|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 10, 7066-7070, March 10, 2000
Disruption of Raf-1/Heat Shock Protein 90 Complex and Raf
Signaling by Dexamethasone in Mast Cells*
David S.
Cissel and
Michael A.
Beaven
From the Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, NHLBI, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1760
 |
ABSTRACT |
Antigen stimulation of mast cells via the IgE
receptor, Fc RI, results in the recruitment of the cytosolic tyrosine
kinase, Syk, and the activation of various signaling cascades. One of these, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK2) cascade, is
inhibited by low concentrations of the immunosuppressant drug, dexamethasone, probably at a step prior to the activation of Raf-1 (Rider, L. G., Hirasawa, N., Santini, F., and Beaven, M. A. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 2374-2380). We now show that
treatment of cultured RBL-2H3 mast cells with nanomolar concentrations
of dexamethasone causes dissociation of the Raf-1·heat shock protein
90 (Hsp90) complex. Raf-1 bereft of this protein fails to associate
with the membrane or Ras in antigen-stimulated cells. Upstream events such as the Syk-dependent phosphorylation of Shc, the
engagement of Shc with the adapter protein, Grb2, and the activation of
Ras itself are unaffected. Interestingly, the counterpart of Raf-1 in
the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascade, MEKK-1
(mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase), is similarly associated
with Hsp90, and this association as well as the activation of MEKK-1
are disrupted by dexamethasone treatment. Disruption of the ERK and JNK
cascades at the level of Raf-1 and MEKK-1 could account for the
inhibitory action of dexamethasone on the generation of inflammatory
mediators in stimulated mast cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The exposure of mast cells to anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids
such as dexamethasone suppresses antigen-induced secretion of granules
and de novo production of arachidonic acid-derived metabolites and inflammatory cytokines (see citations in Refs. 1 and
2). Phospholipase C and MAP1
kinase-related signaling events are also inhibited (2, 3). These
responses, however, are not equally affected by glucocorticoids. Nanomolar concentrations of dexamethasone, for example, suppress activation of the ERK2 MAP kinase as well as the production of arachidonic acid and the cytokine, TNF , but only partially inhibit phospholipase C-mediated events and degranulation (2, 4).
In investigating the mechanisms of actions of dexamethasone, we have
focused on the ERK2 activation cascade (i.e. Ras Raf-1 MEK ERK2) because production of both arachidonic acid via phospholipase A2 and TNF in the RBL-2H3 mast cell line
is dependent on the activation of this cascade (5). The
phosphorylations of Raf-1, MEK, ERK2, and cytosolic phospholipase
A2 are blocked in dexamethasone-treated cells whereas early
antigen-induced events, such as the tyrosine phosphorylation of the IgE
receptor (Fc RI) and its associated tyrosine kinases, Lyn and Syk,
are unaffected (2). Thus, dexamethasone appears to act at the level of,
or at a step proximal to, the activation of Raf-1.
The events that link the antigen-induced activation of Syk to
activation of Raf-1 include Syk-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation of the receptor docking protein, Shc, and the
association of phosphorylated Shc with the adaptor protein Grb2, which
is constitutively associated with the Ras guanine nucleotide exchange
factor, Sos (6). These associations lead to conversion of Ras to its
active GTP-bound state (7) as well as the activation of Raf-1, MEK, and
ERK2 (8, 9). As reported here, the phosphorylation of Shc, its association with Grb2, and the activation of Ras are not impaired in
dexamethasone-treated cells even though activation of Raf-1, MEK, and
ERK2 is blocked. Furthermore, Raf-1 fails to translocate from cytosol
to membrane and associate with Ras possibly because dexamethasone
disrupts binding of Hsp90 to the Raf-1 multimeric complex without
affecting other proteins in this complex, namely 14-3-3, p50cdc37, and FKBP65 (9, 10). Similar preliminary findings are
reported for MEKK-1, the counterpart of Raf-1 in the JNK cascade. The
findings identify a new site of action of dexamethasone and
highlight the critical role of Hsp90 in MAP kinase signaling.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Materials were obtained from the following
sources: dexamethasone from Sigma;
3,3'-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidylpropionate] (DTSSP) from Pierce;
polyclonal antibodies against Raf-1, Src, MEKK-1, and SHIP and
monoclonal antibodies against 14-3-3 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Inc.; monoclonal antibodies against Raf-1, Grb2, and Hsp90 were from
Transduction Laboratories; other antibodies, kinase substrates, and Ras
activation kit were from Upstate Biotechnology; enhanced
chemiluminescence kit was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; radiolabeled
products were from NEN Life Science Products. The antigen, DNP-BSA,
125I-IgE, and DNP-specific monoclonal IgE were gifts from
Drs. Henry Metzger and Juan Rivera (National Institute of Arthritis and
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies
against p50cdc37 and FKBP65 were gifts of Dr. Gary Perdew
(Department of Veterinary Science, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA) and Dr. Stephanie Simek (National Cancer
Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center), respectively.
