![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 11, 7743-7748, March 17, 2000
§,
,
¶,
, and
¶**
From the
Department of Molecular, Cellular and
Craniofacial Biology and the ¶ Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292 and the
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Centre for
Structural and Functional Genomics, Concordia University, Montreal,
Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromogranins are a family of regulated
secretory proteins that are stored in secretory granules in endocrine
and neuroendocrine cells and released in response to extracellular
stimulation (regulated secretion). A conserved N-terminal disulfide
bond is necessary for sorting of chromogranins in neuroendocrine PC12
cells. Surprisingly, this disulfide bond is not necessary for sorting
of chromogranins in endocrine GH4C1 cells. To investigate the sorting
mechanism in GH4C1 cells, we made several mutant forms removing highly
conserved N- and C-terminal regions of bovine chromogranin A. Removing
the conserved N-terminal disulfide bond and the conserved C-terminal dimerization and tetramerization domain did not affect the sorting of
chromogranin A to the regulated secretory pathway. In contrast, removing the C-terminal 90 amino acids of chromogranin A caused rerouting to the constitutive secretory pathway and impaired
aggregation properties as compared with wild-type chromogranin A. Since
this mutant was sorted to the regulated secretory pathway in PC12
cells, these results demonstrate that chromogranins contain independent N- and C-terminal sorting domains that function in a cell type-specific manner. Moreover, this is the first evidence that low
pH/calcium-induced aggregation is necessary for sorting of a
chromogranin to the regulated secretory pathway of endocrine cells.
Peptide hormones and neuropeptides are stored at high
concentrations in secretory granules of endocrine and neuroendocrine cells. This storage is required for the proteolytic processing of
prohormones and the subsequent rapid release of active peptides in
response to extracellular stimulation (for review, see Refs. 1-5).
Secretory proteins that are not stored in secretory granules are
secreted directly by the constitutive secretory pathway, originating in
the trans-Golgi network (2) or the constitutive-like secretory pathway
that originates from immature secretory granules (1). Thus, granule
storage of secretory proteins appears to require two sorting steps
(sorting for entry and sorting by retention; Ref. 3) that refine the
final complement of stored proteins.
Several mechanisms have been proposed for sorting of secretory proteins
into secretory granules. These sorting mechanisms include low pH and/or
calcium-induced aggregation (6-8), receptor-mediated transport of
selected secretory proteins (8, 9), and direct binding to specific
lipid domains in granule membranes (10). Different sorting mechanisms
appear to be responsible for sorting of different secretory proteins.
Thus, pro-opiomelanocortin
(POMC)1 is sorted by binding
to carboxypeptidase E and this sorting depends on an N-terminal
disulfide bridge in POMC (9). Chromogranins contain a similar
N-terminal disulfide bond that is both necessary and sufficient for
sorting in PC12 cells (11-14), although carboxypeptidase E does not
appear to mediate this sorting (11, 15). While chromogranins aggregate
at low pH and in the presence of calcium, this aggregation is neither
necessary nor sufficient for sorting in PC12 cells (12, 16). In
contrast, a narrowly defined aggregation domain is necessary for
sorting of pro-atrial natriuretic factor to the regulated secretory
pathway in AtT-20 cells (17). These findings suggest that individual
secretory proteins contain protein-specific sorting signals that
interact with different cellular sorting mechanisms.
It has long been assumed that regulated secretory proteins contain a
single sorting domain that directs their sorting and storage in
secretory granules (see, e.g., Ref. 18). However, we have
recently found that the N-terminal disulfide bond that is necessary for
sorting of chromogranin B in neuroendocrine PC12 cells (14) is not
required for sorting in endocrine GH4C1 cells (11). This result
suggests that, in endocrine cells, the signals and mechanisms used for
sorting of regulated secretory proteins into secretory granules are
different from those used in neuroendocrine cells. These
endocrine-specific sorting signals remain unknown.
Chromogranin A (CgA) is a regulated secretory protein that is stored in
secretory granules of both endocrine and neuroendocrine cells. To
identify potential signals for sorting of CgA in endocrine cells, we
prepared three mutants of bovine CgA. These mutants were designed to
delete separately: 1) the N-terminal disulfide bond and dimerization
domain (19), 2) the C-terminal domain involved in dimerization and
tetramerization (20, 21), and 3) a putative
calcium-aggregation/condensation domain. The latter was based on our
observation that an approximately 8-kDa peptide of CgA is necessary for
calcium-induced aggregation at acidic pH (22).
