![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 12, 8426-8431, March 24, 2000
,From the Institute of Human Genetics, CNRS, Genome Dynamics and Development, 141 rue de la Cardonille, Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acquisition of the competence to replicate
requires the assembly of the MCM2-7
(minichromosome maintenance)
protein complex onto pre-replicative chromatin, a step of the licensing
reaction. This step is thought to occur through binding of a
heterohexameric MCM complex containing the six related MCM subunits.
Here we show that assembly of the MCM complex onto pre-replicative
chromatin occurs through sequential stabilization of specific MCM
subunits. Inhibition of licensing with 6-dimethylaminopurine results in chromatin containing specifically bound MCM4 and MCM6. A similar result
was obtained by interference of the assembly reaction with an MCM3
antibody. The presence of chromatin-bound MCM intermediates was
confirmed by reconstitution experiments in vitro with
purified proteins and by the observation of an ordered association of
MCM subunits with chromatin. These results indicate that the assembly of the MCM complex onto pre-replicative chromatin is regulated at the
level of distinct subunits, suggesting an additional regulatory step in
the formation of pre-replication complexes.
Studies on the mechanisms that regulate the firing of DNA
replication origins have revealed that both in vitro and
in vivo, chromosomes acquire the competence to replicate
(the licensing reaction) on exit from metaphase (1-4). A number of
proteins implicated in the licensing reaction have been identified.
These include ORC1 (5-7),
the protein (5, 8) CDC6, and the MCM2-7 protein complex (9-12). The
licensing reaction can be divided into three separate steps. First, ORC
is assembled onto chromatin, followed by CDC6 and then the MCM complex.
The loading of the MCM complex requires the previous binding of ORC and
CDC6 (5-7). Yeast homologues of these proteins have been shown to
assemble at DNA replication origins in a similar sequential order
(13-15).
The licensing reaction can be blocked with 6-DMAP, a general inhibitor
of serine/threonine protein kinases. When 6-DMAP is added to
metaphase-arrested Xenopus egg extracts, chromosomal DNA
replication is blocked, very likely at the initiation step (1, 16-18).
The replication defect caused by 6-DMAP is efficiently rescued by a
crude preparation of MCM proteins (9), indicating that 6-DMAP may
affect the function of MCM proteins. A first analysis of chromatin
assembled in 6-DMAP-treated extracts has revealed that this chromatin
does not contain MCM3, whereas subunits of ORC (6, 19) and the CDC6
protein (5) are efficiently bound. Hence, one effect of 6-DMAP is to
inhibit the assembly of the MCM complex onto chromatin through an ORC-
and CDC6-independent mechanism.
The mechanism by which the MCM complex associates with chromatin is not
known. Soluble MCM proteins form complexes containing the six related
MCM subunits in Xenopus (10-12, 20-22) and in a variety of
other eukaryotes (for review, see Ref. 23). A soluble heterohexameric
MCM complex appears to be made by association of two distinct
subcomplexes: one containing MCM3 and MCM5 proteins that are in tight
association with each other and another containing MCM4, -6, and -7 with which MCM2 is weakly associated (12, 22, 24). Analysis of MCM
proteins in different systems has suggested that discrete MCM
subcomplexes may exist in equilibrium with each other (25-27).
Although their biological significance is still unclear, some specific
roles for MCM subcomplexes are emerging. A subcomplex of MCM2, -4, -6, and -7 proteins may bind histone H3, probably tethered by MCM2, whereas
a subcomplex of MCM3 and MCM5 has no affinity for this substrate (28).
A DNA helicase activity has been reported to be associated with a
subcomplex made of MCM4, -6, and -7 proteins in HeLa cells, and this
activity appears to be inhibited by MCM2 (27). MCM4 and MCM6 may
differentially contribute to the helicase activity of the
MCM4·MCM6·MCM7 subcomplex (29). No helicase activity has been
detected for the whole purified MCM complex (30), suggesting that
distinct subunits of the MCM complex may have specific roles in DNA replication.
Here we show that discrete MCM subunits of the MCM complex are already
bound to chromatin before its complete licensing for DNA replication.
Chromatin obtained by interference with the licensing reaction was
found to contain bound distinct subunits of the MCM complex. The
presence of an intermediate step in the assembly of the MCM complex
onto chromatin was confirmed by reconstitution experiments in
vitro and by kinetic analysis of formation of the pre-replication
complex. These observations reveal that specific MCM subcomplexes are
components of pre-replicative chromatin and that the assembly of the
MCM proteins is an ordered process that leads to formation of the
pre-replication complex.
