|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 12, 8711-8718, March 24, 2000
Ribozyme Ablation Demonstrates That the Cardiac Subtype of
the Voltage-sensitive Calcium Channel Is the Molecular Transducer of
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-stimulated Calcium Influx in
Osteoblastic Cells*
Riting
Liu §,
Wei
Li¶,
Norman J.
Karin ,
Joel J.
Bergh¶,
Karen
Adler-Storthz , and
Mary C.
Farach-Carson¶
From the Department of Basic Sciences, University of
Texas-Houston, Dental Branch, Houston, Texas 77030 and the
¶ Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware,
Newark, Delaware 19716
 |
ABSTRACT |
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3
(1,25(OH)2D3) stimulates transmembrane influx
of Ca2+ through L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+
channels (VSCCs) in ROS 17/2.8 osteoblastic cells. Ca2+
influx modulates osteoblastic activities including matrix deposition, hormone responsiveness, and Ca2+-dependent
signaling. 1,25(OH)2D3 also regulates
transcript levels encoding VSCCs. L-type VSCCs are multisubunit
complexes composed of a central pore-forming 1 subunit
and four additional subunits. The 1 subunit is encoded
by one gene in a multimember family, defining tissue-specific subtypes.
Osteoblasts synthesize two splice variants of the 1C
cardiac VSCC subtype; however, the molecular identity of the
1,25(OH)2D3-regulated VSCC remained unknown. We
created a ribozyme specifically cleaving 1C mRNA. To
increase target ablation efficiency, the ribozyme was inserted into U1
small nuclear RNA (snRNA) by engineering the U1 snRNA expression
cassette, conferring the ribozyme transcript with stabilizing stem-loops at both sides and the Sm binding site that facilitates localization into nucleoplasm. After transfection of ROS 17/2.8 cells
with U1 ribozyme-encoding vector, stable clonal cells were selected in
which the expression of 1C transcript and protein were
strikingly reduced. Ca2+ influx assays in ribozyme
transfectants showed selective attenuation of depolarization and
1,25(OH)2D3-regulated Ca2+
responses. We conclude that the cardiac subtype of the L-type VSCC is
the transducer of stimulated Ca2+ influx in ROS 17/2.8
osteoblastic cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Various Ca2+ channels transduce signals that control
the physiological activities of target cells. Voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs)1 are
classified as L, T, N, P/Q, and R type according to their voltage
sensitivity, single-channel properties, ion selectivity, and
pharmacological properties (1, 2). A high threshold for
voltage-dependent activation and sensitivity to
dihydropyridine type organic channel blockers characterize L-type VSCCs
that consist of five distinct subunits ( 1,
2, , , and ) encoded by four genes (3). The ion
translocating function of the L-type channel is conferred by its pore
forming 1 subunit that contains four homologous repeats,
each having six putative transmembrane segments (S1-S6) (1-4). At
least four subtypes have been identified and ascribed to coding gene
differences; 1C, 1D, 1F,
and 1S correspond to cardiac muscle, neuroendocrine
tissue, retina, and skeletal muscle, respectively. The diversity of the
channel is further generated by alternative splicing into various
isoforms, as is the case for the 1C subunit (5).
L-type VSCCs have been identified in osteoblasts of various origins
(6-9), where they are thought to play important roles in regulating
osteoblast responses to external stimuli. In particular, L-type VSCCs
transduce the rapid effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 and
depolarization, leading to Ca2+ influx in various
osteoblastic cells (6, 7, 10). In the longer term,
1,25(OH)2D3 treatment alters gene expression in
osteoblastic cells, resulting in increased expression of matrix
proteins including osteopontin and osteocalcin and reduced expression
of the VSCC 1C subunit (11, 12). However, the molecular
identity of the VSCC involved in Ca2+ flux induced by
1,25(OH)2D3 and depolarization has never been demonstrated conclusively.
Recent developments in ribozyme technology provide powerful means to
selectively inhibit expression of specific target genes. Ribozymes are
a class of small catalytic RNA molecules that recognize specific
substrate RNA molecules by their complementary nucleotide sequence,
cleaving the substrate RNA as an endoribonuclease at enzymatic rates
(13). Ribozyme expression in transfected target cells thus can inhibit
the functional expression of a specific gene. Factors that contribute
to ribozyme efficiency in transfected cells are expression levels,
stability against rapid degradation, correct folding for exposure to
the target, and co-localization and processing at sites where target
transcripts are produced and accumulated. By all of these criteria, the
U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) expression cassette provides an excellent
vehicle for ribozyme delivery and expression (14-16). This cassette
has been successfully used to introduce a ribozyme to inhibit fibrillin 1 expression in a human osteosarcoma cell line (16).
U1 snRNA is a highly expressed, stable small RNA (164 nucleotides)
involved in both spliceosome and catalytic processing during pre-mRNA splicing (14). The U1 snRNA expression cassette has potent, constitutive upstream elements comparable in strength with the
SV40 early promoter (15). At the 5'-end, there is a trimethylguanosine
5' cap. At both ends, there are stable stem-loop structures, with the
3' loop having a high GC content. These structures confer resistance to
exonucleases (14). U1 snRNA has a conserved binding site, referred to
as the Sm binding site, for the small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. The
consensus sequence is RAU3-4NUGR. The hypermethylation of
the 5' cap structure and the binding to the small nuclear
ribonucleoprotein enable U1 snRNA to accumulate in the nucleoplasm,
where the newly transcribed 1C mRNA molecules are
most abundant (14). In consideration of these advantages of the U1
snRNA expression cassette, the ribozyme vehicle used in these studies
was derived from an engineered U1 snRNA expression vector (16),
maintaining the conserved Sm binding sequence AAUUUGUGG.
