|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 10, 6857-6867, March 10, 2000
Physical Properties of the Transmembrane Signal Molecule,
sn-1-Stearoyl 2-Arachidonoylglycerol
ACYL CHAIN SEGREGATION AND ITS BIOCHEMICAL IMPLICATIONS*
Jan-Ove
Hindenes §,
Willy
Nerdal¶ ,
Wen
Guo**,
Li
Di** ,
Donald M.
Small**, and
Holm
Holmsen
From the ** Department of Biophysics, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Bergen, Bergen, and ¶ Department of Chemistry,
University of Bergen, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
 |
ABSTRACT |
sn-1,2-Diacylglycerol
(DAG), a key intermediate in lipid metabolism, activates protein kinase
C and is a fusogen. Phosphoinositides, the main sources of DAG in cell
signaling, contain mostly stearoyl and arachidonoyl in the
sn-1 and -2 positions, respectively. The polymorphic
behavior of sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol (SAG) was
studied by differential scanning calorimetry, x-ray powder diffraction,
and solid state magic angle spinning (MAS) 13C NMR. Three
phases were found in the dry state. X-ray diffraction indicated
that the acyl chains packed in a hexagonal array in the phase, and
the two sub- phases packed with pseudo-hexagonal symmetry. In the
narrow angle range strong diffractions of ~31 and ~62 Å were
present. High power proton-decoupled MAS 13C NMR of
isotropic SAG gave 16 distinct resonances of the 20 arachidonoyl carbons and 5 distinct resonances of the 18 stearoyl carbons. Upon
cooling, all resonances of stearoyl weakened and vanished in the
sub- 2 phase, whereas arachidonoyl carbons from 8/9 to 20 gave distinct resonances in the frozen phases. Remarkably, the
-carbon of the two acyl chains had different chemical shifts in ,
sub- 1, and sub- 2 phases. Large
differences in spin lattice relaxation of the stearoyl and arachidonoyl
methene and methyl groups were demonstrated by contact time
(cross-polarization) MAS 13C NMR experiments in the solid
phases , sub- 1, and sub- 2. This shows
that stearoyl and arachidonoyl in SAG have different environments in
the solid states ( , sub- 1, and sub- 2
phases) and may segregate during cooling. The NMR and long spacing
x-ray diffraction results suggest that SAG does not pack in a
conventional double layer with the two acyls in a hairpin fashion. Our
findings thus provide a physicochemical basis for DAG hexagonal phase
domain separation within membrane bilayers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Although minor components of biological membranes, the
sn-1,2-diacylglycerols
(DAGs)1 play pivotal roles in
lipid metabolism and cell signaling. DAGs produced from glycerol
3-phosphate in the de novo glycerolipid synthesis are
further converted to phosphatidylcholine and
phosphatidylethanolamine by the choline and ethanolamine
phosphotransferase reactions or converted to triacylglycerol in
acyltransferase reactions (1). DAGs are also formed during
agonist-induced cell activation from preformed glycerophospholipids
directly through (phosphoinositide-specific) phospholipase C and
indirectly through the combined action of phospholipase D and
phosphatidate phosphohydrolase (2), and from ceramides by sphingomyelin
synthase (3). The DAGs formed from preformed phospholipids act as
activators of protein kinase C (4), as modulators of phospholipase
A2 (5, 6), as regulators of CTP:phosphocholine
cytidylyltransferase (1), and are thought to interfere with
arachidonate-induced modulation of the GTPase-activating protein
activated GTPase of p21ras (7). The phospholipid-derived (and
perhaps also the de novo synthesized) DAGs are also
converted by DAG kinase to phosphatidic acid which may be further
converted to phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidylglycerol, and
cardiolipin (1), or the DAGs are degraded by DAG and monoacylglycerol
lipases to yield free fatty acids, of which arachidonate is utilized
for eicosanoid synthesis (8-10). DAGs also appears to facilitate
translocation of enzymes to membranes, as discussed for protein kinase
C (PKC) (11), diacylglycerol kinase (12-14), and phosphocholine
cytidylyltransferase (CTP) (15).
In many of these conversions and actions, the exact molecular species
of the DAGs appears to be important, indicating a high degree of acyl
specificity of the enzymes involved, particularly in the
polyphosphoinositide cycle where some isozymes of DAG kinase (16-19)
and CDP-sn-1,2-diacylglycerol synthase (19) are highly specific for sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol (SAG),
which explains the great abundance of
sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl species among (mammalian)
phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PIP), and
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) (20, 21).
Moreover, upon thrombin stimulation of platelets many molecular species
of DAG are formed, but the concomitant PKC-induced phosphorylation of
pleckstrin only correlates with the transient, large accumulation of
SAG, showing that at least in intact platelets the SAG species specifically activates PKC (22). Furthermore, DAG lipases from many
sources use SAG as the preferred DAG species (8-10). Finally, incubation of fibroblasts with radioactive
sn-2-arachidonoylglycerol yields mostly radioactive SAG and
sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-containing lipids (23).
sn-1,2-DAGs, but not sn-1,3-DAGs, stimulate
Ca2+-induced fusion of phosphatidylserine-containing
vesicles (24); sn-1,2-dioleoylglycerol promotes
Ca2+-induced fusion of chromaffin granules with other
membranes (25), and several DAG molecular species facilitate exocytosis
of amylase from parotid gland secretory granules (26) and cause an
L to HII transition in several
glycerophospholipids at very low mol % of DAG (27, 28). Treatment of
phospholipid vesicles with phospholipase C, and thereby forming DAG
within the membranes, also causes vesicle fusion (29-31) that is
accompanied by formation of DAG-rich domains (30); such domains have
also been reported to form during temperature-induced phase transitions
of mixtures of DAG and certain phospholipids (32).
sn-1,2-Dioleoylglycerol has also been shown to promote
binding of protein to phospholipid bilayers (33). Unfortunately, none
of these studies employed SAG but were mostly performed with DAGs
containing the same fatty acid in both the sn-1 and the
sn-2 positions, an acyl combination that is rare in
biological glycerophospholipids.
Evidently, SAG appears to be the molecular species of DAGs that
displays several pivotal roles in cellular signal transduction and
metabolism, and sn-1,2-DAGs (in general) are fusogens that may participate in many cellular processes that may involve their tendency to form separate domains and promote L to
HII transition in membranes. It is, therefore, likely that
these actions of the DAGs are due to their physical behavior. Previous
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and x-ray powder diffraction
studies have shown that DAGs with the same saturated fatty acid
(C12, C16, and C18) in the
sn-1 and -2 positions have a stable bilayered ' phase
(34-36) that transitions to a metastable phase with hexagonally
packed chains on cooling below the melting point of the ' phase
(36). In contrast, the biologically occurring
sn-1-stearoyl-2-oleoylglycerol packs with very complex chain
conformations, disorder and marked polymorphism giving rise to at least
eight phases in the solid state (37). The sn-1,3 isomer of
this DAG, which does not participate in cellular activities, packs in
four phases. In the most stable form the acyl chains come off the
glycerol backbone in a 94o V-shape (38), quite unlike the
hairpin conformation typical for the acyl groups in the bilayer
membrane. The naturally occurring sn-1-stearoyl-2-linoleoylglycerol packs somewhat more
efficiently than the sn-2-monounsaturated DAG in ,
sub- 1, sub- 2, and ' phases with the
' and phases thought to have a tilted bilayer and extended
bilayer structures, respectively (39).