Xenopus Egg Extracts--
Interphasic low speed supernatants
(LSSs) were prepared as described (31). Interphasic high speed
supernatants were prepared as described (32). 6-DMAP-treated extracts
were prepared as described (1). Extracts were made 3% (w/v) with
glycerol (1% for 6-DMAP-treated extracts), frozen in liquid nitrogen
in 50-µl aliquots, and stored at Production of Antibodies and Immunoblotting--
The B24
monoclonal antibody has been previously described (22, 33). The B24
antibody obtained from mice ascites was purified by ammonium sulfate
precipitation as described (34). Antibodies specific for
Xenopus MCM proteins were a generous gift of Dr. H. Takisawa
(University of Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan). The Xenopus ORC1 antibody was a gift from J. J. Blow (University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom). The MCM peptide antibody was raised against a peptide
bearing the Xenopus MCM signature (a motif), which is highly
conserved in the MCM2-7 proteins (35). The peptide
COOH-VCCIDEFDKMNDMDRT-NH2 was synthesized, coupled to
keyhole limpet hemocyanin as described (34), and injected into two
different rabbits (500 µg/injection/rabbit). Western blot signals
were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunodepletion of MCM3 from Xenopus Egg
Extracts--
The B24 antibody was added to Xenopus egg
extracts (high speed supernatant) diluted 5-fold with
phosphate-buffered saline containing protease inhibitors (5 µg/ml
each leupeptin, aprotinin and pepstatin; Sigma). Immunocomplexes were
allowed to form by incubation on a rotating wheel at 4 °C for 30 min; protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma) were added; and incubation was
continued for 30 min under the same conditions. Immunocomplexes were
recovered by low speed centrifugation and washed five times with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline containing protease inhibitors, and bound proteins were eluted with Laemmli buffer. For immunodepletion, either the B24 antibody or control mouse IgGs were coupled to protein
G-Sepharose beads (2:1, v/v) for 1 h at room temperature on a
rotating wheel. Coupled IgGs were extensively washed with phosphate-buffered saline and finally with XB buffer (100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.7),
and 50 mM sucrose with protease inhibitors). One hundred
microliters of Xenopus LSS were supplemented with
cycloheximide and double-depleted with a 50% volume of protein G beads
(Sigma) coupled to either the B24 antibody or control mouse IgGs by
incubation for 40 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were recovered by low
speed centrifugation at 4 °C and supplemented with an energy
regeneration system, demembranated sperm nuclei as required, and
[ Immunopurification of MCM2-7 Proteins--
The B24 antibody or
control IgGs were covalently coupled to protein G beads as described
(36). The beads were incubated with Xenopus egg extracts
(LSS) for 40 min at 4 °C on a rotating wheel and separated by low
speed centrifugation at 4 °C. The beads were thoroughly washed with
XB buffer on ice in the presence of protease inhibitors. Proteins
specifically bound to the beads were eluted first with 2 volumes of XB
buffer + 1.5 M NaCl for 10 min on ice, washed with XB
buffer, and then re-eluted with 2 volumes of glycine (pH 2.5). Proteins
eluted with glycine were immediately neutralized by addition of 0.1 volume of 1 M Tris (pH 8.8). Eluted proteins were
simultaneously dialyzed against XB buffer and concentrated at 0.5 mg/ml
by centrifugation in a Microcon-10 (Amicon, Inc.) at 4 °C. Fractions
were stored as aliquots at Neutralization of MCM3-Chromatin Binding--
About 3 µg (2 µl) of either the B24 antibody or control mouse IgGs (eluted from
protein G-Sepharose beads) were added to 30 µl of a
Xenopus LSS and incubated on a rotating wheel at 4 °C for
30 min. Following incubation, extracts were supplemented with an energy
regeneration system and demembranated sperm nuclei (4 ng/µl), and
incubation was continued at 23 °C for 15 min. For heat inactivation,
the B24 antibody was boiled for 5 min in the presence of 1 mM dithiothreitol, cooled immediately on ice, and then
added to the reaction mixture. Chromatin was purified as described below.
Chromatin Purification Methods--
Demembranated sperm nuclei
were prepared as described (31). Chromatin reconstituted in
Xenopus egg extracts was purified by the modification of a
previously described protocol (37). Samples were diluted 4-fold in
ice-cold chromatin purification buffer (50 mM KCl, 20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.7), 2% sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml
aprotinin, and 5 µg/ml pepstatin). Chromatin was purified by
centrifugation at 6000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C
through a 1.5-ml 0.7 M sucrose cushion made in chromatin
purification buffer without Nonidet P-40 in a microcentrifuge. Pellets
were washed once with chromatin purification buffer, and proteins were
eluted with 2× Laemmli buffer. MCM-depleted or 6-DMAP-treated
chromatin was obtained by incubation of demembranated sperm nuclei
(30-50 ng/µl) in the corresponding extracts for 15 min at 23 °C.
