JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banki, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banki, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 10, 7261-7272, March 10, 2000


Human Transaldolase-associated Repetitive Elements Are Transcribed by RNA Polymerase III*

Andras PerlDagger , Emanuela Colombo, Ella Samoilova, Mark C. Butler, and Katalin Banki

From the Departments of Medicine, Microbiology and Immunology, and Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Syracuse, New York 13210

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Repetitive elements flanked by exons 2 and 3 of the human transaldolase gene, thus termed transaldolase-associated repetitive elements, TARE, were identified in human DNA. Nonpolyadenylated TARE transcripts were detected by Northern blot analysis and cloned by reverse transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction from human T lymphocytes. A dominant 1085-nucleotide long transcript, TARE-6, contained two adjacent Alu elements, a right monomer and a complete dimer, oriented opposite to the direction of transcription of the transaldolase gene. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and in vitro transcription analyses showed that transcription of TARE-6 proceeded in the orientation of the RNA pol III promoter of the Alu dimer and opposite to the orientation of the TAL-H gene. TAREs lacking RNA polymerase III promoter showed no transcriptional activity. In vitro transcription of TARE-6 was resistant to 1 µg/ml alpha -amanitin but sensitive to 100 µg/ml alpha -amanitin and tagetitoxin, suggesting involvement of RNA polymerase III. TAREs in both the transaldolase and HSAG-1 genomic loci were surrounded by TA target site duplications. Homologies between transaldolase and HSAG-1 break off internally at splice donor and acceptor sites. The results suggest RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription of TARE may be a source of repetitive elements, contributing to distinct genes and thus shaping the human genome.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Retrotransposable elements make up as much as 5% of eukaryotic DNA. They are generally considered as a major force in shaping of the genome (1, 2). Retrotransposable elements can be divided into two major classes: those with long terminal repeats (LTRs)1 and those without. The LTR class of elements replicate through RNA intermediates similar to retroviruses (2). In contrast, little is known about the mechanism of retrotransposition of the second class of retrotransposons, the non-LTR elements. Representatives of this class in the human genome include the long (6-7 kb) (LINEs) (3) and short (90-400 bp) interspersed nucleotide elements (SINEs) (4). These elements lack most of the genes encoded by the LTR-containing retrotransposons. The RNA intermediate involved in retroposition of LINEs is transcribed by RNA polymerase II, while that for SINEs is produced by RNA polymerase III. Both LINEs and SINEs are present in the order of 105 copies dispersed throughout the genome. A third family of non-LTR retroposons are retropseudogenes. They represent cDNA copies of fully processed mRNA transcripts. These retropseudogenes lack introns present in the chromosomal locus and always include a poly(A) tract at their 3' end. Since retropseudogenes are deprived of promoter elements located upstream from the transcription initiation site in the parental gene locus, retrotransposition of a correctly initiated mRNA will result in an inactive retropseudogene. However, on rare occasions, retrotransposition of fully processed mRNAs can lead to the creation of new functional genes such as the rat and mouse preproinsulin I gene (5) and jingwey in Drosophila (6).

Evolution of split genes has been suggested to occur by development of a splicing system that could join discontinuous gene structures to make functional proteins or, alternatively, by intron mobility, i.e. a reversal of the splicing process at the RNA level (7-9) or insertion of transposable elements into pre-existing genes (10). The exon-intron structure of genes has been very important in the generation of new genes during evolution (9). Approximately 1 of every 20 genes is expressed by alternative pathways of RNA splicing. As an example, this mechanism allows tissue or growth stage-specific production of 20 different proteins from a single fibronectin gene (11).

We have previously determined that the coding sequence of the human transaldolase (TAL-H) gene contains a transaldolase-associated repetitive element (TARE) (12). TAREs constitute a family of 1,000 to 10,000 repetitive elements encompassed by the 2nd and 3rd coding exons of TAL-H and contain internal sequences of variable length. Nonpolyadenylated TARE transcripts were detected by Northern blot analysis and cloned by reverse transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from human T lymphocytes. A dominant transcript, TARE-6, contained a typical RNA polymerase III promoter within an internal Alu dimer. TARE-6 was transcribed in vitro in the orientation of the RNA pol III promoter. Resistance to alpha -amanitin, sensitivity to tagetitoxin, and mutagenesis studies showed the dependence TARE-6 transcription on RNA polymerase III. Transcriptionally active TAREs have contributed to distinct functional genes and may be a source of mobility in the human genome.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Southern and Northern Blot Analysis-- Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and cell lines, digested with restriction enzymes, electrophoresed in 0.7% agarose gel, blotted to nylon membrane, and hybridized to 32P-labeled DNA probes under high stringency conditions as described previously (13). Total RNA was extracted by the RNAzol method (19). Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated by binding to poly(U) Sephadex column (Life Technologies, Inc.), fractionated in 1% glyoxal gels, and transferred to nylon membranes (13).

Screening of Genomic Library-- A human lymphocyte genomic DNA library was prepared in lambda  DASH phage (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and screened with TAL-H cDNA fragments 4/2 and 4/1 (12) under high stringency conditions as earlier described (13).

PCR-- 10 ng of DNA was subjected to PCR amplification under the following conditions: denaturing at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 40-65 °C experimentally determined for each primer pair for 1 min, primer extension at 72 °C for 1 min in 30 cycles. Following amplification, 10 µl of the 100-µl PCR reaction volume was electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane in 0.4 NaOH, and hybridized to 32P-labeled probe as earlier described (14, 15).

RT-PCR-- 3 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA by 200 units of Superscript reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc., Bethesda, MD) using 80 ng of oligonucleotide or 50 ng of random hexamers as primers for 10 min at room temperature and then for 50 min at 42 °C. The reaction was terminated by heating at 90 °C for 5 min. After chilling on ice, RNA template was digested with 2 units of Escherichia coli RNase H (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 37 °C for 20 min. Subsequently, the first strand cDNA was subjected to PCR. RT-PCR fragments were cloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and sequenced by the chain termination method (16).

