8-A14 in tRNATrp, according to
its special nitrogen chemical shift at 181.0 ppm (30). It gave rise to
a rather strong NOE at 12.15 ppm and a weaker one at 9.75 ppm, to which
the U13 and G22 were assigned, respectively. According to the crystal
structure of other tRNAs (2-7), the s4U8-A14 is stacked
above the 13-22 base pair in the D arm. Both s4U8 and U13
gave rise to NOEs at 11.90 ppm, which was assigned as G46, the base
forming a tertiary interaction with U13 and G22. U12, U11, and G10 were
assigned to the peak at 12.76, 14.69, and 12.35 ppm, respectively,
according to the NOE connectivity between them and between U12 and U13,
by using two-dimensional NOESY, HSQC, and three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC
spectra. U11, U12, and U13 all gave rise to NOEs at 9.32 ppm, the high
field shoulder of a broad peak, consisting of two components. This peak
displayed a nitrogen chemical shift of 94.0 (data not shown), typical
for an amino nitrogen. It also gave NOEs to a broad peak at 8.65 ppm and a sharp peak at 8.18 ppm, which should be an amino and an aromatic
proton, respectively. These signals were therefore assigned to the two
amino protons of A23 (9.32 and 8.65 ppm) and the H8 (8.18 ppm) of A9,
which forms a reversed Hoogsteen base pair with A23 and is a component
of the U12-A23-A9 base triplet (31).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Imino proton region of NOESY spectrum of
B. subtilis tRNATrp A73 mutant at 30 °C
in H2O with 10 mM MgCl2, pH
6.5.
|
|
T
C Stem--
Having assigned U13-G22, another wobble pair,
G51U63, was therefore assigned to the peaks at 10.00 and 11.90 ppm,
respectively. T54, a ribothymidine, is a special base forming another
reversed Hoogsteen pair with A58. The protons of the 5-methyl group of T54 had several NOE cross-peaks to its imino proton and the two imino
protons of
55, which also possess unique proton chemical shifts, and
a cross-peak to H6 of T54 (14). From the NOE pattern of the
two-dimensional NOESY spectrum (Fig. 3), the peak at 13.82 ppm was
assigned to T54. T54 gave rise to an NOE at 13.05 ppm, which was
assigned as G53. G53 gave rise to an NOE at 12.68 ppm, to which G51U63
also had NOEs. Thus, one component of the peak at 12.68 ppm was
assigned to G52. Unambiguous assignment of G52 was carried out by using
15N-labeled G1C72 mutant (data not shown). On the other
side, U63, the peaks at 13.98 and 13.20 ppm were connected in turn by
NOEs. Thus U50 and G49 were assigned to the peaks at 13.98 and 13.20 ppm, respectively.
Anticodon Stem--
Based on the proton and nitrogen
chemical shifts from HSQC spectra and NOE connections from
two-dimensional NOESY spectra of the peaks at 13.98, 12.86, and 13.31 ppm, a sequential connection of U-G-G was assigned in the same helical
region. This U also gave rise to an NOE at 12.69 ppm. Thus a connection
between GUGG was established from these peaks, which could only come
from the anticodon stem and was assigned to G27-U42-G29-G30. The
nitrogen chemical shift of G27 was assigned unambiguously by utilizing the HSQC spectrum of the G1C72 mutant, where G27 and G52 were well
separated from G2 and G3 due to the shift of the G2 and G3 peaks.
Acceptor Stem--
The remaining unassigned peaks in the spectra
were from GC pairs and should be from the acceptor stem. There were
five unassigned GC imino protons distributed in several overlapped
peaks, and only one NOE cross-peak between peaks at 13.18 and 12.76 ppm
in the two-dimensional NOESY spectra. Several 15N-labeled
or non-labeled mutants were constructed to facilitate the assignment.
In the two-dimensional NOESY spectra of A3U70, A4U69, and A5U68
mutants, the resonant peak of the guanine 5' to the adenine was shifted
upfield, and the one 3' to the adenine was shifted downfield. By
combining the information from the two-dimensional HSQC and
two-dimensional NOESY spectra of various mutants, the G-C pairs in the
acceptor stem were completely assigned as shown in Table
I.
So far, all the signals in the two-dimensional HSQC spectrum were
assigned, except one very weak peak at 13.42 ppm with nitrogen chemical
shift of 162.2 ppm. This must be contributed by one of the three
unassigned AU pairs, namely U31-A39 in the anticodon stem and A1-U72
and A7-U66 in the acceptor stem, all of which are at the end of helical
regions. The disappearance of these imino protons suggests that they
are in fast exchange with water or are open under the measurement conditions.
