![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 10, 7013-7020, March 10, 2000
From the Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für
Kristallographie, Takustrasse 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
The interaction of the two transcriptional
regulators RcsA and RcsB with a specific operator is a common mechanism
in the activation of capsule biosynthesis in enteric bacteria. We
describe RcsAB binding sites in the wza promoter of the
operon for colanic acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli
K-12, in the galF promoter of the operon for K2 antigen
biosynthesis in Klebsiella pneumoniae, and in the
tviA (vipR) promoter of the operon for Vi
antigen biosynthesis in Salmonella typhi. We further show
the interaction of RcsAB with the rcsA promoters of various
species, indicating that rcsA autoregulation also depends on the
presence of both proteins. The compilation of all identified RcsAB
binding sites revealed the conserved core sequence TaAGaatatTCctA,
which we propose to be termed RcsAB box. The RcsAB box is also part of
Bordetella pertussis BvgA binding sites and may represent a
more distributed recognition motif within the LuxR superfamily of
transcriptional regulators. The RcsAB box is essential for the
induction of Rcs-regulated promoters. Site-specific mutations of
conserved nucleotides in the RcsAB boxes of the E. coli wza
and rcsA promoters resulted in an
exopolysaccharide-negative phenotype and in the reduction of reporter
gene expression.
Encapsulation by exopolysaccharides
(EPS)1 protects bacteria
against a variety of unfavorable environmental conditions. The production of EPS furthermore represents an essential factor in the
virulence of bacterial pathogens (1). The biosynthesis of high
molecular weight type I EPS in several enteric bacteria like
Escherichia coli (2, 3), Salmonella typhi (4),
Klebsiella pneumoniae (5, 6), and the plant pathogenic
bacteria Erwinia amylovora (7-10) and Pantoea
stewartii (11) is controlled by the Rcs (regulation of
capsule synthesis) regulatory network.
Two transcriptional regulators, RcsA and RcsB, are supposed to induce
EPS biosynthesis cooperatively. The RcsB protein is highly conserved
between different species with about 90% identity (10), and it
represents the cytoplasmic activator of a classical bacterial
two-component system. RcsB might be activated by the membrane-bound
receptor RcsC (3, 12) via phosphotransfer to highly conserved aspartic
acid residues in the N-terminal domain of RcsB. RcsA and RcsB are both
characterized by a LuxR-type C-terminal DNA binding motif, but RcsA
does not contain an N-terminal phosphorylation motif. The RcsA protein
is limiting for the induction of EPS biosynthesis and is virtually not
detectable in the uninduced cell due to its rapid degradation by the
Lon protease (13, 14). The presence of RcsB is absolutely required for
capsule biosynthesis, whereas an rcsA minus phenotype can be
suppressed by multicopy rcsB (15). RcsA might therefore act
as a coinducer of EPS biosynthesis by enhancing the DNA binding
activity of RcsB. Recently, genetic evidence for an autoregulation of
rcsA expression in E. coli has been reported and
a DNA binding activity of RcsA at the rcsA promoter has been
discussed (16).
We have previously shown that a heterodimer formed by one copy of RcsA
and RcsB binds at corresponding regions approximately 500 bp upstream
of the translational start sites of amsG and
cpsA, the first open reading frames (ORF) in the E. amylovora ams operon for amylovoran biosynthesis, and in the
P. stewartii cps operon for stewartan biosynthesis,
respectively (17, 18). The two operons are highly homologous, and the
activation of Rcs-dependent promoters by a RcsAB
heterodimer as a general mechanism remained unclear. In addition, some
evidence for modified Rcs-dependent regulation mechanisms
in E. coli and S. typhi has been proposed (4,
16).
In this work we demonstrate that the binding of RcsAB to regulatory DNA
regions is a general principle in the Rcs-mediated activation of gene
expression. We present RcsAB binding sites identified in the presumed
main promoters of EPS biosynthetic operons of E. coli,
K. pneumoniae, and S. typhi. RcsAB further modulates the rcsA autoregulation in those species by
binding to the rcsA promoters. The compilation of all
identified RcsAB binding sites allows us to define the RcsAB box as a
new conserved bacterial operator. The RcsAB box was analyzed in
vitro and in vivo, and it was found to be essential for
full promoter activity in E. coli.
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Oligonucleotides, and DNA
Techniques--
The E. coli strains Xl1-Blue (19), BL21,
C600, DH5 Expression and Purification of Proteins--
RcsA proteins were
produced with the plasmids pM-RcsAEA,
pM-RcsAEC, and pM-RcsAPS (17, 18) in strain
BL21 as C-terminal fusions to the maltose-binding protein. RcsB
proteins were produced with the plasmids pQ-RcsBEC and
pQ-RcsBEA (17) with an N-terminal poly(His)6
tag in the strain JB3034. The proteins were purified as described (17,
18). If appropriate, the purified RcsA and RcsB proteins of E. coli, E. amylovora, and P. stewartii were named according to their origin RcsAEC, RcsAEA,
RcsAPS, RcsBEC, and RcsBEA,
respectively. A BamHI/HindIII restriction
fragment from plasmid pQHB (22) containing the coding region of
Bordetella pertussis bvgA was cloned into the expression
vector pMalc2, resulting in plasmid pM-bvgA. The BvgA protein was
produced from strain DH5 Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Radioactive DNA
labeling with [ Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Technique--
SPR measurements
were performed with a BIAcore X instrument (BIAcore, Uppsala, Sweden).