Cell Culture and Experimental Procedures--
Experiments were
performed with RBL-2H3(m1) cells, a genetically engineered subline of
RBL-2H3 cells made to express muscarinic m1 receptors (11). Cells were
plated in 60-mm2 (5 × 106 cells/10 ml) or
145-mm2 (1 × 107 cells/30 ml) dishes in
modified Eagle's medium with Earle's salts, supplemented with 15%
fetal bovine serum. For examination of Shc phosphorylation and Ras
activation, fetal bovine serum was omitted. Cultures were incubated
(37 °C) for 18 h with 0.5 µg/ml DNP-IgE to achieve 100%
occupancy of Fc R1 by IgE in the presence of dexamethasone or vehicle
(dimethyl sulfoxide 0.1%), which did not impair cell viability
(>95% viable by trypan blue exclusion). The cultures were then washed
with a glucose saline/PIPES buffer (5) and stimulated in the same
buffer for 5 min or as indicated. Cultures were placed on ice, and all
subsequent manipulations were performed with ice-cold reagents. Cells
were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed (10 min) in
1.0 ml of the following buffers: A (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 12.5 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM
sodium fluoride, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 µg/ml leupeptin, and 25 µg/ml aprotinin), B (20 mM
HEPES, pH 7.3, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 12.5 mM
sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 30 µg/ml leupeptin, 30 µg/ml aprotinin, and 25 mM
p-nitrophenyl phosphate), C (25 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, 25 mM -glycerol phosphate, 2 mM
EDTA, and the protease/phosphatase inhibitors listed for buffer B), or
D (25 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 5 mM KCl, 119.4 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, 1.0%
Nonidet P-40, and the protease/phosphatase inhibitors listed for buffer
A). For Western blot analysis, in vitro kinase assays, and
cell fractionation, cells were lysed in buffers A, B, and C,
respectively. For chemical cross-linking experiments, cells were lysed
in buffer D before addition of 2 mM DTSSP and, 20 min
later, 40 mM glycine to terminate the reaction. Proteins
were immunoprecipitated from this mixture as described below.
Cell Fractionation--
Cell lysates in buffer C were
homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer (~20 strokes) and centrifuged at
500 × g for 5 min to remove nuclei and unbroken cells.
Samples of equal protein content (Bio-Rad protein assay kit) were
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 45 min to separate the
soluble (cytosolic fraction) and insoluble fractions. The latter
fraction was resuspended in 1 ml of buffer C, supplemented with 1%
Triton X-100, rehomogenized (~5 strokes), and centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 45 min to obtain the solubilized
membrane fraction.
Immunoblotting--
Whole cell lysates in buffer A were
clarified by centrifugation at 500 × g (5 min) for
immunoprecipitation. Samples of equivalent protein content of the
clarified lysates as well as the cytosolic and membrane fractions
described above were incubated briefly with agarose beads before
overnight incubation with the appropriate polyclonal antibody. Samples
were then incubated for a further 2 h with Protein A-agarose
beads. The beads were washed 4 times with buffer A and dissolved in 35 µl of Laemmli buffer (12). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Blots
were probed with the indicated primary antibodies and
peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies and visualized by chemiluminescence.