Chromatin was purified as described above, except that Nonidet P-40 was
omitted, and pellets were resuspended in XB buffer. Samples were frozen
as 5-µl aliquots in liquid nitrogen and stored at Reconstitution of Unlicensed Chromatin with Purified MCM Proteins
in Vitro--
MCM-depleted or 6-DMAP-treated chromatin was
reconstituted in vitro with purified MCM subcomplexes as
follows. About 10 ng of MCM-depleted chromatin or 20 ng of
6-DMAP-treated chromatin were incubated with fractions eluted from the
B24 immunocomplex (1 µl) for 15 min at 23 °C. After incubation, 1 µl of the reaction was mixed with 9 µl of either MCM- or
mock-depleted Xenopus interphasic extract (LSS), and DNA
replication was monitored over 90 min at 23 °C. In vitro
reconstituted chromatin was purified as described in the specific
chromatin purification section.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Chromatin formed in
Xenopus egg extracts was fixed and observed by
immunofluorescence microscopy as described (37) using an inverted Zeiss Axioscope.
Assembly of MCM4 onto Chromatin Can Be Dissociated from That of
MCM3--
MCM proteins associate with chromatin very rapidly on exit
from metaphase (4). Using Xenopus DNA replication in
vitro systems, we had previously observed that the MCM4 protein
associates with chromatin more rapidly than MCM3 (22). To test whether
MCM4 would bind to chromatin independently of MCM3, we interfered with the association of MCM3 with chromatin using a specific monoclonal antibody (see "Experimental Procedures"). This antibody
immunoprecipitated MCM3 (Fig.
1A) and also efficiently
removed the five related MCM proteins from Xenopus S-phase
egg extracts (Fig. 1B), consistent with these proteins
forming a stable complex in solution (10, 12, 22). When the
MCM3-specific antibody was added to an interphasic Xenopus
egg extract, the association of MCM3 with chromatin was severely
inhibited (Fig. 1C, lane 2), whereas addition of
control IgGs did not have any effect (lane 1). The presence
of the MCM3-specific antibody also caused inhibition of DNA
replication, as expected when chromatin is not fully licensed (Ref. 13
and data not shown). The binding of MCM3 to chromatin was not affected
when the antibody was heat-inactivated (lane 3) or once
licensing had already occurred, i.e. 15 min after addition
of sperm chromatin (lane 4). In contrast to what was
observed with MCM3, MCM4 could still bind chromatin under these
conditions (Fig. 1C), as could ORC1 (Fig. 1C),
which is not complexed with MCM proteins in solution (6, 7). We conclude that MCM4 binds to chromatin when the binding of the MCM3
protein is specifically blocked, demonstrating that MCM4 can associate
with chromatin independently of MCM3.
MCM4 and MCM6 Proteins Are Specifically Associated with Unlicensed
6-DMAP-treated Chromatin--
In Xenopus, the association
of the MCM3 protein with chromatin can be blocked with 6-DMAP, an
inhibitor of serine/threonine protein kinases, resulting in inhibition
of the initiation of DNA replication (1, 5, 6). 6-DMAP inhibits the
activity of the licensing factor, which normally limits DNA replication to only one round in each S- phase (1). We wished to determine whether
the binding of MCM4 to chromatin could be affected by 6-DMAP as
supplementary evidence that MCM4-chromatin binding can be uncoupled
from that of MCM3. We have biochemically characterized chromatin
obtained in Xenopus egg extracts treated with 6-DMAP. Addition of 6-DMAP to metaphase-arrested extracts inhibits by >90%
DNA replication following release into interphase (Ref. 1 and data not
shown). The presence of 6-DMAP completely abolished the association of
MCM3 with chromatin, as expected (Fig.
2A); however, the MCM4 protein
was found to be specifically bound to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin. The
specific binding of MCM4 to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin was also confirmed
by immunofluorescence microscopy with specific antibodies (Fig.
2C). Previous characterization of chromatin formed in
6-DMAP-treated extracts has shown that the ORC1, ORC2, and CDC6
proteins are bound (5, 6, 19), but it is not known whether 6-DMAP
interferes with the binding of all MCM subunits. Analysis of MCM
proteins bound to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin showed that in addition to
MCM3, the binding of MCM2, -5, and -7 proteins is also largely
repressed. Surprisingly, we observed that MCM6 could be recovered on
this chromatin at almost physiological levels (70% of the control)
(Fig. 2, A and B).
We conclude that 6-DMAP does not inhibit the association of two MCM
subunits (MCM4 and MCM6) with chromatin and that a whole MCM complex is
not required for the retention of these subunits on chromatin. One
implication of these observations is that the MCM4·MCM6 subcomplex
may be a stable intermediate of the licensing reaction.
Reconstitution of Unlicensed Chromatin with Purified MCM Proteins
in Vitro--
To determine whether formation of a heterohexameric
MCM2-7 complex is required for the association of distinct MCM
subunits with chromatin, we performed reconstitution experiments
in vitro with MCM subcomplexes isolated from interphasic,
replication-competent Xenopus egg extracts. These were
obtained by stepwise elution of the MCM2-7 complex immunopurified with
the MCM3-specific monoclonal antibody. The first fraction, obtained by
high salt wash, contained the six MCM subunits (Fig.