Sequencing of the TAL-H Locus-- Three partially overlapping lambda  DASH genomic clones were analyzed (12). To assure reliable sequence data for Alu-rich regions of the TAL-H locus, two adjacent EcoRI fragments (between nucleotides 3541-10172 and 10167-12772) were cloned in the pSP72 vector for transposon-mediated sequencing (17). pSP72-based plasmids were transformed into HB101F' cells. Transposon insertions were created by mating HB101F' donor strains with the JGM recipient strain and plating out the progeny on doubly selective plates (50 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml kanamycin). 28 plasmids with gamma delta transposons spaced 300-400 base pairs apart were selected by PCR-based mapping using primer NGDIR (5'-GTTCCATTGGCCCTCAAAC-3') located at both ends of the transposon and PM001 (5'-CGTTAGAACGCGGCTACAAT-3') or PM002 (5'-GCCGATTCATTAATGCAGGT-3') primers flanking the multiple cloning site of pSP72. Thus, M13 forward (5'-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3' and reverse (5'-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACC-3') sequencing priming sites, carried by the transposon, were introduced throughout the target sequence at 300-400-nucleotide intervals. Sequences of both strands were determined and analyzed with the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (GCG) software (18). Alu sequences were identified with the Pythia program (19, 20). The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank/EMBL data base.

In Vitro Transcription-- As TARE-specific templates, RT-PCR clone 2/8 in Bluescript KS+ plasmid, gel-purified full-length TARE-6-equivalent 2/8 insert and its fragments, truncated at the TAL-H exon 3-proximal end, were utilized. The VA1 template (XbaI-BalI fragment from the adenovirus type 2 genome cloned into the XbaI/SmaI sites of pUC12) pVA1 was used as positive control for RNA polymerase III (pol III)-mediated transcription (21). The adenovirus major late promoter sequence from -400 to +10 fused to a G-less cassette in the pML(C2AT) plasmid was used as positive control template for RNA polymerase II (pol II)-mediated transcription (22). 8 µl of HeLa cell nuclear extract (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was incubated with 0.8 µl of 0.5 µg/µl template for 10 min on ice to allow binding of transcription factors to DNA. Reaction mixtures (11.2 µl) containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10% glycerol, 0.25 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 600 µM ATP, 600 µM UTP, 35 mM CTP, 200 µM 3'-O-methyl-GTP, 5 mM creatine phosphate, 20 ng/µl poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 µCi of [alpha -32P]CTP (800 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products Inc.), 25 units of RNase T1 and 40 units of rRNasin were added to the nuclear extract G-less cassette template complex. Reaction mixtures containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10% glycerol, 0.25 mM EDTA, 85 mM KCl, 3 mM dithiothreitol, 600 µM ATP, 600 µM UTP, 35 mM CTP, 600 µM GTP, 5 mM creatine phosphate, 20 ng/µl poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 µCi of [alpha -32P]CTP (800 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products Inc.), and 40 units of rRNasin were added to VA1 and test template-nuclear extract complexes. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 30 °C for 60 min and terminated by adding 400 µl of stop solution containing 70 µg/ml yeast tRNA, 140 µg/ml proteinase K, 250 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA. Samples were extracted with phenol/chloroform, precipitated with 2.5 volumes of ice-cold filtered ethanol, and vacuum dried for 10 min. Precipitates were resuspended in formamide dye mixture and electrophoresed on an 8% polyacrylamide gel containing M urea, and gels were exposed to x-ray film.

Inhibitors of Transcription-- alpha -Amanitin, a bicyclic octapeptide from the mushroom Amanita phalloides, which selectively inhibits RNA pol II-mediated transcription at low concentrations (23), was obtained from Sigma. Tagetitoxin, an inhibitor of RNA pol III (24), was obtained from Epicentre Technologies (Madison, WI). In vivo transcription in Jurkat (ATCC number CRL8163) and Molt-4 T cell leukemia cell lines (ATCC number CRL1582) was inhibited by a 5-h incubation with 50 µg/ml alpha -amanitin in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml gentamicin, and 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) as earlier described (25). Effect of alpha -amanitin on in vivo transcription was assessed by Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from alpha -amanitin-treated and untreated cells. Transcription by RNA polymerase I was monitored by a 28 S ribosomal probe (pES-28 S cloned into the EcoRI/SalI sites of pGEM4, kindly provided by Dr. Joan Steitz of Yale University). Inhibition of RNA pol II was evaluated by levels of transcription of human beta -actin (26) and 4/1 segment of TAL-H cDNA (12). A 7SL RNA probe (pSP7SL cloned into EcoRI/XbaI sites of SP64, a gift from Dr. Peter Walter of the University of California at San Francisco) was utilized to monitor RNA pol III transcription.

Primer Extension-- Total RNA or in vitro transcribed RNA were used as templates. Prior to primer extension, radiolabeled and non-radioactive in vitro transcription reactions were carried out and separated in a 4% polyacrylamide gel with 7 M urea. TARE transcripts were excised from the gel and passively eluted in 500 mM ammonium acetate, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS at room temperature overnight. Then, RNA was phenol/chloroform extracted, ethanol-precipitated and used for primer extension as earlier described (27). Oligonucleotide primers 5' end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase were annealed with 5 µg of total RNA or 0.5 µg of gel-purified in vitro transcribed RNA at 70 °C for 10 min, chilled on ice for 2 min. RNA was resuspended in extension buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTP, preincubated at 42 °C for 5 min, then 200 units of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) was added, and the sample was incubated at 42 °C for 50 min. The reactions was terminated by heating at 70 °C and chilling on ice. Samples were analyzed in a 6% sequencing gel. cDNA generated with primer extension was cloned by anchored PCR using the 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends kit from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Briefly, cDNA generated with 4/2ORFc primer was treated with RNase, purified on a Glassmax spin cartridge, tailed with dCTP and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), amplified with nested 4/2ORFd and deoxyinosine-containing anchor primers, and cloned into the pCR2.1 vector.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Detection and Cloning of Transaldolase-associated Repetitive Elements, TAREs-- The full-length TAL-H cDNA clone 4/2-4/1 contains 474-bp 5' (4/2 subclone) and 827-bp 3' (4/1 subclone) EcoRI fragments (Fig. 1A). Southern blot hybridizations under high stringency conditions revealed that the 5' segment of the TAL-H cDNA was repetitive while the 3' fragment appeared to be a single copy element in the human genome (Fig. 1B). The functional TAL-H gene has been mapped to a single copy genomic locus (TALDO1) on human chromosome 11 at p15.4-p15.5 (28). Based on comparative Southern blot analyses and screening of two human lymphocyte genomic DNA libraries, the copy number of TARE was estimated between 1,000 and 10,000 per haploid genome (12).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Detection of a transcriptionally active repetitive element in the 5' end of TAL-H specific cDNA clone 4/2-4/1. A, organization of eight coding exons (open boxes) in full-length TAL-H cDNA. Existence of three mini-introns between exons 5 and 8 were recently revealed by sequencing of the entire TAL-H genomic locus. EcoRI cleaves the cDNA into 474-bp 5' (4/2), 32-bp (middle), and 823-bp 3' (4/1) fragments. B, Southern blot hybridization of HindIII and EcoRI digested genomic DNA with 5' (474 bp) and 3' (823 bp) probes. C, Northern blot hybridization of poly(A)+ mRNA and total RNA with 5' and 3' fragments of TAL-H cDNA. The blot previously hybridized with the 3' fragment was reprobed with human beta -actin cDNA (26). Molecular weights are indicated in kilobases.