Biotinylated DNA (about 60 resonance units) were coupled to the
streptavidin-coated sensor chip SA as recommended by the manufacturer.
The experiments were carried out at a flow rate of 50 µl/min. The DNA
fragments and proteins were diluted in running buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA). Bovine serum
albumin and
Kinetic analyses were done using the BIAevaluation 3.0 program. To
determine the binding properties of the proteins, 1:1 Langmuir kinetics
provided by the software were used.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Plasmid pMW31 was constructed by
cloning a 3-kb DNA fragment starting seven nucleotides upstream of the
RcsAB box of the wza gene into the BglII and
PstI sites of the suicide vector pfdA8 (20). In plasmid
pMW29, four essential nucleotide positions in the RcsAB box
TAAAGAAACTCCTA of the 3-kb fragment were modified by PCR, resulting in
the sequence GAACTCAACTCCTA, where the mutated bases were underlined. The plasmids were transformed into E. coli C600 by electroporation and selected for kanamycin
resistance. The correct insertion of the plasmids by homologous
recombination was verified by PCR analysis of the isolated chromosomal DNA.
An approximately 1-kb DNA fragment generated by PCR and containing the
complete E. coli rcsA gene starting 38 bp upstream of the
RcsAB box, was cloned into the vector pBluescript KS+
resulting in plasmid prcsA-WT. Four essential positions of the RcsAB
box TAAGGATTATCCGA in plasmid prcsA-WT were mutated by PCR upon
introduction of an EcoRI restriction site and resulting in the sequence GAATTCTTATCCGA with the mutated
bases underlined.
Determination of Polysaccharides and Biochemical Assays--
EPS
were quantified from cells grown on cellophane-covered LB-agar for
24 h at 37 °C. After harvesting, the cell number was determined
and the capsules were washed off from the cells by vigorous shaking for
3 min. The cells were pelleted by ultracentrifugation, and the
supernatant was dialyzed against water. The polysaccharides were
determined as described (23).
The enzymatic activity of the Location of an RcsAB Binding Site in the E. coli wza
Promoter--
The 485-bp PCR fragment Pwza485
containing the putative promoter and the first nine codons of
wza, the first ORF in the operon for colanic acid
biosynthesis in E. coli, interacted with RcsABEC in EMSAs. Terminal deletions revealed the 55-bp fragment
Pwza55 spanning nucleotide positions
The alignment of the 55-bp fragment with the RcsAB binding site of the
E. amylovora amsG promoter (18) implicated several nucleotides in the region from
To analyze whether the wza promoter exhibits some preference
for the recognition by the homologous RcsABEC proteins, we
used the 55-bp fragment of the wza promoter as a target in
EMSAs with various combinations of the RcsAEA,
RcsAEC, RcsAPS, RcsBEA, and RcsBEC proteins (Fig. 2). The wza promoter was
recognized by the heterologous Rcs proteins in all combinations tested,
and we could not detect significant differences in the extent of
retardation of the DNA fragment. We observed no binding of
RcsAEC or RcsBEC alone to the 55-bp fragment,
or to the 485-bp fragment containing the complete wza
promoter in concentrations up to 4.5 µM. In contrast, approximately 0.2 µM of the two proteins together already
retarded these DNA fragments in EMSAs. The DNA fragment
Pwza48 spanning the nucleotide positions
The binding kinetics of the RcsABEC heterodimer at
Pwza72 was analyzed by the surface plasmon
resonance technique (Fig. 3). With
protein concentrations in a range of 47 nM and 7.5 µM, the ka was calculated to
5.4 ± 3.3 × 104 M In Vivo Analysis of the E. coli wza RcsAB Binding Site by
Mutagenesis--
The chromosomal merodiploids MW29 and MW31 of the
E. coli K12 strain C600 were constructed after integration
of the two plasmids pMW29 and pMW31 by homologous recombination. The
wza promoter of strain MW31 was truncated just upstream of
the RcsAB box, and strain MW29 contained additionally four point
mutations in essential bases within the identified RcsAB binding site.
The phenotypes of the mutants were assayed after introduction of
plasmid pEA101 containing the E. amylovora rcsA gene, which
resulted in the wild type strain C600 in the induction of colanic acid
biosynthesis by activation of the wza promoter. The EPS
production and the phenotype of the control mutant MW31 × pEA101
was not altered compared with the wild type strain C600 × pEA101
(Table III). Thus, the approximately
450-bp fragment upstream of wza is sufficient for full
promoter activity. In contrast, the EPS production of the mutant
MW29 × pEA101 was drastically reduced and the mutant showed a
butyrous colony type (Table III). These results demonstrate the
importance of the identified RcsAB binding site for the activation of
colanic acid biosynthesis, and they indicate that RcsAB might also bind
in vivo to that region.
