J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 12, 8610-8617, March 24, 2000
Tumor Necrosis Factor-
and Fas Activate Complementary
Fas-associated Death Domain-dependent Pathways That
Enhance Apoptosis Induced by
-Irradiation*
Kotohiko
Kimura and
Edward P.
Gelmann
From the Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown
University, Washington, D.C. 20007-2197
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activation of either tumor necrosis factor
receptor 1 or Fas induces a low level of programmed cell death in LNCaP
human prostate cancer cells. We have shown that LNCaP cells are
entirely resistant to
-radiation-induced apoptosis, but can be
sensitized to irradiation by TNF-
. Fas activation also sensitized
LNCaP cells to irradiation, causing nearly 40% cell death 72 h
after irradiation. Caspase-8 was cleaved and activated after exposure
to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
. However, after exposure to anti-Fas
antibody caspase-8 cleavage occurred only between the 26-kDa N-terminal
prodomain and the 28-kDa C-terminal region that contains the protease
components. Although anti-Fas antibody plus irradiation induced
apoptosis that could be blocked by the pancaspase inhibitor zVAD, there was no measurable caspase-8 activity after exposure to anti-Fas antibody. The effector caspases-6 and -7, and to a lesser extent caspase-3, were activated by TNF-
, but not by anti-Fas antibody. Anti-Fas antibody, like TNF-
also activated serine proteases that
contributed to cell death. Exposure of LNCaP cells simultaneously to
TNF-
and anti-Fas antibody CH-11 resulted in marked enhancement of
apoptosis that occurred very rapidly and was still further augmented by
irradiation. Rapid apoptosis that ensued from combined treatment with
TNF-
, anti-Fas antibody, and irradiation was completely blocked
either by zVAD or expression of dominant negative Fas-associated death
domain. Our data shows that there are qualitative differences in
caspase activation resulting from either TNF receptor 1 or Fas.
Simultaneous activation of these receptors was synergistic and caused
rapid epithelial cell apoptosis mediated by the caspase cascade.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Programmed cell death is critical for normal tissue homeostasis
and control of cell growth. Genetic disruptions of cell death pathways
can be oncogenic (1, 2). In addition, cancer cells develop resistance
to programmed cell death as a mechanism of chemotherapy and radiation
resistance. Strategies to restore the cell death response to
chemotherapy or radiation may reverse treatment resistance in some
cancers. The prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, like most clinical
prostate cancers, is dependent on androgens for growth and, like tumor
tissue synthesizes the tissue-specific prostate-specific antigen, a
serine protease (3-6). The hormone dependence of LNCaP cells is
reminiscent of early stage prostate cancer, but the cells share
characteristics of advanced prostate cancers in that they do not
undergo apoptosis in response to either androgen deprivation or
-irradiation (7-10). We have shown that TNF-
1 or
C2-ceramide, at doses that, by themselves, induce little or no cell death, sensitize LNCaP cells to irradiation so that combined treatment with either TNF-
and irradiation or
C2-ceramide and irradiation induces death of the cultures
(11). We have now studied the effect of Fas activation on the
sensitivity of LNCaP cells to radiation-induced cell death. We have
also found that Fas and TNF-
have complementary effects on the
activation of cell death pathways in LNCaP and together induced a
markedly accelerated cell death response compared with activation of
either TNFR-1 or Fas alone.
TNF-
is an inflammatory cytokine that can induce a diverse range of
biological responses (12, 13). Signaling by TNF-
is initiated by
binding to TNFR-1, which causes the association of an adapter protein
TRADD with the intracellular death domain of the TNFR-1 molecule (14).
TRADD mediates the subsequent recruitment of an adapter protein FADD to
form a death-inducing signaling complex, which initiates apoptosis
through activation of caspase-8, a proximal element in the cascade of
cysteine proteases (15-21). Caspase-8 in turn induces activation of
caspase-3 and caspase-7, which cleave PARP, and of caspase-6 that
cleaves lamin B thus contributing to dissolution of the nuclear
envelope (22-25). Signaling by TNF-
also activates anti-apoptotic
cell signals via activation of the transcription factor NF
B that may
override the effects of apoptosis pathways in some cells (26-28).
Signaling through Fas is thought to be less complex than signaling
though TNFR-1. Fas is a cell surface receptor that is activated by
binding of Fas ligand or agonistic anti-Fas antibody (29). Fas receptor
interacts with FADD to activate caspase-8 and, subsequently, the
effector caspases-3, -7, and -6 (30, 31). Unlike TNF-
receptor, Fas
is not linked to activation of NF
B, and therefore is a pure death
receptor that lacks antagonistic anti-apoptotic signaling.
In LNCaP cells TNF-
induces activation of caspases-8, -6, and -7, appearance of classical DNA fragmentation ladders and 20% cell death
within 72 h after treatment. This effect can be blocked by the
pancaspase inhibitor zVAD. In the presence of TNF-
, irradiation, which has no effect by itself, results in 60-70% cell death at 72 h after exposure. In the presence of TNF-
, irradiation
induces the activation of serine proteases that are inhibited by TLCK and slightly enhances caspase activation (11). Therefore, two separate
proteolytic pathways are activated in response to the combined
treatment of LNCaP cells with TNF-
and irradiation. To further
understand the cell death pathways activated by irradiation in
sensitized LNCaP cells, we studied the response of LNCaP cells to
agonistic Fas antibody combined with
-irradiation. These experiments were undertaken to compare the effects of Fas activation with those of
TNF-
in order to elucidate the mechanism by which resistant cells
can become sensitized to radiation-induced apoptosis. We found that Fas
activation caused similar sensitization of the cells to irradiation as
seen with TNF-
. The cell death pathways induced by the two agonistic
receptor/ligand interactions were not entirely redundant and could be
combined to produce accelerated cell death when both TNFR-1 and Fas
were activated simultaneously.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP was
routinely cultured at 37 °C in improved minimal essential medium
(Biofluids, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum using
standard cell culture procedures (3, 4). Twenty-four hours before
exposure to TNF-
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN)
and/or cross-linking anti-Fas antibody (clone CH-11, Immunotech,
Westbrook, ME) and/or irradiation, the medium was changed to improved
minimal essential medium without phenol red (Biofluids) supplemented
with 5% charcoal-stripped calf serum. Caspase inhibitors were added 1 h before treatment of cells with TNF-
, anti-Fas antibody, or
-irradiation. z-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-CH2F(zVAD) were
purchased from Enzyme Systems Products (Livermore, CA). TLCK was
purchased from Sigma. Neutralization antibody for human Fas receptor
clone ZB-4 (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME) was added 1 h before
treatment of either TNF-
or CH-11. For
-irradiation we used a JL
Shepherd Mark I Irradiator [137Cs] source with a dose
rate of 209 centigray/min.