In the present study we have performed similar calorimetric and x-ray
experiments of SAG and complimented these with solid state high power
proton decoupling and cross-polarization, magic angle spinning
13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies. We find that SAG
exists in , sub- 1, sub- 2 phases but no
' phase. However, to our surprise, our NMR results show that the
stearoyl chain freezes before the arachidonoyl chain on cooling and
that the terminal methyl group of the arachidonoyl chains exists in a
different milieu than that of the stearoyl chains. These observations
together with our finding that the average (001) strong x-ray
reflections is around 62-63 Å in the phases, in contrast to 55 Å in sn-1,2-distearoylglycerol (36), perhaps suggest that SAG
exists in a V-shaped segregated bilayer.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
sn-1,2-SAG (claimed to be 99% pure) were obtained
from Serdary Research Laboratories (Englewood Cliffs, NJ) and were
purified by flash column chromatography (under argon) on silica gel
(grade 60, 230-400 mesh, Merck) containing 9% boric acid (w/w) (40) to remove about 5% 1,3-sn-SAG and some high
Rf impurities (UV-sensitive). Eluting solvent
(degassed under vacuum and saturated with argon) was either 5-8%
ethyl acetate in hexane or 1-5% acetone in
dichloromethane. Fractions were tested on boric acid-treated TLC plates
(silica gel hard layer organic binder on a glass support, soaked in 5%
boric acid at room temperature, air-dried overnight, and activated for
1 h at 100 °C), eluted with 5% acetone in dichloromethane. Pure fractions were combined and filtered to remove silica dust. All
samples were demonstrated to be homogeneous by analytical two-dimensional TLC (boric acid-treated silica gel hard layer organic
binder plates, 5% acetone in dichloromethane, visualized with cupric
acid/phosphoric acid followed by charring (41)) and 1H NMR
(500 MHz) in CDCl3 solutions with tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. The purified sn-1,2-SAG was then kept
cold and under argon to avoid isomerization (41) and oxidation, stored either in CHCl3 ( 20 °C) or dry (rotary-evaporated
under reduced pressure, and lyophilized for 15 h in an ice-water bath).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Experiments--
DSC of
dry sn-1,2-SAG was carried out on a Perkin-Elmer DSC-7. Each
sample (1.5-5.0 mg), weighed to the nearest 0.01 mg, was sealed (under
argon) in a stainless steel pan, and a pan with argon was used as a
reference sample. Heating and cooling rates were 5 °C/min. The
enthalpies of melting ( Hm) and crystallization ( Hc) were determined by using 7 series/UNIX
software. The instrument was calibrated by data obtained from high
purity standard material (Indium). Estimated error margin for this
standard is less than 0.5 °C in the transition temperature and 2%
in enthalpy. Hydrated sn-1,2-SAG samples were made by adding
different amounts of water, heating to 35 °C, and shaking for 15 min
to equilibrate water with lipid. The amount of water was estimated
gravimetrically. All samples were checked for hydrolysis and 1,3-acyl
migration by TLC (41), and no hydrolysis or migration was detected.
X-ray Powder Diffraction--
X-ray powder diffraction patterns
were recorded using nickel-filtered CuK radiation from
an Elliot GX-6 (Elliot Automation, Borehamwood, UK) rotating-mode
generator equipped with cameras using Franks double-mirror optics (42)
and toroidal-mirror optics. The samples were packed into 0.7 or 1.0-mm
diameter Lindeman capillaries (Charles Supper, Natick, MA), sealed, and
examined in variable temperature sample holders. The rate of cooling
and heating to a fixed temperature is 2-4 °C/min. The photographs
were taken on a Toroid camera. The diffraction patterns were recorded
using thermal programming similar to those used in the DSC investigation.
NMR--
High resolution 1H and 13C NMR
were recorded on a Bruker 500-MHz spectrometer, and solid state
13C NMR values were recorded on a Bruker AMX-300 NMR
spectrometer (75 MHz for 13C) equipped with a BL7 MAS probe
and a high power amplifier unit. Samples were packed under argon in
7-mm Zr2O rotors with an insert (sample volume ~150
µl). Sample spinning rates were 4.0 kHz for solid state and 1.0 kHz
in the isotropic state. The rotor was spun by dry nitrogen gas, which
was cooled by liquid nitrogen. Sample temperatures are within ±1 °C
with the Bruker B-VT-1000 variable temperature unit, and the probe was
calibrated with respect to the transition from phase to the
isotropic phase of sn-1,2-SAG. Samples were allowed to
equilibrate 20 min before data acquisition. Typical decoupling power
was 50 kHz in solid state and 20 kHz in isotropic state, and a duty
cycle of 1.5% was used for all experiments. For solid state samples,
single contact cross-polarization from the 1H reservoir to
13C spins was employed to increase the 13C
sensitivity and to shorten the effective 13C relaxation
time (43). Different contact times were used to differentiate the
molecular motions. The CH group of adamantane (38.3 ppm) was used as an
external chemical shift reference. For hydrated sn-1,2-SAG,
water was added, and the sample was heated to 35 °C and mixed
vigorously (30 min) before transferring the sample to the rotor. All
samples were checked by TLC and 1H NMR (both in
CD3OD and CDCl3). No sn-1,3-SAG,
hydrolyzed or oxidized impurities, or trace amounts of solvents were
detected. After the solid state NMR experiments, the samples were
checked again, and no changes had occurred for the dry sample. Slight isomerization to sn-1,3-SAG (1%) was found for the hydrated
sample after 3 days.
 |
RESULTS |
Differential Scanning Calorimetry--
Solvent crystallization of
sn-1,2-SAG at 20 °C in hexane, pentane, acetone, and
acetonitrile all gave phases, and no ' phase or phase values
were obtained. The thermodynamic data for dry and hydrated
sn-1,2-SAG are shown in Table
I. There are three phases found for dry
sn-1,2-SAG as follows: , sub- 1,
and sub- 2. Fig.
1a shows that cooling (part of
the region) of the melt from 35 °C will crystallize the phase
(Tc = 3.3 °C). Upon further cooling will
transform to sub- 1 ( 3.1 °C) and
sub- 1 will transform to sub- 2
( 8.8 °C). Fig. 1b shows heating (part of the region)
from 50 °C to 35 °C. Sub- 2 will transform to
sub- 1 at 5.3 °C with a H = 1.4 kcal/mol, and sub- 1 will transform to the phase at
0.1 °C with H = 0.5 kcal/mol. By further
heating, the phase will melt at 7.2 °C, with
H = 8.0 kcal/mol. Thus, can transform to
sub- 1 and then sub- 2 reversibly. Hydrated
1,2-sn-SAG also shows three phases as follows:
w, sub- 1w, and sub- 2w.