In Vitro Kinase Assays--
Raf-1, MEK, and ERK were
immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates (5 × 106
cells) or cytosolic/membrane fractions (from 15 × 106
cells) as described above except that immunoprecipitates were collected
after 2 h of incubation with the required antibody. They were
washed four times in buffer B (diluted with an equal volume of
phosphate-buffered saline) and once in a MOPS buffer (20 mM
MOPS, pH 7.2, 25 mM -glycerol phosphate, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM dithiothreitol). The assay mixture consisted of
immunoprecipitate, [ -32P]ATP (10 µCi in 150 µM cold ATP), 25 mM MgCl2,
substrate, and the MOPS buffer (final volume 35 µl). The substrates
used were 15 nM inactive mouse MAP kinase kinase-1-GST
(MEK-GST; for Raf-1 activity), 45 nM inactive mouse p42 MAP
kinase-GST (ERK-2-GST; for MEK activity), or 70 µM myelin
basic protein peptide (for ERK activity). The mixtures were incubated
at 30 °C for 30 min (for Raf-1 and MEK activities) or 12 min (for
ERK activity) and then solubilized in 35 µl of Laemmli buffer. The
32P-labeled proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE for
autoradiographic detection.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Dexamethasone Inhibits Activation of Raf-1, MEK, and ERK-2 but Not
Upstream Events--
Exposure of RBL-2H3(m1) cells to 100 nM dexamethasone for 18 h resulted in almost complete
suppression of the antigen-induced activation of Raf-1, MEK, and ERK as
determined by in vitro assay of the immunoprecipitated
kinases from cell extracts (Fig.
1A). Initial experiments had
indicated that suppression of Raf activation was
time-dependent (data not shown but see later figure) and
was prevented by co-treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor
antagonist, RU-486 (1 µM) to indicate the probable
involvement of this receptor (13). The activation of Raf-1 was blocked
whether cells were stimulated with antigen, the calcium-mobilizing
agent, thapsigargin, the protein kinase C stimulant, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate, or the muscarinic m1 agonist, carbachol (14,
15) (Fig. 1B). These results indicated a common point of
convergence for these various stimulants, inhibitable by dexamethasone,
for activation of Raf-1.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dexamethasone inhibits events downstream but
not upstream of Raf-1 activation. RBL-2H3(m1) cells were incubated
with vehicle ( ) or 100 nM dexamethasone (Dex.
+) and DNP-specific IgE (0.5 µg/ml) for 18 h in the presence
(A and B) or absence of bovine calf serum
(C). Cells were either left unstimulated ( ) or stimulated
with antigen (Ag, 20 ng/ml DNP-BSA), 100 nM
thapsigargin (Tg), 50 nM phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA), or 1 mM carbachol
(CBC) for 5 min and then lysed. A,
immunoprecipitates of Raf-1, MEK, and ERK-2 were assayed for kinase
activity with Mg2+ [ -32P]ATP and
substrate, namely inactive MEK-GST (for Raf-1 activity), inactive
ERK-2-GST (for MEK activity), and myelin basic protein (MBP)
peptide (for ERK activity). The phosphorylated proteins were separated
by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. B,
immunoprecipitated Raf-1 was assayed for kinase activity as described
above. C, immunoprecipitated Shc was subjected to SDS-PAGE
and blotted for tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (PY)
(upper panel) and Grb2 (lower
panel). SHIP was identified in Shc immunoprecipitates
(IP) by blotting with anti-SHIP antibody. The results were
representative of two series of experiments and other preliminary
experiments.
|
|
Upstream events of Raf-1 activation were unaffected by dexamethasone
treatment. In addition to the previously noted lack of effect on
antigen-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Fc RI, Lyn, Syk, and the
guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Vav (2), the tyrosine
phosphorylation of Shc isoforms (p46shc and p52shc) and
the increased association of Shc with Grb2 (6) were still apparent in
dexamethasone-treated cells (Fig. 1C). Also, the tyrosine phosphorylation of SHIP that coimmunoprecipitates with Shc (16) was
also unaffected (Fig. 1C). Thus, dexamethasone appeared to target a step proximal to Raf-1 activation.