Construction of FADD-dominant Negative Transformants--
The
expression vector for FADD-DN transformants, a pEF vector containing an
N-terminal 79-amino acid deletion mutant of human FADD, was a gift from
Andreas Strasser, University of Cambridge (32). The vector was
transfected into LNCaP cells using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Grand Island, NY), and the transformants were selected by puromycin.
The expression of FADD-DN was confirmed by the Western blotting using
anti-FADD polyclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).
Apoptosis Assays--
In situ end labeling assay is
routinely used in our laboratory for apoptosis determination and has
been previously described (33). Briefly cells were cultured in 12-well
plates. Both floating and adhesive cells were collected together and
fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 30 min. After washing with
phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were spread onto glass slides. The
first reaction was performed by incubating the cells at 37 °C for
2 h in the reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 60 µM
2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid, and 0.005% bovine serum albumin)
supplemented with 1.25 units/ml Klenow fragment (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN), 200 µM dATP, 200 µM dCTP, 200 µM dGTP, and 200 pM biotinylated dUTP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The
second reaction was performed by incubating the cells at 25 °C for
1 h in the peroxidase-conjugated avidin-biotin complex solution
(Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Peroxidase reaction was
performed using VIP (Vector Laboratories) as a substrate. After counter
staining with methyl green, the cells with purple-stained nuclei were
counted as apoptotic cells. Bars in the figure designate standard
deviations (34).
Western Blotting--
100 µg of total cellular protein were
resolved by electrophoresis on either 8 or 10-20% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes
(Trans-Blot transfer medium, Bio-Rad). After blocking with 5% milk in
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl with 0.05%
Tween 20, membranes were probed with monoclonal antibody to PARP
(Enzyme Systems Products, Dublin, CA), rabbit antiserum to caspase-3 (a
gift from Kristine Kikly, SmithKline Beecham, King of Prussia, PA), rat
antiserum to caspase-7 (35) (a gift from Jun Ying Yuan, Harvard
University), mouse monoclonal antibody to caspase-8 (clone N2, C15, and
C5) (36) (gifts from Peter Krammer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany), mouse monoclonal antibody to p18 fragment of
caspase-8 (Cell Diagnostica, Munster, Germany), rabbit antiserum to
DFF45 (37) (a gift from Xiao Dong Wang, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX), mouse monoclonal antibody to
lamin B (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), or goat anti-TNFR-1 polyclonal antibody (R & D systems, Minneapolis, MN) and visualized with enhanced
chemiluminescence detection (Pierce). Western blotting for Fas was
performed with a rabbit antiserum obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Western blotting for Fas ligand
was performed with mouse monoclonal antibody from Pharmingen (San
Diego, Ca).
RT-PCR--
TNF-
, TNF-
, TRAIL, and DR3mRNA were
assayed by PCR amplification of cDNA isolated from LNCaP cells. The
primer sequences for PCR amplification are as follows: TNF-
, left,
5'-GGCTCCAGGCGGTGCTTGTTCC-3' and right,
5'-CAGGCTTGTCACTCGGGGTTCG-3'; TNF-
, left,
5'-GGTCCAGCTCTTCTCCTCCCAGTA-3' and right,
5'-GCGAAGGCTCCAAAGAAGACAGTA-3'; TRAIL, left, 5'-GTGGCAACTCCGTCAGC-3' and right, 5'-GCCCAGAGCCTTTTCATT-3'; DR3, left,
5'-ATGGCGATGGCTGCGTGTCCT-3' and right, 5'-GGTGGCCGGTGGTGGGGTCAGAG-3'.
PCR reactions were cycled at 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 30 s. For TNF-
32 cycles were completed,
for TNF-
37 cycles, for TRAIL 35 cycles, and for DR3 33 cycles.
Caspase-8 Fluorimetric Assay--
Caspase-8 activity was
measured by IETD-amc cleavage using the Apoalert caspase-8 assay kit
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). For the assay, 3 × 106 cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and
suspended in 50 µl of lysis buffer provided by the manufacturer. The
rest of the assay was done according to the manufacture's protocol. Fluorescence was measured using an F-4500 spectrophotometer (Hitachi Ltd., Japan) with 400 nm excitation and 505 nm emission filter.
 |
RESULTS |
To demonstrate that Fas activation sensitized cells to irradiation
we used CH-11, an anti-Fas antibody that cross-links Fas. Fig.