3A, Eluates,
1.5M NaCl), whereas the second fraction, obtained by an
additional wash at low pH (Glycine), contained the
MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex. These purified fractions were incubated
in vitro either with chromatin lacking all MCM subunits (MCM-dep chr) or with chromatin assembled in the presence of
6-DMAP (6-DMAP chr; see the experimental procedure outlined
in Fig. 3B). The ability of the MCM3 protein to bind
chromatin was determined by Western blotting. Incubation of the total
MCM complex with either MCM-depleted or 6-DMAP-treated chromatin
restored the binding of MCM3 (Fig. 3C). The MCM3·MCM5
subcomplex was not sufficient to allow binding of MCM3 to chromatin
lacking all MCM subunits. In contrast, the same MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex
was sufficient to restore binding of MCM3 to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin,
which, as we have shown (Fig. 2), already contains bound MCM4 and MCM6
proteins. These results indicate that the isolated MCM3·MCM5
subcomplex only binds to chromatin if the MCM4 and MCM6 proteins are
bound.
The replication competence of in vitro reconstituted
chromatin was determined by incubation in an extract lacking MCM
proteins (Fig. 3D). As expected, chromatin lacking MCM
proteins (MCM-dep chr) did not replicate in an extract that
did not contain MCM proteins (Fig. 3D, bar 2)
compared with a control incubation in a mock-depleted extract
(bar 1). The total MCM complex did stimulate replication of
both MCM-depleted chromatin (bar 3) and 6-DMAP-treated chromatin (bar 6), demonstrating that the purified MCM
complex is functional. In contrast, the MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex did not
stimulate the replication of 6-DMAP-treated chromatin (bar
7), despite the fact that the binding of MCM3 was restored (Fig.
3C). Thus, rescue of DNA replication in MCM-depleted
extracts is obtained only by re-addition of all six MCM subunits,
confirming previous observations (11). Collectively, these results
indicate that (a) the association of the MCM3·MCM5
subcomplex with chromatin is dependent upon the presence of the MCM4
and MCM6 proteins; (b) a whole MCM complex is not required
for the association of the MCM3 and MCM5 subunits with chromatin; and
(c) the binding of MCM3 to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin is not
sufficient to restore DNA replication.
Sequential Assembly of MCM Subunits onto Chromatin during the
Licensing Reaction--
In support of these results, we have analyzed
in detail the kinetics of the association of all MCM subunits with
chromatin by both indirect immunofluorescence and Western blotting with specific antibodies. The analysis was performed during the first minutes of incubation of demembranated sperm nuclei in an interphasic Xenopus egg extract, i.e. before the formation of
the nuclear membrane. During the first minute of the time course (Fig.
4A), MCM4 and MCM6 proteins
associated with chromatin very rapidly. The MCM3 protein was detected
on chromatin only at a later stage (5-10 min), and the rapid
accumulation of MCM6 compared with MCM3 was confirmed by Western blot
analysis of chromatin fractions (Fig. 4B). Quantification of
the signals obtained by Western blotting and determination of the
MCM3/MCM6 signal ratio during the kinetics of chromatin association
clearly confirmed that MCM6 binds chromatin with faster kinetics than
does MCM3 (Fig. 4C). These data are in agreement with the
results obtained with 6-DMAP and with the in vitro
reconstitution experiments showing that MCM4 and MCM6 are required to
prime the assembly of the MCM complex. MCM7, which in solution forms a
stable complex with MCM4 and MCM6 (22), surprisingly began to
accumulate on chromatin only 5 min after incubation (Fig.
4B), suggesting that its loading or stabilization may be
time-dependent. MCM5 bound to chromatin with kinetics
similar to those of MCM7 (Ref. 20 and data not shown). ORC1 bound to chromatin very rapidly, as rapidly as MCM4 and MCM6 (Fig.
4B), but reached maximal levels of accumulation before
chromatin was fully loaded with all MCM proteins. The very rapid
accumulation of ORC1 is consistent with the notion that ORC is required
for the association of MCM proteins with chromatin (5-7).
We conclude that MCM2-7 proteins associate with chromatin with
distinct kinetics. MCM4 and MCM6 are the first MCM proteins to
accumulate significantly on chromatin at an early step in the licensing
reaction, with kinetics similar to those of ORC1.
MCM Subcomplexes as Intermediates of the Licensing
Reaction--
In this study, we report the first comprehensive
analysis of the assembly of the MCM2-7 complex onto pre-replicative
chromatin. In contrast with the observation that all six MCM proteins
are associated in a complex in solution and are therefore expected to
bind chromatin as a whole heterohexameric complex, we have revealed the
existence of discrete subunits of the MCM complex bound to chromatin
during formation of the pre-replication complex. Only once formation of
pre-replication complexes had been completed were all MCM proteins
observed on chromatin. We have identified MCM4 and MCM6 proteins as a
stable intermediate of the assembly of the MCM2-7 proteins onto
pre-replicative chromatin. This intermediate was observed at an early
step in the licensing reaction and also when the licensing reaction was
blocked with 6-DMAP. Hence, 6-DMAP may interfere with a phosphorylation
event required for either the assembly or the stabilization of a subset
of MCM proteins on chromatin, but the binding of MCM4 and MCM6 does not
depend on this regulation. Similar results were obtained by
interference with the chromatin binding of MCM3 with a specific
antibody, a treatment that did not prevent MCM4 from binding to
chromatin. Given that MCM3 and MCM5 proteins cannot bind chromatin
devoid of MCM4 and MCM6 subunits, the assembly of MCM4 and MCM6
proteins may represent a priming step in the chromatin assembly of the MCM proteins. The inability of the MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex to bind chromatin lacking all MCM subunits also indicates that this subcomplex has low affinity for chromatin and is consistent with previous observations showing that an MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex from HeLa cells has
no affinity for histones (28).