This study was designed with the aim of producing a hammerhead ribozyme
specifically targeting the 1C subtype of the L-type VSCC, transfecting it into ROS 17/2.8 cells in the snRNA expression cassette, and determining whether efficient ablation of the
1C transcript would reduce or eliminate Ca2+
influx stimulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 or
depolarization. Our results provide conclusive evidence that the
cardiac subtype of the L-type VSCC present in osteoblastic cells,
including ROS 17/2.8 cells and primary cultures, can serve as the major
plasma membrane transducer of external stimuli including both
1,25(OH)2D3-stimulated and depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Generation of Partial cDNA Encoding 1C
mRNA Target--
For selecting and testing ribozyme activity
in vitro, a cDNA copy of partial 1C
mRNA was ligated into pGEM®-3Z vector (Promega,
Madison, WI). Total RNA was extracted from cultured ROS 17/2.8 cells
with RNA STAT-60TM (Tel-Test, Inc., Friendswood, TX). The
upstream primer CCC1 (5'-GGTAATCACCCGAAGGAGCAAG-3') in the untranslated
region and the downstream primer CCC3
(5'-ATGAATTCGCGTTGGGGTGGAAGAGTAGTC-3'; ATGAATTC represents an extra
modified sequence) in the open reading frame were selected to amplify a
734-base pair fragment corresponding to bases 160 to 566 of the rat
1C subtype. cDNA was synthesized using reverse
transcriptase (RT) and random hexamer priming (AdvantageTM
RT for PCR Kit, CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA).
Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed as follows: 30 cycles
of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 55 or 65 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C.
The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1.2% (w/v)
agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide. The 734-base pair
amplimer was excised, extracted with the QIAEX II gel extraction kit
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and ligated into a pGEM®-3Z
vector. Subsequently, the ligated product was transformed into JM109
competent cells (Promega) for amplification. At least 10 colonies were
selected, and the cloned DNA and ligation junctions were sequenced to
verify the identity, sequence, and orientation of the insert. A ligated
plasmid, termed pGEM 1C7, was utilized to perform
in vitro transcription. pGEM 1C7 contains an
SP6 promoter upstream from the cloned DNA corresponding to
1C mRNA of the L-type VSCC.
Identification of a Specific Ribozyme Target Site in the
1C mRNA--
The DNA sequence encoding
1C transcript between primers CCC1 and CCC3 in rat ROS
17/2.8 cells was aligned and compared with other rat subtypes of VSCC
1 subunits, including 1S
(GenBankTM accession no. X05921), 1D
(GenBankTM accession no. M57682), and reported sequence for
1C (GenBankTM accession no. M67516). The
computer program Align Plus (Scientific and Educational Software, State
Line, PA) was used for sequence analysis and identification of
subtype-specific sequences (see Fig. 1). A search for the nucleotide
triplet NUX was made (where N is any nucleotide, and
X is A, U, or C). NUX represents the cleavage
triplet of hammerhead ribozymes (17, 18). The secondary RNA structure
was then analyzed using the RNA MFold program (by Mike Zuker; available
on the World Wide Web). Sites buried within complex predicted secondary
structures were eliminated from consideration (19), and a site at nt 6 was selected for this study. The target sequence (25 nt) of ribozyme 6 was compared with available sequences in GenBankTM and
found to be unique to 1C.
Ribozyme Design--
A hammerhead ribozyme targeting
1C mRNA was designed according to published
procedures (13). The ribozyme contained a 24-nt hammerhead domain
flanked by 10-12 nt complementary to the targeted region of the
1C mRNA. To construct the ribozymes in
vitro, two strands of DNA template containing a SP6 RNA polymerase
promoter sequence and ribozyme sequence were synthesized. The ribozyme was targeted to a GUC at nt 6 of 1C mRNA, relative
to the translational site, and was thus named ribozyme 6.
In Vitro Testing of Ribozyme Activity--
The ribozyme-encoding
oligonucleotides were incubated in 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and
50 mM NaCl at 94 °C for 5 min and then cooled gradually
to room temperature to allow annealing into double-stranded DNA.
Substrate RNA was synthesized from pGEM 1C7 that contains a SP6 promoter upstream from the cloned DNA corresponding to partial 1C mRNA. The plasmid pGEM 1C7 was
linearized with SacI and then isolated from an agarose gel
and extracted using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit. Transcription of
substrate and ribozyme RNA was performed with the RiboMAXTM
large scale RNA production system (Promega). The transcription reaction
mixture contained 2.5 µg of linearized plasmid or 1.5 µg of
ribozyme DNA templates and 25 mM each ATP, CTP, GTP, and UTP. In addition, a prescribed amount of SP6 RNA polymerase and buffers
was added as suggested by the manufacturer's instructions in a total
volume of 100 µl. Following transcription, the DNA templates were
removed from the reaction mixture with RQ1-RNase-Free DNase.
Unincorporated nucleotides were removed from the RNA transcript by size
exclusion chromatography through a small prepacked
MicroSpinTM G-50 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The target RNA and ribozyme 6 were mixed, and the in vitro
cleavage reaction was performed in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 20 mM MgCl2 at 37 °C for various times. Prior
to the addition of MgCl2, the mixture was heated at
95 °C for 2 min and then quick chilled on ice. The cleavage reaction
was terminated by the addition of a 3-fold (v/v) excess of Ambion
(Austin, TX) loading buffer containing formaldehyde, formamide, and 6 mM EDTA. Cleavage products were resolved by electrophoresis
in 1.9% (w/v) agarose/formaldehyde gels and then stained with ethidium
bromide and visualized after destaining with RNase-free water.