We now report that the C-terminal domain of CgA is necessary for both
sorting and for low pH/calcium-induced aggregation in GH4C1 cells. In
contrast, it is shown that the C-terminal domain of CgA is not
necessary for sorting to the regulated secretory pathway in PC12 cells.
Together with previous results (11), these findings show that CgA
contains two independent cell-specific sorting domains.
Materials--
Laboratory reagents were purchased from Fisher or
Sigma, unless otherwise indicated. Cell culture media and
penicillin/streptomycin were from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal bovine
and gelding equine serum were from HyClone Laboratories (Logan, UT).
The expression plasmid pcDNA3 was purchased from Invitrogen
(Carlsbad, CA), and restriction endonucleases were from Promega
(Madison, WI). The [3H]leucine and protein A-Sepharose
were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The site-directed mutagenesis
kit, Transformer, was purchased from CLONTECH.
Phospha-Light alkaline phosphatase assay kit was from
Tropix/Perkin-Elmer (Bedford, MA), and rabbit anti-placental alkaline
phosphatase antiserum was from Biomeda Corp. (Foster City, CA). The
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased
from Sigma or Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Phorbol didecanoate was
from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), while the protease inhibitors
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and
N Cell Culture--
GH4C1 rat pituitary somatomammotroph cells
were cultured in medium containing 42.5% Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM), 42.5% Ham's F-10 medium, and 15% gelding equine
serum. PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were
cultured in DMEM containing 10% gelding equine serum and 5% fetal
bovine serum. Both cultures were supplemented with penicillin (50 units/ml) and streptomycin (50 µg/ml) and cultured at 37 °C, in a
humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. For each experiment,
GH4C1 cells were detached with phosphate-buffered saline, (pH 7.2)
containing 0.2 g/liter EDTA, while PC12 cells were detached with 0.25%
trypsin in DMEM. The cells were plated in culture medium at 5 × 105 cells/well in six-well culture plates (5 × 104 cells/cm2).
Cloning and Mutagenesis--
The expression plasmids for
wild-type bovine CgA, CgA Transient Expression of CgA in GH4C1 or PC12
Cells--
Transfections of GH4C1 and PC12 cells were performed
as described previously (11). The pcDNA3/CgA,
pcDNA3/CgA Secretion Experiments--
These were performed as described
previously (11) with minor modifications. Briefly, GH4C1 and PC12 cells
cultured in six-well plates were washed with 1 ml of Krebs-Ringer-Hepes
buffer (KRH) (129 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, 5 mM NaHCO3, 4.8 mM KCl, 2.8 mM glucose, 1.2 mM
KH2PO4, 1.2 mM MgCl2,
and 1 mM CaCl2, (pH 7.4)) for 15 and then 30 min. Stimulated secretion of GH4C1 cells was measured in 1 ml of KRH
buffer containing a secretagogue mixture defined below. Unstimulated
secretion was measured in the absence of secretagogues.
For experiments using cycloheximide treatment, GH4C1 cells were
hormone-treated as described (11). CgA and CgA341 were transiently expressed in hormone-treated GH4C1 cells. The cells were treated for
4 × 30 min with 100 µg/ml cycloheximide prior to secretion experiments. Stimulated and unstimulated secretion media were then
collected for 30 min in the presence of cycloheximide. Secretion was
stimulated in 1 ml of KRH buffer supplemented with 50 mM
KCl, 100 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and 1 µM Bay K8644. Unstimulated cells received 50 mM NaCl and 100 nM 4
Secretion of CgA, CgA341, and SEAP transiently expressed in PC12 cells
was measured for 30 min in either 1 ml of KRH (unstimulated) or in low
salt KRH (NaCl reduced to 79 mM, no CaCl2)
supplemented with 50 mM KCl and 2 mM
BaCl2 (stimulated).
For GH4C1 and PC12 cells, the secretion media were collected and
centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to
remove cell debris. The supernatants were transferred to new tubes, and
Tween 20 and PMSF were added to final concentrations of 0.3% and 1 mM, respectively. EDTA was added to the GH4C1 medium to a
concentration of 5 mM. The media containing secreted CgA
and CgA mutants were heated at 100 °C for 10 min and centrifuged to
remove denatured proteins. Soluble proteins in the supernatant were
trichloroacetic acid-precipitated and analyzed by immunoblotting.