1 shows that CH-11-sensitized LNCaP cells
to cell death induced by both 8 and 20 Gy
-irradiation. This was
somewhat in contrast to our previously published results with radiation
and TNF-
that did not result in more apoptosis at 20 Gy than at 8 Gy
(11).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
CH-11 sensitized LNCaP cells to
radiation-mediated apoptosis. LNCaP cells were treated with 4 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 8 or 20 Gy -radiation. The percentage of
apoptotic cells was determined by the in situ end labeling
assay 72 h after exposure.
|
|
Since it was possible that either Fas or TNF-
were sensitizing LNCaP
cells to irradiation by increasing expression of each other or other
death ligands or receptors, we analyzed the expression of death ligands
and receptors during induction of apoptosis by irradiation and Fas or
TNFR-1 activation. After exposure to either 8 Gy or TNF-
, Fas
expression in LNCaP cells was increased slightly at 6, 24, and 48 h after exposure and combined treatment with TNF-
and irradiation
generated slightly more Fas than either treatment alone (Fig.
2A). Since both TNF-
and
irradiation increased Fas expression to some degree, it was possible
that Fas may have mediated TNF-
sensitization of LNCaP cells to
irradiation. To determine the significance of increased Fas expression
on the effect of TNF-
we used an anti-Fas neutralizing antibody ZB4. Fig. 2B shows that Fas neutralizing antibody blocked
apoptosis induced by concomitant treatment with radiation and CH-11,
but it had no effect on apoptosis induced by either TNF-
or TNF-
plus irradiation.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of TNF- and
CH-11 on expression of death ligands and receptors. A,
Western blots of Fas and Fas ligand at 6, 24, and 48 h after
exposure of LNCaP cells to 40 ng/ml TNF- and/or 20 Gy irradiation.
As controls, extracts from LNCaP cells were treated with 100 µM etoposide were included. The anti-Fas antibody used
for Western blotting detected both unglycosylated Fas lower band and
glycosylated Fas upper band. B, LNCaP cells were treated
with either 40 ng/ml TNF- or 4 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 20 Gy
irradiation in the presence of 10 µg/ml neutralizing antibody to Fas
receptor (clone ZB4) or a control antibody at the same concentration.
The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by the in
situ end labeling assay 72 h after treatment. C,
RT-PCR assay of TNF- , TNF- , TRAIL, and DR-3 mRNA
expression at 6 and 24 h after treatment of LNCaP cells with 40 ng/ml TNF- and/or 4 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 20 Gy irradiation. As a
control we used LNCaP cell treated with 30 nM okadaic acid
for 48 h. D, Western blot of TNFRI in extracts of LNCaP
cells 24 h after treatment with combinations of 40 ng/ml TNF- ,
4 µg/ml CH-11, and 20 Gy irradiation. As a control, LNCaP cells were
treated with 30 nM okadaic acid for 48 h.
|
|
We previously showed that TNF-
could induce the expression of its
own mRNA (11). To determine whether CH-11 was affecting TNF-
expression we analyzed TNF-
mRNA in the cells treated with CH-11. Fig. 2C shows that anti-Fas antibody did not have any
effect on the expression of TNF-
mRNA. Moreover, anti-Fas
antibody did not change the amount of mRNA for TNF-
, TRAIL, or
DR3. We also determined levels of TNFR-1 in LNCaP cells treated with
TNF-
, CH-11, and irradiation by Western blotting (Fig.
2D). There was no change in the levels of TNFRI in response
to these exposures. In Fig. 2, C and D, okadaic
acid treatment was included as a positive control since okadaic acid
rapidly and efficiently induces caspase-dependent cell
death in LNCaP cells. As a result of the experiments shown in Fig. 2 we
do not believe that Fas was sensitizing LNCaP cells to irradiation by
activating expression of other known death receptors or ligands.
Although both CH-11- and TNF-
-sensitized LNCaP cells to irradiation
to a similar degree, we found that caspase activation differed between
LNCaP cells treated with CH-11 and those treated with TNF-
. Fig.
3A shows Western blots
demonstrating activation of different components of the caspase cascade
after either TNF-
or CH-11 treatment. As we had previously shown,
irradiation enhanced the low level of caspase-8 cleavage induced by
TNF-
in LNCaP cells (11). However, at 72 h after treatment
there was substantially more caspase-8 cleavage induced by CH-11 than
by TNF-
as indicated by the presence of the p28 C-terminal cleavage
product in the CH-11-treated cells. Note that both TNF-
and okadaic
acid appeared to cause both caspase-8 cleavage and an apparent increase
in caspase-8 levels as indicated by the fact that the p55 caspase-8
precursor band was increased in intensity compared with control. The
apparent increase in caspase-8 precursor may be similar to the
increases in procaspases-3 and -7 that are essential for apoptosis in
TSU-Pr1 prostate cancer cells treated with okadaic acid (38). Note that procaspase-3 is present at levels undetectable by Western blotting in
untreated cells.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Caspase cleavage in LNCaP cells.
A, LNCaP cells were treated with 40 ng/ml TNF- , 4 µg/ml
CH-11, or 20 Gy irradiation. Caspase cleavage was determined by Western
blotting 72 h after treatment. C15 antibody that recognizes the
p18 peptide was used for detection of caspase-8. As a control, LNCaP
cells were treated with 30 nM okadaic acid for 48 h.
B, Western blots for caspase-8 and caspase-7 in cells
treated with TNF- ± 20 Gy and various concentrations of TLCK
shown at the bottom.
|
|
In contrast to the fact that more caspase-8 cleavage was seen after
CH-11 exposure than after TNF-
exposure, more cleavage of caspase-3,
caspase-7, lamin B (a caspase-6 substrate) (39, 40), and PARP was seen
after TNF-
exposure. No caspase-10 cleavage was seen under any
treatment conditions. Cleavage of DFF was slightly greater in the cells
exposed to CH-11 than TNF-
. Note that after exposure to okadaic acid
we were able to detect both p18 and p10 terminal cleavage products of
DFF45. We only detected a small amount of the 26-kDa partial cleavage
product of DFF in LNCaP cells treated with either TNF-
or CH-11.