Tertiary Base Pairs--
There are several conserved tertiary base
pairs in the tRNATrp structure. Both reversed Hoogsteen
pairs, s4U8-A14 and T54-A58, have been previously assigned.
As mentioned before, the imino proton and methyl group proton of T54
could give NOEs to the two imino protons of
55, as was observed in the two-dimensional NOESY spectrum. Thus the
55N3 proton, which is
hydrogen-bonded to phosphate group of A58 (31), and
55N1 proton were
assigned to peaks at 11.54 and 10.46 ppm, respectively. Their
characteristic nitrogen chemical shifts confirmed the assignment (32,
33). G18, hydrogen-bonded to
55 and stacked together with T54-A58
(31), was assigned to the peak at 9.40 ppm based on its NOE connections
to T54 and
55. Based on an NOE connection to s4U8 and
HSQC spectrum, U48, which forms a reversed Watson-Crick base pair with
A15 and is stacked with s4U8-A14, was assigned to the peak
at 13.14 ppm with a nitrogen chemical shift of 160.4 ppm. A broad but
rather strong peak observed in the HMQC spectra acquired at 10 and
20 °C, with the nitrogen chemical shift of 150.0 ppm and proton
chemical shifts of 10.09 ppm, was assigned to D20, a nucleotide in the
D loop region. It has characteristic proton and nitrogen chemical
shifts due to its hydrogen bonding with oxygen (32).
Sample Components--
There were many peaks, mainly from the D
stem and the T
C stem, in the HSQC spectrum (Fig. 2), each having an
associate peak with lower intensity. These peaks also displayed NOE
patterns in the two-dimensional NOESY spectrum similar to those of
their associated peaks, except that the U13' peak (the associate peak of U13) had an NOE to a peak with a proton chemical shift of 13.79 ppm
and a nitrogen chemical shift of 162.5 ppm, which are typical chemical
shifts for a uridine. This peak was therefore assigned to U8. The only
difference between the two sets of peaks is that there was an
s4U8 in one set and a U8 in the other set, demonstrating
that there were two species of tRNATrp in the sample. The
molar ratio of s4U8 to U8 in the hyperexpressed
tRNATrp was reported to be only about 0.2, but the actual
percentage might be higher because of its instability (20). The peak
intensity of s4U8 was almost as high as that of U11 in the
spectrum of the A73 mutant, whereas it was much lower than that of U11
in the wild type spectrum. The percentage of thiolation ranged from
about 40% to about 95% as revealed by HSQC spectra. We therefore
suggest that the other set of peaks was derived from the species in the tRNATrp sample containing U8 instead of s4U8.
The results of the various assignments are summarized in Table I.
Effect of Temperature on tRNA Structure--
Fig.
4 shows the imino proton spectra of the
tRNATrp wild type at different temperatures. As has been
mentioned before, D20 could only be observed in the HSQC spectra
acquired at 10 and 20 °C and disappeared at 30 °C on account of
the increased exchange rate. In contrast, U12, G18, and G46 were not
clearly observed in both one-dimensional and two-dimensional spectra at
a temperature lower than 30 °C. U50 and G52 were weak at 10 and
20 °C. G67 became stronger and was upfield-shifted extensively with
the increase of temperature. These results indicate that there might be
a minor conformational change when temperature was raised from below
room temperature. Some other peaks were also shifted slightly. No
significant changes were observed when the temperature was raised from
30 to 50 °C except that the
55 N1 proton signal, which is not
hydrogen-bonded, became broadened at 40 °C and vanished at 60 °C,
because of an increased exchange rate of this proton with water. When
the temperature was increased to 60 °C, the intensities of all the
peaks decreased slightly. The peak intensities of U42, G29, and G30
from the anticodon stem were dramatically decreased, indicating that
the exchange rates of these nucleotides were increased, with the
possible existence of partial melting of the anticodon stem. Also, the
peaks of U50 and G18 were decreased. At 70 °C, the anticodon
stem melted extensively as indicated by the disappearance of U42, G30,
and further decrease of G29. G18 disappeared too, indicating the
disrupted linkage between D loop and T
C loop. The tertiary base pair
T54-A58 in T
C loop melted at 75 °C, along with the G51U63 base
pair in T stem. When the temperature was raised to 80 °C, all the
peaks disappeared except that the very small residual peak for
s4U8 remained visible but broadened, indicating the
complete melting of the whole structure of this tRNA molecule.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Imino and methyl proton NMR spectra of
B. subtilis tRNATrp wild type at different
temperatures.