To quantitate SEAP secretion, aliquots of secretion medium were diluted
in KRH (1:50 for GH4C1 cells or 1:10 for PC12 cells) and alkaline
phosphatase activity was determined with the Phospha-Light alkaline
phosphatase assay kit and quantitated using a Berthold LB 9501 luminometer (Wallac, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD).
Pulse-Chase Experiments--
Transiently transfected GH4C1 cells
in six well plates were pulse-labeled (2 h, 37 °C) with 50 µCi/well L-[4,5-3H]leucine (specific
activity 154 Ci/mMol) in 1 ml/well KRH. Following the 2-h pulse, cells
were washed briefly with 1 ml of KRH containing 2 mM
leucine and then chased for seven consecutive 30-min intervals at
37 °C in 1 ml of KRH containing 2 mM leucine. The medium
was replaced with fresh medium after each 30-min interval. Following the collection of basal secretion media for 3.5 h, the cells were incubated for 30 min in 1 ml of KRH containing 2 mM
leucine, 50 mM KCl, 100 nM phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate, and 1 µM Bay K8644 and secretion medium was
collected. The secretagogue mix was used to ensure optimal stimulated
secretion of stored proteins (24). Immediately after each 30-min chase,
secretion media samples were collected and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were
transferred to new microcentrifuge tubes and frozen until
immunoprecipitated. CgA immunoreactivity was immunoprecipitated in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) using CgA antibody that
had been bound to protein A-Sepharose. Only a negligible amount of CgA
was not immunoprecipitated by this procedure, as revealed by a second
immunoprecipitation of the supernatant fractions.
Separation of Soluble and Membrane Fractions--
GH4C1 cells
transiently transfected as described above were scraped from the plates
into 1 ml of KRH containing 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM
N Sucrose Gradient Separation--
Transiently transfected GH4C1
cells from duplicate 35-mm culture wells were lysed, as described
above, in 750 µl of ice cold 0.3 M sucrose, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4). The cell lysate was centrifuged at
500 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant fraction was
layered on top of 750 µl of ice-cold 0.6 M sucrose, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The 0.3 M and 0.6 M sucrose fractions and the pellet were adjusted to 1 ml
total volume and 0.3% Tween 20. Total protein was precipitated with trichloroacetic acid in 0.3-0.45 M sucrose and analyzed by immunoblotting.
In Vitro Aggregation Experiment--
The aggregation experiments
were performed as described previously (11). Secretion medium
containing SEAP was centrifuged, but not heated, before use.
Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting--
SDS-PAGE was
performed on 10% gels (25). The separated proteins were visualized by
immunoblotting (26). Immunoblotting (Western and dot) was conducted as
described (11) with the following modifications. The blocked membranes
were incubated for 1-2 h with the appropriate polyclonal antibody
(anti-bovine CgA 1:20,000; anti-human placental alkaline phosphatase
1:1,000) in 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 500 mM NaCl,
0.05% Tween 20 containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. The blots were
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(1:10,000) in the Tris-NaCl-Tween antibody dilution buffer with 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin for 1-2 h, developed with chemiluminescent
substrate, and exposed to BioMax film.
Data Analysis--
The quantitation of immunoblots was
performed as described (11). -Fold stimulation was calculated as
immunoreactive CgA in secretion medium from stimulated
cells/immunoreactive CgA in secretion medium from unstimulated cells.
-Fold stimulation was calculated for each individual experiment, and
the mean ± S.E. was determined from two to eight experiments. The
data were analyzed by Student's t test, or an ordinary
analysis of variance with Student-Neuman-Keuls test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Chromogranins are highly conserved in both their N- and C-terminal
regions. The N-terminal region is involved in sorting in PC12 cells but
not in GH4C1 cells (11). To determine what regions of CgA were
necessary for sorting in GH4C1 cells, we prepared three CgA mutants:
CgA
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl
ketone were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Supersignal
chemiluminescent reagents were from Pierce, polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane was from Bio-Rad, and nitrocellulose membrane was obtained
from Schleicher & Schuell. BioMax film was from Eastman Kodak Co. The
antiserum to bovine CgA was kindly provided by Dr. David V. Cohn
(University of Louisville, Louisville, KY).