Dexamethasone Disrupts the Hsp90·Raf-1 Complex and Raf-1
Signaling; Comparisons with Other Kinase·Hsp90
Complexes--
Chemical cross-linking and immunoprecipitation studies
revealed that the Raf-1·14-3-3·p50cdc37·FKBP65·Hsp90
complex remained intact in the dexamethasone-treated cells except for a
loss of Hsp90. As shown in Fig.
2A, antigen stimulation by
itself caused a consistent increase (~50%, mean of five experiments)
in the amount of Hsp90 and a decrease (~45%, mean of three
experiments) in the amount of 14-3-3 associated with the Raf-1 complex.
In dexamethasone-treated cells, Raf-1 was partially bereft of Hsp90 and
failed to show an increased association with Hsp90 following antigen
stimulation. Dexamethasone, however, appeared not to affect the
association of 14-3-3 with Raf-1 and its decrease upon antigen
stimulation. The immunophilin, FKBP65, and p50cdc37 (blots for
p50cdc37 are shown in Fig. 2A) were unaffected by
either antigen stimulation or dexamethasone treatment.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Dissociation of Hsp90 from the Raf-1 complex
and impairment of Raf-1 activation in dexamethasone-treated cells.
RBL-2H3(m1) cells were incubated with 100 nM dexamethasone
(Dex.) overnight except for C and D
where concentration and time were varied as indicated. Cells were then
left unstimulated ( ) or stimulated (+) with antigen (Ag)
as in Fig. 1. Except for the assay of kinase activity (C and
D), whole cell lysates were treated with a cross-linking
reagent (DTSSP) before immunoprecipitation (IP) and
identification of proteins by immunoblotting as follows. A,
blots of Raf-1 immunoprecipitated with anti-Raf-1 antibody were probed
for Hsp90, 14-3-3, and p50cdc37 with antibodies to these
proteins. B, blots of immunoprecipitated Raf-1 (anti-Raf-1),
MEKK-1 (anti-MEKK-1), MEK (anti-MEK), Lyn (anti-Lyn), and Src
(anti-Src) were probed with anti-Hsp90 antibody. C and
D, immunoprecipitated Raf-1 was assayed for kinase activity
with MEK-GST as substrate (upper bands in each
panel) or blotted for Hsp90 (lower
bands in each panel). The results were
representative of three or more experiments.
|
|
Dexamethasone acts through the glucocorticoid receptor in a
time-dependent fashion (see Fig. 2D). However,
no detectable change in expression of Raf-1 (see also Ref. 2), Hsp90,
or any other Raf-1-associated proteins was evident by immunoblotting of
extracts of dexamethasone-treated cells in three series of experiments (data not shown). Other Hsp90 complexes, namely complexes of Hsp90 with
MEKK-1, Lyn, Src, and MEK were also examined (Fig. 2B).
Hsp90 association with MEKK-1 has not been previously reported, but this enzyme is the hierarchical counterpart of Raf-1 in the JNK activation cascade, and its activation is suppressed in
dexamethasone-treated RBL-2H3 cells
(3).2 MEKK-1 was also
associated with Hsp90, and this association was markedly inhibited by
100 nM dexamethasone. The other kinase complexes remained
intact with the possible exception of the Src·Hsp90 complex, which
showed a small (~25%) loss of Hsp90. Although such experiments provided no simple explanation for the loss of Hsp90 from Raf-1 and
MEKK-1, dexamethasone acts presumably through induction or suppression
of synthesis of a protein that regulates association of Hsp90 with
Raf-1 and possibly MEKK-1.
The effects of dexamethasone were apparent at therapeutically relevant
levels. Furthermore, the loss of Hsp90 from the Raf-1 complex
correlated with the inhibition of antigen-stimulated Raf-1 activity
whether dose (Fig. 2C) or time of exposure to dexamethasone (Fig. 2D) was varied. A 50% reduction of Hsp90 binding and
Raf-1 activation was observed at, respectively, 6 and 7 nM
dexamethasone (average IC50 values from three experiments).