Comparing with those for dry sn-1,2-SAG, both melting and
transition points, and melting/transitions enthalpies for the hydrated
phases are somewhat lower (~1 °C, 1 kcal/mol). These differences
are significant with respect to the precision of the measurement.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Differential scanning calorimetry of SAG at
cooling (a) and heating (b) rates of
5 °C/min. The curve in a shows that the SAG melt
enters the solid phase at Tc = 3.3 °C. Upon
further cooling will transform to sub- 1
( 3.1 °C), and sub- 1 will transform to
sub- 2 ( 8.8 °C). The curve in b shows
that SAG in sub- 2 will transform to sub- 1
at 5.3 °C, and sub- 1 will transform to the phase at 0.1 °C. By further heating, the phase will melt at
7.2 °C. Thus, can transform to sub- 1, and then
sub- 2, reversibly. Table I lists the thermodynamic data
from curve b, which also defines the , the
sub- 1, and the sub- 2 phases used
throughout the paper.
|
|
Calorimetry of arachidonic acid showed that the acid melts at
37.5 °C ( H = 7.5 kcal/mol) and recrystallizes
with marked undercooling at 68 °C ( H = 6.1 kcal/mol). (The DSC cooling scan of sn-1,2-SAG is shown in
Fig. 1a and heating in Fig. 1b.) The thermodynamic data are presented in Table I. The melting point is
higher than the 49.5 °C previously reported in the literature (44), possibly because the samples of this study are more pure.
X-ray Diffraction--
The long and short spacing and the relative
intensities of the three phases for dry and hydrated
sn-1,2-SAG are summarized in Table
II. For sn-1,2-SAG the form (1 °C) has only one strong peak (4.28 Å) in the short spacing
region and a long spacing (001) of 62.1 Å. In the sub- 1
phase ( 4 °C) three peaks were observed (4.82 (medium), 4.33 (strong), and 4.00 (medium) Å). The long spacing of
sub- 1 is 62.6 Å. In the sub- 2 phase
( 10 °C) three reflections were revealed (4.78 (medium), 4.31 (very
strong), and 3.84 (strong) Å). The long spacing of
sub- 2 is 63.6 Å. The wide angle x-ray reflections for
the hydrated state are very similar to those of the dry state phases.
The difference in long spacing between the hydrated and the dry states
is not significant.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
X-ray differaction spacing (Å) for dry and hydrous 1,2-sn-SAG
Av., average 001 spacing calculated from all the orders. Relative
intensity is given in parentheses as follows: vs, very strong; s,
strong; m, medium; w, weak. The order of 001 reflection is indicated
after the diffraction long spacing intensity.
|
|
These diffraction spacings indicate that in the form the chains are
packed in the usual hexagonal packing. However, the diffraction peak of
4.28 Å is a little larger than the usual 4.1-4.2 Å spacing seen in
most saturated and monounsaturated lipids. This may indicate that the
chain packing is in general a bit more disordered than those with no or
few C=Cs between the chains. The two sub- phases,
sub- 1 and sub- 2, form a distorted,
hexagonal chain packing which also might be described as a somewhat
disordered, two-dimensional rectangular packing of the chains.
The nature of the two sub- phase transformations is probably a
disorder to order process involving conversion of some gauche or skewed
bonds to trans-conformation as the temperature is lowered. Since the
enthalpies of this to sub- 1 and sub- 1
to sub- 2 transitions are small, one can estimate that
around 15-20% of the gauche bonds in the form have been
transformed to trans bonds in the sub- 1 form.
The average (001) reflections of the and sub- phases are 62.1 to
63.6 Å. The phase of sn-1,2-distearoylglycerol is about 55 Å. In this phase the chains were presumed to be nearly
perpendicular to the bilayer plane. This structure is based on the
(001) diffractions of a homologous series of saturated chain
sn-1,2-di(iso)acylglycerols (36). This gives an increment of
about 1.27 Å per carbon. We have noted that the phase of
sn-1-stearoyl-2-linoleoylglycerol (SLG) is 59.5 Å, thus
significantly greater than the distearoyl analog. We argued (38) that
the most likely packing of the chains in the phase was a bilayer
with extended acyl chains and an extended glycerol lying perpendicular
to the plane of the bilayer. The argument that SLG phase is a
bilayer was bolstered by the fact that the phases hydrate with half a
molecule of water that increases the spacing by almost 2 Å. The
spacings of the sn-1,2-SAG are about 2 Å longer than the
linoleoyl analog and could be consistent with a similar structure, that
is a bilayer with extended chains and the glycerol and its
sn-1 ester group lying perpendicular to the plane of the
bilayer. However, sn-1,2-SAG with water shows no significant
change in long spacing and thus appears not to swell with minor
hydration. We emphasize, however, that without a true crystalline
structure it is difficult to be certain about the meaning of the (001)
spacings. In fact, as we noted with the SLG, the intensity distribution
in the first, second, and third order do not follow an ordinary bilayer
distribution, since the (002) reflection is quite strong. This is also
true in the sn-1,2-SAG spacings. Data in this paper may
suggest a chain segregated model.
Amount of Bound Water in sn-1,2-SAG--
Liquid
sn-1,2-SAG was put in a capillary cylinder (8 µl/cm,
Wilmad) mixed with water (30% by volume), and sealed. The contents were mixed vigorously by centrifugation. The capillary cylinder with
sample was then inserted in a 5-mm NMR tube containing
CDCl3/tetramethylsilane. Comparison of 1H NMR
spectra between the neat liquid of sn-1,2-SAG and
sn-1,2-SAG/water at 20 °C shows that there is an extra
peak at 4.64 ppm (equivalent to 1 proton), which is different from the
unbound water (spectra not shown). Therefore, on a time average, every
sn-1,2-SAG molecule binds to half a water molecule in the
liquid state. The free -OH group of sn-1,2-SAG shifts from
4.21 to 4.04 ppm upon forming a water complex. 13C NMR
shows that the chemical shifts changes for the sn-3-glycerol carbon, -CH2-OH, and the
sn-2-glycerol carbon, CH2-OCO-,
shifts upfield by 0.09 ppm after forming hydrated product. The
13C resonances of the two carbonyl groups (C=O) shift
downfield by 0.14 ppm (sn-1) and 0.17 ppm (sn-2).
These changes indicate that the polar head group is involved in the
formation of the hydrated compound.
Solid State 1H NMR of 1,2-sn-SAG--
Due to very
large direct dipole-dipole interaction between abundant nuclei in
solids, the 1H spectra of the different phases of
sn-1,2-SAG are very broad and do not contain high resolution
information, although each different phase has its own characteristic
shape (different relative intensity). They all contain five major
peaks, tentatively assigned from the isotropic spectra and the solution
spectra of sn-1,2-SAG/CDCl3:-H2-C=C (5.8-4.7 ppm), =C-CH2-C= (3.3-2.2 ppm),
-CH2-C=(2.4-1.8), -CH2-(1.5-0.9), and the
methyl peak ( CH3) (0.9-0.5 ppm). Upon hydration (spectra not shown), two additional peaks appear in the phase, one for unbound water (4.9 ppm) and one broad peak for water bound to sn-1,2-SAG (3.6 ppm). In the sub- 1 phase both
the 4.9 ppm peak (unbound water) and the broad 3.6 ppm peak (bound
water) are small and barely visible, whereas in the
sub- 2 phase both these water peaks have vanished.
Solid State 13C NMR of
sn-1,2-SAG--
Scheme 1 presents the
SAG atom numbering. The various types of carbons in SAG are found in
distinct chemical shift regions (Fig. 2).