TARE Units Are Bounded by Terminal Segments Corresponding to TAL-H Exons 2 and 3-- Boundaries of the repetitive element within the TAL-H gene were assessed by gene amplification via PCR from genomic DNA of normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes. A panel of overlapping primer pairs spanning exons 1-8 of TAL-H cDNA were utilized. A series of TARE fragments were amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide primers spanning exons 2 and 3 of TAL-H (Fig. 2, primer set a). These fragments (designated as TAREs 1-6 corresponding to molecular weights 145, 438, 508, 691, 779, and 992 bp in Fig. 2) were cloned and sequenced (Fig. 3A). Each TARE unit was bounded by highly conserved regions corresponding to exons 2 and 3 of the TAL-H gene in an orientation matching with that of the TAL-H locus (Fig. 3B). TARE could not be amplified with 5' primer from TAL-H exon 1 (not shown) or 3' primers from exons 4 through 8 (Fig. 2, primer pairs b, c, and d). Presence of similar TARE units 2-6 was confirmed in peripheral blood lymphocytes of four normal donors and Jurkat T-cell leukemia cells using primers derived from exons 2 and 3 (Fig. 4). This suggested that the repetitive element was confined to exons 2 and 3 of the TAL-H gene.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PCR mapping of TARE in genomic DNA. A, orientation of oligonucleotide primers with respect to the 5' repetitive and 3' non-repetitive segments with the TAL-H cDNA clone 4/2-4/1. Nucleotide positions of PCR primers in correspondence to TAL-H cDNA (12): set a, 4/2ORFb (5'-ACGCCATCGACGAGTACAA-3', positions 151-169) + 4/2REVb (5'-ATCTGGTCCTCTTGTGAC-3', corresponding to positions 295-278); set b, 4/2ORFb + 4/1REV (5'-TGCATTGAACATTCGTTC-3' corresponding to positions 1055-1038); set c, 4/1ORF (5'-TACAACTACTACAAGAAG-3' corresponding to positions 717-734) + 4/1REV; set d, 4/2ORF (5'-TCGAGCTCTACAAGGAAG-3' corresponding to positions 433-450) + 4/1REV 5'- TGCATTGAACATTCGTTC-3' corresponding to positions 1055-1038 in TAL-H. B, agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR reactions utilizing primers pair sets as indicated at the top of each lane. As template, genomic DNA from PBL and plasmid clone 4/2-4/1 were utilized. The gel shown in panel B was transferred to nylon membrane, hybridized to 32P-labeled 474-bp 5' (4/2) fragment, and exposed to an x-ray film (panel C).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, nucleotide sequence of TARE-6. Open reading frames corresponding to exon 2 (positions 1-125) and exon 3 (positions 977-1085) of TAL-H are capitalized. The Alu-Y monomer (positions 479-640) is italicized. The Alu-Y dimer (positions 641-931) is underlined. Typical RNA pol III split promoter sites A and B are indicated in TARE-6. Orientation of the Alus and RNA pol III promoter are opposite to that of transcription of the TAL-H gene. Splice donor (SD) and acceptor (SA) sites are double-underlined. Boundaries of TAREs 2-5 correspond to splice sites in the antisense orientation and are indicated in lowercase letters. A sequence variation of G right-arrow C at nucleotide position 976, converting a splice acceptor site in the sense orientation into a splice donor site in the antisense orientation, is shown in parentheses. B, schematic diagram of structural relatedness among TAREs 1-6, TAL-H, and HSAG-1, based on nucleotide sequence analyses. Open boxes represent TAL-H exons 2 and 3. Homologous internal sequences in TAREs 2-6 and TAL-H are depicted as densely dotted areas. GT (splice donor) and AG (splice acceptor) sites at exon-intervening sequence junctions are noted. Lightly dotted boxes represent Alu-like sequences: arrows show the orientation of Alu sequences; R, right arm; L, left arm. TA direct repeats flanking exons 2 and 3 in both TAL-H and HSAG-1 are indicated.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mapping of TARE in DNA from PBL (lanes 1-4 in each panel) and Jurkat cells (lane 5 of each panel) by PCR. Top panel, orientation of oligonucleotide primer sets a, f, and g within TARE-6. Open bars indicate TAL-H exons 2 and 3, while stippled area marks the internal sequence. Set a, 4/2ORFb corresponding to positions 1-17 + 4/2REVb corresponding to positions 992-975; set f, 2/16FW corresponding to positions 220-238 + 4/2REVd, corresponding to positions 1085-1064; set g, 4/2ORFb + 4/2REVd. Filled bar denotes location of hybridization probe, oligonucleotide 2/16FWb, corresponding to positions 377-394 in TARE-6. TAREs 2-6 were amplified in all DNA samples.

All TARE units showed a >98% sequence identity in regions corresponding to exons 2 and 3 of the TAL-H gene. TARE-6 was the longest of among TARE units with related internal sequences. The most notable site of sequence variation among different TARE-6 clones was a G right-arrow C transition at nucleotide position 974 converting a splice acceptor site in the sense orientation into a splice donor site in the antisense orientation (Fig. 3A). While TARE-1 contained no intron, other members of the TARE family (TAREs 2-5) harbored related internal sequences successively truncated at their TAL-H exon 3-proximal end corresponding to splice sites in the antisense orientation. This may account for the varying size distribution of TAREs in genomic DNA.