Construction of the Eukaryotic Expression Vector Encoding
Ribozyme--
The 1C ribozyme used for transfection was
designed and modified from the ribozyme tested in vitro. The
vector for expressing this ribozyme in transfected cells was
constructed from the plasmid pZeoU1EcoSpe (16). pZeoU1EcoSpe contains
the pZeoSV plasmid DNA modified by excising the SV40 promoter, SV40
polyadenylation site, and polylinker at the BamHI sites. In
constructing the pZeoU1EcoSpe, a U1 snRNA expression cassette in pUC13
(20, 21) was excised with BamHI digestion and ligated into
the BamHI sites of the modified pZeoSV. Two rounds of
site-directed mutagenesis were then performed to change 4 nt flanking
the Sm protein binding site of U1 snRNA, creating unique
EcoRI and SpeI restriction sites. The 5'-flanking region of the inserted U1 snRNA expression cassette possesses a
promoter/enhancer comparable in strength with the SV40 early promoter
(15).
The transfection vector expressing ribozyme 6 was termed
pU1RB 1C6, and the vector expressing the control RNA was
designated pU1control. In construction of pU1RB 1C6 and
pU1control, the Sm binding sequence AATTTGTGG (AAUUUGUGG in mRNA)
was inserted prior to the template DNA sequence. The DNA sequence of
pU1control differs from that of pU1RB 1C6 only in that
the nucleotides corresponding to those in ribozyme 6 were randomly
selected. Oligonucleotides were synthesized and chemically
phosphorylated at the 5'-end (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.,
Coralville, IA). The single-stranded oligonucleotides were annealed and
ligated into the EcoRI and SpeI sites of
pZeoU1EcoSpe to create pU1RB 1C6 and pU1control. The
sequence and orientation of the inserts as well as the U1 snRNA
expression cassette were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture--
ROS 17/2.8 rat osteoblastic sarcoma cells were
cultured in Ham's F-12 medium/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium-high glucose (1:1) containing 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C
in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 as described
previously (11). Zeocin-resistant clones, into which an
anti- 1C ribozyme construct or control plasmid had been
transfected (see below) were maintained in the same medium supplemented
with 50-150 µg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA). The cell
lines were weaned from an initial selection concentration of 225 µg/ml (see below).
Transfection of ROS 17/2.8 Cells--
pU1RB 1C6
and pU1control were linearized with ApaI and cleaned with
Wizard DNA Clean-Up Resin (Promega). ROS 17/2.8 cells were grown to
50-80% confluency and transfected with the linearized plasmids.
Transfections were performed with LipofectAMINETM (Life
Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. At
72 h post-transfection, the cells were passaged to less than 25%
confluency in medium containing 225 µg/ml Zeocin. After 14 days,
widely spaced clonal colonies were scraped and aspirated into a
micropipettor as described (22). The cell clumps were added to wells
containing 0.15 ml of trypsin EDTA (22). After 15 min, the cell clumps
were dispersed by pipetting, and the trypsin reaction was terminated
with 1 ml of medium containing 10% (v/v) serum and 225 µg/ml Zeocin.
The medium was replaced with fresh medium after the cells had attached
firmly. To ensure plasmid retention, the Zeocin concentration was
maintained at 50-150 µg/ml throughout all remaining phases of experimentation.
RT-PCR Analysis of Ribozyme 6 and 1C
Expression--
Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription with
random hexamer were performed as described above. For detection of
ribozyme expression, PCR was performed with primers
PR 1C6 (5'-CATTCTGATGAGTCCGTGAGG-3') and PRU1
(5'-GGAAAGCGCGAACGCAGT-3'). For detection of control plasmid
expression, a nucleotide sequence termed PRcntr
(5'-GCAGTTGACCGAAGAGTTGGA-3') was used with PRU1. The amplification
conditions were as follows: 45 s at 95 °C, 45 s at
58 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C for 30-35 cycles. PCR products
were electrophoresed in 1.4% agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide.
For detection of the mRNA encoding 1C, PCR was
performed with primers CCC1 and CCC3 as described above. PCR also was
performed with a downstream primer pair near the 3'-end used previously in our laboratory (23) and termed PR11
(5'-AGAACCAGAGACAATGTGTGGAATA-3') and PR12
(5'-TACAGGCTAGCATGATATCTTGCCA-3').
Confocal, Immunofluorescent Analysis of 1C
Expression--
Cells were grown overnight, rinsed with Hanks'
balanced salt solution three times, and fixed with 2.5%
paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min. Fixed cells
were blocked for 20 min with blocking solution (1% gelatin, 0.05%
casein, and 0.2% donkey serum) and then rinsed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline. Commercial rabbit anti- 1C
primary antibodies that do not react with either 1S or
1D subtypes (Alomone Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel)
were applied at a dilution of 1:500 in blocking solution for 1 h.
A second antibody solution containing donkey anti-rabbit Ig-Texas Red
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at a dilution of 1:10 in blocking solution
was applied for 1 h. Prior to visualization, the cells were rinsed
three times in buffer containing 0.1% (w/v) gelatin and 0.05% (w/v)
casein for 10 min each. Finally, the cells were prepared with
Fluoromount G (Fisher) and observed with a Zeiss 510 LSM confocal
fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY) as described
previously (24). It should be noted that Western blot analyses using a
variety of osteoblastic cells confirm the specificity of the
1C
antibody.2
Calcium Uptake Assays--
Cultured cells were assayed for
Ca2+ uptake using previously published procedures (25).