Although irradiation increased apoptosis induced by either TNF-
or
CH-11, irradiation had little, if any, effect on the cleavage of DFF
caused by either TNF-
or CH-11. This is consistent with the
expectation that irradiation, in the presence of a death ligand,
activates serine protease-dependent nucleolytic activity in
these cells.2
Caspase activation is believed to be due predominantly to death ligand
activation of the caspase cascade. However, we previously have shown
that the serine protease inhibitor, TLCK, had a slight inhibitory
effect on caspase activation in LNCaP cells treated with TNF-
and
irradiation. This observation was confirmed when we treated the cells
with 40 µM TLCK, which is known to decrease apoptosis by
half. A slight decrease in caspase-8, but not caspase-7 activation was
seen (Fig. 3B).
We further investigated the differences in caspase-8 cleavage and
activation by TNF-
and CH-11 with Western blotting using antibodies
specific for different regions of the caspase-8 molecule (36). In the
left half of Fig.
4A it can be seen that TNF-
alone induced cleavage only of a p43 fragment that corresponded to the
procaspase-8 less the C-terminal p10 peptide. There was also an
increase in caspase-8 p55 precursor in TNF-
-treated cells and even a
greater increase in caspase-8 p55 in cells exposed to TNF-
+ irradiation (right half of Fig. 4A). In contrast,
CH-11 activated cleavage of the N-terminal death effector
domain-containing prodomains from the C-terminal protease domains as
seen by the appearance of p26 detected by N2 antibody and of p28
detected by both C5 and anti-p28 antibody. Irradiation enhanced
CH-11-induced cleavage of caspase-8 (compare third and
seventh lanes in Fig. 4A). Although Western
blotting with peptide-specific antibodies was consistent with the
interpretation of the data shown at the bottom of Fig.
4A, we were not able to detect caspase-8 p10 in any of our
samples or positive controls. Because of differences in procaspase-8
cleavage seen with TNF-
and CH-11 treatment, we assayed caspase-8
activity using a fluorescent substrate. Fig. 4B shows that
TNF-
generated active caspase-8, but CH-11 with or without
irradiation yielded no detectable caspase-8 activity. Therefore,
cleavage of caspase-8 into p26 and p28 fragments was abortive and did
not activate caspase activity.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Caspase-8 cleavage and activity in LNCaP
cells. A, LNCaP cells were treated with combinations of
40 ng/ml TNF- , 1.0 µg/ml CH-11, and 20 Gy irradiation. Samples
were taken at 48 h after treatment for Western blotting. The
specificity of monoclonal antibodies for different fragments of
caspase-8 is shown in the diagram at the bottom that is
adapted from Scaffidi et al. (36). N2 antibody recognizes
the N-terminal domain that contains the death effector domain
(DED) regions. C15 and a commercial antibody to p18
recognize the larger protease component. C5 antibody is specific for
the C-terminal p10 peptide. Our results with the p18 antibody and C15
were identical and are represented by a blot with C15 antibody.
"NS" in the panel showing the C5 antibody blot means
"nonspecific." B, cleavage of IETD-amc measured
fluorimetrically and plotted relative to background fluorescence of
untreated cells.
|
|
One of the nucleases activated in these cell death experiments was
DFF45 as shown by Western blotting and by DNA cleavage into low
molecular weight fragments (not shown). We investigated whether cell
death in our experiments also involved serine protease pathways that
could lead to the activation of other nucleases. We had observed that
apoptosis induced by TNF-
+ irradiation could be inhibited
completely only by a combination of cysteine and serine protease
inhibitors, suggesting that two separate protease cascades were
activated by the combined exposure (11). This implied that TNF-
+ irradiation activated a separate serine protease pathway that was
independent of caspase activation (11). In contrast, we found that
inhibition of apoptosis induced by CH-11 + irradiation could be fully
abrogated by zVAD (Fig. 5). Although TLCK
inhibited about 50% of the apoptosis induced by CH-11 + irradiation, zVAD blocked both apoptosis induced by CH-11 alone and CH-11 + irradiation. This suggested that serine protease activation after exposure to CH-11 + irradiation contributed to apoptosis, but was
dependent on caspase activation. Inhibition of apoptosis induced by
CH-11 + irradiation by zVAD implied that caspases played a predominant
role in apoptosis induced by CH-11 + irradiation. Since we were able to
demonstrate only minimal caspase-6 activation (Fig. 3A), no
caspase-8 activity (Fig. 4B), and no detectable caspase-3,
-7, or -10 cleavage (Fig. 3A), we hypothesize that some
other unidentified caspase activity was responsible for cell death
induced by CH-11 + irradiation.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of apoptosis mediated by Fas and
irradiation by zVAD and TLCK. LNCaP cells were treated with 4 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 20 Gy irradiation in the presence or absence of 50 µM zVAD and/or 20 µM TLCK, and the fraction
of apoptotic cells was determined by the in situ end
labeling assay 72 h after treatment.
|
|
Because there were differences in caspase cleavage and activation
between TNF-
and CH-11 treatment of LNCaP cells, we investigated the
effect of simultaneous activation of TNFR-1 and Fas. We also assayed
the effect of the two ligands together on radiation-induced apoptosis.
TNF-
and CH-11 together caused a sensitization to radiation-induced
apoptosis and rapid induction of cell death. Even at concentrations
that were ineffective when the ligands were used alone, together they
activated apoptosis rapidly. In order to show comparisons between
treatment with TNF-
, CH-11, and irradiation and treatment with any
one or two of these stimuli, we had to measure apoptosis at 24 h,
a time when either TNF-
or CH-11 and irradiation were not seen to
induce apoptosis (Fig. 6A).