Alignment of TAREs with the TAL-H Genomic Locus-- In contrast to the repetitive exons 2 and 3, the functional TAL-H gene locus (TALDO1) is a single copy element (28). The TAL-H locus contains 28, an unusually high number of Alu elements (Table I). Alignment of TARE-6 with the TAL-H locus demonstrated a considerable homology between corresponding regions flanked by exons 2 and 3 (Fig. 5A). TARE-6 clones harbor two adjacent Alu cassettes. Both of these Alus in TARE-6 are in the antisense orientation with respect to the direction of transcription of the TAL-H gene. Based on alignment with major Alu subfamilies (19, 20), Alus of TARE-6 were identified as a Alu-Y right (R) monomer and an Alu-Y dimer (Fig. 3A). An Alu-Y R monomer and an Alu-Y dimer matching with those in TARE-6, were found at base positions 8920-9085 and 11185-11460, i.e. 2100 nucleotides apart in the TAL-H locus. Interestingly, in TAL-H DNA, the Alu-Y R monomer is adjacent to an older Alu-J dimer (base positions 9099-9376). Thus, in comparison to the TAL-H locus, TARE-6 appears internally deleted between two Alu elements. Discontinuation of homologies and possible sites of recombination between the Alu-J (9099-8376) and Alu-Y repeats (11185-11460) are shown in Fig. 5A. These results suggest that TARE-6 may have evolved from the TAL-H locus via recombination between these Alu elements. In the antisense orientation, Alu cassettes of TARE-6 contain several potential splice donor sites (29) which may have been utilized in formation of TARE-3, -4, and -5 (Fig. 3, A and B). Non-Alu intronic sequences of TARE isolates 2-6 are homologous, which further supports their common origin.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Alu elements in the TAL-H locus
Nucleotide position, type (19, 20), arms (L, left arm; R, right arm; complete, i.e., L + R), and sense or antisense orientation with respect to TAL-H gene are indicated.



View larger version (3753K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, alignment of TARE-6 with homologous regions flanking exon 2 (bases 8440-9439) and exon 3 of the TAL-H DNA locus (bases 11050-11649; GenBank accession number: AF058913). Location and orientation (left-arrow ) of Alu elements are marked above the TAL-H DNA. Interruption of homologies between the corresponding Alu segments are indicated (black-triangle). B, nucleotide sequence homologies between exons 2 and 3 the human transaldolase gene and two segments of similar length, 1262 nucleotides apart, in HSAG-1. Accession numbers in the GenBank/EMBL public data base, L19734: human transaldolase mRNA; X03822: HSAG-1. There is a sequence homology of 88% between exon 2 of the TAL-H gene and HSAG-1 (nucleotides 1173-1297) and a homology of 93% between exon 3 of the TAL-H gene and HSAG-1 (between nucleotides 2560 and 2668). TA direct repeats flanking exons 2 and 3 of TARE in both TAL-H and HSAG-1 are indicated.

HSAG-1 Locus Contains TARE with an Unrelated Internal Sequence-- TARE-equivalent segments were noted in a previously described 3.4-kb element, HSAG-1, capable of inducing a leukemia-associated surface antigen (30). A sequence homology of 88% between exon 2 of the TAL-H gene and HSAG-1 (nucleotides 1173-1297) and a homology of 93% between exon 3 of the TAL-H gene and HSAG-1 (nucleotides 2560-2668) were noted. Sequence alignments showed that homologies between TAL-H exons 2 and 3 and the two segments of similar length, 1262 nucleotides apart, in HSAG-1 broke off at internal splice sites (Fig. 5B). Moreover, homologous TARE regions in the TAL-H and HSAG-1 loci were bounded by TA direct repeats (Figs. 3B and 5B). TA is the target sequence of most prokaryotic and eukaryotic transposable elements (31-37), suggesting that these direct repeats may correspond to target site duplications flanking TARE elements in both the TAL-H and HSAG-1 loci. Unlike exons 2 and 3 of the TAL-H gene, which encode a 78-amino acid long region of the TAL-H protein (12), homologous segments in the HSAG-1 locus do not encode such protein (30, 38, 39). HSAG-1 was found to elicit expression of a 14-20-kDa leukemia-associated cell-surface antigen (30). This latter protein is clearly distinct from TAL-H since mAb 37-28, specific for the HSAG-1-induced protein (30), did not react with a TAL-H cDNA-encoded recombinant protein or the native 38-kDa TAL-H protein (not shown). Furthermore, unlike HSAG-1, TAL-H protein is confined to the cytoplasm (12, 40).

Cloning of TARE Transcripts by RT-PCR-- Transposition of repetitive elements may be accomplished through DNA or RNA intermediates (2). In order to evaluate whether TARE is transcribed into RNA, total RNA and poly(A)+ RNA from Jurkat cells were analyzed by Northern blot hybridizations. As shown in Fig. 1C, the 5' (4/2) probe hybridized to a number of abundant 0.5-7.5-kb RNA species, whereas the 3' (4/1) probe annealed to a single 1.3-kb transcript in total cellular RNA. In poly(A)+ RNA, however, both the 5' and 3' probes annealed to a single 1.3-kb message. The 5' probe also hybridized to a faint larger molecular weight band that may represent a small carryover of non-polyadenylated RNA. The abundant 0.5-7.5-kb transcripts recognized by the 5' probe in total RNA, were absent in poly(A)+ RNA. These results suggested that TARE transcripts may be nonpolyadenylated.