These values fall within the range of plasma levels (i.e.
10-20 nM) following therapeutic doses of dexamethasone in
man (17). Maximal effects of dexamethasone occurred at about 15 h.
These data suggested a possible link between loss of Hsp90 and
impairment of Raf-1 activation.
Although the role of Hsp90 and other Raf-1-interacting proteins in
Raf-1 signaling require clarification (18), Hsp90 (19) is known to
promote structural stability of a variety of proteins and to facilitate
signal transduction (20). In its best studied role, Hsp90 binding to
steroid hormone receptors permits ligand activation of the receptors,
and its subsequent dissociation from the receptors permits them to
become transcriptionally active (13). Activation of endothelial
nitric-oxide synthase is also dependent on recruitment of Hsp90 to the
enzyme complex in response to receptor stimulation (21). With respect
to Raf-1, genetic studies in yeast (22) and Drosophila (23)
as well as studies in mammalian cells with the Hsp90-binding agent,
geldanamycin (24), suggest that Hsp90 is essential for Raf-1 stability
and signaling. Geldanamycin blockade of Hsp90 binding to Raf-1 leads to
degradation of Raf-1 and, as a consequence, disruption of Raf-1 signaling (24, 25). The actions of dexamethasone reported here differ
in that Raf-1 signaling is still disrupted even though the levels of
Raf-1 remain unchanged.
With respect to other Raf-1-associated proteins, 14-3-3 is thought to
facilitate the unfolding and the interaction of Raf-1 with Ras with
retention of 14-3-3 by Raf-1 in one model (26) and loss of 14-3-3 in
another (27), the latter model being consistent with the present data.
The effects of antigen and dexamethasone noted above raise the
possibility that Hsp90, possibly in concert with 14-3-3, is also
essential for successful transduction of signals by Raf-1. The role of
the antigen/dexamethasone-insensitive proteins, p50cdc37 and
FKBP65, in Raf-1 signaling are poorly understood.
Inhibition of Translocation of Raf-1 from Cytosolic to Membrane
Fraction and Its Association with Ras--
Studies with geldanamycin
have suggested that Hsp90 is also essential for translocation of Raf-1
to the cell membrane (28). Assays of the cytosolic and membrane
fractions of whole cell extracts (Fig.
3A) showed that Raf-1 activity
was located largely in the cytosolic fraction in unstimulated cells. In
antigen-stimulated cells, Raf-1 activity was increased substantially in
both the cytosolic and membrane fractions although the major portion of the activity still remained in the cytosolic fraction. These increases were not apparent in dexamethasone-treated cells. Raf-1 immunoblots (Fig. 3A) showed that, like Raf-1 activity, Raf-1 protein
was predominantly cytosolic, but following antigen stimulation, the amount of membrane-associated Raf-1 increased substantially, and this
increase was blocked in dexamethasone-treated cells. Calculation of
data from five experiments (values are noted in Fig. 3A)
indicated a 2-3-fold increase in the specific activity of cytosolic
Raf-1 following antigen stimulation even after correction for the
contamination (~15%) of cytosolic fractions by the plasma membrane
marker, 125I-IgE-tagged Fc RI (29) (data not shown). In
contrast to cytosolic Raf-1, the specific activity of membrane Raf-1
remained virtually unchanged and similar to that of cytosolic Raf-1 in
stimulated cells, regardless of the state of stimulation or treatment
with dexamethasone. The antigen-induced association of Raf-1 with Ras (Fig. 3B) was also impaired in dexamethasone-treated cells
although Ras function, as indicated by its association with
phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (data not shown) and a Raf-1 peptide
that binds to activated Ras (Upstate Biotechnology, see legend to Fig.
3) appeared intact in both unstimulated and stimulated cells (Fig.
3C). In three experiments, the binding of Ras to Raf-1
peptide increased upon antigen stimulation and showed similar maximal
increases at 1-2 min in both control (2.0 ± 0.5-fold, mean ± S.E.) and dexamethasone-treated (1.9 ± 0.3-fold) cells.