CC (missing the disulfide bond), and
secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) were described previously (11,
23). CgA341 and CgA387 were prepared from wild-type CgA by
site-directed mutagenesis with primers from Genosys Biotechnologies
Inc. (The Woodlands, TX). The selection primer
(5'-ACTCTGGGGATCGATATGACCGACC-3') changed the BstBI site of
pcDNA3 to a unique ClaI site, whereas the mutagenesis primer for CgA341 (5'-GAGGAAGAGTAGGATCCCGACCGC-3') added a stop codon
at position 342 of the mature protein. In CgA341, amino acids 339 and
341 were changed from glutamic acid and aspartic acid to glutamine and
glutamic acid, respectively, during DNA manipulation. The mutagenesis
primer for CgA387 (5'-GCGCGGCTAGCCGGATCCGAAGAAGGA-3') added a stop
codon at position 388. Both mutagenic primers also added a
BamHI restriction endonuclease site for screening. The identity of the CgA mutants was confirmed by DNA sequencing. All clones
were tested for expression by transient transfection of GH4C1 cells.
Expression and secretion of CgA, CgA
CC, CgA341, and CgA387 were
confirmed by immunoblotting of secretion media, while SEAP expression
and secretion were confirmed by alkaline phosphatase activity.
CC, pcDNA3/CgA341, pcDNA3/CgA387, pcDNA3/SEAP
plasmids (and pcDNA3 as a control) were used to transiently
transfect GH4C1 or PC12 cells in separate experiments. Prior to
secretion or fractionation experiments, the cells were treated with 5 mM sodium butyrate for 20 h.
-phorbol
12,13-didecanoate.
-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl
ketone, and 5 mM EDTA. The cells from duplicate wells were
combined and lysed by scraping and repeated passage through a 26-gauge
hypodermic needle. Each sample was transferred to a 1.5-ml
microcentrifuge tube, frozen, and thawed twice followed by
centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The
supernatant was collected and centrifuged again at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was
resuspended in 50 µl of the above buffer with or without 1% Triton
X-100 and recentrifuged. After this centrifugation, the supernatant
(soluble fraction) was transferred to a new tube and the pellet
remaining was washed with 100 µl of KRH containing the protease
inhibitors and recentrifuged. After washing, the pellet (membrane
fraction) and the soluble fraction from above were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis) and immunoblotting.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
CC (missing the conserved disulfide bond), CgA387 (missing the
conserved C-terminal peptide that is involved in dimerization and
tetramerization), and CgA341 (lacking the putative aggregation domain)
(Fig. 1). These proteins were expressed in endocrine GH4C1 cells.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Wild-type and mutant forms of bovine CgA used
in this report. The dark box at the N
terminus indicates the signal peptide, the letters indicate
amino acids, and the numbers indicate their position in the
mature protein.
Pulse-chase experiments were used to test the sorting of wild-type CgA
and the three CgA mutants in GH4C1 cells. The cells were pulse-labeled
for 2 h, after which chase media were collected every 30 min until
the addition of secretagogues to stimulate granule release at 3.5 h of chase (Fig. 2). Wild-type CgA,
CgA
CC, and CgA387 each exhibited basal secretion that decreased over the first 2 h of chase incubation, consistent with the release of
some non-stored CgA. Upon the addition of secretagogues, secretion of
these three forms of CgA was strongly stimulated, consistent with
granule storage (Fig. 2, compare the 3.5-h and 4.0-h time points). In
contrast, the CgA341 deletion mutant was completely secreted without
stimulation and did not exhibit stimulated secretion (Fig. 2). These
results suggested that CgA341 was secreted only constitutively in GH4C1
cells. Therefore, the secretion and subcellular localization of this
mutant were further analyzed.
|
The secretion of total, immunoreactive wild-type CgA and CgA341 were
compared in hormone treated cells (Fig.