TARE transcripts were further analyzed in total RNA by RT-PCR using a panel of TARE-6-specific oligonucleotide primers. Dominant TARE-6 RT-PCR products were found in total RNA of normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes and Jurkat T cell leukemia cells (Fig. 6). A 234-bp product, amplified from TAL-H exon 3 antisense oligonucleotide-primed cDNA (4/2REVd), corresponded to the TAL-H mRNA (data not shown). By contrast, the 1085- and 992-bp products were amplified from cDNA primed with a TAL-H exon 2 sense strand-specific primer 4/2 ORFb (Fig. 6B) or random hexamers but not with oligo(dT) or TAL-H antisense primers (not shown). Relatedness of this 992-bp antisense RT-PCR product to TARE-6 was demonstrated by nested amplification which resulted in detection of 865- and 774-bp internal fragments using TARE-6-specific internal primer sets, e and f, respectively (Fig. 6A). TARE-6-specific 1085-bp RT-PCR product was cloned from Jurkat cells (clone 2/8) and compared with genomic TARE-6 DNA clone 2/16. They showed a less than 3% sequence divergence. Both the right monomer and dimer Alu elements within clones 2/8 and 2/16 belonged to the same Alu-Y subclass (20). Interestingly, 31 of 42 sequence differences between clones 2/8 and 2/16 were clustered within a 173-nucleotide long segment (between residues 634 and 806) corresponding to the right arm of an Alu-Y dimer in clone 2/8. The same area of TARE-6 was also rearranged and disrupted by Alu-mediated recombination in the TAL-H gene locus (Figs. 3B and 5A). Preservation of a typical Alu-Y element in clone 2/8 may be important for transcription of this TARE unit. Another RT-PCR fragment from Jurkat cells, clone 1/7, representing a 484-bp primary RT-PCR product, exhibited a sequence homology of 100% with TARE-3 (Fig. 3A), except that clone 1/7 had a 25-bp truncation at the 3' end of the internal sequence. This truncation may reflect an additional splicing pattern of TARE in Jurkat cells. A typical RNA polymerase III internal split promoter (41) was noted in TARE-6 (Fig. 3A) which made this element the most efficiently transcribed TARE species. Orientation of the pol III promoter is opposite to that of the TAL-H gene which may be responsible for the antisense transcriptional orientation of TARE-6, as evidenced by the RT-PCR analysis. In other less efficiently transcribed TARE elements, the RNA pol III promoter was internally deleted. Internal deletions in TARE units 2-5 corresponded to splice sites in the antisense orientation concurrent with the direction of TARE-6 transcription, suggesting a precursor-product relationship between TARE-6 and the shorter TARE species.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Detection of TARE transcripts in Jurkat cells and PBL by RT-PCR. A, top panel: orientation of oligonucleotide primers for reverse transcription and PCR primer sets e and f within TARE-6 (Fig. 3A). Open bars indicate TAL-H exons 2 and 3, while stippled area mark internal sequence. Set e, 2/16FW, positions 219-236 + 4/2REVb, positions 992-975; set f, 2/16FW + 4/2 REVd, corresponding to positions 1085-1068; TAL-H exon 2 sense strand-specific primer 4/2ORFb corresponds to positions 151-169; filled bar denotes location of hybridization probe, oligonucleotide 2/16FWb, corresponding to positions 377-394 in TARE-6. Based on sequence analyses, the dominant RT-PCR product, detected as 774- and 865-bp fragments in reactions e and f, respectively, corresponds to TARE-6. TARE-3 transcripts were detected as 309- and 400-bp fragments in reactions e and f, respectively. Detection of amplification products from 4/2ORFb and random hexamer-primed but not 4/2REVd-primed cDNA templates is consistent with detection of antisense TARE transcripts with respect to the TAL-H gene. B, detection of TARE transcripts by RT-PCR following reverse transcription with primer 4/2ORFb. Dominant TARE-6 (992 bp with primer set a and 1085 bp with primer set g) and TARE-3 transcripts (481 bp with primer set a and 582 bp with primer set g) were detected in total RNA from normal PBL (lanes 1 and 2 in each panel) and Jurkat cells (lane 3 of each panel).

TAREs Are Transcribed by RNA Polymerase III-- To further assess the mechanism of TARE transcription, RNA polymerase inhibitors were utilized. Jurkat cells were pretreated with 50 µg/ml alpha -amanitin, a relatively selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase II (23), for 5 h prior to extraction of RNA. Northern blots were hybridized under high stringency and washed in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C. The 3' probe specifically annealed to the 1.3-kb TAL-H transcript (Fig. 7A). As expected, alpha -amanitin inhibited transcription of the 1.3-kb TAL-H mRNA recognized by both the 3' and 5' probe of 4/2-4/1 cDNA. The 5' probe also annealed to four additional RNA species. Identity of two other alpha -amanitin-inhibited transcripts, 7 and 3.5 kb, is unknown. An abundant 5-kb RNA species cross-hybridized with a 28 S ribosomal probe, pES-28 S. Abundance of 28 S RNA, transcribed by RNA pol I, was not affected by alpha -amanitin. As a control, 7SL RNA probe was utilized to monitor relative resistance of RNA pol III transcription to inhibition by alpha -amanitin. The 5' (4/2) probe also hybridized to an alpha -amanitin-resistant 1-kb transcript (Fig. 7A).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Influence of RNA polymerase inhibitors on transcription of TARE. A, effect of alpha -amanitin on transcription of TAL-H and related sequences using Northern blot analysis. Jurkat were treated with 50 µg/ml alpha -amanitin for 5 h prior to extraction of RNA. C lanes contained control cell extract; A lanes contained alpha -amanitin-treated cell extract. Left panel, transcription by RNA polymerase I was monitored by a 28 S ribosomal probe, pES-28S. Inhibition of RNA pol II was evaluated by diminished levels of a 1.3-kb TAL-H-specific transcript hybridizing with the 3' segment of TAL-H cDNA (3' probe). A 7SL RNA probe was utilized to monitor RNA pol III transcription. Right panel, the 5' probe (4/2 segment of TAL-H cDNA) hybridized to 7.0- and 3.5-kb transcripts, in addition to the 1.3-kb TAL-H transcript, all of which showed decreased levels after alpha -amanitin treatment. The 5' probe also hybridized to a 1.0-kb band and a 5-kb band, the latter corresponding to the highly abundant and GC-rich 28 S ribosomal RNA. Levels of 28 S and 7SL RNAs and that of the 1.0-kb transcript were not diminished by alpha -amanitin treatment. B, in vitro transcription of TARE-6-specific clone 2/8. In vitro transcriptional activity of p2/8 sequence-containing templates (1085-nucleotide long transcript) was compared with those of RNA pol II (pML[C2AT], 400-nucleotide long transcript) and RNA pol III-dependent templates (pVA1, 156-nucleotide long transcript) in the presence of HeLa cell nuclear extract. p2/8 construct contained TARE-6 cloned into pBluescript KS plasmid. RNA pol II-mediated transcription was inhibited by low dose (1 µg/ml) alpha -amanitin but not by tagetitoxin (1 µM). RNA pol III-mediated transcription was inhibited by high dose alpha -amanitin (10 and 100 µg/ml) or tagetitoxin (10 µM). Lanes are: 1, control; 2, 1 µg/ml alpha -amanitin; 3, 10 µg/ml alpha -amanitin; 4, 100 µg/ml alpha -amanitin; 5, 10 µM tagetitoxin.