The in vitro reconstitution experiments confirm that
isolated MCM subcomplexes can bind chromatin, suggesting that formation of a heterohexameric complex made of the six MCM subunits is not required for the binding of MCM proteins or for their retention on
chromatin. They also indicate that a full MCM complex is required for
DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts, in agreement with previous findings showing that all six MCM proteins are required to
rescue DNA replication in MCM-depleted extracts (10, 11, 20) and that a
crude preparation of MCM proteins (replication licensing factor-M) can
rescue the replication defect of 6-DMAP-treated extracts (9). However,
purified replication licensing factor-M appears to require an
additional fraction, replication licensing factor-B, to restore
licensing in 6-DMAP-treated extracts (9). Our results suggest that
replication licensing factor-B may be an activity needed to assemble
and/or stabilize part of the MCM complex on chromatin. Purification and
characterization of this activity will be of great interest to
elucidate the regulation of assembly of the MCM proteins onto chromatin.
Dynamics of MCM2-7 Protein Assembly onto Chromatin--
Analysis
of the assembly of the MCM proteins onto chromatin during the licensing
reaction has revealed that MCM proteins are loaded in at least two
steps. The first step (1-3 min) involves the rapid binding of MCM4 and
MCM6 as well as MCM2 (22). This step correlates with the accumulation
of ORC1 on chromatin, raising the possibility that at this stage of the
licensing reaction, ORC1 and the MCM2, -4, and -6 proteins may
physically interact. A physical interaction between ORC1 and MCM4 has
been reported in whole cell extracts of fission yeast (38). The
assembly of this intermediate may represent a pre-licensing step that
is not inhibited by 6-DMAP. In the second step (>5 min), all MCM
proteins accumulate at high levels on chromatin, suggesting that this
step may be dependent on pre-licensing. Given that all MCM subunits are
required to license for replication (Refs. 11 and 12 and this work),
these observations may explain why demembranated sperm nuclei acquire
the "license" to replicate only after 15 min of incubation in
Xenopus interphasic extracts (1), as this is the minimal
time required to complete the third step in the licensing reaction,
i.e. the assembly of all MCM2-7 subunits onto chromatin.
MCM7 accumulated on chromatin only at a later stage of the licensing
reaction, suggesting that it may require either previous binding of
other MCM subunits or a stabilization event that is time-dependent. This finding is consistent with the absence
of MCM7 in 6-DMAP-treated chromatin and strengthens the notion that 6-DMAP interferes with a step in the assembly of a subset of MCM subunits. In solution, MCM7 forms a strong complex with two other MCM
proteins, MCM4 and MCM6 (12, 22); and this complex, purified from HeLa
cells, has been shown to have DNA helicase activity, which may be
relevant to the unwinding step of initiation of DNA replication (27).
The helicase activity of the MCM4·MCM6·MCM7 subcomplex is inhibited
by addition of the MCM2 protein, and no helicase activity is associated
with a heterohexameric complex made of the six distinct MCM subunits
(30). We speculate that formation of the MCM4·MCM6·MCM7 complex on
chromatin is regulated, perhaps being remodeled in an active form only
after formation of the nuclear membrane, when S-phase cyclin-dependent
kinases are active and initiation of DNA replication is allowed.
The evidence presented here shows that MCM2-7 proteins are loaded onto
chromatin sequentially, whereas in solution, these proteins are
associated in a heterohexameric complex. We envisage two models that
can explain how MCM2-7 proteins are loaded onto pre-replicative
chromatin. In the first model, MCM subunits are delivered to chromatin
from the soluble MCM complex, perhaps with the collaboration of
"chaperon-like" proteins. In the second model, MCM proteins bind to
chromatin as a heterohexameric complex, but during the licensing
reaction, this complex is unstable. MCM subunits with high affinity for
chromatin targets (e.g. MCM4 and MCM6; see also Ref. 29)
would be the first to be stabilized, whereas others would be more
sensitive to dissociation. We favor the second model, which is
supported by our in vitro reconstitution experiments showing
that purified MCM proteins do not need to be assembled into a full
heterohexameric complex in order to bind chromatin. This second model
is consistent with a model recently proposed for the loading of MCM2-7
proteins onto pre-replicative chromatin in yeast (39), which parallels
the loading of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a DNA polymerase-
The observation of the assembly of MCM proteins onto chromatin through
distinct MCM subcomplexes suggests an additional level of regulation
for the initiation of DNA replication. One intermediate step in the
assembly of MCM proteins is sensitive to 6-DMAP, suggesting that it is
regulated by the activity of protein kinase(s). These data also raise
the question of whether MCM proteins reassemble in a whole
heterohexameric complex onto chromatin or whether they distribute
differentially at distinct sites, perhaps dynamically interacting in an
ordered manner at discrete steps in the initiation reaction. The
identification of the chromatin targets for MCM proteins and the
analysis of their distribution on chromosomes will be of great
importance in understanding the function of these universal regulators
of the initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C. Before use, aliquots
were thawed, pooled, and supplemented with an ATP regeneration system
(10 mM creatine phosphate, 10 µg/ml creatine kinase, 1 mM ATP, and 1 mM MgCl2) and
cycloheximide (250 µg/ml; Sigma).