3). Hormone treatment stimulates
prolactin granule formation in GH4C1 cells (27, 28). We used the
protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide to create a block of basal
protein secretion (23, 29). Under these conditions only proteins that
were stored in secretory granules prior to cycloheximide treatment
would be available for stimulated secretion (23, 29). Indeed, secretion
of wild-type CgA was stimulated 4.7-fold whereas secretion of CgA341
was only stimulated 2.0-fold under these conditions (Fig. 3). These
findings suggested that, unlike wild-type CgA, which was sorted to the
regulated secretory pathway, CgA341 was preferentially secreted by the
constitutive or constitutive-like secretory pathway in GH4C1 cells.
|
Regulated secretory proteins are stored in dense core secretory
granules, while constitutive secretory proteins are located in lighter
Golgi and transport vesicles. To determine if wild-type CgA and CgA341
are located in different membrane compartments, a membrane pellet was
prepared from transiently transfected GH4C1 cells. The membrane pellet
was resuspended to gently disrupt the membrane, and the extent of CgA
release was determined by immunoblotting. Wild-type CgA was efficiently
retained in the membrane fraction (less than 20% released), while
CgA341 was readily released from the membrane fraction (75% released)
(Fig. 4). The differential release of the
two forms of CgA suggested that they are located in different membrane
compartments. The near complete extraction of both forms of CgA with
the addition of Triton X-100 showed that the proteins are enclosed in a
membrane compartment, as opposed to forming an insoluble aggregate
(Fig. 4). CgA
CC and CgA387 were released similarly to wild-type CgA
(not shown), consistent with their co-localization in secretory
granules with wild-type CgA.
|
To further examine the subcellular localization of these
proteins, a 0.3 and 0.6 M sucrose step gradient was used.
Postnuclear supernatants were prepared in 0.3 M sucrose and
then centrifuged on a 0.6 M sucrose cushion. The migration
of CgA from 0.3 to 0.6 M sucrose was determined as an
indicator of granule localization. Fig. 5
shows that only 10% of CgA341 migrated to the denser sucrose solution,
whereas 30% of wild-type CgA was located in this fraction. This
distribution suggests that CgA341 is stored less efficiently in dense
core secretory granules than wild-type CgA. The pellets that were
collected following the sucrose gradient centrifugation contained 30%
of both forms of CgA (data not shown).
|
Regulated secretory proteins aggregate under the conditions of
millimolar calcium concentrations and acidic pH that are found in the
trans-Golgi network and secretory granules (e.g. Ref. 30), and this aggregation has repeatedly been suggested to play a role in
sorting of regulated secretory proteins. Interestingly, aggregation is
neither necessary nor sufficient for sorting in PC12 cells (12, 16). To
test if the missorting of CgA341 in GH4C1 cells could be explained by a
lack of aggregation, the sorting and aggregation of wild-type CgA,
CgA341, and the constitutive secretory pathway marker SEAP (28) were
separately determined by immunoblotting (CgA) or alkaline phosphatase
activity (SEAP). Fig. 6 shows that the
sorting efficiency of wild-type CgA, CgA341, and SEAP is correlated with the aggregation efficiency of these proteins.
|
The results reported so far demonstrate that, although GH4C1 cells
require a C-terminal domain for sorting of CgA (this report), PC12
cells use an N-terminal sorting domain in chromogranin (11-14). To
complete these data, we tested the sorting of CgA341 in PC12 cells.
Sorting was assayed by immunoblotting of secretion medium collected in
the presence or absence of secretagogues. Secretion of wild-type CgA
and CgA341 were stimulated 47- and 65-fold, respectively. In contrast,
the secretion of the constitutive secretory pathway marker SEAP was
only stimulated 1.1-fold (Fig. 7). Thus,
sorting of CgA341 was similar to that of wild-type CgA in these cells. The very high -fold stimulated secretions reported for wild-type CgA
and CgA341 reflect the higher sorting efficiency of PC12 cells as
compared with GH4C1 cells (11) and are due to the near absence of
unstimulated secretion, as detected by Western blotting (Fig. 7A). Endogenous CgA is only present in low amounts in these
cells and was not detected by immunoblotting (Fig. 7A,
CTRL).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromogranin A contains two independent cell type-specific sorting signals: a conserved N-terminal disulfide bond, which was recently found to act as a sorting signal in neuroendocrine PC12 cells (11-14), and a C-terminal sorting domain that is necessary for sorting in endocrine GH4C1 cells (this report). Importantly, the C-terminal domain is not necessary for sorting in PC12 cells (this report; Ref. 31), while the N-terminal domain is not necessary for sorting in GH4C1 cells (this report; Ref. 11). Thus, the two sorting signals complement each other to allow sorting of CgA to the regulated secretory pathway in both endocrine and neuroendocrine cells. It was recently proposed that sorting-for-entry dominates in neuroendocrine cells while sorting-by-retention dominates in endocrine cells (4). Our current data now provide a molecular mechanism for this proposed sorting difference.