Cells were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/ml onto 3.5-cm dishes
and grown to approximately 50% confluency. Culture medium was
aspirated, and the cells were washed with resting buffer (132 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.3 mM
MgCl2, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, and 25 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4). Then the cells were incubated for 2 min with either 37 °C
or room temperature resting buffer, resting buffer plus 1 nM 1,25(OH)2D3, or depolarizing buffer (5 mM NaCl, 132 mM KCl, 1.3 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM CaCl2,
10 mM D-glucose, and 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4). 1,25(OH)2D3 from stock solution (1 µM) in absolute ethanol was added into the
resting buffer, and the same amount of ethanol was added into all other test tubes. All uptake solutions contained 12.5 µCi/ml
45Ca2+ (NEN Life Science Products). Uptake was
terminated by aspiration of the labeling solution followed by three
washes with ice-cold resting buffer. Cell-associated
45Ca2+ was extracted by a 2-h incubation with
0.5 N NaOH and measured by liquid scintillation counting.
Two-tailed t tests were performed to assess the significance
of the difference between each stimulated group compared with its
control in resting buffer.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of Subtype-specific Ribozyme Cleavage Sites in the
Osteoblastic 1C Transcript--
The first objective was
to verify the sequence of 1C transcript produced in ROS
17/2.8 cells for identification of ribozyme cleavage sites. The
cDNA corresponding to the 5' region of 1C in ROS
17/2.8 cells that encompasses the initiating AUG codon was cloned and
sequenced. This region was chosen for ribozyme targeting because the
mRNA near the translational start site is more likely to be exposed
on the outer surface of the three-dimensional structure of the folded
transcript. Only a few nucleotide discrepancies upstream of the
translational start site were found in a comparison of the
1C mRNA from ROS 17/2.8 osteoblastic sarcoma cells
with the 1C mRNA sequence in GenBankTM
(26); the coding sequences were identical. For selection of subtype-specific ribozyme cleavage sites in the 1C
mRNA in ROS 17/2.8 cells, the mRNA sequence of
1C mRNA was compared with those of 1D
from rat brain mRNA (27) and 1S from rabbit skeletal muscle mRNA (28) obtained from GenBankTM. No
corresponding rat sequence of 1S was found in the
GenBankTM data base. Both Kcat and
Kcat/Km for GUC and CUC
cleavage sites are comparatively higher than for other potential sites. Because 1C mRNA is not an abundant transcript in ROS
17/2.8 cells, both Kcat and
Km were considered (29). GUC at nt 6, relative to
the translational site of 1C, was selected as the best
potential ribozyme target site. Fig. 1
shows the design and specificity of the ribozyme that was termed
ribozyme 6. MFold program analysis of the 1C transcript
further showed that the ribozyme 6 cleavage site was likely to be in a
region of the predicted folded structure accessible for efficient
ribozyme cleavage (Fig. 2A).

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ribozyme 6 is designed to specifically cleave
the 1C subtype of the VSCC.
Sequences encoding 1C, 1D, and
1S subtypes of the L-type VSCC were obtained from
GenBankTM (accession numbers M67516, M57682, and X05921,
respectively). The rat osteoblastic 1C sequence present
in ROS 17/2.8 cells was deduced from a cloned cDNA produced using
primers CCC1 and CCC3 (see "Experimental Procedures") and found to
match the published sequence for 1C in the complementary
region to ribozyme 6. The GUC site chosen for ribozyme targeting is
located at nt 6 (relative to start codon AUG designated nt 1-3) and
contains a sequence unique to the 1C VSCC subtype.
Because this sequence is not present in either 1S or
1D subtypes, the ribozyme will not hybridize with or
cleave these transcripts if present.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Ribozyme 6 cleaves a synthetic
1C target in
vitro. A, a synthetic target mRNA
corresponding to nt 160 to 566 of the 1C sequence was
produced as described under "Experimental Procedures." The site for
cleavage by ribozyme 6 (Ribo-6) in the predicted secondary
structure of the synthetic target is shown. The smaller nt numbers
indicate the position of the nt as input for the RNA MFold program (see
"Experimental Procedures"). B, 1C
mRNA transcripts (783 nt including flanking sequences) were
incubated alone or with ribozyme 6 (3:1, w/w) at 37 °C for various
periods of time in 20 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Cleavage products were resolved by
electrophoresis using 1.9% agarose/formaldehyde gels and visualized by
ethidium bromide staining. Shown are the lanes corresponding to
uncleaved 1C substrate (lane 2),
1C mRNA and ribozyme 6 co-incubated for 1.5 h
(lane 3), and 1C mRNA and
ribozyme 6 co-incubated for 3.0 h (lane 4),
4.0 h (lane 5), or 6.0 h
(lane 6).
|
|
In Vitro Testing of Ribozyme Cleavage of the Substrate
1C mRNA--
To assess the ability of ribozyme 6 to
cleave the 1C transcript, reactions were performed
in vitro with cloned products. To create a synthetic
1C mRNA substrate, a region of 1C
mRNA that encompasses the selected subtype-specific target sites
was inserted into the pGEM3 vector. This vector contains a SP6 promoter directly upstream of the cloned 1C cDNA that
corresponds to nt 160 to 566 relative to the translational start
site. Transcription of the sense RNA construct by SP6 RNA polymerase
yielded a 783-nt RNA substrate that contains 726 nt from the
1C mRNA, plus 57 nt at the ends (46 plus 11 nts)
contributed by the pGEM3 vector. Ribozyme 6 was synthesized from
double-stranded synthetic DNA oligonucleotide as described (30).
The synthetic 1C mRNA substrate and ribozyme were
mixed as described in the legend to Fig. 2B. Cleavage was
assessed after various incubation times in the cell-free system. As
shown in Fig. 2B, cleavage of the 1C target
by ribozyme 6 occurred efficiently within the first 1.5 h
(lane 3). The 783-base substrate was cleaved by
ribozyme 6 into limit 571-base and 212-base fragments that appeared to
be fairly stable for at least 6 h. Two other ribozymes targeting
1C sites were also designed and cloned (data not shown). Ribozyme 6 was the most efficient, consistent with its target being
located in the proximity of the start site.