Dexamethasone itself caused no significant increase in Ras binding
activity in unstimulated cells (1.4 ± 0.3-fold) although an
increase was observed in one of the three experiments. These results
suggested that neither the constitutive activity of Ras in unstimulated
cells nor the further stimulation of Ras in antigen-stimulated RBL-2H3
cells is impaired by treatment with dexamethasone.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dexamethasone inhibits Raf-1 but not Ras
activation. RBL-2H3(m1) cells were incubated with vehicle ( ) or
100 nM dexamethasone (Dex. +) overnight and left
unstimulated ( ) or stimulated with antigen (Ag. +), 200 ng/ml DNP-BSA for 5 min or as indicated. A, Raf-1 was
immunoprecipitated (IP) from cytosolic and membrane
fractions of whole cell lysates and assayed for kinase activity with
MEK-GST as substrate (upper bands) or for Raf-1
protein by Western blot (lower bands). Normalized
values (relative to values for cytosol from antigen-stimulated cells,
second lane) for Raf-1 activity and Raf protein
from five experiments (mean ± S.E.) are indicated. B,
Ras was immunoprecipitated from whole cell lysates and blotted for
Raf-1. C, activated Ras was separated from inactive Ras by
affinity precipitation (AP) from whole cell lysates with a
Raf-1-GST (Ras-binding domain) peptide conjugated to agarose (Ras
activation assay kit, Upstate Biotechnology) and detected by Western
blot. For this experiment (representative of three), cells were
serum-deprived to minimize Ras activity in unstimulated cells and
stimulated with antigen for the indicated times.
|
|
The simplest interpretation of the above results is that Raf-1 is
activated largely in the cytosol and then translocated to the membrane
in its active form through recruitment by Ras. Current models suggest,
however, that Raf-1 is translocated in its inactive form (9) and that
both cytosolic and membrane-associated forms of Raf-1 may be activated
in a Ras-independent and a Ras-dependent manner,
respectively (30). Our data do not distinguish between these two
possibilities, but the data suggest that treatment with dexamethasone
blocks both activation and association of Raf-1 with Ras, that both
processes are dependent on an intact Raf-1·Hsp90 complex, and that
dissociation of this complex by treatment with dexamethasone accounts
for the suppression of the ERK-2/phospholipase A2
activation pathway and ultimately the generation of arachidonic acid
and TNF by dexamethasone in RBL-2H3 cells (Ref. 2 and this paper).
It is apparent from the present and published studies that
glucocorticoids can act via the glucocorticoid receptor to suppress transduction of signals from the plasma membrane to the nucleus at
several steps. Dexamethasone at 0.1 or 1.0 µM
concentrations may negatively regulate various cytokine genes either
directly, by blocking activity of the transcriptional factors AP-1 and
NF- B (see Ref. 31), or indirectly by inducing production of the
inhibitory NF- B protein, I B (32, 33). In addition, dexamethasone
is a potent suppressant of the ERK-2 (2) and JNK (3) MAP kinase pathways apparently because it impedes the proper assembly of Hsp90
with key kinases such as Raf-1 and the less well studied MEKK-1 (this
paper). These pathways have been linked to activation of AP-1 (34),
NF-AT (35), and NF- B (36) in various types of cells, and inhibition
of these pathways would likely influence production of a variety of
cytokines. Production of TNF (37) and interleukin-5 (38) in mast
cells is reported to be dependent on NF- B and NF-AT, respectively.
In conclusion, the present results reveal an unsuspected action of
dexamethasone and point to its possible use in elucidating the role of
Hsp90 in Raf-1 and MEKK-1 signaling.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 10, Rm. 8N109,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1760. Tel.: 301-496-6188; Fax: 301-402-0171; E-mail: beaven@helix.nih.gov.