RcsA and RcsB Bind to the rcsA Promoters of E. coli, K. pneumoniae,
S. typhi, and E. amylovora--
The autoregulation of E. coli
rcsA has been reported previously (16), and we investigated
whether the activation of rcsA promoters is also directed
via DNA binding of RcsAB. The 277-bp PCR fragment
PrcsAEC277 containing the intergenic region
between the E. coli fliR and rcsA genes including
the start codon of rcsAEC was clearly retarded
by RcsABEC (Fig.
4A). A putative RcsAB binding site was detected at nucleotide positions
If the autoregulation of rcsA expression is a conserved
mechanism, an RcsAB binding site should also be present in the
rcsA promoters of other species. We detected putative RcsAB
binding sites in the promoter regions of rcsA genes from
E. amylovora, K. pneumoniae and S. typhi at locations between
The compilation of the RcsAB binding sites of the four rcsA
promoters and of the promoters of wza, amsG, and
cpsA (Table I) revealed several highly conserved positions
within a core sequence of 14 bp, which we will further term RcsAB box.
The RcsAB Box Is Essential for rcsA Autoregulation in E. coli--
The plasmids prcsA-WT, containing the cloned E. coli
rcsA gene with an approximately 300-bp upstream region including
the RcsAB box and prcsA-M4, containing mutations in four essential positions of the RcsAB box, were transformed into the E. coli strain DH5
In contrast, the introduction of plasmid prcsA-M4 in the lon
minus strain SG1087 resulted in a fluidal phenotype and in an increased
EPS production (Table III). Accordingly, the expression of a
cpsB::lacZ fusion in the lon minus
strain JB3034 clearly increased upon introduction of plasmid prcsA-M4
(Table III), but was still lower compared with that of strain
JB3034 × prcsA-WT. The absence of the Lon protease increases the
half-life of RcsA. The background expression of rcsA with
plasmid prcsA-M4 is then obviously sufficient for the activation of the
colanic acid biosynthetic operon.
Identification of an RcsAB Box in the Gene Cluster for K2 Antigen
Expression in K. pneumoniae, and for Vi Antigen Expression in S. typhi--
The rcsA and rcsB genes have also
been described from the enteric bacteria S. typhi and
K. pneumoniae. If the corresponding capsular polysaccharide
biosynthetic gene clusters were regulated by RcsAB, a RcsAB box should
be present in the main promoters. The first ORF of the S. typhi Vi antigen cluster encodes for the putative regulator TviA
(VipR) and a putative RcsAB box was found at position
16 ORFs are described for the K. pneumoniae K2 antigen
biosynthesis gene cluster. An approximately 0.9-kb intergenic region containing a putative The Heterodimer RcsAB and the Transcriptional Regulator BvgA of
Bordetella pertussis Recognize Similar DNA Sequences--
Similarity
searches with the programs MEME and MAST (32) revealed potential RcsAB
boxes within the regulatory regions bvgA and fha
of B. pertussis and Bordatella parapertussis
(Table I). The two promoters are reported to be activated by BvgA, a
transcriptional regulator of the LuxR superfamily, whose DNA binding
domain is homologous to that of RcsA and RcsB. The two 50-bp DNA
fragments PbvgABP and
PbvgABA, containing the putative RcsAB boxes of
the B. pertussis and B. parapertussis bvga
promoters, respectively, and the 50-bp fragment Pfha
containing the putative RcsAB box of the B. pertussis fha
promoter, were retarded by RcsAB in EMSAs (Fig.
7). The fragment Pfha was also
retarded in vitro by the purified BvgA protein (Fig. 7),
indicating that the homology of the DNA binding domains of RcsAB and
BvgA is sufficient to result in the recognition of similar DNA
sequences. The luxI box, a potential binding site for the
LuxR protein, is not related to the RcsAB box (Table I), and it was not
retarded by RcsAB in an EMSA (data not shown).
The RcsAB box has now been identified in promoters of EPS
biosynthetic operons of five different species. It is always present in
the promoter region preceding the first ORF, while the organization of
the operons is quite variable. The E. amylovora amsG and
P. stewartii cpsA genes are homologous and encode for a
putative UDP-galactose lipid-carrier transferase (28). The first ORF of
the E. coli colanic acid biosynthetic operon,
wza, encodes for a putative outer membrane lipoprotein (33)
and shows homologies to amsH, the second ORF in the
ams operon. The tviA (vipR) gene is so
far unique to S. typhi and encodes for a putative regulator protein (4, 34). The orf1 of K. pneumoniae
encodes for a GalF homologue, while galF represents the last
ORF of the E. coli wza operon (33). The location of the
RcsAB box is therefore correlated to the putative main
promoters of EPS biosynthetic operons and not to a specific gene.
The regulation of colanic acid biosynthesis in E. coli K12 by Rcs proteins has been shown (35). A fragment
of approximately 470 bp of the wza promoter was
found to be sufficient for an RcsAB dependent activation (25).
This is in agreement with the phenotype of our mutant MW31. The
characterized RcsAB box is located just at the 5'-end of this essential
promoter region. As observed with the amsG promoter (18),
RcsA alone was not able to bind to the wza promoter. In
addition, an inverted repeat sequence, previously suspected to be an
RcsA binding site (16), does not seem to be essential for the in
vitro binding of RcsAB. However, some beneficial effects for the
RcsAB binding at the wza promoter could not be ruled out as
the deletion of sequences including the repeat resulted in a reduced
extent of retardation by RcsAB. A guanine, which has been shown to be
important for RcsAB binding at the amsG promoter (18), is
replaced by an adenine in the RcsAB box of the wza promoter.