The newly identified C-terminal sorting domain in CgA is necessary for
calcium-induced condensation/aggregation of the protein. As used here,
this includes local condensation of secretory proteins that is not
necessarily receptor-mediated. Thus, this is the first evidence that
calcium-induced aggregation plays a role in sorting of chromogranins.
Such a mechanism had long been proposed to play a role in sorting or
storage of chromogranins in secretory granules (6), but recent evidence
from PC12 cells actually suggested that aggregation was neither
necessary nor sufficient for sorting to the regulated secretory pathway
(12, 16). Calcium-induced aggregation, however, appears to play a role
in sorting in some other cell types. Pro-atrial natriuretic factor
contains two amino acids (Glu-23 and Glu-24) that are both necessary
for sorting and calcium-induced aggregation in AtT-20 cells (17). In
-cells, pro-insulin is sorted to immature secretory granules but
retention of the hormone in mature granules is enhanced after
conversion of non-aggregating proinsulin to aggregating insulin (32).
Together with the present data, these reports suggest that aggregation plays a cell-specific role in sorting and retention of regulated secretory proteins.
Comparison of the sorting of total CgA and newly synthesized CgA suggests that CgA341 partially enters secretory granules (2-2.8-fold stimulation of total protein; see Figs. 3 and 6) but that this protein is not stored in mature granules (no stimulated secretion after 3.5-h chase period, Fig. 2). Instead, CgA341 appears to be secreted by the constitutive-like secretory pathway. This is consistent with the poor aggregation of CgA341 since aggregation is thought to play a role in sorting-by-retention in maturing secretory granules in endocrine cells (1, 3, 4, 6).
CgA contains two dimerization domains that have been proposed to play a
role in sorting to the regulated secretory pathway: an N-terminal
dimerization domain that includes the disulfide bond (19) and a
C-terminal dimerization/tetramerization domain (20, 21). The data for
CgA
CC and CgA387 now show that loss of either dimerization domain
does not prevent sorting of CgA to secretory granules in GH4C1 cells
(Fig. 2). Additionally, the C-terminal dimerization domain is not
necessary for sorting of CgA in PC12 cells (Fig. 7). We cannot formally
exclude that some of the CgA341 is sorted by forming heterotypic
N-terminally linked dimers with endogenous CgA (13, 19). However, the
very low expression levels of endogenous CgA (see control
lanes of Fig. 7A) makes this an unlikely
explanation for the bulk sorting of overexpressed CgA341 in PC12 cells.
Thus, the physiological function of these dimerization domains remains unclear.
The N-terminal domain of CgA has been proposed to play a role in
binding to granule membranes, but it is not clear how. We have
previously noted that the N-terminal sorting domains of several regulated secretory proteins share similar secondary structures characterized by a hydrophobic domain that overlaps with an amphipathic
-helix (18). While it has been proposed that this structure interacts directly with lipid domains in the granule membrane (10),
recent data suggest that this domain is not necessary for membrane
binding of CgA in epithelial
cells.2
As an alternative to direct membrane binding, CgA may bind to membrane-associated proteins. It has recently been shown that POMC binds to membrane-bound carboxypeptidase E (9). POMC exhibits an N-terminal hydrophobic domain similar to the one found in CgA (18). In addition, this domain of POMC contains a disulfide bond that is necessary for sorting of POMC and binding to carboxypeptidase E (9). While it is clear that CgA does not bind to carboxypeptidase E (11, 33), CgA may bind to other receptor-like proteins that are included in granule membranes.