2
D. S. Cissel and M. A. Beaven,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
Hsp90, heat shock protein 90;
FKBP65, FK506-binding protein 65;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
MEK, MAP kinase/ERK kinase;
MEKK, MEK
kinase;
SHIP, SH2 domain-containing inositol polyphosphate
5-phosphatase;
NF, nuclear factor;
NF-AT, nuclear factor of activated T
cells;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
DNP, dinitrophenol;
DNP-BSA, the
antigen dinitrophenylated bovine serum albumin;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
DTSSP, 3,3'-dithiobis[sulfosuccinimidylpropionate];
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
GST, glutathione S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Galli, S. J.
(1993)
N. Engl. J. Med.
328,
257-265[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Rider, L. G.,
Hirasawa, N.,
Santini, F.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
2374-2380[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Hirasawa, N.,
Sato, Y.,
Fujita, Y.,
Mue, S.,
and Ohuchi, K.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4939-4943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Baumgartner, R. A.,
Hirasawa, N.,
Ozawa, K.,
Gusovsky, F.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
1625-1629[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Zhang, C.,
Baumgartner, R. A.,
Yamada, K.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13397-13402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Cuenod, B.,
Zhang, C.,
Scharenberg, A. M.,
Paolini, R.,
Numerof, R.,
Beaven, M. A.,
and Kinet, J.-P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16268-16272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Macara, I. G.,
Lounsbury, K. M.,
Richards, S. A.,
McKiernan, C.,
and Bar-Sagi, D.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
625-630[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Avruch, J.,
Zhang, X. F.,
and Kyriakis, J. M.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
279-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Morrison, D. K.,
and Cutler, R. E., Jr.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
174-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Coss, M. C.,
Stephens, R. M.,
Morrison, D. K.,
Winterstein, D.,
Smith, L. M.,
and Simek, S. L.
(1998)
Cell Growth Differ.
9,
41-48[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Jones, S. V. P.,
Choi, O. H.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
289,
47-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Pratt, W. B.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1997)
Endocr. Rev.
18,
306-360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Hirasawa, N.,
Scharenberg, A.,
Yamamura, H.,
Beaven, M. A.,
and Kinet, J.-P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10960-10967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Zhang, C.,
Hirasawa, N.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
4968-4975[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Kimura, T.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Appella, E.,
and Siraganian, R. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13991-13996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
O'Sullivan, B. T.,
Cutler, D. J.,
Hunt, G. E.,
Walters, C.,
Johnson, G. F.,
and Caterson, I. A.
(1997)
Biol. Psychiatry
41,
574-584[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sternberg, P. W.,
and Alberola-Ila, J.
(1998)
Cell
95,
447-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Prodromou, C.,
Roe, S. M.,
Piper, P. W.,
and Pearl, L. H.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
477-482[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Pratt, W. B.
(1998)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
217,
420-434[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Garcia-Cardena, G.,
Fan, R.,
Shah, V.,
Sorrentino, R.,
Cirino, G.,
Papapetropoulos, A.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(1998)
Nature
392,
821-823[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Louvion, J-F.,
Abbas-Terki, T.,
and Picard, D.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3071-3083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
van der Straten, A.,
Rommel, C.,
Dickson, B.,
and Hafen, E.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1961-1969[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Schulte, T. W.,
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
Romanova, L.,
Mushinski, J. F.,
Monia, B. P.,
Johnston, J. P.,
Nguyen, P.,
Trepel, J.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5839-5845[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Stancato, L. F.,
Silverstein, A. M.,
Owens-Grillo, J. K.,
Chow, Y.-H.,
Joves, R.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4013-4020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Tzivion, G.,
Luo, Z.,
and Avruch, J.
(1998)
Nature
394,
88-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Roy, S.,
McPherson, R. A.,
Apolloni, A.,
Yan, J.,
Lane, A.,
Clyde-Smith, J.,
and Hancock, J. F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3947-3955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schulte, T. W.,
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
Ingui, C.,
and Neckers, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24585-24588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Dreskin, S. C.,
Pribluda, V. S.,
and Metzger, H.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
4407-4415[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Ziogas, A.,
Lorenz, I. C.,
Moelling, K.,
and Radziwill, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24108-24114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Cato, A. C. B.,
and Wade, E.