In addition, the minimal size of the RcsAB binding site at the
wza promoter is obviously larger compared with the
previously identified 23-bp sites in the E. amylovora amsG
and P. stewartii cpsA promoters (18). The reduced binding of
RcsAB to the degenerated box might therefore be stabilized by
additional DNA/protein contacts. The phenotype of the mutant MW29
demonstrates an essential role of the RcsAB box for EPS production in vivo, and it is in full accordance with the results
obtained by the in vitro binding studies.
The rcs regulation of EPS biosynthesis was so far
demonstrated in about 10 serotypes of K. pneumoniae (5, 6)
and in about 20 serotypes of E. coli (3), all producing
structurally different capsular polysaccharides. While the complete
sequence is so far only available for the serotype K. pneumoniae K2 biosynthetic operon, the presence of a RcsAB box can
be expected also in the promoters of the other operons. Elevated copies
of RcsB increased EPS biosynthesis in E. coli K30, but the
phenotype of rcsA and rcsB mutants indicated that
both genes are not essential for low level EPS biosynthesis (3). The
large noncoding upstream regions of orf3 of the K2
biosynthetic operon and of its homologue orfX of the K30
biosynthetic operon contain a putative
The Vi antigen, a linear homopolymer of The detection of an RcsAB box in corresponding regions in the
rcsA promoters of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. typhi, and E. amylovora agrees with a previously
proposed autoregulation mechanism of rcsA expression in
E. coli (16). The self-activation of the rcsA
promoter might counteract a silencing mechanism on rcsA
expression by the histone-like protein H-NS (39), and it could be
important for the rapid increase in EPS biosynthesis as a fast response on environmental stimuli. We first present evidence that the
rcsA self-activation is dependent on both RcsA and RcsB. The
rcsA self-activation is not confined to E. coli
but might be a general mechanism in enteric bacteria. We also
demonstrate that the RcsAB box, previously identified by in
vitro DNA/protein interaction studies, is essential for full
activity of the rcsA promoter in vivo. An
inverted repeat sequence, present upstream of the RcsAB box, is
dispensable at least for the in vitro binding of RcsAB. In
addition, the rcsA promoter remained highly active in
plasmid prcsA-WT despite the truncation of this sequence. The
chromosomal rcsA expression in an E. coli lon
strain was rcsB-dependent, while the RcsA
protein could be detected in the same strain containing multicopy
rcsA (40). The mechanism of autoregulation requires some
leakiness of the rcsA promoter. Its activity might therefore
be enhanced but not strictly depend on the binding of RcsAB. This is in
accordance with the described cpsB induction by the high
copy plasmid prcsA-M4, containing a mutated RcsAB box, in an E. coli lon strain. The leaky expression from multicopy
rcsA is obviously sufficient to activate some EPS
biosynthesis, when the half-life of RcsA is drastically increased by
the lon mutation (14).
The consensus RcsAB box with the sequence TaAGaatatTCctA was determined
out of 12 identified wild type RcsAB boxes from the EPS biosynthetic
operons of E. coli, S. typhi, K. pneumoniae, E. amylovora,
and P. stewartii, from the rcsA promoters of
E. amylovora, P. stewartii, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae and from the bvga and fha
promoters of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis.
The RcsAB box consensus shows some variations from the consensus
previously revealed by in vitro selection of the
amsG promoter (18). The differences might be caused by some
influences of the DNA context of the in vitro selected
sequence, and also by the relative low stringency used during the
in vitro selection. The RcsAB operator is centered
approximately 100 to 70 bp upstream of the presumed A consensus motif present in the C-terminal DNA binding domains of
transcriptional regulators of the LuxR superfamily indicates some
common mechanisms in protein/DNA recognition (42). While the
lux box, a 20-bp repeat centered at approximately We thank C. Langner and R. Diehl for
technical assistance. We are grateful to W. Saenger for helpful
discussions and critical review of the manuscript, and to J. Schneider-Mergener and C. Landgraf for providing the BIAcore technique
and for helpful assistance. We further thank W. Schröder for
providing us with oligonucleotides and C. Kieker for help in the
initial part of this project.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
EPS, exopolysaccharide;
bp, base pair(s);
kb, kilobase pair(s);
ORF, open
reading frame;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay;
SPR, surface plasmon resonance.
The RcsAB Box
CHARACTERIZATION OF A NEW OPERATOR ESSENTIAL FOR THE REGULATION
OF EXOPOLYSACCHARIDE BIOSYNTHESIS IN ENTERIC BACTERIA*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(Stratagene), and JB3034 (15) and the plasmids pQE30
(Qiagen), pMalc2 (New England Biolabs), and pfdA8 (20) were used for
cloning and expression studies. Standard DNA techniques were done as
described (21). DNA fragments were amplified from chromosomal DNA of
strain Xl1-Blue with Vent polymerase and suitable primers. The
sequences of the oligonucleotides are available upon request.
× pM-bvgA and purified by affinity
chromatography of the crude extract with a dextrin column.