-32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
20 °C in 10% glycerol.
80 °C as
described (6).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
MCM4-chromatin binding does not require
MCM3. A, immunoprecipitation of MCM3 from
Xenopus egg extracts. A Xenopus egg extract (high
speed supernatant (HSS)) was incubated with either control
mouse IgGs (IP, Mock) or the B24 monoclonal
antibody (IP,
B24), and immunoprecipitated
proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with an antibody raised
against Xenopus MCM3 (
MCM3) (11). The
arrow indicates the mobility of the IgGs. B,
depletion of MCM3 and related proteins from Xenopus egg
extracts. The Xenopus LSS was double-depleted either with
control IgGs (Mock-dep) or the B24 antibody
(B24-dep), and supernatants were analyzed by Western
blotting with an antibody that recognizes the Xenopus MCM
signature (
MCMs pep). Numbers on the left-hand
side indicate MCM proteins. C, neutralization of
MCM3-chromatin binding with the B24 antibody. A Xenopus LSS
was preincubated with mouse IgGs (lane 1), the B24 antibody
(lane 2), or heat-inactivated B24 antibody (lane
3). Sperm nuclei (4 ng/µl) were added, and incubation was
continued at room temperature for 15 min. In one case (lane
4), the extract was supplemented with the B24 antibody 15 min
after sperm chromatin addition. Chromatin was purified, and proteins
eluted from chromatin were analyzed by Western blotting.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Biochemical characterization of
6-DMAP-treated chromatin. A, components of the
pre-replication complex bound to 6-DMAP-treated chromatin. Sperm nuclei
(50 ng/µl) were reconstituted in metaphase-arrested extracts released
in interphase with 0.3 mM CaCl2 either in the
absence (
) or presence (+) of 3 mM 6-DMAP and incubated
at 23 °C for 15 min. Chromatin was purified in the presence of 0.1%
NP-40, and bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting.
B, quantification of proteins bound to 6-DMAP-treated
chromatin. Western blotting signals in A were quantified and
are expressed as percent of chromatin-bound proteins relative to the
6-DMAP control. C, distribution of MCM4 on 6-DMAP-treated
chromatin. Chromatin assembled in 6-DMAP-treated extracts was stained
with either MCM3 or MCM4 antibodies (fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC)) and Hoechst dye to visualize DNA. Samples were
observed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 10 µm.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Purification of MCM complexes from
Xenopus egg extracts. A, MCM proteins were
immunopurified from interphasic Xenopus egg extracts (LSS)
by incubation with the B24 antibody. Proteins eluted from beads with
high salt (Eluates, 1.5M NaCl) and low pH
(Glycine) were fractionated by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and analyzed by Western blotting with the MCM peptide
antibody (
MCMs pep). The presence of specific MCM
proteins in eluates was verified by Western blotting with specific
antibodies (
MCM6,
MCM4, and
MCM3). Numbers on both the right- and
left-hand sides indicate MCM proteins. The asterisk
indicates a polypeptide that was recognized by the antibody and may
represent a degradation product. HSS, high speed
supernatant. B, shown is the experimental procedure of the
reconstitution experiment. Either MCM-depleted chromatin (MCM-dep
chr) or 6-DMAP-treated chromatin (6-DMAP chr) is
incubated in vitro either with the MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex or
the MCM complex. After 15 min at 23 °C, one aliquot of each sample
is incubated with an MCM-depleted extract, whereas reconstituted
chromatin is purified from another aliquot. C, shown are the
results from in vitro binding of MCM3 to chromatin
reconstituted with MCM complexes. Western blot of chromatin formed in
MCM-depleted extracts (MCM-dep chr) or 6-DMAP-treated
extracts (6-DMAP chr) reconstituted in vitro
either with proteins eluted from B24 antibody beads (MCM3 and MCM5 and
the MCM complex) (+) or with proteins eluted from IgG beads (
). The
binding of the MCM subunits not indicated in the figure was confirmed
by Western blotting with the MCM peptide antibody (data not shown).
