![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 11, 7439-7442, March 17, 2000
§,
,
,
§, and
¶
From the
Institut für Molekularbiologie und
Tumorforschung, Universität Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany and
the § Abteilung für Zelluläre Biochemie,
Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, 37070 Göttingen, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cyclophilin SnuCyp-20 is a specific component
of the human U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle involved in the nuclear splicing of pre-mRNA. It stably associates with the U4/U6-60kD and -90kD proteins, the human orthologues of the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Prp4 and Prp3 splicing factors. We
have determined the crystal structure of SnuCyp-20 at 2.0-Å resolution
by molecular replacement. The structure of SnuCyp-20 closely resembles
that of human cyclophilin A (hCypA). In particular, the catalytic
centers of SnuCyp-20 and hCypA superimpose perfectly, which is
reflected by the observed
peptidyl-prolyl-cis/trans-isomerase activity of SnuCyp-20.
The surface properties of both proteins, however, differ significantly.
Apart from seven additional amino-terminal residues, the insertion of
five amino acids in the loop The nuclear splicing of pre-mRNA is catalyzed by the
spliceosome, which is a highly dynamic macromolecular assembly formed by the ordered interaction of the
snRNPs1 U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5
and of several non-snRNP proteins (for review see Refs. 1-3). Although
the U1 and U2 snRNPs bind to the 5'-splice site and the branch point of
the pre-mRNA, respectively, the U4/U6 and U5 snRNPs pre-assemble to
the [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP. After association of the tri-snRNP with the
pre-spliceosome, the mature and active spliceosome is formed in a
process that involves extreme rearrangements of the spliceosomal RNA
components. Thus, before the first catalytic step of the
transesterification reaction, the U4/U6 snRNA duplex is disrupted,
resulting in the release of U4 snRNA and the association of U6 snRNA
with U2 snRNA and the pre-mRNA (reviewed in Ref. 4). These RNA
rearrangements most likely imply significant rearrangements and
conformational changes of a number of tri-snRNP proteins. One recently
identified protein, which seems a good candidate to catalyze such
conformational changes, is the U4/U6 snRNP-specific 20-kDa protein.
U4/U6-20kD was shown to be a cyclophilin and therefore termed USA-Cyp
(U-snRNP-associated cyclophilin) or SnuCyp-20 (Snurp
cyclophilin-20kDa) (5, 6).
Cyclophilins form a structurally well characterized family of closely
related proteins that exhibit peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) activity and thereby accelerate the folding of
proteins requiring the isomerization of a peptidyl-prolyl bond (reviewed in Ref. 7). However, it remains unclear whether the PPIase
activity is the most important cellular function of cyclophilins. There
is growing evidence that their main function may be to act as
chaperones and that PPIase activity is solely a side effect (8-10).
Nevertheless, purified [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP particles were shown to
be endowed with PPIase activity, which could be inhibited by the
immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA), consistent with the
presence of the cyclophilin SnuCyp-20 (6). SnuCyp-20 could be isolated
in the form of a stable RNA-free ternary complex with the
U4/U6-snRNP-specific 60- and 90-kDa proteins (5, 6), which represent
the human orthologues of the previously characterized yeast splicing
factors Prp4 and Prp3 (5, 11). Because SnuCyp-20 does not interact with
one of these two proteins via its active site (see "Results and
Discussion"), we have solved the crystal structure of the SnuCyp-20
protein to get indications as to how the formation of a complex with
these proteins is accomplished.
The coding region of the human snucyp-20 cDNA was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction from an expressed sequence tag
(EST) from human liver (GenBankTM accession number T53949)
and cloned into the multiple cloning site of expression vector
pGEX-4T-2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) resulting in a
GST/snucyp-20 fusion gene. Expression of the fusion gene in
Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) and subsequent affinity purification of the resulting protein using glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was performed according to the protocols of the vendor and yielded an almost pure fusion protein. The
GST moiety was cleaved off with 10 units of thrombin/mg of fusion
protein and removed by gel filtration using a Superdex 75 (26/60)
column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The pure SnuCyp-20 was
concentrated to 10 mg ml The human snucyp-20 gene was overexpressed as a
Schistosoma japonicum glutathion S-transferase
(GST) fusion gene (18), and the resulting gene product was
affinity-purified, yielding almost pure fusion protein. The fusion
protein was proteolytically cleaved and the GST moiety subsequently
removed by gel filtration. The elution volume of the pure SnuCyp-20
from the gel filtration column corresponded to a monomeric state.