-32P]dATP and the EMSA technique were
done as described previously (17, 18). The RcsAB heterodimer was
obtained by mixing equimolar concentrations of the two proteins. For
the reconstitution of double-stranded DNA fragments, about 1 µg of
each of two complementary oligonucleotides were mixed in 200 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl and incubated
for 5 min at 95 °C. The mixture was cooled slowly to room
temperature and subsequently labeled. Phosphorylation of BvgA was
obtained by incubating the protein in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH
7.0, 20 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 20 mM acetylphosphate for 20 min at 28 °C.
-DNA were added to the protein solutions to a final
concentration of 200 and 8 ng/µl, respectively. RcsA/RcsB mixtures of
various concentrations ranging from about 47 nM to about
7.5 µM were injected allowing an association time of
120 s and a dissociation time of 300 s. A reference flow cell
loaded with a random DNA target of same size as the probe DNA target
was used to subtract unspecific DNA/protein interactions. Regeneration
of the chip surface was achieved by removing all bound proteins with a
pulse of 5 µl of 0.05% SDS in running buffer.
-galactosidase was determined with the
o-nitrophenyl
-D-galactopyranoside assay
after Miller (24).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
119 to
65 relative to the transcriptional start site of wza (Fig.
1) as sufficient for a retardation by the
RcsABEC heterodimer (Fig. 2).
The extent of retardation was diminished with the 41-bp fragment
Pwza41 from positions
119 to
79, and no
retardation was observed with the 27-bp fragment Pwza27 spanning nucleotide positions
106 to
80. This was also observed with the 38-bp fragment
Pwza38 spanning nucleotide positions
119 to
82. This indicated that the 28-bp region spanning nucleotide positions
106 to
79 relative to the transcriptional start site of
wza was essential but not sufficient for the binding of
RcsABEC (Figs. 1 and 2). An extension of the 3'-end of the
55-bp fragment did not further contribute to a better binding of
RcsABEC, and the extent of retardation of the 72-bp
fragment Pwza72 spanning positions
119 to
48
was comparable to that of Pwza55 (data not shown). Incubation at 28 °C compared with 37 °C prior to
electrophoresis increased the percent of retardation of the
RcsABEC/DNA complex about 3-fold.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Analysis of the RcsAB binding site in the
E. coli wza promoter. The RcsAB box is
underlined twice, and putative promoter consensus
sequences are underlined once. Numbers
indicate nucleotide positions relative to the transcriptional start
site. Fragments analyzed for RcsAB binding in EMSAs are indicated by
lines and designated as in the text. Retarded fragments are
marked with "+", nonretarded fragments with "
". Bases
analyzed by mutagenesis are shown above the sequences, the
corresponding positions are given in brackets as mentioned
in the text. Up mutations are in bold, and down mutations
are italic.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Retardation of the E. coli wza
promoter by RcsAB. Fragments Pwza27,
Pwza38, Pwza41, and
Pwza48 were analyzed in EMSAs with
RcsABEC at standard conditions. The retardation of fragment
Pwza55 was furthermore analyzed with
heterologous RcsAB proteins: RcsAEC/RcsBEC
(lane 1), RcsAEC/RcsBEA
(lane 2), RcsAEA/RcsBEA
(lane 3), and
RcsAPS/RcsBEA (lane 4).
Proteins were used in concentrations of 1.7 µM for
RcsBEC and RcsBAE, and of 5.7 µM
for RcsAEC, RcsAEA, and RcsAPS,
respectively. I, retarded DNA fragments; II, free
DNA.
115 to
96 relative to the
transcriptional start site of wza as putative targets for
RcsAB (Fig. 1). Suspected positions were further analyzed by the
introduction of putative up and down mutations according to the
RcsABamsG consensus (Table I). The replacement of the degenerated
adenine at position
110 by a conserved guanine in the fragments
Pwza72 (G
109) and
Pwza72 (G
109A
108)
increased the extent of retardation by RcsABEC (Table
II). In contrast, the retardation was
considerably reduced after replacing the highly conserved thymine at
position
112 in fragment Pwza72 (G
112) by guanine. The retardation was completely
abolished in fragment Pwza72
(C
110T
108C
106) carrying
mutations in three conserved positions. A decreased percent of
retardation in an EMSA was furthermore observed after the replacement
of two less conserved adenines by cytosines in the fragment
Pwza72 (C
98C
96).
Interestingly, two mutations adjacent to the putative RcsAB consensus
also reduced the extent of retardation of fragment
Pwza72 (G
91C
90) by the
two proteins (Table II). This gives evidence for additional DNA/protein
interactions neighboring the consensus motif.
Definition of the RcsAB box in ResAB binding sites
In vitro analysis of the RcsAB binding site in the E. coli
wza promoter
95 to
48, including an inverted repeat sequence, was retarded neither by
RcsAEC nor by RcsABEC (Fig. 2). In addition,
the mutation of four bases in the inverted repeat sequence of the
fragment Pwza72
(C
68G
67G
66A
65)
did not show any effect on the retardation by RcsABEC
(Table II).