They are as follows: the two carbonyl carbons (s1 and a1), the eight
double bonds carbons in the arachidonoyl moiety (a5-a6, a8-a9,
a11-a12, and a14-a15), the carbons adjacent to double-bonded carbons
(a4, a7, a10, a13, and a16), the three carbons of the glycerol backbone
(g1, g2, and g3), the carbons with single bonds to carbons in both the
stearoyl (s2-s17), and the arachidonoyl (a2-a3 and a17-a19) chains and
the chain terminal methyl group of the stearoyl (s18) and the
arachidonoyl (a20) moieties. However, assigning each of the SAG carbon
resonances is in some cases difficult just based on chemical shifts.
Therefore, differences in the carbon mobilities of the stearoyl and
arachidonoyl moieties in the different phases are used to assist the
assignments of the carbon resonances. Figs.
3-6 present high power proton-decoupled
13C spectra of SAG in the isotropic phase and the solid
phases , sub- 1, and sub- 2. These
figures show the carbonyl spectral region (Fig. 3), the glycerol
backbone spectral region (Fig. 4), the C=C spectral region (Fig. 5), and the
CH2 and CH3 spectral regions (Fig.
6). The isotropic phase spectrum
(spectrum A in Figs. 3-6) displays assigned carbon
resonances, and the solid state spectra can be assigned from comparison
with the isotropic phase chemical shift values under the assumption
that the chemical shift values between isotropic phase and the three
solid states are closely correlated (45). In general, the carbon
resonances of SAG displayed in Figs. 3-6 experience an upfield shift
when the sample is brought from the isotropic phase to the solid phase
.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Spectra A-D display
high power proton-decoupled 13C MAS spectra of SAG.
A, displays spectrum of the isotropic phase (12 °C);
B, displays spectrum of the solid phase (6 °C);
C, displays spectrum of the solid sub- 1 phase
(1 °C); and D, displays spectrum of the solid
sub- 2 phase ( 13 °C). Spectrum A is
labeled with the carbon type of the different chemical shift
regions.
|
|

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Spectra A-D display
the SAG carbonyl region of high power proton-decoupled 13C
MAS spectra at different temperatures. Spectrum
A is SAG in the isotropic phase (12 °C); spectrum
B is SAG in the solid phase (6 °C); spectrum C
is SAG in the solid sub- 1 phase (1 °C); and
spectrum D is SAG in the solid sub- 2 phase
( 13 °C). The two carbonyl resonances s1 and a2 are labeled in
spectrum A.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Spectra A-D display the SAG
glycerol carbon region of high power proton-decoupled 13C
MAS spectra. Spectrum A is SAG in the isotropic phase
(12 °C); spectrum B is SAG in the solid phase (6 °C); spectrum C is SAG in the solid
sub- 1 phase (1 °C); and spectrum D is SAG
in the solid sub- 2 phase ( 13 °C). The three
glycerol carbon resonances are labeled in spectrum A.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Spectra A-D display the SAG C=C
carbon resonances. All spectra are high power proton-decoupled
13C MAS experiments. Spectrum A is SAG in the
isotropic phase (12 °C); spectrum B is SAG in the solid
phase (6 °C); spectrum C is SAG in the solid
sub- 1 phase (1 °C); and spectrum D is SAG
in the solid sub- 2 phase ( 13 °C). The eight C=C
carbon resonances of the arachidonic moiety are tentatively assigned
and labeled in spectrum A. See the text for
details.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Spectra A-D display the SAG
CH2 and CH3 resonance region of high power
proton-decoupled 13C MAS spectra. Spectrum
A is SAG in the isotropic phase (12 °C); spectrum B
is SAG in the solid phase (6 °C); spectrum C is SAG
in the solid sub- 1 phase (1 °C); and spectrum
D is SAG in the solid sub- 2 phase ( 13 °C). The
resonances in spectrum A are tentatively assigned and
labeled. Lowercase letters "a" and
"s" in the labeled spectra A-C
denote arachidonic and stearic moiety, respectively. See the text for
details.
|
|
Carbonyl and Glycerol Carbon Resonances--
Assignments of the
carbonyl resonances (Fig. 3) are based on earlier assignments of these
carbons in diacylglycerols (46), and the glycerol backbone carbon
resonance g2 (Fig. 4) is assigned according to published chemical shift
value (47). The differentiation of the glycerol g1 and g3 carbon
resonances (Fig. 4) is tentative and based on expected differences in
shielding, assuming that the hydroxyl group attached to g3 provides
stronger shielding than the ester group attached to g1. However, these
glycerol backbone assignments (Fig. 4) are further supported by
differences in mobility of the g1 and g3 carbons. The g1 carbon
carrying the stearoyl moiety experiences the higher reduction in
mobility of the three glycerol backbone carbons when SAG enters the
solid phase from the isotropic phase as compared with g2 and g3.
This is confirmed by the observed reduction in mobility of the stearoyl
carbons upon the isotropic to solid phase transition (see below).
Carbons with Double Bonds--
The eight C=C carbon resonances of
the arachidonoyl moiety in the four phases studied are presented in
Fig. 5. The assignments of these eight resonances are still tentative
and appear on top of the carbon peaks in the isotropic phase spectrum,
see Fig. 5A. Studies (48) on mixtures of triacylglycerols
and fatty acids containing oleate, linoleate, and linolenate (in
CDCl3 solution) show that C=C resonances usually appear as
two peaks with the carbon furthest away from the glycerol moiety
(highest carbon number in the acyl chain) as the most downfield
resonance. The resonances experience an upfield shift from the
isotropic to the solid phase spectrum (Fig. 5B).
Assuming that the higher degree of mobility in the arachidonoyl chain
is in the tail (methyl end), carbon resonances a15 and a14 can be
identified in the spectrum of SAG in sub- 2 phase, see
Fig. 5D. Further assuming that the least mobile of the eight
C=C arachidonoyl carbons are a5 and a6, these resonances can be
identified as the C=C pair most affected by the loss of mobility in the
arachidonoyl moiety as SAG is brought from the isotropic phase through
the solid phases , sub- 1 and sub- 2
(Fig. 5, A-D). Similar arguments identify a8 as the
resonance third most affected by the reduced mobility in the solid
phases and a12 as the third most mobile olefinic carbon in the solid phase sub- 2 ( 7 °C). Carbons a11 and a12 have the
same chemical shift in the isotropic phase, but they appear to have
different chemical shifts in the phase with the same peak
intensity, i.e. similar mobility. The argument that two
carbons joined by a double bond have similar mobilities because of the
similar peak heights in high power proton decoupled solid state spectra
(Fig. 5, B-D) is also supported by the other pairs of C=C
resonances, the a15-a14 pair, the a5-a6 pair, and to some degree the
a8-a9 pair (the a9 resonance appears in a crowded region).