Transcription of TARE-6 was further investigated by in vitro transcription in the presence of RNA polymerase inhibitors. alpha -Amanitin selectively inhibits RNA pol II at a low concentration (1 µg/ml), while it also inhibits RNA pol III at a high concentration (100 µg/ml) (23). Tagetitoxin is a specific inhibitor of RNA pol III (24). As shown in Fig. 7B, TARE-6 was efficiently transcribed in vitro by HeLa cell nuclear extract, used as a source of transcription factors. 1 µg/ml alpha -amanitin completely abrogated RNA pol II-mediated transcription of pML(C2AT), while transcription of an RNA-pol III-dependent template, pVA1, and that of TARE-6, were not affected (Fig. 7B). By contrast, 100 µg/ml alpha -amanitin also inhibited transcription of pVA1 and TARE-6 templates. Tagetitoxin suppressed transcription of TARE-6 and pVA1, while it had no effect on transcription of pML(C2AT). Bluescript KS+ or pCR2.1 vectors alone were not transcribed by HeLa nuclear extract (not shown).

Transcriptional regulatory elements in TARE-6 were evaluated by deletion studies and site-directed mutagenesis. TARE-5, lacking both A and B boxes of the RNA pol III promoter showed no transcriptional activity (data not shown). Deletion of bases 855-1085 of TARE-6, i.e. removal of the RNA pol A box and the first 4 bases of the B box, abrogated transcription (Fig. 6). Site-directed mutagenesis at position 1 of the B box, previously associated with diminished promoter activity (41), did not affect transcription of TARE-6 (Fig. 8). Transcription start site of in vitro transcribed RNA was determined by primer extension using primer 4/2 ORFc corresponding to the first 18 nucleotides of exon 3 (Fig. 9A). 4/2 REVd was used as an antisense control oligonucleotide. To determine the start site of TARE-6 transcripts in vivo, primer extension studies were carried out on total RNA from Jurkat cells. As shown in Fig. 9B, 144- and 121-nucleotide long primer extension products were identified with TAL-H sense oligonucleotides 4/2 ORFc and 4/2ORFd, respectively, using RNA transcribed in vitro from TARE-6 template or total RNA of Jurkat cells. No primer extension products were obtained with antisense oligonucleotides 4/2REVb and 4/2REVd. This analysis suggested that the start site of in vitro transcription of TARE-6 corresponded to that used in vivo. The results showed that TARE-6 transcripts were generated both in vitro and in vivo in the antisense direction with respect to the TAL-H gene. Primer extension products of in vivo transcribed RNA were cloned by anchored PCR. Sequencing of 144- and 121-bp products located the start site of TARE transcripts 35 bases downstream from exon 3 of the TAL-H locus.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Site-directed mutagenesis of the RNA pol III promoter in TARE-6. A, C right-arrow A substitution at position 858, within the RNA pol III B box of TARE-6 was created as shown by sequence analysis of the wild-type (TARE-6) and mutant constructs (TARE-Bm1). B, schematic diagram pf p2/8. Sau3A site indicated with an asterisk was used to delete bases 855-1085 of TARE-6. C, In vitro transcription of templates pVA1 (lane 1), p2/8 lacking bases 855-1085 of TARE-6 (lane 2), TARE-Bm1 mutant (lane 3), and wild-type TARE-6 in pCR2.1 (lane 4).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Primer extension mapping TARE-6 RNA transcribed in vitro and in vivo. A, TARE-6 clone 2/8 was transcribed in vitro, the resultant RNA was gel purified, and analyzed by primer extension using 5' end-labeled oligonucleotide primers. Lanes are: 123, end-labeled 123-bp ladder; 1kb, end-labeled 1-kb ladder; A C G and T, sequencing reactions run in parallel as a molecular weight marker; lane 1, bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase RNA (from Life Technologies, Inc.) extended with oligonucleotide 5'-CAACGGTGGTATATCCAGTG-3' corresponding to residues 35 right-arrow 14 in the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase coding sequence (positive control); lane 2, 1085-bp TARE-6 clone 2/8-derived RNA transcript primed with 4/2 ORFc oligonucleotide (corresponding to bases 278-295 from exon 3 of TAL-H cDNA or TARE-6 positions 977-994); lane 3, 1085-bp TARE-6 clone 2/8-derived RNA transcript primed with 4/2 REVd oligonucleotides (bases 383-367 in TAL-H); lane 4, 867-bp TARE-6 (containing bases 219-1085) template-derived RNA transcript was primed with 4/2 ORFc oligonucleotides. B, primer extension analysis of in vitro transcribed RNA using 1085-bp TARE-6 template (lanes 1-4 on left side of molecular weight marker, M) and total RNA from Jurkat cells (lanes 1-4 on right side of molecular weight marker, M). Oligonucleotides used for primer extension: lane 1, 4/2ORFC; lane 2, 4/2REVb (bases 295-278 of TAL-H); lane 3, 4/2REVd; lane 4, 4/2ORFd corresponding to bases 301-318 of TAL-H exon 3 or bases 1000-1017 of TARE-6.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A unique feature of the TAL-H gene is that two of its exons are encoded by a repetitive element, TARE. Each TARE unit is bounded by terminal segments corresponding to TAL-H exons 2 and 3, in an orientation matching that of the TAL-H locus. The shortest element, TARE-1, contains no intron, while other members of the TARE family (TAREs 2-6) harbor related internal sequences successively truncated at their TAL-H exon 3-proximal end. Interestingly the TAL-H locus contains an unusually high concentration of Alus, 28 within a 13,113-bp genomic segment. This is almost 10-fold higher that the average of one Alu at 3000-bp intervals (20). TARE-6 harbors two Alus, a Alu-Y right monomer and an Alu-Y dimer, the latter providing an RNA pol III promoter, critical for transcriptional activity. An Alu-Y right monomer and Alu-Y dimer matching with those in TARE-6, were found at base positions 8920-9085 and 11185-11460, i.e. 2100 nucleotides apart in the TAL-H locus. Non-Alu intronic sequences of the TAL-H locus and TARE isolates 2-6 are also homologous, which further supports their common origin. In comparison to the TAL-H locus, TARE-6 appears internally deleted between two Alu elements. Between the two younger Alus, where homologies with TARE-6 are discontinued, the TAL-H locus contains five additional Alus, including three older Alu-J units (20). This analysis suggests that TARE-6 may have evolved from the TAL-H locus via Alu-mediated recombination and deletion.