However, combined treatment with TNF-
and CH-11 induced up to 40%
cell death at 24 h and up to 90% in the presence of irradiation.
In the presence of TNF-
there was a dose-response relationship
between the amount of CH-11 added up to 1.0 µg/ml and cell death. In
the presence of TNF-
and irradiation, all three concentrations of
CH-11 used in Fig. 6A had equivalent effects. Noteworthy was
the difference in induction of apoptosis between concentrations of
TNF-
4 ng/ml and irradiation in the absence and presence of CH-11.
We had seen that apoptosis after either TNF-
+ irradiation or CH-11 + irradiation was dependent on both caspases and serine proteases.
However, in the case of the combination of all three treatments, zVAD
completely blocked cell death at 20 and 48 h (not shown), but TLCK
had no effect on cell death under these conditions (Fig.
6B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of combined TNF-
and CH-11 treatment on LNCaP cells. A, LNCaP
cells were treated with various concentrations of TNF- and/or CH-11.
The dose of CH-11 increased within each group of four bars
as indicated by the triangles. Within each group the CH-11
doses were 0, 0.4, 1.0, and 4.0 µg/ml. Half of the samples were
treated concomitantly with 20 Gy irradiation. Twenty-four hours later,
the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by the in
situ end labeling assay. B, effect of protease
inhibitors on apoptosis induced by TNF- plus CH-11 with or without
irradiation. LNCaP cells were treated with different concentrations of
TNF- and CH-11 shown in the figure with or without 20 Gy
irradiation. 50 µM zVAD and 20 or 50 µM
TLCK were used as shown. The percentage of apoptotic cells was
determined 20 h after treatment by the in situ end
labeling assay.
|
|
The radiation sensitization by TNF-
+ CH-11 was mediated entirely
through the respective cell death receptor interaction with FADD since
the expression of a FADD-DN abrogated the sensitization of LNCaP cells
by TNF-
, CH-11, or both (Fig. 7).
Therefore combined activation of TNFR-1 and Fas in the presence of
irradiation resulted in rapid activation of cell death mediated
entirely by caspase pathways. Activation of either receptor alone in
the presence of irradiation required a longer time period for cell
death and the activation of serine as well as cysteine proteases. Since FADD-DN caused near total inhibition of apoptosis induced by TNF-
+ irradiation, we concluded that FADD was upstream of both caspase and
serine protease activation in LNCaP cells.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of combined TNF-
and CH-11 treatment on LNCaP cells and FADD-DN
transformants. Parental LNCaP cells, vector-transfected LNCaP
cells, and LNCaP cells transfected with FADD-DN were treated with 40 ng/ml TNF- and/or 1 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 20 Gy irradiation. The
percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by the in situ
end labeling assay 24 h after treatment.
|
|
Since FADD-DN blocked sensitization to radiation-induced apoptosis by
TNF-
+ CH-11, we expected the combined effect of TNF-
and CH-11
to be mediated through caspase activation and therefore expected to see
substantial increases in caspase activation after simultaneous
treatment with the two ligands. Fig. 8
shows Western blots on extracts 24 h after treatment. There was a
substantial increase in caspase-8 and -7 activation after exposure to
TNF-
, CH-11, and irradiation. At the same time, the cleavage of
lamin B, PARP, and DFF45 was increased by TNF-
and CH-11. The degree of caspase cleavage at 24 h shown in Fig. 8 equaled or exceeded caspase activation at 72 h seen with either ligand alone + irradiation. Slight differences in caspase activation between Figs. 8
and 3A occur in our experiments and reflect some variability
in results when very low levels of caspase-3, -6, and -7 are
detected.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Caspase activation in LNCaP cells after
treatment with TNF- and CH-11 with or without
irradiation. LNCaP cells were treated with 40 ng/ml TNF- and/or
1 µg/ml CH-11 and/or 20 Gy irradiation. Cell extracts were prepared
at 24 h for Western blotting. As a control, LNCaP cells were
treated with 30 nM okadaic acid for 48 h. C15
monoclonal antibody was used for detection of caspase-8.
|
|
Combined treatment of LNCaP cells with TNF-
and CH-11 resulted in
more rapid and extensive apoptosis. To determine if the time course of
caspase activation was consistent with the timing of apoptosis after
treatment with either ligand plus irradiation or both ligands together,
we analyzed caspase-8 and caspase-7 cleavage at different time points
after treatment with TNF-
, CH-11, and irradiation. Fig.
9 shows a time course of caspase-8 activation after different treatments of LNCaP cells. Activation of
caspase-8 after TNF-
+ irradiation was seen at 24 h and is consistent with initiation of apoptosis 24-48 h after exposure. Caspase-7 cleavage was seen in this experiment at 36 and 48 h at
times when procaspase-7 levels were still increasing. Procaspases-8 also increased after exposure to TNF-
+ irradiation. In contrast, although CH-11 and irradiation induced apoptosis in the same time frame
as did TNF-
+ irradiation, cleavage of caspase-8 to p26 and p28
occurred within the first 3 h after exposure. No caspase-7 cleavage was seen. In addition, procaspase-8 was depleted during the
48-h period and amounts of procaspase-7 did not change. Therefore it
appears that blockage of caspase-8 activation in LNCaP cells occurred
due to abortive cleavage and depletion of procaspase-8. Although p28
generation was also seen after treatment of LNCaP cells with CH-11 and
TNF-
, LNCaP cells treated with TNF-
+ CH-11 + irradiation showed
activation of caspase-8 beginning 3-6 h after exposure. Procaspase-8
was not depleted until 48 h after exposure. Interestingly cleavage
of some caspase-8 to p28 was also seen. Caspase-7 cleavage after
TNF-
+ CH-11 + irradiation was seen at 18 h after exposure,
consistent with the conclusion that caspase-7 was activated by
caspase-8 in these cells. Moreover, procaspase-7 was increased between
3 and 15 h, but decreased after 15 h probably due to the
combined effects of ongoing cell death and processing to active
caspase-7 p20.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Time course of caspase activation in LNCaP
cells. LNCaP cells were treated as shown on the left
side of the figure. Protein extracts were made at the indicated
times and processed for Western blotting for caspase-8
(left) and caspase-7 (right).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this paper we showed that a Fas ligand can cause radiation
sensitization in a cell that is entirely resistant to radiation-induced apoptosis, similar to our previous findings with TNF-
. Fas
activation is an important element in cellular response to irradiation.