Mock-dep chr, chromatin formed in a mock-depleted extract.
D, shown are the results from DNA replication of in
vitro reconstituted chromatin. One aliquot of in vitro
reconstituted chromatin was incubated in an MCM-depleted
(MCM-dep) extract, and DNA replication was measured after a
90-min incubation at 23 °C. MCM-depleted chromatin was also
incubated in a mock-depleted (Mock-dep) extract as a
control. Bar 1, no addition; bars 2 and
5, with proteins eluted form control IgGs; bars 3 and 6, with the MCM complex; bars 4 and
7, with the MCM3·MCM5 subcomplex.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Dynamics of MCMs binding to chromatin during
the licensing reaction. A, demembranated sperm nuclei
(3 ng/µl) were incubated in a Xenopus interphasic extract
(LSS) for the indicated times. Chromatin samples were fixed, and bound
proteins were visualized by in situ indirect
immunofluorescence with specific antibodies. Scale bar = 10 µm. B, kinetics of MCM protein binding to unlicensed
chromatin analyzed by Western blotting of chromatin fractions. A sample
of chromatin formed during the licensing reaction (A) was
purified, and bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with the
indicated antibodies. C, MCM6 binds to sperm chromatin
earlier than MCM3. Western blot signals of MCM3 and MCM6 shown in
B were quantified and are expressed as the MCM3/MCM6 signal
ratio versus time.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
processivity factor. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen in solution is
a ring-shaped homotrimeric protein that binds to the DNA substrate,
forming an unstable intermediate. ATP hydrolysis by the replication
factor C complex causes a conformational change that promotes opening of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen ring and its reformation around DNA, a reaction that is highly regulated (40, 41). Subunits of
ORC and the CDC6 protein, which are required for the loading of MCM2-7
proteins onto chromatin, share significant sequence homology with
subunits of replication factor C, and genetic evidence in yeast
suggests that CDC6 requires ATP hydrolysis to load MCM proteins onto
chromatin (39, 42, 43). Thus, the soluble heterohexameric MCM complex,
which appears to form a ring in solution (30), may contact chromatin
via specific MCM subunits (MCM2, -4, and -6,) forming an unstable
intermediate. A phosphorylation event sensitive to 6-DMAP and ATP
hydrolysis, presumably mediated by ORC and CDC6, will be required to
stabilize the MCM complex on chromatin, completing the licensing reaction.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Stephane Bocquet for excellent technical assistance in the raising of antibodies, J. J. Blow and Y. Takisawa for reagents, Ned Lamb for useful advice on use of antibodies, and all members of the laboratory for discussions. We also thank Ned Lamb and Daniel Fisher for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer and the Fondation de la Recherche Médicale.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by fellowships from the European Community (Biomedicine
and Health) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-0-499619917; Fax: 33-0-499619920; E-mail: mechali@igh.cnrs.fr.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: ORC, origin recognition complex; MCM, minichromosome maintenance; CDC, cell division cycle; 6-DMAP, 6-dimethylaminopurine; LSS, low speed supernatant.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Blow, J. J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
993-1002 |
| 2. |
Kubota, Y.,
and Takisawa, H.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1321-1331 |
| 3. | Blow, J. J., and Laskey, R. (1988) Nature 332, 546-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Lemaître, J.-M.,
Geraud, G.,
and Méchali, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1159-1166 |
| 5. | Coleman, T. R., Carpenter, P. B., and Dunphy, G. (1996) Cell 87, 53-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Rowles, A., Chong, P. J., Brown, L., Howell, M., Evan, G. I., and Blow, J. J. (1996) Cell 87, 287-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Romanowski, P., Madine, M. A., Rowles, A., Blow, J. J., and Laskey, R. A. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1416-1425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Hua, X. H.,
and Newport, J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
271-281 |
| 9. | Chong, J. P., Mahbubani, H. M., Khoo, C.-Y., and Blow, J. J. (1995) Nature 375, 418-421[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Madine, M. A., Khoo, C.-Y., Mills, A. D., and Laskey, R. A. (1995) Nature 375, 421-424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Kubota, Y., Mimura, S., Nishimoto, S.-I., Masuda, T., Nojima, H., and Takisawa, H. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3320-3331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Thömmes, P., Kubota, Y., Takisawa, H., and Blow, J. J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3312-3319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Tanaka, T., Knapp, D., and Nasmyth, K. (1997) Cell 90, 649-660[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Aparicio, O. M., Weinstein, D. M., and Bell, S. P. (1997) Cell 91, 59-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Donovan, S.,
Harwood, J.,
Drury, L. S.,
and Diffley, J. F. X.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5611-5616 |
| 16. |
Mahbubani, H. M.,
Chong, J. P.,
Chevalier, S.,
Thommes, P.,
and Blow, J. J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
125-135 |
| 17. | Munshi, R., and Leno, G. H. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 240, 321-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Yan, H.,
and Newport, J.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1-15 |
| 19. | Carpenter, P. B., Mueller, P. R., and Dunphy, W. (1995) Nature 379, 357-360 |
| 20. |
Romanowski, P.,
Madine, M. A.,