A comparative analysis of TARE elements suggested that TAREs 2 through 5 may have spread out from a precursor which likely to correspond to the transcriptionally active TARE-6 element. TARE-6 is transcribed in a TAL-H exon 3 right-arrow 2 orientation, possibly directed from the RNA pol III promoter of an Alu-Y dimer. Transcription of TAREs 2-5, in which the RNA pol III promoter was internally deleted, was not detected. Internal deletions in TARE units 2-5 corresponded to splice sites in the antisense orientation concurrent with the direction of TARE-6 transcription, indicating a precursor-product relationship between TARE-6 and the shorter TARE species and raising the possibility that TARE-6 may be the source of TARE invasion in the human genome.

The possibility that all TAREs represent retropseudogenes is unlikely for a number of reasons. While 5' truncations are common in retropseudogenes (2) which could account for the absence of exon 1 in TARE, a 3' terminal poly(A) tract is always included in retropseudogenes. Moreover, retropseudogenes derived from fully processed mRNA lack any intron present in the parental gene (2). In fact, we found a human transaldolase pseudogene (TALDOP1) containing a polyadenylated and mutated 3' terminal fragment of TAL-H (28). This is in contrast with the absence of 3' terminal exons in TAREs. While the intron-containing TAREs 2-6 are apparently confined to primate DNA, TARE-1 was noted in all mammalian DNA tested and may correspond to an intronless ancestral gene or inactive pseudogene (data not shown). Indeed, we found an intronless pseudogene in the mouse with several point mutations, a 17-base deletion, and an early termination codon, thus capable of encoding a maximum of 29 N-terminal amino acid residues (data not shown). While TARE-1 may represent this nonfunctional ancestral gene, TAREs 2-6 contain introns and may originate from TARE-6 transcripts. TARE of HSAG-1 contains an intron unrelated to those of TAL-H and TAREs 2-6. With respect to the presence of a completely different intron in TARE of HSAG-1, a derivation of TARE from either of these genomic loci is unlikely. By contrast, TARE is the likely source of TAL-H and HSAG-1 since it is bounded by TA direct repeats in both loci. The TA direct repeats are not part of TARE or a potentially ancestral transaldolase gene since the TAL-H exon 2- and 3-equivalent segments are flanked by dissimilar G(C/T)T dinucleotides in the yeast (42) and A(C/C)T dinucleotides in E. coli (43), respectively. Presence of identical dinucleotide repeats at four strategic locations is a statistically significant finding (p = 0.0002). Retroposon insertion sites are surrounded by short direct repeats. This implies that the genomic DNA into which the retrotransposon inserts is broken via staggered, single-stranded cleavages and that the gaps formed as the element is joined to these ends are filled in by DNA polymerase (44). Therefore, target site duplications around exons 2 and 3 suggests that the TAL-H gene and the HSAG-1 element may have developed by insertion of TARE. A recent survey identified TA as the target sequence of most prokaryotic and early eukaryotic transposable elements (31-37). The data are suggestive of an evolutionary model in which distinct internal sequences, like the ones in TAL-H/TARE-6 and HSAG-1, may have been captured by the repetitive element, TARE-1. Presence of typical splice donor and acceptor sites at junctions between the intervening sequences and exons 2 and 3 in TAL-H and HSAG-1 suggests that the intronic sequences have been acquired by a reverse splicing (7, 8). These findings can be related to a recent observation on evolution of the phosphoglycerate kinase gene in trypanosomes via intron capture (45). Thus, the present data are consistent with the introns-late hypothesis (46), in which acquisition of introns by a repetitive element, possibly via reverse splicing, may lead to development of distinct functional genes.

Mobility of retrotransposons is accomplished through RNA intermediates (1, 2). With the exception of LINE-1 capable of encoding a functional reverse transcriptase (47), reverse transcription of human retrotransposable elements remains enigmatic. While we were able to express a functionally active full-length human recombinant transaldolase protein (48), this protein did not display reverse transcriptase, DNAase/integrase, or transposase activity (data not shown). The two terminal open reading frames of TARE may potentially encode proteins other than TAL-H. This possibility is supported by detecting alpha -amanitin-suppressible transcripts by TAL-H 5' end-specific 4/2 probe (Fig. 7A). Similar to other nonviral retrotransposons, TARE may be reverse transcribed passively (2). Alu elements are the single most abundant class of retrotransposable elements in the human genome. These elements have a dimeric structure that is comprised of two related but nonidentical Alu monomers that are homologous to an internally deleted 7SL RNA gene (49). Activity of the 7SL promoter is dependent on sequences located upstream of the transcription initiation site and 7SL-derived Alu pseudogenes lacking upstream regulatory sequences are transcriptionally inactive (50). While monomeric Alu elements may be transcribed by RNA pol III in the brain (51, 52), most Alu promoters are inactive in vivo (53). Dimeric Alu elements, such as the ones embedded in the long terminal repeat of the human transposon-like element THE-1, may be transcribed as part of RNA pol II transcription units (54). Capture of Alu-containing internal sequences seems to have been critical for transcription and, potentially, for retroposition of TARE-6. In vitro transcription studies suggested that TARE-6 is transcribed from an internal promoter by RNA pol III. Transcription of TARE-6 proceeded in the orientation of the RNA pol III promoter and opposite to the orientation of the TAL-H gene. The RNA pol III promoter appears to be critical for TARE transcription since (i) transcription of TARE-6 proceeds in accordance with the orientation of the pol III promoter and (ii) deletion of the pol III promoter effectively prevents transcription of shorter TARE (2-5) elements or truncated TARE-6.

TAL, which catalyzes the transfer of a 3-carbon fragment, corresponding to dihydroxyacetone, to D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, D-erythrose 4-phosphate, and a variety of other acceptor aldehydes, has a pivotal role in tissue-specific function of the pentose phosphate pathway (12). Expression and enzymatic activity of TAL is regulated in a tissue-specific (40, 55, 56) and developmentally specific manner (57). TAL activity has a dominant effect on susceptibility to apoptosis through control of the balance between the two branches of the pentose phosphate pathway and its overall output as measured by NADPH and GSH production (58-60). Antisense RNAs naturally occurring in eukaryotic cells have been shown (i) to control stability of complementary sense transcripts (61), (ii) to interfere with processing, such as splicing of sense RNA (62), (iii) or encode polypeptides (63). Detection of RNA antisense to the TAL-H mRNA may be particularly interesting with respect to transcriptional regulation of transaldolase activity. In summary, TARE is a new family of transcriptionally active repetitive elements which may influence shaping and function in the human genome and specifically regulate expression of TAL-H.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Paul Phillips for continued encouragement, Gerald B. Price (McGill University, Montreal, Canada) for providing Ab 37-28 and helpful discussions, Robert Roeder (Rockefeller University, New York, NY) for the pVA1 and pML(C2AT), Peter Ward (University of California at San Francisco) for pSP7SL, and Joan Steitz (Yale University, New Haven, CT) for the pES-28S plasmids.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant RO1 DK 49221 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) L19437 (TAL-H cDNA), AF058913 (TAL-H genomic DNA locus), L27346 (TARE-6), and X03822 (HSAG-1).