For example, in lpr and gld mice the Fas/Fas
ligand system is essential for radiation-mediated apoptosis (41). Our
results show that levels of activation of death receptors can play an
important role in radiation-induced death of cancer cells and can
augment sensitivity to radiation. The levels of radiation used in this study were chosen to obtain a biological effect and are in excess of
commonly used single-fraction doses used in therapeutic radiation.
Activation of TNFRI and Fas pathways each induce a low level of cell
death in LNCaP cells. We observed differences between radiosensitization caused by TNF-
and CH-11. For example, whereas there was no increment in cell death in the presence of TNF-
when
the dose of irradiation was increased from 8 to 20 Gy, cell death was
dose dependent in the presence of CH-11. Also, there were differences
in caspase activation downstream from TNFR-1 and Fas. TNF-
induced
an increase in procaspase-8 p55, but we were able to detect very little
caspase-8 cleavage. CH-11 caused depletion of procaspase-8 and the
appearance of caspase-8 cleavage products very early after treatment.
However, caspase-8 was not activated. As a result, downstream effector
caspases-3, -7, and -6 were activated to a greater degree after TNF-
exposure than after CH-11. This implies that a very low level of
caspase-8 activity was present and activated caspases-6 and -7 or that
another upstream signaling caspase, but not caspase-10, transmitted
death signals from the TNFR-1 to the downstream caspases. Little, if
any difference was seen in the appearance of DFF cleavage products
after exposure to TNF-
compared with CH-11, although TNF-
alone
induced more LNCaP cell death than CH-11. Activation of caspase-8 and
greater cleavage of effector caspases-3 and -7 and activation of
caspase-6 correlated with the greater degree of cell death induced by
TNF-
.
We were able to show that the death inducing effects of CH-11 and
TNF-
were complementary. At doses that had no effect when either
agent was used alone, the two agents together induced very rapid cell
death. The effect of combining TNF-
and CH-11 may have been
primarily mediated at the level of caspase-8 since within 6 h
after cells were exposed to 40 ng/ml TNF-
and 1 µg/ml CH-11. There
was an elevation of procaspase-8 p55 and appearance of activated caspase-8 cleavage peptides p43 and p18. Other reports of the interaction between TNF-
and Fas ligand have suggested that each may
augment cell death induced by the other through enhancement of death
ligand expression (42, 43). For example, Spanaus et al. (42)
suggested that TNF-
induced increased expression of Fas, thereby
sensitizing cells to Fas ligand. Based on the data in Fig. 2 we do not
believe this to be the explanation for the cooperative effect of
TNF-
and CH-11 in LNCaP cells. Irradiation increased Fas expression
in LNCaP cells to a much greater degree than did TNF-
(Fig.
2A), yet irradiation enhanced TNF-
-induced apoptosis to a
lesser degree than did CH-11. Moreover, blocking antibody to Fas did
not affect apoptosis induced by TNF-
with or without irradiation.
For these reasons we do not believe that the synergy between CH-11 and
TNF-
can be attributed to increased signal transduction through Fas.
Rather, we believe that the increased level and accelerated pace of
apoptosis we observed after TNF-
and CH-11 treatment of LNCaP cells
is due to enhanced caspase-8 activation. This is similar to caspase-8
induction seen in synovial cells after exposure to TNF-
and Fas
ligand (44). Caspase-8 cleavage induced in LNCaP cells by CH-11
differed from the cleavage pattern described by Scaffidi et
al. (36). After exposure to CH-11 LNCaP cells appeared to generate
the residual p43 fragment that remains after cleavage of p10 from
p55 procaspase-8. It is possible that the differences in caspase-8
cleavage contributed to the synergy seen in the induction of cell death
after treatment with both TNF-
and CH-11.
Because cell death in LNCaP after exposure to TNF-
+ CH-11 was
abrogated by zVAD and FADD-DN, but not affected by TLCK, it appears
that an effect of simultaneous activation of TNFR-1 and Fas is rapid
and efficient caspase activation and cell death within 24 h. Even
though irradiation in addition to TNF-
and CH-11 increased apoptosis
compared with the two ligands alone, no sensitivity to TLCK was
observed as with apoptosis induced by TNF-
+ irradiation (11) or
CH-11 + irradiation, both of which took 72 h to evolve. This data
suggests that cells can be sensitized to irradiation by very high
levels of caspase activation and that under these conditions
irradiation enhances caspase activation even further and apoptosis
occurs within 24 h. However, under conditions where caspase
activation is suboptimal, even though irradiation enhanced caspase
activation over TNF-
and Ch-11 alone, cell death required the
activation of noncaspase proteases. Under the latter conditions, activation of noncaspase proteases occurred after 24 h, resulting in cell death at 72 h. The doses of irradiation used in these experiments were chosen for their biological effect and are in excess
of doses that can be given in a single fraction of therapeutic irradiation.