Resonances of CH2 next to C=C
Carbons--
Spectra A D in Fig. 6 display the SAG
CH2 and CH3 resonance region of high power
proton-decoupled 13C MAS spectra. The spectrum of SAG in
the isotropic phase is shown in A, and the spectra of the
, sub- 1, and sub- 2 phases are shown in
Fig. 6, B-D, respectively. The resonances in the isotropic phase spectrum are tentatively assigned and labeled. The different mobilities of the stearoyl and the arachidonoyl moieties are evident in
Fig. 6D where the resonances present correspond to those
carbons that are still mobile in the sub- 2 phase,
i.e. arachidonoyl carbon resonances only. These resonances
are labeled with the arachidonoyl carbon number, and the peak assigned
to the three carbons of the arachidonoyl chain residing between two
carbons with double bonds is labeled a7, a10, and a13. In the
sub- 1 and the phases, Fig. 6, C and
B, respectively, this peak has about three times the intensity of the other single resonance peaks, thus supporting the
assignment of a combined peak for the a7, a10, and a13 carbons. Furthermore, in the sub- 2 phase this peak has about 1.6 times the intensity of the a16 peak, indicating that the a7 resonance does not contribute to the peak intensity, i.e. the
arachidonoyl chain has lost mobility in the carbon 1-7 chain at
7 °C. Further support of the assignment of the combined a7, a10,
and a13 peak comes from studies on mixtures of triacylglycerols and
fatty acids containing oleate, linoleate, and linolenate (in
CDCl3 solution) by 13C NMR (48). It is found
that the chemical shift value of a CH2 carbon in position to two cis double bonds is 25-26 ppm, which corresponds well
to the 25.9 ppm peak assigned to carbons a7, a10 ,and a13 in Fig.
6A. The chemical shift ranges of other acyl chain carbons
are found to be about 33.8 ppm for acyl-C2, about 25 ppm for acyl-C3,
about 27 ppm for a CH2 carbon in position of one cis
double bond, about 32 ppm for acyl-C(n 2) and about 22.7 ppm for acyl-C(n 1). All these chemical shift
values are in good agreement with the corresponding assignments of
these carbon resonances in Fig. 6A. The differentiation of
two corresponding carbon resonances in the stearoyl and arachidonoyl
chains is based on the observed differences in mobility of these two
moieties. This has also been done in the assignments of the two
CH2 carbons in position to one cis double bond,
i.e. the resonances a16 and a4, in that only the former
shows mobility in the sub- 2 phase.
Resonances of CH2 Carbons in Direct Chain--
In
spectra B and C of Fig. 6 a broad
CH2 peak is present at 32.5 ppm, confirming the crystalline
state of these CH2 carbons (47). The isotropic phase (Fig.
6A) chemical shift of this peak is 30.4 ppm, and this peak
originating from CH2 groups in the stearoyl moiety is
labeled s(CH2)n. The described behavior of these
stearoyl CH2 resonances in the phase (crystalline state of the stearoyl moiety), where the arachidonoyl CH2
resonances appear as "liquid crystalline" state resonances (carbons
that have higher mobility than those in the crystalline state),
demonstrates the different mobilities of the stearoyl and the
arachidonoyl moieties. Furthermore, this differentiated mobility of the
stearoyl and the arachidonoyl moieties is also present in the
sub- 1 and sub- 2 phases (Fig. 6,
C and D). In the sub- 2 phase the
stearoyl CH2 resonances vanish due to impaired mobility,
see Fig. 6D. Thus, as the temperature is lowered, the
stearoyl chain freezes before the arachidonoyl chain.
Acyl Chain Terminal CH3 Groups--
Additional support
of the differential mobilities of the stearoyl and the arachidonoyl
moieties is found in the behavior of the terminal methyl resonances of
the two acyl chains. This resonance is labeled s18 and a20 in the
isotropic phase spectrum (Fig. 6A), and in the solid phase
and sub- 1 (Fig. 6, B and C)
spectra the methyl resonance of the arachidonoyl chain (a20) is found upfield of that of the stearoyl chain (s18). The higher peak intensity of the a20 resonance in the sub- 1 (and in the
sub- 2) phase assigns a20 to the more mobile methyl
resonance. In the sub- 2 phase (Fig. 6D) only
the arachidonoyl moiety methyl group has the mobility to give a high
power proton decoupled peak.
Cross-polarization, Magic Angle Spinning 13C--
The
differential mobility of the stearoyl and the arachidonoyl moieties was
further investigated by cross-polarization MAS NMR experiments, a
kinetic process (49) where simultaneous irradiation of 13C
and 1H resonances increases the carbon magnetization by
polarization transfer from the protons. The subsequent depletion of the
carbon and proton magnetization is caused by spin lattice relaxation processes, and the carbon relaxation rates depend on the carbon species
(50). Thus, the carbon resonance intensities may not be directly
representative of the relative numbers of carbon species in the sample
(e.g. two methyl groups of the same relative number and with
different signal intensities have differences in their spin lattice
relaxation). This is due to differences in surroundings and mobility.
Figs. 7-9 present cross-polarization,
magic angle spinning spectra with contact times of 0.5 and 5.0 ms, as
well as a high power proton-decoupled spectrum of the CH2
and CH3 chemical shift regions.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Spectra A-C display
CH2 and CH3 resonance region of SAG in the
solid phase (6 °C). Spectrum
A is a high power proton-decoupled experiment, and spectra
B and C display cross-polarization experiments with
contact times of 5.0 and 0.5 ms, respectively. The methyl resonances of
the arachidonic and the stearic moieties appear at different chemical
shifts; these peaks are labeled in spectrum A as a20 and
s18, respectively. Note the differential contact time dependences of
the a20 and s18 methyl groups, shown in spectra B and
C.
|
|
These spectra of the , sub- 1, and
sub- 2 phases are shown in Figs. 7-9, respectively. In
Fig. 7 spectrum A is a high power proton-decoupled
experiment and spectra B and C display
cross-polarization experiments with contact times of 5.0 and 0.5 ms,
respectively. The methyl resonances of the arachidonoyl and stearoyl
moieties appear at different chemical shifts and are labeled a20 and
s18, respectively, in the A panels of Figs. 7-9. Note the
differential contact time dependences of the arachidonoyl and stearoyl
moieties, shown in spectra B and C of these
figures. In the solid sub- 1 phase (Fig.
8) spectrum A is a high power
proton-decoupled experiment, and spectra B and C
display cross-polarization experiments with contact times of 5.0 and
0.5 ms, respectively. The methyl resonances of the arachidonoyl and the
stearoyl moieties appear at different chemical shifts, labeled a20 and
s18, respectively (Fig. 8A). The differential contact time
dependence of the arachidonoyl and stearoyl methyl groups is evident in
spectra B and C. Furthermore, this contact time dependence in the
sub- 1 phase is clearly different from the corresponding
dependence in the phase. The different contact time dependence of
the stearoyl peak s(CH2)n in the two solid phases
and sub- 1 is also displayed in Figs. 7 and 8. In
both of these two phases ( and sub- 1) the stearoyl methyl group (s18) produces the larger methyl peak of the two methyl
peaks, and the corresponding arachidonoyl methyl signal (a20) can be
seen as a small shoulder on the upfield side of the stearoyl methyl
signal. In Fig. 9, spectra A C display CH3 and CH2 resonance region
of SAG in the sub- 2 phase. Spectrum A is a high power
proton-decoupled experiment, and spectra B and C display
cross-polarization experiments with contact times of 5.0 and 0.5 ms,
respectively. The methyl resonances of the arachidonoyl and the
stearoyl moieties appear as one broad peak in C, the spectrum acquired
with the short contact time of 0.5 ms. In the spectrum of the longer
contact time of 5.0 ms (spectrum B) and in the high power
proton-decoupled spectrum (spectrum A), only the methyl group of the arachidonoyl moiety appears (spectrum A). The
broad stearoyl moiety CH2 resonance present in the
experiment with 0.5-ms contact time (spectrum C) disappears
when the contact time is increased to 5.0 ms, as well in the high
power-decoupled experiment (spectrum A). The differences in
spin lattice relaxation of the stearoyl and arachidonoyl methyl groups
demonstrated by the different contact time dependences described above,
as well as these methyl groups separate chemical shift values in the
solid phases , sub- 1, and sub- 2,
suggest that s18 and a20 reside in different environments, i.e. the stearoyl and arachidonoyl moieties do not pack
beside each other.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Spectra A-C display
CH2 and CH3 resonance region of SAG in the
solid phase sub- 1 (1 °C).