(1996)
BioEssays
18,
371-378[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Heck, S.,
Bender, K.,
Kullmann, M.,
Gottlicher, M.,
Herrlich, P.,
and Cato, A. C. B.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4698-4707[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Wissink, S.,
van Heerde, E. C.,
van der Burg, B.,
and van der Saag, P. T.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
355-363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Karin, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16483-16486[Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Prieschl, E. E.,
Pendl, G. G.,
Harrer, N. E.,
and Baumruker, T.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
4963-4970[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Kanno, T.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
5277-5283[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Pelletier, C.,
Varine-Blank, N.,
Rivera, J.,
Iannascoli, B.,
Marchand, F.,
David, B.,
Weyer, A.,
and Blank, U.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4768-4776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Prieschl, E. E.,
Gouilleux, V.,
Walker, C.,
Harrer, N. E.,
and Baumruker, T.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
6112-6119[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hiragun, Z. Peng, and M. A. Beaven
Cutting Edge: Dexamethasone Negatively Regulates Syk in Mast Cells by Up-Regulating Src-Like Adaptor Protein
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2006;
177(4):
2047 - 2050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Damazo, S. Yona, R. J. Flower, M. Perretti, and S. M. Oliani
Spatial and Temporal Profiles for Anti-Inflammatory Gene Expression in Leukocytes during a Resolving Model of Peritonitis
J. Immunol.,
April 1, 2006;
176(7):
4410 - 4418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Cohen-Saidon, I. Carmi, A. Keren, and E. Razin
Antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 in mast cells is dependent on its association with heat shock protein 90beta
Blood,
February 15, 2006;
107(4):
1413 - 1420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hiragun, Z. Peng, and M. A. Beaven
Dexamethasone Up-Regulates the Inhibitory Adaptor Protein Dok-1 and Suppresses Downstream Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Antigen-Stimulated RBL-2H3 Mast Cells
Mol. Pharmacol.,
March 1, 2005;
67(3):
598 - 603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. F. Yang, R. T. Poon, Y. Luo, C. K. Cheung, D. W. Ho, C. M. Lo, and S. T. Fan
Up-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Small-for-Size Liver Grafts Enhances Macrophage Activities through VEGF Receptor 2-Dependent Pathway
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2004;
173(4):
2507 - 2515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. M. Andrade, T. Hiragun, and M. A. Beaven
Dexamethasone Suppresses Antigen-Induced Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Downstream Responses in Mast Cells
J. Immunol.,
June 15, 2004;
172(12):
7254 - 7262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Harding, V. Hsu, K. Kornfeld, and J. F. Hancock
Identification of Residues and Domains of Raf Important for Function in Vivo and in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2003;
278(46):
45519 - 45527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Rosenhagen, C. Soti, U. Schmidt, G. M. Wochnik, F. U. Hartl, F. Holsboer, J. C. Young, and T. Rein
The Heat Shock Protein 90-Targeting Drug Cisplatin Selectively Inhibits Steroid Receptor Activation
Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2003;
17(10):
1991 - 2001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ayroldi, O. Zollo, A. Macchiarulo, B. Di Marco, C. Marchetti, and C. Riccardi
Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Inhibits the Raf-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Binding to Raf-1
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2002;
22(22):
7929 - 7941.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Hundley, A. R. Prasad, and M. A. Beaven
Elevated Levels of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Antigen-Stimulated Mast Cells Is Associated with Minimal Activation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
J. Immunol.,
August 1, 2001;
167(3):
1629 - 1636.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Chaves-Dias, T. R. Hundley, A. M. Gilfillan, A. S. Kirshenbaum, J. R. Cunha-Melo, D. D. Metcalfe, and M. A. Beaven
Induction of Telomerase Activity During Development of Human Mast Cells from Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cells: Comparisons with Tumor Mast-Cell Lines
J. Immunol.,
June 1, 2001;
166(11):
6647 - 6656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Miura and D. W. MacGlashan Jr
Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase regulates p21ras activation during IgE-mediated stimulation of human basophils
Blood,
September 15, 2000;
96(6):
2199 - 2205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|