The rate at which cells undergo apoptosis and the role of caspases and
noncaspase proteases may depend on the magnitude of initial caspase
activation. The role of different proteases may also be cell type
specific. For example, lymphocytes are highly sensitive to induction of
apoptosis by activation of Fas which results in caspase activation and
rapid cell death (45, 46). In contrast epithelial cells may not have
the same degree of caspase activation either because of reduced
response to death ligands, or because of a lower level of procaspases.
In fact, epithelial cells may have to synthesize procaspases in
response to a death signal in order to sustain a death response (38).
The involvement of serine proteases has been described in many cell
types including epithelial cells and hepatoma cells (47-50). Recently
Samejima et al. (51) showed that chicken hepatoma cells
first activated caspases in response to a death signal, but were not
fully committed to the point of no return in cell death until
noncaspase proteases were also activated. Our observations that zVAD
and TLCK both have a role in blocking apoptosis in LNCaP cells treated
with either TNF-
+ irradiation or CH-11 + irradiation are consistent with the involvement of two classes of proteases in cell death. Although the data in this paper are consistent with the notion that
caspase activation preceded serine protease activation, previously we
found that in cells treated with TNF-
and irradiation, caspases, and
serine proteases had equal and independent contributions to cell death
(11). Moreover, since TNF-
+ CH-11 + irradiation induced rapid cell
death that was entirely caspase-dependent, we believe that
early overwhelming caspase activation can achieve cell death in
epithelial cells as in lymphocytes.
In these experiments we were able in induce a low, but reproducible
level of LNCaP cell death with CH-11 antibody. Rokhlin et
al. (52) demonstrated that a cross-linking of Fas receptor by
anti-Fas antibody did not induce apoptosis in LNCaP cells and thus
conclude that this cell line was resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis.
There are several differences in the experiments that may explain the
discrepancy between their data and ours regarding sensitivity of LNCaP
cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. They used a strain of LNCaP cells that
they termed LNCaP.FGC and used IPO-4 anti-Fas antibody. More
importantly, Rokhlin et al. (52) treated LNCaP cells with
anti-Fas antibody in the presence of 10% fetal calf serum. Our
experiments are done in charcoal-stripped calf serum. The differences
in the content of survival factors between the two types of serum
probably explains the differences in LNCaP cell sensitivity to anti-Fas
antibodies seen by the two groups. In fact, we agree that LNCaP cells
are relatively resistant to Fas-mediated apoptosis, for instance, as
compared with TNF-
-mediated apoptosis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to our colleagues Kristine
Kikly, Jun Ying Yuan, Peter Krammer, Xiao Dong Wang, and Andreas
Strasser for providing invaluable reagents. We also thank Sarah Spiegel
for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant CA79912.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 202-687-2207;
Fax: 202-784-1229; E-mail: Gelmanne@gunet.georgetown.edu.
2
K. Kimura and E. P. Gelmann, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TNF-
, tumor
necrosis factor
;
PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase;
z-VAD, z-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-CH2F;
TLCK, N
-p-tosyl-L-lysine-chloromethyl
ketone;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
TNFR-1, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1;
TRADD, TNF
receptor-associated death domain;
FADD, Fas-associated death domain;
FADD-DN, dominant negative mutant of FADD;
DFF, DNA fragmentation
factor;
Gy, gray.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Evan, G.,
and Littlewood, T.
(1998)
Science
281,
1317-1322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Reed, J. C.
(1997)
Nature
387,
773-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Horoszewicz, J. S.,
Leoung, S. S.,
Chu, T. M.,
Wajsman, Z. L.,
Friedman, M.,
Papsidero, L.,
Kim, U.,
Chai, L. S.,
Kakati, S.,
Arya, S. K.,
and Sandberg, A. A.
(1980)
Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.
37,
115-132[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Horoszewicz, J. S.,
Leoung, S. S.,
Kawinski, E.,
Karr, J.,
Rosenthal, H.,
Chu, T.,
Miranel, E.,
and Murphy, J.
(1983)
Cancer Res.
43,
1809-1818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Montgomery, B. T.,
Young, C. Y.,
Bilhartz, D. L.,
Andrews, P. E.,
Prescott, J. L.,
Thompson, N. F.,
and Tindall, D. J.
(1992)
Prostate
21,
63-73[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Lim, D. J.,
Liu, X. L.,
Sutkowski, D. M.,
Braun, E. J.,
Lee, C.,
and Kozlowski, J. M.
(1993)
Prostate
22,
109-118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
DeWeese, T. L.,
Shipman, J. P.,
Dillehay, L. E.,
and Nelson, W. G.
(1998)
J. Urol.
159,
591-598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Leith, J. T.
(1994)
Prostate
24,
119-124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Pflug, B. R.,
Reiter, R. E.,
and Nelson, J. B.
(1999)
Prostate
40,
269-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Kokontis, J. M.,
Hay, N.,
and Liao, S.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
941-953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Kimura, K.,
Bowen, C.,
Spiegel, S.,
and Gelmann, E. P.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
1606-1614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Sherwood, E. R.,
Ford, T. R.,
Lee, C.,
and Kozlowski, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Response Modif.
9,
44-52
|
| 13.
|
Wallach, D.,
Boldin, M.,
Varfolomeev, E.,
Beyaert, R.,
Vandenabeele, P.,
and Fiers, W.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
96-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hsu, H.,
Shu, H. B.,
Pan, M. G.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1996)
Cell
84,
299-308[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Grimm, S.,
Stanger, B. Z.,
and Leder, P.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10923-10927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Chinnaiyan, A. M.,
O'Rourke, K.,
Tewari, M.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1998)
Cell
81,
505-512
|
| 17.
|
Muzio, M.,
Chinnaiyan, A. M.,
Kischkel, F. C.,
O'Rourke, K.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Ni, J.,
Scaffidi, C.,
Bretz, J. D.,
Zhang, M.,
Gentz, R.,
Mann, M.,
Krammer, P. H.,
Peter, M. E.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1996)
Cell
85,
817-827[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Boldin, M. P.,
Goncharov, T. M.,
Goltsev, Y. V.,
and Wallach, D.