The physiological significance of two independent sorting signals in
CgA is not clear. It is possible that this is an adaptation to the
widespread expression of chromogranins in most endocrine and
neuroendocrine cells. Thus, the protein is equipped to enter secretory
granules in cells that may exhibit different sorting mechanisms (4). It
is of interest that, in a comparison of CgA sequences ranging from frog
to man, the N- and C-terminal domains are the most highly conserved
(34). An alternative, but not mutually exclusive, model is that the
presence of multiple sorting signals is related to the physiological
functions of CgA. The protein is a precursor for several biologically
active peptides that play a role in the regulation of endocrine
secretion. These peptides are located in the N-terminal region, central
region, and the C-terminal region of CgA (35). The presence of multiple sorting signals may ensure that N-and C-terminal fragments of CgA are
correctly sorted after cell type-specific proteolytic processing of
CgA. As an example, processing of CgA by furin is thought to produce
parastatin and CgA347 (35). This shortened form of CgA is similar to
the CgA341 tested in this report. Since furin processing takes place in
the trans-Golgi network, the processed protein would contain the
N-terminal but not the C-terminal sorting domain. Thus, this processing
could determine the further routing and processing of CgA in the
secretory pathway in different cell types. This proposed mechanism is
similar to the processing of egg-laying hormones in neurons of
Aplysia and Lymnaea. In these cells, cleavage by
furin or furin-like enzymes determines the intracellular localization
of the processing products in individual cell types (36, 37). However,
unlike sorting of egg-laying hormones, which are sorted to different
subcellular locations in individual cell types, the two sorting signals
in CgA are used to reach equivalent secretory granules in different
cell types.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. David V. Cohn for kindly providing the bovine CgA antisera. We thank Drs. Ulrike Kühn and Renu Jain for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grant 1 R01 DK 53367-01, grants from the Jewish Hospital Research Foundation (Louisville, KY), and a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association, Kentucky affiliate (to S. U. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported by United States Public Health Service Grant 2 T32 DE 07254-06.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 502-852-8905; Fax: 502-852-4702; E-mail: sven.gorr@louisville.edu.
2 U. Kühn and S.-U. Gorr, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin; CgA, chromogranin A; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; KRH, Krebs-Ringer-Hepes; PMSF, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SEAP, secreted alkaline phosphatase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Arvan, P., and Castle, D. (1998) Biochem. J. 332, 593-610 |
| 2. |
Kelly, R. B.
(1985)
Science
230,
25-32 |
| 3. | Shennan, K. I. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24, 535-539[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Thiele, C., Gerdes, H. H., and Huttner, W. B. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, R496-R500[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Zhou, A.,
Webb, G.,
Zhu, X.,
and Steiner, D. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20745-20748 |
| 6. | Gorr, S. U., Kumarasamy, R., Dean, W. L., and Cohn, D. V. (1987) Bone Miner. 2, 251-255[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Gerdes, H. H.,
Rosa, P.,
Phillips, E.,
Baeuerle, P. A.,
Frank, R.,
Argos, P.,
and Huttner, W. B.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
12009-12015 |
| 8. |
Rindler, M. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31180-31185 |
| 9. | Cool, D. R., Normant, E., Shen, F., Chen, H. C., Pannell, L., Zhang, Y., and Loh, Y. P. (1997) Cell 88, 73-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Thiele, C., and Huttner, W. B. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 511-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Gorr, S. U.,
Huang, X. F.,
Cowley, D. J.,
Kuliawat, R.,
and Arvan, P.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C121-C131 |
| 12. | Glombik, M. M., Kromer, A., Salm, T., Huttner, W. B., and Gerdes, H. H. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1059-1070[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Kromer, A.,
Glombik, M. M.,
Huttner, W. B.,
and Gerdes, H. H.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
1331-1346 |
| 14. | Chanat, E., Weiss, U., Huttner, W. B., and Tooze, S. A. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2159-2168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Normant, E.,
and Loh, Y. P.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2137-2145 |
| 16. | Chanat, E., Weiss, U., and Huttner, W. B. (1994) FEBS Lett. 351, 225-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Canaff, L.,
Brechler, V.,
Reudelhuber, T. L.,
and Thibault, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9483-9487 |
| 18. | Gorr, S. U., and Darling, D. S. (1995) FEBS Lett. 361, 8-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Thiele, C.,
and Huttner, W. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1223-1231 |
| 20. | Yoo, S. H., and Lewis, M. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8816-8822[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Yoo, S. H.,
and Lewis, M. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17041-17046 |
| 22. |
Gorr, S. U.,
Shioi, J.,
and Cohn, D. V.
(1989)
Am. J. Physiol.