and Laskey, R. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10189-10194 |
| 21. |
Hendrickson, M.,
Madine, M.,
Dalton, S.,
and Gautier, J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12223-12228 |
| 22. | Coué, M., Amariglio, F., Maiorano, D., Bocquet, S., and Méchali, M. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 245, 282-289[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Kearsey, S. E., and Labib, K. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1398, 113-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Sherman, D. A.,
and Forsburg, S. L.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
3955-3960 |
| 25. | Lei, M., Kawasaki, Y., and Tye, B. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5081-5090[Abstract] |
| 26. | Su, T. T., Feger, G., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 319-329[Abstract] |
| 27. |
Ishimi, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24508-24513 |
| 28. |
Ishimi, Y.,
Ichinose, S.,
Omori, A.,
Sato, K.,
and Kimura, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24115-24122 |
| 29. |
You, Z.,
Komamura, Y.,
and Ishimi, Y.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
8003-8015 |
| 30. | Adachi, Y., Usukura, J., and Yanagida, M. (1997) Genes Cell 2, 467-479[Abstract] |
| 31. | Menut, S., Lemaître, J.-M., Hair, A., and Méchali, M. (1988) in Advances in Molecular Biology: A Comparative Methods Approach to the Study of Ooocytes and Embryos (Richter, J. D., ed) , pp. 196-226, Oxford University Press, Oxford |
| 32. | Méchali, M., and Harland, R. M. (1982) Cell 30, 93-101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Bucci, S., Ragghianti, M., Nardi, I., Bellini, M., Mancino, G., and Lacroix, J.-C. (1993) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 37, 509-517[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1991) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 35. |
Hu, B.,
Burkhart, D.,
Sculte, D.,
Musahl, C.,
and Knippers, R.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5289-5293 |
| 36. | Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 522-523, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 37. | Coué, M., Kearsey, S. E., and Méchali, M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1085-1097[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Grallert, B.,
and Nurse, P.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2644-2654 |
| 39. | Perkins, G., and Diffley, J. F. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 23-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Tsurimoto, T.,
and Stillman, B.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1950-1960 |
| 41. |
Burgers, P. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22698-22706 |
| 42. |
DeRyckere, D.,
Smith, C. L.,
and Martin, G. S.
(1999)
Genetics
151,
1445-1457 |
| 43. |
Weinreich, M.,
Liang, C.,
and Stillman, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
441-446 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Francon, J.-M. Lemaitre, C. Dreyer, D. Maiorano, O. Cuvier, and M. Mechali A hypophosphorylated form of RPA34 is a specific component of pre-replication centers J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2004; 117(21): 4909 - 4920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekholm-Reed, J. Mendez, D. Tedesco, A. Zetterberg, B. Stillman, and S. I. Reed Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly J. Cell Biol., June 21, 2004; 165(6): 789 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Forsburg Eukaryotic MCM Proteins: Beyond Replication Initiation Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 109 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bruemmer, F. Yin, J. Liu, J. P. Berger, T. Kiyono, J. Chen, E. Fleck, A. J. Van Herle, B. M. Forman, and R. E. Law Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Inhibits Expression of Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2003; 17(6): 1005 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gozuacik, M. Chami, D. Lagorce, J. Faivre, Y. Murakami, O. Poch, E. Biermann, R. Knippers, C. Brechot, and P. Paterlini-Brechot Identification and functional characterization of a new member of the human Mcm protein family: hMcm8 Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2003; 31(2): 570 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lei, I. H. Cheng, L. A. Roberts, M. A. McAlear, and B. K. Tye Two mcm3 Mutations Affect Different Steps in the Initiation of DNA Replication J. Biol. Chem., August 16, 2002; 277(34): 30824 - 30831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Shohet, M. J. Hicks, S. E. Plon, S. M. Burlingame, S. Stuart, S.-Y. Chen, M. K. Brenner, and J. G. Nuchtern Minichromosome Maintenance Protein MCM7 Is a Direct Target of the MYCN Transcription Factor in Neuroblastoma Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(4): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Dimitrova, T. A. Prokhorova, J. J. Blow, I. T. Todorov, and D. M. Gilbert Mammalian nuclei become licensed for DNA replication during late telophase J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2002; 115(1): 51 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Crevel, A. Ivetic, K. Ohno, M. Yamaguchi, and S. Cotterill Nearest neighbour analysis of MCM protein complexes in Drosophila melanogaster Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2001; 29(23): 4834 - 4842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Lei and B. Tye Initiating DNA synthesis: from recruiting to activating the MCM complex J. Cell Sci., January 4, 2001; 114(8): 1447 - 1454. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Méndez and B. Stillman Chromatin Association of Human Origin Recognition Complex, Cdc6, and Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins during the Cell Cycle: Assembly of Prereplication Complexes in Late Mitosis Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2000; 20(22): 8602 - 8612. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||