1
s
1 and the kd to 1.4 ± 0.4 × 10
3 s
1, resulting in a
KD of 77 ± 28 nM. The
KD of RcsABEC at the E. coli
wza promoter corresponds to the KD of
RcsABEA at the E. amylovora amsG promoter
previously determined by the EMSA technique (18). We furthermore
analyzed the DNA fragment Pwza72
(G
112C
109T
108C
107),
containing four point mutations in highly conserved positions (Fig. 1).
This fragment was not retarded by RcsAB in an EMSA (Table II). The
ka was calculated to 560 ± 140 M
1 s
1 and the
kd to 2.4 ± 1.0 × 10
2
s
1, resulting in an approximately 103-fold
increased KD of 50 ± 30 µM.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
SPR analysis of the RcsAB binding
properties. SPR measurements were performed with the immobilized
DNA fragments Pwza72 (solid
line) and
Pwza72(G
112C
109T
108C
107)
(dotted line). Resonance units with the two
fragments were determined with a random 72-bp DNA fragment as a
control; the beginning of the injection was defined as 0 s. In the
presented diagrams, RcsB was used at 750 nM and RcsA at
3.75 µM.
Phenotype of mutated RcsAB boxes in E. coli
264 to
251 relative to
the translational start site of rcsAEC (Table
I). Accordingly, the reconstituted 34-bp DNA fragment
PrcsAEC34 spanning nucleotide positions
274 to
241 was retarded by RcsABEC (Fig. 4A). Among the most critical positions for RcsAB binding are three conserved purines most likely represented by the sequence GGA at positions
261
to
259 in the rcsAEC promoter. The mutation of
the three purines to the sequence TTC in fragment
PrcsAECM completely abolished retardation of the
277-bp fragment by RcsABEC (Fig. 4A). This demonstrated that the proposed sequence is essential for the in vitro binding of the Rcs proteins to the
rcsAEC promoter. The rcsA
autoregulation appears to be dependent on the presence of both
proteins, as neither RcsA nor RcsB alone in concentrations of up to 4.5 µM were able to shift the 277-bp fragment of the rcsAEC promoter in EMSAs.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of RcsAB binding sites in the
rcsA promoters of E. coli, E. amylovora, K. pneumoniae, and S. typhi. EMSAs were performed with 2 µM
RcsAEC and 2 µM RcsBEC,
I, retarded DNA fragments; II, free DNA.
A, analysis of the E. coli rcsA promoter.
PrcsAEC277, 277-bp fragment upstream of
rcsAEC; PrcsAECM,
PrcsAEC277 with the mutations
T
261T
260C
259;
PrcsAEC34, 34-bp fragment from
241 to
274
relative to the translational start of rcsAEC.
B, analysis of rcsA promoters from various
enteric bacteria. PrcsAKP, 45-bp fragment from
223 to
267 upstream of rcsAKP;
PrcsAEA, 29-bp fragment from
290 to
318
upstream of rcsAEA;
PrcsAST, 38-bp fragment from
238 to
275
upstream of rcsAST. 1, without
protein; 2 and 3, 2 µM
RcsABEC.
321 to
244 relative to the
translational start sites (Table I). We could demonstrate an
interaction of RcsABEC with the 29-bp fragment PrcsAEA from
331 to
302 of E. amylovora rcsA, with the 29-bp fragment
PrcsAKP from
239 to
267 of K. pneumoniae rcsA and with the 29-bp fragment
PrcsAST from
275 to
247 of S. typhi
rcsA (Fig. 4B). An alignment of rcsA
promoters of the closely related species E. coli, S. typhi
and K. pneumoniae revealed several identical regions located
further downstream, which might represent promoter consensus sequences
(Fig. 5). The RcsAB binding sites are
then located approximately 100 bp upstream of the presumed
transcriptional start sites of the rcsA genes.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Alignment of the rcsA
promoters of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and
S. typhi. The essential region as analyzed
in vivo with the rcsAEC promoter is
shown. The overall identity of the three promoters is 42.7%. Identical
positions are marked by asterisks; the rcsA start
codons, putative ribosomal binding sites (RBS), and putative
promoter consensus sequences are underlined. The RcsAB boxes
are shaded; nucleotides in italic above the
aligned sequences indicate mutated positions in plasmid prcsA-M4.
, and the bacteria were analyzed for their
phenotype. The plasmid prcsA-WT with the wild type rcsA
promoter increased the EPS production and resulted in a fluidal colony
type. This was obviously due to an increased RcsA copy number (Table
III). In contrast, the colonies remained butyrous with plasmid prcsA-M4 containing the four point mutations in the RcsAB box, and the EPS
production was dramatically decreased compared with strain DH5
× prcsA-WT. These results show that the RcsAB box is also essential
for the rcsA autoregulation in vivo in E. coli.
322 to
309
relative to the translational start site of tviA (Table I).
The 60-bp fragment PtviA spanning nucleotides
347 to
288
was retarded by RcsABEC in EMSAs (Fig.
6). This indicates that the
tviA RcsAB box is recognized in vitro by the two
proteins.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Retardation of DNA fragments containing RcsAB
boxes from the promoters of K. pneumoniae
Pgalf and S. typhi
PtviA. The 59-bp fragment Pgalf and the
60-bp fragment Ptvia were analyzed with EMSAs at standard
conditions for RcsABEC binding. Proteins were added in
concentrations of 2 µM. I, retarded DNA
fragments; II, free DNA.