257,
E247-E254 |
| 23. | Gorr, S. U., and Moore, Y. R. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 545-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Hinkle, P. M., Scammell, J. G., and Shanshala, E. D. I. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 3503-3511[Abstract] |
| 25. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Burnette, W. N. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Scammell, J. G., Burrage, T. G., and Dannies, P. S. (1986) Endocrinology 119, 1543-1548[Abstract] |
| 28. |
Gorr, S.-U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3575-3580 |
| 29. |
Sachs, E.,
and Jamieson, J. D.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
262,
G257-G266 |
| 30. |
Demaurex, N.,
Furuya, W.,
D'Souza, S.,
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2044-2051 |
| 31. | Parmer, R. J., Xi, X. P., Wu, H. J., Helman, L. J., and Petz, L. N. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 1042-1054 |
| 32. |
Kuliawat, R.,
and Arvan, P.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
77-86 |
| 33. | Cool, D. R., and Loh, Y. P. (1998) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 139, 7-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Turquier, V.,
Vaudry, H.,
Jegou, S.,
and Anouar, Y.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
4104-4112 |
| 35. | Cohn, D. V., Fasciotto, B. H., Reese, B. K., and Zhang, J. X. (1995) J. Nutr. 125 Suppl., 2015S-2019S |
| 36. |
Jung, L. J.,
Kreiner, T.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
11-21 |
| 37. |
Klumperman, J.,
Spijker, S.,
van Minnen, J.,
Sharp-Baker, H.,
Smit, A. B.,
and Geraerts, W. P.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
7930-7940 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Courel, M. S. Vasquez, V. Y. Hook, S. K. Mahata, and L. Taupenot Sorting of the Neuroendocrine Secretory Protein Secretogranin II into the Regulated Secretory Pathway: ROLE OF N- AND C-TERMINAL {alpha}-HELICAL DOMAINS J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11807 - 11822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-F. Yan, Y.-W. Lin, C. MacMullen, A. Ganguly, C. A. Stanley, and S.-L. Shyng Congenital Hyperinsulinism Associated ABCC8 Mutations That Cause Defective Trafficking of ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels: Identification and Rescue Diabetes, September 1, 2007; 56(9): 2339 - 2348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Dikeakos and T. L. Reudelhuber Sending proteins to dense core secretory granules: still a lot to sort out J. Cell Biol., April 23, 2007; 177(2): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Courel, C. Rodemer, S. T. Nguyen, A. Pance, A. P. Jackson, D. T. O'Connor, and L. Taupenot Secretory Granule Biogenesis in Sympathoadrenal Cells: IDENTIFICATION OF A GRANULOGENIC DETERMINANT IN THE SECRETORY PROHORMONE CHROMOGRANIN A J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 38038 - 38051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Garcia, S.-K. Han, W. G. Janssen, Z. Z. Khaing, T. Ito, M. J. Glucksman, D. L. Benson, and S. R. J. Salton A Prohormone Convertase Cleavage Site within a Predicted {alpha}-Helix Mediates Sorting of the Neuronal and Endocrine Polypeptide VGF into the Regulated Secretory Pathway J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41595 - 41608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-U. Gorr, S.G. Venkatesh, and D.S. Darling Parotid Secretory Granules: Crossroads of Secretory Pathways and Protein Storage J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2005; 84(6): 500 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Lacombe, C. Mercure, J. D. Dikeakos, and T. L. Reudelhuber Modulation of Secretory Granule-targeting Efficiency by Cis and Trans Compounding of Sorting Signals J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4803 - 4807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Taupenot, K. L. Harper, and D. T. O'Connor Role of H+-ATPase-mediated Acidification in Sorting and Release of the Regulated Secretory Protein Chromogranin A: EVIDENCE FOR A VESICULOGENIC FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3885 - 3897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Malosio, T. Giordano, A. Laslop, and J. Meldolesi Dense-core granules: a specific hallmark of the neuronal/neurosecretory cell phenotype J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2004; 117(5): 743 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bundgaard, H. Birkedal, and J. F. Rehfeld Progastrin Is Directed to the Regulated Secretory Pathway by Synergistically Acting Basic and Acidic Motifs J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5488 - 5493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Venkatesh, D. J Cowley, and S.-U. Gorr Differential aggregation properties of secretory proteins that are stored in exocrine secretory granules of the pancreas and parotid glands Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): C365 - C371. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hosaka, M. Suda, Y. Sakai, T. Izumi, T. Watanabe, and T. Takeuchi Secretogranin III Binds to Cholesterol in the Secretory Granule Membrane as an Adapter for Chromogranin A J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3627 - 3634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Taupenot, K. L. Harper, N. R. Mahapatra, R. J. Parmer, S. K. Mahata, and D. T. O'Connor Identification of a novel sorting determinant for the regulated pathway in the secretory protein chromogranin A J. Cell Sci., March 14, 2003; 115(24): 4827 - 4841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||