Spectrum A is a high power proton-decoupled experiment, and
spectra B and C display cross-polarization
experiments with contact times of 5.0 and 0.5 ms, respectively. The
methyl resonances of the arachidonic and the stearic moieties appear at
different chemical shifts, and these peaks are labeled in
spectrum A as a20 and s18, respectively. Note the
differential contact time dependences of the a20 and s18 methyl groups,
shown in spectra B and C.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Spectra A-C display
CH2 and CH3 resonance region of SAG in the
solid phase sub- 2
( 13 °C). Spectrum A is a high power
proton-decoupled experiment, and spectra B and C
display cross-polarization experiments with contact times of 5.0 and
0.5 ms, respectively. The methyl resonances of the arachidonic and the
stearic moieties appear as one broad peak in the spectrum acquired with
the short contact time of 0.5 ms. C, in the spectrum of the
longer contact time of 5.0 ms. B, and in the high power
proton-decoupled spectrum only, the methyl group of the arachidonic
moiety appear (A). The broad stearic moiety CH2
resonance present in the 0.5-ms contact time experiment (C)
disappears when the contact time is increased to 5.0 ms as well in the
high power proton-decoupled experiment (A).
|
|
Hydrated SAG--
The NMR experiments on dry SAG (Figs. 3-9) were
also carried out with hydrated SAG, and these are in excellent
agreement with the corresponding results obtained on dry SAG. The
hydrated phases have slightly better signal to noise ratio for some
peaks, e.g. the three glycerol carbon peaks (g1, g2, and
g3). This is probably due to increased mobility when hydrated.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The x-ray data of SAG shown here suggest a molecular organization
that differs from that of a regular bilayer. In the regular bilayer
arrangement SAG would be found in the conventional hairpin conformation, i.e. the stearoyl and arachidonoyl chains
would pack together and next to each other. The strong x-ray peak from a long spacing of ~62 Å in the molecular organization of SAG in the
three solid phases would require that the SAG molecules extend about 31 Å along the long axis of the unit cell. Even if the SAG molecule was
parallel to the c axis and fully extended, it seems unlikely
that it could be 31 Å long. The 4 double bonds (~1.27 Å) are
shorter than the CH2-CH2 bonds, and this would
shorten the extended chain. Computer models suggest that the SAG
molecule in extended conformation is about 26 Å long, and the
corresponding bilayer composed of 26-Å long SAG molecules in a hairpin
fashion would be ~52 Å thick. Thus, the x-ray data make unlikely a
regular bilayer organization of SAG in the solid phases ,
sub- 1, and sub- 2.
The NMR data demonstrate that in the phase the stearoyl moiety is
in the solid crystalline phase (the main chain stearoyl s(CH2)n resonance is found as a broad peak at 32.5 ppm in
the phase and as an isotropic phase peak at 30.4 ppm). Furthermore, in the phase the arachidonoyl moiety displays a mobility typical of
the liquid crystalline phase. At the lower temperatures of the
sub- 1 and sub- 2 phases, the solid phase
character of the stearoyl carbon resonances and the higher mobility of
arachidonoyl resonances persist, even though the arachidonoyl
resonances show differences in mobility so that in the
sub- 2 phase a20 to a10-a8 display mobility and give rise
to high power proton-decoupled NMR peaks. In these spectra all stearoyl
peaks have vanished due to the low mobility of these carbons. Of the
glycerol resonances the one assigned to g1 displays a line broadening
that greatly exceeds the g2 and g3 resonances, when SAG is brought from
the isotropic phase to the solid phase. This is in excellent
agreement with the described behavior of the sn-1-bound
stearoyl moiety. The highly different behaviors of the stearoyl and
arachidonoyl moieties suggest segregation of these moieties when
present in the solid phases , sub- 1, and
sub- 2. A V-shaped conformation of the SAG molecule with
the stearoyl and arachidonoyl chains coming off the glycerol with an
angle between their planes of about 115o achieves such a
segregation of the stearoyl and arachidonoyl moieties and could explain
the strong x-ray peak from a long spacing of 62-63 Å in the molecular
organization. With this separation of the two acyl chains the stearoyls
pack in a stearoyl layer and the arachidonoyls pack in an arachidonoyl
layer. These two "monolayers" will stack onto neighboring stearoyl
and arachidonoyl layers, without interdigitation, and presumably so
that two stearoyl layers and two arachidonyl layers meet and the
separation of stearoyl "bilayers" (and the arachidonoyl bilayers)
will be 62-63 Å (see Scheme 2). A
V-shaped conformation of 94o has been found for
sn-1-stearoyl-3-oleylglycerol in an x-ray single crystal
diffraction study (38), whereas the
sn-1-stearoyl-2-oleoylglycerol, on the other hand, gave rise
to disordered crystal packing (37), probably due to disordered chain
packing. In the sn-1,2-diacylglycerol molecule in our study,
the four double bonds of the arachidonoyl chain could make the two acyl
chains sufficiently incompatible so that the two chains segregate when
they pack in the solid phase. We emphasize, however, that only a
definitive (single crystal) x-ray structure can resolve the
uncertainties in the molecular organization of SAG in the solid
phase.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Scheme 2.
Schematic representation of a possible
conformation and packing of SAG in the phase. The model shows the immobile stearoyl and
glycerol moieties as thick lines and the mobile arachidonoyl
chains as thin lines. The packing arrangement shown with
separate stearoyl bilayers and arachidonoyl bilayers is in accordance
with the chain segregation indicated in the NMR data. The strong long
spacing x-ray diffraction on 62.1 Å determines a stearoyl/arachidonoyl
interchain angle of ~115°.
|
|
For the biological implications, sn-1,2-SAG is formed
rapidly from PIP2 in cell membranes during during
stimulation of cells by agonists that are coupled to PLC- through
G-proteins and to PLC- through receptor tyrosine phosphorylation
(51). This SAG is rapidly phosphorylated to
sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonolyl phosphatidic acid by DAG
kinase and thus exists only transiently in the membrane (22). However,
the tendency of DAGs in general to form microdomains in membranes (30,
32) suggests that PLC-generated SAG also may become transiently
concentrated in microdomains in the cell membranes. It is worth noting
that molecular modeling studies show that polyenoic acyl chains can
adopt low energy conformations with nearly straight chains (52) and
that sn-1-stearoyl DAGs with polyenoic sn-2 acyl
chain can assume regular (low energy) conformations with parallel
chains (53). When DAGs in such conformations are used to model a
monolayer, regular and energetically favorable packing with parallel
chains is possible (54). However, according to the present results, the
conformation of the acyl chains of SAG in microdomains may deviate from
the parallel hairpin structure of their membrane-packed parent
molecules and attain a more V-shaped structure as indicated in Scheme
2. Certainly when the SAG moiety is in the membrane as part of the
phosphatidylinositol, its chains must lie side by side. However, once
hydrolyzed it is possible that rearrangement takes place so that
separate domains of stearate and arachidonate exist. The segregation of
the arachidonoyl and the stearoyl chains in such domains could promote
the L -HII transformation observed with DAGs
generated in liposomes (27, 28). Also, the non-lamellar phase and/or
the so-called extended conformation with non-parallel acyl chains has
been thought to be involved in the mechanism(s) by which DAGs promote
attachment of proteins, such as PKC to membranes (55, 56). One may only speculate whether single SAG molecules produced during this hydrolysis also may exert some tension on neighboring molecules in a biological membrane by their tendency to attain a V-shape. If so, this would rearrange the local packing around the newly formed SAG molecules that
could be part of the mechanism(s) for SAGs biological actions. Our
findings thus provide a physicochemical basis for DAG hexagonal phase
domain separation within membrane bilayers; such hexagonal domains are
postulated to be responsible for the various biological actions such as
membrane destabilization, enzyme activation, and fusion events promoted
by SAG or other 1-saturated/2-polyunsaturated glycerols (56).