(1996)
Cell
85,
803-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Duan, H.,
Chinnaiyan, A. M.,
Hudson, P. L.,
Wing, J. P.,
He, W.-W.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1621-1625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Fernandes-Alnemri, T.,
Litwack, G.,
and Alnemri, E. S.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
2737-2742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Villa, P.,
Kaufmann, S. H.,
and Earnshaw, W. C.
(1997)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22,
388-393[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Dbaibo, G. S.,
Perry, D. K.,
Gamard, C. J.,
Platt, R.,
Poirier, G. G.,
Obeid, L. M.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
481-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Smyth, M. J.,
Perry, D. K.,
Zhang, J.,
Poirier, G. G.,
Hannun, Y. A.,
and Obeid, L. M.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
316,
25-28
|
| 24.
|
Mizushima, N.,
Koike, R.,
Kohsaka, H.,
Kushi, Y.,
Handa, S.,
Yagita, H.,
and Miyasaka, N.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
395,
267-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Cuvillier, O.,
Rosenthal, D. S.,
Smulson, M. E.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2910-2916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Van Antwerp, D. J.,
Martin, S. J.,
Kafri, T.,
Green, D. R.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1996)
Science
274,
787-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Wang, C. Y.,
Mayo, M. W.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Science
274,
784-787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Beg, A. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Science
274,
782-784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Itoh, N.,
Yonehara, S.,
Ishii, A.,
Yonehara, A.,
Mizushima, S.,
Sameshima, M.,
Hase, A.,
Seto, Y.,
and Nagata, S.
(1991)
Cell
66,
233-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Los, M.,
Van de Craen, M.,
Penning, L. C.,
Schenk, H.,
Westendorp, M.,
Baeuerle, P. A.,
Droge, W.,
Krammer, P. H.,
Fiers, W.,
and Schulze-Osthoff, K.
(1995)
Nature
375,
81-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Enari, M.,
Hug, H.,
and Nagata, S.
(1995)
Nature
375,
78-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Newton, K.,
Harris, A. W.,
Bath, M. L.,
Smith, K. G. C.,
and Strasser, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
706-718[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Berchem, G. J.,
Bosseler, M.,
Sugars, L. Y.,
Voeller, H. J.,
Zeitlin, S.,
and Gelmann, E. P.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
735-738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Chase, W.,
and Bown, F.
(1997)
General Statistics
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 35.
|
Li, H.,
Zhu, H.,
and Yuan, J.
(1998)
Cell
94,
491-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Scaffidi, C.,
Medema, J. P.,
Krammer, P. H.,
and Peter, M. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26953-26958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Liu, X.,
Zou, H.,
Slaughter, C.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
Cell
89,
175-184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Bowen, C.,
Voeller, H. J.,
Kikly, K.,
and Gelmann, E. P.
(1999)
Cell Death Differ.
6,
394-401[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Orth, K.,
Chinnaiyan, A. M.,
Garg, M.,
Froelich, C. J.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16443-16446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Takahashi, A.,
Alnemri, E. S.,
Lazebnik, Y. A.,
Fernandes-Alnemri, T.,
Litwack, G.,
Moir, R. D.,
Goldman, R. D.,
Poirier, G. G.,
Kaufmann, S. H.,
and Earnshaw, W. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8395-8400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Reap, E. A.,
Roof, K.,
Maynor, K.,
Borrero, M.,
Booker, J.,
and Cohen, P. L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5750-5755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Spanaus, K.,
Schlapbach, R.,
and Fontana, A.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
4398-4408[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Quirk, S. M.,
Porter, D. A.,
Huber, S. C.,
and Cowan, R. G.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
4860-4869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Kobayashi, T.,
Okamoto, K.,
Kobata, T.,
Hasunuma, T.,
Sumida, T.,
and Nishioka, K.
(1999)
Arthritis Rheum.
42,
519-526[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Weis, M.,
Schlegel, J.,
Kass, G. E.,
Holmstrom, T. H.,
Peters, I.,
Eriksson, J.,
Orrenius, S.,
and Chow, S. C.
(1995)
Exp. Cell Res.
219,
699-708[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Krammer, P. H.
(1999)
Adv. Immunol.
71,
163-210[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Huang, Y.,
Sheikh, M. S.,
Fornace, A. J., Jr.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
3431-3439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Boix, J.,
Fibla, J.,
Yuste, V.,
Piulats, J. M.,
Llecha, N.,
and Comella, J. X.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
238,
422-429[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Jones, R. A.,
Johnson, V. L.,
Buch, N. R.,
Dobrota, M.,
Hinton, R. H.,
Chow, S. C.,
and Kass, G. E.
(1998)
Hepatology
27,
1632-1642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Kwo, P.,
Patel, T.,
Bronk, S. F.,
and Gores, G. J.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
G613-G621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Samejima, K.,
Tone, S.,
Kottke, T. J.,
Enari, M.,
Sakahira, H.,
Cooke, C. A.,
Durrieu, F.,
Martins, L. M.,
Nagata, S.,
Kaufmann, S. H.,
and Earnshaw, W. C.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
225-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Rokhlin, O. W.,
Bishop, G. A.,
Hostager, B. S.,
Waldschmidt, T. J.,
Sidorenko, S. P.,
Pavloff, N.,
Kiefer, M. C.,
Umansky, S. R.,
Glover, R. A.,
and Cohen, M. B.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1758-1768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us