Expression of Ribozyme 6 mRNA in Transfected
Cells--
Ribozyme 6 and control double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides
were inserted separately into a modified U1 snRNA expression vector as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The predicted secondary structures of both transcripts of U1-ribozyme and U1-control chimeric RNA were compared with the parent U1 snRNA using the RNA MFold program.
As shown in Fig. 3, the U1-ribozyme 6 chimeric transcript was predicted to preserve the 5' and 3' stem-loop
structures of U1 snRNA. The Sm binding site (AAUUUGUGG) of U1-ribozyme
also is predicted to maintain its single-stranded character seen in U1
snRNA. While these models do not necessarily reflect the actual structure of the RNA molecules under study, they provide useful models
for the design of active ribozymes.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sequence and predicted secondary structure of
chimeric ribozyme transcript of
pU1RB 1C6. Ribozyme 6 DNA was
inserted into a modified U1 snRNA expression vector to produce a
modified anti- 1C ribozyme-producing vector termed
pU1RB 1C6. The hammerhead ribozyme is located at the
center of the transcript flanked by stem structures at both ends. The
5' cap structure was methylated by 1 or 3 methyl (m) groups.
A Sm binding site sequence (AAUUUGUGG) was included. Primers
PR 1C6 (5'-CATTCTGATGAGTCCGTGAGG-3) (sense) and PRU1
(5'-GGAAAGCGCGAACGCAGT-3) (antisense) were designed to amplify the
ribozyme transcripts. The number at 1C mRNA
indicates the position relative to the translational start site. An
arrow indicates the cleavage site.
|
|
The ribozyme-encoding and control plasmids were transfected into
ROS17/2.8 cells using LipofectAMINETM and subcloned as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Multiple, stable, and
Zeocin-resistant clones transfected with ribozyme 6 were screened for
1C mRNA expression by RT-PCR analysis. The clone
that demonstrated the most efficient ablation of 1C
mRNA as revealed by PCR was selected for further study.
For detecting the transcripts of U1-ribozyme and U1-control chimeric
genes, specific primers were designed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The RT-PCR analysis shown in Fig.
4 demonstrates that ribozyme 6 was
expressed only in the selected clonal cells transfected with ribozyme
6-encoding plasmids, while control ribozyme transcripts were found only
in clonal cells transfected with control plasmids. As expected, both
ribozyme and control transcripts were absent in the parental ROS 17/2.8
cells. The cDNA bands migrate at a size corresponding to the
expected 66 base pairs, demonstrating that the ribozyme and control RNA
constructs were expressed in the respective clonal cells.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Ribozyme 6 and control chimeric RNA are
expressed in transfected ROS 17/2.8 cells as detected by RT-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted from ROS 17/2.8 parental cells
(lanes 1 and 1'), and subclones were
transfected with ribozyme encoding pU1RB 1C6
(lanes 2 and 2') or with pU1control
(lanes 3 and 3'). Preparation of the
ribozyme and control constructs and transfection and subcloning were as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Reverse transcription
reactions were performed with random hexamer primers. PCR was performed
using ribozyme-specific primers (lanes 1,
2, and 3) as shown in Fig. 3. The control
chimeric RNA was detected using control chimeric RNA-specific 5' primer
(lanes 1', 2', and 3') and
the same 3' primer as that used to detect the ribozyme.
|
|
Inhibition of 1C Expression in ROS 17/2.8
Cells--
Selected clonal cells were analyzed by RT-PCR and
immunofluorescence microscopy for 1C transcript and
protein expression. As shown in Fig. 5,
the 1C mRNA levels were strikingly reduced in cell
lines transfected with ribozyme-encoding plasmids, while the
1C mRNA levels in cell lines transfected with
control plasmids were comparable with those found in the original ROS
17/2.8 cells. The primers (CCC1 and CCC3) employed in Fig. 5,
A and B, amplified 1C transcripts
that spanned the predicted ribozyme cleavage site shown in Fig. 1. It
was considered that short versions of 1C transcripts
containing 3' sequences might be present in cells transfected with
active ribozyme. To address this, a downstream primer pair (PR11 and
PR12) that amplifies region IV of 1C transcripts corresponding to bases 3551-4276 relative to the translational start
site of rat 1C was used in RT-PCRs. No products were
detected, suggesting that 5'-targeted, ribozyme ablation of
1C transcript leads to complete degradation. The
amplimer size of the PR11/PR12 product has been revised from earlier
estimates (11) of 740 nt to a more precise determination of 726 nt,
shown in Fig. 5C, lanes 1 and
3. Similar amounts of glyceraldehyde-3'-phosphate dehydrogenase were amplified in reactions from all three cell lines
(Fig. 5C, lanes 1'-3'),
indicating that 1C targets were specifically affected.