Unsaturated DAGs are cone-shaped molecules with the hydroxyl apex at
the interface. A few of these molecules can change a flat bilayer to a
concave one. When the two chains are quite different, such as we have
shown here for SAG, chain segregation may occur in the dry or nearly
dry state. However, to obtain a chain segregated, extended conformation
in a hydrated bilayer, the glycerol-OH and ester groups would either
have to be buried in the center of the bilayer or one of the acyl
chains would have to protrude into the aqueous layer. Both processes
are thermodynamically unfavorable as it costs energy to bury -OH and
ester groups in hydrocarbon or to force -CH2 groups into
water. A possible role for chain segregation in protein binding to
membrane would be as outlined in Scheme
3. The formation of a few proximate SAG molecules in a membrane would
cause a local cavity or dimple on the surface. An adjacent protein
might hydrogen-bond to the SAG-OH(s) and perhaps to adjacent
phospholipids on the rim of the dimple. If the protein had a
sequestered hydrophobic tip that could specifically interact with the
arachidonoyl chain(s), then chain segregation could occur with the
protein interacting with the arachidonoyl chain in the dimple, the
glycerol-OH bound to the tip of the protein, and the stearoyl chain
submerged deep in the hydrocarbon part of the bilayer. This speculation
is reasonable, as the SAG-OH is hydrogen-bonded to protein and
therefore can be submerged in a hydrophobic environment. The segregated
arachidonoyl moiety interacts with the protein hydrophobic finger,
allowing it to settle into the bilayer, and the stearoyl group remains
firmly anchored in the bilayer (Scheme 3).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Scheme 3.
Possible mechanism for anchoring a
PS-requiring protein to a biological membrane through formation of
SAG. A, section of a bilayer is shown containing
sn-1-stearoyl (thick lines)-2-arachidonoyl
(semi-thick lines)-PIP2 (dark gray)
surrounded by PS molecules (light gray, each carrying a net
negative charge on the head group) in one leaflet. B, same
bilayer as in A after PI-specific PLC action.
sn-1-Stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-PIP2 has been
converted to SAG (the glycerol moiety with the free OH is indicated by
dark, small squares). Since SAG is a cone-shaped molecule, a
dimple is made in the membrane with the acyl chains of the neighboring
PS somewhat splayed. A membrane-anchoring domain of a protein is shown
in juxtaposition to the dimple with positively charged amino acids
positioned above the PS molecules and with a (extending) hydrophobic
finger. C, the anchoring domain is fastened to the dimple
through electrostatic attraction (arrows) between the PS
heads and the positive charges in the anchoring domain and through
hydrogen bonds (broken lines) between the tip of the finger
protruding out of the anchoring domain and the hydroxyl group of SAG.
D, the hydrophobic finger of the anchoring domain
specifically interacts with the arachidonyl chains of SAG which
segregates from the stearoyl chain, so that the entire SAG molecule is
attaining the chain-segregated, low energy form depicted in Scheme 2,
and the protein becomes firmly anchored.
|
|
Although highly speculative, the mechanism depicted in Scheme 3 takes
into account the tendency of SAG to form the low energy, V-shaped
structure suggested from the physicochemical results in the present
work (Scheme 2). In an in vitro system Goldberg et
al. (57) found that both SAG and
sn-1,2-dioleoylglycerol (DO) gave pronounced activation of
PKC, which seemed to be related to the increased tendency of SAG and DO
to form non-bilayer lipid domains in ternary mixtures of saturated PC
and PS (58), whereas other DAGs (dioctanoylglycerol,
dipalmitoylglycerol, and oleoyl-acetylglycerol) gave little or no
activation. Further studies by these authors (59) showed that SAG and
DO also gave conformational changes in the phosphatidylcholine head
groups that correlated with the DAG-induced activation of PKC. Studies
by others (55, 56) with large unilamellar vesicles of saturated PC and
PS also indicated that PKC activation may be related to the interphases
between DO-rich and DO-poor domains in ternary mixtures with PC and
PS.
We are unaware of physicochemical studies of neat DO similar to those
we have performed with SAG, and we feel that it is unlikely that the
acyl chains of a DAG with two identical acyls are able to segregate in
the way we have shown here for neat SAG. However, since
1-stearoyl-2-oleoylglycerol packs poorly (37), it is possible that DO
also packs anisotropically and, thus, may have a tendency to segregate
and mix indiscriminantly with other phospholipids accompanied by
formation of DO-rich and DO-poor domains (56). The striking similarity
between DO and SAG in physicochemical behavior and the ability to
activate PKC (59, 60) support this view.
The tendency of SAG to attain a V-shaped conformation may represent a
property of mixed chain DAGs in general which could provide a
physicochemical basis for their fusogenic behavior (24, 28). Also, the
non-lamellar and/or extended conformation with non-parallel acyls has
been thought to promote attachment of proteins such as PKC to membranes
(55, 56). It is also possible that SAG molecules produced during
hydrolysis of PIP2 by PLC exert tension on neighboring
membrane molecules by the tendency of SAG to attain V-shape. If so,
this would rearrange the local packing around the newly formed SAG
molecules that may be part of the biological actions of SAG (Scheme
3).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants TG5T32HL-07291 and 5 PO1HL26335 (to D. M. S.) and EU
BIOMED 2 Grant EC BMH4-97-2609.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by the Norwegian Council for Science and Humanities
(NFR). The experiments described in this paper were performed as a
visiting student at the Dept. of Biophysics, Boston University School
of Medicine.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Chemistry, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway. Tel.: 44 55 58 33 53; Fax: 47 55 58 94 90; E-mail:
willy.nerdal@kj.uib.no.

Present address: Wyeth-Ayerst Research, 865 Ridge Rd., Monmount
Junction, NJ 08852.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DAG, sn-1,2-diacylglycerol;
PKC, protein kinase C;
PIP, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate;
PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
DSC, differential scanning
calorimetry;
DO, sn-1,2-dioleoylglycerol;
SAG, sn-1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol;
MAS, magic angle
spinning;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
PLC, phospholipase C;
SLG, sn-1-stearoyl-2-linoleoylglycerol.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Vance, D. E.,
and Vance, J.
(1996)
Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes
, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
|
| 2.
|
Singer, W. D.,
Brown, H. A.,
and Sternweis, P. C.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
475-509[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Luberto, C.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14550-14559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Spiegel, S.,
Foster, D.,
and Kolesnick, R.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
159-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Kramer, R. M.,
Checani, G. C.,
and Deykin, D.