54-dependent promoter
precedes orf3, but the DNA fragment does not contain a RcsAB
box. However, a RcsAB box is located at positions
181 to
168
relative to the translational start site of orf1, encoding a
GalF like protein (Table I). The retardation of the 59-bp DNA fragment
PgalF spanning nucleotides
202 to
144 by RcsABEC (Fig. 6) gives evidence that the region upstream of
galF (orf1) might contain an
Rcs-dependent promoter.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Retardation of identical DNA fragments by
RcsABEC and B. pertussis
BvgA. EMSAs with the fragments
PbvgABP and PbvgABA and
Pfha were performed at standard conditions without protein
(lanes 1) and with 2 µM RcsABEC
(lanes 2 and 3). Fragment
Pfha was retarded with RcsAB (left
picture; lane 1, without protein,
lane 2, 1 µM; lane
3, 2 µM) and with BvgA (right
picture; lane 1, without protein;
lane 2, 1.2 µM; lane
3, 6.1 µM). I, retarded DNA
fragments; II, free DNA.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
54-dependent promoter, while the only
detectable RcsAB box in the K2 operon is present upstream of
galF (orf1). RcsAB might therefore activate the
expression of galF (orf1) and possibly
orf2, whereas the further downstream located genes
might depend upon the regulation of additional mechanisms. The product
of galF (orf1) might increase the biosynthesis of
activated sugar precursors, and the homology of orf2
to the EPS related gene orf1 of Aeromonas
hydrophila indicates some involvement of its gene product in K2
polysaccharide biosynthesis.
-1,4
2-deoxy-2-N-acetylgalactosamine uronic acid, is produced by
all strains of S. typhi, and Salmonella paratyphi
as well as from some strains of Salmonella dublin and
Citrobacter freundii (36, 37). The
RcsB-dependent biosynthesis of the Vi polysaccharide has
been reported (4, 38), and the rcsA and rcsB
genes have been isolated from S. typhi (4). However, an
involvement of RcsA in the regulation of Vi antigen biosynthesis could
not be shown (4). Our findings indicate a potential molecular target
for the interaction of RcsA together with RcsB upstream of
tviR (vipR) at the presumed main promoter for Vi
antigen biosynthesis. The interaction of the putative regulator TviA
(VipR) with its own promoter, containing the RcsAB box, and with RcsB
(4) has been proposed (34). It will be interesting to elucidate the
in vivo role of the RcsAB box in this complex regulation mechanism.
35 regions of the
wza and rcsA promoters. This indicates that the
RcsAB dimer might act as a class I activator (41) and helps in
attracting the RNA polymerase or in stabilizing the transcriptional complex.
40 bp
from the luxI transcriptional start proposed to be involved
in the DNA binding of LuxR from Vibrio fischeri (31, 43), is
not related to the RcsAB box, similar DNA sequences are recognized by
RcsAB and by BvgA, a response regulator of B. pertussis
virulence factor genes. The DNA binding of BvgA at the RcsAB boxes in
the fha and the bvgaP1 promoters has previously
been shown (44-46). The BvgA protein is also known to bind to the
ptx promoter controlling the expression of pertussis toxin,
which does not contain a RcsAB box. However, BvgA binds about 10 times
weaker to that promoter and evidence for a different mechanism of DNA
recognition has been proposed (45-47). The BvgA binding sites at the
fha and bvgaP1 promoters are located from
approximately
100 to
70 upstream of the transcriptional start
sites, which exactly corresponds to the location of the RcsAB box in
the E. coli wza and rcsA promoters. The
interaction of the
-subunit of the RNA polymerase with BvgA has been
demonstrated (43-45), and a similar function for RcsAB might be
proposed. The homology of the DNA binding domains of BvgA and RcsAB in
addition to the observed recognition of similar DNA sequences could
point to a common phylogenetic origin. A RcsAB boxlike sequence might
therefore be recognized also by some other members of the LuxR superfamily.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-30-838-3463;
Fax: 49-30-838-6702; E-mail: fbern@chemie.fu-berlin.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Leigh, J. A.,
and Coplin, D. L.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
46,
307-346[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Gottesman, S.,
Trisler, P.,
and Torres-Cabassa, A.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
162,
1111-1119 3.
Jayaratne, P.,
Keenleyside, W. J.,
MacLachlan, P. R.,
Dodgson, C.,
and Whitfield, C.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
5384-5394 4.
Virlogeux, I.,
Waxin, H.,
Ecobichon, C.,
Lee, J. O.,
and Popoff, M. Y.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1691-1698 5.
Allen, P.,
Hart, C. A.,
and Saunders, J. R.
(1987)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
133,
331-340[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Mc Callum, K. L.,
and Whitfield, C.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
494-502 7.
Bernhard, F.,
Poetter, K.,
Geider, K.,
and Coplin, D. L.
(1990)
Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.
3,
429-437[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Chatterjee, A.,
Chun, W.,
and Chatterjee, A. K.
(1990)
Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.
3,
144-148
9.
Coleman, M.,
Pearce, R.,
Hitchin, E.,
Busfield, F.,
Mansfield, J. W.,
and Roberts, I. S.