In Fig. 5B, additional nonspecific DNA bands were observed
when the annealing temperature was decreased from 65 to 55 °C during
the PCR process, but 1C transcripts remained undetectable. The inability to detect 1C transcript in
ribozyme 6-transfected cells, even under lower stringency PCRs, points to the efficiency of the pU1RB 1C6 construct.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ribozyme 6 inhibits the expression
of 1C-encoding mRNA as
detected by RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from nontransfected
ROS 17/2.8 cells (lanes 1 and 1') or
subclones transfected with ribozyme encoding pU1RB 1C6
(lanes 2 and 2') or with control
pU1control (lanes 3 and 3'). Reverse
transcriptase reactions were performed with random hexamer primers. PCR
reactions shown in lanes 1, 2, and
3 were performed using primers CCC1 and CCC3 (see
"Experimental Procedures") located near the 5'-end or
subtype-nonspecific primers PR11 and PR12 (23) located closer to the
3'-end of the 1C transcript. The annealing
temperature of the PCR shown in A was 10 °C higher than
that used in the reaction shown in B and C. Only
1C subtype products were detected in all cases. The PCRs
shown in lanes 1', 2', and
3' were performed using glyceraldehyde-3'-phosphate
dehydrogenase (G3PDH)-specific primers and provided a
loading assessment.
|
|
The selected clonal cells were further characterized by
immunofluorescence using specific antibodies to 1C
protein and confocal microscopy. The antibodies are specific to the
1C subtype of the VSCC as determined by the
manufacturer. As shown in Fig. 6, A-C, the number of detectable immunoreactive cell surface
1C VSCCs was substantially reduced in clonal cells
harboring ribozyme-coding pU1RB 1C6 (Fig. 6B).
In contrast, clonal cells transfected with pU1control (Fig.
6C) showed a pattern and density of 1C
protein expression similar to that found in the parental ROS 17/2.8
cells (Fig. 6A). This finding demonstrated that ribozyme 6 successfully inhibited cell surface expression of 1C
protein as well as transcript in transfected cells.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Confocal immunocytochemistry demonstrates
blockade of 1C protein expression
in ROS 17/2.8 cells expressing ribozyme 6. Antibodies specific to
1C were used to assess cardiac VSCC protein expression
in parental cells or pU1RB 1C6- or pU1control-transfected
ROS 17/2.8 subclones. A, parental ROS 17/2.8 cells; B, subclone transfected with
pU1RB 1C6; C, subclone transfected with
pU1control. Methods were as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Magnification was × 1000. Note that the micrograph
in A was taken in an area of the plate where cells were at
higher density.
|
|
ROS 17/2.8 Cells Ablated of 1C Transcript Do Not
Respond to 1,25(OH)2D3 and
Depolarization--
45Ca2+ uptake assays were
performed using subconfluent cell monolayers as described under
"Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig.
7, cells in which 1C of
VSCC was ablated by active ribozyme 6 lost the ability to respond to
either depolarization or 1,25(OH)2D3. In
contrast, cells transfected with control plasmids continued to express
1C and maintained their sensitivity to
1,25(OH)2D3 and high K+-stimulated
depolarization reflected by a statistically significant 2-3-fold
increase in 45Ca2+ influx. As seen previously
(6), slightly higher levels of stimulated
45Ca2+ influx were seen when cells were
depolarized. Overall, treatment with
1,25(OH)2D3 increased
45Ca2+ influx 2.2-fold, compared with 2.8-fold
after depolarization. Together, these results revealed that the
1C subtype of VSCC is responsible for
1,25(OH)2D3-stimulated influx in ROS 17/2.8 cells.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
ROS 17/2.8 cells ablated of
1C do not demonstrate stimulated
45Ca2+ influx in response to depolarization or
1,25(OH)2D3.
45Ca2+ influx assays were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures" using subclones
demonstrating efficient ribozyme-mediated ablation of the
1C transcript assessed by RT-PCR and
immunohistochemistry as shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Depolarizing buffer
differs from resting buffer in that it contains high KCl (see
"Experimental Procedures"). 1,25(OH)2D3 was
used at a concentration of 1 nM. Values for influx within
each experiment were normalized to values of cells in resting buffer
that were assigned a normalized value of 1.0. Data represent the mean
and S.D. in five experiments. The p values indicated over
the bar graphs for these experiments were as
follows: p < 0.01 (**) and p > 0.05 ( ). Only those groups marked with a double
asterisk demonstrated influx values significantly different
from controls receiving resting buffer.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Ca2+ influx induced by various stimuli, including
depolarization and treatment with calcitropic hormones such as
1,25(OH)2D3, plays an important role in
signaling processes related to bone growth, differentiation, and
remodeling. For example, recent work demonstrated that
1,25(OH)2D3-dependent
Ca2+ influx modulates the post-translational state of the
extracellular bone matrix phosphoprotein, osteopontin (31). The VSCC
represents a major pathway for Ca2+ entry into bone cells
(6, 32). Several laboratories, including our own, have demonstrated the
presence and activation of VSCCs in osteoblasts treated with
1,25(OH)2D3 (6), parathyroid hormone (8), and
epidermal growth factor (32) and during depolarization (6). The
development of 1,25(OH)2D3 analogs with
differential actions on nuclear receptor-mediated or membrane-initiated
pathways provided a powerful approach to dissect the dual effects of
1,25(OH)2D3, demonstrating conclusively that
the rapid activation of cell surface VSCCs is independent of the
classical nuclear receptor (12, 33). Vitamin D3 analogs
that bind to the nuclear receptor but fail to stimulate
Ca2+ influx have clinical utility because they stimulate
bone formation with a lesser tendency to produce hypercalcemia compared
with 1,25(OH)2D3 (34). This implies that
activation of VSCCs may be of pathophysiological importance in the
development of hypercalcemia.
Early studies established that depolarization and hormone-stimulated
Ca2+ influx into osteoblasts could be inhibited by
dihydropyridines (6), indicating that the VSCCs involved in this influx
are of the high threshold, or L-type. Since the first cDNA encoding the 1S skeletal muscle Ca2+ channel subunit
was cloned (28), two major additional subtypes of L-type VSCCs were
discovered: the cardiac muscle subtype, 1C, and the
neuroendocrine subtype, 1D. Recently, a new L-type
subtype ( 1F) from retina also was reported (35). Major
subtypes of VSCCs are frequently found outside the excitable tissue
where they were first discovered; for example, the expression of the 1C subtype was detected in rat brain as well as cardiac
tissue (26).