|
|
The methyl group signals are shown in the right column of
Fig. 4. The peaks at 1.06 and 1.00 ppm at 30 °C were assigned to the
methyl groups of T54 of the tRNATrp containing
s4U8 or U8, respectively, based on their chemical shifts
and NOEs observed in the two-dimensional NOESY spectrum (35). The two well resolved sets of resonant peaks for the
s4U8-containing and U8-containing tRNATrp
species made possible the separate monitoring of the thermal stability
of these two tRNATrp species. From 10 to 70 °C, the
signal of T54 of the species containing s4U8 was only
shifted slightly with no loss in intensities. This suggests that there
was no conformational change around the D loop and T
C loop at below
70 °C. The peaks from the tRNATrp species containing U8,
however, behaved differently. The T54 methyl signal of this species
started to decrease at 50 °C and almost disappeared at 70 °C.
When the temperature was increased further to 75 °C, the methyl
group signal of the native state of the species containing
s4U8 also decreased. Finally, at 80 °C, a strong peak at
1.73 ppm appeared, corresponding to the methyl group of T in the random coil state (34). In summary, the whole structure of the
tRNATrp species containing s4U8 is not altered
even at 50 °C. Its anticodon stem becomes partially melted at
60 °C, whereas the T
C stem and the tertiary base pair between
55 and G18 are partially melted at 70 °C. At 80 °C, the structure of the molecule is disrupted and becomes a random coil. In
comparison, the U8-containing tRNATrp species was less
stable. Its conformation started to change at about 50 °C, as
indicated by the diminished intensity of its T methyl signal, in
contrast to the s4U8-containing species which started to
change only above 60 °C. These findings suggest that the thiolation
of U8 stabilizes the tRNATrp structure.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Uridine Thiolation--
The base modification pattern of B. subtilis tRNATrp hyperexpressed in E. coli
is more similar to that of E. coli tRNATrp than
to that of native B. subtilis tRNATrp (20, 21).
Two molecular species were found in the present study, one with
s4U at position 8 and the other without such thiolation.
Due to their similar chromatographic properties, these two species
could not be separated by HPLC (19). This was evident in the
15N-1H HSQC and proton NOESY spectra in which
two distinct signals were observed for the same tertiary base pair
between positions 8 and 14. The ratio between these components varied
for different batches of tRNATrp, ranging from about 40 to
95%. Incomplete thiolation at position 8 was favored by overproduction
of the cloned heterologous tRNATrp in minimal medium. Even
for the native tRNAs of E. coli, the degree of thiolation in
individual tRNA species is known to depend on bacterial growth rates
(35). The differences in the chemical shifts of the two molecular
species mainly reside in the T stem and D stem and in the tertiary
interactions between T and D loops, clearly indicating that the base
modification at position 8 causes a conformational change in this region.
Assignment of Imino Protons--
The imino protons of
15N-labeled B. subtilis tRNATrp were
completely assigned with the use of multidimensional NMR techniques and comparison of wild type and mutant tRNATrp. In the
two-dimensional NOESY spectrum, most of the imino peaks were correlated
by NOE cross-peaks, permitting sequential assignments by NOEs. The
commonly used starting points in assignment, such as s4U
and GU pairs, were also utilized in the present study. For NOE cross-peaks from overlapped peaks, three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC was
used to render the assignments unambiguous.
Several tertiary base pairs were observed in the present study.
Two reverse Hoogsteen pairs, s4U8-A14 and T54-A58, were
assigned according to their characteristic chemical shifts and their
NOEs to other imino protons as reported for other tRNAs (14, 30, 31).
A15-U48, a reverse Watson-Crick base pair connecting the D loop and
variable loop, was assigned according to its NOE to s4U8.
Also, the pairing of G18 and 89 55 was observed and assigned. However,
the G19-C56 base pair connecting the D loop and T
C loop was not observed. This might not be entirely surprising in the light of
differences among the D loop sequences of tRNATrp and those
of yeast tRNAAsp and tRNAPhe. The G18G19
doublet in the D loop of tRNATrp is in the same sequence
position as that in tRNAAsp but different from that in
tRNAPhe, even though both of the latter two molecules have
an 8-membered D loop, whereas tRNATrp has only a 7-membered
D loop. The crystal structure of yeast tRNAAsp also lacks
any interaction between G19 and C56 (36), and the same applies to
Bombyx mori tRNAGCCGly (37),
which has a similar D stem and loop sequence. This has been attributed
to the occurrence of anticodon-anticodon interaction (36). In
tRNATrp, which has a CCA anticodon, apparently no
anticodon-anticodon interaction can be expected. However, it is
noteworthy that all these three tRNAs lack bases at positions 17 and
47, with a wobble pair instead at the 13-22 position in
tRNATrp and tRNAAsp to compensate for the lack
of base at 47 (38), and another wobble pair at 10-25 in
tRNAAsp and tRNASer. This implies that it is
the characteristic structural feature of these tRNAs, rather than the
anticodon-anticodon interactions, that results in the lack of
interactions between G19 and C56 in solution.