(1990)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
136,
1799-1806[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Bereswill, S.,
and Geider, K.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1354-1361 11.
Poetter, K.,
and Coplin, D. L.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
229,
155-160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Stout, V.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
659-669 13.
Torres-Cabassa, A. S.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
981-989 14.
Stout, V.,
Torres-Cabassa, A.,
Maurizi, M. R.,
Gutnick, D.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
1738-1747 15.
Brill, J. A.,
Quinlan-Walshe, C.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
2599-2611 16.
Ebel, W.,
and Trempy, J. E.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
577-584 17.
Kelm, O.,
Kiecker, C.,
Geider, K.,
and Bernhard, F.
(1997)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
256,
72-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Wehland, M.,
Kiecker, C.,
Coplin, D. L.,
Kelm, O.,
Saenger, W.,
and Bernhard, F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3300-3307 19.
Bullock, W. O.,
Fernandez, J. M.,
and Stuart, J. M.
(1987)
BioTechniques
5,
376-379
20.
Geider, K.,
Hohmeyer, C.,
Haas, R.,
and Meyer, T. F.
(1985)
Gene (Amst.)
33,
341-349[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
22.
Boucher, P. E.,
Menozzi, F. D.,
and Locht, C.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
241,
363-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Dubois, M.,
Giles, K. A.,
Hamilton, J. K.,
Rebers, P. A.,
and Smith, F.
(1956)
Anal. Chem.
28,
350-356[CrossRef]
24.
Miller, J. H.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
25.
Stout, V.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
4273-4280 26.
Arakawa, Y.,
Wacharotayankun, R.,
Ngatsuka, T.,
Ito, H.,
Kato, N.,
and Ohta, M.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
1788-1796 27.
Hashimoto, Y.,
Li, N.,
Yokoyama, H.,
and Ezaki, T.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4456-4465 28.
Bugert, P.,
and Geider, K.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
15,
917-935[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Blattner, F. R.,
Plunkett, G., III,
Bloch, C. A.,
Perna, N. T.,
Burlan, V.,
Riley, M.,
Collado-Vides, J.,
Glasner, J. D.,
Rode, C. K.,
Mayhew, G. F.,
Gregor, J.,
Davis, N. W.,
Kirkpatrick, H. A.,
Goeden, M. A.,
Rose, D. J.,
Mau, B.,
and Shao, Y.
(1997)
Science
277,
1453-1474 30.
Scarlato, V.,
Prugnola, A.,
Aricó, B.,
and Rappuoli, R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6753-6757 31.
Devine, J. H.,
Shadel, G. S.,
and Baldwin, T. O.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
5688-5692 32.
Bailey, T. L.,
and Gribskov, M.
(1998)
Bioinformatics
14,
48-54 33.
Stevenson, G.,
Andrianopoulos, K.,
Hobbs, M.,
and Reeves, P. R.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
4885-4893 34.
Hashimoto, Y.,
Khan, A. Q.,
and Ezaki, T.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1430-1436 35.
Gottesman, S.,
and Stout, V.
(1991)
Mol. Microbiol.
5,
1599-1606[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Baker, E. E.,
Whiteside, R. E.,
Basch, R.,
and Derow, M. A.
(1959)
J. Immunol.
83,
680-686
37.
Felix, A.,
and Pitt, R. M.
(1934)
Lancet
227,
186-191[CrossRef]
38.
Houng, H. S.,
Noon, K. F.,
Ou, J. T.,
and Baron, L. S.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
5910-5 39.
Sledjeski, D. D.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1204-1206 40.
Dierksen, K. P.,
and Trempy, J. E.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
5053-5056 41.
Ishihama, A.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
2483-2489 42.
Henikoff, S.,
Wallace, J. C.,
and Brown, J. P.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
183,
111-132[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Stevens, A. M.,
Dolan, K. M.,
and Greenberg, E. P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12619-12623 44.
Boucher, P. E.,
Murakami, K.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Stibitz, S.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1755-1763 45.
Zu, T.,
Manetti, R.,
Rappuoli, R.,
and Scarlato, V.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
21,
557-565[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Roy, C. R.,
and Falkow, S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
2385-2392 47.
Stibitz, S.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
5615-5621
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Hinchliffe, S. L. Howard, Y. H. Huang, D. J. Clarke, and B. W. Wren The importance of the Rcs phosphorelay in the survival and pathogenesis of the enteropathogenic yersiniae Microbiology, April 1, 2008; 154(4): 1117 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. McClelland, and R. M. Harshey The RcsCDB Signaling System and Swarming Motility in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium: Dual Regulation of Flagellar and SPI-2 Virulence Genes J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2007; 189(23): 8447 - 8457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Schwan, S. Shibata, S.-I. Aizawa, and A. J. Wolfe The Two-Component Response Regulator RcsB Regulates Type 1 Piliation in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2007; 189(19): 7159 - 7163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ferrieres, S. N. Aslam, R. M. Cooper, and D. J. Clarke The yjbEFGH locus in Escherichia coli K-12 is an operon encoding proteins involved in exopolysaccharide production Microbiology, April 1, 2007; 153(4): 1070 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||