Since the initial discovery that Ca2+ influx by
1,25(OH)2D3 was transduced by L-type VSCCs in
ROS 17/2.8 osteoblastic cells (6), many efforts have been made to
discern the exact molecular nature of the Ca2+ channel(s)
present in osteoblastic cells. L-type VSCCs are the best studied
Ca2+ channel type and appear to be the major VSCC in
osteoblasts, although T-type channels may be expressed transiently
during development (36, 37). Three types of cDNA sequences
corresponding to 1S, 1C, and
1D were detected by Barry et al. (8) in the
rat UMR-106 osteosarcoma cell line. Two alternate splice isoforms of
the 1C subtype were identified in rat ROS 17/2.8
osteoblastic sarcoma cells and primary osteoblasts in our laboratory,
but the other two subtypes were undetected (11). The molecular
identification of the cardiac subtype was confirmed recently in primary
cultures of rat calvarial osteoblasts, where it was proposed that the
1C is involved in development of epidermal growth factor
responsiveness of these cells (32). This finding was consistent with
our previous report (11) that the 1C subtype was present
in primary cultures of cells grown from neonatal rat calvaria. Taken
together, these studies indicate that the 1C subtype of
the VSCC is the major subtype expressed both in primary cultures and
cell lines of osteoblastic phenotype. Nonetheless, a collective
limitation of all prior studies is that they rely upon circumstantial
evidence to predict relationships between structure and function. No
evidence has been presented to definitively link the presence of
1C VSCC subtype to a demonstrated function.
The approach taken in this study involved ribozyme-mediated ablation of
the 1C transcript in transfected osteoblastic cells, followed by functional assays using stable transfectants. For the study
to be definitive, it was essential that 1C transcript levels be reduced to negligible levels. Antisense approaches have been
used previously in this system (38), but we believed more efficient
ablation would be achieved using a ribozyme approach with catalytic
efficiency. Considering that targeting the initiating AUG codon or
adjacent sequences may increase the antisense effect of ribozymes (39,
40), ribozyme-6 was chosen for transfection and expression in ROS
17/2.8 cells. Because the alternative splice that occurs in the
osteoblast 1C mRNA is downstream in the coding region at transmembrane segments IVS3-IVS4 (11), ribozyme-6 was
expected to cleave transcripts encoding both of these isoforms. We also
engineered a ribozyme construct in which ribozyme 6 was inserted into a
U1 snRNA expression cassette (16). This cassette offered the advantage
of producing a ribozyme that should be highly expressed, resistant to
exonucleases, and capable of concentrating in the nucleoplasm, where
newly transcribed 1C transcripts should be most abundant.
In this study, we prepared stable sublines of ROS 17/2.8 cells in which
1C expression is highly inhibited by expression of active ribozyme 6. Control cell lines expressing inactive ribozyme constructs also were prepared. The selected clonal cells showing most
efficient ribozyme-mediated ablation of 1C transcripts, as well as clonal control transfectants, were employed to investigate the relationship between 1C and Ca2+ influx
modulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 and depolarization.
45Ca2+ uptake assays were performed in
subconfluent cell monolayers of sublines expressing active and inactive
ribozymes, as well as in the parental line. As presented under
"Results," cells expressing active ribozyme 6 lost their rapid
Ca2+ response to both 1,25(OH)2D3
and depolarizing high K+ buffer. In contrast, cells
transfected with control plasmids maintained their sensitivity to
1,25(OH)2D3 and high K+ buffer,
demonstrated by rapid 45Ca2+ influx at levels
comparable with nontransfected cells. Taken together, these data
establish that the 1C subtype of the L-type channel is
the depolarization and 1,25(OH)2D3-responsive
VSCC in osteoblasts.
The results presented here integrate and extend previous findings
regarding the nature of the osteoblast VSCC. For the first time, we
definitively demonstrated that the rapid membrane-initiated effects of
1,25(OH)2D3 on Ca2+ influx in
osteoblasts are transduced by the 1C subtype of the VSCC. By defining the cardiac subtype to be the molecular form of VSCCs
responsive to 1,25(OH)2D3 and depolarization,
we are now in a position to further explore the physiological
importance of the VSCC in osteoblast function and to begin to define
the signaling pathways activated directly by the VSCC.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. William T. Butler, Zhou
(Georgia) Chen, and Dan Carson for many wonderful ideas and
enthusiastic support of this project. We are grateful to Dr. Harry C. Dietz at The Johns Hopkins University for providing the plasmid used to
create the ribozyme vector and Dr. Kirk Czymmek for assisting with the
confocal microscopy. We thank all of the members of the Farach-Carson
laboratory and Dr. Gary Meszaros for many useful discussions. We
especially thank Dr. Kamil Akanbi for assistance with sequence
analysis. Finally, we are grateful to Sharron Kingston and Margie
Barrett for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant AR39273 (to William T. Butler and M. C. F.-C.) and a
grant from NASA/Texas Medical Center (to M. C. F.-C. and N. J. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of
Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, 304 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE 19716. Tel.: 302-831-2277; Fax: 302-831-2281; E-mail:
farachca@udel.edu.
2
K. Brubaker and R. Duncan, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VSCC, voltage-sensitive calcium channel;
nt, nucleotide(s);
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
snRNA, small nuclear RNA;
1, 25(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Catterall, W. A.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
493-531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Tsien, R. W.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6,
715-760[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Perez-Reyes, E.,
and Schneider, T.
(1995)
Kidney Int.
48,
1111-1124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Singer, D.,
Biel, M.,
Lotan, I.,
Flockerzi, V.,
Hofmann, F.,
and Dascal, N.