We have noticed that U12 resonates at 12.76 ppm, which is in a rather
high field region compared with the chemical shifts of normal
Watson-Crick A-U pairs. Similar situations were reported for U27 (12.70 ppm) in E. coli initiator
tRNAfMet (39), U7 (12.6 ppm) in E. coli tRNAVal (15), and U7 in Thermus
thermophilus tRNAIle (40). In comparison, the U12 in
tRNAAsp and tRNASer resonates in a far more
downfield region, although they all have similar sequences in the D
stem. A possible explanation is that there exists a rather special
local conformation in tRNATrp different from that in
tRNAAsp and tRNASer. In the present study,
three AU pairs, two from the acceptor stem and one from the anticodon
stem, were not assigned in NMR spectra. All of these AU pairs are
located at the end of the stem and thus may exchange very rapidly with
water. In the HSQC spectrum, a very weak cross-peak from uridine was
not assigned. If the acceptor stem of the tRNATrp is also
stacked on the T
C stem as in the crystal structure of yeast
tRNAPhe or E. coli tRNAIle in
solution (41), the A7-U66 base pair should be protected from fast
exchange with water, as was observed in the studies of
tRNAAsp (42). We therefore tentatively assign this peak to A7U66.
Thermal Melting--
Thermal melting experiments showed that in
the presence of high magnesium ion concentration the melting of the
structure was cooperative in character, compared with a more sequential
behavior in the absence of magnesium (43). The D stem and
s4U8-A14 base pair were stabilized with Mg2+
binding. The tRNATrp species containing s4U8 is
more stable thermally by about 20 °C than that containing U8 with
regard to the initiation of thermal unfolding, thus providing striking
evidence that the thiolation of U8 stabilizes the tertiary structure of
tRNATrp.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank the Biotechnology Research
Institute for the purchase of the 750-MHz NMR spectrometer.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Research Grant Council of
Hong Kong.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 852-2358-8705;
Fax: 852-2358-1552; E-mail: gzhu@ust.hk.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
NOE, nuclear
Overhauser effect;
NOESY, nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy;
HSQC, heteronuclear single-quantum correlation;
HPLC, high
pressure liquid chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schimmel, P.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
2747-2759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Kim, S. H.,
Quigley, G. J.,
Suddath, F. L.,
McPherson, A.,
Sneden, D.,
Kim, J. J.,
Weinzierl, J.,
and Rich, A.
(1973)
Science
179,
285-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Robertus, J. D.,
Ladner, J. E.,
Finch, J. T.,
Rhodes, D.,
Brown, R. S.,
Clark, B. F.,
and Klug, A.
(1974)
Nature
250,
546-551[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Giege, R.,
Moras, D.,
and Thierry, J. C.
(1977)
J. Mol. Biol.
115,
91-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Moras, D.,
Comarmond, M. B.,
Fischer, J.,
Weiss, R.,
Thierry, J. C.,
Ebel, J. P.,
and Giege, R.
(1980)
Nature
288,
669-674[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Schevitz, R. W.,
Podjarny, A. D.,
Krishnamachari, N.,
Hughes, J. J.,
Sigler, P. B.,
and Sussman, J. L.
(1979)
Nature
278,
188-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Woo, N. H.,
Roe, B. A.,
and Rich, A.
(1980)
Nature
286,
346-351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Rould, M. A.,
Perona, J. J.,
Soll, D.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1989)
Science
246,
1135-1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Ruff, M.,
Krishnaswamy, S.,
Boeglin, M.,
Poterszman, A.,
Mitschler, A.,
Podjarny, A.,
Rees, B.,
Thierry, J. C.,
and Moras, D.
(1991)
Science
252,
1682-1689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Schimmel, P. R.,
and Redfield, A. G.
(1980)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.
9,
181-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Reid, B. R.
(1981)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
50,
969-996[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Holley, R. W.,
Apgar, J.,
Everett, G. A.,
Madison, J. T.,
Marquisee, M.,
Merill, S. H.,
Penswick, J. R.,
and Zamir, A.