Efforts to crystallize the purified SnuCyp-20 resulted in well
diffracting crystals using PEG6000 as a precipitant. A complete native
data set was collected at a resolution of 2.0 Å, and the structure of
SnuCyp-20 was solved by Patterson search methods using hCypA (14) as a
search model. The data collection and refinement statistics are
summarized in Table I. The structure of
SnuCyp-20, a
1-
3 and of one amino acid in the
loop
2-
8 changes the conformations of both loops. The enlarged
loop
1-
3 is involved in the formation of a wide cleft with
predominantly hydrophobic character. We propose that this
enlarged loop is required for the interaction with the U4/U6-60kD protein.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 in the buffer used for gel
filtration (120 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6) by means of Centriprep-10 concentrators
(Amicon). Crystallization of the pure protein was performed at 21 °C
in Linbro plates using the hanging drop vapor diffusion technique. A
drop of 1.5 µl of protein solution was mixed with an equal volume of
reservoir solution and sealed against 1 ml of reservoir solution. The
best crystals were obtained with 25% (w/v) PEG6000, 200 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5. To collect data
under cryo conditions, crystals were flash-frozen in a solution
containing 25% (w/v) PEG6000, 200 mM MgCl2,
11% (v/v) glycerol, and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5). A
complete native data set was collected at a resolution of 2.0 Å. X-ray
data were collected on an R-AXIS IV image plate system equipped with a
Rigaku RU-300 rotating anode generator operating at 50 kV and 100 mA
and focusing mirrors (Molecular Structure Corp.). The
crystal-to-detector distance was 120 mm and 1° oscillation images
were collected with a 10-min exposure time. Diffraction data were
processed using the programs DENZO and SCALEPACK (12). The SnuCyp-20
crystals belong to space group P212121 (cell constants:
a = 47.3 Å, b = 59.9 Å,
c = 60.7 Å) and contain one molecule in the asymmetric
unit. The structure of SnuCyp-20 was solved by Patterson search methods
using the program X-PLOR (13) with the refined crystal structure of
hCypA (14) (Protein Data Bank code 2CPL) as a search model. The initial electron density map was significantly improved with the help of the
program ARP (15). Model building into the electron density map was done
with the program O (16), and the structure was refined using X-PLOR
(13). The model was manually improved, and water molecules were built
with help of the program ARP (15). The final model contains 173 amino
acids and 188 water molecules and has good stereochemistry as evaluated
using the program PROCHECK (17). The SnuCyp-20 coordinates have been
deposited with the Protein Data Bank and will be released upon
publication (Protein Data Bank codes 1QOI and R1QOISF for the structure
factor entry).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-barrel of eight antiparallel
-strands and two
-helices sitting on the bottom and top of the barrel (Fig.
1), superimposes well with the structure
of hCypA (Fig. 2). The root mean square
deviation for 158 common C
atoms of SnuCyp-20 and hCypA is 0.8 Å.
Two short 310 helices are present in SnuCyp-20. The first
one lies within the loop connecting strand
6 and
7 and is also
found in hCypA, whereas the second one, located in the loop between
helix
2 and strand
8, is not present in hCypA. The active center
of SnuCyp-20 and hCypA, as well as most residues shown for hCypA to be
involved in CsA binding, superimpose almost perfectly, consistent with
the fact that SnuCyp-20 exhibits PPIase activity, which is inhibited by
CsA.2
Crystallographic data and refinement statistics

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Three-dimensional structure of
SnuCyp-20. Residues that represent insertions into the primary
structure, with respect to hCypA or whose C
-atom positions differ
significantly from the corresponding amino acids in hCypA are shown in
red. The Fig. was produced using the programs MOLSCRIPT (33)
and RASTER3D (34).

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Stereo view of the superposition of the
C
-backbones of hCypA and SnuCyp-20. hCypA
is shown in red and SnuCyp-20 is blue. The
superposition was created using the program VMD (35).
Two cysteine residues of SnuCyp-20, namely Cys47 and
Cys174, are also present and highly conserved within a
family of cyclophilins, whose members contain non-cyclophilin domains
and are referred to as divergent cyclophilins (19). The spatial
orientation of these cysteines renders the formation of a disulphide
bond possible, because the distance between the sulfur atoms of these
cysteines amounts to 4.9 Å and can be reduced to 1.7 Å by rotation of
the sulfur atoms around the respective C
-C
axes. However,
Cys47 and Cys174 clearly exist in the reduced
form in the presented structure of SnuCyp-20 (Fig.
3). Likewise, the crystal structure of a
divergent cyclophilin from the nematode parasite Brugia
malayi reveals the reduced form of the corresponding cysteines
(19). This finding is consistent with the fact that both the crystals
of both SnuCyp-20 and the B. malayi cyclophilin domain were
obtained in the presence of DTT.
|
The main differences in the primary structure of SnuCyp-20 compared
with hCypA are an amino terminus elongated by seven amino acids, the
insertion of one amino acid in the loop connecting helix
2 with
strand
8, and the insertion of five amino acids in the loop
connecting helix
1 with strand
3.