(1991)
Science
253,
1553-1557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Perez-Reyes, E.,
Wei, X. Y.,
Castellano, A.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
20430-20436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Caffrey, J. M.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
20265-20274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Lieberherr, M.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
13168-13173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Barry, E. L. R.,
Gesek, F. A.,
Proehner, S. C.,
and Friedman, P. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10914-10918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Duncan, R. L.,
Akanbi, K. A.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1998)
Semin. Nephrol.
18,
178-190[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Yukihiro, S.,
Posner, G. H.,
and Guggino, S. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
23889-23893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Meszaros, J. G.,
Karin, N. J.,
Akanbi, K.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32981-32985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Norman, A. W.,
Nemere, I.,
Zhou, L-X.,
Bishop, J. E.,
Lowe, K. E.,
Maiyer, A. C.,
Collins, E. D.,
Taoka, T.,
Sergeev, I.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1992)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
41,
231-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Haseloff, J.,
and Gerlach, W. L.
(1988)
Nature
334,
585-591[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Green, M. R.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
7,
559-599[CrossRef]
|
| 15.
|
Skuzeski, J. M.,
Lund, E.,
Murphy, J. T.,
Steinberg, T. H.,
Burgess, R. R.,
and Dahlberg, J. E.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem
259,
8345-8352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Montgomery, R. A.,
and Dietz, H. C.
(1997)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6,
519-525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Ruffner, D. E.,
Stormo, G. D.,
and Uhlenbeck, O. C.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
10695-10702[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Koizumi, M.,
Hayase, Y.,
Iwai, S.,
Kamiya, H.,
Inoue, H.,
and Ohtsuka, E.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
7059-7071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Christoffersen, R. E.,
McSwiggen, J.,
and Konings, D.
(1994)
J. Mol. Struct.
311,
273-284
|
| 20.
|
Manser, T.,
and Gesteland, R. F.
(1981)
J. Mol. Appl. Genet.
1,
117-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Zhuang, Y.,
and Weiner, A. M.
(1986)
Cell
46,
827-35[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Karin, N. J.
(1999)
BioTechniques
27,
681-682[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Meszaros, J. G.,
Karin, N. J.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1996)
Connect. Tissue Res.
35,
107-111[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
French, M. M.,
Smith, S. E.,
Akanbi, K.,
Sanford, T.,
Hecht, J.,
Farach-Carson, M. C.,
and Carson, D. D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1103-1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Meszaros, J. G.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
282,
236-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Snutch, T. P.,
Tomlinson, W. J.,
Leonard, J. P.,
and Gilbert, M. M.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
45-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Hui, A.,
Ellinor, P. T.,
Krizanova, O.,
Wang, J.-J.,
Diebold, R. J.,
and Schwartz, A.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
35-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Tanabe, T.,
Takeshima, H.,
Mikami, A.,
Flockerzi, V.,
Takahashi, H.,
Kangawa, K.,
Kojima, M.,
Matsuo, H.,
Hirose, T.,
and Numa, S.
(1987)
Nature
328,
313-318[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Birikh, K. R.,
Heaton, P. A.,
and Eckstein, F.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
245,
1-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Gaur, R. K.,
and Krupp, G.
(1997)
Methods Mol. Biol.
74,
69-78[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Safran, J. B.,
Butler, W. T.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29935-29941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Loza, J. C.,
Carpio, L. C.,
Bradford, P. G.,
and Dziak, R.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
386-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Khoury, R.,
Ridall, A. L.,
Norman, A. W.,
and Farach-Carson, M. C.
(1994)
Endocrinology
135,
2446-2453[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Farach-Carson, M. C.,
and Devoll, R. E.
(1995)
News Physiol. Sci.
10,
198-204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Strom, T. M.,
Nyakatura, G.,
Apfelstedt-Sylla, E.,
Hellebrand, H.,
Lorenz, B.,
Weber, B. H.,
Wutz, K.,
Gutwillinger, N.,
Ruther, K.,
Drescher, B.,
Sauer, C.,
Zrenner, E.,
Meitinger, T.,
Rosenthal, A.,
and Meindl, A.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
260-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Chesnoy-Marchais, D.,
and Fritsch, J.
(1988)
J. Physiol.
398,
291-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Loza, J.,
Stephan, E.,
Dolce, C.,
Dziak, R.,
and Simasko, S.
(1994)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
55,
128-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Duncan, R. L.,
Kizer, N.,
Barry, E. L. R.,
Friedman, P. A.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1864-1869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Coleman, J.,
Green, P. J.,
and Inouye, M.
(1984)
Cell
37,
429-436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Hirashima, A.,
Sawaki, S.,
Inokuchi, Y.,
and Inouye, M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
7726-7730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shao, K. J. Czymmek, P. A. Jones, V. P. Fomin, K. Akanbi, R. L. Duncan, and M. C. Farach-Carson
Dynamic interactions between L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channel Cav1.2 subunits and ahnak in osteoblastic cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
May 1, 2009;
296(5):
C1067 - C1078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Alcorn, T. M. Merritt, M. C. Farach-Carson, H. H. Wang, and J. T. Hecht
Ribozyme-mediated reduction of wild-type and mutant cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) mRNA and protein
RNA,
April 1, 2009;
15(4):
686 - 695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Bergh, Y. Shao, E. Puente, R. L. Duncan, and M. C. Farach-Carson
Osteoblast Ca2+ permeability and voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channel expression is temporally regulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
March 1, 2006;
290(3):
C822 - C831.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Nemere, M. C. Farach-Carson, B. Rohe, T. M. Sterling, A. W. Norman, B. D. Boyan, and S. E. Safford
Ribozyme knockdown functionally links a 1,25(OH)2D3 membrane binding protein (1,25D3-MARRS) and phosphate uptake in intestinal cells
PNAS,
May 11, 2004;
101(19):
7392 - 7397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|