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: SUNY HSC, 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210. E-mail: perla@vax.cs.hscsyr.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LTR, long terminal repeat; kb, kilobase(s); bp, base pair(s); TARE, transaldolase-associated repetitive elements; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocytes; pol, polymerase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Temin, H. M. (1985) Mol. Biol. Evol. 2, 455-468[Abstract]
2. Weiner, A. M., Deininger, P. L., and Efstratiadis, A. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 631-661[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Fanning, T. G., and Singer, M. F. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 910, 203-212[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Shen, M., Batzer, M., and Deininger, P. (1991) J. Mol. Evol. 33, 311-320[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Soares, M. B., Schon, E., Henderson, A., Karathanasis, S. K., Cate, R., Zeitlin, S., Chirgwin, J., and Efstratiadis, A. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 2090-2103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Long, M., and Langley, C. H. (1993) Science 260, 91-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Sharp, P. A. (1985) Cell 42, 397-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Roger, A. J., and Doolittle, W. F. (1993) Nature 364, 289-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sharp, P. A. (1994) Cell 77, 805-815[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Cavalier-Smith, T. (1985) Nature 315, 283-284[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Hynes, R. O. (1989) Fibronectin , Springer Verlag, New York
12. Banki, K., Halladay, D., and Perl, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2847-2851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Perl, A., Rosenblatt, J. D., Chen, I. S., DiVincenzo, J. P., Bever, R., Poiesz, B. J., and Abraham, G. N. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 6841-6854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Srivastava, B. I., Banki, K., and Perl, A. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 4391-4395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Agarwal, R. K., and Perl, A. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5283-5284[Free Full Text]
16. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Strathmann, M., Hamilton, B. A., Mayeda, C. A., Simon, M. E., Meyerowitz, E. M., and Palazzolo, M. J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1247-1250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Devereux, J., Haeberli, P., and Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387-395
19. Jurka, J., and Milosavljevic, A. (1991) J. Mol. Evol. 32, 105-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Batzer, M. A., Deininger, P. L., Hellman-Blumberg, U., Jurka, J., Labuda, J., Rubin, C. M., Schmid, C. W., Zietkiewitz, E., and Zuckerkandl, E. (1996) J. Mol. Evol. 42, 3-6[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Lassar, A. B., Martin, P. L., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Science 222, 740-748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4394-4398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Lindell, T. J., Weinberg, F., Morris, P. W., Roeder, R. G., and Rutter, W. J. (1970) Science 170, 447-449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Steinberg, T. H., Mathews, D. E., Durbin, R. D., and Burgess, R. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 499-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Zieve, G., Benecke, B., and Penman, S. (1977) Biochemistry 16, 4520-4525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Gunning, P., Ponte, P., Okayama, H., Engel, J., Blau, H., and Kedes, L. (1983) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 787-795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Piras, G., Kashanchi, F., Radonovich, M. F., Duvall, J. F., and Brady, J. N. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 6170-6179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Banki, K., Eddy, R. L., Shows, T. B., Halladay, D. L., Bullrich, F., Croce, C. M., Jurecic, V., Baldini, A., and Perl, A. (1997) Genomics 45, 233-238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Makalowski, W., Mitchell, G. A., and Labuda, D. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 188-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Stanners, C. P., Lam, T., Chamberlain, J. W., Stewart, S. S., and Price, G. P. (1981) Cell 27, 211-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Doak, T. G., Doerder, F. P., Jahn, C. L., and Herrick, G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 942-946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Migheli, Q., Lauge, R., Daviere, J. M., Gerlinger, C., Kaper, F., and Langin, T. (1999) Genetics 151, 1005-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Zhang, L., Sankar, U., Lampe, D. J., Robertson, H. M., and Graham, F. L. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3687-3693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Romans, P., Bhattacharyya, R. K., and Colavita, A. (1998) Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Rezsohazy, R., van Luenen, H. G., Durbin, R. M., and Plasterk, R. H. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4048-4054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Arca, B., Zabalou, S., Loukeris, T. G., and Savakis, C. (1997) Genetics 145, 267-279[Abstract]
37. Amutan, M., Nyyssonen, E., Stubbs, J., Diaz-Torres, M. R., and Dunn-Coleman, N. (1996) Curr. Genet. 29, 468-473[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Chamberlain, J. W., Henderson, G., Chang, M. W. M., Lam, T., Dignard, D., Ling, V., Price, G. B., and Stanners, C. P. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 3409-3423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Price, G. B., Benzing, K., Stewart, S., and Grover, J. (1985) Immunol. Lett. 9, 9-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Banki, K., Colombo, E., Sia, F., Halladay, D., Mattson, D., Tatum, A., Massa, P., Phillips, P. E., and Perl, A. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 180, 1649-1663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Murphy, M. H., and Baralle, F. E. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 7695-7700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Schaaff, I., Hohmann, S., and Zimmermann, F. K. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 188, 597-603[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Yura, T., Mori, H., Nagai, H., Nagata, T., Ishihama, A., Fujita, N., Isono, K., Mizobuchi, K., and Nakata, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3305-3308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Galas, D. J., and Chandler, M. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4858-4862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Golding, B. D., Tsao, N., and Pearlman, R. E. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7506-7509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Hurst, L. D. (1994) Nature 371, 381-382[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Mathias, S. L., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., Jr., Boeke, J. D., and Gabriel, A. (1991) Science 254, 1808-1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Banki, K., and Perl, A. (1996) FEBS Lett. 378, 161-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Ullu, E., and Tschudi, C. (1984) Nature 312, 171-172[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Ullu, E., and Weiner, A. M. (1985) Nature 318, 371-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]