Electron density can be allocated to three of the seven residues elongating the amino terminus of SnuCyp-20 compared with hCypA, namely to Asn5, Ser6, and Ser7. The observed conformation of these residues, however, is the result of crystal packing contacts.
The insertion of one residue in loop
2-
8 causes the displacement
of residues 158-163 with respect to the corresponding residues in
hCypA; this leads to a significantly altered conformation of this loop
with respect to hCypA, including the introduction of a short
310 helix (Fig. 1). The respective loops in all other cyclophilins, whose structures have been solved (19-25), resemble however more the loop
2-
8 of SnuCyp-20 than of hCypA, thus
rendering it unlikely that the conformation of loop
2-
8 in
SnuCyp-20 represents an adaptation to specific requirements for its
function in the spliceosome.
The insertion of five amino acids in loop
1-
3 results in the
formation of a lobe whose conformation is stabilized by two salt
bridges formed by the side chains of Glu50 and
Arg52 or of Asp54 and Arg92,
respectively. This lobe creates, together with amino acids located in
loop
4-
5, a wide cleft with predominantly hydrophobic character (Figs. 4 and
5). This cleft is not present in hCypA or
in other cyclophilins of known structure and seems likely to create a
protein-protein interaction site. SnuCyp-20 was shown to be part of a
stable complex, which further contains the U4/U6-90kD and -60kD
proteins (5, 6). Although no direct interaction between SnuCyp-20 and
U4/U6-90kD could be demonstrated up to the present, U4/U6-60kD was
identified as a direct binding partner of SnuCyp-20. U4/U6-60kD
contains seven repeats of the WD40 motif and is therefore expected to
fold into a seven-bladed propeller, whose large flat surface forms a
platform of protein-protein interaction as shown for the
-subunits of G-proteins by x-ray structure analysis (26-29). This large flat propeller surface of the U4/U6- 60kD orthologue Prp4 was shown to
interact with the U4/U6-90kD orthologue Prp3 (30) and thus may not be
accessible for SnuCyp-20.
|
|
In contrast to other known cyclophilin-protein interactions (8, 10) SnuCyp-20 obviously does not bind U4/U6-60kD via its catalytic site. This can be deduced from biochemical data, because hCypA, whose active site is identical to that of SnuCyp-20, is not able to bind U4/U6-60kD. In addition, PPIase activity could be shown for [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs (6), which requires that the SnuCyp-20 catalytic center not be occupied by U4/U6-60kD. Finally, mutations introduced into the active site of SnuCyp-20, which abolished its catalytic activity, did not affect the U4/U6-60kD binding capability.2 Combining these data, it seems likely that a region outside of the large flat surface of the U4/U6-60kD propeller serves as an anchor site for SnuCyp-20, which may act as a chaperone or PPIase on other sites of the spliceosome, probably to facilitate rearrangements of protein interactions during the splicing process.
The presented structure of SnuCyp-20, which shows a striking similarity
to hCypA, reveals loop
1-
3 as well as a number of hydrophobic
residues within loop
4-
5 as good candidates for mutational
studies to figure out the interactions of this protein with U4/U6-60kD.
After the thioredoxin-like protein U5-15kD (31, 32) this paper presents
the second three-dimensional structure of an snRNP-associated protein
having a close homologue in the cytoplasm, which obviously has been
adopted by the spliceosome and adjusted in the course of evolution to
the specific needs of the splicing machinery.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Gerhard Klebe and Milton Stubbs (Institut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Universität Marburg), whose x-ray diffractometer we used.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 286/A11 to R. F. and SFB 379/A6 to R. L.) and the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz Programm (to R. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 1QOI, R1QOISF, and 2CPL) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-6421-2865390; Fax: 49-6421-2867008; E-mail: ficner@imt.uni-marburg.de.