(1987)
Biochem. J.
248,
779-783[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Roldan, E. R.,
Martinez-Dalmau, R.,
and Mollinedo, F.
(1994)
Int. J. Biochem.
26,
951-958[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Homayoun, P.,
and Stacey, D. W.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
144-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Balsinde, J.,
Diez, E.,
and Mollinedo, F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15638-15643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Allen, A. C.,
Gammon, C. M.,
Ousley, A. H.,
McCarthy, K. D.,
and Morell, P.
(1992)
J. Neurochem.
58,
1130-1139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Lee, M. W.,
and Severson, D. L.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
298,
213-219
|
| 11.
|
Ha, K. S.,
and Exton, J. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10534-10539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Besterman, J. M.,
Pollenz, R. S.,
Booker, E. L. J.,
and Cuatracasas, P.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9378-9382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Maroney, A. C.,
and Macara, I. G.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2537-2544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Punnonen, K.,
and Yuspa, S. H.
(1992)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
99,
221-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Kolesnick, R. N.,
and Hemer, M. R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10900-10904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
MacDonald, M. L.,
Mack, K. F.,
Williams, B. W.,
King, W. C.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
1584-1592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Lemaitre, R. N.,
King, W. C.,
MacDonald, M. L.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
266,
291-299[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Walsh, J. P.,
Suen, R.,
Lemaitre, R. N.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol Chem.
269,
21155-21164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Saito, S.,
Goto, K.,
Tonosaki, A.,
and Kondo, H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9503-9509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Mauco, G.,
Dangelmaier, C. A.,
and Smith, J. B.
(1984)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
224,
933-940
|
| 21.
|
Hodkin, M. N.,
Pettitt, T. R.,
Martin, A.,
Michell, R. H.,
Pemberton, A. J.,
and Wakelam, M. J. O.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
200-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Fukami, M. H.,
and Holmsen, H.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
228,
579-586[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Simpson, C. M.,
Itabe, H.,
Reynolds, C. N.,
King, W. C.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15902-15909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Sanchez-Migallon, M. P.,
Aranda, F. J.,
and Gomez-Fernandez, J. C.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
68,
558-566[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Sanchez-Migallon, M. P.,
Aranda, F. J.,
and Gomez-Fernandez, J. C.
(1994)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
314,
205-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Mizuno-Kamiya, M.,
Inokuchi, H.,
Kameyama, Y.,
Yashiro, K.,
Shin, S.-O.,
and Fujita, A.
(1995)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
118,
693-699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Coorsen, J. R.,
and Rand, R. P.
(1990)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
68,
65-69[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Basanez, G.,
Nieva, L. L.,
Rivas, E.,
Alonso, A.,
and Goni, F. M.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
2299-2306[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Luk, A. S.,
Kaler, E. W.,
and Lee, S. P.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
6965-6973[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Basanez, G.,
Nieva, J.-L.,
Goni, F. M.,
and Alonso, A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
15183-15387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Ruiz-Arguello, M. B.,
Goni, F. M.,
and Alonso, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22977-22982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Jimenez-Monreal, A. M.,
Villalain, J.,
Aranda, F. J.,
and Gomez-Fernandez, J. C.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1373,
209-219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Soulages, J. L.,
Salamon, Z.,
Wells, M. A.,
and Tollin, G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5650-5654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Pascher, I.,
Sundell, S.,
and Hauser, H.
(1981)
J. Mol. Biol.
153,
791-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Dorset, D.,
and Pangborn, R. M.
(1988)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
48,
19-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Kodali, D. R.,
Fahey, D. A.,
and Small, D. M.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
10771-10779[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Di, L.,
and Small, D. M.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
1611-1623[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Goto, M.,
Honda, K.,
Di, L.,
and Small, D. M.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
2185-2191[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Di, L.,
and Small, D. M.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
16672-16677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Kodall, D.,
and Duclos, R.
(1992)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
61,
169-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Kodali, D. R.,
Tercyak, A.,
Fahey, D. A.,
and Small, D. M.
(1990)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
52,
163-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Franks, A.
(1958)
Br. J. Appl. Phys.
9,
349-352[CrossRef]
|
| 43.
|
Fyfe, C. A.
(1983)
in
Solid State NMR for Chemistry
(Fyfe, C. A., ed)
, pp. 180-260, CFC Press, Ontario, Canada
|
| 44.
|
Markley, K. S.,
O'Connor, R. T.,
and Singleton, W. S.
(1960)
Fatty Acids
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 162-164, Interscience Publications, New York
|
| 45.
|
Dalling, D. K.,
Zilm, K. W.,
Grant, D. M.,
Heeschen, W. A.,
Horton, W. J.,
and Pugmire, R. J.
(1981)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
103,
4817-4824[CrossRef]
|
| 46.
|
Hamilton, J. A.,
Bhamidipati, S. P.,
Kodali, D. R.,
and Small, D. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1177-1186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Bruzik, K. S.,
Salamonczyk, G. M.,
and Sobon, B.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1023,
143-146[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Gunstone, F. D.,
and Shukla, V. K. S.
(1995)
Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc.
31,
219-137[CrossRef]
|
| 49.
|
Hartmann, R. S.,
and Hahn, E. L.
(1962)
Phys. Rev.
128,
2042-2053[CrossRef]
|
| 50.
|
Rethwisch, D. G.,
Jacintha, M. A.,
and Dybowski, C. R.
(1993)
Anal. Chim. Acta
283,
1033-1043[CrossRef]
|
| 51.
|
Rhee, S. G.,
and Bae, Y. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15045-15053[Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Applegate, K. R.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1986)
J. Lipid Res.
27,
658-680[Abstract]
|
| 53.
|
Applegate, K. R.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1991)
J. Lipid Res.
32,
1635-1644[Abstract]
|
| 54.
|
Applegate, K. R.,
and Glomset, J. A.
(1991)
J. Lipid Res.
32,
1645-1655[Abstract]
|
| 55.
|
Epand, R. M.
(1996)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
81,
101-104[CrossRef]
|
| 56.
|
Vigh, R. M.,
Maresca, B.,
and Harwood, J. L.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
369-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Goldberg, E. M.,
Lester, D. S.,
Borchard, D. B.,
and Zidovetzki, R.
(1994)
Biophys. J.
66,
382-393[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Goldberg, E. M.,
Lester, D. S.,
Borchard, D. B.,
and Zidovetzki, R.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
965-973[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Hinderliter, A. K.,
Dibble, A. R. G.,
Biltonen, R. L.,
and Sando, J. J.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
6141-6141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Dibble, A. R. G.,
Hinderliter, A. K.,
Sando, J. J.,
and Biltonen, R. L.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
1877-1890[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Postle, L. W. Gonzales, W. Bernhard, G. T. Clark, M. H. Godinez, R. I. Godinez, and P. L. Ballard
Lipidomics of cellular and secreted phospholipids from differentiated human fetal type II alveolar epithelial cells
J. Lipid Res.,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
1322 - 1331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bitsanis, M. A. Crawford, T. Moodley, H. Holmsen, K. Ghebremeskel, and O. Djahanbakhch
Arachidonic Acid Predominates in the Membrane Phosphoglycerides of the Early and Term Human Placenta
J. Nutr.,
November 1, 2005;
135(11):
2566 - 2571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|