(1965)
Science
147,
1462-1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Sanchez, V.,
Redfield, A. G.,
Johnston, P. D.,
and Tropp, J.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
5659-5662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Roy, S.,
and Redfield, A. G.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
7073-7083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Hare, D. R.,
Ribeiro, N. S.,
Wemmer, D. E.,
and Reid, B. R.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
4300-4306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Niimi, T.,
Kawai, G.,
Takayanagi, M.,
Noguchi, T.,
Hayashi, N.,
Kohno, T.,
Muto, Y.,
Watanabe, K.,
Miyazawa, T.,
and Yokoyama, S.
(1993)
Biochimie (Paris)
75,
1109-1115[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Wallis, N. G.,
Dardel, F.,
and Blanquet, S.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
7668-7677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ikemura, T.
(1985)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
2,
13-34[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Xue, H.,
Shen, W.,
and Wong, J. T.
(1993)
J. Chromatogr.
613,
247-255[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Xue, H.,
Glasser, A.,
Desgres, J.,
and Grosjean, H.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2479-2486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Matsugi, J.,
Murao, K.,
and Ishikura, H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
3514[Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Xue, H.,
Shen, W.,
Giege, R.,
and Wong, J. T.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9316-9322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Plateau, P.,
and Gueron, M.
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
104,
7310-7311[CrossRef]
|
| 24.
|
States, D. J.,
Harberkon, R. A.,
and Ruben, D. J.
(1982)
J. Magn. Reson.
48,
286-292
|
| 25.
|
Kay, L. E.,
Keifer, P.,
and Saarinen, T.
(1992)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
114,
10663-10665[CrossRef]
|
| 26.
|
Zhang, O.,
Kay, L. E.,
Olivier, J. P.,
and Forman-Kay, J. D.
(1994)
J. Biomol. NMR
4,
845-858[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Delaglio, F.,
Grzesiek, S.,
Vuister, G.,
Zhu, G.,
Pfeifer, J.,
and Bax, A.
(1995)
J. Biomol. NMR
6,
277-293[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Zhu, G.,
and Bax, A.
(1990)
J. Magn. Reson.
90,
405-410
|
| 29.
|
Johnston, P. D.,
and Redfield, R. G.
(1978)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
3913-3927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Griffey, R. H.,
Davis, D. R.,
Yamazumi, Z.,
Nishimura, S.,
Hawkins, B. L.,
and Poulter, C. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
12074-12078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Quigley, G. J.,
and Rich, A.
(1976)
Science
194,
796-806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Griffey, R. H.,
Davis, D. R.,
Yamazumi, Z.,
Nishimura, S.,
Bax, A.,
Hawkins, B. L.,
and Poulter, C. D.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
9734-9741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Davis, D. R.,
Griffey, R. H.,
Yamazumi, Z.,
Nishimura, S.,
and Poulter, C. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
3584-3587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kan, L. S.,
Ts'o, P. O.,
Sprinzl, M.,
Van der Haar, F.,
and Cramer, F.
(1977)
Biochemistry
16,
3143-3154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Emilsson, V.,
Naslund, A. K.,
and Kurland, C. G.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4499-4505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Westhof, E.,
Dumas, P.,
and Moras, D.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
184,
119-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Amano, M.,
and Kyogoku, Y.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
210,
671-681[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Steinberg, S.,
and Ioudovitch, A.
(1996)
RNA (NY)
2,
84-87[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Griffey, R.,
Poulter, C. D.,
Bax, A.,
Hawkins, B. L.,
Yamaizumi, Z.,
and Nishimura, S.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
5895-5897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Choi, B. S.,
and Redfield, A. G.
(1983)
Biochemistry
25,
1529-1534[CrossRef]
|
| 41.
|
Hare, D.,
and Reid, B. R.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
5129-5135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Roy, S.,
Papastavros, M. Z.,
and Redfield, A. G.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
6081-6088[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Kastrup, R. V.,
and Schmidt, P. G.
(1975)
Biochemistry
14,
3612-3618[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Gong, Q. Guo, K.-L. Tong, G. Zhu, J. T.-F. Wong, and H. Xue
NMR Analysis of Bovine tRNATrp. CONFORMATION DEPENDENCE OF Mg2+ BINDING
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 31, 2002;
277(23):
20694 - 20701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Guo, Q. Gong, K.-L. Tong, B. Vestergaard, A. Costa, J. Desgres, M. Wong, H. Grosjean, G. Zhu, J. T.-F. Wong, et al.
Recognition by Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetases of Discriminator Base on tRNATrp from Three Biological Domains
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 12, 2002;
277(16):
14343 - 14349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.