2 D. Ingelfinger, T. Achsel, U. Reidt, K. Reuter, R. Ficner, and R. Lührmann, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: snRNP, small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle; SnuCyp-20, Snurp cyclophilin-20kDa; hCypA, human cyclophilin A; CsA, cyclosporin A; PPIase, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase; pre-mRNA, precursors of mRNA; GST, glutathione S-transferase; DTT, dithiothreitol; PEG6000, polyethylene glycol 6000 Da.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Burge, C. B., Tuschl, T. H., and Sharp, P. A. (1999) in The RNA World (Gesteland, R. F. , Cech, T. , and Atkins, J. F., eds) , pp. 525-560, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 2. | Krämer, A. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 367-409[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Will, C. L., and Lührmann, R. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 320-328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Staley, J. P., and Guthrie, C. (1998) Cell 92, 315-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Horowitz, D. S., Kobayashi, R., and Krainer, A. R. (1997) RNA 3, 1374-1387[Abstract] |
| 6. | Teigelkamp, S., Achsel, T., Mundt, C., Göthel, S. F., Cronshagen, U., Lane, W. S., Marahiel, M., and Lührmann, R. (1998) RNA 4, 127-141[Abstract] |
| 7. | Göthel, S. F., and Marahiel, M. A. (1999) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 423-436[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Baker, E. K., Colley, N. J., and Zuker, C. S. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4886-4895[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Schreiber, S. L., and Crabtree, G. R. (1992) Immunol. Today 13, 136-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Zhao, Y.,
Chen, Y.,
Schutkowski, M.,
Fischer, G.,
and Ke, H.
(1997)
Structure
5,
139-146 |
| 11. | Lauber, J., Plessel, G., Prehn, S., Will, C. L., Fabrizio, P., Groning, K., Lane, W. S., and Lührmann, R. (1997) RNA 3, 926-941[Abstract] |
| 12. | Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 |
| 13. | Brünger, A. T. (1993) X-PLOR, Version 3.1 , Yale University Press, New Haven, CT |
| 14. | Ke, H. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 228, 539-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Lamzin, V. S., and Wilson, K. S. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 269-305[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Jones, T. A., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 173-208 |
| 17. | Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Cryst 26, 283-291 |
| 18. | Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene 67, 31-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Taylor, P., Page, A. P., Kontopidis, G., Husi, H., and Walkinshaw, M. D. (1998) FEBS Lett. 425, 361-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Edwards, K. J., Ollis, D. L., and Dixon, N. E. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 271, 258-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Konno, M., Ito, M., Hayano, T., and Takahashi, N. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 256, 897-908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Mikol, V.,
Kallen, J.,
and Walkinshaw, M. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
5183-5186 |
| 23. | Clubb, R. T., Ferguson, S. B., Walsh, C. T., and Wagner, G. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 2761-2772[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Ke, H.,
Zhao, Y.,
Luo, F.,
Weissman, I.,
and Friedman, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11850-11854 |
| 25. | Mikol, V., Ma, D., and Carlow, C. K. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 1310-1316[Abstract] |
| 26. | Lambright, D. G., Sondek, J., Bohm, A., Skiba, N. P., Hamm, H. E., and Sigler, P. B. (1996) Nature 379, 311-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Wall, M. A., Coleman, D. E., Lee, E., Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A., Posner, B. A., Gilman, A. G., and Sprang, S. R. (1995) Cell 83, 1047-1058[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Sondek, J., Bohm, A., Lambright, D. G., Hamm, H. E., and Sigler, P. B. (1996) Nature 379, 369-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Gaudet, R., Bohm, A., and Sigler, P. B. (1996) Cell 87, 577-588[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Ayadi, L., Callebaut, I., Saguez, C., Villa, T., Mornon, J. P., and Banroques, J. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 284, 673-687[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Reuter, K., and Ficner, R. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D 55, 888-890[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Reuter, K., Nottrott, S., Fabrizio, P., Lührmann, R., and Ficner, R. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 294, 515-525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef] |
| 34. | Merrit, E. A., and Bacon, D. J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 505-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996) J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Gonzalez-Santos, H. Cao, R. C. Duan, and J. Hu Mutation in the splicing factor Hprp3p linked to retinitis pigmentosa impairs interactions within the U4/U6 snRNP complex Hum. Mol. Genet., January 15, 2008; 17(2): 225 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Ohi, L. Ren, J. S. Wall, K. L. Gould, and T. Walz Structural characterization of the fission yeast U5.U2/U6 spliceosome complex PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3195 - 3200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Xu, J. Zhang, X. Huang, J. Sun, Y. Xu, Y. Tang, J. Wu, Y. Shi, Q. Huang, and Q. Zhang Solution Structure of Human Peptidyl Prolyl Isomerase-like Protein 1 and Insights into Its Interaction with SKIP J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 15900 - 15908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ingelfinger, S. F. Gothel, M. A. Marahiel, U. Reidt, R. Ficner, R. Luhrmann, and T. Achsel Two protein-protein interaction sites on the spliceosome-associated human cyclophilin CypH Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): 4791 - 4796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gonzalez-Santos, A. Wang, J. Jones, C. Ushida, J. Liu, and J. Hu Central Region of the Human Splicing Factor Hprp3p Interacts with Hprp4p J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23764 - 23772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |